Hanna 1

Fathers and Religion

James Joyce’s The Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is the subject of a

great deal of scholarly attention. As it is generally accepted as one of the greatest

works of the Twentieth Century, critics everywhere find the novel a rich feeding

ground for review. Many of these scholars delve into the relationships formed

between Stephen and his multiple father figures. Richard Ellmann speaks to this

subject saying that Stephen’s isolation is an important means to obtaining freedom

and that by allowing Stephen to experience the flaws and limitations of friendship,

he creates a representation of his hero’s broken ties with Ireland. Grant H. Redford

contributes to this by describing the manner in which the themes found in A Portrait

are given significance through the structure of this particular work of art. This point

is further argued by Dorothy Van Ghent who says that the use of stream of

consciousness is a manifestation of the isolation of Stephen’s character.

Marguerite Harkness describes Stephen’s search for a father figure as a

“quest for the father of his choice.” (55) She establishes Simon Dedalus and the

mythological Daedalus as the two poles between which “other fathers populate

Stephen’s world.” (54) Harkness concludes that “patriarchy may be an evil, but for

this young artist and for his creator it appears at worst a necessary evil.” (76)

Despite this, she maintains that it also contains positive promises of freedom and

kinship. Father Arnall is the father figure most explicitly linked to Stephen’s religion

as his sermons lead Stephen to a new, devout spirituality. Cheryl Herr, however,

states that the actual motivation behind this conversion is Stephen’s desire for

power, a prominent topic of the sermons.

Hanna 2

Throughout his journey in Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, Stephen

Dedalus is influenced by several different father figures including his own father,

Simon Dedalus, in addition to Father Arnall, and Cranly. Each of them first provides

him with a new hope and vigor in life but each is eventually written off and

discarded in some fashion. While all the aforementioned critics address this, they

neglect to mention the effect that this has on the main character’s spirituality.

Stephen Dedalus’ ultimate rejection of the church and disenchantment with

spirituality is a result of the unsatisfactory relationships he has shared with the men

in his life.

As a small child Stephen is completely enamored of his father and takes great

delight in the time that they spend together. The story of the “moocow” is an

example of the tenderness that exists between them. At Stephen's young age he had

a love for his father; he looked up to him and thought only the best of him. When

questioned about his father by a schoolmate, Stephen simply states his true opinion

of his father, saying that he is “a gentleman." When he is somewhat older and has

come home from school for the holiday, Simon Dedalus shows great tenderness to

his son and initially makes a great effort to make Stephen’s first Christmas dinner

special and enjoyable.

Throughout the novel though, Stephen and his father's relationship becomes

progressively unsteady and Stephen becomes increasingly disenchanted with his

father, forming a sort of cynicism towards him. This is a result of several factors

including his father’s inability to effectively provide for his family financially.

Stephen believes his father is in a lot of trouble and before the family moves to

Hanna 3

Dublin he hears his father tell his uncle that he has enemies and in danger of being

involved in a fight. This news puts a great deal of pressure on Stephen and causes

him to pull away from his father, feeling that overhearing this information has made

him a part of the fight. This sense of being let down by the man he looked up to most

is a key factor in the development of Stephen’s spirituality. This realization that the

world is not perfect is the first step the Stephen takes on his religious journey

throughout the novel. Van Ghent postulates that “language is a creator of reality”

and that the very use of stream of consciousness writing is a reflection on the

isolation of Stephen Dedalus’ character. (60)

Because of the situation with his father at home, Stephen is particularly

motivated towards finding a positive male father figure for his life. While in school,

Stephen hears three sermons on hell given by Father Arnall, which inspires in him a

very devout sense of religion. Cheryl Herr asserts that this is largely due to

Stephen’s own sense of ambition. She states, “The concentrated repetition of ‘power’

makes inescapable the fact that in this final bid for his allegiance, the church plays

on Stephen’s most vulnerable spot—his intense desire for a mastery and for a social

validation that will enable his personal talents to find an outlet.” (92)

This is the most important event in Stephen’s early religious life as an

individual because it inspires such a drastic change. From this moment until his loss

of faith, Stephen makes a conscious decision to be a proponent of a very rigid and

very devout religion, and follows it. After the sermon on sin and hell, Stephen

examines his soul and sees the shape it is in, wondering, "Why was he kneeling there

like a child saying his evening prayers?” He then goes on to realize that "He felt only

