117
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR JAMES J. DAVIS, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS ETHELBERT STEWART, Commissioner BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES \ \T CAA BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS/ JlOe DUU MISCELLANEOUS SERIES BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1928 NOVEMBER, 1929 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1929 Fpr sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C* - Price 20 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

bls_0500_1929.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: bls_0500_1929.pdf

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABORJAMES J. DAVIS, Secretary

BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSETHELBERT STEWART, Commissioner

BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES \ \T CA ABUREAU OF LABOR STA TISTICS/ • • • • JlOe DU U

M I S C E L L A N E O U S S E R I E S

BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1928

NOVEMBER, 1929

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 1929

Fpr sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C* - Price 20 cents

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 2: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 3: bls_0500_1929.pdf

ContentsPage

Introduction and summary_______________________________________ 1Families provided for________________________________________ 3Building trend, 1927 and 1928_________________________________ 5Per capita expenditure for buildings____________________________ 6

Expenditures for building operations in representative cities, 1921 to 1928. 20Average estimated cost of dwellings per family__________________ 21

Apartment-house living in American cities, 1928_____________________ 23Comparison of conditions in cities of over 500,000_______________ 24Comparison of conditions in cities of under 500,000______________ 25

General table___________________________________________________ 32in

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 4: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 5: bls_0500_1929.pdf

BULLETIN OF THEU. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSNo. 500 WASHINGTON NOVEMBER, 1929

BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN 19281

Introduction and SummaryT HE Bureau of Labor Statistics presents in this bulletin the ninth

annual report of building permits issued in cities of the United States having a population of 25,000 and over. According to the estimate of the Census Bureau as of Julj 1, 1928, there were 319 cities in the United States in this population group.

On January 1 of this year schedule forms were mailed by the bureau to all of these cities except those in States where local bureaus are collecting like information. In these States the information is collected by the State and mailed to the Federal bureau. Schedules were received from 310 cities and data for these cities are shown herein. The States of Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania are now cooperating with the bureau in this work.

The city building officials are also heartily cooperating with the work of the bureau. In 1922 it was necessary to send agents to 33J£ per cent of the cities from which data were collected. In 1927 only

per cent of the cities were visited by the bureau’s agents and in collecting the 1928 information it was necessary to send to only 6.1 per cent of the cities.

The costs shown in the following tables refer to the cost of the building only, land costs not being included. The costs are estimated by the builder at the time of applying for his permit to build and are recorded on the application. There is probably a tendency in many cases to underestimate. Some cities are stricter than others in making applicants state a true cost.

Table 1 shows the total number of new buildings and the estimated cost of each of the different kinds of new buildings for which permits were issued in the 310 cities from which schedules were received for the year 1928, the per cent that each kind forms of the total number, the per cent that the cost of each kind forms of the total cost, and the average cost per building.

i Earlier reports concerning building permits issued in the United States are published in Bulletins Nos. 295, 318, 347, 368, 397, 424, 449, and 469 of the Bureau of Labor Statistics; also in issues o f the Labor Review for July, 1921; April, 1922; July and October, 1923; June and October, 1924; June, September, and October, 1925; June, July, and October, 1926; M ay, June, July, October, and November, 1927; M ay, June, October, and November, 1928; M ay and June, 1929.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 6: bls_0500_1929.pdf

2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 1 .— N U M B E R A N D COST OF N E W BU ILD IN G S AS S T A T E D B Y P E R M IT S ISSU ED IN 310 CITIES D U R IN G C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928, B Y K IN D OF B U IL D IN G

New buildings for which permits were issued

Kind of building Numberof

buildings

Per cent of grand total

Estimated cost

A m ou nt'Per

cent of grand total

Averageper

building

RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS1-family dwellings....................................................2-family dwellings....................................................1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores

combined...............................................................Multifamily dwellings............................................Multifamily dwellings with stores combined__Hotels_______________________________________

145,32219,963

2,62512,0701,528

23537

209

37.75.2

.73.1.4.1

(,) . i

$715,317,535153,157,386

26,702,412776,520,45890,754,524

114,928,650780,576

35,559,169

23.14.9

.925.12.9 3.7

0 )1 .1

$4,9227,672

10,17264,335 59,394

489,058 21,097

170,140Lodging houses.........................................................A ll other....................................................................

Total................................................................ 181,989 47.2 1,913,720,710 61.8 10,516NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Amusement buildings............................................Churches_______ - ____________________________

950 1,009 3,973 3,839

156,457 4,520

304 1,353

243 517 852

11,787 367

13. I l l 4,158

.2

.31 .01 .0

40.61 .2.1.4.1.1. 2

3.1 .1

3.41 .1

84,914,600 49,059,444

152,649,534 70,690,699 55,140,483 14,913,812 65,080,263

256,101,159 29,378,349 38,690,950

143,519,854 4,895,029

583,553 211,890,765

7,710,836

2.7 1.6 4.92.31 .8 .5

2 .18.3 .9

1 .24.6

.20

6 .8.2

89,384 48,622 38,422 18,414

352 3,300

214,080 189,284 120,899 74,837

168,451 415

1,590 16,161 1,854

Factories and workshops........................................Public garages..........................................................Private garages,.......................................................Service stations........................................................Institutions...............................................................Office buildings........................................................Public buildings.......................................................Public works and utilities......................................Schools and libraries...............................................Sheds___________ ____________________________Stables and barns....................................................Stores and warehouses............................................A ll other_______ _____________________________

T otal............................................................... 203,440 52.8 1,185,219,330 38.2 5,826Grand total.................................................... 385,429 100.0 3,098,940,040 100.0 8,040

1 Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.

In the 310 cities for which reports were received for the year 1928 permits were issued for 385,429 buildings. Of this number, 181,989 buildings, or 47.2 per cent, were for residential purposes and 203,440, or 52.8 per cent, for nonresidential use.

Of the residential buildings 145,322 were 1-family dwellings; this is 37.7 per cent of the total number of new buildings for which per­mits were issued or 79.8 per cent of the total number of residential buildings. Two-family dwellings, the next most numerous group of residential buildings, comprised only 5.2 per cent of the total number of buildings. With the exception of private garages no other kind of building in either the residential or nonresidential group consti­tuted as much as 5 per cent of the total number of buildings for which permits were issued.

In the nonresidential group private garages were far the most numerous kind of building. Of all buildings for which permits were issued in these 310 cities during the calendar year 1928, over 40 per cent were private garages, over 7 per cent more private garages being erected than 1-family dwellings.

Stores and warehouses ranked next after private garages in the nonresidential group and formed only 3.4 per cent of the total number of new buildings.

It will be seen from the above that out of every 100 buildings for which permits were issued in cities having a population of 25,000 or over, 78 were either 1-family dwellings or private garages.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 7: bls_0500_1929.pdf

The total estimated expenditure for new buildings in these 310 cities was $3,098,940,040 of which $1,913,720,710, or 61.8 per cent, was for residential buildings and $1,185,219,330, or 38.2 per cent, for nonresidential buildings. ^

The Bureau of Labor Statistics has been collecting figures concern­ing building permits issued for every year since 1920, and in each of these years up to 1928, 1-family dwellings accounted for the greatest expenditure of any kind of buildings. In 1928, however, the permits issued for multifamily dwellings (apartment houses) show a larger estimated expenditure than those issued for 1-family dwellings. The estimated cost of apartment houses for which permits were issued in these 310 cities during 1928 was $776,520,458, or 25.1 per cent of the expenditure for all new buildings, as compared with $715,317,535, or 23.1 per cent, for 1-family dwellings.

If we group apartment houses and apartment houses with stores we find that the expenditure for both kinds of apartment houses equaled the expenditure for 1-family dwellings and 2-family dwell­ings combined. Each combination comprised approximately 28 per cent of the total estimated expenditure for all buildings.

In the nonresidential group, office buildings accounted for the largest expenditure of money, $256,101,159 being expended for this class of structure. Stores and warehouses rated next in expenditures in this group, followed by factories, and schools and libraries in order. Private garages which comprise 40.6 per cent of the number of new buildings account for only 1.8 per cent of the cost.

The average cost per building of all new buildings in these 310 cities was $8,040. In residential buildings the average cost was $10,516 and in nonresidential buildings, $5,826. The average cost of nonresidential buildings, however, is “ pulled down” by the inclusion of a large num­ber of private garages and sheds. If we exclude these two classes of buildings the average cost of the remaining nonresidential buildings is $13,992 per building.

Families Provided For

Table 2 shows the number and per cent of families provided for by each of the different kinds of dwellings for which permits were issued in 302 identical cities during the calendar years 1927 and 1928, by land of dwelling.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 3

T a b l e 2»—N U M B E R A N D P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES TO BE H OUSED IN N E W D W E LLIN G S FO R W H ICH P E R M IT S W E R E ISSUED IN 302 ID E N T IC A L CITIES D U R IN G T H E C AL­E N D A R YE A R S 1927 A N D 1928, B Y K IN D OF D W E L L IN G

Kind of dwelling

Number of new buildings for which permits were issued

Families provided for

Number Per cent

1927 1928 1927 1928 1927 1928

1-family dwellings...................................................2-family dwellings...................................................1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores

combined..............................................................Multifamily dwellings...........................................Multifamily dwellings with stores com bined.. _

Total...............................................................

164,268 25,227

3,329 13,663 1,768

143,88919,956

2,620 12,063 1,528

164,268 50,454

5,399 179,177 19,580

143,88939,912

4,276 190,282 19,780

39.212.0

1.342.84.7

36.110.0

1 .147.85.0

208,255 180,056 418,878 398,139 100.0 100.0

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 8: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Data were received from 302 cities for both 1927 and 1928. In these 302 cities 398,139 families were provided with dwellings in new buildings in 1928, as compared with 418,878 in 1927, a decrease of 20,739 dwelling units or 5.0 per cent in 1928 as compared with 1927.

There were 164,268 families accommodated in the new 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued in 1927 in these 302 cities. This is 39.2 per cent of the total number of families provided for during that year. In 1928, 1-family dwellings provided for 143,889 families, which was 36.1 per cent of the total number of families supplied with new dwelling places. In contrast, the number of families provided for in apartment houses increased from 179,177 in1927 to 190,282 in 1928. In 1927, 42.8 per cent of the total number of family dwelling places for which permits were issued were in apart­ment houses, while in 1928 this percentage had risen to 47.8. The percentage of families supplied with residences in new 2-family dwell­ings decreased from 12 in 1927 to 10 in 1928.

Table 3 shows the number and percentage distribution of families provided for in the different kinds of dwellings in the 257 identical cities from which reports were received each year from 1921 to 1928, inclusive.

4 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 3 .—N U M B E R A N D P E R C E N T OF FAM ILIES P R O V ID E D F O R IN T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES, 1921 T O 1928, IN CLU SIVE

Year

Number of families provided for in— Per cent of families provided for in—

1-familydwellings

2-family dwellings i

Multi­family

dwellings 2All classes of dwellings

1-familydwellings

2-family dwellings 1

Multi­family

dwellings *

1921......................... 130,873 38,858 54,814 224,545 58.3 17.3 24.41922......................... 179,364 80,252 117,689 377,305 47.5 21.3 31.21923......................... 207,632 96,344 149,697 453,673 45.8 2 1.2 33.01924......................... 210,818 95,019 137,082 442,919 47.6 21.5 30.91925_....................... 226,159 86,145 178,918 491,222 46.0 17.5 36.41926......................... 188,074 64,298 209,842 462,214 40.7 13.9 45.41927....................... 155,512 54,320 196,263 406,095 38.3 13.4 48.31928......................... 136,907 43,098 208,673 388,678 35.2 11.1 53.7

* Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined. 3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores combined.

The trend toward apartment-house dwelling continues in full swing. This fact is amply shown by the above table. In 1921 accom­modations were provided for 224,545 families in the new buildings for which permits were issued during that year. Of this number 58.3 per cent were sheltered in 1-family dwellings, 17.3 per cent in 2-family dwellings, and 24.4 per cent in apartment houses.

Seven years later, in 1928, it is found that 53.7 per cent of the 388,678 new family dwelling units were in apartment houses and only 35.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings and 11.1 per cent in 2-family dwellings.

The total number of families provided for in 1928 increased 73.1 per cent in 1928 over 1921. One-family dwellings, however, increased only 4.6 per cent in number in 1928 over 1921, while the family units provided in apartment houses in 1928 increased 280.7 per cent over those provided during 1921,

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 9: bls_0500_1929.pdf

The per cent of families housed in 1-family dwellings has decreased each year from that of the preceding year, except that 1924 showed a slight increase over 1923. Apartment units have shown exactly the opposite trend; 1924 was the only year that the percentage of families housed in apartment houses was less than that of the preceding year. The percentage of families housed in 2-family dwellings reached a peak in 1924; since that year there has been a steady decline in the per­centage of families housed in this class of dwelling.

Building Trend, 1927 and 1928

Table 4 shows the number and cost of the different kinds of buildings for the 302 identical cities from which reports were received in 1927 and 1928 and the per cent of increase or decrease in the number and in the cost in 1928 as compared with 1927.

T a b l e 4 .—N U M B E R A N D COST OF N E W BU ILD IN G S FO R W H ICH P E R M IT S W E R E ISSUED IN 302 ID E N T IC A L CITIES D U R IN G T H E C A L E N D A R Y E A R S 1927 A N D 1928, B Y K IN D OF B U IL D IN G

INTR0DUCTTON AND SUMMARY 5

Kind of building

New buildings for which permits were issued

1927

Number Cost

1928

Number Cost

Per cent of increase (+ ) or decrease (—) in 1928 compared

with 1927

Number Cost

PRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

1-family dwellings..................................2-family dwellings................................. .1-family and 2-family dwellings with

stores combined—...............................Multifamily dwellings-.......................Multifamily dwellings with stores

combined............................................ .H otels_________________________________Lodging houses....................................A ll other...............................................

Total-

NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Amusement buildings........ .Churches--.......................... .Factories and workshops...Public garages.......................Private garages.................... .Service stations....... ............ .Institutions.......................... .Office buildings. ..................Public buildings................. .Public works and utilities..Schools and libraries...........Sheds......................................Stables and barns.................Stores and warehouses____All other.................................

Total-

Grand total-

164,268 25,227

3,32913,663

1,78320179

213

208,763

943 1,118 4,181 4,192

181,859 4,919

332 1,271

339 593 837

13,608 358

13,280 4,283

$789,382,883208,578,118

34,978,625736,830,499

90,666,916 69,393,263 1,305,302

30,763,923

143,88919,956

2,62012,063

1,52823437

207

$710,900,837153,128,386

26,678,912776,419,458

90,754,524 114,289,650

780,576 35,369,533

-1 2 .4-2 0 .9

-21 .3-1 1 .7

-14 .3+16.4-5 3 .2- 2 .8

1,961,899,529 180,534 1,908,321,876 -1 3 .5

128,208,773 58,890,438

141,307,499 74,395,804 65,449,178 15,022,065 75,132,340

242,853,223 47,450,619 45,389,033

155,542,100 5,091,261

823,018 215,747,108

7,239,146

947 1,002 3,932 3,836

155,478 4,462

303 1,352

243 516 843

11,658 356

12,925 4,127

84,676,800 48,852,444

152,410,564 70,656,199 54,921,052 14,768,932 65,001,863

255,801,159 29,378,349 38,670,950

142,154,423 4,869,737

581,478 210,305,687

7,703,679

+•4-10 .4- 6 .0-8 .5

-14 .5-9 .3-8 .7+6.4

-28 .3-13 .0

+ .7-14 .3

- . 6-2 .7-3 .6

232,113 1,278,541,605 201,980 1,180,753,316 -13.0

440,876 3,240,441,134 12,514 3,089,075,192 -1 3 .2

- 9 .9-2 6 .6

-2 3 .7+5.4

+ . 1 +64.7 -40 .2 +15.0

-2 .7

-34 .0-17 .0+7,9-5 .0

-16.1-1 .7

-13 .5+5.3

-38 .1-14 .8- 8 .6-4 .4

-29 .3-2 .5+6.4

-7.6

-4 .7

In the 302 cities from which reports were received for both 1927 and 1928 permits were issued for 382,514 new buildings during the calendar year 1928 as compared with 440,876 during the calendar year 1927. This is a decrease, in the number of buildings, of 13.2

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 10: bls_0500_1929.pdf

per cent. The estimated amount spent for the erection of the build­ings for which permits were issued in 1928 was $3,089,075,192, a decrease of 4.7 per cent from the $3,240,441,134 spent during 1927.

Residential buildings decreased more in number but less in esti­mated expenditure than nonresidential buildings in 1928 as com­pared with 1927. The decrease in the number of residential buildings for which permits were issued during 1928, in these 302 cities, being 13.5 per cent over 1927, while nonresidential buildings decreased in number 13.0 per cent. In estimated costs, however, the decrease in residential buildings was only 2.7 per cent as compared with 7.6 per cent in nonresidential buildings.

All classes of residential buildings except hotels showed a decrease in the number of buildings, comparing 1928 with 1927. Hotels increased 16.4 per cent in number. The greatest decrease was in 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores where there was a falling off of 21.3 per cent.

In estimated expenditure four classes of structures in the residential group showed a decrease and four showed an increase. The decreases ranged from 9.9 per cent in the case of 1-family dwellings to 40.2 per cent in lodging houses. The increases in estimated expenditure in this group ranged from one-tenth of 1 per cent for multifamily dwellings with stores combined to 64.7 per cent for hotels.

In the nonresidential group all classes of buildings showed a decrease in number except amusement buildings, office buildings, and schools and libraries, office buildings showing the largest increase with a gain of 6.4 per cent over 1927. The decreases ranged from six-tenths of 1 per cent for stables and barns to 28.3 per cent in the case of public buildings.

In amounts expended factory buildings, office buildings, and miscellaneous buildings showed an increase in 1928 as compared with 1927. All other nonresidential buildings showed a decrease in expenditures ranging from 1.7 per cent for service stations to 38.1 per cent for public buildings.

Per Capita Expenditure for Buildings

Table 5 shows the total and the per capita expenditures for new buildings, new housekeeping dwellings, repairs and additions, and for all lands of buildings in each of the 310 cities for which reports were received for the calendar year 1928; the total number of fami­lies provided for and the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population in these 310 cities; and the total expenditure for all classes of buildings in 302 cities in 1927.

In the 310 cities which reported for 1928 there was an expenditure of $3,423,584,461 for building operations of all kinds. Of this amount, $3,098,940,040 was for new buildings and $324,644,421 for repairs to old buildings. Of the amount spent for new buildings, $1,762,452,315 was for housekeeping dwellings. The expenditure for all buildings for the 302 cities which reported for 1927 was $3,593,839,405.

The per capita expenditure for the cities from which reports were received for 1928 was $76.18 for all building operations, divided as follows: $68.96 for new buildings and $7.22 for repairs; $39.22 of

6 BUILDING PERMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 11: bls_0500_1929.pdf

the amount expended for new buildings was for housekeeping dwell­ings. The population of these 310 cities, as estimated by the Bureau of the Census for July 1, 1928, was 44,940,049.

The five leading cities in per capita expenditure were White Plains, N. Y ., $440.15; Yonkers, N. Y ., $293.64; Evanston, 111., $276.85; Mount Vernon, N. Y ., $260.74; and New Kochelle, N. Y ., $230.19. All of these cities are suburban cities, four being suburbs of New York and one of Chicago. In all of these cities residential buildings accounted for the large per capita expenditure.

Following is a list of the five leading cities in total expenditure for the years 1920 to 1928, inclusive. It will be noted that the cities of New York, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia make up this list each year except for 1920 and 1921 when Cleveland was included and Philadelphia slumped below the leading five.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMABY 7

1920New York___________ $277, 695, 337Chicago_____________ 84, 602, 650Detroit______________ 77, 737, 215Cleveland____________ 64,198, 600Los Angeles__________ 60, 023, 600

1921New York__Chicago___Cleveland - _. Los Angeles. Detroit____

1922New York__Chicago____Los Angeles.. Philadelphia. Detroit_____

1923New York...Chicago------Los Angeles..Detroit_____Philadelphia-

1924New York-Chicago__Detroit___

442, 285, 248 133, 027, 910 86, 680, 023 82, 761, 386 58, 086, 053

645, 176, 481 229, 853, 125 121, 206, 787 114, 190, 525 93, 614, 593

789, 265, 335 334, 164, 404 200,133, 181 129, 719, 831 128, 227, 405

836, 043, 604 308, 911, 159 160, 547, 723

1924—ContinuedLos Angeles__________ $150, 147, 516Philadelphia________ _ 141, 402, 655

1925New York............. ....... 1,020,604,713Chicago--____ ______ 373,803,571Detroit______________ 180,132, 528Philadelphia_________ 171, 034, 280Los Angeles................ 152, 646, 436

1926New York___________ 1,039,670,572Chicago-------------------- 376, 808, 480Detroit______________ 183, 721, 443Philadelphia_________ 140, 093, 075Los Angeles........... ....... 123, 006, 215

1927Now York__Chicago____Detroit_____Los Angeles.. Philadelphia-

1928New York__Chicago____Detroit_____Philadelphia. Los Angeles. _

880, 333, 455 365, 065, 042 145, 555, 647 123, 027,139 117, 590, 650

916, 671, 855 323, 509, 048 129, 260, 285 112, 225, 865 101, 678, 768

During 1928 accommodations were provided in the new dwellings for which permits were issued for 399,657 families, or at the rate of 88.9 families to each 10,000 of population in these 310 cities.

Following is a list of the five leading cities in the building of homes for each year since 1921. This list shows the number of families provided with homes in new buildings for each 10,000 of the city’s population. Four of the five for 1928 are contiguous to the great metropolitan center of New York City.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 12: bls_0500_1929.pdf

8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

1921Long Beach_______________ 631. 9Los Angeles_______________ 320. 9Pasadena_________________ 251. 7Shreveport________________ 249. 8Lakewood________________ 191. 3

1922Long Beach_______________ 1, 081. 0Los Angeles______________ 441. 6Lakewood------------------------- 358. 9Miami____________________ 268. 1East Cleveland------------------- 267. 6

1923Long Beach_______________ 1,038. 1Los Angeles_______________ 657. 4Miami___________________ 611. 1Irvington_________________ 432. 1Lakewood------------------------- 381. 5

1924Miami 1__________________ 2, 248. 9Irvington_________________ 501. 2Los Angeles 2______________ 448. 3San Diego________________ 378. 0Long Beach_______________ 347. 6

1925Miami ------------------------- 1,342.0San Diego------------------------- 392. 0Tampa___________________ 379. 3Irvington_________________ 374. 6Los Angeles2......................... 331. 0

1926St. Petersburg_____________ 700. 3Mount Vernon____________ 644. 7Irvington_________________ 398. 6White Plains______________ 367. 2San Diego________________ 339. 5

1927Irvington_________________ 740. 5White Plains______________ 419. 5Mount Vernon____________ 414. 8Yonkers__________________ 349. 0East Orange______________ 338.1

1928Yonkers__________________ 347. 6Mount Vernon____________ 299. 1White Plains______________ 298. 3Long Beach_______________ 297. 4Irvington_________________ 295. 4

* The ratio of families provided for in Miami in 1924 was based on the population as estimated b y the Census Bureau for that year. In the light of the actual census taken by State enumeration in 1925, it would seem that the estimate for 1924 was below the actual population for that year, hence the ratio here shown for 1924 is probably higher than the actual population in that year would warrant.

> Population not estimated in 1924 or 1925; 1923 estimate used.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 13: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 14: bls_0500_1929.pdf

10 B U I L D I N G P E R M IT S I N tTH E P R I N C I P A L C IT IE S

T a b l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D FO R

City and StateExpenditure

for new buildings,

1928

Expenditure for repairs and addi­

tions. 1928

Total expenditures

1928 1m

Expenditure for new

housekeeping dwellings

only,1928

Akron, Ohio.............Alameda, Calif........Albany, N. Y ..........Allentown, Pa_____Altoona, Pa..............Amsterdam, N. Y__Alton, 111...................Anderson, Ind_____Asheville, N . C____Ashtabula, Ohio___Atlanta, Ga.............. .Atlantic City, N . J .Auburn, N. Y_........ .Augusta, Ga.... ........ .Aurora, HI..................

Baltimore, M d .........................Bangor, M e..............................Battle Creek, M ich ................Bay City, M ich......................Bayonne, N. J.........................Beaumont, Tex........................Belleville, HI............................Bellingham, Wash..................Berkeley, Calif........................Bethlehem, Pa.........................Binghamton, N. Y ............. .Birmingham, Ala....................Bloomfield, N. J......................Bloomington, 111____________Boston, Mass...........................Bridgeport, Conn.... ...............Brockton, Mass................... .Brookline, Mass........ .......... .Buffalo, N. Y ............................Burlington, Iowa............. ........Butler, Pa..................................Butte, M ont_______________ _

Cambridge, Mass______Camden, N. J .................Canton, Ohio..................Cedar Rapids, Iowa___Central Falls, R . I_____Charleston, S. C _______Charleston, W . Va____Charlotte, N. C ..............Chattanooga, Tenn____Chelsea, Mass_________Chester, Pa......................Chicago, 111......................Chicopee, Mass...............Cicero, 111.........................Cincinnati, O h io .. ........Clarksburg, W . Va........ .Cleveland, Ohio.............Clifton, N. J....................Colorado Springs, Colo..Columbia, S. C ................Columbus, Ga..................Columbus, Ohio............. .Council Bluffs, Iowa___Covington, K y ............... .Cranston, R . I ..................Cumberland, M d._.........

Dallas, Tex......... .Danville, 111..........Davenport, Iowa. Dayton, Ohio____

$17,837,6001,994,724

12,503,7155,484,7152,898,276

677,675816,115

2,169,0142,832,362

25,119,931 6,786,810

858.870 1,185,8482,650,700

28,478,200 489,260

2,686,5051,490,2011.807.300 3,615,913 1,014,881 1,608,1055,517,9503,479,3902,762,317

12,820,6643,932,1001.319.300

47,961,4323,070,5241,448,908 5,738,345

23,279,259402.871 302,740 215,050

7.146.1136,762,090 3,083,1471,856,631

230,345 383,228

2,613,790 7,048,994 3,978,069

898,540 1,537,867

315,208,908 1,161,2653.560.114

30,679,9901,075,450

47,017,150 3,437,510

614,466 1,347,695

984,84814,857,790

701,4501,299,4003,607,224

924,421

6,360,840752,159

1,060,3629,010,900

1 Not estimated by Census Bureau.

$1,647,598 136,672

2,389,810 450, S25 463,631

8,000 228,340

n

1,624,032158,728

m m

7,467,150156,350184,807354,695188,065710,856

6,740264,213558,676363,616694.076

1,403,913608,500 63,500

7,737,125 456,098 276,950553.077

1,122,72440,90086,096

151.390

937,610665.965 579,171 581,59973,000

177,407259.390 409,270 725,417 265,175 208,675

8,300,140114,300299.966

4,778,740113,935

9,141,375 104,545 198,029 262,080 169,154

1,379,460 108,800 292,350 103,025 75,127

1,728,159 163,189 289,379

1,347,478 ,

$19,485,098% m > m

14,893,525 5,035*040 3,360,907

88i 1,044,455% 452, m§,095,110

513,878 27,894 ^

615,596 1,550,944 2,950,472

33,945,350 625,610

2,871,312 1,844,8961,995,365 4,326,7691,021,6211.872.318 6,076,6263,843,0083,456,393

14,224,5774,540,600 1,382,800

55,698,557 3,526,6221,725,858 8,291,422

24,401,983 443,771 388,836366,440

8,083,7237.428.0553.662.318 2,438,230

303,345560,635

2,873,1807,458,264 4,703,4861,163,715 1,746,542

323,509,0481,275,565 3,860,080

35,458,730 1,189,385

56,158,5253.542.055

812,4951,609,775 1,154,002

16,237,250810,250

1,591,750 3,710,249

999,548

8,088,999915,348

1,349,74110,358,378

$20,196,0^81,536,930

16,188,741 6,518,16® 3*041,304

807,580 (8)

2,218,31

i|Jlo,§075,822,864

843,1941,459,0902,791,528

28,437,790851,355

4,751,866775,209

1,949,950

1,787,110 8,683,0682,476,6214,290,909

21,786,696 6,880,077

924,200 60,987,468 5,186,712 1,433,3695,902,440

33,073,453 721,140

<*>

9,557,469 5,330,3274,156,0202,602,622

798,730586,099

2,038,709 5,554,8844,874,201

866,0602,396,265

365,065,0421,117,1104,635,829

30,570,2991,007,635

45,480,5503,388,565

577,398 1,533,3751,539,749

23,282,600930,250

1,722,3102,669,634

942,465

9,773,5231,036,7912,053,351

10,332,026

$12,164,1481,429,2247,460,200 Z, 165,000

1,749* 300150,250

9,968,489259,265 159,125815,644

1,561,549

12,660,000136,550752,750229.200 968,500

1,486,841666,000674.000

4,107,5511.421.0001,264,421 7,130,3353.370.000

601.00026,867,550

1.945.000 732,950

5,065,100 10,750,950

178,100258.30011,500

3,581,3001,164,950 2,180,850

688,940 92,000

160.300 860,000

4,432,0201,862,875

573,000 1, 000,000

174,749,900368.300

2,537,60021,628,235

357,23516,247,100 2,539,650

340,4401.108.000

700,72411,533,300

261,400953.200

2,775,200284,010

3,187,924599,086 635,6501

2,703,48a* EstiiRatQ as of July 1,1926,

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 15: bls_0500_1929.pdf

R E P A IR S, A N D FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, I N 310 C ITIE S IN TH E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 11

Estimated

Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita

expendi­ture for

City and State population, July 1,1928

NumberRatioper

10,000

For new build­ings

For re­pairs and additions

TotalRank

ofcity

house­keeping

dwellings only, 1928

Akron, Ohio . ______ (>)>32,400

2,557504Alameda, Calif-...................... 155.6 $61.57 $4.22 $65.78 78 $44.11

Albany, N. Y .......................... 120,400 615 51.1 103.85 19.85 123.70 22 61.96Allentown, Pa........................ 99,400 556 55.9 55.18 4.53 59.71 93 31.84Altoona, Pa.............................. 69,100 155 22.4 41.94 6.70 48.64 136 13.46Amsterdam, N . Y _________ 36,200 42 11.6 18.72 .17 18.89 258 6.70Alton, 111.................................. < 26,797 167 62.3 30.46 8.52 38.98 171 21.19Anderson, Ind......................... 2 34,600 268 77.5 62.69 8 .20 70.89 66 25.48Asheville, N . C ....................... 9 32,000 370 115.6 88.51 8.21 96.72 40 54.67Ashtabula, Ohio..................... 2 25,500 20 7.8 15.49 4.66 20.15 254 5.89Atlanta, Ga.............................. 255,100 3,170 124.3 98.47 8.92 107.39 27 39.08Atlantic City, N . J -_ ............Auburn, N. Y ..... ...................

54,700 57 10.4 105.79 29.69 135.48 20 4.74< 35,677 31 8.7 10.00 4.45 14.45 272 4.46

Augusta, Ga............................Aurora, 111................................

56,700 318 56.1 20.56 6.79 27.35 223 14.3947,100 301 63.9 56.28 6.36 62.64 88 33.15

Baltimore, M d ........................ 830,400 2,884 34.7 31.89 8.99 40.88 160 15.25Bangor, M e................. - .......... >26,800 38 14.2 17.51 5.83 23.34 243 5.10Battle Creek, M ich ............... 47,200 177 37.5 56.92 3.92 60.83 91 15.95Bay City, M ich...................... 49,600

95,30057 11.5 30.04 7.15 37.20 180 4.62

Bayonne, N. J ........................ 436 45.8 18.96 1.97 20.94 250 10.16Beaumont, Tex....................... 56,300 540 95.9 64.23 12.63 76.85 53 26.41Belleville, 111............................ <26,969

2 26,300136 50.4 37.63 .25 37.88 178 24.70

Bellingham, Wash................. 264 100.4 61.14 10.05 71.19 64 25.63Berkeley, Calif....................... 71,000 1,330 187.3 77.72 7.87 85.59 47 57.85Bethlehem, Pa........................ 67,600 223 33.0 51.47 5.38 56.85 101 21.02Binghamton, N. Y ................. 74,800 306 40.9 36.93 9.28 46.21 145 16.90Birmingham, Ala...................Bloomfield, N . J___________

222,400<9

2 30,700

2,589675

116.4 57.65 6.31 63.96 87 32.06

Bloomington, HI..................... 90 29.3 42.97 2.07 45.04 148 19.58Boston, Mass.......................... 799,200 6,805 85.1 60.01 9.68 69.69 67 33.62Bridgeport, Conn................... < 143,535 388 27.0 21.39 3.18 24.57 237 13.55Brockton, Mass...................... <65,343 141 2 1.6 22.17 4.24 26.41 229 11.22Brookline, M a s s ................... 45,700 556 121.7 125.57 12.10 137.67 19 110.83Buffalo, N . Y .......................... 555,800 3,181 57.2 41.88 2 .02 43.90 149 19.34Burlington, Iowa................... 2 27,100 55 20.3 14.87 1.51 16.38 266 6.57Butler, P a ............. ................. < 25,230 40 15.9 12.00 3.41 15.41 267 10.24Butte, M ont............................ 43,600 7 1 .6 4.93 3.47 8.40 288 .26

Cambridge, Mass...... ............ 125,800 863 6 8 .6 56.81 7.45 64.26 83 28.47Camden, N . J_______ ______ 135,400 350 25.8 49.94 4.92 54.8 6 111 8.60Canton, Ohio..........................Cedar Rapids, Iowa...............

116,800 374 32.0 26.40 4.96 31.36 210 18.6758,200 157 27.0 31.90 9.99 41.89 157 11.84

Central Falls, R . I _________ 2 95,700 44 17.1 8.96 2.84 11.80 282 3.58Charleston, S. C ................... . 75,900 46 6 .1 5.05 2.34 7. 39 289 2.11Charleston, W . Va.................Charlotte, N* C......................

55,200 258 46.7 47.35 4.70 52.05 124 15.5882,100 1,237 150.7 85.86 4.99 90.84 43 53.98

Chattanooga, Tenn__............ 73,500 611 83.1 54.12 9.87 63.99 86 25.35Chelsea, Mass......................... 49,800 142 28.5 18.04 5.32 23.37 242 11.51Chester, Pa.............................. 74,200 243 32.7 20.73 2.81 23. 54 240 13.48Chicago, HI.............................. 3,157,400

45,40034,447 109.1 99.83 2.63 102.46 32 55.35

Chicopee, Mass......................Cicero, 111.................................

102 22.5 25.58 2.52 28.10 221 8.1171,600

413,700464 64.8 49.72 4.19 53.91 116 35.44

Cincinnati, Ohio..................... 3,559 86.0 74.16 11.55 85.71 46 52.28Clarksburg, W . V a................ 2 30,900 98 31.7 34.80 3.69 38.49 174 11.56Cleveland, Ohio..................... 1,010,300 3,167 31.3 46.54 9.05 55.59 107 16.08Clifton, N. J ............................Colorado Springs, Colo_____

236,200(950,600

54795

151.1 94.96 2.89 97.85 36 70.16

Columbia, S. C ....................... 272 53.8 26.63 5.18 31.81 208 21.90Columbus, Ga........................ 46,600 321 68.9 21.13 3.63 24.76 236 15.04Columbus, Ohio.....................Council Bluffs, Iowa.............

299,000 2,477 82.8 49.69 4.61 54.31 114 38.5742,300 94 22.2 16.58 2.57 19.15 255 6.18

Covington, K y ........................ 59,000 314 53.2 22.02 4.96 26.98 228 16.16Cranston, R . I ........................ 37,500 559 149.1 96.19 2.75 98.94 35 74.01Cumberland, M d ................... 2 34,400 67 19.5 26.87 2.18 29.06 218 8.26

Dallas, Tex..............................Danville, 111.............................

217,800 1,199 55.1 29.20 7.93 37.14 181 14.6438,800 164 42.3 19.39 4.21 23.59 239 15.44

Davenport, Iowa....................Dayton, Ohio..........................

3 Data no

<52,469 140 26.7 20.21 5.52 25.72 233 12.11184,500

t collected.732 39.7

<•£48.84

Itate cen7.30

sus Jan. 1,56.14

1925.102 14.65

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 16: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T ab l e S .—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D F O R

1 2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

City and StateExpenditure

for new buildings,

1928

Expenditure for repairs and addi­

tions, 1928

Total expenditures

1928 1927

Expenditure for new

housekeeping dwellings

only,1928

Decatur, 111.............Denver, Colo..........Des Moines, Iowa.Detroit, M ich........Dubuque, Iowa___Duluth, M inn........Durham, N . C ------

East Chicago, Ind........East Cleveland, Ohio—Easton, Pa.....................East Orange, N. J ........East Providence, R . I-East St. Louis, 111_____Elgin, 111........................Elizabeth, N . J_______Elkhart, Ind..................Elmira, N. Y .................El Paso, Tex..................Erie, Pa..........................Evanston, HI.................Evansville, Ind_______Everett, Mass...............Everett, Wash..............

Fall River, M ass... Fitchburg, M ass....Flint, M ich.............Fond du Lac, Wis_.Fort Smith, Ark__Fort Wayne, In d ... Fort Wayne, Tex... Fresno, Calif______

Galveston, Tex............Gary, Ind.....................Grand Rapids, M ich .Great Falls, M ont___Green Bay, W is_____Greensboro, N . C ____Greenville, S. C ..........Greenwich, Conn____

Hagerstown, M d ..........Hamilton, Ohio_______Hammond, Ind.............Hamtramck, M ich____Harrisburg, Pa..............Hartford, Conn.............Haverhill, Mass............Hazelton, Pa.................Highland Park, M ich .Hoboken, N . J..............Holyoke, Mass..............Houston, Tex................Huntington, W . Va__Hutchinson, Kans____

Indianapolis, Ind.. Irvington, N . J___

Jackson, M ich........Jacksonville, F la ... Jamestown, N . Y_. Jersey City, N . J__Johnstown, Pa____Joliet, 111.................Joplin, M o ..............

$3,906,71015,113,000 4,154,173

117,458,340 764,425

9,672,888

3,126,499 1,678,961

426,330 7,266,012 2,972,117 2,490,326 2,013,0755,473,100

832,616 1, 668,1211,836,814 3,846,534

12,306,1754,780,0901,521,858

677,590

2,546,384570,115

13,112,152493,631

1,004,184 4,284,436

10,083,9371,205,652

5,240,8756,435,2452,525,6521,831,8614,520,1441,197,4525,736,745

462,2001,920,9346,057,9801,056,9304,713,635 9,394,186

444,190 1,011,988 1,675,167

320,790913,700

34,598,940929,600

1,067,390

19,354,5736,556,253

1,550,6906,818,5901,554,990

12,943,194 961,341

2,773,8281,231,393

$262,635 1,657,750

355,807 11> 801,945

112,961 1,006,036

355,405 110,291 306,669 366,373 117,984 216,608 356,571 30,500

231,273 237,596 307,411 917,154 872,050 330,724 238,901 509,000

289,260252,235

1,310,57785,499

604,518

1,459,850455,913

368,246 800,275

1,751,510 133,830 160,000 528,151 242,691 867,635

215,034 142,099 469,300 288,045 881,140

1,884,257 109,875 183,022 928,110 244,173 347,400 710,563 52,000

201,722

2,612,81383,041

546,396 841,569 291,880 933,050 133,753 307,792 172,346

$4,169,34516,770,7504,509,980

129,260,285 877,386

3,289,404 9,905,838

3,481,904 1,789,252

733,0087,632,3853,090,1012,706,934 2,369,646 5,503,6001,063,889 1,905,7172,144,225 4,763,688

13,178,2255,110,814 1,760,7591,186,590

2,835,644822,350

14,422,729 579,130

1,608,702 5,011,124

11,543,7871,661,565

2,676,8086,041,150 8,186,755 2,659,4821,991,861 5,048,295 1,440,143 6,604,380

677,234 2,063,033 6,527,2801,344,9755,594,775

11,278,443 554,065

1,195,0102,603,277

564,9631,261,100

35,309,503981,600

1,269,112

21,967,3866,639,294

2,097,0867,660,1591,846,870

13,876,244 1,095,0943,081,620 1,403,739

$5,790,41515,754,6002,876,131

145,555,6471,288,2074,431,4352,587,754

4,304,3661,220,6201,299,670

12,313,0922.389.700 5,562,971 1,891,883

10,922,8772,660,5661,311,7831,792,5615,393,056

15,917,2253,415,9982.097.830

(’)

1,840,768637,975

22,087,4511,000,179

<*>6,002,498

28,483,764 2,690,578

2,974,415 15,016,529 12,319,420 1,163,119 2,508,8984.837.830 1, 111, 182 5,700,062

1,558,2051,782,7496.431.2001,545,8153,569,365

17,529,941 909,625

2,072,504 2,654,960 1,519,5992.044.200

27,326,4751,547,150

(8)23,682,316 12,960,227

2,575,64412,768,386 2,745,835

13,851,780 1,386,1832.793.700 1,355,533

$1,967,5008,249,2001,675,328

66,448,106269.500 947,650

1,582,935

950,850186,000202.425

4,631,150 1,478,025 1,843,880 1,055,5703.451.000

590,261 631,100900.426

2.104.5007.714.000 1,488,250

977,600262,300

469,020110.500

8,495,144203.000 184,488

2,128,8156,402,445

480,645

1,146,686 3,701,575 3,584,100

789,830 834,180

2,030,865 729,547

4,559,300

300,510 1,538,487 2,759,700

404.2001.214.500 4,650,269

271,400343,264364.500 70,500

492,80017,806,385

467,900467,270

10,224,100 5,021,800

1,107,450 5,263,115

855.0007.649.000

345,1501,412,900

591.200i Not estimated by Census Bureau. 3 Estimate as of July 1,1926. * Data not collected.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 17: bls_0500_1929.pdf

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 3

REPAIRS, AND FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR, ETC., IN THE CALENDAR YEAR 1928—Con.

City and StateEstimated population, July 1,1928

Families provided for

NumberRatioper

10,000

Per capita expenditure, 1928

Fornewbuild-

For re­pairs and additions

TotalRank

ofcity

Per capita expendi­ture for house­

keeping dwellings only, 1928

Decatur, 111.............Denver, Colo..........Des Moines, Iowa..Detroit, M ich.........Dubuque, Iowa___Duluth, M inn........Durham, N . C ........

East Chicago, Ind..........East Cleveland, O hio...Easton, Pa...................... .East Orange, N. J......... .East Providence, R. I—East St. Louis, 111......... .Elgin, 111...........................Elizabeth, N. J...............Elkhart, In d ...................Elmira, N. Y ...................El Paso, Tex....................Erie, Pa............................Evanston, HI...................Evansville, Ind...............Everett, Mass................ .Everett, Wash--------------

Fall River, Mass__Fitchburg, M ass-—Flint, M ich.............Fond du Lac, W is. Fort Smith, Ark___Fort Wayne, Ind__Fort Worth, Tex___ Fresno, Calif...........

Galveston, Tex............Gary, Ind.....................Grand Rapids, M ich -Great Falls, M ont___Green Bay, Wis..........Greensboro, N . C ------Greenville, S. C ...........Greenwich, Conn........

Hagerstown, M d ......... .Hamilton, Ohio...........Hammond, Ind............Hamtramck, M ich____Harrisburg, Pa............. .Hartford, Conn.............Haverhill, Mass........... .Hazleton, Pa................ .Highland Park, Mich..Hoboken, N . J............. .Holyoke, Mass............. .Houston, Tex............... .Huntington, W . Va___Hutchinson, Kans____

Indianapolis, Ind . Irvington, N . J___

Jackson, M ich___Jacksonville, F la .. Jamestown, N . Y . Jersey City, N . J~Johnstown, Pa___Joliet, 111.................Joplin, M o .............

57,100294,200151,900

1,378,90042,300

116,80047,600

50,800 2 39,400

38,40065.000

2 27,10074.00036.000

850.000 117,800

a .47.60098.100 43,300

<29,303

134.30045.200

148,800 2 26,500 4 31,643105.300 170,60064.000

50.60089.100

164,200 *30,900

36.10051.900

*28,100(9

2 32,00044.20056.000 99,80086.900

172.300 * 49,232

38,30086.400 0 )60.400

*164,95468.600 0 )

382,100 2 34,600

63.700140.70046.000

324.70073.70041.900(9

3391,869

406 15,929

67196464

20413624

968 271 501 207

1,002155120310397945420283123

11025

2,2215961

407 1,758

146

890895260186446193344

410

2061,363

6857

1175

864,463

87146

2,5111,022

2501,658

1692,155

73180151

59.463.526.7

115.515.816.897.5

40.234.5 6.3

148.9100.067.757.5

$68.4251.3727.3585.1818.0719.55

203.21

61.55 42.61 11.10

111. 78 109.67 33.65 55.92

24.0 33.3615.59

198.542.865.442.0

8 .25.5

149.322.319.338.7

103.02 2 .8

72.999.954.584.151.585.9 68.7

258.5348.73 35.1523.12

18.96 12.6188.12 18.6331.73 40.69 59.11 18.84

45.6258.8239.1981.7450.74 87.09 42.61

25.6 92.8

124.68.9

23.7 79.113.814.9 13.5

14.4443.46

108.1810.5954.2454.529.02

26.4219.39

14.2270.612.7

15.13209.7513.55

65.7 295.4

39.2117.836.7 66.49.9

43.0

50.65189.49

24.3448.46

13.0466.20

$4.605.632.34 8.56 2.67 8.614.89

7.002.807.995.644.35 2.939.90

$73.0257.0029.6993.7420.74 28.16

208.11

68.54 45.41 19.09

117.42 114.03 36.58 65.82

5910021642

253220

8

1472572426

18677

4.752.61

38.11 18.20

177260

18.323.375.52

17.37

2.15 5.58 8.81 3.23

19.10 6.90 8.56 7.12

7.288.98

10.674.334.43

10.188.64

276.8552.1040.66 40.49

21.11 18.19 96.9321.85 50.84 47.5967.67 25.96

52.9067.8049.86 86.07 55.18 97.27 51.25

3123162164

24926139

24412813972

12171

13345

10938

125

6.72 3.21 8.38 2.89

10.14 10.94 2.23 4.78

10.74

21.16 46.67

116.56 13.48 64.38 65.46 11.25 31.20 30.13

24814325

2778279

283212215

5.754.31.76

20.88 214.06 14.31

2516

274

6.842.40

8.585.986.35 2.87 1.817.35

57.49191.89

32.9254.4440.1542.7414.8673.55

10

20411216515227157

$34.4928.0611.0448.136.378.11

33.25

18.724.725.27

71.25 54.54 24.92 29.32

12.627.64

162.06 15.17 22.58 8.95

3.492.44

57.097.665.83

20.2237.53 7.51

22.6641.54 21.83 25.56 23.11 39.13 25.96

9.3934.8149.284.05

13.9826.99 5.51 8.96 4.22

8.16 107.95

6.82

26.76 145.14

17.3937.4118.5923.564.68

33.72

< State census, Jan. 1,1925.

