BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF … THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration,

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration, and Consider Further Development of, California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program.

)) ) ) )

Rulemaking 15-02-020 (Filed February 26, 2015)

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY’S (U 338-E) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS

ON INTERCONNECTION ISSUES RELATED TO THE BIOENERGY FEED-IN TARIFF

ROBERT F. LeMOINE

Attorney for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-4476 Facsimile: (626) 302-6693 E-mail: [email protected]

Dated: May 25, 2016

- 1 -


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


)) ) ) )


SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY’S (U 338-E) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS

ON INTERCONNECTION ISSUES RELATED TO THE BIOENERGY FEED-IN TARIFF

Pursuant to the Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling Requesting Supplemental Comment on

Interconnection Issues Related to the Bioenergy Feed-In Tariff under the California Renewables

Portfolio Standard served May 6, 2016 (the “ALJ Ruling”), Southern California Edison (“SCE”)

respectfully submits these Supplemental Comments on Interconnection Issues Related to the Bioenergy

Feed-In Tariff.

I.

INTRODUCTION

The bioenergy feed-in tariff (“BioMAT”)1 requires the large investor-owned utilities (“IOUs”) to

procure certain biofuel generation resources eligible under the California renewables portfolio standard

(“RPS”) program. The first BioMAT program period began February 1, 2016.2

1 See Senate Bill 1122, Stats. 2012, ch. 612; Pub. Util. Code §§ 399.20(c)-(f); Decision (“D.”)14-12-081 and D.15-09-004.

2 ALJ Ruling at p. 1.

- 2 -

On October 30, 2015, Governor Brown issued the Emergency Proclamation on Tree Mortality

(“Emergency Proclamation”), which requires that California fire and regulatory agencies “immediately

identify areas of the State that represent high hazard zones for wildfire and falling trees using best

available science and geospatial data.”3 The Emergency Proclamation also directs the California Public

Utilities Commission (“CPUC” or “Commission”) to facilitate the use of dead trees from high hazard

zones as fuel for RPS-eligible generation facilities by, among other things, adjusting the BioMAT

program and facilitating interconnections agreements for forest bioenergy facilities.4 In response to a

Staff Proposal to implement the Emergency Declaration, the Bioenergy Association of California

(“BAC”) proposed changes to the current interconnection process for forest BioMAT projects. The ALJ

Ruling seeks supplemental comments on BAC’s proposal.

II.

SUMMARY

SCE’s responses to the questions posed in the ALJ Ruling are based upon a set of first principles,

which include the following: (1) the interconnection process is governed by two tariffs, Rule 21 under

CPUC jurisdiction and the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (“WDAT”) under FERC jurisdiction,

which can only be changed via regulatory action at the CPUC or FERC; (2) interconnections are offered

first-come, first-served on a non-discriminatory basis; and (3) non-viable projects should not be

permitted to remain in the interconnection queue taking capacity from and delaying construction of

potentially viable projects.

In light of these principles, SCE opposes changes to the interconnection rules that would favor a

subset of developers at the expense of important projects that are not in the favored category. However,

if the Commission determines that changes are needed to facilitate the interconnection of projects

3 See www.gov.ca.gov/docs/10.30.15_Tree_Mortality_State_of_Emergency.pdf. 4 Emergency Declaration, Ordering Paragraphs 9 and 10.

- 3 -

impacted by the Emergency Declaration, then such changes should be narrowly tailored to avoid

prejudice to other projects awaiting interconnection.5

III.

SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS

A BioMAT project must have a nameplate capacity no greater than 3 MW and must be in the

service territory of an investor-owned utility (“IOU”).6 As such, BioMAT projects are eligible to be

considered in the utility’s “Fast Track” interconnection screening process, which is available under

either the CPUC-jurisdictional Rule 21 process or the FERC-jurisdictional WDAT process. Both parties

(utility and project developer) are required to follow these rules set forth in the tariffs, with no

exceptions. Alteration of either interconnection tariff is governed by a regulatory process that may

result in adoption of new tariffs by the regulatory body. A similar process is required for alteration of

the BioMAT tariff, which governs the procurement process, and the BioMAT power purchase

agreement (“PPA”), which is the contractual agreement that governs the sale of the project’s output to

the utility and payments to the seller.

Once accepted into the interconnection queue, a Fast Track-eligible project is screened against

10 technical criteria relating to the ability of the project to interconnect and operate without deleterious

effects on the electric grid.7 If the project passes all 10 screens, the utility may offer the developer the

opportunity to proceed directly to a generator interconnection agreement (“GIA”) without further study.

If the project does not pass Fast Track Initial or Supplemental Review, it proceeds to a detailed study

interconnection process along with other (non-Fast Track) projects.8

5 In recognition of PG&E’s much larger allocation of capacity under category 3 (forest biomass) of the BioMAT program (D.14-12-081, p. 38), SCE defers to PG&E’s proposed alternative to the BAC proposal, which SCE expects PG&E to make in its concurrently-filed supplemental comments.

6 See D.14-12-081, p. 42 (MW limit), p. 44 (location). 7 If a project is unable to successfully pass the “Initial Review” phase of the Fast Track screening process, a

“Supplemental Review” may be performed in accordance with Section F.1.b of Rule 21 (subject to payment of any applicable fees) to determine if this additional system review allows for successful passage of the Fast Track process.

8 Assuming no electrical interdependence to other projects or impacts to the transmission system.

- 4 -

SCE generally agrees with certain aspects of the Bioenergy Association of California (“BAC”)

proposal. SCE agrees that an applicant is free to withdraw from the interconnection process after receipt

of a study and before the posting of interconnection financial security (“IFS”). SCE also agrees that the

applicant can re-enter (i.e., re-start) the interconnection process at a later date, with a new queue

position, which will require the proposed facility to be re-studied under current system conditions. Each

of these points is supported within the current interconnection procedures. However, the BAC proposal

is inconsistent in its understanding of some of the key principles and processes within the

interconnection process. SCE comments on these inconsistencies in the following responses.

1. Response to Question 1

What, if any, effect would adopting the BAC interconnection proposal have on interconnection procedures under Rule 21 and the Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT)? Provide a detailed explanation of your position.

The BioMAT PPA requires a project to have an interconnection queue number.9 The BioMAT

tariff contains eligibility requirements including: “An Applicant must have passed the Fast Track

screens, passed Supplemental Review, completed an SCE System Impact Study in the Independent

Study Process, completed an SCE Distribution Group Study Phase 1 Interconnection Study in the

Distribution Group Study Process, or completed an SCE Phase 1 Study in the Cluster Study Process for

its Project (“Interconnection Study”), or make use of an existing interconnection Agreement to the

extent permitted by SCE’s tariffs.”10 The requirement for an applicant to have an active interconnection

request along with having the results of an interconnection study is consistent with all other SCE

renewable procurement programs (although most of SCE’s renewable procurements now require a Phase

II or Facilities Study).

The BAC proposal appears to misunderstand the purpose of IFS, characterizing IFS as a barrier

to interconnection. On the contrary, IFS is one of the key items in the revised Rule 21 and WDAT

9 Bioenergy Market Adjusting Tariff Power Purchase Agreement, Form 14-970 (BioMAT PPA), Cover Sheet, paragraph B(xiii).

10 Schedule BioMAT, Bioenergy Market Adjusting Tariff, Section D.5.

- 5 -

interconnection procedures that ensure an efficient interconnection process. The IFS requirements,

which increase as the applicant moves through the various stages of the interconnection process, is more

commonly referred to as “skin in the game,” the purpose of which is to require that interconnection

customers make financial commitments in advance of construction of their generating facilities. The

IFS requirements are structured with off-ramps that allow less-than-committed customers to withdraw

from the interconnection process before expending large amounts of their own resources on non-viable

generating facilities. In turn, these financial commitments provide a positive impact on the efficient

administration of the interconnection process, because they reduce the number of speculative

interconnection requests and holding of system capacity to the potential detriment of other more viable

projects.

