Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BEHAVIOR ECOLOGY GROWTH Jll~ INTERSPECIFIC RELATIONSHIPS
OF THE YELLOW AND BLACK BULLHEADS
A Thesis Submitted to
the Department of Biology
Kansas State Teachers College Emporia Kansas
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Master of Science
by
James K ~ohmeyer
August 1972
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my appreciation to Dr Robert
J Boles for his supervision and constructive criticism
and to Drs Robert F Clarke and Thomas A Eddy for their
reading of the manuscript and suggestions for improvement
I also would like to thank those farmers who allowed
me to capture specimens from their waters I am especially
grateful to my wife Linda for her support and typing of
the manuscript
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I INTRODUCTION bull
Literature Review bull bull bull Taxonomy of the Species Description of Field Study Area
3 4 5
II MATERIALS AND METHODS 7
Laboratory Study Field Study 7
9
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 15
Species Behavior bull 15 Ingestive Behavior bull 15 Shelter-Seeking Behavior 16 Agonistic Behavior bull bull 18 Sexual Behavior 20 Care-Giving Behavior bull bull 21 Eliminative Behavior 23 Allelomimetic Behavior bull bull 23 Investigative Behavior 24 Escape Behavior bullbullbullbullbullbull 26
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens bull 26
Ecological Relationships and Distribution bull bull 29 Laboratory Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 29 Field Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull 30
Growth bull 56 Length-Frequency Distributions bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Population Estimates bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Absolute Growth bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 60 Length-Weight Relationships bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 62 Condition Factor bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 69
IV SUMMARY 78
V LITERATURE CITED bull bull 83
1
v
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
I I natalis and I melas cantured at the Clear- - Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 31
II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull 33
III Bottom description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 37
IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 40
V Per cent of ~ melas and ~ natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 42
VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 43
VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull 48
IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull 61
X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 61
XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I melas 65
XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I natalis bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 67
vi
TABLE PAGE
XIII Lenght-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 melas from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 70
XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 natalis from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 72
xv The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of 1 melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bullbull 77
XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 77
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to express my appreciation to Dr Robert
J Boles for his supervision and constructive criticism
and to Drs Robert F Clarke and Thomas A Eddy for their
reading of the manuscript and suggestions for improvement
I also would like to thank those farmers who allowed
me to capture specimens from their waters I am especially
grateful to my wife Linda for her support and typing of
the manuscript
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I INTRODUCTION bull
Literature Review bull bull bull Taxonomy of the Species Description of Field Study Area
3 4 5
II MATERIALS AND METHODS 7
Laboratory Study Field Study 7
9
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 15
Species Behavior bull 15 Ingestive Behavior bull 15 Shelter-Seeking Behavior 16 Agonistic Behavior bull bull 18 Sexual Behavior 20 Care-Giving Behavior bull bull 21 Eliminative Behavior 23 Allelomimetic Behavior bull bull 23 Investigative Behavior 24 Escape Behavior bullbullbullbullbullbull 26
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens bull 26
Ecological Relationships and Distribution bull bull 29 Laboratory Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 29 Field Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull 30
Growth bull 56 Length-Frequency Distributions bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Population Estimates bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Absolute Growth bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 60 Length-Weight Relationships bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 62 Condition Factor bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 69
IV SUMMARY 78
V LITERATURE CITED bull bull 83
1
v
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
I I natalis and I melas cantured at the Clear- - Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 31
II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull 33
III Bottom description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 37
IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 40
V Per cent of ~ melas and ~ natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 42
VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 43
VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull 48
IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull 61
X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 61
XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I melas 65
XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I natalis bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 67
vi
TABLE PAGE
XIII Lenght-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 melas from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 70
XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 natalis from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 72
xv The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of 1 melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bullbull 77
XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 77
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I INTRODUCTION bull
Literature Review bull bull bull Taxonomy of the Species Description of Field Study Area
3 4 5
II MATERIALS AND METHODS 7
Laboratory Study Field Study 7
9
III RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 15
Species Behavior bull 15 Ingestive Behavior bull 15 Shelter-Seeking Behavior 16 Agonistic Behavior bull bull 18 Sexual Behavior 20 Care-Giving Behavior bull bull 21 Eliminative Behavior 23 Allelomimetic Behavior bull bull 23 Investigative Behavior 24 Escape Behavior bullbullbullbullbullbull 26
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens bull 26
Ecological Relationships and Distribution bull bull 29 Laboratory Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 29 Field Study bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bullbull 30
Growth bull 56 Length-Frequency Distributions bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Population Estimates bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 56 Absolute Growth bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 60 Length-Weight Relationships bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 62 Condition Factor bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 69
IV SUMMARY 78
V LITERATURE CITED bull bull 83
1
v
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
I I natalis and I melas cantured at the Clear- - Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 31
II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull 33
III Bottom description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 37
IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 40
V Per cent of ~ melas and ~ natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 42
VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 43
VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull 48
IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull 61
X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 61
XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I melas 65
XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I natalis bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 67
vi
TABLE PAGE
XIII Lenght-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 melas from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 70
XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 natalis from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 72
xv The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of 1 melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bullbull 77
XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 77
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
v
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
I I natalis and I melas cantured at the Clear- - Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 31
II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull 33
III Bottom description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 37
IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 40
V Per cent of ~ melas and ~ natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 42
VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 43
VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 45
VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull 48
IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull 61
X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull bull bull bullbull 61
XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I melas 65
XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationship of I natalis bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 67
vi
TABLE PAGE
XIII Lenght-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 melas from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 70
XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 natalis from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 72