61318°—29----- 25 Estimate as of July 1,1925.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 18: bls_0500_1929.pdf

1 4 b u i l d i n g P e r m i t s i n t h e p r i n c i p a l c i t i e s

T ab l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D F O B

City and StateExpenditure

for new buildings,

1928

Expenditure for repairs and addi­

tions, 1928

Total expenditures Expenditure for new

housekeeping dwellings

only,19281928 1927

Kalamazoo, M ich..................... $1,559,478 $475,386 $2,034,864 $2,223,046 $640,525Kansas City, Kans................... 1,562,452 88,825 1,651,277 1,586,790 648,620Kansas City, Mo__................... 14,739,275 802,000 15,541,275 14,822,336 7,629,200Kearny, N. J_............................ 6,115,160 136,430 6,251,590 5,795,875 2,945,000Kenosha, W is............................ 3,291,659 434,745 3,726,404 4,468,453 2,484,518Kingston, N. Y ......................... 1,020,006 716,784 1,736,790 2,140,093 683,050Knoxville, Tenn........................ 6,784,741 329,796 7,114,537 5,699,417 3,187,541Kokomo, Ind.... ......................... 459,013 67,653 526,666 480/095 350,262

Lakewood, Ohio........................ 4,512,046 110,050 4,622,096 3,516,399 2,172,400Lancaster, Pa............................. 1,528,895 860,180 2,389,075 3,004,838 839,050Lansing, M ich........................... 4,919,662 284,685 5,204,347 7,330,420 2,004,800

'Lawrence, Mass__..................... 427,500 175,135 602,635 913,134 104,200Lebanon, Pa.............................. 403,000 257,325 660,325 604,500 101,000Lewiston, M e............................ 985,000 5,000 990,000 469,100 148,000Lexington, K y ........................... 1,448,119 169,299 1,617,418 2,350,985 573,400Lima, Ohio................................. 295,217 159,217 454,434 707,313 86,100Lincoln, Nebr............................ 3,450,854 192,495 3,643,349 4,398,540 1,801,712Little Rock, Ark....................... 3,804,523 455,585 4,260,108 2,993, 636 2,079,137Long Beach, Calif..................... 15,607,585 700,240 16,307,825 13,639,425 8,631,515Lorain, Ohio.............................. 1,079,714 97,660 1,177,374 1,300,534 815,140Los Angeles, Calif..................... 91,279,946 10,398,822 101,678,768 123,027,139 60,977,127Louisville, K y............................ 15,462,120 2,657,955 18,120,075 23,340,610 8,250,300Lowell, Mass.............................. 630,805 310,945 941,750 971,115 170,600Lynchburg, Va_........................ 916,244 176,839 1,093,083 1,528,729 499,710Lynn, Mass................................ 2,841,269 945,535 3,786,804 3,877,775 1,898,500

McKeesport, Pa........................ 1,845,076 339,909 2,184,985 2,356,119 980,535Macon, Ga................................. 1,997,240 352,449 2,349,689 2,886,116 1,248,170Madison, W is............................ 6,860,767 769,347 7,630,114 4,461,813 4,646,200Malden, Mass............................ 2,695,847 197,097 2,892,944 3,800,093 2,307,250Manchester, N . H ..................... 827,360 231,359 1,058,719 1,940,074 339,625Mansfield, Ohio........................ 1,668,055 140,839 1,808,874 1,779,555 663,000Marion, Ind............................... 1,243,660 63,500 1,307,160 521,560 382,000Marion, Ohio............................. 1,106,345 33,940 1,140,285 557,793 439,900Medford, Mass.......................... 4,324,637 190,196 4,514,833 4,370,512 3,689,450Memphis, Tenn........................ 12,223,414 2,059,625 14,283,039 12,402,920 6,100,030Meriden, Conn.......................... 1,008,926 259,795 1,268,721 1,316,177 678,200Miami, Fla................................. 1,262,488 683,575 1,946,063 9,540,937 592,855Milwaukee, Wis........................ 31,764,594 3,641,787 35,406,381 37,747,895 19,159,269Minneapolis, Minn................... 20,057,560 3,200,165 23,257,725 22,429,620 8,377,920Mobile, Ala................................ 3,158,310 187,508 3,345,818 2,146,241 1,690,456Moline, 111.................................. 1,458,440 201,335 1,659,775 1,170,010 553,084Montclair, N. J......................... 4,119,035 524,233 4,643,268 5,446,164 3,673,324Montgomery, Ala..................... 2,981,098 307,820 3,288,918 2,531,347 1,023,355Mount Vernon, N . Y ________ 13,650,885 611,564 14,262,449 16,775,452 10,991,935Muncie, Ind............................... 2,422,019 452,129 2,874,148 3,038,813 1,134,885Muskegon, M ich........ ............. 1,533,007 277,328 1,810,335 1,078,668 318,010Muskogee, Okla........................ 530,330 35,255 565,585 842,567 314,350

Nashville, Tenn...... ................. 4,893,949 670,694 5,564,643 7,078,073 1,916,074Newark, N. J_______ _______ 29,391,765 4,893,388 34,285,153 51,451,630 16,655,563Newark, Ohio................. .......... 1,038,316 28,600 1,066,916 653,822 338,300New Bedford, Mass................. 808,753 286,622 1,095,375 2,166,627 281,100New Britain, Conn_............. 2,889,608 • 642,509 3,532,117 4,103,884 1,762,950New Brunswick, N. J .............. 1,757,670 426,395 2,184,065 2,839,066 807,925Newburgh, N. Y ....................... 989,275 248,692 1,237,967 1,517,651 429,800New Castle, Pa__..................... 1,358,740 107,500 1,466,240 3,037,495 938,825New Haven, Conn.......... ........ 7,779,394 1,019,000 8,798,394 11,741,379 2,227,300New London, Conn................. 1,919,465 269,187 2,188,652 1,801,715 1,453,400New Orleans, La....................... 9,858,184 2,769,494 12,627,678 15,898,775 5,305,913Newport, K y ............................. 259,810 167,140 426,950 439,225 185,300Newport, R . I ............................ 564,520 115,545 680,065 906,330 309,300Newport News, Va............... . 600, 111 219,194 819,305 548,015 347,203New Rochelle, N . Y — ............ 10,386,272 847,046 11,233,318 9,735,614 8,639,450Newton, M ass.......................... 10,094,405 707,673 10,802,078 10,138.606 8,986,720New York City, N . Y ............. 849,962,931 66,708,924 916,671,855 880,333,455 526,470,604Niagara Falls, N . Y ................. 4,270,153 599,325 4,869,478 4,791,480 2,447,278Norfolk, V a ............................... 3,347,903 491,840 3,839,743 3,346,826 1,984,650Norristown, Pa.......................... 981,025 313,940 1,294,965 1,826,101 574,000Norwalk, C o n n ....................... 4,225,963 555,740 4,781,703 3,592,009 2,371,683

* Not estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimate as of July 1,1926.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 19: bls_0500_1929.pdf

R E P A IR S, A N D FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, E T C ., IN TH E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928—Con.

IN T R O D U C TIO N AND S U M M A R Y 1 5

City and State Estimated

Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928

population, ju ljr i, 1928

Numberla tio For new

build* iflgs

For re­pairs and additions

TotalRank

ofcity

56,400 165 29.3 $27.65 $§.43 $36,08 188118,300 32i 27.1 13.21 <75 13.90 275391, ood 1,969 50.4 37.70 2.05 39.75 1092 32,100 857 267.0 190,50 4,25 194.75 0

56,500 295 52.2 58,26 7.69 05.95 70i 28,400 126 44.4 35.92 25.24 61,15 90i05,400 040 89.2 64.37 3.13 07.50 7340,400 82 20.3 11,36 1.67 13.04 270

65,000 537 &2.0 69.42 1.69 71.11 6558,300 154 26.4 26.22 14.75 40.98 15979,600 443 55.7 01.80 3.58 65.38 80

2 93,500 32 3.4 4.57 1.87 0.45 2902 25,300 19 7.5 15.93 10.17 20, 10 231

36,600 77 21.0 26.91 .14 27.05 22748,700 104 21.4 29.74 3.48 33.21 20149,700 19 3.8 5.94 3.20 9.14 28071,100 497 69.9 48.54 2.71 51.24 12079,200 527 66.5 48.04 5.75 53.79 117

• 104,200 3,099 297.4 149. 78 6.72 156.51 1444,9000 )

329,400

22721,081

1,542

50.6 24.05 2.18 26.22 230

46.8 46.94 8.07 55.01 110< 110,296 50 4.5 5.72 2.82 8.54 287

38,600 114 29.5 23.74 4.58 28.32 219105,500 501 47.5 26.93 8.96 35.89 189

50,400 203 40.3 36.61 6.74 43.35 15161,200 321 52.5 32.63 5.76 38.39 17550,500 542 107.3 135.86 15.23 151.09 1653,400 718 134.5 50.48 3.69 54.17 11585,700 116 13.5 9.65 2.70 12.35 281

2 32,500 0 )

2 33,400 52,900

127158

39.1 51.32 4.33 55.66 105

172 51.5 33.12 1.02 34.14 199745 140.8 81.75 3.60 85.35 48

190,200 1,887 99.2 64.27 10.83 75.09 5437,100 137 36.9 27.19 7.00 34.20 197

156,700 124 7.9 8.06 4.36 12.42 280544,200 4,965 91.2 58.37 6.69 65.06 81455,900 2,240 49.1 44.00 7.02 51.01 12769,600 638 91.7 45.38 2.69 48.07 13835,600 109 30.6 40.97 5.66 46.62 144

2 33,700 323 95.8 122.23 15.56 137.78 1863,100 726 115.1 47.24 4.88 52.12 12254,700 1,636 299.1 249.56 11.18 260.74 446,800 371 79.3 51.75 9.66 61.41 8946,600 104 22.3 32.90 5.95 38.85 17233,200 116 34.9 15.97 1.06 17.04 265

139,600 753 53.9 35.06 4.80 39.86 168473,600 3,288 69.4 62.06 10.33 72.39 612 30,600 108 35.3 33.93 .93 34.87 191

4119,539 42 3.5 6.77 2.40 9.16 28572,800 327 44.9 39.69 8.83 48.52 13740,800 210 51.5 43.08 10.45 53.53 12030,400 74 24.3 32.54 8.18 40.72 16152,500 143 27.2 25.88 2.05 27.93 222

187,900 546 29.1 41.40 5.42 46.82 1412 29,700 218 73.4 64.63 9.06 73.69 56429,400

0 )< 27,757

2,10743

49.1 22.96 6.45 29.41 224

61 2 2.0 20.34 4.16 24.50 23853,300 101 18.9 11.26 4.11 15.37 26848,800 1,205 246.9 212.83 17.36 230.19 557,300 939 163.9 176.17 12.35 188.52 11

6,017,50068,300

109,523 182.0 . 141.25 11.09 152.33 15506 74.1 62.52 8.77 71.30 62

184,200 634 34.4 18.18 2.67 20.85 25236,200 96 26.5 27.10 8.67 35.77 190

2 30,100 358 118.9 140.40 18.46 158.86 13

Per capita expendi­ture for house-

keep

on ly , 19!

Kalaflaazoo, M ich .., Kansas City, Kans.. Kansas City, M o . . . Jteitfiiy, N p fid s M ,JOngstoii, N ; Y___^_ Knijx¥ille,Teriii-^ . Kokomo, Ind.......... .

Lakewood, O h io ...Lancaster, Pa..........Lansing, M ich........Lawrence, Mass___Lebanon, Pa...........Lewiston, M e.........Lexington, K y ........Lima, Ohio..............Lincoln, Nebr.........Little Rock, A rk ... Long Beach, Calif..Lorain, Ohio...........Los Angeles, Calif..Louisville, K y ........Lowell, Mass..........Lynchburg, Va____Lynn, Mass.............

McKeesport, Pa..........Macon, Ga....................Madison, W is...............Malden, Mass..............Manchester, N. H ____Mansfield, Ohio...........Marion, Ind..................Marion, Ohio...............Medford, Mass.............Memphis, Tenn..........Meriden, Conn...........Miami, F la .. ...............Milwaukee, W is..........Minneapolis, M inn__Mobile, Ala...................Moline, 111....................Montclair, N. J ______Montgomery, Ala........Mount Vernon, N . Y_Muncie, I n d ................Muskegon, M ich.........Muskogee, Okla______

Nashville, Tenn_______Newark, N . J .................Newark, Ohio..............New Bedford, Mass___New Britain, Conn___New Brunswick, N . J_.Newburgh, N. Y ...........New Castle, Pa.............New Haven, Conn........New London, Conn___New Orleans, La...........Newport, K y .................Newport, R. I _ ..............Newport News, Va__New Rochelle, N . Y___Newton, Mass...............New York City, N . Y_Niagara Falls, N . Y ___Norfolk, Va.....................Norristown, Pa..............Norwalk, Conn..............

$11.36 5.48

19.61 91.74 48,07 24.0530.24 167

S3.42 14.39 25.19

1 .11 3.99 4.04

11.77 1.73

25.3426.25 82,84m i s

25.05 1.55

12.95 18.00

10.4020.39 92.00 43.213.90

20.40

13.17 69.74 32.07 18.283.78

35.21 18.38 24.29 15.54

109.0016.22

200.9524.256.829.47

13.7335.17 11.062.35

24.22 19.80 14.14 17.88 11.85 4a 94 12.36

11.146.51

177.04156.8487.4935.8310.7715.8678.79

* State census, Jan, 1, 1925. 6 Estimate as of July 1,1927,

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 20: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T ab l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S F O R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D FO R

1 6 BUILDING PEEMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

City and StateExpenditure

for new buildings,

1928

Expenditure for repairs and addi­

tions, 1928

Total expenditures Expenditure for new

housekeeping dwellings

only,19281928 1927

Oakland, Calif........................... $17,824,002 $1,713,163 $19,537,165 $20,518,417 $8,107,443Oak Park, 111............................. 9,074,251 216,244 9,290,495 9,080,676 5,265,455Ogden, Utah.............................. 1,202,325 145,900 1,348,225 1,498,260 476,300Oklahoma City, Okla.............. 12,267,630 1,254,368 13,521,998 12,682,293 8,709,509Okmulgee, Okla........................ 227,615 25,350 252,965 262,150 45,550Omaha, Nebr............................. 8,422,073 628,337 9,050,410 4,567,218 2,257,950Orange, N . J.............................. 2,708,090 398,409 3,106,499 5,581,523 1,306,400Oshkosh, Wis............................. 686,924 165,922 852,846 1,494,076 539,066Ottumwa, Iowa......................... 328,450 65,325 393,775 579,900 204,800

Paducah, K y ............................. 527,590 81,015 608,605 356,000 202,735Pasadena, Calif......................... 5,056,253 893,300 5,949,553 8,965,720 3,347,929Passaic, N . J .............................. 2,573,057 488,461 3,061,518 5,603,448 1,766,650Paterson, N . J........................... 6,214,664 1,142,027 7,356,691 6,369,917 2,580,513Pawtucket, R. I ........................ 2,430,159 392,430 2,822,589 3,586,765 1,923,850Peoria, 111................................... 3,411,295 539,965 3,951,260 3,409,575 2,182,500Perth Amboy, N . J.................. 910,022 457,337 1,367,359 1,671,872 432,082Petersburg, V a . ........................ 416,767 151,861 568,628 279,466 187,650Philadelphia, Pa....................... 100,023,155 12,202,710 112,225,865 117,590,650 51,432,580Phoenix, Ariz............................. 5,604,161 372,501 5,976,662 5,645,124 2,146,922Pittsburgh, Pa.......................... 35,223,329 4,150,203 39,373,532 37, 111, 332 13,270,969Pittsfield, Mass......................... 1,657,915 155,215 1,813,130 1,650,690 1,117,200Plainfield, N. J.......................... 3,058,148 406,623 3,464,771 5,046,011 2,066,779Pontiac, Mich............................ 12,637,246 477,980 13,115,226 17,558,296 5,801,365Port Arthur, Tex...................... 1,646,320 234,916 1,881,236 1,731,380 457,877Port Huron, M ich.................... 429,450 31,725 461,175 839,065 190,550Portland, M e............................. 2,218,792 520,094 2,738,886 2,326,783 1,046,350Portland, Oreg.......................... 18,407,440 2,868,530 21,275,970 28,973,455 9,907,285Portsmouth, Ohio..................... 1,145,200 101,885 1,247,085 1,585,007 615,350Portsmouth, Va__..................... 534,945 153,586 688,531 463,385 242,055Poughkeepsie, N . Y ................. 1,460,119 204,701 1,664,820 1,147,667 691,550Providence, R . I ....................... 13,172,494 2,831,025 16,003,519 23,132,819 7,190,600Pueblo, Colo.............................. 1,170,983 295,829 1,466,812 1,625,382 911,825

Quincy, 111.................................. 1,096,736 180,221 1,276,957 1,073,321 529,775Quincy, Mass............................ 6,505,572 364,440 6,870,012 5,231,872 3,695,600

Racine, W is............................... 4,134,138 283,351 4,417,489 6,391,171 3,109,193Reading, Pa............................... 2,809,366 998,954 3,808,320 4,614,067 1,507,650Revere, Mass............................. 1,118,897 108,245 1,227,142 1,602,120 942,545Richmond, Ind.......................... 703,017 237,706 940,723 1,826,139 598,342Richmond, Va........................... 7,579,286 1,265,595 8,844,881 15,216,203 3,625,166Roanoke, Va.......... .................. 3,108,331 171,092 3,279,423 2,583,996 1,369,582Rochester, N. Y ........................ 15,683,912 1,936,886 17,620,798 22,589,418 7,960,709Rockford, 111.............................. 4,281,725 1,454,917 5,736,642 6,553,423 2,721,500Rock Island, 111........................ 503,515 1,079,729 1,583,244 1,999,890 453,500

Sacramento, Calif..................... 4,674,424 849,908 5,524,332 8,814,211 3,302,972Saginaw, M ic h .. . ..................... 3,871,672 477,913 4,349,585 3,610,783 1,469,116St. Joseph, M o...................... 1,878,643 125,975 2,004,618 768,898 374,200St. Louis, M o ............................ 38,215,329 4,613,166 42,828,495 41,417,221 19,228,980St. Paul, Minn.......................... 7,026,558 1,672,955 8,699,513 10,071,216 4,529,238St. Petersburg, Fla................... 1,540,000 306,100 1,846,100 2,907,500 828,100Salem, Mass............................... 1,323,125 396,560 1,719,685 2,727,080 707,000Salt Lake City, Utah............... 3,930,626 1,346,778 5,277,404 4,855,845 2,297,410San Antonio, Tex...................... 16,732,750 1,567,609 18,300,359 12,190,280 8,661,556San Diego, Calif.............. ......... 11,310,940 839,198 12,150,138 13,877,153 7,247,101San Francisco, Calif................. 33,822,280 3,682,158 37,504,438 46,448,676 19,944,664San Jose, Calif........................... 2,233,010 308,290 2,541,300 3,554,430 1,301,010Savannah, Ga............................ 2,010,069 127,065 2,137,134 2,180,050 1,429,665Schenectady, N. Y ................... 2,962,070 466,410 3,428,480 4,318,270 1,669,500Scranton, Pa.............................. 3,597,993 1,034,250 4,632,243 5,707,115 1,632,495Seattle, Wash............................. 30,540,015 4,266,960 34,806,975 29,070,080 15,833,350Sheboygan, W is........................ 1,596,165 512,554 2,108,719 2,171,940 1,037,400Shreveport, La.......................... 4,039,341 807,084 4,846,425 3,946,370 2,039,914Sioux City, Iowa....................... 1,966,060 204,380 2,170,440 1,867,575 1,058,750Sioux Falls, S. Dak................... 1,843,540 161,185 2,004,725 2,042,505 858,920Somerville, Mass................. ..... 1,203,945 220,252 1,424,197 3,385,850 861,300South Bend, Ind ....................... 6,032,415 330,770 6,363,185 4,888,660 2,951,350

* Not estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimate as of July 1,1926.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 21: bls_0500_1929.pdf

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 7

REPAIRS, AND FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR, ETC., IN THE CALENDAR YEAR 1928—Con.

City and StateEstimated

Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita

expendi­ture for

population, July 1,1928

NumberRatio

per10,000

For new build­ings

For re­pairs and additions

TotalRank

ofcity

house­keeping dwellings only, 1928

274,100 2,430 88.7 $65.03 $6.25 $71.28 63 $29.5857,700 745 129.1 157.27 3.75 161.01 12 91.2639,100 157 40.2 30.75 3.73 34.48 196 12.18

7,104,0800 )

222,800

2,63715

253.4 117.87 12.05 129.92 21 83.68

412 18.5 37.80 2.82 40.62 163 10.1336,500 281 77.0 74.19 10.92 85.11 49 35.7933,200 155 46.7 20.69 5.00 25.69 234 16.24

3 27,400 38 13.9 11.99 2.38 14.37 273 7.47

2 26,100 94 36.0 20.21 3.10 23.32 241 7.7762,100 600 96.6 81.42 14.38 95.80 41 53.9171,800 351 48.9 35.84 6.80 42.64 153 24.61

144,900 748 51.6 42.89 7.88 50.77 129 17.8173,100 455 62.2 33.24 5.37 38.61 173 26.3284,500 437 51.7 40.37 6.39 46.76 142 25.8350,100 104 20.8 18.16 9.13 27.29 225 8.6237,800 48 12.7 11.03 4.02 15.04 269 4.96

2,064,200 10,576 51.2 48.46 5.91 54.37 113 24.92a 42,100 748 177.7 133.12 8.85 141.96 17 51.00673,800 2,544 37.8 52.28 6.16 58.44 96 19.7050,000 211 42.2 33.16 3.10 36.26 187 22.34

a 32,500 311 95.7 94.10 12.51 106.61 30 63.5961,500 1,735 282.1 205.48 7.77 213.26 7 94.33

2 33,000 210 63.6 49.89 7.12 57.01 99 13.882 30,700 71 23.1 13.99 1.03 15.02 270 6.21

78,6000 )41,200

2612,321

169

33.2 28.23 . 6.62 34.85 192 13.31

41.0 27.80 2.47 30.27 214 14.9461,600 85 13.8 8.68 2.49 11.18 284 3.9339,100 96 24.6 37.34 5.24 42.58 154 17.69

286,300 1,134 39.6 46.01 9.89 55.90 103 25.1244,200 372 84.2 26.49 6.69 33.19 202 20.63

39,800 133 33.4 27.56 4.53 32.08 205 13.3167,600 977 144.5 96.24 5.39 101.63 33 54.67

74,400 681 91.5 55.57 3.81 59. 37 95 41.79115,400 263 22.8 24.34 8 .66 33.00 203 13.0636,000 247 68.6 31.08 8.01 34.09 200 26.14

2 31,000 153 49.4 22.68 7.67 30.35 213 19.30194,400 764 39.3 38.99 6.51 45.50 146 18.6564,600 364 56.3 48.12 2.65 50.77 130 21.20

328,200 1,862 56.7 47.79 5.90 53.69 118 24.2682,800 779 94.1 51.71 17.57 69.28 68 32.8742,700 146 34.2 11.79 25.29 37.08 182 10.62

75,700 917 121.1 61.75 11.23 72.98 60 43.6375,600 577 76.3 51.21 6.32 57.53 97 19.4378,500 98 12.5 23.93 1.60 25.54 235 4.77

848,100 7,190 84.8 45.06 5.44 50.50 131 22.67• 250,100 773 30.9 28.09 6.69 34.78 194 18.11

53,300 172 32.3 28.89 5.74 34.64 195 15.5443,000 120 27.9 30.77 9.22 39.99 166 16.44

138,000 731 53.0 28.48 9.76 38.24. - 176 16.65218,100 2,784 127.6 76.72 7.19 83.91 50 39.71119,700 2,146 179.3 94.49 7.01 101.50 34 60.54585,300 6,084 103.9 57.79 6.29 64.08 85 34.0845,500 370 81.3 49.08 6.78 55.85 104 28.5999,900 430 43.0 20.12 1.27 21.39 246 14.3193,300 269 28.8 31.75 5.00 36.75 183 17.89

144,700 292 20.2 24.87 7.15 32.01 206 11.28383,200 4,658 121.6 79.70 11.14 90.83 44 41.3935,100 188 53.6 45.47 14.60 60.08 92 29.5881,300 713 87.7 49.68 9.93 59.61 94 25.0680,000 282 35.3 24.58 2.55 27.13 226 13.29

2 31,200 211 67.6 59.09 5.17 64.25 84 27.53102,700 199 19.4 11.72 2.14 13.87 276 8.3386,100 579 67.2 70.06 3.84 73.90 55 34.22

Oakland. Calif.....................Oak Park, 111.......................Ogden, Utah........................Oklahoma City, Okia........Okmulgee, Okla..................Omaha, Nebr.......................Orange. N . J........................Oshkosh, W is...... ................Ottumwa, Iowa...................

Paducah, K y .......................Pasadena, Calif...................Passaic, N . J........................Paterson, N . J .....................Pawtucket, R . I ..................Peoria, 111........................—Perth Amboy, N . J ............Petersburg, Va.................... .Philadelphia, Pa................. .Phoenix, Ariz......................Pittsburgh, Pa......................Pittsfield, Mass.......... .........Plainfield, N. J ...................Pontiac, M ich..................... .Port Arthur, Tex--------------Port Huron, M ich........ — .Portland, M e........ .............. .Portland, Oreg.....................Portsmouth, Ohio...............Portsmouth, Va..................Poughkeepsie, N . Y ...........Providence, R . I ._ .............Pueblo, Colo........................

Quincy, HI............................Quincy, Mass......................

Racine, Wis....................—Reading, Pa.......... — .........Revere, Mass--------------------Richmond, Ind...................Richmond, Va__.................Roanoke, Va........................Rochester, N . Y ..................Rockford, 111........................Rock Island, HI..................

Sacramento, Calif..............Saginaw, M ich....................St. Joseph, M o....................St. Louis, M o......................St. Paul, M inn...................St. Petersburg, Fla_______Salem, M ass.......................Salt Lake City, Utah_____San Antonio, Tex...............San Diego, Calif_________San Francisco, Calif______San Jose, Calif.....................Savannah, Ga— ...............Schenectady, N . Y .............Scranton, Pa........................Seattle, Wash.......................Sheboygan, Wis..................Shreveport, La....................Sioux City, Iowa...............Sioux Falls, S. Dak_______Somerville, Mass.................South Bend, In d ................

• Estimate of July 1,1927,

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 22: bls_0500_1929.pdf

1 8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 5 .—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W BU ILD IN G S A N D FO R

City and StateExpenditure

for new buildings,

1928

Expenditure for repairs and addi­

tions, 1928

Total expenditures Expenditure for new

housekeeping dwellings

only,19281928 1927

Spokane, Wash.......................... $4,879,063 $857,715 $5,736,778 $3,656,500 $2,244,025Springfield, 111............................ 3,319,125 420,028 3,739,153 3,770,303 1,929,900Springfield, Mass...................... 4,956,324 1,020,475 5,976,799 8,905,819 2,776,050Springfield, M o......................... 1,366,035 249,620 1,615,655 (3) 677,275Springfield, Ohio...................... 1,407,564 149,203 1,556,767 1,693,927 987,550Stamford, Conn........................ 4,009,610 1,185,668 5,195,278 6,042,716 2,244,550Steubenville, Ohio.................... 1,151,595 41,815 1,193,410 1,856,435 708,000Stockton, Calif.......................... 1,411,142 363,724 1,774,866 2,803,347 809,210Superior, Wis............................. 1,665,705 186,447 1,852,152 1,277,019 551,850Syracuse, N . Y .......................... 11,861,603 1,358,826 13,220,429 21,^90,371 8, 000,200

Tacoma, Wash.......................... 4,026,470 633,945 4,660,415 4,764,728 2,546,000Tampa, Fla................................ 3,042,030 575,024 3,617,054 6,145,201 1,620,260Taunton, Mass.......................... 768,247 114,250 882,497 1,055,999 215,300Terre Haute, Ind...................... 605,195 368,292 973,487 1,212,771 336,050Toledo, Ohio.............................. 14,463,296 2,882,899 17,346,195 15,513,710 6,658,125Topeka, Kans............................ 1,832,950 158,564 1,991,514 2,222,196 1,187,550Trenton, N. J ............................ 3,314,867 791,054 4,105,921 4,539,632 1,172,100Troy, N. Y ................................. 1,061,600 262,064 1,323,664 3,206,057 786,750Tucson, Ariz.............................. 2,726,395 168,996 2,895,391 2,322, 550 1,102,972Tulsa, Okla................................ 12,697,207 713,844 13,411,051 14,791,854 7,613,800

Union City, N . J...................... 749,085 371,671 1,120,756 3,409,526 326,300Utica, N . Y ................................ 3,475,465 441,505 3,916,970 3,381,105 2,140,100

Vallejo, Calif.............................. 372,488 69,359 441,847 492,898 182,950

Waco, Tex.................................. 1,997,020 294,319 2,291,339 1,573,641 631,003Waltham, Mass......................... 2,285,970 191,085 2,477,055 2,217,925 1,744,300Warren, Ohio__........................ 1,667,940 143,680 1,811,620 1,425,474 1,084,830Washington, D . C.................... 50,284,426 3,690,553 53,974,979 39,263,477 29,601,350Waterbury, Conn..................... 2,944,450 543,850 3,488,300 5,015,638 1,963,500Waterloo, Iowa.......................... 2,460,584 261,610 2,722,194 1,151,981 848,700Watertown, Mass..................... 2,729,425 94,670 2,824,095 4,281,230 2,246,800Watertown, N. Y ..................... 931,030 221,419 1,152,449 756,204 278,800West New York, N. J............. 1,272,875 355,510 1,628,385 1,685,293 577,000Wheeling, W . Va...................... 1,331,806 635,682 1,967,488 3,014,131 641,280White Plains, N. Y .................. 12,093,064 539,142 12,632,206 10,125,792 6,365,600Wichita, Kans........................... 7,323,978 650,243 7,974,221 5,848,942 3,976,615Wichita Falls, Tex__............... 1,315,400 596,012 1,911,412 4,050,687 900,788Wilkes-Barre, Pa...................... 3,233,464 662,881 3,896,345 4,934,339 753,540Wilkinsburg, Pa........................ 1,810,556 105,005 1,915,561 1,932,390 1,009,095Williamsport, Pa...................... 1,733,765 347,175 2,080,940 2,732,695 730,090Wilmington, Del....................... 4,447,657 1,129,452 5,577,109 6,805,900 2,307,463Wilmington, N. C.... ................ 592,500 156,000 748,500 552,125 222,000Winston-Salem, N. C________ 8,001,722 529,306 8,531,028 6,539,187 3,597,360Woonsocket, R . I ...................... 464,470 454,073 918,543 1,360,179 271,300Worcester, Mass........................ 5,772,236 1,488,084 7,260,320 8,814,669 2,509,535

Yonkers, N . Y ........................... 34,373,299 1,245,525 35,618,824 32,585,888 29,553,210York, Pa..................................... 1,347,932 717,117 2,065,049 1,588,854 575,300Youngstown, Ohio..... .............. 8,108,260 529,415 8,637,675 9,007,160 5,043,935

Zanesville, Ohio........................ 475,276 72,788 548,064 1, 021,100 372,785

Total................................. 3,098,940,040 324,644,421 3,423,584,461 3,593,839,405 1,762,452,315

1 N ot estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimated as of July 1,1926.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 23: bls_0500_1929.pdf

R E PA IR S, A N D F A M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, E T C ., IN T H E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928—Con.

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 0

City and StateEstimated population, ^ u ly l, 1928

Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita

expendi­ture for house­

keeping dwellings only, 1928

NumberRatioper

10,000

For new build­ings

For re­pairs and additions

TotalRank

ofcity

Spokane, Wash_____________ 109,100 574 52.6 $44.72 $7.86 $52.58 119 $20.57Springfield, 111_____________ 67,200 352 52.4 49.39 6.25 55.64 106 28.72Springfield, Mass___________ 149,800 647 43.2 33.09 6.81 39.90 167 18.53Springfield, M o______ _____ 51,700 305 59.0 26.42 4.83 31.25 211 13.10Springfield, Ohio_____ _____ 73,000 315 43.2 19.28 2.04 21.33 247 13.53Stamford, Conn...... ................ 43,800 331 75.6 91.54 27.07 118.61 23 51.25Steubenville, Ohio............— 2 32,600 191 58.6 35.33 1.28 36.61 185 21.72Stockton, Calif....................... 51,000 226 44.3 27.67 7.13 34.80 193 15.87Superior, W is______________ 0 ) 136Syracuse, N . Y ........................ 199,300 1,561 78.3 59.52 6.82 66.33 75 40.14

Tacoma, Wash...... ................. 110,500 822 74.4 36.44 5.74 42.18 156 23.04Tampa, Fla............................. 113,400 647 57.1 26.83 5.07 31.90 207 14.29Taunton, Mass....................... 40,600 60 14.8 18.92 2.81 21.74 245 5.30Terre Haute, Ind___________ 73,500 113 15.4 8.23 5.01 13.24 278 4.57Toledo, Ohio.... ....................... 313,200 1,698 54.2 46.18 9.20 55.38 108 21.26Topeka, Kans......................... 62,800 304 48.4 29.19 2.52 31.71 209 18.91Trenton, N . J.......................... 139,000 223 16.0 23.85 5.69 29.54 217 8.43Troy, N . Y .............................. 72,300 157 21.7 14.68 3.62 18.31 259 10.88Tucson, Ariz............................ 8 27,500 336 122.2 99.14 6.15 105.29 31 40.11Tulsa, Okla.............................. 170,500 2,187 128.3 74.47 4.19 78.66 52 44.66

Union City, N . J.................... 64,400 84 13.0 11.63 5.77 17.40 263 5.07Utica, N. Y .............................. 104,200 342 32.8 33.35 4.24 37.59 179 20.54

Vallftjn, Calif (l) 43

Waco, Tex................................ 46,600 177 38.0 42.85 6.32 49.17 135 13.54Waltham, Mass...................... 37,100 362 97.6 61.62 5.15 66.77 74 47.02Warren, Ohio.......................... 2 36,100 306 84.8 46.20 3.98 50.18 132 30.05Washington, D . C ................. 552,000 4,305 78.0 91.09 6.69 97.78 37 53.63Waterbury, Conn__________ 0 ) 504Waterloo, Iowa__................... 37,100 270 72.8 66.32 7.05 73.37 58 22.88Watertown, Mass................... 2 26,400 454 172.0 103.39 3.59 106.97 28 85.11Watertown, N. Y ................... 33,700 53 15.7 27.63 6.57 34.20 198 8.27West New York, N . J........... 2 41,000 170 41.5 31.05 8.67 39.72 170 14.07Wheeling, W . Va__________ 0 ) 125White Plains, N . Y ............... 2 28,700 856 298.3 421.36 18.79 440.15 1 221.80Wichita, Kans........................ 99,300 1,207 121.6 73.76 6.55 80.30 51 40.05Wichita Falls, Tex_________ (i) 222Wilkes-Barre, P a - - ............... 91,900 174 18.9 35.18 7.21 42.40 155 8 .20Wilkinsburg, Pa..................... 2 28,000 90 32.1 64.66 3.75 68.41 70 36.04Williamsport, Pa__............... 44,000 169 38.4 39.40 7.89 47.29 140 16.59Wilmington, Del.................... 128,500 365 28.4 34.61 8.79 43.40 150 17.96Wilmington, N. C ................. 39,100 64 16.4 15.15 3.99 19.14 256 5.68Winston-Salem, N . C ............ 80,000 965 120.6 100.02 6.62 106.64 29 44.97Woonsocket, R . I ................... 53,400 79 14.8 8.70 8.50 17.20 264 5.08Worcester, Mass..................... 197,600 474 24.0 29.21 7.53 36.74 184 ! 12.70

Yonkers, N . Y ........................ 121,300 4,216 347.6 283.37 10.27 293.64 2 243.64York, Pa__.............................. 49,900 144 28.9 27.01 14.37 41.38 158 11.53Youngstown, Ohio................. 174,200 929 53.3 46.55 3.04 49.58 134 28.95

Zanesville, Ohio...................... 2 30,600 138 45.1 15.53 2.38 17.91 262 12.18

Total.............................. 44,940,049. 399,657 88.9 68.96 7.22 76.18 39.22

8 Data not collected.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 24: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Expenditures for Building Operations in Representative Cities, 1921 to 1928

D ATA have been collected since 1921 concerning the amount expended for building operations in 257 identical cities. The

information was obtained from the record of permits issued by the local building officials of the different cities. The costs are the estimated costs given by the prospective builder at the time of applying for Ins permit. The cost of the building only is included. The total expenditure for new buildings was less in these cities during 1928 than for any year since 1922 and fell below $3,000,000,000 for the first time since that year. Table 6 belowN shows the estimated ex­penditures for residential buildings, nonresidential buildings, and total new buildings; the population as estimated by the Census Bureau as of July 1 each year; the number of families provided for; the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population; the index num­ber of each of these items; and the index number of families provided for weighted by population.T a b l e 6 .— E ST IM A T E D E X P E N D IT U R E S A N D IN D E X N U M B ER S OF E X P E N D IT U R E S

FO R N EW R E SID E N T IA L BUILD ING S, N O N R E SID E N T IA L B U ILD IN G S, A N D T O T A L N E W BUILD ING S; ALSO FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR A N D R A T IO OF FA M ILIES PR O ­V ID E D FO R TO E A C H 10,000 OF POPU LATION IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES IN 1921 TO 1928, IN CLU SIVE

Residential buildings Nonresidential buildings Total new buildings

YearEstimated

expenditureIndex

numberEstimated

expenditureIndex

numberEstimated

expenditureIndex

number

1921..................................... $937,352,739 1,612,352,921 2,000,986,900 2,070,276,772 2,461,546,270 2,255,994,627 1,906,003,260 1,859,429,751

100.0 $635,775,199 876,276,713

1,070,596,718 1,137,631,080 1,343,880,884 1,300,840,876 1,231,785,870 1,135,549,986

100.0 $1,573,127,938 2,488,629,634 3,071,583,618 3,207,907,852 3,805,427,154 3,556,835,503 3,137,789,130 2.994.979. 737

100.01922..................................... 172.0 137.8 158.21923..................................... 213.5 168.4 195.31924..................................... 220.9 178.9 203.91925................................. — 262.6 211.4 241.91926..................................... 240.7 204.6 226.11927..................................... 203.3 193.7 199.51928..................................... 198.4 178.6 190.4

Population Families provided for

Year As estimated by Census Bureau for

specified year

Indexnumber Number Index

number

Ratio to each 10,000 of popula­

tion

Index num­ber weighted b y popula­

tion

1921..................................... 36,575,118 37,511,516 38,447,913 39,384,311 40,320,708 41,257,106 42,058,897 42,767,125

100.0 224,545 377,305 453,673 442,919 491,222 462,214 406,095 388,678

100.0 61.4 100.0163.71922..................................... 102.6 168.0 100.6

1923..................................... 105.1 202.0 118.0 192.2183.2 198.4

1924..................................... 107.7 197.3 112.51925..................................... 110.2 218.8 121.81926..................................... 112.8 205.8 112.0 182.41927.................................... 115.0 180.9 96.6 157.3

148.11928.................................... 116.9 173.1 90.9

The peak expenditure for new buildings was reached in 1925, when $3,805,427,154 was expended for building operations, according to permits issued in these 257 cities. The expenditure for 1928 was nearly a billion dollars less than the 1925 peak. Each year since

20

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 25: bls_0500_1929.pdf

1925 has shown a decrease in amount expended for new buildings over the preceding year. The 1928 expenditure was 21.3 per cent less than the 1925 expenditure, but was 90.4 per cent above the expendi­ture for 1921.

Expenditures for residential and nonresidential buildings each reached a peak in 1925. The amount expended for residential build­ings that year was $2,461,546,270. During 1928 the expenditure for residential buildings was $1,859,429,751, which was 24.5 per cent less than the 1925 expenditure, but was 98.4 per cent above the expendi­ture for 1921. The expenditure for nonresidential buildings during 1925 was $1,343,880,884 and during 1928 it was $1,135,549,986. That is, during 1928 15.5 per cent less was expended for nonresiden­tial buildings than during 1925 or 78.6 per cent more than during 1921.

The population of these 257 cities on July 1, 1921, was 36,575,118 according to the estimate of the Census Bureau and by July 1,1928, it had risen to 42,767,125, or 16.9 per cent above the 1921 population.

During 1925 housing units were provided for 491,222 families. This is the record year in regard to families provided for. During1928 only 388,678 families were provided with dwelling places in new buildings, this being 20.9 per cent less than the number accommodated during 1925 and 73.1 per cent more than those provided for during 1921.

In 1921 there were 61.4 families provided for to each 10,000 of population. By 1925 this ratio had risen to 121.8 but in 1928 had fallen to 90.9. The index number of families provided for weighted by population reached a peak of 198.4 in 1925 and then declined steadily each year until it stood at 148.1 in 1928.

Average Estimated Cost of Dwellings per Family

Table 7 shows the average cost each year, 1921 to 1928, of dwell­ing accommodations per family in each of the different kinds of dwellings for which permits were issued in the 257 identical cities from which reports were received every year.

The costs from which these averages were computed are the costs of the building as stated by the prospective builder at the time of applying for his permit to build. Land costs are not included. There may be a profit or loss between the cost to the builder and the cost to the home purchaser.T a b le 7.—A V E R AG E COST OF D W E LLIN G S P E R F A M IL Y IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES,

1921 TO 1928

E XP E N D IT U R E S IN R EPRE SEN TA TIV E C IT IE S 2 1

Year

Average cost of dwellings per family l in—

Index numbers of cost of dwellings per family in—

On©*familydwell­ings

Two- family dwell­ings 2

Multi­family dwell­ings 8

All classes of

dwell­ings

One-familydwell­ings

Two- family dwell­ings 2

M ulti­family dwell­ings 3

All classes of

dwell­ings

1921............................... $3,972 $3,762 $4,019 $3,947 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.01922............................... 4,134 3,801 3,880 4,005 104.1 101.0 96.5 101.51923............................... 4,203 4,159 4,001 4,127 105.8 110.6 99.6 104.61924............................... 4,317 4,336 4,418 4,352 108.7 115.3 109.9 110.31925............................... 4,618 4,421 4,289 4,464 116.3 117.5 106.7 113.11926............................... 4,725 4,480 4,095 4,422 119.0 119.1 101.9 112.01927............................... 4,830 4,368 4,170 4,449 121.6 116.1 103.8 112.71928............................... 4,937 4,064 4,129 4,407 124.3 108.0 102.7 111.7

1 Buildings only; see text above.2 Includes one-family and two-family dwellings with stores.3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 26: bls_0500_1929.pdf

The average cost of the 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued has advanced nearly a thousand dollars between 1921 and 1928. In 1921 the average cost of the separate dwelling was $3,972, while in 1928 it was $4,937. There has been a steady increase each year over the preceding year. The average cost of the 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued in 1928 was 24.3 per cent higher than the average cost of those for which permits were issued during 1921.

The average cost of 2-family dwellings was $3,762 per family in 1921. This rose steadily until a peak of $4,480 per family, or 19.1 per cent above the 1921 cost, was reached in 1926. In 1928 the average cost of 2-family dwellings was $4,064 per family. This is 8 per cent above the 1921 cost.

The average cost per family provided for in apartment houses was lowest in 1922, the cost being $3,880 per family that year. By 1924 the average cost had risen to $4,418 per family. In this year average expenditure j>er family provided for was higher in apart­ment houses than in single-family dwellings. In 1925 and 1926 the per family cost of multi-family dwellings declined, climbed slightly in 1927, and again sank in 1928, the 1928 cost being $4,129 per family, or only 2.7 per cent higher than the 1921 cost.

The average cost per family of all dwelling units in new buildings was $3,947 in 1921. In 1925 a peak cost of $4,464 was reached. The cost in 1928 was $4,407, which was an increase of 11.7 per cent over the 1921 per family cost.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics collects monthly the wholesale prices of building material and from such figures computes index numbers. Retail prices as paid by builders are not avaliable, but it is believed that the trend of retail prices follows closely the trend of wholesale prices. The index number of wholesale prices shown in Table 3 differs from that previously shown because of a different weighting for the different building materials.

The index numbers shown in Table 8 for wages in the building trades are wage rates for union labor only. In many cities the building trades are highly organized, while in others there is much nonunion labor. The bureau has no data concerning wages of non­union labor in the building trades. It is thought, however, that the trend of wages of nonunion labor would follow closely that of union labor.

The price of building material reached a peak of 111.6 in 1923 and fell to a low of 95.8 in 1927. The 1928 price stood at 96.2. Union wage rates reached their highest point, 129, in 1928, rising from the low of 93.4 in 1922.

2 2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 8 .— IN D E X N U M B E R OF W H OLESALE PRICES OF B U IL D IN G M A T E R IA L A N D OF U N ION W AG E R ATE S IN T H E B U IL D IN G T R A D E S , 1921 to 1928

Year

Index numbers for

Year

Index numbers for

Whole­sale

prices of building material

Union wage rates per hour

in the building

trades

Whole­sale

prices of building material

Union wage rates per hour

in the building

trades

1921................................................ 100.099.9

111.6105.0

100.093.4

103.6112.2

1925............................... 104.4102.795.896.2

116.3124.0 128.5129.0

1922................................................ 1926............................................1923................................................ 1927.......................................1924................................................ 1928..........................................

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 27: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Apartment House Construction in American Cities, 1928

T HERE is no abatement of the trend toward apartment houses as dwelling places in the cities of the United States. Figures

taken from permits issued in 257 cities in the United States having a population of 25,000 or over show that the popularity of the multi­family dwelling is still growing. A multifamily dwelling is one designed to accommodate three or more families. The term is equivalent to the more generally used appellations “ apartment house ” or “ tenement house.”

Reports have been received from 257 identical cities continuously since 1921 showing the number of families provided for and the class of dwelling with which they were provided. This information is shown below in Table 9.

In 1928 homes were provided in new buildings for 388,678 families;53.7 per cent of these were in apartment houses; 35.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings, and 11.1 per cent in 2-family dwellings. This is the first year since the compilation of these data by the bureau that more than half of the families provided for in new buildings were housed in apartment houses. In new construction in 1921 only24.4 per centof all families provided for were housed in apartment houses, and 58.3 percent in 1-family dwellings.T a b l e 9 .—P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R IN TH E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF

D W E LLIN G S IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES, 1921 TO 1928, IN CLU SIVE

Year

Num­ber of

families provided for in all classes

of dwell­ings

Per cent of families provided for in—

Year

Num­ber of

families provided for in all classes

of dwell­ings

Per cent of families provided for in—

One-fam ilydwell­ings

Two- fam ily dwell­ings 1

Multi­family dwell­ings 2

One-fam ilydwell­ings

Two- fam ily dwell­ings 1

M ulti­familydwell­ings2

1921........................... 224,545 377,305 453,673 442,919

58.347.5 45.847.6

17.321.3 21.2 21.5

24.431.233.030.9

1925........................... 491,222 462,214 406,095 388,678

46.040.738.335.2

17.513.913.411.1

36.445.4 48.3 53.7

1922.......................... 1926...........................1923.......................... 1927...........................1924........................... 1928...........................

1 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined.2 Includes multi-family dwellings with stores combined.

This is the third consecutive year that more family units have been provided in apartment houses than in 1-family dwellings. Just what effect this change in the type of dwelling will have on the social, economic, and political life of the country is hard to determine. That it will have its impress on the character and life of the people is an undoubted fact. Few apartment-house dwellers are home owners. As has been pointed out before by the bureau, apartment-house con­struction is changing the character of building labor by giving more opportunity for work to certain trades, namely, structural-iron workers, concrete workers, marble and stone cutters, etc., and less to other trades, especially carpenters.

23

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 28: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Comparison of Conditions in Cities of Over 500,000

In t h e 14 cities of the United States which have a population of500,000 or over 67.2 per cent of the families provided for in1928 were housed in apartment houses, 22.1 per cent in 1-family dwellings, and 10.7 per cent in 2-family dwellings. In 1927 the same classes of dwellings housed 60.8 per cent, 25.8 per cent, and 13.4 per cent, respectively. These 14 cities provided for 236,113 families in1927 and 232,681 families in 1928, as shown in Table 10.

Data are shown in this table for New York as an entity and for each of the five boroughs separately. Chicago provided for a larger portion of families in apartment houses than any other city, 80.7 per cent of the total housing units in new dwellings being in this class of building in 1928 as compared with 12.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings.

The per cent of families housed in new apartment houses in New York practically equaled that of Chicago, 80.3 per cent of the new housing units being in apartment houses and 12.4 per cent in l-family dwellings.

There was a great difference, however, in the class of homes provided in the different boroughs. In Manhattan 99.9 per cent of new housing units were in apartment houses and only one-tenth of 1 per cent in1-family dwellings. In the borough of Richmond 60.3 per cent were in 1-family dwellings and only 23.3 per cent in apartment houses.

Baltimore built a larger proportion of 1-family dwellings than any other city in this population group, but even in Baltimore there was an increase in the percentage of families provided for in apart­ment houses in 1928 as compared with 1927. Detroit and San Fran­cisco were the only cities in the United States having a population of 500,000 or over where a larger percentage of the families provided for in new buildings were housed in 1-family dwellings in 1928 than in 1927. In 1927 there were 15,614 families provided for in new buildings in Detroit; of this number 35.9 per cent were accommodated in 1-family dwellings. In 1928 of the 15,929 families provided for,42.7 per cent were housed in 1-family dwellings.

Boston, Buffalo, Cleveland, Detroit, and Milwaukee built large numbers of 2-family houses.