The BAC proposal also misstates the requirement for IFS, stating that it is 30% of the

interconnection cost. Section F.4 of Rule 21 outlines the requirements for the posting of IFS, and

similar requirements are found in Section 4.8 of SCE’s WDAT Generator Interconnection Procedures

(“GIP”).11 The initial posting of IFS is due 60 calendar days after publication of the final

Interconnection System Impact Study (“SIS”) and is based on a formula that depends on the size of the

proposed generating facility and the type of upgrade or required interconnection facility that are required

for interconnection based on the result of the study. In general, the first IFS posting tends to be no larger

than 15% of the total cost responsibility for network upgrades (with a maximum of $7.5 million), if any,

and 20% of the total cost responsibility for distribution upgrades and interconnection facilities, if any, as

outlined in the SIS. The second posting, which is required 120 calendar days after the publication of the

final Interconnection Facilities Study (“FAS”), tends to be the timeframe when the IFS amount is raised

to 30% of the cost responsibility for network upgrades (with a maximum of $15 million), distribution

upgrades, and interconnection facilities, if any, outlined in the FAS. Since the BioMAT tariff

requirement is for a “Phase I or equivalent” study, which is equivalent to saying the “SIS or equivalent”

11 Attachment I to WDAT, effective November 1, 2014.

- 6 -

in Rule 21 terminology, the required posting amount is 15% to 20%, not the 30% that is noted in the

BAC proposal. The 30% level is the requirement for the second posting that follows the FAS results.

The BAC proposal suggests that its members cannot afford to post IFS without having secured a

PPA first. In SCE’s experience, hundreds of interconnection customers have posted the required IFS,

some for projects which have PPAs, but many of which have not yet secured PPAs at the time of

posting. Experienced developers know the IFS provisions well in advance, and those who are willing to

take on the financial risks of developing such generating facilities view the IFS postings as just another

financial risk of development. Forest BioMAT projects should be no exception, and BAC has provided

no compelling reason to provide the exception other than its members may not be able to afford the IFS.


The BAC interconnection proposal would allow projects to bid into BioMAT after investing only the cost of a Phase 1 interconnection study, without any additional fees for maintaining a position in the Rule 21/WDAT interconnection queue. What, if any, additional screens on project viability should the Commission require for projects that have received a Phase 1 study but have left the interconnection queue prior to receiving a BioMAT power purchase agreement (PPA)? Please provide a detailed rationale and provide examples, if relevant.

As previously mentioned, there is no provision currently in Rule 21 or SCE’s WDAT that allows

an interconnection request to remain active in the process without making the required IFS postings. To

allow a small group of interconnection customers an exception to this rule violates open/equal access

and anti-discrimination principles, and would be unfair to other interconnection requests already in the

interconnection process. As such, there are no additional “viability screens” that would be required, as

IFS has proven to be an effective viability screen. As discussed above, upon reentering the queue, new

studies would be required to evaluate the state of the system at the new, later date.

- 7 -


What, if any, are the potential effects of the BAC interconnection proposal on the ability of BioMAT projects to meet their contractual commercial online date, i.e., 24 months after executing the PPA, with a possible six-month extension for interconnection delay? Please be specific and provide examples if relevant.

Under the BAC proposal, where an interconnection request enters the queue, receives its Fast

Track, Phase I or SIS study results, withdraws from the process prior to posting IFS, waits until it

receives a PPA, and then re-starts the interconnection process, the interconnection request could be

exposed to financial risk as compared to the relative certainty of remaining in the process. The

interconnection study process, as well as the queue and the impacts of interconnection requests on the

grid, are all dynamic and time-dependent processes. There is no guarantee that the interconnection

studies will have the same results the second time around. The succeeding study results could either see

lower costs or higher costs, depending on any number of factors.

The question asks about the potential effects the BAC proposal would have on the proposed

commercial operation date (i.e., 24 months after executing the PPA). For interconnection requests that

are eligible for the Fast Track interconnection screening process, which are 3 MW or smaller in SCE’s

territory, the required interconnection facilities are typically also small and can be constructed in a

matter of months, not years. However, if a forest BioMAT interconnection request withdraws after the

SIS or Phase I results, only to re-enter later, not only does the study timeline reset, but the post-study

construction timeline also resets because the resources that might have been committed to the withdrawn

project are released to work on other projects.12 Thus, withdrawing from the interconnection process

and then re-entering when a PPA is executed may put at risk the ability of the developer to meet the

required commercial operation date.

12 The large volume of interconnection agreements that have been executed in SCE’s territory over the past 12-18 months that are currently in construction phase means that resources (crews and long-lead time equipment) are allocated based upon the developer’s ability to have their designs completed in a manner that allows the projects to be scheduled in line with other projects in the same phase.

- 8 -

The BAC proposal states the following: “IOUs can facilitate the just the [sic] interconnection

piece within 24 months as interconnection is only a small portion of the entire project.”13 Until the

applicant receives its interconnection study results, there is no ability for SCE to facilitate or expedite

any portion of an interconnection plan of service for one of these proposed facilities. This is particularly

true if the proposed facility requires distribution or network upgrades that require time-consuming

permitting/licensing prior to construction.

To summarize, SCE believes that the BAC proposal underestimates the timing impact that

withdrawal and re-entering the queue may pose to an applicant. The BAC proposal does nothing to

increase the speed of interconnection for these projects, and could have the opposite effect of delaying

their construction and jeopardizing PPAs or other procurement programs they are seeking.


Compare the potential impact on the administration of the BioMAT program of the BAC interconnection proposal to the Staff Proposal on interconnection, addressing at least the following issues:

a. Management of the interconnection queue

b. Interconnection costs for BioMAT participants

c. Costs to ratepayers of BioMAT projects that receive PPAs.

a) The efficient management of the interconnection process requires established rules well in

advance that apply to all participants equally. Any attempt to grant exceptions, or allow certain projects

to advance to the “front of the line,” would have a detrimental impact on all other participants in the

interconnection process.

b) Interconnection costs are dependent on many factors, particularly the location of the point of

interconnection and the state of the grid near the point of interconnection, making it difficult to estimate

13 Bioenergy Association of California’s Comments on Administrative Law Judge’s Ruling on the Staff Proposal to Implement the Governor’s Emergency Proclamation on Tree Mortality and Seeking Comment on the Staff Proposal, February 26, 2016, p. 15.

- 9 -

whether the BAC proposal would reduce interconnection costs for participants. For the reasons stated

previously, SCE believes that contrary to BAC’s goal of reducing uncertainty, its proposal will add to

developer uncertainty due to the risk of re-starting the interconnection process and the associated delays

in moving towards an interconnection agreement and construction of required facilities. The use of a

pre-application report (PAR) is not an efficient means of lowering this risk. The PAR can give some

level of assurance that the grid has not changed at the proposed point of interconnection, but provides no

guarantee that something else may not have changed elsewhere on the distribution system in the interim

that might lead to a change in the project’s plan of service and financial responsibilities. The Fast Track

screens in particular are very sensitive to localized changes to the grid. For example, one of the Fast

Track screens that applicants often fail is the 15% of peak load penetration screen. Generally speaking,

to remain under the 15% peak load screen, a generating facility can be no larger than 1.5 MW

interconnecting to a typical 12 kV SCE distribution circuit that has a peak load of 10 MVA. Higher

voltage circuits can support higher penetration rates, but it does not take many new entrants on a given

circuit to foreclose Fast Track eligibility for later queued generating facilities. The PAR will be able to

identify whether there are new entrants proposing to interconnect on a given circuit, but not much

beyond that. The PAR is a simplified analysis that does not examine system impacts or provide any cost

information.

c) BAC seems to indicate that some of their members intend to enter the BioMAT queue and

“wait it out” along with at least four other unaffiliated applicants14 in hopes that the PPA price will rise

to a level much higher than the starting price of $127.72/MWh. To reach BAC’s proposed PPA price of

$187.72/MWh would require a minimum of six consecutive price increases, or one full year. This

assumes that no applicant accepts the BioMAT PPA price during that period. If the number fell below

five unaffiliated applicants, or if an applicant elected the price during that period, the price increase

string would be reset, and the time required to reach $187.72/MWh would be longer than one year.

