Upload
martha-simpson
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Objectives
Understand the current evidence related to the impact of hormonal contraception on breastfeeding Describe current expert opinion about the appropriate choice of hormonal contraceptives for breastfeeding womenBe aware of future directions for research in this area
Case
18 y/o G1P1 s/p NSVD yesterday is ready for discharge. You note on the chart that she is breastfeeding. You have counseled her about birth control pills.
What should you prescribe?
Birth control and breastfeeding
Public health issue of global importance100 million postpartum women/yr decide:– What method– When to start it
2 Good Things
Postpartum contraception– Birth interval < 24
months rarely desired
– Maternal/infant mortality
Breastfeeding– Complete nutrition– Safe food source– Immunological
defense– Saves money– Reduces risk of
breast and ovarian cancer
Global strategy on infant and young child nutrition
Revitalization of the global commitment to appropriate infant and young child
nutrition, and in particular to breastfeeding
WHO, 4/02
US commitment to breastfeeding
American Academy of Pediatrics– Breastfeeding is the ideal method of
feeding and nurturing infants
Healthy People 2010– Increase rates of breastfeeding initiation
and continuation
Breastfeeding statistics
Initiation 6 months 1 year
2010 goal 75% 50% 25%
US 64% 29% 16%
NM 78% ?? ??
Factors affecting breastfeeding
Favorable factors– Older age– Higher income– More education
Unfavorable factors– Teens– Lower income– Less education– Smoking
Family planning in NM
44% pregnancies unintended in 2000Half to couples using no methodHalf used a method inconsistently, incorrectly or a method with a high failure rate
PRAMS, 2001
Lactation: After birth
Delivery of placenta
Estrogen
Progesterone
Infant suckling
PI F PROLACTIN
MILK
Oxytocin
Potential harms of hormonal contraception
Quality of milkPassage of hormones to the infantInfant growth, milk quantity, duration of breastfeeding
Potential harms of hormonal contraception
Quality of milk
Passage of hormones to the infantInfant growth, milk quantity
Quality of milk
WHO, 1988“10 cc aliquots expressed, freeze-dried and transported to London by air” Some differences in micro-nutrients and fat content– Conflicting interpretation of significance– Infant growth a better, but elusive outcome
Potential harms of hormonal contraception
Quality of milkPassage of hormones to the infant
Infant growth, milk quantity, duration of breastfeeding
Passage of hormones to infant
Case reportsMeasuring steroid content of breast milkEstradiol in breast milk AND in maternal serum after ingestion of pill (50mic)600 cc breastmilk/day from mother taking a 50 mic COC:– 10 ng of estradiol compared with– 3-6 ng during anovulatory cycles– 6-12 ng during ovulatory cycles
Long term effects: Nilsson, 1986
48 children exposed to COCs in breastmilk48 controls8 year follow-upNo differences in– Growth – Disease– Intellectual development– Psychological behavior
Potential harms of hormonal contraception
Quality of milkPassage of hormones to the infantInfant growth, milk quantity, duration of breastfeeding
Problems with RCTs
Methods of randomization unclearMethods for allocation concealment unclearSmall sample sizesLarge loss-to-follow-up ratesMethods for measuring milk output may not reflect breastmilk production
Semm, 1966
N = 100 womenMunich, Germany 50 – high dose COC on PP days #1-1050 – identically packaged placebosOutcomes– No differences in milk volume, lactation initiation or
infant growth during the first 10 postpartum days
Miller, 1970
N= 50 women – Iowa25 – high dose COC begun at 2 wks x 21 days25 – identically packaged placebosOutcome– Less milk volume as measured by supplemental
feeds and duration of breastfeeding– Prior successful BFing best determinant of BFing to
3 mos
WHO, 1984, 1986, 1988
Hungary, ThailandN = 171 women choosing oral contraceptives– Age 25-35– Multips (2-4 live births)– Prior successful breastfeeding– Infants 2700 – 3700 gms
86 – low-dose COC begun 6 wks PP85 – progestin-only begun 6 wks PP
WHO outcomes
Breast milk volume @ 4 wk intervals x 6 mosBreast milk compositionInfant growth– 6, 9, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks
WHO results
Milk volume decreased in both groups from wk 6-24– 41% COC– 12% progestin-only
No differences in – Supplementation– “inadequate milk production”– breastfeeding continuation– infant growth– milk composition
WHO disclaimer
“… our method of measuring milk output… may have little relationship to the amount actually ingested by the baby during that or any other 24-hour period.”