2 4 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 1 0 .— PE R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T T Y P E S OF DW E LLIN G S IN C ITIES H A VIN G A PO PU LA TIO N OF 500,000 OR O VER IN 1921,1927, A N D 1928

Total num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in— Total

num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in—

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

One-familydwell­ings

Two- family dwell­ings 1

Multi­familydwell­ings2

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

One-familydwell­ings

Two- family dwell­ings i

Multi­family dwell­ings 2

Baltimore, M d.: 1921..................... 2,176

3,5462,884

878

85.0 4.5 10.5Buffalo, N . Y .:

1921..................... 2,405 3,373 3,181

12,252 41,201 34,447

51.6 48.0 0.41927__................. 94.4 0 .2 5.4 1927.............. 34.2 36.7 29.1

33.41928.................... 86.4 13.6 1928..................... 22.1 44.5Boston, Mass.:

1921 ..................... 15.5 30.5 54.0Chicago, 111.:

1921..................... 37.9 17.6 44.61927.................... 5,316

6,80510.3 32.2 57.5 1927..................... 13.6 1 0.2 76.2

1928..................... 9.5 28.0 62.5 1928..................... 12.2 7.1 80.71 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined.3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores combined.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 29: bls_0500_1929.pdf

APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 25

T able 10.—PER CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT TYPES OFDWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF 500,000 OR OVER IN 1921,1927, AND1928—Continued

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

One-familydwell­ings

Two-familydwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

One-familydwell­ing

Two-familydwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

Cleveland, Ohio: 1921.....................192 7 1928....................

Detroit, Mich.:1921.....................1927...................192 8

Los Angeles, Calif.:1921.................192 7 192 8

Milwaukee, Wis.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

New York City,N. Y .:

1921.....................192 7 192 8 B ron x -

1921............ .1927............ .1928............

B rook lyn -1921..............1927..............1928...........

Q ueens-1921............1927..............1928............

M anhattan- 1921-...........192 7 192 8

4,0843,6313,167

6,74315,61415,929

19,57220,80121,081

2 ,2124,2524,965

51,360 105,519 109,523

14,03730,02533,768

16,636 33,172 28,938

13,25631,20528,797

4,837 9,502

15,983

35.5 43.942.8

46.935.942.7

6 8.039.5 31.3

44.930.919.7

31.6 15.912.4

11.74.03.8

24.111.69.1

60.033.429.4

0.7(8)0 .1

40.530.721.7

17.926.6 28.4

16.9 8.7

10.0

38.226.722.3

24.213.3 7.2

11.98.53.4

44.017.512.5

24.417.1 9.8

3.7(8)0 .1

24.025.535.5

35.237.5 28.9

15.251.858.8

16.9 42.458.0

44.2 70.980.3

76.487.592.8

31.9 71.078.4

15.649.5 60.8

99.9

New York City, N . Y —Contd.

R ich m on d - 1921............192 7 192 8 .

Philadelphia, Pa.:1921..................1927...................1928..................

Pittsburgh, Pa.:1921...................192 7 .192 8 .

St. Louis, M o.:1921.................. .1927.................. .1928.....................

San F r a n c is c o , Calif.:

1921.....................192 7 192 8

Washington, D . C.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Total (14 cit­ies):

1921...........1927.........1928..........

2,5941,6152,037

2,406 12,197 10,576

1,3352,5882,544

2,0725,4637,190

8,6746,084

2,1953,9384,305

100.077.960.3

93.371.269.2

59.3 73.862.4

49.029.123.4

37.631.136.2

75.447.330.4

20.616.4

3.37.3

26.87.6

10.2

24.116.818.7

17.09.55.7

0.50.7

1.523.3

6.725.523.4

13.918.727.4

54.157.9

45.459.358.1

24.652.2

112,373 236,113 232,681

44.225.822.1

21.7 13.410.7

34.060.867.2

* Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.

Comparison of Conditions in Cities of Under 500,000

In t a b l e 11 are shown cities having a population of 25,000 or over which provided for 200 or more families in either 1927 or 1928. The table shows figures for 1921, 1927, and 1928, where data are available for these three years. When the information is not available for 1921 it is shown for the earliest year for which data were collected. A few of the smaller cities, which have reached a population of25,000 since 1920, are shown for 1927 and 1928 only.

Most of the cities having a population of 500,000 or less built most of their new family housing units in 1-family dwellings. There are some exceptions, however, even in cities having a population of less than 100,000. In Mount Vernon, N. Y., for instance, 83.7 per cent of the family units built in 1927 and 77 per cent of those built in1928 were in apartment houses. The Bureau of the Census esti­mated the population of Mount Vernon to be 54,700 on July 1, 1928. Evanston, 111., with a population of 47,600, accommodated 70.5 per cent of the families provided for in 1927 and 75.6 per cent of those provided for in 1928 in apartment houses.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 30: bls_0500_1929.pdf

2 6 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

In most of the cities which might be classed as suburbs of larger cities the majority of the family units provided were in apartment houses in 1927 and 1928. Among cities in this class are Yonkers, N. Y .; White Plains, N. Y .; Elizabeth, N. J.; East Cleveland, Ohio; Cambridge, Mass.; and Highland Park, Mich. In the last-named city only one-half of 1 per cent of the family units for which permits were issued in 1927 and only 2.6 per cent of those for which permits were issued in 1928 were 1-family dwellings.

Albany, N. Y . ; Bethlehem, Pa.; Bridgeport, Conn.; Medford, Mass.; New Britain, Conn.; and Pawtucket, R. I., were large builders of2-family dwellings.

Richmond, Ind., was the only city where no apartment houses were built in any of the three years for which data are shown.T a b le 11.—P E R C E N T OP FAM ILIES PR O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S

OF D W E LLIN G S IN C ITIES H A VIN G A P O PU LA TIO N OF F R O M 26,000 TO 500,000 JEN SP E C IF IE D Y E A R S

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

1-fam­ily

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings 1

Multi­family dwell­ings 2

100.083.9 3.4 12.780.2 5.9 13.8

88.2 11.881.2 5.4 13.433.7 .8 65.5

59.3 39.7 1 .048.9 44.6 6.548.8 28.9 22.3

90.2 2 .0 7.874.9 1.9 23.186.7 1.3 12.1

93.4 6 .692.6 .4 7.196.1 3.9

100.072.4 1.5 26.192.5 1.5 6 .0

97.1 2 .1 .870.4 1.1 28.569.7 2 .2 28.1

78.1 3.3 18.654.1 20.6 25.341.6 14.2 44.2

51.9 27.9 2 0.225.8 33.9 40.364.9 19.3 15.881.4 9.7 8 .8

100.085.7 1.9 12.487.7 1.3 11.0

92.1 1 .6 6.391.8 5.2 3.092.1 5.6 2.3

56.9 28.1 15.02.3 39.5 58.1.7 19.0 80.3

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

1-fam-iiy

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings 1

M ulti­familydwell­ings2

540 100.0

348 90.8 9.2264 94.3 5.7700 77.6 1.7 20.7867 65.6 8 .1 28.3

1,330 28.0 1.7 70.382 96.3 3.7

230 35.7 46.1 18.3223 43.5 41.7 14.8

327 55.7 30.6 13.8310 31.6 32.3 36.1306 34.6 30.7 34.6

1,659 93.7 .5 5.73,019 78.2 1.3 20.42,589 70.2 . 8 29.0

675 42.7 29.2 28.1

404 35.6 32.7 31.7497 41.6 31.4 27.0388 44.6 27.3 28.1

118 2 2.0 54.2 23.7472 2 2.0 28.0 50.0556 21 .2 14.4 64.4

43 7.0 93.0636 5.5 33.7 60.9863 5.3 26.7 6 8 .0

145 100.0559 85.3 5.2 9.5350 87.7 12.3

403 86.1 1 .0 12.9512 90.0 2 .2 7.8374 89.6 1 .6 8 .8

712 77.7 6 .0 16.4269 73.2 3.7 23.0258 83.7 7.0 9.3

Akron, Ohio:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Alameda, Calif.:1921__.................1927.....................1928__.................

Albany, N. Y .:1921.....................1927_...................1928....................

Allentown, Pa.:1921.....................1927....................1928_...................

Altoona, Pa.:1921.....................1927.....................1928_...................

Anderson, Ind.:1921.....................1927 . .......1928-...................

Asheville, N . C.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8

Atlanta, Ga.:1921_...................1927.....................1 9 2 8 -.................

Atlantic City, N. J.: 1921.....................192 7 1928 . .......

Augusta, Ga.: 1928- Aurora, 111.:

1921................1927__............192 8

Battle Creek, Mich.:1921................192 7 192 8

Bayonne, N. J.:1921................192 7 192 8

2342,5212,557

152239504

302558615

102681556

91282155

37456268

374449370

1,6142,5633,170

36624857

318

126418301

127268177

274344436

Beaum ont, Tex.:1928. ................. .

Bellingham, Wash:192 7 .192 8 .

Berkeley, Calif.:1921................... .1927....................1928........... ........

Bethlehem, Pa.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .

Binghamton, N. Y .:1921....................192 7 .192 8

Birmingham, Ala.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Bloomfield, N . J.:1928.....................

Bridgeport, Conn.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Brookline, Mass.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Cambridge, Mass.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Camden, N . J.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Canton, Ohio:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Charleston, W . Va.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

1 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores.2 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 31: bls_0500_1929.pdf

APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 2 7

T able 11.—PER CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued

Total num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in—

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-ily

dwell­ings

2-fam-iiy

dwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

Charlotte, N . C.:1921..................... 322 93.2 3.1 3.71927..................... 1,052 48.1 13.3 38.61928..................... 1,237 47.9 13.7 38.3

Chattanooga, Tenn.:1921................... 226 65.9 5.8 28.31927..................... 596 56.9 8.7 34.41928..................... 611 50.9 6.4 42.7

Chester, Pa.:1921..................... 47 91.5 8.51927..................... 361 82.3 9.4 8.31928..................... 243 92.6 7.4

Cicero, 111.:1921..................... 453 57.8 40.8 1.31927................... 559 26.3 27.0 46.71928..................... 464 23.3 12.9 63.8

Cincinnati, Ohio:1921..................... 1,161 92.9 1.3 5.81927..................... 3,212 52.3 18.0 29.71928..................... 3,559 51.2 10.1 38.8

Clifton, N. J.:1921..................... 540 39.8 58.2 2 .01927..................... 567 58.9 23.8 17.31928..................... 547 43.9 26.9 29.3

Columbia, S. C.:1928..................... 272 82.4 14.7 2.9

Columbus, Ga.:1921..................... 88 68.2 31.81927..................... 325 92.6 7.41928.................... 321 100.0

Columbus, Ohio:1921..................... 1,317 65.8 31.7 2.51927..................... 2,430 60.5 19.7 19.81928..................... 2,477 58.1 12.1 29.9

Covington, K y.:1921..................... 198 95.5 2.5 2 .01927..................... 346 81.5 13.9 4.61928..................... 314 54.8 34,7 10.5

Cranston, R . I.:1921..................... 154 72.7 27.31927..................... 452 79.2 18.8 2 .01928..................... 559 77.3 12.9 9.8

Dallas, Tex.:1921..................... 2,846 80.8 5.6 13.61927..................... 986 67.1 27.0 5.91928..................... 1,199 58.7 29.0 12.3

Dayton, Ohio:1921..................... 546 96.0 2 .2 1 .81927..................... 1,201 43.8 37.3 18.91928..................... 732 40.7 11.7 47.5

Decatur, 111.:1921..................... 335 82.7 13.7 3.61927..................... 613 96.1 3.91928..................... 339 97.6 2.4

Denver, Colo.:1921..................... 1,624 87.8 4.8 7.41927.......... . . . . . . 1,847 72.4 3.2 24.41928..................... 1,869 60.8 3.9 35.4

Des Moines, Iowa:1921..................... 758 87.1 7.1 5.81927..................... 360 86.7 2 .2 11.11928..................... 406 83.0 1.5 15.5

Duluth, Minn.:1921..................... 637 96.4 1.7 1.91927..................... 303 95.0 2 .0 3.01928..................... 196 90.3 3.6 6 .1

Durham, N. C.:1927..................... 508 81.1 9.1 9.81928..................... 464 8 6 .2 3.4 10.3

East Chicago, Ind.:1921..................... 168 57.1 31.0 11.91927..................... 406 40.9 32.5 26.61928..................... 204 28.9 19.6 51.5

City, State, and year

Total num­ber o f

Per cent of families provided for in—

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-iiy

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings

M ulti­familydwell­ings

472258136

13.14.7

10.3

39.89.31.5

47.08 6.0 8 8 .2

3762,140

968

26.64.23.9

38.66 .88.7

34.889.087.4

249271

79.978.2

17.720.7

2.41 .1

260 93.8 6 .2585501

6 6.873.3

12.39.8

20.917.0

67262207

52.293.593.7

20.92.32.9

26.94.23.4

5141,6501,002

28.012.414.3

66.413.412.5

5.674.273.3

310 71.0 4.5 24.5

518 62.5 37.5444397

74.580.6

24.517.4

.92 .0

4151,423

945

74.022.620.7

5.86.9 3.7

20.270.575.6

509420420

84.393.891.2

2.44.85.2

13.41.43.6

15 46.7 53.3440283

13.911.3

69.135.3

17.053.4

141251n o

47.554.673.6

22.729.515.5

29.815.810.9

3483,5592,221

61.892.275.7

33.04.9

16.7

5.22.97.6

586485407

81.498.498.5

14.21.6.2

4.4

1 .2

909 96.7 3.33,1601,758

55.573.9

2 2.05.1

22.52 1.0

103 96.1 3.9571 96.7 3.3369 8 6 .2 4.1 9.8

4941,675

890

59.132.867.4

0.429.99.2

40.537.323.4

6301,709

895

94.995.293.5

2.5 3.36.5

2.51.4

East C levelan d ,Ohio:

1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .

East Orange, N . J.:1921.............. .192 7 .192 8 .

East Providence,R . I.:

192 7 .192 8 .

East St. Louis, 111.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Elgin, 111.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Elizabeth, N. J.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

El Paso, Tex.:1928................... .

Erie, Pa.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8

Evanston, 111.:1921................... .192 7 192 8

Evansville, Ind.:1921.................192 7 .192 8

Everett, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8

Fall River, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .

Flint, Mich.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .

Fort Wayne, Ind.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Fort Worth, Tex.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Galveston, Tex.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Gary, Ind.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

G ran d R a p id s ,Mich.:

1921.....................192 7 192 8

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 32: bls_0500_1929.pdf

2 8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b l e 11.—P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN CITIES H A V IN G A PO PU LA TIO N OF F R O M 25,000 TO 500,000 IN SP E C IF IE D Y E A R S —Continued

Total num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in­ Total

num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in—

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

i-fam­ily

dwell­ings

2-fam-ily

dwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-iiy

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings

M ulti­familydwell­ings

Great Falls, M ont.: 1928..................... 260 52.7 6.5 40.8

Kenosha, Wis.:1921_................... 128 82.8 14.1 3.1

Greensboro, N . C.: 1927.................... 303 77.9 14.5 7.61928..................... 446 90.1 5 4 4.5 1928-................... 295 90.2 7.5 2.4

Greenwich, Conn.: 1928..................... 344 68.9 13.1 18.0

Knoxville, Tenn.: 1921.................... 489 98.8 1.2

Hamilton, Ohio: 1921.....................

1927-................... 818 83.9 .9 15.2192 100.0 1928-................... 940 77.2 6.4 16.4

1927..................... 362 100.0 Lakewood, Ohio:1928..................... 410 99.0 1 .0 1921-................... 877 26.3 72.3 1.4

Hammond, Ind.: 1921

1927-................... 582 22.0 18.9 59.1288 87.8 1? 2 1928..................... 537 15.8 11.5 72.6

1927..................... 1,141 60.5 6 0 33.6 Lancaster, Pa.:1928..................... 698 67.6 6.4 25.9 1921-................... 73 76.7 19.2 4.1

Harrisburg, Pa.: 1921.....................

1927.................... 247 97.6 2.4179 48.6 44 7 6.7 1928.................... 154 100.0

1927 319 98.7 1 3 Lansing, Mich.:1921.....................1928 206 97.6 2.4 492 93.7 3.9 2.4

Hartford, Conn.: 1921

1927-................... 420 87.1 1.9 11.0717 7.8 39 9 52.3 1928-................... 443 99.1 .9

1927..................... 1,270 11.0 21.7 67.2 Lincoln, Nebr.:1928.....................

Highland P a r k , Mich.:

1921.....................

1,363 8 .0 12.8 79.2 1921..................... 241 97.5 2.51927-................... 388 80.7 19.31928..................... 497 62.6 37.4

250 13.2 15.2 71.6 Little Rock, Ark.:1927 366 .5 1 .6 97.8 1921..................... 749 96.0 1.3 2.71928..................... 117 2 .6 1.7 95.7 1927-................... 514 83.9 .4 15.8

Holyoke, Mass.: 1921.....................

1928..................... 527 76.5 23.599 53.5 46.5 Long Beach, Calif.:

1927 275 14.2 11.6 74." 2 1921..................... 3,8821,4793,099

33.2 7.3 59.51928 ............. 86 46.5 16.3 37.2 1927..................... 57.6 10.6 31.8

Houston, Tex.: 1928-................... 41.9 14.9 43.21921..................... 2,572 88.9 3.4 7.7 Lorain, Ohio:1927..................... 4,536

4,46359.9 20.3 19.8 1921.................... 146 87.7 6 .8 5.5

1928 ............... 63.5 21.7 14.8 1927.................... 237 99.6 .4Indianapolis, Ind.:

1921........._..........1928-................... 227 100.0

2,565 56.1 21.4 22.5 Louisville, K y.:1927 2,400

2,51158.5 19.1 22.4 1921_................... 677 88.9 11.1

1928..................... 52.0 14.3 33.7 1927-................... 1,5741,542

70.0 7.5 22.5Irvington, N. J.:

1921.....................1928-................... 54.9 10.6 34.5

389 38.8 39.3 21.9 Lynn, Mass.:1927..................... 2,562

1,022

108

4.5 23.1 72.4 1921..................... 140 57.1 12.9 30.01928..................... 3.9 11.2 84.9 1927..................... 528 24.4 22.0 53.6

Jackson, Mich.:1921..................... 87.0 3.7 9.3

1928.....................McKeesport, Pa.:

1921....................

501 26.9 24.0 49.1

1927 . 206 87.4 12.6 127 89.0 11.01928_................... 250 93.6 6.4 1927.................... 246 90.7 " 4.1 5.3

Jacksonville, Fla.: 1928..................... 203 82.3 11.8 5.91921..................... 747 75.8 9.9 14.3 Macon, Ga.:

1921.....................1927 2,0981,658

59.5 25.5 15.1 162 95.1 4.91928..................... 60.1 17.2 22.6 1927..................... 352 89.2 . 6 10.2

Jamestown, N . Y .: 1922.....................

1928..................... 321 98.1 1.9161 94.4 3.7 1.9 Madison, Wis.:

1927 225 77.8 8.9 13.3 1921..................... 283 73.5 12.7 13.81928..................... 169 94.7 5.3 1927..................... 489 79.8 3.9 16.4

Jersey City, N . J.: 1921.....................

1928..................... 542 74.5 8.7 16 .8970

1,2872,155

4.4 46.3 49.3 Malden, Mass.:1927 1.9

.425.812.9

72.386 .6

1921..................... 94 40.4 27.7' 31.91928 1927..................... 415 S6.9 55.9 7.2

Kansas City,Kans.: 1921.....................

1928..................... 718

256

18.4

46.1

12.0

48.0

69.6

5.9395 100.0 Medford, Mass.: 1921.....................1927 .............. 387 100.0

89.4 1927..................... 628 53.7 42.8 3.51928.................... 10.6321 1928..................... 745 48.3 37.3 14.4Kansas City, M o.:

1921..................... 2,578 70.1 1.7 28.2 Memphis, Tenn.: 1921 1,245

1,8651,887

71

75.3 47.1

2.417.9

2 2 .21927..................... 3,104 33.1 2.3 64.6 1927 35.01928..................... 1,969 49.0 3.8 47.2 1928 41.4 19.1 39.5

Kearny, N. J.: 1921 205 52.7 35.6 11.7

Meriden, Conn.: 1921..................... 26.7 43.7 i 29.6

1927 696 31.5 35.3 33.2 1927..................... 211 82.0 5.2 1 2.81928..................... 857 15.3 34.1 50.6 1928..................... 137 88.3 7.3 4.4

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 33: bls_0500_1929.pdf

APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 2 9

Table 1 1 .-P E R CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in— Total

num­ber of

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-ily

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

959 85.9 14.1Oakland, Calif.:

1921..................... 2,6812,6942,430

720

698 83.2 5.7 11.0 1927.....................124 97.6 2.4 1928.....................

Oak Park, 111.:1921.....................

3,5742,1892,240

75.9 5.2 18.9 1927..................... 91865.2 11.8 23.0 1928.................... 74557.1 11.6 31.3 Ogden, Utah:

1921..................... 477638 92.3 1.3 6.4 1927..................... 200

276334323

65.951.854.2

9.432.617.3

24.715.628.5

1928.....................O k l a h o m a City,

Okla.:1921.....................

157

1,7241,7522,637

1,298477

1927.....................726 91.2 . 8 8 .0 1928___________

Omaha, Nebr.:1921....................

246 66.3 16.3 17.4 1927_...................11 10.9 5.4 83.7 1928................... 4121,636 18.5 4 5 77.0 Orange, N. J.:

1921..................... 5564 75.0 12.5 12.5 1927.................... 722317 94.6 5.4 1928 281

1,262790600

371 90.8 .3 8.9 Pasadena, Calif.: 1921....................

470 89.8 10.2 1927654 82.7 1.5 15.7 1928....................753 71.3 1 1.2 17.5 Passaic, N . J.:1921..................... 4261,393 19.1 49.1 31.8 1927..................... 4675,144 3.5 16.2 80.3 1928..................... 3513,288

215537327

2.3

20.028.739.1

12.9

38.130.2 33.0

84.8

41.9 41.2 27.8

Paterson, N . J.:1921..................... 5871927..................... 1,167

7481928___________Pawtucket, R . I .:

1921.................... 277129195210

25.6 36.948.6

71.3 46.212.4

3.116.939.0

1927..................... 5811928___________ 455

Peoria, 111.:1921..................... 300

444497546

21.224.323.3

40.17.28.4

38.768.468.3

1927..................... 3491928..................... 437

Phoenix, Ariz.:1921..................... 407

218 46.8 21.1 32.1 1927..................... 6141928..................... 748

2,3352,0772,107

41.824.620.7

47.264.772.9

11.010.8

Pittsfield, Mass.: 1921.................... 431927.................... 1186.3 1928..................... 211

2471,0491,205

74.9 26.122.9

17.85.22.3

7.368.6

Plainfield, N. J.: 1921.................... 135

74.8 1927-................... 5071928.................... 311

249734

83.568.461.2

15.331.638.8

1 .2 Pontiac, M ich.:1921..................... 60

939 1927..................... 1,0691,735

508

1928. ...................286397506

419496634

72

56.368.369.2

69.2 63.9 43.8

83.3

37.1 26.4 22.9

17.2 2 .0.9

6 .65.37.9

13.634.155.2

Port Arthur, Tex.: 1927-...................1928-................... 210

Portland, M e.:1921..................... 2071927..................... 2161928-.................. 261

16.7Portland, Oreg.:

1921..................... 3,1363,1662,321

285 77.5 10.5 11.9 1927.....................358 69.3 13.1 17.6 1928.....................

Per cent of families provided for in—

1-fam­ily

dwell­ings

2-fam-ily

dwell­ings

M ulti­familydwell­ings

Miami, Fla.:1922................192 7 192 8

M i n n e a p o l i s ,M inn.:

1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Mobile, Ala.:1928.....................

Montclair, N . J.: 1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Montgomery, Ala.:1928................... .

M o u n t V e rn o n , N . Y .:

1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .

M untie, Ind.:1921....................1927................... .1928................ .

Nashville, Tenn.: 1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .

Newark, N. J.:1921................... .192 7 192 8 _

New Britain, Conn.:1921....................1927.....................1928_..................

New Brunswick* N . J.:

1921.....................192 7 192 8

New Haven, Conn.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

NewLondon,Conn.:1928... .................

New Orleans, La.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8

New Rochelle,N.Y.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Newton, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Niagara Falls,N.Y.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Norfolk, Va.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

Norwalk, Conn.:1921.....................192 7 192 8

77.957.141.6

70.322.725.9

91.289.588.5

83.866.476.9

76.170.982.3

25.5 6 .8 6 .8

85.957.858.3

16.411.618.8

39.219.223.4

45.846.363.5

82.093.182.4

73.9 6 6 .069.5

95.3 61.065.9

100.049.373.6

96.755.2

100.0100.0

78.3 68.1 62.1

91.471.069.1

4.34.12 .2

4.7.3.7

2.5

2 .215.16.4

. 62.94.4

52.76.4

2 1 2

2 .25.3

10.5

60.115.011.1

54.519.6 20.9

32.547.829.9

12.7 1.7.7

26.717.6

4.729.7 15.2

8.914.5

3.31 2.07.7

i7. a 38.8 56.1

25.077.073.48 .8

10.5 8.9

13.918.416.7

23.3 26.213.3

21.8 86 .8

11.936.8 31.2

23.573.470.1

6.361.255.7

21.7 5.8 6 .6

5.35.2

16.9

26.17.3

12.8

9.319.0

41.811.9

32.823.1

.53.72.7

2 .63.23.4

21.328.235.2

6 .125.9

61318°—29-

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 34: bls_0500_1929.pdf

30 BUILDING PERMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES

T a b le 11.—P E R C E N T OF FAM ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN CITIES H A VIN G A PO PU LATIO N OF F R O M 25,000 TO 500,000 IN S P E C IF IE D Y E A R S —Continued

Total num­ber o f

Per cent of families provided for in— Total

num­ber of

Per cent of families provided for in—

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-ily

dwell­ings

2-fam-iiy

dwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

City, State, and year

fam­iliespro­

videdfor

1-fam-ily

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings

M ulti­familydwell­ings

Portsmouth, Ohio: 1921..................... 113 91.2 9 8 .0

San Diego, Calif.: 1921..................... 1,450

2,6132,146

300

8 8 .6 .3 11.11927..................... 224 95.1 3,6 1.3 1927..................... 76.8 7.6 15.61928..................... 169 95.3 1 ,2 3.6 1928..................... 73.6 3.7 22.7

Providence, R . I.: 1921..................... 566 33.9 51,2 14.8

San Jose, Calif.:1921..................... 83.7 3.6 12.7

1927..................... 1,1881,134

288

37.4 37.3 25.3 1927..................... 385 73.0 10.4 16.61928..................... 42.2 31.7 26.1 1928..................... 370 67.0 5.9 27.0

Pueblo, Colo.:1921..................... 98.6 1.4

Savannah, Ga.:1921 ................. 347 81.0 19.0

1927..................... 401 89.3 10,7 1927 ................. 401 72.6 15.0 12.51928..................... 372 79.0 17,5 3.5 1928 ................... 430 59.1 15.8 25.1

Quincy, Mass.:1921..................... 404 57.2 34.4 8.4 Schenectady, N . Y .:

1921 193 70.071.389.2

30.09.79.7

1927..................... 926 52.8 16.6 30.6 1927 349269

18.91 .11928.................... 977 46.4 14.3 39.3 1928.....................Racine, Wis.:

1921..................... 169 77.5 15.4 7.1 Scranton, Pa.: 1921 75

280292

81.357.1 51.7

90.561.050.1

18.7 42.913.7

1927..................... 609 62.7 19.0 18.2 19271928..................... 681 43.2 33.2 23.6 1928 34.6

9.539.049.4

Reading, Pa.:1922..................... 333 56.2 27.0 16.8 Seattle, Wash.:

1921 1,9614,5054,658

1927..................... 233 82.4 3.4 14.2 19271928..................... 263 97.3 2.7 1928 . 6Revere, Mass.:1921..................... 152

241247

69.7 50.253.8

30.338.238.1

Sheboygan, W is.:4.41927 11.6

8 .11921..................... 90 95.6

1928_...................Richmond, Ind.:

1921.....................

1927.................... 204 88.2 11 .81928.................... 188 82.4 16.0 1 .6

41 58.5 41.5 Shreveport, La.:1927 228

153

7411,774

764

100.0100.0

78.1 44.9

1921 ..................... 1,157 100.01928.....................

Richmond, Va.:1921.....................

1927..................... 185 66.5 15.1 18.4

21.9 45.7

1928....................Sioux City, Iowa:

713 70.5 11.5 18.0

1927 9 4 1921 ..................... 638 90.4 5.0 4.51928 63! 4

100.0

9 A 27! 2 1927.................... 267 72.7 ______ 27.3Roanoke, Va.:

1921..................... 3511928__.................

Sioux Falls, S. D .:282 69.9 3.5 26.6

1927 395364

90.956.0

9.130.2

303 100.01928 13.7 1927.................... 151 •84.8 7.3 7.9

Rochester, N . Y .: 1921....................

1928-................... 211 71.6 28.41,3192,4481,862

351

72.1 17.1 10.8 Somerville, Mass.:1927 50.4 8 .1 41.5 1921 ..................... 204 5.4 75.5 19.11928 46.1 6 .8 47.2 1927- — ............. 399 1 .0 54.1 44.9

Rockford, 111.:1921..................... 68.7 16.5 14.8

1928.....................South Bend, Ind.:

199 1 .0 64.3 34.7

1927 926 55.754.6

22.2 2 2 .028.0

1921-................... 665 78.0 13.8 8 .11928.....................

Sacramento, Calif.: 1921.....................

779 17.5 1927.................... 540 96.3 2 .6 1 .11928-................... 579 95.9 2.1 2 .1

737 84.0 4.6 11.4 Spokane, Wash.:1927 959 82.7

74.45.0

12.312.313.3

1921 ..................... 438 98.7 1.31928 917 1927.................... 595 85.2 .5 14.3

Saginaw, M ich.: 1921....................

1928................... 574 82.8 1.4 15.9251 96.8 1 .6 1 .6 Springfield, 111.:

1927 347 98.8 1 .2 1921.................... 210 76.7 6.7 16.61928 577 90.5 2 .6 6." 9 1927-................... 354 92.7 3.1 4.2

St. Paul, Minn.: 1921.....................

1928.................... 352 81.0 2 .8 16.22,1941,148

773

78.6 4.6 16.8 Springfield, Mass.: 1921.....................1927..................... 72.0 7.0 21.0 827 59.9 30.0 10.2

1928..................... 86.3 6.7 7.0 1927..................... 1,240647

36.5 18.2 45.2St. Petersburg, Fla.:

1927.....................1928.................... 63.8 13.9 22.3

442 84.2 7.0 8 .8 Springfield, M o.: 1928-...................1928...................... 172 98.8 1 .2 305 87.9 1 .6 10.5

Salt Lake City, (Jtah: 1921..................... 826 90.0 3.8 6 .2

Springfield, Ohio: 1921 ..................... 253 90.9 9.1

1927..................... 850 56.1 8 .0 35.9 1927..................... 285 84.9 15.11928..................... 731 52.7 15.0 32.3 1928-................... 315 79.7 15.2 5.1

San Antonio, Tex.: 1921..................... 1,718

2,1712,784

95.5 4.5Stamford, Conn.:

1921.................... 190 50.5 34.7 14.71927..................... 79.6 3.7 16.7 1927..................... 559 30.6 21 .8 47.61928..................... 70.8 6 .1 23.1 1928............ 331 60.4 27.8 11.8

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 35: bls_0500_1929.pdf

APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 3 1

table 1 1 —PER CENT OP FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN, CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

1-fam-ily

dwell­ings

2-fam­ily

dwell­ings

Multi­familydwell­ings

City, State, and year

Total num­ber of fam­ilies pro­

vided for

Per cent of families provided for in—

1-fam­ily

dwell-

2 fam­ily

dwell­ings

M ulti­family

ings

Stockton, Calif.:m i ....................1927-.................1928...................

Syracuse, N . Y .:1921....................192 7 192 8

Tacoma, Wash.:192 1 192 7 192 8

Tampa, Fla.:192 2 192 7 192 8

Toledo, Ohio:1921....................192 7 192 8

Topeka, Kans.:1921....................192 7 192 8

Trenton, N . J.:1921....................192 7 192 8

Tucson, Ariz.:192 7 192 8

Tulsa, Okla.:1921....................192 7 192 8

Union City, N . J.:1921....................192 7 192 8

Utica, N . Y .:1921....................192 7 192 8

Waltham, Mass.:1921....................192 7 192 8

Warren, Ohio:1921...................192 7 192 8

624412226

6271,8381,561

843769822

422826647

6001,7491,698

188320304

317316

535336

1,1381,4342,187

5625584

478259342

137285

171321306

66.870.9 86.3

55.553.053.1

93.180.565.9

94.893.0

80.381.0 68.0

84.087.5 75.7

89.396.277.6

54.291.7

77.568.1 48.0

33.9

43.383.459.9

92.7 49.148.9

94.795.395.4

2.94.4

38.8 16.514.8

5.2 1.1 1.7

15.78.3

10.5

.7

1.9

7.5 6 .0

5.1 13.9 2 1.8

14.312.59.5

56.716.68 .2

4.430.525.4

5.34.72 .6

33.226.2

5.730.532.1

6.919.534.1

5.54.15.3

4.010.621.4

16.012.523.7

10.71.9

22.4

38.32.4

17.418.1 30.3

51.887.586.9

31.9

2.920.425.7

2 .0

Waterbury, Conn.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8

Waterloo, Iowa:

Watertown, Mass:1927.....................1928....................

West New York, N . J.:

1921....................1927.....................1928-...................

WhitePlains,N.Y.:192 7 192 8

Wichita, Kans.:1921-...................1927 . 1928 . .......

Wichita Falls, Tex.:192 7 1928_...................

Wilkes-Barre, Pa.:1921.....................1927-...................192 8

Wilmington, Del.:1921....................1927.....................1928_ ...................

Winston-S a 1 e m, N . C.:

1921.....................192 7 192 8 ............

Worcester, Mass.:1921-...................1927-...................1928....................

Yonkers, N . Y .:1921-—...............1927-...................1928....................

Youngstown, Ohio:1921.....................1927-...................1928.....................

271675504

270

759454

170

1,204856

1,336988

1,207

548222

82230174

356923965

715795474

4,1464,216

7241,148

929

54.444.6

98.5

14.117.6

6.38.51 .2

22.5 34.8

93.277.773.1

90.5

91.5 64.8 52.3

71.283.188.5

94.174.863.8

67.059.0 68.4

76.0 14.314.8

80.883.6

22.920.719.0

85.982.4

62.53.5

12.4

3.81.9

2 .84.97.4

5.85.4

4.9 25.2 24.1

7.6 .5 . 8

2 .65.9

17.818.616.5

6.74.9

20.711.8 10.2

33.924.9 36.3

1.5

31.2 8 8 .086.5

73.763.3

4.017.419.6

3.75.4

3.610.023.6

2 1.216.410.7

5.3 22.630.3

15.222.415.2

24.079.180.3

17.17.3 6 .1

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 36: bls_0500_1929.pdf

General Table

G ENERAL TABLE A, pages 33 to 108 shows detailed information for 310 cities in 1928 and 302 cities in 1927. The table is di­

vided into three parts.Part 1 relates to new residential buildings, giving the number and

cost of each kind of dwelling, the number of families provided with dwelling places in new buildings, and the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population in each city from which data were received for 1927 and 1928. The ratio of families provided for is based both on the 1920 census and the population as estimated by the Census Bureau for the specified year.

Part 2 gives the number and cost of new nonresidential buildings for each city from which reports were received.

Part 3 shows the number and cost of additions, alterations, and repairs to old buildings, the number and cost of installations, and the grand total of all buildings, both new and old.

The number of installation permits and their construction costs were obtained whenever such permits were issued by the building inspector. In a number of cities, however, these permits were issued by offices other than that of the building inspector, and no data were collected in such cities.

In 1927 there were 77,818 permits issued for installations to cost $37,772,931, compared with 70,850 permits and an estimated cost of $38,351,921 in 1928.

The bureau attempted to classify additions, alterations, and re-

Eairs under the headings repairs, etc., to housekeeping dwellings, non- ousekeeping dwellings, and to nonresidential buildings. Many of

the cities which reported by mail, however, grouped them. ^In the 310 cities which reported for 1928 permits were issued for

279,020 repairs to old buildings. The cost of these repairs was esti­mated at $324,644,421. In 1927 permits were issued for 288,824 repairs at an estimated cost of $353,398,271.

The total estimated expenditure for the 664,449 building opera­tions (including new buildings and repairs to old buildings), for which permits were issued in 1928, was $3,423,584,461. In 1927 per­mits were issued for 729,685 building operations at an estimated expenditure of $3,593,839,405.

32

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 37: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .—Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by 'permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS

Housekeeping dwellings

C ity and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family

dwellings with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings with stores^combine?

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum ­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Akron, Ohio.................. 1927 2,117 $10,702,908 2,117 42 $331,387635,750

84 1 $33,000 1 48 $1,124,300 1,179,400

25,000 532,407152.000765.000436.000 116,500

319Alameda, Calif-............

1928 2,051 10,348,998 2,051 76 152 71 3541927 194 867,956 194 6 29,100 12 1 1,500 1 1 32Albany, N . Y ________

1928 170 886,317 170 2 10,500 4 11 3301927 273300

3,878,000 4,516,700 2,653,200 2,779,300 1,277,135

904,390

273300

12489

2.851.5002.078.500

248 1 9,000 1 512

241219435

8

21

$48,000100,000376.000223.000 78,500

1216633212

1928 178Allentown, Pa.............. 1927 510 510 10 92,500

46.200 3,500

21.200

14 8 1131928 482 482 5 7 4

Altoona, Pa................... 1927 261 261 1 1 2 33,000 AAmsterdam, N . Y ____

1928 149 149 1 4,500208,000

2 4 41927 28 220,500 28 19 38 1 11,000 1

Alton, HI........................1928 18 149,100 18 11 83,500 22 1 10,000 21928 156 544,224 156 4 12,500 8 2 11,000

9,10012,500

3Anderson, Ind________ 1927 330 868,000

824,550330 1 7,000

6,5002 3 5 4 312,000

38,00011316

1 10,000 6

Asheville, N . C_______1928 248 248 1 2 1 2 31927 316

2581,299,960 1,178. 750

162, 700

316258

x 2,500 2 3 8,50025,0007,000

3 1015

396,200 495,550

12594

11

18,00050,000

3101928 4 8

Ashtabula, Ohio........... 1927 36 36 1 21928 20 150,250 20

Atlanta, Ga__________ 1927 1,387 1,319

64 37 12

5,155,610 5,607,700

263,718 151,265 85,400

1,387 1,319

64 37 12

253 638,001939,089210,500

21,00026,300

50644072108

19961

35,350 18,300

105,750 16,000

221012

1

80149

111

1,026,0503,400,900

949,00055,000

6181,398

756

30.000 2,500

149,00016.000

303

253

Atlantic City, N . J___

Auburn, N . Y ..............

192819271928 1927

2203654

161

1928 31 159,125 31Augusta, Ga.................. 1927 310 807,143 310 10 57,950

42,25020 6 20,225

10,3006 2 16,666

120,0008

1928 259 643,094 259 13 26 4 5 1 28Aurora, 111..................... 1927 358 1, 814,525

1,426,549358 3 27,000

9,0006 2 20,000 2 2 108,000

110,000691,000

1,910,000

4833

1 22,000 41928 264 264 1 2 1 16,000 2 1

Baltimore, M d ............. 1927 3,348 13,626,000 3,348 1 12,000 2 5 26,000 6 13 1901928 2,491 10,750,000 2,491 10 393

Bangor, M e................... 1927 31 129,600 31 1 7,000 21928 33 117,550 33 1 7,000 2 3 12,000 3

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 38: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Table A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits CO*issued in 1927 and 1928, &?/ intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

Housekeeping dwellings

City and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family

dwellings with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

N um ­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Battle Creek, M ic h ... 1927 246 $836,475 669,750 161,425 209,20031.00020.000

1,486,841666,000 757,910629.000

2,541,080 1, 893,701

517, 750777.000 612,050 608,881

7,627, 214 5,575,0041.989.150 1,656,000

474,500561.000

3,277,700 3,877,400 1,181,460 1,043,300

767,175 695,950

1.639.150 2,127,100 4,963,800 3,330,075

246 6 $39,00043,000

12 2 $13,000 2 2 $30,000 81928 163 163 5 10 1 $40,000 4

Bay City, M ich______ 1927 42 421928 54 54 1 20,000

368,500557,000

3Bayonne, N . J_______ 1927 8 8 62 396,000

257,500124 6 42,800

16,00012 20 197 1 10,500

118,0003

Beaumont, Tex______19281928

3540

3540

39 78 3 5 21 306 8 44

Belleville, 111................. 1928 136 136Bellingham, Wash___ 1927 316 316 2 22,000 14 2 47,000 18

1928 249 249 2 45.000 773,700

2,067,35071.00057.000

272,100 268,000

2,350,250 1,499,631 2,121,700

562,00040.00040.000

10,856,340

15Berkeley, Calif_______ 1927 569 569 35 315,000

52,000603,500

70 34 204 3 101,00068,00087,600

24

Bethlehem, Pa_______19281927

37282

37282

953

18106

3 26,500 5 685

91116

15

2426

Binghamton, N. Y —19281927

9798

9798

4150

478,500 407,900 387,540 63,750 10,500

82100

7 63,500 11 420

17112

1 45,000 16

1928 106 106 47 94 13 106Birmingham, A la------- 1927

1928 1927

2,3621,818

2,362 1,818

365

124

248

1312

51,925 45,200 47,650 75,000

1612

6983

590751

4 90,625 27

Bloomfield, N . J_____ 365 82 813.000922.000

5,500

164 4 10 26 437 3 290,000 86

Bloomington, Til19281927

28884

28884

941

1882

5 9 162

15510

2 155,000 35

1928 85547

85 1 5Boston, Mass________ 1927 547 852 7,436,603

8,163,200 596,550 441,10077.00037.000

784,000 491,500

2,759,875 2,969,025

1,704 3 82,000 6 511 2,799 50 1,069,500 260192819271928 1927

647207173

647 952 1,904156

2 22,000 3 558 14,804,950 382,950 255,600

20,000

4,251134Bridgeport Conn 207

17378 4153 106 19 57 4 205,000 52

Brockton, Mass 152 152 9 18 2 6192819271928 1927

131 104 118

1,155

131 5 10Brookline, !Mass 104

118 1,155

66 132 41 1.616.5002.446.500 3,299,4323.282.500

40546

80 63 358Bu£aJo, N , Y ................ 1,092 111 1,725,650

487,500145 39 847 19 508,400 134

1928 704 704 676 1,352 36 63 52 896 47 681,850 166

BUILDING

PEBM

ITS IN'

THE PBIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 39: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Burlington, Iowa_____

Butler, Pa......................Butte, M ont.................

Cambridge, Mass........

Camden, N . J...............

Canton, Ohio___..........

Cedar Rapids, Iow a...

Central Falls, R . I ___

Charleston, S. C ..........

Charleston, W . Va___

Charlotte, N . C ...........

Chattanooga, Tenn___

Chelsea, Mass...............

Chester, Pa...................

Chicago, HI...................

Chicopee, Mass............

Cicero, HI.......................

Cincinnati, Ohio..........

Clarksburg, W . Va___

Cleveland, Ohio...........

Clifton, N . J - ..............

Colorado S p r i n g s , Colo.............................

Columbia, S. C ............

Columbus, Ga..............

Columbus, Ohio..........

Council Bluffs, Iowa__

19271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928

85 53 401 7

35 46

477 307 461 335 145 151

3 3

26 45

197 216 506 593 339 311

5 11

297 225

5,604 4,209

72' 71

147 108

1,679 1,821

56 58

1,593 1,354

334 240

6786

188 224 301 321

1,469 1,438

101 75

200,000177.500258.300 10,00011.500

441,150461.500

1,944,9501.070.6502.131.200 1,878,550

637,815 653,94029.00012.000 35,250

158.800 643,450731.500

1,746,960 2,770,740 1,027,858 1,123,075

25,60050.500

1,291,600930.000

36,108,800 26,597,300

278.000254.300

1.139.200813.800

11,718,234 13,927,985

202,750254.350

8.712.1008.298.100 1,880,7251.357.650

236,075 296,440698.350914.000 910,643 700,724

7,299,9007.382.100

342,900 234,400

85 4 47,140 853 1 600 240

17

35 107 1,031,800 898,800

214 42 1,545,500 2, 221,000

180,000

359 6 88,700 2846 115 230 17 587477 23 150,600

59,5008,000

29 3 50 x 4,000 3307 13 34,800 26 10 17461 5 44,850 10 1 1 7 347,500

31,00040

335 3 21,300 6 2 9 1 250,000 24145151 1 35,000

7,5007,000

643

33

1519

100,20073,000

3038

1 12,600 1 11

12 109,800 3626 5 49,000 10 1 7,000 245 1 1,500

55,0001

197 1 3,666 2 4 8 13 154,450 62216 8 25,500 16 2 7,000 2 8 96,000 24506 67 193,250 134 3 43,000 6 74 1,136,550 406593339311

5

81201751

305,110 50,654 39,500

397,700

1624034

102

5115

34,80054,30017,600

8125

721823

1,270,370304,293637,700

466,178250

282

51.000 70,07545.000

82711

11 64 512,500 128 1 10,000 60,000 70,000

138,513,700 111, 734,200

3297 17 109,900 34 2 30225 3 18

27,01123,247

5,6044,209

721,926 1,090

19

22,434,450 11, 635,900

149,500

3,8522,180

38

257192

4,003,600 2,786,500

350252

1,9991,537

238318

25,830,20021,996,000

4,3844,559

71 14 104,000 28 1 10,000264,500857,000

3147108

1,679

6129

289

763,500 354,800

3,207,150

12258

578

181

262,20020,000

292

181049

899.000492.000

3,560,500 5,781,000

196136955

620

65160

1,821 179 1,888,750 358 82 1,377 1 30,500 356 15 31,05080,385

2058 2 22,500 4 20 36

1,5931,354

334240

67

5423116267

5,257,500 3, 219,500

446,560 469,500

1,084622124134

193778

298.000224.000120.500128.500

29661113

53654

15

2,585,500 4,080,000

61,000 509,000

7761,050

18145

151910

1

560.000 425,500266.000 75,000

149758015

86 1 44.00080.00044.00080.000

9188 4 30,000 8 3 10224 20 150,000 40 2 8301 1 24321

1,4691,438

101

230147

1

1,843,900 1,184,200

8,000

460294

2

1042

146,50029,5003,000

1952

53865

1,508,0002,336,500

112,40018,000

30362531

2617

1,061,000601,000

179115

75 3 9,000 3 2 16 0 0Crc

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 40: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits Ctfissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

H ousekeeping dwellings

C ity and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family

dwellings with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum ­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Covington, K y _______ 1927 282 $871,700584,000

1,857,5502,164,900

425,538071 Q1A

282 22 $106,000 44 3 $17,000 4 4 $28,000 16192819271928 1927

172358432

172QKQ 4840

261,200344,500288,300

9680

112

53.00024.000

135

73

55.00036.000

300,000

339Cranston, R . I ----------- OOO

432 36 72 1 49 2 $22,000 6Oi’imVkAflotl/l TUT/I 96 96CA 2 18,750

1 2002 2 40,000 12

11 000 o 1192819271928 1927

64662704184

Zi 1, olU1,626,3051,804,009

812,500

04662

X130 596*725 260 3 40* 000 6 15 190,000 58Dallas, rex ............ ——

704184

1741

1,015 665 4,200

3482

23 356,250qi Ann

143 1 12,000 4Danville, HI.................. 07 1 16,496 6

Davenport, Iow a.........19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927

137 119 132 526 298 589 331

1,337 1,136

312 337

5,602 6,794

67

518,086 563,170 588,250

2,437,346 1,333,188 3,060,400 1,935,500 6,462,900 5,869,200 1,421,482 1,564,328

29,695,263 35,841,184OKO OOK

1371191QA

i 8,0009,400

881,954254,300

211

ol, UUU15.00016.000

885,000

Z4411 o 2 99 OOft ? 1

394

T\aT7+/vn AIiia16Z526298589

224 448UW

194 5 284,600 3343 86 35 968,000 323 4 148,000 25

T aaa ‘1'11* Til 3 125,000 24331

1,3371,136

312337

5,602

2 32.0001.157.0002.105.000

59,60088.000

15,856,432

8n 1 30 236.000275.000 33,022 23,000

14,936,347

60 30 450Denver, Colo— ..........36

472

86

4,130

50 661Des Moines, Iowa........ 5 40

32,065

2 63Detroit, M ic h _______ 17 139,690 25 480 5,179 133 3,554,235 678

35919281007

6,79467

2,242 15,368,447 4,484 30 459,500 40 350 12,740,280 4,252 89 2,038,695Dubuque, Iowa—------- Vo LI

19281097

54ooo 219,500 1,373,874

874,650 1,122,205

54288177412

1 50,000 132 15,800

23,000142,100

4 2 6,5005,000

2 2 30,000 9XuAt1COQ 400177 3 6 1 1 3 45,000 12

Durham, N . C ..............IvZo1927

1# / 412 23 46 5 iio ,666

179.500 308,900222.500 625,000

50486860

195East Chicago, Ind------

East Cleveland, Ohio.