14 Three unaffiliated applicants (statewide) are required for an initial price adjustment, which would occur after the first BioMAT PPA was executed. After that, any further price adjustments require at least five unaffiliated applicants in the BioMAT queue.

- 10 -

Under the original scenario, the resulting BioMAT PPAs would be priced about 50% higher than would

be the case if applicants accepted a price at or near the starting price. Costs to SCE’s customers would

be proportionately higher. In addition, as discussed earlier, there is risk of a facility’s interconnection

costs and network upgrade costs being significantly different from the original cost estimates. In the

event those costs rise substantially, that would require a BioMAT applicant to wait to accept an even

higher PPA price in order to achieve a reasonable rate of return. Again, in such a scenario, costs to

SCE’s customers would be higher.


If the Commission were to adopt the BAC interconnection proposal, should it apply to the entire BioMAT program? Why or why not?

The BAC interconnection proposal should not apply to the entire BioMAT program because the

assumptions and conditions described in the BAC interconnection proposal do not apply to other

BioMAT customers. BioMAT is a feed-in tariff that establishes a price for the program that adjusts in

accordance with market offers. Parties that participate in BioMAT programs typically participate in the

BioMAT program when the price paid for energy and capacity for a project closely match the revenue

required to develop the project. In this unique case, project developers are seeking to obtain a place in

the queue with the expectation that eventually the project economics will become more favorable for the

developers. Due to the unique nature and limited scope of BAC’s interconnection request, even if the

Commission were to adopt the BAC interconnection proposal, it should not adopt the proposal for the

entire BioMAT program.15

15 The Emergency Declaration itself limits the CPUC’s actions related to interconnection agreements to “forest bioenergy facilities in high hazard zones.” Emergency Declaration, Ordering Paragraph 10.

- 11 -


If the BAC interconnection proposal should not apply to the entire BioMAT program, should it apply only to generators in Category 3? Should only those generators using fuel from high hazard zones be included? Please provide a detailed rationale for your position.

As stated above, SCE does not believe that the BAC interconnection proposal should be adopted

because it violates a basic tenet of open access interconnection that applies rules in a nondiscriminatory

manner to all parties. BAC’s interconnection proposal would apply a different set of rules to a subset of

parties. As such, if the Commission adopts all or part of BAC’s interconnection proposal in order to

support the Emergency Proclamation, the changes should only apply to BioMAT projects that use

material from High Hazard Zones.


If the BAC interconnection proposal is adopted, should the Commission set a condition that the terms of the BAC interconnection proposal will expire once the tree mortality emergency declared by the Emergency Proclamation has been declared to be over? Should the Commission set a different expiration date? Please provide a detailed rationale for your position.

SCE opposes adoption of the BAC interconnection proposal. However, should the Commission

decide to adopt the proposal, or a variation of it, the special treatment should be terminated prior to the

end of the Emergency Proclamation to avoid plants using the BAC interconnection proposal to get a

PPA for a project that does not come on-line until after the Emergency Proclamation has ended. SCE

recommends that if the Commission were to accept all or part of the BAC interconnection proposal,

once the Emergency Proclamation has been declared to be over, BioMAT procurement activities for

projects using high hazard zone fuels, as well as the associated requirements adopted as a result of the

BAC interconnection proposal, should immediately be terminated.

- 12 -


What changes would be required to the BioMAT tariff and the BioMAT PPA in order to implement the BAC interconnection proposal? Please specify and justify the changes proposed. A redline version of the current tariff and/or PPA reflecting the proposed changes should be attached to the comments.

Section 10 of the Emergency Proclamation does require the Commission to “prioritize

facilitation of interconnection agreements for forest bioenergy facilities in high hazard zones.” SCE

does not believe that BAC’s proposal accomplishes this objective. SCE understands that PG&E will

propose an alternative method to facilitate BioMAT interconnections for these projects, as PG&E has

the bulk of the capacity for this BioMAT category.

IV.

CONCLUSION

SCE respectfully requests the Commission consider and adopt the recommendations made in

these Supplemental Comments.

Respectfully submitted, ROBERT F. LeMOINE

/s/ Robert F. LeMoine By: Robert F. LeMoine

Attorney for SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770 Telephone: (626) 302-4476 Facsimile: (626) 302-6693 E-mail: [email protected]

May 25, 2016

VERIFICATION

I am a Manager in the Procurement Policy Organization of Southern California Edison Company

and am authorized to make this verification on its behalf. I have read the foregoing SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY’S (U 338-E) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS ON

INTERCONNECTION ISSUES RELATED TO THE BIOENERGY FEED-IN TARIFF. I am informed

and believe that the matters stated in the foregoing pleading are true.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 25th day of May, 2016, at Rosemead, California.

/s/ Janos Kakuk By: Janos Kakuk

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770


STATE OF CALIFORNIA


)) ) ) )


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, I have this day served a true copy of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY’S (U 338-E) SUPPLEMENTAL COMMENTS ON INTERCONNECTION ISSUES RELATED TO THE BIOENERGY FEED-IN TARIFF on all parties identified on the attached service list(s) R.15-02-020. Service was effected by one or more means indicated below:

☒ Transmitting the copies via e-mail to all parties who have provided an e-mail address.

☒ Placing copies in properly addressed sealed envelopes and depositing such copies in the United States mail with first-class postage prepaid to all parties for those listed on the attached non-email list.

☒ Placing the copies in sealed envelopes and causing such envelopes to be delivered by hand or by overnight courier to the offices of the Assigned ALJ(s) or other addressee(s).

ALJ Robert Mason ALJ Anne. E Simon CPUC 505 Van Ness Ave. San Francisco, CA 94102

Executed May 25, 2016, at Rosemead, California.

/S/ Laura Velarde Laura Velarde SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770

PROCEEDING: R1502020 - CPUC - OIR TO CONTIN FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: MAY 24, 2016

DOWNLOAD THE COMMA-DELIMITED FILE ABOUT COMMA-DELIMITED FILES

Back to Service Lists Index

ANU VEGA AUNDREA WILLIAMS PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DIR.- REGULATORY AFFAIRS & STRATEGY EMAIL ONLY GEXA ENERGY , LP EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY, TX 00000 FOR: GEXA ENERGY CALIFORNIA, LLC

BRIAN KORPICS CC SONG STAFF ATTORNEY REGULATORY ANALYST THE CLEAN COALITION MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CLEAN COALITION FOR: MARIN /CLEAN ENERGY

DANIEL KING DAVID X KOLK, PH.D SEMPRA U.S. GAS & POWER, LLC COLTON ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPT EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: SEMPRA U.S. GAS & POWER, LLC FOR: COLTON ELECTRIC UTILITY DEPT

JAMIE L. MAULDIN KATY MORSONY ATTORNEY ALCANTAR & KAHL ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO, PC EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: ENERGY PRODUERS AND USERS FOR: COALITION OF CALIFORNIA UTILITY COALITION (EPUC) EMPLOYEES (CCUE)

CPUC Home

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONService Lists

Parties

Page 1 of 20CPUC - Service Lists - R1502020

5/25/2016https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/servicelists/R1502020_82917.htm

MARCIE A. MILNER RACHEL GOLD VP & REGULATORY AFFAIRS POLICY DIRECTOR SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P. LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), FOR: LARGE-SCALE SOLAR ASSOCIATION L.P.

