27
Biology Of Cultured Cells

Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Biology Of Cultured Cells

Page 2: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Does Culturing Reflect Reality

• Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment– 3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)– Heterogeneity is changed– Local growth factors are removed

• New Environment Promotes New Properties– Progenitors are encouraged to proliferate– Differentiated cells might not have the same

function as starting differentiated cells

Page 3: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Majority Of Cells Adhere On Plastic (Treated) Provided They Are Not Transformed

• It Was Observed That Cells Prefer –vely Charged Glass Surface

• Plastic (polystyrene) Is Tissue Culture Treated – With High Energy Ionizing Radiation – Electric Ion Discharge

• Adhesion Is Mediated By Surface Receptors And Matrix– Matrix Is Secreted By Cells, Adheres To Charged Plastic– Receptors Bind to Matrix

Adhesion

Page 4: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Three Major Classes– Cell-Cell Adhesion Molecules

• CAMs (Ca2+ Independent)• Cadherins (Ca2+ Dependent)• Primarily Between Homologous Cells• Signaling occurs

– Cell-Substrate Molecules• Integrins• Bind to fibronectin, entactin, laminin, collagen• Bind the specific motif (RGD, arginine, glycine,aspratic)• Comprised of and unit

Cell Surface Adhesion Molecules

Page 5: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• 3rd Class Is Proteoglycans– Also Binds Matrix or Other Proteoglycans– Not Via RGD Motif– Low affinity Growth Factor Receptors– May Aid Binding To Higher Affinity Receptors– No Signaling Capacity

Cell Surface Adhesion Molecules

Page 6: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)
Page 7: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Spaces In Between Cells Filled With ECM– Common constituents: fibronectin, laminin, collagen,

hyaluronan, proteoglycans, bound growth factors/cytokines

• ECM Is Dependent On Cell Types– Fibrocytes secret collagen I and fibronectin– Epithelial cells secret laminin

• In Most Cases Cell Lines Are Allowed To Make Their Own ECM

• Sometimes We Provide ECM

Extracellular Matrix (ECM)

Page 8: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Cell Proliferation

Page 9: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• 4 Phases– M Phase, mitosis occurs

• Chromatin condensation, sister chromatid separation• Daughter cells

– G1 Phase• Progression to DNA SYNTHESIS • Alternatively Go OR differentiation• Restriction Points

– S Phase• DNA Synthesis• Progression to G2

– G2 Phase• Integrity of DNA Checkpoints• Apoptosis is an option

– DNA fragmentation, cell shrinkage, formation of small vesicles

Cell Cycle

Page 10: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Environment Regulates Entry Into Cell Cycle• External Growth Factors Promote Cell Proliferation

– PDGF, EGF, FGF (+ve)– TGF- (-ve)– Interact with surface receptors

• High Density Inhibits Proliferation (Contact Inhibition)

• Inside The Cell Both Positive and Negative Factors– Positive, cyclins, Growth Factor Receptor Activation– Negative, p53, Rb, Checkpoints

Control Of Cell Proliferation

Page 11: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Proliferation Does NOT Promote Differentiation

• Differentiation Often Requires– High density– Cell-Cell Interaction– Cell-Matrix Interaction– Differentiation Factors

• The Above Conditions Can Be Antagonistic To Proliferation

Proliferation vs Differentiation

Page 12: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)
Page 13: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• 3-D Tissue Retains Its Properties Longer But Can Not Be Propagated

• To Overcome This Limitation– Cells Are Cultured On Matrices– Matrigel Is Commercially Available

• Not Perfect But Promising– Heterotypic Cultures Are Promising– Pathological Behavior Can Be Studied

Tissue Retains Function Longer

Page 14: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Inability To Express In Vivo Phenotype Is Attributed To Dedifferentiation

• Still Not Clear If Dedifferentiation Occurs– Wrong lineage expansion is a possibility

– Undifferentiated cells dominate

– Absence of appropriate inducers, hormones, matrix

• Deadaptation vs Dedifferentiation– Deadaptation-enviroment suppresses phenotype, reversible