19281927192819271928

400166591214

1,340,035699,742281,750113,500143,700

400166591214

8451412

1

63,400392,600143,850126,500

9,500

16902824

288

349,00075,350

4212

4171212

4102

201,000227,40098,000

404527

2 8 32,800 120

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 41: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Easton, Pa....................

East Orange, N . J___

East Providence, R . I.

East St. Louis, HI____

Elgin. Ill...................... .

Elizabeth. N . J .............

Elkhart, Ind.................

Elmira, N . Y .............. .

E l Paso, Tex...............

Erie, Pa........................

Evanston, 111... ...........

Evansville, In d ..........

Everett, Mass.............

Everett, W ash............Fall River, Mass........

Fitchburg, Mass........

Flint, M ich.................

Fond du Lac, W is.___

Fort Smith, A rk........Fort Wayne, Ind____

Fort Worth, Tex_____

Fresno, Calif................

Galveston, Tex........... .

Gary, Ind......................

Grand Rapids, Mich..

Great Falls, M ont-----

Green Bay, W is---------

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928 1927 192S 1927 1923192719281927192819271928

169138

199212391367245194205143219 140 109 10258

220 331 320 322 196

61 32

107 137 81 52 19

3,280 1,682

86 55 60

477 401

1,758 1,299

145 118 552 318 550 600

1,627 837 82

137 165 167

352,060149,425651,750311,650915.400

1,227,725 1,456,397 1,391,980 1,160,560 1,015,0701.278.0001.130.000

850,105 490,261 731,312 556,100 294,415 790,441

1,852,700 1,754,100 3,617,5002.711.000 1,447,950 1,392,550

237,500222,600222,300656,440353,420191.400 85,800

10,923,266 7,014,241

295,740 193,000 183,488

2,423,160 2,107,815 9,216,896 5,201,087

506,161 415,645

1,051,414 1,022,459 2,896,438 2,795,995 6,707,3003.405.000

289,853 481,930 761,555 760,180

39169138

199212391367245194205143219 140 109 10258

220 331 320 322 196 394 3836132

107137815219

3,2801,682

865560

477401

1,7531,299

145118552318550600

1,62783782

137165167

154

66382225342333

10951

74328471746

15250

842

76176

313323

125033292988

136,50053.000

620,100327.000176.000 207,300 208,080 131,40029.000 18,500

983.000415.000

22,650

29,010234,800228,100818,000244.000 24,500 31,000

905.000 344,500

237,38567,10017,5009,700

1,031,832

640,130 184,768 15,000

4,850 967,842 153,780 187,300 179,100 61,750 60,100

64.000

81327644506846

66

218102

1486569434

812

304100

1684

152352

64

5006658581616

16

10

4,000

92,00044,500

32,00027,80024,400

17,000104,000

2,500

12,000

114,00096,30042.00016.000 43,450 36,700

56,3753,000

18,00015,000

113,83290,940

1,00055,5653,000

310,365117,483

15,000

"”33,“477

"l06,"000'

9.0004.000

5837

2117131

212611111

2256

140435

8,299,5003.808.000

18,000 11,000

437,820260,60015.00022.000

2.960.0001.616.000

7,000100,00075.000

171,65080,97520,40026.000

7.138.0003.688.000

15.00016.000

177,000 410,50040.000

139,68434.000

8 ,000

217,505

2,170,014766,94716,00050.00034.00053.000

529,80022,000

121,500164,800

8,00010,000

1,854813

63

11881117

1,175671

4 15

18967648

974526

69

751511640

133

558316

624 1925

325 17224

1508233

30,225

318,500140,000

30,00035,500

361.000186.000

9,500

255,0001,055,000

12,000

11,500

83,450109,500

10,000

18,000 364,085 132,160

32,900 1,192,600

116,000

79,000

7

”B5

49

29188

1836

515454

1130036

240 0

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 42: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Year

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

. 19271928

d estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations t and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

030 0

PART U—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

Housekeeping dwellings

1-family dwellings

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

2-family dwellings

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Multifamily dwellings

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

4021101692502375449

3624066904722541

315 201 140 109685242 20

23

402,7152,836

13545

$1,804,527 1,920,465

398,875 682,957

3,591,735 4,050,300

294,085 215,610

1,244,724 1,519,9872.964.8001.945.800

96,850236,400

1,792,100 1,168,500 1,525,551 1,252,017

280,700 213,900 318,013 134,89313.50021.500

4021101692502375449

3624066904722541

315201140109

$84,00023,600

8,500138.000200.000 98,500 76,900

205,000108,90084,20093,800

113687145

4211

10,0001,641,209

797,35299,40035.500

475,275 112,84726.500

8,000

45,000 329,750 299,300

8,675,363 11,459,985

467,225 364,800

402,7152,836

13545

167

445

160,80071.000

3,457,122 4,226,050

25,50029.000

$13,0007.0005.000

43,000

227217428108422

62

107,80023.00095.50034.50019.00036.00016.000

84,386 11

12,00025,500

$269,99573,80019,30033,09049,000

183,0004,5008,000

$380,60083,000

18.500 764,500 374,00012,00039.500

4253904

14

957,600308,000

2,305,3792,125,400

6,00022,000

710927

36

611,000475,500

11,138 806,000 335,000 60,000

4242112

20

450,000

236,150174,000

9,00015,100

31104

9

639.500122.500

2,603,820 1,737,550

124.00049.000

16832

8616164016

153,000

128,500 208,800

5,000 10,000

6516

13091

144153

116

BTJILDING PEBM

ITS IN

THE PBIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 43: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Hutchinson, Kans _ _ Indianapolis, I n d .._

Irvington, N . J .........

Jackson, M ich ..........

Jacksonville, Fla___

J amestown, N . Y _ _.

Jersey City, N . J___

Johnstown, Pa..........

Joliet, 111....................

Joplin, M o.................

Kalamazoo, M ich ...

Kansas City, Kans..

Kansas City, M o . . .

Kearny, N . J ............

Kenosha, W is...........

Kingston, N . Y ____

Knoxville, T enn___

Kokomo, Ind .......... .

Lakewood, Ohio___

Lancaster, Pa.......... .

Lansing, M ich ........ .

Lawrence, Mass___

Lebanon, Pa.............

Lewiston, M e...........

Lexington, K y ........ .

Lima, Ohio...............

Lincoln, N ebr._____

192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927

1261,4051,305

11540

180234

1,248997175 160249

9346176 148 11499

193148387237

1,0289652191312362661261146867263940

12885

241154366439

128

32192219

1601043213

313

433,770 6,276,714 6,122,670

703,478259.000 817,550

1,043,450 4,055,500 3,381,565

871.200813.000156.60065.500

482,900 250,250

1.235.600 1,178,400

398.200367.200 641,100 591,025 720,950 578,620

4,400,207 4,594,700 1,189,900

7 8,500 1,368,197 2,248,418

678.600626.050

2,395,814 2,497,141

162.000 195,262

1,097,755920.600

1.346.600839.050

1,585,665 1,986,800

92.20053.200

191.500 101,00069,500 62,000

971,558 573,400144.600 68,100

1,605,590

126 2 12,500 4 3 21,00® 1,812,800 s 3,079,00® 7,053,5®©, 3,342,90®

16 480 816

1,759 720

1,405 229 1,107,745 458 31 2 204.000145,550535.000 791,400

573096

148

1,305 180 876,880 360 31 4.11540

1802905513

3,074,950585,50092,550

58011026

73

103,00043,000

124

19495

1213

234 8 61,000 161,248

997175

25112810

1,055,525461,80074,400

50225620

2421

102,500140,200

3230

58653

1,107„0@© 1,221, @5®

59*7m

29235430

44

92,50057,900

2421

160 3 21,000 6 2 21,000 3249

9315130210

1,245,700 829,500 92 095

30220420

183911

194,500336,00072,200

307511

55101

12,832,, 500 5,512,0®©

12*080873

1,6394

8;7

223,500906,000

58228

46 9 69,500 18 5 15,400 5 1 30*. 060 4176148114

72

169,00035,500

144

21

34.00044.000

42

221

45*0001301.000 1^000

224.000

8181452

11

; 20,000 25,000

48

99 3193148 1 4,500 2 3 30,000 12 2 15,000 Q387 6287 4 59.000

3,571,657 2,701,000

524,0001,135,500

55.000

351,852

92718542123

1 ii aha 4152

3Aft1,028

9653437

261.500323.500881.500 991,00096,600

6874

2 13,000 4 9341 7

11, uuu 489, 500 10,000

152.00068.000

219 123 246 11 I g131236

14414

28828

29

32,000113,500

416

203 3 13

266 8 77,600 16 5 114,500 6 2 44,000 7126 4 40,800 8114 3 32,000 6 1 25,000

588,6396686 4 22,800 8 20 124

726 30 163,600 60 20 526,800 15439 3 1,500 640 2 155.000

1,133,000775.000

42128 55 480,000

397,800110 14 307

3704 17s nnn

85 31 62 12 5 1 f o, uuu 70 AHA OfOA241 4 13,800 6 iVy UUU M154366 4 29,500 8 2 . 180,000 46439 2 18,000 412 6 52.000

14.00012 5 60,600 198 1 2 4 37,000 2232

1922 3 28,000 6 3 38.000

58.0001519 2 21,000 4 1 7,000 2 5 52160

10432 1 8,000 313 3 18,000 6

313 12 284,555 75 COO

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 44: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State

Little Rock, A rk ...

Long Beach, Calif____

Lorain, Ohio...........

Los Angeles, Calif—

Louisville, K y .........

Lowell, Mass...........

Lynchburg, V a____

Lynn, M ass.............

McKeesport, P a_~

Macon, Ga—............

Madison, W is_____

M alden, M ass.........

Manchester, N . H ____

Mansfield, Ohio—

Marion, In d ............

Marion, Ohio..........

Year

192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Housekeeping dwellings

1-family dwellings

N um ­ber

311431403 852

1,297236227

8,2136,5931,102

847734887

114129135223167314315 390404 153 132 13592

1511234171

123160

Cost

$1,491,712 1,393,368 1,724,985 2,829,165 4,134,840

806,300 815,140

32,135,913 25,487,4015.955.5504.669.550

322,700 165,600 355,023 499,710 708,100 701,850

1,353,873 808,235

1,150,065 1,233,170 2,051,300 4,028,000

821,675 717,150 631,225 262,325 707,800 624,500 91,840

168,000 361,650 425,900

Fami­lies

311431403 852

1,297236227

8,2136,5931,102

847734887

114129135223167314315 390404 153 132 13592

1511234171

123160

2-family dwellings

Num­ber

73225

908 L, 051

50 57 3 1 1

58

717

116431212

Cost

$360,000 1,157,335

7,075,7687,220,809

225,450576,80017,8005,0009,500

521.900492.900

71,5007,000

57.300 168,800 997,850 335,10084,00077.300

11,50035.00034.00010.000 6,000

Fami-

146450

1,8162,102

100114

62

116120

1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined

Num­ber Cost

$5,700

40,50043,3505,000

103,300184,750

99,45058,800

49,500111,900

27,0006,0004,000

Fami­lies

Multifamily dwellings

Num ­ber

9182475

174

1,0421,106

50114

Cost

$310,000193,050354,152

1,151,4002,931,840

22,866,436 28,268,917 2,468,900 2,518,100

703,75033.00035.00080.000 15,000

315.500187.500 211,000

1,255,0009,600

18,000176,000

5.0008.000

Fami­lies

18675

124448

1,278

10,772 12,386

264

259246

6765630

5006

Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num­ber Cost

$20,900

89,300364,150

699,370 301,100

70,000

26,2007,000

65,000150,000

25,000

Fami-

6

'2 261

90

24

435

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 45: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Medford, M ass.............

Memphis, Tenn...........

Meriden, Conn............

Miami, Fla....................

Milwaukee, W is..........

Minneapolis, M in n ...

Mobile, Ala...................

Moline, HI.....................

Montclair, N . J ............

Montgomery, Ala........

M ount Vernon, N . Y_

Muncie, Ind.................

Muskegon, M ich.........

Muskogee, Okla...........

Nashville, Tenn..........

Newark, N. J ................

Newark, Ohio...............

New Bedford, Mass__

New Britain, Conn. _.

New Brunswick, N . J.

Newburgh, N. Y . .........

New Castle, Pa............

New Haven, Conn___

New London, C on n ...

New Orleans, La..........

Newport, K y ................

1927 337 2,086,600 3371928 360 2,239,450 3601927 878 3,699,425 8781928 782 3,239,080 7821927 173 709,050 1731928 121 622,700 1211927 581 1,264,656 5811928 121 557,855 • 1211927 1,314 7,227,412 1,3141928 979 5,742,220 9791927 1,427 6,259,570 1,4271928 1,278 5,655,670 1,2781927 365 878,500 3651928 589 1,547,956 5891927 109 522,125 1091928 108 543,084 1081927 173 2,443,413 1731928 175 2,862,619 1751927 361 720,000 3611928 662 877,355 6621927 240 2,598,300 2401928 302 3,475,335 3021927 300 1,021,746 3001928 337 1,016,650 3371927 119 334,350 1191928 104 318,010 1041927 92 224,500 921928 102 297,850 1021927 541 1,470,650 5411928 537 1,164,124 5371927 179 1,880,197 1791928 77 673,923 771927 65 215,500 651928 108 338,300 1081927 116 679,900 1161928 36 252,800 361927 154 1,090,100 1541928 128 1,025,450 1281927 72 335,200 721928 102 418,625 1021927 74 465,340 741928 62 380,300 621927 146 822,750 1461928 133 839,125 1331927 121 858,000 1211928 127 908,800 1271927 107 768,450 1071928 102 782,400 1021927 510 2,051,969 5101928 437 1,745,805 4371927 44 182,700 441928 41 178,800 41

134139156180

44

15

531129130

46

542

407181

1.098.0001.050.000

525,200 809,55026,00027,00034,550

4,511,520 4,294,950

968,100 852,850

23,500

473,394 246,705

18,000718,000539,600

9,500 36,000

123,450 4,829,410 2,185,070

154,70028,300

663.000382.500266.50081.500 67,80049.500

100.000152.000 168,500150.000239.000

2,011,530 2,057,010

........6,'500

268278312

1,0761,062

258260

8

611874

61084

814

326

1601088022161220

36383246

1,1981,376

19

19,300

50,700

9.00010.000 23,750

547,800410,200

8,00010,000

282,000

16,000

5,135

260,500584,990

5,000

42,000

40,00032,800

67,10099,700

45,000

732,607 145161

971665574

320245

70,000400,000

1,590,4502,051,400

74.50018.500

118,300

3,419,500 6,840,899 1,291,530 1,869,400

82,000119.000205.000

143,600 24,000

100,000 128,000

7,645,000 5,453,500

83,150 113,100

7,000267,000608,500

17,811,30011,956,580

280,000 52,000

210,500

687.000 1,093,000

106.000 373,000

1,241,196451,640

2210765374527

661

1,3222,454

504702

224148

31

1,6861,053

9

8103128

3,8612,563

221762474

3403703256

179110

58.00035.000

2,430,400 1,871,000

279,700540,000

861,000 1,523,500

15,400

20,0001.300.0001.255.000

24,000

75.00051.000 64,500

12,00021,00059.00087.000

113,770

163

427

21

165207

8

4271224

1598

34

14 45 23

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 46: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits ^issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

C ity and State Year

Housekeeping dwellings

1-family dwellings

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

2-family dwellings

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Multifamily dwellings

Num ­ber Cost F am i­

lies

Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Newport, R . I _______

Newport News, Va_ _

New Rochelle, N . Y ._

Newton, Mass............ .

New York C ity,N .Y .: The Bronx.............

Brooklyn.............. .

Manhattan______

Queens.................. .

R ichm ond............ .

Niagara Falls, N . Y__.

Norfolk, Va_.................

Norristown, Pa.......... .

Norwalk, Conn______

Oakland, Calif—........ .

Oak Park, HI..........Ogden, Utah.......... ......

19271928192719281927192819271928

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

355955 73

274276502575

1,211 1,271 3,843 2,631

4 12

10,425 8,477 1,258 1,229

271 350 317 27856 82

221 248

1,537 1,012

208 193 179 139

$382,000301.300 191,336 294,703

3.501.6504.223.650 5,235,725 7,026,620

8,981,200 8,949,000

25,648,850 17,909,150

94, 500731.000

60,719,140 47,311,8105,999,839 5,557,609 1,434,508 1,856,983 1,370,900 1,071,950

312,900531.000

1,649, 530 1,840,483 5,599,687 4,122,993 2,287,600 2,577,955

507,050435.300

355955 73

274276502575

1,211 1,271 3,843 2,631

4 12

10,4258,4771,2581,229

27135031727856 82

221248

1,5371,012

208193179139

2714

116 182

1,223537

2,1421,270

24

2,1079031211264553334 7

15 21 51 22

$12,000 8,000

273,300149.000

1,252,400 1,960,100

13,100,150 5,749,635

22,316,200 12,281,400

28,500131.000

17,428,7517,379,500

895.250 911,500336.250 342,69526,000 13,700 26,000 43,000

125,900 200,200 274,780 117,750

5428

232364

2,4461,0744,2842,540

48

4,214 1,806

242 252 90

106 6 6 8

14 30 42

102 44

$19,000$52,500

4,005,240 2,377,800

28677553

$237,8001,889,000

5642

754540

832,700 626,000

9.469.5007.019.500

1,508 1,080

648585

6,155,900 5,255,100

531.000498.000 118,85075,100 16,500

1,121 1,013

90 82 15 10 4

9,500

7831,5701,031

163229

1,006775

21825

1327

101,178,500 115,621,200 77,759,050 74,453,400 79,073,000

123,860,000 49, 765,100 55,234,150

37,000 1, 599,000

37,500 144,500383.000865.000

24,374 27, 720 19,432 19,311 9,494

15,963 14,597 16,295

8 434

7 34

54102311277

8,456,00016,912,05016,906,00013,225,500

3,616,000 5,093,100

80,000 162,000 96,000 28,000

34,000

8,000

"e’ooo

46,000 49,373 43,900

218,000 36,500

60,000285.000

2,238,830 3,737,8002.991.0002.243.000

335.000 35,000

5674752114

143,500

335,95685,000

762.000400.000

43348

1,896 3,627 4,105 3,376

8481,206

174014

11641

14072

BTJILDING PERM

ITS IN

THE PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 47: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Oklahoma City, Okla.

Okmulgee, Okla...........

Omaha, Nebr................

Orange, N. J—..............

Oshkosh, W is................

Ottumwa, Iow a...........

Paducah, K y ................

Pasadena, Calif............

Passaic, N . J.................

Paterson, N . J..............

Pawtucket, R . I ...........

Peoria, 111.......................

Perth Am boy, N . J . . .

Petersburg, Va.............

Philadelphia, Pa..........

Phoenix, Ariz................

Pittsburgh, Pa..............

Pittsfield, Mass............

Plainfield, N . J.............

Pontiac, M ich..........

Port Arthur, Tex.........

Port Huron, M ich____

Portland, M e................

Portland, Oreg_______

Portsmouth, Ohio____

Portsmouth, Va...........

1927 1,1641928 2,0291927 121928 71927 3381928 3391927 491928 191927 1621928 1501927 381928 381927 1361928 841927 4571928 3501927 541928 661927 2241928 1751927 2691928 2891927 3251928 3601927 771928 521927 401928 401927 8,6811928 7,3211927 4051928 5201927 1,9091928 1,5881927 721928 1391927 2501928 2291927 5901928 1,2011927 5081928 2101927 1021928 691927 1471928 1621927 2,2471923 1,6031927 2131928 1611927 621928 71

4,294,925 7,071,259

27,900 27,050

1,683,295 1,838,750

460,600216.900 480,839 535,366248.750 204; 800290.000 186,735

2,979,373 2, 774,358

430,800 468,150

1,079,866764.900

1,262,900 1,318,550 1,665,150 1,973,500

404,183 245,677 150,080179.750

39,990,675 31,255,6701,232,420 1,674,357

11,729,951 9,929,044

480,700824.000

1,906,915 1,769,479 2,421,056 3,907,465 1,075,654

457,877 343,100 184,050681.550721.550

9,500,360 7,149,585

713,645 595,450 191,925 206,055

1,164 2,029

12 7

338339 49 19

162150

13684

4573505466

224175

32536077524040

8,6817,321

405520

1,9091,588

72139250229590

1,20150821010269

147162

2,2471,603

2131616271

13181

657,670 447,700

262162

23

16,00035,700

36

4862

1

1,083,4501,043,350

12,000

315411

4

17

18,000111,500

829

479

2033

18,500 56,000

149,200 201,950 311,500

814184066

117

2011

387,500270.000

2,521,000758.000

12555

510194

42

78.00020.000

62

4 530,000 117

2 1,200 4 1 2,500 1

1 2,000 2 2 14,000 821 91,805 42 20 841,300 279 4 63,030 1231 142,867 62 1 6,500 1 24 405,204 179 1 19,000 833 351,170 66 2 37,500 4 15 1,284,000 319 2 118,000 2415 168,500 30 5 70,000 9 10 975,000 225 1 85,000 21

101 684,850 202 21 193,400 27 68 1,502,100 626 16 240,000 8867 448,313 134 16 160,300 22 70 1,175,000 408 2 32,000 9

136 983,350 272 3 32,800 6 5 62,700 21 3 36,000 1366 482,800 132 3 27,500 4 1 10,000 4 2 85,000 26

2 30,000 4 1 40,000 2 3 90,000 181 10,000 2 1 5,000 1 7 194,000 74

22 228,800 44 3 38,000 5 2 178,000 60 2 27,850 68 84,780 16 7 41,625 11 2 60,000 252 5,000 42 2,400 4 1 5,500 4

16 221,540 32 281 1,513,270 371 49 10,320,770 2,484 46 2,566,120 629280 1, 709,350 560 172 1,190,110 215 43 13,821,960 1,990 38 3,455,490 49082 328,860 164 14 135,300 4566 300,565 132 12 172,000 9675 673,400 150 38 347,500 46 15 2,588,000 461 5 94,000 22

118 1,151,325 236 18 140,600 23 35 1,817,000 614 11 233,000 8317 135,500 34 1 8 ,0 0 0 1 3 33,5G0 1116 143,200 32 1 150,000 4019 139,050 38 5 65,100 7 7 899,000 21222 161,400 44 1 1,900 1 4 134,000 3764 402,500 128 40 1,592,000 35167 496,600 134 39 1,397,300 400

2 3,500 21 6,500 2

4 40,500 8 5 268,000 612 10,000 4 3 9,800 3 5 305,000 92

50 385,000 100 45 2,529,000 774 3 240,000 4539 294,500 78 46 2,313,200 620 3 150,000 20

5 21,800 8 1 2,500 32 6,900 2 2 13,000 6

2 3,000 4 1 1,500 1 1 39,000 121 6 ,0 0 0 2 1 30,000 12

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 48: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

C ity and State Year

Housekeeping dwellings

1-family dwellings

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

2-family dwellings

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined

N um ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Multifamily dwellings

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

lies

Poughkeepsie, N . Y.

Providence, R . I —

Pueblo, Colo.______

Quincy, 111—............. .

Quincy, Mass...........

Racine, W is________

Reading, Pa............ .

Revere, Mass.......... .

Richmond, Ind____

Richmond, V a_____

Roanoke, Va.............

Rochester, N . Y ___

Rockford, 111............. .

Rock Island, HI____

Sacramento, Calif...

Saginaw, M ich_____

1927 361928 571927 4441928 4781927 3581928 2941927 1771928 1311927 4891928 4531927 3821928 2941927 1921928 2561927 1211928 1331927 2281928 1531927 7971928 4841927 3591928 2041927 1,2341928 8581927 5161928 4261927 1531928 1141927 7931928 6821927 3431928 522

$297,000663,050

3.586.200 4,202,600

893,675 732,425 766,850 517,775

2.304.200 2,136,900 2,076,513 1,671,568 1,183.700 1,455,650

524,900 522,745 837,870 598,342

3,629,843 2,428,501 1,582,286

903,832 6,822,905 4,983,570 1,936,000 1,789,500

590,275 399,500

2,806,322 938,800

1,353,066

3657

444478368294177131489453382294192256121133228163797484359204

1,234858516425153114793

522

104

2111731932

1777055

111

36

$98,90038,500

2,034,5001,697,000

115,600138,200

12,000683,100514,700414,340846,125

10,000340,000364,800

626,000206,665

119.500852.500 467,400 574,800 422,000

123,650275,050

7,00032,500

208

4223463864

$9,000

226,700131,000

7.5004.500

$23,600 44,000 1,120,000

1,105,000

1316

256281

2164140110222

36,7007,200

94

33.50023.00041.00042.00018.500

637.000 1,044,000

278.500406.500123.000

38495

12824

102,00056,000

16672

60190112194132

48,500107,65078.00026.000

46112

212

9,0004,700

10,00022,500

3,662,000990.000 82,225

346,2501.647.5002.065.500

461,500484.000150.000 64,000

178,010216,900

81120836

110761767181218553294

122

$90,00046.000

237,00066.000

160,000

61,000162,00060,000

835,840336,589122,900

39,500

16154515

20

16339

11123

24

61,050 40

BUILD

ING

PEEM

ITS IN

THE PKINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 49: bls_0500_1929.pdf

St. Joseph, M o .............

St. Louis, M o...............

05 St. Paul, M inn_______M52 St. Petersburg, Fla___00|° Salem, Mass..................

Salt Lake City, U tah.

San Antonio, T ex____

San Diego, Calif...........

San Francisco, Calif__

San Jose, Calif_______

Savannah, Ga________

Schenectady, N . Y ___

Scranton, Pa______

Seattle, Wash_____

Sheboygan, W is___

Shreveport, La____

Sioux City, Iowa__

Sioux Falls, S. Dak___

Somerville, Mass__

South Bend, Ind__

Spokane, W ash____

Springfield, HI.........

Springfield, M ass..

Springfield, M o . . . Springfield, Ohio..

Stamford, Conn___

Steubenville, Ohio___

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928

10763

1,6891,682

827667372170 61 49

477 386

1,728 1,972 2,008 1,679 2,701 2,204

281248 291 264249 240 160 161

2,7602,332

180156123603194197128161

42

620656607475328285453413268242251171 200 126 155

261,734 304,200

5,798,235 6,000,340 4,392,054 4,028,118 1,015,600

824.100390.000332.000

2,061,560 1,542,010 5,373,134 7,169,571 6,607,004 5,847,376

13,000,000 9,933,034 1,040,485

947,7801.155.300

805,3751,554,1501.540.900

729,900 652,385

9,464,5268.082.900

938,800 903,600

1,355,385 1,519,397

650,700 753,750640.000 676,48016,0005,800

2,600,0002,851,3501.888.550 1,853,875 1,536,410 1,520,8001.957.550 1,920,650

621,775 784,650 828,950

1.319.300 1,614,250

802.100550.000

10763

1,5891,682

827667372170 51 49

477 385

1,728 1,972 2,008 1,579 2,701 2,204

281248 291 254249 240 160 151

2,7502,332

180155123503194197128151

42

520555507475328285453413268242251171 200 126 155

436648402612

5724345536 85 8337

410 16514

54

3010664

55

112451212460449

2,764,900 4,017,340

398,520 258,600 28,900

693.000260.500172.500 140,400 250,365 567,595 370,626 134,175

1,926,069 1,308,945

53,120 29,500

172,300 278,250105.00040.000

368,200 119,710

78,450 70,400

104,600 55,891

195,785

19.00032.000

182,4401,010,920

547,500

25,000

47.100 35,600

720.600 272,400

4,000107.100113.600 613,500 453,30048.00018.000

872

1144868

11072

17016674

82033028126068228

9834

212128

1010

22490

24248

1208818

32

16 115,790 323 11,000 55 84,000 77 71,500 148 35,065 128 73,580 10

12

248,200327,100

11,5004,000

10,000

36,140

108,00065,60078,70017,000

28,00016,200

15,000

23,000

50,50039,00010,40027,1502,000

6,500

11,5002,000

14.000 34,5007,500

77.000

3 434 504154 6

54

159

41618155

350221

56

13 2951

106143

70,000 6,181,000 7,780,200

832,800 210,600 64,500

241.000 114,500

1,010,500615.000 753,480 924,390

1,004,400994,300

13,846,9758,381,185

110.150230.150 106,400 346,040262.000 23,000

787,000 6,290,100 7,672,000

45,100 324,732 172,800 286,000 \65,000

622,600280,00075.00036.000

147.000363.000 54,400

373,5001,683,000

425.00040.000

45.000 966,000 127,50064.00063.000

352,6103,764

22946

52 23

305236350642407410

5,0903,476

53 94 50

108603

1,7552,300

341287075'12

176

1285911257

56111832

16

1.123.0001.104.000

163,20031,920 35,000

260,250 107,500 250,000 35,150 20,000

85,000

56,400

13,000

10,000

9,00028,000

10,000

158,000

223,30015.00030.000

346400

1287

12

78566011

16

18

26

6 Or

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 50: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued o >

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

City and State

Stockton, Calif__

Superior, W is___

Syracuse, N . Y __

Tacoma, Wash__

Tampa, Fla_____

Taunton, Mass__

Terre Haute, Ind.

Toledo, Ohio____

Topeka, Kans___

Trenton, N . J___

Troy, N . Y ..........

Tucson, Ariz____

Tulsa, Okla..........

Union City, N . J.

Utica, N . Y _____

Vallejo, Calif____

Waco, Tex—........

H ousekeeping dw ellings

Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family

dwellings with stores combined

Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined

Num ­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

liesNum ­

ber Cost Fami­lies

Num­ber Cost Fami­

lies

19271928

292195

$1,094,250 707, 260

292195

54

$25,20020,350

108

22

$6,6509,800

22

22

$88,00071,800

4821

3 $264,500 60

1927 72 256,550 551,850

6,030, 6004.977.000 1,655,5901.539.000 1,782, 245 1,495,860

261,905 190,800 546,025 336,050

5,906,425 4,902,450

936,900 861, 550

1, 721,150

72 8 24,200 121928 136 13619271928 1927

974829619

974829619

14099

1,195, 700 847,000

280198

723

108,000 181,200

2433

26197

1.473.0001.386.000

487.000970.000 80,800 76,700 50,000

346369144

12102

735.000609.00015.00037.000 3,500

214132

61928 542 542 7 254 2 261927 783 783 7 55,350

47,7009 7 31 1 3

1928 602 602 11 11 8 341927 65 65 4 35,500 8 1 181928 50 50 5 24,500 101927 182 182 1 9,000 21928 113 11319271928 1927

1,417 1,155

280

1,417 1,155

280

5976

432,550 552,125

118152

1523

177,750 93,750

2827

17113

568,500227,800198.000266.000

10,000150,000

1587830

751

120,150 882,00035.00051.000 4,500

48,500

28286

101928 230 230 i 9,000 2 8 63 1 91927 304 304 4 40,000 6 1 3 1 31928 173 973,600

551,800 593,650

1.470.099 998,832

4, 649,1004.659.100

173 4 41 2 91927 88 88 10 106,450

152,800 69,620 38,052

410,575 1,096,100

127,500 45,000

193.000106.000

20 1 6,500 21928 104 104 21 42 2 40,300

10,197 23,575

111927 290 290 20 40 5 15 63 103,359 1901928 308 308 5 10 6 42,513

6,00010 2 8

19271928

9761,049

9761,049

99238

198476

1 1 2644

646,100 1,765,600

488,000 17,800

240641

21

45.00093.000

313.000245.000

1921

1927 11 22 5 117,000 10 11 133 4 901928 3 18,500

1,346,600 1,401,100

106.950182.950 555,275 608,003

3 4 8 1 4 5 691927 216 216 21 42 1 6,000

18,0001

1928 205 205 13 26 2 2 3 615,000 1091927 26 261928 43 431927 169 169 1 3,300 21928 171 171 I 23,666 6

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 51: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Waltham, Mass______ 1927 140 784,500 1,003,100 1,072,459 1,028,030

12,451,095 11,316,8501.751.5001.071.500

512,900 844,700

140 43 427,750 421,70034.000 22,800 42,30092.000

535,000 375,500

86 1 12,000 1 13 152.000154.000

52 1 30,000165,500

6421928 177 177 46 92 12 51 6

Warren, Ohio................ 1927 306 306 6 12 3 15.500 14,00050.500

31928 292 292 2 4 2 4 2 20,000 6

Washington, D . C ____ 19271928

1,863 1,307

1,8631,307

715

1430

4 6 6257

8, 592,500 15,392,500

551,000 422,500

1,8242,592

16563

827,0002,800,000

12,00094,000

231376

Waterbury, Conn____ 1927 367 367 70 140 55 1 31928 225 225 48 96 25 153 9 30

Waterloo, Iowa............. 1927 142 142 1 14,000 21928 266 266 1 4,000 4

Watertown, Mass........ 1927 107 773, 500 568,600

107 326 2.855.2001.678.200

6521928 80 80 187 374

Watertown, N. Y ........ 1927 50 255,550 275,800

501928 51 51 1 3,000

51,50057.00037.000

2West New York, N . J - 1927 24 143,500 24 5 10 6 405.000

419.500 18,50092.000

3,854,500 2, 220,000

363.000547.500 73,76837.000 88,900

187,90051.000

140 4 315,00020,00049,000

109Wheeling, W . Va_____

192819271928

214787

20,500 789,490 549,280

3,015,850 3,578,700 2,533,785 3,076,615 2,023,066

214787

76

1412

56

60,00051,688

77

622

1428

38

12

58

White Plains, N . Y___

Wichita, Kans_______

19271928 1927

271298768

271298768

226

23

240,000 63,500

131,750 300,500 53,300 28,000

219,020 168,425 81,000

441246

221

11.40032.4003.0005.000

242

472215

859442167

251

160,000471,00013.00047.000

28100

5

Wichita Falls, Tex-----19281927

882496

882496

4416

8832

1 1 287

21620

3 20

1928 198 835,788 729,657 397,215 696,100

1,009,095 615,250 549,390

198 6 12 3 12Wilkes-Barre, Pa......... 1927

192814991

14991

2821

5642

1 10,000 2 55

2041

1 8,200 3Wilkinsburg, Pa_____ 1927 114 114 9 18 3 18,000 3 3 11 6 130,300 20

1928 90 90Williamsport, Pa......... 1927 132 132 13 76,700

141,50026 7 75.200

13.200 351,000

51 4 75,500 241928 108 108 21 42 10 26,000

13,00020,3006,400

10 3 9Wilmington, Del_____ 1927 304 2,001,205

2,133,163 178,200 195,000

304 2 2 4 54 2 32.00028.000

661928 323 323 3 3 2 126,000 33 1

Wilmington, N . C ___ 1927 53 53 6 18,20027,000

12 2 31928 52 52 6 12

Winston-Salem, N . C .

Woonsocket, R . I____

19271928 1927

69061671

3,324,101 2,842,385

318.800164.800

2,913,550 1,930,635 5,751,685 6,933,910

372,500 575,300

4,476,100 4,389,835

424,206 346,285

9061671

52520

24,050 103,950 169,300 41,000

586,000 327,400

1.543.8001.205.800

105040

96

58,21530,300

147

43679

325,155463,725

86,000 65,500

20025639

361

29.500 157,00017.500

9364

1928 36 36 6 12 6 31Worcester, Mass.......... 1927 469 469 67 134 7 68,500 14 48 684,100

251,500 18,262,800 21,074,500

1781928 324 324 39 78 15 72

Yonkers, N . Y .............. 1927 591 591 137 274 2 20,000 2 155 3,2073,306

3 335.000339.000

8,000

72801928 622 622 104 208 136 4

York, Pa........................ 1927 99 99 1 31928 144 144

Youngstown, Ohio___ 19271928

928777

928777

5033

420,200252,400

10066

2720

233,400 196,700

10,000

3629

113

186,000205,000

12,0005,000

5357

4 123,000 31

Zanesville, Ohio______ 1927 105 105 1 2 1 41928 128 128 3 21,500 6 1 4

Total:302 cities.................. 1927 164,268

145,322789,382,883715,317,535

164,268145,322

25,22719,963

208,578,118 153,157,386

50,45439,926

3,329 34,978,625 26,702,412

5,3994,283

13,663 12,070

736,830,499 776,520,458

179,177 190,346

1,768 1,528

90,666,916 90,754,524

19,580 19,780310 cities................. 1928 2,625

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 52: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Numoer and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by 'permitissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

00

City and State YearGrandtotal

families

Population

Census of 1920.

Estimate for specified

year

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

Esti­mate for specified

year

Non hou sekeepin g dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

Lodging houses

Number Cost

Other

Number Cost

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

Number Cost

Akron, Ohio............ .

Alameda, Calif.____

Albany, N . Y ______

Allentown, P a ........ .

Altoona, Pa________

Amsterdam, N . Y__

Alton, 111.................. .Anderson, In d ........ .

Asheville, N . C ____

Ashtabula, Ohio___

Atlanta, Ga________

Atlantic City, N . J_

Auburn, N . Y _____

Augusta, G a_______

Aurora, HI_________

Baltimore, M d _____

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

2,5212,557

2395045586156815562821556742

167456

370

2,563 3,170

248 57 20 31

344 318 418 301

3,546 2,884

208,435

113,344

” 73,’ 502

60,331

33," 525

'24,'682 29,767

28,507

"22"082

200,616

"50,"707'

36,192

52," 548

36,397

733,826

120.9122.783.0

175.049.254.3 92.775.646.725.720.012.567.7

153.290.0

157.5129.817.2 9.1

127.8158.0 48.911.25.58.6

65.560.5

114.882.7 48.3

46.751.170.2 55.941.6 22.418.7 11.6

102.9124.345.810.4

61.256.189.963.9 43.3 34.7

$5,000

$40,000

230,000

4,244,750 42,000

2,450,000

$300,000

300.000475.000

27,061

30,000

340,000

146,540

306.000331.000

2,2082,200

2021844064045394952681564830

162 339 253 332 2783720

1,740.1,698

124511631

328 278 366 267

3,3712,507

$12,191,595 12,469,148

923,556 1,469,224 7,238,500 7, 935,200 3, 557,700 3,395,000 1,392,135

957,151 439,500 242,600 567,724

1,206,100 881,550

1,755,160 1,749,300

169.700 150,250

6,885,011 9,968,489 2,017,968 4,546,015

111.700 159,125 901,318 962,184

1,991,5251,561,549

14.661.00015.441.000

BUILDING

PEBM

ITS IN

THE PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 53: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Bangor, M e_________

Battle Creek, M ich ___

Bay City, M ich____

Bayonne, N . J______

Beaumont, T ex___Belleville, 111............Bellingham, Wash_

Berkeley, Calif.........

Bethlehem, P a.........

Binghamton, N . Y_.

Birmingham, A la . . .

Bloomfield, N. J ___

Bloomington, HI___

Boston, M ass.......... .

Bridgeport, C onn ...

Brockton, Mass____

Brookline, Mass___

Buffalo, N . Y . ........ .

Burlington, Iow a....

Butler, P a___Butte, M ont..

Cambridge, M ass_____

Camden, N . J...... ..........

•Canton, Ohio_________

Cedar Rapids, Iow a....

•Central Falls, R . I ____

(Charleston, S. C .......... .

1927 33 25,978 0 ) 12.71928 38 0 ) 14.61927 268 36,164 46,100 74.11928 177 47,200 48.91927 42 47,554 49,400 8.81928 57 49,600 12.01927 344 76,754 93,100 44.81928 436 95,300 66.81928 540 40,422 56,300 133.61928 136 24,823 (') 54.81927 348 25,585 0) 136.01928 264 0) 103.21927 867 56,063 69,400 164.61928 1,330 71,000 237.21927 230 50,358 66,000 46.71928 223 67,600 44.31927 310 66,800 73,900 46.41928 306 74,800 45.81927 3,019 178,806 217,500 168.81928 2,589 222,400 144.81927 1,062 22,019 0) 482.31928 675 (9 306.61927 96 28,725 (*) 33.41928 90 0) 31.31927 5,316 748,060 793,100 71.11928 6,805 799,200 91.01927 497 143,535 0) 34.61928 388 0) 27.01927 176 66,254 0) 26.61928 141 0) 21.31927 472 37,748 44,800 125.01928 566 45,700 147.31927 3,373 ........ 556,"775 650,000 66.61928 3,181 555,800 62.81927 93 24,057 38.71928 55 22.91928 40 23,778 0) 16.81927 1 41,611 43,300 .21928 7 43,600 1.71927 636 109,694 123,900 58.01928 863 125,800 78.71927 559 116,309 133,100 48.11928 350 135,400 30.11927 512 87,091 113,300 58.81928 374 _ 116,800 42.91927 145 ..........45,'566' 54,100 31.81928 157 58,200 34.51927 74 24,174 30.6.1928 44 _ 0 18.21927 38 67,957 75,000 6 .61928 46 75,900 6.8

i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.

68.137.68.5

11.536.945.895.9

124.9187.334.8 33.041.940.9

138.8116.4

67.085.1

105.4121.761.357.2

.21.651.368.642.025.8 45.232.026.827.0

5.16.1

639,000

550.000 348,500150.00015,000

25,000

700,000

260,000

10,00

187,636

66,000543,000

63.00054.000

117,4507^000

5,085,00080,00018,000

60,000

32 37

256 169 42 55 97 74

542 136 320 252 646 460 145 152 169 166

2,465 1,918

481 405 87

- 86 1,969 2,160

327 250 163 136 211 221

1,870 1,516

90 54 40 1 7

190 178 505 330 474 341 145 152 32 23 32 46

27,26,

2,1,

136,600136.550 918,475 752,750 161,425 229,200 848,800968.500 313,477 666,000 826,910224.000 145,280800.551279.850489.000 346,050 264,421 301,214 155,335268.500370.000520.000601.000 807,143947.550 860,960 963,000 864,175732.950 039,650065.100 257,157810.950 257,140178.100258.300 10,000 11,500

107,150581.300 539, 560164.950531.550180.850 637,815 688,940259.100 92,000 91,250

160.300

£§>t"1

CD

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 54: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State

Charleston, W . Va____

Charlotte, N . C............

Chattanooga, T arn___

Chelsea, M ass..............

Chester, Pa__...............

Chicago, 111...................

Chicopee, M a ss ..........

Cicero, HI.......................

Cincinnati, O hio.........

Clarksburg, W . Va___

Cleveland, Ohio...........

Clifton, N . J .................

Colorado Springs, C olo.

Columbia S. C _____

Columbus, Ga______

Columbus, Ohio____

Year

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Grandtotal

families

268 1,052 1,237

596 611 107 142 361 243

41,201 34,447

110 102 559 464

3,212 3,559

76 98

3,631 3,167

567 547 67 95

206 272 325 321

2,430 2,477

Population

Census of 1920

39,607

46,338

‘ 57,"895

43," 187

58,030

2,"76170536,214

44,995

401,247

"27,"869'

796,841

""26,"470'

‘ "§6,"l05 "~37,‘ 524

" ‘ 31,"125

"237,’ 03l'

Estimate for specified

year

0)972,5001,010,300

50,00050.600 45,80046.600

291,400 299,000

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

67.965.1

227.0267.0 102.9105.524.832.962.241.9

152.5127.530.4 28.2

124.2103.1 80.1 88.7 27.335.245.639.7

214.2206.622.3 31.654.972.5

104.4 103.1102.5104.5

Esti­mate for specified

year

50.446.7

188.2150.781.8 83.1 21.828.5 49.932.7

132.8 109.124.822.581.664.877.9 86.0

37.331.3

156.6

41.253.8 71.068.9 83.4 82.8

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost Number Cost

$424,500

"‘ 170,"555"

4,919,00013,432,000

350.000 50,000

325.000 475,60d

Lodging houses

$25,000

25,000112,000

95,000

Other

Number CostNumber

$26,4002,500

40,00077,100

15,0004,650,0003,379,600

68,000

900,0001,115,000

1,400,000

660,00068,000

Total new housekeep­ing and isonhouse- keeping dwellings

Cost

215 $855,900236 Ir 310,900651 3,, 122,260755 4,642,020398 1,584,280358 1,862,87556 423,30076 573,000

317 1,486,500229 1,015,000

10,067 23%484,750' 7,427 lOH* 673,500

91 427,50088 436,300

250 3,328,400168 2,537,600

2,018 19,385,8842,086 22,743,235

72 583,80081 407,235

2 ,224 IT, 738,1001*791 By 122,700

417 2*774,785331 2,539,65067 236,07587 340,440

W5 808,350•m 1,108,000

990,643m . 700,724

1,781 1% 614,3001,60» 11,601,300

BUILDING PEBM

ITS IN

THE PBIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 55: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Council Blufis, Iowa___ 1927 136 36,162 41,600 37.61928 94 42,300 26.0

Covington, Ky_.............. 1927 346 57,121 58,700 60.61928 314 59,000 55.0

Cranston, R . I ................ 1927 452 29,407 36,600 153.71928 559 37,500 190.1

Cumberland, M d .......... 1927 110 29,837 36.91928 67 O) 22.5

Dallas, T ex..................... 1927 986 ........ 158,976" 211,600 62.01928 1,199 __ 217,800 75.4

Danville, 111.................... 1927 192 33,776 38,200 56.81928 164 38,800 48.6

Davenport, Iowa........... 1927 125 ..........56,"727" 0 ) 22.01928 140 (*) 24.7

Dayton, Ohio................. 1927 1,201 152,"559" 180,700 78.71928 732 184,500 48.0

Decatur, 111................— 1927 613 ..........43,"818 56,000 139.91928 339 57,100 77.4

Denver, Colo.................. 1927 1,847 ........ 256,"49l" 289,800 72.01928 1,869 294,200 72.9

Des Moines, Iowa.......... 1927 360 126,468 148,900 28.51928 406 151,900 32.1

Detroit, M ich................. 1927 15,614 993,678 1,334,500 157.11928 15,929 1,378,900 160.3

Dubuque, Iowa.............. 1927 67 ..........39,'H i ' 41,900 17.11928 67 42,300 17.1

Duluth, M inn................ 1927 303 98,917 114,700 30.61928 196 116,800 19.8

Durham, N . C ............... 1927 508 ..........21,"719" 45,700 233.91928 464 47,600 213.6

East Chicago, Ind......... 1927 406 ..........35,"967’ 49,100 112.91928 204 50,800 56.7

East Cleveland, O h io .. 1927 258 ..........27,"292' 0) 94.51928 136 0) 49.8

Easton, Pa....................... 1927 77 33,813 37,900 22.81928 24 38,400 7.1

East Orange, N . J......... 1927 2,140 ..........50,716" 63,300 422.01928 968 65,000 190.9

East Providence, R . I . 1927 249 ..........21,"793’ 0) 114.31928 271 0) 124.4

East St. Louis, 111........ 1927 585 66,767 73,100 86.61928 501 74,000 75.0

Elgin, HI........................ 1927 262 ..........27,‘ 454’ 35,000 95.41928 207 36,000 75.4

Elizabeth, N . J .............. 1927 1,650 ......... 95,"783" ft) 172.31928 1,002 ?i) 104.6

Elkhart, Ind................... 1927 224 24,277 (l) 92.31928 155 (1) 63.8

Elmira, N . Y .................. 1927 116 45,393 49,500 25.61928 120 50,000 26.4

i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.

32.722.268.953.2

123.5149.1

46.655.150.342.3

66.539.7

109.559.463.763.524.226.7

117.0115.5 16.015.826.416.8

111.297.5 82.740.2

20.3

338.1148.9

80.067.774.957.5

23.424.0

117,000

700,0002,234,000

50,000

1,346,940 172,000

27,500

1,030,000

600,000

6,000

75,000

15.00025.000

50,000

90,000

>9,291

16,000183,100

3,493,3002,433,000

20,000

1,000

41,000

200,000

426,000

10980

31224040347110066

810906186138122136795383592333

1,3981,225

321342

8,3149,513

6756

29418544041226110338235820

225119223242447406249199460321221141113105

466,300 261,400

1,037,700 984,200

2,262,050 2,775,200

484,288 284,010

2,453,030 3,354,924

833,196 599,086 676,170 635,650

5.188.900 6,026,7793.185.400 1,967,5007.871.900 8,482,300 1,514,104 1,675,328

69,022,207 69,053,106

252,325 289,500

1,426,174 975,150

1,374,305 1,582,935 1,952,242

950,850963.000186.000 563,785 202,425

9,981,850 4,631,1501.109.400 1,478,025 2,360,097 1,843,880 1,204,560 1,055,5707.055.0003.451.000

859,605 590,261 765,962

1,306,100Crc

&ENEBAL TA

BLE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 56: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART I.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

OrfcO

City and State YearGrandtotal

families

PopulationBatio of families

provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

Estimate for specified

yearCensus of 1920

Esti­mate for specified

year

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

Lodging houses

Number Cost

Other

Number Cost

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

N um ber Cost

E l Paso, Tex.........

