Upload
truongtram
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bethany Community School
Response to Intervention Guidelines
Committee Members:Kristin GagnonMaureen GallaHeather PeckLinda VassalloErin WatsonKaren ProtoTim CharronRob Spino
Mary Federico
8/20/08
What is RTI?
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a regular education initiative. RTI is the practice of (1) providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and (2) using learning rate over time and level of performance to (3) make important educational decisions.
Bethany Community School follows the core principals of the response to intervention model including:
the belief that we can effectively teach all children the importance of intervening early the use of a multi-tier model of service delivery the use of a problem-solving method to make decisions within a multi-tiered
model the use of research-based, scientifically validated instruction/interventions the monitoring of student progress to inform instruction the use of data to make decisions
The use of RTI improves services by: Increasing the success rate of students receiving instruction in the general
education setting, Providing research-based instruction as an early intervention to students, Providing critical data needed to design, implement and monitor instructional
interventions, Reducing the time that additional instructional supports are delivered to students, Reducing the number of referrals to special education.
2
TIER II
The following diagram illustrates the three tiers of the RTI model:
Tier I is at the top of the figure and reflects the general education curriculum. This tier is designed for and provided to all students in each grade level. Tier 1 is comprehensive and universal. Student progress is monitored by the classroom teacher through benchmark assessments or weekly if identified at-risk.
Tier II is the middle section of the figure and represents those students who need more intensive and specific instruction in order to be successful in school. These students participate in Bethany Community School’s supplemental support program. Student progress is monitored weekly at this level.
Tier III activities include comprehensive assessment to identify whether a student has a specific disability and meets the criteria for special education. Student progress at this level is monitored on a regular basis.
Classroom Instruction
&Assessment
Supplemental Support Instruction
&Assessment
Special EducationInstruction
&AssessmentTIER III
TIER IALL
STUDENTS
SOMESTUDENTS
FEWSTUDENTS
3
The 3 tiers of the RTI process are further defined in a series of steps listed below. The RTI steps are adapted from Response to Intervention: Principles and Strategies for Effective Practice (Brown-Chidsey & Steege, 2005).
Tier I
1. Implement scientifically based general education instructional methods. Verify accuracy of instructional procedures with integrity assessment.
2. Collect benchmarks of all students’ performance at least three times during the school year.
3. Identify which students scored below the benchmark target(s).4. Provide individual and/or small group intervention activities and
differentiated instruction within the classroom for those students who score below the benchmark target(s). Progress monitoring should focus on modifications and interventions put in place.
Tier II
5. Provide daily scientifically based small-group instruction to students with scores below benchmark target(s) who do not respond to classroom interventions.
6. Monitor student progress toward the benchmark(s), using daily/weekly assessments and data graphing for 15 sessions.
7. Review, revise, and/or discontinue small-group instruction based on student performance and progress toward the benchmark(s) at the end of the 15 sessions. For those students making adequate progress, cycle back to step six.
8. For students not yet showing evidence of progress toward meeting the benchmark(s) by the end of the first 15 sessions, increase the intensity, duration, and/or frequency of instruction and continue to monitor progress for up to another 15 sessions.
9. Review, revise, and/or discontinue small-group instruction, based on student performance and attainment of benchmark(s) at the end of the second 15 sessions. For those students making adequate progress, cycle back to step six.
Tier III
10. For students not yet showing evidence of meeting the benchmark(s) after significant interventions at steps 5-9, initiate a comprehensive evaluation to determine whether the student has a disability and is eligible for special education services.
11. IEP team determines whether student has a disability and meets the criteria for special education services; if the student is eligible for special education, an IEP is developed and becomes the student’s new instructional program.
Tier I
4
1. Implement scientifically-based general education instructional methods. Verify accuracy of instructional procedures with integrity assessment.Bethany Community School implements a variety of research-based and curriculum-based instructional programs in language arts and math. The tables below identify the publisher/author, instructional strategies, and targeted skills.
