4
Ann. Sci. For. (1989) 46 sum., 85s-88s Foresf ire@ Pkysiolragb.; E. Drsyer kat d., &s, Elsevier/lNRA Biorhythms in conifer seed germination during extended storage J.P. Barnert' and N.9. Marnonova U. S. Department of Ag&u/RIre, (=Oresf U.S.A.,and 2 Central Scientik Reseah InsgtLsn'g of &rest Geneb ad Selwtion, Vomns&, U. S. S. R. Introduction A proportion of sound s d s of m i f e r species do not germinate du~ng w pertods of the year, even when mRdl&ns are favorable. Mamonov csl a!., (19s) report that the non-germinating ss& have apparently undergone p h y s i o l q d ckazgss that anmasd germination, mis phenomenon may be due to sasod periodicity, or bishflhs. h eady mid-I 930's, Sd&in (1 935) r~a& sea- sonal variation in the gemina~sn of redl spruce (Piceil rubens Sarg.) wds. DavW (1951) and Shomer-llan (I=) also fouM seasonal trends in the seed viabifiv of several pins spies. In thm lager Wo studies, germina~va apacie wa at a maximum in Ap~l and to a minimum in Nave ber. 7198 existence af sewn& mmms has been dinicult to dswment, ad %e sbnifi- cane@ is still ques~on&, S a m re searchers have been &Be to W exlstenes of these fluma~ons (R@mec 1974; Smurova, 1969), while 0th~~ h e not (R~st~vsear et a/., 1975). Biorhythms, also known as seasonal mythms or peri- OCficIQ, seem to be related to age of seeds, med storage conditions and tree swies. me mnwpt: is irnpflant bs- auw seeds may be inconxtly ciassifid m non-viable if gsrminalian test?; are mnducld at a time of year when ths mysiolqid a&iQ of $ke seeds being Iwtd is !ow, ln carder to elm@ the signifiwes of hie rhflhms, indepndent obsewations of b101 freshly collect& and stored seeds of wvera9 conifer es were wnductd in %he Soviet Union ad in the Unit& Stales, Sds &om Wts ern (Pinus sy&@s~ t.), Nmay e (&@a &C)S (L.) Kwnrsl.), ad Sibdm (Larix siCsJ'n'm h-.) wws u d in mminalh t& mnductsd in the Soviet tss& were ntn in gwminatom mtwt wditions (Mammv @I Wssd samples were used in e& fwt. PPle tes re repaat& ~ r & stor& we %rat ha coll&d &om t9n

Biorhythms in seed storage - Southern Research · 2013. 12. 8. · Biorhythms in conifer seed germination during extended storage J.P. Barnert' and N.9. Marnonova U. S. Department

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Ann. Sci. For. (1989) 46 sum., 85s-88s Foresf ire@ Pkysiolragb.; E. Drsyer kat d., &s,

    Elsevier/lNRA

    Biorhythms in conifer seed germination during extended storage

    J.P. Barnert' and N.9. Marnonova

    U. S. Department of Ag&u/RIre, (=Oresf U.S.A., and 2 Central Scientik Reseah InsgtLsn'g of &rest G e n e b a d Selwtion, Vomns&, U. S. S. R.

    Introduction

    A proportion of sound s d s of m i f e r species do not germinate du~ng w pertods of the year, even when mRdl&ns are favorable. Mamonov csl a!., (19s) report that the non-germinating ss& have apparently undergone p h y s i o l q d ckazgss that anmasd germination, mis phenomenon may be due to s a s o d periodicity, or bishf lhs. h eady mid-I 930's, Sd&in (1 935) r ~ a & sea- sonal variation in the gemina~sn of redl spruce (Piceil rubens Sarg.) w d s . DavW (1951) and Shomer-llan (I=) also fouM seasonal trends in the seed viabifiv of several pins s p i e s . In t h m lager Wo studies, germina~va apacie w a at a maximum in A p ~ l and to a minimum in Nave ber. 7198 existence af s e w n & mmms has

    been dinicult to dswment, a d %e sbnifi- cane@ is still ques~on&, S a m r e searchers have been &Be to W exlstenes of these fluma~ons (R@mec 1974; Smurova, 1969), while 0 t h ~ ~ h e

