Upload
ngotruc
View
246
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Final Study Report
to
Town Manager & Selectmen
7 December, 2015
2
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
• Purpose of the Study
• Summary Results (Space & Operation)
• Space Needs Program
• Design Options
• Cost Estimates
• Q & A Discussion
Summary of the Presentation:
3
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Purpose of the Study :
• Evaluate the condition of the existing facility
• Evaluate Fire Department programs identifying the amount
of space appropriate for these programs compared to
current space
• Develop a station program to identify future needs
• Identify Bedford’s growth tendencies
• Evaluate the current Department’s
• Call volumes
• Station placement based on travel time for incident
response and location
4
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions - Site:
• One of the front line vehicles deploys from the rear of
the facility
• Pedestrian traffic at rear of the facility
• Shared private way
• Small congested site
• Insufficient parking
5
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions - Building:
• Code issues
• Deferred maintenance
• Accessibility
• Building envelope
• Mechanical
• Electrical
• Plumbing
• Fire protection
6
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions –Operational issues:
Apparatus and Support Spaces
• Size of apparatus bay
• Number of front-facing apparatus bays
• Lack of isolated decontamination area
7
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions –Operational issues:
Apparatus and Support Spaces
• Insufficient storage and work areas
• Improper location SCBA filling station
• Inadequate gear room
8
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions –Operational issues:
Administrative Area
• Insufficient storage
• Inadequate conference room
• Training room poorly located
• Insufficient offices and office storage
9
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Existing Conditions – Firefighter‘s Area
• Inefficient layout of day room/dining/kitchen areas
• Lack of mobility within bunk rooms
• Toilet and shower rooms constrained
• Undesirable female accommodations locations
• Fitness area placement in basement
• Lack of storage
10
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Space Needs Program
Year Square Feet
ORIGINAL FIRE STATION 1949 6,574
H & M PROGRAM 1991 11,700
D & S PROGRAM 1994 12,300
EXISTING STATION 1998 13,331
PROPOSED STATION 2017 20,303
DIFFERENCE From Existing 6,972
•Of the 6,972 additional programmed sf., 4,651sf is relegated
to the apparatus bay and ancillary support spaces
11
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Changes in Operations Since 1998 Renovation
Community Changes Since 1998 Renovation
1998 2015 Chang
e
Staff Size Increase 22 31 +9
Fleet Size Increase 8 11 +3
FY2003 FY2015 Chang
e
Emergency Incidents 1,871 2,553 +682
Overall Number of Incidents 1,899 3,122 +1,223
Rescue & Emergency Medical
Services
1,097 1,428 +331
FY2002 FY2015 Change
Residential Units 4,372 5,233 +861
12
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Available Options
• Option A
• Renovate and expand existing facility
• Option B
• Built new facility on existing site
• Option C
• New facility on a different site
13
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Option A - Renovate and Expand
PROS CONS
Salvage portion of existing Renovations could trigger multiple
code implementations
Renovations costs are than new Fire Department needs to relocate
during construction
No impact to the current response Construction cost for temporary
quarters
Most current needs are met. Not a
long term solution
Site issues can not be addressed
No space for future expansion
Drive-through station can not be
achieved
14
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Option B - New Facility on Existing Site
PROS CONS
Fulfills the majority of the
programmatic need
Existing building is demolished
Operationally efficient Fire Department needs to relocate
during construction
No impact to the current response Construction cost for temporary
quarters
Will serve the community for years
to come
Site issues can not be addressed
Parking will still be an issue
Drive-through station can not be
achieved
15
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Option C - New Facility on Different Site
PROS CONS
Fulfills the majority of the
programmatic need
Cost of land acquisition and possible
building demolition
Operationally efficient
No impact to the current response
Drive-through bays can be achieved
Space allocation for future
expansion
Will serve the community for years
to come
Existing building is salvaged for
reuse
16
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Site Locations – Existing Site Response
17
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Site Locations – Great Rd and Loomis
18
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Site Locations – Great Rd and DeAngelo
19
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Estimated Construction Cost
20
Bedford Fire Feasibility Study
7 December, 2015
Discussion
Question and Answers
21
BREWSTER FIRE & RESCUE HEADQUARTERS
Estimated Project Budget Summary
Total Construction Costs
Architectural and Engineering Fees
Owner’s Project Manager
Survey, Commissioning, Geotech, Legal Fees
Furniture, Furnishings and Operational Equipment
Communication Equipment
Required Testing, BAN Fees, Utility Back Charges, etc…
Owner’s Development Costs
Total Owner’s Development Costs
$10,955,125
$ 802,194
$ 441,525
$ 79,750
$ 239,000
$ 314,550
$ 90,000
$ 2,027,019
$ 12,982144
Total Construction and Owner’s Development Costs
Owner’s Contingency 5%
Total Project Costs
Total Budget
`