xv The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of 1 melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bullbull 77
XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 77
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
vi
TABLE PAGE
XIII Lenght-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 melas from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 70
XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of 1 natalis from Clear Creek bullbullbullbullbullbullbullbull 72
xv The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of 1 melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bullbull 77
XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of I natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 77
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
vii
LIST OF FIGLES
FIGURE PAGE
1 Distribution of the Yellow Bullhead I natalis and the Black Bullhead I melas in Kansas (After Cross 1967) - bull bull bull 2
2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas 11
3 Length-frequencies of 79 ~ rnelas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull bull 57
4 Frequency distribution of 79 ~ melas grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull 58
5 Frequency distribution of 84 natalis grouped into age groups bull bull bull bull bull bull bull bull 59
6 Calculated growth in length of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 63
7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 melas and 84 natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 64
8 Length-weight relationship of 79 melas captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 74
9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 bull 75
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
SBFUI r
bull CL96T CSSOlJ ld4JV) SBSU~ U1 cS BlltlUI r CpBaQlTng ~jBlg aQl pUB
S11E4EU r p~ou11nH ~OlldX aul JO uormqjll sora i ltlln23
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
3
from trapping and fishing at selected stations along a stream
study area The captured bullheads were examined measured
tagged and released An attempt was made to compare distribushy
tion of the species in the stream and to compare their growth
rate under field conditions
Clear Creek a small stream located in west-central
Lyon County was chosen for the field portion of this study
The habitat was varied along the creeks length and the
distance from its upper branches to the point where it flows
into the Neosho River is approximately 25 miles (straight line
distance) I first observed the study species in Clear Creek
at the time that the laboratory specimens were being collected
Literature Review
With such a large overlap in the ranges of I natalis
and I melas it would seem probable that both species would be
present in some of the same bodies of water Many studies
have shown this to be the case but in this portion of the
thesis I will refer only to those close to the study area
Elkin (1954) in Oklahoma and Hall (1934) Minckley (1959)
and Cross (1967) in Kansas reported finding these two species
coexisting
Studies which concern some aspect of the life history
of either I melas or I natalis are numerous especially
for the former Forney (1955) studied the life history of
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
4
I melas in one Iowa lake Carlander (1969) compiled life
history and ecological observations from many sources but
considerably more space was devoted to I melas Cross (1967)
gave the Kansas life history for the two species but again
much more space was alloted to I melas
Esterly (1917) discussed species behavior and the
relation between habits in nature and reactions in the
laboratory He said The actual mode of work is to learn
what the particular organism does in nature and to discover
by means of the laboratory the reasons for its behavior
Bardach and Villars (1970) studied the behavior and Todd
(1971) the chemical languages of natalis in the laborashy
tory Darnell and Meierotto (1962) determined the feeding
chronology of melas in laboratory studies
Taxonomy poundpound the Species
According to Bailey (1956) the family name Ictaluridae
is an amalgamation of Amiurus Gill (=Ameiurus Rafinesque)
with Ictalurus Rafinesque From this revision the family
name Ameiuridae was changed to Ictaluridae Ictalurus was
then adopted as the generic name of the bullheads and the
larger forktailed catfishes
Cross (1967) and others (Harlan and Speaker 1956 Clay
1962 Breukelman 1966 Trautman 1957 and Eddy 1957) relying
on differences in color body measurements and qualitative
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
5
body characters of natalis and 1 melas listed the following
as characteristics of each species
natalis - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellow-white or milk-white Chin barbels unpigmented (white) or matching the underside of the head Anal fin with 24-27 rays vertebrae 42-45 The body is slender caudal fin rounded outward and slightly notched above mid-point of its distal edge anal fin long and low band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine saw-edged posteriorly jaws nearly equal in length
melas - Yellowish-brown to black ventral surface of head and body bright yellow yellowishshywhite or milk-white Chin barbels pigmented and darker than skin on underside of head Anal fin with 17-21 rays vertebrae 39-40 Body usually more stout than that of 1 natalis caudal fin rounded inward slightly notched and may appear almost square-tipped anal fin short and rounded band of teeth in upper jaw without any backward lateral extensions pectoral spine smooth posteriorly (may be rough but not toothed) jaws equal in length or the upper only slightly protruding
Description of Field Study Area
The drainage basin of Clear Creek includes approxishy
mately four square miles on the east escarpment of the
Flint Hills Upland adjacent to the Neosho River in west-
central Lyon County The total drainage of Clear Creek lies
in nine adjacent sections 7-9 and 16-21 in T18 RlO The
creek originates as a permanent spring 45 miles west and
10 miles south of Americus and flows into the Neosho River
25 miles west of the same city The Neosho River is a part
of the Arkansas River Basin Numerous tributaries join Clear
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
6
Creek and most are of intermittent flow The surface drainage
is derived mostly from agricultural lands
The field study area was primarily rolling bluestem
prairie broken by ridges and limestone outcrops (Hartman
1960) The soils are dark grayish-brown and grayish-brown
limestone calcareous shales and loess The bottom structure
of Clear Creek is either clay mud gravel or bedrock
The normal growing season for the study area is 186
days Seventy-two percent of the annual precipitation 30 -to
38 inches falls within this period Average temperature
for July is 261 o C as compared to an average January reading
of -06degC (Breukelman Eddy and Hartman 1961)
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
CHAPTER II
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Laboratory Study
The laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas State
Teachers College campus from October 1970 until November
1971
The study species ~ melas and I natalis were
maintained in glass aquaria measuring from 46 cm by 150 cm
by 26 cm to 31 cm by 60 cm by 26 cm All sides of the
aquaria were clear and kept clean of algae and fungi for
the duration of the study The glass sides were scraped
and cleaned at the same time that the aquaria were drained
and fresh water added (approximately once a week) The
fresh water was tap water that had been allowed to age in
tanks for a minimum of 24 hours Bottom filters were used
and covered with one inch of gravel Air was supplied to
the aquaria at all times
Tiles were used in the aquaria to provide cove~ for
the bullheads Cuboidal construction tiles approximately
30 cm to a side and having four compartments were used in
the larg~r aquaria Cylindrical tiles 30 cm in length and
10 cm inside diameter were used in the small aquaria as the
only cover and in the larger to provide additional shelter
Observations were normally made during the daylight
or early evening hours Because classes were held in the
study area the bullheads were exposed to much human activity
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
8
during portions of the day Most observations were confined to
the periods when few people were in the area and the light
conditions could be altered at will
The laboratory specimens were normally fed dry catfish
pellets Other foods used included liver (pork and beef)
mealworm larvae earthworms and scraps of fish and crayfish
The time of feeding was varied to observe the responses at
different hours of the day and evening
The populations of study fish were arranged so that in
some aquaria only one species was present while in another
both species were together In this manner the specific
behavior and ecology could be studied and at the same time
the interspecific relationships Some of the variables that
were adjusted during the experiment were the size of the
fish comparative number of species amount of food shelter
and external stimuli produced by the researcher ~
Notes in longhand were taken by the observer at each
observation period The times for observation were kept to
a minimum of 30 minutes and lasted as long as two hours
Everything observed was recorded in the laboratory notebook
as the events took place Behavior observed was recorded in
the notebook under the general behavior headings given by
Scott (1958)
Drug-induced spawning was attempted Injections of
between 03 and 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin were given
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
9
to seven of the largest melas No sex determination was
attempted The injections were given into the shoulder hump
anterior to the dorsal fin I melas were used to observe
this behavior because of the greater availability of mature
specimens
The ecology portion of the laboratory study was confined
to the effects of light temperature (water and air) barometshy
ric pressure turbidity and human or mechanical stimuli
affecting the bullheads The lights used were the overhead