Hanna 4

an ache of soul and body, his whole being, memory, will, understanding, flesh,

benumbed and weary.” (Joyce 394) Religion has suddenly and unexpectedly pushed

its way back into Stephen's life and he rushes to confession. This marks the

beginning of a period of Stephen’s life in which he is nearly as devout as his Jesuit

teachers and mentors. It is also important to note that, as Marguerite Harkness

points out, “That faith is only nominally the faith of Simon Dedalus who has, by this

point in the novel, been utterly usurped by more ‘appropriate’ fathers.” (63)

As he grows older though, Stephen eventually becomes skeptical of the faith

that was brought on through Father Arnall’s inspiration and once again Stephen

finds himself without a mentor during a transitional time in his life. That is, until he

meets Cranly at university. While Cranly is Stephen’s best friend, he also represents

another step in his journey to find a new father figure. Cranly acts as an ersatz

secular confessor for Stephen. He confides absolutely everything in his friend, just as

he used to confess to the priests his every action during his days of religious fervor.

Although he does not understand Stephen's desire and need for absolute freedom,

Cranly is a good friend to him. As they become closer and he begins to take on the

mentor role, Cranly gradually begins to encourage Stephen to conform to the wishes

of his family and put forth more of an effort to fit in with his peers—advice that

Stephen rails against. Richard Ellman states, “It may be that Cranly’s judgements of

Stephen are well-founded, but we are never allowed to regard them so. They at once

make Stephen suspicious of Cranly’s attitude towards him.” (Ellmann 92) Later in

the novel, the reader is shown again the difference between their characters when

Cranly is baffled by Stephen’s desire to be exiled and questions him, “Alone, quite

Hanna 5

alone. You have no fear of that. And you know what that word means?” (Joyce 519)

Stephen ultimately takes no heed of this warning though and instead moves on from

Cranly, separating himself from him and finding his own individuality and

aspirations for life.

This lack of an important father figure at every stage in his life is

instrumental in Stephen’s fall from religion. Throughout the different influences and

upheavals of his experiences, he explores separate extremes of being involved in

religion—both as an extreme example of sin in debauchery and as an extreme

example of the perfect model of catholic morality. The consequences of having so

many unsuccessful father figures are Stephen’s complete loss of faith in his religion,

Catholicism. Every male figure in his life has failed him in some form. Simon Dedalus

was unable to fulfill his duties as father, Father Arnell’s teachings are ultimately

discarded, and Cranly becomes more of a rival than a mentor.

Due to these situations, Stephen has a completely misshapen view of

fatherhood and also a lack of experience in the area of love. This makes it impossible

for Stephen to truly grasp the concept of a loving father who holds his best interests

at heart. Without a loving earthly father, he has no basis for feeling love from his

heavenly father. As Stephen grows, he slowly but inexorably distances himself from

religion. The rift between Stephen and his own earthly father figures eventually

directly mirrors the rift between Stephen and his heavenly father. His lack of

religion and turn from his own previously devout faith is a result of this.

Some may say that Stephen’s relationships with his father figures are

completely unrelated to his religious formation—or ultimate lack of such. This is,

Hanna 6

however, an incorrect statement. The men who hold significant positions in a

person’s young, formative years always influence the direction of his path and there

are two ways for this to manifest itself in life. For many, this involves a slow and

subtle acquisition of the father figure’s belief system. Stephen demonstrates this at

an early age through his obedience not only to Simon Dedalus himself, but also to

the priests at his school.

However, as Stephen grows older he begins to react to authority’s influence

in the opposite manner. He begins to exhibit signs of pushing against the known and

expected. He falls into a life of debauchery, which is a departure from his former life

of obedience to the rules and authority. Stephen then throws off this lifestyle by

embracing one of extreme morality and piety, which is in turn cast off by his

rejection of religion all together. Therefore, although not each father figure is

directly linked to Stephen’s spirituality throughout the entire play, they each initiate

a reaction that furthers his development in this particular area.

The final pages of the novel find Stephen Dedalus lacking any form of

direction or instruction making the decision to leave Ireland. The ultimate

realization of Stephen’s aspirations to being an artist is found in his desire for exile.

Grant H. Redford discusses this, saying, “Once he has defined what the artist can and

must do, once he has demonstrated to himself that his principles have validity in

action … he is ready for the more vital severing, the cutting off of himself from the

Church and his family and his friend Cranly.” (112)

It is at this stage in his life that Stephen embraces the final father figure

represented in the novel—that of the mythical Daedalus. This hero is an inspiration

Hanna 7

for Stephen’s future life and the path that he ultimately decides to take. The world

he finds himself in is gloomily oppressive and he has lost hope in it. Stephen feels

that he cannot create art in such an environment. Daedalus’ relation to flight as a

means of escape is an excellent mirror for Stephen’s own desire for such and his

ultimate exodus from Ireland.

