Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Black hole Lasers powered by Axion SuperradianT instabilities
BLASTs João G. Rosa
Aveiro University
with Tom Kephart (Vanderbilt University) Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 231102 (2018) (Editors’ Suggestion)
[arXiv:1709.06581 [gr-qc]]
Café com Física, Universidade de Coimbra, 28 November 2018
Gr@v
Lasers and stimulated emission
Kerr black hole having a BLAST:
superradiant instability
stimulated axion decay
Outline
1. Black hole superradiance 2. Axions 3. Lasing in superradiant axion clouds 4. Primordial black hole lasers 5. Fast Radio Bursts 6. Summary & Future prospects
Black hole superradiance [Zeldovich (1966)]
ω < mΩ
R > 1
Ω
Low frequency waves can be amplified by scattering off a Kerr black hole:
ds2 = −1− 2Mr
Σ
dt2 +
Σ
∆dr2 + Σdθ2
+(r2 + a2)2 − a2 sin2 θ∆
Σsin2 θdφ2 − 4Mra sin2 θ
Σdtdφ
Kerr metric
Event horizon and Cauchy (inner) horizon:
(G = c = = 1)
J = aM ∆ = r2 + a2 − 2Mr Σ = r2 + a2 cos2 θ
r± = M ±
M2 − a2 0 ≤ a ≤ M
Black hole superradiance
Klein-Gordon equation in Kerr space-time:
Separation of variables:
gµν∇µ∇νΦ = 0
stationary and axisymmetric
Φ(t, r, θ,φ) = e−iωteimφS(θ)R(r)
spheroidal harmonics
Superradiance for scalar waves
Schrodinger-like equation
where
d2ψ
dr2∗+
ω2 − V (ω)
ψ = 0
ψ =
r2 + a2R , dr∗ =(r2 + a2)
∆dr
ergoregion
event horizon
Superradiance for scalar waves
I II
ψI = e−i(ω−mΩ)x , ψII = Ae−iωx +Beiωx
General solutions:
Boundary conditions:
Reflection coefficient:
ψI(0) = ψII(0) , ψI(0)− ψ
II(0) = αψI(0)
V (ω) = αδ(x)
+ mΩ(2ω −mΩ)(1−Θ(x))
R =
B
A
2
=α2 +m2Ω2
α2 + (2ω −mΩ)2> 1
Toy model for superradiance
ω < mΩ
I II V (ω) = αδ(x)
+ mΩ(2ω −mΩ)(1−Θ(x))
Toy model for superradiance
In the superradiant regime: • negative phase velocity: • positive group velocity:
Waves carry negative energy into the BH Energy and spin extraction from BH
kI = ω −mΩ < 0
vg = dω/dkI = 1
• Superradiant amplification for different waves:
– Scalar: 0.3%
– Electromagnetic: 4.4%
– Gravitational: 138%
• No superradiance for fermions
[Press & Teukolsky (1974)]
Superradiant amplification
[Press & Teukolsky (1972); Cardoso, Dias & Lemos (2004)]
• surround black hole with mirror
• multiple superradiant scatterings
• exponential amplification of signal
• extract large amount of energy and spin
• radiation pressure eventually destroys mirror
Black hole bombs
Massive fields can become bound to the black hole: “gravitational atoms”
[Arvanitaki et al. (2009)]
gravita6onal poten6al
Massive black hole bombs
I II
∞
ψI = e−i(ω−mΩ)x , ψII = A sin(ωx)
Bound states satisfy:
In the limit :
ω cot(ωL) + α = i(ω −mΩ)
L
ψI = e−i(ω−mΩ)x , ψII = A sin(ωx)
ωL 1 , α ω
ωR nπ
2L
ω = ωR + iΓ
Γ −ωR(ωR −mΩ)
α
Superradiant instability
Toy model for superradiant instabilities
Φ ∝ e−iωRteΓt
• Solve radial equation in both regions • Match asymptotic behaviour in overlap region
• Possible for small mass coupling:
r − r+ r+
Near region
Far region
Matching asymptotics method
r − r+ l/ω
αµ = GMµ/c 1
Gravitational Hydrogen-like spectrum
Note: matching not possible for extremal BH [JGR (2009)]
superradiant instability
[Detweiler (1980); Furuhashi & Nambu (2004)]
Gravitational “atoms”
ωn µc21−
α2µ
2n2
αµ ≡ GµMBH
c
Γ = −Cln(ωR −mΩ)α4l+5µ
r+ − r−r+ + r−
2l+1
(n, l,m)
αµ 1
Superradiant growth rate
n = 2, l = m = 1
[see review by Brito, Cardoso & Pani (2015)]
[Dolan (2007)]
Non-relativistic scalar clouds n = 2, l = m = 1
v2 (αµ/2)c
Γsa
24α9µ
c3
GM
4× 10−4a
µ
10−5 eV
αµ
0.03
8s−1 ,
r+ 0.1 αµ
0.03
µ
10−5 eV
−1 1 +
1− a2
cm
r0 =
µcαµ 66
αµ
0.03
−1 µ
10−5 eV
−1cmBohr radius:
Event horizon:
Superradiant growth rate:
Superradiant condition implies (for l=m=1):
For stellar mass black holes:
Can use superradiance to probe the low-energy BSM particle spectrum
Astrophysical black hole bombs
ω < Ω ⇒ αµ < 1/2
αµ 0.75
M
M⊙
µ
10−10 eV
CP-violation in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD):
Neutron electric dipole moment:
Introduce dynamical axion field [Peccei & Quinn (1977)]:
L = −1
4FµνF
µν − θ
32π2Fµν F
µν
θ 10−10
Axions
L = −1
4FµνF
µν − 1
32π2
φ
FφFµν F
µν − 1
2∂µφ∂
µφ− V (φ)
Axion is a pseudo-NG boson of the U(1) Peccei-Quinn symmetry that gets potential from QCD instantons:
Axion can be very light: a
Axions
µ 10−5
Fφ
6× 1011 GeV
−1
eV
φ
V (φ)
[Weinberg; Wilczek (1978)]
The electromagnetic triangle anomaly leads to an axion-photon-photon interaction:
This leads to axion decay into photon pairs:
Axions can account for dark matter!
Axion-photon coupling
Lφγγ =αK
8πFφφFµν F
µν
τφ 3× 1032K−2 µ
10−5 eV
−5Gyr
Misalignment production:
- axion field initially displaced from origin - oscillates about origin after QCD transition - stable cold dark matter condensate
Fine-tuned initial conditions and other production mechanisms yield axion DM range:
Axion dark matter
10−12 eV µ 10−2 eV
Ωφh2 0.11
10−5 eV
µ
1.19
F (Fφ,Θi)Θ2i
[Preskill, Wise & Wilczek; Abbott & Sikivie; Dine & Fischler (1983)]
Axion decay into photon pairs can be stimulated by the passage of a photon:
In dense axion clusters, this can lead to lasing:
- cross section:
- photon mean free path:
- lasing condition:
Lasing axion clusters
Γstφ = 2fγΓφ
σst = Γstφ /Φγ
λγ = 1/(nφσst)
λγ
2R=
µ4τφβR2
24πM 1
[Kephart & Weiler (1987,1995), Tkachev (1987)]
Lasing can occur only for sufficiently dense clusters:
which translates into a large axion degeneracy:
Can lasing occur in superradiant axion clouds?
Lasing axion clusters
ρφρ⊙
6
K4
µ
1 eV
−2
nφ
µ3 2× 1019
K4
µ
1 eV
−6
Boltzmann equation for axion decay/inverse decay:
where:
Lasing equations
dnλ(k)
dt=
dXLIPS
fφ(p)(1 + fλ(k))(1 + fλ(k
))
− fλ(k)fλ(k)(1 + fφ(p))
|M|2
ni =
d3ki(2π)3
fi(ki)
Simplified cloud model:
- “2p”-toroidal axion cloud (flat space, non-relativistic) - homogeneous and isotropic phase space distributions
Lasing equations
pφ αµ
2µc , pγ µc
2, ∆pγ αµ
2µc
dnγ
dt= Γφ
2nφ
1 +
8π2
µ3βnγ
− 16π2
3µ3
β +
3
2
n2γ
spontaneous decay
stimulated decay
photon annihilation
“active” axions
“sterile” axions
We also need to include:
• axion source from BH superradiant instability • photon escape rate:
Photon-axion dynamics:
Lasing equations
Γe = c/(√5r0)
dNφ
dt= ΓsNφ − Γφ
Nφ(1 +ANγ)−B1N
2γ
,
dNγ
dt= −ΓeNγ + 2Γφ
Nφ(1 +ANγ)−BN2
γ
,
A = 8α2µ/25 , B1 = 2α4
µ/75 , B2 = 2α3µ/25 , B = B1 +B2
Γφ Γs Γe
Numerical solution
µ = 10−5 eV
K = 1
MBH = 8× 1023 kg
a = 0.7
αµ 0.03
N cφ =
Γe
2AΓφ
N cγ =
Γs
AΓφ
Laser pulses Neglecting annihilation, close to lasing threshold:
where:
X = Nφ/Ncφ − 1 1 , Y = Nγ/N
cφ 1
d2 log Y
du2= η − 1
2Y
u = Γet , η = Γs/Γe 1
Y =
Y0eηu
2/2 , Y 2η
C cosh−2√
C(u− umax)/2
, Y 2η
BLAST properties For the first laser pulses:
LB 2× 1042
K2a
10−5 eV
µ
2 αµ
0.03
7
ξ
100
erg/s
τB 1√a
10−5 eV
µ
αµ
0.03
−9/2
ξ
100
−1/2
ms
νB 1.2 µ
10−5 eV
GHz
ξ = log (Γs/Γφ)
107− 4 logµ/10−5 eV
+ 8 log (αµ/0.03) + log
a/K2
Plasma effects BLASTs typically exceed BH Eddington luminosity
i.e. radiation pressure blows away surrounding plasma.
