Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dr. Vincent J. Carbone, Director 614 Corporate Way,
Board Certified Behavior Analyst-Doctoral Valley Cottage, NY 10989 Certificate # 1-00-0232 Vincent J. Carbone, Ed.D., BCBA, LLC Phone: 845-267-0920
Fax: 845-267-0921
Kristin Albert, M. Ed., Assistant Director www.carboneclinic.com Board Certified Behavior Analyst Certificate #1-08-4241
Jaimie Weinlein, MAT, Supervisor of Education & Therapy
BEHAVIOR REDUCTION PLAN
Sabrina: Sabrina
Date of Birth:
Age: 9 years, 3 months
Disability: Autism
Parents/Guardian:
Clinic Start Date: 07/16/2013
Reported By: Lisa Reynolds, M.Ed., BCBA; Kristin Zulkeski, B.S., BCaBA; Julien Mollereau
Approved by: Jaimie Weinlein, MAT; Kristin Albert, M.Ed., BCBA
Date of Report: 07/26/2013
Brief Description of Assessment Methods
During a 4-session assessment period from July 16, 2013 to July 19, 2013, sequence analysis
(antecedent-behavior-consequence; ABC) data were recorded on the frequency and cumulative
duration of problematic behaviors emitted by Sabrina that interfered with instruction. The
following clinic-wide definitions of episode and cumulative duration were used when recording
data on problem behaviors:
An episode of problem behavior begins with the emission of a response that is a member
of any of the topographical response classes defined below and ends when there is a
break of at least 3 seconds during which no additional responses that are members of any
of the topographical response classes defined below are emitted. Any response, which is
a member of any of the topographical response classes defined below, emitted following
an inter-response time greater than 3 seconds shall constitute the beginning of a new
episode of problem behavior.
The cumulative duration is the amount of time (i.e., seconds and/or minutes) during
which episodes of problem behavior are emitted within a session. The duration of each
episode of problem behavior is measured from the beginning to the end of that episode in
accordance with the above definition. Therefore, the shortest duration for any episode of
problem behavior will be 3 seconds. The durations of individual episodes are added
together to calculate the cumulative duration for a session.
Across the 4-session assessment period, Sabrina emitted a cumulative total of 72 episodes of
problem behavior, lasting for a cumulative duration of 43 minutes and 0 seconds. This averaged
out to 18 episodes per session, lasting for an average cumulative duration of 10 minutes and 45
2
seconds per session. Episodes of problem behavior included the topographies listed below. Of
the 72 total episodes of problem behavior, 10 occurred when Sabrina was interrupted or
transitioned from a reinforcing activity, 7 occurred when Sabrina was denied access to a
reinforcer (told “no”), 16 occurred when there was a motivating operation (MO) that was strong
but Sabrina manded inappropriately, 10 occurred when Sabrina was presented with demands
during discrete trial instruction (DTI), 11 occurred when Sabrina was presented with demands
during activities, 5 occurred when automatic reinforcement was high in value, 13 occurred when
the MO was unclear (i.e., “Out of the Blue”), and 0 occurred when another MO was in effect.
Based on these data, the following behaviors have been topographically defined and targeted for
reduction:
Biting (B): Opening the mouth and placing an item or any body part (often the part of her palm
between her thumb and wrist) between her teeth and closing her jaw so that teeth close around
body part or item.
Bolting (BT): Leaving or attempting to leave (walking or running) an activity or setting in
which she is engaged or has been instructed to stay.
Crying (C): The production of tears. Often accompanied by whining (emitting vocal wailing
sounds or high pitched, non-functional noises consisting of intelligible or unintelligible speech
sounds/words) and/or the emission of vocalizations at an excessively loud and socially
unacceptable volume.
Flopping (F): When not instructed to do so, any sudden drop to the ground, or attempt to do so,
that occurs while sitting or standing.
Grabbing (G): Any extension of the hand or arm in the direction of an object or person
accompanied by wrapping or attempting to wrap her fingers around that object or person. May,
but does not have to, be accompanied by squeezing of the object or person.
Physical Resistance (P): When physically prompted, using or attempting to use any part of her
body to push against the instructor in the opposite direction of the prompt that lasts more than 3
seconds.
Shoes Off (SO): Any instance in which shoes are removed from feet, when not instructed to do
so, either by using her hands or using the other foot to push the shoe off of the opposite foot.
