Upload
duongthuy
View
222
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BIOCON BIOLOGICS INDIA LTD
Prepared By
Environmental Clearance for the Proposed Manufacturing ofBiologicals, Antibodies and its Derivatives
Formulations for Antibodies, Derivatives, Protiens, Peptidesand Biologicals
atPlot No. 2, 3, 4 & 5, Biocon SEZ, Bommasandra Industrial
Area, Phase 4, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District,Karnataka
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORTDecember - 2016
HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD, CHENNAI
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
BIOCON Biologics India Ltd (BBIL)
Mr. Lourde Joseph - Vice President
Mr. Kameshwar Rao - Head (EHS)
Mr.Ashwinkumar P - Asst Manager
Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd,
Dr. J. R. Moses - EIA Coordinator (EC) & Functional Area (FAE)
Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru - EIA Coordinator (EC) & Functioal Area (FAE)
Dr. Rajkumar Samuel - Functional Area Expert (FAE)
Mr. Vamsee Krishna Navooru - FAE
Mr. Abishek Moses - Team Member (TM)
Mr. A. Manoharan - FAE
Mr. V. Dhivakar - FAE
Ms. Ramaa Prakash - FAE
Ms. A. Ragatharani - Functional Area Associate (FAA)
Mr. Chengalvarayan - TM
Ms. Abhirami - TM
Dr. K. Karupaiyan - TM
Mr. Vardharajan - TM
Ms. Kavya S Kumar - TM
Mrs. Anushya - TM
Mr. Tamil Selvan. B - TM
The following personnel are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in collection,
compilation of needful data regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the report on
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of M/s. Biocon Biologics India Ltd, Bangalore.
NABET CERTIFICATE
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page i
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page ii
Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA
I hereby certify that Mr.N.Vamsee Krishna Navooru was involved in the EIA report along with
self for the project titled “Manufacturing of Biologicals, Antibodies and its Derivatives,Formulations for Antibodies, Derivatives, Proteins, Peptides and Biologicals” by M/s.Biocon Biologics India Ltd, at Biocon SEZ, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4,Bommasandra Jigani Link Road, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District & KarnatakaState, along with the Functional Area Experts listed below during June 2016 to till date.
Date: 20/12/2016 (Dr. J R Moses)EIA Coordinator
Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd.,A-21, Phase III, Thiru-vi-ka Industrial Area, Guindy,
Chennai - 600032
Functional Area Experts:
S. No. Functional Areas Name of the Expert Duration of Involvement Signature1. AP, AQ, RH & SHW Dr. J R Moses June 2016 – Till date
2. AP, WP, N & SHW Mr. Vamsee KrishnaNavooru
Oct 2016 – Till date
3. WP & EB Dr. Rajkumar Samuel June 2016 – Till date
4. EB, SE, SC & SHW Mr. A. Manoharan June 2016 – Till date
5. WP & SHW Mrs. Ramaa Prakash June 2016 – Till date
6. SE Mr. V. Dhivakar June 2016 – Till date
7. LU & HG Dr. T.P. Natesan Aug 2016 – Till date
8. NV Mr. Vivek Navare Aug 2016 – Till date
AP - Air pollution monitoring, prevention and controlAQ - Meteorology, air quality modeling and predictionEB - Ecology and biodiversityHG - Hydrology, ground water and water conservationLU - Land useNV - Noise & VibrationRH - Risk assessment and hazards managementSC - Soil conservationSE - Socio-economicsSHW - Solid and hazardous waste managementWP - Water pollution monitoring, prevention and control
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page iii
Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization
I, Dr. J R Moses hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA
for the “Manufacturing of Biologicals, Antibodies and its Derivatives,Formulations for Antibodies, Derivatives, Proteins, Peptides and Biologicals”by M/s. Biocon Biologics India Ltd, at Biocon SEZ, Bommasandra IndustrialArea, Phase 4, Bommasandra Jigani Link Road, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru UrbanDistrict & Karnataka State by M/s. Biocon Biologics India Ltd. I also confirm that
I shall be fully accountable for any misleading information mentioned in this
statement.
Signature: Date: 20/12/2016
Name: Dr. J.R Moses
Designation: CEO
Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd.,Chennai
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page iv
Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P)Ltd.Client: Biocon Ltd
Electronic city, Bengaluru
Project: Manufacturing of Biologicals, Antibodiesand its DerivativesFormulations for Antibodies, Derivatives,Protiens, Peptides and Biologicals
Project No.:
4300020384
Title:EIA/EMP Report
Document No.:
RP002Rev.:
0This document is the property of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd. and mustnot be passed on to any person or body not authorised by us to receive it nor becopied or otherwise made use of either in full or in part by such person or bodywithout our prior permission in writing.
File path:c:\users\hecs\desktop\report format.docx
Notes:
1.
Revision Details:
A 21/12/2016 Second Submission
Mr.A.ManoharanMr.V.DhivakarMrs.RamaaprakashDr.K.KarupaiyanMrs.RagatharaniMr.VardharajanMrs.AnushyaMr.Tamilselvan
Mr.VamseeKrishnaNavooru
Dr.J.R.Moses
0 07/12/2016 First Submission Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
Rev. Date DetailsInit. Sign. Init. Sign. Init. Sign.
Prepared Checked Approved
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page v
TABLE OF CONTENTSExecutive Summary ................................................................................................................................2
Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................................................................ 13
1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................. 131.2 Overview of Biocon ................................................................................................................ 13
1.2.1 Overview of Biocon SEZ.............................................................................................. 141.3 Project Proponent .................................................................................................................. 15
1.3.1 Awards .......................................................................................................................... 151.4 Proposed Project ................................................................................................................... 151.5 Justification & Need for the Project........................................................................................ 151.6 Location of the Project Site .................................................................................................... 15
1.6.1 Sites considered for the project location....................................................................... 181.7 Need for the EIA study........................................................................................................... 18
1.7.1 Project Screening (Cat B) and ToR .............................................................................. 181.7.2 EIA Study ...................................................................................................................... 181.7.3 EIA Cost ........................................................................................................................ 19
1.8 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study ..................................................................... 191.9 Structure of the EIA Study ..................................................................................................... 21
Chapter 2 Project Description.................................................................................................... 24
2.1 Type of project ....................................................................................................................... 242.2 Site Location and Coordinates............................................................................................... 24
2.2.1 Existing Environmental Setup...................................................................................... 272.3 Size or Magnitude of Operation ............................................................................................. 272.4 Proposed Schedule for Approval & Implementation.............................................................. 282.5 Technology and Process Description .................................................................................... 28
2.5.1 Process Description..................................................................................................... 282.6 Land Use of the Project Site .................................................................................................. 32
2.6.1 Resource requirements ............................................................................................... 332.7 Assessment of New & Untested Technology for the Risk of Technological Failure.............. 382.8 Construction Management..................................................................................................... 382.9 Sustainable aspects, Energy Conservation Measures & Solar Energy Installation .............. 39
Chapter 3 Description of Environment ..................................................................................... 44
3.1 Preamble................................................................................................................................ 443.2 Study Area ............................................................................................................................. 453.3 Description of the Study Area ................................................................................................ 453.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas........................................................................ 453.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area .......................................................... 473.6 Physical Conditions................................................................................................................ 48
3.6.1 PIA District Profile........................................................................................................ 483.6.2 Climatic Conditions ...................................................................................................... 493.6.3 Rainfall ......................................................................................................................... 493.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District.................................................... 493.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover .............................................................................................. 523.6.6 Topography.................................................................................................................. 573.6.7 Geology of the PIA District........................................................................................... 633.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District .................................................................................... 643.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District........................................................................................ 653.6.10Drainage Pattern in PIA District ................................................................................... 663.6.11Soils in PIA District ...................................................................................................... 693.6.12Physiography of PIA District ........................................................................................ 713.6.13Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District ......................... 753.6.14Seismicity..................................................................................................................... 76
3.7 Air Environment ..................................................................................................................... 763.7.1 Meteorological Conditions ........................................................................................... 773.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection.................................................................................... 77
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page vi
3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data ................................................ 773.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period.............................................................. 793.7.5 Ambient Air Quality ...................................................................................................... 81
3.8 Noise Environment ................................................................................................................. 953.8.1 Results and Discussions.............................................................................................. 953.8.2 Observations ................................................................................................................ 95
3.9 Water Environment................................................................................................................. 963.9.1 Surface Water Resources............................................................................................ 963.9.2 Ground water resources ............................................................................................ 126
3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality......................................................................................... 1313.11 Flora & Fauna....................................................................................................................... 135
3.11.1Flora ........................................................................................................................... 1353.11.2Fauna ......................................................................................................................... 136
3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area .......................................................... 1373.12.1Socio economic Profile of the district ......................................................................... 1383.12.2Socio economic Profile of the study area .................................................................. 139
Chapter 4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................... 173
4.1 General................................................................................................................................. 1734.2 Land Environment ................................................................................................................ 173
4.2.1 Potential Impact due to Location................................................................................ 1734.2.2 Potential Impact due to construction.......................................................................... 1744.2.3 Potential Impact due to operation .............................................................................. 175
4.3 Water Environment............................................................................................................... 1764.3.1 Potential Impact due to Location................................................................................ 1764.3.2 Potential Impact during Construction ......................................................................... 1774.3.3 Potential Impact during Operation ............................................................................. 178
4.4 Biological Environment......................................................................................................... 1804.4.1 Potential Impact during Construction ......................................................................... 180
4.5 Air Environment.................................................................................................................... 1824.5.1 Potential Impact during Construction ......................................................................... 1824.5.2 Potential Impact due to Operation ............................................................................. 1844.5.3 AERMOD Model......................................................................................................... 185
4.6 Noise Environment ............................................................................................................... 2164.6.1 Potential Impact during Construction ......................................................................... 2164.6.2 Potential Impact during Operation ............................................................................. 217
4.7 Solid Waste Management .................................................................................................... 2184.7.1 Potential Impact Due to Construction ........................................................................ 2184.7.2 Potential Impact during Operation ............................................................................. 219
Chapter 5 Analysis of Alternatives Sites................................................................................. 222
5.1 History and Background of site selection ............................................................................. 2225.2 Current proposal................................................................................................................... 2225.3 Results of the Analysis ......................................................................................................... 222
Chapter 6 Environmental Monitoring Programme ................................................................. 224
6.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme................................................................................. 2276.2 Monitoring by Biocon............................................................................................................ 2316.3 Compliance Reports............................................................................................................. 2316.4 Plantation Monitoring Programme........................................................................................ 2316.5 On-site Mock Drills Requirements........................................................................................ 231
Chapter 7 Additional Studies ................................................................................................... 234
7.1 Risk Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 2347.2 Fire Hazards and Risk Mitigation Plan ................................................................................. 234
7.2.1 Fire Hazards............................................................................................................... 2347.2.2 Fire Risk Assessment of Natural Gas........................................................................ 234
7.3 Electrical Hazards and Safety Measures ............................................................................. 2377.4 Occupational Health and Noise Management Plan ............................................................. 2387.5 Occupational Safety Management and Surveillance Programme ....................................... 238
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page vii
7.6 Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Systems........................................................................... 240
Chapter 8 Project Benefits ....................................................................................................... 243
8.1 Preamble.............................................................................................................................. 2438.2 Induced Development .......................................................................................................... 2438.3 Improvement in local Infrastructure ..................................................................................... 2438.4 Improved solid waste management ..................................................................................... 2448.5 Improved water and sanitation facilities............................................................................... 244
8.5.1 Water resources ........................................................................................................ 2448.5.2 Provision for toilets .................................................................................................... 244
8.6 Improved Socio-Economic Conditions................................................................................. 244The villagers expect BIOCON guided CSR interventions could benefit the communities more.
2458.6.1 Health Facilities ......................................................................................................... 2458.6.2 Education Facilities.................................................................................................... 2458.6.3 Skill Development Activities....................................................................................... 245
8.7 Employment Opportunities................................................................................................... 2468.7.1 Employment during the Development Period............................................................ 2468.7.2 Direct Labour ............................................................................................................. 2468.7.3 Indirect Labour........................................................................................................... 246
Chapter 9 Environmental Management Plan .......................................................................... 248
9.1 Administrative and Technical Setup for Environmental Management................................. 2489.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management..................................... 249
9.2 Greenbelt Development ....................................................................................................... 2519.2.1 Objectives of Greenbelt Plan..................................................................................... 2519.2.2 Plant Species for Green Belt development................................................................ 2519.2.3 Greenbelt Development Plan .................................................................................... 252
9.3 Rainwater Harvesting........................................................................................................... 2619.3.1 Estimation of Rainwater Harvesting Potential ........................................................... 2619.3.2 Harvesting Plan and Recharge Structures ................................................................ 2629.3.3 Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Plan ................................................................ 2669.3.4 Monitoring wells for Impact Assessment ................................................................... 268
9.4 Solar Power Harnessing ...................................................................................................... 2699.5 Occupational Health and Safety .......................................................................................... 270
9.5.1 Occupational Hazards ............................................................................................... 2709.5.2 Personal Protective Equipment ................................................................................. 2719.5.3 Health Monitoring....................................................................................................... 2729.5.4 Safety......................................................................................................................... 2729.5.5 Endemic Disease Mitigation Plan .............................................................................. 273
9.6 Institutional Mechanism for Implementation of Mitigation Measures ................................... 2749.7 Environmental Management Cell (EMC) ............................................................................. 2759.8 Approach towards Voluntary Compliance............................................................................ 2779.9 Audits and Inspections......................................................................................................... 2779.10 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures.................................................................... 2779.11 Budgetary Estimates............................................................................................................ 283
9.11.1Budgetary Estimate for Environmental Management................................................ 2839.11.2Budgetary Estimate for CSR Interventions in the Study Area ................................... 284
Chapter 10 Summary & Conclusion .......................................................................................... 288
10.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 28810.1.1Project background.................................................................................................... 28810.1.2Overview of Biocon.................................................................................................... 28810.1.3Overview of Biocon SEZ............................................................................................ 28910.1.4Location of Project site .............................................................................................. 28910.1.5Need and Justification of Project Development......................................................... 289
10.2 Project Description............................................................................................................... 28910.2.1Cost of the Project ..................................................................................................... 290
10.3 Description of Environment.................................................................................................. 29010.3.1Terrestrial Environment ............................................................................................. 290
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page viii
10.3.2Socioeconomic status ................................................................................................ 29110.4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures................................................. 29210.5 Analysis of Alternative Sites................................................................................................. 29210.6 Environmental Monitoring Programme................................................................................. 29210.7 Additional Studies................................................................................................................. 29310.8 Project Benefits .................................................................................................................... 293
10.8.1Corporate Social Responsibility ................................................................................. 29310.9 Environmental Management Plan ........................................................................................ 29410.10 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 294
Chapter 11 Disclosure of Consultants ...................................................................................... 296
Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)................................................ 296
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1-1: Location map of BiconSEZ.................................................................................................. 15Figure 1-2 Location map of Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) ....................................................... 16Figure 1-3 : Google Map showing the proposed project site location ................................................... 17Figure 2-1: Project Site Location ........................................................................................................... 24Figure 2-2: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (10 Km Radius).......................................................... 25Figure 2-3: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)............................................................ 25Figure 2-4: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (1Km Radius)............................................................. 26Figure 2-5: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (0.5 Km Radius)......................................................... 26Figure 2-6: Process Flow....................................................................................................................... 29Figure 2-7: Brief Process Flow diagram for Vials & Injectable Pens Filling. ......................................... 30Figure 2-8: Proposed Layout plan ......................................................................................................... 32Figure 2-9: Site photographs ................................................................................................................. 33Figure 2-10: Water Balance Chart......................................................................................................... 36Figure 2-11 : Feasibility & Environmental Assessment Process........................................................... 42Figure 3-1: Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius .................................................................. 48Figure 3-2: Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka ............................................................................... 51Figure 3-3: Land Use Pattern in the PIA District ................................................................................... 52Figure 3-4: Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district ......................................................................... 53Figure 3-5: Land Use Pattern of the Study Area ................................................................................... 54Figure 3-6: Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area...................................................................... 55Figure 3-7: Contour map of project site ................................................................................................. 58Figure 3-8: Physiography map of Karnataka State ............................................................................... 59Figure 3-9: Physiography map of Study Area........................................................................................ 61Figure 3-10: Topo map of the study area .............................................................................................. 62Figure 3-11: Geology Map of PIA District .............................................................................................. 64Figure 3-12: Geomorphology Map of Study area .................................................................................. 65Figure 3-13: Hydrogeology Map of PIA district...................................................................................... 66Figure 3-14: Drainage Map of the Study area ....................................................................................... 67Figure 3-15: Soil Map of Karnataka State ............................................................................................. 70Figure 3-16: Physiography Map of the Study Area ............................................................................... 73Figure 3-17: Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka........................................................................................ 75Figure 3-18: Seismicity Map of India ..................................................................................................... 76Figure 3-19: Wind roses drawn for various seasons as per IMD observatory data (1970-2000).......... 79Figure 3-20: Site Specific Windrose for the study period ((September to November) .......................... 80Figure 3-21: Hourly variation of the mixing heights ............................................................................... 81Figure 3-22: Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area ............................ 87Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area............................ 88Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area .............................. 89Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area.............................. 90Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study Area ............................... 92Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area ................................ 93Figure 3-28: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area .............................. 94Figure 3-29: Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area................................... 97Figure 3-30: Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area................................... 98
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page ix
Figure 3-31: Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 forBangalore Urban District, Karnataka................................................................................................... 127Figure 3-32: Informal Consultation with Locals ................................................................................... 140Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301 ...................................... 167Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302 .......................................... 168Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303...................................... 169Figure 3-36 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304............................................................................................................................................................. 170Figure 3-37 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305........................................ 171Figure 4-1: Annual Wind Rose Diagram (January – December 2015) ............................................... 186Figure 4-2: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2 ...................................... 196Figure 4-3: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of NO2 .......................................................................................................................... 197Figure 4-4: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of CO............................................................................................................................ 198Figure 4-5: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO ....................................... 199Figure 4-6: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of SO2 ...................................... 200Figure 4-7: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2 ...................................... 201Figure 4-8: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of PM ....................................... 202Figure 4-9: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO ....................................... 203Figure 4-10: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of SO2........................................................................................................................... 204Figure 4-11: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of NO2 .......................................................................................................................... 205Figure 4-12: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of PM............................................................................................................................ 206Figure 4-13: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of CO............................................................................................................................ 207Figure 4-14: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of SO2 .................................... 208Figure 4-15: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2 .................................... 209Figure 4-16: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of PM ..................................... 210Figure 4-17: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO ..................................... 211Figure 4-18: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of SO2........................................................................................................................... 212Figure 4-19: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of NO2 .......................................................................................................................... 213Figure 4-20: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of PM............................................................................................................................ 214Figure 4-21: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) IncrementalConcentration of CO............................................................................................................................ 215Figure 4-22: Waste Management Concept in BBIL............................................................................. 220Figure 7-1 : Jet Fire radii due to Accidental Fire of NG pipeline ......................................................... 236Figure 7-2 : Flash Fire radii due to Accidental Fire of NG pipeline ..................................................... 237Figure 9-1: Coordination of EMC of BL and BSEZ with BBIL industry................................................ 249Figure 9-2: Hypothetical representation of three tier greenbelt development..................................... 253Figure 9-3: Identified Locations of Rainwater Harvesting Structures/Pits........................................... 267Figure 9-4: Implementation Arrangement ........................................................................................... 275Figure 9-5: Biocon Organizational Setup for Environmental Management Cell ................................. 276
Figure FD0301: Map Showing the Study area of the ProjectFigure FD0302: Map Showing the Air monitoring locationsFigure FD0303: Map Showing the Noise monitoring locationsFigure FD0304: Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locationsFigure FD0305: Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page x
LIST OF TABLESTable 1-1: Salient Features of the project site and its environs ............................................................ 17Table 2-1: List of Major Industries within 10KM radius from proposed project site............................... 27Table 2-2: Sensitive areas from the site boundary, 10 KM radius......................................................... 27Table 2-3: Capital Investment of the Project ......................................................................................... 28Table 2-4: Time schedule for completion of the proposed project ........................................................ 28Table 2-5 : Raw materials details .......................................................................................................... 31Table 2-6 : Detailed Land Break up....................................................................................................... 32Table 2-7: Power & Fuel requirement.................................................................................................... 34Table 2-8: Operating parameters for Boiler & DG ................................................................................. 34Table 2-9 : Details of Man power requirement ...................................................................................... 35Table 2-10 : Water Requirement ........................................................................................................... 35Table 2-11: Solid Waste generation details........................................................................................... 37Table 2-12: Hazardous Waste generation and disposal ....................................................................... 37Table 2-13 : Construction Materials and Approximate Quantities ......................................................... 38Table 3-1: Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary................................. 45Table 3-2: District land use/land cover statistics ................................................................................... 52Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10Km radius of the Study Area ..................................... 54Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000)................................................. 77Table 3-5 : Site Specific Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September – November 2016) ....... 81Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations ............................................................ 82Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters.................................... 82Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants .......................................... 85Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants .......................................... 86Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data ........................................................................................... 87Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data .......................................................................................... 88Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data............................................................................................ 89Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data ............................................................................................ 90Table 3-14: Ambient Lead (Pb) Monitoring Data ................................................................................... 90Table 3-15: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data.............................................................. 91Table 3-16: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data ................................................................................. 92Table 3-17: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data.......................................................................... 93Table 3-18: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data........................................ 94Table 3-19: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels ............................................................................. 95Table 3-20: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius.................................................................. 96Table 3-21: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area ..................................................................... 99Table 3-22: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters..................................... 121Table 3-23: Details of Surface water sampling locations .................................................................... 121Table 3-24: Surface Monitoring Results .............................................................................................. 123Table 3-25: Surface Water Quality Standards..................................................................................... 125Table 3-26: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District .................................................. 126Table 3-27: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations...................................................... 128Table 3-28: Ground Water Monitoring Results .................................................................................... 129Table 3-29: Soil Quality Monitoring Locations..................................................................................... 132Table 3-30: Soil Quality Monitoring Results ........................................................................................ 133Table 3-31: The List of Flora within the Study area............................................................................. 135Table 3-32: List of Wild Fauna in the Study Area................................................................................ 136Table 3-33: Amphibians....................................................................................................................... 137Table 3-34: Rodents ............................................................................................................................ 137Table 3-35: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators....................................................................... 138Table 3-36: Socioeconomic details of the study area.......................................................................... 140Table 3-37: Child population within the study area ............................................................................. 143Table 3-38: Social group details within the study area........................................................................ 146Table 3-39: Workers group distribution in the study area.................................................................... 151Table 3-40: Industrial estates within the study area ............................................................................ 156Table 3-41: List of major Industries within the study area ................................................................... 156Table 3-42: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk ........................................................................ 157Table 3-43: Health profile of Anekal Taluk .......................................................................................... 158Table 3-44: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area ........................... 159Table 3-45: Literacy details within the study area ............................................................................... 161
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page xi
Table 3-46: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management........................ 164Table 3-47 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk....................................................................................... 165Table 3-48: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study area ......................................... 165Table 4-1: Details of break up in terms of volumetric contribution ...................................................... 179Table 4-2: Expected Characteristics of effluent generated from BBIL................................................ 179Table 4-3: Expected Characteristics of Sewage generated from BBIL............................................... 179Table 4-4: Boiler Stack & Emission details ......................................................................................... 184Table 4-5: DG Stacks & Emission details ........................................................................................... 184Table 4-6: Receptor Details................................................................................................................. 186Table 4-7: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ........................... 187Table 4-8: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of NO2 ........................................................................................................ 187Table 4-9: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ................................. 187Table 4-10: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO .......................... 187Table 4-11: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of CO ......................................................................................................... 188Table 4-12: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO ................................ 188Table 4-13: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM .......................... 188Table 4-14: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM ................................ 188Table 4-15: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of PM.......................................................................................................... 189Table 4-16: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO .......................... 189Table 4-17: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of CO ......................................................................................................... 189Table 4-18: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO ................................ 190Table 4-19: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2 ......................... 190Table 4-20: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of SO2 ........................................................................................................ 190Table 4-21: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2 ............................... 190Table 4-22: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ......................... 191Table 4-23: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of NO2 ........................................................................................................ 191Table 4-24: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ............................... 191Table 4-25: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM .......................... 192Table 4-26: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM ................................ 192Table 4-27: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of PM.......................................................................................................... 192Table 4-28: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO .......................... 192Table 4-29: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of CO ......................................................................................................... 193Table 4-30: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO ................................ 193Table 4-31: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2 ......................... 193Table 4-32: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of SO2 ........................................................................................................ 194Table 4-33: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2 ............................... 194Table 4-34: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ......................... 194Table 4-35: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016) Incremental andResultant Concentrations of NO2 ........................................................................................................ 194Table 4-36: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2 ............................... 195Table 7-1: Estimated Heat Radiation Levels due to failure of NG pipeline......................................... 234Table 7-2: Suggested Frequency of Medical Examination under Occupational Health SurveillanceProgramme.......................................................................................................................................... 240Table 7-3 :Suggested Medical Tests under Occupational Health Surveillance Programme .............. 240Table 7-4: Minimum required fire protection systems as per National Building Code ........................ 241Table 9-1: Roles and Responsibilities of Developer and Industry ...................................................... 249Table 9-2: Recommended Plants for Greenbelt.................................................................................. 255Table 9-3: Estimated Volume of run-off that can be harvested from Roof Top .................................. 262Table 9-4: Estimated Installation Capacity and Cost for Solar Power Harness.................................. 269Table 9-5: Occupational Health Hazards ............................................................................................ 270Table 9-6: Personnel Protective Equipment........................................................................................ 271
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page xii
Table 9-7: Project Activities, Associated Impacts, and Mitigation Measures ...................................... 279Table 9-8: Environmental Management - Capital Cost ....................................................................... 283Table 9-9: Environmental Management - Annual Recurring Cost....................................................... 283Table 9-10: Suggested Sector Plan Budget Allocation and Timeline.................................................. 284
LIST OF EXHIBITSExhibit 9-1: A Typical Rainwater Harvesting System .......................................................................... 263Exhibit 9-2: A Model Storage Pond/Tank ............................................................................................ 264Exhibit 9-3: Model Recharge Pit (source: Google) .............................................................................. 265Exhibit 9-4: Schematic of Recharge Pit (Source: Google) .................................................................. 265Exhibit 9-5: Schematic Diagram of Recharge Well ............................................................................. 265
LIST OF ANNEXURESAnnexure A: Land Possession Certificate – KIADB Allotment LetterAnnexure B: Environmental Clearance obtained for Biocon SEZ & EC compliance reportAnnexure C: SEZ approval for BIOCONAnnexure D: A Gazette Notification of SEZAnnexure E: Biocon letter to Biocon Biologics India Ltd for DevelopmentAnnexure F: Biocon SEZ LayoutAnnexure G: Proposed project BBIL Site PlanAnnexure H: Proposed Project BBIL Green Belt LayoutAnnexure I: Contour MapAnnexure J: Product Details & Manufacturing ProcessAnnexure K: Proposed Site facilitiesAnnexure L: Raw Materials & Mass balanceAnnexure M: Water Balance ChartAnnexure N: On-site & Off-site Emergency PlanAnnexure O: Material Safety Data SheetAnnexure P: Agreement copy made with TSDFAnnexure Q: BBIL STP & ETP process & SpecificationsAnnexure R: Rain water harvesting layoutAnnexure S: P and ID diagram for natural gas lineAnnexure T: Standards for NAAQ, Noise, Water & SoilAnnexure U: Water allotment letter for BioconAnnexure V: Enterprise Social Commitment Plan of BioconAnnexure W: Biocon EHS Policy
LIST OF APPENDICESAppendix I: Terms of Reference by SEAC, KarnatakaAppendix II: ToR Compliance
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page xiii
LIST OF ACCRONYMS
AAQ Ambient Air QualityAAQM Ambient Air Quality MonitoringBBIL Biocon Biologics India LtdBSEZ Biocon Special Economic ZoneCPCB Central Pollution Control BoardCSR Corporate Social ResponsibilityDMP Disaster Management PlanEIA Environmental Impact AssessmentEMC Environmental Management CellEMP Environmental Management PlanETP Effluent Treatment PlantFO Furnace OilGLC Ground Level ConcentrationISO International Standard for OrganizationKIADB Karnataka Industrial Area Development BoardKSPCB Karnataka State Pollution Control BoardkWh Kilowatt hourLOS Level of ServiceMEE Multiple Effect EvaporatorMSDS Material Safety Data SheetNAAQ National Ambient Air QualityPCB Pollution Control BoardPCU Passenger Car UnitPO Pure OilRA Risk AssessmentR & D Research & DevelopmentRO Reverse OsmosisSEAC State Expert Appraisal CommitteeSEIAA State Environmental Impact Assessment AuthoritySTP Sewage Treatment PlantTDS Total dissolved SolidsTOR Terms of ReferenceTSDF Treatment, Storage and Disposal FacilityZLD Zero Liquid Discharge
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 1
Executive Summary
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 2
Executive SummaryM/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited proposes to set up a commercial manufacturing complexfor manufacture and commercially supply various generic drugs which would include dosageforms like oral solids, parenteral, etc. The finished dosage form dossiers would be filed incountries of interest for regulatory approval. Once the dossiers are in compliance withrespective regulatory requirements, the product would be ready to market.
It would be B2C opportunity for BBIL which aim to build a robust pipeline with a balance ofdifficult-to-develop and technology-intensive molecules that can be commercialised. BBILhas currently more than 20 ANDA programmes under development. The new companywould also aim to use Biocon’s well-established API business to vertically integrate intomaking finished dosage forms for developed markets and emerging market.
BBIL would focus on few special therapeutic segments such as oncology, diabetology,cardiology, inflammatory diseases and become a market leader in them. Production andexport of Novel at Plot No 2,3,4 and 5 Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4, Anekal taluk,Bengaluru Urban district
Production for the Biologicals, antibodies and its derivatives - 1650 kg/ annum
Formulations of antibodies, derivatives, proteins, peptides and biologicals
i) 10 million vials/annum
ii) 4 million injectable pens/annum
From the Project site towards SW Bande nalla Sandra village at a distance of 1.3 km,Nearest Highway Road NH-44 (Old NH-7) Bengaluru to Hosur highway at a distance of 4 kmtowards NE, Nearest Railway Station is Heelalige at a distance of 5.7 km towards NE;Nearest Airport is Kempegowda International Airport, Bengaluru at 44 km towards North. TheNotified Sensitive Area is Bannerghatta National Park 9.59 km towards WSW.
The Proposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic OrganicChemicals as per the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of theproject. The facility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental ImpactAssessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities. Theapplication along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka on12.07.2016. Based on the information furnished and the presentation made before the StateExpert Appraisal Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 169th SEACmeeting held on 02.08.2016 and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparingEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 30 IND2016 dated 29.08.2016
I. Water Requirement
The total requirement of raw water for the unit will be 130 KLD. Water requirement for theproposed project would be supplied by Biocon SEZ.
II. Waste Water Generation
The ETP will be mainly catering to the industrial effluents generated from proposed BBILproject. Low TDS wastewater volume is expected to be 103 KLD and the Sewage is
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 3
expected to be 25 KLD. Domestic effluent will not be mixed with LTDS wastewater. There isa separate STP proposed for treating domestic effluent generated due to the proposedproject. Effluent generated from proposed project will be treated in conventional ETPfollowed by RO. Reject from RO will be sent to existing MEE at BSEZ. Salts generated fromMEE will be disposed to TSDF
Details of break up in terms of volumetric contributionS.
No. Details Unit For 4500 KLDEffluent Sewage Total
1. Domestic KLD - 25 252. Process KLD 103 - 103
Total KLD 103 25 128
Treated effluent & Sewage will be used for green belt/toilet flushing and utilities within BBIL &BSEZ project.
III. Power Requirement
• Biocon has own dedicated in-house 66/11 KV substation that caters to all the units.
• The power requirement for the proposed project will be 7 MW.
• The power back up will be provided with existing combination of DG sets and turbinesby Biocon Unit.
Power & Fuel requirement
Details Capacity Source
Power Requirement (KVA) 12000 BESCOM
Back-up (KVA) 4 x 3000 DG sets
Diesel Requirements (lit/Month) - IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
Natural Gas 12000SCMD GAIL
Boiler: NG based/Diesel based fuel fired boiler 1 Nos having capacity of (16 ton/Hr)
Since Biocon is planning for natural gas powered boiler, diesel as fuel is required onlyfor the 4 x 3 mVA DG sets whenever there is power backup required.
This power backup scenario will be present only for the period whenever there is nopower supply from grid. The grid supply to BSEZ is very reliable with minimaldowntime
Diesel for DG sets will be from the existing diesel storage tank that caters to BSEZutilities. There is enough existing capacity to cater to proposed 4 DG sets
Diesel is procured by BSEZ via tankers from IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 4
IV. Man Power
The manpower requirement including both the technical and non-technical personnel
Details of Man power requirement
Operation Phase
Permanent (Nos) 500
Contractual (Nos) 60
Total (Nos) 560
Construction phase: 100 Nos.
V. Solid Waste
During operation phase, 271Kg of solid waste (Organic & inorganic) will be generated.
Solid Waste generation details
Waste Quantity (kg/day)Collection
methodDisposal method
Organic 122 Bins Sent to Biocon For further processing
Inorganic 149 Bins Authorized vendors
ETP Sludge 50 Trolleys TSDF
Note: - (As per CPCB Guidelines - 0.484 kg/capita/day for Bangalore)
Hazardous waste Management
There is no hazardous waste generation during construction phase of the project. Thehazardous wastes which will be generated during the operation phase of the project.
Hazardous waste materials will be properly disposed as per the Hazardous and otherWastes (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules 2016; Agreementwill be made with TSDF approved dealers for safe disposal of hazardous wastes. PCBauthorization for Hazardous waste disposal will be obtained.
Hazardous Waste generation and disposal
S.No Waste Type Category Quantity Method of Disposal
1. Used/Spent Oils 5.1 2500 Litres/Annum Authorized recyclers
2. Waste/Residue containing Oil 5.2 250 Kg/Annum Authorized recyclers
3. Concentration/EvaporationResidue 37.3 55 Tons/Annum Authorized TSDF
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 5
4. ETP Sludge 35.3 18 Tons/Annum Authorized TSDF
5.Empty Containers/Barrels/Linerscontaminated with hazardousmaterials
33.1 1200 Nos/Annum Authorized recyclers
6. Process Residue - Nil NA
Biomedical Waste
Since the project is production of Biologicals, Antibodies and derivatives, the cultures (liquidstate) will be pre-treated with suitable methods and disposed along with effluent for furthertreatment in Effluent Treatment Plant.
Assessment of New & Untested Technology for the Risk of Technological Failure
The project is biological products manufacturing industry with R & D activity. Themanufacturing processes for these products are tried & tested method, and therefore there isno risk of technological failure. In addition to this the facility is being backed up by the R & Dcentre there would be continuous efforts for optimization of the processes to care of the anytechnological failures.
VI. Land Requirement
The total land available for the proposed project is 11940 Sq. mt (2.95 Acres) and built-upwill be 40320 Sq. mt. Available land area will be utilized for building and plant.
Existing Infrastructure of BSEZ will be used for BBIL.
Detailed Land Break up
S. No Land use Type of landArea
Sq. Mt Acres
1 Building Coverage Leased 11940 2.952 Road and Pavement BSEZ 3600 0.89
3 Green belt area BSEZ 4375 1.084 Water Reservoir Leased 1000 0.255 DG Sets & Boilers Leased 500 0.12
6 ETP & ERP Leased 500 0.127 STP Leased 100 0.028 Water Treatment Plant Leased 100 0.02
9 Solid Waste Storage Leased 50 0.01
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 6
VII. Analysis of Alternative Sites Considered
The site for the proposed project is situated at plot nos 2,3,4&5 Plot No 2,3,4 and 5Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4, Bommasandra Jigani Link Road, Anekal taluk,Bengaluru Urban district, BSEZ is facilitating the entire infrastructure like road connectivity,graded plots, water infrastructure, Waste water collection system, solid waste managementsystem, green belt development etc.
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited has made a MoU agreement with BSEZ for a land areaof 2.95 Acres, located within the industrial area where other industrial activities have alreadybeen established and some are yet to come up (It is provided with sufficient water and powersupply. It has well established infrastructure, transportation and communication networks.The site is well connected to national highway, and near well-established airport. Thereforethere is no need for the consideration of an alternative site.
VIII. Project cost
Total Project cost is INR Rs. 1000 crore.
IX. Description of the Environment
Meteorological Environment
The micro-meteorological conditions during the study period for hourly data of wind speed,wind direction and temperature were recorded at the project site. From the IndianMeteorological Department (IMD) at Bengaluru, the annually determined wind direction isalso mostly West to East. From the meteorological data recorded at this project site, thepredominant wind direction was observed from W to E during the study period (Sep to Nov2016 (Post monsoon)). The wind speed ranges between 1.41 to 2.66 m/s. The temperatureranges between 17.1 – 28.5°C. While the relative humidity ranges from 62 - 86%. The totalrainfall recorded during study period is 406 mm.
Ambient Air Quality
The ambient air quality has been monitored at 8 locations for 16 parameters including 12parameters as per NAAQS, 2009 within the study area. The baseline levels of (PM2.5),(PM10), Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, Pb, O3, NH3, Benzene (C6H6),Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12), As, Ni in all the monitoring locations were found within theNAAQS limits during the monitoring period (Post monsoon) i.e from Sep to Nov 2016.
Noise Environment
The existing ambient noise levels were monitored using precision noise level meter in andaround the project site at 10km radius at 8 locations during the study period (Sep to Nov2016). During the study period, day time noise levels varied between 55.00 – 84.50 dB(A)and night time noise levels varied from 50.10 – 78.90 dB(A) across the sampling stations.The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in theproposed project site (BBIL site within BSEZ industrial area) were found within the standardlimits whereas in all residential areas they are slightly exceeds the limits prescribed byCPCB/MoEF&CC.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 7
Water Environment
The study area consists of Bommandahalli in the southern region, Hennagara /Ramakrishnapura Lake in the part of Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Chandapura Lakein the North Eastern / North northeastern part from the project site. The Ragihalli Lake in thepart of Southwest region. As the KIADB Industrial Area estate lies in the Northeastern region,the representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen. The prevailing statusof water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground and surface water have beenassessed during Sep to Nov 2016.
The standard methods prescribed in IS were followed for sample collection, preservation andanalysis in the laboratory for various physiochemical parameters.
Surface water quality
The values range from 7.11-7.80 for pH, 210-1475 mg/l for TDS, 100-323 mg/l for TotalHardness, 119-905 mg/l .
Ground Water Quality
The values range from 7.18-7.96 for pH, 390-1290 mg/l for TDS, 133-686 mg/l for Hardness,1.4 – 23.9 mg/l for nitrates, 62 – 417 mg/l for chlorides, 18.57 - 143mg/l for sulphate & BDL(DL 0.1)-6.69 mg/l for fluoride.
Land Environment
Assessment of soil characteristics is of paramount importance since the vegetation growth,agricultural practices and production is directly related to the soil fertility and quality. It isobserved that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils arealmost neutral in nature, conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-716 μS/cm. As theEC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature. Nitrogen,potassium and phosphorous content ranges from 314-769 kg/ha, 0.750-1400 kg/ha, and0.316-0.800 kg/ha.
Biological Environment
The Project area is occupied by trees and shrubs. There is a Bannerghatta National Park ata distance of 9.59 Km towards West. The buffer zone of the project site is predominantlycovered by Plantation/orchards. The species observed in the study area are mostlycommercial crops and plantation crops and breaks were also observed throughout the semi-evergreen and moist deciduous forest types. There is no extinct flora and fauna speciesfound in the study area.
Socio Economic Environment
Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has ageographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders withBengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, Ramanagaram on the west, and with thestate of Tamil Nadu in the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the totalpopulation,50,22,661 are males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. Thedistrict’s share of total Karnataka’s population is 15.75 percent.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 8
The project is located in the Jigani KIADB, Jigani of Anekal taluk of Bangalore Urban District.The 10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion ofBangalore Corporation Limits.
The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal ispredominantly rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of themain occupation in rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semiand unskilled labour forces go to the other part of the district.
The child sex ratio of the project area is 968 but for the district it is 944. There is a need forsocial intervention is required to balance the gender inequality.
The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (80.23%). Thescheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 17.08% (22.93% of the district) and2.07% (3.26% of the district).
An important dimension to understand the employment scenario is through the main andmarginal workers data provided by the Census. Of the total working population, the majority(91.20%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It isdue to the industrialization in the area. The job vibrancy is due to the secondary and tertiarysectors. Only 10.25% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation(primary).
X. Anticipated Environmental Impacts
Air Environment
Baseline data reveals that ambient air quality in the study area for all the parameters are wellwithin the permissible limits as prescribed by National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Themain sources of emissions will be from the D.G sets and Boiler which are facilitated withstacks of adequate height as an air pollution control measure.
Noise Environment
Baseline line study showed that the noise levels were within the CPCB standards atindustrial sites. The designed equipment with noise levels not exceeding beyond therequirements of Occupational Health and Safety Administration Standard will be employed.Though the noise levels in buffer zone residential areas are slightly higher than standardlimits.
Land Use & Alternate sites
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited has made a MoU agreement with BSEZ for a land areaof 2.95 Acres, located within the industrial area where other industrial activities have alreadybeen established and some are yet to come up (It is provided with sufficient water and powersupply. It has well established infrastructure, transportation and communication networks.The site is well connected to national highway, and near well-established airport. Thereforethere is no need for the consideration of an alternative site.
Environmental Monitoring Program
A monitoring schedule with respect to Ambient Air Quality, Water & Wastewater Quality,Noise Quality as per Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB), shall be maintained.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 9
Pollution Control Measures
The D.G sets are facilitated with adequate stack height or above to disperse the pollutants.Acoustic enclosures are provided to the DG sets to control noise emissions.
Municipal Solid Waste is being disposed to local pig farm. The hazardous waste will bestored separately in hazardous waste storage and disposed to KSPCB/CPCB authorizedTSDF sites within a stipulated period of time. Hazardous waste materials will be properlydisposed as per the Hazardous and other Wastes (Management and trans boundaryMovement) Rules 2016 and subsequent amendments
ETP to treat low TDS homogenous nature of effluents. STP to treat sewage generated from proposed industry ETP & STP proposed is Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) System. Treated wastewater
will be used for maintaining the green belt within the BBIL/BSEZ and the balance will bereused at the units as non-potable water for various applications within BSEZ. RO rejectsafter ETP will be send to MEE and salts generated from MEE will be sent to TSDF.
A storm water drainage system in BSEZ is already developed for the entire project site. The runoff from uncontaminated areas will be collected in tank and will be used for
irrigation of greenbelt area. The oil contaminated water, if any will be sent to oil water separator; separated oil will be
sent to KSPCB approved vendors and water will be sent to ETP for further treatment. Thetreated water will be re used for various applications within BSEZ/BBIL.
XI. Risk Analysis
Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis including identification, screening of scenarios, andconsequence analysis of the various risk scenarios. Risk Assessment has done with respectto the Raw materials, Processes, Solvent & neighbouring villages;
The Methodology adopted for Risk Assessment by using the software PHAST examines theprogress of potential incident from the initial release to far –field dispersion includingmodelling of pool spreading and evaporation, flammable and toxic effects where individualrisks are to be identified and also PHAST software.
The scope of the study mainly involves:
Identifications of Hazards
Consequence modelling
Impact limits identifications and contour mapping of the risk on the layouts.
Mitigating measures for handling and storage to reduce impacts & prevent incidents.
The consequence analysis is performed for Natural gas pipelines which are connected to16TPH Boiler.
All the hazards are observed in East direction due to the wind blowing from West.
Safety measures for tanks and pipelines are proposed to avoid hazards.
In case of emergency, onsite and offsite emergency plan will be implemented
XII. Risk Control Measures
Pressure safety valves for storage tanks & Pipelines
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 10
Pressure alarm high and pressure alarm low for storage tanks
Level indicators with monitoring from control for storage tanks
Level transmitter, Level gauge and Temperature indicators for the storage tanks
Fire protection arrangements in the form of Fire Hydrants and Monitors for the storage tanks.
Emergency Handling checklist and procedure
Disaster Management Plan
The salient features of Disaster Management Plan includes
Emergency shutdown procedure
Electrical Power Failure & Key Utility failures
Fire protection system
Emergency safety equipment & Reporting and response to emergency
Emergency Help from nearby industries and tie up with nearby industries
Emergency Control Room - is the focal point in case of an emergency from where theoperations to handle the emergency are directed and coordinated. It will be equipped withInternal and P & T telephones, Paging system and Emergency siren.
On-Site Emergency Plan
To provide effective planning, communication and to ensure discipline while mitigatingidentified emergencies at the earliest utilizing available resources, safety gadgets andsystems.
Synchronized action from all the internal and external agencies at the earliest to initiatecorrective and preventive action.
To minimize the human injury and illness during emergency mitigation, priority is given torescue of incident victim/s, rendering them first aid onsite and if required providing furthermedical services at the earliest, which is available nearest to our plant (health city).
To minimize damage to property, general environment or work environment.
To effectively refer and utilize this revised onsite emergency plan while conducting on siteemergency and preparedness response drills and also during real emergencies.
To identify any deviations during above drills and real situations to ensure any identified andrecorded observations for continual corrective actions and preventive actions.
Off-Site Emergency Plan
The Off-site Emergency Plan, which is the responsibility of the District Emergency Authority,deals with measures to prevent and control emergencies affecting the public and theenvironment. The management developed contingency plan as per Hazardous and OtherWastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016 and other applicableregulations, in association with District Emergency Authority. A yearly mock drill of districtoffsite emergency plan is essential and mandated as per National Disaster ManagementGuideline. SOPs has implemented for rescues teams and regarding the wearing of fullprotective gear before entering the hazardous zone and cordoning off the disaster site arerequired. This plan considers the possible effects of incidents from any industry on theneighbouring population and the remedial measures.
Inventory of hazardous chemicals
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 11
MSDS of such chemicals
Types of emergencies
Nature, extent and likely effects of such incidents
Risk and Environmental Impact Assessment
The District Emergency Authority, based on severity of any emergency in product distributionnetwork will declare off-site emergency.
XIII. Benefits of the Proposed Project
The project area together with Biocon SEZ is classified as an important project for integratedover all development under the KIADB. This proposition is going to benefit the entire regionfor fast track development. Based on the past experience the export oriented investmentsare supposed to be doing good in the long run. The exports have been facilitated by thegrowth in a number of industries such as chemical industries, pharmaceutical, engineeringindustries, etc.
The overall development of the region could be is many folds and hence describing theproject benefits in isolation is unfair and therefore cannot be justified. More clearly the projectbenefits accrued when this project is planned and implemented in a remote location couldhave been a much lower scale development than that all other developments within KIADBIndustrial area.
More over in order to augment the growth, the state has planned multitude of developmentoptions in all sectors (tourism, Water resources, Agriculture, urban development, educationetc.,) including industrial sector. The proposed projects is one such development to improveeconomy and employment generation in the region and fulfill market requirement and willplay a vital role in the health care sector and thereby addresses the market demand andSocial benefits.
The products manufactured at this facility will be exported that will aid in adding to therevenue of the nation. The corporate social responsibilities that will be taken up by theproposed project will improve the well-being of the society and the corporate responsibilitiestowards the protection of the environment will help in conserving the ecosystem. It will alsoprovide employment opportunities to larger population.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 12
Chapter 1Introduction
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 13
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Project Background
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) proposes to set up a commercial manufacturingcomplex for manufacture and commercially supply various generic drugs which wouldinclude dosage forms like oral solids, parenteral, etc. The finished dosage form dossierswould be filed in countries of interest for regulatory approval. Once the dossiers are incompliance with respective regulatory requirements, the product would be ready to market.
It would be B2C opportunity for BBIL which aim to build a robust pipeline with a balance ofdifficult-to-develop and technology-intensive molecules that can be commercialised. BBILhas currently more than 20 ANDA programmes under development. The new companywould also aim to use Biocon’s well-established API business to vertically integrate intomaking finished dosage forms for developed markets and emerging market.