KindergartenLanguage Arts
Publisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted SkillsGrowing Readers by Kathy Collins
Readers’ Workshop:Oral Reading, Partner Reading
Independent Reading, Building Reading Stamina, Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
Reading with Meaningby Debbie Miller
Shared Reading, Modeling Responding, MakingPredictions, MakingConnections, and other comprehension strategies
Mondo Publishing, Wright Group Guided Reading Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
Constructing Meaning by Nancy Boyles
Whole Group, Small Group Comprehension
Writers Workshop by Ralph Fletcher
Writers’ Workshop/Process
Brainstorming, Draft, Edit/revise, Publish/Share
No More Letters of the Week Explicit/Direct Instruction,Reading Wall
Phonological Awareness,Letter ID and Sound
CSDE Phonological Awareness Module
Whole Group Phonological Awareness
Pre- primer Dolch Words Sight WordsZaner Bloser Whole Group HandwritingHBJ Whole Group Grammar
MathPublisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted Skills
Wright Group/McGraw-Hill, Everyday Mathematics
Whole Group/Direct Instruction;Small Group
Number and Numeration; Operations and Computation; Data and Chance; Measurement and Reference Frames; Geometry; Patterns, Functions and Algebra
Wright Group, Growing with Math
Whole Group/Direct Instruction;Small Group
Basic Concepts
First Grade
Language ArtsPublisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted Skills
Growing Readers by Kathy CollinsOn Solid GroundBy Sharon Taerski
Readers’ Workshop:Oral Reading, Partner Reading
Independent Reading, Building Reading Stamina, Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
5
Reading with Meaningby Debbie Miller
Shared Reading, Modeling Responding, MakingPredictions, MakingConnections, and other comprehension strategies
Mondo Publishing, Wright Group, Sunshine
Guided Reading Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
Teacher Created Literacy Centers Reinforcement of literacy skillsConstructing Meaning by Nancy Boyles
Whole Group, Small Group Comprehension
Writers Workshop by Lucy Caulkins
Whole Group, Small Group, Individual Conferences
Choosing Topic, Sketching Ideas, Writing Process
Teacher Created Spelling Program Small Group Study and practice of sight words and word families
Cast-a-Spell Whole Group Study and practice of sounds, sight words and word families
Zaner Bloser Whole Group HandwritingHBJ Whole Group Grammar
MathPublisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted Skills
Wright Group/McGraw-Hill, Everyday Mathematics
Whole Group/Direct Instruction;Small Group
Problem Solving; Number and Counting; Operation and Number Models; Algorithms; Data and Chance; Geometry; Measurement; Reference Frames; Estimation, Mental Arithmetic, and Number Sense; Patterns, Sequences, Functions and Algebra
Second Grade
Language ArtsPublisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted Skills
Growing Readers by Kathy Collins
Readers’ Workshop:Oral Reading, Partner Reading
Independent Reading, Building Reading Stamina, Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
Reading with Meaningby Debbie Miller
Shared Reading, Modeling Responding, MakingPredictions, MakingConnections, and other comprehension strategies
Mondo Publishing, Wright Group, Sunshine
Guided Reading Decoding, Fluency, Comprehension
Constructing Meaning by Nancy Boyles
Whole Group, Small Group Comprehension
Writers Workshop by Lucy Caulkins
Whole Group, Small Group, Individual Conferences
Choosing Topic, Sketching Ideas, Writing Process
Teacher Created Spelling Program Small Group Study and practice of sight words and word families
6
Cast-a-Spell Whole Group Study and practice of sounds, sight words and word families
Zaner Bloser Whole Group HandwritingHBJ Whole Group Grammar
MathPublisher/ Author Instructional Strategies Targeted Skills
Wright Group/McGraw-Hill, Everyday Mathematics
Whole Group/Direct Instruction;Small Group
Problem Solving; Number and Counting; Operation and Number Models; Algorithms; Data and Chance; Geometry; Measurement; Reference Frames; Estimation, Mental Arithmetic, and Number Sense; Patterns, Sequences, Functions and Algebra
2. Collect benchmarks of all students’ performance at least three times during the school year.
Bethany Community School’s classroom teachers collect a variety of benchmarks in language arts and math to monitor students’ progress. The tables below outline the assessments and the times of year that they are completed.
