Upload
benjamin-vaughan
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
blended learning: recipes or
pick-and-mix?
Stephen BostockFebruary 2008
“Blended learning”
“…combining established ways of learning and teaching and the new opportunities offered by technology in order to improve students' learning and increase flexibility in how, when and where they study” Blended Learning Unit (CETL), University of Hertfordshire, http://perseus.herts.ac.uk/, accessed 10-4-2007
That is, blend traditional learning activities and new ‘e-learning’ activities (online or face-to-face).
Here we concentrate on online e-learning, blended with campus teaching/learning activities (TLAs).
Macdonald, J. 2006Blended learning and online tutoring
“I think we still have a lot to learn about the ways in which asynchronous and synchronous [face-to-face or technology mediated] tutor-mediated support can be designed to complement each other.” (p54)
“If there is currently a recipe for a blended strategy, it is a broth of pedagogy, heavily peppered with pragmatism”
What is used in blended courses?
Macdonald, J. 2006, Blended learning and online tutoring Survey of blended learning courses 2004/5:
Asynchronous text conferencing (45 of 48 cases) Face-to-Face meetings (42) Course website (28) Online quiz/test (13) Email (10 – underestimated) Less than 10: Synchronous conferencing,
PowerPoint slides, telephone, digital audio/video, print, digital whiteboard, phone conference, digital lecture..)
A simplistic example:possibilities
Onsite Online
Lectures
Problem sheets in class
Tutorials
A field trip
A simplistic example:possibilities
Onsite Online
Lectures Web documents
Problem sheets in class Formative online quizzes
Tutorials Asynchronous text discussions
A field trip Computer simulation
A simplistic example:one design
Onsite Online
Lectures Web documents
Problem sheets in class Formative online quizzes
Tutorials Asynchronous text discussions
A field trip Computer simulation
Three tactics for adding online components
Having identified the possible online and onsite course elements, why select one or other or both?
1. Deficit technology provides support for a missing or non-accessible learning activity. E.g. online discussion in distance learning
2. Substitutionsubstitute a traditional element with a technology-based one. E.g. online tutorials replace onsite tutorials
3. Enrichment technology duplicates existing TLAs, allowing personalized experiences. E.g. lecture handouts on web, audio podcasts of notes, feedback from a quiz
Criteria for ‘blendedness’
Efficiency and effectiveness for learning, of course Just pick and mix? Or a recipe? Complementary, mutually supportive course
components? (technology-supported and traditional, online and onsite)
A balanced experience for students and teachers, according to their expectations and abilities
Flexibility of use, personalization, empowerment
Teaching Activities
to encourage students to behave in ways that will promote the learning outcomes
Intended learning outcomes
written with active verbs describing the learning to be demonstrated, at threshold level and possibly at higher grades of performance
Assessment Tasks
to enable students to demonstrate learning in particular contexts, consistent with the verbs in the ILOs
What the teacher does
What the students do
Learning activities
Actual learning outcomes
Constructive AlignmentJohn Biggs 2003
Generating options
Assessment tasks
Online/CAA
Assessment tasks Onsite
/traditional
Intended learning
outcomes
Teaching-Learning Activities
Online
Teaching-Learning Activities
Onsite
1
2
3
4
Selecting options: example TLAsIntended learning
outcomeTeaching-Learning
Activity: OnlineTeaching-Learning
Activity: Onsite
Recall information X
Web documents & links
Reading a set book, lectures
Perform skill Y Formative quizzes Problem sheets in class
Contribute to discussion on Z
Asynchronous text discussions
Tutorials
Apply knowledge and skills to W
Computer simulation
A field trip
A notional TLA selectionIntended learning
outcomeTeaching-Learning
Activity: OnlineTeaching-Learning
Activity: Onsite
Recall information X
Web documents & links
Reading a set book, lectures
Perform skill Y Formative quizzes Problem sheets in class
Contribute to discussion on Z
Asynchronous text discussions
Tutorials
Apply knowledge and skills to W
Computer simulation
A field trip
A simple toolIntended learning
outcomeTeaching-Learning
Activity: OnlineTeaching-Learning
Activity: Onsite
ILO1
ILO2
ILO3
ILO4
e-TLA3
e-TLA4
TLA1
TLA2
TLA4
What should drive the design of blended learning courses?
Analysis Especially Intended Learning Outcomes
(central to course design: Biggs) Other aspects of needs analysis?
Learning activities Specific ones of a current course General types, from a theory e.g.