This is only considered a problem behavior if Sabrina does not comply with “keep your shoes
on” or “put your shoes back on” within 3 seconds of instruction to do so.
Whining (W): Any time Sabrina emits vocal wailing sounds or high pitched, non-functional
noises consisting of intelligible or unintelligible speech sounds/words that are not accompanied
by tears.
3
Problem Behavior Summary Data Sheet
Across Antecedents
Date
07/16 07/17 07/18 07/19 Cumulative
Total
Interruption/
Transition
3 1 4 2 10
Told “No”/
Denied Access
1 2 2 2 7
MO Strong but
Mands
Inappropriately
3 10 2 1 16
Demand during
DTI
2 1 0 7 10
Demand during
Activities
9 2 0 0 11
Automatic
Reinforcement is
High in Value
1 1 2 1 5
MO Unclear/Out
of the Blue 1 10 0 2 13
Other
0 0 0 0 0
Total frequency
20 27 10 15 72
Total duration
6:05 19:15 3:57 13:43 43:00
4
Tentative Functional Analysis and Possible Treatments
Antecedent /
Frequency
Behaviors
Tentative Analysis
of Function
Possible
Treatment
Data Collection
Interruption/
Transition
10
BT, C, F, G, P, W Socially-mediated
positive and negative
reinforcement
Interruption/
Transition Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
Told No/
Denied Access
(7)
BT, C, F, W, SO,
G
Socially-mediated
positive
reinforcement
Told No Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
MO Strong but
Mands
Inappropriately
(16)
BT, G, P, W, C Socially-mediated
positive
reinforcement
Count and Mand
Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
Demand during
DTI (10)
B, C, W, P Socially-mediated
negative
reinforcement
Demand During
Discrete Trial
Instruction Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
Demand during
Activities (11)
C, W, F, SO, B,
BT, P
Socially-mediated
negative
reinforcement
Demand During
Activities Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
Automatic
reinforcement is
high in value
(5)
B, P Automatic positive
reinforcement
Response Blocking Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
MO
Unclear/Out of
the Blue (13)
B, BT, C, F, G, P,
SO, W
Socially-mediated
positive and negative
reinforcement
Out of the Blue
Protocol
Total frequency and
cumulative duration of
episodes of problem
behavior per session by
antecedent
5
Functional Definitions of Problem Behavior
Sequence analysis data recorded on Sabrina’s problem behavior suggest that the problem
behaviors listed above are multiply-controlled.
The antecedent conditions that evoked problem behavior included: when interrupted from a
preferred item or activity and/or transitioned to another item or activity, when Sabrina was told
“no” or denied access to a reinforcing item or activity, when an MO was strong by Sabrina
manded inappropriately, when demands were presented during DTI, when demands were
presented during activities, when automatic reinforcement was high in value, and when the
specific MO was unclear (i.e., out of the blue).
These data suggest that there may be a functional relationship between the responses and a
history of access to socially-mediated positive reinforcement (SMPR), socially mediated
negative reinforcement (SMNR), and automatic positive reinforcement (APR).
Interruption/Transition Antecedent: When Sabrina is interrupted from a preferred
activity and transitioned to a less preferred item or activity, she will engage in any of the
problem behaviors listed above because in the past these behaviors have been reinforced
by the removal of the demand to transition (SMNR) and the maintenance of access to the
preferred item or activity (SMPR).
Told “No”/Denied Access Antecedent: When Sabrina is told “no” or denied access to a
preferred item or activity, she will engage in any of the problem behaviors listed above
because in the past these behaviors have been reinforced by the presentation of
reinforcing stimuli (SMPR) in an effort by others to stop the problem behavior.
MO Strong but Mands Inappropriately Antecedent: When there is a strong MO for a
specific reinforcer, Sabrina will mand inappropriately by engaging in any of the problem
behaviors listed above to gain access to that item instead of appropriately manding for the
item because in the past these problem behaviors may have been reinforced by receiving
access to the desired item (SMPR).
Demand during DTI or Demand during Activities Antecedents: When Sabrina is
presented with demands during ITT or during activities, she will engage in any of the
problem behaviors listed above because in the past these behaviors may have been
reinforced by removal or delay of the demand (SMNR).
Automatic Reinforcement is High in Value Antecedent: When Sabrina is in a
reinforcer-deprived environment, she may engage in stereotypic/self-stimulatory behavior
because in the past this behavior has been reinforced by the feeling/sensation produced
simply by engaging in the behavior (APR).