RICK NOGER ROBIN SMUTNY-JONES PRAXAIR PLAINFIELD, INC. DIR. - CALIFORNIA POLICY & REGULATION EMAIL ONLY IBERDROLA RENEWABLES, LLC EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLYFOR: PRAXAIR PLAINFIELD, INC. EMAIL ONLY, OR 00000 FOR: IBERDROLA RENEWABLES, LLC

VIDHYA PRABHAKARAN 3 PHASES RENEWABLES, LLC ATTORNEY EMAIL ONLY DAVIS WRIGHT & TREMAINE, LLP EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: 3 PHASES RENEWABLES, LLC EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO ELECTRIC) LLC

CHARLIE KARUSTIS KEVIN BOUDREAUX OWNER ENERCAL USA LLC YAVI ENERGY, LLC 7660 WOODWAY DRIVE, STE. 471A 517 BOSTON POST ROAD, NO.65 HOUSTON, TX 77063 SUDBURY, MA 01776 FOR: ENERCAL USA, LLC FOR: YAVI ENERGY, LLC

DAVID F. SMITH DAVID GETTS DIR - ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS GEN. MGR. TRANSWEST EXPRESS LLC SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET, STE. 2400 3610 N. 44TH ST., STE. 250 DENVER, CO 80202 PHOENIX, AZ 85018 FOR: TRANSWEST EXPRESS LLC FOR: SOUTHWESTERN POWER GROUP II, LLC (SWPG)

JOSHUA A. NORDQUIST OSCAR HERRERA DIR. - BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT DEPT. OF WATER AND POWER ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CITY OF LOS ANGELES 6225 NEIL ROAD 111 N. HOPE ST, RM., 1246 RENO, NV 89511 LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 FOR: ORMAT NEVADA, INC. FOR: L.A. DEPT. OF WATER & POWER

SARAH K. FRIEDMAN RYAN HARWELL SENIOR CAMPAIGN REPRESENTATIVE DIRECT ENERGY BUSINESS, LLC SIERRA CLUB 818 W. 7TH ST., 2ND FL. 714 WEST OLYMPIC BLVD., STE. 1000 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 LOS ANGELES, CA 90015 FOR: DIRECT ENERGY BUSINESS FOR: SIERRA CLUB

S PEREZ TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC.



MANSFIELD POWER AND GAS, LLC 818 W. 7TH ST 818 WEST 7TH ST. LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 FOR: TIGER NATURAL GAS, INC. FOR: MANSFIELD POWER AND GAS, LLC

YEP ENERGY DANA P. PALMER 818 W. 7TH ST. MCGUIRE WOODS LLP LOS ANGELES, CA 90017 1800 CENTURY PARK EAST, 8TH FLOOR FOR: YEP ENERGY (ENERCAL USA, LLC'S ESP LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 BUSINESS NAME) FOR: DIRECT ENERGY SERVICES, LLC

JESSALYN ISHIGO INGER GOODMAN ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT OFF. COMMERCE ENERGY INC AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. 1 CENTERPOINTE DRIVE, SUITE 350 1919 TORRANCE BLVD. LA PALMA, CA 90623-2520 TORRANCE, CA 90501 FOR: COMMERCE ENERGY, INC. FOR: AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.

DANIEL W. DOUGLASS GREGORY S. KLATT ATTORNEY DOUGLASS & LIDDELL DOUGLASS & LIDDELL 4766 PARK GRANADA, STE. 209 4766 PARK GRANADA, SUITE 209 CALABASAS, CA 91302 CALABASAS, CA 91302 FOR: EDF TRADING NORTH AMERICA, LLC/EDF FOR: WESTERN POWER TRADING FORUM RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC./TIGER NATIONAL (WPTF)/DIRECT ACCESS COALITION (DACC) GAS, INC.

CAROL SCHMID-FRAZEE NGUYEN QUAN ATTORNEY REGULATORY AFFAIRS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. 630 EAST FOOTHILL BLVD. ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPNY FOR: BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICES

GREG BASS DONALD C. LIDDELL DIRECTOR DOUGLASS & LIDDELL NOBLE AMERICAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC 2928 2ND AVENUE 401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 500 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 FOR: CALIFORNIA ENERGY STORAGE (CESA) FOR: NOBLE AMERICAS ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC

DONALD KELLY THOMAS DARTON EXE. DIRECTOR PILOT POWER GROUP, INC. UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LANE, STE. 520 3405 KENYON ST., STE. 401 SAN DIEGO, CA 92122 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 FOR: PILOT POWER GROUP, INC. FOR: UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK (UCAN)

PAUL A. SZYMANSKI SCOTT HARDING SR. COUNSEL ENERGY RESOURCE PLANNER, SR. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT 8330 CENTURTY PARK CT., CP32D 333 E. BARIONI BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 IMPERIAL, CA 92251 FOR: SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT



MARINA WEST RUTH RIEMAN BOARD MEMBER VICE-CHAIR MORONGO BASIN CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA DESERT COALITION PO BOX 24 PO BOX 1508 JOSHUA TREE, CA 92252 YUCCA VALLEY, CA 92286 FOR: MORONGO BASIN CONSERVATION FOR: CALIFORNIA DESERT COALITION ASSOCIATON (MBCA)

LORRIE L. STEELY RICHARD RAVANA FOUNDER PRESIDENT MOJAVE COMMUNITIES CONSERVATION ALLIANCE FOR DESERT PRESERVATION PO BOX 2397 PO BOX 3987 APPLE VALLEY, CA 92307 APPLE VALLEY, CA 92307 FOR: MOJAVE COMMUNITIES CONSERVATION FOR: ALLIANCE FOR DESERT PRESERVATION COLLABORATIVE (MC3) (ADP)

KEVIN EMMERICH CHUCK BELL BASIN AND RANGE WATCH LUCERNE VALLEY ECON. DEVELOPMENT ASSN. 102551 CEDAR CANYON ROAD PO BOX 193 CIMA, CA 92323 APPLE VALLEY, CA 92356 FOR: BASIN AND RANGE WATCH FOR: LUCERNE VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION (LVEDA)

GREG MICHAELS PATRICK VANBEEK SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE & ENERGY COMMERCIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA 3450 14TH ST. STE. 420 2875 MICHELLE DR. STE 100 RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 IRVINE, CA 92606 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE & FOR: COMMERCIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY

HEATHER SWAN LISA-MARIE G. CLARK LANCASTER POWER AUTHORITY LEGAL DIVISION CITY OF LANCASTER CPUC 44933 FERN AVE. 505 VAN NESS AVE., RM. 4300 LANCASTER, CA 93534 SAN FRANCISO, CA 94102 FOR: LANCASTER COMMUNITY CHOICE FOR: ORA AGGREGATION

JAMES HENDRY MICHAEL A. HYAMS UTILITIES SPECIALIST POWER ENTERPRISE-REGULATORY AFFAIRS SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM. SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM 525 GOLDEN GATE AVE., 7TH FLOOR 525 GOLDEN GATE AVE., 7TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3220 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3220 FOR: SFPUC FOR: CLEANPOWER SF

MATTHEW FREEDMAN CARL ZICHELLA STAFF ATTORNEY DIRECTOR - WESTERN TRANSMISSION THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL 785 MARKET STREET, 14TH FL 111 SUTTER ST., 20TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 FOR: THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK FOR: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL

KEVIN P. BUNDY NORA SHERIFF SR. ATTORNEY ALCANTAR & KAHL LLP



CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 345 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 2450 351 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 600 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 FOR: CALIFORNIA LARGE ENERGY CONSUMERS FOR: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY ASSOCIATIONS (CLECA)

ERICA BRAND LARISSA KOEHLER ACTING DIR. - CALIFORNIA ENERGY PROGRAM ATTORNEY THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND 201 MISSION STREET, 4TH FL. 123 MISSION STREET, 28TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 FOR: THE NATURE CONSERVANCY FOR: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND

MARK HUFFMAN BRIAN T. CRAGG LAW DEPT ATTORNEY PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI, DAY & LAMPREY PO BOX 7442, B30A-2467 505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94106 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR: INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS (PG&E) ASSOCIATION (IEPA)

JEANNE B. ARMSTRONG JEANNE B. ARMSTRONG ATTORNEY ATTORNEY GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: SOLAR ELECTRIC SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR: THE SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION (SEIA)

SEAN P. BEATTY STEVE SHERR WEST REGION GEN. COUNSEL SVP BUSINESS AFFAIRS & GEN. COUNSEL NRG ENERGY, INC, FOUNDATION WINDPOWER, LLC 100 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 650 505 SANSOME STREET, STE 450 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: NRG ENERGY, INC. FOR: FOUNDATION WINDPOWER, LLC

SARA STECK MYERS GREGORY JOHN STANGL ATTORNEY CEO CEERT PHOENIX ENERGY 122 28TH AVENUE 950 LINCOLN BLVD. / BOX 29166 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94129 FOR: CENTER FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND FOR: PHOENIX ENERGY RENEWABLE TECHNOLOGIE (CEERT)

PUSHKAR WAGLE MATTHEW BARMACK BAY AREA MUNICIPAL TRANSMISSION GROUP DIR. - MARKET & REGULATORY ANALYSIS 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE CALPINE CORPORATION DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505 4160 DUBLIN BLVD., SUITE 100 FOR: BAY AREA MUNICIPAL TRANSMISSION DUBLIN, CA 94568 GROUP FOR: CALPINE CORPORATION

LAURA WISLAND MARK BYRON SENIOR ENERGY ANALYST WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PROGRAM MGR. UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS UNIV. OF CALIF. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 500 12TH ST., STE. 340 1111 FRANKLIN ST., 6TH FL. OAKLAND, CA 94607 OAKLAND, CA 94607



FOR: UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS FOR: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

TANDY MCMANNES GREGG MORRIS ABENGOA SOLAR DIR. I KAISER PLAZA, STE. 1675 THE GREEN POWER INSTITUTE OAKLAND, CA 94612-3699 2039 SHATTUCK AVE., SUTE. 402 FOR: ABENGOA SOLAR BERKELEY, CA 94704 FOR: GREEN POWER INSTITUTE

JULIA LEVIN JULIA A. LEVIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ON BEHALF OF WATERSHED CENTER BIOENERGY ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 106 SAINT ALBANS ROAD PO BOX 6184 KENSINGTON, CA 94708 ALBANY, CA 94706 FOR: THE WATERSHED CENTER FOR: BIOENERGY ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA

NANCY RADER ARTHUR HAUBENSTOCK EXECUTIVE DIR. ATTORNEY CALIFORNIA WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION SUSTAINABLE ENERGY STRATEGY PARTNERS 2560 NINTH STREET, STE. 213A 175 ELINOR AVE., STE. G BERKELEY, CA 94710 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 FOR: CALIFORNIA WIND ENERGY ASSOCIATION FOR: HARVEST POWER CALIFORNIA, LLC

L. JAN REID GARSON KNAPP COAST ECONOMIC CONSULTING LIBERTY POWER CORP. 3185 GROSS ROAD 131 - A STONY CIRCLE, STE. 500 SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062 SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 FOR: L. JAN REID FOR: LIBERTY POWER DELAWARE, LLC/LIBERTY POWER HOLDINGS

GEOF SYPHERS CHRISTIANA DARLINGTON SONOMA CLEAN POWER ATTORNEY AT LAW 50 OLD COURTHOUSE SQUARE, STE 605 CLERE INC SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 1130 DIABLO COURT FOR: SONOMA CLEAN POWER AUBURN, CA 95603 FOR: CALAVERAS HEALTHY IMPACT PRODUCT SOLUTIONS (CHIPS)

CHRISTIANA DARLINGTON JORDAN PINJUV DARLINGTON LEGAL SERVICES COUNSEL 110 MAPLE ST. CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR AUBURN, CA 95603 250 OUTCROPPING WAY FOR: PLACER COUNTY AIR POLLUTION FOLSOM, CA 95630 CONTROL DISTRICT (PCAPCD) FOR: CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR (CAISO)

BLUMBERG JULEE MALINOWSKI BALL GLACIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA, INC. EXECUTIVE DIR. 720 14TH ST. CALIFORNIA BIOMASS ENERGY ALLIANCE SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 1015 K STREET FOR: GLACIAL ENERGY OF CALIFORNIA, INC. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: CALIFORNIA BIOMASS ENERGY ALLIANCE



JUSTIN WYNNE KIMBERLEY DELFINO ATTORNEY CALIF. PROGRAM DIR. BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 1303 J STREET, STE. 270 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES FOR: DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION (CMUA)

MATTHEW KLOPFENSTEIN ROBERT PALMESE ATTORNEY EDF INDUSTRIAL POWER SERVICES (CA), LLC GONZALEZ, QUINTANA & HUNTER, LLC 455 CAPITOL MALL COMPLEX, STE 217 915 L STREET, STE. 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: EDF INDUSTRIAL POWER SERVICES FOR: NLINE ENERGY, INC. (CA), LLC

ANDREW BROWN JEDEDIAH GIBSON CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS L.L.P. 2600 CAPITOL AVE., STE. 400 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816 FOR: CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. FOR: BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE

ANDREW B. BROWN ELAINE SISON-LEBRILLA ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS, LLP SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT 2600 CAPITAL AVENUE, SUITE 400 6201 S STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5931 SACRAMENTO, CA 95817 FOR: ALLIANCE FOR RETAIL ENERGY MARKETS FOR: SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY (AREM) DISTRICT (SMUD)

MARK HENWOOD KAREN NORENE MILLS HENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. ATTORNEY 7311 GREENHAVEN DRIVE, STE. 275 CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION SACRAMENTO, CA 95831 2300 RIVER PLAZA DRIVE FOR: MARK HENWOOD SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 FOR: CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION

ROBERT PALMESE CALPINE POWERAMERICA-CA, LLC PALMCO POWER CA 2730 GATEWAY OAKS DR., STE 100 2710 GATEWAY OAKS DR., STE 150N SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 FOR: CALPINE POWERAMERICA-CA, LLC FOR: PALMCO POWER CA

TENASKA POWER SERVICES CO T. BROWN 2710 GATEWAY OAKS DR., STE 150 N 2710 GATEWAY OAKS DR, STE 150N SACRAMENTO, CA 95833 SACRAMENTO, CA 95833-3505 FOR: TENASKA POWER SERVICES CO. FOR: TENASKA CALIFORNIA ENERGY MARKETING, LLC

ANN L. TROWBRIDGE ETTA LOCKEY ATTORNEY SR. COUNSEL DAY CARTER & MURPHY LLP PACIFICORP 3620 AMERICAN RIVER DR., STE. 205 825 NE MULTNOMAH ST., STE. 1800 SACRAMENTO, CA 95864 PORTLAND, OR 97232 FOR: AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS FOR: PACIFICORP D/B/A PACIFIC POWER ASSOCIATION (AECA)



0 WAHL ADRIANA AYUSO DEP. DIR. - POLICY & ELECTRICITY MARKETS LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER SOLARCITY CORPORATION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

ALLISON SMITH AMY BARR ATTORNEY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY STOEL RIVES LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

ANTHONY KEKULAWELA AYO AFOLABI PORT OF OAKLAND PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: PORT OF OAKLAND

BARBARA BARKOVICH BELEN VALENZUELA CONSULTANT IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT BARKOVICH & YAP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

BRANDI FICHTNER BREWSTER BIRDSALL, P.E., QEP KIRKWOOD MEADOWS PUD SR. ASSOCIATE EMAIL ONLY ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: KIRKWOOD MEADOWS PUD EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

BRIAN D. THEAKER BRUCE MCLAUGHLIN DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS BRAUN & BLAISING, P.C. NRG WEST EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: POWER & WATER RESOURCES POOLING AUTHORITY

CAITLIN LIOTRIS CASE COORDINATION SENIOR CONSULTANT PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY STRATEGIES EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

CATHIE ALLEN CHARLES R. MIDDLEKAUFF PACIFICORP PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, OR 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

DAMON FRANZ DAVID BROWNLEE, JR.

Information Only



DIRECTOR - POLICY & ELECTRICITY MARKETS CITY OF NEEDLES SOLARCITY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF NEEDLES

DAWN ANAISCOURT DIANE LUCCHETTI DIR - CPUC REGULATORY AFFAIRS CITY OF UKIAH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF UKIAH

EMILY P. SANGI EVELYN KAHL DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP COUNSEL EMAIL ONLY ALCANTAR & KAHL LLP EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

FELIX LEBRON FRED LYNN DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY

FREEMAN S. HALL GRANT FUJII SOLAR ELECTRIC SOLUTIONS, LLC PACIFIC GAS AND ELECRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

HERMAN LEUNG JAN PEPPER CITY OF PASADENA ELECTRIC DIV., MGR. EMAIL ONLY SILICON VALLEY POWER EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: CITY OF PASADENA EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: SILICON VALLEY POWER

JANET OPPIO JANICE DIAS ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL POWER PORT OF STOCKTON EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: ALAMEDA MUNICIPAL POWER FOR: PORT OF STOCKTON

JEAN-CLAUDE BERTET JENELE DAVIDSON LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SERVICESEMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: VICTORVILLE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES SERVICES

JENNIFER W. SUMMERS JEREMY WAEN CALIFORNIA REGULATORY AFFAIRS SR. REGULATORY ANALYST SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000



JESSICA HILGART JIM STEFFENS PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF BANNING

JON ABENDSCHEIN KANNA VANCHASWARAN CITY OF PALO ALTO CITY OF CERRITOS EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF PALO ALTO FOR: CITYOF CERRITOS

KAREN PALMER KATIE JORRIE TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT

KATIE RAMSEY KEVIN SIMONSEN CLEAN COALITION ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CO 00000

KEVIN WOODRUFF KIMBERLY C. JONES WOODRUFF EXPERT SERVICES REGULATORY CASE MANGER EMAIL ONLY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

LAURENCE G. CHASET LEGAL DIVISION COUNSEL CPUC KEYES FOX & WIEDMAN, LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

LEILANI JOHNSON KOWAL LINDA NOVICK LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER HARVEST POWER EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

M. GRADY MATHAI-JACKSON MAGGIE CHAN PACIFC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

MARC D. JOSEPH MARK SORENSEN ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO BIGGS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: BIGGS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES

MCE COMPLIANCE MCE REGULATORY MARIN CLEAN ENERGY MARIN CLEAN ENERGY



EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

MEL GRANDI MELISSA PRICE CITY OF UKIAH LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF UKIAH FOR: LODI ELECTRIC UTILITY

MICHAEL TENEYCK PATRICK FERGUSON CITY OF CORONA DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP DEPT OF WTER & POWER EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CALPINE CORPORATION FOR: CITY OF CORONA

PAUL ESFORMES PAUL HAUSER PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: TRINITY PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT

PETER MILLER PHILLIP REESE NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL C/O REESE-CHAMBERS SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS, EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

PJOY T. CHUA REGULATORY FILE ROOM LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER & POWER PACIFIC GAS AND ELETRIC COMPANY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

REIKO KERR ROB HICKEY PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT. GRIDLEY ELECTRIC UTILITY CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: GRIDLEY ELECTRIC UTILITY FOR: CITY OF RIVERSIDE

ROBERT GEX SCOTT LESCH DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT. EMAIL ONLY CITY OF RIVERSIDE EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF RIVERSIDE

STEPHEN HOLABAUGH STEVEN F. GREENWALD TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICT DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: TRUCKEE DONNER PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR: LIBERTY UTILITIES (CALPECO DISTRICT ELECTIRC) LLC



STEVEN HANDY STEVEN K. ENDO, P.E. REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY WATER & POWER EMAIL ONLY CITYOF PASADENA EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY FOR: REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF PASADENA WATER & POWER

TERRY CROWLEY THERESA PHILLIPS CITY OF HEALDSBURG LASSEN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF HEALDSBURG FOR: LASSEN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT

TOM MILLER TONY BRAUN CITY OF SHASTA LAKE BRAUN BALISING MCLAUGHLIN PC EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF SHASTA LAKE

TONY GONCALVES UDI HELMAN ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC HELMAN ANALYTICS EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONL, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: ROSEVILLE ELECTRIC

VALERIE PUFFER VANESSA LARA CITY OF GLENDALE WATER & POWER MERCED IRRIGATION DISTRICT EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: GLENDALE WATER & POWER FOR: MERCED IRRIGATIN DISTRICT

VANESSA XIE VINCE BRAR ISLAND ENERGY CITY OF CERRITOS CITY OF PITTSBURG EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: CITY OF CERRITOS FOR: CITY OF PITTSBURG D/B/A ISLAND ENERGY

WILLIAM DIETRICH MRW & ASSOCIATES, LLC SENIOR CONSULTANT EMAIL ONLY DIETRICH CONSULTING EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

DOUGLAS DAVIE KAREN TERRANOVA VICE PRESIDENT ALCANTAR & KAHL WELLHEAD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000-0000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000-0000

TAM HUNT DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLC COMMUNITY RENEWABLES SOLUTIONS, LLC EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000-0000



EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000-0000

MIKE LEVIN MICHAEL NORDLICHT DIR - GOVN'T AFFAIRS AGERA ENERGY, LLC FUELCELL ENERGY, INC. 555 PLEASANTVILLE RD, S 107 3 GREAT PASTURE ROAD BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510 DANBURY, CT 06810 FOR: AGERA ENERGY, LLC

ERIKA SCHMITT KIRA BRYERS CUSTOMIZED ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LTD. CUSTOMIZED ENERGY SOLUTIONS LTD. 1528 WALNUT STREET, 22ND FL. 1528 WALNUT STREET, 22ND FLOOR PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102 PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

KARA MORGAN KELLY CRANDALL TRANSWEST EXPRESS LLC KEYES FOX & WIEDMAN LLP 555- 17TH STREET, STE. 2400 1400 16TH ST., 16 MARKET SQR., STE. 400 DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80202