BBIL would focus on few special therapeutic segments such as oncology, diabetology,cardiology, inflammatory diseases and become a market leader in them. Production andexport of Novel at Plot No 2, 3, 4 and 5 Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4,Bommasandra Jigani Link Road, Anekal taluk, Bengaluru Urban district, Karnataka for theproduction of following:
Production for the Biologicals, antibodies and its derivatives - 1650 kg/ annum
Formulations of antibodies, derivatives, proteins, peptides and biologicals
1. 10 million vials/annum
2. 4 million injectable pens/annum
The proposed project falls under the schedule 5 (f) “Synthetic Organic Chemicals” and itslocated in Notified Industrial Area, the projects attracts the Category B as per EIA Notificationdated September 14, 2006 and its subsequent amendments.
1.2 Overview of Biocon
M/s. Biocon Limited, a leading biopharmaceutical manufacturing organization wasestablished in 1978, Bangalore. It is India's largest biotech company focused on deliveringaffordable innovation.
As a fully integrated Biopharma company, it delivers innovative biopharmaceutical solutionsranging from discovery to development and commercialization, leveraging the cutting edgescience, cost-effective drug development capabilities and global scale manufacturingcapacities, to move ideas to market.
Biocon Ltd., Asia’s premier biopharmaceutical company, is committed to ensure a globalright to healthcare by addressing the worldwide need for safe, effective and affordable biotherapeutics. They have harnessed the power of biotechnology through affordable innovationto enhance access to new and differentiated therapies for diseases that are chronic, wheremedical needs are largely unmet.
The company is a pioneer in bringing the benefit of high quality, yet affordable, novelbiologics and biosimilars to patients in India and other emerging markets. Today, they areIndia’s largest and fully integrated biopharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 14
and supplies advanced, life-saving biopharmaceuticals for diabetes, cancer and autoimmuneconditions at price points that make them affordable and thus accessible.
As an innovation-led organization focused on providing affordable access, they haveleveraged our inherent strengths in advanced science to develop, manufacture and deliver arich portfolio of small molecules APIs & formulations and complex biologics - both novels andbiosimilars - including Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs), rh-Insulin and insulin analogs.
Their global scale capacities for manufacturing high quality, affordable biologics havepositioned them as the world's fourth largest insulin’s producer, enabling to address thegrowing needs of diabetes patients across the globe. As one of the leading oncologycompanies in India, they have brought safe, efficacious and affordable medicines for cancerto cater to the needs of patients, caregivers and medical practitioners in the country.As India's largest domestic branded biologics company, they have taken key products likeINSUGEN (rh-insulin), BASALOG (Glargine), CANMAb (Trastuzumab),BIOMAb-EGFR(Nimotuzumab) and ALZUMAb (Itolizumab), a ‘first in class’ anti-CD6 monoclonal antibody,from discovery to commercialization.
1.2.1 Overview of Biocon SEZ
M/s. Biocon SEZ (BSEZ) was established in 2006. It is located at plot # 2, 3, 4 & 5,Bommasandra Jigani link road, Bommasandra Industrial area, phase 4, Bengaluru,Karnataka state. It is India’s largest integrated biotechnology hub, comprising an integratedcluster of research laboratories and manufacturing facilities spread across 90 acres in KIADB(Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board) industrial estate. Location map of BSEZ isgiven in Figure 1-1.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 15
Figure 1-1: Location map of BiconSEZ
1.3 Project Proponent
M/s. Biocon Ltd
Corporate Headquarters: 20th KM, Hosur Road, Electronic City, Bangalore, India - 560 100,Phone: +91 80 2808 2808 / 91 80 4014 4014, Fax: +91 80 2852 3423,
Contact Persons: - 1) Mr.Lourde Joseph – Vice President2) Mr.Kameshwar Rao – Head (EHS)
1.3.1 Awards
Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw has received several awards on behalf of Biocon and in her personalcapacity as one of India's leading business entrepreneurs (Pls refer Biocon website underawards for details).
1.4 Proposed Project
The proposed project is setting up of commercial manufacturing complex for manufacturingof Biological Antibodies and its derivatives with an area of 1.19 Ha (2.95 Acres) within theBiocon Special Economic Zone (BSEZ).
1.5 Justification & Need for the Project
To achieve the growth target, Biocon intends to expand its (and its affiliates) manufacturingcapacities by adding one more Greenfield site in Bengaluru, for manufacturing of variousbiologicals, antibodies, derivatives and formulated products.
The project seeks to fulfil the following objectives:
1. Primarily to fulfil the demands of a large world market.
2. Generate substantial export earnings.
3. Create a world class facility on par with international biological manufacturingorganizations.
The facility would be designed to develop processes for pre-clinical, clinical and commercialscale material. The capabilities would include the scale up of the product to pilot scale andcommercial scale manufacturing. The Greenfield site is envisaged to meet the national andinternational regulations to be followed in the manufacture of the biological products asapplicable and shall be built under the cGMP guidelines.
1.6 Location of the Project Site
The proposed site is located at Biocon SEZ Bommasandra Village, Anekal Taluk, inBengaluru urban district of Karnataka. The site is about 1.19 Ha (2.95 Acres) and falls in57H/9 of SOI Topo sheet and spatial location of the site is 120 48’ 3.22” N & 790 39’ 35.22” E(Centre Coordinates). Salient features of the project site and its Environs are given in Table1-1. Location map of Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) is given in
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 16
Figure 1-2. Google Map showing the proposed project site location is also given in Figure1-3.
Figure 1-2 Location map of Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL)
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 17
Figure 1-3 : Google Map showing the proposed project site locationTable 1-1: Salient Features of the project site and its environs
S.No. Particulars Details within 10Km radius from Proposed project
1. Location: Plot No. 4 & 5, BBIL, BSEZ, Bommasandra Industrial area,Phase 4, Bommasandra Jigani Link Road
Village -Taluk (Mandal) Anekal
District Bangalore UrbanState Karnataka
2. Latitude 120 48’ 3.22” N3. Longitude 790 39’ 35.22” E4. Elevation above Mean Sea Level (MSL) 880 m above MSL5. Climatic conditions as per IMD Annual Daily Mean (MIN) Temperature : 19 0C
Annual Daily Mean (MAX) Temperature : 29.4 0CAnnual Average Rainfall : 974.5 mmAnnual Average Humidity : 80 Day; 51 Night
6. Present land use at the proposed site Industrial (KIADB Industrial Area)7. Nearest Highway/Road NH-44 (old NH-7) Bengaluru to Hosur Highway at a distance of 4
km towards NE8. Defence installations Nil within 10 km radius9. Nearest railway station Heelalige railway Station at a distance of 5.7 Km towards NE
10. Nearest airport/air strip Kempegowda International Airport, Bengaluru 44 km towards N11. Nearest village Bande Nalla Sandra at a distance of 1.3 km towards SW12. Nearest town Bengaluru 25 Kms towards N13. Nearest river Nil within 10 km radius14. Hills/valleys Nil within 10 km radius15. Archaeologically important places Nil within 10 km radius16. Nearest place of Tourist/Religious importance Bannerghatta Nationa Park at a dstance of 9.59 km towards W17. Ecologically sensitive areas (National
Parks/Wildlife sanctuaries/bio-sphere reserves)Bannerghatta Nationa Park at a dstance of 9.59 km towards W
18. Reserved/Protected forests within 10 km radius Nil19. Type of soil Reddish brown clay slit soil
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 18
1.6.1 Sites considered for the project location
As discussed in earlier section. The site for the proposed project is situated at plot nos2,3,4&5 Plot No 2,3,4 and 5 Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4, Anekal taluk, BengaluruUrban district, BSEZ is facilitating the entire infrastructure like road connectivity, gradedplots, water infrastructure, Waste water collection system, solid waste management system,green belt development etc.
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited has made a MoU agreement with BSEZ for a land areaof 2.95 Acres, located within the industrial area where other industrial activities have alreadybeen established and some are yet to come up (MoU agreement with BSEZ encloses asAnnexure E) It is provided with sufficient water and power supply. It has well establishedinfrastructure, transportation and communication networks. The site is well connected tonational highway, and near well-established International airport. Therefore there is no needfor the consideration of an alternative site.
1.7 Need for the EIA study
According to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification issued by Ministry ofEnvironment, Forests & Climate Change (MoEF&CC) under Environment Protection Act, theProposed Project termed under Schedule 5 (f), Category B, Synthetic Organic Chemicals asper the EIA Notification 2006 and its Amendments requiring EIA studies of the project. Thefacility requires prior Environmental Clearance from State Environmental Impact AssessmentAuthority (SEIAA), Karnataka before commencing onsite activities.
1.7.1 Project Screening (Cat B) and ToR
The application along with relevant project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnatakaon 12.07.2016. Based on the information furnished and the presentation done before theState Expert Appraisal Committee Members, the proposal was appraised in the 169th SEACmeeting held on 02.08.2016 and was issued the Terms of Reference (TOR) for preparingEnvironmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report vide Letter No. SEIAA/F.No- SEIAA 30 IND2016 dated 29.08.2016 which is enclosed as Appendix-I. ToR compliance is enclosed asAppendix-II.
1.7.2 EIA Study
The EIA study was undertaken covering all the aspects of the specific conditions mentionedin the terms of reference issued by SEIAA. This EIA study was undertaken by M/s HubertEnviro Care Systems (P) Ltd (HECS), a NABET accredited EIA consulting organisation, withspecific project related inputs required for undertaking the EIA studies from Biocon Ltd,Bengaluru.
M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd is authorized to undertake EIA studies for SyntheticOrganic Chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates, bulk drugs and intermediatesexcluding drug formulations, synthetic rubbers basic organic chemicals, other syntheticorganic chemicals and chemical intermediates) as per the NABET accreditation scheme.
As per EIA notification, public consultation for the proposed project shall be exempted as theproject is coming up in notified KIADB industrial area.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 19
1.7.3 EIA Cost
EIA study was undertaken by HECS for an amount of Rs.17, 50,000/-(Seventeen Lakh fiftythousand only).
1.8 Overview of the Methodology of the EIA Study
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report has been prepared based on themethods and guidelines suggested by MoEF&CC/SEIAA to address all the specificconditions stipulated in the Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA, Karnataka.
The EIA study team, headed by an accredited EIA Coordinator, along with the approvedFunctional Area Experts, undertook detailed baseline studies as per ToR, betweenSeptember 1, 2016 and November 1, 2016.
Micro-meteorological data comprising hourly readings of wind speed, wind direction, dry bulbtemperature, relative humidity and rainfall were measured by installing an onsitemeteorological station near the Project site. Hourly readings were collected for a period ofthree (03) months.
Micro-meteorological data was adopted for generating wind rose diagrams and also topredict the ground level concentrations due to release of emissions from the proposedproject.
Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) was measured at Eight (08) locations in the study area as per themethods and procedures recommended by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) Airquality sampling was undertaken for a period of 12 weeks with a total of 24 samples per sitewere taken as per the MoEF&CC guidelines. All 12 Parameters as per NAAQ standardswere analysed. In addition to that VOC, Cl, H2S, HF, HBr & Hcl were also analysed at all thelocations. The measured background air quality data was compared with that of theprevailing National Ambient Air Quality Standards and this will also form the basis forpredicting the cumulative air quality scenario due to the operation of the proposed facility.
Hydro-geological status was studied based on the secondary published long-term data. Dataon sub-surface soil profile and also bore-log data in the study area was obtained. Inadditional, a preliminary study on the regional and local aquifer status was studied based onprimary and secondary data.
Ground water samples from eight (08) locations were analysed as per the terms of referencefor all the designated parameters. The measured values were compared with drinking waterstandards. Secondary data on the regional ground water status was also collected from theCentral Ground Water Board and the State Ground Water Board.
There are no major perennial rivers flowing within the study area. However surface watersamples from eight (08) locations were analysed as per the terms of reference for all thedesignated parameters. All seasonal streams, rivers and water bodies located within thestudy area were mapped through latest remote sensing data under land use and land coverstudy. Walkthrough surveys were also undertaken to assess the current status of the waterresources. Details about the major cropping pattern and irrigation methods etc were collected
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 20
from local village offices and also published district census data. Details of the surface waterquality in the study area were also collected and analysed for designated physicochemical,elemental and biological parameters.
Land use and land cover was mapped using remote satellite imagery. The data wasprocessed using applicable software models and level 2 land use classification within thestudy area was developed. A walkthrough survey was also undertaken near the forestboundaries, major settlements and plantation area to verify the land use as a part of theground truth survey procedures.
Soil samples were also collected at eight (08) locations and all relevant parameters such astexture, nutrients, heavy metals and other parameters were analysed in the soil samples.
Flora and Fauna survey was undertaken in the study area and all spotted ecological andbiological aspects were mapped based on grid sampling method. Bio-diversity density andabundance were estimated. Walkthrough surveys near forest area and its environs were alsoundertaken to assess the ecology around the forest areas and dependency of the localpeople on the forest produce.
Primary socio economic survey was undertaken in the study area to capture thesocioeconomic conditions, major occupation of the people, drinking water and sanitationfacilities, transportation and other amenities in the study area, with a specific reference to thevillages located within five (5) km radius (Category-I) of the project site and villages locatedwithin 5 to 10Km radius (Category-II) of the project site.
In addition to the above, district level census data published by National Informatics Centre(NIC) was also collected for a detailed analysis on the socioeconomic aspects. Since, thereare no settlements at the proposed Project site, detailed Rehabilitation and Resettlementstudies are not envisaged under this study; however, the indirect impacts on the local andregional community due to land acquisition were studied.
A typical review on the various industrial units, various pollution control systems proposeddetails of wastes and discharges that are envisaged from the proposed project were alsoundertaken. Such inputs are adopted while predicting various environmental impacts due tooperation of the facility and also to suggest an appropriate environmental management planand environmental monitoring plan.
As a part of the environmental impact assessment study, an attempt was made to predict thepossible and likely impacts on background environment. Likely air quality impacts due torelease of emissions within the BBIL (stacks) were modelled using AERMOD model.Groundlevel concentration of criteria pollutants such as Particulate Matter, Sulphur Dioxide, andOxides of Nitrogen were estimated using MoEF&CC approved AERMOD model. Hourlymeteorological data collected for a period of one (01) year (Jan – Dec 2015) from IMD wasadapted to assess ground level concentrations. Maximum ground level concentrations werepredicted and concentration isopleths of the above mentioned pollutants were plotted.
The predicted ground level concentrations of the respective pollutants were added to theprevailing baseline concentrations of the designated pollutants to assess the likely
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 21
cumulative post project scenario and such values were compared with the National AmbientAir Quality Standards.
Noise generating sources and the expected noise levels were estimated. Impact due toutilisation of treated wastewater for greenbelt/ Toilet flushing/Utilities applications werestudied. Since the proposed project will not discharge any treated wastewater into surfacewater bodies (ponds, rivers and Canals), no further environmental modelling studies relatedto river water quality modelling etc were considered under this study.
In addition to the above aspects, the positive environmental benefits arising from communitydevelopment plans under CSR programme, ecological and biodiversity enhancementaspects due to development of plantation and green-cover development in the project sitewere also studied.
Based on a detailed environmental impact assessment study, a comprehensive report on theenvironmental management plan was developed covering the following aspects: constructionphase environmental management plan, air quality management plan, noise and waterquality management plan, wastewater treatment, reuse, recycling and disposal programme,rainwater harvesting plan, socioeconomic and community development plan, ecological andbiodiversity enhancement plan. An outline of the proposed environmental managementsystems, environmental cell and environmental monitoring programme were also presentedin this report.
Although the proposed project utilises the limited quantities of flammable and combustiblematerials with threshold levels below the stipulated quantities under Hazardous MaterialsHandling Rules, a preliminary risk assessment study and Disaster Management study, wasundertaken to assess the residual risks, if any, due to storage and handling of diesel, furnaceoil, Natural gas and other combustible material. Wherever applicable, quantitative methodswere adopted to establish the heat radiation levels due to accidental fires at storage facilities.
CPCB guidelines on risk assessment methods were adopted and CPR 18E guidelines wereused for estimating the consequences of fire accidents. Based on the risk assessment study,a preliminary fire safety and occupational health management plan was suggested. A roadmap for onsite emergency and disaster management plan was suggested based on thepreliminary information available at this stage.
1.9 Structure of the EIA Study
This EIA report is structured into nine chapters as below.
Chapter 1 – Introduction presents details of project background, overview of Biocon Ltd,overview of Biocon SEZ, type of proposed BBIL project, justification and need for the project,screening and scoping studies etc.,
Chapter 2 – (Project Description) presents details of the proposed project, landrequirement and details of various supporting facilities required for the project.
Chapter 3 - (Description of Environment) presents a comprehensive description of thebaseline environmental conditions of the study area. This includes the data obtained fromprimary surveys and also secondary published data from various authentic sources.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 22
Chapter 4 – (Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures) presents theenvironmental aspects associated with the proposed project, envisaged emissions anddischarges from the facility, an overview of various pollution control systems proposed underproject planning activities in the detailed project report and construction and operationalphase environmental impacts.
Chapter 5 – (Analysis of Alternative Sites & Technology) presents alternative sites if anyconsidered for the project and alternative Technologies considered for this project.
Chapter 6 – (Environmental Monitoring Programme) depicts the summary of proposedenvironmental management plan.
Chapter 7 – (Additional Studies) presents the findings of the risk assessment study, riskmitigation plan, a preliminary onsite emergency and disaster management plan.
Chapter 8– (Project Benefits) presents the benefits of the project.
Chapter 9 – (Environmental Management Plan) depicts the summary of proposedenvironmental management plan.
Chapter 10 – Presents the (Summary and Conclusion) of EIA report.
Chapter 11 – Disclosure of Consultant Engaged presents the declaration by the EIAconsultant organisation as per the NABET requirements.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 23
Chapter 2Project Description
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 24
Chapter 2 Project Description
2.1 Type of project
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) proposes to set up a commercial manufacturingcomplex to manufacture and commercially supply various generic drugs which would includedosage forms like oral solids, parenteral, etc.
The finished dosage form dossiers would be filed in countries of interest for regulatoryapproval. Once the dossiers are in compliance with respective regulatory requirements, theproduct would be ready to market.
2.2 Site Location and Coordinates
As discussed in Chapter 1 the proposed project is situated at plot # 2, 3, 4 & 5,Bommasandra Industrial Area, phase 4, Anekal taluk, Bengaluru Urban district, Karnataka.The location of the project site is shown in Figure 2-1.
Figure 2-1: Project Site Location
2
34
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 25
The Google imageries of project site demarcated 10, 5, 1 & 0.5 km radius appended below in
Figure 2-2 to 2.5 respectively.
Figure 2-2: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (10 Km Radius)
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 26
Figure 2-3: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (5 Km Radius)
Figure 2-4: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (1Km Radius)
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 27
Figure 2-5: Satellite Imagery of the Project Site (0.5 Km Radius)
2.2.1 Existing Environmental Setup
The list of existing industries within 10 km radius from the project site is given in Table 2-1and the details of sensitive areas from the site boundary are given in Table 2-2. The sitedoes not fall within the CRZ area.
Table 2-1: List of Major Industries within 10KM radius from proposed project site
S. No Name Type of Industry Distance (km) Direction1 Apotex Pharma Chem Pharmaceutical 1.19 N2 Syngene Int Ltd (Biocon park) Chemicals 0.63 NE3 P.D Biopchem Pvt Ltd Pharmaceutical 1.00 SW
4 M/s Micro Labs Ltd
ML- 15, API divisionPharmaceutical 1.33 SSW
5 Micro Labs Ltd
ML- 22, API divisionPharmaceutical 1.89 SW
6 CIPLA Pharmaceutical 2.11 SW7 Mylan Limited Pharmaceutical 2.38 SW8 Acebright Pharmaceutical 3.95 SW9 Kumar Organic Products Ltd Pharmaceutical 4.18 SW
Table 2-2: Sensitive areas from the site boundary, 10 KM radius
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 28
S. No Name Distance (km) Direction1. Bannerghatta National Park 9.59 W2. Ragihalli Forest 9.27 SW3. Hennagara Lake 2.59 S4. Kammasandra Lake 4.40 NE5. Hebbagodi Lake 3.88 NE6. Ramakrishnapura Lake 4.58 SE7. Chandapura Lake 4.77 E8. Karnataka – Tamil Nadu Border 12.96 S
2.3 Size or Magnitude of Operation
The BBIL would aim to use Biocon’s well-established API business to vertically integrate intomaking finished dosage forms for developed markets and emerging market.
BBIL would focus on few special therapeutic segments such as oncology, diabetology,cardiology, inflammatory diseases and become a market leader in these therapeuticcategories. Production and export of Novel are,
1. Production of Biologicals, Antibodies and Its Derivatives - 1650 kg/ annum.
2. Formulations of Antibodies, Derivatives, Proteins, Peptides And Biologicals,
i. 10 million vials/annum
ii. 4 million injectable pens/annum
The total capital investment on the project is INR 1050 Crores, the details of which areprovided in the Table 2-3.Table 2-3: Capital Investment of the Project
S.No Investment on Fixed Assets (approx) Rs (In Crores)
A Land 0
B Building 310
C Plant and Machinery
i) Indigenous 300
ii) Imported 400
a) CIF value 0
b) Contingency 40
Total A + B + C {i + ii (b)} 1050
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 29
2.4 Proposed Schedule for Approval & Implementation
The time schedule for completion of the proposed project is given in the following Table 2-4.Table 2-4: Time schedule for completion of the proposed project
Particulars Time schedule
Approval Jan 2017
Civil works Jan 2017
Erection & installation of machinery Jan 2018
Completion Dec 2018
2.5 Technology and Process Description
2.5.1 Process Description
2.5.1.1 Products Manufactured
The proposed products are of Oncology, Diabetology, Cardiology and Inflammatorytherapeutic categories. The proposed products with capacity is as follows,
1. Production of Biologicals, Antibodies and Its Derivatives - 1650 kg/ annum.
2. Formulations of Antibodies, Derivatives, Proteins, Peptides And Biologicals,
I. 10 million vials/annum
II. 4 million injectable pens/annum
2.5.1.2 Detailed Manufacturing Process Description
The process flow of the proposed products is appended below in Figure 2-6 and Figure 2-7.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 30
Figure 2-6: Process Flow
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 31
Figure 2-7: Brief Process Flow diagram for Vials & Injectable Pens Filling.The manufacturing process for the proposed products with material balance is enclosed asAnnexure J.
2.5.1.3 Raw materials required
The raw materials required for the manufacture of proposed products are provided in theTable 2.5 below. Raw materials listed will be procured as per the production requirement.The raw materials MSDS is enclosed as Annexure O.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 32
Table 2-5 : Raw materials details
S.No Raw Material Quantity
(kg/annum) Imported/Domestic
1 Amino Acids 24000 Imported2 Glucose Solution 97500 Domestic3 Sodium Bicarbonate 1050 Imported4 Tris 15585 Imported5 Sodium Chloride 173490 Domestic6 Sodium Hydroxide 7125 Imported7 Urea 14100 Imported8 Citric Acid 7800 Domestic9 Acetic Acid 7500 Domestic
10 Histidine 67500 Imported11 Gycol 30000 Domestic12 Sorbitol 72000 Imported13 Empty Vials 100,00,000 ---14 Empty Injectable Pens 40,00,000 ---15 Nutrients 682500 Imported16 Formulation Excipients As Reqd. Imported
2.5.1.4 Source of supply of Raw Materials & Marketing Area of Final Products
The raw materials are either obtained from local suppliers or imported & transportation modeis by air, road & sea.
The geographical distribution of products is USA, Europe, Canada & Domestic markets etc..Transportation mode is by air, road & sea.
2.5.1.5 Storage Facility for Raw Materials and Products
Raw materials and finished products will be stored in a warehouse inside the proposed BBILfacility. The proposed area for warehouse is 5487 Sq. Mt.
2.5.1.6 Resource Optimization/Recycling and Re-Use Envisaged in the Industry
Recovery & Re-Use:
There is no planned recovery and reuse of raw materials used due to stringent productquality standards.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 33
2.6 Land Use of the Project Site
The total land available for the proposed project is 11940 Sq. mt (2.95 Acres) and built-upwill be 40320 Sq. mt. Available land area will be utilized for building and plant.
Existing Infrastructure of BSEZ used for BBIL are,
Roads and Pavements
Security
Diesel storage yard
Multiple Effect Evaporator
MEE Salts storage yard
Food Court
Parking Area
Transport facility for employees
The area break-up for 11940 Sq. mt (2.95 Acres) which is allocated for BBIL is provided inthe Table 2-6. The proposed layout plan demarcating various units within the plant and theboundaries with land use pattern is provided in Figure 2-8, layout is enclosed as AnnexureG.
Figure 2-8: Proposed Layout planTable 2-6 : Detailed Land Break up
S. No Land use Type of landArea
Sq. Mt Acres
1 Building Coverage Leased 11940 2.95
2 Road and Pavement BSEZ 3600 0.893 Green belt area BSEZ 4375 1.084 Water Reservoir Leased 1000 0.25
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 34
5 DG Sets & Boilers Leased 500 0.126 ETP & ERP Leased 500 0.12
7 STP Leased 100 0.028 Water Treatment Plant Leased 100 0.029 Solid Waste Storage Leased 50 0.01
The site photographs are appended below in Figures 2.9.
West Side of BBIL Site North side of BBIL Site
South Side of BBIL Site East Side of BBIL site
Figure 2-9: Site photographs
2.6.1 Resource requirements
2.6.1.1 Land Requirement and Land use planning
The total land available for the proposed project is 11940 Sq. mt (2.95 Acres) and built-upwill be 40320 Sq. mt. Available land area will be utilized for building and plant.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 35
2.6.1.2 Power requirement
• Biocon has own dedicated in-house 66/11 KV substation that caters to all the units.
• The power requirement for the proposed project will be 7 MW.
• The power back up will be provided with existing combination of DG sets and turbinesby Biocon Unit.
The details of power requirement and backup power facilities are given in Table 2-7.
Table 2-7: Power & Fuel requirement
Details Capacity Source
Power Requirement (KVA) 12000 BESCOM
Back-up (KVA) 4 x 3000 DG setsDiesel Requirements(lit/Month) - IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
Natural Gas 12000SCMD GAIL
Boiler: NG based/Diesel based fuel fired boiler 1 Nos having capacity of (16 ton/Hr)
Since Biocon is planning for natural gas powered boiler, diesel as fuel is required onlyfor the 4 x 3 mVA DG sets whenever there is power backup required.
This power backup scenario will be present only for the period whenever there is nopower supply from grid. The grid supply to BSEZ is very reliable with minimaldowntime
Diesel for DG sets will be from the existing diesel storage tank that caters to BSEZutilities. There is enough existing capacity to cater to proposed 4 DG sets
Diesel is procured by BSEZ via tankers from IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
Operating parameters for Boiler & DG are given in Table 2-8
Table 2-8: Operating parameters for Boiler & DG
S.No Parameter/Equipment Boiler DG
1 Fuel type Natural gas HSD2 Fuel Source GAIL Gas IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
3 Gross calorific value 9880 Kcal/m3 10500 Kcal/m3
4 Sulphur content (%) Zero 50 mg/kg5 Ash content (%) Zero Zero
6 Methane (% by vol) 90 NA7 Ethane (% by vol) 6 NA8 Propane (% by vol) 2 NA
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 36
9 CO2 (% by vol) 1 NA10 N2 (% by vol) 1 NA
11 Daily requirement 12000 SCMD Captive power is only for back up.Power will be fed from grid.
12 Transport mode Pipeline Trucks
2.6.1.3 Manpower Requirement
The manpower requirement including both the technical and non-technical personnel is givenin Table 2-9.
Table 2-9 : Details of Man power requirement
Operation Phase
Permanent (Nos) 500
Contractual (Nos) 60
Total (Nos) 560
Construction phase: 100 Nos.
2.6.1.4 Water Requirement
The total requirement of raw water for the unit will be 130 KLD. Water requirement for theproposed project would be supplied by Biocon SEZ. Water Balance Chart is given in Figure2-10. Water allotment letter for Biocon/Biotech is enclosed as Annexure UTable 2-10 : Water Requirement
S. No Water requirement Proposed (KLD)
1 Product 822 Formulation 213 Domestic 27
Total 130
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 37
Figure 2-10: Water Balance Chart
2.6.1.5 Solid Waste details
During operation phase, 271Kg of solid waste (Organic & Inorganic) will be generated. The
details are given in Table 2-11.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 38
Table 2-11: Solid Waste generation details
Waste Quantity (kg/day)Collection
methodDisposal method
Organic 122 Bins Sent to Biocon For further processing
Inorganic 149 Bins Authorized vendors
ETP Sludge 50 Trolleys TSDF
Note: - (As per CPCB Guidelines - 0.484 kg/capita/day for Bangalore)
2.6.1.6 Hazardous Waste details
There is no hazardous waste generation during construction phase of the project. Thehazardous wastes which will be generated during the operation phase of the project areprovided in Table 2-12.
Hazardous waste materials will be properly disposed as per the Hazardous and otherWastes (Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules 2016; Agreementwill be made with TSDF approved dealers for safe disposal of hazardous wastes. PCBauthorization for Hazardous waste disposal will be obtained.
Table 2-12: Hazardous Waste generation and disposal
S.No Waste Type Category Quantity Method of Disposal
1. Used/Spent Oils 5.1 2500 Litres/Annum Authorized recyclers
2. Waste/Residue containing Oil 5.2 250 Kg/Annum Authorized recyclers
3. Concentration/EvaporationResidue 37.3 55 Tons/Annum Authorized TSDF
4. ETP Sludge 35.3 18 Tons/Annum Authorized TSDF
5.Empty Containers/Barrels/Linerscontaminated with hazardousmaterials
33.1 1200 Nos/Annum Authorized recyclers
6. Process Residue - Nil NA
2.6.1.7 Biomedical Waste
Since the project is production of Biologicals, Antibodies and derivatives, the cultures (liquidstate) will be pre-treated with suitable methods and disposed along with effluent for furthertreatment in Effluent Treatment Plant.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 39
2.7 Assessment of New & Untested Technology for the Risk of
Technological Failure
The project is biological products manufacturing industry with R & D activity. Themanufacturing processes for these products are tried & tested method, and therefore there isno risk of technological failure. In addition to this the facility is being backed up by the R & Dcentre there would be continuous efforts for optimization of the processes to care of the anytechnological failures.
2.8 Construction Management
The manufacturing block is proposed to house the entire range of manufacturing equipmentincluding the clean room facilities, as necessary, in compliance with the cGMP standards.The manufacturing block would be constructed with expansion capabilities within the block toenable the doubling of the capacity of the various products proposed to be manufactured.
The manufacturing block would typically comprise of the following blocks:1. Biological (Monoclonal Antibody) block / sa. Drug substanceb. Drug product
The manufacturing block would also include the support functions such as the technicalareas to support the manufacturing activities meant for housing the Electrical Services,HVAC system, warehouse – both raw material and finished goods, in-process quality controllaboratories, offices for operations and maintenance, safety equipment like scrubbers anddust collection, cryogenic systems and documentation archives.
Construction Materials and approximate quantities are mentioned in the following Table2-13.
Table 2-13 : Construction Materials and Approximate Quantities
S. No ConstructionMaterials Quantity (MT)
1. Cement 1,05,000 Nos
2. Steel 7000
3. Sand -
4. Concrete gravel -
Water requirement will be met from Biocon SEZ and private water supplier. Biocon BiologicsIndia Limited looks to initiate work on the 1st Phase of this plant, post the grant of necessaryapprovals. The first phase is expected to come up in a period of 60 months. Furtherinvestments in the facility would be contingent on commercial visibility, capacity utilization,economic conditions and various other business drivers.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 40
2.9 Sustainable aspects, Energy Conservation Measures & Solar Energy
Installation
Salient features of sustainable aspects of the building:1. Use of modular wall and ceiling panels with low heat transmission.
Energy Conservation Measures:1. Selection of High Efficiency Utility Equipment’s like:
a. Water Cooled Chillers & Cooling Towerb. Air Compressorc. Centrifugal Pumps
2. Using only IE-2 motors across AHU/Pumps etc3. AHU’s are designed to run on re-circulation mode.4. Using Plug fans in AHU to increase efficiency.5. Selecting AHU fans at best efficiency and optimum hertz; using VFD to optimize the
power consumption.6. Installing PIBC valves to optimise Chilled water & hot water flow in AHU’s.7. Differential pressure switch/ Transmitters across AHU filters and terminal HEPA filters
to check filter choked conditions.8. Optimised duct and pipe design.9. All main line ducts are pressure tested to identify and rectify any leakage issues and
thus arresting energy loss.10. Energy efficient VRV (Variable Refrigerant Volume) units proposed for office areas
which will run as and when required.
Solar Energy Installations:No Solar Energy Installations Proposed for the project
2.9.1.1 Infrastructure Facilities during Construction & Operation phase
The sanitation and restroom will be provided to the labor force during the construction phase.During operation phase the office room, rest room and canteen are being provided to theemployees. The site layout plan is enclosed as Annexure-3.
2.9.1.2 Machinery & Equipment details
The detailed list of machineries & equipments proposed to be procured for the manufactureof products are listed out below.
List of process equipment (Upstream and Downstream):
1. Oxygen Sensor
2. Peristaltic Pump
3. Tube Welding Machine
4. Tube Sealing Machine (Dual Head - Thin Wall & Thick Wall)
5. CO2 Shaker incubator
6. Barcode Reader with Printer
7. Refrigerated Centrifuge
8. Refrigerator, 2-80C
9. Microscope with Camera & Comp.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 41
10. Automated Cell Counter
11. Metabolite Analyzer
12. pH & Conductivity Meter
13. Slurry Tank
14. Buffer Hold Tank
15. Media Prep.n Tank
16. Single Use Mixer
17. Laminar Air Flow Hood
18. Filter Integrity Testing M/C
19. Magnetic Mixer with Heater
20. Weighing Scale (Flush Platform Type)
21. Weighing Balance
22. Sterilization Autoclave
23. Part Washing Machine
24. Kill Autoclave
25. Continuous Centrifuge
26. Depth Filtration skid
27. Buffer dilution and Pumping Skid
28. Turbiditimeter
29. Filter Intigrity Testing M/C
30. Harvest Storage Tank
31. Chromatography Column
32. Osmometer
33. Laundry Tumbler Dryer
34. Bio-Waste Collection Tank
35. Bio-kill System
List of process equipment (Fill Finish):
1. Vial and PFS Filling lines
2. Autoclaves
3. Mobile formulation vessels
4. Lyophilizers
5. Visual inspection machines
6. GMP Washer
7. CIP/SIP Station Skids
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 42
8. Ultrasonic skid
9. Dynamic pass Box
10. Deep Freezer
11. Refrigerator
12. Laminar Flow Units
13. pH & Conductivity meter with printer
14. Mixing device for disposable bags
15. Magnetic stirrer - 20kg
16. Integrity Test machine mounted on SS trolley
17. Peristaltic pump
18. Fogging machine
19. Weighing Balances
20. Printer
21. Particle counters
2.9.1.3 Feasibility & Environmental Assessment Process
A schematic representation of the overall feasibility and environmental assessment process isshown in Figure 2-11. The EIA process is composed of the following stages:
• Study of project information• Screening & Scoping• Environmental Pre-Feasibility study & application for approval of TOR• Collection of detailed project management plan/report• Baseline Data collection• Impact identification, Prediction & Evaluation• Mitigation measures & delineation of EMP• Risk Assessment and Safety & Disaster Management plan• Review & finalization of EIA Report based on the TOR requirements.• Submission of EIA report for implementation of mitigation measures & EMP as well as
necessary clearances from relevant Authority.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 2 – Project DescriptionPage 43
Figure 2-11 : Feasibility & Environmental Assessment Process
Screening andReconnaissance Survey
Citation of Necessary Mitigation Measures,Delineation of Environment Monitoring and
Management Plan
Feasibility Study and Application ofTOR
Scoping and Application ofTOR
Identification of Monitoring, LocationsFor Monitoring & Sampling, Analysis Of
Samples And Generation Of PrimaryData
Establishment of BaselineEnvironmental Status
Collection of Detailed Project Plan/Report
Identification of SecondaryData Sources & Collection of
Data
Compilation, Verification and Validation ofdata
Study of ProjectDetails
Consequence Analysis & RiskAssessment
Preparation of Draft EIA Report &Review
Identification, Prediction & Evaluation ofImpacts
Citation of Necessary Preventive,Control & Precautionary Measures.Delineation of Safety and Disaster
Management Plan
Submission, Appraisal by Authorities for necessary clearance
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
0Page 44
Chapter 3Description of Environment
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 45
Chapter 3 Description of Environment
3.1 Preamble
This chapter depicts the existing environmental conditions in and around the proposedproject with an area of 2.95 Acres (1.19 Ha) located at plot # 2, 3, 4 & 5, BSEZ,Bommasandra Industrial area, phase 4, Bommasandra Jigani link road, Anekal TalukmBengaluru Urban District & Karnataka state. The primary baseline data monitored coveredthree (3) months i.e., from September to November 2016, and secondary data was collectedfrom Government and Semi-Government organisations. The primary baseline data has beengenerated by M/s. Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd, Chennai, and a MoEF&CC approvedEnvironmental Testing Laboratory for the following Terrestrial environmental components.
Terrestrial Environmental Components
Meteorology
Temperature
Relative Humidity
Rainfall
Wind Speed & Direction
Solar Radiation
Ambient Air Quality
Particulate matter <10 micron size (PM10)
Particulate matter <2.5 micron size (PM2.5)
Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Lead (Pb)
Ozone (O3)
Benzene (C6H6)
Benzo (a) pyrene (C20H12)
Arsenic (As)
Nickel (Ni)
Hydrogen Fluoride (HF)
Hydrogen Bromide (HBr)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
Hydrogen Chloride (Hcl)
Ambient Noise Levels
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 46
Day equivalent noise levels
Night equivalent noise levels
Inland Water Quality
Groundwater Quality
Surface Water Quality
Soil Quality
Flora & Fauna (Ecology)
3.2 Study Area
A 10Km radial distance with the proposed project site as the epicentre has been identified as
the General study area for assessing the baseline environmental status. The core studyarea is the project area and its immediate surroundings to the tune of 1.0 Km radius from the
boundary. The project area is the land where the project is being developed. Further the
Project Impact/Influence Area (PIA) is 10Km from the boundary of the core area covering
Anekal Taluka and some portion of Bangalore corporation under Bangalore urban district of
Karnataka. The map showing the study area/PIA for the EIA study is given as FigureFD0301.
3.3 Description of the Study Area
As described in Chapter 1 Introduction the Biocon SEZ is located 25Km North of Bengaluruin Bengaluru district of Karnataka. The BBIL project forms a part of the BSEZ.
An overall idea of the study area with reference to the physical conditions are presented forbetter understanding in the following sections before proceeding into the section on theprevailing environmental conditions of the study area. Location map of the project site isgiven in Figure 1-2.
3.4 Environmentally/Ecologically Sensitive areas
The environmental sensitive areas covering an aerial distance of 10 km PIA from projectboundary is given in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1: Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 15km from Project Boundary
S.No Areas Proposed project locationboundary
1 Areas protected under international conventions, national orlocal legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or otherrelated value
Bannerghatta NationalPark – 9.59Km
Bannerghatta Zoo – 9.39Km
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 47
Ragihalli Forest – 10.3 Km
2 Areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons –Wetlands, Watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone,biospheres, mountains, forests
Hennagara Lake – 2.2 Km
Kammasandra Lake – 4.0 Km
Hebbagodi Lake – 3.2 Km
Ramakrishnapura Lake – 4.5 Km
Chandapura Lake – 4.6 Km
3 Areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of floraor fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering,migration
Bannerghatta National Park – 9.59Km
Bannerghatta Zoo – 9.39 Km
4 Inland, coastal, marine or underground waters Hennagara Lake – 2.2 Km
Kammasandra Lake – 4.0 Km
Hebbagodi Lake – 3.2 Km
Ramakrishnapura Lake – 4.5 Km
Chandapura Lake – 4.6 Km
5 State, National boundaries Karnataka – Tamil Nadu Border –13.2 Km
6 Routes or facilities used by the public for access to recreation orother tourist, pilgrim areas
Bannerghatta - Anekal Road – 2.8Km
7 Defence installations Nil
8 Densely populated or built-up area Jigani – 2.6 Km
Bommasandra – 3.6 Km
9 Areas occupied by sensitive man-made land uses (hospitals,schools, places of worship, community facilities)
Hospitals
Narayana Nethralaya – 3.6 Km
Narayana Hridayala – 3.8 Km
Sparsh Hospital – 3.9 Km
Educational Institutions
MSB Educational Institute – 6.77km
Vivekananda Kendra Vidyalaya –4.9 Km
Spruthy Educational Institutions –5.49 Km
Azim Premji University – 6.7 Km
Worship Places
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 48
Jigani Masjid – 3.0 Km
St Marys Church – 3.9 Km
St.Ignatious Church – 8.9 Km
Masha Allah Masjid – 8.0 Km
10 Areas containing important, high quality or scarce resources,(groundwater resources, surface resources, forestry, agriculture,fisheries, tourism, minerals)
Hennagara Lake – 2.2 Km
Kammasandra Lake – 4.0 Km
Hebbagodi Lake – 3.2 Km
Ramakrishnapura Lake – 4.5Km
Chandapura Lake – 4.6Km
Bannerghatta National Park – 9.59Km
Bannerghatta Zoo – 10.2 Km
11 Areas already subjected to pollution or environmental damage(those where existing legal environmental standards areexceeded)
No Notified/Recognized pollutedarea within 15Km distance.
12 Areas susceptible to natural hazard which could cause theproject to present environmental problems, (earthquakes,subsidence, landslides, erosion or extreme or adverse climaticconditions)
The site falls in Seismic Zone – II(Low Risk) as per seismic zoningMap of India
3.5 Ecological Sensitive Areas and Other Protected Area
Ecologically sensitive areas like Biosphere Reserve, National Parks, and Wildlife Sanctuariesprotected sites as per Ramsar convention and other protected areas (PA) are not foundwithin 10 Km radius of the project site except Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) located ata distance of 9.59Km radius from proposed project site.
The Bannerghatta Biological Park, popularly known as BBP, has been an integral part ofBannerghatta National Park and emerged out as an independent establishment during theyear 2002. It is in order to meet the growing demand for eco-recreation, eco-tourism andconservation, an area of 545.00 Ha of forest from National park was set aside to constituteas Biological Park originally and later extended to 731.88 Ha.
Bannerghatta Biological Park is located about 22Kms south of Bengaluru city. It is oneamong the few places in the world where wilderness is preserved so close to a big city. It ishaving different units such as Zoo, Safari, Butterfly Park and Rescue Center (Conservation ofcaptive animals).
In Core area there are no trees in wild and mostly with scrub land. Protected areas from theproject location are shown in Figure 3-1.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 49
Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) Proposed BBIL Project Site
Figure 3-1: Ecological Sensitive Areas within 10Km radius
3.6 Physical Conditions
In this section, the physical conditions of PIA district Bengaluru Urban are discussed ingeneral and wherever possible references to the conditions prevailing in the study area inparticular are also provided. The physical conditions are discussed as under:
District profile
Drainage, land use, geology, Physiography
Natural resources
Climatic conditions, seismic zone characteristics and natural hazards
3.6.1 PIA District Profile
Bengaluru Urban is a district of the Indian state of Karnataka. It is surrounded by theBengaluru Rural district on the west, east and north and the Krishnagiri district of Tamil Naduon the south. Bengaluru Urban district came into being in 1986, with the partition of theerstwhile Bengaluru district into Bengaluru Urban and Bengaluru Rural districts. BengaluruUrban has four taluks: Bangalore North, Bengaluru East, Bengaluru South and Anekal. Thecity of Bengaluru is situated in the Bengaluru Urban district. The Bengaluru Urban district has17 hoblies, 668 villages and 9 municipal corporations. Electronics City the pride of India andhub of Bengaluru’s Information Technology companies is situated in Anekal Taluk.
This is the most advanced district in Karnataka. It had a population of 6,537,124 of which88.11% is urban as of 2001. As of Census 2011, its population has increased to 9,588,910,with a sex-ratio of 908 females/males, the lowest in the state and its density is 4,378 peopleper square km.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 50
3.6.2 Climatic Conditions
Due to its elevation, Bangalore enjoys a pleasant and equable climate throughout the year.The highest temperature recorded was 39.20C on 24 April 2016 and the lowest was 7.80C in1884. Winter temperatures rarely drop below 140C and summer temperatures seldomexceed 360C.The PIA district has moderate climatic conditions and characterised by sub-tropical climate. The summer heat is moderated by fairly frequent thunderstorms andoccasional squalls causing power outages and local flooding.
3.6.3 Rainfall
Bangalore receives about 970mm of rain annually, the wettest months being August,September, October and in that order. The summer heat is moderated by fairly frequentthunderstorms and occasional squalls causing power outages and local flooding. Theheaviest rainfall recorded in a 24-hour period was 159.7 mm recorded on 1 October 1997.
Most of the rainfall occurs during late afternoon/evening or night and rain before noon isinfrequent. November 2015 (290.4 mm) was recorded as one of the wettest months inBangalore with heavy rains causing severe flooding in some areas, and closure of a numberof organisations for over a couple of days.
3.6.4 Natural Resources of Bengaluru Urban PIA District
3.6.4.1 Flora & Fauna
According to Gazetteer of South India, (1988), large trees are common in Bangalore Urbandistrict being usually found only near villages. Among them Margosa (Meliaazardirachta),various species of Ficus (indica, tsiela and religiosa), Tamarind, Acacias (arabica andspeciosa), Mango, Coconut Palms, Palmyra and date (Phoenixsylvestris) etc. are reported. Alarge part of the district is covered with low scrub jungle, in which red sanders tree(Pterocarpussantalinus), the satin-wood (Chloroxylonswietenia), Casuarina were found. Floraand fauna of PIA are discussed in section 3.11.
3.6.4.2 Forest Resources
There are at least a dozen forests around Bangalore. They are mainly Makalidurga,Devarabetta, Doddaragi Halli Betta & Chickkaragi Halli Betta, Suvarnamukhi, Thottikal Falls,Nandihills, Skandagiri, Muthyalamadu & Savanadurga.
3.6.4.3 Irrigation
The only river of some importance in the district is the Arkavathi river, which flows in thenorthwest border of the division. This river is a tributary of the Cauvery and flows from northto south. On the way, it forms several large tanks as at Hessaraghatta. Apart from this mainriver, there are other small rivers like the Vrishabhavathi.
The Vrishabhavathi runs right from one end of the City to the other. On its way, it is fed byeffluents from various factories and sewage from several human settlements. This river isone of the ugliest features in the City. It becomes particularly obnoxious near Mysore Road.Another stream Suvarnamukhi that has its origin in the division also joins the Vrishabhavathi.
Irrigation of the cultivated lands in the district is mainly carried on by means of water drawnfrom tanks and wells. In the months of April, May and June severe scarcity of water may be
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 51
felt. Bangalore City is provided with drinking water from mainly two sources, namely,Tippagondanahally reservoir constructed across the Arkavati river in magadi taluk ofBangalore Rural division and the Cauvery river. Both these sources become almost dry forabout a month in May-June, if the monsoons are delayed. The water table of the city is goingdown each year and the open wells and bore-wells are getting drier and drier. More andmore bore-wells have been sunk over the years much beyond the carrying capacity of thewater table in the city so much, that almost alternate houses have bore wells now. Anotherfactor for lowering of the water table is the drying and dying up of the lakes and tanksexisting in the city, which have been either filled up to make layouts for constructing housesor for creating bus-stands and playgrounds. Many lakes and tanks of the city are severallypolluted because of the fact that sewage waters are let into these water bodies.
3.6.4.4 Agricultural Resources
In PIA Agriculture is the main occupation of the people of the district. Rice is the staple foodof the people and paddy is the principal food crop followed by Ragi, Jowar and Maize crops.Tobacco, Cashews, Coconut, arecanut, Cardomom, Chillies, Cotton, Sugarcane are alsocultivated.