Erie, P a ......................

Evanston, 111............

Evansville, In d ........

Everett, M ass...........

Everett, W ash..........Fall River, Mass___

Fitchburg, Mass___

Flint, M ich...............

Fond du Lac, W is........

Fort Smith, A rk___Fort W ayne, Ind___

Fort Worth, Tex___

Fresno, Calif.............

Galveston, Tex_____

Gary, Ind -.................

Grand Rapids, M ich ..

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

158310444397

1,4239454204204402831232511106725

3,5592,221

61 485 407

3,160 1,758

157 146 571 369

1,675 890

1,709

77,560

‘ 93,'372

’ 37,"234

85,264

40,’ 120

27,644 120,485

41,029

9i,599

23,427

'28,’ 870* 86,549

106,482

"45,086"

44,255

'"S5,"378

"137,'634*

113,500117,800

846,40047,600

98,10042,90043,300

0)132,600134,30044,70045,200

142,700148,800

20.440.047.642.5

382.2 253.849.349.3

109.770.544.5 20.89.1

16.36.1388.5242.536.7 25.221.156.047.0

296.8165.134.832.4

129.083.4

302.5 160.7124.265.0

13.926.3

306.7198.543.5 42.8

102.665.4

18.98.215.05.5

249.4149.3

47.038.7

193.2 103.025.222.8

114.472.9

196.699.9

105.6 54.5

$42,78080,000

400,000

185.000190.000

$99,000250,000

75,216

370,00091,800

$32,761

1,107,121 185,000

2,000

2,300,000704,141 81,076

1,585,109 8,500

206,792

305,650400,00025,000

28,00040,000

135,000

71 $518,345242 980,426392 2,621,900360 2,203,500447 12,120,500263 7,899,000409 1,720,900400 1,488,250218 1,319,50091 977,600

110 262,300186 1,089,88495 544,23661 234,90022 110,500

3,399 12,233,6421,895 8,586,944

86 295,74056 203,00062 186,488

483 3,585,846404 2,313,815

14,990,7402,2951,417 8,792,021

151 743,953122 480,645558 1,391,064338 1,546,686979 6,004,512699 3,729,575

1,661 6,916,600867 3,719,100

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 57: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Great Falls, M ont__

Green Bay, W is........

Greensboro, N . C___

Greenville, S. C ........

Greenwich, C o n n ...

Hagerstown, M d___

Hamilton, Ohio........

Hammond, In d ........

Hamtramck, M ich ..

Harrisburg, Pa..........

Hartford, Conn........

Haverhill, Mass____

Hazleton, Pa.............

Highland Park, Mich__

Hoboken, N . J..........

Holyoke, Mass..........

Houston, Tex............

Huntington, W . Va___

Hutchinson, Kans__ Indianapolis, Ind___

Irvington, N. J_____

Jackson, M ich..........

Jacksonville, Fla____

Jamestown, N . Y ___

Jersey City, N. J___

Johnstown, P a .........

1927 260 24,121 0) 103.61928 260 0) 107.81927 168 3i,'oi7" 35,600 54.21928 186 36,100 60.01927 455 19,861 60,300 229.11928 446 51,900 224.61927 119 23,127 0) 51.51928 193 P) 83.51927 363 22,123 P> 164.01928 344 0) 155.51927 97 28,064 y> 34.61928 82 0) 29.21927 362 39,675 43,770 91.21928 410 44,200 103.31927 1,141 ..........36,004~ 54,200 316.91928 698 56,000 193.91927 70 48,615 93,800 14.41928 89 _ 99,800 18.31927 319 75,'917" 85,700 42.01928 206 86,900 27.11927 1,270 138,036" 168,300 92.01928 1,363 172,300 98.71927 99 53,884 18.41928 68 __ _ 0) 12.61927 126 32,277" 37,500 39.01928 57 38,300 17.71927 366 ..........46,’ 499’ 81,700 78.71928 117 86,400 25.21927 22 68,166 <l) 3.21928 5 0) .71927 275 60,203 6u,400 45.71928 86 60,400 14.31927 4,536 138,276 328.01928 4,463 0) 322.81927 194 "50,"l77" 66,900 38.71928 87 68,600 17.31928 146 23,298 0) 62.71927 2,400 314,194 374,300 76.41928 2,511 382,100

W79.9

1927 2,562 25,480 1,005.51928 1,022 0) 401.11927 206 48,374 61,700 42.61928 250 63,700 51.71927 2,098 91,568 138,900 229.11928 1,658 140,700 181.11927 225 38,917 45,100 57.81928 169 46,000 43.41927 1,287 298,103 321,500 43.21928 2,155 _ 324,700 72.31927 128 67,"327" 73,000 19.01928 73 73,700 10.8

* Population not estimated by Census Bureau.

47.351.590.5 85.9

1 30,0001 45,000

1 505,000

82.792.8

210.5124.6

7.5 8.9

37.223.775.579.1

31

352,00043,000

33.614.944.813.5

45.514.2

21

62,00012,000a 270,000

29.012.7

64.165.7 4 1,030,000

1 120,00033.4 39.2

151.0 117.849.936.740.066.417.5 9.9

2 222,0001 2 2,000

97 482,103155 789,830166 769,555176 834,180403 2,158,522418 2,030,865113 425,175178 759,547275 4,204,335266 4,559,30076 902,08565 300,510

362 1,244,724407 1,538,487764 4,999,700515 2,759,70048 288,55064 404,200

319 1,811,100205 1,214,500385 6,451,139278 4,693,26983 386,10059 271,40084 793,28841 343,26415 1,296,0007 364,5002 72,0004 70,500

68 1,283,05050 492,800

3,361 15,162,9553,440 18,088,385

164 630,72562 467,900

131 467,2701,667 9,401,2591,524 11,254,100

618 11,469,928207 5,141,800193 910,100242 1,107,450

1,585 6,413,0251,215 5,263,115

188 1,005,300165 855,000258 4,874,800259 7,671,000115 659,19561 345,160

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 58: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

City and State

Joliet, HI...................

Joplin, M o...............

Kalamazoo, M ich ..

Kansas City, Kans.

Kansas City, M o . .

Kearny, N . J...........

Kenosha, Wis.........

Kingston, N. Y ___

Knoxville, Tenn . _.

Kokomo, Ind_____

Lakewood, O h io ...

Lancaster, Pa..........

Lansing, M ich........

Lawrence, Mass___

Lebanon, P a ...........

Lewiston, M e--------

Year

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Grandtotal

families

206 180 128 151 193 165 387 321

3,104 1,969

696 857 303 295 134 126 818 940 45 82

582 537 247 154 420 443 43 32 32 19 43 77

Population

Census of 1920

38,442

“29,"902

48,487

"ioi,’ i77

324,416

“ 26,"724'

""45,"472

77,818

“30,‘ 567

"41,'732

" 53,"Iso'

”57,"327"

’ 94,"275"

24,643

“31,"791'

Estimate for specified

41,50041,900

855,500 56,400

117,500 118,300 383,100 391,000

854.600 56,500

0)0 102,100 105,400 39,100 40,400 62,200 65,000 57,700 58,30075.60079.600 0)

36,100 36,600

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

46.842.850.539.834.038.231.795.760.7

260.4320.774.972.950.247.2

105.1120.815.027.3

139.5 128.746.529.073.377.34.6 3.4

13.07.7

13.5 24.2

Esti­mate for

year

49.643.0

34.829.332.9 27.1 81.050.4

55.552.2

80.189.211.520.393.682.6 42.826.455.655.7

11.921.0

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

$341,200

20,000180,000

32,400210,000

1,390,000

Lodging houses

Number Cost

$7,000

13,200

16,000

Other

Number Cost

24

$370,000

222,00050,000

512,000

5,000

'§6,"155'

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

Number

189154115103193153 387 293

1,169 1,047

358 300 262 281 130 118 712 801 42 42

203 134 254154 372 441231332192828

Cost

$1,873,6001,412,900

414.200932.400 641,100 640,525 720,950 655,620

8,977,864 7,859,200 2,747,400 2,945,000 1,633,297 2,484,518

719.400

3,052,853 3,909,541

163.500 350,262

2,893,755 3,562,400 1,396, 500

839,050 1,795,165 2,004,800

204,800 104,200191.500 101,000135.500 164,000

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 59: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Lexington, K y ................

Lima, Ohio.....................

Lincoln, Nebr.................

Little Rock, Ark............

Long Beach, Calif.........

Lorain, Ohio...................

Los Angeles, Calif.........

Louisville, K y ................

Lowell, Mass..................

Lynchburg, V a..............

Lynn, Mass....................

McKeesport, Pa............

Macon, Ga—...................

Madison, Wis.... ............

Malden, Mass................

Manchester, N. H _____

Mansfield, Ohio.............

Marion, Ind....................

Marion, Ohio..................

Medford, Mass...............

Memphis, Tenn.............

Meriden, Conn__..........

Miami, Fla.....................

Milwaukee, W is............

Minneapolis, M inn____

1927 160 41,534 48,100 38.51928 104 48,700 25.01927 35 41,326 48,700 8.51928 19 49,700 4.61927 388 54,948 69,900 70.61928 497 71,100 90.41927 514 65,142 77,500 78.91928 527 79,200 80.91927 1,479 55,593 104,200 266.01928 3,099 0) 557.41927 237 ..........37,295” 44,000 63.51928 227 44,900 60.91927 20,801 ........576,‘ 673' (0 360.71928 21,081 ___ 0) 365.61927 1,574 234,891 320,100 67.01928 1,542 329,400 65.61927 79 112,759" 0) 7.01928 50 2 110,296 4.41927 89 30,070 38,600 29.61928 114 38,600 37.91927 528 99,148 104,800 53.31928 501 105,500 50.51927 246 46,781 49,900 52.61928 203 50,400 43.41927 352 52,995 60,100 66.41928 321 61,200 60.61927 489 ..........38,‘ 378' 48,800 127.41928 542 ______ 50,500 141.21927 415 49,103 52,900 84.51928 718 53,400 146.21927 165 78,384' 84,800 21.11928 116 _ 85,700 14.81927 157 27,"824" 0) 56.41928 127 (l) 45.61927 77 ........ 23,’ 747" 32.41928 158 66.51927 128 ........ 27,'89l" (l) 45.91928 172 0) 61.71927 628 39,038 51,300 160.91928 745 52,900 190.81927 1,865 162,‘ 35I" 178,900 114.91928 1,887 190,200 116.21927 211 ..........29,'867' 36,800 70.61928 137 37,100 45.91927 698 29,571 140,000 236.01928 124 156,700 41.91927 4,252 ‘ 457,‘ l47‘ 536,400 93.01928 4,965 ______ 544,200 108.61927 2,189 380,582" 447,700 57.51928 2,240 455,900 58.9

i population not estimated by Census

2 270,000

72

178,00031,0001 40,000

122

500,000 1,851,000

90,000

1916

1,979,5001,000,200

55

400.000285.000

1 225,000

2 11,000

1 8,000

2 520

1 100,000116224

100,000 25,000

3,725,000470.000535.000453.000

2 40,000

21

136,00065,000

2355

200,000 355,882364.000438.000

sau. 1 State census, 1925.

971,558843,400152.600 86,100

2,067,590 1,872,712 1,613,018 2,579,137 6,321,365 8,721,515

811,300 815,140

64,057,617 61,977,327 9,452,570 8,250,308

340,500170.600 364,523 499,710

1.986.5001.898.500 1,512,523. 980,535

1,237,065 1,248,170

2,030,5252,307,250

724,825564,625732,800663.000 161,840382.000 384,650 439,900

3,273,900 3,689,450 5,866,295 6,100,030

818, 550 778,200

1,639, 256 617,855

22,197, 632 20,050.151 9,418; 200 9,268,920

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 60: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

Oxo

City and State

Mobile, Ala...............

Moline, 111.................

Montclair, N . J ........

Montgomery, Ala—

M t. Vernon, N. Y ._

Muncie, Ind ..............

Muskegon, M ich___

Muskogee, Okla------

Nashville, Tenn.......

Newark, N . J ............

Newark, Ohio...........

New Bedford, Mass___

New Britain, Conn___

New Brunswick, N . J~

Newburgh, N . Y ......... .

Newcastle, Pa-............. .

Year

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927

Grandtotal

families

387638158109334

7262,2111,636

31737111910492

116654753

5,1443,288

6610815142

5373271952109074

182143

Population

Census of 1920

60,777

30,734

28,"810

43,464

‘ 42," 726

36,524

36," 570

"30,"277

118,342

‘ 414,"524'

~26,~7i8

'I2i,"2i7‘

"5 9 ’ 3i6

“ 32,"779

30,366

‘ 44,‘ 938

Estimate for specified

year

67,70069.600 35,10035.600

8(947.600 63,100 53,300 54,70045.80046.800 45,50046.600 32,900 33,200

137,800139.600 466,700473.600

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

63.7105.051.435.5

115.9112.190.4

167.0 517. 5382.986.8

101.632.528.430.438.355.363.6

124.179.324.740.412.5 3.5

90.555.159.564.129.624.440.5

Esti­mate for specified

57.291.745.030.6

115.1 414.8299.169.279.3 26.222.3 28.034.9 47.553.9

110.269.4

75.444.948.951.3 23.229.567.523.4

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

$75,000

600,000236,000

603,000

‘560,"ooo

850,000

30,000

'218,“OOO

Lodging houses

Number Cost

$24,000

Other

Number Cost

$29,500

65,000

210,000

40,000

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

Number

19611220924430736467835437830334011910692

10655960094656266

108133 39

281204122134 82 68

165138

Cost

$1,035,500 1,690,456

735,125 553.084

3,622,107 3,702,8241.420.000 1,259,355

11,838,300 10,991,935 1,120,296 1,134,885

334.350 921,010224.500314.350

2,273,650 1,916,074

26,081,407 17,594,563

220.500 338,300 858,600 281,100

2.184.000 2,002,950

744,700 1,065,925

533,140 429,800 989,850 938,825

BUILDING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 61: bls_0500_1929.pdf

New Haven, Conn____

New London, Conn___

New Orleans, La___

Newport, K y ............

Newport, R . I ...........

Newport News, V a .

New Rochelle, N . Y___

Newton, Mass..........

New York City, N .Y .: The Bronx...............

Brooklyn................ .

Manhattan............ .

Queens......................

R ichm ond..............

Niagara Falls, N . Y „ .

Norfolk, Va...................

Norristown, Pa ............

Norwalk, Conn............

Oakland, Calif..............

Oak Park, 111................

Ogden, Utah.................

Oklahoma City, O kla..

Okmulgee, Okla____

Omaha, Nebr............

Orange, N . J_______

Oshkosh, Wis............

1927 497 162,537 184,900 30.6 26.9 2 187,230302.000160.000 70,000

130,000

1928 646 187,900(l)

33.6 29.1 41927 176 25,688 68.1 11928 218 0) 84.9 11927 2,077 387,219 424,400 63.6 48.9 3 2,186,127 11928 2,107 429,400

0)(>)

54.4 49.11927 44 29,317 15.01928 43 14.7 2 8,5001927 37 30,255 0) 12.21928 61 2 27,757 20.2 22.01927 65 35,596 51,700 15.5 10.6 1 200,0001928 101 63,300 28.4 18.91927 1,049 36* 213 47,300 289.7 221.81928 1,205 48,800 332.8 246.9 1

1156,00075,0001927 734 46,064 56,000 159.4 131.1

1928 939 57,300 203.9 163.9

1927 30,0261928 33,7681927 33,172 1 170,0001928 28,938 6 5,055,0001927 9,602 . 5,620,048 J 5,970,800 187.8 176.7 20 24,127,000 21 4,056,000

11,593,600535,000

1928 15,983 \ 6,017,600 194.9 182.0 33 49,630,000622,500150,000

181927 31,205 7 51928 28,797 11927 1,615

2,0371 85,000

5,900135,000

1928 2 160,000 11927 397 50,760 66,600

68,30078.2 59.6 2 104,000 1

1928 606 99.7 74.11927 496 115,777 179,200 42.8 27.71928 634 184,200 54.8 34.4 1 168,0001927 66 ..........32,'3i9‘ 35,800 20.4 18.41928 96 36,200 29.7 26.51927 285 ..........27,"743" 0) 102.71928 368 0) 129.01927 2,694 ........ 216,‘ 26l" 267,300 124.6 100.8 3 638,000 1 360.000

600.000 160,000

1928 2,430918

274,10066,600

112.4 88.7 2 282,000 320,000

1,660,000

21927 39,858 230.3 165.1 2 11928 745 57,700 186.9 129.1 51927 200 32,804 38,300 61.0 52.21928 157 39,100

0)47.9 40.2

1927 1,7522,637

16

91,295 191.9 3 622,00020,0001928 0) 288.8 1

1927 17,430 C1) 9.21928 15 0)

219,200222,80036,10036,50033,200

8.61927 477 191,601 24.9 21.8 1 46,0001928 412 21.5 18.5 1 1,000,0001927 722 ^3,268 217.0 200.01928 281 84.5 77.01927 162 33,162 48.9 48.8 1 750,0001928 155 33,200 46.7 46.7

177190128140

1,2721,267

444436606674

330319619767

3,628 2,735 8,621 6,765

210 296

14,272 10,811 1,443 1,436

336 417337 31061 89

243 280

1,698 1,132

261 233 181 142

1,349 2,183

13 11

357 366 97 66

163 163

i Population not estimated by Census Bureau. ’ State census, 1926.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 62: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits Orissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued 00

PART l .—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

C ity and StateGrand

PopulationRatio of families

provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Non housekeeping dwellingsTotal new housekeep­

ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

tOlalfamilies

Census of Estimate for specified

yearCensus

Esti­mate for

Hotels Lodging houses OtherNumber Cost1920 of 1920 specified

year Number Cost Number Cost Number Cost

Ottumwa, Iowa_______ 1927 38 23,003 0) 16.5 38 $248,750 204,800 290,000 405,735

4,035,508 3,383,929

1928 38 (1) 16.5 38Paducah, K y __________ 1927 136 24,735 (1) 55.0 136

1928 94 0) 38.0 1 $200,00060,000

1 $3,000 89Pasadena, Calif_______ 1927 790 45,354 60,500 174.2 130.6 1 503

1928 600 62,10070.80071.800

143,800 144,90072.10073.100 83,500

132.3 96.6 1 36,000170,000

408Passaic, N . J__________ 1927 467 63,841 73.2 66.0 1 1 $40,000 108 2,431,470

1,766,650 3,704,216 2,586.513 2,377,750 1,923,850 1,825,150 2,182, 500

876,833 432,082 155,080

1928 351 55.0 48.9 97Paterson, N . J _________ 1927 1,167

748135,875 85.9 81.2 1 4.000

6.000431

1928 55.1 51.6 1 331Pawtucket, R . I _______ 1927 581 64,248 90.4 80.6 416

1928 455 70.8 62.2 361P p. nr in., Til 1927 349 76,121 45.8 41.8 331

1928 437 84,50049,100

57.4 51.7 369Perth Am boy, N . J___ 1927 192 41,707 46.0 39.1 106

1928 104 50.10037.100 37,800

2,035,9002,064,200

0)

24.9 20.8 69Petersburg, Va________ 1927 44 31,012 14.2 11.9 42

1928 48 15.5 12.7 43 187,650Philadelphia, Pa ___ 1927 12,197

10,576 614

1,823,779" 66.9 59.9 10 1,283,100 3,349,000

25,000

9,083 55,895,475 55,781,580 3,190,075 2,446,922

16,882,851 13,567,969

657,700

1928 58.0 51.2 1 1,000,000 1,468,495

300,000 1,390,000

7 7,862504Phoenix, Ariz_________ 1927 29,053 211.3 2 1

1928 748 (0 257.5 1 599Pittsburgh, Pa ___ 1927 2,588

2,544118

588,343 665,500673,80049,10050,000

Q(1)

44.0 38.9 3 1 60,000297,000

2,0461,772

931928 43.2 37.8 2

Pittsfield, Mass_______ 1927 41,763 28.3 24.01928 211 50.5 42.2 156 1,117,200

3,010,065 2,066,779 4,615,556 6,101,365 1,075,654

920,377

Plainfield, N . J .............. 1927 507 27,700 183.0 2811928 311 112.3 256

Pontiac, M i c h . . . .____ 1927 1,0691,735

508

..........34,"273' 54,00061,500

(1)311.9 198.0 1 200,000

300,000695

1928 506.2 282.1 2 1,309508Port Arthur, T e x .____ 1927 22,251 228.3

1928 210 I1) 94.4 2 462," 500 212

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 63: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Port Huron, M ich ...

Portland, M e .............

Portland, Oreg...........

Portsmouth, Ohio— .

Portsmouth, Va.........

Poughkeepsie, N . Y_.

Providence, E . I .......

Pueblo, Colo...............

Quincy, 111..................

Quincy, Mass.............

Racine, Wis................

Reading, Pa................

Revere, Mass.............

Richmond, Ind ..........

Richmond, V a...........

Roanoke, Va...............

Rochester, N . Y ........

Rockford, HI...............

Rock Island, 111.........

Sacramento, Calif___

Saginaw, M ich...........

St. Joseph, M o...........

St. Louis, M o.............

St. Paul, Minn______

St. Petersburg, F la...

1927 104 25,944 (*)1928 71 0)1927 216 69,272 77,5001928 261 78,6001927 3,166 258,2881928 2,321 h1927 224 33,011 40,5001928 169 41,2001927 79 54,387 60,7001928 85 61,6001927 87 35,000 35,9001928 96 _ 39,1001927 1,188 237,595" 280,6001928 1,134 __ 286,3001927 401 43,050’ 44,1001928 372 _ 44,2001927 181 35,978" 39,5001928 133 39,8001927 926 47,876" 65,3001928 977 67,6001927 609 ..........58,‘ 593’ 71,3001928 681 74,4001927 233 i07,784~ 114,5001928 263 115,4001927 241 28,823 35,2001928 247 36,0001927 228 26,765 0)1928 153 0)1927 1,774 171,567 191,8001928 764 194,4001927 395 50,842 63,2001928 364 64,6001927 2,448 ........295,750" 324,5001928 1,862 328,2001927 926 65,651 80,9001928 779 82,8001927 208 35,177 41,9001928 146 42,7001927 959 ..........65,"908" 74,6001928 917 75,7001927 347 61,903 74,4001928 577 75,6001927 107 77,939 78,5001928 98 78,5001927 5,463 " 772,"897" 839,2001928 7,190 848,1001927 1,148 234,698 250,1001928 773 0)1927 442 14,237 48,5001928 172 53,300

i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.

2 55021

550,00085,000 1 60,000

12

80,000435,000

11

287,000 79,777

1 600,000

i1

200,00075,0001 1,500,000

2 194,1781 1,000,000

1 150,00071

329,50045,000

1 150,000

492

1.995.0002.967.000

240,000

33

249.000361.000

i 20.006

104 346,60070 190,550

158 990,600172 1,046,350

2,347 13,204,3601,693 10,052,285

219 737,945165 615,35066 235,425

242,0557352 518,40068 691,550

714 7,284,400706 7,625,600380 1,016,675331 911,825178 774,050132 529,775618 3,684,300586 3,695,600454 2,863,853422 3,109,193205 1,694,700263 1,587,427174 985,400182 942,545229 1,437,870153 598,342958 8,117,843535 5,200,166

1,664,511363240 1,369,582

1,397 10,207,245968 8,154,887665 4,173,200538 2,721,500157 890,275118 453,500836 3,948,358751 3,347,972346 955,800533 1,619,116107 261,73466 374,200

2,527 18,359,3352,915 22,556,980

6,026,574888699 4,529,238396 1,155,500172 848,100

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 64: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Table A.—Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

o

City and State YearGrandtotal

families

Population

Census of 1920

Estimate for specified

year

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—

Census of 1920

Esti­mate for specified

year

Nonhousekeeping dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

Lodging houses

Number Cost

Otfiers

Number Cost

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

Number Cost

Salem, Mass.................

Salt Lake City, Utah.

San Antonio, Tex........

San Diego, Calif..........

San Francisco, Calif__

San Jose, Calif..............

Savannah, Ga..............

Schenectady, N . Y —

Scranton, Pa_...............

Seattle, Wash...............

Sheboygan, W is...........

Shreveport, L a .............

Sioux City, Iowa-........

Sioux Falls, S. D a k . . .

Somerville, Mass.........

South Bend, In d .........

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

218120850731

2,1712,7842,6132,1468,6746,084

385370401430349269280292

4,5054,658

204188185713267282151211399199540579

42,529

118,110

"161,379

74,683

"558," 676

~39,"642

83,252

88," 723

137,783

"315,"§i2'

" "30,"955'

"43,874"

71,227

25,‘ 262"

93,091

70,983

42.90043.000

135.700138.000 211,400 218,100115.300119.700576.000585.300 44,800 45,50099.70099.900 93,20093.300

143.900144.700375.300 383,200

35,10078.00081.30079.00080.000

101,600 102,700 84,200 86,100

51.3 28.272.0 61.9

134.5172.5349.9 287.3170.5119.697.193.348.251.739.330.320.3 21.2

142.9147.765.960.745.1

162.537.539.659.983.742.921.476.1 81.6

50.827.9 62.653.0

102.7127.6226.6 179.3150.6 103.985.981.340.243.037.4 28.819.520.2

120.0121.6

53.6 25.487.733.8 35.3

19.464.167.2

$35,000

$1,400,000

263.000153.000

2,825,000 2,445,800

6,60015,000 $60,000

884,0001,778,000

175,000

........800‘

255,000

4,30068,000

174,000

94,988

150,000

11478

526449

1,8172,1182,1901,6903,4802,612

311270334317

220184

2,8612,496

19217214456720320913618114469

532566

$1,334,000742.000

3,244, £60 2,297,410 7,846,719 8,661,556 8,360,820 7,400,101

31,796,144 22,465,464

1,273,970 1,301,010 1,434,000 1,429,665 2,369,1501.844.500 1,181,100 1,700,495

16,639,425 17,785,350 1,037,200 1,037,400 1,456,376 2,134,902

833,500 1,058,750

752.000 858,920

1,831,420861,300

2.725.500 2,951,350

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 65: bls_0500_1929.pdf

61318*

Spokane, W a s h ...

Springfield, HI------

Springfield, Mass.

Springfield, M o . .. Springfield, Ohio..

Stamford, Conn___

Steubenville, Ohio.

Stockton, C alif..—

Superior, W is..........

Syracuse, N. Y ........

Tacoma, Wash........

Tampa, Fla.............

Taunton, Mass____

Terre Haute, Ind ._

Toledo, Ohio...........

Topeka, Kans.........

Trenton, N . J..........

Troy, N . Y ..............

Tucson, Ariz............

Tulsa, Okla.............

Union C ity, N . J ...

Utica, N . Y .............

Vallejo, Calif-..........

W aco, T ex...............

Waltham, Mass—

Warren, Ohio..........

1927 595 104,437 109,0001928 574 ____ 109,1001927 354 ‘ 59,"i§3~ 66,4001928 352 67,2001927 1,240 129,614 147,4001928 647 149,8001928 305 39,6§I 51,7001927 285 60,840 71,6001928 315 73,0001927 559 35,096 42,8001928 331 43,8001927 171 28,5081928 191 0)1927 412 40,296 49,8001928 226 51,0001927 84 “39,"67l"1928 136 (*)1927 1,838 171,717 197,0001928 1,561 199,3001927 769 96,965 107,2001928 822 110,5001927 826 51,608 107,8001928 647 113,4001927 91 ..........37," 137’ 40,2001928 60 40,6001927 184 66,083 72,7001928 113 73,5001927 1,749 243,164 305,4001928 1,698 313,2001927 320 50,022 61,9001928 304 62,8001927 316 119,289 136,7001928 223 139,0001927 110 72,013 72,3001928 157 72,300

0)1927 535 20,2921928 336 (41927 1,434 72,075 150,0001928 2,187 ___ _ 170,500

: 1927 255 40,074 64,0001928 84 64,4001927 259 94,156 103,4001928 342 104,200

(01927 26 21,1071928 43 01927 171 38,500 45,7001928 177 46,6001927 285 30,915 36,4001928 362 37,1001927 321 27,050 0)1928 306 0)

57.055.059.859.595.749.977.046.851.8

159.394.360.067.0

102.256.121.234.3

107.090.979.384.8

160.1125.424.5 16.227.817.171.969.864.060.826.518.715.321.8

263.7165.6199.0303.463.621.0 27.536.312.320.444.4 46.092.2

117.1 118.7113.1

i Population not-estimated by Census Bureau.

54.652.6 1 25,00053.352.484.1 1 500,00043.2 1 500,00059.039.843.2 1 20,000

130.6 1 200,66575.6 1 230,000

_________ 1 20,000

82.7 2 70,00022,50044.3 1

93.3 i 250,0007&3 1 80,000 1 55,00071.774.4 1 115 00ft76.6 1 40,000

XXl/p Uw57.1 1 100,00022.614.8 1 300,00025.315.457.354.251.748.423.116.0 1 350,00015.221.7 i 4,000

1 15,000170,0003 1 25,000

27,80095.6128.3

25

135,0001,240,000

2 2 11,50039.813.025.032.8 1 250,000

i 76,000500,00037.4 1

38.078.397.6

2 350,005

513

29559447027226427724825214417330620480

1361,160

552 799 622 70 56

183 113

1,515 1,270

284240 310 18099

128 379 325

1,110 1,337

31 13

238 224 26 44

171172 198241 315 300

2,045,9502,269,0251,649,9101.929.9004.867.650 3,276,050

677,275893.750

1.007.5503.336.1002.474.550

971,600 708,000

1.548.600 831,710280.750 551,850

9.792.300 8,135,200 2,157,590 2,661,000 1,961,895 1,720,260

347,405515.300 555,025 336,050

7,205,3756,658,1251.169.9001.187.5501.775.6501.522.100

664.750790.750

1,668,275 1,297,972 5,931,075 8,853,800 1,045,500

326.3001.545.6002.390.100

106.950258.950

1,058,575631,003

1,406,2501.744.300 1,121,959 1,434,830

O

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 66: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

C ity and State Year

Washington, D . C ........

Water bury, Conn.........

Waterloo, Iowa..............

Watertown, Mass..........

Watertown, N . Y ..........

West New York, N . J~

Wheeling, W . V a...........

White Plains, N . Y ___

Wichita, Kans...............

Wichita Falls, Tex____

Wilkes-Barre, Pa..........

Wilkineburg, Pa............

Williamsport, Pa______

Wilmington, Del...........

Wilmington, N . C .........

Winston-Salem, N , CL-.

Grandtotal

families

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

3,9384,305

675504

759 454

50 53

283 170 182 125

1,204 856 988

1,207 548 222 230 174 166 90

233

365

64923

Population

Census of 1920

437,571

91,715

36," 230

'21,"457

31,285

29," 926

56,208

"2l’ 6§r

"72,"217

40,079

73,833

*24,"403*

36,198

"116," 168'

” §3,372

"48,"395

Estimate for specified

year

96,10099,300

0)90.90091.900 0)(043,60044.000

126,400 128,50038,40039.10077.10080.000

Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of popula­tion based on—-

Census of 1920

73.55. 39.74.

353. 211.16.16.94.56.32. 22.

572.407.136.167.136.55.31.23.68.38.64.46.33. 33. 20. 19.

190.199.

Esti­mate for specified

year

72.978.0

72.8

15.015.7

102.8121.6

25.318.9

53.438.4 29.028.4 17.716.4

119.7 120.6

N on h ou sek eep in g dwellings

Hotels

Number Cost

$1,350,000 3,500,000

Lodging houses

Number

400,000

353,300

640,000

29,750

Cost

Other

Number Cost

$492,000 236,000 98,500 77,000

$12,000

145.000 222; 600

2,800299.000 41,122

620.000

27,350

Total new housekeep­ing and nonhouse­keeping dwellings

Number

1,947 1,385

495 308 143 268 433 267 50 52 39 23

16589

345 334 808 962 519 207 184 117 13590

158 143 313 3306158

753720

Cost

0 5 fcO

$23,805,395 33,337,350 2,948,000 2,040,500

526,900 1,248, 700 3,628,700 2, 246,800

255, 550278.800915.000722.000

1,168,278641,280

7,293, 750 6,718,900 3,044, 535 4,616, 615 2,150,134

900,788 1,055, 777

753, 540 976,400

1,009,095 845, 450

1,029,090 2,438, 327 2,927,463

202.800 222,000

3,813,0663,597,360

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRINCIPAL

CITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 67: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Woonsocket, R . I_.

Worcester, M ass...

Yonkers, N . Y ____

York, Pa..................

Youngstown, Ohio.

Zanesville, Ohio___

Total:302 cities. 310 cities.

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

19271928

154 79

795 474

4,146 4,‘ 216

102 144

1,148 929 111 138

418,878399,657

43,496

132,368

' 29," 569

38,015,164 38,248,312

52,300 53,400

195,500 197,600 118,800 121,300 49,600 49,900

169,400 174,200 0)0)

3 43,919,581 8 44,940,049

35.4 18.244.226.4

413.9420.9 21.630.586.770.237.546.7

110.4104.5

29.414.840.7 24.0

349.0347.620.628.967.8 53.3

95.4 200235

100,000

400,000

69,093,263 114,928,650

1,305,302 780,576

214209

3,500300,000389,60050,000

31,063,923 35,559,169

10149

592381890866100144

1,021833107132

208,748 181,989

29,

591,600 274,800 552,150 899,135 063,285 553, 210 380,500 575,300 838,700 043,935 446,206 372,785

1,961,899,529 1,913,720,710

1 Population not estimated by Census Bureau. 8 See notes to details.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 68: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENT!AL BUILDINGS

City and State Year

Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,

etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost

AlrfOT>, Ohin 1927 3 $818,350 235,500

4,200

9 $427,171 72,500 13,356 42,700

350,000 80,000

25 $223,400 1,332,975

378,630 13,500

100,000

2,262 2,163

257

$762,915 471,537

41 $102,009102,022

5,50015,475

2 $616,00019281927

5 3 27 191

$531,35020,000

28AlarriArla; Hal if 6 2 12 48,090

39,401 377,615 411,215 351,675

3 1 $5,50027,8201928 2 3 187 13 2

Albany, N . Y 1927 4 260,000224.000146.000357.000

1 1 8 144,300438,50095,50045,000

354 22 59,20016,00031,700

1 100,000900,000

1,500198,400

Allentown, Pa________19281927

23

1 23

58,000 230,000 242,500

8,165 201,175

116

358655

310

13

1,250,000530,000

22

1928 7 4 2 517 522,915 97,148 94,427 50,530 55,875 25,452 29,240 27,814 28,080

9 38,100 1 235,000 5Altoona, Pa 1927 3 78,000

832,6908 334 6 5,100 1 25,000

192819271928

4 5 263 2 2,050Amsterdam, N . Y 1 50.000

35.0001 25,000

5,000113

1 1 119 1 3,0009,100

91.50021.500 37,000 37,800

2 5,500 1 250,000Alton, Til 1928 4 21,185

28,000 2,400

84 4 1 78,400Anderson, Ind 1927 3 117,100

1,000,00030.00036.000

3 24, 500 3 128 16 1 400,00019281927192819271928 1927

2 2 1 4,000 198,500 142,250 51,500 36,800

133,100

142 3Asheville, N . C 1 1 2,000

6,70012 216 13

2 5 8 177 20,400 26,330 24,123 35,905

8 2 365,000Ashtabula, Ohio 5 49,800

17,450 287,500

3 116 7 4,150 15,200

172,975

3 8501 25,000

135,500 1,969,500

115,000

2 49,900 333,425 208,500

3,500 115,000

5 3 124 5 2 50,500125,000Atlanta, Ga..... .............. 9 24 7 8 312 45 5 196,372 1

Atlantic City, N . J___192819271928

41

1811

911

361,00020,000

1,0008,5002,000

15,388800

1332

292,750120,000265,000

2,00010,410

29610670

33,656 32,379 33,365 50,252 41,119

2769

97.25042.250 70,0006,800

21

181,500476,000

242

6,122,000 763,800 228,000

Auburn, N . Y __ 1927 4 1 137 4 2 238,00019281927

3 28,826 1 70.000 6,000

11,69023.000

1 2 145 10 16,95046,52731,80029,600

Augusta, Ga 1 *400 2 8 103 9,3994,289

76,36256,494

1,764,5001,304,700

18,50522,61083,53161,955

14 1 7,000 1 9,97519281927

1 25,0006,400

3 2 1 8,500 53 8 3 2,43040,000Aurora, 111________ __ 2 1 3 19,000

27,750723,000

1,144,0004,200

75

5 88,00037,500

302,900

243 11 11928 5 7 192 3 6,600

220,3001 60,000

Baltimore, M d _______ 1927 4 85.00035.000

15 741,000618,500

20 51 3,353 40 4 570,000 5 1.135.0004.152.000

40,000Bangor, M e___19281927

1 7 262

152

106,00053.50026.500

192,40041,400

2,20464

343

373,000875

2 420,000 41

1928 1 2 73 3 4,80032,50018,350

2 265,000Battle Creek, M ich___ 1927

192821

225,0007,000

32

375,00051,000

1614

428,850272,200

57

299239

148

12

1,930,000850,000

55

111,600418,300

BUILD

ING

? PERM

ITS IK

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 69: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Bay City, M ich

Bayonne, N . J.

Beaumont, Tex___Belleville, HI..........Bellingham, Wash.

1927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

i Includes public garages.

Berkeley, Calif............

Bethlehem, Pa_______

Binghamton, N. Y ___

Birmingham, Ala____

Bloomfield, N . J.........

Bloomington, HI_____

Boston, Mass...... ........

Bridgeport, Conn____

Brockton, Mass______

Brookline, Mass..........

Buffalo, N . Y ..............

Burlington, Iowa........

Butler, P a.— Butte, M ont

Cambridge, M ass._

Camden, N . J..........

Canton, Ohio______

Cedar Rapids, Iowa___

Central Falls, R . I ___

Charleston, S. C_____

Charleston, W . V a------

Charlotte, N . C____

50,000130,000

5,000

191,7505,000

15,962138,00016,000

650,626260,963

150.000442.00033.00018.000 82,000

832,500448,000

163,03829.00050.000

237,366100,000

1,140,000121,000

25036,000

53,000

55.00080.000

169,65041,800

60,000

411,112 381,716

200,000

60,000630.000388.000

23,000

175.000175.000

924,700271,000

8,100

40,00064,300

172,500

130.000 158,500

1,00025,000

400.000

79.000 21,91820.000

131,500 40,000

402,400

2410

51,3251,051,350

607,000280,180

19,“655" 12,000

12106

10174132

2521

203,050 241,967233.500 29,800

753,400 895,600

1,991,414 540,850 92,500

20^705"35,000611,600

1,080,000110.500

80,000

7578531

1,907,420 1, 389,902

70,000 39,500 1,800

11513 36 361416 6 5 2

10,000 891,500 159,000 406,985 748,600 464,400 180,075 133,950 595,541 39,000

2959

18

2,65015,00021,500

125,080218,615

37,500

26," 66534,700

8,80014,350

108,71021,50046.80083.800

76.000 323,810 361,93020.00035.000 6,000

14.000 1,506,000

424,00098,700

16,00030.000 93,50035.000

537,258 235,19012.000

9.000 92,400

469,180 37,900 43,750 28,000 15,250 49,1009.000

99,500 15,600 14,305

3,000 18,000

151,5G0 94,200

263,500

286 48,620 6 20,500185 37,181 5 10,25072 38,100 3 2,70075 46,650 3 7,200

155 183,269 10,231 22,845

108166 5 3,100121 13,680 15 184,950666 151,302 8 12,650457 125,990 12 20,080305 182,191 7 65,200241 152,785 8 17,200389 177,799 3 29,000352 110,070 5 51,350311 70,699 47 285,437487 78,865 22 87,900424 188,700

162,6001 1,000

397 2 15,00038 21,500 6 18,00024 13,300 2 8,000

1,189 909,075 19 71,6001,176 946,915 28 242,100

591 268,592 8 138,620455 255,774 17 89,100257 82,300 5 55,465241 77,113 2 2,550120 133,477 3 7,350132 191,145 1 45,000

2,591 1,059,024 87 88,7152,211 686,074 19 16,075

25 8,000 3 6,00096 29,094

19, 74038 1 1,50011 2,898 2 5,15058 10,300 7 14,350

194 175,443 6 25.500205 158,805 6 53,100444 395,800 17 76,150284 107,580 6 39,795724 198,529

112,76221 29,250

570 17 119,650397 79,481 12 48,195360 74,947 13 98,56081 36,615

18,040 2,190

2512 4 8,50024 3,095 3 25,500

163 43,310 11 39,124175 99,190 6 30,20058 9,885 13 34,05081 15,959 9 25,150 .

165,000

540,852

1,485,208

60,150674,812228,500

125,000 1,503,413 1,752,248

37,477

30,000

1,385,000320.000300.000

2,013,170 1,551,000

112,000 150,000

18,000

18,000

14,000

4,20a

"I," 6655,300

39,676

38,500

1,545,062701,434

105,000

218,0003,395,7808,068,000

661,30029,550

513,0002,050,000

320,90032,100

181,0002,058,875

22,000

27,329150,000

559,500941.800536.800

O l

GEISfEftAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 70: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T ables A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in .1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

a>o *

C ity and State

Chattanooga, Tenn___

Chelsea, Mass...............

Chester, Pa___............

Chicago, H I.................

Chicopee, Mass______

Cicero, m ._ _ ...............

Cincinnati, Ohio_____

Clarksburg, W . V a_~

Cleveland, Ohio_____

Clifton, N . J ....... .........

Colorado Springs,Colo_

Columbia, S. C______

Columbus, Ga.............

Columbus, Ohio..........

Council Bluffs, Iowa_

Covington, K y ............

Cranston, R . I ............

Cumberland, M d ____

YearNum­

ber

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Amusement and recreation places

Cost Num­ber

$87,260 173,000

25,000 2,363,000

15,939,500 200,000

175,00050,000

4 102,0002 51,8001 100,000

18 2,845,0006 619, 5001 2,7751 153,000

24,800 1,100

60,000

1,995,000167,00040,0003,000

12,000

13.00049.000

Churches

47

Cost

$281,200154,744

3, COO 20,000

3,371,000 6,855,100

80,000141.000 519,0C0750.00049.5004.000

285.000288.000

8.0005.000 5,727

22,000117.50056.500

9008.000

111, 500152.500

3,000

20,0008,000

*350,000154,00087,500

Factories, shops, etc.

Num­ber

262197

15

1213 1814 7 4

52591010

. . . . .

2

Cost

$207,018147,64343.000

148.700194.800145.000

10,096,600 14,556,300

10.00090.000

415.000368.900

1,468,0C0763.000

3,8C0100.700954.700

1,182,600137.900 339,500

s'ooo'3,400

59.50074.000

112.000 114,000272.800 25,60061.00040.50041.500

101,100 232,52567,250 2,120

Num­ber

Garages (public)

2212156

Cost

$501,250 80,000 23,800 5,000

53,000 9,445,000 4,692,900

49,355 88,000

411,0C0 1,426, SCO

10,000 53,000

958,500 615,300 35,800 63,600 40,750 1,500

1,275 1,044,000

30,200 46,000

16,0009,000

11,400

Garages (private)

Num­ber

253 121 39 51

181 137

7,372 4,994

167 143 187 170

1,659 1,613

134 107

4, 540 3,724

490 . .436

216 217 67 77 62 60

2,681 2,370

82 74

180 125 391 465 124 103

Cost

$85,733 20,617 22,805 27,565

104,440 131,767

2,914,500 1,831,600

53,750 43,575 61,495 54,220

711,045 793,590 51, 680 31,325

1,059,650 876,150 160,425 149,260 30,223 33,015 7,025

14,850 11,102 5,019

782,050 701,340 15,900 19,050 84,210 70,950

164,194 175,999 31,478 30,991

Gasoline and service stations

Num­ber

283207

71

116

2620182

14086

57557

Cost

$138,393 46,000

4,30024.400

113.300 986,50031.400

40094,375 16,100 62,785 57,600 38,350 11,000

217.300132.300

7,17516,9008,075

13.500 40,800 29,9C033.25051.500

110,450 153,400

7,500 500

2,000 10,000 8,140 1,750

21.250

Institutions

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

$175,000

3,970,900 3,600,000

530,000610,800

250,000 4,475,000

$90,000

453,000

Office buildings

Cost

$478,100 1,057,000

23,350

24,700 43,981,950 36,599,213

80,400

59,000 96,500

1,259, 500 1,335,000

140,200 51,000

5,476,600 83,625 29,300

7,000

15,000

1,487,000372,000

134,00052,0002,800

BUILDING

P

EB

MIt

S IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 71: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Balias, Tex...... ..............

Danville, 111...................

Davenport, Iowa..........

Dayton, Ohio__............

Decatur, 111....................

Denver, Colo.................

Des Moines, Iowa........

Detroit, M ich ................

Dubuque, Iow a__........

Duluth, M inn...............

Durham, N . C ..............

East Chicago, Ind........

East Cleveland, Ohio..

Easton, P a .....................

East Orange, N . J_____

East Providence, R. I .

East St. Louis, 111........

Elgin, 111.........................

Elizabeth, N . J.............

Elkhart, Ind__..............

Elmira, N . Y .................

El Paso, Tex..... ............

Erie, Pa..........................

Evanston, HI.................

Evansville, Ind.............

Everett, Mass...............

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

64.00012.000

14,500 29,800

202,500 71,616

650,000

642,000

2,700 10,650

8,776,800 3,647, 500

72,650

54,000

165,0003,700

64,68146.00012.000 60,000

, 059,800

"39,350

168,00077,000

1 18,0001 10,5001 8,0001 1,5004 54,4003 38,100

800,00021,000

326,760 359,100

18,400

20,00039.000

587.50032.000

139.500 166,000 149,200 310,505

1,551,500 1,906,600

75,844

14.50046.50031.500 71,90054.000 89,30080.000 4,000

35,000

242,000

3,00060,00024,00023,500

20,000166,000

2,500

8.700 16,750

182,57017.700 96,000

228,000 65,000

100,000 177,500

7 151,66532 351,3266 50,1601 6,9885 30,9002 70,200

44 795,81545 621,43315 180,00012 118,40015 245,0005 57,000

57,"55l"131 7,939,284172 9,843,388

3 168,550

5 157,00017 170,77513 303,20026 414,55045 956,355

5 68,0902 2,0003 10,3003 140,0004 20,8625 850,000

16 336,8006 108,425

10 182,5314 102,5001 7,0009 326,0008 143,0007 750,9006 32,3252 2,6504 25,800

7 38,1005 39,250

14 169,1003 180,000

6 290,50018 1,348,50012 236,7656 103,913

280,836 124,750

6,500 5,105

60,490 30,000

319,268 611,643 27,050 12,700

330,500 313,000 152,215 46,475

2,457,468 4,339,203

24.00052.50013.000

112,00029.000 6,000

120,00042.500 8,000

18,90728,600

309,80085.00012.000 74,750 15,000

3,00049.00084.00016.000 46,450

45.10028.1003.000

15,875161,000 107,385 131,000 90,000 64,850

111,9002.000 3,950

190212

34

280 230

1,317 1,061

658 465 810 672 526 497

11,501 11,067

208 141 390 156 14 12

127 84

126 106

395311240264442336325308619526218252249232172206772612556379380 397 183 172

46,927 41,448 2,900 1,800

58,432 46,012

701,075 550,399 163,045 104,910 380,150 327, 500 84,828 76,371

3,089,379 2,875,042

60,873 39,594 93,655 34,814 5,980 3,365

52,039 37,764 32,035 27,196 83,120 46,819

394,039 280,875130.500 110,14283,316 74,154

116,373 102,005221.500184.500 44,447 56,580 52,021 43,034 25,080 44,969

205,326 151,709 330,755 285,775 49, 571 47,72987.25075.250

38

111

111721112113

100,35097.900 11,74269.900 56,5006,200

121,80058,000

131,000 72,750 42,400 74,950

664,718 364,87022.300 9,500

15,87552,72947,80042.00066.500 8,740 1,950

20.300 5,900

10,435 53,05099.00030.000

5,80039,100 54,64211.70017.50030.00065.000 38,55028.700 4,400

27.300 500

41, 759 9,150

37,20028.000 20,000 75,690

155,250

21,00085,200

28,000

‘so,“ooo'50.000

187,400 120,000

40,000 3,370,000 1,145,774

2,50024,50030,000

1,000,000

301,000

14,5006,000

40,000400,00098,100

140,500

443,260102,640

930,000

"713,’ 565

2,254,000425.000111.000

5,15020,980,340 6> 139,974

60,000 121,000

257,800500,000

75,000

157, 500 461, 200 10,00092.000

1,024,50025.000

600,060880,000102,500

30,000

4,500 29,300

400,000 351,500 128,400

GENEBAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 72: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

O00

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State Year

Amusement and recreation places

Num­ber Cost

Churches

Num­ber Cost

Factories, shops, etc.

