Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Beyond the Price
6 Aug 2015
John Enright and Colin Hui
At Health Purchasing Victoria (HPV) we help public health care services deliver high quality
patient care by ensuring they have a reliable and agile supply chain.
We do this by:
Partnering with them to organise collective contracts for the things they buy.
Providing advice and education on how to get their supply chain working at its best.
Ensuring Victorian Government health purchasing policies are complied with.
Who is Health Purchasing Victoria?
Looking beyond the price
Category Management
Price
Utilization Cost
Standardisation
Demand Management
Labour Productivity
Maintenance
Shrinkage
Damages
Waste
Disposal
Recall Mgmt
Revision Procedures
Infection Rates etc.
Beyond Price – not a new idea…
• Fuel efficiency
• Maintenance
costs
• Safety features
• Warranty
What car
should I buy? What will I
have for
dinner
Who should I
fly with? I’ve run out
of milk
• Convenience
• Past experience
• How long will it
take to cook?
I need a new
shirt
• Reputation
• Baggage
• Food
• Leg room
• Expiry date
• Packaging
• Taste
• Convenience
• Quality
• Material
• Colour
• Brand
TOTAL COST to PATIENT
Hospital Cost Supply Chain
Cost (Hospital)
Order Processing
Inventory
Transport
Supplier Cost
Supply Chain Cost (Supplier)
Order Processing
Inventory
Transport
Profit Sales
Selling Cost
Product Cost Research,
Manufacturing, Packaging, etc.
What is beyond price in health?
5 Health Purchasing Victoria | Working with Victoria’s health sector to achieve best-value supply chain outcomes
Contract
Price
Data quality
Common
standards
Predictability
Trust
Product quality
Quality of
relationships
Service
Patient
Outcomes
Four key levers to drive value
• Get the best price you can by aggregating demand
• Managing consumption to reduce demand
• Buy the best value product that will do the job
• Improve the efficiency of buying, handling, using and
maintaining the product
Source: http://www.grosvenor.com.au/the-next-wave-of-procurement-savings/
Pay Less
Buy Less
Buy Cheaper
Buy Smarter
Examples….
Reducing use of consumables –
e.g. training/education
Reusable vs single use
Lease payments for disposed
equipment
Not taking advantage of
warranties
Lost/damaged product
Buying a better value item that
still does the same job
Standard equipment rather than
a modified spec
Right specification vs over spec
Volume commitments to drive
optimal pricing
Reducing the cost of purchasing
through e-commerce
Buying in bulk where possible
More reliable product
Forecasting demand
Considering total cost, not just
price
Coin locks on trolleys Implementing returnable handling equipment
Buy Less Buy Cheaper Buy Smarter
House brand products Long sole-supplier contracts for capital
Compulsory EDI Integrated forecasting & planning
Examples from retail…
Driving value needs solid foundations…
Information
Collaboration Incentives
Information
Standardised, trusted and accurate information to drive decision making
and processes, and which enables opportunities to be discovered
Qualities of good information:
• Easy to access and keep up to date
• Transparent
• Spans the entire supply chain
• Should enable relationships between data
sets to be created – enabling analytics
• Common standards
• Enables decision making
• Crosses organisations
• Measure’s what’s important
• Helps provide focus - “fish where the big
fish swim”
• It’s trusted as being right
• But – you can drown information
Some Opportunities:
• Understanding cost drivers
• Understand the points of waste and how
they can be influenced or eliminated
• Understanding the true value of a
product/service – not just price
• Using common categorisations/accounting
to enable consistent spend analysis
• Contract visibility
• Common master data – e.g. VPC as the
foundation for product data, Bravo for
suppliers
Collaboration
Internal and external collaboration focussed on common goals, clear
accountabilities, and using objective, trusted data
Qualities of good collaboration:
• Both internal and external
• Requires trust and transparency
• Clearly defined joint goals and objectives
• Both parties have the opportunity to benefit
• Sharing of information
• Involve the real decision makers/experts
• A commitment to continuous improvement
• Two-way accountability to perform, and
measurement of performance
• Fact-based decision making
• But – can’t be superficial or one-way
Some Opportunities:
• Shared visibility of costs – enabling honest
discussions around improving efficiency
• Longer contracts – enables improved
investment in innovation and efficiency
• Technology collaborations
• Understanding demand, and using it to
drive certainty where possible
• Total cost of ownership
• Regional supply chain collaborations
• EDI implementations
Incentives
Put in place strategies to incentivise the type of behaviour you want to see,
and discourage those you don’t
Qualities of good incentives:
• They drive accountability
• Right type for the job e.g. contractual,
commercial, efficiency based
• Target at the right level(s) – organisational,
functional, individual
• Ensure a sharing of risk and reward
• But - need to be aware of where incentives
are misaligned across the supply chain
• No one size fits all
• Can’t set and forget
Some Opportunities:
• End to end category management
• Open book pricing models
• Establishing contracts which enable
efficiency to be realised
• Pricing strategies to enable efficiency
• Transparent benchmarking of performance
against peers
Key Points
Impacting the price
Case study: Orthopaedic Prostheses category
Beyond Price – Orthopaedic Prostheses
• Background
• Market Research on cost breakdown
• What can we do to impact the price?