    not (R~st~vsear et a/., 1975). Biorhythms, also known as seasonal mythms or peri- OCficIQ, seem to be related to age of seeds, med storage conditions and tree s w i e s . me mnwpt: is irnpflant bs- a u w seeds may be inconxtly ciassifid m non-viable if gsrminalian test?; are mnducld at a time of year when ths mys io lq id a&iQ of $ke seeds being Iwtd is !ow,

    ln carder to elm@ the signifiwes of hie rhflhms, indepndent obsewations of b101 freshly collect& and stored seeds of wvera9 conifer es were wnductd in %he Soviet Union a d in the Unit& Stales,

    S d s &om Wts ern (Pinus s y & @ s ~ t.), N m a y e (&@a &C)S (L.) Kwnrsl.), a d S i b d m (Larix siCsJ'n'm h-.) wws u d in m m i n a l h t& mnductsd in the Soviet

    tss& were ntn in gwminatom mtwt wditions (Mammv @I Wssd samples were used in

    e& fwt. PPle tes re repaat& ~ r & stor& w e %rat ha coll&d &om t 9 n

  • through 1982. Starage time averagd W M 3 yr. All s s d s RiitsJ h n d ~ d to a misturs conlent of less Ihw 10% a& held in %a!& containers at subfrwzing Ismperal.ures &ri% storage. At the md of the gepminam tesb, ungarnimlsd se& were ~sn;%lya;rJI% to ddtw- mine their soundnes, prw1"Eian 04 germ& natcdd seads was =brat& for tw~w psriod and swies. Il.ls r m l b of nalion tesb w r e US& m t numsrom &scsrvationrr natiw is usually at ib maimurn in %b mm&.

    Tesls in the Unl& St-les us& 3 kesw 6 lectd k&-sib s& bls of Iode4af piindn fHw palusihs Mil!.) d slab k p h (R ~3dIidM Engelm.). mesas sacsd bts w r e cletrrd of aD

    L3y Rotah, d k W ko p o w lolr 24 monthly tests and slwd at -f aQD"C ~& mh- ture contents nsau with unsbal6M se, for 3 rswaaons. tions wr8 m~

    1 W). Averagcr, $962) aatd pmlwa~s -re, compl& Fw each beatnrml value is a mathern

    Results and Diseussim

    Analysis sf the Soviet test data showed no ~ ~ o d i c i v in a t s pine and Noway spmce s e d s during the "it grr cr9' storage, but gemiwa~on of Sibdan far& seiaads dwsased in Mar& and Seplemh. A&sr the I st yr of stadrage, Scots pine s d ~ 1 - raina~on d~seased du~ng fie summer (June a& Juty) and winter ( I S e w m b r and Januaqgd) rnenfis* Geminagsn d wmw a d l a d s e e deweasd, d then lower vaigaes were eX1~3nCJd owr maore months (Table 1).

    Tests aim i&iial& that ttps ncdmbr of sound s&s that kit IQ geminate vhss wi%Btiin a g i m y ~ a r . Onty a few kcaslrly mi- le& @ne m d s~)lrg(ee SB&S faild lo ger- minate dud% the 1st yr of stsrap, indC r&b mnfiming a lack of wriodim d u ~ n g the 1st yyo.. tiarch s&%, however, mm to ex%%ib& monthly eliBerem8s in

    inaeon d u ~ n g the 1 sif yr. Dudwg ederadd ststage, the nuawbr gf

    viable seds that MUM not wraws'nate

    Jan. Feb. Mar. m. May June J ~ Y A q - S q t . Oet- Now. Dw.

  • increased significantly and di~erences in germination corresponding to the seasons of the year became pronounced. Thus, during a period of the year when one expects to see diminished physiological activity, the number of s e d s with lowered physiological activity increased 1.6, 2.2 and 1.5 times for pine, spruce and tarch, respectively (Mamonov et a/., 1 986). Long-term data collected on stored seeds by the Central Research Insetute of Forest Genetics and Selection rn the Soviet Un~on showed the number of pine and spruce seeds that dtd not germinate in March was, respectively, 2.8 and 17.7 times greater than In April, and in Novem- ber there were 5.4 and 5.1 times fewer non-germinating seeds than in December. These seasonal fluctuatrons in the num- bers of viable non-germinated seeds are indirect evidence of biorhythms.