Major Field Crops cultivated: Paddy, Ragi, Jowar, Maize, Sugarcane, Tobacco, Cotton,Chilli etc
Horticulture crops: Mango, Orange&batavina, Cashew, Banana, Chillies, Bhendi, Brinjal,greens, Marigold,
Plantation and Spice crops: Oil palm, Coconut, Betelvine
Livestock: Non descriptive Cattle (local low yielding), Crossbreed cattle, Non descriptiveBuffaloes (local low yielding), Graded Buffaloes, Goat, Sheep, Others (Camel, Pig, Yak etc.)Poultry.
3.6.4.5 Mineral Resources
Bangalore Urban does n’t contains minerals of sufficient commercial value. Nodularconcentrations of lime canker are found as secondary product in many places in the gneissicregions. Graphite is observed to occur as crystalline flakes near Chikkabanavar. Geology &
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 52
Minerals map of Karnataka is given in
Figure 3-2.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 53
Figure 3-2: Geology & Minerals Map of Karnataka
Project Site
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 54
3.6.5 Land Use & Land Cover
Total geographical area of Bangalore Urban district is 2184.14 Km2. Total are of Agricultureland is 531.98 Km2 (%). Forest area covered is 26.41 Km2 (%). Built up area is 1451.41 Km2
(%). Grass land is 5.87Km2 (%). Water bodies’ area is 36.45 Km2 (%). Waste Lands area is122.02 Km2 (%). Others area is 10Km2 (%). Details of land use/land cover for the BangaloreUrban district are given in Table 3-2 and Figure 3-3. Land Use of Bangalore Urban (2005)is given in Figure 3-4.Table 3-2: District land use/land cover statistics
S.No Division of LandUse/Land Cover
Area in Km2 Area in Acres Area in Ha % To TotalArea
1 Agriculture 531.98 131455.12 53197.99 24.35
2 Forest Cover 26.41 6526.05 2640.99 1.20
3 Built up 1451.41 358651.22 145140.99 66.45
4 Grass Land 5.87 1450.50 586.99 0.26
5 Water Bodies 36.45 9006.99 3644.99 1.67
6 Waste Lands 122.02 30151.79 12201.99 5.59
7 Others 10.00 2471.05 999.99 0.46
Total 2184.14 539712.74 218413.99 100
Figure 3-3: Land Use Pattern in the PIA District
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 55
Figure 3-4: Land Use Map of Bangalore Urban district
3.6.5.1 Land Use Pattern of the Study Area
Land Use pattern of the study area is given in
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 56
Table 3-3. Land Use Pattern of the study area is given in Figure 3-5. LULC map of the Studyarea is given in Figure 3-6.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 57
Table 3-3: Land Use/Land Cover statistics of 10Km radius of the Study Area
S.No Land Use Area in Sq.Km Area in Acres Area in Ha Area inPercentage
1 Urban Built-up Land 130.60 32271.96 13059.99 40.06
2 Rural 27.24 6731.15 2723.99 8.36
3 Crop Land 89.92 22219.71 8991.99 27.58
4 Fallow Land – Agriculture 11.23 2774.99 1122.99 3.45
5 Scrub Forest 13.72 3390.28 1371.99 4.21
6 Deciduous Forest 15.93 3936.38 1592.99 4.89
7 Swamp/Mangrove - -
8 Land with Scrub 12.58 3108.58 1257.99 3.85
9 Barren Land/Rocky Land 3.18 785.79 317.99 0.97
10 Water bodyReservoir/Lakes/Ponds
16.74 4136.54 1673.99 5.14
11 Mining 4.86 1200.93 485.99 1.49
Total 326.00 80556.40 32600.01 100.00
Figure 3-5: Land Use Pattern of the Study Area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 59
Figure 3-6: Land use/Land cover map of the Study Area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 61
3.6.6 Topography
Topography of Bangalore Urban district is generally flat. Physiographically the district can bedivided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at a general elevation of about 900amslwith its major part sloping toward south and south east forming pediplains interspersed withhills all along the western part. The pediplains form the major part of the district underlain bygranites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to 950m amsl. Major part of thepediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rolling topography witherosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness. Major part ofthe pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southern direction. Contour map ofproject site is given in Figure 3-7. Physiography map of Karnataka state is given in Figure3-8. Physiography map of the Study area is given in Figure 3-9. Topo map of the study areais given in Figure 3-10.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 62
Figure 3-7: Contour map of project site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 63
Figure 3-8: Physiography map of Karnataka State
Project Site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 65
Figure 3-9: Physiography map of Study Area
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 66
Figure 3-10: Topo map of the study area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 67
3.6.7 Geology of the PIA District
The prevailing rock is light to dark grey or whitish biotic granite gneiss, which variesconsiderably from place to place varies in texture, structure and appearance, according tothe fineness or coarseness of its constituent grins and the relative abundance or scarcity,and mode of deposition of the darker ferro-minerals. These complex Gneissic masses havebeen styled “Peninsular Gneiss”.
The schists are not conspicuous in this district, but small isolated strings of a darkhornblende grannulite, with its contact modified phase of the secondary pale-green pyroxenerock, occur in some parts. Among the dyke rocks, a group of dykes of charnockite affinitiesand also some hornblende dykes are found bordering Kanakapura taluk. Geology map of thePIA district is given in Figure 3-11.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 68
Figure 3-11: Geology Map of PIA District
3.6.8 Geomorphology of PIA District
Physiographically the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills atan general elevation of about 900 amsl with its major part sloping towards south and southeast forming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains formthe major part of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of
Project Site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 69
850 to 950 m amsl. Major part of the pediplain constitute low relief area having matureddissected rolling topography with erosional land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil ofvaried thickness. Major part of the pediplains is dissected by streamlets flowing in southerndirection. Geomorphology Map of study area is given in
Figure 3-12.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 70
Figure 3-12: Geomorphology Map of Study area
3.6.9 Hydrogeology of PIA District
Groundwater occurrence, movement and recharge to aquifers are controlled by degree ofweathering, fracture pattern, geomorphological setup and rainfall. Granites and Gneisses ofpeninsular gneissic group constitute major aquifers in the urban district. Ground water occursin phreatic conditions in the weathered zone and under semi confined to confined conditionsin fractured and jointed rock formations. Laterites of Tertiary age occur as isolated patchescapping crystalline rocks in Bangalore north taluk and ground water occur in phreaticcondition. Alluvium of 20m thick, which occur along the river courses, though of limitedthickness and aerial extent possess substantial ground water potential. Hydrogeology map ofPIA district is given in Figure 3-13.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 71
Figure 3-13: Hydrogeology Map of PIA district
3.6.10 Drainage Pattern in PIA District
Major part of the district is drained by Shimsha and Kanva rivers of Cauvery basin i.eBangalore north and South taluks. (Catchment area of 468 sq.km which includesNelamangala and Magadi taluks of Bangalore rural also). Anekal taluk is drained by SouthPennar river of Ponnaiyar basin, which takes its birth from Nandi hills and flows towardssouth (Catchment area is 2005 sq.km which covers Devanahalli and Hoskote taluks ofBangalore rural district also). Drainage Map of the study area is given in Figure 3-14.
Project Site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 73
Figure 3-14: Drainage Map of the Study area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 75
3.6.11 Soils in PIA District
The soils of the district can be broadly grouped into red loamy soil and lateritic soil.
Red Loamy Soils generally occur on hilly to undulating land slope on granite and gneissicterrain. It is mainly seen in the eastern and southern parts of Bangalore north and southtaluks.
Laterite soils occur on undulating terrain forming plain to gently sloping topography ofpeninsular gneissic region. It is mainly covered in Anekal taluk and western parts ofBangalore North and south taluks. Soil Map of Karnataka is given in
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 76
Figure 3-15.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 77
Figure 3-15: Soil Map of Karnataka State
Project Site
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 78
3.6.12 Physiography of PIA District
Physiographically, the district can be divided into rocky upland, plateau & flat topped hills at ageneral elevation of about 950amsl.The major part is sloping towards south and south eastforming pediplains interspersed with hills all along the western part. The pediplains form themajority of the district underlain by granites and gneisses with the highest elevation of 850 to950amsl. The pediplain constitute low relief area having matured dissected rollingtopography with erosion land slope covered by a layer of red loamy soil of varied thickness.Physiography Map of Study area is given in
Figure 3-16.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 79
Figure 3-16: Physiography Map of the Study Area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 81
3.6.13 Cyclones & Depressions, Winds and Coastal Erosion in PIA District
Bangalore urban district is facing the brunt of moderate to severe floods. Floods areassociated with cloud bursts, cyclones or depressions in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea.The floods are quite common in Bangalore Urban District. As per Karnataka wind hazardmap Bangalore Urban district is falling under low damage risk zone. Karnataka wind HazardMap is given in
Figure 3-17.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 82
Figure 3-17: Wind Hazard Map of Karnataka
3.6.14 Seismicity
As per the IS:1893 (Part-1) 2002 of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), the projectlocation/study area falls in Zone II, which is categorised as a Low risk zone. The seismicity
Project Site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 83
map of India is shown in
Figure 3-18.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 84
Figure 3-18: Seismicity Map of India
3.7 Air Environment
Baseline ambient air quality assessment gives the status in the vicinity of site and is anindispensable part of environmental impact assessment studies. Significant changes, inpredominant winds and weather conditions are observed in winter, summer and post-monsoon seasons apart from the local topographic influences. The baseline status of airenvironment in the study area is assessed through a systematic air quality surveillanceprogramme.
3.7.1 Meteorological Conditions
The regional air quality is influenced by the meteorology of that region. The principal weatherparameters that influence the concentration of the air pollutants in the surroundings are wind
Project Site
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 85
speed, wind direction and temperature. The meteorological data is useful for properinterpretation of the baseline data. It is used as input for air quality dispersion models forpredicting the post project environmental scenario i.e. ground level concentrations due toproposed utilities like boiler & DG sets, etc.
3.7.2 Meteorological Data Collection
Available secondary data pertaining to the meteorological parameters was obtained from theIMD Climatalogical tables. In addition, baseline meteorological data (primary data) wasgenerated during the Post-monsoon Season (Sep to Nov 2016). The methodology adoptedfor monitoring surface observations is as per the standard norms laid down by Bureau ofIndian Standards (BIS) i.e. IS:8829 and Indian Meteorological Department (IMD).
3.7.3 General Meteorological Scenario based on IMD Data
The nearest Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) station located to project site isBangalore. The Climatological data for Bangalore (12 58’ N and 77o 35’ E), published by theIMD, based on daily observations at 08:30 and 17:30 hour IST for a 30 year period, ispresented in the following sections on the meteorological conditions of the region. Themonthly variations of the relevant meteorological parameters are reproduced in Table 3-4.
Table 3-4: Climatological Summary – Bangalore Region (1971-2000)
MonthTemp (oC) Rainfall
(mm)RelativeHumidity
(%)
Station LevelPressure
hPaMeanWind
Speed(m/s)
Predominant WindDirections
(From)*DailyMax.
DailyMin. Total No. of
days 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30 08:30 17:30
Jan 27.4 14.2 1.8 0.0 86 42 17.0 13.3 1.58 E E
Feb 30.1 15.9 7.6 0.4 77 34 17.5 12.9 1.75 E E
Mar 32.7 18.2 14.0 0.8 68 28 18.7 12.4 1.83 SW E
Apr 34.0 20.8 40.0 2.8 73 35 22.8 15.9 1.91 SW E
May 33.1 20.9 94.4 6.0 76 47 23.3 19.5 2.72 W W
Jun 29.8 19.8 80.5 5.0 83 63 22.8 21.9 4.69 W W
Jul 28.6 19.4 102.7 7.4 86 66 22.2 21.7 4.61 W W
Aug 28.0 19.2 116.6 9.3 88 68 22.2 21.9 4.08 W W
Sep 28.5 19.3 195.6 9.6 86 65 22.3 21.5 2.66 W W
Oct 28.0 19.0 152.0 8.7 85 66 22.1 20.6 1.69 W E
Nov 26.8 17.1 58.4 4.1 84 62 20.0 18.6 1.41 E E
Dec 26.1 15.1 17.3 1.5 87 56 18.1 16.2 1.53 E E
Max. 34.0 20.9 195.6 9.6 87 68 22.3 21.9 4.69Min. 26.1 14.2 1.8 0.4 68 28 17.0 13.3 1.42Avg. 29.4 18.2 - 55.7 82 53 20.8 18.1 2.56
As per the above Climatological table the observations drawn for the study period are thefollowing. Wind roses drawn for various seasons as per IMD observatory data (1970-2000)are given in
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 86
Summer –(March-May) Monsoon –(June-September)
Post Monsoon-(October –December) Winter –(January-February)
Figure 3-19.
Daily maximum temperature during the study period is 28.5oC and the daily minimumtemperature is 17.1oC were recorded in the months of September and Novemberrespectively
Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 62% were recorded in the monthsof September and November respectively
Maximum and minimum rainfall of 195.6 mm and 58.4 mm was recorded in the months ofSeptember and November respectively
Total rainfall recorded during the study period is 406 mm
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 87
Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 2.66 m/s and 1.41m/s.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 88
Summer –(March-May) Monsoon –(June-September)
Post Monsoon-(October –December) Winter –(January-February)
Figure 3-19: Wind roses drawn for various seasons as per IMD observatory data (1970-2000)
3.7.4 Meteorological Scenario during Study Period
Meteorological scenario in and around the project site is an essential requirement duringstudy period for proper interpretation of baseline air quality status. Site-specificmeteorological data was collected during the study period post monsoon season, 2016
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 89
(September – November 2016 three months). The terrain is flat and elevation varied from 3-5m above mean sea level. Automatic weather station was installed at project site (On top ofBSEZ Security room) to record the meteorological parameters during the study period.Meteorological parameters recorded include temperature, wind speed, wind direction,relative humidity, solar radiation and rainfall. The location is chosen such that there is noobstruction to the flow of wind and sunlight. The hourly meteorological data of wind speed,wind direction, temperature and solar radiation were recorded at the project site. Thesefrequencies were computed on eight hourly as well as 24 hourly basis and the correspondingresults are used to draw wind rose for 00-08hrs, 08-16 hrs, 16-24 hrs and 00-24hrscorresponding to study period as shown in subsequent sections. The overall wind patternrecorded for 01.00 – 24.00 hours during the study period is given in Figure 3-20.Figure 3-20: Site Specific Windrose for the study period ((September to November)
September 2016 October 2016
November 2016
3.7.4.1 Atmospheric Inversion
Atmospheric inversion level at the project site was monitored; the results observed at the siteduring the study period are as follows
Average atmospheric temperature : 22.80C
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 90
Average Relative humidity : 74%
Average Wind speed : 2.03 m/s
The daily inversion level calculated based on the average temperature and average windspeed at the project site and the maximum inversion height is derived by the graph plottedbased on the average temperature and average wind speed. The daily inversion level at theproject site varies from 50 to 1750m during 6 AM to 5 PM, the maximum recorded at 5 PM,May 2016. This is shown in
Figure 3-21.
Figure 3-21: Hourly variation of the mixing heights
3.7.4.2 Observations during Study Period
The meteorological data collected during monitoring is used for interpretation of baselinestatus and to simulate the meteorological conditions for prediction of impacts in modellingstudies. Site Specific Meteorology data for the Study Period (September – November 2016).
Table 3-5 : Site Specific Meteorology Data for the Study Period (September –November 2016)
S. No Parameter Observation
1. Temperature Min Temperature : 17.1 0C
Max Temperature : 28.5 0C
Avg Temperature : 22.80C
2. Relative Humidity Range 62 to 86%
3. Wind Speed Range 1.41 m/s – 2.66 m/s
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 91
4. Predominant Wind Direction W to E
5. Rainfall 54.8 – 195.6 mm
3.7.5 Ambient Air Quality
The selection criteria for monitoring locations are based on the following:
Topography/Terrain
Meteorological conditions
Residential and sensitive areas within the study area
Representatives of regional background air quality/pollution levels and
Representation of likely impacted areas
3.7.5.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations
To evaluate the baseline air quality of the study area, Eight (08) monitoring locations havebeen identified. A map showing the monitoring locations is given as FigureFD0302 and thedetails of the locations are given in Table 3-6.
Table 3-6: Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
StationCode Location Type of
Wind Lat longsDistance (km)from Project
boundaryAzimuth
Directions
A1 Project Site - 12048’3.22” N, 77039’ 35.22”EA2 Jigani U/W 12047’2.70” N, 77038’ 29.91”E 4.31 WA3 Ramakrishnapura D/W 12046’56.24”N, 77041’ 39.39”E 7.02 ESEA4 Byagadadenahalli C/W 12045’10.97”N, 77042’ 9.72”E 7.89 SEA5 Indalavadi C/W 12043’46.06”N, 77038’ 28.19”E 4.45 SSWA6 Bommasandra D/W 12049’3.07”N, 77041’ 56.58”E 5.63 EA7 Doddathoguru C/W 12051’0.42”N, 77039’ 10.82”E 5.45 NA8 Hullahalli C/W 12049’27.45”N, 77036’ 55.68”E 2.60 NW
3.7.5.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Techniques and Frequency
Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12weeks), i.e. during Post Monsoon season (September to November, 2016).
PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, Ni, were monitored on 24 hourly basis andO3 and CO were monitored on eight hourly basis and VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S aremonitored on 2 hrly basis. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution Control Board(CPCB) monitoring guidelines at each location. Analytical methods used for analysis ofparameters are given in Table 3-7.
Table 3-7: Analytical Methods for Analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters
S.No Parameters Analytical method NAAQ standards: 2009 Sampling Time
1.Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),μg/m3
IS:5182(Part-2):2001(Reaff:2006)
50 (Annual) 80(24 Hours) 24 Hours
2.Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), IS: 5182 (Part - 6): 2006 40 (Annual) 80 (24 Hours) 24 Hours
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 92
μg/m3
3.Particulate Matter(PM2.5), μg/m3
IS: 5182 (Part - 23): 2006 40 (Annual) 60 (24 hours) 24 Hours
4.Particulate Matter(PM10), μg/m3
IS:5182 (Part– 23): 2006 60 (Annual) 100 (24 hours) 24 Hours
5.CO μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–10):1999
(Reaff:2006)2 (8 hours) 4 (1hour) 8 Hours
6.Pb μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–22):2004
(Reaff:2006)0.5(Annual) 1(24 hours) 24 Hours
7.O3, μg/m3 IS: 5182 (Part – 9): 1974 100(8hours) 180 (1hour) 8 Hours
8.NH3, μg/m3 APHA(air) 2nd edition
(Indophenol-blue method)100(Annual) 400(24 hours) 8 Hours
9.Benzene, μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–11):1999
(RA:2009)
5 (Annual) 5 (Annual) 24 Hours
10.Benzo (a) pyrene,ng/m3
IS:5182(Part–12):2004(RA:2009)
1 (Annual) 1 (Annual) 24 Hours
11.Arsenic, ng/ m3 APHA (air) 2nd edition 6 (Annual) 6 (Annual) 24 Hours
12. Volatile OrganicCompounds (ppm)
PID (Photo-IonizationDetection) Method
-- -- 2 Hours
13.
Chlorine (µg/m3)IS 5182 (part 19):1982(Ref2003)
-- -- 2 Hours
14. Hydrochloric acid(µg/m3)
NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
15. Hydrobromic acid(µg/m3)
NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
16.Hydrogen sulphide(µg/m3)
IS 5182 (part 7) : 1973(Ref2003)
-- -- 2 Hours
17. Hydrogen fluoride(µg/m3)
NIOSH Method -- -- 2 Hours
3.7.5.3 Results and Discussions
The variations of the pollutants PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As& Ni are compared with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), MoEF&CCNotification, November, 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to November,2016) for the study area is given in Table 3-8 to Table 3-18 and graphically presented inFigure 3-21Trend of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area Figure 3-22to Figure 3-28.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 93
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 95
Table 3-8: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants
S.No Location NameSO2
(µg/m3)NO2
(µg/m3)PM2.5
(µg/m3
PM10
(µg/m3
Pb(µg/m3)
CO(mg/m3)
O3
(µg/m3)NH3
(µg/m3)Benzen(mg/m3)
Benzo (a)pyrene(ng/m3)
Arsenic(As)(ng/m3)
Nickel(Ni)
(ng/m3)
1 Project Site 11.68 26.39 30.25 65.12BDL
(DL 0.05)0.014 14.25 8.99
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
2 Jigani 11.12 24.91 27.19 60.44BDL
(DL 0.05)0.012 13.32 6.44
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
3 Ramakrishnapura 9.87 20.45 24.67 56.61BDL
(DL 0.05)0.012 11.34 5.35
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
4 Byagadadenahalli 7.61 18.56 21.72 51.61BDL
(DL 0.05)BDL
(DL0.005)BDL
(DL10)BDL(DL5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
5 Indalavadi 8.45 19.61 22.60 54.39BDL
(DL 0.05)0.11 10.65 6.37
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
6 Bommasandra 8.70 17.62 19.52 48.37BDL
(DL 0.05)0.01 14.11 5.64
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
7 Doddathoguru 10.59 21.68 25.31 58.34BDL
(DL 0.05)0.013 12.67 5.87
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
8 Hullahalli 7.98 16.37 17.89 46.61BDL
(DL 0.05)BDL
(DL0.005)BDL
(DL10)BDL(DL5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 2)
BDL(DL 10)
Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 96
Table 3-9: Summary of the average baseline concentrations of pollutants
S.No Location Name
Volatile OrganicCompounds
(ppm)Chlorine(µg/m3)
Hydrochloricacid
(µg/m3)
Hydrobromicacid
(µg/m3)
Hydrogensulphide
(µg/m3)
Hydrogenfluoride
(µg/m3)
1 Project Site 4.91 BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
2 Jigani 3.61 BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
3 Ramakrishnapura 1.33 BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
4 Byagadadenahalli BDL(DL 0.1) BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
5 Indalavadi BDL(DL 0.1) BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
6 Bommasandra BDL(DL 0.1) BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
7 Doddathoguru2.05 BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
8 HullahalliBDL(DL 0.1) BDL(DL 145) BDL(DL 140) BDL(DL 35) BDL(DL 6) BDL(DL 350)
Note: BDL (Below detectable limit), DL (Detectable limit)
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 97
Table 3-10: Ambient PM10 Monitoring Data
S.NO LOCATION NAMEPM10 Concentrationg/m³
Minimum µg/m3 Maximum, µg/m3 Average, µg/m3 98th Percentile
1 Project Site 62.74 69.88 65.12 69.88
2 Jigani 58.24 64.32 60.45 63.46
3 Ramakrishnapura 48.30 63.50 56.60 63.04
4 Byagadadenahalli 46.50 55.20 51.15 55.20
5 Indalavadi 47.50 58.40 54.30 57.98
6 Bommasandra 44.50 55.80 48.04 55.25
7 Doddathoguru 52.60 62.58 58.36 62.50
8 Hullahalli 42.30 55.20 46.61 52.21
Figure 3-22: Trends of Measured Ambient PM10 Concentrations in the Study Area
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 98
Table 3-11: Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring Data
S.No LocationPM2.5 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximum,µg/m3
Average,µg/m3
98th
Percentile
1 Project Site 28.16 34.60 30.29 69.88
2 Jigani 23.20 29.54 27.19 63.46
3 Ramakrishnapura 20.80 27.20 24.61 63.04
4 Byagadadenahalli 18.40 29.48 21.70 55.20
5 Indalavadi 18.40 25.60 22.64 57.98
6 Bommasandra 13.10 23.10 19.53 55.25
7 Doddathoguru 23.20 27.46 25.29 62.50
8 Hullahalli 13.30 23.10 17.88 52.21
Figure 3-23: Trends of Measured Ambient PM2.5 Concentrations in the Study Area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 99
Table 3-12 : Ambient SO2 Monitoring Data
S.No LocationSO2 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximum, µg/m3Average,
µg/m3
98thPercentile
1 Project Site 8.80 14.20 11.55 14.02
2 Jigani 5.00 13.80 11.15 13.62
3 Ramakrishnapura 7.50 12.60 9.85 12.60
4 Byagadadenahalli 6.40 9.80 7.65 9.80
5 Indalavadi 6.40 13.00 8.45 11.48
6 Bommasandra 6.10 13.45 8.70 13.24
7 Doddathoguru 7.80 12.60 10.60 12.42
8 Hullahalli 6.40 9.80 8.00 9.75
Figure 3-24: Trends of Measured Ambient SO2 Concentrations in the Study Area
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 100
Table 3-13: Ambient NO2 Monitoring Data
S.No Location
NO2 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site 17.30 29.50 26.38 29.22
2 Jigani 21.20 28.60 24.90 28.28
3 Ramakrishnapura 17.80 23.60 20.43 23.51
4 Byagadadenahalli 10.20 23.60 18.55 23.55
5 Indalavadi 13.75 23.50 19.65 23.27
6 Bommasandra 11.60 26.80 17.66 25.33
7 Doddathoguru 15.60 23.80 21.68 23.74
8 Hullahalli 12.40 19.20 16.38 18.46
Figure 3-25: Trends of Measured Ambient NO2 Concentrations in the Study Area
Table 3-14: Ambient Lead (Pb) Monitoring Data
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 101
S.No LocationPb Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site BDL BDL BDL BDL
2 Jigani BDL BDL BDL BDL
3 Ramakrishnapura BDL BDL BDL BDL
4 Byagadadenahalli BDL BDL BDL BDL
5 Indalavadi BDL BDL BDL BDL
6 Bommasandra BDL BDL BDL BDL
7 Doddathoguru BDL BDL BDL BDL
8 Hullahalli BDL BDL BDL BDL
Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit
Table 3-15: Ambient Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring Data
S.No LocationCO Concentration, µg/m3
Minimummg/m3
Maximummg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site 0.010 0.018 0.014 0.018
2 Jigani 0.005 0.022 0.012 0.021
3 Ramakrishnapura 0.004 0.018 0.012 0.018
4 Byagadadenahalli 0.002 0.009 BDL(DL 0.005) 0.009
5 Indalavadi 0.010 0.210 0.111 0.201
6 Bommasandra 0.005 0.019 0.011 0.019
7 Doddathoguru 0.001 0.018 0.013 0.018
8 Hullahalli 0.001 0.013 BDL(DL 0.005) 0.011
Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit
Averagemg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 102
Figure 3-26: Trends of Measured Ambient CO Concentrations in the Study AreaTable 3-16: Ambient Ozone (O3) Monitoring Data
S.No LocationO3 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site 8.20 19.80 14.18 19.52
2 Jigani 11.20 16.50 13.34 16.36
3 Ramakrishnapura 8.20 13.50 11.35 13.50
4 Byagadadenahalli 8.60 11.60 BDL(DL 10) 11.55
5 Indalavadi 9.40 12.20 10.67 11.92
6 Bommasandra 10.50 15.60 14.11 15.51
7 Doddathoguru 9.20 14.60 12.61 14.60
8 Hullahalli 8.60 13.60 BDL(DL 10) 12.96
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 103
Figure 3-27: Trends of Measured Ambient O3 Concentrations in the Study Area
Table 3-17: Ambient Ammonia (NH3) Monitoring Data
S.No LocationNO2 Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site 6.50 11.20 8.99 11.11
2 Jigani 5.40 7.28 6.45 7.27
3 Ramakrishnapura 4.50 6.30 5.34 6.12
4 Byagadadenahalli 4.20 6.50 BDL(DL 5) 6.36
5 Indalavadi 4.80 7.65 6.36 7.54
6 Bommasandra 4.50 7.60 5.60 7.42
7 Doddathoguru 4.20 7.50 5.89 7.39
8 Hullahalli 4.20 6.50 BDL(DL 5) 6.36
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 104
Figure 3-28: Trends of Measured Ambient NH3 Concentrations in the Study Area
Table 3-18: Ambient Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Monitoring Data
S.No LocationBENZENE Concentration, µg/m3
Minimumµg/m3
Maximumµg/m3
Averageµg/m3
98th Percentile
1 Project Site 3.40 5.40 4.93 5.40
2 Jigani 2.10 5.40 3.60 5.31
3 Ramakrishnapura 0.05 3.00 1.30 2.89
4 Byagadadenahalli 0.02 0.90 BDL(0.1) 0.73
5 Indalavadi 0.02 0.90 BDL(0.1) 0.73
6 Bommasandra 0.02 0.90 BDL(0.1) 0.73
7 Doddathoguru 1.20 4.70 2.53 4.44
8 Hullahalli 0.02 0.90 BDL(0.1) 0.05
Note: - BDL = Below Detectable Limit
3.7.5.4 Observations
Maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO, Pb, O3 , NH3 , C6H6, C20 H12, As & Niare well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Industrial, Commercial andResidential areas at all monitoring locations during the study period.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 105
3.8 Noise Environment
The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) ofall kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambientnoise level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities.
Ambient noise levels have been established by monitoring noise levels at eight (08)locations in and around 10Km distance from project area during September to November,2016 using precision noise level meter. The noise monitoring locations in the study areawere selected after giving due consideration to the various land use categories. The land usecategories include commercial, residential, rural and sensitive areas. Noise levels wererecorded on an hourly basis for one complete day at each location using pre- calibratednoise levels. A map showing the monitoring locations is given as Figure FD0303.
3.8.1 Results and Discussions
Based on the recorded hourly noise levels at each monitoring location, the day equivalent(Ld) and night equivalent (Ln) were calculated;
Ld: Average noise levels between 6:00 hours to 22.00 hours. Ln: Average noise levels between 22:00 hours to 6.00 hours.
The Day-Night (Ldn) equivalent noise levels were calculated using the US EnvironmentalProtection Agency formula:
Ldn = 10 Log [0.0416 {16 (10Ld/10) + 8 (10Ln+10/10)}]
The comparison of day equivalent noise levels (Ld) and night equivalent noise levels (Ln) withthe respective CPCB stipulated noise standards for various land use categories are shown inthe Table 3-19.
Table 3-19: Day and Night Equivalent Noise Levels
S.No Location Location
Code
Distance(km) from
Projectboundary
AzimuthDirection
Noise levelin dB(A) Leq CPCB Standard Environmental
SettingDay Night Lday (Ld) LNight (Ln)1. Project Site N1 55.0 50.1 75 70 Industrial2. Jigani N2 4.31 W 77.3 71.0 55 45 Industrial3. Ramakrishnapura N3 7.02 ESE 73.6 69.4 55 45
Residential
4. Byagadadenahalli N4 7.89 SE 78.0 73.6 55 455. Indalavadi N5 4.45 SSW 84.5 78.0 55 456. Bommasandra N6 5.63 E 67.2 61.4 55 457. Doddathoguru N7 5.45 N 78.1 73.5 55 458. Hullahalli N8 2.60 NW 83.9 78.9 55 45
3.8.2 Observations
It is observed that the day equivalent and night equivalent noise levels at all locations arewithin prescribed CPCB standards
Day equivalent noise levels (Ld) ranged between 55.0 dB(A) to 84.5 dB (A) Night equivalent noise levels (Ln) ranged between 50.1dB (A) to 78.9 dB (A).The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in theIndustrial area were slightly exceeded the prescribed standards except project site and inResidential noise zones noise levels are slightly exceeded the limit prescribed by MoEF&CC.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 106
3.9 Water Environment
3.9.1 Surface Water Resources
There are about 118 water bodies including small and large natural/manmade within 10Kmradius from proposed BBIL project. Realignment of storm water drainage without disturbanceshall be made in accordance with existing natural drainage forming as grid type arrangementbased on the natural slope (gravity flow) which finally discharges into major water bodies.The study area consists of the Hennagara lake in the southern region, Ramakrishnapura lakein the part of East South Eastern region. The Hebbagodi and Kammasandra lake in the NorthEastern/North north Eastern part from the project site. The Bergur/Askhayanagara lake in thepart of North North West region. As the Bommasandra Industrial Area estate lies in theNortheastern region, the representative surface water sampling locations have been chosen.The List of major water bodies nearby project site is given in Table 3-20. Photographs ofExisting major water bodies are given in Figure 3-29 & Figure 3-30.
Table 3-20: List of Major Water Bodies within 10Km radius
S.No Name of the Water bodies Distance Direction
1 Hennagara lake 2.3 S
2 Chandapura lake 4.8 ENE
3 Kammasandra lake 3.9 NE
4 Hebbagodi lake 3.7 NE
5 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.5 ESE
6 Begur lake 8.6 NNW
7 Akshayanagara lake 9.1 NNW
8 Singasandra lake 9.2 N
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 107
Hennagara Lake Chandapura Lake
Kammasandra Lake Begur Lake
Figure 3-29: Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 108
Ramakrishnapura lake Hebbagodi lake
Singasandra Lake Akshayanagara Lake
Figure 3-30: Photographs of existing major water bodies within the study area
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 109
Table 3-21: Water bodies in 10km radius of Project area
S.NoName of Water body/Nearest
LocationDistance from
Project Site(Km) DirectionArea
Nearby villagesCentre of Water body
Acres Hectares Latitude Longitude
1 Near Chikka Begur 9.8 NNW 31.67 12.82 Devar Chikkanahalli
Gyanappanahalli
Begur
12053’ 5.94” 770 38’ 12.60”
2 Begur Lake 8.6 NNW 116.90 47.25 Ckikka Begur
Gyanappanahalli
Subash Nagar
120 52’ 25.25” 770 37’ 48.87”
3 Near Chikka Begur 8.66 NNW 11.7 4.75 Begur
Subash Nagar
Singasandra
Parappana Agrahara
120 52’ 40.64” 770 38’ 31.46”
4 Singasandra Lake 9.0 N 6.92 2.81 Parappana Agrahara
Ckikka Begur
Hallayout
120 52’ 54.81” 770 38’ 44.79”
5 Near Kudlu 9.2 N 47.30 19.14 Kudlu
Singasandra
Parappana Agrahara
Hallayout
120 53’ 3.92” 770 39’ 53.14”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 110
6 Rayasandra 8.93 NNE 73.06 29.57 Naganathapura
Ghattihalli
Cudasandra
120 52’ 34.75” 770 41’ 27.05”
7 Naganathapura 7.77 NNE 77.53 31.36 Rayasandra
Dooda , ChikkaNagamangala
Chenna Keshavanagar
Singasandra
120 52’ 10.75” 770 40’ 36.55”
8 Chenna Keshavanagar 7.06 NNE 31.04 12.59 Dooda , ChikkaNagamangala
Naganathapura
120 51’ 56.77” 770 40’ 19.63”
9 Huskur Lake 8.67 NE 78.45 31.77 Chintalamadavala
Kaggalipura
Harohalli
Avalahalli
Ghattihalli
120 51’ 46.19’’ 770 42’ 46.43’’
10 Near Avalahalli 9.46 NE 10.87 4.41 Chintalamadavala
Kaggalipura
Harohalli
Ghattihalli
Huskur
120 51’ 58.79” 770 43’ 4.83”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 111
11 Near Kaggalipura 8.37 NE 7.94 3.39 Chintalamadavala
Harohalli
Kommasandra
Gopasandra
120 51’ 25.77” 770 43’ 28.87”
12 Near Gulimangala 6.98 NE 25.65 10.37 Huskur
Chikka Nagamangala
Shantipura
120 51’ 18.73” 770 41’ 46.83”
13 Near Shantipura 6.98 NE 11.24 4.54 Chikka, DoddaNagamangala
Gulimangala
Govindachettipalya
120 51’ 14.52” 770 41’ 22.50’’
14 Near Govindachettipalya 6.1 NNE 15.88 6.41 Electronic City
Dodda, Chikka
Nagamangala
Konappana Agrahara
120 51’ 24.76’’ 770 40’ 20.25”
15 Near Govindachettipalya 6.335 NNE 11.74 4.76 Electronic City
Dodda, Chikka
Nagamangala
Konappana Agrahara
120 51’ 33.40” 770 39’ 59.56”
16 Near Chenna Keshavanagar 6.9 N 15.10 6.09 Singasandra 120 51’ 56.09” 770 39’ 37.66”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 112
Basapura
Chikka Togur
17 Near Subhash nagar 7.5 NNW 9.54 3.82 Basapura
Singasandra
Chenna keshavanagar
Begur
120 52’ 10.91” 770 38’ 58.89”
18 Near Subhash nagar 7.5 NNW 11.03 4.47 Basapura
Singasandra
Chenna keshavanagar
Begur
120 52’ 07.49” 770 38’ 38.40’’
19 Near Tejeswininagar 9.24 NW 75.12 30.76 Hulimavu
Jambu Savari Dinne
Gyanappanahalli
Begur
120 52’ 10.81” 770 36’ 15.39”
20 Near Tejeswininagar 8.72 NW 1.42 0.53 Gyanappanahalli
Begur
120 51’ 58.96” 770 36’ 50.95”
21 Near Tejeswininagar 7.84 NW 7.4 2.98 Chikka Kammanahalli
Begur
120 51’ 33.19” 770 37’ 00.79”
22 Near Tejeswininagar 7.31 NW 20.35 8.20 Chikka Kammanahalli
Begur
120 51’ 28.77” 770 37’ 23.69”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 113
Ittasandra
23 Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.4 NW 16.12 6.29 Tejeswininagar 120 51’ 19.48’’ 770 36’ 13.84”
24 Near Weavers Colony 9.27 NW 28.32 11.42 Vaddarpalya
Chikka Kammanahalli
120 51’ 09.89” 770 35’ 24.47”
25 Near Chikka Kammanahalli 8.01 NW 4.93 2.02 Weavers Colony
Tejeswininagar
120 50’ 55.33” 770 36’ 11.48”
26 Near Chikka Kammanahalli 7.32 NW 9.70 3.95 Tejeswininagar 120 51’ 10.95” 770 37’ 00.69”
27 Near Chikka Kammanahalli 6.63 NW 4.30 1.73 Bettadasanapura 120 50’ 57.19” 770 37’ 19.80”
28 Near Ittasandra 6.27 NW 12.10 4.93 Vaddarpalya
Bettadasanapura
120 51’ 12.41” 770 37’ 58.75’’
29 Near Vaddarpalya 5.64 NNW 12.16 4.94 Ittasandra
Chikka TogurDoddaTogur
Konappana Agrahara
120 51’ 02.71” 770 38’ 39.27”
30 Near Konappana Agrahara 6.12 N 36.74 14.87 Chikka Togur
Basapura
Govindachettipalya,Dodda Togur
Electronic City
120 51’ 25.29” 770 39’ 32.84”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 114
31 Near Govindachettipalya 5.3 NNE 5.87 2.38 Konappana Agrahara
Electronic City
Shantipura
Virsandra
120 50’ 51.49” 770 40’ 25.04”
32 Near Govindachettipalya 5.14 NNE 10.67 4.33 120 50’ 45.86” 770 40’ 26.65”
33 Near lakshminarayanapura 7.13 NE 29.49 11.87 Gottamaranahalli
Gulimangala
Shantipura
Chintalamadavala
120 50’ 49.13” 770 42’ 28.78”
34 Near Chintalamadavala 7.72 NE 124.51 50.35 Gottamaranahalli
Gulimangala
Vaddarpalya
Shingena Agrahara
Kaggalipura
Gopasandra
Chikka Timmasandra
120 50’ 46.11” 770 43’ 05.69”
35 Muttanallur Kere 6.45 EEN 244.49 98.96 Lakshmisagara
Hilalige R S
Ramasagara
Alibommasandra
Muttanallur
120 49’ 19.93” 770 43’ 42.05”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 115
Bendiganahalli
Somanahalli
36 Near Hilaligi 4.89 EEN 24.89 10.07 Bommasandra
Lakshmisagara
Ramasagara
120 49’ 1.96” 770 42’ 9.15’’
37 Near Bangalapet
(Kammasandra)
4.98 EEN 50.33 20.38 Vidyanagar
Shree Ananthnagar
Vaddarpalya
Hilaligi
120 49’ 32.34” 770 41’ 39.62”
38 Hebgodi Lake 3.73 NE 3.64 1.46 Gollahalli
Virsandra
Shree Ananthnagar
Bangalapet
120 49’ 43.89” 770 40’ 49.09”
39 Near Gollahalli 3.35 NE 34.13 13.78 Virsandra
Hebgodi
Tirupalya
Bangalapet
Shinkaripalya
120 49’ 52.83” 770 40’ 20.73’’
40 Near Gollahalli 2.8 NE 16.94 6.84 Hebgodi
Tirupalya
120 49’ 35.45” 770 40’ 3.34”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 116
Maragondanahalli
Virsandra
Shinkaripalya
41 Near Maragondanahalli 2.78 NNE 9.32 3.80 Shinkaripalya
Gollahalli
Hebgodi
Tirupalya
120 49’ 37.86” 770 39’ 44.46”
42 Near Shinkaripalya 3.55 NNW 18.30 7.41 Maragondanahalli
Electronic City
Bettadasanapura
Podu
120 50’ 00.71” 770 39’ 8.05”
43 Near Virsandra 4.38 NNE 13.69 5.49 Shree Ananthnagar
Shinkaripalya
Electronic City
120 50’ 22.61” 770 40’ 29.66”
44 Near Virsandra 4.55 NNE 10.12 4.11 Dodda Togur
Electronic City
Shinkaripalya
120 50’ 27.98” 770 40’ 14.19”
45 Near Podu 4.47 NW 22.43 9.03 Binjipura
Bettadasanapura
Chittikarepalya
120 49’ 58.06” 770 37’ 50.66’’
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 117
46 Near Bettadasanapura 6.2 NW 9.56 3.88 Chikka Kammanahalli 120 50’ 41.62’’ 770 37’ 20.83”
47 Near Chittekarepalya 6.0 NW 4.76 1.93 Dinne Palya 120 50’ 13.39’’ 770 37’ 1.44’’
48 Near Dinnepalya 6.61 NW 14.98 6.08 Chittikarepalya
Chikka Kammanahalli
120 50’ 15.25” 770 36’ 35.93’’
49 Near Kalkere R.F 9.71 WWN 5.52 2.24 Shanuboganahalli 120 49’ 54.21” 770 34’ 31.59’’
50 Near Timmayyanadoddi 8.01 WWN 3.42 1.39 Sampigeramanagara
Kalkere R.F
120 49’ 50.09” 770 35’ 29.34”
51 Near Chittekarepalya 6.07 NW 7.17 2.93 Dinnepalya
Timmayyanadoddi
Hakkibikki Colony
120 49’ 55.32” 770 36’ 42.26”
52 Near Chittekarepalya 5.39 NW 9.71 3.94 Binjipura
Hakkibikki Colony
120 49’ 48.13’’ 770 37’ 16.31’’
53 Near Hakkibikki Colony 6.12 WWN 21.32 8.65 Bodigrama
Salindra Doddi
Sampigeramanagara
120 49’ 35.88” 770 36’ 20.92”
54 Near Hakkibikki Colony 5.18 WWN 49.07 19.85 Salindra Doddi
Chittekarepalya
Bodigrama
Chinnagodanapalya
120 49’ 18.45” 770 36’ 48.79”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 118
55 Near Sampigeramanagara 7.48 WWN 13.31 5.39 Bodigrama
Salindra Doddi
Lakshmipura
120 49’ 27.19’’ 770 35’ 34.36’’
56 Near Bingipura 4.11 WWN 10.35 4.19 Hulimangala
Chinnagodanapalya
Hakkibikki Colony
120 49’ 20.51” 770 37’ 38.86”
57 Near Hulimangala 4.5 NW 50.59 20.48 Kempapura
Binjipura
Chinnagodanapalya
120 49 7.05” 770 37’ 55.94”
58 Near nanjapura 1.89 NW 14.89 6.02 Vabsandra
Hulimangala
Kempapura
Kyalasanahalli
120 48’ 36.72” 770 38’ 34.10”
59 Near Kyalasanahalli 0.42 NW 17.84 7.14 Srirampura
Vabsandra
Tarandahalli
KachanayakanahalliColony
120 48’ 15.22” 770 39’ 18.09”
60 Near Yarandahalli 0.89 NE 8.26 3.35 Srirampura
Kachanayakanahalli
120 48’ 22.46” 770 40’ 4.10”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 119
Colony
Vabsandra
61 Near Kachanayakanahalli Colony 1.6 EEN 21.92 8.84 Yarandahalli
Srirampura
Yellamana Mandira
Kachanayakanahalli
120 48’ 9.40” 770 40’ 35.24”
62 Near Bommasandra Industrial Area 3.18 EEN 23.26 9.39 Yarandahalli
Kachanayakanahalli
Bommasandra
Chandapura
120 48’ 31.50” 770 41’ 20.84’’
63 Chandapura Lake 4.82 E 23.83 9.67 Kittiganahalli
Bommasandra
Hale Chandapura
Lakshmisagara
120 48’ 20.05” 770 42’ 17.88”
64 Near Hale Chandapura 6.04 E 9.09 3.67 Chandapura
Kittiganahalli
Hilaligi
Bommasandra
Lakshmisagara
Guddehatti
120 48’ 18.64” 770 43’ 0.47”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 120
65 Near Bendiganahalli 8.88 E 15.66 6.41 Ambedkar Colony
Hale Chandapura
Lakshmisagara
Guddehatti
120 48’ 38.53” 770 44’ 31.42”
66 Near Guddehatti 8.63 E 8.36 3.34 Ambedkar Colony
Hale Chandapura
Lakshmisagara
Bendiganahalli
Neralur
Yadavanhalli
120 47’ 98.58” 770 44’ 29.59”
67 Near Guddehatti 9.23 E 14.82 5.99 120 47’ 55.24” 770 44’ 41.87’
68 Near Neralur 6.62 E 43.03 17.32 Tirumagondanahalli
Chandapura
Hale Chandapura
Sainagar
Ambedkarnagar
120 47’ 49.51” 770 43’ 18.35’’
69 Near Tirumagondanahalli 6.2 EES 8.4 3.37 Neralur
Sainagar
Igaluru
Banahalli
120 47’ 29.22” 770 43’ 2.73’’
70 Near Sai nagar 8.12 EES 1.39 0.57 Neralur 120 47’ 16.47’’ 770 44’ 2.84’’
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 121
Tirumagondanahalli
Yadavanhalli
Ambedkarnagar
Baligaranahalli
71 Near Mastenahalli 0.78 SE 15.81 6.42 Hosahalli
Hennagara
Srirampura
Bandenalasandra
120 47’ 32.94’’ 770 39’ 47.98’’
72 Near Bandenalasandra 0.59 SW 21.36 8.64 Kyalasanahalli
Srirampura
Mastenahalli
Jigani market
120 47’ 41.58’’ 770 39’ 13.42”
73 Jigani Kere 2.54 WWS 194.56 78.70 Koppa
Kyalasanahalli
Bandenalasandra
Holamanchinahalli
Harapanahalli
120 47’ 45.19’’ 770 37’ 54.78’’
74 Bidarakere 4.8 W 74.06 30.01 Nalsandra
Koppa
Begihalli
120 48’ 2.17” 770 36’ 37.34”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 122
75 Near Manatapa 6.2 WWN 40.53 16.4 Jangalpalya
Ramasandra
Nalsandra
Kariappanahalli
Hullakasavanahalli
120 48’ 35.77’’ 770 36’ 0.53’’
76 Near Jangalpalya 7.04 WWN 5.90 2.38 Ramasandra
Nalsandra
Kariappanahalli
Hullakasavanahalli
Manatapa
120 48’ 49.43” 770 35’ 42.95”
77 Near Sampigehalli 8.40 W 17.57 7.11 Vajarahalli
Kariappanahalli
Jangalpalya
Kempanayakanahalli
120 48’ 23.96’’ 770 34’ 54.44’’
78 Near Begihalli 5.49 WWS 6.73 2.69 Vaddarapalya
Harapanahalli
120 47’ 37.91’’ 770 36’ 29.60’’
79 Near Ramasagara 5.07 SW 3.96 1.60 Vaddarapalya
Harapanahalli
Bukkasagara
120 46’ 57.63” 770 36’ 55.12’’
80 Near Ramasagara 4.24 SW 11.58 4.70 Harapanahalli 120 47’ 1.30’’ 770 37’ 20.43’
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 123
Bukkasagara
Holamanchinahalli
81 Near Kallabalu 4.94 SW 8.83 3.54 Bukkasagara
Jigani Industrial Area
120 46’ 24.34” 770 37’ 16.01’’
82 Hennagara Kere 2.31 S 399.65 161.73 Mastenahalli
Hennagara
Rajapura
Sitanayakanahalli
Vaddarpalya
Holamanchinahalli
Bandenalasandra
120 46’ 38.80’’ 770 39’ 40.59’’
83 Near Rajapura 3.28 SE 69.90 28.29 Hinnakki
Sitanayakanahalli
Lingapura
Hennagara
120 46’ 23.58” 770 40’ 38.55”
84 Ramakrishnapura Lake 4.50 ESE 12.80 5.09 Hinnakki
Igaluru
Naganayanahalli
120 46’ 40.06” 770 41’ 45.54”
85 Near Ramakrishnapura 5.15 SE 17.39 7.06 120 46’ 51.31” 770 42’ 15.67”
86 Near Adesonatti 6.94 SE 22.29 9.01 Bandapura
Madivala
120 46’ 23.48” 770 43’ 9.61”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 124
Marasur
Naganayanahalli
Ramakrishnapura
87 Near baligaranahalli 8.59 SE 29.01 11.72 Ichanguru
Veddarayapalya
Krishnasagara
Ambedkarnagar
Bandapura
120 46’ 35.15” 770 44’ 14.70”
88 Near Kambalipura 9.22 SE 96.24 38.92 Madivala
Mutsandra
Shettihalli
Maisandra
120 45’ 25.93” 770 44’ 6.66”
89 Near Shettihalli 7.64 SE 121.97 49.37 Marasur
Byagadadenahalli
Haleuru
Avadenahalli
Tattanahalli
120 45’ 12.57” 770 42’ 50.38”
90 Near Shettihalli 8.5 SE 55.73 22.53 120 44’ 57.51” 770 43’ 18.30”
91 Near Murasur 6.64 SE 11.63 4.79 Haleuru
Naganayakanahalli,Byagadadenhalli
120 45’ 39.34” 770 42’ 29.08”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 125
92 Near Naganayakanahalli 4.7 SE 16.59 6.72 Hinnaki
Lingapura
Dodda Hagade
Marasur
120 46’ 10.68” 770 41’ 29.32”
93 Near Dyavasandra 4.04 SSW 45.38 18.37 Haragadde
Vaddarapalya
Wayanahalli
Bommandahalli
120 45’ 30.70” 770 39’ 8.30”
94 Near Konasandra 4.63 SSW 15.29 6.20 Dyavasandra
Bommandahalli
Vaddarapalya
120 45’ 36.88” 770 38’ 31.34”
95 Near Konasandra 4.39 SSW 17.43 7.04 Vaddarapalya
Jigani Industrial Area
Mahanthalingapura
120 45’ 54.56” 770 38’ 19.09”
96 Near Jigani Industrial Area 4.22 SSW 15.22 6.16 Mahanthalingapura
Vaddarapalya
Konasandra
120 46’ 13.44” 770 37’ 57.79”
97 Near Mahanthalingapura 6.08 SW 6.51 2.69 Kallabalu
Giddanehalli
Goninayakanadoddi
120 45’ 55.56” 770 36’ 52.46”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 126
Kasinakuntedoddi
98 Near Kunmadiwala 7.09 SE 41.47 16.81 Byagadadenhalli
Chennaha Agrahara
Avadenahalli
120 44’ 51.43” 770 42’ 4.07”
99 Near Yellamnanapalya 5.97 SE 12.97 5.22 Kun Madiwala
Dodda Hagade
Byagadadenhalli
120 45’ 9.21” 770 41’ 20.53”
100 Near Sappanalli 5.3 SSE 19.59 7.89 Dodda Hagade
Yellamnanapalya
Wayanahalli
120 45’ 11.74” 770 40’ 30.06”
101 Near Kumbarnahalli 5.20 S 8.56 3.43 Nosenuru
Haragadde
Dyavasandra
120 45’ 6.42” 770 39’ 40.14”
102 Near Krishnanadoddi 7.50 SW 4.89 1.99 Ragihalli 120 45’ 0.85” 770 36’ 41.06”
103 Near Jekkanahalla 9.55 SW 14.62 5.91 Hebbala
Huruganadoddi
120 43’ 44.64” 770 36’ 26.79”
104 Near Nosenuru 6.08 S 25.62 10.36 Nosenuru Gollahalli
Kumbarnahalli
Suragijakkanahalli
120 44’ 35.18” 770 39’ 26.78”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 127
105 Near Yellamnanapalya 5.94 SSE 12.76 5.18 Dodda Hagade
Byagadadenhalli
Kunmadiwala
120 45’ 8.73’’ 770 41’ 20.83”
106 Near Chikka hagade 7.45 SE 200.38 81.02 Chennena Agrahara
Vaderahalli
Hosakote
Kempu Vedarahalli
120 44’ 13.69” 770 41’ 35.90”
107 Near Dodda Hagade 6.86 SE 10.82 4.40 Soppanalli
Kempu Vedarahalli
Chennena Agrahara
Chikka hagade
120 44’ 34.78” 770 41’ 1.75”
108 Near Medihalli 9.30 SE 108.26 43.79 Gourenahalli
Bodrahalli
Anekal
Kaval Hosahalli
120 42’ 56.25” 770 41’ 5.16’
109 Near Kembu Vedarahalli 7.62 SE 18.60 7.5 Suragijakkanahalli
Vaddarapalya
Chikka hagade
120 44’7.56” 770 40’ 52.51”
110 Near Suragijakkanahalli 6.24 SSE 12.36 5.02 Vaddarapalya
Chikka hagade
120 44\ 4.55” 770 40’ 30.21”
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 128
Kembu Vedarahalli
Honnakalasapura
111 Near Honnakalasapura 8.38 SSE 21.99 8.89 Sidi Hosakote
Siddanapalya
Gourenahalli
120 43’ 31.20” 770 40’ 39.45”
112 Near Gourenahalli 9.08 SSE 12.73 5.11 Medihalli
Siddanapalya
Aaiyanapalya
120 43’ 7.10” 770 40’ 18.96”
113 Near Aduru 7.67 SSW 16.70 6.72 Vaddarapalya
Sonnayakanapura
Nosenuru Gollahalli
120 43’ 54.51” 770 39’ 7.95”
114 Near Sonnayakanapura 8.37 SSW 9.06 3.66 Siddanapalya
Aaiyanapalya
Timmasandra
Nagaiyanadoddi
120 43’ 25.03” 770 39’ 19.00”
115 Near Chikkanahalli 9.06 SSW 7.24 2.98 Timmasandra
Nagaiyanadoddi
Indlavadipura
120 43’ 4.94” 770 38’ 52.48”
116 Near Indlavadipura 9.47 SSW 5.85 2.3 Timmasandra
Nagaiyanadoddi
120 42’ 54.69” 770 38’ 34.00”
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 129
Nallaiyanadoddi
117 Near Indlavadi 8.05 SSW 9.12 3.68 Nallaiyanadoddi
Sonnayakanapura
Aduru
Kadujakkanahalli
120 43’ 46.72’’ 770 43’ 46.72”
118 Near Kadujakkanahalli 7.12 SSW 12.04 4.80 Nosenuru Gollahalli
Aduru
Indlavadi
120 44’ 15.45” 770 38’ 23.96”
3791.10 1533.8
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 131
3.9.1.1 Surface Water Quality Assessment
To establish the baseline status of water environment, the existing representative samplinglocations for surface water within a radial distance of 10Km from project site have beenselected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an adequate survey ofthe project area. Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parameters is given inTable 3-22.