KINDERGARTEN BENCHMARKSREADINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARCONCEPTS ABOUT PRINT SEPT., NOV., FEB., MAYLETTER ID SEPT., NOV., FEB., MAYLETTER/SOUND ID SEPT., NOV., FEB., MAYDIBELS INITIAL SOUND FLUENCY SEPT., JAN.DIBELS LETTER NAMING FLUENCY SEPT., JAN., MAYDIBELS PHONEME SEGMENTATION FLUENCY JAN., MAR., MAYDIBELS NONSENSE WORD FLUENCY JAN., MAR., MAYREADING INFORMAL RUNNING RECORD FEB., APR.DRA LEVEL DEC., FEB., MAY
WRITINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARLANGUAGE ARTS WRITING ASSESSMENT SEPT., JAN., JUNE
MATHASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARUNIT TESTS UPON COMPLETION OF EACH UNIT***FURTHER ASSESSMENTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
GRADE 1 BENCHMARKSREADINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARINFORMAL RUNNING RECORD OCT., APRIL
7
DRA LEVEL SEPT., NOV., FEB., MAYDIBELS LETTER NAMING FLUENCY SEPT.DIBELS PHONEME SEGMENTATION FLUENCY SEPT., JAN., MAYDIBELS NONSENSE WORD FLUENCY SEPT., JAN., MAYDIBELS RETELL FLUENCY JAN., MAYDIBELS ORAL READING FLUENCY JAN., MAY
WRITINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARDICTATION SEPT., MAYGANSKE DEVELOPMENTAL SPELLING SEPT., JAN., MAYWORD PATTERN SURVEY SEPT.WRITING ASSESSMENTS – UNITS OF STUDY SEPT., DEC., MAYWRITING PROMPT PERSONAL NARRATIVE FEB., APR.MATHASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARUNIT TESTS UPON COMPLETION OF EACH UNIT***FURTHER ASSESSMENTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
GRADE 2 BENCHMARKS
READINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARFORMING A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING;DEVELOPING AN INTERPRETATION;MAKING READER/TEXT CONNECTIONS;EXAMINING CONTENT & STRUCTURE
JAN., MAY
DRA LEVEL SEPT., NOV., FEB., MAYDIBELS NONSENSE WORD FLUENCY SEPT.DIBELS RETELL FLEUNCY SEPT., JAN., MAYDIBELS ORAL READING FLUENCY SEPT., JAN., MAY
WRITINGASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARWORD PATTERN SURVEY SEPT., MAYWRITING ASSESSMENTS – UNITS OF STUDY UPON COMPLETION OF EACH UNIT OF STUDYWRITING PROMPT – NARRATIVE NOV. – PERSONAL NARRATIVE; FEB. & MAY –
FICTIONAL NARRATIVE
MATHASSESSMENT TIMES OF YEARUNIT TESTS UPON COMPLETION OF EACH UNIT***FURTHER ASSESSMENTS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
8
3. Identify which students scored below the benchmark target(s).
Bethany Community School has benchmark targets at various points in the school year, which are listed in the tables below.
GRADE LEVEL DRA BENCHMARKS AND CEILINGS
DIBELS Benchmarks K-2
ISF LNF PSF NWF ORFK - Sep 8 8 K - Jan 25 27 18 13 K-May 40 35 25 1-Sep 37 35 24 1-Jan 35 50 201-May 35 50 402-Sep 50 442-Jan 682-May 90
***NEED TO INSERT TABLE FOR WRITING BENCHMARKS
MATH BENCHMARK IS 70% ON EACH UNIT OF STUDY
9
Grade September
November FebruaryEnd ofYear Ceiling
K 2 4 18
1 4 8 12 18 28
2 18 20 24 28 38
4. Provide small group intervention activities and differentiated instruction within the classroom for those students who score below the benchmark target(s). Continue to monitor progress via benchmarks.
Classroom teachers meet with the RTI team (administrator, curriculum coordinator, supplemental skills teacher, special education teacher) after benchmark assessments have been completed to review benchmarks, identify at-risk students, plan interventions for targeted areas, determine duration of classroom support, type of progress monitoring and expected outcome with support in place.
