Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    1/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    2/23

    Introductionmetastatic pathological fractures

    Up to 27% of all cancers

    Variable histology

    Osteolytic & osteoblastic mix

    Affected by bisphosphonate Rx

    (not uniform)

    Unknown biomechanics

    Variable stereology

    Bone mineral density

    Bone volume fraction

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    3/23

    Aim

    Quantify the comparative structural impactof..

    Osteolytic lesions

    Mixed osteolysis/osteoblastic lesions Bisphosphonate treatment

    ..on metastatic femoral lesions

    Assess the reliability of clinical fracture risk

    assessment.

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    4/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    5/23

    Controls

    MT-1 humanbreast cancer

    genes

    MT-1 humanbreast cancer

    genes

    Canine Ace-1prostate cancer

    genes

    Healthy

    N=6

    Osteolytic

    lesions

    N=8

    + systemic

    bisphosphonates

    Osteolytic lesions

    N=9

    Mixed osteolytic/osteoblastic

    lesions, N=9

    5-6 week old

    Nude athymic rats

    N=32

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    6/23

    Stereology

    CT imaging

    Region of interest

    600 slices distal physis

    proximal CT slices per 0.01 mm

    Each scan reconstructed

    continuous tone (.ct) format greyscale bitmap (.bmp)

    Amira Dev 5.2.2 imaging software

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    7/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    8/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    9/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    10/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    11/23

    Cortical destruction

    >2/31/3-2/3

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    12/23

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    0.8

    0.85

    Osteolytic BP-Osteolytic Mixed Control

    TMD

    gHA/cm3

    ResultsTissue Mineral Density

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    13/23

    0.4

    0.45

    0.5

    0.55

    0.6

    0.65

    0.7

    0.75

    Osteolytic BP-Osteolytic Mixed Control

    BV/TV

    ResultsBone Volume Fraction, BV/TV

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    14/23

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160180

    200

    uc(MPa)

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    E

    (GPa)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    EA

    (kN)

    Ultimate Compressive Stress,

    UC (Mpa)

    Axial Rigidity,

    EA, kN

    Youngs Modulus,

    E, GPa

    ResultsMechanical Testing

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    15/23

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0.35 0.55 0.75 0.95

    uc

    (MPa)

    TMD (gHA/cm3)

    ResultsUC stress vs Tissue Mineral Density

    R2=0.72

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    16/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    17/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    18/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    19/23

    Discussion

    Bisphosphonate treatment increases

    BV/TV by 19% (p

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    20/23

    Discussion

    Mirels size correlates with bone volume fraction

    Not with tissue mineral density

    Ultimate compressive stress correlates Tissue mineral density

    Not with bone volume

    Mirels size does not correlate ultimate

    compressive stress

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    21/23

    Discussion

    CT improves

    definition of cortical involvement

    enhances reliability of Mirels score

    Previous published inter-observer correlation

    Size..0.48 0.56

    Type.0.35 0.61

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    22/23

  • 7/31/2019 Benedict Rogers - Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Femoral Metastatic Lesions

    23/23

    Thank You