MO Unclear/Out of the Blue Antecedent: When Sabrina is motivated for some type of
a change to be made within the current environment (e.g., attention, a generally enriched
environment) but the specific MO is unclear, she will engage in any of the problem
behaviors listed above because in the past these behaviors may have been reinforced by
the presentation of reinforcing stimuli (SMPR) in an effort by others to stop this
seemingly “out of the blue” problem behavior.
6
Behavior Reduction Plan
Sabrina’s Behavior Reduction Plan will include using MO manipulations to decrease the value of
the reinforcers associated with each antecedent that evokes problem behavior (thereby
decreasing the likelihood that problem behavior will be emitted), differential reinforcement to
increase alternative/appropriate replacement behaviors (DRA), and extinction (EXT) to reduce
the frequency of problem behavior. The following treatment protocols, specific to each
antecedent that evoked problem behavior during the assessment period, will be implemented:
1. Interruption/Transition Protocol: Treatment for Interruption/Transition Antecedent (Page
7)
2. Told “no”/Denied Access Protocol: Treatment for Told “no”/denied access antecedent
(Page 9)
3. Count and Mand Protocol: Treatment for MO Strong but Mands Inappropriately
Antecedent (Page 11)
4. Demand during DTI Protocol: Treatment for Demand during DTI Antecedent (Page 14)
5. Demand during Activities Protocol: Treatment for Demand during Activities Antecedent
(Page 17)
6. Out of the Blue Protocol: Treatment for MO Unclear/Out of the Blue Antecedent (Page
19)
7. Topography-specific Treatments (Page 21)
a. Response Blocking for Biting
b. Walk With Me Protocol
7
1. Interruption/Transition Protocol: Treatment for Interruption/Transition Antecedent
The purpose of this protocol is to teach Sabrina to transition from a reinforcing activity to
another activity without engaging in problem behavior as a replacement for problem behavior
that is maintained by a history of SMNR (having the demand to transition removed) and
SMPR (maintaining access to the reinforcing activity). Set up many transition opportunities
per day for Sabrina to learn this skill.
Offer a
“Promise”
HOWEVER, IF SABRINA EMITS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
(Bolting, crying, whining, physical resistance, grabbing, flopping)
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
REMOVES DEMAND
&
SABRINA
MAINTAINS
ACTIVITY
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
REMOVES “PROMISE”
&
REMOVES ACTIVITY
&
MAINTAINS DEMAND
&
After Transition and
Several Responses
without Problem
Behavior----Reinforces
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Transitions Easily
Prevention:
MO
manipulation Consequence:
EXT + DRA
SABRINA’S ACTIVITY
INTERRUPTED
(Asked to Leave One
Activity and Directed to
Another Activity)
8
MO Manipulations
o Approach Sabrina while holding out a “promise” (i.e., a highly preferred item)
so it is clearly visible to Sabrina.
o Present a demand to transition away from the current activity or reinforcer by
asking Sabrina to physically leave the area in which the activity was taking
place or by asking her to give you the reinforcer she currently has access to.
o Initially offer the “promise” during every transition. But, over time, thin the
schedule of reinforcement by offering a “promise” only intermittently, and
eventually not at all.
DRA
o If Sabrina complies (with prompting if necessary) and does not engage in any
problem behavior, deliver the “promise” as a reinforcer immediately and
continue with the transition.
o It may be necessary to provide additional reinforcers throughout the transition
depending on the effort and number of demands required to complete the
transition (see Walk with Me Protocol on p. 21 of this document).
o Once you have successfully transitioned to the next activity, deliver
reinforcers as appropriate to maintain Sabrina’s responding.
o Over time, fade prompts to increase independence during transitions and thin
the schedule of reinforcement so as to intermittently reinforce appropriate
transition behaviors.