By clearly alluding to this familiar mythological reference, Joyce provides

both hope and a warning for his hero. Stephen must discover a balance for himself.

The desire to flee Ireland must not be so overpowering that he forgets the danger of

overestimating his own value. To do this would be a disaster on the same level as

Icarus' foolish flight too close to the sun. Fully aware of this danger, Stephen

attempts to counteract it by biding his time at the university. He spends a great deal

of time developing his theories fully before attempting to leave Ireland and write

seriously.

Stephen’s spiritual growth and evolution throughout the novel is a direct

result of the manner in which he is affected by the father figures present in the

different stages of his life. Simon Dedalus was an important figure for the innocent,

child-like Stephen. Father Arnall inspires a new, devoutly religious Stephen, and

Cranly acts as mentor for an older, more cerebral Stephen. Each makes his mark on

Stephen’s spirituality, driving him in both directions, both closer and further from

religion. However, they are each in turn cast off by him and ultimately replaced by

his namesake, Daedalus, a character unconnected to religion, Ireland, and the reality

that Stephen has come to know.

Word Count: 2113

Hanna 8

Works Cited

Ellman, Richard. “A Portrait of the Artist as Friend.” The Kenyon Review. 1956. “Joyce’s

Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York.

1962. Print.

Harkness, Marguerite. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: Voices of the Text.

Boston: Twayne, 1990. Print.

Herr, Cheryl. "The Sermon as Massproduct: "Grace" and A Portrait." James Joyce: A

Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. Mary T. Reynolds. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice Hall, 1993. 89. Print.

Redford, Grant H. “The Role of Structure in Joyce’s Portrait.” Modern Fiction Studies.

Purdue Research Foundation. 1958. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed.

Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Van Ghent, Dorothy. “On A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” The English Novel:

Form and Function. 1953. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas

E. Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. “The Portable James Joyce.” Ed.

Harry Levin. New York: Penguin Books, 1976. 245-526. Print.

Hanna 9

Works Consulted

Anderson, Chester G., ed. James Joyce: A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man : Text

Criticism, and Notes. New York: Viking, 1968. Print.

Anderson, C. G. “The Sacrificial Butter.” Accent. 1952. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and

Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith: New York. 1962. Print.

Booth, Wayne C. “The Problem of Distance in A Portrait of the Artist.” Twentieth

Century Interpretations of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood

Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 85-95. Print.

Boes, Tobias. "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and the "Individuating Rhythm"

of Modernity." John Hopkins University Press. 75.4 (2008): 767-785. Print.

Block, Haskell M. “The Critical Theory James Joyce.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art.

1950. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly.

Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Chayes, Irene Hednry. “Joyce’s Epiphanies.” The Sewanee Review. The Univeristy of the

South. 1946. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly.

Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Colum, Padraic. "Drama." Nation 107.2780 (1918): 430-431. Academic Search

Complete. Web. 12 Apr. 2012.

Colum, Padraic. "Irishry." Nation 107.2777 (1918): 317-319. Academic Search

Complete. Web. 13 Apr. 2012.

Ellmann, Richard. “The Structure of the Portrait.” Twentieth Century Interpretations

of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall,

1968. 38-40. Print.

Hanna 10

Foxworthy, Becky. "The Unfulfilled Quest: The Hero in Thomas Mann's Tonio Kroger,

Death in Venice, James Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, and

Andre Gide's La Symphonie Pastorale." MS thesis. Ball State University, 1981.

Print.

Glasheen, Adaline. “Joyce and the Three Ages of Charles Stewart Parnell.” A James

Joyce Miscellany. Second Series. Ed. Marvin Magalaner. Southern Illinois

University Press. 1962. 151-178. Print.

Goldberg, S.L. “Art and Life: The Aesthetic of the Portrait.” Twentieth Century

Interpretations of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood Cliffs:

Prentice-Hall, 1968. 64-84. Print.

Gordon, Caroline. “Some Readings and Misreadings.” The Sewanee Review. The

University of the South. 1953. Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed.

Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Gross, John. James Joyce. New York: Viking, 1970. Print.

Halper, Nathan. The Early James Joyce. New York: Columbia UP, 1973. Print.

Hodgart, Matthew J.C., Mabel P. Worthington. Song in the Works of James Joyce. New

York: Columbia University Press, 1959. Print.