fluorescent lamps (approximately two meters above the aquaria)
and whatever light entered the room through the door or windows
Water temperature was measured with a mercury column Celsius
thermometer and air temperature with a mercury column Fahrenshy
heit thermometer Barometric pressure readings were taken
directly from The Emporia Gazette The turbidity and human
or mechanical stimuli were recorded as qualitative data
Field Study
A personal survey of Clear Creek was conducted after
gaining permission to fish and trap from the landowners and
the Kansas Forestry Fish and Game Commission in Pratt Kansas
The decision was made a~ter the initial survey to trap in the
main stream between its Neosho River outlet and as far upstream
as sufficient water could be found within which the traps
could be completely submerged Thirty-seven collecting stations
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
10
were selected (Fig 2) During the initial collecting period
the following data were recorded for each collecting station
a date b pool length c pool depth d pool width e water turbidity f type of creek bottom g description of pool bank h water flora i water velocity j water temperature k remarks
These same data were again collected at the conclusion
of the trapping program The data from the two visits were
used to form habitat descriptions for each collecting station
The term pool is defined for the purpose of this
paper as any stream area deep enough for complete submersion
of the traps and lying between two shallow areas of the
creek
Turbidity was measured by the use of a U S Geological
Survey turbidity rod The water temperature was taken by
holding a mercury Celsius thermometer approximately 30 cm
below the surface of the water for a minimum of one minute
The water velocity was approximated by allowing a fishing
bobber to float a known distance (10-20 feet) and recording
the number of seconds elapsed The velocity procedure was
run three times for each collecting station and the average
feet-per-second recorded
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
11
c co -IN (J~r
I 2I ( -8
I ))LLshy
II
-shy t3
r Iq Ls1ij
~Gf6 I II~ ~~~~ r t- rIq ~ )_n
3 0
==- ~ w ~
11 J5-~~ f-- ~ 1 0y-- 0lt0
O~~ 7 I 0
I J53 y~d-~ I l~ ~
~~__- J ( ltAd (
1 Jf 3i~3C) 3( ~oI
~
~
~
J1 ~ ~
Figure 2 Map showing locations of collecting stations on Clear Creek Lyon County Kansas
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
12
Climatic data were taken from the Federal Aviation Agency
reports as recorded in The Emporia Gazette The Federal
Aviation Agency weather reports for the Emporia area were
taken at the Emporia Airport which is four miles south of
Emporia or 13 miles southeast of the field study area The
climatic data required for each of the collecting periods
were as follows
a high air temperature b low air temperature c barometric pressure d trend of barometric pressure e relative humidity f precipitation
The trend of barometric pressure is stated as either
rising falling or steady
The data for each bullhead captured were recorded in
the field notebook under the following categories
a collecting station number b date c tag number d weight (grams) e total length (cm) f species g remarks
The traps used were cylindrical wire pots made of quarter
inch hail screen 75 cm long and 275 cm in diameter The
fish could enter the traps from either end through funnel
shaped openings approximately five cm in diameter Square
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
13
doors (12 cm to a side) on the side of the cylinder were
used for fish removal and placement of the bait within the
traps The bait was contained in dog food cans with a
plastic snap-on lid over one end Holes in the metal
allowed the bait to diffuse into the surrounding water
The bait used in the traps was fresh liver (beef or
pork) Earthworms or liver were used on the few days that
hook and line was used for collecting
The tags used were strap tags manufactured by National
Band and Tag Company of Newport Kentucky The style was
number 1005 and size 1 It measured 21 mm (94 mm clinched)
by two rom by 03 mm and weighed only 00675 grams (Rounsefell
and Everhart 1953) The tags were normally attached to the
left opercle of the study species When clinched the tag
had an indentification number facing outward and the letters
KSTC inward
Length-frequency distributions were used to estimate
age The fish of each age group normally form a peak in the
distribution curve
Estimation of population densities were attempted by
the mark and recapture procedure (Odum 1966)
Absolut7 growth and length-weight relationships were
determined graphically Absolute growth was plotted as the
average length for each age group
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
14
The value of the condition factor or the coefficient of
condition is interpreted as expressing the relative wellshy
being of the fish (Carlander 1969) This coefficient K
is determined by the following formula bull
5K(TL) VI 103
L
Where VI = weight in grams
L = length in mID
5and 10 is a factor to bring the value
of K near unity
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
CHAPTER III
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Species Behavior
Ingestive Behavior
Both I melas and I natalis fed in the same manner
The body was held head down at angles between 15 and
90 degrees The head was pushed against the bottom with
powerful thrusts of the caudal fin The more vigorous
the feeding the larger the body angle and the more powershy
ful the caudal thrusts
I melas always became conditioned to feeding in the
aquaria before natalis The shortest time between the
placing of food in the aquaria and the fish actually feeding
was 0 seconds for I melas and 10 seconds for I natalis
I melas often rose toward the surface at my approach and
caught the food on its way to the bottom I natalis grabbed
food en its way down but not until they had been excited by
food on the aquaria bottom Many times melas when in
separate aquaria would feed for several minutes before I
natalis had left their shelter
The smaller specimens of both species were usually the
most active at feeding time and began feeding first
The time of feeding made no noticable difference in the
appetites of the study specimens
The method of actually ingesting the food varied between
the field and the laboratory In the field the bullheads
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
16
(both species) gripped the bait between their jaws and moved
for a short distance before swallowing I observed this
procedure several times when fishing under a low water bridge
on Clear Creek and it never varied The bullheads in the
laboratory were hesitant only through the first day but
subsequently would swallow immediately upon biting the food
substance
One individual I melas maintained in another room and
not one of the study specimens would rise to the surface and
take mealworm larvae or liver from the fingers The fish
could actually raise its head out of the water and gently
take the food without biting any fingers
The type of food would cause different reactions with
the study fish Mealworm larvae and earthworms were fed
alive and their body motion caused great excitement and
vigorous feeding The catfish pellets and liver were both
eaten readily but not with as much vigor as with the earthshy
worms or mealworms When feeding on pellets or liver the
fish often fed until their abdomens were quite visibly swollen
Shelter-Seeking Behavior
The most frequently utilized form of shelter were the
tiles The fish also sheltered against the glass and in the
open areas of the aquaria bottoms I natalis only infrequentshy
ly left the tiles while I melas could often be found some
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
17
distance from the nearest tile
Both species exhibited the same two body positions within
the tiles The head was usually within five cm of the opening
Position one was horizontal with the fish completely at rest
The only body motions visible were the opening and closing of
the jaws and operculum Position two was head up at an
angle up to 45 degrees The caudal fin just touched the
bottom of the tile and all fins were constantly in motion
The fish would drift slowly vertically or horizontally and
touch the tile at the sides or top I natalis displayed this
alert position much more then I melas
The horizontal position was also assumed when the fish
were away from the tiles All sizes of I melas demonstrated
this behavio~ but only the dominated I natalis The usual
choice of location was next to a tile or along the aquarium
side A position away from any solid object was usually
assumed only by the larger I melas
One additional position that was assumed was the vertical
This position was demonstrated only by the dominated 3maller
fish of both species The position was the same as the horizonshy
tal except that the ventral portion of the fishs body rested
against an aquarium side or a tile The caudal fin was against
the aquarium bottom and slightly bent from the weight of the
fish This position was often assumed in the aquaria corners
or between a tile and the glass aquaria side
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
18
I melas was often observed sheltering in aggregations
This occurred both in the tiles and on the aquaria bottoms
Bowen (1931) stated that Fishes in older stages which are
not actively aggregating nearly always rest in contact with
one another with the tips of the barblets the ends of the
fin or the tail resting against a companion
I natalis was observed in aggregations only during
periods of stress or excitement Bardach and Villars (1970)
stated that natalis band together when frightened
Agonistic Behavior
This type of behavior was never observed until after the
fish had become accustomed to their new surroundings At
first all of the fish stayed together either in a corner or
in the same tile After one or two days a hierarchy usually
was established and a dominance pattern observed
Dominance was primarily based upon size A fish that
had been dominant in one group became a subordinate to fish
larger than itself when added to an already established
-population Dominance was very clear between the different
size classes but not definite for fish of near equal size