Extinction
o If Sabrina engages in problem behavior when you present the demand to
transition, DO NOT ALLOW HER TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO THE
PREFERRED ITEM OR ACTIVITY SHE WAS BEING ASKED TO GIVE
UP. Physically remove or block access to this preferred item or activity.
o ALSO, REMOVE THE “PROMISE” THAT WAS OFFERED.
o DO NOT REMOVE THE DEMAND TO TRANSITION. Maintain the
demand to transition by vocally representing the demand about every 2 – 3
seconds and using physical guidance (i.e., prompts) to obtain compliance.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
o Block access to all reinforcers as long as problem behavior continues.
o ONCE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR STOPS OCCURRING FOR ABOUT 3 – 5
SECONDS (i.e., 3 – 5 responses), begin delivering reinforcers so as to
reinforce appropriate transition behavior.
o If problem behavior is still occurring after completing the transition, begin
requiring responses related to the activity to which you have just transitioned
(see the Demand during DTI or Demand during Activities protocols on p. 15
or p. 17 of this document).
9
2. Told “no”/Denied Access Protocol : Treatment for Told “no”/denied access antecedent The purpose of this protocol is to reduce problem behavior that is maintained by a history of
SMPR (i.e., gaining access to denied activity or item) by offering an “alternative” and
reinforcing “accepting no” behavior. Set up many opportunities per day for Sabrina to learn
this skill.
SABRINA ASKS
FOR SOMETHING
TOLD “NO”
(or access to reinforcer is
denied in some way)
Offer an
“Alternative”
HOWEVER, IF SABRINA EMITS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
(Bolting, crying, flopping, whining, shoes off, grabbing)
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
Gives Sabrina what she
wants;
Negotiates;
Offers other items;
Attends to behavior
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
Does not give Sabrina what
she wants;
Does not offer an
“alternative”
&
Removes all attention for
problem behavior
(except to protect)
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Accepts “No” in
Future
Prevention:
MO
manipulation
Consequence:
EXT + DRA
10
MO Manipulations o When Sabrina mands for something that you are not willing to give her,
approach her while holding out an “alternative” (i.e., a highly preferred item)
so it is clearly visible to Sabrina.
o Deny access or say no to Sabrina’s mand for a desired activity or item.
o As you deny access or say no, offer an “alternative” activity or item saying,
“But you can have this,” or, “But you can do this”.
o Initially offer the “alternative” for each instance of denying access. But, over
time, thin the schedule of reinforcement by offering an “alternative” only
intermittently, and eventually not at all.
DRA – Differential reinforcement of alternative behaviors o If Sabrina complies (with prompting if necessary) and does not engage in any
problem behavior, deliver the “alternative” as a reinforcer immediately and
continue to deny access, then continue on to the next activity.
o Once Sabrina successfully accepts “no,” deliver reinforcers as appropriate to
maintain Sabrina’s responding.
o Over time, fade prompts to increase accepting “no” and thin the schedule of
reinforcement so as to intermittently reinforce appropriate accepting “no”
behaviors.
Extinction o When Sabrina emits problem behavior following being told “no” or denied
access, do not change environment or provide any attention, items, actions,
activities, or other potential reinforcers contingent upon the problem behavior.
o If Sabrina engages in problem behavior when you say “no” or deny access to
an activity or item, DO NOT ALLOW HER TO ACCESS THE DESIRED
ITEM OR ACTIVITY FOR WHICH SHE WAS TOLD “NO.” Physically
block access to the desired item or activity. ALSO, REMOVE THE
“ALTERNATIVE” THAT WAS OFFERED.
o DO NOT GIVE ACCESS TO THE DENIED ACTIVITY OR ITEM.
Maintain “no” or continue denying access by blocking access to the activity or
item.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
o Block access to all reinforcers as long as problem behavior continues.
o ONCE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR STOPS OCCURRING FOR ABOUT 3
SECONDS, reengage with Sabrina and reinforce appropriate behaviors.
o If problem behavior continues for an extended duration and time/schedule
dictates a transition, present subsequent demands and treat accordingly using
Interruption/Transition (p. 7), Demand during DTI (p. 14), or Demand during
Activities (p. 17) protocols.
11
3. Count and Mand Protocol: Treatment for MO Strong but Mands Inappropriately
Antecedent
The purpose of this protocol is to reduce problem behavior that is maintained by a history of
SMPR (i.e., gaining access to desired items and activities) by teaching appropriate mand
topographies as replacements for the problem behavior. Conduct mand training across many
different MOs many times per day to teach these skills.