Table 3-22: Test methods used for the analysis of water quality parametersS. No Parameter Measured Test Method1. pH (at 25°C) IS:3025 (Part - 11): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)2. Electrical Conductivity IS:3025 (Part - 14): 1983 (Reaff: 2006)3. Color IS:3025 (Part- 4) 1983 (Reaff 2006)4. Total Hardness as CaCO3 IS:3025 (Part - 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006)5. Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 IS:3025,1 (Part - 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009)6. Cadmium IS:3025 (Part 41) 19917. Chloride as Cl IS:3025 (Part - 32) 1988(Reaff 2009)8. Total Dissolved Solids IS:3025:1(Part - 16) 1984 (Reaff 2006)9. Aluminium as Al IS:3025 (Part - 55) 2003 (Reaff 2009)10. Chromium as Cr IS:3025 (Part - 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009)11. Lead as Pb IS:3025 (Part - 47) 1994 (Reaff 2009)12. Zinc as Zn IS:3025 (Part - 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009)13. Sodium as Na IS:3025,5(Part - 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006)14. Temperature IS:3025 (Part - 9) 1983 (Reaff 2006)15. Chemical oxygen demand as O2 IS:3025 (Part-58)-200616. Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l) IS:3025 (Part - 38)1989 (Reaff 2009)17. Salinity -18. Copper as Cu IS:3025 (Part - 42)1992 (Reaff: 2009)19. BOD,5 days @200C as O2 5210B APHA22nd Edn 201220. Total coliform bacteria (MPN/100ml) IS:1622 1981 (Reaff: 2009)21. F-Coli IS:1622, 1981 (Reaff: 2009)
The prevailing status of water quality at eight sampling locations each for ground water andsurface water has been assessed during September – November 2016 are presented inTable 3-23.Surface water quality results are provided in Table 3-24. A map showing themonitoring locations is given as Figure FD0304.
Table 3-23: Details of Surface water sampling locations
S.No Name of the Water body Distance from ProjectBoundary
Direction fromproject boundary
1 Hennagara lake 2.30 S2 Chandapura lake 4.80 ENE3 Kammasandra Lake 3.90 NE4 Hebbagodi lake 3.70 NE5 Ramakrishnapura lake 4.50 ESE6 Begur Lake 8.60 NNW7 Akshayanagara Lake 9.10 NNW8 Singasandra Lake 9.20 N
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 133
Table 3-24: Surface Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters Units SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 SW-6 SW-7 SW-8
1 Colour Hazen BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
2 pH at 25°C - 7.16 7.22 7.30 7.11 7.34 7.16 7.80 7.23
3 Turbidity NTU 2.1 1.8 2.8 25.4 13.3 BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
BDL(DL 0.1)
4 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 6.2 6.4 4.8 6.1 5.8 5.8 6.2 5.8
5 BOD, 3 Days @27°C mg/l 2.4 2.5 4.1 3.1 2.1 3.2 3.1 3.1
6 COD mg/l 5.1 5.2 48 5.2 4.8 4.8 5.2 4.57 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 545 1140 1475 1190 210 485 232 330
8 Total Suspended Solids mg/l 4 4 8 36 25 BDL(DL 1.0)
BDL(DL 1.0)
28
9 Total Hardness as CaCO3 mg/l 169 301 905 805 119 238 122 179
10 Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 64 342 442 380 54 170 55 98
11 Chloride as Cl mg/l 194 174 180 335 49 112 33 73
12 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 22 43 48 55 26 38 20 48
13 Fluoride as F mg/l 3.41 6.41 1.96 5.16 2.55 2.26 4.51 1.29
14 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l BDL(DL1.0)
BDL(DL1.0) 2.4 36 BDL
(DL1.0) 1.62 BDL(DL1.0) 1.34
15 Dissolved Iron mg/l 0.224 0.086 0.160 0.032 0.236 0.154 0.30 0.164
16 Sodium as Na mg/l 86 65 78 70 13 41 33 3017 Potassium as K mg/l 8.0 27.9 18 17 6.0 17 4.0 11.018 Calcium as Ca mg/l 40.1 67.0 180 148 20.0 40.1 33 3219 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 16.8 32.6 110 106 16.8 33.6 10 24
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 134
20 Cyanides as CN mg/l BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
21 Zinc mg/l 1.55 1.34 0.675 2.62 0.65 0.76 1.23 2.77
22 Chromium as Cr mg/l BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
23 Copper as Cu mg/l 0.045 0.032 BDL(DL 0.01)
0.045 0.046 BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
24 Manganese as Mn mg/l BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
BDL(DL 0.01)
25 Cadmium as Cd mg/l BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BD
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
26 Lead as Pb mg/l BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
27 Selenium as Se mg/l BDL
(DL 0.005)
BDL
(DL0.005)
BDL
(DL 0.005)
BDL
(DL0.005)
BDL
(DL 0.005)
BDL
(DL0.005)
BDL
(DL0.005)
BDL
(DL0.005)
28 Phosphate mg/l BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
BDL
DL 0.02)
29 Nickel as Ni mg/l BDL
( DL 0.01)
BDL
( DL 0.01)
BDL
( DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
( DL 0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
BDL
(DL0.01)
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 135
3.9.1.2 Results and Discussions
Summary of analytical results
In the surface water the pH varied between 7.11-7.80 which are meeting the IS: 2296
1982 for inland surface water. The pH value for all the samples in the study area during
study period found to be within the limits.
The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 210-1475 mg/l for the surface water
The TDS value for all the samples meeting the class E standards of IS: 2296 1982.
The surface water is minimum 33mg/l and maximum 335mg/l which are meeting the
class C standards of IS: 2296 1982.
The sulphate content of the surface water meeting the minimum range of 20mg/l and
maximum range of 55mg/l. The surface water samples meeting the class E standard of
IS: 2296 1982
The surface water indicates its range varied between 122-905 mg/l.
Surface water quality standards are provided in Table 3-25.
Table 3-25: Surface Water Quality Standards
S.No Parameters Unit A B C D E
1 Colour Hazen 10 300 300 --- ---2 Turbidity NTU --- --- --- --- ---3 pH -- 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.54 Conductivity µS/cm --- --- --- 1000 22505 Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 500 --- 1500 --- 21006 Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l --- --- --- --- ---7 Total Hardness as CaCo3 mg/l 300 --- --- --- ---8 Calcium as Ca mg/l 80.10 --- --- --- ---9 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 24.28 --- --- --- ---
10 Sodium mg/l --- --- --- --- ---11 Potassium mg/l --- --- --- --- ---12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 250 --- 600 --- 60013 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 400 --- 400 --- 100014 Phosphate mg/l --- --- --- --- ---15 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 20 --- 50 --- ---16 Fluorides as F mg/l 1.5 1.5 1.5 --- ---17 Cyanide mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05 --- ---18 Arsenic mg/l 0.05 0.2 0.2 --- ---19 Cadmium mg/l 0.01 --- 0.01 --- ---20 Chromium, Total mg/l 0.05 0.05 0.05 --- ---21 Copper mg/l 1.5 --- 1.5 --- ---22 Iron mg/l 0.3 --- 50 --- ---23 Lead mg/l 0.1 --- 0.1 --- ---24 Zinc mg/l 15 --- 15 --- ---25 Manganese mg/l 0.5 --- --- --- ---26 Selenium mg/l 0.01 --- 0.05 --- ---27 Mercury mg/l 0.001 --- --- --- ---28 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 6 5 4 4 ---29 COD mg/l --- --- --- --- ---
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 136
30 BOD mg/l 2 3 3 --- ---
Class A – Drinking water without conventional treatment but after disinfection.
Class B –Water for outdoor bathing.
Class C – Drinking water with conventional treatment followed by disinfection.
Class D – Water for fish culture and wild life propagation.
Class E – Water for irrigation, industrial cooling and controlled waste disposal.
3.9.2 Ground water resources
Ground Water Department is monitoring the changes in groundwater regime continuouslythrough a network of Piezometer wells fitted with Automatic water level recorders in differenthydro geological and geomorphic units. Ground water level behaviour is analysed based onmonitoring of ground water level from the network hydrograph stations (NHS) established byCGWB.
Groundwater resource of the district has been assessed keeping in view, the sustainable andoptimum development of the resource. The estimation has been done based Ground WaterEstimation methodology (GEM)-1997. Assessment is done taking into consideration ofvarious hydrologic units viz. Command, non command hilly area with more than 20% slopeand poor quality area.
The groundwater potential of the gross geographical area of the basin is estimated on pro-rata basis from the district-wise groundwater resources-2012 published by the CentralGroundwater Board (CGWB) as given in Table 3-26. Ground water level fluctuation decadalmeans (May 2001 – May 2010) with May 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka isgiven in Figure 3-31.Table 3-26: Groundwater Potential in Bengaluru Urban PIA District1
Attribute Potential /QuantityArea of the district 2190 Sq.KmNet Annual groundwater availability of thedistrict 11723 ha-m
Total groundwater draft for irrigation, domesticand industrial uses 3794 ha-m
Existing gross ground water draft for all uses 16703 ha-mDraft Exceeding the total available groundwater resources leaving Nil
Balance Available for Exploitation Nil
1 http://cgwb.gov.in/District_Profile/karnataka/2012/BANGALORE_URBAN-2012.pdf
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 137
Figure 3-31: Ground water level fluctuation decadal mean (May 2001 – May 2010) withMay 2011 for Bangalore Urban District, Karnataka
Project Site
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 138
3.9.2.1 Ground water Quality
Total Eight (08) ground water monitoring locations were identified for assessment in differentvillages around the project site based on the usage of sub surface water by the settlements/villages in the study area. The groundwater results are compared with the desirable andpermissible water quality standards as per IS: 10500 (2012) for drinking water. Groundwaterquality monitoring locations and results are given in Table 3-27 and Table 3-28. A mapshowing the monitoring locations is given as Figure FD0304.
Table 3-27: Details of Groundwater Quality Monitoring Locations
Station Code Location Distance (km) fromProject boundary
AzimuthDirections
GW1 Near Project Site 2.60 -GW2 Jigani 4.31 WGW3 Ramakrishnapura 7.02 ESEGW4 Byagadadenahalli 7.89 SEGW5 Indalavadi 4.45 SSWGW6 Bommasandra 5.63 EGW7 Doddathoguru 5.45 NGW8 Hullahalli 2.60 NW
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 139
Table 3-28: Ground Water Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters UNIT GW1 GW2 GW3 GW4 GW-5 GW-6 GW-7 GW-8
1.Colour Hazen BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
2.Turbidity NTU BDL
( DL 0.1) 0.7
BDL
( DL 0.1)
BDL
( DL 0.1)
BDL
( DL 0.1)
BDL
( DL 0.1)
BDL
( DL 0.1)
BDL
( DL 0.1)
3.pH - 7.78 7.18 7.23 7.96 7.73 7.56 7.43 7.46
4.Dissolved Oxygen mg/l NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
5.BOD 3days @27°C mg/l BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
BDL
( DL 1.0)
6.COD mg/l BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
BDL
( DL 4.0)
7.TSS mg/l BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
BDL
(DL 1.0)
8.Total Dissolved Solids mg/l 1165 895 390 502 712 815 1260 360
9.Total Hardness as CaCo3 mg/l 385 372 133 223 295 417 686 147
10.Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 mg/l 265 215 132 190 278 230 204 132
11.Calcium as Ca mg/l 77 95 28 46 64 95 153 33
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 140
12.Magnesium as Mg mg/l
47 33 15 26 33 44 74 16
13.Chlorides as Cl- mg/l 232 233 62 107 185 160 417 66
14.Sulphate (SO4) mg/l 121 98.6 18.57 33.35 42.8 42.96 143 29.5
15.Nitrates(NO3) mg/l 10.3 23.9 2.88 1.4 22.4 72 12.1 2.68
16.Fluoride as F- mg/l
4.23 3.26 4.99BDL ( DL
0.1)2.53 1.28 6.69 1.93
17.Sodium as Na mg/l 97.9 95.9 34.8 42 54.9 47 84.9 42.8
18.Potassium as k mg/l 24.5 23.8 8.3 2.0 13.5 4.0 16.3 12.5
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 141
3.9.2.2 Results and Discussions
A summary of analytical results are presented below:
The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is varied
between 7.18-7.96,
The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 390-1290mg/l for the ground water
and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012
The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l.
The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges between 66mg/l –
417mg/l.
The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the
sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied between 19 mg/l -
122mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
The Total hardness ranges is between 133-686 mg/l for ground water its meeting the
permissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
3.10 Soil as a resource and its Quality
The predominant soils in the PIA district are red loamy and sandy soil and laterite soil.Laterite soil is mostly red in color and yellow loamy, pale to bright red colours are also seen.Laterite soil is suitable for Paddy, Sugarcane, Areca nut and Plantation crops, viz.crops likeCardamom & Plantains. Loamy red soils are distributed in the lower reaches of valleys. Redlateritic soil is the most dominant soil type in the area. The texture of the soil varies from fineto coarse. The soil in valleys and intermediate slopes is rich in loam whereas in upper slopesit is much coarse in nature. The soil responds well to irrigation and other soil-managmentpractices. Silty and Loamy soils are of transported origin and are found mostly along riverbanks and in valley plains. They have good infiltration capacity and are well suited foragriculture due to their fertility.
3.10.1.1 Soil quality
In order to assess the quality of soil at different locations in the study area, various land usecategories were taken into account. Soil sampling was carried out at Eight (08) locations inthe study area. Soil analysis was carried as per IS: 2720 methods. Soil quality monitoringlocations & results are given in Table 3-30. map showing the monitoring locations is given asFigure FD0305.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 142
Table 3-29: Soil Quality Monitoring LocationsLocation
CodeLocation
Distance (Km)w.r.t project site
Directionw.r.t. project site
S1 Project Site - -
S2 Jigani 4.31 ES3 Ramakrishnapura 7.02 ESES4 Byagadadenahalli 7.89 SES5 Indalavadi 4.45 SSW
S6 Bommasandra 5.63 W
S7 Doddathoguru 5.45 NS8 Hullahalli 2.60 NW
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 143
Table 3-30: Soil Quality Monitoring Results
S.No Parameters Units S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8
1 Colour - Brown Brown LightBrown Brown Brown Reddish Brown Light Brown Dark Brown Reddish
Brown
2 Soil Texture -SandyClayLoam
Sandy Clay Loam Sandy ClayLoam
Sandy ClayLoam
Sandy ClayLoam
SandyLoam
SandyLoam Loam
3 Sand % 49 65 67 63 66 72 72 46
4 Silt % 22 7 12 12 7 18 16 295 Clay % 29 28 21 25 27 10 12 256 pH - 7.26 7.35 7.56 7.74 7.53 6.8 5.26 8.66
7 ElectricalConductivity
µmhos/cm 71 46 72 598 48 51 19 719
8 Infiltration Rate cm/hr 1.12 1.1 1.14 1.16 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.189 Bulk Density gm/cc 1.28 1.38 1.27 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.27 1.15
10 Cation ExchangeCapacity
meq/100gm 17.9 19.9 15.9 16.9 17.9 8.9 11.9 21.3
11 Moisture content % 5.46 10.46 5.95 13.09 11.6 9.92 9.81 4.92
12 Water HoldingCapacity % 28 26 30 28 27 25 24 22
13 Organic Carbon % 0.617 0.59 0.543 0.599 0.555 0.510 0.938 1.66
14 Organic matter % 1.065 1.018 0.936 1.03 0.956 0.879 1.61 2.87
15 Nitrogen as N kg/ha 338 648 769 466 397 478 335 314
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 144
16 Phosphorus kg/ha 0.500 0.636 0.583 0.500 0.316 0.571 0.648 0.800
17 Potassium kg/ha 1.400 0.771 0.943 1.350 1.200 1.200 1.086 0.750
18 Calcium % 0.016 0.008 0.008 0.044 0.012 0.012 0.004 0.01219 Magnesium % 0.014 0.017 0.014 0.010 0.068 0.031 0.014 0.02020 Boron mg/kg 1.12 0.98 1.14 1.02 1.08 0.89 0.95 1.14
21 Cadmium mg/kg
BDLDl
0.001)BDL (Dl 0.001) BDL (Dl 0.001) BDL (Dl 0.001) BDL (Dl 0.001) BDL (Dl
0.001)BDL (Dl0.001)
BDL (Dl0.001)
22 Chromium mg/kg 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.011 0.028 0.021 0.025
23 Copper mg/kg 10.6 8.54 7.39 11.8 21.6 10.4 11.6 6.724 Iron mg/kg 1212 1334 778 2316 1638 1430 6410 1016
25 Lead mg/kg 398 BDL( DL 0.001) 5.39 5.96 9.67 BDL( DL0.001)
BDL( DL0.001) 1.62
26 Manganese mg/kg 2.5 4.5 6.2 1.14 5.6 2.4 1.1 0.9827 Zinc mg/kg 15.8 22.3 18.3 33.5 53.2 31.9 20.01 20.01
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 145
3.10.1.2 Results and Discussions
Summary of analytical results
The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils are almost
neutral in nature.
Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-716 μS/cm. As the EC value is less
than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 22-30 (%).
Nitrogen content ranged from 314 kg/ha to 769 kg/ha
Phosphorous ranged from 0.316 to 0.800 kg/ha
Potassium content ranges from 0.750 to 1400 kg/ha
3.11 Flora & Fauna
The study of terrestrial ecology within the study area of 10 Km radius has been carried outthrough field investigation and satellite imagery data as discussed earlier. The area can beclassified into the following ecological zone.
3.11.1 Flora
The field investigation and satellite imagery data show, that the study area is a mixture ofagricultural, wasteland and get irrigated by the tanks and tube wells. The Evergreen isobserved within the study area. The experimental finding of the pre monsoon season showsthe dominance of Scrubs like Anogeisses latifoila followed by Chloroxylon Swieritenia, Aacialeucophloeatrees like Termila spp, Pterocarpus marusupium, Dalbergia latifolia, Serata,Dendroca lamus Strictus within the study area. The List of Flora within the study area isgiven in Table 3-31.
Table 3-31: The List of Flora within the Study area.
S.No Botanical Name Family Name Vernacular Name
1 Anogeisses latifoila Combretaceae Dinduga2 Chloroxylon Swieritenia Rutaceae Kloroksilan Svaiteniya3 Acacia leucophloea Mimosaceae Bellada, bili-jali4 Acacia Catechus Fabaceae Karungali5 Santalum album Santalaceae Agarugandha,bavanna, bhadrasr6 Shorea Talura Dipterocarpaceae aragina mara, bile bovu7 Terminalai Spp Combretaceae Beḷḷi būdu marada8 Pterocarpus marusupium Fabaceae Honne9 Dalbergia latifolia Fabaceae beete
10 Dendrocalamus Strictus Poaceae Bidiru, Kirubidiru, & Konkani11 Tectona Grandia Lamiaceae Saguvani12 Terocarpus santalinus Fabaceae Agslue,Rakta Chandana& Honne13 Pterocarpus Fabaceae Banga, Bange mara. Bengali14 Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Holenandi15 Plantago lanceolata Plantaginaceae Esabakolu, Esabgolu
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 146
3.11.1.1 Aquatic Vegetation
Aquatic plants are found in the littoral zone, which are ideal habitats for fish and migratorybirds. The status of aquatic vegetation in various wetlands has been mapped, on the basis ofwhich it is broadly divided into completely vegetated (CV), partially vegetated (PV),vegetation on fringes (VF) and no vegetation (NV). Of the total 682 wetlands, 517 do notsupport any vegetation, of these 417 are tanks. There are 83 tanks partially vegetated, 54with vegetation on fringes and 7 are completely vegetated.
3.11.1.2 Planktons
Phytoplanktons surveyed are considered under five major groups:
S.NO Planktons Name
1 Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms):
2 Chlorophyceae:
3 Desmidiaciae (Desmids):4 Dinophyceae:5 Myxophyceae:
6 Ostracoda:
3.11.2 Fauna
Domestic – The domestic animals are mainly mammals like cow, goat, cat, dog etc arefound common in the study area.
Wild Animals – Since the natural forests constitute negligible of the forest area and sincethey are in isolated pockets, the wild life does not offer a wide spectrum of species. Wildanimals are seen in Bannerghatta National Park with native and non native species. Otherthan these, some reptiles and amphibians can also be seen with a number of bird species.
A List of birds, reptiles, amphibians and rodents based on information gathered from localinquiries is presented. Wild Fauna in the study area is given in Table 3-32 to Table 3-34.
Table 3-32: List of Wild Fauna in the Study Area
S.No Zoological Name Family Name Common Name
1 Ahaetullanasuta Colubridae Green whip snake
2 Athenebrama Strigidae Spotted owlet
3 Felischaus Felidae Jungle cat
4 Funambulu palmarum Sciuridae Palm squirrels
5 Francolinuspondicerianus Phasianidae Patridge
6 Pantheratigristigris Felidae Bengal tiger
7 Pantheraleo Felidae Lion
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 147
8 Pantheratigris Felidae Tiger
9 Maniscrassicaudata Manidae Pangolin
10 Milvusmigransgovinda Accipitridae Pariya kite
11 Najanaja Elapidae Cobra
12 Ursusthibetanus Ursidae Beer
Table 3-33: Amphibians
S.NO Zological Name Common Name
1 Bufom lanostictus Toad
2 Rana cyanophlyctis Frog
3 Rana tigrina Frog
4 Rhacophorus bi maculates Tree frog
Table 3-34: Rodents
S.NO Zological Name Common Name
1 Bandicota indica Badicoot
2 Musmusculus Mouse3 Rattusrattus Rat4 Ratufaindica Squirrel
3.11.2.1 Birds
Wetland and water birds make use of a variety of conditions, from dry zones and meadowsbordering lakes to open water zones. On the basis of their size, the availability of food andsuitable foraging conditions, different birds can occupy different parts of the lake. InBengaluru there are five major groups of water birds found based on the wetland zones theyfrequent. List of birds are given below:
S.NO List of Birds
1 Open water birds,
2 Waders and shoreline birds,3 Waders and shoreline birds
4 Birds of reed bed
5 Birds of open air space above wetlands
3.12 Socio-economic profile of the Project Influence Area
Bangalore district is located in the sour eastern corner of Karnataka State. It has ageographical area of 2196 sq.km. The district is land locked and shares its borders withBengaluru Rural district on the north and the east, Ramanagaram on the west, and with the
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 148
state of Tamil Nadu in the south. The population of the district is 96,21,551. Of the totalpopulation,50,22,661 are males and 45,98,890 are females as per 2011 Census. Thedistrict’s share of total Karnataka’s population is 15.75 percent.
3.12.1 Socio economic Profile of the district
The district is unique in nature as more urbanized with rural flavours. The district is thehighest contributor to the State Economy with 33.3% contribution to GDDP (2012-13). Theper capita annual income in the district is INR 2,02,340 (2012-13).
The tertiary sector contributing 39.5% and secondary sector is contributing 36% and primarysector is contributing 2.3% to GDP.
Paddy, Ragi, Maize, oil seeds, Horticulture crops are main crops of the district. The districthas good agricultural in infrastructure like Ware houses, Cold storage facilities, transportfacilities for domestic and international markets. District social indicators are given in Table3-35.
Table 3-35: Bengaluru Urban District Social Indicators
S.No Social Indicators Value
1 Decadal variation 47.18%
2 Urban population 90.94%
3 Sex ratio 916
4 Sex ratio for 0-6 age group 944
5 Population density 4358
6 Scheduled caste population 22.93%
7 Scheduled tribe population 3.26%
8 Literacy rate 87.67%
9 Work Participation rate 44.14%
10 Main Workers 40.10%
11 Marginal Workers 4.04%
12 Maternal maternity rate 45 (2011-12)
13 Infant Mortality rate 3 (2011-12)
Source: Census 2011 & Economic Survey 2015-16
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 149
3.12.2 Socio economic Profile of the study area
The project is located in the Jigani KIADB, Jigani of Anekal taluk of Bangalore District. The10 Km radius covers almost a major portion of Anekal taluk and some portion of BangaloreCorporation.
The project area comprises of urban and rural background. The taluk Anekal ispredominantly rural as 68% population in rural part of the taluk. Agriculture is one of themain occupation in rural apart from Industries and Service sector. The area has more semiand unskilled labour forces go to the other part of the district. Socioeconomic detail of thestudy area is given in Table 3-36. Consultation photographs are given in Figure 3-32.
Exhibit 1: Govt. Primary School atRajapura
Exhibit 2: Interaction with people, atRajapura
Exhibit 3: Interaction with public atRamakrishnapura
Exhibit 4: Socio economic survey atBommasandra
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 150
Exhibit 5: With a shop owner at Hullahalli Exhibit 6: Primary Agri. Credit CoopSociety, Bukkasagara
Figure 3-32: Informal Consultation with LocalsTable 3-36: Socioeconomic details of the study area.
Name of Villages Number of Household Total Population Male FemaleWithin 5 Km radiusBanahalli 1673 5819 3164 2655Bande Nalla Sandra 426 1348 836 512
Bommasandra 4334 15254 8826 6428Gollahalli 2160 7433 4631 2802Haragadde 2010 7735 4839 2896
Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hebbagodi 9623 34827 20771 14056Hennagara 658 2801 1453 1348
Hinnakki 311 1384 695 689Hosahalli 191 875 456 419
Hulimangala 643 2787 1479 1308Jigani 4437 17036 9990 7046Kachanaikanahalli 1468 5606 2961 2645
Kammasandra 2749 9912 5685 4227Kittaganahalli 2064 7280 3983 3297Koppa 337 1474 753 721
Koppa Gate 369 1415 721 694Kyalasanahalli 547 1892 1039 853
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 151
Lingapura 174 895 444 451Mada Patna 1092 4076 2569 1507
Maragondahalli 2145 8824 4943 3881Masthena Halli 368 1506 775 731Nanjapura 103 405 194 211
Rajapura 200 912 473 439Ramakrishnapura 73 339 178 161Ramasandra 73 343 176 167
S.Bingipura 463 1851 981 870Seethanaikana Halli 82 337 169 168Thirupalya 4251 14762 9433 5329
Vaderamanchanahalli 778 2599 1735 864Veerasandra 2595 9190 5397 3793Yarandahalli 1472 5732 3465 2267
Total 48686 179689 104884 748055 to 10 KmA Medihalli 105 451 236 215
Adigondanahalli 324 1354 676 678Adur 150 717 368 349Agasa Thimmanahalli 5 22 14 8
Ali Bommasandra 162 700 355 345Amani Doddakere 8 32 18 14
Andapura 524 1769 951 818Aravantigepura 54 247 138 109Avadadenahalli 148 680 339 341
Avalahalli 106 551 291 260Bagganadoddi 93 386 203 183Balagaranahalli 1464 5447 3358 2089
Bandapura 207 853 421 432Bannerughatta 2092 8054 4160 3894Begihalli 364 1412 731 681
Bendiganahalli 183 658 342 316Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 1195 4379 2489 1890Bommandahalli 191 798 404 394
Bukkasagara 435 1748 897 851Byagadadenahalli 272 1435 1004 431
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 152
Byrappanahalli 121 486 252 234Chandapura 1240 4562 2461 2101
Chandrapura -Chatrakane 1695 5934 3031 2903Chikkanahalli 64 293 154 139Gollahalli 34 137 72 65
Gowrenahalli 450 2226 1123 1103Guddahatti 380 1635 801 834Gulimangala 194 849 446 403
Halesampigehalli 249 928 468 460Harapanahalli 817 3040 1670 1370Hasaruvani 4 17 10 7
Honnakalasapura 105 494 253 241Hullahalli 825 3510 1795 1715Huskur 612 2598 1317 1281
Iggalur 1272 4702 2454 2248Indlawadi 439 1933 1000 933Itchangur 365 1347 832 515
J.Bingipura 17 75 39 36Jangal Palya 141 520 247 273Kadajakkanahalli 125 566 293 273
Kaggalipura 60 232 126 106Kalbalu 554 1979 1230 749
Kalkere 770 2793 1761 1032Kammasandra Agrahara 153 664 316 348Kempavaderahalli 62 287 144 143
Konasandra 151 684 354 330Krishnasagara 141 594 324 270Laxmi Sagara 216 1007 512 495
Madivala 634 2792 1399 1393Mahanthalingapura 622 2751 1429 1322Mantapa 343 1438 717 721
Marasur 770 3034 1641 1393Marasur Agrahara 30 136 63 73Muthanallur Amanikere 66 239 115 124
Nallasandra 183 803 427 376Neralur 1500 5608 3217 2391
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 153
Ragihalli 402 1655 852 803Ramasagara 520 2199 1087 1112
Sakalawara 204 827 424 403Sidihosakote 331 1591 830 761Sonnanayakanapura 277 1240 615 625
Soppahalli 117 489 258 231Sriramapura 284 1162 595 567Suragajakkanahalli 308 1311 729 582
Thattanahalli 220 923 490 433Thimmasandra 41 194 97 97Thirumagondanahalli 567 2107 1095 1012
Vaddara Palya 1231 4686 2835 1851Vaderahalli 19 57 35 22BBMP (M Corp.) part 21322 80037 42157 37880
Total 49329 191064 101987 89077
Source: Census 2011
The child sex ratio of the project area is 968 but for the district it is 944. There is a need forsocial intervention is required to balance the gender inequality. Child population details withinthe study area are given in Table 3-37.
Table 3-37: Child population within the study area
Village Name Child Population(0-6) Male Female
Banahalli 669 329 340Bande Nalla Sandra 111 52 59
Bommasandra 1722 881 841Gollahalli 671 356 315Haragadde 772 395 377
Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hebbagodi 3850 1904 1946Hennagara 367 190 177
Hinnakki 171 80 91Hosahalli 115 52 63Hulimangala 320 163 157
Jigani 2101 1114 987Kachanaikanahalli 637 332 305Kammasandra 1216 632 584
Kittaganahalli 815 439 376
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 154
Koppa 201 107 94Koppa Gate 230 116 114
Kyalasanahalli 191 100 91Lingapura 110 52 58Mada Patna 467 232 235
Maragondahalli 1294 648 646Masthena Halli 169 91 78Nanjapura 45 20 25
Rajapura 105 53 52Ramakrishnapura 63 34 29Ramasandra 36 13 23
S.Bingipura 242 107 135Seethanaikana Halli 39 19 20Thirupalya 1251 646 605
Vaderamanchanahalli 253 144 109Veerasandra 1029 532 497Yarandahalli 733 386 347
Total 20393 10435 99585 to 10 Km radiusA Medihalli 39 19 20
Adigondanahalli 133 67 66Adur 77 31 46
Agasa Thimmanahalli 3 2 1Ali Bommasandra 78 41 37Amani Doddakere 3 2 1
Andapura 262 134 128Aravantigepura 16 8 8Avadadenahalli 81 37 44
Avalahalli 58 29 29Bagganadoddi 55 30 25Balagaranahalli 583 270 313
Bandapura 82 45 37Bannerughatta 992 469 523Begihalli 154 75 79
Bendiganahalli 92 46 46Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 496 257 239
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 155
Bommandahalli 111 64 47Bukkasagara 224 114 110
Byagadadenahalli 95 63 32Byrappanahalli 61 27 34Chandapura 584 290 294
Chandrapura -Chatrakane 700 335 365Chikkanahalli 23 15 8Gollahalli 15 7 8
Gowrenahalli 392 193 199Guddahatti 184 88 96Gulimangala 92 48 44
Halesampigehalli 120 55 65Harapanahalli 398 216 182Hasaruvani 4 3 1
Honnakalasapura 55 23 32Hullahalli 421 210 211Huskur 281 138 143
Iggalur 530 270 260Indlawadi 223 120 103Itchangur 161 78 83
J.Bingipura 6 2 4Jangal Palya 31 14 17
Kadajakkanahalli 69 34 35Kaggalipura 19 13 6Kalbalu 217 103 114
Kalkere 281 151 130Kammasandra Agrahara 108 48 60Kempavaderahalli 34 15 19
Konasandra 83 42 41Krishnasagara 29 19 10Laxmi Sagara 146 74 72
Madivala 318 164 154Mahanthalingapura 376 196 180Mantapa 182 96 86
Marasur 344 173 171Marasur Agrahara 12 7 5
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 156
Muthanallur Amanikere 21 8 13Nallasandra 87 53 34
Neralur 694 325 369Ragihalli 190 89 101Ramasagara 240 126 114
Sakalawara 84 35 49Sidihosakote 164 89 75Sonnanayakanapura 183 86 97
Soppahalli 62 31 31Sriramapura 189 99 90Suragajakkanahalli 153 81 72
Thattanahalli 70 34 36Thimmasandra 19 7 12Thirumagondanahalli 247 126 121
Vaddara Palya 597 292 305Vaderahalli 2 0 2BBMP (M Corp.) part 10334 5306 5028
Total 23469 11857 11612
Source: Census 2011
The majority of the population in the project area belongs to General Category (80.23%). Thescheduled caste and scheduled tribe population are 17.08% (22.93% of the district) and2.07% (3.26% of the district). Social group details within the study area are given in Table3-38.
Table 3-38: Social group details within the study area
Village Name General Scheduledcaste Scheduled Tribe
With 5 KmBanahalli 5104 558 157Bande Nalla Sandra 987 355 6
Bommasandra 13468 1512 274Gollahalli 6561 552 320Haragadde 5790 1846 99
Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hebbagodi 29799 4134 894Hennagara 1995 753 53
Hinnakki 915 377 92Hosahalli 443 411 21
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 157
Hulimangala 1669 1065 53Jigani (CT) 14036 2480 520
Kachanaikanahalli 4941 542 123Kammasandra 8859 891 162Kittaganahalli 6211 868 201
Koppa 883 579 12Koppa Gate 599 721 95Kyalasanahalli 1288 580 24
Lingapura 392 154 349Mada Patna 3526 437 113Maragondahalli 8196 494 134
Masthena Halli 1253 240 13Nanjapura 219 180 6Rajapura 583 319 10
Ramakrishnapura 132 182 25Ramasandra 126 217 0S.Bingipura 1016 826 9
Seethanaikana Halli 251 61 25Thirupalya 11639 2486 637Vaderamanchanahalli 2032 368 199
Veerasandra 7822 1028 340Yarandahalli 4613 923 196
Total 147802 26584 53035 to 10 Km radiusA Medihalli 185 239 27
Adigondanahalli 988 363 3Adur 340 377 0Agasa Thimmanahalli 22 0 0
Ali Bommasandra 405 283 12Amani Doddakere 32 0 0Andapura 1704 20 45
Aravantigepura 80 166 1Avadadenahalli 320 310 50Avalahalli 118 431 2
Bagganadoddi 163 179 44Balagaranahalli 4837 489 121
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 158
Bandapura 461 392 0Bannerughatta 6109 1835 110
Begihalli 884 467 61Bendiganahalli 341 258 59Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 3468 729 182
Bommandahalli 569 214 15Bukkasagara 999 636 113Byagadadenahalli 1013 353 69
Byrappanahalli 434 50 2Chandapura 4000 502 60Chandrapura -Chatrakane 5409 429 96
Chikkanahalli 232 20 41Gollahalli 132 5 0Gowrenahalli 1922 304 0
Guddahatti 719 837 79Gulimangala 543 278 28Halesampigehalli 851 59 18
Harapanahalli 2454 445 141Hasaruvani 17 0 0Honnakalasapura 331 154 9
Hullahalli 1299 2143 68Huskur 1777 747 74
Iggalur 3715 900 87Indlawadi 1504 345 84Itchangur 1015 324 8
J.Bingipura 69 3 3Jangal Palya 514 6 0Kadajakkanahalli 375 95 96
Kaggalipura 155 23 54Kalbalu 1304 551 124Kalkere 2073 694 26
Kammasandra Agrahara 291 302 71Kempavaderahalli 135 147 5Konasandra 477 200 7
Krishnasagara 460 132 2Laxmi Sagara 777 201 29
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 159
Madivala 1621 1144 27Mahanthalingapura 1020 1475 256
Mantapa 739 686 13Marasur 2206 791 37Marasur Agrahara 121 15 0
Muthanallur Amanikere 234 1 4Nallasandra 466 324 13Neralur 4938 542 128
Ragihalli 929 485 241Ramasagara 1394 765 40Sakalawara 462 363 2
Sidihosakote 1004 579 8Sonnanayakanapura 175 1065 0Soppahalli 159 329 1
Sriramapura 797 308 57Suragajakkanahalli 1021 284 6Thattanahalli 519 393 11
Thimmasandra 10 0 184Thirumagondanahalli 1426 598 83Vaddara Palya 2943 1666 77
Vaderahalli 36 21 0BBMP (M Corp.) part 71400 7262 1375
Total 149642 36733 4689
3.12.2.1 Employment and Livelihood
An important dimension to understand the employment scenario is through the main andmarginal workers data provided by the Census. Of the total working population, the majority(91.20%) is the main workers i.e they have study job more than six months per annum. It isdue to the industrialization in the area. The job vibrancy is due to the secondary and tertiarysectors. Only 10.25% of working population involved in the agriculture and allied occupation(primary). Workers group distribution in the study area is given in
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 161
Table 3-39.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 163
Table 3-39: Workers group distribution in the study area
Village Name TotalWorkers
MainWorkers
MarginalWorkers
AgricultureMain
HouseholdMarginal
HouseholdMain
OthersMarginalOthersMain
CultivatorsMain
Agri.LabourMarginal
CultivatorsMarginal
Agrilabors
Within 5 Km radius
Banahalli 3032 2495 537 131 35 17 10 61 7 2268 503
Bande Nalla Sandra 809 773 36 105 81 8 6 5 3 582 19
Bommasandra 7993 7359 634 48 151 17 11 76 25 7084 581
Gollahalli 5151 4988 163 56 40 24 3 43 2 4849 134
Haragadde 4303 4215 88 180 143 8 4 27 1 3865 75
Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39
Hebbagodi 20240 18863 1377 93 96 21 16 122 10 18552 1330
Hennagara 1319 1275 44 207 184 7 6 69 2 815 29
Hinnakki 514 224 290 24 14 8 29 9 80 177 173
Hosahalli 407 397 10 44 6 1 0 11 5 336 4
Hulimangala 1177 1139 38 74 53 7 6 13 1 999 24
Jigani (CT) 8557 7923 634 83 473 11 28 225 48 7142 547
Kachanaikanahalli 3646 2883 763 136 130 17 7 70 22 2547 717
Kammasandra 5267 4671 596 180 407 42 51 108 18 3976 485
Kittaganahalli 4073 3678 395 88 50 11 4 91 5 3449 375
Koppa 631 601 30 110 72 5 6 16 2 403 17
Koppa Gate 639 517 122 8 24 8 51 2 0 483 63
Kyalasanahalli 922 824 98 120 98 1 20 46 21 560 56
Lingapura 370 317 53 226 46 8 15 27 4 18 26
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 164
Mada Patna 2396 2331 65 23 13 4 4 4 0 2291 57
Maragondahalli 3777 3526 251 19 123 4 12 144 37 3240 198
Masthena Halli 630 624 6 85 8 0 1 13 0 518 5
Nanjapura 151 145 6 46 5 1 1 3 0 91 4
Rajapura 479 326 153 32 137 9 87 4 2 153 55
Ramakrishnapura 187 162 25 4 2 1 1 4 0 152 23
Ramasandra 169 156 13 22 48 0 7 16 0 70 6
S.Bingipura 916 912 4 56 145 0 1 0 0 711 3
Seethanaikana Halli 135 135 0 33 4 0 0 0 0 98 0
Thirupalya 10726 9676 1050 155 67 38 27 84 74 9370 911
Vaderamanchanahalli 1779 1741 38 51 14 4 0 6 1 1670 33
Veerasandra 5726 5561 165 64 73 15 6 21 1 5403 143
Yarandahalli 3392 3146 246 42 67 6 47 8 3 3029 190
Total 100954 92972 7982 2631 2848 315 467 1342 375 86151 6825
5 to 10 Km
A Medihalli 247 201 46 44 13 14 28 2 0 142 4
Adigondanahalli 595 582 13 211 36 2 0 5 0 330 11
Adur 257 232 25 57 49 3 13 4 0 122 9
Agasa Thimmanahalli 13 13 0 1 5 0 0 1 0 6 0
Ali Bommasandra 257 193 64 89 27 0 35 14 3 63 26
Amani Doddakere 21 20 1 15 1 1 0 0 0 4 0
Andapura 723 655 68 102 20 7 9 176 15 357 37
Aravantigepura 200 199 1 47 126 0 0 3 0 23 1
Avadadenahalli 292 292 0 61 15 0 0 0 0 216 0
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 165
Avalahalli 239 220 19 37 92 2 7 4 0 87 10
Bagganadoddi 212 168 44 97 61 3 40 0 1 10 0
Balagaranahalli 3145 2987 158 62 18 8 1 1 1 2906 148
Bandapura 416 276 140 116 81 8 17 8 14 71 101
Bannerughatta 3491 3301 190 74 171 17 59 212 16 2844 98
Begihalli 666 641 25 66 74 3 8 37 0 464 14
Bendiganahalli 317 311 6 56 21 1 0 2 0 232 5
Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 2617 2545 72 33 13 4 4 6 2 2493 62
Bommandahalli 352 352 0 91 135 0 0 2 0 124 0
Bukkasagara 909 834 75 58 62 8 6 26 1 688 60
Byagadadenahalli 1028 853 175 41 37 12 17 7 23 768 123
Byrappanahalli 204 185 19 13 3 0 0 2 0 167 19
Chandapura 2252 2133 119 131 265 18 13 70 16 1667 72
Chandrapura -Chatrakane 2529 2396 133 74 24 17 0 16 4 2282 112
Chikkanahalli 176 89 87 84 3 2 81 1 0 1 4
Gollahalli 76 68 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 68 1
Gowrenahalli 951 936 15 30 28 1 0 106 3 772 11
Guddahatti 1040 658 382 125 107 14 51 51 27 375 290
Gulimangala 438 249 189 59 27 37 62 12 19 151 71
Halesampigehalli 427 408 19 26 16 2 0 0 0 366 17
Harapanahalli 1441 1389 52 86 39 12 0 14 1 1250 39
Hasaruvani 11 9 2 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Honnakalasapura 241 230 11 85 57 1 4 13 0 75 6
Hullahalli 1672 1540 132 103 178 13 7 172 39 1087 73
Huskur 1070 896 174 195 45 16 30 15 1 641 127
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 166
Iggalur 2226 1970 256 192 309 15 15 100 15 1369 211
Indlawadi 740 735 5 305 36 1 0 2 1 392 3
Itchangur 823 737 86 128 105 1 0 1 0 503 85
J.Bingipura 52 50 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 49 2
Jangal Palya 357 226 131 194 3 3 2 7 37 22 89
Kadajakkanahalli 243 229 14 93 17 1 10 3 0 116 3
Kaggalipura 75 29 46 21 0 5 9 0 0 8 32
Kalbalu 1201 1171 30 35 14 4 2 1 0 1121 24
Kalkere 1204 787 417 12 8 14 6 6 1 761 396
Kammasandra Agrahara 389 389 0 62 69 0 0 1 0 257 0
Kempavaderahalli 123 122 1 27 84 0 0 0 1 11 0
Konasandra 397 366 31 97 14 1 2 37 0 218 28
Krishnasagara 457 443 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 441 14
Laxmi Sagara 445 444 1 83 9 0 0 3 1 349 0
Madivala 1072 1042 30 446 317 12 14 5 0 274 4
Mahanthalingapura 1387 1175 212 154 98 12 18 62 124 861 58
Mantapa 684 658 26 89 44 2 7 60 4 465 13
Marasur 1578 1559 19 179 132 2 2 11 0 1237 15
Marasur Agrahara 54 38 16 22 3 1 0 2 0 11 15
Muthanallur Amanikere 83 76 7 30 9 0 5 3 0 34 2
Nallasandra 338 298 40 85 26 2 6 7 0 180 32
Neralur 2797 2646 151 133 51 15 22 9 1 2453 113
Ragihalli 765 564 201 229 124 35 97 4 2 207 67
Ramasagara 1138 840 298 165 53 15 16 9 13 613 254
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 167
Sakalawara 421 389 32 95 21 3 3 11 4 262 22
Sidihosakote 923 713 210 392 127 9 192 15 1 179 8
Sonnanayakanapura 542 534 8 100 155 2 1 4 3 275 2
Soppahalli 221 221 0 68 120 0 0 0 0 33 0
Sriramapura 484 332 152 3 0 4 2 3 1 326 145
Suragajakkanahalli 592 582 10 98 83 1 1 13 0 388 8
Thattanahalli 496 354 142 174 116 2 29 6 9 58 102
Thimmasandra 101 65 36 62 1 0 25 0 6 2 5
Thirumagondanahalli 1064 862 202 140 90 17 61 23 4 609 120
Vaddara Palya 2675 2487 188 36 82 12 3 109 3 2260 170
Vaderahalli 44 43 1 3 0 1 0 17 0 23 0
BBMP (M Corp.) part 39729 35988 3741 266 1175 147 215 1183 94 33364 3285
Total 94445 85225 9220 6598 5345 574 1257 2699 511 70583 6878
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 168
3.12.2.2 Industries within the study area
The area has more industrial estates with many leading industries are situated. Industrialestates located within the study area are given in Table 3-40. List of Industries are given inTable 3-41.