Num­ber Cost

Garages (public)

Num­ber Cost

Garages (private)

Num­ber Cost

Gasoline and service stations

Num­ber Cost

Institutions

Num­ber Cost

Office buildings

Num­ber Cost

Everett, Wash______Fall River, Mass-----

Fitchburg, M ich____

Flint, M ich__............

Fond du Lac, Wis.__

Fort Smith, Ark____Fort W ayne, Ind-----

Fort W orth, Tex____

Fresno, Calif..... .........

Galveston, Tex..........

Gary, In d ...................

Grand Rapids, M ich

Great Falls, Mont__.

Green Bay, W is........

Greensboro, N. C ___

Greenville, S. C ........

Greenwich, Conn___

Hagerstown, M d -----

Hamilton, Ohio-------

192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$18, 525 199,150

175.000 514,500942.000

229,80010,000

21 135,51210 66,5003 427,1531 25,0003 3,5503 100,3005 868,5002 12,800

22,00057,656

142,000

""'5,"ooo'

"557,"565'

157,214

$8,000188,000200,000

160,000 355,150 63,545

$11,000 25,450 50,59045.00069.000

1,026,348580,225

345,87214.000

115,865 283,69827,30050.000 6,500

75,000 145,700299.000287.000 115,30042,500

127.000 117,450 472,600 195,300174.000

78,000

107,00012,0001,000

6,550 31,900

251,190 100,068 78,914

188,682 10,250 23,125

494,050 8,000

86,45071.000

305,600 556,80043.000 8,350 2,200 3,500

347,543 247,22518.000 4,700

75.00031.000 54,700 22,95025.000 1,400

46

103494

$24,950 21,850

182,700 10,500

111, 149 155,747

5,000

40,400 61,100

484,168 371,137

7,500 2,800

12,000 184,500 110,800 81,000

185,900 39,500

124,230 24,600 7,100

233,00036,000

1,0003,000

86,70052,500

174 200 132 10459

2,2151,706

172149151810716496296221158213178825608

2,4021,498

167157312233115984826

120119162136175 189

$10,640 71,690 43,834 32,365 17,885

666,616 528,769 34,592 22,231 19,579

275,988 208,592 77,795 52,495 35,982 26,450 23,248 29,476

293,475227.790 669,735363.790 47,236 43,800 62,239 39,338 15,675 15,393 14,2002,450

75,020 110,725 37,255 27,030 38,521 53,072

$17,200 8,315

39,950 ‘2,375 6,900

45,695 206,065

12,700 8,930

25,430 48,500 91,783

100,502 61,457 17,350 19,677 5,250 2,000

29,925 24,450

117,600 79,160 6,000

11,200

1,62536,00045,150

6,0002,500

10,00025,000

17,950 11,650

$681,00025,000

$11,200 1,157,865 251,600

180,000 631,384 62,162

162,475

1,"685,*804

11,91038,000

97.00040.000

141,200

54,995

"i58,640

158,0001,054,860

""452,"166 13,500

27,880550,000

65,000

4,000

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 73: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Hammond, In d _______

Hamtramck, M ich____

Harrisburg, Pa..............

Hartford, Conn.............

Haverhill, Mass______

Hazleton, Pa..................

Highland Park, M ich .

Hoboken, N . J _ . ..........

Holyoke, Mass..............

Houston, Tex_________

Huntington, W . Va___

Hutchinson, Kans........Indianapolis, Ind..........

Irvington, N . J_______

Jackson, M ich________

Jacksonville, Fla______

Jamestown, N . Y _____

Jersey City, N . J ........ .

Johnstown, Pa________

Joliet, HI______________

Joplin, M o____________

Kalamazoo, M ich_____

Kansas City, Kans___

Kansas City, M o..........

Kearny, N . J.............

Kenosha, Wis................

Kingston, N . Y _______

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

100,00020,000

253,00022,6006,000

240,235206.500152.500

230,000202,290

387,000

18,000903.000309.000350.000182.000

8,0002,450,921

84.000 125,000

" ’ "428,'42235.000

219,30014.000

700,0001,000,000

375

5,000

65.000 192,125 990,000

10.000

740,000

500

18

115.000107.000450.000

120,00060,000

245,938

228,000 315,273

263,200

371.040 643,650147.000160.000 55,000

420.040 1,608,500

5,000

76,300 421,650 361,500

107,000

105,00071.000 6,000

98,70046.00062.000

228,000304.000 61,500 15,200

314,500154.00040.00015.00060.000

254,375 117,000

2,000

424244

161222

4 43 415 2

1459258

1114

10146 2

2517161118

131689

50161075

2

108,30017.500 7,500

85.00032.00037.400

216,000 170,70013,20027,82035,10010.400

115,00034.000 77,80072.500 32,650 26,750

623,675 505,650 132,50010.000

102,929 182,620158.500308.500

301,50059,500

334,254

25,000

68,00050.000 99,90047.000 72,550 84,219

1.5007.500

145.000512.500156.000103.500

12,000 16,900 57,526

172168271259579419147 127 10856

1241551520

110109148 1154 162 120 191

4,5632,755

738

361414320318

29415813721107491

267232203272592402261242371313195164

127,700171,68048,90244,240

197,365161,235466,010462,35344.74538.745

186,62777,12760,32567,92718.750 37,290 54,80045.750 73,155 94,301 37,811 12,500 35,410

1,081,264 712,179 490,079 343,923 83,446 97,494 95,035 64,885

108,225 83,590

301,267 276,799 89,101 75,159 29,250 6,678

30,005 33,493 43,434 36,828 24,615 33,277

122,175 138,975 81,855 82,710

109,395 97,476 63,785 56,065

1004

12

21.700 6,000 5,200 4,500

57.00038.00073,16053.700 7,885

27,35014,0822,9586,0003,000

6,000 34,400 11,350

108,618 163,029

3,800 29,000 24,650

128,850 116,675 17,200 34,300

83,550 96,450 8,800 8,300

13,96161.30094.00020.00017.00030.000 52,5208,750

32,10014.40020.300 3,700

156.200182.20020.400 2,500

42.50012.500 4,250

13.000

23

59.00092.000

133

10,500470,000310,400

124

10,000 2,003,000

367,900

1 1,400

1 50,000

154

35,000859.500100.500

516222

225,5501,999,9126,261,803

9,500

33

862,000665,000

65

28,000116,600

2 538,525

1 900,000 22

160,00098,000

1 300,000

1612

1,391,479663,7002 740,000

112

175.000100.000 52,500

311

37.000 110,00040.000

2 516,0002 40,250

2 77,500

6 785,000 5531

1,552,000441,880105.000395.000

12

100,000313,000

2 315,000 12

115.000145.000

CJCO

GENERAL TA

BLE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 74: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS-*Continued

City and State Year

Amusement and recreation places

Num­ber Cost

Churches

Num­ber Cost

Factories,etc.

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

Garages (public)

Cost

Garages (private)

Num­ber Cost

Gasoline and service stations

Num­ber Cost

Institutions

Num­ber Cost

Office buildings

Num­ber Cost

Knoxville, T en n „.

Kokomo, Ind_____

Lakewood, Ohio...

Lancaster, Pa.........

Lansing, M ich.......

Lawrence, Mass_„.

Lebanon, Pa_____

Lewiston, M e....... .

Lexington, K y .......

Lima, Ohio_______

Lincoln, N ebr____

Little Rock, Ark__

Long Beach, Calif.

Lorain, Ohio_____

Los Angeles, Calif.

Louisville, K y ____

Lowell, Mass_____

Lynchburg, Va___

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$192,000 42,240 3,500

$131,300210,600

6,000

35,00019,000

355,0005,000

125,000

44.00072.00015.000

11

1 65,0001 254,9601 20,0001 170,0001 12,0001 900,000

300.000 500

62,500 156,500118.000

4504,075,925

577,493 1,231,750

40,‘ OOO* 135,000

1,500 8,000

15.000 200,000 343,20042.000 7,000

10.000 102,90012,500

228,750 2,800

99,625 13,000

104,000

1,801,725 1,909,944 1,343,250

948,500 55,000

198142

31

258284

1521

12289,00048,500

$368,256 79,000

124,420

75,0005,800

3,350,000 1,415,400

52,000

$166,800 298,56037.200 10,000 63,500 15,00031.200 35,7008,000

115,000

47.000 26,15025.000 16,500

90,000 5,000

64.500 500

34.500 43,800 10,000

10 87,134

70,000 116,770 198,094

2,836,155 2,071,215

25,700 400

3,017,873 2,919,254 1,121,000 1,191,000

98,400273,450

4,500

1,500 46,800

14697

2,002,734 569,330 643,725 158,510

6,500

202,550 6,600

27092

1972834223231601304634098285

203483017

126132166144471479168168961

1,418195234

10,0258,378

513679180139114

$45,550 14,538 34,034 34,221

113,835 93,976

121,19597.875

139,79092.875 38,915 37,82585.00014.000 2,100

41.000 172,55518,13524.800 18,267 86,528 97,907 32,370 27,711

345,570 521,565 34,519 39,944

2,627,398 2,522,701

149,975 205,35540.800 31,935 15,256 15,524

354472

146775

$40,560 75,425 24,575 28,600 15,000 21,900 5,000

77,625 136,700 24,705

10,000 15,500

500

21,00094.550 28,200 13,200 30,150 21,800 51,7507,300

16.550 36,7803,000

22,000 347,697 410,28154.500 25,30028.50012.625 42,00025.625

$136,800

80,00073,000

300.000225.000

224,000

50,000

9,281,883 1,086,782 1,900,000

80

$87,000572,400

2,600

500.000226.000 75,000

162,000

732, 700

'650,’ 000

3,492,595 4,203,490 2,750,000

900,000

22,9245,500

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 75: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Lynn, Mass................

McKeesport, Pa____

Macon, Ga.................

Madison, Wis............

Malden, Mass______

Manchester, N . H ~ .

Mansfield, Ohio........

Marion, Ind...............

. Marion, Ohio.............

Medford, Mass_____.

Memphis, Tenn____

Meriden, Conn___ _

Miami, Fla.................

Milwaukee, W is____

Minneapolis, Minn_.

Mobile, A la.......... .

Moline, 111..................

Montclair, N . J_____

Montgomery, Ala_._

M t. Vernon, N . Y . ..

Muncie, Ind..............

Muskegon, M ich___

Muskogee, Okla____

Nashville, Tenn........

Newark, N. J............

Newark, Ohio...........

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1027 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

150,500 800

33,900 377,850 32,800 5,000

200,000

500,000

160,000443,000

400.000235.000

67,600788,60097,500

134.000 70,525

2,374,667300.000

1,179,400600

31,000

383,131

6,500150,000

97,0004,500

236,325

214.000 38,500

147,6003,621,000

68,177200.000

73.000 2,200

15,30048.000

199,99733,92647.000

357,123

55.00020.000 58,000

128,000168,35014,300

830,900 40,900 59,500

222,948 361,800 335,700 39,000 68,752

51,80080,000

91,600100,00058.000 7,000

192,095 33,17515.000

275.000 49,15015.000

228.000418.000172.00030.000

140,675 302,800

8,20015.00061.000 48,200

143,072 182,950 179,00070.000 59,9357,400

18,70088.00063.00075.000 17,600 14,300

17,500426,20096,2009,000

93,750 4,500

712,900 1,359,371

719.500 315,725

11,000125.500

.136,856 318,538

15.000175.000124.00020.000

135,518 160,468

7,50021,20016,00015,900

113,700833,500

2,040,5321,348,762

20,000

18 68,570 341 119,035 4 8,00012 35,900 360 117,931 5 6,2406 15,920 182 64,402

54,9565,6009,970

90,404

157 5 22,50050 11 44.100

31.100 69,910

80 77 320,000 390 143 62,500 437 104,800 16 93,300

10 27,200 231 105,291 8 44,2004 40,500 181 81,617 6 37,9003 48,000 246 76,341 3 9507 80,500 196 63,705 10 30,3001 2,000 267 56,890 8 20,6001 8,000 207 39,462

12,8005 17,650

4 24,000 64 9 27,1004 57,000 112 20,160 14 30,000

268 30,210 36,830

179,591

4 4,90022,00027,800

316 314 78,900 343 413 16,200 346 169,612 2 22,5007 319,800 897 254,215 18 140,4005 119,600 934 284,384 23 80,8603 17,000 170 112,113 5 7,050

135456

66,510 116,799

1 2,00075,55032 294,650 35

12 101,750 189 39,698 18 39,55033 901,040 3,723 1,447,334 60 138,72521 786,900 2,711 1,037,086 23 52,21038 163,335

233,8252,562 592,205 76 163,550

45 2,367 577,630 53 138,9253 94,000 11 5,520 12 81,6685 71,600 514 102,530 3 15,4724 31,200 176 49,146 5 13,4813 45,460 160 42,612 4 14,9752 23,000 365 238,871 10 28,553

31690

230,4119,000

3 31,00010,4001 30,000 3

400 40,000 175,627

5 10,000 151,30018 754,000 260 18

23 1 ,310,000 224 134,831 11 47,8004 16,900 437 82,250 10 17,7353 112,905 520 94,783 3 5,490

228 108,687 53,847 12,027

12 106,100 63,150 6,855

253 946 880 13, 795

13,4508 20,500

33,90044,800

io 124,700 136 1113 193, 700 130 13,210 17

134 543,740 1,271 1,615,604 23 171,65012 508,542 942 1,136,609 26 130,6002 11,200 137 27,804 5 17,2002 10,800 167 32,416 4 6,000

11

150,00072,000

11

15.00048.000

211

115, 300 35,000

200,0001 15,000

24

40,300 740,000

1 6,000

343 24 1 3

16 1 24

17 19 1 3

101,500291,200

2,605,10072.000

138,6661,250

41,701 231,919

1,503,250 1,308,825 5,654,150

75.000 628,000

32

166,400 143,000

32133

539.000 879,738140.000 693,21025,000

121

3,50028,000

50011

10,000100,000

754

1,173,000 327,176 38,0001

2743,200 296,750

11

97.50067.500

2 46,000

4

42271

28,000

12

785.000240.000

7,936,402 1,826,644

150.000

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 76: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs j alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State

Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,

etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings

Num ­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost

19271928192719281927192819271928 1927

$1,500 3 $34,000 379

$181,725 114,750

7,000 500,900 109,100138.000 99,000

155.000 67,300

16 $56,30016,500

295 $227,30066,665

212,540113,29033,50023,57548,39051,35079,580

31 $89,450 31,400 36,250 1,0257.000

14,5004.000

5 114 10New Britain, Conn— X 25.000

50.000 100,00018.000

1 324 10 2 $211,000212

91,00053,900

183.000155.000

12 220 1New Brunswick, N . J. 11

33

32

33,00038,17562,20033,42519,500

159106

33

2 $475,000 42

290,000 61,695

2 3 15 97 1inewDurgu9 in* x148,000 3 11 100

New Castle, Pa- 1 38,000 6 3 306 8 33,500 1 270,000 10 392,300192819271928

3 141,00052,000

2 40.000 348,000

1,087,3628,200

35.000 193,072

5 130,000 244 69,920340,723466,000

1 4,00076,55080,500New Haven, Conn____ 4 533.000

205.000 7,600 8,300

234,060268,094

2 14 449 21 6 529,0003 18 9 138,000 331 20 1 90,000 3 364,166

New London, C on n .— 19271928 1927

327

4 180 107,850 105,165 60,277

3 11,2009,000

173,4442 10 96,500

72,529179 2 1 40,000

164*823New Orleans, La_____ 5 101,900 9 7 86 42 1 4 1,686,763

XT otrnnrf XT \r192819271928 19271 QOfi

3 72

504,34356,000

7 44,235 191

37,500 10,000 2,750

20,000 51,100

11056

35,961 26,500

283

65,55016,500

900

22

202,85554,000

3 1,419,037

2 14,4006,000

15,000

1 41 25,760 57,300 49,370 13,549 7,296

208,084

1XT + T> T 5 261,200

3 8001 3 123 4 5,750

8003 1 74,0004,500

1 10 116104

1Newport News, Va----- 1927

192819271928

279

New Rochelle, N . Y __ 1 4,000 3 210,000545,00050,000

7 53,60082,500

244 7 24,000 1 1,500 1 175,0002 2 1,900 9 231 224,352 3 11,600 1 40,000 2 200,700

Newton, Mass________ 1927 4 40,800 1 9 120,500 1 30,000 469 314,901 6 23,850 3 1,260,000 2 59,0001928 3 38,000

9,496,400 4,270,904

12.139.000 6,808,000

15.991.000

3 29,000

2,755,5963.442.5507.327.550

2 32,000 436 279,305 2 5,500 1 25,000 1 100,000New York City, N. Y .:

TMia Tlfnny 19271928 1927

4220940

158

24

1.330.000 937,500

2.395.000

100 529 7,288,105 8,460,295 5,774,000

611 329,600203,315

2,791,315

24 118,200222,150420,975

38 701,600

Brooklyn,, ............106204

433157

6495,496

32136

31

798,00075,000

2229

1,857,2506,051,500

Manhattan_______19281927

3232

295

2.237.0003.825.000

18738

9,061,55015,163,200

16555

8,196,000 7,848,800

4,414160

2,145,055 41,710

17019

454,725 27,745

—..."l2,’ 750,'666'

2675

3,135,500 67,045,500

Queens___________19281927

2138

6,295,0006,084,800

221

180,000 3,736,500

4087

28,864,000 1,659,300

3795

3,229,650 2,386,350

3187,219

184,1802,629,372

1796

60,300388,387

74

9,800,000530,000

5535

74,875,750 3,110,500

T> {/ihmnnH192819271928

324

1,427,900529,500981,200

277 1,191,500 238,500 206,200

7911

3,625,300120,500129,200

1129

4,010,80093,500

606,000

6,643987

2,508,370255,904265,327

1309

414,915 30,350 79,550

1 20,000 444

2.219,050 295,480

8 7 6 11 1,001 44 3 i,i86,666 8 46,700

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 77: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Niagara Falls, N . Y . . .

Norfolk, V a ....................

Norristown, Pa..............

Norwalk, Conn.............

Oakland, Calif________

Oak Park, 111........ .........

Ogden, Utah..................

Oklahoma City, Okla.

Okmulgee, Okla............

Omaha, Nebr.................

Orange, N . J ..................

Oshkosh, W is_________

Ottumwa, Iowa............

Paducah, K y .................

Pasadena, Calif............

Passaic, N . J.................

Paterson, N . J...........

Pawtucket, R . I ............

Peoria, 111.......................

Perth Am boy, N . J___

Petersburg, Va..............

Philadelphia, Pa...........

Phoenix, Ariz................

Pittsburgh, P a..............

Pittsfield, Mass............

Plainfield, N . J..............

90,00011,7005,500

1,011,600 287,749

67,500

”40,00038,362

190,000

115,0002,258,000

45,000

59.000

‘ _3,"666'35.000

31,522165.000 10,000 71,500

186.000454.000472.000 60,000 95,000

109,500129,568

199,50029,400

354,00055,000

1315676

458,156 470,571 97,209

327,100 226,600 21,900 17,650

492,500 651,932 614,850

3312

26.300 25,0002,000

21.300

244

5259

11925

21151

75,502 9,000

114,450 361,189476.000185.000 70,0001 30,000 3

2 205,000 4 53,50036 320,625 6 66,75016 404,150 14 267,50022

15,4001,400

178,500

2 13,000

6 1 1,6004 107,000 6 260,0001 40,000 1 1,375322

34,30082,00026,000

1 1,637

8 173,650 1 40,0006 49,000 2 18,000

2 25,600 2 18,6001 19,750 13 201,1503 14,225 13 64,142

16 250,282 9 44,1003 30,100 7 44,100

10 261,000 57 66,92518 957,500 12 11,6753 245,000 2 12,0004 144,700 1 4,000

12 117,500 13 132,0008 85,850 9 111,6004 58,000 10 48,2005 262,500 1 14,500

1 10,000 2 13,200174 7,791,070 102 3,306,385162 6,626,870 100

22,250,560

44,00090,8461 60,000 11

33 589,100 17 99,85023 1,224, 740 209 721,971

12 169,150 5 16,7002 21,500 4 173,0003 30,000 1 100,000

1,50032,37549,800

48,00060,300

140,000

"”"6,"000*

2,500796,56944,000

112.500 33,450

102,000311.500

75,0002,500

11,941

17

185378

300 4,801,600 5,032,500

351,735 101,100

1,623,000 753,460

131.0002.249.500 1,681,700

258,063164,500237.000

1.149.500

222,850361,000158,150

63,200

405381459455129

231232

1,935 1,473

531506115

1,1851,027

197

322362 163 115 213 18339451517

472363 222 209 340 331 412 396 469 445 122 1054756

1,5561,300

10073

1,9801,467

181151347

144,688 127, 742 83,981 93,423 90,602

116,600 100,155 607,842 456,844 275,781 218,91522.650 1,400

210,635 228,710

5,465 2,615

90,230 84,448

319,151 164,073 52,415 51,908 16,70015.650 5,000 4,155

102,044 66,145

178,522 157,035 261,971 164,922 198,070 162,194 129,085 125,465 59, 655 50,840 9,297

10,017 1,765,500

964,530 43,265 33,151

1,231,082 1,180,019

125,145 79,590

178,568 189,372

109

15

121028487

11

48

22

232555

558

291954

131397

15741

13102428

26,40034,72514,25036,585

100,10023,75053,80058,37024,900

106,397

11,00031,25098,9007,500

41,450 61,100 19,300 21,900

6,40017.20019.0005.500

15,450 48,33331.050 15,42025.000 94,775

142,80022,95032.05065.200 19,50023.0007.500

48,000

30,00020,695

205,000147,600

9,750

6,5005,100

210,000

28,000

125,700640.000180.000 532,234 215,00025.00070.000

471,729 50,000

400,00035,000

33,40065,29130,000

184,100600,000

11,000

4,090,060 5,742,600

120,800

2,044,0004,072,100

14,500

12

79,90042,44324,750

5,15076,500

375,000 995,700

1,199,000

201,190

2,676,800 114,100

160,5001,032,710

122,900

31,000

209,500156,00098,5503,000

59,000

239,00017,387

6,151,125 7,622,365

462.000 749,903

2,308,7507,084,050

245.000

135,000312,500

GO

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 78: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—GoatixmeA

City and State

Pontiac, M ich............

Port Arthur, Tex____

Port Huron, M ich ...

Portland, M e_______

Portland, Oreg..........

Portsmouth, Ohio—

Portsmouth, V a ........

Poughkeepsie, N . Y_

Providence, R . I ------

Pueblo, Colo------------

Quincy, 111..................

Quincy, Mass............

Racine, W is................

Reading, Pa................

Revere, Mass_............

Richmond, Ind..........

Richmond, Va...........

Roanoke, V a ..............

YearNum­

ber

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927 192$

Amusement and recreation places Churches

Cost Num­ber

$92,500

4,600 6,250

1,593,440 866,000

1,600

1,959,000166,000

1,5006,0006,000

6,000677,000

428,110

90.00059.000

500 700

1,034,444

Cost

$279,500 10,000 26,700 16,200

5,5006,000

260,000335,000

3,90027,000

56,000

134,500

1,00012,00085,000

300,000

206,600125.000215.000

1,068,842216,80071,950

525,000

Factories, shops, etc. Garages (public) Garages (private)

Num­ber

$11,166,2001,820,100

Cost Num­ber

5,50077,8006,100

175.000 46,330

615,950 456,100 47,150

228.000 16,500

111,900,800

355,500664,150

10,5502,900

65037,000

100,000503.700 313,900217.700 399,095

2,200

17,000

100,000

Cost Num­ber

$100,260 520,500

4.700 2,000

88,126184,000

2,046,6501,023,855

2.700 4,000

43,48533,500

707,000364,800

18,400 4,500 6,000

20,00051.00020.000

158,850 235,125

7,000

27,500 3,500

557,900 105,150

707 787 148 139 28 30

217 253

3,150 2,365

101 81 99 80 83

106 903 905 349 317 159 131 696 726 577 408 377 313

137114549279324255

Cost

$204,044220,04632,51834,9835,9157,030

66.525 85,092

506,445 399,020 15,765 12,475 9,985 9,190

37,067 43,010

651,954 597,960105.522 119,48940,758 25,236

274,952 240,321 179,465173.523 245,365 235,52552,495 53,352 37,24428.525

220,269 138,57434,517 26,490

Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

$45,160 47,800

9,40011,72011,25012.500

260,00082.500 60,650 16,350 12,385 14,875 22,10040.000

102,20054.000 21,10024.00011.500

20,375 45,500 26,785 3,250

22,200 43,000

12,00014,5003,500

27,951 26,400

Cost Num­ber

$10,000

40.00039.000

1,410,000

1,500

40.00050.000

21,500

340,000

125,000

18,000

182,944

Cost

$91,0801,166,480

200,00035,0005,600

1,839,6001,166,500

550,000

200,000

3,726,700 500,700

850,0006,200

99,000

95,575

138,57518,300

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 79: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Rochester, N . Y ............

Rockford, 111..................

Rock Island, 111............

Sacramento, Calif.........

Saginaw, M ich ..............

St. Joseph, M o ..............

St. Louis, M o ................

St. Paul, M inn..............

St. Petersburg, Fla___

Salem, Mass...................

Salt Lake City, Utah__

San Antonio, T ex_____

San Diego, Calif______

San Francisco, C alif.. .

San Jose, Calif..............

Savannah, G a...............

Schenectady, N . Y ___

Scranton, Pa..................

Seattle, W ash.......... .

Sheboygan, W is............

Shreveport, L a ..............

Sioux City, Iowa..........

Sioux Falls, S. Dak___

Somerville, Mass..........

South Bend, Ind ..........

Spokane, Wash.............

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

-1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

114221

1,779,200 379,482 210,000 18,600 2,000

75,000196,200

7,000

34184

142

1,317,583 989,730 37,000

476,000 1,500

78,500241,288

264,950 152,529

2,200

76

15,0001,000

2,648,200830,644

4 3 2 25 2 3 2

1779735

58,6007,500

22,00027.000

209,10063.000

123.000 1,130,000

785.000 192,125

2,472,385 352,750 135,140 94,890

36,60065.000

418,400 831,800234.000150.000 36,50029.000

69,50077.000

521,160 192,02585,925

180,100 95,550

102,00057.000 33,920

1315

'25"5645

24

16 161667

159

2115593710237

23,500 49,050

191,500 , 239,300

,’ 233,‘ 655" ,246,650 695,300

6,120 110,352

7,300 14,400 3,000

128,000 57,000 29,225

474,900112.650 105,86550,820

999,364 674,706 28,765

250,705115.650

2213

1113 24 4 2 1 1

110,00010,900

1.496.000178.000

2.163.000100.000292.000117.000 25,471

490,955 11,00030.00010.000

132,000

' “74,"oo5'

359,200114,000

23,500158,00050.00050.000

60,0005,000

435,80025,000

75,000

81084

59423375

141134

10

298.000 88,850

533,800 81,640

575,875 772,050

4.375 22,500 20,645 94,707

237,150 476,850325.000

4.375 297,400

44,550

109.000 95,000 31,500

337.000

6151110

136,100 903,800 41,650 56,700

267,300 260,865 136,500 166,350 16,000

’" ’ 96,"755"12,700 3,500

12,800 15,000 25,800

190.000665.000 49,680

664,8002,8008,100

135,200138.000 410,560 305,500 197,400 365,900 309,950291.000 59,0451,600

44.00079.000 81,200

593,900 611,35030.500 25,600 71,175

164,557 103,50069.50050.000

’ 120,"555"30.000

100,000 119,70027.000

341,300

2,2041,655

796601201183282222466467 17370

3,547 3,566 1,509 1,380

422 257 143 122 90

130 409 338 870 713 140 150 204 160 81 48

402 444 451 324

2,003 1,789

303 243 275 247 305 345 27 27

183 79

1,320 1,203

858 644

792,322 573,626 228,392 179,100 51,180 39,515 43,800 44,301 80,424

142,566 34,242 42,413

939,528 825,544 343,137 333,411 125,800 70,600

124,450 86,525 41,95539.386

118,950 130,159 169,646 174,008 146,48599,221 31,170 26,680 19,805 19,175

183,045 189,670 297,867 165,400 341,000 290, 96582.729 69,675 60,373 45,493 40,185 45,785 14,500 39,155

161,82857.730

304,178 271,735 101,00684.386

128,850 195,950 49,30062.500

• 46,6003.000

25,975 28,39224.10013.700 33,95015.800 78,25561.80052.800 52,20037.700 21,6002.000 1,850

56.700108.500 182,695 230,80058.800 81,711 28,805

115,01017.075 35,235 34,60038.800 1,500

37.00019.800 77,90088.250

192,0208,025

24.075 85,325 15,160 18,50018.10055.000 55,44032.250

68,000 50,050 22,675 32,200

375.000 6,850

47.000170.00050.000

385,00025,000

2,00025,000

154.000 2,290,000

138.000

87,500

’ 355'555"

" ’ 55,606

300,000

61,000 546,500 577,399 145,000

3,000

135.000286.000

260,058526.000200.000

101,345

25,000375.000160.000

1,092,000

2,083,000 338,900 330,800 10,300

361,000

456,250

603, lOO 111,000

11,500 1,896,000 1,327,660

276,000

‘ 506,’ §5&

34,75038.000

667,4753,907,500 1,130,800

117,75080.000

4,655,720941,185

329,004180,000

91,000 350,000 145,550

2, 739,400

44,000685,229

10,000

5,200

245,000458,200

5,00001

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 80: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS —Continued

City and State Year

Amusement and recreation places

Num­ber Cost

Churches

Num­ber Cost

Factories, shops, etc.

Num­ber Cost

Garages (public)

Num­ber Cost

Garages (private)

Num­ber Cost

Gasoline and service stations

Num­ber Cost

Institutions

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

Office buildings

Cost

Springfield, 111____

Springfield, Mass..

Springfield, M o___Springfield, O hio..

Stamford, C on n ...

Steubenville, Ohio.

Stockton, Calif___

Superior, W is.........

Syracuse, N . Y ___

Tacoma, W ash___

Tampa, Fla............

Taunton, Mass___

Terre Haute, Ind ..

Toledo, Ohio..........

Topeka, Kans........

Trenton, N . J ........

Troy, N . Y .............

Tucson, Ariz..........

Tulsa, Okla............

1927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$60,000730.000237.000

40,0001,500

300385,000

40.00011.00030.00025.000

55972,884278.00042.90060.00030.900

292,600 169,750162.000

515,2071,432,064

12,000503,300447,500

2,800

10,616 4,000

98,670 366,000

$907,5006,000

355,00060,0009,000

37,000126,000

151,60432,275

1 6,0006 566,8001 85,0001 5,0004 41,0006 90,4005 49,900

10,000 76,000 88,500 7,400

13,300 194,725 28,400

4,00019,0004,700

1,047,80072,350

$11,100 18,000

150.000203.000 142,750 315,500139.000

90040,000

141,900 108,488 13,8Q0 47,250

405,575 344,790 985,600 422,000 103,150 427,960 69,125 3,4005.000 7,500

800,021 :, 082,500

6.000

288,882341,40045,5001,500

34,20023,850

124,300129,700

$40,500 47,400

120, 740 250,000 34,50030.00037.000 12,950

132,200

30.000 28,44923.000 9,670

40,550 405,500 211,000 74,500

156,300 26,750 3,100

20,725

40,965 23,850 13,500

463,250 4,000

12,200 111, 592

9,650 375,500 50,000 20,786 48,700

313,800 419,650

31635679962978

30139429025294

122420296136137

1,510 1,245

358228531348132 127 441 370

2,8362,378

496467402338163133 279138

1,296 1,458

$76,763 73,690

352,650 235, 570

15.110 53,995 71,327

150,910144,83529.110 29,195 53,034 36,186 21,158 20,565

549,544 465,670 44,345 30,800 73,780 46,920 39,619 41,572 90,542

.69,185 765,027 565,239 88,600 86,623

194,718 134,900 89,919 69,875 24,688 42,164

409,842 502,998

$52,50023.300 65,950 34,81467.00031.20023.000 16,59710.200 6,000

17.00021.00031.500 20,968 12,250 94,65064.100 12,000 44,00069.30027.100 7,625 1,200

35,4008,500

48,98878.50043.30023.100 61,750 70,150 18,350

. 14,650 4,025 1,250

98,900 224,600

$275,000

110,000

30,000

62,000

200,0003,290,500

155, 568

"184,500

10,000 1,328,000

95,918 260,000207.000

16,700 76,000

522.00083.000

14

$250,150

118,300175.000300.000

521,500614,900

218,000102,60031,000

2,438,000 1,177,300

20,000 56, 570

1,50010,000

72,065369,200

155,0009,300

680,3814,283,800

375,000

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 81: bls_0500_1929.pdf

8T8I

9Union City, N . J..........

Utica, N . Y ....................

Vallejo, Calif..................

W aco, T ex____________

|° Waltham, Mass______

to Warren, Ohio.... ............

Washington, D . C ........

<Ja Water bury, Conn........

Waterloo, Iow a.............

Watertown, Mass.........

Watertown, N . Y -------

West New York, N . J__

Wheeling, W . Va..........

White Plains, N . Y ___

Wichita, Kans...............

Wichita Falls, Tex____

Wilkes-Barre, Pa..........

Wilkinsburg, Pa...........

Williamsport, Pa..........

Wilmington, D el..........

Wilmington, N . C ........

Winston-Salem, N . C__

Woonsocket, R . I___

Worcester, Mass___

Yonkers, N . Y ........ .

York, P a................... .

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 3927 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

100,000

900,00036,000

6,500160,800251,00035,000

150,6121,294,296

250,000

“ '96,"705

250,000

554,713 8b,000

822,977 604,000

178,80026,0001,000

”l84,~73713.00037.000

150.000200.000

20,000710,000

2,500

12,500 46,200 25,000

1,700

70,000

169,200

15,43253,500

30,000

8,200 1,034,500 1,236,350

22,000 13,000, 35,000 2,500

65,000

22,50045.00015.000

331.000113.000 366,500

2,9007,400

130,200139,600

256.000 35,500

103,200232.00091.00090.000

125.000 179,500 3b7,39072,400

444,500250.000844.000266.000254.000214.000

175,00036,95076.000 6,700

10.000

22417

269

111612

1212

52.00025.00079.00035.000 71,500 78,710

1,009,250 203,500 175,375

9,00063.000

695.000307.00089.000

142

13846

10827

1125

250 39,500

263,250 98,802 97,200 15,700

428,900 217,200 188,600 130,000 84,150

247,730 226,477

412131543

" T9

2427145

172

47.800687.800 78,505

1,034,77015,40010,500

’ ’ "340,"545"296.800 97,85031.800

167,175 218,025 439,300 276,500 305,72020,200

14 85,6003 66,2007 41,200

11 185,500

‘ " ‘ "49,"970"1 34,0005 82,8905 50,8001 14,5001 9,5001 7,5008 717,000

20 981,740

1 4,5004 29,5002 50,000

1 2,000

4 84,0004 84,0006 19,5845 56,0006 64,500

14 846,90010 187,60013 168,5001 2,8003 6,850

73 143,67054 107,709

5 54,2002 25,5005 58,500

2 2,500

3 150,5005 122,000

"l24“ " ’ "457,'530’79 205,07549 1,065,20051 1,463,8005 24,2003 60,000

26181

280198232886

1013620747794

1,6581,554

382296311358239220198 1917339

199 147 219 210397 3552318

175162159 111160 168 857 7943645

55153315796

449398 556 513 173 222

131.100 45,485

102,945 70,715 24,474 19,337 1,950 9,853

68,770 111, 500 86,740 16,200

469,545 460,460288.100 310,30045,70655,158

109,305112,52548,870

35,55051,87574,46351,526

159,689193,38981,34059,65513,6324,667

52,548112.090 74,861 47,423 77,670

255.091 291,60010,075 13,500

137,254 146,582 59,474 33,701

212,267 185,484 393,516 307,389 75,852 88,582

7,000

22.35046.350 25,680

9,600 57,169 5,500

28.500 14,650 41,200

124,000189,50034.30019.30014.30038.500

3,050 950

5, oOO7.000

15.500 21,610 51,00021.500 21,900 84,750 40,6503.000

28,260 15,794 11,6001,500

10,8503,000

55,30039.200 8,500

30,500 29,400 28,000 9,200

27,71541.200 33,900 80,260

188,100

2,500

100,000

53,000

9,20020,00050,000

254,000

374,113 1,078,990

386,000 20,000

1,500

91,300

110,000

"228,'226

697,755 178,631

68,00030,000

17,000

loo,"555'

199,500

6,000

65,000675,000

2,000

59,000 2,706,110 6,550,700

225.000127.000

75,000

3,00075.00065.000

227,000 1,155,375

645,000

1,370,370 1,453,469

351.000115.00045.000

221,60087,20010.000

1,992,625150,000

256,45056.20036.200

477,900

350,000

GENERAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 82: bls_0500_1929.pdf

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits ^issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

City and State Year

Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,

etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost

Youngstown, Ohio____

Zanesville, Ohio............

Total:302 cities 310 cities____

1927192819271928

381

$225,000183.000150.000

52

$144,20079,500

201463

$71,750191,950128,90011,150

187

$116,60079,200

86394711591

$180,235 136,810 i8 ,605 15,066

3315125

$111,700 41,350 39,666 26,800

12

$90,0001,400,000

2911

$300,000 521,300

4,000 30,000

19271928

943950

128,208,773 84,914,600

1,1181,009

58,890,438 49,059,444

4,1813,973

141,307,499152,649,534

4,192 3,839

74,395,804 70,690,699

181,859 156,457

65,449,178 55,140,483

4,9194,520

15,022,065 j.4, 913,812

332304

75,132,340 65,080,263

1,271 1,353

242,853,223 256,101,159

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 83: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State

Akron, Ohio_________

Alameda, Calif............

Albany, N. Y ..............

Allentown, Pa_______

Altoona, P a .—............

Amsterdam, N . Y ___

Alton, 111............. .........Anderson, Ind...........

Asheville, N . C_..........

Ashtabula, Ohio_____

Atlanta, Ga.................

Atlantic City, N. J___

Auburn, N . Y .............

Augusta, Ga.................

Aurora, 111....................

Baltimore, M d___ - __

Bangor, M e__________

Battle Creek, M ich___

Year

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Public build­ings

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

$61,000 6,500

122,655 357,000

15,600

1,754,000

3,100 22,690

863,700 194,900 161,000

12,000

Public works and utilities

Cost Num­ber

$238,100 39,400

117,805110,00025,000

490,000

34,752

175,600 81,500

1,400 134,600

1,700,000 15,000 44,500

2,3002,838

225,00087,000

800160,000

Schools, libraries, etc.

15

Cost

$376,000469.000

5.000 36,900

350.000500.000

5.000187.000621.000 663,944

25,000767,348

85,000

75,628 1,961,029

82,500215,000

67,4472,000

662,457988.000

1,567,000550.000

6,0004,400

Sheds

Num­ber

31349

651721

12136

2113

10 1484

250187

Cost

$11,985 13,660 6,125

31,724 2,200 3,750 2,000

24,400 25,590

290 1,140

200 2,215

937 1,050

695 67,226 30,833 76,427 8,600 1,850

2,122 2,056

700 250

3,500

1,3254,5254,6606,800

Stables and barns

Num­ber Cost

$1001,000

1,000

" m

2050

900150

8001,200

55610

4,000

400

Stores, ware­houses, etc.

Num­ber

149116

4 197

17563019

148190441629

17151314 68 7825

2928

Cost Num­ber

$3,429,887 1,829,558

77, 520 3,898,800

664,050 440,650 238,400 256,025 146,839

77.700 113,96451,625

206,550 508,970 392,425

2,000 19,725

1,914,050 1,329,724

658,784 99,980 25,50024.700

120,33049,040

179,400 233,950

1, 242,500 1,212,000

3,650 8,400

71,025 195,850

All other

19

Cost

$209,850

19,000

"3M 56'

800

27,400800

96,300 131,850

1,900 240

4,150

"6,"555*

6,500

Total new nonresi- dential buildings

Num­ber

2,5352,406

294293445404730596510293115 131 114 176 171 319 249 154 159 814 767 201116 158 176 1£5 121 282 230

3,5752,399

8197

Cost

$7,005,817 5,368,352

492,901 525,500

6,128,115 4,568,515 2,355,275 2,089,715 1,166,380 1,941,125

125, 530 435, 075 248,391 744, 305

1,287,464 3,503,733 1,083,062

248,980 244,843

3,633,971 15,151,442 2,614,340 1, 240,795

550,602 197, 745 220,034 203, 662 464,462

1,089,151 8,004,700

11,037,200 672,455 332,710

3,620,566 1,933,755

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 84: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 0Oissued in 1927 and 1828, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State YearNum­

ber

Public build­ings

Cost Num ­ber

Public works and utilities

Cost

Schools, libraries, etc.

Num­ber Cost

Sheds

Num­ber Cost

Stables and barns

Num­ber Cost

Stores, ware­houses, etc.

Num­ber Cost

All other

Num­ber Cost

Total new nonresi­dential buildings

Num­ber Cost

Bay City, M ich -----

Bayonne, N . J.........

Beaumont, Tex........Belleville, 111______Bellingham, Wash..

Berkeley, Calif........

Bethlehem, Pa.........

Binghamton, N . Y_

Birmingham, Ala—

Bloomfield, N. J___

Bloomington, 111___

Boston, Mass...........

Bridgeport, Conn__

Brockton, M ass.___

Brookline, Mass___

Buffalo, N. Y ...........

Burlington, Iowa___

Butler, Pa.... ............Butte, M on t.............

Cambridge, M a ss..

1927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928

$210, 500 12,000

5,280

14,500

199, 239 12,000

275,000

184,000

42,273

‘ i e i ’ ooo

1,118,638 2,715,193

109,047

372,759

12$162,900 287,770

75,000

90.00065.000

261,5065,150

16,500

5.545.0001.529.000

200,00050,90013,000

5,087,00022,100

$106,000

659,453 219,000

63,600 60,123

468,000 50,000

193,977 920,186 215,427

190.000116.000

3,989,264181,70070,000

120,000

60,000144,000

3,762,9491,455,000

31 $4,4756,220

40120

12,171 23,175

1,000900200

5,6607,9501,0003,000

316212168

5666

336,032 233,369 14,040 7,300

10,945 15,845

1,325 31,430 43,900 1,000

50 13,400

75,000

36,000420,00029,700

6006,8556,790

$23,200

5,625100

2,0002,000

5,0002,500

10,000

10,240

$1,000

5 12 8026

13 30 35 164

1519

294181586

1213

127 1422314 18

1039

13942211

1,600

16,500 172,000 504,714 20,000

101.500 135,950 160,390 191,55963,150 81,250

148, 975164.000

2,994,043 2,039,435

692.45023.00069.000

129.000 3,972,567 5,664,050

120,050 364,800 30,335

131.450 858,700247.000

1,015,800 2,815,875

10.000 6,600 8,000

15,000900

352.500 1,405,518

4 169

35113136

56

$6,450 4,100 8,850

85, 785 8,236 9,726

17,450 38,350

23.00060.000

33,5009,775

$336222119120 239 115 235 272 736 540 355 310 538 537 845 863 500 4366251

1,7331,630

662505343325147151

3,2092,758

48108451574

290

$220,6201,261,001

984.200 838,800

1,302,436 348,881 650, 592 384,105

1,608,404 717, 399 647,191

1,990,390 1,873, 610 1,497,896 9,630,442 5,665,329 1,486,077

562,100327.200 718,300

22,832,331 21,013,882 1,594,552 1,107, 524

337,945 715,958

1,361,527 673, 245

18,273,674 12,468,309

407,000 224,771 44,440 32,048

203,550 5,250,845 3,564,813

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CiTIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 85: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Camden, N . J ................

Canton, Ohio_________

Cedar Rapids, Iowa___

Central Falls, R . I ____

Charleston, S. C______

Charleston, W . V a____

Charlotte, N . C _______

Chattanooga, Tenn ..

Chelsea, Mass................

Chester, Pa......... ...........

Chicago, 111.....................

Chicopee, Mass_______

Cicero, HI.......................

Cincinnati, Ohio______

Clarksburg, W . V a___

Cleveland, Ohio............

Clifton, N. J....... ..........

Colorado Springs, Colo.

Columbia, S. C .........

Columbus, Ga...............

Columbus, Ohio............

Council Bluffs, Iow a. _

Covington, K y ..............

Cranston, R . I ..............

Cumberland, M d _____

Dallas, Tex___________

435,040

50014,000

9,50035.00015.000

8,275,600 2,584, 000

22,600 215,000

90,000

60,000

300,000

9,000

748,300 61,892

65,000115,000

4,000

"i,"505‘

285

1,896,600 2,797,800

4,000

68,50062,000

66,000810,000

5,470,000300

40,000

35,000

3,450

61,000180,000

35.00020.000

100,000

8,000 181,700 43,000

200,000 288,727

13,495,00015,796,100

175.000359.000 85,000

1,060,0001,532,000

75.00095.000

3,357,500 3,026,900

78,000384,000

15,000 1,610,000

500,000

6,000100,000

192,250113,960

10,0002,5005,1454,9359,345

1,700 1,495

775 1,600

600 20,605 3,600

12,905 4,075 1,550

325

396194363442

8487146

14487

334,98588,29514,8107,640

700300

50,17537,685

500625

10,9505,9004,7555,1212,2304,845

40

89, 650 63,950

900750

2,150100400

88,25627,752

3,000 1,200 3,050

"“ 675

17,000

19,300 16,700

7,800

7,00011,000

12575

1,80015,300

5001,500

750

600400

100

5,7008,500

3133506450

10258

218

568

2626139

16318517 22 13 12 12 15 39 27 67 64 24 19 12 157

18 6 3

85126

596,880 1,728,750

103,999 76,725

158,925 136,900

4,3006,650

15,990500.000 127,200 278,795 669,950 323,673 256,83041,500

118,500314.30099.000

15.815.40017.141.400

24,3005,350

108.000 191,885252.300 365,28048,025 59,850

7,610,250 6,657,800

54,750127.900 25,140 91,09029.40074.100

156,34091, 330

1,030,400752.900 146,000 347, 50047.40076.00028.100 53,250 58,828 17,800

3,035,317 1, 627,948

161

22,50018,3401,800

18 39,470

50

3

26,621

8,956"2,100

911

63,30050,000

200

15

18,00015,609

40 6,440

43

27,5006,000

22

1,500900

..........