The largest ~ melas was clearly the dominant fish in
its population but its influence was much less than that
expressed by the largest I natalis over its own group
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
19
The I melas tolerated much more physical contact and only
rarely did it actually chase or bite others of its own species
1 natalis on the other hand did not allow any physical
contact except for periods of stress These periods were
either during cleaning of the aquaria or just after the
introduction to a new environment
The largest 1 natalis always commanded the preferred
shelter When in its shelter tile and in the alert position
it always stood its ground if another fish tried to enter
At this time it rapidly moved its head back and forth
laterally and held its jaws wide open as though roaring
at the intruder Todd (1971) stated that mouth displays
varied considerably in intensity The roar as I have called
it is labeled a quiver by Todd who said it usually
preceded either a mouth fight or a chase The smaller fish
always backed away from the larger and no biting was observed
during these encounters
Biting was observed in several separate laboratory aquaria
I me1as were observed biting only one time In this case the
fish were exhibiting sexual behavior and trying to establish
their territories The two victims were badly scratched and
one died before the two could be removed Most of the damage
was caused by scraping against the tiles in trying to escape
and not from the actual bites With I nata1is the most
usual case was when two fish of near equal size were t~ying to
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
20
establish dominance and claim the only tile shelter In
several instances larger I natalis were observed pursuing
smaller specimens and even holding the caudal fin within their
jaws The damage suffered from the bites by the I natalis
was serious The caudal fins were eaten away and death
resulted in three instances The other fish that were
damaged all recovered when moved to new aquaria
Sexual Behavior
No sexual behavior was observed with I natalis They
were not injected with hormones to stimulate reproduction
and exhibited no natural sexual behavior
Seven of the largest I melas were injected with from
03 to 08 cc of Chorionic Gonadotropin on 24 May 1971 One
aquarium contained four large I melas and it was with this
group that the biting was recorded The first scraping or
damage was noted on 5 June 1971
The two largest I melas did not feed at all on 7 June
1971 This was the first time this had ~appened since
observations began From 10 June 1971 until the morning
of 14 July 1971 they fed but appeared very nervous
On 8 July 1971 the two largest I melas were recorded
staying very close to each other They spent most of their
time together and were constantly touching and circling each
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
21
other This activity continued until the afternoon of 14
July 1971 when eggs were first observed
Care-Giving Behavior
The eggs were laid in two masses One mass was approxshy
imately 30 mm high and 20 mm in diameter at its base The
second was 10 mm high and 5 mm in diameter at the bottom
The aquarium where the eggs were laid had no gravel or bottom
filter and the eggs adhered directly to the aquarium bottom
Ulrey Risk and Scott (1938) stated that Because the
eggs of the catfish are laid in a single large mass it seems
certain that they are all laid at one time 1I In the laborashy
tory however the eggs were laid in two masses and this
might indicate that they were laid at two different times
The eggs were constantly fanned by the adult bullheads
No sexing of the two parents was conducted but one of the
two fish did much more of the fanning The two fish differed
in that one had a notched adipose fin and was slightly
larger in size The rounded-adipose fin individual did by
far the most fanning The notched-adipose fin individual
serated the eggs either by itself for brief periods or at
the same time as the other fish
The fanning was done by the pelvic and caudal fins
The fish used only their pelvic fins for short periods (up
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78
22
to one minute) and a rather gentle body motion Between
these periods there were brief (up to 15 seconds) flurries
of activity in which both the caudal and anal fins were used
For the flurry periods the fish drifted downward until the
eggs were between the caudal and pelvic fins and then with
forceful lateral motions swept the eggs with their pelvic
fins
The fish constantly changed positions when fanning
The most frequent move was 180 degrees ~en turning the
parents touched the eggs with their chin barbels which
dragged across the egg mass as they passed over
The adult fish stopped fanning when I approached the
egg ~sses closer than 30 cm The adu1~s did not flee but
rather remained quietly on the bottom with their heads
facing the disturbance Only the notched-ana1-fin individual
stayed over the nest when an underwater object moved near
the fanning fish The other adult always retreated into a
tile
The notched-adipose-fin adult tried to defend the nest
When a pencil was first lowered there was no reaction except
that the fish turned slowly so as to keep facing the pencil
The fish only bit the pencil after it was tapped against the
inside of the aquarium glass The fish opened its mouth very
wide and struck the pencil three times in succession without
the pencil having been removed from the water between bites
23
The bites were vigorous and the pencil was moved sharply in my
hand Teeth were felt scrapping against the wood of the pencil
The eggs were laid on 14 July 1971 and by 1100 hours
on 15 July 1971 over half were missing By 1500 hours of
the same day the remaining eggs were recorded as no longer
visible A thorough search of the aquarium produced no sign
of the eggs There were no recorded disturbances that could
explain the distruction of the eggs
Both parents continued to fan the area where the eggs
were laid The adult with the notched adipose fin was the
fish that did the most fanning as was the case before the
disappearance of the eggs This behavior was last recorded
on 27 July 1971
Eliminative Behavior
No behavior of this type was observed The water became
foul but no solid or liquid wastes were detected
Allelomimetic Behavior
Both melas and natalis displayed this behavior
when first introduced into new surroundings The fish
crowded into one corner of the aquaria or one compartment
of a tile When venturing into the open the smaller fish
usually followed the larger or more aggressive fish This
behavior lasted up to two days for fish that had been just
24
captured but never more then one day for fish transferred
from one aquarium to another Draining and cleaning the
aquaria always caused the fish to group but they stayed
together an average of only two hours ~
As stated in the Shelter-Seeking Behavior section 1
melas ~as often observed in aggregations The aggregations
in the tiles were constantly in motion and there was
considerable shifting of positions by the individuals When
in the open however there were often periods when the fish
would lie next to each other in the horizontal position
When one fish in the resting group moved it caused the others
to shift also
Allelomimetic behavior was frequently observed when the
fish were either searching for food or when actually feeding
At times of feeding agonistic behavior was abandoned and
only ingestive and allelomimetic behaviors were recorded
The smaller fish were the most active and were usually
feeding before the larger fish were out of their shelters
The activity of the smaller fish either feeding or actively
searching for food was investigated frequently by the larger
fish
Investigative Behavior
This behavior was observed when the fish were placed into
a new environment and just after the cleaning of the aquarium
25
When the study area was quiet and there were no disturbances
around the aquaria the fish left their aggregations swam
over the bottom and even part way up the sides and then
returned to their group This routine was followed until
the fish became accustomed to their new or changed environshy
ment
Normal investigation of the open area in the aquaria
occured daily It was usually observed when the lights
were either low or off the water was turbid or there was
no human activity other then myself in the study area
The fish used their eyes for investigations Except
when the water was very turbid or the lights were off they
were able to discern a moving object Moving objects beside
the aquaria frightened the fish but not as much as when above
the aquarium
The chin barbels were used constantly They were always
in motion except when the fish were resting in the horizontal
position The barbels were extended and just touched the
bottom as the fish swam forward Any obJect that the fish
came upon was examined by moving the barbels over and around
the subject
The bullheads were highly sensitive to touch on their
bodies They would examine any object that was touched
When food particles hit a fish on the dorsal surface it
would immediately turn and bite the particle Objects not of
26
food value were not swallowed but were held in the mouth and
then spit out
Escape Behavior
This particular behavior does not include fleeing from
other fish or outside disturbances It was observed only
with I natalis and in this case refers to any attempt for
escape from the confinement of the aquarium Two freshly
captured I natalis did escape from their aquarium the
first night after capture and were found dead on the floor
in the morning Screen tops were then placed on the aquarium
and there were no more escapes One of the larger remaining
I natalis was observed trying to push the screen top off
its aquarium The screen was approximately 10 centimeters
above the water and the fish thrashed violently for periods
of up to five seconds This action was observed with only
one individual fish and recorded seven times within two days
Interspecific Relationships of the Laboratory Specimens
Two experiments were conducted in which the study
specimens were nearly equal in size The dominant individual
in each case was a I natalis
One I natalis and two I melas were maintained in