Table 3-40: Industrial estates within the study area
S.No Industrial Area Extent (Acres)
1 Jigani I 18
2 Jigani II 16
3 Veerasandra Phase I 14
4 Veerasandra Phase II 10
5 Bommasandra Phase I 25
6 Bommasandra Phase II 10
7 Dyavasandra 30
Source: PWC
Table 3-41: List of major Industries within the study area
S.No. Industries Location1 Mallik Engineering Jigani2 PS Paints & Coats Pvt Ltd Jigani3 Shashi Bio-energy Products Jigani4 Shree Shiv Granites Jigani5 J’Pan Tubular Components Jigani6 Aron Universal Ltd. Jigani7 Hikal Ltd. Jigani8 OTIS Jigani9 Kirloskar Toyota textile machinery Pvt. Ltd. Jigani
10 Bill Forge Pvt Ltd Jigani11 Kumar Organics Pvt. Ltd. Jigani12 Cipla Limited Jigani13 Mylan Limited Jigani14 Micropack Jigani15 HCL Technologies Jigani16 Microbabs Jigani
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 169
S.No. Industries Location17 Rich core Life sciences Pvt Ltd Jigani - Bommasandra Link Road18 BIOCON Jigani19 Strides Shasun Limited Suragajakkanahalli20 Apotex Pharmachem Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road21 Sigma Aldrich Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road
22 Anthem Bioscience Pvt Ltd Bommasandra
23 Ansell Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road24 Sansera Engineering Pvt Ltd Jigani – Bommasandra Link Road
3.12.2.3 Health Facilities within the study area
The advantage of being near to Bengaluru city and urbanisation, the public and privatehealth facility is accessible. Health facilities available in Anekal taluk is given in Table 3-42.
Table 3-42: Health facilities available in Anekal Taluk
Taluk Hospitals CommunityHealth Centre PHCs
Anekal Anekal AnekalAttibeleDommasandra
JiganiSarjapuraMarsur
ChandapuraHaragaddeHebbgodi
MahantalingapuraSource: Health & family welfare department, Govt. of Karnataka
Rural health facilities like sub centers and primary health centers are available apart from atPrivate health services at accessible distance. The ambulance services are availed inemergency situations.
But the bigger issue is that the area is more vulnerable to pollution related diseases likePneumonia, Tuberculosis, etc. The occupational and pollution causing diseases are the mainproblem in any urbanized and industrialized environment. The air pollution due to the vehiclemovement is more intense than the industrial pollution.
Accident is another issue due to the growing vehicular movement.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 170
It has been observed that the ground water is depleted due to the over exploitation fordomestic and industrial purpose. So the groundwater is contaminated with more toxicchemicals in addition to the pollution caused by the industries. Consumption of untreatedwater will create water-borne disease like Diarrhea, Typhoid, Filariasis.
Sexually transmitted diseases (STI), HIV/AIDS are responsible for an enormous burden ofmorbidity and mortality in the industrial area as migrants from different locations andavailability of opportunities. The uncared and uncontrolled behavior change is causing a bigsocial stigma in the industrial area. The concerned authority and industries are responsiblefor intervention and counseling.
The other major health issue is mental health due to the stress, migration, unable toadaptability of new environments, windfall gain from assets. Also it increases the crime rate.
The accessibility of maternity centers and awareness made people use institutional deliverysystem. For understanding health profile of Anekal taluk, the health indicators are given inTable 3-43.
Table 3-43: Health profile of Anekal Taluk
Indicators for Composite Taluk Development Index
Indicators Anekal Taluk District
Sex ratio 835 916
Infant Mortality rate 11 15
Child Mortality rate 36 17
Maternal Mortality rate 73 73
Percentage of Institutional delivery 100 99.95
Percentage Children fullyimmunised
78.6 100
Availability of Doctors per 1000people
0.74192 0.0912
Source: Human Development report 2014
3.12.2.4 Sanitation Facilities & Drinking water facilities within the Study Area
The main source of drinking water is from Tap water and Bore well. The consumption of safedrinking water is fully followed. In case of sanitation, access to the sanitary facility (toilets) isnot fully available. Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area aregiven in Table 3-44.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 171
Table 3-44: Village wise sanitation & drinking water facilities within the study area
Village Name
Tapw
ater
from
trea
ted
sour
ce
Tapw
ater
from
un-tr
eate
d so
urce
Cove
red
well
Un-c
over
ed w
ell
Hand
pum
p
Tube
well/B
oreh
ole
Sprin
g
Rive
r/Ca
nal
Tank
/Po
nd/
Lake
Othe
r sou
rces
No. o
f Toi
let
Within 5 Km
Banahalli 62.5 9.1 0.8 0.9 13.7 9.7 0.4 0.1 0 2.8 91.5
Bande Nalla Sandra 0.6 99.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98
Bommasandra (CT) 38.3 4.4 1.3 0.1 1.4 54.2 0 0 0 0.1 90.8
Gollahalli 24 32.3 0 0 0 43.6 0 0 0 0 93.1
Haragadde 31.7 25.7 0.1 0 0 41.8 0.1 0 0 0.6 92.5
Harapanahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 94.9
Hebbagodi (CT) 31.6 31.8 0.4 0 0.1 29.6 0 0 0 6.4 98.8
Hennagara 23.8 22.5 0 0 0.2 53.6 0 0 0 0 74.4
Hinnakki 74.9 22 0.7 0 2.1 0.3 0 0 0 0 67.2
Hosahalli 0 0 0 0 0 98.9 0 0 0 1.1 55.2
Hulimangala 49.1 12.4 0.5 0 0 37.7 0 0 0 0.3 50.4
Jigani (CT) 43.2 25.2 1.1 0.6 1.1 26.3 0 0 0 2.4 96.3
Kachanaikanahalli 72.1 8.8 0.1 0.1 0 18.7 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 90.5
Kammasandra 43.7 18.5 0.3 0 0.1 22.3 0 0.1 0 14.9 97.4
Kittaganahalli 52.8 9 0.1 0.1 0.7 37 0.1 0 0 0.4 96.4
Koppa 4.3 93.3 0 0 0 1.8 0.6 0 0 0 81.2
Koppa Gate 0.3 98.7 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5 0 52.8
Kyalasanahalli 4 4.8 5.9 3 5.7 75.6 0 0.2 0 0.8 48.7
Lingapura 89 9.8 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0.6 29.3
Mada Patna 19.6 35.6 0 0.1 0 21.6 0 0 0 23 95.9
Maragondahalli (CT) 25.2 42.2 10.5 0.1 0.1 22 0 0 0.1 0 94.3
Masthena Halli 71.2 10.4 3 0 0 9.3 0 0 0 6 79.4
Nanjapura 8.6 81 0 0 0 10.5 0 0 0 0 39
Rajapura 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.1
Ramakrishnapura 12.1 87.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.4
Ramasandra 73.4 17.2 0 0 0 9.4 0 0 0 0 39.1
S.Bingipura 8.9 1.4 0.2 0 3.8 81.6 0 0 0 4.1 43.3
Seethanaikana Halli 62.7 1.2 10.8 0 0 22.9 0 0 0 2.4 47
Thirupalya 31.2 39.6 0.5 0 0.1 22.5 0.1 0 0 5.9 79.8
Vaderamanchanahalli 4.1 23.3 0 3.3 6.8 61.9 0 0.1 0 0.5 90.4
Veerasandra 40 28.7 0 0 1.3 29.6 0.1 0 0 0.2 94
Yarandahalli 34.9 1.3 0.2 0.1 4.1 51.6 5.5 0.1 0 2.3 91.7
5 to 10 Km
A Medihalli 31.2 40.5 0.7 0.2 1.1 23.1 0.1 0 0.1 3 16.3
Adigondanahalli 29.5 41.5 0.5 0.3 1.5 23.5 0.1 0 0.1 3 53.9
Adur 34.8 38.4 1 0.1 0.4 22.2 0 0 0 3 34.4
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 172
Agasa Thimmanahalli 1 87.5 0 0 0 11.5 0 0 0 0 60
Ali Bommasandra 76.6 10.9 0 0 0 12.1 0 0 0 0.3 48
Amani Doddakere 65.6 30.6 0 0 0.6 3.2 0 0 0 0 59.8
Andapura 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 95.8
Aravantigepura 0 76.9 0 0 0 23.1 0 0 0 0 49.1
Avadadenahalli 0 66.7 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 30.1
Avalahalli 94.9 1.6 0.9 0.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 80.2
Bagganadoddi 9.1 43.6 34.5 0 10.9 1.8 0 0 0 0 12.9
Balagaranahalli 0 58.3 0 0 0 41.7 0 0 0 0 93.9
Bandapura 0.9 94.3 0 0 0 4.7 0 0 0 0 60.9
Bannerughatta 2 94.1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 85.4
Begihalli 6.1 68.3 0.1 0 0 25.2 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 57
Bendiganahalli 0 95.3 2.6 0 0 1.7 0 0 0 0.4 58
Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 40.7 41.7 0 1.1 0 15.7 0.1 0 0 0.8 85.8
Bommandahalli 77.5 6 0.6 0.6 7.1 7.1 0 0 0 1.1 47.1
Bukkasagara 0 82.3 0 0 0 16.6 0 0 0 1.1 78
Byagadadenahalli 27.3 55.8 0.1 0 3.3 2.6 0 0 0 10.8 48.1
Byrappanahalli 3.4 78.7 0.6 0 0 17.2 0 0 0 0 96
Chandapura 66.4 19.4 0 0 0.2 13.7 0.2 0 0 0 92.3
Chandrapura -Chatrakane 78.6 9.1 0 0 0 11.8 0 0 0 0.5 96.5
Chikkanahalli 97.2 1.7 0 0.6 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 5.8
Gollahalli 34.6 5.2 0 0.2 0.3 59.4 0 0.2 0 0 44.7
Gowrenahalli 11.9 15.9 0.1 0.1 0 39.7 0 0.1 3.4 28.8 82
Guddahatti 1.4 98.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.5
Gulimangala 19.1 10.6 0 0 0 14.9 0 0 0 55.3 64.2
Halesampigehalli 0.9 96.9 0 0 1.8 0.4 0 0 0 0 89.6
Harapanahalli 2.4 51.6 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 94.9
Hasaruvani 35.2 19.9 1.7 0 0.6 42.6 0 0 0 0 0
Honnakalasapura 88 5 0 0 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 37.5
Hullahalli 13.2 31.7 0 0 3.8 44.6 0 0.6 0 6 57.2
Huskur 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 87.2
Iggalur 2.9 83.7 0 0 12.5 1 0 0 0 0 79.2
Indlawadi 18.4 54.5 0.4 0.3 20.2 4.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.3 43.6
Itchangur 30.3 31.3 0 0 1.2 36.9 0 0 0 0.3 62.6
J.Bingipura 38.4 42.8 0.2 0 0 18.4 0 0 0 0.1 100
Jangal Palya 1.8 93.1 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 100
Kadajakkanahalli 0 0 0 0 0 99.7 0 0.3 0 0 28.7
Kaggalipura 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64.7
Kalbalu 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51.4
Kalkere 13.9 0 0 0 0 84.4 0 0 1.6 0 68.7
Kammasandra Agrahara 1.7 46.6 0 0 0 51.7 0 0 0 0 32.4
Kempavaderahalli 6.6 86.7 0 0 6.4 0.2 0 0 0 0 52.6
Konasandra 30.2 1.1 0 0 0 68.7 0 0 0 0 56.7
Krishnasagara 0 86.3 0 0 0 13.7 0 0 0 0 66.5
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 173
Laxmi Sagara 75.6 24.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5
Madivala 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51
Mahanthalingapura 35.3 47.6 0 0 0 15.9 1.2 0 0 0 47.6
Mantapa 94.4 0.4 0 0 0 5.2 0 0 0 0 71.3
Marasur 12.2 38.7 0 0 0 48.3 0 0.2 0 0.6 72.2
Marasur Agrahara 28.7 62.9 0 0 0 5.6 0 0 0.3 2.5 100
Muthanallur Amanikere 30 53.2 0 0 1.4 11.6 0 0 0 3.9 92.1
Nallasandra 25 61.1 0 0 0 13.9 0 0 0 0 66.1
Neralur 26.9 69.2 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88.7
Ragihalli 0 83.1 0 0 0 16.9 0 0 0 0 38.2
Ramasagara 29 54.3 0.5 0 0 16.1 0 0 0 0 79
Sakalawara 10.2 11.6 1.5 0 0.1 76.5 0 0.1 0 0.1 54.9
Sidihosakote 61.6 4.8 1.2 0 0 32.2 0 0.2 0 0 39.1
Sonnanayakanapura 19.5 54.7 0.2 1.1 0 23.3 0 0 0.4 0.8 32.1
Soppahalli 19.4 69.9 0.5 0 0 8.7 0 0.5 0 1 31.4
Sriramapura 0.9 92.6 0 0 0 6.1 0 0 0 0.4 94.8
Suragajakkanahalli 64.8 26.3 1.7 1.4 3.1 1.7 0 0 0 1 86.2
Thattanahalli 99.2 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5
Thimmasandra 4.3 47.4 0.9 0 42.2 4.3 0 0.4 0.4 0 5
Thirumagondanahalli 10.6 59.5 0 0 0 28 0 0.3 0 1.6 58.7
Vaddara Palya 0 87.7 0.4 0 0 9.1 0 0 0 2.9 84.8
Vaderahalli 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71.4
BBMP part 24.7 43.9 0 0 0 31.1 0 0 0 0.3 96.4
3.12.2.5 Education facilities
The study area has a higher literacy rate due to the urbanization and industrialization of thearea. The main reasons are the accessibility to the primary education and higher education.The literacy rate of the area is 77.50. The dropout rate is low due to the awareness of theimportance of the education. The dropout rate in elementary education is 0.2 (Anekal taluk).Literacy details within the study area are given in Table 3-45.
Table 3-45: Literacy details within the study area
Village name Male Female % ofliterate
Within 5 Km radius
Banahalli 2609 1867 86.91
Bande Nalla Sandra 711 321 83.43
Bommasandra 7417 4687 89.45
Gollahalli 4086 2150 92.22
Haragadde 4016 1860 84.39
Harapanahalli 1275 943 83.95
Hebbagodi 17821 10437 91.22
Hennagara 1131 917 84.14
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 174
Hinnakki 476 350 68.10
Hosahalli 323 230 72.76
Hulimangala 1051 789 74.58
Jigani 8093 4766 86.10
Kachanaikanahalli 2345 1876 84.95
Kammasandra 4737 3153 90.73
Kittaganahalli 3135 2330 84.53
Koppa 557 465 80.28
Koppa Gate 460 363 69.45
Kyalasanahalli 795 513 76.90
Lingapura 331 269 76.43
Mada Patna 2103 997 85.90
Maragondahalli 3529 2377 78.43
Masthena Halli 576 451 76.81
Nanjapura 121 98 60.83
Rajapura 358 276 78.56
Ramakrishnapura 93 65 57.25
Ramasandra 133 99 75.57
S.Bingipura 625 445 66.50
Seethanaikana Halli 125 91 72.48
Thirupalya 7985 3780 87.08
Vaderamanchanahalli 1420 572 84.91
Veerasandra 4466 2690 87.69
Yarandahalli 2839 1501 86.82
Total 85742 51728 86.30
5 to 10 Km
A Medihalli 181 126 74.51
Adigondanahalli 500 425 75.76
Adur 284 190 74.06
Agasa Thimmanahalli 10 5 78.95
Ali Bommasandra 252 215 75.08
Amani Doddakere 13 6 65.52
Andapura 653 513 77.37
Aravantigepura 88 56 62.34
Avadadenahalli 221 177 66.44
Avalahalli 215 149 73.83
Bagganadoddi 106 65 51.66
Balagaranahalli 2807 1408 86.66
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 175
Bandapura 307 269 74.71
Bannerughatta 3185 2560 81.35
Begihalli 515 393 72.18
Bendiganahalli 229 185 73.14
Bhovi Palya (Shanthi Pur) 1905 1243 81.07
Bommandahalli 245 188 63.03
Bukkasagara 659 545 79.00
Byagadadenahalli 865 290 86.19
Byrappanahalli 174 119 68.94
Chandapura 1934 1494 86.17
Chandrapura -Chatrakane 2544 2278 92.13
Chikkanahalli 85 62 54.44
Gollahalli 42 36 63.93
Gowrenahalli 601 568 63.74
Guddahatti 580 484 73.33
Gulimangala 338 258 78.73
Halesampigehalli 361 307 82.67
Harapanahalli 1275 943 83.95
Hasaruvani 6 4 76.92
Honnakalasapura 144 121 60.36
Hullahalli 1127 853 64.10
Huskur 1018 801 78.51
Iggalur 1980 1627 86.46
Indlawadi 680 506 69.36
Itchangur 640 290 78.41
J.Bingipura 32 25 82.61
Jangal Palya 162 149 63.60
Kadajakkanahalli 211 138 70.22
Kaggalipura 95 75 79.81
Kalbalu 951 425 78.09
Kalkere 1443 652 83.40
Kammasandra Agrahara 184 159 61.69
Kempavaderahalli 89 69 62.45
Konasandra 268 198 77.54
Krishnasagara 250 195 78.76
Laxmi Sagara 353 288 74.45
Madivala 977 869 74.62
Mahanthalingapura 818 599 59.66
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 176
Mantapa 528 469 79.38
Marasur 1268 902 80.67
Marasur Agrahara 47 53 80.65
Muthanallur Amanikere 96 82 81.65
Nallasandra 307 237 75.98
Neralur 2657 1635 87.34
Ragihalli 507 360 59.18
Ramasagara 822 731 79.28
Sakalawara 309 237 73.49
Sidihosakote 593 451 73.16
Sonnanayakanapura 315 265 54.87
Soppahalli 155 106 61.12
Sriramapura 434 375 83.14
Suragajakkanahalli 541 352 77.12
Thattanahalli 357 233 69.17
Thimmasandra 61 50 63.43
Thirumagondanahalli 841 667 81.08
Vaddara Palya 2155 996 77.06
Vaderahalli 26 13 70.91
BBMP (M Corp.) part 33276 27822 87.65
Total 77897 59636 82.06
The available education infrastructure (Block level information about schools in the AnekalBlock based on DISE 2015-16 data is given in Table 3-46.
Table 3-46: Schools in Anekal Block including both public and private management
Prim
ary
only
Prim
ary
with
Upp
erPr
imar
yPr
imar
ywi
th U
pper
Prim
ary
Sec
and
H.Se
cUp
per
Prim
ary
+Se
c an
dH.
Sec
Prim
ary
with
Uppe
rPrim
ary
&S
ec.
Uppe
rPri
mar
ywi
thSe
c
Sec
only
Hr.S
ecO
nly/
Jr.C
olle
ge Tota
l
190 179 17 1 80 4 39 2 512
3.12.2.6 Other infrastructure facilities
Due to urbanization, parks, gardens and playgrounds not given importance due to the landvalue. The open space required for the children and elder citizens to move around and foroutdoor activity. It is very important for maintaining human health, so that it will strengthenthe foundation of the society. Industries can contribute in developing and maintaining theparks, garden and open space as environmental and social activity. The area hastraditionally enjoying open space and space for playing, but the haphazard developments willdeter such facility. There are ample opportunities in the study area for developing treeavenues.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 177
As the urbanization is happening, the same time the road infrastructure is being developedfor the man and materials being transported from up country area. The issue is the roads aregetting damaged as the high vehicular movement. The length of the roads in Anekal taluk isgiven in Table 3-47.
Table 3-47 : Details of roads in Anekal taluk
National Highway State Highway Major District Road
26 67.8 109.37
The area needs more passenger shelters at bus stops and appropriate road signs to beplaced at conspicuous places.
Summary of socioeconomic indicators within the study area is given in Table 3-48.
Table 3-48: Summary of socioeconomic Indicators within the Study areaS.No Particulars Study Area
1 Number of villages in the Study Area 1022 Total Households 98015
3 Total Population 370753
4 Children Population (<6 Years Old) 43862
5 SC Population 63317
6 ST Population 9992
7 Total Working Population 195399
8 Main Workers 178197
9 Marginal Workers 17202
10 Agricultural Workers 17422
11 Household Industries 4041
12 Other Workers 156734
13 Institutional Birth Rate 100
14 Childhood Immunization 78.6
15 Literates 275003
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 178
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 179
Figure 3-33 Map Showing the Study area of the Project in Figure FD 0301
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 180
Figure 3-34 Map Showing the Air monitoring locations in FigureFD0302
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 181
Figure 3-35 Map Showing the Noise monitoring locations in FigureFD0303
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 3 Description of EnvironmentPage 182
Figure 3-36 Map Showing the Ground Water & Surface Water monitoring locations in FigureFD0304
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Description of EnvironmentPage 183
Figure 3-37 Map Showing the Soil monitoring locations in Figure FD0305
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 184
Chapter 4Anticipated Environmental Impacts and
Mitigation Measures
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 185
Chapter 4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation
Measures
4.1 General
The potential impacts on the environment from the development of BBIL project have beenidentified considering the nature and extent of the activities associated with the projectimplementation and operation. The proposed facility is for manufacturing of BiologicalAntibodies and its derivatives.
In this chapter, likely impacts of these activities on environmental attributes have beenidentified, assessed and presented. In order to mitigate likely environmental impacts duringconstruction and operation phases due to the proposed development suitable mitigationmeasures are framed and incorporated as a part of planning process. The impacts havebeen assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively for various environmental componentsand impact specific mitigation measures are proposed.
4.2 Land Environment
4.2.1 Potential Impact due to Location
4.2.1.1 Impacts due to Land Acquisition
As stated in Chapter 2 (Project description) BBIL is proposed within BSEZ to be developed inan area of about 1.19 Ha (2.95 Acres), which is part of Biocon SEZ. The complete land fordevelopment of BBIL is in possession of Biocon Ltd for more than a decade. The completeland was acquired in the year 2005 from KIADB. The land is devoid of any settlements andthere will be no land acquisition and Resettlement or Rehabilitation for development of theproposed project. Details of survey numbers and area as per land possession certificates aregiven in Annexure A. Therefore there will not be any direct impact due to land acquisition.
4.2.1.2 Impacts due to changes in land use pattern
The project site 1.19 Ha (2.95 Acres) is comprised predominantly scrub land and is devoid oflarge trees. The land use of the existing area is already for industrial use which results in lossof existing vegetation. Also it will have impact on the existing drainage pattern in the projectfoot print area and altered drainage in the adjoining BSEZ area if the development is notproperly planned.
4.2.1.3 Mitigation Measures
The change in land use pattern shall be as per requirement of the proposed projectdevelopment plan which is for Industrial use.
The development within the designated area (1.19 Ha) shall be carried out in such away to ensure proper drainage by providing surface drainage systems including stormwater network etc., and all the altered drainage in the foot print area need to beproperly connected to the existing natural drainage system of the region.
Also during site preparation care shall be taken to avoid any disturbances to existingdrainage systems within BSEZ.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 186
The planning shall be in accordance with the standard landscape planning conceptsadequate provision for green areas.
4.2.2 Potential Impact due to construction
4.2.2.1 Impact due to site grading/levelling
The project site is relatively flat with minimum undulations and gradually sloping from SW toNE with ground levels varying from 1 to 6 m over a distance of approximately 500 m. Theproject site is with minimum undulation and most of the area within the BSEZ is classified as“Land with scrub”. The soil composition mainly covered with Sandy clay loam. During theconstruction phase site levelling would be required which involves site preparation work, thesoil and rock debris etc.,achieved as cut material from the higher gradient shall be utilised toelevate the low level areas within project premises.
The land disposal of solid wastes such as construction rubble, camp site garbage anddiscarded topsoil may impact soil quality. There might be a temporary phase of dumping theconstruction materials and wastes in the BBIL marring the aesthetics of the site. Apart fromthe localized construction impacts confined to the site, the impact is likely to be insignificantand no long term adverse impacts on topography are envisaged. This could meet most of theearthen material required at site/ therefore no additional construction material (Borrowmaterial) is required at site. Hence there could be a reduction in transportation/conveyanceof earth material to and from the site.
4.2.2.2 Mitigation Measures
The earth material will be balanced by cut and fill quantities within the site. The cutquantity will be required at the site to fill areas within the construction site.
4.2.2.3 Impact on local infrastructure
Transportation of Construction Material: Transportation of huge quantities of constructionmaterial (quarry material, cement, steel bitumen, paint bricks etc) during construction phaseof BBIL results in use of public infrastructure like roads, railways, drainage, water and powersupply which in turn results in extra burden on the existing infrastructure.
Construction Workers Camp: During the construction phase of the project there will belarge-scale short term employment generation (around 100 to 150 personnel) in the form ofskilled and semi-skilled labours. This could be for a period of three years but the daily wageun skilled labours employed locally will get job only for less than half of the constructionperiod. Also, majority of the works will be sub-contracted. As the construction period isanticipated to span nearly 2-3 years, temporary workers camps is planned to be set up forsemi-skilled labourers in the project area. There could be several impacts due to the locationof construction camp in the area where in local area will receive people from most part of thecountry.
4.2.2.4 Mitigation Measures
Existing road network is adequate to mitigate impacts from transportation of constructionmaterial.
Construction material shall be sourced from nearby Approved &Licensedquarries/vendors
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 187
Trucks with construction material susceptible for fugitive suspension will be covered withtarpaulin covers during transport of construction materials
Transportation management will be adopted for movement of dumpers transportingquarry stones and construction materials and traffic will be regulated
Vehicles deployed will conform to emission norms (air/noise) of CPCB and have validPollution Under Control (PUC) certificates
Very old vehicles ( more than 20 years) will not be allowed at construction site Dumpers and trucks will comply with standards for exhaust emissions and noise levels
To avoid/minimise impact/strain on the existing infrastructure, the worker camps will be self-sufficient and would not rely on any local resource. This would help to avoid any conflict withthe local population. To mitigate impacts from health hazards, sanitation facilities will beprovided. Further, the worker camp siting will be planned away from habitations.
Following additional mitigation measures shall be followed:
The camps will be adequately equipped with all the necessary facilities such as watersupply, LPG supply, power supply, wastewater collection, solid waste collection andsanitation.
The domestic wastes generated from the camps will be disposed at approved disposalsites.
Periodic health check-ups will be undertaken for early detection and control ofcommunicable diseases.
Medical facilities including first aid will be available in the workers camps for attending toinjured workers.
4.2.3 Potential Impact due to operation
4.2.3.1 Discharges on land-Impact
The wastewater generated in BBIL will be mainly sewage and process effluent. Sewagegenerated will be treated in proposed STP. Effluent generated from various processes will betreated in proposed ETP followed by RO. Rejects from RO will be treated in existing MultipleEffect Evaporator of BSEZ. Salts generated from MEE will be disposed to TSDF (Agreementcopy made with TSDF is enclosed as Annexure P). Treated wastewater from STP & ETPwill be used for green belt development/Toilet Flushing within BBIL & BSEZ and balance willbe reused as non potable water for various applications (mostly utilities). Discharge ofwastewater on land is not permitted and there will not be any impacts due to contaminationof soil, ground and surface water (canals & numerous village ponds) in and around theproject sites, so that the proposed system will be Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system.
4.2.3.2 Mitigation Measures
Periodic maintenance and check of wastewater conveyance pipelines Attempt to restore by replacing a part or putting together the torn or broken parts of the
conveyance pipeline in case of any leakage is detected. Necessary preventive measures for spillage from pipelines, such as surface RCC
channels along the pipelines shall be adopted Lining of effluent collection tank/ETP common guard pond Treated wastewater quality shall be ensured as per standards before using for greenbelt
application.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 188
With regards to ETP-There will be institutional arrangement to check the efficiency ofZero waste discharge.
4.2.3.3 Impacts- Soil Contamination
Potential impacts on land environment are envisaged due to hazardous and non-hazardouswastes generated due to various operations of BBIL. Sludge generated during productionprocess, chemical waste including toxic waste, burnt fuel waste, oil slurry, Salts from MEEetc are the source of hazardous waste. Sludge from STP & ETP will be generated from BBILproject. Poor management of such materials/wastes from the operations is potential risk ofsoil contamination.
4.2.3.4 Soil – Mitigation Measures
Excavated soil will be stockpiled in a corner of the site in bunded area to avoid run offwith storm water.
Excavated stock piled top soil will be reused for horticultural/ agricultural/Green beltpurposes.
Good housekeeping and best practices of waste handling shall be adopted toeliminate/minimise the risks of soil contamination. The wastes generated will be stored intemporary storage facility and then it has to be transferred to nearby Treatment, Storageand Disposal Facility (TSDF) and also to the approved vendors of Karnataka StatePollution Control Board (KSPCB) landfill or compost facility. However, waste minimisationtechniques will be adopted in order to minimise the generation of wastes.
4.3 Water Environment
4.3.1 Potential Impact due to Location
4.3.1.1 Impact on existing water resources
There are 118 water bodies including small and large natural/manmade within 10Km radiusfrom proposed project acting as groundwater resources in surrounding villages. Details ofwater bodies in the PIA are given in Table 3-21.
The water requirement during the construction phase for proposed BBIL is 0.5 – 1.0 MLDwhich will be met from BSEZ through BMWSSB. During operation phase, water requirementof proposed units will be mainly for process, condenser cooling water, DM water for steamgeneration, service water, domestic use, fire water, green belt etc.
A total of 130 KLD of water will be withdrawn from BSEZ to meet the requirement of BBIL.Wastewater generated from proposed BBIL project will be treated in proposed STP & ETPand Zero Liquid Discharge will be maintained, hence impact due to the proposed project isvery minimal.
4.3.1.1.1 Impacts to surface water bodies
The surface water and groundwater are the life line of the villages. The 118manmade/natural ponds very well indicate how the water resources system in this areaworks for the villagers who are primarily engaged in agriculture activities. All the ponds in thearea are working as recharge sites for the under lying groundwater and hence the surfacewater groundwater system is acting like a single unit and therefore cannot be seen inIsolation.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 189
Any contamination in surface drainage due to construction and operation of BSEZ & BBILcould collapse the system and will have serious impacts to the water resources especiallythe availability of potable water in the PIA area. The impacts will be high in the core areaespecially the 5.0 km radius area. Therefore the efficiency of the Zero waste discharge needto be ensured with proper regulatory and institutional arrangements.
4.3.1.2 Mitigation Measures
Though the proposed development will not draw Groundwater, the following measuresproposed as a part of development to improve the ground water scenario and also to ensurethat ground water is not contaminated.
Strategic plans such as implementing following structures for rainfall harvesting andgroundwater recharging purposes in project site.
Recharge pits Only roof-top rain water harvesting Rainwater storage ponds/tanks Storage cum recharge ponds Proposed to create awareness among villagers/farmers in the study area on advanced
management methods in conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water for irrigationand other purposes integrating to the above mentioned water harvesting and rechargemeasures.
Monitoring of water quality and groundwater level variations in and around the projectsite.
4.3.2 Potential Impact during Construction
4.3.2.1 Impact due to Wastewater Generation
During construction phase of the proposed project, sewage will be generated fromconstruction workers camp and from the project site. Wastewater generation at constructionsite includes surface runoff also which may contain pollutants and traces of solvents, paints,metal compounds etc. which may impact the groundwater and nearby surface waterresources if not managed properly.
4.3.2.2 Mitigation Measures
Water quality of nearby villages will be monitored during construction phase An adequate drainage system will be provided at the site with separate collection streams
to segregate the storm run-off from roads, open areas, material storage areas, vehiclewash water and other wastewater streams. Suitable measures will also be taken toprevent the washing away of construction materials into the drainage system. Sewage generated at site and at construction workers camp will be collected in
holding tank and periodically transferred to existing Sewage Treatment Plants (STP)within BSEZ.
No wastewater shall be disposed directly on land or on existing surface waterresources without appropriate treatment
Institutional arrangement in addition to monitoring arrangement for the Zero wastedischarge systems and other impact mitigation measures that could endanger theavailability of potable water in quantity and quality.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 190
4.3.2.3 Impact on existing drainage pattern
The existing drainage pattern in and around proposed project site is shown in Figure 3-14. Itmay be noticed that there are 118 water bodies including small and large natural/manmadewithin 10Km radius from proposed BBIL Table 3-21 acting as groundwater resources insurrounding villages.
Due to project development, there will not be any change/obstruction to the natural drainagepattern.
4.3.2.4 Mitigation Measures
Storm water drainage network was already designed by BSEZ. Outlets were proposed for the storm water towards natural sloping which can be used
during monsoon. Outlets will be connected to existing drainage network with a mechanism to avoid
contamination of groundwater. Grading within the project site will be planned in such a way that there shall be negligible
impacts on the existing natural drainage system/pattern. The local communities are worried over the disruption of drainage and blocking of water
to certain Ponds. This could generate much more impact to an already non perennialsystem.
4.3.3 Potential Impact during Operation
4.3.3.1 Impact due to Wastewater Generation
The source of wastewater generation from BBIL is as follows:
Industrial process wastewater/effluent Boiler and cooling water blow down Domestic wastewater/Sewage Equipment cleaning and floor washings, etc.
The details of wastewater quantities to be generated from BBIL are discussed in Section2.6.1.4.The untreated wastewater if discharged into nearby surface water may affect thesurface water and/or if disposed off on land without treatment may pollute the ground andsurface water.
4.3.3.2 Mitigation measures:
Various mitigation measures are proposed to be adopted to minimise the impact if any on thewater environment due to the wastewater/runoff generation during the operation phase of theproject.
Institutional arrangement for monitoring of water by pollution Preventive measures as well as after, measures in case any contamination Monitoring should ensure early determination of any threats to water resources in
terms of contamination If contaminated proper expertise need to be brought in to schematise the various
recharge mechanism to reduce or nullify the impact effects.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 191
4.3.3.3 Wastewater Quality and Quantity
The ETP will be mainly catering to the industrial effluents generated from proposed BBILproject. Low TDS wastewater volume is expected to be 103 KLD and the Sewage isexpected to be 25 KLD. Domestic effluent will not be mixed with LTDS wastewater. There isa separate STP proposed for treating domestic effluent generated due to the proposedproject. Effluent generated from proposed project will be treated in conventional ETPfollowed by RO. Reject from RO will be sent to existing MEE at BSEZ. Salts generated fromMEE will be disposed to TSDF. The break up in terms of volumetric contribution (for effluent& sewage) is as given in Table 4-1.Table 4-1: Details of break up in terms of volumetric contributionS.
No. Details Unit For 4500 KLDEffluent Sewage Total
1. Domestic KLD - 25 252. Process KLD 103 - 103
Total KLD 103 25 128
Treated effluent & Sewage will be used for green belt/toilet flushing and utilities within BBIL &BSEZ project.
Expected Characteristics of effluent & Sewage is given in Table 4-2 & Table 4-3. ETP &STPLayout is provided in Annexure Q.Table 4-2: Expected Characteristics of effluent generated from BBIL
S. No. Parameter Concentration*
InletCharacteristics
Concentration*
OutletCharacteristics
1 pH 6.75 -8.5 6.5-8.5
2 TDS 1500 – 1600 <2100
3 TSS 500 – 600 <100
4 BOD 1200 – 1300 <10
5 COD 4000 - 5000 <30
* All parameters except pH are expressed as mg/l
Table 4-3: Expected Characteristics of Sewage generated from BBIL
S. No. Parameter Concentration*
InletCharacteristics
Concentration*
OutletCharacteristics
1 pH 6.2 -7.0 6.8-7.2
2 TDS 500 – 600 <500
3 TSS 300 – 400 <10
4 BOD 300 – 400 <10
5 COD 350 - 500 <50
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 192
S. No. Parameter Concentration*
InletCharacteristics
Concentration*
OutletCharacteristics
* All parameters except pH are expressed as mg/l
4.3.3.4 Conveyance of Wastewater to ETP & STP
The wastewater will be conveyed to ETP & STP through pipeline. The ground slopesnaturally to the NE corner of the processing area where the ETP & STP is proposed.Tentatively, it is expected that the invert level at the ETP (as and when conveyance is put inplace) shall be 2.5 to 3.0 m below the existing ground level. This shall be considered in thedesign of the ETP & STP.
4.3.3.5 Wastewater Collection at BBIL
BBIL shall have a minimum of two tanks for each type of wastewater generated and theholding capacity of each tank shall be for a flow of one day.
Once a tank (for a particular type of waste stream) is filled, the ETP cum STP operator shallbe informed, who shall check the effluent quality (finger print test) and assign the path wayfor onward conveyance and treatment at the ETP and STP.
4.3.3.6 Mitigation Measures
ETP to treat low TDS homogenous nature of effluents. STP to treat sewage generated from proposed industry ETP & STP proposed is Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) System. Treated wastewater
will be used for maintaining the green belt within the BBIL/BSEZ and the balance will bereused at the units as non-potable water for various applications.
A storm water drainage system in BSEZ is already developed for the entire project site. The runoff from uncontaminated areas will be used for irrigation of greenbelt area. The oil contaminated water, if any will be sent to oil water separator; separated oil will be
sent to KSPCB approved vendors and water will be sent to ETP for further treatment. Thetreated water will be re used for various applications within BSEZ/BBIL.
4.4 Biological Environment
4.4.1 Potential Impact during Construction
The impacts caused by construction activities include the following:
Exhaust emissions from diesel run engines, construction machinery and vehicles Dust suspension during site preparation, construction and material transport Noise caused by vehicles transporting construction material Noise caused by handling of construction materials Noise & exhaust emissions from diesel run engines of construction machinery
During construction the transport of construction material will cause dust emission, emissionof exhaust gases from vehicles such as CO2, CO and NOx. The fugitive dust may coat theleaves of plants and trees. Fauna that occur in the project area and surroundings may bedisturbed by the sound of vehicles, construction and construction equipment.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 193
The impacts caused by construction to fauna are temporary and not long term and most (ifnot all) the observed and documented flora and fauna of the project area will adapt to theseimpacts.
4.4.1.1 Mitigation Measures
Spraying of construction materials like sand and gravel with water will minimise dustemission.
Properly maintained vehicles will produce reduced noxious emission. And the temporary labour camps must have proper sanitation facilities.
4.4.1.2 Impacts on Flora
There are no national parks, wildlife sanctuaries or biosphere reserves within 10 km radiusfrom the plant site. Except Bannerghatta National Park, which is 9.59Km away fromproposed project in west direction.
Baseline status of vegetation clearly suggests thatproject area is mainly barren land devoidof large trees and mainly consists of scattered and sparse vegetation. However, theirpopulation is quite small and isolated in the buffer area. The proposed project constructionactivities may involve removal or thinning of some vegetation. Under the Green Beltdevelopment plan suitable species of herbs and trees will be used for plantations based on“Guidelines for Developing Greenbelt” published by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)by involving local forest department or local community people.
4.4.1.3 Impacts on Fauna
The large scale construction activities in the proposed core area and related roads andtransmission lines would involve movement of vehicle and people, digging of soil, materialloading, and erection of towers and stringing of conductors etc. may impact on existingFauna.
It is observed that there are 118 small to medium seasonal water bodies present in 10.0 Kmperiphery of the proposed project and therefore envisaged that during winter season flocks ofmigratory birds may move between these water bodies.
In the project area only domestic and feral animals such as cattle, goats, crows, dogs andcats were observed.
Power lines/Towers are often known to be the main reason for bird collision and death. Thebird collision incidences are normally species specific and vary seasonally. It is thereforerecommended that transmission lines for evacuation of the power shall be laid carefully. Thepower lines shall be kept at a safe distances from general bird habitats such as water bodiesand forest plantation areas in the buffer area in order to avoid bird mortalities due tocollisions.
It is suggested that maximum precautions should be taken during construction phase and aswell as during operational phases so that the waterholes/water bodies present in the projectsite, are also not disturbed.
4.4.1.4 Mitigation measures
Ensure no pollutants discharged into water bodies, No power lines be laid near or overwater bodies.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 194
Do not cause any direct or indirect disturbances to plantation and water bodies located inbuffer areas
Efforts need to be taken to avoid fatal traffic accidents leading to the death of livestock. If livestock deaths are frequently reported from same place adequate Preventive
measures need to be taken at such places (awareness building/ signage’s andprecautionary signs or even repair of road works with fencing etc)
4.4.1.5 Impact on Migratory Paths for Wildlife and Forest Blocks
There are no identified migratory paths for major and minor wildlife in the project site and thestudy area. The identified fauna which are observed at the project site and in the study areaare local migrants only. Therefore the proposed BBIL project operations are not likely to haveany adverse impact on the paths for avi-fauna.
In case BSEZ wanted to create water bodies/pools the efforts need to be made to avoidadverse impacts to avi fauna.
4.4.1.6 Mitigation Measures
Discharge of wastes/wastewater without treatment into the water bodies during theconstruction and operation would not be allowed
Awareness will be given to workers about the importance and conservation of terrestrialecology and biodiversity
Avoid adverse impacts to faunal species in case creation of water pools.
4.5 Air Environment
4.5.1 Potential Impact during Construction
4.5.1.1 Impact due to Transportation of Construction Material
Transportation of construction material results in use of public infrastructure like roads andduring material transportation, there is a possibility of impact on air quality along the routedue to exhaust emissions, fugitive dust suspension and traffic congestion. The windblowndust during the material movement could impact the road users and also habitations enroute.Fugitive dust could arise during material unloading. This can contribute towards slight build-up of pollutant concentration over the baseline levels. In case of requirement of quarrymaterial, same will be sourced from nearby approved/licensed quarries; the environmentalmanagement at the quarry site will be taken care by the quarry agencies.
4.5.1.2 Emission during Construction at Site
During the construction activities, the sources of potential impacts on the air quality at theconstruction site can be categorised as:
Exhaust emissions from diesel run engines, construction machinery and vehicles Dust suspension during site preparation, construction, trenching and material transport Soil grading and compaction will be involved as part of site preparation by using
mechanical shovels and earthmovers for site clearance, cut and fill and other sitelevelling activities.
These activities could generate dust particles and affect the ambient air quality.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 195
Fugitive dust is expected particularly during dry weather conditions due to the sitepreparation and movement of transport vehicles for materials and personnel. Emissions fromdiesel power generators, construction equipment and transport vehicles will affect the airquality within the work areas, if not adequately managed. Movement of materials such ascement, steel, sand, etc. will cause disturbance to the adjoining BSEZ site andcommunities/communities enroute.
With the present background concentrations of air quality parameters, it is expected thatthere will only be a mild build-up of air pollutants.
The impacts during construction are short-term in nature and will cease on completion of theconstruction. Further, adoption of suitable mitigation measures will ensure that these impactsare rendered insignificant.
4.5.1.3 Mitigation Measures
Equipment and vehicles will be regularly maintained in accordance with themanufacturer's recommendations to maximise fuel efficiency and help minimiseemissions and also will use fuel that has low sulphur content as per prevailing standardsspecified.
A strict speed limit of 30 km/hr will be enforced for vehicles using unmade tracks and theRoW.
Water spraying the running track within the ROW and/or the surface of the access roadwith water;
Vehicles transporting soil and aggregate to be covered for example using tarpaulins orcovers that prevent the escape of dust, and prohibiting such vehicles from stopping nearBSEZ area and settlements
Keeping site roads and approaches to watercourse crossings free from deposits of mudand silty material
Using windbreaks, netting screens or semi-permeable fences to reduce dust emissionsfrom working areas close to sensitive residential or agricultural locations or naturalhabitats.
In order to ameliorate the fugitive dust suppression, the surfaces near the proposed siteand transport roads will be sprinkled with water to reduce dust generation.
The earth material generated during excavation will be used in levelling, makingembankments and landscaping the area.
On-site vehicle speeds will be controlled to reduce excessive dust suspension in air anddispersion by traffic. However, such an impact can be minimized by restricting entry onlyto PUC certified vehicles. The construction equipment and transport vehicles will beperiodically washed to remove accumulated dirt.