However, electric field within cloud can exceed the Schwinger threshold for e+e- production:
LEdd 1038 (M/M⊙) erg/s
|E| ∼ Ec
µ
10−5 eV
αµ
0.03
L
1043 erg/s
1/2
Plasma effects Rate of Schwinger electron-positron plasma production:
Expect plasma to reach critical density in a single pulse:
and effective photon plasma mass blocks axion decay.
BLASTs are short electromagnetic bursts!
dne
dt=
α0π2 |E|2e−πEc/|E| 1056
|E|2
E2c
e−πEc/|E| m3s−1
νp =
nee2
4π20me 1
ne
1016 m−3
1/2GHz
Plasma effects Electrons and positrons eventually annihilate:
allowing lasing to restart.
Expect BLASTs to repeat!
τann 4 ne
1016 m−3
−1hours
Constraints 1. Critical cloud mass/spin for lasing:
BLASTs only possible for
2. Non-linear axion self-interactions quench superradiance (“bosenova”):
Jc
φ
JBH
0.06
aα3µK2
µ
10−8 eV
−2 1
µ 10−8 eV MBH 10−2M⊙Primordial Black Holes
φc Fφ αµ 0.03K
[Kodama & Yoshino (2012-2015)]
Primordial black holes Large density fluctuations collapse directly into BHs once they re-enter the horizon in radiation era:
Possible mechanisms: (multi-field) inflation, curvaton, phase transitions
PBH mass comparable to mass within Hubble horizon:
δρ/ρ 0.1
M =c3t
G 1025g−1/2
∗
T
300 GeV
−2
kg
Primordial black holes PBHs heavier than 1012 kg survive until today and may contribute to dark matter!
[Carr, Kuhnel & Sandstad (2017)]
Primordial black holes PBHs are born with no spin and accrete mostly in spherical configuration [Ali-Haimoud & Kamionkowski (2017)]
However, PBHs can merge into spinning PBHS!
e.g. two equal Schwarzschild BHs merge into BH with spin [Scheel et al. (2009)]
PBH merger rate in clustered scenario: [Clesse & Garcia-Bellido (2016)]
Clusters, dwarf spheroidal galaxies:
af 0.7
Γtotalcapt 3× 10−9fDMδloc yr−1Gpc−3
δloc 109 − 1010
Fast Radio Bursts If axions account for most of the dark matter:
They can produce repeating BLASTs for PBHs with mass
BLAST properties:
longer BLASTs are fainter and yield short-lived continuous lasers (1-100 years)
shorter BLASTs are brighter and yield long-lived repeating fast radio bursts (104 years)
µ ∼ 10−5 eV
MPBH (2− 8)× 1023 kg
νB ∼ 1 GHz LB ∼ 1039 − 1042 erg/s τB ∼ 100− 1 ms
Fast Radio Bursts If axions account for most of the dark matter:
They can produce repeating BLASTs for PBHs with mass
BLAST properties:
longer BLASTs are fainter and yield short-lived continuous lasers (1-100 years)
shorter BLASTs are brighter and yield long-lived repeating fast radio bursts (104 years)
µ ∼ 10−5 eV
MPBH (2− 8)× 1023 kg
νB ∼ 1 GHz LB ∼ 1039 − 1042 erg/s τB ∼ 100− 1 ms
Fast Radio Bursts More than 30 FRBs with these properties have been observed in the past decade [Lorimer et al. (2007)]
FRB 121102 repeats and is localized within a faint dwarf galaxy [Chatterjee et al.; Marcote et al.; Tendulkar et al. (2017)]
Possible mechanisms: compact object mergers; NS collapse; energetic pulsars/magnetars…
Could BLASTs account for some of these FRBs?
QCD axion exists and is the dark matter
Sub-terrestrial PBHs exist and merge
Predictions • Up to 105 active FRBs across the sky (PBHs <10% of DM)
• X-rays afterglows from e+e- annihilation
• Gravitational waves from mergers
• Gravitational waves from bosenova between bursts
• DM axion-photon conversion in galactic B-field @ SKA [Kelley & Quinn (2017)]
• QCD axion with mass ~10-5 eV and gφγγ∼10-15 GeV-1 [ADMX, X3, CULTASK, MADMAX, ORPHEUS]
Summary
• Superradiant instabilities can produce dense axion clouds around spinning black holes
• Stimulated axion decay leads to extremely bright lasing bursts (BLASTs)
• Tantalizing agreement with observed Fast Radio Bursts for cosmological axions and primordial black holes
• Lasing may occur for other light BSM bosons?
Thank you!