DANIEL RAMIREZ JASON R. SMITH ANALYST PRESIDENT ENERGY STRATEGIES, LLC TRANSCANYON, LLC 215 SOUTH STATE STREET, STE 200 ONE ARIZONA CENTER SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111 400 EAST VAN BUREN ST., STE. 350 PHOENIX, AZ 85004 FOR: TRANSCANYON, LLC

ROBERT D. SMITH BRANDON SMITHWOOD VP, TRANSMISSION PLANNING & DEVELOP MGR. - CALIF. STATE AFFAIRS TRANSCANYON, LLC SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION 400 EAST VAN BUREN ST., STE 350 EMAIL ONLY PHOENIX, AZ 85004 EMAIL ONLY, CA 90000

RANDY S. HOWARD STEVEN ZURETTI LOS ANGELES DEPT. OF WATER AND POWER DIR - REGULATORY AFFAIRS 111 NORTH HOPE STREET, ROOM 921 BROOKFIELD ENERGY MARKETING INC. LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 601 S. FIGUEROA ST., STE. 2200 FOR: L.A. DEPT OF WATER & POWER LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

ABRAHAM ALEMU MILISSA MARONA RESOURCE PLANNING & DEV. MANAGER DIR - GOV'T & UTILITY RELATIONS CITY OF VERNON CODA ENERGY 4305 SANTE FE AVENUE 135 E. MAPLE AVE. VERNON, CA 90058 MONROVIA, CA 91016 FOR: CITY OF VERNON

HIMANSHU PANDEY LINCOLN BLEVEANS ASST. POWER PRODUCTION SUPERINTENDENT POWER RESOURCES MANAGER BURBANK WATER & POWER BURBANK WATER & POWER 164 W. MAGNOLIA BLVD. 164 WEST MAGNOLIA BLVD. BURBANK, CA 91502 BURBANK, CA 91502 FOR: CITY OF BURBANK FOR: CITY OF BURBANK

YAREK LEHR JOHN D BALLAS



AZUSA LIGHT & WATER CITY ENGINEER 729 N. AZUSA AVENUE CITY OF INDUSTRY AZUSA, CA 91702 PO BOX 3366 FOR: CITY OF AZUSA - LIGHT AND WATER CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91744 DEPT. FOR: CITY OF INDUSTRY

AMBER WYATT CAROL SCHMID-FRAZEE SR. ATTORNEY ATTORNEY AT LAW SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE. G.O.1, RM 345E 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE./PO BOX 800 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

CASE ADMINISTRATION KATIE SLOAN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVE./PO BOX 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENUE, ROOM 800 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770

JOHN W. LESLIE, ESQ SHAWN BAILEY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR - PLANNING & ANALYSIS DENTONS US LLP SEMPRA US GAS AND POWER 600 WEST BROADWAY, STE. 2600 488 8TH STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101

DONALD KELLY JOHN S. FRIDERICHS EXE. DIR. DIRECTOR - ORIGINATION & DEVELOPMENT UTILITY CONSUMERS' ACTION NETWORK PILOT POWER GROUP, INC. 3405 KENYON STREET, SUITE 401 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LANE, STE. 520 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 SAN DIEGO, CA 92122

DEAN A. KINPORTS CENTRAL FILES SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT CP32D 8330 CENTURY PARK CT, CP31-E SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1530

DESPINA NIEHAUS DAVID DAVIS SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY 61736 ONAGA TRAIL 8330 CENTURY PARK COURT, CP32H JOSHUA TREE, CA 92252 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-1530

PETER T. PEARSON CARRIE THOMPSON ENERGY SUPPLY SPECIALIST CITY OF ANAHEIM BEAR VALLEY ELECTRIC SERVICE 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD., STE. 802 42020 GARSTIN DRIVE, PO BOX 1547 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 BIG BEAR LAKE, CA 92315-1547 FOR: CITY OF ANAHEIM - INTEGRATED RESOURCES DIV.

SHELLY-ANN MAYE KENNETH SAHM WHITE REGULATORY MGR. ECONOMICS & POLICY ANALYSIS DIRTECTOR TRANSCANYON, LLC CLEAN COALITION 666 GRAND AVENUE, STE. 500 16 PALM CT. DES MOINES, CA 94000 MENLO PARK, CA 94025

SUE MARA ERIC BORDEN



CONSULTANT ENERGY POLICY ANALYST RTO ADVISORS, LLC THE UTILITY REFORM NETWORK 164 SPRINGDALE WAY 785 MARKET STREET, STE. 1400 REDWOOD CITY, CA 94062 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103

DUSTIN ELLIOTT JOANIE YUEN MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY ONE MARKET ST., SPEAR STREET TOWER 77 BEALE ST., MC B9A SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

SARAH KEANE SHERIDAN J. PAUKER, ESQ. ATTORNEY REGULATORY COUNSEL MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER ONE MARKET PLAZA, SPEAR TOWER, STE 3300 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

MONICA SCHWEBS ANNA MURVEIT MORGAN LEWIS BOCKIUS, LLP CALIFORNIA EMVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES ONE MARKET, SPEAR STREET TOWER 423 WASHINGTON ST. 4TH FL. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1596 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

JOHN MCINTYRE LILLY B. MCKENNA ATTORNEY MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI & DAY, LLP ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 30TH FL. 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 SAN FRANCISICO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

LUISA F. ELKINS SETH D. HILTON GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI & DAY, LLP ATTORNEY 505 SANSOME ST., STE. 900 STOEL RIVES LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, STE. 1120 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 FOR: HYDRO PARTNERS

SUZY HONG THOMAS W. SOLOMON ATTORNEY AT LAW ATTORNEY AT LAW GOODIN MACBRIDE SQUERI DAY & LAMPREY LLP WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 505 SANSOME STREET, SUITE 900 101 CALIFORNIA STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

MICHAEL B. DAY DIANE FELLMAN ATTORNEY VP - REGULATORY & GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS GOODIN, MACBRIDE, SQUERI, & DAY, LLP NRG WEST REGION 505 SANSOME STREET, STE 900 100 CALIFORNIA ST., STE. 650 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3133 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4505 FOR: ABENGOA SOLAR

JEFFREY P. GRAY CALIFORNIA ENERGY MARKETS ATTORNEY 425 DIVISADERO ST STE 303 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94117-2242 505 MONTGOMERY ST., STE 800 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-6533 FOR: CALPINE CORPORATION



MEGAN M. MYERS ALEXEY ORKIN ATTORNEY FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS INC. LAW OFFICES OF SARA STECK MYERS 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE 122 - 28TH AVENUE DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121

BARRY R. FLYNN KERRY HATTEVIK FLYNN RESOURCE CONSULTANTS, INC. REG. DIR.- WEST GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 5440 EDGEVIEW DRIVE NEXT ERA ENERGY RESOURCES LLC DISCOVERY BAY, CA 94505 829 ARLINGTON BLVD. EL CERRITO, CA 94530

KATHY TRELEVEN JENNIFER WEBERSKI KATHY TRELEVEN CONSULTING CONSULTANT ON BEHALF OF: 103 BANDOL CT. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND SAN RAMON, CA 94582 49 TERRA BELLA DRIVE WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596

CYNTHIA CLARK JODY S. LONDON MANAGER, WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY PROGRAM PO BOX 3629 UNIVERSITY OF CALIF.-OFF. OF THE PRES. OAKLAND, CA 94609 111 BROADWAY . SUITE 1472 OAKLAND, CA 94607

