Upload
scott-reeves
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Does endometriosis effect implantation?
Bilgin GURATES, MD
IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS
It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease
This database gives us the dimension of this problem, which is a huge problem,
Many different experimental moldels, even animal models, that show that, this disease decreses fertility.
THE MECHANISM OF INFERTILITY
Altered folliculogenesis,Ovulatory dysfunction,Hyperprolactinemia, Luteal phase defect,Accelerated ovum transport,Sperm phagocytosis,Impaired fertilization,Embryotoxicity against early embryonic
development,Defective implantation
IMPLANTATION
Embryo quality, This is a high indicator of how pregnancy rates can be more or less.
Endometrial receptivity, Which is a crucial event.
Transfer efficiency, That it is actually very important step in the implantation rate.
control of hyper stimulation
Presence of Endometriosis Decreases PregnancyRates
Padigas K, Fertil Steril 1996Kodama H, Fertil Steril 1996Guzick DS, Fertil Steril 1994Adamson GD, Semin Reprod
Endocrinol 1997Tummon IS, Fertil Steril
1997Falcone T, Curr Opin Obstet
Gynecol 1996Lu PY, Mayo Clinic Proc
1995
Without assisted reproductive
technologies or with ovulation induction
ENDOMETRIOSIS &FERTILITY(IVF)
GEBER, S., 1995. Hum. Reprod. JONES, H.W., 1984. Fertil. Steril OLIVENNES, F., 1995. Fertil. Steril. OEHNINGER, S., 1988. J. InVitro
Fertil. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National):
French national IVF registry: analysis of 1986 to 1990 data. 1993. Fertil. Steril.
MAHADEVAN M.M., 1983. Fertil. Steril WARDLE, P.G., 1986. Lancet WARDLE, P.G., 1985. Lancet YOVICH, J.L., 1985, Lancet MATSON, P.L., 1986.Fertil. Steril. O’SHEA, R.T., 1985. Lancet PAL, L., 1998. J. Assist.Reprod. Genet. ARICI , A., 1996. Fertil. Steril
SAME WORSE
aspiratedEndometriosis
L/S tubal factor
Impact of ovarian endometrioma on oocytes andpregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization
Takahiro Suzuki, Fertility and Sterility 2005
Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization
Christos Coutifaris,
Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization
Christos Coutifaris,
Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization
Christos Coutifaris,
Impaired parameters Number of oocytes retrieved, Peak E2 concentration, Fertilization rate, PR, and IR
Poor oocyte quality
Defective implantation capacity
ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVENESS
Theoretically, endometriosis might affect endometrial receptiveness by altering the local biochemical environment
paracrine endocrine immune response.
ENDOMETRIOSIS IN OOCYTE RECIPIENTSSimon C, Gutierrez A, Vidal A, de los Santos MJ, Tarın JJ,
Remohı J, et al. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:725–9.
Sung L, Mukherjee T, Takeshige T, Bustillo M, Copperman A. Endometriosis is not detrimental to embryo implantation in oocyte recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:152–6.
Dıaz I, Navarro J, Blasco L, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohı J. Impact of stage III–IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:31–4.
n=178retrospective
premature ovarian failure
(n = 54),
low response (n = 77)
endometriosis(n = 10)
No difference pregnancy rate
per woman, per cycle, per implantation.
SIMÓN, C. 1994. Hum. Reprod.
OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
239 oocyte
recipientretrospecti
ve
Endometriosis
( n = 55)
without endometriosis
(n = 184).
pregnancy rates (28 versus 29%) implantation rates
(12 and 13%)
Sung L, . J Assist Reprod Genet 1997
OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
N=25
stage III–IV endometriosi
s (n=25)
Healthy recipient(n =33)
Impact of stage III–IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study
Israel Dı´az, Fertility and Sterility 2000
Infertility outcome comparing endometriosis and tubal infertility. SIMÓN, C., A. GUTIERREZ, A. VIDAL, et al. 1994. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation.Hum. Reprod. 9: 725–729
Pregnancy rate per cycle (34.4% vs. 12.5% ; p <0.0004) Pregnancy per transfer (37.3% vs. 15.1% ; p <0.002)
Implantation rate(13.4% vs. 5.8%; p <0.003)
Decreases Number of blastomeres
Arrested embryos
59 women78 women
IVF IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
Simon C, Hum Reprod 1994, Sung L, J Assist Reprod Genet 1997, Dıaz I, Fertil Steril 2000
ENDO(-) ENDO(+) ENDO(-)
Grup 1(n=44) Grup 11(n=14) Grup 111(n=16)
ENDO(-) ENDO(-) ENDO(+)
DONORS
RECIPIENTS
Preg RatePer Tansfer
61.4 % 28.6 % 60 %
Pellicer, 1994
OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
Follicular-oocyte-embryo quality in endometriosis
Ovlatory dysfonction (Tummon 1988)Pituitary-ovarian axis(Chaill 1995)Over production of progesterone
(Pellicer 1998)IL-6 IL-1β, VEGF (Pellicer 1998)Apoptosis (Toya 2000)PGF2 (Bergqvist 1997)MIS (Fallat 1997)Inhibins A ,inhibins B, activin B
(Akande 2000)Endothelin-1 , (Abea 1994)
ConclusionsClinic evidence using the oocyte donation
model strongly suggest that the endometrium is NOT altered in women with endometriosis.
In-vitro studies on the endometrium of endometriosis patients do not support the hypothesis of an altered endometrial environment.
Rather, decrease oocyte /embryo quality seems to be cause of endometriosis related infertility .
ConclusionsNone of the alterations described in the in-vitro
studies is relevant for endometrial receptiveness.Endometrial priming protocols used in OD cycles
reestablish an adequate uterine cavity environment.
GnRHa restores the normal apoptotic rate.(Imai A, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000) 3-month course of GnRH-a(Surrey ES, Fertil Steril 2002) Artificial endometrial priming for OD could be beneficial in that down-regulation
and the exogenous supply of E and P(Cunha-Filho JS, J Assist Reprod Genet 2003) Pinopode formation with artificial priming has been demonstrated to be normal in
these patients(Garcıa-Velasco JA, Fertil Steril 2001)
A question that remains to be answered concerns the endometrial receptiveness of these patients in natural cycles.
THANK YOU!