aquarium A The 1 natalis killed both of the I melas in
13 and 22 days respectively Both individuals had their
27
caudal fins eaten away and the bones exposed The individual
that died first had a hole eaten into the top of its head
behind the eyesmiddot
Two I natalis and ~ melas were housed in aquarium B
The dominant specimen was the larger of the two ~ natalis
The smaller I natalis and the I melas had their caudal fins
eaten away and the damage was done presumably by the domshy
inant individual Both survived the damage and eventually
their wounds healed over
Both aquarium A and B contained only one cylindrical
tile shelter The dominant I natalis specimens used the
inside of the tile shelter and the subordinate fish the
outside The two subordinate I melas in aquarium A stayed
in close contact before their deaths The subordinate I
melas and ~ natalis specimens in aquarium B however
stayed on opposite sides of the tile The subordinate I
nataljs in aquarium B had what appeared to be the least
preferred shelter position which was between the tile and
the front glass
Two experiments were conducted for testing interspecific
relationships between specimens of unequal size
Aquarium C contained six ~ natalis and six ~ melas
The 12 fish were all placed in the aquarium at the same time
The I melas usually fed first but were observed being
---
---
28
chased away from the feeding area by the larger 1 nata1is
When the two species fed together the 1 nata1is were more
aggressive and tEe 1 me1as moved aside The largest 1
nata1is was observed chasing a smaller ~ me1as out of a
tile opening with the caudal fin of the smaller fish in its
mouth Two of the smaller I me1as suffered caudal fin
wounds but this was the only evidence of physical damage
suffered by any of the 12 fish Three of the four tile
compartments were usually occupied by individual 1 nata1is
The fourth compartment was usually shared by the two or more
I me1as
Aquarium D contained seven 1 me1as and one 1 nata1is
The 1 natalis was the same specimen that killed the two I
me1as in aquarium A The 1 nata1is was introduced into an
already established population and was approximately equal
in length to the median-sized 1 me1as The 1 nata1is when
released into the aquarium swam into one of the lower comshy
partments and would not allow any of the 1 me1as to enter
its compartment regardless of size The 1 me1as were
nipped around the caudal fin area when fleeing but were not
bitten when face to face with the I nata1is
Within one week of introduction the 1 nata1is in
aquarium D had changed its shelter location It moved from
one of the lower compartments to an upper one The movement
29
or traffic of I melas was much less in the upper compartments
After the I natalis moved upward t the I melas again utilized
the lower compartments
Ecological Relationships and Distrib4tion
Laboratory Study - Both Species
The amount of light in the study area greatly influenced
the activity of the study species The fish were much more
active when the overhead lights were off Enough light came
in through either the shaded windows (during the day) or the
open door (at night) to make observations When the overshy
head lights were turned on t the fish retreated to their tile
shelters The lights did not influence the bullheads when
hungrYt and they were constantly in motion until their
appetites were sated
The air temperature in the study area was held constant
239~27degC by thermostat and did not vary from these limits
throughout the year The water temperature was approximately
55degC lower than the air temperature
Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeable effect
upon the laboratory specimens The fish fed when the baroshy
metric pressure was rising t falling t or steady
Increased activity was noted when the aquaria water
became turbid with dissolved food particles and body wastes
30
External stimuli almost always frightened the study fish
When people were in the room the fish ventured away from
their shelters only during periods of feeding or hunger
Vibrations transmitted through the aquaria stands were
detected when created within five meters of the aquaria
Movement of a hand or arm was detected within two meters
Field Study
Eighty-four I natalis and 79 1 melas were captured at
30 of the 37 collecting stations on 77 collecting days between
10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 (Table I) ~ natalis were
captured at 26 collecting stations and I melas at 21 Both
species were found together in 17 of the~30 pools in which
bullheads were captured
Metcalf (1959) referring to a Kansas portion of the
Arkansas River basin reported that ~ me1as were found at
every station where I natalis were captured and were usually
several times more abundant
Clarke Breukelman and Andrews (1958) gave the relative
abundance in Lyon County as abundant for I melas and common
for 1 natalis
The collecting station pools varied greatly in size
Table II shows the length width depth and area for each
3station The range was from two to 840 m with a mean of
31761 m bull
31
TABLE I 1 natalis and 1 melas captured at the Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Collecting Station 1 natalis 1 melas
1
2
3
4
5
6 3 1
7 4 2
8 9 1
9 9 3
10 1
11 5 3
12 4 3
13 3 5
14 4
15 2
1
17 4
16 2
14
18 1 2
19 3 3
32
TABLE I (Continued)
Collecting Station Ie- natal is- I me1as
20 4 4
21 8
22 4
23 1
24 4
25
26 1
27 3 14
28 2
29 2
30 ~ 2
31
32 1 1
33 3 4
34 1 2
35 1
36 4
37 4 1
33
TABLE II Pool size for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Length Width Depth Arja m m m m
1 30 2 05 300
2 10 2 04 80
3 65 4 04 1040
4 30 3 06 540
5 15 2 05 150
6 70 4 12 3360
7 20 3 12 720
8 30 2 05 150
9 65 5 20 6500
10 10 3 08 240
11 60 3 09 1620
12 20 15 15 4500
13 50 4 08 1600
14 50 3 08 1200
15 40 8 08 2560
16 40 4 09 1440
17 25 15 20 7500
18 10 2 08 160
34
TABLE II (Continued)
Station Length m
Width m
Depth m
Area m3
19 15 3 15 675
20 10 3 10 300
21 40 4 15 2400
22 2 2 05 20
23 15 5 10 750
24 60 4 08 1920
25 20 4 08 640
26 100 5 05 2500
27 5 3 04 60
28 5 3 04 60
29 20 2 04 160
30 35 4 10 1400
31 60 4 12 2880
32 40 4 15 4200
33 25 7 10 1500
34 12 5 10 600
35 bull 80 7 15 8400
36 45 5 12 2700
37 40 2 04 320
35
Depth was more important than area when considering the
pool sizes The average depth for the collecting stations
was 09 meters The average depth for the 17 pools where
both species were collected was 11 meters 12 meters was
the average depth for the four pools where only 1 melas
were captured The average depth for the nine pools where
only 1 natalis were collected was 07 meters This last
figure would appear to indicate that ~ natalis was found
in pools of less depth than 1 melas The range for the
pools where only I natalis were captured was 04 to 12
meters while that for I melas was 08 to 15 meters
The turbidity of the collecting station pools was quite
low Except for periods of up to seven days following heavy
run-off the turbidity readings were less then 2 ppm This
was the smallest ppm measurement which could be read on the
u S Geological Survey turbidity rod The platinum needle
was visible to the creek bottom
Cross (1967) stated that the characteristic turbidity
is high for 1 melas and clear for 1 natalis Clay
(1962) reported I natalis as largely a creek species that
is not as tolerant of turbidity as 1 melas Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) found that These records indicate that
Ameriurus natalis in the Southwest as well as in the North
inhabits cleaner and swifter water than A melas Trautman
(1957) often found I natalis present in small low-gradient
36
brooks which contained normally clear waters and some aquatic
vegetation
The range for the water temperatures throughout the study
area was slight In August t the range was between 220 and
260degC t with a mean of 240degC When the study ended in
November the same readings ranged from 39 to 67degC t with
a mean of 50degC
Table III shows the bottom description for each of the
collecting stations
Fifty-nine 1 melas were captured in pools with mud
bottoms t as compared to 54 for 1 natalis natalis t
however was found in 19 of the 29 mud-bottomed pools and
I melas only 15
Thirty-five I natal is were captured in pools containing
large rocks Only ten I melas were found in pools with the
same type of cover Eight pools contained the large rocks
and I natalis were found in seven and I melas in five
Except for the mud and large rocks there was no evidence
found to indicate any preference t by either species t forany
particular bottom type
Cross (1967) stated that t The yellow bullhead is
principally a stream-fish t and is most common in clear
permanently-flowing tributaries that have rocky bottoms
Thus its distribution complements that of the blackbullhead t
which seems best adapted to ponds and muddy intermittent
37
TABLE III Bottom description for each of the collecting stations
Station Bottom Description
1 mud
2 mud
3 mud
4 mud
5 mud silt and large scattered rocks
6 mud silt and large scattered rocks
7 rock and much debris
8 rock and much debris
9 mud gravel large rocks and much debris
10 mud and gravel
11 mud clay and rock
12 gravel silt and large and small rocks
13 silt gravel much debris and fallen tree
14 clay silt and largerocks
15 mud silt and large rocks in center
16 rock
17 mud and silt
18 mud gravel and clay
19 mud clay logs and fallen tree
38
TABLE III (Continued)
Station Bottom Description
20 mud rock and logs
21 silt gravel and logs
22 silt gravel and dead trees
23 mud graye1 and rocks
24 mud rocks and clay
25 mud rocks and gravel
26 rock and some mud
27 mud and gravel
28 mud and some rocks
29 mud and gravel
30 mud rocks and gravel
31 mud shale rocks and gravel
32 mud shale rocks and gravel
33 mud and debri
34 mud rocks and gravel
35 mud shale rocks and gravel
36 mud shale and gravel
37 mud gravel and silt
39
creeks These habitats are not fully discrete however both
species are found at many localities The last sentence of
the quote would apply to~ natalis and ~ melas in Clear
Creek
Hall (1934) in Kansas and Larrabee (1926) in Iowa
reported finding 1 melas and 1 natalis in habitats with
muddy bottoms Hall listed both species as being common in
a Kansas lake and creek Minckley (1959) reported that
The yellow bullhead inhabited the muddy-bottomed streams
