BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond New Design for the REMBRANDTPARK Amsterdam Yves Martens Buiting Bosontwikkeling In cooperation with

BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2e avond

New Design for the

REMBRANDTPARKAmsterdam

Yves Martens

Buiting Bosontwikkeling

In cooperation with


BACKGROUND

New design Rembrandtpark

Construction of a new roadWet ecological corridorRe-design of the park


LOCATION REMBRANDTPARK


IMPRESSION WITH PICTURES


BACKGROUND

Three themes:1. Trees

2. Routing and safety3. Design and use

2nd evening in september: theme TreesTwo other themes to be discussed in

November during 3rd evening


WORKSHOP

1. Presentation 2nd evening2. Two other themes used to discuss

for this workshop

Main questions:1. How can GIS be used in preperation

for the 3rd meeting?


AGENDA 2nd evening

TREE SURVEY

FRAMEWORK DESIGN

MODEL STUDY

DISCUSSION


TREE SURVEY

NUMBER 246 bomen

PURPOSE monitor present qualities

MEASURMENTS AND CHARACTERISTCS

tree speciesdiameter breast heighttree heightvitalitycrown projection and

shapedamage and/or faults


TREE SPECIES


VITALITY


CROWN PROJECTION


SHAPE OF THE CROWN / DIRECTION

SHAPE OF TREE WITH LIVING CROWN < 2 METER

SHAPE OF TREE WITH LIVING CROWN 2 TO 4 METER

OTHER TREES


DAMAGE AND/OR FAULTS

NO DAMAGE

MECHANICAL DAMAGE


FRAMEWORK DESIGN

ECOLOGICAL CORRIDOR

CLOSED AND GREEN BORDER

STARTING POINT WATERWAY

SAFETY

SPONTANEOUS PROCESSES

BEAUTIFUL TREES


ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORconnection between “Schipluidensingel” and the Rembrandtpark


CLOSED BORDERgreen screen between park en Lelylaan (=road)


STARTING POINT WATERWAYconnection on “Schipluidensingel” is fixed


SAFETYgentle slope (minimum 1:3)


BEAUTIFUL TREES & SPONTANEOUS PROCESSES remain as many beautiful trees as possible



MODEL STUDY4 alternatives

CONNECTION CULVERT

QUAY or DAM-WALL

GENTLE SLOPE, 1:3

DUBBLE SLOPE WITH TERRACES


Alternative 1: CONNECTION CULVERT Alternative 1: CONNECTION CULVERT


CONNECTION CULVERT CONNECTION CULVERT does not suffice to the ecological corridordoes not suffice to the ecological corridor


Alternative 2: QUAY OR DAM-WALLAlternative 2: QUAY OR DAM-WALL




QUAY OR DAM-WALLQUAY OR DAM-WALL


QUAY OR DAM-WALL QUAY OR DAM-WALL


QUAY OR DAM-WALL QUAY OR DAM-WALL Only suffice to the demands for ecology Only suffice to the demands for ecology and safety when using a very special and and safety when using a very special and expensive construction.expensive construction.


Alternative 3: SLOPE 1 : 3 Alternative 3: SLOPE 1 : 3



GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3


GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3GENTLE SLOPE 1 : 3Better alternative from ecological point of Better alternative from ecological point of view, but it gives little possibilities for view, but it gives little possibilities for further design of the park.further design of the park.


Alternative 4: DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH Alternative 4: DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACESTERRACES



DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACESDUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACES


DUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACESDUBBLE SLOPE 1 : 3 WITH TERRACESwide slope with groups of trees on the wide slope with groups of trees on the slopes and terracesslopes and terraces


DISCUSSION

BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2e avondIn cooperation with


Workshop

What we learned:1. Among some people trust is lost, which

causes problems2. Certain information on maps can trigger

emotion and anger3. There is a difference between public

participation and public decision4. Visualization techniques are unlimited but

information on the map should be accurate and complete

5. Well defined plan eases the acceptance


Task for the workshop

We are going to prepare 2 themes for the 3rd evening!

Theme routing and safety Theme further design and use


Theme routing and safety

What is the best routing?(Cyclist vs joggers)

How can we make a safe design?(Streetlights vs dark spots)


Theme further design and use

1. Interaction between park and surroundings?

(how is the park experienced from the inside)

2. Zoning?(division recreational areas vs nature)


TASK

Every group gives (3) recommendations on how to use GIS in this project.

Material: paperpen

maps of the park


REMEMBER

Trust among citizens is slowly regained

Technically everything is possible, but (financial) resources are limited


Results of the workshop

Your ideas will be integrated in the CoPack!

Your ideas will be used in preparation of the 3rd public

meeting in November in Amsterdam!

Documents

BEWONERSPARTICIPATIE - 2 e avond New Design for the REMBRANDTPARK Amsterdam Yves Martens Buiting Bosontwikkeling In cooperation with