The Tier 1 documentation form will be completed by the classroom teacher at the RTI meeting. An Alternative Strategies resource list is available for classroom-based intervention ideas for those
students requiring differentiation. Follow-up meeting will be held with the RTI team to review progress.
Tier II
5. Provide daily scientifically based small-group instruction to students with scores below benchmark target(s) who do not respond to classroom interventions.
For students who continue to fall below benchmarks despite classroom interventions teachers refer students to the Supplemental Support Program (SSP) by completing the SSP Referral form.
Students are serviced through Bethany Community School’s Supplemental Support Program either individually or in a small group setting depending on student need. The following tables indicate the skills targeted and the types of interventions.
BCS Grade K Supplemental Support Reading Program
10
Pre-Reading Skill Area Activities Activity Source Materials
PhonologicalAwareness
Rhyming songs pictures rhyme production auditory identification
Identifying and sorting initial and final sounds picture cards objects matching picture to beginning sound
(worksheets, word wheels)Segmenting
clapping out words in a sentence
Syllable awareness clap out syllables
Following directions/listening games
Blending compound words (ex. Cup, cake
=cupcake) syllables (ex. Ti-ger= tiger)
Speaking sounds into ear piece
Road to the Code
Explode the Code
Teacher-made
Alphabet Knowledge
andWriting
Review of letter introduced in class: Class-generated pattern books with
target letter incorporated (i.e. B is for ______)
Letter matching (upper and lower case) Name writing (first, last) Name puzzle Letter formation Practice (whiteboard, clay, shaving
cream, pencil and paper,etc.) Sentence structure (capital at the
beginning, punctuation at the end, proper spacing, etc.)
No More Letter of the Week
Teacher-made
Print Awareness Left to right, swoop down to next line, tracking one to one correspondence
Shared reading
BCS Grade 1 Supplemental Support Reading Program
11
Reading Skill Area
Activities Activity Source Materials
Fluency
Repeated reading of texts: support texts with
pictures, repetitive phrases, rhyme and rhythm
decodable texts (vocab. is limited to words with sounds that students have practiced
Reading Recovery
Wilson ReadingRead Naturally
Leveled trade books (Rigby, Wright Group, MCP, Sundance, Scott-Foresman)
Teacher-made
Word Study:
Decoding strategies, Word Recognition,
andSpelling
(explicit instruction in phonics and word
analysis – decodeable words and sight words)
Picture, sound, word and spelling sorts (sorting word and picture cards into groups according to sound and/or pattern)
Building words and blending sounds
Repeated review of words, letters, and sounds to develop automatic recognition and retrieval
Creation of a word collection (or word bank) to promote vocabulary development, ownership of known words, and automatic recognition
Use of rhyming pictures to aid in the memorization of phonetically irregular high frequency words
Sentence writing to practice sentence form, listening for sounds in words and spelling
Words Their Way
Making Words
Wilson ReadingTLC Reading Program
Book Buddies Tutoring Program (Univ. of VA)
BCS Teachers
Reading Recovery
Words Their WayTeacher-made
Plastic letters, letter tiles
Teacher-made word books and flashcards
Teacher-made word cards and games
Teacher-made cards
Teacher-made writing books
Comprehension
Making predictions
Asking questions
Re-telling of events and details in sequence
Comparing and contrasting
Reading with Meaning -(D. Miller)
Mosaic of Thought – (E. Keene, S. Zimmerman)
Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA)
Teacher-made
Teacher-made re-telling “kits” with objects corresponding to text
***Need to insert Supplemental Support Grade 1 Math Program
BCS Grade 2 Supplemental Support Reading Program
12
Reading Skill Area
Activities Activity Source Materials
Fluency
Repeated reading of texts: trade books decodeable texts (vocab.