Alignment connecting the construction material procurement site and the project site shallbe selected to ensure that the impacts on the receptors en route the material movementare minimised to a large extent.
The baseline data will be used as reference to aid in selection of the leastenvironmentally damaging alignment.
To reduce impacts from exhausts, emission control norms will be enforced/ adhered. Adequately sized construction yard will be identified at the site for storage of construction
materials, equipment tools, earthmoving equipment, etc. Fuel tanks adequately designed to minimize fugitive emissions and welding gas cylinders
will be stored in a secluded area within project site.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 196
Welding personnel will be properly trained and will wear necessary Personal ProtectionEquipment
4.5.2 Potential Impact due to Operation
The impacts on air environment due to the operation of BBIL project within the BSEZ hasbeen carried out.
The AAQ model studies carried out covering the following:
Impact covering the process emissions such as Point Sources of the individual stacks Impact covering the DG sets Point Sources of the proposed BBIL industry in BSEZ.
4.5.2.1 Details of Sources of Emission considered for Air Quality Modelling
Following sources of emission are identified as a part of proposed development of BBILconsidered in the air quality modelling study.
1. BBIL Point Sources:-
Following are the point source emissions proposed as a part of development for the BBIL.
16 TPH Boiler (natural gas/ Diesel) 4X3000 KVA DG sets etc,Emissions of these sources were estimated based on fuel used with Air Pollution Control(APC) Measures through available Primary/Secondary data. The estimated emission detailsfor the proposed BBIL point sources are given in Table 4-4. The DG Set emissions areestimated based on DG capacity & fuel. These DGs will be operated during power failureonly. The estimated emission details from DG sets are given in Table 4-5.Table 4-4: Boiler Stack & Emission detailsStack Details Fuel Emissions DetailsStackConnected
StackHeight(m)
StackVelocity(m/sec)
StackDiameter(mm)
ExitTemp.(0C)
Fuelused
Source PM(g/s)
CO(g/s)
SO2(g/s)
NOX(g/s)
HC(g/s)
VolumetricFlow(m3/hr)
Boiler(16TPH)
48 9 Internal –3500
Top- 1000
140-150
NaturalGas
GAILGas
NilNil Nil Nil Nil 25000
250-280
Backupfuel-
Diesel
IOCL/BPCL/HPCL/MRPL
0.2618 0.935 0.2805 3.06 0.3825 30000
Table 4-5: DG Stacks & Emission detailsStack Details Emissions Details
Stack Connected to DGStackHeight
(m)
StackVelocity(m3/sec)
StackDiameter
(mm)
ExitTemp.
(0C)PM10(g/s)
CO(g/s)
HC(g/s) SOx
(g/s)NOX(g/s)
DG 30 8.5 500 400 0.0884 1.045 0.44 0.255 3.485
2. Other Emission Sources:-
Other emissions include process fugitive emissions from chemical/PoL handling, storage andtransfer operations etc. Fugitive emissions can be controlled by selecting suitableequipments/Storage, appropriate handling methods etc., and hence no emissions wereconsidered.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 197
4.5.3 AERMOD Model
AERMOD is a ‘near-field, steady-state’ Gaussian model. It uses boundary-layer similaritytheory to define turbulence and dispersion coefficients as a continuum, rather than as adiscrete set of stability classes. Variation of turbulence with height allows a better treatmentof dispersion from different release heights. AERMOD requires Surface as well as Upper Airdata as meteorological input.
4.5.3.1 Model Assumptions
The following are the assumptions for the air quality modelling;
Uses rural dispersion Stack-tip downwash Model assumes receptor on flat terrain Used calms processing routine Used missing data processing routine No exponential decay No Dry and Wet Depletion
Input Data: The following technical details are considered for Air Quality Modelling studies:
Point Source: The Point source inputs are given in Table 4-4 & Table 4-5 for all thesources identified in the study area.
4.5.3.2 Meteorological Data Considered
For the purpose of carrying out the air quality modelling study, site specific meteorologicaldata (pre-processed from MM5) for the complete year from January to December 2015obtained from IMD was used. The raw met data have been processed in AERMET view tocreate surface and upper air data which can be used as inputs to AERMOD.
4.5.3.3 Wind Speed and Wind Direction
The wind roses were drawn for the met files obtained on a sixteen-point compass (N, NNE,NE, ENE; E, ESE, SE, SSE; S, SSW, SW, WSW; W, WNW, NW, and NNW). Wind patternrepresenting 24 hours for the year of January to December 2015 is discussed. The frequencyoccurrence of wind at various speeds was calculated on the basis of total number ofobservations recorded in the respective wind speed category. The overall wind patternrecorded for 24 hours during the year January to December 2016 is collected from IMD and
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 198
is given in
Figure 4-1. The predominant wind directions observed were from E, W to E, SW, calmconditions prevailed for 1.93% of the total time.
Figure 4-1: Annual Wind Rose Diagram (January – December 2015)
4.5.3.4 Receptors Locations
The details of the receptors are given in Table 4-6.
Table 4-6: Receptor Details
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 199
Location No. Receptors Distance (km) Azimuth DirectionsA1 Project Site - 2.60A2 Jigani 4.31 WA3 Ramakrishnapura 7.02 ESEA4 Byagadadenahalli 7.89 SEA5 Indalavadi 4.45 SSWA6 Bommasandra 5.63 EA7 Doddathoguru 5.45 NA8 Hullahalli 2.60 NW
4.5.3.5 Model Results
The 1st 24-hour average incremental, Predominant wind direction incremental and resultantconcentrations and Annual average incremental and resultant concentrations of PM, CO,SO2 and NO2 due to proposed BBIL and due to overall development of the project are givenin Table 4-7 to Table 4-36.Scenario-1: Boiler- 16TPH with natural Gas
Scenario-2: Boiler – 16TPH with backup fuel Diesel
Scenario-3: DG - 4*3000KVAScenario-1: Boiler- 16TPH with natural Gas:
Table 4-7: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO22
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 0.5 30A2 Jigani 28.60 0.3 28.9A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.3 23.9A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.1 23.7A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.05 23.55A6 Bommasandra 26.80 0.1 26.9A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.03 23.83A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.10 19.3
Table 4-8: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2
3
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 0.7 30.2A2 Jigani 28.60 0.4 29A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.5 24.1A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.2 23.8A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.10 23.6A6 Bommasandra 26.80 2 28.8A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.1 23.9A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.2 19.4
Table 4-9: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO24
2 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
3 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
4 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of NO2 - 40 µg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 200
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 2 31.5A2 Jigani 28.60 0.6 29.2A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.6 24.2A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.3 23.9A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.1 23.6A6 Bommasandra 26.80 2 28.8A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.1 23.9A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.3 19.5
Table 4-10: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 5
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.1 0.118A2 Jigani 0.022 0.02 0.042A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.05 0.068A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.02 0.029A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.002 0.212A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.02 0.039A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.006 0.024A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.002 0.015
Table 4-11: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 6
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.1 0.118A2 Jigani 0.022 0.03 0.052A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.09 0.108A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.01 0.019A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.004 0.214A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.2 0.219A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.01 0.028A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.01 0.023
Table 4-12: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO7
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.2 0.218A2 Jigani 0.022 0.09 0.112A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.09 0.108A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.03 0.039A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.01 0.22A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.2 0.219A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.02 0.038A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.02 0.033
5 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
6 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
7 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 40 µg/m3
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 201
Scenario-2: Boiler 16TPH – Backup Fuel DieselTable 4-13: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM8
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.05 69.93A2 Jigani 64.32 0.005 64.325A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.01 63.51A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.005 55.205A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.001 58.401A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.01 55.81A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.005 62.585A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.01 55.21
Table 4-14: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM9
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.2 70.08A2 Jigani 64.32 0.04 64.36A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.05 63.55A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.01 55.21A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.005 58.405A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.05 55.85A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.01 62.59A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.01 55.21
Table 4-15: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM10
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.08 69.96A2 Jigani 64.32 0.02 64.34A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.06 63.56A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.01 55.21A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.003 58.403A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.08 55.88A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.02 62.6A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.02 55.22
Table 4-16: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 11
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.3 0.318A2 Jigani 0.022 0.01 0.032
8NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM10 - 100 µg/m3
9 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM10 - 60 µg/m3
10 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM10 - 60 µg/m3
11 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 202
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.05 0.068A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.01 0.019A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.009 0.219A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.05 0.069A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.01 0.028A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.005 0.018
Table 4-17: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 12
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.3 0.318A2 Jigani 0.022 0.3 0.322A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.3 0.318A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.06 0.069A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.01 0.22A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.1 0.119A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.01 0.028A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.06 0.073
Table 4-18: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO13
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.6 0.618A2 Jigani 0.022 0.4 0.422A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.4 0.418A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.08 0.089A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.02 0.23A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.4 0.419A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.05 0.068A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.06 0.073
Table 4-19: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO214
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.08 14.28A2 Jigani 13.80 0.005 13.805A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.01 12.61A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.008 9.808A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.001 13.001A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.01 13.46A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.005 12.605A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.001 9.801
12 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
13 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 40 µg/m3
14 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of SO2 - 80 µg/m3
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 203
Table 4-20: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2
15
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.2 14.4A2 Jigani 13.80 0.02 13.82A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.02 12.62A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.01 9.81A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.005 13.005A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.02 13.47A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.010 12.61A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.010 9.81
Table 4-21: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO216
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.20 14.40A2 Jigani 13.80 0.08 13.88A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.05 12.65A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.02 9.82A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.006 13.006A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.050 13.50A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.010 12.61A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.020 9.82
Table 4-22: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO217
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 0.80 30.30A2 Jigani 28.60 0.08 28.68A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.10 23.70A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.08 23.68A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.03 23.53A6 Bommasandra 26.80 0.10 26.90A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.08 23.88A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.01 19.21
Table 4-23: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2
18
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 2.00 31.50A2 Jigani 28.60 0.50 29.10A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.50 24.10
15 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of SO2 - 50 µg/m3
16 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of SO2 - 50 µg/m3
17 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
18 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 204
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.20 23.80A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.07 23.57A6 Bommasandra 26.80 0.20 27.00A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.10 23.90A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.10 19.30
Table 4-24: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO219
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 2.00 31.50A2 Jigani 28.60 0.80 29.40A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.50 24.10A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.20 23.80A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.10 23.60A6 Bommasandra 26.80 0.90 27.70A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.10 23.90A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.20 19.40
Scenario-3: DG - 4*3000KVATable 4-25: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM20
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.10 69.98A2 Jigani 64.32 0.020 64.34A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.020 63.52A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.020 55.22A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.010 58.41A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.060 55.86A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.005 62.585A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.020 55.22
Table 4-26: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM21
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.40 70.28A2 Jigani 64.32 0.10 64.42A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.10 63.60A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.05 55.25A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.02 58.42A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.20 56.00A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.04 62.62A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.05 55.25
19 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of NO2 - 40 µg/m3
20NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM10 - 100 µg/m3
21 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM10 - 60 µg/m3
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 205
Table 4-27: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of PM22
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of PM
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 69.88 0.20 70.08A2 Jigani 64.32 0.10 64.42A3 Ramakrishnapura 63.50 0.08 63.58A4 Byagadadenahalli 55.20 0.04 55.24A5 Indalavadi 58.40 0.01 58.41A6 Bommasandra 55.80 0.08 55.88A7 Doddathoguru 62.58 0.01 62.59A8 Hullahalli 55.20 0.01 55.21
Table 4-28: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 23
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.30 0.318A2 Jigani 0.022 0.10 0.122A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.08 0.098A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.08 0.089A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.03 0.24A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.10 0.119A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.03 0.048A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.05 0.063
Table 4-29: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO 24
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 0.70 0.718A2 Jigani 0.022 0.20 0.222A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.20 0.218A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.10 0.109A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.10 0.31A6 Bommasandra 0.019 0.70 0.719A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.10 0.118A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.10 0.113
Table 4-30: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of CO25
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A1 Project Site 0.018 2.00 2.018A2 Jigani 0.022 0.50 0.522A3 Ramakrishnapura 0.018 0.40 0.418A4 Byagadadenahalli 0.009 0.10 0.109
22 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM10 - 60 µg/m3
23 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
24 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 60 µg/m3
25 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of PM2.5 - 40 µg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 206
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of CO
Baseline value(mg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(mg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(mg/m3)
A5 Indalavadi 0.210 0.09 0.30A6 Bommasandra 0.019 2.00 2.019A7 Doddathoguru 0.018 0.10 0.118A8 Hullahalli 0.013 0.20 0.213
Table 4-31: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO226
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.30 14.5A2 Jigani 13.80 0.050 13.85A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.007 12.607A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.007 9.807A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.007 13.007A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.030 13.48A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.010 12.61A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.010 9.81
Table 4-32: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO2
27
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
predominant Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.400 14.60A2 Jigani 13.80 0.20 14.00A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.08 12.68A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.050 9.85A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.020 13.02A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.08 13.53A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.020 12.62A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.020 9.82
Table 4-33: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of SO228
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of SO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 14.20 0.400 14.60A2 Jigani 13.80 0.200 14.00A3 Ramakrishnapura 12.60 0.20 12.80A4 Byagadadenahalli 9.80 0.050 9.85A5 Indalavadi 13.00 0.040 13.04A6 Bommasandra 13.45 0.40 13.85A7 Doddathoguru 12.60 0.04 12.64A8 Hullahalli 9.80 0.050 9.85
26 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of SO2 - 80 µg/m3
27 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of SO2 - 50 µg/m3
28 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of SO2 - 50 µg/m3
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 207
Table 4-34: 1st 24-hour Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO229
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
1st 24-hour Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 0.50 30.00A2 Jigani 28.60 0.10 28.70A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.10 23.70A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.10 23.70A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.05 23.55A6 Bommasandra 26.80 0.80 27.60A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.05 23.85A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.10 19.30
Table 4-35: Predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November 2016)Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO2
30
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 2.00 31.50A2 Jigani 28.60 0.50 33.60A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.50 24.10A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.10 23.70A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.10 23.60A6 Bommasandra 26.80 1.00 27.80A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.10 23.90A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.10 19.30
Table 4-36: Annual Average Incremental and Resultant Concentrations of NO231
LocationNo.
Name of theReceptor
Annual Concentration in µg/m3 of NO2
Baseline value(µg/m3)
Incremental –concentrationdue to BBIL
(µg/m3)
Resultant –Concentration
(µg/m3)
A1 Project Site 29.50 2.00 31.50A2 Jigani 28.60 1.00 29.60A3 Ramakrishnapura 23.60 0.70 24.30A4 Byagadadenahalli 23.60 0.30 23.90A5 Indalavadi 23.50 0.10 23.60A6 Bommasandra 26.80 2.00 28.80A7 Doddathoguru 23.80 0.10 23.90A8 Hullahalli 19.20 0.30 19.50
4.5.3.6 Isopleths
The Isopleths for the predominant wind direction Concentration, Annual Average Conc. of allthe parameters for three Different Scenarios due to the emissions of BBIL are given inFigure 4-2 to Figure 4-21.
Scenario-1 Boiler 16TPH with Natural gas
29 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
30 NAAQS for 24-Hour Average Concentration of NO2 - 80 µg/m3
31 NAAQS for Annual Average Concentration of NO2 - 40 µg/m3
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 208
Figure 4-2: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 209
Figure 4-3: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of NO2
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 210
Figure 4-4: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of CO
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 211
Figure 4-5: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO
Scenario-2: Boiler 16TPH with backup fuel Diesel
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 212
Figure 4-6: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of SO2
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 213
Figure 4-7: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 214
Figure 4-8: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of PM
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 215
Figure 4-9: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 216
Figure 4-10: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of SO2
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 217
Figure 4-11: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of NO2
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 218
Figure 4-12: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of PM
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 219
Figure 4-13: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of CO
Scenario-3: DG - 4*3000KVA
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 220
Figure 4-14: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of SO2
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 221
Figure 4-15: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of NO2
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 222
Figure 4-16: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of PM
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 223
Figure 4-17: Isopleth for Annual Average Incremental Concentration of CO
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 224
Figure 4-18: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of SO2
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 225
Figure 4-19: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of NO2
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 226
Figure 4-20: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of PM
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 227
Figure 4-21: Isopleth for predominant wind direction (September 2016 to November2016) Incremental Concentration of CO
4.5.3.7 Observations at Receptors
The 1st highest 24 Hour average, study period incremental and Annual Averageincremental and resultant concentrations of PM, SO2, CO and NO2 are well withinNAAQS for BBIL sources alone.
Though the results are within the prescribed NAAQS, the following measures areproposed to be adopted / followed.
4.5.3.8 Mitigation Measures
All air pollution control measures like scrubbers/bag filters has to be provided by theindustry.
Ambient air quality monitoring will be carried out regularly at selected locations in order tocheck and compare the predicted concentrations with the measured concentrations.NAAQS Exceedance if any may be checked thoroughly and adequacy/Performance ofAir Pollution Control measures shall be reviewed.
Water sprinkling shall be carried out on road surfaces in the project area. Adequate Greenbelt width shall be developed within BBIL. Trucks with cargo susceptible for fugitive suspension will be covered with tarpaulin. All
the vehicles will be periodically checked to ensure compliance to the emission standards
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 228
In addition, EMC shall ensure that all the individual units shall be with essential pollutioncontrol measures as to be stated by KSPCB in their CTE/CTO.
4.6 Noise Environment
4.6.1 Potential Impact during Construction
Construction activities increase ambient noise levels. There would be impact on noise levelsdue to the following:
Vehicles transporting construction material Handling of construction material Diesel run engines of construction machinery Welding and cutting operation of metal Pile driving activities during construction of heavy structure
Noise is an inherent part of construction activity and response of species / communitieswould be either attracted or diverted away from the region. Noise generated from dieselengines etc. could result in movement of mobile faunal species away from area of operation.
Noise generated from construction activities will be predominantly confined withinBBIL/BSEZ site area and will impact construction workers at site. Impacts due to theseactivities would be short-term in nature and localised.
Poorly trained drivers have the habit of horning at frequent intervals even of not required.Even in front of Silence zones and even in sleeping hours in the mid night.
4.6.1.1 Noise-Mitigation Measures
The following mitigation measures will be followed to minimise the noise generation and theassociated impacts.
Exercise of route selection as well as measures such as traffic regulation, timings oftransportation etc will be followed to avoid congested built up areas.
During construction, noise levels will be maintained below threshold levels stipulated byCentral Pollution Control Board (CPCB) by selecting appropriate equipment, machineryand using enclosures. Procurement of machinery/construction equipment will be done inaccordance with specifications conforming to source noise levels less than 75 dB (A).
Only well-maintained construction equipment; which meets the regulatory standards forsource noise levels, will be used. Any equipment producing high noise, whereverpossible, will be oriented so that the noise is directed away from sensitive receptors.
Noise attenuation will be practised for noisy equipment by employing suitable techniquessuch as acoustic controls, insulation and vibration dampers. The attenuation devices willbe properly maintained throughout the construction period.
High noise generating activities such as piling and drilling will not be scheduled duringnight time to minimise noise impacts.
Time bound noisy construction activities will be carried out; so as to avoid concurrenteffect from the construction site.
Personnel exposed to noise levels beyond threshold limits will be provided with protectivegears such as earplugs, muffs, etc. especially construction personnel involved in piledriving operations. Rotation of personnel will also be adopted.
Temporary noise barriers will be used to break the propagation of sound from theconstruction site.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 229
Periodic maintenance of the equipment to be used in the developmental works will becarried out. Worn out parts will be replaced and rotating parts will be lubricated tominimise noise emissions.
Ambient noise levels will be monitored at regular intervals during construction phase ofthe project.
All haul roads (for truck transport and other vehicles) within the boundary and outside willbe sealed and maintained properly to avoid excessive noise levels from Engineacceleration and deceleration
Drivers need to be captioned or rained to avoid frequent horning unless otherwise it isrequired
Driver education for Silence zones and off hours between 12 mid night and mooring 6am.
Adequate PPE for noise mitigation need to be used for labours who are exposed to highnoise.
4.6.2 Potential Impact during Operation
Major sources of noise generation in BBIL unit, noise generation sources during operationalphase are classified into two categories:
Stationary sources due to operation of heavy duty machinery at the project site likeBoilers, Compressors, DG sets, Pumps etc.
Mobile sources corresponding to mainly vehicular traffic for staff mobilization, materials,material transportation, liquid fuel transportation to project site, etc.
Vibrations are expected to be generated by various activities associated with theproposed project during operational phase. The impact of vibrations beyond the sitewould be negligible during normal operation phase. However, the impacts on workersengaged in the plant area would be considerable due to occupational exposure. Theproposed fixed major equipment/units such as boiler house, compressors, pumps, DGsets etc., also generate vibrations during operational phase and may cause exposures tothe workers/operators engaged at these units.
4.6.2.1 Mitigation Measures
The major noise generating equipment like Compressors, DG sets, Boiler Feed waterpumps etc. will be enclosed in an acoustic enclosure designed for an insertion loss of 25dB (A) and silencers to other equipment etc.
Major noise generating equipment will be designed with 85 dB (A) ensuring cumulativenoise at 1.0 m remains at 85 dB (A).
The occupational noise exposure to the workers in the form of eight hourly time weightedaverage will be maintained well within the prescribed Occupational Safety and HealthAdministration (OSHA) standard limits.
Adequate PPE need to be provided to the staff exposing to noise risks. Acoustic silencers will be provided in equipment wherever necessary. Acoustic design with sound proof glass panelling will be provided for critical operator
cabins / control rooms of individual modules as well as central control facilities. Use of personal protective equipments/devices such as ear-muffs, ear plugs etc. will be
strictly enforced for the workers engaged in high noise areas. Periodic maintenance of the equipment to be used in the developmental works will be
carried out. Worn out parts will be replaced and rotating parts will be lubricated tominimise noise emissions.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 230
Implementation of greenbelt for noise attenuation will be undertaken: shrub plantation;landscaping with horticulture; and Tree plantation at vehicle parking areas and alongapproach roads.
Ambient noise levels will be monitored at regular intervals during operational phase of theproject.
Low vibration generating machines/equipment will be selected to meet internationalstandards and foundations will be so designed to minimise vibrations and securedproperly.
Vibration generating sources and their platforms should be maintained properly tominimize vibrations and related impacts.
Various standards pertaining to vibrations are formulated by statutory bodies like Bureauof Indian Standards (BIS) and Director General of Mines Safety (DGMS), which is beingpracticed would be continued to mitigate the workers’ health effects due to vibrations.
Vibration dampers shall be provided around the source of generation Transportation Management Plan will be prepared and the transportation of construction
materials will be planned in line with the same
4.7 Solid Waste Management
4.7.1 Potential Impact Due to Construction
4.7.1.1 Impact due to Solid Waste Generation
Solid waste such as metal debris, concrete blocks, plastic etc., is likely to be generated insignificant amount during the construction phase of the development. Appropriate measurestherefore need to be taken to cater for the adequate disposal of such solid wastes. Impropersolid waste disposal may also lead to skin diseases. Moreover solid waste will attractvermins, rats and deteriorate the general aspect of the site and its surroundings. Organicwastes will comprise mainly of domestic refuse like food and garden debris such as fallenleaves. During the construction phase, the inorganic waste likely to be generated will include:
Concrete rubbles and blocks Cement sheets Wooden and metallic beams Paper, plastic, cartons
Blocks, rocks, boulders Broken tiles, glass debris Metal debris, cans and tins Wood, straw and timber remains
Organic waste generated during the construction stage will be minimal and shall includeleaves, branches, food consumed by workers on site.
Poor construction procedures that generate excessive wastes increase construction costsand results in disposal of otherwise valuable resources. The solid waste generated duringconstruction phase may impact soil quality, water quality and public health if not regulatedproperly. Improper solid waste disposal may also lead to skin diseases. Moreover solid wastewill attract vermins, rats and deteriorate the general aspect of the site and its surroundings.Appropriate measures therefore need to be taken to cater for the adequate disposal of solidwastes generated during construction phase of the project.
4.7.1.2 Mitigation Measures
Construction waste will be re-used within plant site for filling of low lying areas. Otherwastes which can be re-cycled will be sold. Recyclable wastes will be disposed throughapproved KSPCB vendors.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation MeasuresPage 231
General refuse generated on-site will be collected in waste skips and separated fromconstruction waste.
A local authorised waste handler will be employed to remove general refuse from the site,separately from construction waste and municipal wastes, on regular basis to minimiseodour, pest and litter impacts.
Coordinating with local bodies such as KIADB, panchayaths and municipalities for jointoperation to minimise waste (Ref: Wastes to energy concept etc.)
The burning of refuse at construction sites will be prohibited. Appropriate fence should beused to prevent propagation of the debris via strong winds.
4.7.1.3 Hazardous Materials Management
Hazardous materials such as lubricants, paints, compressed gases, and varnishes etc.,will be stored as per the prescribed/approved safety norms.
Hazardous wastes will be disposed through approved KSPCB vendors. Hazardous materials will be stored as per prescribed safety norms in locations with
restricted entry and with fire-fighting facilities. Medical facilities including first aid will be available for attending injured workers
4.7.2 Potential Impact during Operation
4.7.2.1 Impact due to Solid Waste Generation
During operation phase of BBIL, is likely to generate various types of solid waste which canbe broadly categorized as Hazardous Waste and Non-hazardous Waste. Further, thegenerated solid waste generation may include Biodegradable, Recyclable and Inertcompounds. The details of waste generation and its management proposed are discussed inSection 2.6.1.5. If the solid waste generated is not properly managed and disposed inunauthorised manner, it will impact on soil quality, groundwater and air quality.
4.7.2.2 Solid Waste Management during Operation Phase
Strict guidelines will be put in place in order to manage the solid waste generation during theoperational phase of the development. The main goals of the guidelines will be to ensureadopting recycling techniques and encouraging sorting of solid waste at source into organicand inorganic wastes. Due to the high volume of solid waste generated, recycling andcomposting techniques will be encouraged to reduce amount of solid waste which will becarted away.
The compost/Organic waste converter from the on-site facility (BSEZ) may be used for thelandscaped areas/green belt development and reduce the amount of fertilizers used. Wastemanagement propose at BBIL is given in Figure 4-22.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 232
Hazardous Waste TSDF
Bio Degradable WasteComposting/Organicconverter andGreenbelt application/Local Municipalbins/composting etc.
Recyclable Waste KSPCB approvedrecycling units/vendors
Figure 4-22: Waste Management Concept in BBIL
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 233
Chapter 5Analysis of Alternatives
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Analysis of Alternatives SitesPage 234
Chapter 5 Analysis of Alternatives Sites
5.1 History and Background of site selection
The proposed site and the land in question have been acquired in the year 2005 underBSEZ. The area was kept idle for a long period and then efforts were made recently by theBIOCON for development of Biocon Biologics India Limited on a fast-track basis.
The efforts made for site analysis during the pre-acquisition time is nowhere documentedand hence not discussed in this chapter.
5.2 Current proposal
As the proposed BBIL is part of the land identified for industrial unit by BSEZ, there are noalternative sites analysed.
However based on the current set up the following are the advantages of the site:
100% Land is under possession of Biocon The project site is located within KIADB’s Bommasandra Industrial Area, which is notified
industrial area No R&R Issues No public hearing is required as per EIA notification Existing infrastructure of BSEZ can be utilised for the BBIL project Site is well connected by road & rail Nearest Highway Located at ~4km distance towards NE, connecting Bengaluru and
Hosur
Moreover this is now identified as one of the most important identified KIADB industrial area.This Industrial is a focused area for major development and also for future investment.
5.3 Results of the Analysis
The current site is an earmarked industrial area by Biocon. Therefore no further siteanalysis has been carried out under this EIA.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 235
Chapter 6Environmental Monitoring Programme
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 236
Chapter 6 Environmental Monitoring Programme
In this chapter, environmental monitoring programme for the proposed BBIL is formulated.Environmental Monitoring Programme is an important component during environmentalmanagement of the project. The institutional mechanism to implement the planned mitigationand monitoring measures during all stages of the project is discussed in Chapter 9. Theproject management especially the Environmental Management Cell (EMC) (described inChapter 9) should always go for a rational approach with regards to environmentalmonitoring. This includes judicious decision making in consultation with institutionalstakeholders (e.g. Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) or reputedenvironmental consultants for appropriate changes in the monitoring strategy, i.e., changesin the sampling frequency, sampling location, monitoring parameters and any new/additionalrequirements.
Considering the water resources system for irrigation and drinking water, any contaminationof the surface water could endanger the portability of drinking water. Therefore it is for thebest interest of the project that Biocon consider a workable the institutional mechanism forenvironmental monitoring especially to preserve and conserve the surface water andgroundwater component in this region from industrial contamination. Referring to thebaseline details in Chapter 3, water resources in PIA has as many as 110 water bodies allnon-perennial and acting as recharge sites for the groundwater. Groundwater being the mostimportant poor man’s resources the protection of this system from contamination is theresponsibility of the Biocon and GoK.
Therefore environmental monitoring of this project is very important with higher number ofwater quality monitoring station in an industrial area within an area of five square kilometres.
The following are the main objectives of the environmental monitoring program:
Ensure zero discharge from ETP&STP for the protection of water resources Provide information for documentation of monitoring of mitigation measures and impacts Tool for the statutory authority of unanticipated adverse impacts or sudden changes in
the environmental condition due to the proposed project Provides information that could be used for evaluating the effectiveness of implemented
mitigation measures Provides information that could be used to verify predicted impacts and thus validate
impact prediction techniques The efficacy of the mitigation measures being followed during construction and
operational phases can be assessed and the measures can be revised, made morestringent and reinforced based on the monitoring results
Environmental Monitoring can also serve a basic component of a periodic environmentalregulatory auditing program for the proposed project
Coordination with local bodies with regards to solid waste management
The following programme as detailed in the environmental monitoring programme forconstruction as well as operation phases shall be implemented by the BBIL authority.Besides the monitoring, the compliances to all environmental clearance conditions andregular permits from KSPCB /MoEF&CC shall be monitored and reported periodically. Thelikely significant impacts and mitigation measures will also be monitored.
The environmental attributes to be monitored during construction and operational phases ofthe project, specific description along with technical details of environmental monitoring
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 237
including the monitoring parameters, methodology, sampling locations and frequency ofmonitoring are presented in Section below.
The environmental monitoring programme proposed to be followed by BBIL authority hasbeen formulated in Section 6.1. In addition to this Environmental Monitoring Programme,other member industries shall monitor all environmental parameters such as air quality, noiselevels, treated wastewater, water quality, etc., within their industry premises as per thestipulations laid by SEIAA/MoEF&CC/CPCB/KSPCB in their respective EnvironmentalClearance/Consent for Establishment (CFE)/ Consent For Operation (CFO).
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 239
6.1 Environmental Monitoring ProgrammeEnvironmental
AttributesParameters to be
monitored No. of Sampling Locations Frequency ofMonitoring Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance
Construction Phase
Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2,NO2, and CO
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Once a monthduring construction
Fine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5,Respirable Dust Sampler fitted with Gaseoussampling arrangements for SO2, NO2, , COanalyser /portable CO meter for CO.
National Ambient Air QualityStandards released duringNovember, 2009 is given asAnnexure T
Noise Levels Day and night noiselevels
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Once a monthduring construction Portable hand-held noise level meter.
National Ambient NoiseStandards is given as AnnexureT
Water Quality
Physical, Chemicaland Biological
In addition to theabove, Alpha, Betaemitters (surfacewater)
Groundwater (03) Project Site/nearby project
site Jigani RamakrishnapuraSurface water (03) Hennagara Lake Hebbagodi Lake Kammasandra Lake
Once a monthduring construction
Grab sampling and analysis by using standardmethods.
IS10500, 2012 drinking waterstandards for Groundwater whichis given as Annexure T
Designated Best UseClassification of Inland SurfaceWater of National RiversConservation Directorate,MoEF&CC for Surface Water isgiven as Annexure T
Soil
Soil texture, type,electricalconductivity, pH,infiltration, porosity,etc.,
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Once a year duringconstruction
Collection and analysis of samples as per IS2720
Baseline data, Soil standards byIndian Council of AgriculturalResearch, New Delhi is given asAnnexure T
Meteorology Wind speed, wind Project Site Hourly IMD/CPCB manual -
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 240
EnvironmentalAttributes
Parameters to bemonitored No. of Sampling Locations Frequency of
Monitoring Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance
direction, rainfall,temperature,humidity.
measurementduring construction
Operation Phase
Air Quality PM10, PM2.5, SO2,NO2, O3 and CO
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Twice a weekFine Particulate Samplers for PM10, PM2.5,Respirable Dust Sampler fitted with Gaseoussampling arrangements for for SO2 and NO2,O3, CO analyser /portable CO meter for CO
National Ambient Air QualityStandards released duringNovember, 2009 given asAnnexure T
Noise Levels Day and night noiselevels
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Once a month Portable hand-held noise level meter. National Ambient NoiseStandards, given as Annexure T
Water Quality
Physical, Chemicaland Biological
In addition to theabove, Alpha, Betaemitters (surfacewater)
Groundwater (03) Project Site/nearby project
site Jigani RamakrishnapuraSurface water (03) Hennagara Lake Hebbagodi Lake Kammasandra Lake
Once a month Grab sampling and analysis by using standardmethods.
IS10500, 2012 drinking waterstandards for Groundwater whichis given as Annexure T
Designated Best UseClassification of Inland SurfaceWater of National RiversConservation Directorate,MoEF&CC for Surface Watergiven as Annexure T
Soil
Soil texture, type,electricalconductivity, pH,infiltration, porosity,etc.,
Six (06) Project Site Jigani Ramakrishnapura Bommasandra Doddathoguru Hullahalli
Once a year Collection and analysis of samples as per IS2720 Baseline data
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 241
EnvironmentalAttributes
Parameters to bemonitored No. of Sampling Locations Frequency of
Monitoring Standards Methods for Sampling & Analysis Compliance
MeteorologyWind speed, winddirection, rainfall,temperature,humidity.
Project Site Hourlymeasurement IMD/CPCB manual -
Treated WastewaterQuality
Physical, Chemicaland Biological
One (01) ETP & STP Inlet ETP & STP outlet
Daily Grab sampling and analysis by using standardmethods.
Environment ProtectionAmendment Rules, 2015 given asAnnexure T
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 243
6.2 Monitoring by Biocon
The environmental monitoring shall be carried out by Biocon within their industry premises.Monitoring guidelines should clearly indicate the conditions of discharge and theconsequences with regards to the penal action and the impact to ground water resources ofthe region. Groundwater is the sole water source for millions of people in the adjoining areas.Biocon should not only limit the environmental monitoring as stated above, environmentalmonitoring programme in terms of parameters, location and frequency shall be formulated asper the stipulations laid by KSPCB/CPCB/MoEF&CC/SEIAA in their respectiveEnvironmental Clearance/Consent To Establish (CTE)/Consent To Operate (CTO).
6.3 Compliance Reports
As a part of environmental monitoring programme, following compliance reports shall besubmitted to KSPCB and Regional Office of MoEF&CC.
Half yearly compliance reports in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearanceterms and conditions on June 01 and December 01 of every calendar year
Environmental statement (Form-V) for the financial year ending March 31 to KSPCB onor before September 30 every year
Format for maintaining records of hazardous waste if any in Form-3 as per HazardousWaste (Management, Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2008
Format for maintaining hazardous waste imported and exported in Form-10 as perHazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary movement) Rules, 2008
Safety data sheet for hazardous chemicals shall be maintained as per schedule-9 ofMSIHC rules, 1989 (amended 2000)
Format for maintaining notification of major accident in schedule-6 as per MISHC rules,1989 (amended 2000)
Water Cess returns in Form-1 as per Rule 4 (1) of Water (Prevention & Control ofPollution) Cess Rules 1978 on or before the 5th of every calendar month
6.4 Plantation Monitoring Programme
Environmental Management Cell/team will monitor the following activities of greenbelt andlandscape development:
Development of nursery (if possible) Treatment and sowing of seeds Watering Transport of seedlings Planting of seedlings
Fencing of plantation area Weeding and soil working Pruning (trimming of plant) Replacement/Inter planting Watch and ward of plantation
During operation phase periodic monitoring of plantation growth, manuring, watering,pruning, and replacement will be performed in order to properly maintain vegetation,greenbelt, landscape and green cover. It is suggested to plant shrubs or plants with 1 or 2 mheight in utility corridor to avoid bird nesting/resting on the plants.
6.5 On-site Mock Drills Requirements
On-site mock drills are very important as it helps employees to be aware of the safetyprocedures and how to react during the time of crisis. Conducting mock drills at regular
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Monitoring ProgrammePage 244
intervals enhances preparedness and checks the viability of environmental/disastermanagement plan. Mock drills are essential for the following reasons:
Helps in revising/improving the environmental/disaster management plan Helps to evaluate whether the responsible officials are trained efficiently for the
unforeseen event Helps in evaluating whether the emergency equipment are being maintained at BBIL
premises
To ensure efficient environmental/disaster management, BBIL authority/EHSdepartment/EMP cell shall conduct periodic on-site mock drills in case of occurrence of thefollowing activities:
Fire, Natural calamities (cyclones, floods, earthquakes) Power break down Oil spill Bomb threats; War alerts/terrorist attacks
Mock drills should also involve fire department, police, municipal authorities, hospitals andother department/agencies that are mandated to provide emergency support. Documentingthe outcome of mock drills is an important aspect as this helps in revising the existing planmore efficiently. In all safety programmes the right personnel need to be employed and this isof utmost importance.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Page 245
Chapter 7Additional Studies
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 246
Chapter 7 Additional Studies
7.1 Risk Analysis
According to the specific items 7 and xiv of the Terms of Reference (ToR) issued for theproject, preliminary hazard identification and risk assessment was undertaken to quantify thepossible fire and occupational health risks associated with the operation of the project at thedesignated location. The good engineering practices suggested by the Central PollutionControl Board (CPCB) for risk assessment in industries (CPCB document Probes/133/2009-10) and CPR-18 E risk assessment procedures guidelines which are widely accepted by theMinistry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MoEF & CC) India, have been adoptedwhile assessing the residual risks associated with the operations of the project with specificreference to fire hazards, chemical exposure hazards, occupational hazards and naturalhazards.
As part of the risk assessment, a preliminary review on the hazardous materials andchemicals proposed to be handled at the site were reviewed and the storage capacities anddesign features of such hazardous materials were also reviewed while assessing the residualrisks. Occupational health hazards such as exposure to dust emissions, thermal stress andwork-zone levels were also studied. Qualitative analysis of risks associated with naturalhazards such as earth quakes, floods and cyclones were also undertaken.
Based on the findings of the risk assessment study, a preliminary risk management plan hasbeen developed as per the applicable rules and guidelines; wherever possible, goodengineering and management practices are suggested to minimise any intolerable risks.
7.2 Fire Hazards and Risk Mitigation Plan
7.2.1 Fire Hazards
Unlike other process industries, the proposed project does not handle any major flammablematerials. BBIL has not proposed any solvent storage for the proposed project, since there isno usage of solvent in the process. There is no proposed storage tank for any kind of fuelsince the proposed 1 x 16 TPH boiler is powered by natural gas and diesel for 4 x 3000 KVADG sets will be catered from existing BSEZ diesel storage tank.
7.2.2 Fire Risk Assessment of Natural Gas
Based on the preliminary analysis, the major fire hazards envisaged are from Natural gaspipe line and handling at the project site, as Natural Gas is extremely flammable with anyleak, always anticipate and except that ignition will occur.
In order to assess the risks due to proposed failure of NG pipeline, consequence modelingwas undertaken using PHAST software, which is recommended by Ministry of Environment,Forests & Climate Change, India. For the purpose of the consequence modeling, it has beenassumed that due to mechanical failure of the pipeline.
The predicted heat radiation levels due to pipeline failure of NG scenario are presented inTable 7-1. Radiation contours are presented in Figure 7-1 and Figure 7-2.
Table 7-1: Estimated Heat Radiation Levels due to failure of NG pipeline
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 247
Heat Radiation Level(Kw/m2)
Possible Physical Effectdue to Heat Radiation (ref)
Jet fire Distance for NG pipelinefailure
37.5 Sufficient to cause damage toprocess equipment
Not reached
25.0 Minimum energy required toignite wood
Note reached
12.5 Melting of cables and plastic Not reached
9.5 Second degree burns in 20seconds
Not reached
4 Zero percent lethality, butmay cause blisters
12.64 m
1.6 Will cause no discomfort onprolonged exposure
-
S.No Description Event Impact criteria
Consequence Distance (m)
Category1.5/F
Category1.5/D
Category5/D
1. Rupture ofNatural GasPipeline
Dispersion of vapourcloud
UFL (165000) ppm 2.59906 2.05628 2.58791
LFL (44000) ppm 7.60516 5.06071 7.50128
LFL Frac (22000)ppm
11.007 7.34547 10.83
Jet fire 4 kW/m2 9.5744 12.6462 9.5744
12.5 kW/m2 NR NR NR
37.5 kW/m2 NR NR NR
Flash Fire 22000 ppm 11.007 7.34547 10.83
44000 ppm 7.60516 5.06071 7.50128
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 248
Figure 7-1 : Jet Fire radii due to Accidental Fire of NG pipeline
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 249
Figure 7-2 : Flash Fire radii due to Accidental Fire of NG pipeline
It may be inferred from the model heat radiation contours with 4 Kw/m2 would occur withinthe facility boundary and hence the overall impacts due to fire accidents will be lesssignificant. Hence the overall risk due to handling of such quantity of NG at site will beinsignificant.
7.3 Electrical Hazards and Safety Measures
Energised equipment and power lines can pose electrical hazards for workers.Recommended measures to prevent, minimise, and control electrical hazards include
Consider installation of hazard warning lights inside electrical equipment enclosuresto warn inadvertent energisation
Use of voltage sensors prior to and during personnel’s entrance into enclosurescontaining electrical components
Deactivation and proper grounding of live power equipment and distribution linesaccording to applicable legislation and guidelines whenever possible before work isperformed on, or proximal to, them
Provision of specialised electrical safety training to those personnel working with oraround exposed components of electric circuits. This training should include, but notbe limited to, training in basic electrical theory, proper safe work procedures, hazardawareness and identification, proper use of PPE, proper lockout/tagout procedures,first aid and proper rescue procedures.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 250
7.4 Occupational Health and Noise Management Plan
Based on the noise mapping data presented in Chapter 4 of this report, the major noisegenerating sources are vacuum pumps, air compressors, standby diesel generators, Boilerfee water pumps etc.
Biocon will be procuring the equipment with guaranteed noise levels less than 85 dB (A) atone (1) metre distance from the respective machines/equipment. The predicted noise levelsindicate that noise levels outside the process rooms and DG sets will be maintained wellwithin the acceptable levels. In addition to the noise control programme proposed to beadopted by Biocon as stated in Chapter 9 of this report, the following occupational noisemanagement plan shall be adopted:
1. Noise abatement measures inside the site shall be undertaken, if noise levels areabove 85 dB (A); measures must be taken and assessed by a competent person.Such measurements should be repeated at appropriate intervals.
2. If noise level is above 85 dB (A) then the following procedures shall be adopted.
Inform employees of the noise levels present and measures taken to reduceexposure
Make ear protection available and provide training in its use
Hearing checks must be made available to employees exposed to noise levelsin excess of 85 dB (A) over an 8 hour period
Although ear-plugs and ear muff will be provided to the persons working in theproject area/high noise area, as a part of the good management practices,work rotation scheme will be adopted for the persons working in the high noisegenerating areas.
3. If noise levels near the machinery exceed 90 dB (A), then the following correctiveprocedure shall be adopted:
Identify reasons for excess noise and draw up a plan in place to reduce
Identify and clearly designate hearing conservation zones
Ear protection must be worn and its use supervised
Employees must be trained in the hazards of noise and the correct use ofhearing protection
7.5 Occupational Safety Management and Surveillance Programme
The Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India has a nodal organisation, viz.Directorate General Factory Advice Service and Labour Institutes (DGFASLI), in dealing withOccupational Safety and Health issues in Industries. The DGFASLI is the technical arm ofthe Ministry on matters connected with Occupational Health in the manufacturing and portsectors.
The Factories Act, 1948, provides for appointment of qualified Medical Practitioners andCertified Surgeons to examine young persons engaged in dangerous manufacturingprocesses and to ensure medical supervision in case of illness due to the nature ofmanufacturing processes. The Factories Act, 1948, also provides for notification of certainoccupational diseases as listed in the Third Schedule of the Act. As per section 90 of the
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 251
Factories Act, 1948, the State Government is vested with the powers to appoint a CompetentPerson to conduct inquiry into the causes of any accident or notifiable diseases.
The following measures need to be implemented in the work places to enhance occupationalhealth:
Identify and involve personnel in assessing workplace risks
Assess and consider employees' needs when planning and organising work
Provide advice, information and training to employees, as well as mechanisms foremployee feedback such as a suggestion scheme
Occupational health surveillance and Occupational health audit
To develop a system of creating up to date data base on mortality, and morbiditydue to occupational diseases and use it for performance monitoring of the same
Extending support to the state government for effective enforcement of the healthprovisions stipulated under section 41F of the Factory Act by equipping them withwork environment monitoring technologies.
The occupational health safety system should be headed by a competent and qualifiedsafety office that will be supported by a team of safety volunteers from each plant anddepartment within the project site. The safety team will take up a detailed task based riskassessment studies and will develop task based safety procedures and work permit systems.The safety team should record the near misses in the plant and take necessary correctiveaction to minimise the occupational risks.
A dedicated existing occupational health centre consist the following facilities:
A full time doctor is appointed to monitor the day-to-day occupational health aspectsand also to provide medical advice to the workers, employees
Minimum facilities such as an oxygen cylinder for emergency medical use, clean roomwith two (2) beds for first aid applications, with first aid kits as per the Factories act
ECG facilities
Peak expiratory flow meter to check the lung function
As a part of the surveillance programme, the following minimum medical examination may beundertaken during the pre-employment phase:
General physical examination and blood pressure, X-Ray of chest & ECG
Sputum examination, Detailed routine blood & urine examination
Audiometry
Spirometry
Eye tests for the workers and drivers
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 252
As part of the routine and annual medical examinations on the persons working in the highnoise generating areas, stress areas and dust exposure areas, a comprehensive surveillanceprogramme may be adopted. Some of the good management practices are suggested inTable 7-2 and Table 7-3.Table 7-2: Suggested Frequency of Medical Examination under Occupational HealthSurveillance Programme.
Age (Years) Periodicity Duration of Exposure Periodicity
< 30 Years Once in five years < 10 Years Once in five years
31 – 40 Once in Four years 10 to 20 Once in four years
41 – 50 Once in three years 21 – 30 Once in three years
> 51 Once a year > 31 Once a year
Table 7-3 :Suggested Medical Tests under Occupational Health SurveillanceProgramme
S. No Disorder Tests to be conducted
1 Heart Diseases ECG, Blood for Lipid Profile, Stress Test, 2D – Echo and other requiredTests
2 Anemia Hb%, TC, DC, ESR & Stool for Occult Blood, Ova and Cyst
3 Lung Diseases Sputum, X-Ray Chest, Spirometery
4 Diabetes Random Blood Sugar, Urine sugar, If positive, BSL – Fasting/PPBSdiabetic profile
5 Hypertension Blood pressure reading; if required, renal profile + ECG and stress test
6 Urine Examination Routine and Microscopic
Medical records – A record –keeping system for holding the results of medical examinationsand reports of symptoms will be maintained as part of the health surveillance scheme. Theseare confidential medical records relating to individuals. As part of the health surveillanceprogramme, employees should be informed of the confidential results of each assessmentand of any implications of the finding, such as the likely effects of their continuing to work.
7.6 Fire Protection and Fire Fighting Systems
Fire fighting systems shall be designed based on the National Building Codes. Since theproject falls under low-hazard category, the fire fighting system shall be designed accordingto chapter 9 (Environmental Management Plan) in the National Building Codes and summaryof the minimum fire fighting systems’ requirements are presented in Table 7-4. It is proposedto install jockey pump, diesel pump and electrically operated centrifugal pump for fire waternetwork arrangements. Ring-main pipeline systems will be provided to cater to the firehydrant requirements across the site. Fire hose reels, fire buckets and fire extinguishers will
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Additional StudiesPage 253
be provided as per the National Building Code requirements. Onsite & Offsite EmergencyPlan is enclosed as Annexure N.