53537384366448447495395554

228234165215484

73214159

9,3506,640

224194233214

1,8541,800

197183

4,9634,137

560499281274119 132 115 102

2,9402,577

120 103 212 158 421 504 149 115 536 559

2, 171,065 5,597,140 1,185,139

902,297 1,618, 236 1,167, 691

505, 215 138, 345 166,134 222,928 663,034

1,302, 890 1,611,165 2,406,974 2,445,870 2,115,194

141, 605 325, 540 637,840 522, 867

117,156, 435 123,535,408

612,460 724,965

1,153, 725 1,022, 514 6,399, 305 7,936, 755

328, 780 668, 215

18,400,700 28,894,450

529, 700 897,860 114,670 274,026 593, 205 239, 695 340, 632 284,124

8, 674, 6503, 256, 190

321,000 440, 050 425,110 315,200 333,684 832, 024 357,606 640, 411

5, 502,371 3,005,916

0 tel

§

r*

1

00

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 86: bls_0500_1929.pdf

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 00issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

City and State Year

Public build­ings

Public works and utilities

Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and

barnsStores, ware­houses, etc. All other Total new nonresi­

dential buildings

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost

Danville, 111................... 1927 3 $11,000 66,280 1,175

17 $82,3021928 1 $3,000

22,90012 32 153,073

Davenport, I o w a .__ 1927 14 $17,150 12,320 10,487 32,630

2 5 324 1,238,447 424,7121928 1 $4,100 1 $6,000

1,227, 26626 13 220,080

94,700 206,400 537,725

1,213,000 712,250

4,372,350 422,043 204,825

8,894,416 13,105, 210

280Dayton, Ohio________ 1927 6 33 2 1,185 8 1,462

1,2393,494, 096 2,984,121 2,351,820

1928 74 14Decatur, HI___________ 1927 5 $131,500

358,2002 75.000

50.000536.000651.000

65 7691928 6 1 118 616 1,939,210

Denver, Colo_________ 1927 2 707 139,40092,4504,1254,418

83 276 $162,450 1,973 5,859, 6501928 3 33,650 12 520 132 1,400

6586,630,700 1,053, 611Des Moines, Iowa _ __ 1927 3 85,000

1,065,00021 1 100 72

1928 1 523,000 1,101,639

154,813 203,278

2 25 1 100 48 24 59,850 659 2,478,845Detroit, M ic h _____ 1927 5 33 4,055, 582

3,814,860635 21 251,050

1,068,00012,776 63,132,176

1928 5 25 618 9 12,181 265

48,405,234 806,737Dubuque, Iowa 1927 1 1 250.000

125.000 1,600

38 10, 592 5 15,30036,600

803,3001928 1 2 240,231

14,0004 154 474, 925

Duluth, Minn _ _ 1927 3 715,000 2 1 62 24,585 7 10,025 10 11 4,976 511 1,822, 6661928 2 27,500 45 6,125 1 100 11 68,000 4 839,950 402 1,308, 218

Durham, N . C __ 1927 5 42,800 3 332,826 5 5,150 26 168,875 166,300

90 1,063,2061928 2 10,990

20,0004 7,421,198

59,808 406,000

1 2,000 25 2 10,000 77 8,089,953East Chicago, Ind 1927 1 3 18 80,100

56,0906,000

194 2,010,7971928 2 4 1,400

3,65011 159 2,175, 649

220,135East Cleveland, Ohio— 1927 5 1 1411928 11 1,350,000 6 1,375 1 14,000 136 1,492,961

Easton, Pa 1927 4 39.500 19,850

101,00077.500 70,000 56,800

349,240 261,869

110 424,4271928 1 8,000

12,2401 96,210 3 89 223,914

East Orange, N . J 1927 1 10,000 1,057,797

2 2 700 3 18,624850

19 11 124,9009,380

472 1, 628, 5341928 4 1 493, 598

106,0004 2,800

1,8001 20 11 385 2, 634,862

East Providence, R . I_ 1927 4 18 3 290 1,222, 3001928 2 750,000

20,00013 4,800

2,6307 320 1,494,092

East St. Louis, Til 1927 1 2 198,000 6 41 1 725 533 2,960,7361928 1 23,000 2 400 41 7 850 426 646,446

Elgin, "Hi 1927 2 800 8 90,800 2 1,500 347 389, 5231928 3 182,000

687.000489.000

321 957, 505 2,911,500 2,022,100

Elizabeth, N . J 1927 3 106,000 3 73,000 1 15,000678,000

11 6711928 2 1 2,566 2 600 11 5 98,000 582

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 87: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Elkhart, Ind..................

Elmira, N . Y .................

E l Paso, T ex..................

Erie, Pa.............._..........

Evanston, HI.................

Evansville, Ind.............

Everett, Mass...............

Everett, W ash________Fall River, Mass--------

Fitchburg, Mass...........

Flint, M ic h . . ...............

Fond du Lac, W is____

Fort Smith, Ark...........Fort Wayne, Ind..........

Fort Worth, Tex...........

Fresno, C alif.. . . ...........

Galveston, Tex.............

Gary, Ind..... ..................

Grand Rapids, M ich ..

Great Falls, M ont........

Green Bay, W is............

Greensboro, N. C .........

Greenville, S. C ._ ........

Greenwich, Conn.........

Hagerstown, M d ..........

Hamilton, Ohio_______

Hammond, Ind_______

9.0008.000

146,000

739,95314,000

100,000

110,800

1,100

13

10750.000 622.960277.000

943,877

47,650

16,000142,000

1,000

8,000 362,640 30,000

111,500117,000

987,00035,000

3,060

18,00012,000

180,713

12,8001,200,000

10,9203,275

5,00026,000

180,000

14,50027,329

127,00024,50077,000

65,350 459,000

200,000

214,000

8,000

28,7056,000

247

108

1.026,5001.365.0001.765.000

326,779 379,541

680,084

5,000 1,233, 216

846.950

""loo ,’ 666"486,978 140.000 81,304

325.950

1410

732,242 378,799

35,00012,500

"573,'266 ' 111,000 816,135

280,601 749,095 660,000

4,000168,00095,000

270,60020,000

101,000

112

50050

2,600

70 16,920

13

1,0001,040

2142

3,500 3,000

14,751 2,550

8 850

41234

700 14,800 16,342

1 1,000

2 200

3............

2

275

’ " ‘ i,’ 576"

"15.456"44,000

3 11,066

31284

13 20 34 135

13 19 26 11 10 105

3619212

939517 8

135940

2997924441613 56 21

102616

1418 18 27 48 10 16 17 111

852.425112.850

4,750208.850 161,312 629,190 525,72945.400

236,300493.500131.750 39,500

124,000168,100367.450 95,755 74,550 48,350

1,200 655,283 780,585150.700 30,17515.400

519,165 653,415

t, 451,438 217,495 171,410155.450 69,230

273.700 L, 628,100

118.750 L, 364, 900

618.500 67,445

601,272 332,145 407,049 308,737 551,521 24,200

163,170274.425 128,55055,000

19,250 33,650

520,300 530,700

3 990

31313

1,875 11,100 63,650

22

480175

9291

2,370 115,907

1021

10,1254,207

911

7,8412,110

76 76,000

1 7,500

1

"""is"

245

4,755"

30 18,709

2825

67,99536,320

1 10,000

2 1,400

302315300214280860754627441493536217211192299229160106

2,5702,354

197197286919819

1,055578306268252281

1,000692

2,7051,674

2082023532752222168784

183178222163208213368326

1,743,438 242,355 212, 684 362,021 650,437 856,388

1,209,335 1,643,034 3,082,855 4,107,175 1,425,740 3,291,840

586,015 544,258 415,290 441,410

2,002,148 342, 507 459,615

8, 584,192 4,525,208

378,705 290.631 817,696

1,973,790 1,970, 621 8, 746, 501 1,291,916 1,452,927

725,007 603,878 761,876

5,090,570 1,511,300 3,799,970 2,716,145

524, 231 1, 735,822 1, 528,456

997,681 2,188,4182.489.279

338,720 437,905

1,143,490 1,177,445

496,475 161,690 496,185 382,447

1,209,6003.298.280

O

W>tr*

0003

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 88: bls_0500_1929.pdf

PART 2 —NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 00issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

City and State Year

Public build­ings

Public works and utilities

Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and

barnsStores, ware­houses, etc. All other Total new nonresi­

dential buildings

Num­ber Cost Num ­

ber Cos Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost N um ­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num ­

ber Cost

TTamt.ramn.lr, Mich 1927 1 $5,000 13 $120,980 200 $773,6001928 1 $6,800 11 $1,040

70010 127,850

85,125 72, 250

1,417,283 1,158,292

205 652. 7301927 1 1,000 2 14 305 543,7901928 2 $3,020,000

1,624,3001 $35,000

907,783 1,585,000

13 297 3,499,135 8> 484,914 4,700,917

1927 3 8 307,060 23,315

6 47 14,06522,320

520

3 2,03013,000

65 7601928 5 3 42 2 35 30 $32," 492 581

Haverhill, Mass 1927 1 35,000 7 3 1,950 2 1,150 3 6,500 187 266,2001928 16 3,350

5,8363 1,575 10 20,600 1 450 178 172, 790

Hazleton, Pa 1927 1 6,400 2 20 277,663 145 998,0291928 1 7,530

350,0007 47,938 2 564 75 668,724

Highland Park, M ich. 1927 1 1 134,000 6 19,200 161,240

141 1,079,5251928 3 5,300

1,00012 180 1,310.667

Hoboken, N . J 1927 1 150,000 1 10.000 2 1 2,500 1 6,800 35 1,049,1501928 2 1,900

4.8501.850

2 51,000 38 250,290Holvoke Mass 1927 1 4,500 13 9 54,900 172 230,200

1928 1 4,500 10 2 1,400 4 17,250 2,881,739

3 14,500 159 420,900Houston, Tex 1927 2 135,900

367, 5003 734,013

373,968 5,000

16 955,916 2,303,257

163 82 84,001 582 11,408,844192819271928 1928

5 31

23 2 13,000700

178 3,105,919 47, 750

274 946,292 818 16,510, 555 784,911Huntington, W . V a___ 6 1 50 34 223

1 20,000 25 2.5005.500

11,0727,3326.500

50

6 700 3 15,000 166 461,700Hutchinson K!ans 50 2 225 37 460,650 306 600,120Indianapolis, Ind 1927

1928 1927

30 522, 754 29 485,915 2 1,800,000903,500

100 162 1,525,055 2,043,095

132,925

5,031 10,427,4694 73 153 3,162 8,100,473

Irvington, N . J 2 85,063 2 1 1,500 17 17 14,660 797 1,207,9271928 1 220,000

190,0001 7 126,500 21 62,680 557 1,414,453

1,415,848Jackson, IVEich 1927 1 25 19,680 21,071 40,970 29,875

47 150, 775 4811928 60 37 210,275 465 443,240

Jacksonville, Fla 1927 5 241,900 130,000

17 706,250128,150

1 6.5003.500

600,500 362,000

139 133 1,756,390 428,350 168,750 52,800

339,000 177,740

664 49,735 1,442 5,034,530

J amestown N Y192819271928 1927

1 5 13

102 2 7,075 8220

121 9,490 699351

1,555,475 1,322,775

2 2 1,100 9 253 699,990Jersey C ity N J 19 2,011,069

1,149,0254 4,800

19,750 1,232 1,857

2 1,500 42 514 7,636,8251928 18 1 250,000 14 2 26,500 22 423 5,272,194

Johnstown, Pa 1927 40 7 38,000 1 400 235 429,1831928 2 250,000 27 1 5,500 5 17,325 192 616,191

Joliet Til 1927 1 600 13 95,400 49 558,9501928 1 3,950 4 96,655 15 779,000 62 1,360,928

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 89: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Joplin, M o .....................

Kalamazoo, M ich____

Kansas City, Kans___

Kansas City, M o_____

Kearny, N . J.................

Kenosha, W is.............. .

Kingston, N . Y_.......... .

Knoxville, Tenn...........

Kokomo, Ind............... .

Lakewood, Ohio______

Lancaster, Pa________

Lansing, M ich_______

Lawrence, M ass,........

Lebanon, Pa................

Lewiston, M e..............

Lexington, K y .............

Lima, Ohio...................

Lincoln, Nebr..............

Little Rock, Ark.........

Long Beach, Calif____

Lorain, Ohio................

Los Angeles, Calif____

Louisville, K y .............

Lowell, M ass..............

Lynchburg, Va—........

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

16,0004,000

73,920

275,000

23,000 156, 787

21, 741

175,000 86,450

392,330

20

500,000 29 841,844 30,000 29 704,702

1 150,000 1,185,000

1 65,0002 250,000 1 36,000

8,350* Includes stables and

41,000

41,50033.00055.000

155,300 1,200

47,520 480,000

80,000380,000

26,300

'l66,"o55'

65,500 690,525

1,146,000 500

299,900 42,000

108,000

233.000 6,000

813.000110.000

1,200

245,200 80,000 80,000

618,275 330,000

268,000334.000185.000

1,060,00053,000

150,000

84,200107,000

40,000635,000

53,000 171,800

1,963,825 4,825,645 1,463,400

984,500

26,000145,036

4442245

4733

106250

54 1, 750 4 1,459

415 403 43 26 27 19

4202,150

9,6006,3001,000

2005,5509,3755,9356,315

22,20090,587

870150

16,650 5,100

7001,000

7,030 1,350

85 375

23,375 9,525

325 300

4 519,482 * 613,326

311,170 45,010 6,010 5,105 4,755 5,890

814132

4,1005,0001,400

6,4001,200

57615,600

205

5,000450

500

(5)(5)

20,8005,6452,500

795585

79

106

32615171

2022219

6276049064

, 24,254, 129,

6 Included with sheds.

173,85092.000 74,072

187,060260.650 227,655 896,200

1,016,150 21, 56022.000

300,050 186,115175.650 36,850

283,080

6,775 35,780 8,360

19,770 356,815 56,270

178,450 455,000 20,300

259,325 5,000

79,000

125, 252, 68, 35, 84,

101, 323, 242, 296, 814,

2,043, 101, 201,

10,889, 8,662, 1,049, 1, 563,

1 50

4767

4,600 35,850

3 4,500

3 1,345

11 7,115

6 49,225

3 70,000

1 4,000

223 1, 450,650

109113

728,237 267,626

75

9,350315

145127333294278353926646304273433346282235550485246 307 482 350 179 158 557 501 143 127 220663627

253187 190 166 539 550 248 228

1,794 1,957

231 266

13,551 11,680 1,131 1,223

247188 184 156

723,175 298,993

1,198,058 918,953 740, 365 908,832

4,164,832 6,880,075 2,993, 395 3,170,160 2, 538,195

807,141 996,120 336,956

2,141, 262 2,875,200

240,179 108,751 494,810 949,646 985,010 689,845

5,283, 515 2,914,862

534,145 323,300240.000302.000 318,600821.000

1,140, 260604, 719 329, 735 209,117

2,148,548 1,578,142

865, 627 1,225,386 6,577, 740 6,886,070

392,149 264,574

42,090,606 29,302,619 12,189,070 7,211,820

278,460 460,205 924,671 416, 534

0 3CJ*

GENEBAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 90: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairsf alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

00

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State YearNum­

ber

Public build-

Cost

Public works and utilities

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

Schools, libraries, etc.

Cost

Sheds

Num­ber Cost

Stables and barns

Num­ber Cost

Stores, ware­houses, etc.

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

All other

Cost

Total new nonresi- dential buildings

Num­ber Cost

Lynn, Mass_______

McKeesport, Pa___

Macon, Ga.__.........

Madison, W is..........

Malden, Mass.........

Manchester, N . H_.

Mansfield, Ohio___

Marion, Ind_______

Marion, Ohio______

Medford, Mass........

Memphis, Tenn___

Meriden, Conn____

Miami, Fla________

Milwaukee, W is___

Minneapolis, Minn.

Mobile, A la..............

Moline, 111________

Montclair, N . J------

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$2,8801,400

8,100

68,500

3,000,000 700

247,000 1,530,000 1,057,370

12,000

$340,0006,500 $15,000

90,000 219,400780,000

604,864460,000

15,000375,000

25,000

$13,079 8,175 1,185 9,835

11,250 3,100 1,752

930 5,895 1,480 4,322 3,625 1,800 2,591

23,000 1,500 4,565

390,000

24,5002,700

593,9533,500

1,400,30021,000

100,00070,000

292.500851.500

6,535875

37,05020,670

6,800 157,500 70,000

400,000 600

1,698,897 1,968,000

590,770 1,423,530

275,440 162,500

841223773952221

17,518 15, 732

268,661 384,740

1,850 2,580

825

230,000

$80024,742

1,500

8003,920

400

1,166'

7,800780

3,000

3,1504,000

60

20011,000

142665

3249421824131312128479

1471317805317

10465

10964

10315128214 7

195

$144,050245.000 76,85027.000

173.000 486, 774 415,297323.100 341,475157.100 104, 73550,185

183,850 99,10016.000

180.000 17,840

135,315 134, 525109.000

2,363,890 1,118,390

12,000 18,350

740, 772 215,130

1,794,775 1,669, 200 3,501,500 1,332,950

112.000 211,500

11,880 45,340

404.100 48,600

10

121991

$9,050 11,081

15,700

600

4,750

8,450

2,500 317,460 66,347

290,695 73,015

2,500

39,0005,500

426482216193118

497293212306267299243100172322473387390

1,0741,088

187149

4,383 3,297 2,892 2,729

67 560 198 188 405

$1,069,639 942,769 335,757 864,541

1,307,747 749,070

I ,138,935 1,929,567 1,163,061

388,597 870,583 262, 735 824,140

1,005,055 326,300 861,660 131,965 666,445 762,351 635,187

4,992,355 6,123,384

354,163 230, 726

$.619, 752 644,633

11,814,718 11,714,443 10,070,860 10,788,640

907,128 1,467,854

245,888 905,356

1,092,524 416,211

BUILDINGS PEEM

ITS IN

THE PR

INCIPAL,

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 91: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Montgomery, A la.........

M ount Vernon, N . Y__

Muncie, Ind..................

Muskegon, M ich_____

Muskogee, Okla............

Nashville, Tenn_..........

Newark, N. J.................

Newark, Ohio................

New Bedford, M a ss...

New Britain, Conn___

New Brunswick, N . J_

Newburgh, N. Y ______

New Castle, Pa.............

New Haven, Conn___

New London, C on n .—

New Orleans, La..........

Newport, K y .................

Newport, It. I ...............

Newport News, Va___

New Rochelle, N . Y__

Newton, Mass...............

New York City, N . Y .: The Bronx..............

Brooklyn.................

M anhattan............

Queens.....................

Richmond.... ..........

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928

20,000600,000

111, 595

325,250

1,006,161 162,181

2,500

45,497

27,200

37,000

15,"OOO

32,000

1

" 2 "

4 3

11158

11995 2

130.000

"” 153,'555'

205.000185.000

2.245.0002.163.000

695.000 1,835,5001.078.000

657.000360.000 80,000

239,1002,500

14,000

2,087,000

157,500177,950

8,000

115,150 206,500

150,000 1,397, 768

18,000 478,735

5.0001.000

21,000

75,000200,000

768,300330,600

5,280202,000

714,970275,000

193,600 255,175 15,000

1,083,000599.000

4,500969.000

450.000 2,000

156,458526.000

155,000

124,600

"§55,"555’6.515.0001.008.000

803,686 1, 318,672

95,800

261,000 457,879191.500

3.625.0008.604.000

12.461.0007.262.0007.380.0004.115.000

11,308,7002.986.000

739.5001.268.000

87

80100

265

316118134 3

145835

142

97

3,5552,0553,4072,8537,400

6,715 810

7,455 38,580 47,912 11, 510

950 800

36,045 7,230

525 124,743

6,370 14,495

104,999 88,898 4,525 2,200

31,243 62,105

2,3902,300

2,861 10,195 9,840 3,255 2,480

1,500500

62,936 59,070 18,577 25,600

10,5001,800

2,0052,2854,1509,500

1,300

8003,800

6,9306,700

300750

70010,0301,000

104,95058,450

1501,500

57920301311192299

3772

143117

4

2111932087153

440402103137

194.600 511,773324.600 700,08835,635 75,210

284,900 198,800 15,250 82,475

251,5,50 796,300

6,173,088 1,595,179

96,000

95,400134,650240,450

40,8007,000

182.700171.700

2,50020.500

200,000 323,60083.500 81,900

1,349,204580,83954,54522,20042,00012.500 38,553

146,951 169,450203.900 304,500251.900

4,695,950 5,864,700 3,236,800

10,471,250 20,929,600 8,443,500 5,774,810 5,754,550

608.700 537,627

_____ f_________

1 300

1411

157,90629,725

3 5,700

45 1,685

313

22,5006,380

4 12,600

2 12,306

28847382645

219241124142

1,500 926,195 884,820 23,960 85,040 75,713

111, 110 35,642 80,024

106 357,100494 1, 721, 743346 3, 778,182306 2,658,950575 1,576,535661 1,287,134266 544, 587289 611,997102 574,747108 215,980293 4,186,760347 2,977,875

1,731 20,963,7451,217 11,797,202

157 401,831180 700,016552 769,217235 527,653351 1,258,765381 886,658185 1,412,450124 691,745128 675,890138 559,475429 1,737,935286 419,915605 8,886,272470 5,250,094220 226,675225 396,065346 5,394,166349 4,552,27174 217,54551 66,010

168 399,940156 255,220118 56,602177 252,908296 1,007,529276 1,590,822542 2,677,991474 1,107,685

1,582 30,621,9511,698 35,047,6647,190 55,842,335'5,997 52,818,900

504 151,721,515614 137,967,920

8,406 39,698,6187,801 25,374,5151,310 3,331,5831,413 5,688.928

O«%W>rHIWFSI

0 0

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 92: bls_0500_1929.pdf

PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Contmned

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

City and State Year

Public build­ings

Public works and utilities

Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and

barnsStores, ware­houses, etc. All other Total new nonresi­

dential buildings

Num ­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost

1927 4 $21,500 1 $375,000 26 $5,430 2 $1,150 39 $171,357 511 $1,578,8811928 1 $40,000 5 642,300 2 236,249 17 1,480 4 440 59 192,525 11 $9,400 513 1,822,875

Norfolk, Va 1927 1 600,000 OQK 7f)A1 15,000 34 5,535 9 1,130 20 132,859 547 969,714

1928 3 43,200 4 1 161 000 30 6 245 x 150 21 155,850 543 1,205, 253Norristown, Pa 1927 1 9,000 2 450,500 10 ’ 610 3 2,100 9 88,650 163 878,712

1928 11 751 9 75,150 158 407,025Norwalk, Conn 1927 1 800 12 10,750 1 12,500 14 149,460 281 1,221,860

1928 2 300,000 32 53,125 2 8,000 13 197,300 306 1,854,280Oakland, C^lif 1927 3 187,600 17 460,797 18 2,137,095 10 14,040 111 1,633,765 33 173,618 2,258 8,892,612

1928 1 7,500 19 324,530 14 1,408,086 16 11,670 98 3,636, 264 18 52,696 1,783 8,934,559Oak Park, 111 1927 1 7,000 3 910,000 3 2,050 7 199,500 557 2,083,231

1928 3 30,000 3 239,994 1 2,000 12 638,500 2 12,300 450 2,158,796Ogden Utah 1927 1 5,000 1 35,000 39 83,810 53 206,460

1928 x 200,000 3 1,700 16 118,425 40 726,025nirlflllATnfl Pifrr Alrlo 1927 -- 30 002 2 42 100 4 383,000 4 390 80 961,075 1,357 5,342,218UiviaUUilicI) VJllj y VJilcli.

1928 j 38 302 2 26* 200 14 1 073 383 19 6 410 1 1,800 113 909,098 1,248 3,538,1211927 1 *750 5

JL} \J4 0f UOO143,400 2 *650 5 2,460 1 800 39 189,425

1928 2 140,000 9 38,050 20 182,065Omaha, Nebr___ ___ 1927 3 285,000 8 2,440 11 17,995 65 505,590 20 46,645 469 1,644,450

1928 3 192,000 30 134,825 83 965,640 9 39,000 535 5,164,123Orange, N. J 1927 3 850 1 850 13 123,350 192 1,026,776

1928 1 150,000 17 574,780 144 1,401,690Oshkosh, Wis 1927 2 24,090 1 7,000 219 200,505

1928 1 25,000 2 250 7 38,300 198 147,858Ottumwa, Iowa_ 1927 2 700 1 300 7 23,200 64 271,750

1928 4 22,000 62 123,650Paducah, K y 1927 5 1,500 8 30,000 33 42,000

1928 2 450 15 22,600 51 121,855Pasadena, Calif 1927 1 25,746 4 16,250 11 456,924 73 1,106,075 614 3,730,499

1928 6 15,700 5 380,828 39 676,310 162 55,333 624 1,672,324Passaic, N . J 1927 3 28,800 1 512,825 3 600 24 340,425 291 1,679,474

1928 21 131,500 1 150 14 238,522 266 806,407Paterson, N . J 1927 1 49,000 3 11,000 9 5,596 52 665,225 1 335 603 1,665,227

1928 5 279,000 1 48,579 6 1,700 1 400 55 1,046,875 3 4,200 453 3,628,151Pawtucket, Hr I 1927 1 3,000 22 3,170 1 250 16 134,750 469 759,190

1928 2 25,000 I 155,000 16 2,165 1 400 8 34,600 4 1,266 440 506,309

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 93: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Peoria, 111......................

Perth Am boy, N . J__

Petersburg, V a ............

Philadelphia, Pa.........

Phoenix, Ariz________

Pittsburgh, Pa............

Pittsfield, Mass______

Plainfield, N . J............

Pontiac, M ich..............

Port Arthur, Tex____

Port Huron, M ich___

Portland, M e...............

Portland, Oreg_______

Portsmouth, Ohio___

Portsmouth, V a ..........

Poughkeepsie, N . Y__

Providence, R . I_____

Pueblo, Colo................

Quincy, 111...................

Quincy, Mass________

Racine, W is.................

Reading, Pa.................

Revere, Mass_...........

Richmond, Ind.............

Richmond, Va_______

Roanoke, Va....... ..........

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

3 148,000

348,845 110,000 28,800

1,077,468 16,000

399,000

200,657 33,915

92,00069,200

33,753 463,000

1,432,364

11,000

53,870

176,000

1,407,50016,000

1,497,656

1,500110,600386,000183,627

82,0002,819,600

12,000

704,00012,0001,800

15,960

30,00044,400

3,600

45,000

9,314,825 6,285,790

107.300 693,386633.300

1,531,4356,500

343,755

1,956,775

443,000

85,000

"1,478,700 745,200

392,081 1,917,000

340,000 62,200

279,500 1,250, 000

52, 472420.000

78,369215.000

11,000 571,164

677,540

5669

345329

5 46

1421

89426535101420333

22

1627424

3

32,67510,230

2,700

2,190 16,913 11,910 4,900 7,750

634 4,550 5,050 2,048

14,878

750 13,211 8,400

261,125 454,225

1.825 1,800

5121.825

350 500

53,600 17,250 11,080 4,287 1,870 6,925

24, 710 12,851

525 14,050 12,725 10,000

1,950 250 100

174,989 106,883

3,060

1 17,2203 3,0502 5755 1,5253 1,800

14,000

171,00023,000

1,050800

2005,000

5,000

9,000500

1,1002,500

900

210186613

9513319 17 13 16 82 737

54 113 5

13 80 85 1220 54

1514 73 79 22 23 1216 29 37 27 1755 17 138

12 17

2321074748

366,500 588,650 42, 545

139,900

16,600 6,882,405 6,323, 240

695,163 164,000

2,789, 350 1,796,614

57,410 28,650

163,450 191,113 524,845 403,130

3,440 177,467 33,800 5,600

145.650 697,020 987,935

1,347,55517.700

237.925 22,5006,500

177,725224.925

1,170,850 1,295,920

120,250 45,37256.700

189.650 457,625

1, 246,800 168, 275 98, 750

222, 375 79,050 23,100 45,450

104,900 50,350

2,063,309 1,204, 349

417,640 329,449

2 26,000

6546

319,435170,920

54281

236,64182,255

800

I 3,000

1215

20093,0004,450

11

300700

1 4,500

413

56,750110

1 700

5312

8,0001,8006,0001,000

578525155129 47 74

2,2361,930

189233

2,3111,979

2132083784158759442352295347

318364

3,7602,939

141 117 120 111 116130

1,192 1,176

452397198166755813638454524408106120161142

1,463826394325

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 94: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued

City and State YearNum­

ber

Public build­ings

Cost Num­ber

Public works and utilities

Cost Num­ber

Schools, libraries, etc.

Cost

Sheds

Num­ber Cost

Stables and bams

Num­ber Cost

Stores, ware­houses, etc.

Num­ber Cost

All other

Num­ber Cost

Total new nonresi­dential buildings

Num­ber Cost

Rochester, N . Y ..........

Rockford, 111............ ...

Rock Island, 111______

Sacramento, Calif____

Saginaw, M ich ............

St. Joseph, M o ............

St. Louis, M o ..............

St. Paul, M in n ...........

St. Petersburg, F la ...

Salem, Mass........... .

Salt Lake City, Utah.

San Antonio, Tex........

San Diego, C alif.........

San Francisco, Calif. -

San Jose, Calif_______

Savannah, Ga..............

Schenectady, N . Y _ „ .

Scranton, Pa................

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927 19231927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$7,250 13,000

$457,200 80,500

10 $2,264,714 3,851,007

9581,410

69,500160,000

2, 111, 969 108,150

1,293,000

35.000 70,410

"§i9,‘ 77625.000

16,675 1,400 7,500 8,965

12,030 11,823 7,281

6,400,0001,000,000

114,000

26,000330,000

192,1001,700

150,00038,000

54,0006,5003,3005,000

965,300 1,146,600

942.000 9,283

235.000

20976957

5,230 168, 177 150,826

54,000

450.000125.000

661,000

2,90060075

7004,220

22,370

623,689281,39061,694

75,000 59,300

435,950 1,023, 740 1,363,781

21,200 12,075

327,500 65,000

275,778 1, 712,124 1,761,689

158,790

225211

19165937

45,773 45,667 23,995 30,150 19,470 9,835

77.000 2,300

90.000158,000

1,078,203

5,0003,6505,8408,515

$33,700

400'

605510

30,000

750

3,500200

2,000500

$516,657 506,350 683,125 373,200 20,000

40561623 21 15

1592192828561817103252

112127122109146101353024 28 24 20 172

1,

365,775 582,602 132, 500 400,348 202,600 79,050

569,300 503,175 399,166 440,280388.500 34,800

125, 700 187,050 193, 440 394,035 681, 320 190,081 910,906 142,390 421,041 502,985 374,340 467,060 417,075 193,425 160,100 262,000 79,255

236.500

49

182375

182014540

$2,175 34,455

50 5,000

18,050

3, 275

1,000

215,090 406,989 15,300

8,700 22, 370

469,979 10,240 20,000

1,100

2,508 1,914

888 684 230 185 455 344 581 601 211 148

4,946 4,963 1, 754 1,818

598 329 170 152 182 248 626 743

1,402 1,210

450 445 336 283 120 91

468 506 505 372

$10,127,687 7,529,025 1,736,417 1, 560, 225

710,0«0 50,015

3,914, 434 1,326,452 2,342, 752 2,252,556

362, 392 1, 504, 443

16, 730,810 15,658, 349 2,493,993 2,497,320 1,196, 500

691,900 1,032; 225

581,125 1, 020,465 1,633,216 3,502,430 8,071,194 4,309,344 3,910,839 9,952, 532

11,356,816 1,846,180

932,000 587,130 580,404

1,330,245 1,117,570 3,848,965 1,897,498

BUILD

ING

PEEM

ITS IN

THE PEIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 95: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Seattle, W ash______

Sheboygan, W is____

Shreveport, La........

Sioux City, Iowa___

Sioux Palls, S. D ak___

Somerville, Mass___

South Bend, Ind___

Spokane, Wash........

Springfield, HI_____

Springfield, Mass__ .

Springfield, M o.......Springfield, Ohio___

Stamford, Conn___

Steubenville, Ohio__

Stockton, Calif.........

Superior, W is...........

Syracuse, N . Y ........

Tacoma, W ash........

Tampa, Fla..............

Taunton, Mass........

Terre Haute, Ind___

Toledo, Ohio............

Topeka, Kans..........

Trenton, N . J ...........

Troy, N . Y ...............

Tucson, Ariz............

Tulsa, Okla..............

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

42,000590,250

28,300

18,13029.00020.000

60,0009,065

129,000

" 32,600

5,744

121,874 73,273

27,000

113,000

19,000125.000 121,10040.000

106,000

7,860301,500

66,00040,500

15,0009,840

’ l25,'666~

‘495,'665" 191,250

41,500856*800

3,00015,350

’~'i2,'566‘

’"'87,"666" 20,000

140,000

37,500650,00015*000

145,650

45.00026.000

"i06,~863"170,000

9.00013.000 81,1506,3005,000

540,600

23,900155,000

112,5008,000

64*830 52,930 3,175 4,500

16,419 1,450 6,915

32,325

1,275 6,345

13,300 9,830

525 17,200 2,3.00 2,300

71,575 59,675 2,550

13,725 1,500

16,800 7,750

30023,90031,5684,6104,585

8001,165

25,66054,32029,58827,3307,6142,385

340460

15,447 23,737 18,861 14,162 4,500 2,400 5,540 1,807

2a 152 30,980

1266

75700

1,3505,425

1 100

1 1,250

11

4,200250

1 150

2161

6,4002,500

580300

1 200

......3

2 725~750

1 15,000

42

3,400400

181185243026742021122719 15 44 3028 501720 1018 289

1318122

1533

59443935

106557 9 5 5

144130258 9

2947

22102103

2,690,335 6,022,100

186,268 202,690 367,435 660,018119.650154.750130.000213.750189.400 243,570310.000 230,950 337,261 391,55756,360

632,350237,600142.200 94,900 15,500 69,850

200.400 201,07575.000 14,100

108,332171.650686.000 756,300 647,315 486,150371.750 367, 550 796,450 320,850 117,31036,64062.000 11,650

2,403,794 1, 535,457

157, 630 64,150 58,285

258,205 338,70065.200

189, 434 1,160,120 1,346,340

17

4,400 31,650

921

621182710

7,500 18, 595 1,550

25,685 97,299 86,015

2,950

4221

19,837 1,600

700

51

5,20025

3832

25,5609,775

351

8,5006,0753,000

1 100

8 1,925

2845

35,637110,500

1*940

2,814 2,478

360 309 550 362 385 427 59 78

248 105

1,528 1,351

939 875 375 426 965 728 163 340 468 369 318 100 153 536 424 203 198

1,724 1,392

1,045668195171482395

3,0632,587

605583543430193164334228

1,5671,758

9,097,815 12,754,665

666,422 558,765

1,764,122 1,904,439

848,900 907,310

1, 154, 505 984,620

1,134,003 342, 645

1,937,878 3,081,065 1,045, 3322, 610, 038 1, 740, 173 1, 389, 225 2,331,114 1,680, 274

688,760 640,070 400,014

2,088,971 1, 535, 060

830,110 443, 595 979, 813 579,432 826, 786

1,113,855 10,126, 0023, 726, 403 2,031,323 1,365,470 3, 362, 290 1,321, 770

440, 793 252,947 348,847 269,145

6, 003,840 7,805,171

746,640 645,400

1,967,079 1, 792,767 2,043,269

270,850 382,600

1,428,423 8,386,146 3,843,407

Qfel

W > t-<

CD

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 96: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterationsy and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued

PART 2 —NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Contiiraed

CDfcO

City and State YearNum­

ber

Public build­ings

Cost Num­ber

Public works and utilities

Cost Num­ber

Schools, libraries, etc.

Cost

Sheds

Num­ber Cost Num­

ber

Stables and barns

Cost

Stores, ware­houses, etc.

Num ­ber Cost Num­

ber

AH other

C ost

Total new nonresi- dential buildings

Num ­ber Cost

Union City, N . J........

Utica, N . Y ...... ..........

Vallejo, C alif..............

Waco, Tex__________

Waltham, Mass..........

Warren, Ohio............

Washington, D. C ___

Waterbury, Conn___

Waterloo, Iowa.........

Watertown, Mass___

Watertown, N. Y ____

West New York, N. J.

Wheeling, W . Va____

White Plains, N . Y ~

Wichita, Kans_______

W ichita Falls, Tex._ .

Wilkes-Barre, Pa____

Wilkinsburg, Pa____

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1627 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

$82,000

80, 778

53,000

20,0001,000

23,700510,000

286,934

$50,00030,000

$200,000

3,500

"145,’ 000*

" 26,000

3,000 69,498

857,786

$26050

4*26©3,606

10,6751,5051,220

$3, 500

700

1,720,835 1,801,104

368,563

14,826

"l2,"565‘

18,000

80,00080,000

23, 56 5 6,600

29,300 22,250 4,. 545 4,300 2,625

250

50,000

5.1006.100

568,000 115350)100:

110,850 15,500

155,000 9,000

264,276200,000

184,100

1,530,500120,000771,933282,075

1,750 200

1,000 2,300

16,737 6,830

6,500

10,000

10,000

886,666 51,000

625,000

161814196

186194452119256945 4 3

116

1314

106' 110; 1133015 12

$1,800 74,650

208,. 400 261,400 143,615 36,681 64,939

133.200 122,800

2,50® 27,720 19'300

2,385)450 2,281,250

189,700 128,000 193,600 274,39553.500 57,800 30,75035.00065.50024.000 42,425

127,950:369.200 464,900

1,. 127,359 506,695 482,490 159,485 91,950

105,450

$500

" i ’ 000*

21 9,165

15,1804,800

67,950

2,25019,8003,1504~0Q0

111,5004,100

12,000

34,800

2861053222552551095671

182260534140

2,0251,914

5713623854312722452092068953

269185 264 278 621 561186 70

292272165128

$670,500 422,785

1,354,395 1,085,365

316,729 113,538 262,881

1,366,017 640,545 541,670 211,330 233,110

10,930,436 16,947,076 1,839,288

903,950 404,751

1,211,884 602,430 482,625 94,920

652,230 579,050 550,875

1,321,073 690,526

2,167,566 5,374,164 2,312,986 2,707,363 1,663,497

414,612 3,172,439 2,479,924

841,590 801,461

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 97: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Williamsport, P a ...

Wilmington, D e l.. .

G* Wilmington, N . CL.

M Winston-Salem, N. C_ ooj° Woonsocket, R . I____

cp Worcester, M ass.____

Yonkers, N . Y ............

York, Pa.......................

Youngstown, O h io ...

Zanesville, Ohio..........

Total:302 cities.. 310 cities..

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

19271928

339243

206,840

9,20063,0006,400

650.000226.000

200,000

47,460,61929,378,349 617

60,000

23,9976,000

30,810114.000

4,000 4,535

101.000 1,017,495

33,50020,000

600,00098,000

45,389,033 38,690,950

837852

288,77767,000

162,000666,111

119,354 625,950 767,93796.00080.000

791,000

164,500

155,542,100143,519,854

213,608 Ul,787

2,555 31,087 2,200 1,000

14,2555,735

12,23010,31915,46818,4494,941

23,500

750 3,175 5,065

910 465

25,091,26124,895,029

2 358 2 367

1,110

1,0757,725

18,4926,144

73011,00020,000

920

750

2823,018 2583,553

13,28013,111

7,200 61,450

216,168 118,330 83,500

201,500 1,200,732

661,962 5,800

22,900 364,265 190,027 788,190

1,443,200 1,000

36,600 293,350 128,150 37,175 19,010

215,747,108211,890,765

10

4,2834,158

5,30012,2637,200

3,124

5,700 14,890 15,296 5,200

12,700 9,600

15,000

7,239,1467,710,836

2092529228405169

712672201146765654733674207240

1,0241,055

160114

232,113 203,440

1,465,715 704,675

3,378,799 1,520,194

220,075 370,500

2,199,176 4,404,362

422,654 189,670

2,229,729 2,873,101 5,333,244 4,820,089

752, 992 772,632

2,942,760 3,064,325

643,766 102,491

1,278,541,605 1,185,219,330

2 See notes to details.

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 98: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits J©issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS

Repairs, etc., on residential buildings •Repairs, etc., on non- Grand total of all per­ Rank Installation

permitsCity and State Year

Housekeepingdwellings

N onhousekeeping dwellings

residential build­ings 6

Total repairs, etc.6 mits— new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

incostof

con­

Number Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruc­tion Num ­

ber Cost

1927 752 $998,676 1,647, 596

5,495 $20,196,088 253 $322,2191928 750 5,356 19,485,096 25 408 167,189

Alameda, Calif 19271928 1927

272244

$101,347 110,242

24 $19,126 26,430

296 120,473 136,672

2,822,128

792 1,536,930 2,131,396

16,188, 743 14,893,525

13 257 734 180Albany, N . Y 1,833

1,418394

2,684 120 122,3561928 2,389,810

675,194 450,325 482, 789

2,226 35Allentown, Pa 1927 304

382585

419,444311,400248,064189,814

90 255, 750 138,925 234, 725

1,663 6,588,16919281927

83116

465 1,556 1,479

5,935,040 3,041,304

87Altoona, Pa 701 77 16,973

1928 529 335 272,817 8C4 462,631 1,313 3,360,907 141 86 14,711Amsterdam, N . Y 1927 7 42,500

6,000 228,340

170 607,530 683,6751928 2 163 284

Alton, 111........................ 1928 204 107,724 162,439 114,094 249,760 121,203 50,010 40,510

84 125,616 288 564 1,044,455 264 245 74,892Anderson, Ind 1927 340 81 100,538

169,725421 262,977 936 2,213,382

2,452,8335,987,153

1 401928 315

45057 372 283,819

728,2C0796 168

Asheville, N . C 1927 86 478,500 141,545

536 1,187 58 15,4941928 267 107 374 262,748 901 3,095,110 147 54 11,091

Ashtabula Ohio 19271928

172 4 $750 43 27,34078,269

219 78,1G0 410 496, 780 32 7,412116 52 168 118, 779 347 513,872 300 27 4,765

Atlanta, Ga 1927 1,5311,487

766

1,341,925 4,085 11,860,907 369 220,2151928 2,274,848 3,952 27,394,779 19 222 185,762

Atlantic C ify, N . J 1927 534 432,499 488,748

35 128,038129,300

197 630,0191,005,984

1,190,556 1,091 5,822,864 410 490,758

Auburn N Y192819271928 1927

442 30 200 67276

1,624,032 180,892 158, 726 337,738

839250

7,410,842 843,194

71 333 291,676

921,2721,478

316

121,506 157,615 107,418 192,210 171,673

22 37,220 180,123

114 321 515, 596 1,459,090

299Augusta, Ga___ __ 170 1,442 1,965 52 5,635

Aurora, 11119281927

1 110,000 35572

167,680 143,331

1,834388

385,098 335,541

2,233 1,036

1, 550, 944 2,791, 528

’ ""226* 4627

2,85735,340

19281927192819271928

298 69 128,099 367 299,772 5,772,090 7,467,150

42,300 156,350

864 2,950,47228,437,79033,945,350

151”Baltimore, M d 13,679

12,193 21

20,62517,099 18

Bangor, ]Vte 620

5,10022,450

15 37,200132,900

134 851,355i 1,000 18 39 173 625,610 288

BUILD

ING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 99: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Battle Creek, M ich___

B ay City, M ich.............

Bayonne, N . J ...............

Beaumont, T ex___Belleville, 111..........Bellingham, W ash.

Berkeley, Calif.........

Bethlehem, Pa.........

Binghamton, N . Y_.

Birmingham, A la ...

Bloomfield, N . J___

Bloomington, HI___

Boston, Mass...........

Bridgeport, C onn ...

Brockton, Mass.......

Brookline, Mass___

Buffalo, N . Y .......... .

Burlington, Iowa___.

Butler, Pa___Butte, M ont.

Cambridge, Mass___

Camden, N . J...........

Canton, Ohio............

Cedar Rapids, Iowa___

Central Falls, R . I ------

Charleston, S. C ..........

Charleston, W . Va------

192719281927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

207202

118120

255331

234 237 909 704

1,637 2,442

14 3615 14

4,2263,682

94201295294117130

1,166946

311792

34335056845940634365154255

250248

114,307

241,490103,450

84,58889,108

337,855 208,531 383,854 254,599 626,905 737,61515.50040.500 19,00021.500

2,795,530 2,263,774

105,310 94,055

115,738 92,375

286,270 314,694 760,702 589,701

25,460 7,250

81,830 264,919 245,149 272,661 211,250 155,495 120,126 194,608 174,048 26,855

201,33373,999

10

114106

7,95011,200

63 12,675

5,000

213,895

19,550550

10,050

1042

141135

5942

825866444460

48

1513

1,7971,677

621791511326186

360325

202242

234235 143 122 219 229788810

96106

6 For years in which figures are shown for total repairs, etc., only, no details were reported.

229 212,825 883 4,751,866265 184,807 762 2,871,312

1,109 393,164 1,487 775,209222 354,695 499 1,844,896122 116,950 338 1,949,950310 188,065 504 1,995,365

1,120 710,856 1,901 4,326, 76923 6,740 274 1,021,621

396 309,608 951 1,787,110466 264,213 990 1,872,318

1,287 929,384 2,669 6,683,0681,487 558,676 2,487 6,076,626

303 549,580 803 2,476,621281 363,616 743 3,843,006

1,734 1,071,249 2,441 4,290,9091,570 694,076 2,273 3,456,3932,082 1,855,040 5,392 21,786,6962,906 1,403,913 5,687 14,224,577

18 125,500 999 6,880,07750 608,500 891 4,540,60030 77,000 179 924,20027 63,500 164 1,382,800

6,137 10,347,994 9,839 60,987,4685,465 7,737,125 9,255 55,698,557

156 731,200 1,145 5,186,712380 456,098 1,135 3,526,622446 231,239 952 1,433,359426 276,950 887 1,725,858178 501,263 536 5,902,440216 553,077 588 6,291,422

1,526 1,542,622 6,605 33,073,4531,271 1,122,724 5,545 24,401,983

65 57,000 203 721,14076 40,900 238 443,77151 86,096 136 388,83639 26,201 55 68,249

134 151,390 215 366,440577 1,199,474 1,057 9,557,469585 937,610 1,052 8,083,723711 619,712 1,751 5,330,327590 665,965 1,293 7,428,055627 439,331 1,944 4,156,020574 579,171 1,579 3,662,318729 346,571 1,358 2,602,622630 581,599 1,256 2,438,23065 34,415 192 798,73036 73,000 98 303,345

346 328,715 433 586,099354 177,407 454 560,635168 519,775 611 2,038,709131 259,390 601 2,873,180

156

202

189115265

198

824359

8,65019,980123

139

' ' " 39"935779

878,135 598,877

110

232

........ 7"8,3017,380

8

7,814,242 8,104,037

4,196135

212

80

2045 1,350

303307

2125

6,795817308

64

70

"‘ "l30"4084

14,20914,687

169

309

295 3144104

412141,26431,894155

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 100: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new constructiony and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued

Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non­

residential build­ings

Grand total o f all per­ Rank Installationpermits

City and State YearHousekeeping

dwellingsN onhousekeeping

dwellings

Total repairs, etc. m its— new construc­tion and repairs, etc*

incost

ofcon­

Number Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruc­tion Num­

ber Cost

Charlotte, N C 1927 235 $165,258 207,052 370,624 305,612 92,630 83,955

112,925

86 $656,201 202,218 473,427 418,895 208,525

321 $821,459 409,270 844,051

1,137 1,397 3,006

$5,554,8847,458,2644,874,201

1928 356 71 427 69Chattanooga, Tenn___

Chelsea, Mass________

1927 1,5351,553

149

589 2,1242,275

225

114 $100,96619281927

5 $910 71776

725,417 301,155 265,175 271,925

2,939343

4,703,486866,060

"'105 1233

89,2281,200

19281927

126 73 181,220 199 348 1,163,715 2,396,265

253~Chester, Pa_____ ______ 91 42 159,000 133 664 15 16,450

1928 101 208,675 11,423,857

489 1,746,542 365,065,042

210" 28 25,400Chicago, 111___________ 1927 3,950 2,911,610

2,117,435 61,150 52,875

122,104 244,966

2,733 8,512,247 6,683 26,100 416 1,603,6001928 3,579

982,336

326,182, 705

16,000 61,425

5,915 8,300,140 77,150

114,300 153,704 299,966

4,785,110 4,778,740

95,055

19,982 323,509,048 ........2 856 3,614,000Chicopee, Mass 1927 130 445 1,117,110

1,275,565 4,635,829 3,860,080

30,570,299

19281927

91 33 124 406 241Cicero, 111 96 9 31,600

55,000105 588

19281927

162 3 165 547 122Cincinnati, Ohio 4,790 8,662

9,431422

2,9404,892

1, 704,7131928 5,545

15335,458,7301,007,635

13 3,446,565Clarksburg, W . Va — 1927 109 47,190

62,325 1,294,075 •1,089,550

44 47,865 51,610

7,992,675 7,866,925

37 5,6301928 128 35 163 113,935

9,341,750 9,141,375

84,080 104,545

427 1,189,385 45,480,550 56,158,525 3,388, 565 3,542,055

577,398 812,495

1,533,375

"~25o"Cleveland, Ohio 1927

1928 1927

1,8451,620

1 55,000184,900

3,0753,038

4,9214,665

157

12,108 10,593 1,134

987

7 6Clifton, N . J

1928 157 133Colorado Springs, C olo. 1927 275 121,562

95,971 93,675

138 105,091102,05838,145

413 , 226,653 198,029 131,820 262,080 208,474 169,154

1,993,650 1,379,460

142,950 108,800

76119281927

267 134 401 762 279Columbia, S. C __ _____ 317 58 375 689 136 33,625

1928 505 883 1,609,775 1,539,749 1,154,002

23,282,600 16,237,250

930.250810.250

22i~ 127 16,550Columbus Ga 1927

192819271928 1927

23823192575710776

86,774 67,072

779,350 553,260 112,600 78,700

1 14,00013,97574,350

500

7794

367

107.700 88,107

1,139,950825.700 30,350 30,100

316 733g 333 756 255

Columbus, Ohio 7 1,2991,078

147

6,0305,350

376i 320

4032

Council Bluffs, Iowa—1928 24 100 283 285

BUILDING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 101: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Covington, K y ...............