• Formulary control and Representatives
• Key learnings
Background
• Estimated global market value, estimated sales in 20111
• Hips replacement: $5.84b
• Knees replacement: $6.94b
• Extremities replacement: $1.09b
• Prices vary between countries, states, regions, private and public sectors
and health services.
• In June 2015, Lord Carter of Coles released an interim report on the
review of Operational productivity in NHS providers.2
• Report is based on 22 NHS Trusts
• Primary cemented hip has a variance of 44% between the lowest and
highest price paid.
• Primary uncemented hip has a variance of 56%
Market research and cost break down
• Hip and knee implant review report released in 2008, estimated the
breakdown of cost structure for orthopaedic implants in United States.3
• Note that the cost of manufacturing is not the largest cost components
• The highest cost component is Selling, General and Admin = value added
services such as representative, supply chain, training, clinical support,
marketing etc.
How can we impact the price?
Value added service
Rationalisation at Health service
Level
Formulary Control
Reduce cancellation and
last minute orders
Management of consignment
stock
Return loan kits in time
Need for Representatives for every case
•Standardisation creates efficiencies
for both parties
•Reduce cancellations benefits both
parties.
•Reduce ad hoc/urgent orders will
reduce supply chain cost
•Reduce delays in loan kit returns will
minimise the opportunity cost for
suppliers
Formulary Control
• Formulary Concept
• A list of approved products for use in a particular health services.
• Pre-approval must be sorted before ordering non-formulary products
• For example: The use of uncemented hips vs cemented hips
• BMJ published a research paper about the cost effectiveness between
cemented and uncemented prostheses:
‘In men and women aged 70 and 80 revision rates at five and 10 year were
lowest with cemented prostheses and highest with cementless prostheses.
Only in 60 year old men were cementless prostheses competitive in terms
of 10 year revision rates.’4
Cemented Hip Uncemented Hip %Variance
£854 £1977 131%
Clinical support and Representatives
• Suppliers a team of representatives supporting the orthopaedic market.
The number will depended on the size of the company, on average it will
be more than 10 EFT.
• the key question is not about removing representative, whether there is
an alternative model that is more cost effective.
Transition Product
Training and specialisation
Consolidate suppliers
Quantify current
services provided by
supplier representatives
Determine Return on Investment
Key learnings
The key learnings from orthopaedic prostheses:
• Prices varies based on different setting, especially in a non-mandatory
procurement environment in NHS
• The importance of benchmarking to understand your position
• Understand total cost of ownership allows health services to work out new
ways to reduce cost in partnership with suppliers.
• Supplier consolidation is the first step to drive new efficiencies
• Formulary control based on evidence based practice is absolutely essential
for prostheses, medical consumables and pharmaceuticals
• Clinical representative support is a significant part of the expenditure, is
there a better alternative option.
Where to from here?
• Health services must work on multiple levels in order to influence price
• Collective Procurement and Market consolidation
• Local rationalisation and supply chain
• Clinicians prescribing and formulary control
Reference
1. Orthoknow, Strategic insights into the orthopaedic industry, published June 2012, ORTHOWORLD Inc
2. Lord Carter of Coles, Review of Operational Productivity in NHS providers Interim Report, June 2015,
published by Department of Health
3. Orthopedic Network News, 2008 Hip and Knee Implant Review, Volume 19 Number 3 July 2008. posted to
www.orthopedicNetworkNews. Com on August 10, 2008 at 9:00pm est
4. M Pennington, R Grieve, J S Sekhon, P Gregg, N Black, J h van der Meulen, iCemented, cementless, and
hybrid prostheses for total hip replacement: cost effectiveness analysis, BMJ 2013:346:f1026 doi:
10.1136/bmj.f1026 (Published 27 February 2013)
Health Purchasing Victoria | Working with Victoria’s health sector to achieve best-value supply chain outcomes 23
Questions
Level 34
Casselden Place
2 Lonsdale Street
Melbourne 3000
T: 03 9947 3700
F: 03 9947 3701
www.hpv.org.au