and the upland gravelly creeks usually occurring in the
headwaters Clear Creek would fit this habitat type
Table IV shows the approximate velocity for each collectshy
ing station
I natalis were more numerous at each of the five
velocities except 08 ftsec A single 1 natalis was the
only bullhead captured in the 25 ftsec pools Table V
shows the per cent of each species captured in areas with
each of the velocities
Both species were most numerous at the 08 and 13 ftsec
velocities - This would indicate a preference for a slower
current and would agree with statements by Dolan (1960) for
1 natalis and Hubbs and Lagler (1958) for both species
It would not agree however with a statement by Hubbs and
Ortenburger (1929) that I natalis inhabited swifter waters
than I melas
--
40
TABLE IV Water velocity for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
1 13
2 25
3 13
4 13
5 25
6 13
7 13
8 (08
9 13
10 25
11 17
12 13
13 (08
14 13
15 13
16 17
17 13
18 13
19 13
41
TABLE IV (Continued)
Collecting Station Velocity in ftsec
20 17
21 08
22 08
23 17
24 08
25 08
26 lt08
27 08
28 08
29 08
30 08
31 08
32 (08
33 08
34 08
35 (08
36 08
37 08
The velocity is expressed in ft7sec and is the mean of two readings for each collecting station
42
TABLE V Per cent of I melasand natalis captured for each velocity at the collecting stations on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Per Cent () Velocity I natalis I melas- -
08 14 8
08 30 47
13 41 35
17 14 10
25 1 0
Velocity is expressed in ftsec
Table VI shows the pool-bank description for each
collecting station
Seventy-one per cent of the bullheads were captured in
pools with some undercutting When broken down to species
however the figures are 76 per cent for ~ natalis and 65
for I melas
The type of bank did not noticeably influence the
number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
Table VII shows the aquatic flora for each collecting
station
Eighty-six per cent of the I melas and 78 per cent of
I natalis were captured in pools containing coontail
43
TABLE VI Bank description for each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Undercutting Description
1 dirt
2 X dirt and tree
3 X dirt and tree
4 dirt
5 dirt
6 dirt
7 X dirt and tree
8 X dirt
9 X dirt gravel and tree
10 X dirt and bridge
11 X dirt and tree
12 dirt
13 dirt
14 X dirt and tree
15 X dirt
16 dirt shale and seep
17 dirt
18 X dirt and grass gravel
44
TABLE VI (Continued)
Station Undercutting Description
19 X dirt
20 dirt and grass
21 X grass and gravel
22 X dirt and grass
23 X dirt bridge and grass
24 X dirt and grass
25 dirt
26 X dirt and woody shrubs
27 X dirt grass and tree
28 X dirt and grass
29 X dirt gravel grass and ws
30 X dirt grass and ws
31 X dirt rock grass and ws
32 X dirt grass and ws
33 X dirt grass and ws
34 X dirt grass and ws
35 X dirt grass and ws
36 X dirt grass and ws
37 X dirt grass and ws
The letters ws denote woody shrubs
45
TABLE VII Aquatic flora found in each of the Clear Creek collecting stations
Station Aquatic Flora
1 none
2 filamentous algae
3 filamentous algae
4 filamentous algae
5 filamentous algae
6 filamentous algae and coontail
7 coontail and filamentous algae
8 filamentous algae
9 filamentous algae and coontail
10 filamentous algae
11 filamentous algae
12 filamentous algae and coontail
13 coontail
14 coontail
15 coontail
16 duck weed and coontail
17 coontail
18 coontail sedge and grass
46
TABLE VII (Continued)
Station Aquatic Flora
19 filamentous algae
20 coontail sedge and grass
21 filamentous algae coontail grass and duckweed
22 filamentous algae
23 coontail and filamentous algae
24 coontail filamentous algae sedge and cattails
25 filamentous algae
26 filamentous algae and coontail
27 filamentous algae and coontail
28 sedge and coontail
29 sedge and coontail
30 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
31 sedge coontail and filamentous algae
32 coontail and filamentous algae
coontail and filamentous algae33
34 filamentous algae coontail and duckweed
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
36
35
filamentous algae coontail and sedge
filamentous algae coontail sedge and duckweed
37
47
(Ceratophyllum Sp) Even though more 1 melas were captured
in the pools with coontail only 1 natalis were captured in
the three pools that were choked with that plant Seventy-six
per cent of the 1 natalis and 63 per cent of the 1 melas
were found in pools with filamentous algae The other species
of aquatic flora present in the stream did not appear to
affect the number of individuals or species found in the
different pools
Hubbs and Lagler (1949) reported 1 natalis as being
more common than the other bullheads in clean waters with
a growth of aquatic vegetation Clear Creek would fit this
category and 1 natalis was indeed more numerous than 1
melas Both species were found frequently (Hall 1934) in
weedy habitats in a Kansas lake and creek
Table VIII shows the climatic data for each of the
collecting days
Both of the species were captured in greater numbers
when the daytime high temperature was above 156degC I melas
was captured more frequently than 1 natalis above this
temperature but were outnumbered after the temperature
dropped below 156 degrees No bullheads were captured the
one day that the high temperature was 22degC or the three days
that the low temperatures were below -lloC
Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the days
that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per cent of
TABLE VIII Climatic data for each collecting day on Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
August
10 278 200 2997 Down 52
11 31 7 200 3008 Steady 35
12 328 167 2999 Steady 48
13 31 7 200 3002 Steady 20
14 333 178 3009 Up 28
16 ---shy 183 3019 Down 59
17 31 7 150 3013 Down 45
18 311 156 3002 Down 45
19 317 226 3005 Down 37
20 333 200 3003 Down 32
21 333 206 2993 Steady 63
23 ---shy 189 2992 Down 54
~
24 333 217 3004 Steady 43 co
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
26 361 178 3005 Up 47
27 333 156 3011 Down 49
30 ---shy 128 3010 Down 46
31 294 133 3003 Down 42
September
1 300 172 2995 Steady 41
3 333 206 2983 Down 52
4 328 244 29~83 Down 70
7 ---shy 21 7 2994 Down 54
8 339 228 2995 Down SO
9 367 161 3000 Down 49
10 350 183 2995 Down 46
13 ---shy 150 2995 Down 38
14 31 7 189 2971 Steady 37 ~ 0
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
15 322 156 3003 Down 36
16 300 83 3006 Steady 47
17 222 11 7 3028 Down 41 Trace
21 ---- 50 3022 Down 16
22 222 106 3020 Down 57 Trace
23 228 89 3040 Down 44
24 211 106 3026 Down 70
25 189 133 2996 Steady 87 90
27 ---- 211 2976 Down 42
28 306 211 2990 Up 57
29 322 200 2999 Down 53
30 294 200 2992 Down 50
VI o
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
J6
October
1 3U6 194 2989 Down 56
2 294 167 2991 Up 81 08
4 ---- 67 3012 Down 25
5 228 100 3015 Steady 29
6 267 83 3023 Down 44
7 283 122 3004 Down 36
8 267 139 3008 Steady 37
9 306 33 3018 Steady 43
11 ---- 100 3001 Down 23
12 250 67 2983 Down 23
13 244 67 3004 Down 40
14 300 89 2984 Steady 40
15 211 11 2987 Down 54 In
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
16 272 161 2998 Down 90
18 ---shy 172 2981 Steady tJ7 31
19 250 100 3001 Steady 53 33
20 172 11 3002 Down 93 26
21 139 122 3019 Down 87
22 144 11 7 3008 Steady 66
23 150 11 7 3009 Steady 88
25 ---shy 89 2999 Steady 75
26 206 144 2972 Down 73
27 244 111 2965 Up 50 04
November
3 194 -06 3031 Down 34
4 167 28 3004 Down 33
8 ---shy -06 3007 Down 76 14 VI N
TABLE VIII (Continued)
Temperature Date Noon Low BP BP Trend RH Precipitation
9 61 11 3032 Down 38
10 56 22 3015 Down 22
11 144 00 3014 Down 22
12 183 78 2984 Down 38
15 ---- 122 3005 Down 59
16 239 128 3005 Down 93 22
17 233 122 2977 Down 70
18 156 28 3005 Up 73 Trace
19 189 -33 3006 Down 41
20 77 44 2989 Steady 30
22 ---- -38 3013 Down 82
23 67 -11 3013 Down 82 Snow-40
24 22 -17 3025 Down 89
VI wThe letters BP = Barometric Pressure and RH = Relative Humidity
The Precipitation is in inches
54
the days that it was steady When it was rising however
I natalis were captured on 40 per cent of the days and I
melas on 49 per cent Sixty-two per cent of the ~ natalis
and 68 per cent of the ~ melas were captured when the
barometric pressure was in the thirties
When the barometric pressure was in the twenties the
fish-per-day amounted to 092 for ~ natalis and 087 for
I melas 089~ natalis and 102 I melas per day were
captured when the reading was in the thirties
Forty-eight per cent of the collecting days had relative
humidities in the forties and fifties Sixty-two per cent
of all the bullheads were captured during these days The
percentage of total fish captured increased as the relative
humidity rose to the forties and decreased after the
relative humidity reached the fifties The one exception
was when the relative humidity was in the sixties (which
was recorded on only two days) when three per cent of the
bullheads were captured There was no discernible pattern
for the number of either species captured at the different
humidities
Eighty-two per cent of the bullheads were captured on
the days with no precipitation These days accounted for
85 per cent of the collecting days Five per cent of the
days had only a trace of moisture and on these days seven
per cent of the study species were captured Ten per cent
55
of the days had more than a trace of moisture and eleven
per cent of the fish were captured on these days More
I melas than 1 natalis were captured on the days with only
a trace or no precipitation 1 natalis however outshy
numbered I melas for the days with more than a trace of
precipitation
Toth (unpublished research problem 1968) reported
finding leeches (Myzobdella moorei) on specimens of I melas No leeches were found on any I melas during this
study but four I natalis were captured with leeches (species
unknown) attached
The four I natal is that were infested with leeches
were collected at stations 32 33 and 36 These captures
took place between 4 October 1971 and 13 October 1971 Two
of the fish were in age group III and one each were in age
groups II and IV
Twelve attached leeches were observed in all This
would agree with the one to three-per-host intensity as
given by Harms (1960) All of the leeches were attached
to the skin at the base of the chin barbels
When the leeches were pulled off of the fish a small