Laurillard’s, modified Constructivist, REALS Modes of engagement
Analyze the problem
Factors to consider before we can select and design teaching and assessment methods include
1. My teaching philosophy and personal goals
2. The learners: knowledge, ability, learning styles …
3. Other stakeholders
4. Subject domain and intended learning outcomes
5. Environment, resources, constraints
6. Aims and the evaluation methods needed
E.g. The JISC Effective Practice Planner
Other theories
Educational theories can serve to organize course design, providing checklists of ‘necessary features’.
1. Laurillard’s Conversational Framework has 12 L&T processes, that can be simplified to 6 (by Hegarty, Bostock and Collins 2000)
2. “Social constructivism” as Rich Environments for Active Learning (REALs) has 5 themes (Grabinger & Dunlap 1995; Bostock
1998)
The Conversational Framework
Course feature Online TLAs Onsite TLAs
1. Information delivery
2. Discussion with teacher
3. Task goals understood
4. Practice skills
5. Reflection and adaptation
6. Student cooperation
Example course using the Conversational Framework(Hegarty, Bostock & Collins 2000)
Constructivism: REALs
Constructivist Principle
Online TLAs Onsite TLAs
a. Student responsibility & initiative
b. Active learning by making things
c. Authentic learning contexts
d. Authentic assessment
e. Cooperative support
Example course using REALs(Bostock 1998)
Why is course design so difficult?
1. There are many variables and contexts: every course is different
2. It’s not a ‘simple’ problem, it’s a ‘wicked’ problem
3. So how can become better at it?
“Educating the Reflective Practitioner”Donald Schön 1987
The traditional view of professional practice was: Professionals know the theory and use it to solve
problems Theory and technique are derived from academic
research and applied to life problems Technical rationality approach to problems, theory
and technique are applied to the facts If a new type of problem arises, they must create
new rules or theory
But life isn’t like that
There are ‘indeterminate zones’ of practice (wicked problems) Problems are unique Multiple aspects to a problem Uncertainty because there is no model or
framework for ‘the problem’, no handle on it Conflicts of interest and values, ethical
dilemmas Some situations are beyond conventional technical
competence. They require artistry. Technical rationality is an insufficient or wrong view
of professional expertise.
Reflection-in-action Professionals both act with expertise (knowing-in-
action) and do it flexibly, intelligently, creatively (reflection-in-action)
“reflection-in-action is central to the artistry with which practitioners make new sense of uncertain, unique, or conflicted situations” … “she behaves like a researcher trying to model an expert system” (p.35)
They construct and maintain the world as they see it; “Communities of practitioners are continually engaged in … worldmaking” (p.36)
“Theory” derives from the community of practice
Learning professional practice (of designing e-learning)
If there is no science-based theory or technique for designing blended learning, how can it be learnt?
That is, how can we join the community of practitioners, their language, conventions, skills, values, etc.
Schön: Enter a ‘practicum’ where you tackle real-world problems with peer support, and coaching from experienced professionals in the field
In other words, become action researchers in e-learning, researching your own practice to improve it
Conclusion
All design methods have educational assumptions, implicit or explicit. How to blend effectively?
1. Alignment of onsite and online teaching and assessment with the intended learning outcomes will blend them to a degree
2. Other theories may add richness
3. However, it will never be simple – it’s a wicked problem – but simple tools may get us started by framing the problem
4. There are no blueprints, you must join the community of practitioners who design and research their own e-learning practice in collaboration with their students
References
Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R., et al. 2001 A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing, abridged edition, New York: Longman
Biggs J.2003 Teaching for quality learning at university, 2nd ed. SRHEBloom, B.S. (Ed.) 1956 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational
goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain, New York, Toronto: Longmans, GreenBostock, S.J., 1998, Constructivism in Mass Higher Education: a Case Study British Journal
of Educational Technology British Journal of Educational Technology 29 (3), 225-240 Bostock, S. J., Hulme, J. A. and Davys, M. A. 2006 CommuniCubes: Intermediate
Technology For Interaction With Student Groups, chapter in Audience Response Systems in Higher Education edited by David Banks, Hershey PA: Idea Group Inc.
Grabinger, R. S. & Dunlap, J. C. 1995 Rich environments for active learning: A definition, ALT-J, 3 (2), 5-34
Hegarty, J.R. Bostock, S J. and Collins, D. 2000 Staff development in information technology for special needs: a new, distance-learning course at Keele University, British Journal of Educational Technology 31 (3),199-212
JISC, 2004 Effective Practice Planner http://www.jisc.ac.uk/elp_practice.htmlLaurillard, D. 2001 Rethinking University Teaching, 2nd ed., Brighton: RoutledgeFalmer
Macdonald, J. 2006, Blended learning and online tutoring Schön, D. A. 1987 Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass