26
Does endometriosis effect implantation? Bilgin GURATES, MD

Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Does endometriosis effect implantation?

Bilgin GURATES, MD

Page 2: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS

It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease

This database gives us the dimension of this problem, which is a huge problem,

Many different experimental moldels, even animal models, that show that, this disease decreses fertility.

Page 3: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

THE MECHANISM OF INFERTILITY

Altered folliculogenesis,Ovulatory dysfunction,Hyperprolactinemia, Luteal phase defect,Accelerated ovum transport,Sperm phagocytosis,Impaired fertilization,Embryotoxicity against early embryonic

development,Defective implantation

Page 4: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

IMPLANTATION

Embryo quality, This is a high indicator of how pregnancy rates can be more or less.

Endometrial receptivity, Which is a crucial event.

Transfer efficiency, That it is actually very important step in the implantation rate.

control of hyper stimulation

Page 5: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Presence of Endometriosis Decreases PregnancyRates

Padigas K, Fertil Steril 1996Kodama H, Fertil Steril 1996Guzick DS, Fertil Steril 1994Adamson GD, Semin Reprod

Endocrinol 1997Tummon IS, Fertil Steril

1997Falcone T, Curr Opin Obstet

Gynecol 1996Lu PY, Mayo Clinic Proc

1995

Without assisted reproductive

technologies or with ovulation induction

Page 6: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ENDOMETRIOSIS &FERTILITY(IVF)

GEBER, S., 1995. Hum. Reprod. JONES, H.W., 1984. Fertil. Steril OLIVENNES, F., 1995. Fertil. Steril. OEHNINGER, S., 1988. J. InVitro

Fertil. FIVNAT (French In Vitro National):

French national IVF registry: analysis of 1986 to 1990 data. 1993. Fertil. Steril.

MAHADEVAN M.M., 1983. Fertil. Steril WARDLE, P.G., 1986. Lancet WARDLE, P.G., 1985. Lancet YOVICH, J.L., 1985, Lancet MATSON, P.L., 1986.Fertil. Steril. O’SHEA, R.T., 1985. Lancet PAL, L., 1998. J. Assist.Reprod. Genet. ARICI , A., 1996. Fertil. Steril

SAME WORSE

Page 7: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

aspiratedEndometriosis

L/S tubal factor

Impact of ovarian endometrioma on oocytes andpregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization

Takahiro Suzuki, Fertility and Sterility 2005

Page 8: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization

Christos Coutifaris,

Page 9: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization

Christos Coutifaris,

Page 10: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization

Christos Coutifaris,

Page 11: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Impaired parameters Number of oocytes retrieved, Peak E2 concentration, Fertilization rate, PR, and IR

Poor oocyte quality

Defective implantation capacity

Page 12: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVENESS

Theoretically, endometriosis might affect endometrial receptiveness by altering the local biochemical environment

paracrine endocrine immune response.

Page 13: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension
Page 14: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension
Page 15: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension
Page 16: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ENDOMETRIOSIS IN OOCYTE RECIPIENTSSimon C, Gutierrez A, Vidal A, de los Santos MJ, Tarın JJ,

Remohı J, et al. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:725–9.

Sung L, Mukherjee T, Takeshige T, Bustillo M, Copperman A. Endometriosis is not detrimental to embryo implantation in oocyte recipients. J Assist Reprod Genet 1997;14:152–6.

Dıaz I, Navarro J, Blasco L, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohı J. Impact of stage III–IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:31–4.

Page 17: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

n=178retrospective

premature ovarian failure

(n = 54),

low response (n = 77)

endometriosis(n = 10)

No difference pregnancy rate

per woman, per cycle, per implantation.

SIMÓN, C. 1994. Hum. Reprod.

OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS

Page 18: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

239 oocyte

recipientretrospecti

ve

Endometriosis

( n = 55)

without endometriosis

(n = 184).

pregnancy rates (28 versus 29%) implantation rates

(12 and 13%)

Sung L, . J Assist Reprod Genet 1997

OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS

Page 19: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

N=25

stage III–IV endometriosi

s (n=25)

Healthy recipient(n =33)

Impact of stage III–IV endometriosis on recipients of sibling oocytes: matched case-control study

Israel Dı´az, Fertility and Sterility 2000

Page 20: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Infertility outcome comparing endometriosis and tubal infertility. SIMÓN, C., A. GUTIERREZ, A. VIDAL, et al. 1994. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in vitro fertilization and oocyte donation.Hum. Reprod. 9: 725–729

Pregnancy rate per cycle (34.4% vs. 12.5% ; p <0.0004) Pregnancy per transfer (37.3% vs. 15.1% ; p <0.002)

Implantation rate(13.4% vs. 5.8%; p <0.003)

Decreases Number of blastomeres

Arrested embryos

59 women78 women

IVF IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS

Page 21: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Simon C, Hum Reprod 1994, Sung L, J Assist Reprod Genet 1997, Dıaz I, Fertil Steril 2000

Page 22: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ENDO(-) ENDO(+) ENDO(-)

Grup 1(n=44) Grup 11(n=14) Grup 111(n=16)

ENDO(-) ENDO(-) ENDO(+)

DONORS

RECIPIENTS

Preg RatePer Tansfer

61.4 % 28.6 % 60 %

Pellicer, 1994

OOCYTE DONATION IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS

Page 23: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

Follicular-oocyte-embryo quality in endometriosis

Ovlatory dysfonction (Tummon 1988)Pituitary-ovarian axis(Chaill 1995)Over production of progesterone

(Pellicer 1998)IL-6 IL-1β, VEGF (Pellicer 1998)Apoptosis (Toya 2000)PGF2 (Bergqvist 1997)MIS (Fallat 1997)Inhibins A ,inhibins B, activin B

(Akande 2000)Endothelin-1 , (Abea 1994)

Page 24: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ConclusionsClinic evidence using the oocyte donation

model strongly suggest that the endometrium is NOT altered in women with endometriosis.

In-vitro studies on the endometrium of endometriosis patients do not support the hypothesis of an altered endometrial environment.

Rather, decrease oocyte /embryo quality seems to be cause of endometriosis related infertility .

Page 25: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

ConclusionsNone of the alterations described in the in-vitro

studies is relevant for endometrial receptiveness.Endometrial priming protocols used in OD cycles

reestablish an adequate uterine cavity environment.

GnRHa restores the normal apoptotic rate.(Imai A, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000) 3-month course of GnRH-a(Surrey ES, Fertil Steril 2002) Artificial endometrial priming for OD could be beneficial in that down-regulation

and the exogenous supply of E and P(Cunha-Filho JS, J Assist Reprod Genet 2003) Pinopode formation with artificial priming has been demonstrated to be normal in

these patients(Garcıa-Velasco JA, Fertil Steril 2001)

A question that remains to be answered concerns the endometrial receptiveness of these patients in natural cycles.

Page 26: Bilgin GURATES, MD. IMPLANTATION IS OR IS NOT AFFECTED BY ENDOMETRIOSIS It’s a common disease and an enigmatic disease This database gives us the dimension

THANK YOU!