SABRINA
“WANTS”
SOMETHING (MO)
Teach Mands
Frequently
HOWEVER, IF SABRINA ASKS WITH PROBLEM
BEHAVIOR
(Bolting, grabbing, whining, crying, physical resistance)
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
Gives Sabrina
What she wants;
Asks what she wants;
Searches for what
Sabrina wants
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
Immediately withdraws
attention
(except to protect)
Uses count procedure
Until 5-10 Seconds of
No Problem Behavior
+
Prompts and Reinforces
Appropriate Mand
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Mands Appropriately
Prevention:
MO
manipulation
Consequence:
EXT + DRA
12
MO Manipulations
o Have a wide variety of reinforcers readily available.
o Begin by delivering reinforcers “for free” (i.e., without placing any demands)
to build motivation.
o Frequently contrive opportunities to conduct mand training so as to teach
Sabrina to appropriately vocally mand across a variety of motivational
categories, settings, stimuli, and instructors.
DRA
o Use prompting and prompt fading as appropriate to teach Sabrina new vocal
mand topographies. If the mand topography matches the MO, regardless of
the quality of her articulation provide MO specific reinforcement for Sabrina’s
initial vocal mand. Contrive another trial and vocally prompt Sabrina
immediately after delivering the reinforcer in order to shape the
quality/articulation of Sabrina’s vocal mand. Provide reinforcement for each
vocal approximation. Differentially reinforce and provide larger amounts of
the specific reinforcer as vocal mand topography improves. Once Sabrina has
improved her vocal mand with instructor-provided echoic prompts, run an
item only trial. In other words, if Sabrina’s vocal mand improvement is
maintained with the item only, differentially reinforcer with a larger amount
of the reinforcer.
o Differentially reinforce appropriate mand responses. In other words, deliver
larger amounts of the reinforcer when Sabrina independently emits vocal
mands and deliver smaller amounts of the reinforcer when Sabrina emits vocal
mands following echoic prompts.
Extinction
o When Sabrina declares motivation for a reinforcer that you are willing to
deliver but she mands using problem behavior, run the COUNT AND MAND
PROCEDURE as described below.
o Tell Sabrina, “No (problem behavior),” and begin counting aloud and showing
the passage of time by using your fingers. You will say, “No (problem
behavior), one, two, three…” as you hold up your fingers. Use a slow count to
10 initially. If Sabrina counts, ignore her counting and maintain your pace of
counting.
o If you complete the count and Sabrina has not engaged in another form of
problem behavior, vocally prompt the appropriate vocal mand topography. As
soon as Sabrina imitates the vocal mand, deliver a small amount of the
reinforcer.
o HOWEVER, if at all during the count interval, Sabrina engages in any form of
problem behavior (see topographies above) restart your count. For example,
“No (problem behavior), one, two, no (problem behavior), one, two, three, no
(problem behavior), one, two, etc.).” Continue this process until Sabrina has
stopped engaging in all forms of problem behavior for the entire interval (i.e.,
to the count of 10) and you can therefore prompt the appropriate vocal mand
and deliver the reinforcer.
o If you repeat the count for many trials without reaching 10, then discontinue
by merely withdrawing the reinforcer without comment AND THE
OPPORTUNITY TO COUNT AND MAND IS NO LONGER AVAILBLE
TO SABRINA. If she moves away from you, ensure her safety, but do not
follow her. If and when she returns to you with continued problem behavior
13
and a clear motivation for a particular reinforcer, restart the count and mand
procedure. If he/she does not return to you and time dictates that it is
necessary to move on to a new activity, then merely carry on and the
opportunity to count and mand is no longer available.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
14
4. Demand during DTI Protocol: Treatment for Demand during DTI Antecedent The purpose of this protocol is to abolish the reflexive conditioned motivating operation
(CMO-R), thereby abolishing (decreasing) the value of escape as a reinforcer and abating
(decreasing) problem behavior during DTI, which was maintained by a history of SMNR
(i.e., escape). DTI will comprise 30% of the time during Sabrina’s sessions.
INSTRUCTIONAL
DEMAND IS PRESENTED
Abolish CMO-R
HOWEVER, IF SABRINA EMITS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
(Biting, crying, whining, physical resistance)
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
REMOVES OR
DELAYS DEMAND
OR
REMINDS SABRINA
OF REINFORCERS
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
MAINTAINS DEMAND
(EXT)
&
REQUIRES SEVERAL
APPROPRIATE
RESPONSES
&
THEN REINFORCES
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Complies with
Instructional Demands
Consequence:
EXT + DRA
Prevention:
MO
manipulation
15
MO Manipulations (Antecedent Curricular Revisions)
1. Use competing positive reinforcers (pairing): Pair the instructional
environment with the delivery of highly valued, positive reinforcers.
