Upload
shawn-watts
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Protest Types Pre-Award — Ground rules and competitive range –Example: Challenging a problematic solicitation term that impairs a proposal strategy or favors a competitor. Post-Award — Contract award flaws –Example: Challenging a failure to follow solicitation terms or applying them unequally. 3
Citation preview
Bid Protests In Brief
Mark D. ColleyArnold & Porter LLP
NCMA Boston ChapterNovember 18, 2015
2
What are Bid Protests?
Disputes regarding the procurement process – Contractors enlisted to enforce the rules and preserve
competition
A means to contest errors, rule violations, and “unreasonable” judgments– NOT a way to resolve policy choices
Great deference to discretionary judgments– Agency “has the right to get it wrong”
3
Protest Types
Pre-Award — Ground rules and competitive range– Example: Challenging a problematic solicitation term
that impairs a proposal strategy or favors a competitor.
Post-Award — Contract award flaws– Example: Challenging a failure to follow solicitation
terms or applying them unequally.
4
Protest Forums
Government Accountability Office (“GAO”)̶, Fast, intensive, and (relatively) informal̶, Branch of Congress--recommends agency action̶, No appeal rights, but may refile at COFC
Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”)̶, Traditional court rules, but special expedited protest
procedures̶, Can order agency action̶, Appeals to the Federal Circuit
5
Protest Forums - Cont’d
Agency protests,̶ Less formal and limited process, so less directly confrontational
,̶ Agency self-assessment, but review above the contracting officer.
,̶ Typically reserved for preaward protests
6
Protest Timing—GAO Protests
• Pre-Award: before the deadline for proposal receipt or bid opening.
• Post-Award: – Default Rule: within 10 calendar days after award or when
basis for protest is “known or should have been known.” – Debriefing tolls the default rule:
• not later than 5 calendar days after a requested and required debriefing in order to secure an automatic stay of contract performance, otherwise, no later than 10 calendar days after the debriefing.
• Really 4 ½ days
7
Best Practices: Addressing Pre-Award Concerns– Speak Now Or Forever Hold Your Peace
Promptly assess issue.– Ground rules concerns due before proposal submission,
time to challenge other issues as short as 10 days.– System favors open competition.
Consider use of bidders’ questions to address structure concerns.
Never delay a pre-award debriefing. Consider informal channels for disagreement, as
appropriate (e.g., agency counsel). Consider pros and cons of a pre-award protest.
8
Automatic Stay
GAO Protests Only; Not COFC (injunction decision)
Remains in effect while the protest is pending.
Important leverage; protest viability reduced without a stay.
9
Automatic Stay: Agency Override
The head of the procuring agency may authorize the award or performance of a contract upon a written determination and finding that:– “urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly
affect interests of the United States” will not permit waiting for a resolution of the protest.
Challenging an override: The Protester may challenge the override by filing an action in the Court of Federal Claims.
10
Post-Award Debriefings
Timely request essential (3 business days)– TAKE THE DATE OFFERED!
Scope/structure varies widely– In person, telephonic, entirely written– Controlled and choreographed
FAR requirements limited -- Not subject to challenge– significant weaknesses or deficiencies; – the overall evaluated cost and technical rating of the awardee and the debriefed
offeror; – the overall ranking of all offerors; – a summary of the rationale for the award; – reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror
as to whether source selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the executive agency.
11
Post-Award Debriefings – Cont’d
Best practices– Information gathering vs. debate– Include attendees who know the procurement and
proposal in detail• Counsel?
– Prepare questions in advance (sometimes requested)– Request redacted SSDD, etc. and copies of all debrief
materials– Get written confirmation if agency holds debriefing
open
12
GAO Protests: Procedure
Agency counsel defends– Agency resources vary widely– Awardees may (and should) intervene to help defend the award
decision
Agency responds 30 calendar days after protest filing– Includes Evaluation Record
Comments and Supplemental Protests (if any)10 calendar days after Agency response/record
Supplemental briefing; hearing; ADR – all at GAO’s option. Decision within 100 calendar days from filing.
13
COFC Protests Are Different
DOJ handles protest defense, not agency counsel.
No fixed filing, procedural or decision deadlines.
Single judge vs. “institutional” review.
14
Forum Choice
Most start at GAO -- Automatic stay; can move to COFC
GAO has exclusive jurisdiction over IDIQ task order protests (over $10M or excess scope)
COFC more burdensome/expensive
Some circumstances and law may favor COFC
15
Common Considerations Before Protesting
Criticality of procurement Likelihood of protest success Likelihood of ultimate procurement success Size of procurement Customer relations – customer burden Impact on agency conduct more generally Investment in procurement Lack of adequate agency explanation Availability of CICA stay/injunction Costs of protest process/possibility of fee award
– Costs of affirmative protest unallowable – FAR 31.205-47– Costs of protest defense unallowable absent CO request – FAR 31.205-47– Fee recovery available (typically partial) under CICA/EAJA in limited circumstances
16
Protective Orders
• Proprietary proposals and source selection evaluations
• Only attorneys and consultants not involved in “competitive decision-making”
• A severe handicap on counsel, particularly in highly complex, specialized and technical cases
– “Answer the Questions”– A material benefit to have in-house counsel participate
17
Protest Grounds
Fact dependent. Each procurement is different.
No Rule 11 standard– Inference and analysis/“Information and belief” can suffice.
RFP Section M is the key.– Assess the basis for award and what must change to affect the outcome.– Evaluation criteria weights are critical. Were they applied properly?
Where were the mistakes and inequities?
Protester must demonstrate prejudice due to the procurement errors.
Some things are not subject to protest:– Contract administration;– Subcontract awards;– Bias.
18
Top Four Reasons GAO Sustained Protests In FY2014
Failure to follow evaluation criteria
Flawed source selection decision
Unreasonable technical evaluation
Unequal treatmentSource: GAO Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2014,
B-158766.
+2: -Lack of meaningful Discussions
-Cost/price realism evaluations
19
Preparations and Support
Outside counsel – involve early– Selection and conflict resolution– Briefings, background materials
Proposal Team– Manage expectations
• “Don’t believe everything you may suspect”– Coach on timing, debriefing planning, protective order
limits– Identify experts--even before award– Classified procurements require even more lead time
and logistical arrangements
20
Bid Protest Statistics for Fiscal Years 2010-2014
FY 2014 FY 2013 FY 2012 FY 2011 FY 2010
Cases Filed 2,561(up 5%)
2,429(down 2%)
2,475(up 5%)
2,353(up 2%)
2,299(up 16%)
Cases Closed2,458 2,538 2,495 2,292 2,226
Merit (Sustain + Deny)Decisions 556 509 570 417 441
Number of Sustains 72 87 106 67 82
Sustain Rate 13% 17% 18.6% 16% 19%
Effectiveness Rate 43% 43% 42% 42% 42%
ADR (cases used) 96 145 106 140 159
ADR Success Rate 83% 86% 80% 82% 80%
4.70% 3.36% 6.17% 8% 10%Hearings (42 cases) (31cases) (56 cases) (46 cases) (61 cases)
Source: GAO Bid Protest Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2014, B-158766
21
CRS Analysis – Comparison of Total Contract Obligations To Protests Filed
Source: Congressional Research Analysis of GAO Data, available at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40227.pdf
22
QUESTIONS?
23
For Additional Information, Please Contact:
Mark D. Colley, PartnerArnold & Porter LLP – Washington, DC
(202) [email protected]