WHO conclusions
“Combined oral contraceptives cannot be recommended for use during early lactation. The age at which it seems safe to recommend them will be a subject for debate and controversy.”
2 RCTs: Progestin-only pills
1: Progestin-only vs. placebo1: Progestin-only vs. progestin-only, timing of start
Velasquez, 1976
N = 20 womenMexico 12 – NET (progestin only) on PP days #1-14 8 – identically packaged placebosOutcomes– No differences in milk volume, infant growth or milk
composition during 14 days of the study
Were, 1997
N = 200 womenEldoret, Kenya 100 – progestin-only begun 6 weeks PP100 – progestin-only begun 6 months PPOutcomes– No effect on contraceptive continuation rates– No effect on pregnancy rates
DMPA: no RCTs
WHO non-randomized trial, 1994:– 2466 mother-infant pairs
• POP• DMPA• Norplant• Non-hormonal
Results:– No differences in infant growth
Progestin-only
Halderman, 2002Compare breastfeeding continuation in women given DMPA before discharge, POPs, vs. non-hormonal methods 319 women– 102 DMPA– 77 POPs– 138 Non-hormonal (barriers, abstinence)
DMPA received at mean 52 hours after delivery (range: 3 hrs to 132 hrs)
Halderman, 2002
2 weeks: No difference in BF continuation or supplementation– 60% supplementing across all groups– 56% cited insufficient milk
4 weeks: 77% DMPA BF vs. 83% non-horm BF (p=.02)– No differences in insufficient milk
6 weeks: No differences in BF continuation
ACOG Recommendations for Hormonal Contraception “if used”
POPs to start 2-3 weeks postpartumDMPA to start at 6 weeks postpartumCOCs, if prescribed, should not be started before 6 weeks postpartum, and only when lactation is well established and the infant's nutritional status well-monitored
ACOG bulletin: Breastfeeding: Maternal and infant aspects 7/00
ACOG Practice bulletin 2000
“Progestin-only preparations are safe and preferable forms of hormonal contraception for lactating women. Combination OCs are not recommended as the first choice for breastfeeding mothers because of the negative impact of contraceptive doses of estrogen on lactation.” Level A evidence
The use of hormonal contraception in women with
coexisting medical conditions, ACOG, 7/00
Levels of evidence
Level A: Recommendations are based on good and consistent scientific evidenceLevel B: … based on limited or inconsistent scientific evidenceLevel C: …based on consensus and expert opinion
Cochrane Review 2003
Evidence from RCTs is limited and of poor qualityNo established link between hormonal contraception and milk quality/quantityEvidence inadequate to make recommendations regarding hormonal contraceptive use for breastfeeding women
Hormonal contraception & lactation
What do providers prescribe?
Single study – Rochat 1981– Survey: 3697 doctors in 72 countries– 831 responses - 22% response rate– 45% ever prescribed COCs for BF women
– Woman’s preference– Previous BF history– International Planned Parenthood guidelines
Survey of New Mexico OB-GYNs and CNMs
Questions– Prescribing practices– Attitudes about OCs for BFing women– Knowledge questions
What do the residents prescribe?
10/10 RX hormonal contraceptives10 start DMPA prior to hospital discharge8 start COCs at 2 weeks PP2 start COCs at 6 weeks PPNone discourage COCs in BF women3: Recommend if factors favorable (2-6 wks)6: Recommend routinely as benefits outweigh risks
(2-6 wks)
RCT: Choice of OC for BF postpartum women
Women to be randomized to POPs vs. COCsDouble-blind RCT (pills packaged identically) Begin at 2 weeks PP– Outcome measures:
• Breastfeeding continuation at 2 months PP• Infant weight • Method continuation