2. Mix and vary tasks: Present instructional demands in which the stimuli
and response requirements vary from trial to trial. The use of mixed
verbal behavior (MVB) cards (index and picture cards) will assist the
teacher in ensuring there is a mix of skills being presented.
3. Use errorless teaching: Ensure high levels of correct responding through
the use of errorless teaching (0-second prompt delay) and error correction
procedures. During the errorless teaching procedure, the instructor will
prompt, transfer, present distracters, and probe.
- Prompt: present the discriminative stimulus (SD; i.e., instruction)
and, using a zero second time delay, prompt the correct response
by using the least intrusive/most effective prompt necessary.
- Transfer: present the SD and prompt the correct response using a
faded prompt and/or a 2-second constant time delay.
- Distracters: present one to four known MVB skills.
- Probe: present the SD and further fade prompts or allow for an
independent response.
4. Intersperse easy and difficult demands: Present easy tasks which result
in correct responding and are correlated with a higher density of
reinforcement along with relatively more difficult tasks. About 80% of
tasks presented should be easy (previously mastered skills) versus 20% of
tasks presented being relatively more difficult (current acquisition skills).
5. Fade in the number of demands: At every intensive teaching session
begin by presenting a low frequency of demands before delivering
reinforcers and fade in greater and greater response ratio requirements.
6. Fade in the effort and difficulty of tasks: Begin by presenting easy tasks
that are of a relatively low response effort and fade into more difficult
tasks. This should also be done at each intensive teaching session.
7. Pace instruction properly: The pace of instruction should be relatively
fast, using an inter-trial interval of about 1 – 2 seconds. Once you have
removed reinforcement, begin presenting tasks immediately. Once
Sabrina has responded, only 1 – 2 seconds should pass before the next
demand is placed or reinforcement is delivered.
(See an article regarding this topic that was recently published by Dr. Carbone
and colleagues:
Carbone, V. J., Morgenstern, B., Zecchin-Tirri, G., Kolberg, L. (2010).
The role of the reflexive-conditioned motivating operation (CMO-R)
during discrete trial instruction of children with autism. Focus on Autism
and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 110-124.
DRA
o Delays in the receipt of reinforcers have been demonstrated to be related to
higher levels of problem behavior. Therefore, reinforcers will be immediately
delivered for all desirable or on-task behaviors, such as complying with
demands, following directions, keeping hands folded, appropriate manding,
and correct responding.
o Specific items, activities, and actions that have functioned as reinforcers (e.g.,
edibles, Elmo videos, tickles) during the assessment period will be used to
16
differentially reinforce appropriate behaviors (e.g., sitting with hands folded,
correctly responding to instructional demands).
o Based on the assessment period, it was determined that during DTI
reinforcement will be delivered according to a variable ratio schedule of 10
(VR 10), which means that the reinforcer is delivered after approximately 10
responses.
Extinction
o When Sabrina engages in any of the problem behaviors defined above, the
instructor will withhold reinforcement by implementing escape extinction,
thereby not allowing her to escape the instructional demand.
o In other words, the instructor will maintain the instructional demand by
representing the demand in a neutral voice about every 2 – 3 seconds and
using prompts (e.g., vocal, physical) if necessary, to obtain compliance.
o The instructor will not deliver verbal praise or any other reinforcers while
implementing escape extinction.
o ONCE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR STOPS OCCURRING FOR ABOUT 3
RESPONSES, the instructor will return to using a natural tone of voice,
frequently delivering verbal praise, and delivering other reinforcers according
to Sabrina’s previously established schedule of reinforcement (i.e., VR 10) so
as to reinforce compliance during DTI.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
17
5. Demand during Activities Protocol: Treatment for Demand during Activities
Antecedent
The purpose of this protocol is to decrease problem behavior that occurs during the
completion of daily activities (e.g., those that are a part of natural environment teaching
(NET)) due to a history of SMNR (i.e., escape). NET will comprise 70% of the time during
Sabrina’s session.