circular wound was left One I natalis was captured at
station 33 that had small circular scars around its chin
barbels The scars were completely healed and matched the
wounds that were left when the leeches were pulled off
56
GRowrH
Length-freguency Distribution
The estimated ages of the captured bullheads were
obtained by plotting length-frequency distributions Figure
3 illustrates the length-frequency distributions for the
79 ~ melas and 84 ~ natalis captured from the Clear Creek
collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November
1971
Four age groups were obtained for each of the two
species The peaks in the distribution curves appear to
indicate that I mela~ attains a slightly greater length
during the first year but that ~ natalis is longer at
ages II and III The peaks for the age group IV individuals
were at 250 centimeters for both species
Frequency distributions for the captured bullheads
showed a normal decreasing frequency for ~ melas (Fig 4)
but a high second year frequency for ~ natalis (Fig 5)
A frequency distribution similar to that shown for natalis
was reported by Schoffman (1955) In that case however
it was the age group III that was high
Population Estimates
All of the captured bullheads were marked and released
Nineteen of the 79 I melas and 12 of the 84 I natalis were
Ln
250
melas ---shy
-_~~~-~-
200
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTllfETERS
L nata1is
1
~
f
_ ___ __~-- 1LV ------t- ----~-------- -- shy -I -----------f---------t-------~-- ------~~- -I
Figure 3 Length-frequencies of 79 I melas and 84 I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 Novemb~r 1971 -
15
~ j 12
11
10
9 ti Cf)
8H ~
~ 7 0
p 6 ~
~ 5 ~ 4
3
2 t
11 I -------- j --------middot--I--middot--------t-shy -- -----
100 150
40
58
I j
I 30
(I)
8 L
H U ~ p (I)
20 ~ 0
~ ~ rQ
~
10
I II III
AGE IN YEARS IV
Figure 4 Frequency distribution of 79 I melas grouped into age groups
60
59
50
10
4Q+
j
(j
z ~
2S v ~ p ]
()
30 ~ 0 T ~ ~
i
cI 1
sect i
z
20
I II III IV AGE IN YEARS
Figure 5 Frequency distribution of 84 nata1is grouped into age groups
60
recaptured Using the mark and recapture procedure (Rouseshy
fell and Everhart 1953) resulted in population estimates
of 328 I me1as and 588 I natalis for Clear Creek
Cross (1967) in referring to I me1as stated The
species is not abundant in large streams where bottoms are
rocky or sandy nor in small streams that have a permanent
flow of clear water Clear Creek fits the latter portion
of the statement by Cross and is a possible explanation
for the difference in estimated populations
Absolute Growth
The average total 1enghts and weights for each of the
age groups of I me1as and I nata1is are shown in Tables
IX and X
The average length of ~ me1as for age groups I-IV was
higher than the average found by Houser and Collins (1962)
for 19 Oklahoma streams Their study found that in Oklashy
homa the averages for streams were considerably lower than
those of other waters However except for age group I
the average length for all Oklahoma waters was higher than
that for Clear Creek
Lewis (1949) determined the age of 218 I me1as from an shy
Iowa stream Vertebral ring counts were made to determine
age and this showed agreement with a length frequently distrishy
bution chart for the first three age groups The length
61
TABLE IX Average total lengths and weights for each age group of melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 128 294
II 164 513
III 192 1008
IV 242 1730
TABLE X Average total lengths and weights for each age group of I nata1is captured from Clear Creek between-10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Average Growth Age in Years Length (cm) Weight (g)
I 122 169
II 162 476
III 217 1280
IV 246 1968
62
averages obtained for I melas from Clear Creek were higher
than that found by Lewis but within the range of lengths
for age groups I II and III No individual fish captured
by Lewis was as long as the average age IV fish from Clear
Creek
Sandoz (1960) calculated growth rates for both I melas
and I natalis from a reservoir drainage system in Oklahoma
The average lengths for the age groups were below those
found for Clear Creek Sandoz aged only group I and II for
I melas but groups I-IV for I natalis He listed I
natalis as being 06 centimeters longer for year I but 114
centimeters for both species at year II
The average total lengths and weights of Tables IX and
X were then plotted graphically to show the calculated growth
in length (Fig 6) and weight (Fig 7) for the study species
I natalis weighed less then I melas at years I and II but
was heavier at years III and IV
Length-weight Relationships
Tables XI and XII show the numbers of fish and average
weights used to calculate the length-weight relationships
of I melas and I natalis
Logarithmic equations were calculated to express the
relationships between length and weight for the study species
Figure 6 Calculated growth in length of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
63
4
1 melas
3
I natalis
t 2
AGE IN YEARS
25 Ii
201 I
f I
1
1StII I
l~l j I I I jJI f I 1
51 I r
1 o~
(f)
r4 ~ H
~ HZ ~ u Z H
c H o Z ~ I
~ o H
200+
I
64
I
43
----__-_
1 y bull --shy
2
AGE IN YEARS
I natalis
Figure 7 Calculated growth in weight of 79 I melas and 84 I natalis captured from Clear Creek collecting stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
150J UJ
~ cr Z H
Eo-ltr 0shyH
~ 100 ~
I I
II I melasI
I 50+
65
TABLE XI Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of l me1as
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
102 1 130 141 1 450
110 2 145 144 1 330
114 1 170 145 1 380
115 1 50 146 1 290
11 7 2 245 149 1 450
118 1 330 151 2 375
121 1 340 153 2 395
123 1 270 150 1 450
124 1 270 157 2 390
125 4 245 158 1 320
126 3 327 160 1 400
129 1 330 161 2 530
130 1 300 162 1 580
131 2 350 163 2 590
134 2 235 164 1 600
135 2 360 165 2 520
136 1 410 167 2 455
137 1 450 169 1 600
138 1 430 170 1 700
66
TABLE XI (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
173 1 620 188 1 820
174 1 620 191 1 1070
178 1 600 195 2 1050
180 2 670 196 1 1090
182 1 750 199 1 1100
183 1 860 205 1 1430
184 1 1010 208 1 1220
185 2 850 215 1 1220
186 4 943 242 1 1730
67
TABLE XII Number of fish and average weights used to calculate the length-weight relationshyship of I natalis
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
cm Fish Grams cm Fish Grams
104 1 160 154 2 375
105 1 30 155 1 340
111 1 90 158 2 430
115 2 235 160 1 380
11 7 1 40 161 1 560
118 2 190 162 3 503
125 2 170 163 3 483
126 1 190 166 1 450
130 3 190 167 1 550
133 1 170 168 1 720
139 2 215 169 1 570
142 3 293 170 2 540
145 3 340 172 1 560
147 3 303 173 1 710
148 1 290 174 1 470
149 1 250 175 2 640
150 3 393 176 1 720
151 3 470 178 1 700
152 2 290 179 1 500
153 2 310 180 1 850
68
TABLE XII (Continued)
Total Number Average Total Number Average Length of Weight Length of Weight
em Fish Grams em Fish Grams
185 2 745 217 1 1180
186 1 650 220 1 1300
187 1 580 222 1 1360
200 1 820 227 1 1480
202 1 1230 228 1 1360
211 1 1310 245 3 1973
212 2 1150 250 1 1950
---
69
The equations were as follows
I me1as log W ~ -29533 + 37974 log L
I natal is logW ~ -19815 + 30743 log L
Where W = weight in grams and L = total length in
centimeters (Tables XIII and XIV)
Figures 8 and 9 show the length-weight relationships
for I me1as and I nata1is from Clear Creek The dots
represent empirical averages (Tables XIII and XIV) and
the curves are graphs of the length-weight equation
Condition Factor
The condition factor or coefficient of condition
expresses the condition (degree of plumpness) of a fish
in numerical terms (Lagler 1956) Tables XIII and XIV
illustrate the average condition factor for each of the
recorded capture lengths The average condition factor
for I me1as was 131 This was greater than the 109
found for 1 natalis and would indica~e that on the
average 1 melas were more robust or plump than I
nata1is Car1ander (1969) reported similar condition
factors for the two species He gave a condition factor
of 138 for 8130 I melas and 121 for 317 1 natalis
The values of the condition factor for I me1as did
not follow any apparent pattern when considered for the
70
TABLE XIII Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I me1as from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
102 13 123 137 45 1 75
110 245 109 138 43 164
114 17 115 141 45 161
115 5 033 144 33 loll
11 7 245 103 145 38 125
118 33 201 146 29 093
121 34 192 149 45 136
123 27 145 151 375 109
124 27 142 153 395 loll
125 245 126 156 45 119
126 326 163 157 39 101
129 33 154 158 32 081
130 30 137 160 40 098
131 35 156 161 53 128
134 235 098 162 58 136
135 36 146 163 59 136
136 41 163 164 60 136
71
TABLE XIII (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
165 52 116 185 85 134
167 455 098 186 943 148 169 60 124 188 82 123
170 70 142 191 107 154
173 62 120 195 105 142
174 62 118 196 109 145
178 60 106 199 110 140
180 67 115 205 143 166
182 75 124 208 122 136
183 86 140 215 122 123
184 101 162 242 173 122
72
TABLE XIV Length-weight relationship and condition factor K(TL) of I natalis from Clear Creek
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
cm cm
104 16 142 152 29 083
105 j 026 153 31 087
111 9 066 154 375 103
115 235 155 155 34 091
117 4 025 158 43 109
118 19 116 160 38 093
125 17 087 161 56 134
126 19 095 162 503 118
130 19 086 163 483 112
133 17 072 166 45 098
139 215 080 167 55 118
142 193 102 168 72 152
145 34 loll 169 57 118
147 303 095 170 54 110
148 29 089 172 56 110
149 25 076 173 71 137
150 393 117 174 47 089
151 47 140 175 64 120
73
TABLE XIV (Continued)
Total Weight Average Total Weight Average Length Grams K(TL) Length Grams K(TL)
em em
176 72 132 211 131 139
178 70 124 212 115 121
179 50 087 21 7 118 115
180 85 146 220 130 122
185 745 118 222 136 124
186 65 101 227 148 127
187 58 089 228 136 115
200 82 103 245 1973 134
202 123 149 250 195 125
200
~ 150
~ ai 100 tf)
H
G H ~
r 50__
to bull
bull -_
--shy ----- ----------shy---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I i---t
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1~ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTIHETERS
-lFigure 8 Length-weight relationship of 79 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting JOshystations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
200middot
150
50
100~
_~-r
-~--
-shy
v ~