    The greatest differences in the pedor- mance of the 2 pine spcies tested in ~e United States appeared to be due to the half-sib s e d lots. However, many of the trends establish& in the Soviet tests were confirmed in the United States pine seed tests. Gemination of 2 longleaf pine s e d lots ffu~tuated 4 or 5% from the mean over the 24 mo period, but were essentially the same as the initial germination percentage after 2 yr of storage. Viabilily of the other seed tot decreased over the storage pe- riod, but without a consistent seasonal trend. Germination values were much more variable than percentages in long- leaf pine. Response varied by each half- sib seed lot and the time of testing. The most obvious trends were decreases in speed of germination in late summer or early fail and increases in the spring - usually April or May (Fig. 1 ).

    LONWUF PIFiE

    --- L O T 1

    F s 1. Longleaf pine anB slash pine wmn\inationakes ovw a 2 yyr p

  • The response of slash pine s e d s was similar; however, the magnitude of dffler- ences in this more dormant-seeded s p cies was less than for longleaf pins. Ger- mination varied markdly m s n g s& lots, but was fairly unirom over the 24 ms test period. Germination values were mare variable and tar ied signiflantly K* month (time) of testing ( f ig. I ) . Greater fluctuation in germinalion did F d u ~ w the 2nd year of testing. Slash @ne g e d - nation values varied considerabdy among lots, but because lots reswndsd different- ly with time of testing, overall season& trends are hard to idmttfy. Gemrinaw values for 2 lots peaked in late springf early summer and decreased in August and September in both years of the test. There were indications that overall bends were different in the 2 yr.

    The marked differences in response among seed lots and the passibiliv iyof changes with the age or storage OF tihe seed could explain why gerrninatian of lots of pine species test& over time seems to improve with storage (bme~, 1%9; 1970). The data analyzed in this remd suppoFt the concept of biorhgctkms in csni- fer seed gemination and a nurnbr sf conclusions were re&ed: 3) i n d h ~ of biorhylhms are more tike8y to b baud in seeds of non-dormasrl swc=ies %an in dormant species; 2) variation in biohylhm occurs from 1 yr to another; 3) germiwatiw peaks oaur in the e d y sp~ng and Ims

    r in late summer; and 4) stor& se& show more seasonal flcaduation thm heshly wIJeGa& seeds. In addi~on, these studies indicate that the month ( ~ m i ~ ) gJI

    testing may influence the speed sf germi- nation mare than ik affects total germina- tian.

    &miation at BRfrciaO Se& Analysts (1980) Rules fw testing ssds . J. Ssed Techno/. 3, 1 - 126

    Balddn H.1. (1935) Seaonal variations in the germination of red spruce. Am. J. BoI. 22, 392- 394

    BamsM J.P. (1969) Long-term storage of long-' leaf pine seeds. Tree P/antersV Notes 26, 22-25 B m s 8 J.P. (1 970) Storage of sand pine seeds. P r w b"pIa~ l f@,~ 'M~t@~ 21, 11-12

    CEz&ator F.J. (1962) Germination value: an index csrambining sw& ancll completeness of pine se& germination. For. %I'. 8, 386-396

    DaGd R. (1951) klivating germination of mari- time phe s e d s . Nav. Stores R ~ K 661, 16-7 '7, 23-24

    Mmomv N.!., P~oselgava R.F. -'. Bpahova A.S. (19%) Stori* sea& 6.1 main tree spe~es. Agropasmizclal MQSOW, p. 77 (in Russian)

    Shomer-Blm A. (8964) Baafluenca of heal and dehydration on germination of pines. Isr. J. &t 13,93-"80

    Rostowv S.A., &ubi& E.S. bZ Solsmsn~va A A. (-975) K Y P ) ~ O S U o sezonno~li ps~rastania semian sesni obiknovennoi. Lesn. Khoa. 4, 57- W (in Russian) Smescrsva M.V. (1969) Sezcannaya inmench~vosl b&esba semian seaswi obknovenwoi prr &lit&- nem Mmnenii. Sul. WMLiWl5/57, 6-9 (ir? Rus- sim)