TIM LINDL ANDY KATZ COUNSEL LAW OFFICES OF ANDY KATZ KEYES FOX & WIEDMAN LLP 2150 ALLSTON WAY , STE. 400 436 14TH STREET, STE. 1305 BERKELEY, CA 94704 OAKLAND, CA 94612

TIM MASON PHILLIP MULLER ENERGY & TRANSMISSION ADVISORY SERVICES PRESIDENT TIM MASON CONSULTING SCD ENERGY SOLUTIONS 1000 FRESNO AVE. 436 NOVA ALBION WAY BERKELEY, CA 94707 SAN RAFAEL, CA 94903

C. SUSIE BERLIN JEFF KASPAR LAW OFFICES OF SUSIE BERLIN DEPUTY PORT DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY & ENVIR1346 THE ALAMEDA, STE. 7, NO. 141 PORT OF STOCKTON SAN JOSE, CA 95126 2201 W. WASHINGTON STREET STOCKTON, CA 95203-2942 FOR: PORT OF STOCKTON

DAVID OLIVARES ED FRANCIOSA ELECTRIC RESOURCE MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1231 11TH STREET PO BOX 4060 MODESTO, CA 95354 MODESTO, CA 95352 FOR: MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT

GREG SALYER WES MONIER MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT STRATEGIC ISSUES AND PLANNING MANAGER 1231 11TH STREET TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT



MODESTO, CA 95354 333 EAST CANAL DRIVE, PO BOX 949 TURLOCK, CA 95381-0949 FOR: TURLOCK IRRIGATION DISTRICT

KELLY FOLEY NATHANAEL MIKSIS GENERAL COUNSEL CALIFORNIA CLEAN POWER CALIFORNIA CLEAN POWER 50 SANTA ROSA AVE., SUITE 420 50 SANTA ROSA AVE. SUITE 420 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404

SHEHZAD WADALAWALA JAMES H. CALDWELL, JR CALIFORNIA CLEAN POWER 1650 E. NAPA STREET 50 SANTA ROSA AVE., SUITE 420 SONOMA, CA 95476 SANTA ROSA, CA 95404

CALIFORNIA ISO MATTHEW SWINDLE 250 OUTCROPPING WAY CEO & FOUNDER FOLSOM, CA 95630 NLINE ENERGY, INC. 5170 GOLDEN FOOTHILL PARKWAY EL DORADO HILLS, CA 95762

AUDRA HARTMANN BRAD HEAVNER PRINCIPAL POLICY DIRECTOR SMITH, WATTS & HARTMANN CALIFORNIA SOLAR ENERGY INDUSTRIES ASSN 925 L STREET, SUITE 220 1107 9TH ST., NO. 820 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

DAN GRIFFITHS KATE KELLY ATTORNEY DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. 1303 J STREET, SUITE 270 915 L STREET, SUITE 1480 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

LINDA JOHNSON MICHAEL BOCCADORO BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH P.C. WEST COAST ADVISORS 915 L STREET, SUITE 1270 925 L STREET, SUITE 800 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 FOR: AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION (AECA)

SARAH TAHERI SCOTT BLAISING SO. CALIF. PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY ATTORNEY 915 L STREET, STE. 1410 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 915 L STREET, STE. 1270 FOR: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 AUTHORITY (SCPPA)

STEVEN J. KEENE STEVEN KELLEY BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN & SMITH, P.C. POLICY DIRECTOR 915 L STREET, SUITE 1270 INDEPENDENT ENERGY PRODUCERS ASSN. SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 1215 K STREET, SUITE 900 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814



C/O WEST COAST ADVISORS DOUGLAS KERNER AGRICULTURAL ENERGY CONSUMERS ASSN. ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS 925 L STREET, SUITE 800 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816

JEFFREY D. HARRIS LYNN M. HAUG ATTORNEY AT LAW ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP ELLISON, SCHNEIDER & HARRIS LLP 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 2600 CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 400 SACRMENTO, CA 95816-5905 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-5905

DAVID R. BRANCHCOMB KEN WITTMAN SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES MANAGER, RATES & REGULATROY AFFAIRS PO BOX 496028 LIBERTY UTILITIES REDDING, CA 96049 6921 N. LAKE BLVD. TAHOE VISTA, CA 96148

VIRINDER SINGH DEBI WINNEY DIR - REGULATORY & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS PACIFICORP EDF RENEWABLE ENERGY 825 NE MUTLNOMAH ST., STE. 600 1000 SW BROADWAY, SUITE 1880 PORTLAND, OR 97232 PORTLAND, OR 97205

POOJA KISHORE PACIFICORP 825 NE MULTNOMAH, STE. 600 PORTLAND, OR 97232

ANGIE GOULD CHLOE LUKINS CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ORA DIV. EMAIL ONLY CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

DAVID PECK FOREST KASER CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

MICHAEL JASKE MITCHELL SHAPSON CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STAFF ATTORNEY EMAIL ONLY CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

NICHOLAS FUGATE ROBERT BLACKNEY SUPPLY ANALSYS OFFICE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

State Service



SANDY GOLDBERG THERESA DANIELS SR. COUNSEL ENERGY SPECIALIST 1 GOVERNOR'S OFF. OF PLANING & RESEARCH CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000

ANNE E. SIMON CHERYL LEE CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES PROCUREMENT STRATEGY AND OVERSIGHT BRANCROOM 5104 AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

CHRISTIAN KNIERIM EHREN SEYBERT CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH COMMISSIONER PETERMAN AREA ROOM 5303 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

HAL KANE JULIE A. FITCH CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RISK ASSESSMENT AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES AREA ROOM 5019 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

KARIN M. HIETA LEE-WHEI TAN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH ELECTRICITY PRICING AND CUSTOMER PROGRAMROOM 5010 ROOM 4102 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

MARIA AMPARO WORSTER MARIA SOTERO CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH PROCUREMENT STRATEGY AND OVERSIGHT BRANCROOM 4209 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

MARTIN JR. LIZARDE MEGHA LAKHCHAURA CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OFFICE OF RATEPAYER ADVOCATES PROCUREMENT STRATEGY AND OVERSIGHT BRANCAREA AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

NEHA BAZAJ PAUL DOUGLAS CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DEMAND RESPONSE, CUSTOMER GENERATION, AN PROCUREMENT STRATEGY AND OVERSIGHT BRANCAREA AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE



SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

ROBERT MASON ROSANNE O'HARA CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH ROOM 5107 AREA 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

SCARLETT LIANG-UEJIO SEAN A. SIMON CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION MARKET STRUCTURE, COSTS AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONER RANDOLPH AREA 4-A AREA 4-A 505 VAN NESS AVENUE 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

XIAN "CINDY" LI KAREN GRIFFIN CALIF PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ELECTRICITY PLANNING & POLICY BRANCH 1516 NINTH STREET, MS-20 ROOM 4104 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-3214

LYNETTE E. GREEN ENERGY SPECIALIST CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION 1516 9TH STREET, MS 45 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

TOP OF PAGE BACK TO INDEX OF SERVICE LISTS



List of Non‐Email Recipients

Sean A. Simon Calif Public Utilities Commission Commissioner Randolph Area 4-A 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Rosanne O'Hara Calif Public Utilities Commission Electricity Planning & Policy Branch Area 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Xian "Cindy" Li Calif Public Utilities Commission, Electricity Pricing And Customer Programs Branch Room 4104 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Lynette E. Green Energy Specialist California Energy Commission 1516 9th Street, MS 45 Sacramento, CA 95814

Karen Griffin California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street, MS-20 Sacramento, CA 95814

Scarlett Liang-Uejio Calif Public Utilities Commission Market Structure, Costs And Natural Gas Area 4-A 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3214

Documents

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF … THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Continue Implementation and Administration,