DEMAND PRESENTED
DURING ACTIVITY
(e.g.,
“Stay with Me,”
“Play with These Toys”)
Abolish CMO-R
HOWEVER, IF SABRINA EMITS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
(Crying, whining, flopping, physical resistance, shoes off, biting,
bolting)
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
REMOVES OR
DELAYS DEMAND
OR
REMINDS SABRINA
OF REINFORCERS
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
MAINTAINS DEMAND
(EXT)
&
THEN
REINFORCE AFTER
SEVERAL
APPROPRIATE
RESPONSES
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Complies with
Demands during Activities
Prevention:
MO
manipulation
Consequence:
EXT + DRA
18
MO Manipulations
o During NET, pair non-preferred items/activities with previously established
reinforcers so as to build the motivation for these items/activities. Deliver
preferred items “for free” (i.e., without placing any demands) at high rates
(i.e., several times per minute).
o Initially stay with activities, especially non-preferred activities, for short
periods of time. As these non-preferred activities become conditioned
reinforcers, gradually increase the amount of time Sabrina is required to stay
with them.
DRA
o After a period of pairing, fade in the number and difficulty of demands.
Mands should be the first responses required prior to mixing and varying
across the other verbal operants.
o Use prompt and prompt fading procedures so as to errorlessly teach skills,
thereby decreasing the response effort ensuring frequent opportunities to
reinforce appropriate responses.
o Specific responses to be reinforced include mands, playing with toys
according to their function, social interactions with adults or other students,
using language (e.g., tacts, intraverbals) during NET activities, and
completing personal care/self-help routines.
o Begin with a dense schedule of reinforcement during NET and thin this
schedule as appropriate based upon Sabrina’s motivation and the response
effort required.
Extinction
o When Sabrina engages in any of the problem behaviors defined above, the
instructor will withhold reinforcement by implementing escape extinction,
thereby not allowing her to escape the activity-based demand.
o In other words, the instructor will maintain the activity-based demand by
representing the demand in a neutral voice about every 2 – 3 seconds and
using prompts (e.g., vocal, physical), if necessary, to obtain compliance.
o The instructor will not deliver verbal praise or any other reinforcers while
implementing escape extinction.
o ONCE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR STOPS OCCURRING FOR ABOUT 3
RESPONSES, the instructor will return to using a natural tone of voice,
frequently delivering verbal praise, and delivering other reinforcers as
appropriate given Sabrina’s motivation and the response effort required within
that activity.
o Subsequently, the instructor will require a period of compliant responding
without additional problem behavior prior to transitioning to another activity.
During this time the instructor will make adjustments to his/her behavior (e.g.,
quicker pace of instruction, denser schedule of reinforcement, using a wider
variety of and/or more valuable reinforcers) so as to increase Sabrina’s
motivation to participate in the activity and decrease the likelihood of
additional escape-maintained problem behavior.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
19
6. Out of the Blue Protocol: Treatment for MO Unclear/Out of the Blue Antecedent
The purpose of this protocol is to teach Sabrina to appropriately mand for a generalized rich
environment as a replacement for problem behavior that has previously been maintained by
obtaining access to a variety of reinforcing stimuli (i.e., SMPR). This type of problem
behavior may occur seemingly without reason, and may therefore be mistakenly thought to
be a sensory or medical issue.
“OUT OF THE BLUE”
(No obvious environmental
stimulus (no demand, not
told no, etc.) and it is not
medical problem)
Teach Manding
Frequently
NO YES
If teacher/Parent
Asks what she wants;
Searches for what
Sabrina may want;
Talks to Sabrina to
discover reason for
behavior
Problem Behavior KEEPS
Happening
If teacher/Parent
Immediately withdraws
attention
(except to protect)
&
Blocks access to
reinforcers
&
Waits for 3-5 seconds of
NO problem behavior
BEFORE attending to
Sabrina and reinforcing
appropriate change in
behavior
Problem Behavior STOPS
Happening
&
Sabrina Complies with
Demands during Activities
Consequence:
EXT + DRA
Prevention:
MO
manipulation
HOWEVER IF SABRINA EMITS PROBLEM BEHAVIOR
(Biting, bolting, crying, flopping, grabbing, physical resistance,
shoes off, whining)
20
MO Manipulations
o Have a wide variety of reinforcers readily available.
o Begin by delivering reinforcers “for free” (i.e., without placing any demands)
to build motivation.
o Frequently contrive opportunities to conduct mand training so as to teach
Sabrina to appropriately vocally mand across a variety of motivational
categories and settings.