is limited to words with sounds that students have practiced)
poetry reader’s theater
Speed reading drills and speed sorting activities – single words with target pattern(s) and/or sight words
Reading RecoveryWilson ReadingRead Naturally
Book Buddies Tutoring Program (Univ. of VA)
Wilson ReadingWords Their Way
Trade books
Teacher-madeOne-Minute Reader
Various
Teacher-made word books and flashcards
Word Study:
Decoding strategies,
Word Recognition,and
Spelling
(explicit instruction in phonics and word
analysis – decodeable words and sight words)
Picture, sound, word and spelling sorts
Building words and blending sounds
Repeated review of words, letters, and sounds to develop automatic recognition and retrieval
Creation of a word collection to promote vocabulary development, ownership of known words, and automatic recognition
Use of rhyming pictures to aid in the memorization of phonetically irregular high frequency words
Sentence writing to practice sentence form, listening for sounds in words and spelling
Words Their Way
Making Words
Wilson ReadingTLC Reading Program
Book Buddies Tutoring Program (Univ. of VA)
BCS Teachers
Reading Recovery
Words Their WayTeacher-made
Letter tiles
Teacher-made word books and flashcards
Teacher-made word cards and games
Teacher-made cards
Composition books
Comprehension
Genre study
Connecting, picturing, wondering, guessing, noticing strategiesThink-alouds
Graphic organizers to organize and compare information
Book Buddies Tutoring Program (Univ. of VA)
Reading with Meaning - (D. Miller)Mosaic of Thought – (E. Keene, S.
Zimmerman)Reading with Meaning - (D. Miller)
Think-Alongs – Steck-Vaughn
Multiple sources
Teacher-made
Copies of Think-Along workbooksKWL, story map, Venn diagrams, event flow chart, main idea and detail chart
***Need to insert Supplemental Support Grade 2 Math Program
13
6. Monitor student progress toward the benchmark(s), using daily/weekly assessments and data graphing for 15 Supplemental Support Program sessions.
The SSP teacher utilizes the following daily/weekly assessments to monitor student progress at each grade level within the supplemental support program.
Kindergarten: Phonological awareness assessment DIBELS Initial sound fluency DIBELS Phoneme segmentation fluency DIBELS Word use fluency
Grade 1: DIBELS Daily running record Daily word list ***Need to add math progress monitoring assessment
Grade 2: DIBELS Daily word list Speed drill with target word pattern Reading fluency (WPM) weekly ***Need to add math progress monitoring assessment
7. Review, revise, and/or discontinue small-group instruction based on student performance and progress toward the benchmark at the end of 15 sessions. For students making adequate progress, cycle back to step six. Determinations are made at twice monthly SSP meetings attended by the SSP teacher, classroom
teacher, curriculum coordinator, and an administrator.
8. For students not yet showing evidence of progress toward meeting the benchmark(s) by the end of the first 15 sessions, increase the intensity, duration, and/or frequency of instruction and continue to monitor progress for up to another 15 sessions. RTI team will reconvene to assist with the planning for these students.
9. Review, revise, and/or discontinue small-group instruction, based on student performance and attainment of benchmark at the end of the second 15 sessions. For students not making adequate progress, a review meeting will be held (with the RTI team and school psychologist) to determine the appropriateness of a PPT. For those students making adequate progress, cycle back to step six.
Tier III
14
10. For students not yet showing evidence of meeting the benchmark(s) after significant interventions at steps 5-9, initiate a comprehensive evaluation to determine whether the student has a disability and is eligible for special education services.
11. PPT team determines whether student has a disability and meets the criteria for special education services; if the student is eligible for special education, an IEP is developed and becomes the student’s new instructional program. If the student is not eligible for special education services, then RTI team will reconvene to determine appropriate programming.
15
Meeting with RTI team to review benchmarks, identify at-risk students, plan interventions for targeted areas, determine duration of classroom support, type of progress monitoring and expected outcome with support in place.A classroom interventions resource list is available for classroom-based intervention ideas for those students requiring differentiationTier I Documentation Form is completed
In June, classroom teachers complete Regular Ed. Support Summary Sheet.
For those students not responding sufficiently to SSP services, refer to PPT.
For students who continue to fall below benchmarks, despite classroom intervention, refer to SSP.
Student is provided individual or small group support. SSP collects data for progress monitoring.
Attend SSP review meetings to monitor progress and determine changes to program if necessary.
Review meeting will be held for those students not responding to SSP services.
Referral to Sp. Ed. Form
SSP Referral Form
MathLanguage Arts
In August, Classroom teachers review records to determine previous support
Tier I Documentation Form
Tier III
Tier II
Tier I