~~~ ~_
~----- bull 10 1
10 I
11 12 I
13 -l
14 Imiddot
15 Imiddot
16 I -j
17 I
18 --middotmiddot-I--middot--middotmiddotjmiddot----1-------1---middot-middotI--middot---~----I-
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TOTAL LENGTH IN CENTUfETERS
Figure 9 Length-weight relationship of 84 I me1as captured from Clear Creek collecting -J
stations between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971 V1
76
different age groups (Table XV) The condition factors for
1middot natalis however became progressively greater through
the age groups (Table XVI)
77
TABLE XV The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l melas captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 34 138
2 26 115
3 18 142
4 1 122
TABLE XVI The values of the condition factor K(TL) for each age group of l natalis captured from Clear Creek between 10 August 1971 and 26 November 1971
Age in Years Number of Fish K(TL)
1 17 092
2 54 110
3 9 126
4 4 132
CHAPTER IV
SUMMARY
1 A study of two sympatric species of bullheads
Ictalurus melas (Rafinesque) and Ictalurus natalis (Le
Sueur) was conducted from October 1970 to November
1971 A laboratory study was conducted on the Kansas
State Teachers College campus for determining the species
behavior ecology and interspecific relationships A
field study was conducted on Clear Creek a small stream
in west-central Lyon County to determine distribution
and growth data for the study species
2 I melas fed more readily in the aquarium I
natalis left their shelters much less than I melas I
melas often aggregated and rested with body contact I
natalis aggregated only when frightened and would othershy
wise allow no physical contact The large I natalis were
much more dominant over their populations and much biting
was observed Only one case of biting was observed for
I melas Sexual and care-giving behavior were observed
only with I melas 1 natalis were observed trying to
escape from the aquaria but no ~ melas made the attempt
3 Individual I natalis were the dominant fish in
the mixed populations Subordinate fish (of either species)
were physically damaged or chased away from the dominant
specimens shelter Two 1 melas were killed by a I
79
natalis of nearly equal size This same individual when
introduced into an already established population of I
melas became the dominant fish even though four of the
I melas were longer and heavier
4 The ecological conditions affected both species
the same The amount of light influenced activity The
fish were much more active when the overhead lights were
off The lights did not influence the bullheads when they
were hungry Changes in barometric pressure had no noticeshy
able effect upon the laboratory specimens Increased
activity was noticed when the water was turbid External
stimuli such as movement or vibrations always frightened
the study fish
5 Eighty-four 1 natalis and 79 1 melas were
captured at 30 of the 37 collecting stations between 18
August 1971 and 26 November 1971 1 natalis were captured
at 26 stations and I melas at 21
6 12 meters was the average depth of the four pools
where only 1 melas were captured The average depth for the
nine pools where only 1 natalis were captured was 07 meters
7 An almost equal number of specimen were captured
from pools with mud bottoms 1 natalis however were found
in 19 of the 29 pools and I melas in only 15 Thirty-five
I natalis were found in seven of the eight pools with
large rocks Only ten 1 melas were captured from five of
80
the eight pools No evidence was found to indicate a
preference by either species for the remaining bottom
types of Clear Creek
8 I natalis were more numerous than I melas at
four of the five recorded water velocities The one
velocity with more I natalis was the second slowest
Both species were most numerous at the same two velocities
The two velocities were the second and third slowest and
indicated a preference for a slow current
9 The type of bank did not noticeably influence
the number of bullheads in the pools Both species were
represented almost equally with the different bank types
10 Both species showed a preference for the pools
with more then just a trace of aquatic flora ~ melas
were more numerous in all of the pools with coontail
(Ceratophyllum sp) but only I natalis were captured from
the three pools with a heavy growth of this plant species
11 Both of the study species were captured when the
daytime high was above l56degC ~ melas was captured more
frequently then 1 natalis above this temperature but the
reverse was true when it went below l56degC The same
results were recorded when the low temperature was below
44degC
12 Both species were captured on 57 per cent of the
days that the barometric pressure was falling and 39 per
81
cent of the days that it was steady I me1as however
were captured on more days when the barometric pressure
was rising More~ me1as were captured per day when the
reading was in the thirties The reverse was true for
the days with the barometric pressure in the twenties
13 There was no discernible pattern for the number
of either species captured at the different humidities
14 More I me1as than I nata1is were captured on
the days with only a trace or no precipitation I
nata1is however outnumbered I me1as for the days
with more than a trace of precipitation
15 Leeches were found on four specimens of I
nata1is No leeches or scars were observed on any
specimens of I me1as
16 Four age groups were obtained for each of the
two species I me1as attains a slightly greater length
at group I but I natalis is longer at age groups II and
III Age group IV was the same length for both species
17 I me1as had a normal frequency distribution
(number decreasing each year) but I nata1is had a high
age group II
18 Nineteen of the 79 I me1as and 12 of the 84 I
nata1is were recaptured Populations were estimated at
328 I me1as and 588 I nata1is
19 I nata1is weighed less then I me1as at years
82
I and II but was heavier at years III and IV
20 I melas had a higher condition factor than I
natalis The average for I melas was 131 and for I natalis 109 The condition factors for the age groups
of I melas did not follow any apparent pattern I
natalis however had condition factors that progressively
increased from group I through groups IV
LITERATURE CITED
Bailey RM 1956 A revised list of the fishes of Iowa with keys for identification p 327-377 In Iowa fish and fishing Iowa Conserve Comm bullbull Des Moines Iowa
Bardach John and Trudy Villars 1970 Three fleeing bullheads Natur Rist 79 36-41
Bowen Edith S 1931 The role of the sense organs in aggregations of Ameiurus me1as Eco1 Monogr 1 1-35
Breuke1man John 1966 What have I caught Forestry Fish and Game Commission Pratt Ks 36 p
______~------_ Thomas A Eddy and Emily L Hartman 1961 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation Kansas School Naturalist 7(4) 1-16
Car1ander Kenneth D 1969 Handbook of freshwater fishery biology The Iowa State Univ Press Ames Iowa 752 p
Clarke Robert F John Breukelman and Ted F Andrews 1958 An annotated check list of the vertebrates of Lyon County Kansas Trans Kan Acad Sci 61(2) 165-194
Clay William M 1962 A field manual of Kentucky fishes Kentucky Dept of Fish and Wildlife Resources vii + 147 p
Cross FB 1967 Handbook of Fishes of Kansas University of Kansas 357 p
Darnell Reznest M and RB Meierotto mination of feeding chronology in fAmer Fish Soc 91(3) 313-320
1962 ishes
DetershyTrans
Dolan Tom 1960 Know your fish Sports Afield New York NY
Eddy Samuel 1957 How to know the freshwater fishes Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 253 p
85
1947 Northern fishes (Ref Ed) Univ Minn Press 276 p
Elkin Ronald E 1954 The fish population of two cutoff pools in Salt Creek Osage Country Oklahoma Proc Okla Acad Sci 35 25-29
Esterly Calvin O 1917 Specificity in behavior and the relation between habits in nature and reactions in the laboratory Univ of Calif Zoo 16(20) 381-392
Forney JL 1955 Life history of the black bullhead Ameiurus melas (Rafinesque) of Clear Lake Iowa Iowa St J Sci 30(1) 145-162
Hall Harry H 1934 An ecological study of the fishes of Mineral Lake Kansas Trans Kansas Acad Sci 37 225-233
Harms Clarence E 1960 Some parasites of catfish from Kansas Jour Parasit 46(6) 695-701
Hartman Emily L 1960 The FB and Rena G Ross Natural History Reservation The Emporia State Research Studies 8 (1) 40 p
Houser Alfred and C Collins 1962 Growth of black bullhead catfish in Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 79 18 p
Hubbs Carl L and AI Ortenburger 1929 Fishes collected in Oklahoma and Arkansas in 1927 Univ of Oklahoma Biological Survey 1(3) 47-112
and KF Lagler 1958 Fishes of the Great Lakes region (Second Ed) Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26 xiii + 213 p
Lagler Karl F 1956 Freshwater Biology Wm C Brown Co Dubuque Iowa 421 p
Langlois TH 1936 Length-weight relationships in Ohio State fish ponds Copeia 1936(2) 120 p
Larrabee Austin P 1926 An ecological study of the fishes of the Lake Okoboji region Univ of Iowa Studies XI(12) 14-15
86
Lewis William M 1949 The use of vertebrae as indicators of the age of the northern black bullhead Ameiurus ~ melas (Rafinesque) Is St J Sci 23(2) 209shy218
Metcalf AL 1959 Fishes of Chautauqua Cowley and Elk counties Kansas Univ Kansas Publ Mus Nat Hist 11(6) 345-400
Minckley WL 1959 Fishes of the Big Blue River basin Kansas University of Kansas Publications Museum of Natural History 11(7) 401-442
Rounsefell George A and WH Everhart 1953 Fishery science Its methods and applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc New York 444 p
Sandoz O 1960 A pre-impoundment study of Arbuckle Reservoir Rock Creek Murray County Oklahoma Okla Fish Res Lab Rep 77 28 p
Schoffman Robert J 1955 Age and rate of growth of the yellow bullhead in Reelfoot Lake Tennessee J Tenn Acad Sci 30(1) 4-7
Scott John P 1958 Animal behavior Univ of Chicago Press Chicago 281 p
Todd John H 1971 The chemical languages of fishes Scientific American 224 98-106
Toth Andre 1968 Ecto- and Endoparasites of the Black Bullhead (Ictalurus melas) in Lyon County Unpub masters thesis KSTC Emporia Kansas
Trautman MB 1957 The fishes of Ohio Ohio St Univ Press 683 p
Ulrey L C Risk and W Scott 1938 The number of eggs produced by some of our common freshwater fishes Invest Ind Lakes and Streams 1(6) 73-78