DRA
o Use prompting and prompt fading as appropriate to teach Sabrina new vocal
mand topographies. (See the Count and Mand Protocol on p. 11 of this
document for detailed teaching procedures.)
o Differentially reinforce appropriate mand responses. In other words, deliver
larger amounts of the reinforcer when Sabrina independently emits vocal
mands and deliver smaller amounts of the reinforcer when Sabrina emits vocal
mands following echoic prompts.
EXT
o When problem behavior occurs, the instructor will immediately block access
to all suspected reinforcers, including attention by not looking at or talking to
Sabrina.
o Otherwise, the instructor will not change anything about the environment. In
other words, the instructor will not remove potentially aversive stimuli from
the environment.
o If Sabrina attempts to engage in any aggressive or self-injurious behaviors, the
instructor will use physical prompting to protect her while providing the
minimal amount of attention possible.
o The instructor will continue to block access to all suspected reinforcers until
Sabrina ceases engaging in problem behavior for a period of 3-5 seconds.
o After this period of time passes without Sabrina engaging in problem
behavior, the instructor will reengage with Sabrina and return to reinforcing
appropriate responding according to previously described schedules of
reinforcement.
21
7. Topography-specific Treatments
a) Response Blocking for Biting
o When Sabrina engages in biting (self), the instructor will physically block the
behavior from occurring and will simultaneously redirect Sabrina to engage in
whatever appropriate behavior should be occurring at that time.
o If this behavior is evoked by one of the antecedents listed above, the instructor
will also implement the antecedent-specific protocol.
b) Walk with Me Protocol
The purpose of this protocol is to teach Sabrina to walk in close proximity to the
instructor when transitioning from one activity to another activity without bolting,
walking ahead, holding onto the instructor, or touching the walls or other objects. Set
up many contrived opportunities to practice each day. Start by completing transitions
with short distances, provide many prompts, and reinforce. Increase distance for
transitions and decrease prompts/reinforcers as appropriate.
MO Manipulations
o Before transitioning/walking, offer Sabrina a “promise” (i.e., a highly
preferred edible) and ensure that it is clearly visible to Sabrina.
o Present a vocal SD similar to, “Walk with me.”
DRA
o If Sabrina complies by walking in close proximity to the instructor (with
prompts if necessary) during the transition, deliver the “promise” as
reinforcement every 3-5 seconds.
o Once you have successfully transitioned to the next activity, deliver
reinforcers as appropriate to maintain Sabrina’s responding.
o Over time, fade prompts to increase independence during transitions and thin
the schedule of reinforcement so as to intermittently reinforce appropriate
walking and transitioning behaviors.
Extinction
o If Sabrina engages in problem behavior or walking ahead, during the
transition, DO NOT ALLOW HER TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE
“PROMISE.” If needed, physically remove or block access to this preferred
item.
o ALSO, INDICATE REINFORCEMENT IS NO LONGER AVAILABLE, BY
REMOVING THE “PROMISE.”
o DO NOT REMOVE THE DEMAND TO WALK WITH ME. Maintain the
demand by representing the demand about every 2 – 3 seconds and using
physical guidance (i.e., prompts) to obtain compliance.
o Block access to all reinforcers as long as problem behavior continues.
o Once you have completed the transition, if problem behavior is still occurring
begin requiring responses related to the activity to which you have just
transitioned.
o ONCE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR STOPS OCCURRING FOR ABOUT 3 – 5
SECONDS (i.e., 3 – 5 responses), begin delivering reinforcers so as to
reinforce appropriate behavior (e.g., walking next to the instructor in the
absence of problem behavior, completing the activity in the absence of
problem behavior).
o If Sabrina bolts (i.e., leaves or attempts to leave) during the transition, return
to the location where the bolt began, then continue the transition from there.
22
Data
Sequence analysis (ABC data) per episode of problem behavior
Duration data per episode of problem behavior, cumulative duration per session
Summary data by antecedent, total frequency, and cumulative duration.
Graphing
Total Frequency and Cumulative Duration of Episodes of Problem Behavior per 2.5-hour
Session
Total Frequency of Problem Behavior by Antecedent per 2.5-hour Session for:
o Interruption/Transition
o Told “No”/Denied Access
o MO Strong but Mands Inappropriately
o Demand during ITT
o Demand during Activities
o Automatic Reinforcement is High in Value
o MO Unclear/Out of the Blue.
Criteria for Success
10 consecutive sessions without problem behavior