Table 7-4: Minimum required fire protection systems as per National Building Code
R:
Req
uire
dN
R:
Not
re
quire
dN
ote
2:
Req
uire
d to
be
in
stal
led
in
base
men
t if
area
of
ba
sem
ent
exce
eds
200
m2
Not
e 3
:R
equi
red
to
be
prov
ided
if
base
men
t ar
ea
exce
eds
200
m2 .
Not
e 4
:A
dditi
onal
val
ue g
iven
in p
aren
thes
is s
hall
be a
dded
if b
asem
ent a
rea
exce
eds
200
m2 .
Not
e 7
:R
equi
red
to
be
prov
ided
fo
r bu
ildin
gs
with
he
ight
m
ore
than
15
m
.N
ote
20:
one
elec
tric
and
one
dies
el
pum
pof
ca
paci
ty
280
ltrs/
min
ute
each
an
d on
e
elec
tric
pum
p of
180
lpm
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 254
Chapter 8Project Benefits
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Project BenefitsPage 255
Chapter 8 Project Benefits
8.1 Preamble
The project area together with Biocon SEZ is classified as an important project for integratedover all development under the KIADB. This proposition is going to benefit the entire regionfor fast track development. Based on the past experience the export oriented investmentsare supposed to be doing good in the long run. The exports have been facilitated by thegrowth in a number of industries such as chemical industries, pharmaceutical, engineeringindustries, etc.
Although this EIA is only pertaining to BBIL & BSEZ, while describing the project benefits it isnecessary to describe all in totality. The overall development of the region could be is manyfolds and hence describing the project benefits in isolation is unfair and therefore cannot bejustified. More clearly the project benefits accrued when this project is planned andimplemented in a remote location could have been a much lower scale development thanthat all other developments within KIADB Industrial area.
More over in order to augment the growth, the state has planned multitude of developmentoptions in all sectors (tourism, Water resources, Agriculture, urban development, educationetc.,) including industrial sector. The proposed project is one such development to improveeconomy and employment generation in the region.
8.2 Induced Development
All the above developments described above together with the proposed project would bringseveral benefits in the nearby region of Bangalore and in turn lead to the faster developmentof the country. The various developments are as follows.
Skill development and Training to the local population Localizing the global/domestic value chain Technology transfer Foreign Direct Investment Improved working condition Shifting of manpower resources from low productivity to high productive activities Diversifying the local industrial base Shifting activities from unorganized to organized sector Convergence of population and thereby enhanced local consumption and spending
8.3 Improvement in local Infrastructure
The proposed BBIL project is expected to bring an improvement in the local infrastructure ofthe region. There will be probable increase in the infrastructure resources due to the projectin the region by the way of additional/improved transport, communication, health facilities andother basic facilities being created. The proposed project thus will cater to the growingdemand-supply gap of physical and social infrastructure further acting as catalyst toindustrialization and urbanization of the region. Implementation of the proposed project thusis expected to benefit the locals.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Project BenefitsPage 256
8.4 Improved solid waste management
Together with the national mood on solid waste management (Swatch Bharat Abhiyan) theentire country could benefit the various waste management facility. The Jigani Industrialestate is expected to benefit improved solid waste management facilities. The local electedrepresentative’s initiative is most significant in this case. As a part of this project, Biocon shallalso initiate activities towards proper solid waste management in the study area villages.
8.5 Improved water and sanitation facilities
8.5.1 Water resources
With regards to the water resources the area is very sensitive due to the over 118 Watertanks/water bodies that invariably act as recharge structures for the Regional ground water inquantity and quality. Groundwater is poor man’s (or common man) most important naturalresource. In this context the proposed ZLD concept by Biocon will ensure that the groundand surface water are not contaminated at any point of time.
It is also the responsibility of BIOCON to ensure that regional water resources unaffected bysuitable mitigation measures that includes proper solid waste management.
8.5.2 Provision for toilets
In addition to the BIOCON and local bodies in association with local elected representativesshould make sure that all people in the area have toilets and no one is resorting to opendefecation. The facilities should include improved common facilities at urban clusters as wellas in villages. This shall be taken up as a part of Sanitation facilities under CSR programmeby BIOCON.
8.6 Improved Socio-Economic Conditions
The project will have overall positive impact on the socio-economic conditions of the region.Proposed development will also create several direct and indirect employment opportunities.People will have higher earning and buying capacities and their standard of living willincrease.
The quality of life in the region is likely to improve due to the creation of direct and indirectjobs for the local people. This will result in more than one earning member in the family andreduce the dependency on a single earner and enable them with better economic freedom.
The industrial projects promoted earlier and the Industrial project under study has greatpotential to transform the lives of the villages around provided BIOCON uses this project as amedium to transfer the benefits to the communities around through proper CSR interventionssuggested in this report.
During consultation with villagers, it is understood that the communities around are not veryhappy about the employment generation for the youth in the area.
Pollution, canal water blockages by industries, ground water extraction from villages byindustries are serious negative impacts observed, as most of the industries in KIADBindustrial area is getting water through road tankers. Some industries have permission towithdrawal water from BWSSB.
Error! Reference source not found. 4300020384EIA/EMP Report
Project BenefitsPage 257
The area is becoming focus for more investment by employees of industries looking forrented accommodation in the villages.
The villagers expect BIOCON guided CSR interventions could benefit the communities more.
8.6.1 Health Facilities
Considering the current inadequacy of health care facilities in the Study area villages, as apart of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives, it is envisaged to create healthinfrastructure in the form of Mobile Medical Unit and Community Outreach Centres, which willbe beneficial to the employees and also to the local people living in the region as theirdependency on nearby towns and cities for quality medical treatment will be reduced. As partof CSR, it is also proposed to conduct periodic health camps and carryout health andnutrition related programmes which will create health awareness and lead to better healthconditions of the people.
8.6.2 Education Facilities
The baseline socio-economic condition reveals that the educational status among the overallpopulation in the study area is low to moderate and there are no proper higher andprofessional education facilities in the study area, except in Bangalore Urban. This degradesthe social development in the region and discourages the female education. This is true theother way also such that if the female education is lower, the parameters of social upliftmentof females and development of the region is affected negatively. Thus as a part of CorporateSocial Responsibility (CSR), the following activities have been proposed to be undertaken inthe area:
Education fund for subsidizing quality education Education improvement programmes for schools including teachers training Promoting girl child education through grants and scholarships Adult literacy training Mobile schools for construction labourers Maintenance of mobile school vans
Inspite of having numerous educational facilities, the ‘Education for All’ programme is notworking in the region. BIOCON need to take initiative to coordinate with the other industrieslocated within KIADB area to improve the education especially the girl child in associationwith National programme for enhancing girl child education.
8.6.3 Skill Development Activities
With globalization, Indian industries are now opening to the world, resulting in growingdemand for world-class quality workmanship and deployment of latest technologies toenhance technical skill and productivity. Intense training to workforce and equipping themwith required knowledge and skill will ensure quality and higher level of productivity of menand machines.
Realizing this, as part of CSR, it is proposed to provide vocational training in professionalmanner and to develop highly trained workforce that suits requirement of various industries.Structured training programmes will be conducted to enable both new entrants and lessexperience workers in order to improve their skill levels, knowledge and competency
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Project BenefitsPage 258
8.7 Employment Opportunities
The project will have significant beneficial impacts on both urban and rural economy in theproject area. The proposed industry in the Biocon SEZ shall open up new and betteremployment opportunities for the local population. Farmers and their families will also benefitfrom expanded opportunities for seasonal employment elsewhere to earn supplementalincomes. Rural village level enterprises will also prosper, promoting local economic growth.Manufacturing spurs demand for a number of inputs from raw materials to intermediatecomponents. Robust manufacturing growth would provide an impetus to services andagriculture, and will act as source of gainful employment in the project region. This will resultin the higher standard of living of the local population.
It may be noted that the existing industries in the KIADB area and within BIOCON SEZ arealready providing good employment opportunities for skilled and unskilled categories. Hence,with the proposed additional development, it definitely is bound to bring in more benefits tothe local population and the overall region.
8.7.1 Employment during the Development Period
Construction activities generate temporary labour opportunities. It is assumed that about25% of the infrastructure development cost constitutes, the labour cost. With the investmentalready made by BSEZ within KIADB area and also the infrastructure investments yet to bemade by BBIL, the benefit in terms of job opportunities related to construction activitiesamounts to Rs.300 Crores, overall.
8.7.2 Direct Labour
Being one of the factors for the production, the proposed industrial unit will generate directlabour opportunities. It is assumed that a direct labour opportunities equivalent to 0.43persons will be generated against every million that will be invested by the industrial unit. Theaverage wages for the direct labour is considered at Rs. 35,000 per month.
8.7.3 Indirect Labour
Along with the direct labour, the industrial unit will also generate opportunities for indirectlabour. It is assumed that every single direct labour opportunity will create 1.75 timesadditional opportunities for indirect labour. Further, the average wages for the indirect labouris considered at Rs. 20,000 per month.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 259
Chapter 9Environmental Management Plan
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 260
Chapter 9 Environmental Management Plan
The Environmental management plan assumed special significance in industries because ofthe pollution potential especially in terms of Air, Water, Soil, Noise and Solid wastemanagement. This chapter presents an overview of Environmental Management Plan.
The main objectives of Environmental Management Plan are to:
Identify key environmental issues envisaged to be encountered during construction andoperation phases of the project.
Provide guidelines for appropriate mitigation measures. Establish systems and procedures for implementing mitigation measures Ensure that the mitigation measures are being implemented Monitor the effectiveness of mitigation measures Institutional framework includes the responsibilities for environmental management as
well as responsibility for implementing environmental measures Take necessary prompt action when unforeseen impacts occur
The anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures for each likely impact on theprevailing environment have been discussed in detail at the respective sections in Chapter4. The Environmental Monitoring Programme and Budgetary provisions for implementation ofproposed mitigation measures have been discussed in Chapter 6. Following specificenvironmental management plan/measures are discussed:
Administrative and Technical Setup for Environmental Management Greenbelt development Solar power harnessing Rainwater harvesting Occupational health and safety Institutional arrangements/framework for environmental management
Summary of project activities, associated impacts and mitigation measures
9.1 Administrative and Technical Setup for Environmental Management
Highly qualified and experienced persons in the field of Environmental Management ofsimilar kind of industry shall be considered for the positions of General Manager (GM) foroverall Environmental management for Biocon Limited. Well qualified personnel withminimum qualification of graduation in the respective discipline and minimum of seven (7)years of experience in relevant field shall be considered for the third level positions asmentioned in the organisation setup. However the right person for the right job with rightattitude need to be the focus while selecting such personnel as qualification criteria alonehas the potential to fail because of lack of concerns and negative attitude towardsenvironmental management,
BBIL industry shall appoint experienced persons for the position of Manager (Environment)for management of environmental aspects within the industrial plant premises andcoordination with BL (Biocon Limited) and BSEZ (Biocon SEZ) Environmental ManagementCell (EMC). Administrative relationship between BL, BSEZ and BBIL industrial unit is given inFigure 9-1.
The responsibilities of the Environmental Management Team/Cell shall be as follows:
Identify environmental aspects, normal, abnormal and emergency conditions
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 261
Ensure implementation of standard operating procedures as updated from time to time Evaluate any non-conformity to the environmental standards, as stipulated by different
regulatory agencies Ensure and implement necessary corrective actions Establish procedures for reporting, document and record control Establish and implement procedures for incident and near miss reporting, investigation
and root cause analysis and prescribe corrective action
BIOCONLTD
EMC
BSEZ BBIL
Figure 9-1: Coordination of EMC of BL and BSEZ with BBIL industry
9.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities for Environmental Management
The roles and responsibilities of Developer (Biocon Ltd) and BBIL (Proposed Industry) arebrought out in Table 9-1. These roles and responsibilities can be shared by developer as apart of agreement with BBIL industry and shall have clear terms on environmentalmanagement responsibilities.
Table 9-1: Roles and Responsibilities of Developer and IndustryS.No. Component Responsibility of Developer Responsibility of Industry
1. Generalagreement
Evolve very specific plot allotment guide lines withproper Environmental impact mitigation clausesespecially with regards to pollution minimisation efforts.Any violations need proper penal clauses with adequatenotice.
Strictly adhere to the plot allotmentguidelines and agreement.
No pollutant shall be released toNatural water systems that affect thecommon people of the region.
2. Water supply Required water for the BBIL industry for process, coolingand domestic usage shall be supplied by developerthrough BWSSB.The bulk water for the BBIL will be sourced from BSEZ.Water and respective pipelines shall be laid to Industry.
Groundwater shall not be withdrawn at any stage of theproject. Groundwater shall not be contaminated bydischarge of pollutants in to streams, ponds and other
Water requirement shall be met fromexisting water supply scheme atBSEZ.Groundwater shall not be withdrawnat any stage of the project.
Groundwater shall not becontaminated by discharge ofpollutants into streams, ponds and
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 262
S.No. Component Responsibility of Developer Responsibility of Industry
surface water bodies. other surface water bodies.3. Water
recycle/reuseZero discharge for ETP/STP is proposed in BBIL,Industry authority shall ensure the reuse of treatedwastewater from ETP & STP.
BBIL industry should adoptrecycle/reuse methodologies to themaximum extent possible.
4. Wastewatercollection/conveyance
Developer will provide the wastewater conveyancesystem through pipeline from the BBIL industry holdingtank to respective ETP & STP.
The wastewater conveyance(pipeline) within industry shall beprovided by Developer.
5. Wastewatertreatment anddisposal
Developer shall provide the ETP for treatment ofeffluents and STP for sewage as per the projectdevelopment plan.
BBIL shall be responsible to treatwastewater as per stipulatedstandards of CPCB/KSPCB.
6. Treatedwastewatermonitoringprotocol
i. BBIL authority shall monitor wastewater holdingtank.
ii. EMP cell shall monitor the treated wastewater atfollowing locations on daily basis: Respective ETP & STP holding tanks Treated WW Tanks
BBIL have to utilise the Developerexisting infrastructure facility.Monitoring of wastewater on dailybasis by BBIL shall be carried out asper SOPS and regulatory standards attheir respective holding tanks withonline monitoring facility for pH, TDS,TSS, BOD & COD etc.
7. Rainwaterharvesting
Rainwater harvesting pits/recharge wells shall beprovided at identified locations as per development plan.
Rainwater harvesting in industrypremises shall be adopted.
8. Wastemanagement
Sludge generated from ETP shall be disposed to TSDFand the same shall not be used as manure for greenbelt/green areas development.
Sludge generated from STP shall be used as manure forgreenbelt/green areas development
BBIL shall have their independentHazardous/Non-hazardous wastecollection and segregation systemand shall have a temporary storagefacility for 90 days detention which willbe designed as per the requirement.Wastes shall be periodically disposedto nearby TSDF.Industry shall follow “The HazardousWastes (Management, Handling andTrans boundary Movement) ThirdAmendment Rules, 2015”.
9. Post projectenvironmentalmonitoring
BL EMC shall conduct post project environmentalmonitoring as per the environmental monitoringprogramme suggested for construction and operationphases in Chapter 6.Specific requirement of monitoring shall be carried out asa part of compliance to EC/CTE/CTOEmissions/Discharges and Solid and Hazardous wastegeneration and the air quality results of BBIL area shallbe displayed at main entrances.
Industry specific critical pollutantsshall be monitored at industry level.Specific requirement of monitoringshall be carried out as a part ofcompliance to CTE/CTO.
10. Stackmonitoring
Developer need to ensure that all regulatory measuresare properly incorporated and all institutionalarrangements by developer.
Stack monitoring shall be carried outby BBIL
11. Greenbeltdevelopment
Greenbelt development along the boundary and greenareas in common areas and utility corridor shall bedeveloped.
Greenbelt and green areas shall bedeveloped in the industry level as perKSPCB norms.
12. Storm watermanagement
Storm water collection along roads, common areas andutilities shall be provided. Ensure no pollutants aredischarged to the fresh water streams by BBIL in aclandestine environment.
Storm water collection within theindustry shall be provided anddischarge facility into the commonstorm water drains shall be provided.
13. Truck parking Logistic zones meant for truck parking are providedwithin processing area. This parking space will serve thetrucks until custom clearance to enter the BBIL.
Iindustry shall provide on-site parkingspaces for trucks within the industrypremises.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 263
9.2 Greenbelt Development
Trees play a vital role in the environment in preventing the horizontal dispersion of thepollutants to the surrounding areas. Trees are very suitable and effective for detecting,recognizing, reducing and controlling air pollution, minimising noise pollution and will alsocheck soil erosion, make the ecosystem more complete and functionally more stable andconducive.
Owing to their large surface area besides their bio-aesthetical values trees are to be used asindicators of biological effects of pollutant.
9.2.1 Objectives of Greenbelt Plan
The objectives of greenbelt development are as follows:
Mitigation of Fugitive dust Emissions and improve ambient air quality Provide a shelter belt around the project area for dust absorption and noise reduction Prevention of land degradation due to activities during construction phase Balancing Eco Environment Enhancement of the overall environmental quality Provide adequate shelter and habitat to the local fauna Enhancing the ecological equilibrium of the area Providing aesthetic value to the project area Prevention of negative impacts on reserve forests, sanctuary and wildlife Conserve soil quality and improve moisture level in ambient atmosphere Compliance of the conditions stipulated in the environment clearance Improving the forest cover and maintaining the biodiversity of the region Create awareness for environmental conservation and tree planting Generate employment for the local people
9.2.2 Plant Species for Green Belt development
Greenbelt/green area development will be carried out in and around the BBIL along theboundary, roadside and on the vacant areas in BSEZ with above objectives. Emphasis shallbe on native plant species on the basis of air pollution tolerance index of tree.
The selection of plant species for the development depends on various factors such asclimate, elevation and soil. The plant species should exhibit the following desirablecharacteristic in order to be selected for plantation.
While selecting the plant species for the proposed green belt in a designated area of 0.43 Ha(1.08 Acres) land, the following guidelines will be considered:
Tolerance to specific conditions or alternatively wide adaptability to eco-physiologicalconditions
Fast growing type and providing optimum penetrability Capacity to endure water stress and climate extremes after initial establishment Should be wind-firm and deep-rooted Should form a dense canopy and perennial green Species tolerant to air pollutants like PM, SOX and NOX should be preferred Be able to attenuate noise generated within the area Native origin and locally available Be well adapted to the existing soil conditions
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 264
Should have a large leaf area index. Should be permeable to help create air turbulence and mixing within the belt Introduction of monocultures and alien plant species would be avoided to the maximum
possible extent Should be able to thrive along with diverse species
9.2.3 Greenbelt Development Plan
The greenbelt development plan for the proposed BBIL is based on “Guidelines forDeveloping Greenbelt” published by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). Greenbelt isproposed within BBIL site and along the boundary. Green areas are also proposed near thecommon utilities to serve as recreational facilities and breathing spaces and also to createbuffer zones. The three tier tree plantation shall be ideal recommendation for greenbeltaround the boundary of the proposed BBIL industry.
A total area of 0.43 ha (1.08 Acres) was earmarked for greenbelt/ green areas developmentwhich is about ~36%of total plot area i.e 2.95 Acres.
9.2.3.1 Design of Green Belt
While the green belt will be developed as per CPCB guidelines with concept of three tiersgreenbelt development with tall, medium and short height permanent trees in general. Asurvey was also conducted with respect to existing types and vegetation diversity within theBSEZ area for development of greenbelt around project components.
The following guidelines will be considered in green belt development.
The spacing between the trees will be maintained slightly less than one meter to increasethe density
Planting of trees in each row will be in staggered orientation In the front row shrubs will be grown. The short trees (< 10 m height) will be planted in the first two rows (towards plant side) of
the green belt. The tall trees (> 10 m height) will be planted in the outer three rows (awayfrom plant side)
Tall trees one line and short trees one line will be planted around the industries blocks tocontrol the fugitive emissions and to reduce the noise.
Pits measuring approximately 2’x2’x2’ may be dug where the soil is reasonably deep,and, pits measuring approximately 3’x3’x3’ where the soil is shallow or gravelly.
Expose the pits to direct sunlight for about 15 days ando If the soil at the site is reasonably good, pits may be filled with 80% site-soil +
20% composted cow-dung. About 200 gm Neem-cake and leaf-litter, grass oragricultural residue may be added
o If the soil at the site is poor, pits may be filled with 35% site-soil + 35% fertile soil(from an external source) +30% composted cow-dung. Neem-cake and otherorganic matter may be added as in the previous instance
Saplings should ideally be planted after the annual rains begin. The saplings would needto be watered once the rains cease.
Saplings shall be suitably nurtured and maintained. Soil conditioning and fertiliserapplication shall be undertaken. If required, suitable soil treatment shall be provided toensure good growth of tree cover.
Construction of temporary shelters of locally available materials such as bamboo andgrass around the growing saplings is recommended in the summer, to help the plantswithstand the hot sun.
During construction period
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 265
o Ground-vegetation should be allowed to shed seeds before cutting or moving it formulch. This would leave behind a seed-bank to flourish in the next growing-season, providing a natural source of mulch for the following year.
o Open Burning of bushes and other waste on land must be avoided, as it reducessoil-quality, and harms the ground-vegetation, amphibians, reptiles and ground-nesting birds.
Development of greenbelt shall start with construction phase and shall be continued fullfledge with operation phase of the proposed BBIL project.
As a part of improving biodiversity areas need to be ear marked for the growth of creepersthat are always neglected in green belt development category. Creepers are becomingincreasingly threatened due to lack of concerns and selective dereliction of this species.
The indicative sketch of three tier greenbelt development is given in Figure 9-2.
Figure 9-2: Hypothetical representation of three tier greenbelt development
9.2.3.2 Cost estimations for Green Belt development
Approximately 645 no. of trees is proposed to be planted in entire project site to follow theconcept of 1500 trees/Ha. The survival of the plantation shall be monitored frequently andsurvival rate of the plantation during operational phase shall not be less than 80%.
A capital cost of INR 20 Lakhs shall be earmarked for this purpose and INR of 5 Lakhs shallbe allocated for recurring expenses totalling INR 20 Lakhs towards green belt developmentand maintenance. The lay out plan of the greenbelt and green areas in project site isenclosed as Annexure H.
9.2.3.3 Recommended Species for Plantation
Based on climate and soil characteristics of the study area, some species are recommendedfor plantation. The climate of the region is not extreme where there is normal rainfall as wellas normal heat and soil temperature is also not very high in summer. The pollutants namelystack, dust/fugitive emissions, sulphur dioxide, smoke and carbon dioxide along with thenoise pollution can be effectively curbed by planting specific floral species. Therecommended species for greenbelt and plantation are given in Table 9-2.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 267
Table 9-2: Recommended Plants for Greenbelt
S.No No. Botanical Name Family Common Name S/T HA HT GR E/D CS Flo.S.
1 A2 Acacia auriculiformis A.cunn Mimoseae Australian Wattle T Tree 16m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong June - Jan
2 A19 Actinodaphne angustifolia Nees Lauraceae T Tree 13m Slow Evergreen Round May - June, Nov
3 A21 Adina cordifolia Roxb Rubiaceae Haldu T Tree 20m Slow growing Deciduous Oblong / Round June - Sept
4 A25 Ailanthus excelsa Roxb Simarubaceae Mar Maharakha T Tree 20m Quick growing Deciduous Round Feb - March
5 A26 Alangium chinense (Lour) Harms Alangiaceae T Tree 10m Quick growing Deciduous
6 A29 Albizia lebbeck Benth Mimoseae Siris T Tree 20m Quick growing DeciduousRound /Spreading April - May
7 A31 Albizia odoratissima Benth Mimoseae Kala Siris T Tree 18m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong April - June
8 A34 Alnus nepalensis Betulaceae Uits - Tree 20m Quick growing Deciduous - Sept - Nov
9 A35 Alnus nitida Endl Betulaceae - - Tree 20m Quick growing after 1st yr. Deciduous - August - October
10 A36 Alstonia scholaris (Linn.) R.Br. Apocynaceae Devil tree T Tree 15m Quick growing Evergreen Round Dec -Mar
11 A41
Aphanamixis polystachya (Wall)Parker. Meliaceae Harin-hara T Tree 13m Slow growing Deciduous Oblong / Round July
12 A44 Azadirachta indica A Juss Meliaceae Neem T Tree 20mQuick growth after 1stseason Evergreen Spreading
Jan - March, Aug. -Sept
13 B1 Balanties roxburghii Planch Balanitaceae Hingan T Tree 9m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading April - june
14 B2
Bambusa arundinacia (Retz)Roxb Poaceae Kantabans T Shrub 20m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong
15 B3 Bambusa vulgaris Schrad Poaceae T
Shrub / tallperennialgrasses 15m Quick growing Deciduous
16 B6 Bauhinig acuminata Linn Caesalpinaceae Kanchan T Shrub 3m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong / Round June
17 B7 Bauhinia purpurea Linn Caesalpinaceae Khairwal T Tree 7m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong Sept - Nov
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 268
18 B8 Bauhinia racemosa Lamk. Caesalpinaceae Astha T Small Tree 5m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong Mar -June
19 B9 Bauhinia semla Wanderlin Caesalpinaceae Semla T Tree 10m Quick growing Deciduous Round Sept - Nov
20 B10 Bauhinia varigata Linn Caesalpinaceae Kachnar T Tree 5m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong Nov
21 B13 Bougainvillea spectabilis Wild Bischofiaceae Bougainvillea T Shrub 8m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong / Round Throughout the year
22 B17 Butea monosperma Lamk Fabaceae Kashmir T Tree 10m Slow growing Deciduous Oblong /Ovoid Jan - April
23 C1
Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L)Swartz. Cesalpinaceae White Gald Mahur T Tree 4m Quick growing Evergreen Spreadding Throughout the year
24 C2 Callistemon citinus (Curtis ) stapf. Myrtaceae Battlebrush T Small Tree 5m Slow growing Evergreen ConicalThroughout the yearesp. April.
25 C3 Calophyllum inophyllum Linn Clusiaceae Sultanachampa T Tree 18m Slow growing EvergreenRound /Spreading Dec - Jan
26 C4 Calotropis gigantea R.Br (Linn) Asclepiadaceae Gigantic Swallow wort T Shrub 5m Quickgrowing Evergreen Oblong / Round Feb - July
27 C5 Calotropis procera (R.Br) Ait Asclepiadaceae Swallow wort T Shrub 6m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong / Round December
28 C7 Cassia fistula Linn Caesalpinaceae Jammu T Tree 12m Quick growing Deciduous Round Mar - May
29 C8 Cassia iavanica Caesalpinaceae T Tree 12m Quick growing Deciduous Round May - June
30 C9 Cassia pumila Lamk Caesalpinaceae Yellow Casia T Tree 10-12m Quick growing Evergreen Round
31 C10 Cassia renigera Wall ex. Benth. Caesalpinaceae Pink Cassia T Tree 10m Quick growing Deciduous Round/spreading May- June
32 C11 Cassia siamea Lamk. Caesalpinaceae Iraan waad tree T Tree 10-12m Fast growing Evergreen Oblong Aug - May
33 C18
Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn(auct), Weight Verbenaceae Bhant T Shrub 3-4m Quickgrowing Evergreen Round Oct - Jan
34 C20 Cordia dichotoma Forst Cordiaceae Chota T Tree 10m Quick growing after 1st yr. Evergreen Round/ Oblong March - April
35 D3 Delonix regia (Boijer) Rafin. Caesalpinaceae Flameboyant T Tree 15m Quick growing DeciduousSpreading/ Flattopped. April - June
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 269
36 D4 Dendrocalamus Strictus Nees Poaceae Solid bamboo T
Shrub / tallperennialgrass. 12m Quick growing Deciduous - -
37 D5 Derris Indica (Lann.) Bennett. Fabaceae Pongam T Tree 10m Quick growing Evergreen Round April - June
38 D8 Duranta repens L Verbenaceae - T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading -
39 E4 Eucalyptus citriodora Hook Myrtaceae Lemon scented gum T Tree 20m Quick growing Evergreen Conical Feb - Apri. Oct - Dec.
40 E5 Eucalyptus hybrid Myrtaceae Mysore gum T Tree 20m Quick growing Evergreen Conical Feb - April, Oct - Dec.
41 F1 Ficus benghalensis Linn Moraceae Bargad T Tree 20m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading April - June
42 F2 Ficus benjamina Linn Moraceae - T Tree 12m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading Sept - Nov
43 F4 Ficus gibbosa Blume Moraceae Datir T Tree 10m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading April - May
44 F7 Ficus religosa Linn Moraceae Pipal T Tree 20mGrows slow in earlystages later grows fast Evergreen Round/Oblong Jan - July
45 G3 Gardenia jasminoides Eills. Rubiaceae - T Tree 5m Quick growing Evergreen OblongApril - Aug extendedupto Sept.
46 G4 Gardenia resinifera Roth Rubiaceae Dikamali T Tree 5m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong Mar - June.
47 G5
Gliricidia sepium (Jacq) Kunth exWalp. Fabaceae
Mother - of - Cocoa,Mexican lilac T Tree 10m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong/Round Jan - March
48 G6 Grevillea robusta A. cunn Proteaceae. Silvery or silky oak T Tree 20m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong Feb - April
49 H1 Hamelia patens Jacq Rubiaceae Scarlet bush T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Round Oct - Jan
50 H2 Heterophragma roxburghii DC Bignoniaceae Warras T Tree 18m Quick growing Evergreen Round / Oblong Feb-April51 H3 Hibiscus rosa sinensis Malvaceae Jasud T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Round / Oblong Throughout the year
52 H5 Holoptelia integrifolia Ulmaceae Indian Elm T Tree Quick growing Deciduous Oblong Feb - April
53 I3 Ixora coccinea Rubiaceae Rangan T Tree 6m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong Throughout the year
54 I4 Ixora rosea Rubiaceae T Tree 6m Quick growing Evergreen OblongMore or lessthroughout the year
55 I5 Ixora undulata Rubiaceae T Tree 6m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong March - April
56 J2 Juniperus communis Pinaceae Common Juniper S Shrub 10m Quick growing Evergreen Round / Oblong March - April
57 K1 Kigelia africana Lamk Bignoniaceae Sausage tree T Small Tree 10m Quick growing Evergreen Round / Oblong Mar - June.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 270
58 L1 Lagerstroemia parviflora Roxb Lythraceae Phurush T Tall Tree 20m Quick growing Deciduous Round / Oblong June
59 L2 Lagerstroemia speciosa Lythraceae Jarool T Tree 10m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong April - june
60 L3 Lantana camara Linn. Verbenaceae Lantana T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading Throughtout the year
61 M3
Mollotus philippensis (Lour)Muell, Arg Euphorbiaceae Kamala, Kamila. T Tree 12m Slow growing Evergreen Oblong/Round Nov - Jan
62 M4
Mammea suriga (Buch - Ham.Ex. Roxb.) Guttifer aceae Nagkesar T Tree 18m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading Feb - March
63 M9 Millingtonia hortensis L.f Bignoniaceae Indian cork - tree, Buch S Tree 10m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong/Round Oct - Dec.
64 N1 Nerium indicum Apocynaceae Kaner T Shrub 5m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong / Round Throughout the year
65 N2 Nyctanthus arbor-tristis Oleaceae Harsinghar T Shrub 5m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong/RoundMore or lessthroughout the year
66 P1
Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC)Backer Caesalpinaceae. Copper pod tree. T Tree - Quickgrowing Evergreen Oblong/Round May - Sept
67 P8 Poinciana pulcherrima Caesalpinaceae. Guletura T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong Oct - Jan
68 P9 Polyathia longifolia (sonn) Th Anonaceae Devadaru S Tree 15 or 5m Quickgrowing EvergreenConical orRounded April - June
69 P14 Populus nigra Linn Salicaceae Lombardy S Tree 20m Quick growing Deciduous Conical -
70 P21 Pterygota alata var. irregularis Sterculiaceae - T Tree 15m Quick growing Evergreen Round/Oblong Mar - April
71 S6 Samanea saman Mmos eae. Rain Tree T Tree 20m Quick growing Evergreen Spreading/Round Mar - June.
72 S9 Saraca asoka Roxb De wilde Caesalpinaceae Ashok T Tree 5m Quick growing Evergreen - Dec - May
73 S13 Soymida febrifuga A juss Meliaceae Indian redwood T Tree 15m Quick growing Deciduous Round/Oblong Mar.
74 S14 Spathodea campanulata Beauv. Bignoniaceae Indian Tulip tree T Tree 12m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong/Round Nov. Jan
75 S17 Sterculia guttata Sterculiaceae kukur T Tree 15m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong/Round Jan - Feb
76 T1 Tabernaemontana divaricata Apocynaceae Tagar,Chandani T Shrub 3m Quick growing Evergreen Round. Throughout the year
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 271
77 T3 Tecoma stans linn. Bignoniaceae T Shrub 5m Quick growing Evergreen Oblong Feb - April
78 T5 Terminalia alata heyne ex roth Combretaceae Laurel T Tree 20m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong/Round May - July
79 T6
Terminalia arjuna roxb wight &Arn Combretaceae Arjun T Tree 15m Quick growing Deciduous Oblong/Round April - July
80 T11 Thevetia peruviana pers Merrill Apocynaceae Yellow oleoner T Shrub 6m Quick growing Evergreen Round/Oblong Round/Oblong
81 T12 Thuja occidentalis CupressaceaeAmerican Arborvitae,White cedar. T Tree 15m Quick growing Evergreen Conical -
82 U1 Ulumus wollichiana Planch Ulmaceae Mored pabuna T Tree 15m Quick growing Evergreen Round -
Note: - Commercial plants are not recommended within the BEZ.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 273
9.2.3.4 Nursery Development within BSEZ
Nurseries would be developed in open areas with six to eight seedlings per m2 for pottedplants with above mentioned guidelines.
9.2.3.5 Vermiculture Development and Usage
Vermicomposting is natural organic manure and its chemical composition is much moresuperior to compost made either in conventional composting pits or by bacterialdecomposition. Vermicomposting consists of humus, which is the basic building block offertile soil. It contains all essential macro and micronutrients for plants in readily availableform due to which plants are able to easily absorb them. Vermicomposting is prepared withthe aid of earthworms. Vermicomposting pits shall be developed and biodegradable wastefrom project premises shall be utilized for manure production.
9.2.3.6 General Guidelines Regarding the Plantation-plan
The original topography and vegetation of the site must be retained that newly-plantedsaplings may get the benefit of their natural micro-climate and may survive with relativelyless inputs. Soil from the site should be used for the plantation, as far as possible, andsupplemented with external nutrients only where necessary. Chemical fertilizers or pesticidesmust be avoided, as they reduce soil-quality and integrity, as also, the food/medicinal valueof plants. Locally available leaf-litter, grass-cuttings, agricultural residue, compost or otherorganic material may be used as supplementary plant-nutrients.
9.3 Rainwater Harvesting32
Rain Water Harvesting (RWH) refers to collection of rain falling on earth surface for beneficialuses before it drains away as run-off. The recent groundwater estimation as in MarchSeptember 2013, by Central Groundwater Board, Govt. of India and Bangalore UrbanDistrict, has classified Anekal Taluk, in which the project area is situated, under “OverExploitation category”. As a necessity to improve groundwater in the region as adevelopmental activity, rainwater harvesting is proposed within the BBIL. Rainwaterharvesting and conservation practices reduce the soil erosion, increases soil moisture andenhance recharge to groundwater body.
The objectives of rain water harvesting proposed for the project are as follows:
Rainfall – runoff management Control soil erosion Increase the soil moisture Prevent rush of surface flow of water Recharge to groundwater in favourable areas Direct use of harvested rainwater Saving in pumping cost
9.3.1 Estimation of Rainwater Harvesting Potential
Rainwater Harvesting shall be implemented at BBIL to conserve rainwater. Roof top area,greenbelt/green area, road/paved area and open areas proposed in the project areconsidered for arriving the rainwater which can be harvested.
32Ref: Concepts & Practices for Rainwater Harvesting- CPCB 2001
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 274
The approximate quantities of rainwater that can be harvested at BBIL are given inTable 9-3.The equation used for run off estimation is based on CPCB guidelines on ‘Concepts andPractices for Rain water Harvesting’- Oct 2001.The calculations are based on the following:
Average annual rainfall is 740 mm based on 1970-2000 IMD data Average No of rainy days are 33.3 Run of co-efficient are considered as given by CPCB guidelines
Table 9-3: Estimated Volume of run-off that can be harvested from Roof Top
S.No.
Land UseDistribution in BBIL
Land UseArea Area in
m2
Rainfall(m)
Volume(m3)
Run offcoefficient
Volumeof run-offharvested
Volume ofrun-off
harvested(m 3 /day)Plot (Acre)
1. Roof top Area 2.06 8358 0.740 6184 0.80 4947 149.93Total
Note: - Roof top area is considered as 70% of the plotted area (11940 m2).
9.3.2 Harvesting Plan and Recharge Structures
9.3.2.1 Roof-top Rainwater Harvesting
For the proposed project only Roof-top rain water is proposed for harvesting. Roof-toprain-water harvesting is one of the appropriate options for this kind of industries foraugmenting groundwater recharge/storage where natural recharge is considerably reducedand not much land is available for implementing any other artificial recharge measure.
In a typical roof top rain-water harvesting system, rain-water from the roof is collected in astorage vessel or tank for use during periods of scarcity. Such systems are usually designedto support the drinking and cooking needs of the family and comprise a roof, a storage tankand guttering to transport the water from the roof to the storage tank. In addition, a first flushsystem to divert the dirty water, which contains debris, collected on the roof during non-rainyperiods and a filter unit to remove debris and contaminants before water enters the storagetank are also provided. Therefore, a typical Roof top Rain-water Harvesting Systemcomprises following components:
Roof catchment Filter unit Drain pipes Storage tank. Gutters
Collection sump. Down pipe Pump unit First flush pipe
A typical Roof-top rainwater harvesting system is given in Exhibit 9-1. However, duringdetailed engineering of the industry suitable structure will be arrived for rainwater harvesting.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 275
Exhibit 9-1: A Typical Rainwater Harvesting System
Filtration forms the most important process in the purification of water. It usually involvesallowing water to pass through a filter media e.g. sand. Filtration essentially involves removalof suspended and colloidal impurities present in water. Depending on the type of filtration,the chemical characteristics of water may be altered and the bacterial content may beconsiderably reduced. These effects take place due to various processes such asmechanical straining, sedimentation, biological metabolism and electrolytic changes.
The sand being used for filter in roof top rain-water harvesting systems should be free fromclay, loam, vegetable matter, organic impurities etc. and should also be uniform in nature andgrain size. There are three types of filters i.e.
i) Slow Sand Filters,ii) Rapid Sand Filters (gravity type) andiii) Pressure Filters.
9.3.2.2 Storage Ponds/Tanks
In addition to roof top rainwater harvesting, we can also adopt storage tank /pond system forstorm water storage. Storage ponds/tanks are civil structures to store harvested rainwater.From these storage facilities, water can be pumped directly to points of demand or suppliedthrough over-head tanks. Silt trap pits and filter beds have to be maintained before letting thewater to the storage pond / tank. The storage tanks may be properly cemented to avoidleakage or seepage into ground. Dimensions of these structures may be maintained at 20 mx 10 m x 2 m. Storage Ponds are not proposed for the proposed project. A model of thestorage pond / tank is shown in Exhibit 9-2 for storing harvested rainwater.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 276
Exhibit 9-2: A Model Storage Pond/Tank
9.3.2.3 Recharge pits- typical arrangements
In the BBIL project area, recharge pits are recommended to be constructed near the roof-topharvesting structures. Due to enhanced vertical hydraulic conductivity through the rechargepit structure, natural recharge process of aquifer system gets enhanced, especially whenstorms are of short duration and rainfall days are less as in case of project area, andsustainability of the aquifer is ensured for a long period. The benefit accrued during heavyrains in non- rainy (summer) season or during draught time will be worth mentioning. In suchcircumstances recharge will be at its peak stage. As a result all shallow open wells andponds will get adequate quantity of water as huge relief for Industries who depends onground water, nearby farmers and poor landless villagers.
In addition to Roof-top rain water harvesting, recharge pits will be planned by the industryand BSEZ authorities for roof top harvesting. In the project area, Recharge pits of 2.0 mdiameter with a depth of 3.0 m will be constructed. The pit has to be back filled with asequence of boulders, gravel, pebbles and coarse sand from bottom to top. A constructedmodel recharge pit is shown in Exhibit 9-3. A schematic diagram of the Recharge Pit isgiven in Exhibit 9-4. It is recommended to dig a trial pit of 5.0 m before constructing theRecharge pit. The site may be avoided if groundwater table is encountered within a depthrange of 5 m.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 277
Exhibit 9-3: Model Recharge Pit (source:Google)
Exhibit 9-4: Schematic of Recharge Pit(Source: Google)
9.3.2.4 Recharge Wells- Typical arrangements
Recharge wells are the structures to recharge water in the sub-surface levels directly to theaquifer. In the project area, the piezometric level of the deeper aquifer is expected to be inthe range of 20 to 30 m below ground level. Gravity recharge wells in the vicinity of storageponds are useful in recharging the deeper aquifer system.
A schematic design of the recharge well is presented in Exhibit 9-5. The collected rain waterin the pond may be diverted through well maintained channels, two desilting pits and twofilter beds into each recharge well by gravity. From bottom of last filter bed, pipe carrying therecharge water may have to go down the recharge well upto piezometric surface. Therecharge well of 300 to 450 mm diameter, down to a depth of 80 m is recommended.Recharge wells are not proposed for the proposed BBIL project.
Exhibit 9-5: Schematic Diagram of Recharge Well
INLETOUTLET FOR
EXCESSWATER
SAN
D
BOULDERS
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 278
9.3.3 Rainwater Harvesting and Utilisation Plan
Based upon the survey and hydro-geological conditions of the project area, harvesting andrecharge structures are proposed for rainwater harvesting and groundwater recharging. Theproposed harvesting and recharge structures within the BBIL site are:
Roof-top rainwater harvesting Recharge pits of 16 number
The locations identified for rainwater harvesting within the BBIL site are given in Exhibit 9-3.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 279
Figure 9-3: Identified Locations of Rainwater Harvesting Structures/Pits
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 280
The flash flood water can be recharged directly to the deeper aquifer through recharge wellsfor enhancing the depleting resource and make it sustainable.
Rainwater which will be harvested from building roof-tops can be stored at higher levelstorage tanks below the roof-top level and be directly supplied by gravity flow to the points ofdemand without the process of pumping. The overall rain water that could be harvested byimplementing roof-top rain water harvesting is estimated to be about 4947 m3 in a year (150m3/day).
Locations for constructing rain-water storage ponds/tanks are selected at 16 locations forrainwater harvesting from roof-tops of the buildings. Harvested water should be sent throughdesilting and filter bed pits to allow silt-free water into the storage facilities. Dimensions ofthese structures may be maintained at 2m dia and 3 m depth proposed conservationstructures are expected to harvest and store about 4947 m3. The overflow water duringheavy rains can be diverted to outfalls through proposed storm water drainage. As per theToR Biocon has explored various methods for rainwater harvesting, however it is decided bythe management of Biocon that the existing system will be followed for the proposed projectalso i.e collecting roof top rain water and store in existing rain water storage tank due to nonviability. Details of the existing rain water storage tank are given below:
9.3.4 Monitoring wells for Impact Assessment
The effectiveness of artificial recharge structures is known by closely monitoring thegroundwater levels of the phreatic and confined aquifer systems. Monitoring of thegroundwater regime is done by establishing a network of observation wells tapping theshallow and deeper aquifer systems separately.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 281
The phreatic aquifer can be monitored by measuring groundwater levels in the open dugwells or dedicated shallow water table wells nearby the site (Currently there is no well withinthe site). 2 to 3 piezometric wells are proposed within BSEZ to check the ground waterquality. The existing dug wells nearby project site may also be selected for monitoring.Piezometric surface in the deeper aquifer may have to be monitored by installing dedicatedpiezometers. Piezometer is a small diameter (38 mm) tube with a 2 to 3 m perforated pipe atthe bottom lowered in a borehole (100 to 150 mm) drilled down into the confined aquifer. Theperforated portion of the tube has to be positioned against the bottom of the confined aquiferwith clean sorted gravel shrouded between the tube and the borehole surface. Rest of theborehole may be filled with unsorted gravel or clay.
The observation wells/piezometers are to be monitored at least four times in a year, i.e. inthe months of January, May, August and November. Data collected from these wells, providemore meaningful record / database and clarity in the changes in the ground water regime inthe Project area.
Digital water level recorders, which collect water level information automatically ranging intime from 1 hour to 1 month, provide accurate and valuable data for groundwatermanagement. The recorder is an electronic device which is installed within the water columnof the observation well. The device collects the groundwater level data at the desired intervalof time and stores the digital data on board which can be retrieved through data retrievalsystems or hand held computers and can be downloaded directly into office computers forfurther analysis. Groundwater chemical quality monitoring also can be done through thesedevices with appropriate add-on probes.
9.4 Solar Power Harnessing
The feasibility of Solar Power Harnessing within the BBIL built up areas particularly atavailable roof tops is also studied. The available technologies for generating solar power aremainly Solar Photo Voltaic (PV) Cells and Solar Thermal. Technology of Solar PV Cells issuitable for solar power generation with proper utilization of the roof top areas available onthe roofs of buildings/structures within the industry premises. The off grid solar PV systemwill be used for the solar power harnessing.
Basic components that are used to build a solar PV system are as follows:
Flat Roof Solar PV Panel mounting systems Solar PV Panels and solar modules Solar PV Charge Controllers Solar Batteries PV Junction Boxes/PV Combiner Boxes
Off-Grid Solar PV Power Inverters Solar PV Cables & Connectors Solar PV Generation Meters AC & DC Isolators Solar PV System monitoring
For the purpose of installation of off grid solar PV cells, the suitable buildings and structuresare identified and the roof top areas are considered for calculation of total possible capacityof installed solar PV.
The calculation for installed capacity and cost is based on the following assumption:
100 m2 area is required for the installation of 10 kWp capacity Capital cost including batteries and other accessories is INR 1 lakh/kWp.
The installed capacity and approximate cost details for BBIL area is as given in Table 9-4.
Table 9-4: Estimated Installation Capacity and Cost for Solar Power Harness
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 282
Project Total Plotarea (m2)
Roof top area(considering 70% of
total area) (m2)
Installation capacity(Considering 100 sqm
for 10kWP) kWp
Installationcapacity in
MW
Cost forinstallation
(considering `8cr/MW) ` Crores
BBIL 11940 8358 835.8 0.835 6.68
The total cost towards solar power harness is coming to about Rs. 66.8 million (~Rs 6.68 Cr),since huge cost is involved for the solar harnessing. This will be thoroughly studied duringproject execution stage. If it is financially viable the developer will sure go for solarharnessing power. Also, the Government of India & Government of Karnataka has taken jointinitiative to provide un-interrupted 24X7 power supply in the state of Karnataka (exceptagriculture consumers). In future Karnataka state will become one of the surplus powerstates in India. At present KIADB is supplying uninterrupted power supply to all existingindustries, installation of solar power may not be required immediately may be explored infuture if required.
9.5 Occupational Health and Safety
Occupational health & safety needs attention both during construction, erection, operationand maintenance phases of BBIL project. Broad framework for Occupational health andsafety measures is presented in this section.
9.5.1 Occupational Hazards
Occupational health hazards, areas associated with hazards and proposed mitigationmeasures are given in Table 9-5.
Table 9-5: Occupational Health HazardsS.
No.OccupationalHealth Hazard Areas associated with Hazards Mitigation
1. Non-ionizingradiation
Combustion facility workers may have ahigher exposure to Electric and MagneticFields (EMF) due to working in proximityto electric power generators, equipment,and connecting high-voltage transmissionlines
Identification of potential exposure levels in theworkplace
Establishment and identification of safety zones todifferentiate between work areas with expectedelevated EMF levels
Personal exposure monitoring equipment shouldbe set to warn of exposure levels
2. Heat Occupational exposure to heat occursduring operation and maintenance ofcombustion units, pipes, and related hotequipment like Boilers etc.
Regular inspection and maintenance of pressurevessels and piping
Provision of adequate ventilation in work areas Time reduction for work in elevated temperature
and ensuring access to drinking water Shielding surfaces where workers come in close
contact with hot equipment Use of warning signs near high temperature
surfaces and Personal Protective Equipment(PPE).
3. Noise Noise sources in combustion facilitiesand auxiliaries; boilers and auxiliaries,such as pulverizes; diesel engines; fansand ductwork; pumps; compressors;condensers; precipitators and motors etc.
Provision of sound-insulated control rooms withnoise levels below 60 dB(A);
Design of generators to meet applicableoccupational noise levels
Identify and mark high noise areas and provisionof PPE.
4. ConfinedSpaces
Specific areas for confined space entrymay include condensers, and coolingwater towers
Adequate Engineering measures shall beimplemented to eliminate the degree of confinedspaces.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 283
S.No.
OccupationalHealth Hazard Areas associated with Hazards Mitigation
Unavoidable confined spaces shall be providedwith permanent safety measures.
5. ElectricalHazards
Energized equipment and power linescan pose electrical hazards for workers
Consider installation of hazard warning lights. Use of voltage sensors prior to and during
workers' entrance. Deactivation and proper grounding of live power
equipment and distribution lines according toapplicable legislation and guidelines.
Provision of specialized electrical safety training toworkers.
6. Fire andExplosionHazards
Handling and storage of fuel, productsetc.
Use of automated combustion and safety controls. Proper maintenance of boiler safety controls. Implementation of startup and shutdown
procedures. Automated sensors and regular cleaning
mechanism. Provide Fire proof jackets for those who will work
for extinguish power.7. Dust Dust may arise due to dedusting
activities and vehicles movement etcDust may contain silica (associated withsilicosis), arsenic (skin and lung cancer)
Use of dust controls such as proper housing andwater sprinkling etc.
Regular sweeping, mopping, inspection andmaintenance of roads/asbestos containingmaterials etc.
Prevalent occupational diseases for workers are possible for which project proponent shallprovide necessary safety equipment and conduct periodical health checkup. As a giant inBiopharmaceutical Company, Biocon is committed for occupational health & safety ofemployees.
9.5.2 Personal Protective Equipment
The personal protective equipment (PPE) offers adequate protection to worker, co-workersand visitors. Proper use of PPE shall be part of recurrent training programs for employees.Table 9-6 provides the list of PPE which shall be provided in industrial premises:
Table 9-6: Personnel Protective EquipmentProtection for Equipment Protection Against
HAND Leather gloves Asbestos gloves Electrical resistance gloves Canvas gloves Hand sleeves
Cuts due to handling Heat radiation Electrical shock Contact with oil & grease etc. Falling of hot slag/material
LEG Leg-guards Leather safety boots Asbestos safety boots
Welding sparks Striking by objects, fall of objects and stepping on
sharp or hot objects Heat radiation, stepping hot or sharp objects and
stepping on sharp or hot objectsEYE Spectacle/goggles with plain shatter proof lens Foreign bodies entering eyes and reflected arc raysHEAD Fibre Helmet Fall of objects/hitting against objects during
construction, maintenance etcEAR Ear plugs or muffs High noise levelNOSE Dust protection mask Fine dust particlesFIRE Fire Extinguishers
Fire Jackets Fire Suits etc.
Fire
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 284
9.5.3 Health Monitoring
Medical surveillance has been prescribed in the Factories Act, 1948 (Amended). Undersection 41C, it is stated that "every occupier of a factory involving any hazardous processshall:
“Maintain accurate and up to date health records or, as case may be, medical records ofworkers in factory who are exposed to any chemical, toxic or any other harmful substanceswhich are manufactured, stored, handled or transported and such records shall beaccessible to the workers subjected to such conditions as may be prescribed and provide formedical examination of every worker, (a) before such worker is assigned to a job involvingthe handling of or working with a hazardous substance and b) while continuing in such joband after he has ceased to work in such job, at intervals not exceeding twelve months, insuch manner as may be prescribed."
Biocon has already established an occupational health service centre inside BSEZ premisesto promote and maintain physical, mental and social well-being of the employees. The unit iswell equipped to detect and prevent occupational/work related diseases and is being offeringeffective emergency and injury care at work. The centre will develop health educationtraining packages including use of personal protective equipment for all employees andimpart training accordingly. Occupational Health Service shall arrange to provide adequatenumber of First Aid Boxes with approved contents on the shop floor. Ambulance shall beavailable to meet any emergency situation.
The records of health check-up of all employees have been already maintained by Biocon.This will be extended to BBIL also. The occurrence of occupational health hazards anddiseases shall also be maintained. The records will be reviewed at intervals of two years tocheck the effectiveness of various measures implemented. Based on the review, action planto improve the effectiveness of occupational health and safety measures shall be prepared.
9.5.4 Safety
Overall safety of man and material is an important aspect of industry performance. Thesafety policy of the industry shall be clearly defined. The developer shall implement separatesafety measures for construction and operation phases and a safety officer shall beemployed by the BBIL industry which shall also coordinate with BL EMC safety officer.
Creating awareness among the targeted group is very important for the successfulimplementation of safety.
9.5.4.1 Safety Circle
In order to fully develop the capabilities of the employees in identification of hazardousprocesses and improving safety and health, safety circles would be constituted in each areaof work. The circle would consist of 5-6 employees from that area. The circle normally shallmeet for about an hour every week.
9.5.4.2 Safety Training
Safety training shall be provided by the Safety Officer with the assistance of faculty memberscalled from Professional Safety Institutions and Universities. In addition to regularemployees, limited contractor labours shall also be provided safety training.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 285
9.5.5 Endemic Disease Mitigation Plan
During baseline monitoring (September to November 2016) environmental consultant hasdone informal consultation with villagers in the study area it is understood that there are nomajor epidemics in recent years in the study area., but the occurrence of certain majordiseases such as TB, Cancer, Fluorosis and kidney problems are prevalent.
Considering the possibility of increase the above diseases due to development of BBIL withinBiocon SEZ in the study area, it is necessary to have an Action plan to mitigate the issuebeforehand.
9.5.5.1 Possible Health Hazards
Industrial Unit: The possible Health hazards which may become an Endemic disease orOccupational illnesses in Long term during construction and operational phase of BSEZ/BBIL area are given below:
Chemical hazards, including heavy metals, such as lead & mercury, solvents like diesel,and many other chemicals including paints that are used in project.
Physical hazards, such as excessive noise, vibration, extremes of temperature andpressure, and ionizing and non ionizing radiation.
Biomechanical hazards, such as heavy lifting, repetitive or awkward or forcefulmovements that result in musculoskeletal disorders, like carpal tunnel syndrome and lowback pain.
Biologic hazards, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), hepatitis B and hepatitisC viruses, the tubercle bacillus, and many other bacteria, viruses, and othermicroorganisms that may be transmitted through air, water, food, or direct contact.
Psycho-social hazards, such as workplaces where there is high stress due to excessivedemands on, and low control by, workers; stress and hostility resulting from urbancongestion, such as “Road Traffic”.
9.5.5.2 Occupation Health & Endemic Disease Mitigation Action Plan
Data Collection: Occupational and environmental diseases and injuries can be recognizedat the individual level, which depends on obtaining and assessing an occupational andenvironmental history. Before implementation of the Mitigation Action Plan, the healthinformation of the people in the project area upto 10km shall be collected from respectivedepartments (Government/Hospitals). The data shall be collected and the report should bedocumented & updated every year.
Mitigation Measures: The following are some of the mitigation measures for OccupationalHealth and Endemic diseases:
Immediate Actions:
Ensure through proper support and training that all employees are aware of hazards andaccept responsibility for working safely during Construction and Operational phases. Thiswill significantly reduce Occupational Health hazards and illness.
Ensure presence of a key staff/doctor at the time of emergency to know, what to do ifthey suspect a notifiable disease in the surrounding.
Community based participatory research to identify issues and to assess change fordeveloping problem/location specific plans.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 286
Long Term Actions:
It shall be ensured that the respective Government department of Municipality disinfectsresidential areas which lie around the project site regularly.
Ensuring provision of necessary medical facilities in the study area. Necessary guidanceshall be provided to enhance the medical facility in the area.
Periodic health awareness camps and health check-ups should be organised in the studyarea to ensure better health standards of the people.
Basic Information Requirements
The following shall be understood before implementing a mitigation measure;
Possibility of providing additional responsibilities to EHS to take necessary immediateactions during emergencies.
Animal welfare – for example, access to feed, provision of sufficient appropriate sheltersshall be analysed.
Potential alternative methods to control various diseases out breaks. Consideration of other induced developments. Possibilities to dissipate information quickly.
Monitoring for Endemic Disease Mitigation Activities
Frequent health check-ups shall be carried out for the workers. Thus the health relatedissues within the industrial unit can be analysed.
Mitigation measures as suggested above shall be updated every year based on thecollected data/information on health conditions of the people living in the study area.
Information obtained from monitoring of Environmental parameters as provided in Chapter 6shall be correlated with the health information to provide a clear understanding of pollutantimpacts.
9.6 Institutional Mechanism for Implementation of Mitigation Measures
The effective implementation and close supervision of the environmental management tomitigate the environmental impacts, which are likely to arise due to the construction andoperational phases of the project could be achieved through a suitable institutionalmechanism. The proposed institutional mechanism recommended for the implementation ofthe mitigation measures is presented in Figure 9-4.
A proper institutional mechanism to understand and implement appropriate environmentalmanagement measures during various stages of the project is a pre requisite and has astrong bearing for the overall success of the project management. Implementation of theEnvironmental Management measures shall become easy once an environmentallyresponsible Team is in place.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 287
KSPCB MoEF&CC CPCB
BL ProjectAuthority
Fund Support Monitoring Efficiency
of Implementation Monitoring
Performance Indicator Ensuring Compliance
to StatutoryRequirements
Compliance toEnvironmental andSocial Policy
SupportInstitution
External Institute ofreputed Monitoringinstitution
In house and externalMonitoring
Implementation ofEMP/MitigationMeasures
Obtaining StatusClearances
Compliance to internalpolicies
Data Management andtrend analysis topropose and implementappropriate intervention
Environmental Management Cell (EMC)
CTE CTO Monitoring of
conditionsApplied
CTO/CTEApplications
EnvironmentalAppraisal
EnvironmentalAppraisal
CDMApplication
ProvidingDesignInformation
Assistance inMonitoring
Figure 9-4: Implementation Arrangement
9.7 Environmental Management Cell (EMC)
Apart from having an Environmental Management Plan, it is also necessary to have apermanent organizational set up charged with the task of ensuring its effectiveimplementation of mitigation measures and to conduct environmental monitoring. The majorduties and responsibilities of Environment Management Cell are:
To implement the environmental management plan To assure regulatory compliance with all relevant rules and regulations To ensure regular operation and maintenance of pollution control devices To minimize environmental impacts of operations as by strict adherence to the EMP To initiate environmental monitoring as per approved schedule Review and interpretation of monitoring as per approved schedule Review and interpretation of monitoring results and corrective measures in case
monitored results are above the specified limit Maintain documentation of good environmental practices and applicable environmental
laws as ready reference Maintain environmental related records Coordination with regulatory agencies, external consultant, monitoring laboratories Maintain log of public complain and the action taken
Record keeping: The proposed environmental management cell should have all basic recordkeeping facilities such as:
Hard ware/software facilities, Adequate space,
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 288
Vehicle (transport) and Basic furniture and All simple instruments such as GPS, Digital camera, Hand held noise metre etc.
The cell should have all basic environmental management data of the project that includesbut not limited to the following
Environmental Impact Assessment Reports (both well preserved soft and hard copy) All valid and up to date environmental clearance and consent papers All latest Environmental legislations, policies, codes and manuals for ready references A list of consultants on environmental management need to be kept with yearly revision
of the list. This will help to receive proper advice in case of an emergency or arequirement and also to implement day to day environmental management activities.
Over a period of time a system to understand and absorb the new revisions and changes inthe environmental requirements and practices are to be established. This can only beachieved by regular training and genuine capacity building initiatives. The organizational setup for Biocon Environmental Management Cell is given as Figure 9-5.
Figure 9-5: Biocon Organizational Setup for Environmental Management Cell
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 289
9.8 Approach towards Voluntary Compliance
Biocon has already best 4 management systems i.e Environmental Management System(EMS) based on recognized international standards for environmental and safetymanagement systems (ISO 14001 – 2008), OHSAS 18001- 2007, 2008, SocialAccountability (SA) 8000 & ISO 9001: 2008 Quality Management systems. The mainobjective of ISO 14001 is to establish a system to assess, monitor and manageenvironmental performances, which can be used to promote continual environmentalimprovement and prevention of pollution. Biocon EHS Policy enclosed as Annexure W
9.9 Audits and Inspections
In addition, the EHS/EMC Department shall be responsible for implementing ComplianceAssurance activities, namely environmental audits. Internal audits and reviews ofenvironmental procedures shall be conducted annually.
The EHS Steering Committee, made up of Management Team members, shall conductquarterly EHS performance reviews. Any change to the environment wholly or partial isidentified, evaluated and equally corrective actions are taken to better the environmentalperformance.
A vital part of EHS practice is to learn from experience, using it as basis to improve thesystem. To this effect, periodic inspections and record keeping provides a measure of howeffective programs are and facilitates identification of areas where improvement will benecessary. Environmental inspections consist of examining all activities and documentingthose actions that are carried out in compliance with environmental clearances,specifications relating to environmental protection, and mitigation plans approved.
9.10 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Various project activities, associated impacts and mitigation measures are summarised inTable 9-7.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 291
Table 9-7: Project Activities, Associated Impacts, and Mitigation Measures
S.No. Activity
Relevant Environmentalcomponents likely to be
impacted
Likely Impacts and theirsignificance in the absence
of Mitigation MeasuresProposed
Mitigation MeasuresResponsible Agencyfor Implementation
Construction Phase1. Site levelling/
Materialtransport andconstructionactivities
Air Quality Exhaust emissions fromvehicles
Windblown dust duringmaterial movement
Fugitive dust duringmaterial unloading
Dust suspension duringsite preparation,construction andtrenching
Emissions from DG sets
To reduce impacts from exhausts, emission control norms will beenforced/adhered.
All the vehicles and construction machinery will be periodically checked toensure compliance to the emission standards
Construction equipment and transport vehicles will be periodically washedto remove accumulated dirt
Providing adequately sized construction yard for storage of constructionmaterials, equipment tools, earthmoving equipment, etc.
Provide enclosures on all sides of construction site Movement of material will be mostly during non-peak hours. On-site vehicle speeds will be controlled to reduce excessive dust
suspension in air and dispersion by traffic Water sprinkling will be carried out to suppress fugitive dust in the project
site Environmental awareness program will be provided to the personnel
involved in developmental works Use of tarpaulin covers and speed regulations for vehicles engaged in
transportation
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBIL industry
Noise Noise /Vibration fromfollowing activities Vehicles transporting
construction material Diesel run engines of
construction machinery Drilling/Pile driving
activities
Noise levels shall be maintained below threshold levels stipulated byCentral Pollution Control Board (CPCB) time to time
Procurement of machinery/construction equipment in accordance withspecifications conforming to source noise levels less than 75 dB (A)
Well-maintained construction equipment, which meets the regulatorystandards for source noise levels, shall be used
Any equipment emitting high noise, wherever possible, shall be orientedso that the noise is directed away from sensitive receptors
Noise attenuation will be practised for noisy equipment by employingsuitable techniques such as acoustic controls, insulation and vibrationdampers
High noise generating activities such as piling and drilling shall bescheduled in day time
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBILindustry
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 292
S.No. Activity
Relevant Environmentalcomponents likely to be
impacted
Likely Impacts and theirsignificance in the absence
of Mitigation MeasuresProposed
Mitigation MeasuresResponsible Agencyfor Implementation
Personnel exposed to noise levels beyond threshold limits shall beprovided with PPE.
Disturbance to NaturalDrainage pattern
Impact to natural flow ofrunoff due to blockageand change of drainagecourse
The drains passing through the area shall be routed as per the proposeddrain routing plan
Adequate storm water drainage system shall be provided. The storm water system need to be properly connected to the natural
drainage system of the area Drainage system will be provided at construction yard. Measures will be
taken to prevent silting of natural drainage due to runoff from constructionareas
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBIL
Vegetation and Strain onexisting infrastructure
Loss of vegetation andstrain on existinginfrastructure.
Commencement of greenbelt development during construction phaseespecially in terms of nursery development and identification ofindigenous species
Temporary workers camp with self-sufficient infrastructure facilities.
ConstructionContractors/Developer/BBIL
Existing Traffic Traffic addition Jigani link road is passing just adjacent from BSEZ and the Transportationof construction materials will be carried out during non- peak hours.
Regularization of truck movement
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBIL
2. Solid WasteManagement
Soil quality Impacts due to disposalof solid waste on ground
Construction waste shall be used within project site for filling of low lyingareas.
Excavated soil shall be stockpiled in a corner of the site in bunded area toavoid run off with storm water.
General refuse generated on-site shall be collected in waste skips andseparated from construction waste.
Local authorised waste recycler shall be employed to remove generalrefuse from the site, separately from construction waste and hazardouswastes
Recyclable wastes will be disposed through KSPCB approved vendors Burning of refuse at construction sites shall be prohibited.
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBIL
3. Handling ofhazardousmaterials
Human safety andproperty loss
Fire accidents due tohazardous materialhandling
Health Issues
Adequate safety measures as per OSHA standards will be adopted Construction site will be secured by fencing with controlled/limited entry
points. Hazardous materials such as lubricants, paints, compressed gases, and
varnishes etc., will be stored as per the prescribed/approved safetynorms.
ConstructionContractors/developer/BBIL
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 293
S.No. Activity
Relevant Environmentalcomponents likely to be
impacted
Likely Impacts and theirsignificance in the absence
of Mitigation MeasuresProposed
Mitigation MeasuresResponsible Agencyfor Implementation
Construction site will be secured by fencing with controlled/ limited entrypoints
Medical facilities including first aid will be made available for attending toinjured workers.
Handling and storage as per statutory guidelines. Positive isolation procedures will be adhered Handling and storage as per MSIHC rules, MoEF&CC guidelines with Fire
protection system. Hazardous wastes, if any, shall be disposed to nearby TSDF through
KSPCB/CPCB approved vendors4. Water
ResourcesWater scarcity /Pollution tothe nearby water bodies
Impacts to the surfacewater body
Water Requirement during the construction will be met through roadtankers/local municipal bodies
Care should be taken to prevent the contaminated runoff from theconstruction site to the nearby natural streams, if any
Optimized utilization of the water Wastewater and sewage generated shall be treated at existing BSEZ STP
ConstructionContractors/Developer/BBIL
Operational Phase1. Stack
Emissions ofBBIL
Air Quality Stack emissions Use of Natural Gas for Boiler Stack height of Boiler shall be as per CPCB guidelines Stack emissions will be maintained as per KSPCB/CPCB standards by
providing emission control devices Periodical Monitoring of pollutants at stacks
Developer/BBIL
Vehicular emissions Access roads to be provided to avoid traffic congestion Use of tarpaulin covers and speed regulations for vehicles engaged in
transportation
Developer/BBIL
2. Operation ofCompressors,andgeneratorsetc
Noise Increased noise levelsdue to equipmenthandling and vehicularmovement
Acoustic Barriers and Enclosures All transportation vehicles, machinery will be periodically checked to
ensure minimal noise generation to comply OHSAS and ambient noisestandards in the surrounding area
Personal Protecting Equipment (PPE) Greenbelt Development Counselling and traffic regulation
Developer/BBIL
Vibration Temporary perplexity Machine and equipment likely to generate vibration shall be fixed based Developer/BBIL
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 294
S.No. Activity
Relevant Environmentalcomponents likely to be
impacted
Likely Impacts and theirsignificance in the absence
of Mitigation MeasuresProposed
Mitigation MeasuresResponsible Agencyfor Implementation
Health implication onworking continuously invibrating environment
on the detail designing of foundation. Machinery equipped with latest vibration-reduction technology shall
minimise the vibrations. Vibration dampers shall be provided around the source of generation
3. Water Supply Water resources Impact on existing waterresources
Total water requirement will be met from BSEZ through BWSSB No dependent on Ground water
Developer
4. Solid wastemanagement
Groundwater and Soilquality
Impact due to disposal ofsolid waste on groundwithout treatment
Composted bio-degradable waste will be used as manure for greenbelt. Non compostable and non-recyclable waste will be sent to municipal. Other recyclable wastes will be sold to KSPCB authorised recyclers.
Developer/BBIL
5. Handling ofhazardouswastes
Fire accidents due toproducts handling
Human life and loss ofproperty
Hazardous materials will be stored as per the prescribed/approved safetynorms.
Temporary storage of hazardous waste within the industry premises for aperiod of 90 days.
Hazardous wastes will be sent to nearby TSDF through KSPCB approvedvendors.
Medical facilities including first aid will be available for attending to injuredworkers
Emergency alarms, provision of fire hydrant system and fire station. Effective Disaster Management Plan (DMP) which covers onsite and
offsite emergency plans. Recovery of spills to the extent possible
Developer/BBIL
6. Operation ofBBIL
Socio-economicconditions of the region
During operational phase, the BBIL and associated facilities is likely to generate direct employment of 56no’s. In addition, there is wide variety of jobs that are generated in the form of indirect employment (e.g.hotel business, small eateries, construction, transport, etc.). This project may generate indirect employmentup to 1000.Local people will be given preference based on their qualification and skill set. Together with thisemployment potential, project will help to enhance the socio economic conditions of the area with betterschooling, communication and transport facilities that will be developed/ triggered as a part of overalleconomic development of the region
Developer/BBIL
Natural Hazards As given in Disaster Management Plan (DMP) prepared; Site Main controller will act as the overall in-charge ofthe control of educative, protective and rehabilitation activities to ensure least damage to life and property.
Induced Development Offers an efficient and cost effective supply chain/ value proposition to the local importers and exporters.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 295
9.11 Budgetary Estimates
9.11.1 Budgetary Estimate for Environmental Management
The budgetary estimate (Capital Cost) for Environmental Management is INR 19 Crores andthe annual recurring cost is INR 2.4 Crores. The breakup of cost is given in Table 9-8 &
S.No. Purpose Cost items
Millions Crores(INR)
1. Greenbelt development Plantation 2 0.2
2. Solid waste Management Dustbins, Waste storage shed etc 2 0.20
3. Housekeeping Housekeeping 1 0.1
4. Air Pollution Control Installation of Stacks &Control equipments 15.1 1.51
5. Noise Pollution Control Enclosures 5 0.5
6. Water Pollution Control Construction of ETP & STP 150 15
7. Environmental Monitoring Environmental Laboratory 15 1.5
Total Capital Cost 190 19.0
Table 9-9.
Table 9-8: Environmental Management - Capital Cost
S.No. Purpose Cost items
Millions Crores(INR)
1. Greenbelt development Plantation 2 0.2
2. Solid waste Management Dustbins, Waste storage shed etc 2 0.20
3. Housekeeping Housekeeping 1 0.1
4. Air Pollution Control Installation of Stacks &Control equipments 15.1 1.51
5. Noise Pollution Control Enclosures 5 0.5
6. Water Pollution Control Construction of ETP & STP 150 15
7. Environmental Monitoring Environmental Laboratory 15 1.5
Total Capital Cost 190 19.0
Table 9-9: Environmental Management - Annual Recurring Cost
S. No. Purpose Cost items Millions Crores (INR)
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 296
1. Greenbelt development Green belt maintenance 0.5 0.05
2. Solid Waste Management Waste dustbin/waste handling 1 0.1
3. Housekeeping Housekeeping 0.5 0.05
4. Air Pollution Control Periodical Maintenance/Cleaning etc 1 0.1
5. Noise Pollution Control Maintenance/Cleaning 0.5 0.05
6. Water Pollution Control STP & ETP Maintenance 20 2
7. Environmental Monitoring Terrestrial Environmental Monitoring 0.5 0.05
Total Recurring Cost 24 2.4
9.11.2 Budgetary Estimate for CSR Interventions in the Study Area
Biocon’s Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives, started in 2004, are based on theprinciple of making enduring impact through programs that promote social and economicinclusion.
At Biocon, CSR has been an integral part of their business since inception. The company iscommitted to innovation, affordability and access to healthcare. In line with this commitmentand as a socially responsible organisation, Biocon has, over the last 10 years, investedsignificantly in various CSR programs aimed at making a difference to the lives ofmarginalized communities.Biocon's CSR activities are/will be implemented through:
Biocon Foundation - develops and implements healthcare, educational, andinfrastructure projects for marginalized sections of society and also promotes the richArt & Culture of India, to encourage artists, and sensitize communities.
Biocon Academy – aims to address the skill deficit in the Biotechnology sector, bydeveloping high-end talent through advanced learning and industrial training to makethem employable
External Partners – with track records in the CSR area.
9.11.2.1 Phasing of CSR Initiatives
Biocon Foundation’s initiatives are primarily focused on healthcare, primary education andrural development. All projects are developed and implemented by Biocon Foundation basedon need assessment through discussions with local communities, and governmentdepartments. Project appraisals are done periodically by combining community feedbackwith evaluation metrics developed by the Foundation. These metrics include patient footfall,health indicators, feedback from teachers, community satisfaction etc.
It is suggested Biocon may take up the investments on priority ranking of the activities asfurnished in a period of 5 years as given in the below Table 9-10.
Table 9-10: Suggested Sector Plan Budget Allocation and TimelineS. No. Sector Priority Suggested % Timeline for Investments
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Environmental Management PlanPage 297
ranking forinvestment
of Allocationout of Total
Budget
First &Second
year
3rd to 5th
year
A. Education 15%
All activitiesranked as1&2 in the
table
All activitiesranked as >3in the table
1. Providing Computers & Supply of Furniture 22. Additional class rooms to Schools 3
3. Construction of Anganwadi Buildings withToilets 1
4. School Construction of Compound wall 4B. Village Level Infrastructure 35%
1. Provision of drinking water to villages havingfluoride ground water 1
2. Bore well 2
3. SANITATIONHousehold toilets 5
4. Construction of Community Hall 65. Better road facility 4
6. HEALTH –Sub health centres & healthcamps 3
C. Youth Development 15%1. Youth motivation programmes 1
2. Skill Training specific to the BioconIndustries 2
3. Promoting ancillary units through YouthEntrepreneur development programmes 3
4. Sports Equipments 4D. Women Empowerment 15%
1. Women empowerment motivationprogrammes 1
2. Skill Training specific to the Bioconindustries 2
3.
Promoting service units (Job order/ Finishingcontract jobs/Gardening/Horticulture/Catering/canteen)through SHG Entrepreneur developmentprogrammes
3
E. Environment/Sustainable Development 20%1. Tree plantation 2
2. Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandrysupport programmes 1
3. Rain water harvesting and water shedprogrammes 1
9.11.2.2 Governance
9.11.2.2.1CSR Committee
The CSR Committee is responsible for oversight of all CSR activities from start to finish. Itshall meet at least twice a year to ensure Biocon delivers on its CSR goals.
9.11.2.2.2 Identification of programs for CSR
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 9 Environmental Management PlanPage 298
Programs to be supported via CSR will be selected by the CSR committee through atransparent process and the selected programs will meet the regulatory requirements.Enterprise social commitment plan of Biocon enclosed as Annexure V.
9.11.2.2.3Budgeting and spend
For each financial year, the minimum amount available for CSR spending will be defined inaccordance with the applicable provisions of the statute. Any surplus arising out of CSRprojects shall not form part of business profit of the company. As per the statute, any unspentbudget shall be reported in the Annual Report.
9.11.2.2.4Reporting
CSR initiatives of the company will be reported in the Annual Report.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 299
Chapter 10Summary & Conclusion
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 10 Summary & ConclusionPage 300
Chapter 10 Summary & Conclusion
10.1 Introduction
10.1.1 Project background
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) proposes to set up a commercial manufacturingcomplex for manufacture and commercially supply various generic drugs which wouldinclude dosage forms like oral solids, parenteral, etc. The finished dosage form dossierswould be filed in countries of interest for regulatory approval. Once the dossiers are incompliance with respective regulatory requirements, the product would be ready to market.
It would be B2C opportunity for BBIL which aim to build a robust pipeline with a balance ofdifficult-to-develop and technology-intensive molecules that can be commercialised. BBILhas currently more than 20 ANDA programmes under development. The new companywould also aim to use Biocon’s well-established API business to vertically integrate intomaking finished dosage forms for developed markets and emerging market.
BBIL would focus on few special therapeutic segments such as oncology, diabetology,cardiology, inflammatory diseases and become a market leader in them. Production andexport of Novel at Plot No 2, 3, 4 and 5, BSEZ, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase 4,Bommasandra Jigani Road, Anekal taluk, Bengaluru Urban district, Karnataka for theproduction of following:
Production for the Biologicals, antibodies and its derivatives - 1650 kg/ annum
Formulations of antibodies, derivatives, proteins, peptides and biologicals
3. 10 million vials/annum
4. 4 million injectable pens/annum
10.1.2 Overview of Biocon
M/s. Biocon Limited, a leading biopharmaceutical manufacturing organization wasestablished in 1978, Bangalore. It is India's largest biotech company focused on deliveringaffordable innovation.
As a fully integrated Biopharma company, it delivers innovative biopharmaceutical solutionsranging from discovery to development and commercialization, leveraging the cutting edgescience, cost-effective drug development capabilities and global scale manufacturingcapacities, to move ideas to market.
Biocon Ltd., Asia’s premier biopharmaceutical company, is committed to ensure a globalright to healthcare by addressing the worldwide need for safe, effective and affordable biotherapeutics. They have harnessed the power of biotechnology through affordable innovationto enhance access to new and differentiated therapies for diseases that are chronic, wheremedical needs are largely unmet.
The company is a pioneer in bringing the benefit of high quality, yet affordable, novelbiologics and biosimilars to patients in India and other emerging markets. Today, they areIndia’s largest and fully integrated biopharmaceutical company that develops, manufacturesand supplies advanced, life-saving biopharmaceuticals for diabetes, cancer and autoimmuneconditions at price points that make them affordable and thus accessible.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Summary & ConclusionPage 301
As an innovation-led organization focused on providing affordable access, they haveleveraged our inherent strengths in advanced science to develop, manufacture and deliver arich portfolio of small molecules APIs & formulations and complex biologics - both novels andbiosimilars - including Monoclonal Antibodies (MAbs), rh-Insulin and insulin analogs.
Their global scale capacities for manufacturing high quality, affordable biologics havepositioned them as the world's fourth largest insulin’s producer, enabling to address thegrowing needs of diabetes patients across the globe. As one of the leading oncologycompanies in India, they have brought safe, efficacious and affordable medicines for cancerto cater to the needs of patients, caregivers and medical practitioners in the country.As India's largest domestic branded biologics company, they have taken key products likeINSUGEN (rh-insulin), BASALOG (Glargine), CANMAb (Trastuzumab),BIOMAb-EGFR(Nimotuzumab) and ALZUMAb (Itolizumab), a ‘first in class’ anti-CD6 monoclonal antibody,from discovery to commercialization.
10.1.3 Overview of Biocon SEZ
M/s. Biocon SEZ (BSEZ) was established in 2006. It is located at plot # 2, 3, 4 & 5,Bommasandra Industrial area, phase 4, Bommasandra Jigani link road, Anekal Taluk,Bangalore Urban Distict, Karnataka state. It is India’s largest integrated biotechnology hub,comprising an integrated cluster of research laboratories and manufacturing facilities spreadacross 90 acres in KIADB (Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board) industrial estate.
10.1.4 Location of Project site
The proposed site is located at Biocon SEZ Bommasandra Village, Anekal Taluk, inBengaluru urban district of Karnataka. The site is about 1.19 Ha (2.95 Acres) and falls in57H/9 of SOI Topo sheet and spatial location of the site is 120 48’ 3.22” N & 790 39’ 35.22” E(Centre Coordinates).
10.1.5 Need and Justification of Project Development
To achieve the growth target, Biocon intends to expand its (and its affiliates) manufacturingcapacities by adding one more Greenfield site in Bengaluru, for manufacturing of variousbiologicals, antibodies, derivatives and formulated products.
The project seeks to fulfil the following objectives:
4. Primarily to fulfil the demands of a large world market.
5. Generate substantial export earnings.
6. Create a world class facility on par with international biological manufacturingorganizations.
The facility would be designed to develop processes for pre-clinical, clinical and commercialscale material. The capabilities would include the scale up of the product to pilot scale andcommercial scale manufacturing. The Greenfield site is envisaged to meet the national andinternational regulations to be followed in the manufacture of the biological products asapplicable and shall be built under the cGMP guidelines.
10.2 Project Description
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 10 Summary & ConclusionPage 302
M/s. Biocon Biologics India Limited (BBIL) proposes to set up a commercial manufacturingcomplex to manufacture and commercially supply various generic drugs which would includedosage forms like oral solids, parenteral, etc.
The finished dosage form dossiers would be filed in countries of interest for regulatoryapproval. Once the dossiers are in compliance with respective regulatory requirements, theproduct would be ready to market.
10.2.1 Cost of the Project
The total capital investment on the project is INR 1050 Crores.
10.3 Description of Environment
Project Influence Area (PIA)/Study Area: A 10 km radial distance with the proposed projectsite as the epicentre has been identified as the General study area for assessing thebaseline environmental status. The core study area is the project area and its immediatesurroundings to the tune of 1.0 km radius from the boundary. The project area is the landwhere the proposed BBIL is being developed. Further the Project Impact Area (PIA) is 10kmfrom the boundary of the core area covering Anekal Taluka under Bengaluru Urban district.
10.3.1 Terrestrial Environment
Ecologically sensitive areas like Biosphere Reserve, National Parks, and Wildlife Sanctuariesprotected sites as per Ramsar convention and other protected areas (PA) are not foundwithin 10 Km radius of the project site except Bannerghatta Biological Park (BBP) located ata distance of 9.59Km radius from proposed project site.
Daily maximum temperature during the study period is 28.5oC and the daily minimumtemperature is 17.1oC were recorded in the months of September and Novemberrespectively
Maximum and minimum relative humidity of 86% and 62% were recorded in the monthsof September and November respectively
Maximum and minimum rainfall of 195.6 mm and 58.4 mm was recorded in the months ofSeptember and November respectively
Total rainfall recorded during the study period is 406 mm Maximum and minimum Mean wind speed during the study period is 2.66 m/s and 1.41
m/s. Ambient air quality was monitored twice in a week for One (01) season (shall cover 12
weeks), i.e. during Post Monsoon season (September to November, 2016). PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, Pb, NH3, C6H6, C20H12, As, Ni, were monitored on 24 hourly basis
and O3 and CO were monitored on eight hourly basis. VOC, Cl, HCl, HBr & H2S weremonitored on 2 hrly basis. Sampling was carried out as per Central Pollution ControlBoard (CPCB) monitoring guidelines at each location. All parameters are within thestipulated norms.
Day equivalent noise levels (Ld) ranged between 55.0 dB(A) to 84.5 dB (A) Night equivalent noise levels (Ln) ranged between 50.1dB (A) to 78.9 dB (A). The field observations during the study period indicate that the ambient noise levels in
the Industrial area were slightly exceeded the prescribed standards except project siteand in Residential noise zones noise levels are slightly exceeded the limit prescribed byMoEF&CC.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Summary & ConclusionPage 303
In the surface water the pH varied between 7.11-7.80 which are meeting the IS: 2296
1982 for inland surface water. The pH value for all the samples in the study area during
study period found to be within the limits.
The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 210-1475 mg/l for the surface water
The TDS value for all the samples meeting the class E standards of IS: 2296 1982.
The surface water is minimum 33mg/l and maximum 335mg/l which are meeting the
class C standards of IS: 2296 1982.
The sulphate content of the surface water meeting the minimum range of 20mg/l and
maximum range of 55mg/l. The surface water samples meeting the class E standard of
IS: 2296 1982
The surface water indicates its range varied between 122-905 mg/l. The ground water results of the study area indicate that the average pH ranges is varied
between 7.18-7.96,
The Total Dissolved Solids ranges is varied between 390-1290mg/l for the ground water
and its meets the permissible limits of IS 10500: 2012
The desirable limit of the chloride content is 250mg/l and permissible limit is 1000 mg/l.
The chloride content in the ground water for study area is ranges between 66mg/l –
417mg/l.
The desirable limit of the sulphate content is 200mg/l and permissible limit is 400mg/l. the
sulphate content of the ground water of the study area is varied between 19 mg/l -
122mg/l meeting the desirable limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
The Total hardness ranges is between 133-686 mg/l for ground water its meeting thepermissible limit of the IS 10500: 2012.
The pH of the soil samples ranged from 5.26- 8.66 indicating that the soils are almostneutral in nature.
Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from 19-716 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 22-30 (%). Nitrogen content ranged from 314 kg/ha to 769 kg/ha Phosphorous ranged from 0.316 to 0.800 kg/ha Potassium content ranges from 0.750 to 1400 kg/ha
10.3.2 Socioeconomic status
The district is unique in nature as more urbanized with rural flavours. The district is thehighest contributor to the State Economy with 33.3% contribution to GDDP (2012-13). Theper capita annual income in the district is INR 2,02,340 (2012-13).
The tertiary sector contributing 39.5% and secondary sector is contributing 36% and primarysector is contributing 2.3% to GDP.
Paddy, Ragi, Maize, oil seeds, Horticulture crops are main crops of the district. The districthas good agricultural in infrastructure like Ware houses, Cold storage facilities, transportfacilities for domestic and international markets.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 10 Summary & ConclusionPage 304
10.4 Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures
BBIL is proposed within BSEZ to be developed in an area of about 1.19 Ha (2.95Acres), which is part of Biocon SEZ. The complete land for development of BBIL is inpossession of Biocon Ltd for more than a decade. The complete land was acquired inthe year 2005 from KIADB. The land is devoid of any settlements and there will be noland acquisition and Resettlement or Rehabilitation for development of the proposedproject.
The wastewater generated in BBIL will be mainly sewage and process effluent.Sewage generated will be treated in proposed STP. Effluent generated from variousprocesses will be treated in proposed ETP followed by RO. Rejects from RO will betreated in existing Multiple Effect Evaporator of BSEZ. Salts generated from MEE willbe disposed to TSDF.
Treated wastewater from STP & ETP will be used for green belt development/ToiletFlushing within BBIL & BSEZ and balance will be reused as non potable water forvarious applications (mostly utilities). Discharge of wastewater on land is notpermitted and there will not be any impacts due to contamination of soil, ground andsurface water (canals & numerous village ponds) in and around the project sites, sothat the proposed system will be Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system.
There are no national parks, wildlife sanctuaries or biosphere reserves within 10 kmradius from the plant site. Except Bannerghatta National Park, which is 9.59Km awayfrom proposed project in west direction.
The 1st highest 24 Hour average and Annual Average incremental and resultantconcentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2 , CO and NO2 are well within NAAQS for BBILsources alone.
Hazardous materials such as lubricants, paints, compressed gases, and varnishesetc., will be stored as per the prescribed/approved safety norms.
Hazardous wastes will be disposed through approved KSPCB vendors.
Hazardous materials will be stored as per prescribed safety norms in locations withrestricted entry and with fire-fighting facilities.
10.5 Analysis of Alternative Sites
The proposed site and the land in question have been acquired in the year 2005 underBSEZ. The area was kept idle for a long period and then efforts were made recently by theBIOCON for development of Biocon Biologics India Limited on a fast-track basis.
10.6 Environmental Monitoring Programme
Environmental monitoring programme has been formulated and the same will beimplemented. The effective implementation and close supervision of the environmentalmanagement to mitigate the environmental impacts, which are likely to arise due to theconstruction and operation phases of the project could be achieved through a suitableinstitutional mechanism.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Summary & ConclusionPage 305
10.7 Additional Studies
A disaster is a catastrophic situation in which suddenly, people are plunged into helplessnessand suffering and, as a result, need protection, clothing, shelter, medical & social care andother necessities of life.
The Disaster Management Plan (DMP) is aimed to ensure safety of life, protection ofenvironment, protection of installation, restoration of production and salvage operations inthis same order of priorities. For effective implementation of DMP, it should be widelycirculated and a personnel training is to be provided through rehearsals/drills. To tackle theconsequences of a major emergency at the project location or its immediate vicinity, a DMPhas to be formulated.
The objective of the DMP is to make use of the combined resources of the project facilitiesand the outside services to achieve the following: Effective rescue and medical treatment of casualties Safeguard other people Minimize damage to property and the environment Initially contain and ultimately bring the incident under control Identify any dead Provide for the needs of relatives Provide authoritative information to the news media Secure the safe rehabilitation of affected area Preserve relevant records and equipment for the subsequent inquiry into the cause and
circumstances of the emergency.
A framework for DMP was prepared to minimise damages in the event of a disaster. An On-Site Emergency Preparedness Plan and Off-Site Emergency Preparedness Plan werebroadly prepared to deal with emergencies and prevent disasters.
An institutional framework with clear assignment of roles and responsibilities was broadlyprepared with which location of Emergency Control Centre and Assembly Points will beidentified. Communication system and alarm systems for effective communication in theevent of a disaster are broadly identified. DMP for natural hazards such as cyclones wasbroadly prepared. Mutual aid scheme, composition of District Level Emergency Committeeand aspects relating to community involvement for dealing with off-site disasters werebroadly prepared.
10.8 Project Benefits
The project area together with Biocon SEZ is classified as an important project for integratedover all development under the KIADB. This proposition is going to benefit the entire regionfor fast track development. Based on the past experience the export oriented investmentsare supposed to be doing good in the long run.
10.8.1 Corporate Social Responsibility
As a responsible company towards the development of social conditions in the vicinity of theBBIL project, Biocon shall implement the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities.This shall be based on the gap assessment in and around (up to 10.0 km radius from Projectsite) villages.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 10 Summary & ConclusionPage 306
Annual Recurring CSR Cost would be 2% of the average net profits of the three immediatepreceding financial years.
10.9 Environmental Management Plan
The main objectives of Environmental Management are to:
Identify key environmental issues envisaged to be encountered during construction andoperation phases of the project.
Provide guidelines for appropriate mitigation measures Establish systems and procedures for implementing mitigation measures Ensure the mitigation measures are being implemented Monitor the effectiveness of mitigation measures Institutional framework includes the responsibilities for environment management as well
as responsibility for implementing environmental measures Take necessary prompt action when unforeseen impacts occur Based on the above objectives in mind, the following specific environmental management
plan/measures are discussed;o Administrative and Technical Setup for Environmental Management:o Rainwater harvesting:o Occupational health and safety: Occupational health & safety needs attention both
during construction, erection, operation and maintenance phases. As per theMoEF&CC suggestion in ToR, broad framework for Occupational health and safetymeasures are presented in EIA report.
Institutional arrangements/framework for environmental management. The effectiveimplementation and close supervision of the environmental management to mitigate theenvironmental impacts, which are likely to arise due to the construction and operationalphases of the project could be achieved through a suitable institutional mechanism. Theproposed institutional mechanism recommended for the implementation of the mitigationmeasures is presented in EIA report.
10.10 Conclusion
Typically any developmental projects also trigger a set of environmental and social impacts.These environmental and social impacts (proposed development will not envisage anyresettlement) due to development projects occur in different forms. An Environmental ImpactAssessment has been carried out to study the potential environmental and social impactsdue to the proposed BBIL project. Potential environmental and social impacts due to theproposed development on attributes like air quality, noise, water quality, soil, flora, socio-economic, etc. have been assessed as part of this EIA study. Appropriate mitigationmeasures to help minimize/avoid impacts from the development have been recommended.The measures include avoidance measures, mitigation measures and environmentalenhancement measures.
Anticipated project impacts and prevailing environmental issues are manageable and can beavoided or mitigated or minimized to acceptable standards. Potential impacts have beenidentified attributable to the proposed project and most of which are localized and temporaryin nature and can be mitigated with minor to negligible residual impacts.
The effective implementation and close supervision of environmental management tomitigate the environmental impacts could be achieved through a suitable institutionalmechanism proposed in this EIA.
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Page 307
Chapter 11Disclosure of Consultants
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 11 Disclosure of ConsultantsPage 308
Chapter 11 Disclosure of Consultants
In order to assess the potential environmental impacts due to the proposed BBIL project atBSEZ, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Phase-4, Bommasandra Jigani Link Road, AnekalTaluk, Bangalore Urban District & Karnataka State, Biocon Limited (BL) has engaged HubertEnviro Care Systems (P) Limited, Chennai to undertake EIA study. The nature ofconsultancy service rendered covers terrestrial environmental assessment.
Brief Profile of Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Limited (HECS)
Enviro Care Systems was started in the year of 1997 by Dr. J.R.Moses with the vision toserve the world in all environmental related problems by completing the latest technologicaladvancements available.
In the year 2004, Enviro Care Systems became Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd afterhaving collaboration with Hubert Stavoren B.V. for higher Technology.
The company provides total pollution control solutions to several industries like ThermalPower Plant, Pharma, R&D Facilities, Electroplating and Manufacturing, IT Parks,Residential Complexes, Dairies, Food Processing, Textile mills, Breweries, etc.
The company is specialized in executing projects right from concept development, supply,erection, commissioning and operation on turnkey basis. HECS has successfully executedmore than 200 environmental engineering projects for various industrial sectors both in Indiaand overseas.
HECS has state-of-art facilities to provide quality environmental consultancy and engineeringsolutions.
Strengths of HECS
Number of Employees
Total no of Employees : 674
No of Employees engaged in EIA : 105
Consultancy : 25
Laboratory : 80
Projects : 13
Operation & Maintenance : 556
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Disclosure of ConsultantsPage 309
Quality Policy of HECS
4300020384 Error! Reference source not found.EIA/EMP Report
Chapter 11 Disclosure of ConsultantsPage 310
QCI-NABET - EIA Accreditation
Consultancy Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
NABET Certificate No NABET/ EIA/ 1013/ 041
National Accreditation Board for Education & Training (NABET) is a constituent board of theQuality Council of India (QCI). QCI, NABET has accredited HECS for carrying out Category‘A & Category B’ EIA studies in the following sectors:
Mining of minerals including Open cast only (Sector # 1 as per NABET scheme) Onshore oil and gas exploration development & production (Sector # 2 as per NABET
scheme) Thermal Power Plants (Sector # 4 as per NABET scheme) Metallurgical Industries (ferrous & non-ferrous) (Sector # 8 as per NABET scheme) Cement Plants (Sector # 9 as per NABET scheme) Petroleum refining industry (Sector # 10 as per NABET scheme) Petro-chemical complexes (industries based on processing of petroleum fractions &
natural gas and/or reforming to aromatics) (Sector # 18 as per NABET scheme) Petrochemical based processing (Sector # 20 as per NABET scheme) Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates, bulk drugs and
intermediates excluding drug formulations, synthetic rubbers, basic organic chemicals,other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates) (Sector # 21 as perNABET scheme)
Isolated storage & handling of Hazardous chemicals (Sector # 28 as per NABETscheme)
Industrial Estates/Parks/Complexes/Areas, Export Processing Zone (EPZs), SpecialEconomic Zones (SEZs), Biotech Parks and Leather Complexes (Sector # 31 as perNABET scheme)
Building and large construction projects including shopping malls, multiplexes,commercial complexes, housing estates, hospitals, institutions (Sector # 38 as perNABET scheme)
Townships and Area development projects (Sector # 39 as per NABET scheme)
Note: - List ‘A’ – Accredited EIA Consultant Organizations Complying with Version 3 of theScheme – as on Decmenter 16, 2016 (#)
Further details may be seen on the following URL: www.hecs.in
HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTDCHENNAI
A-21, III Phase, Behind Lions Club School, Thiru Vi Ka IndustrialEstate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032, Tamil Nadu, India