Hope, A. D. “The Esthetic Theory of James Joyce.” Australian Journal of Psychology

and Philosophy. 1943. Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E.

Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Jack, Jane H. “Art and A Portrait of the Artist.” Essays in Criticism. 1955. Joyce’s

Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York.

1962. Print.

Hanna 11

Kain, Richard M., Marvin Magalaner. Joyce: The Man, the Work, the Reputation. New

York: New York University Press, 1956. Print.

Kaye, Julian B. “A Portrait of the Artist as Belphen-Stoom.” A James Joyce Miscellany.

Second Series. Ed. Marvin Magalaner. Southern Illinois University Press.

1962. 79-89. Print.

Kellenher, John V. “The Perceptions of James Joyce.” Atlantic Monthly. 1958. “Portraits

of an Artist: A Casebook on James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young

Man.” Ed. William E. Morris, Clifford A. Nault, Jr. The Odyssey Press, Inc. New

York. 1962. Print.

Kenner, Hugh. “The Portrait in Perspective.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of A

Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968.

26-37. Print.

Lemon, Lee T. “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: Motif as Motivation and

Structure.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of A Portrait of the Artist as a

Young Man. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 41-52. Print.

Levin, Harry. “The Artist.” James Joyce. New Directions. 1960. “Joyce’s Portrait

Criticisms and Critques.” Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962.

Print.

MacGregor, Geddes. “Artistic Theory in James Joyce.” Life and Letters. 1947. “Joyce’s

Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York.

1962. Print.

Magalaner, Marvin. Time of Apprenticeship: The Fiction of a Young James Joyce.

London: Abelard-Schuman, 1959. Print.

Hanna 12

McCarthy, Patrick A., and Paul Tiessen. "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and

Ultramarine: Two Exercises in Identification." Joyce/Lowry: Critical

Perspectives. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, 1997. 109. Print.

Muir, Edwin. "James Joyce." Nation 121.3145 (1925): 421-423. Academic Search

Complete. Web. 13 Apr. 2012.

Noon, William T. “Steeled in the School of Old Aquinas.” Joyce and Aquinas. Yale

University Press, 1957. 1-17. Print

Norris, Margot. Joyce's Web: The Social Unraveling of Modernism. Austin: University of

Texas, 1992. 52. Print.

Patterson, Anthony and Stephen Brown. “Marketers Wake! A Portrait of the Artist as a

Marketing Man”. IMAGINING MARKETING: ART, AESTHETICS AND THE

AVANT-GARDE. (February 11, 2000): 73. Stephen Brown & Anthony

Patterson, eds., Routledge. 2000.

Prescott, Joseph. “Exploring James Joyce.” Southern Illinois University Press.

Carbondale. 1964. Print.

Prescott, Joseph. “Stephen Hero.” Twentieth Century Interpretations of A Portrait of

the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 21-25. Print.

Qui, Li. "Exile and Salvation: Exile Motif in "A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man"

from Archetypical Perspective." Journal of Harbin University. 6.21 (2011) Print.

Ryf, Robert S. “Perspectives in Criticism.” A New Approach to Joyce: A New Approach

to Joyce. Vol. 8. University of California Press. Berkley and Los Angeles. 1962.

Print.

Hanna 13

Scholes, Robert. “Stephen Dedalus, Poet or Esthete?” James Joyce: A portrait of the

Artist as a Young Man: Text Criticism, and Notes. Ed. Chester G. Anderson.

New York: Viking, 1968. 468-480. Print.

Seward, Barbara. “The Artist and the Rose.” University of Toronto Quarterly. University

of Toronto Press. 1957. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques. Ed. Thomas E.

Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.

Sharpless, Parvin. “The Irony in Joyce’s Portrait: The Stasis of Pity.” Twentieth

Century Interpretations of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood

Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968. 96-106. Print.

Stewart, J.I.M. “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” Twentieth Century

Interpretations of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Englewood Cliffs:

Prentice-Hall, 1968. 15-20. Print.

Thornton, Weldon. The Antimodernism of Joyce's Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.

1st ed. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1994. Print.

Von Phul, Ruth. “Joyce and the Strabismal Apologia.” A James Joyce Miscellany.

Second Series. Ed. Marvin Magalaner. Southern Illinois University Press.

1962. 119-132. Print.

Waith, Eugene M. “The Calling of Stephen Dedalus.” College English. The National

Council of Teachers of English. 1957. “Joyce’s Portrait: Criticism and Critiques.

Ed. Thomas E. Connolly. Meredith. New York. 1962. Print.