– Dedifferentiation-conversion to primitive phenotype, irreversible

Dedifferentiation

Page 15: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)
Page 16: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• After 1st Passage Primary Culture Becomes Cell Line (note Between Finite and Continuous)

• By 3rd Passage Cell Line Stabilizes

• Survival Of Stronger Might Not Necessarily Be The Objective

• Mesenchymal Cells Usually Dominate– Ex. Fibroblasts

• It Is Hard To Avoid Overgrowth Of Specialized Cells (Ex. Hepatic Parenchyma)

Evolution Of Cell Lines

Page 17: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Approximately 10 Passages

• Senescence Follows– Thought To Be Due To Telomeres– Every Division Telomeres Shorten– Germ, Stem Cells Use Telomerase

• Transformation Is Needed If Division Will Continue

Evolution Of Cell Lines

Page 18: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

• Finite Cell Lines Can Change To Continuous• Often p53 Mutation or Deletion Occurs• Overexpression Of Telomerase• Transformation vs Immortalization

– Transformation-additional changes in growth characteristics

– Immortalization-infinite lifespan

• Aneuploidy Is A Characteristic Of Cont. Cell Lines– In between diploid and tetraploid– Heteroploidy is also observed

• Most Cells Never Become Continuous Cell Lines

Continuous Cell Lines

Page 19: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)
Page 20: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Cell Plasticity and Regenerative Medicine

Page 21: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Cell Types

• Somatic cells share the same genome• Expression profile is what determines cell type.

Examples of cell types:– Cardiac Muscle cells– Fibroblasts– Neurons– Stem Cells

• Recent studies have shown that a small number of transcription factors can revert skin cells to Pluripotent Stem Cells– Oct4, Sox2, Nanog

Page 22: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Stem Cells Give Rise to Different Cell Types

• Stem Cells Can Be Totipotent or Pluripotent

• Totipotency is the ability to produce ALL the cell types in an organism (placenta, endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm)– A zygote is a totipotent cell

• Pluripotency is the ability to produce ALL types in an organism EXCEPT placenta (endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm)

Page 23: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Stem Cells

Wikipedia, 2010

Page 24: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Stem Cells and Regeneration

• Stem Cells can regenerate damaged tissue• For example heart • Pluripotent Stem Cells (PSCs) hold great promise in

regenerative medicine– A major obstacle is the danger of Stem Cells turning into

tumors

• Scientists are working on transient expression/suppression of key genes involved in inducible PSCs– A good approach is through use of siRNA

Page 25: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Wound Healing and Regeneration• Humans have little regenerative capacity primarily due to tumor

suppressing genes

• Rb (retinoblastoma) is a key enzyme in tumor suppression.

– If Rb gene is inactivated cells start acting as Stem Cells

– This is a risky manipulation

• Arf is another important tumor suppressing gene that if turned off regeneration is observed

• Rb and Arf silencing was shown to result in muscle cell division and regeneration (Blau M, 2010)

• The wound site is a unique site where cells start dividing to repair damage tissue

– Adult cells are used in this process

– They start acting as ‘younger’ cells for a relatively short period of time

Page 26: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Plasticity of Fibroblasts• Fibroblasts are a ubiquitous cell type• Recent study showed that heart fibroblasts can be turned into

cardiomyocytes (Srivastava and colleagues, 2010)• Three transcription factors are needed for this transformation

– Gata4– Mef2c– Tbx5

• Expression of these transcription factors is most effectively achieved using genetically engineered retroviruses

• Heart fibroblasts have the highest conversion efficiency into cardiomyocytes– Skin fibroblasts can also be converted with a lower efficiency

Page 27: Biology Of Cultured Cells. Does Culturing Reflect Reality Culturing Deviates From In Vivo Environment –3-D matrix is disrupted (collagen, cell-cell contact)

Reverted Fibroblasts to Cardiomyocytes

Masaki, 2010

cTnT is cardiac Troponin T- a reliable marker for cardiomyocytes

MHC-GFP is a transgenic mouse with green fluorescent mature cardiomyocytes Note Upper Right quadrant

-The higher the number, the more reverted fibroblasts-Mesp1 is dispensable for troponin expression