Cranston, R . I ................

Cumberland, M d ..........

Dallas, T ex......................

Danville, 111....................

Davenport, Iow a...........

Dayton, Ohio_________

Decatur, 111___________

Denver, C o lo . . . ............

Des Moines, Iow a.........

Detroit, M ich_________

Dubuque, Iowa.......... .

Duluth, M inn ................

Durham, N . C________

East Chicago, In d .........

East Cleveland, Ohio__

Easton, Pa.......................

East Orange, N . J .........

East Providence, R . I__

East St. Louis, 111..........

Elgin, 111..........................

Elizabeth, N . J ..............

Elkhart, Ind...................

Elmira, N . Y ..................

El Paso, Tex__________

Erie, P a ...........................

16712858

141,500108,95070,100

35542

118,000183,400

3,800

5259

1,2511,429

1440

244

39,151 18,292

752,898 692,862

18,980 53,000

108,274

2 1,600 17 16

936534223518

59,820 56,835

1,065,224 1,035,297

102,113 110,189 30,460

1 200

536648

320,161 334,997

325347

1,328,869 1,012,481

169 124,235 13 38,500 53 99,900

203224

166,563 108,402

6174

141,853247,405

86 1,429 1,358

87 111 148 139 33 39 98

135 297 260 150

35,396 439,580 437,299 86,875

100,412 175,480 188, 702 22,870 40,910

153,324 133,669 266,495 227,094 45,000

322192302532 23 20 44 38 5333

140 16426

77,565 743,015 568,737 63,368

132,538 165,847 166,703 14,615 69,381

158,134 154,800 436,213 139,279 13,000

3 18,200

10758

60,32330,123

113113

181,815186,485

419264

5151236419338

263,091 259,533

5,500 50,233

112,579 120,887 117,308

471

82,12515,000

20582

44108273181

11,355 681,844 25,000 7,290

118,694 211,125 118,738

22

1,125 1,550

504472

332,642344,299

200166

1,229,179 377,06027 195,795

20218260737175

2,1871,963

3775

262819861995254235

264 298

7,014 6,847

586 118

1,648 1,5"~

112 143 171 159 77 77

151 171 437 424 176 470 220 171 476 486 323

7 195 344 694 521 877 492 704 665

259,500292,350

73,900103,025100.571 75,127

1,818,122 1,728,159

121,293 163,189 138,734 289,379

1,649,030 1,347,478

253,195 262,635

2,023,050 1,657,750

308,416 355,807

13,401,264 11,801,945

229,145 112,961

1,182,595 1,006,036

150,243 232,950 341,327 355,405 37,485

110,291 311,458 306,669 702,708 366,373 58,000

117,984 242,138 216,608 297,800356.571 956,37730,500 57,523

231,273 333,137 237,596 623,779 307,411

1,561,821 917,154

726 580 884

1,048 320 256

3,533 3,428

240 245 708

1,235 3,118 2,617 1,615 1,184 7,339 6,154 1,243 1,299

28,104 28,541

918 328

2.453 2,175

642 632 626 421 256 236 319 280

1,134 928 689

1,032 1,200 1,003 1,072 1,0061.454

910 704 787

1,122 926

1,162 1,014 1,956 1,779

1,722,310 1,591,750 2,669,634 3,710,249

942,465 999,548

9,773,523 8,088,999 1,036,791

915,348 2,053,351 1,349,741

10,332,026 10,358,378 5,790,415 4,169,345

15, 754,600 16,770, 750 2,876,131 4,509,980

145,555,647 129,260,285

1,288,207 877,386

4,431,435 3,289,404 2,587,754 9,905,838 4,304,366 3,481,904 1,220,620 1, 789, 252 1,299,670

733,008 12,313,092 7,632,385 2,389,700 3,090,101 5,562,971 2,706,934 1,891,883 2,369,646

10,922,877 5,503,600 2,660,566 1,063,889 1,311,783 1,905,717 1,792,561 2,144,225 5,393,056 4 ,76S, 688

65 4,180223

12917

1,0002,345266

63 290 130,741

273

234

53

11776 51,050

30

112

3

275421154

95,02888,322143

54

1373825

92,95764,605207

282

" " ‘ 67'205207

19,62724,301

148163915

34,96322,87425,800

162

171

94

262

196

178

104 CO^ 1

Ge

ne

ra

l, t

ab

le

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 102: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 3.—REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued

CD0 0

C ity and State Year

Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Housekeepingdwellings

Number Cost

N onhousekeeping dwellings

Num­ber Cost

Repairs, etc., on non- residential build­ings

Num­ber Cost

Total repairs, etc.

Number Cost

Grand total of all per­m its— new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

Number Cost

Rankin

costof

con­struc­tion

Installationpermits

Num ­ber Cost

Evanston, 111..............

Evansville, In d ..........

Everett, M ass............

Everett, W ash.........._Fall River, Mass........

Fitchburg, Mass........

Flint, M ich .................

Fond du Lac, W is .~

Fort Smith, A rk........Fort W ayne, In d ____

Fort Worth, Tex........

Fresno, Calif__............

Galveston, T ex...........

Gary, Ind.....................

Grand Rapids, M ich .

Great Falls, M ont___

Green Bay, W is.........

Greensboro, N . C ____

192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

333245916780202213

219124

45

1,767 154 167 790

1,843 281 440

1,617 1,497

3,7802,599

177156177

351406

$549,770 538,700 215,237 192,251 166,288 54,218

174,20983,60539,46027,610

583,942 100,185 56,914

122,011 174,105 213,401

$118,085

89,000

983,310 130,355 141,185

2632

255,762 325

203,6051,465

13,000

966,960 655,650 69,035 80,260

95,000 181,658

45.20026.200

1381441429

6845314

376113132

459283442107124

240261

150136

$164,100 333,350 54,121

138,473 26,027

184,683

135,265 205,655 21,108

224,625

726,635225,54928,585

364,422268,757424,287

220,778 363,018 314,728 629,510 151,641

635,8901,095,860

87,75053,570

120,992

350,690320,293

396

232233 152 357 26897 74

2,816 2,451

207 181

1,172 442 423

1,462 2,565

566 882

1,741 1,624

878 575

4,020 2,860

203 185 197 232 551 545

$713,870 872,050 269,358 330,724 192,315 238,901509.000 309,474 289,26060,568

252,235 1,269,617 1,310,577

325,734 85,499

604,518 442,862 726,688

4,746,5231.459.850

493,698 455,913 979,473 368,246

3,921,447800,275

1.602.850 1,751,510

156,785 133,830 210,887160.000 490,890 528,151

1,470 1,040 1,861 1,805

667 535 454 842 592 318 202

8,785 6,700

490 434

1,520 1,844 1,646 4,812 4,560 1,023 1,272 2,551 2,243 2,857 1,966 8,386 5,401

508 542 716 683

1,176 1,179

$15,917,225 13,178,225 3,415,998 5,110,8142.097.830 1,760,759 1,186,590 1,840,768 2,835,644

637,975 822,350

22,087,451 14,422,729 1,000,179

579,130 1,608,702 6,002,498 5,011,124

28,483,764 11,543,787 2,690,578 1,661,565 2,974,415 2,676,808

15,016,529 6,041,150

12,319,420 8,186,755 1,163,119 2,659,482 2,508,898 1,991,8614.837.830 5,048,295

44

209251

157

277

291222

100

215

1.63"

62

"164*

loo

"'99'

168

25408304

121158

$2,125

10,002

30,000

3009,6523,3177,039

21,065101,455

39,59762,575

BUILDING

PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 103: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Greenville, S. C_............

Greenwich, C on n .........

Hagerstown, M d ............

Hamilton, Ohio..............

Hammond, Ind ..............

Hamtramck, M ich........

Harrisburg, Pa...............

Hartford, Conn..............

Haverhill, Mass.............

Hazleton, Pa...................

Highland Park, Mich__

Hoboken, N. J...............

Holyoke, M ass...............

Houston, T ex.................

Huntington, W . Va___

Hutchinson, Kans_____Indianapolis, Ind ...........

Irvington, N. J ..............

Jackson, M ich ................

Jacksonville, Fla............

Jamestown, N . Y ..........

Jersey City, N . J...........

Johnstown, Pa...............

Joliet, 111..........................

Joplin, M o.......................

Kalamazoo, M ich_____

Kansas City, Kans........

26323183

111627043

195

272,150 126,048 215,162 494,465

36,565

18,870 121,034

75

3755

1926

1872212342582226986504840

268,500 225,240 165,405 385,475 286,840 364,696 378,662 48,510 41,225

142,297 98,627

54,95038,70096,600

36,45017,300

277

1514611047642249411723

15815611187

9081,081

10932

178

176,839 90,610

187,100 81,625

447,418 456,756 50,314 12,000 72,710

1,000

75,000

300

73418054

1,0297332210

129109427416

1,3101,016

325328

80163260247220322

102,375 60,746

137,890 145,294 676,865 417,228 125,965 117,207 328,360 344,815 123,285 94,833

216,450 246,875

1,000 35,167

4130

100 107 665 501 175 171 702 5306256

12031

192921

1,015

108,396 173,200 204,584

474751

338 347,287 242,691

538329 591 -120 352,237 578166 867,635 610100 159,645 398106 215,034 33462 41,840 632

221 142,099 841189 221,900 1,321214 469,300 1,055228 483,665 476249 288,045 518413 1,214,475 1,037342 881,140

2,593,888844

1,176 2,3211,072 1,884,257 1,931

101 257,325 37187 109,875 324

106 281,187 33591 183,022 207

216 279,435 928,110

372195 382234 398,449

244,173271

197 239192 530,950 432141 347,400

754,676350

1,937 5,8801,814 710,563 6,072

132 131,514 50942 52,000 270

214 201,722 6516,874 3,853,588 13,5725,531 2,612,813 10,217

170 282,372 1,585139 83,041 903527 249,696 1,201523 546,396 1,230

1,975 1,320, »31 5,0023,4311,517 841,569

500 417,760 1,039499 291,880 917782 1,340,155 1,554693 933,050 1,375322 297,805 672303 133,753 556341 361,150 579391 307,792

2 i8 ,158607

143 403239 172,346 469968 383,888 1,494

1,5131,066 475,386498 125,475 1,163397 88,825 1,043

1, 111, 182 1,440,143 5,700,062 6,604,380 1,558,205

677,234 1,782,749 2,063,0336.431.200 6,527,280 1,545,815 1,344,975 3,569,365 5,594,775

17,529,941 11,278,443

909,625 554,065

2,072,504 1,195,010 2,654,9602.603.277 1,519,599

564,9632.044.200 1,261,100

27,326,475 35,309,503

1,547, i50 981,600

1,269,112 23,682,31621.967.386 12,960,2276,639,294 2,575,644 2,097,086

12.768.386 7,660,159 2,745,835 1,846,870

13,851,780 13,876,244

1,386,183 1,095,094 2,793,700 3,081,620 1,355,533 1,403,739 2,223,046 2,034,864 1,586,7901.651.277

229 8 2,200

77

286

185

78

236 50 5,500

90116 172,260

50

296

248799

,7253,3631,463165

294

244

15

268242

650719

386,7141,120,83622

76

182560745

282,688 193,56166

200297645 3

95,200 200,050

2,300 1,025

77

40

"'"259“

" “ ’ 149’

231

186

217CDo *

GEN

ERAL, TA

BLE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 104: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued §

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued

Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non- Grand total of all per­ Rank Installation

permitsC ity and State Year

Housekeepingdwellings

Nonhousekeepingdwellings

residential build­ings

Total repairs, etc. mits — new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

incostof

con­

Number Cost Num ­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruc­tion Num­

ber Cost

1927 524 $422,700 342,165 36,360 45,480

300 $1,256,940406,23518,72090,8.00

824 $1,679,640802,00055,080

2,9192,345

788

$14,822,33615,541,2755,795,875

1,098576

3

$310,204

Kearny, N . J . . . . . . .19281927

339102

58 $53,600 25524

652126

34 351,975568

Kenosha, W is_______19281927

81 2 150 23 106268

136,430296,961

679963

6,251,5904,468,4533,726,4042,140,0931,736,7905,699,4177,114,537

480,095

81 24513

4,200196,392

Kingston N Y19281927

250341

350,00098,298

142,959329,987

7 745 1063

84,000326,275535,435175,315

267404

434,745424,573716,784505,302

894816

128 337 272,220

19281927

312873

3 38,390 45335

360 713 211Knoxville, Tenn _ _ _ 1,208

8522,4702,138

410

66 9,1751928 329,796

Kokomo, Ind 1927 103 40,936 19 35,480 122 76,41667,653

127,8341928 71 420 526,666 298

Lakewood, Ohio 1927 170 108,184 99,800

139,878 115,640 244,240 156,755

15 19,65010,250

209,640744,540

7,500127,930

185 870 3,516,399 12 1,6721928 120 21 141 110,050

623,328625 4,622,096 109 280 21,766

Lancaster Pa 1927 280228297

59 273,810 84 423 856 3,004,838 2,389,075 7,330,420 5,204,347

913,134

19281927

107 335 860,180 251,740 284,685 174,189 175,135 173,000

647 170Lansing IvTicii 75 372 1,301

1,340261

19281927

301 97 398 96Lawrence, M ass. 95

1928 2758

64,86093,00047,575

55 116,’ 275“ 80,000

209,750

82 222 602,635 604,500 660,325 469,100 990,000

290Lebanon Pa- 1927 1 59 311

19281927

31 15 46 257,325 15,000 5,000

239,167

131 287Lewiston, M e 6 70

1928 10 3,500 75,991 37,686 56,855 57,297 91,460 93,195

331,523 266,241

1 1,500 163,176

11 66 267Lexington, K y . . . . . . ._ 1927 269 66 335 748 2,350,985 8 2,650

1928 177 86 131,613 263 169,299 556 1,617,418 219" 9 2,660Lima Ohio 1927

1928 1927

180189161

1 400 67 167,723100,33590,94299,300

183,468189,344

248 224,978159,217182,402192,495514,991455,585

471 707,313454,434

4,398,5403,643,3492,993,6364,260,108

X^ncoln, Nobr2 1,585 59

36250197

4321,0681,0702,0081,528

302 4 5,000

192819271928

1741,113

733

23 197 131Jjitflft Rftfsifj Ark- 195 1,308

872139 116

BUILDING PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 105: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Long Beach, Calif_____ 1927 719 335,360335,13560,90542,580

( 664 404,960 365,105 36,180 55,080

1928 741 568Lorain, Ohio__________ 1927 97 34

1928 77 36Los Angeles, Calif_____ 1927

1928LnnisvillA, TTy ___ 1927 385 739,755 535 959,215

1928Lowell, Mass__________ 1927 269 110,535 195 241,620

213,480 135,588 105,659 390,571 592,530 174,429 81,909

1928 255 97,465 141Lynchburg, V a________ 1927 240 103,947 86

1928 220 71,180 93Lynn, Mass 1927 408 431,065

353,005 322,140 253,000

2221928 416 169

McKeesport, P a_______ 1927 1,236879

3 11,2705,000

21669

Macon, Ga____________19281927

1

1928Madison, Wis_________ 1927 541 252,870

261,048 180,807 97,139

79 131,408508,299425,70099,958

135,716

1928 450 83Malden, Mass................ 1927 238 57

1928 167 62Manchester, N . H ......... 1927

1928554 204,450 2 4,500 179

Mansfield, Ohio.... ........ 1927 175 75,49843,477

56 147,11797,3421928 118 58

Marion, Ind ___________ 1927

Marion, Ohio__________19281927

7889

55,66619,043

2 1,500 843

7,000 22, m

1928Medford, Mass________ 1927 220 158*216

112,07129 176,045

78,1251928 193 44Memphis, Tenn_______ 1927

1928Meriden, Conn________ 1927

1928Miami, Fla____________ 1927 1,183

460571,108 314,806

23 24,6984,495

734441

686,123 364,274

Milwaukee, W is............19281927

14

1928Minneapolis, M inn____ 1927

1928Mobile, Ala..................... 1927 416 142,813 20 60,800

1928Moline, HI............... ....... 1927 453 l40,247

117,337107 48,750

77,973Montclair, N . J —..........

19281927

563 7 6,025 87

1928Montgomery, Ala_____ 1927

1928M ount Vernon, N . Y__ 1927 152 514,760

251,389110 644,210

360,1751928 138 124

1,3831,309

131 113

13,922 12,749

920 932 464 396 326 313 630 585

1,455 949

1,508 1,3!

620 533 295 229 735 598 231 176 134 88

132 64

249237

1,7971,872

253697

1,940915

2,1442,1952,2812,360

436491560657271268974

1,744262262

740,320700,24097,08597,660

16,878,91610,398,8221.698.970 2,657,955

352,155 310,945239.535176.839 821,636945.535507.839 339,909 341,304 352,449 384,278 769,347606.507 197,097 344,666 231,359 222,615140.819 33,420 63,500 41,178 33,940

334,261 190,196

1,544,270 2,059,625

143,464 259,795

1,281,929 683,575

3,735,545 3,641,787 2,940,560 3,200,165

203,613187.508 188,997 201,335 731,533 524,233 754,247307.820

1.158.970 611,564

4,1974,988

599606

37,65533,1953,2783,215

787

5831,2651,2791,9051,3251,9431,8171,5071,475

970 682 544 293 360 580 701

1,109 1,131 4,017 4,005

628 975

3,545 1,568 8,609 7,258 6,791 6,580

872 1,647

870 954 920 804

1,444 2,916

962 946

13,639,425 16,307,825 1,300,534 1,177,374

123,027,139 101,678,768 23,340,610 18,120,075

971,115941,750

1,528,7291,093,0833.877.775 3,786,804 2,356,119 2,184,985 2,886,116 2,349,689 4,461,813 7,630,114 3,800,093 2,892,944 1,940,074 1,058,719 3,779,555 1,808,874

521,560 1,307,160

557,793 1,140,285 4,370,512 4,514,833

12,402,920 14,283,039 1,316,177 1,268,721 9,540,937 1,946,063

37,747,895 35,406,381 22,429,620 23,257,725 2,146,241 3,345,818 1,170,0101.659.775 5,446,164 4,643,268 2,531,347 3,288,918

16,775,45214,262,449

609573

66,72084,01031

252

5

" ” 27"9,813

10,8132,997,5303,120,275

270

260~98

7751,250

12687

54440

101

12,682 178,683

9,755 22,159

175

”""l72~

68

153

263

206

238

256

111837936

1,170,070 1,020,04337

243638 524

25,811 24,105

380,51569,276

8,981,0169,082,880

193

14

21

14211 38,554

216

107

144

38

GENEKAL TAB

LE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 106: bls_0500_1929.pdf

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued.

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued §

Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non­ Grand total of all per­ Rank Installation

permitsC ity and State Year

Housekeepingdwellings

N onhousekeeping dwellings

residential build­ings

Total repairs, etc. mits — new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

incostof

con­

Number Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruc­tion Num­

ber Cost

1927 1,2331,320

647

$341,982 452,129 199,731 277,328 43,320 35,255

617,663 670,694

2,1112,3211,032

990

$3,038,813 158 $12,4781928 1,259 $348,025 61 $104,104 2,874,148 154 79 8,993

Muskegon M!ich 1927 1,078,6681928 595 1,810.335 205

Muskogee Okla 19271928 1927

54 31,895 31,255

14 11,425 68 262 842,567BO 15 4,000 45 259 565, 585 293

Nashville, Tenn 1,2451,280

2,097 7,078,073 226 38,2591928 2,227 5,564, 643 92 235 167,770

Newark, N . J _________ 1927 868 1,625, 318 2 $7,200 451 2,773,960 1,321 4,406,478 3,998 2,972

51,451,630 1, 515 1,181,568 1,998,5511928 769 1,290, 247 424 3,603,141 1,193 4,893,388

31,491 28,600

538,810 286,622 661,119

34,285,153 1, 210Newark Ohio 1927 64 287 653,822

1928 r 64 352 1,066,916 261N ew Bedford, Mass___ 1927

192819271928 1927

634271581

320,550 1.54,870 513,838

103 218,260 131, 752

737 1,422681

2,166,627 1,095,375136 407 258

N ew Britain, Conn___ 224 147,281 805 1,4371,227

451

4,103,884 3,532,117 2,839,066

642 642,509681,916

134N ew Brunswick, N . J— 106 198,300

165,833 66,265

38 483,616 128,752 242,356 195,042 240,320

144 1 5,50019281927

7410981

152

27 131,810 27 128 426,395 308,621 248,692

386 2,184,065 1,517,651 1,237,967 3,037,495 1,466,240

11,741,379

176""NT pwhn rcli N Y 45 154 364

19281927

53,650 69,390 57,910

227,314 336,000 75,375

134,982 772,300

1,191,215

58 139 345 246N ew Castle, Pa 48 200 309,710 794 9 1,330

19281927

118219

51 49,590 743,563 683,000

169 107,500 970,877

1,019,000

593 228N ew Haven Conn 513 732 1,514 359 37,154

1928 333 337 670 1,330551

8,798,394 58 369 84,650N ew London, Conn___ 1927

1928115150

1 5,000 87 299, 215 134,205

203 379,590 269,187

1,801,715 2,188, 652

3 4,40050 200 565 174 39 1,170

"NTaw OrlfiftTi*? Tift 19271928192719281927192819271928

380 435 1,289,880 1,578,279

815 2,062,180 2,769,494

38,980

2,4332,882

162

15,896,775 12,627,678

439,225744 532 1,276

4447

Newport, TCy72 36,565 2 7,250 25 123,325 99 167,140

112,390 115,545 100,077 219,194

194 426,950 906,330

305Newport, R . I 142 346

102 55,485 66 66,060 168 384 680,065 285Newport News, V a ____ 798 972 548,015

771 161,687 417 U 7,507 1,188* 1,439 819,305 278

BUILDING

PBEM

ITS IN

THE PEIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 107: bls_0500_1929.pdf

N ew Rochelle, N . Y . _.

Newton, Mass................

N ew York City, N . Y : The Bronx...... .........

Brooklyn..................

Manhattan________

Queens......................

R ichm ond................

Niagara Falls, N . Y ___

Norfolk, V a.....................

Norristown, P a ..............

Norwalk, Conn..............

Oakland, Calif...............

Oak Park, HI..... ............

Ogden, Utah...................

Oklahoma City, Okla__

Okmulgee, Okla.... ........

Omaha, N ebr.................

Orange, N . J...................

Oshkosh, Wis.................

Ottumwa, Iow a.............

Paducah, K y __________

Pasadena, Calif..............

Passaic, N . J__________

Paterson, N . J_________

Pawtucket, R . I _______

Peoria, 331_____________

1927192819271928

192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

354327

627466

4,8304,8791,3651,4782,9822,525

555508328 412 369 345 221 191 295 280

489,945 454,847

1,491,805 1,310,380 5,523,040 5,958, 775 7,172, 791 7, 704,466 1,799,414 1,384,191

503,000 391,965 223,612 228,079 263,475 175,430 123,386 116,405 237,949 265,865

6755

273187

21

188,400 2,165,350 3,955,425

10,778,760

21,350

113118

6,1276,0601,7231,6721,4801,212

919964363409168214211185128113 95

114

1731357533

3713812010

105157

144,865 123,382 216,750 29,500

250,634 218,052 18,475 8,950

73,493 119,102

4,000

1,200

"6,"000'

28187

2391

1511316

104121

9524170834074

43,536 103,336 24,900 48,375 16,000 43,525

17141

77

1014

318347

214,769 204,425

24 41,857265

155129485420

94,43596,375

243,540271/115

3,6006198

104

279 691,095 905 9,735,614250 847,046 845 11,233,318467 897,490 1,628 10,138,606445 707,673 1,676 10,802,078

6,754 9,417,580 11,864 172,588,0816,526 6,919,304 10,959 189,824, 8536,620 12,857,025 22,431 220,968,9606,606 15,522. 055 18,358 198,284, 9053,118 31,220, 048 3,832 290,320, 5632,877 37,809, 648 3,787 361,723, 0683,901 5,897, 452 26,579 184,438,4613,489 5,767, 629 22,101 151,565, 804

918 1,057, 718 3,671 12,017, 390917 690,288 3,766 15,273, 225496 950, 491 1,343 4,791, 480647 599,325 1,577 4,869, 478580 580, 712 1,464 3,346, 826530 491,840 1,383 3,839, 743353 598,989 577 1,826,101304 313,940 551 1,294, 965390 391,219 914 3,592,009394 555, 740 980 4,781, 703

3,071 2, 239,179 7,027 20,518,4172,177 1, 713,163 5,092 19,537,165

202 268,845 1,020 9,080,676153 216,244 836 9,290, 49582 449,750 316 1,498, 26057 145,900 239 1,348, 225

462 648,030 3,168 12,682, 293534 1, 254,368 3,965 13, 521, 99833 32, 825 85 262,15026 25,350 57 252,965

209 750,973 1,035 4,567,218278 628, 337 1,169 9,050,410402 763,197 691 5,581, 523333 398,409 542 3,106, 499112 62, 732 494 1,494, 076382 165, 922 733 852,84677 59,400 179 579,90090 65,325 190 393. 77550 24,000 219 356,00088 81,015 228 608,605

1,661 1,199,713 2,778 8,965,7201,420 893,300 2,452 5,949, 553

588 1,492,504 987 5,603, 448612 488,461 975 3,061, 518

1,524 1,000,474 2,458 6.369, 9171,474 1,142, 027 2,258 7,356,691

255 449,825 1,140 3, 586, 765190 392,430 991 2,822, 589583 473,465 1,492 3,409, 575524 539,965 1,418 3,951,260

51

‘ "“ 52“4

10

1,488 3,053 3,383

1,8505,565

550,250 1,091,960 1,747,703

11,027 830,733

28 9,150

10137039711560

64,989 48,767 66,481 27,101

124

" ” 239"

103746 276,252

24

55

235 2243

177

249 11,777 45,43541

310

56

’ " ’ 146"2124

4,360 47,705

276

306 121 27,045

289

864776253924

31,245 103, 585 28,330 23,625

150

72

159

119

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 108: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— C ontinued

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued

C ity and State

Perth Am boy, N . J .

Petersburg, Va..........

Philadelphia, Pa------

Phoenix, Ariz----------

Pittsburgh, Pa..........

Pittsfield, Mass........

Plainfield, N . J .........

Pontiac, M ich______

Port Arthur, T ex—

Port Huron, M ich_.

Portland, M e............

Portland, Oreg..........

Portsmouth, Ohio—

Portsmouth, Va____

Poughkeepsie, N . Y —

Providence, R . I —

Year

19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Housekeepingdwellings

Number

2391905050

5,7884,940

2882,5912,681

138124128182447521

2515

558488

4,1533,891

15113019223211152

3,1492,524

Cost

$343,811 439,237 60,000 35,336

4,693,745 4,904,210

114,903 1,832, 9(31 1,997,640

83,610 83.315

199, 585 186,863 195,979 226,345

13,275 10, 250

259,996 159, 320

1,392, 610 1,271,905

50, 592 49,470

118,762 133,941 159,110 48, 261

1,181, 830 1,163,700

N onhousekeeping dwellings

Num ­ber

44

Cost

$3,051,400 365,470

50,0001,000

73,297 30,140

12,000

Repairs, etc., on non- residential build­ings

Num­ber

26

1827

1,9751,691

1399035592664

1101129777

24 8

242283

1,0341,044

523525 56 2326

387 573

Cost

$3,500 18,100 55,089

316,525 9,809, 680 7,298,500

257, 598 2,970,234 1,787,093

459.300 7i;900

338.588 218, 760 128,022 251,635

337,575 21,475

278,478 330, 634

1, 576,0401, 596,625

84,480 52,415 33,816 19,645 77,530

156,4402, 681,085 1,667,325

Total repairs, etc.

Number

241 396 68 77

7,763 6,631

485 427

3, 512 3,319

164 188 239 295 544

7664923

892815

5,1874,935

20416521728813478

3,5363,097

Cost

$347,311 457,337 115,089 151,861

14, 503,425 12,202, 710

299,923 372,501

7,854, 595 4,150, 203

542,910 155,215 588,173 406,623 324,001 477,980 206,736 234,916 350,850 31,725

611,771 520,094

2.968, 650 2,80S, 530

147,072 101,885152, 578153, 586 236,640 204,701

3,862,915 2,831,025

Grand total of all per­mits — new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

Number

502 394 157 194

19,082 16,423 1,178 1,259 7,869 7,070

470 552

2,114 2, 8511.351 1,207

206140

1,3681.351

11,2949, 567

564 447 403 472 302 276

5,442 4,979

Cost

$1,671,872 1,367,359

279,466 568,628

117,590, 650 112,225, 865

5, 645,124 5,976,662

37, 111, 332 39,373, 532 1,650. 690 1,813,130 5,046,011 3,464, 771

17, 558, 296 13,115,226 1,731,380 1,881, 236

839,065 461,175

2,326,783 2,738,886

28,973,455 21,275,970 1,585,007 1,247,085

463,385 688, 531

1,347,667 1,664,820

23,132,819 16,003,519

Rankin

costof

con­struc­tion

233

"292

""85

10

"253

138

45

197

301

"16023

*245

214

" 8 3

Installationpermits

Num­ber

3052244655

4031

152152

34

1,800

Cost

$135,115 78,935 6,991 8,963

12,3503,800

28,43422,108

10,342 4,059 3,638

8,72011,500

186,095

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PBINCIPAL

CITIE

S

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 109: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Pueblo, C olo.................. 19271928

Qrrinny; 111 1927 47 23,793117,686

1 2,10053,535

112

44,5509,000

Quincy, M ass.-..............19281927

68 11928 874 281,934

162,518 156,206 503,047 319,804

629646

319321

82,506 294,750 124,645 381,395 674,550

Racine, W is.— — ____ 1927 185

Beading, Pa___________19281927

1551,3151,185

14

2,50053,5004,600

Bevere, Mass__________19281927

21928

Richmond, I n d - . -____ 1927 192 117,855 122,440 383,591 294,415

1 5,000 4968

80,520 115,266

1,379,831 965,806

1928 212Richmond, V a________ 1927 867 19 54,610

5,374584396

Boanoke, Va__________19281927

553 7

1928 289 110,092831,502531,950211,556296,322

26 61,000 1,391,984 1,404,936

432,250 1,158,595

Bochester, N . Y _______ 1927 914 1 31,000 8459231928 737

Bockford, ELL........ ......... 1927 299 2642621928 391

B ock Island, HI_______ 1927

Sacramento, Calif.........19281927

833645

1,556,484 299,329 622,398

19 61,000 28331

12,245652,090227,510138,231282,467

1928 227 537Saginaw, M ich.... ........... 1927 361 174,000

195,446138

1928 420 104St. Joseph, M o.... .......... 1927

1928 46 83,985 2,919,299 1,407,943

921,856 825,340 227,500 194,400 150,205 251,650 131,818

24 41,990 3,383,647 3,059,003

475,902 847,615 328,000 111, 700 210,650 144,910 459,002

1,215,293

St. Louis, M o__ - ______ 1927 3,3502,8821,7491,598

502

1237

142

24,130146,220152,891

2,2001,830

239884

St. Paul, M inn________192819271928

St. Petersburg, Fla____ 1927 1541928 342 111

Salem, Mass................... 1927 310 1801231928 477

Salt Lake City, U tah .. 1927 178 1141928 183 131,485 144

San Antonio, Tex_____ 19271928

San Diego, Calif_______ 19271928

San Francisco, Calif.__ 1927 1,8022,720

252

1,850,000 1,458,776

155,445

1,200847166135

2,850,000 2,120,229

278,835 199,365

San Jose, Calif— ..........19281927

24 103,1531928 260 108,925

Savannah, Ga................. 19271928

Schenectady, N . Y ____ 1927 269 397,950208,085

173 220,925238,3251928 266 5 20,005 138

613 284,145 1,445730 295,829 1,45859 70,443 43571 180,221 369

828 426,910 2,201936 364,440 2,335281 457,268 1,373202 283,351 1,078

1,638 937,942 2,3671,508 998,954 2,179

227 218,425 507152 108,245 454242 203,375 632280 237,706 575

1,470 1,818,032 3,891956 1,265,595 2,317399 181,423 1,156315 171,092 880

1,760 2,254,486 5,6651,660 1,936,886 4,542

563 643,806 2,116653 1,454,917 1,875545 399,535 932880 1,079,729 1,183976 951,419 2,267764 849,908 1,859499 312,231 1,426524 477,913 1,658341 144,772 659

70 125,975 2845,562 6,327,076 13,0354,749 4,613,166 12,6272,130 1,550,649 4,7722,482 1,672,955 4,999

656 555,500 1,650453 306,100 954490 360,855 774600 396,560 830292 590,820 1,000327 1,346,778 1,024

1,018 841,131 3,4611,423 1,567,609 4,2843,060 1,206,989 6,6522,250 839,198 5,1503,002 4,700,000 6,9323,591 3,682,158 6,648

418 434,280 1,065395 308,290 948157 158,920 611117 127,065 525442 618,875 1,192409 466,410 1,175

1,625,382 1,466,812 1,073,321 1,276,957 5,231,872 6,870,012 6,391,171 4,417,489 4,614,067 3,808,320 1,602,120 1,227,142 1,826,139

940,723 15,216,203 8,844,881 2,583,9963.279.423

22,589,418 17,620, 7986.553.423 5,736, 642 1,999,890 1,583,244 8,814,211 5,524,332 3,610,783 4,349,585

768,898 2,004,618

41,417,221 42,828,495 10,071,216 8,699,513 2,907,500 1,846,100 2,727,080 1,719,685 4,855,845 5,277,404

12,190,280 18,300,359 13,877,153 12,150,138 46,448,676 37,504,438 3,554,430 2,541,300 2,180,050 2,137,134 4,318,270 3,428,480

2273

..........211

2,865

1,53549,285

240

75

113 6772643

75,300 12,775 17,989126

247

271

5762

4,6001,025145

2858 3,265

8912 2,175

224202227

8

46,58173,8001,580

93

114

188690

’ "” 254"67

207,461

........57,"§7238,151

9

" ”"59"

201

213

95

26""7 4 2 "

7972,2481,408

1661191011

374,813 222,462 584,172 261,925 40,500 20,450 1,750 1,540

48

11

166

179

145 001

GENERAL TA

BLE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 110: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued

PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued

City and State

Scranton, Pa............

Seattle, Wash..........

Sheboygan, W is—

Shreveport, La____

Sioux City, Iowa—

Sioux Falls, S. Dak

Somerville, Mass___

South Bend, Ind—

Spokane, W ash------

Springfield, 111........

Springfield, Mass__

Springfield, M o -----Springfield, Ohio__

Stamford, Conn___

Steubenville, Ohio.

Stockton, Calif____

Superior, W is--------

Year

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

Repairs, etc., on residential buildings

Housekeepingdwellings

Number

525521

1,4571,447

1021052920

184300550503601348378

157131266

1611659285

179171173232

Cost

$234,280 181,544 329,511 378,890 65,275 48,955

116,000 20,810

52,867 92, 772

200,695 174,653 257,450 170,420 183,658

120,802 90,595 85,107

301,600 200,615 47,725 28,265 86,540 94,003 67, 708 98,657

N onhousekeeping dwellings

N um ­ber Cost

$500

6,335

2501,000

133,7604,000

13,2005,0506,925

Repairs, etc., on non­residential build­ings

Num­ber

18416327553751584

20494657

1862207396

1616175

105991312

14012318

Cost

$234,038 330,510 396,361 421,859 119,900 155,425 20,000

140,375

167,385 132,510 130,075 390,315 599,265 209,800 236,370

765,913 155,025 75,000

316,045 985*053

7,000 13,550

175,194 264,671 94,850 87,790

Total repairs, etc.

Number

416633

4,2314,538

709685

1,7321,992

1531633340

430233346607

42147439534119334127226626410597

207

Cost

$677,050 1,034,250 3,332,840 4,266,960

468,318 512,554 725,872 807,084 185,175 204,380 136,000 161,185 420,427 220,252 225,282 330, 770 565,218 857, 715 380,220 420,028

1,707,055 1,020,475

249,620 160,107 149,203 617,645

1,185,668 54,725 41,815

274,934 363,724 169,483 186,447

Grand total of all per­m its— new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

Number

1.141 1,189 9,906 9,512 1,261 1,166 2,426 2,921

741799228299822407

2,4062,5242.142 2,187 1,134 1,195 1,954 1,539

628945

1,017883834349423

1,166926490614

Cost

$5,707,115 4,632,243

29,070,080 34,806,975 2,171, 940 2,108, 719 3,946,370 4,846,425 1,867,575 2,170, 440 2,042,505 2,004,725 3,385,850 1,424,197 4,888,660 6,363,185 3,656,500 5,736, 778 3,770,303 3,739,153 8,905,819 5,976, 799 1,615, 655 1,693, 927 1,556, 767 6,042,716 5,195,278 1,856,435 1,193,410 2,803,347 1,774,866 1,277,019 1,852,152

Rankin

costof

con­struc­tion

108

”*16

" l8 l

”102177

187

230

"”79

127

84220

225

”"97

249

“208

199*

Installationpermits

Num ­ber

47449275

160

166

85124

10611392

Cost

$185,555 204,730 31,210 34,555

4,400

78,45044,195

56,796

37,016 109,710

20,846 23,972 35,773

BUILDING PERM

ITS IN

THE PRIN

CIPAL C

ITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 111: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Syracuse, N . Y _____

Tacoma, Wash_____

Tampa, Fla...............

Taunton, Mass-------

Terre Haute, Ind—

Toledo, Ohio.... .........

Topeka, Kans______

Trenton, N . J__........

T roy , N . Y ................

Tucson, Ariz..............

Tulsa, Okla................

Union City, N . J___

Utica, N. Y ...............

Vallejo, Calif.............

W aco, Tex.................

Waltham, Mass........

Warren, Ohio............

Washington, D . C__

Waterbury, Conn___

Waterloo, Iowa_____

Watertown, Mass—

Watertown, N. Y___

West New York, N . J__

Wheeling, W . Va___

W hite Plains, N . Y _ _ „

Wichita, Kans______

1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928

465

2,1121,698

126150

1,0321,321

243

39431139929375

22056456970251549

13524920693

115109

147

189154155

52562

1214854128391

669632

569,775 439,140

458,610 316,302 51,273 48,732

338,134 905,613

88,827

392,992 127,730 188,840 139,267 100,482 117,798 314,891 322,584

1,551,686 229,856 80,910

141,470 45,352 43,778 86,950 94,452

50,485

185,550 51,625 72,340

110,569 75,685

147,615 339,334 275,843 193,350 226,162 243,644 290,007

1015

15

83,000

35,000912

63,578 4 934

29,100

20,315

7,450

6,57513,800

358261

79964995

105

156293

99

106141244884555

225165504163589089535235

99

103241

156157 60 80

224

1,373,471836,686

362,406 258,722 181,528 64,606

30,158

216,829

403,911 663,324 309,198 59,219

166.259 51,198

159,742391.260 112,740 141,815 400,200 279,72023,867 25,581

165,235 199,867 82,475

93,195

358,300 168,705 181,820

110,850 115,558 201,320 171,646 359,839 471,126 312,980 247,777 360,236

1,077 729

1,228 1,198 2,911 2,347

222 257 921

1,188 1,614 1,477

342294 500 452 643 482 125 275 789 734 758 556 112 201 339295 146 167 144 178 148 246

2,9823,617

22123724219949

11349953594

177647569143171

2,072,069 1,358,826

575,815 633,945 821,016

575,024 267,801 114,250 308,899 368,292

2,304,495 2,882,899

305,656 158,564 796,903 791,054 498,038 262,064 271, 675 168,996 474,633 713,844

1,693,526 371,671 481,110 441,505 69,219 69,359

252,185 294,319 171,130 191,085 92,185

143,680 4,527,646 3,690,553

228,350 543,850 220,330 261,610 50,100 94,670

405,734 221,419191.243 355,510 524,780 635,682 664,476 539,142 491,421650.243

3,961 3,103 2,453 2,341 4,755

3,637 487 484

1,586 1,696 6,192 5,334 1,231 1,117 1,353 1,062

935 774 838 828

3,466 3,829 1,075

674 672 680 630 448 373 410 524 679 997 686

6,954 6,916 1,287

907 770 898 754 625 758 793 222 253

1,081 843 752 783

2,322 2,390

21,990,371 13,220,429 4,764,728 4,660,415 6,145,201

3, 617,054 1,055,999

882,497 1,212, 771

973,487 15,513,710 17,346,195 2,222,196 1,991,514 4,539, 632 4,105,921 3,206,057 1,323,664 2,322,550 2,895,391

14, 791,854 13,411,051 3,409,526 1,120, 756 3,381,105 3,916,970

492,898 441,847

1,573, 641 2,291,339 2,217, 925 2,477,055 1,425,474 1,811,620

39,263,477 53,974,979 5,015,638 3,488,300 1,151,981 2,722,194 4,281, 230 2,824,095

756,204 1,152,449 1,685,293 1,628,385 3,014,131 1,967,488

10,125,792 12,632, 206 5,848,942 7,974,221

2 95043

106132133

16,152 24,055132

274

” ’ 269’10222

65,5276,790

29

191

118 2 8,200

237

152 355

13,819 47,000

42

’ ” 257’126128

18,23417,501

120

304

173

167

204 1561,019

22,150847,760'

8

136

161

158

2544

12184

62523,1636,200

47,300

218

192

46386 300,000

65 O

GENERAL TA

BLE

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 112: bls_0500_1929.pdf

T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and addition to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, intended use of buildings— Continued §

P A R 7* 3,—REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, ^iV2> ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued

Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non- Grand total o f all per­ Rank Installation

permitsC ity and State Year

Housekeepingdwellings

Nonhousekeepingdwellings

residential build­ings

Total repairs, etc. mits — new construc­tion and repairs, etc.

incostof

con­

Number Cost Num­ber Cost Num­

ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruc­tion Num ­

ber Cost

Wichita Falls, Tex........ 19271928

203264

$117,529 221,670

67 $119,527 374,342

270 $237,056596,012

975 $4,050,687 1,911,41272 336 613 195 1 $200

Wilkes Barre, Pa 1927 900 706,123 1,376 4,934,339 13 37,8751928 948 662,881 1,337 3,896,345 121“ 20 104,590

WilHnfihnro Pa 19271928 1927

37 114,400 337 1,932,39058 105,005 276 1,915,561 194

Williamsport, Pa 292 107,744 44 $4,905 133 308,881 469 421,530 836 2,732,695 101 13,2771928 546 347,175 941 2,080,940 183 183 14,680

Wilmington, Del 1927 689 988,774 1,924 6,805,900 186 151,230799 1,129,452 1,969 5,577,109 91 146 96,190

WilminfffnTi "NT f! 1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927

6597

8531,021

1295

471498216217375

49,25065,000

280,909346,34728,17060,726

20 80,000 91,000

246,036 182,959 317,755 393,347

85 129,250156,000526,945529,306345,925454,073

197 552,125 748,50015 112 239 281

Winston-Salem, N . C ~ 126 979 2,4442,550

463

6,539,187 8,531,028 1,360,179

918,543137 1,158

16161

"R T 149UUUQUvAOb, XV. J- - ---76 171 366 272 9 4,866

Wnrr*Astftr M ass 260,358 728,817 382,387 271,125 336,447 150,682 104,150

553 1,772,432 759,267 806,972 974,400 115,785

1,024964

2,032,790 2,381 8,814,669466 1,488,084

1,189,359 1,245,525

455,362

1,9992,0051,934

718

7,260,320 32,585,888

73VnnlrArs 'M V 166 382

177 394 35,618,824 1,588,854

12York Pa 5 3,130

360,00031 411 1 1,700

19281927192819271928

485203

2 83 206,435 121,550

570246

717,117 225,700 529,415

954 2,065,049 9,007,160 8,637,675

184VnnnffstftiFn Ohlrt 43 2,291

2,191303 607.anoQin11o flhin 66

9227,088 31,655

5 4,05028,793

71 31,138 72,788

328 1,021,100548,0641 12,340 5 $ 98 344 297

Total: 302 cities.. 310 cities..

19271928

a 122,687 * 122,244

3 85,333,662 3 79,522,037

31,134 3 1,396

3 9,237,804 3 16,430,601

3 57,108 3 55,849

3 156,006,017 3 138,423,293

3 288,824 3 279,020

3 353,398,271 3 324,644,421

729,685664,449

3,593,839,4053,423,584,461

77,81870,850

37,772,931 38,351,921

3 See notes to details.

BUILDIN

G

PERMITS

IN THE

PRINCIPAL

CITIES

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 113: bls_0500_1929.pdf

LIST OF BULLETINS OF THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSThe following is a list o f all bulletins o f the Bureau o f Labor Statistics published since

July, 1912, except that in the case o f bulletins giving the results o f periodic surveys o f the bureau only the latest bulletin on any one subject is here listed .

A com plete list o f th e reports and bulletins issued prior to July, 1912, as well as the bulletins published since that elate, will be furnished on application . Bulletins marked thus (*) are ou t o f print.

Conciliation and Arbitration (including strikes and lockouts).♦No. 124. Conciliation and arbitration in the building trades of Greater New York. [1913.]*No. 133. Report of the industrial council of the British Board of Trade on its inquiry into industrial

agreements. [1913.]No. 139. Michigan copper district strike. [1914.]No. 144. Industrial court of the cloak, suit, and skirt industry of New York City. [1914.]No. 145. Conciliation, arbitration, and sanitation in the dress and waist industry of New York City.

[1914.]*No. 191. Collective bargaining in the anthracite coal industry. [1916.]♦No. 198. Collective agreements in the men’s clothing industry. [1916.]No. 233. Operation of the industrial disputes investigation act of Canada. [1918.]No. 255. Joint industrial councils in Great Britain. [1919.]No. 283. History of the Shipbuilding Labor Adjustment Board, 1917 to 1919.No. 287. National War Labor Board: History of its formation, activities, etc. [1921.]No. 303. Use of Federal power in settlement of railway labor disputes. [1922.]No. 341. Trade agreement in the silk-ribbon industry of New York City. [1923.]No. 402. Collective bargaining by actors. [1926.]No. 468. Trade agreements, 1927.No. 481. Joint industrial control in the book and job printing industry. [1928.]

Cooperation.No. 313. Consumers' cooperative societies in the United States in 1920.No. 314. Cooperative credit societies in America and in foreign countries. [1922.]No. 437. Cooperative movement in the United States in 1925 (other than agricultural).

Employment and Unemployment.*No. 109. Statistics of unemployment and the work of employment offices in the United States.

[1913.]No. 172. Unemployment in New York City, N. Y. [1915.]

*No. 183. Regularity of employment in the women’s ready-to-wear garment industries. [1915.]♦No. 195. Unemployment in the United States. [1916.]No. 196. Proceedings of the Employment Managers’ Conference held at Minneapolis, Minn., Jan­

uary 19 and 20,1916.♦No. 202. Proceedings of the conference of Employment Managers’ Association of Boston, Mass.,

held M ay 10,1916.No. 206. The British system of labor exchanges. [1916.]No. 227. Proceedings of the Employment Managers’ Conference, Philadelphia, Pa., April 2 and 3,

1917.No. 235. Employment system of the Lake Carriers’ Association. [1918.]

♦No. 241. Public employment offices in the United States. [1918.]No. 247. Proceedings of Employment Managers’ Conference, Rochester, N. Y ., M ay 9-11,1918.No. 310. Industrial unemployment: A statistical study of its extent and causes. [1922.]No. 409. Unemployment in Columbus, Ohio, 1921 to 1925.

Foreign Labor Laws.♦No. 142. Administration of labor laws and factory inspection in certain European countries. [1914.] No. 494. Labor legislation of Uruguay. [1929.]

Housing.♦No. 158. Government aid to home owning and housing of working people in foreign countries. [1914.] No. 263. Housing b y employers in the United States. [1920.]No. 295. Building operations in representative cities in 1920.

61318°—29------8a)

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 114: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Industrial Accidents and Hygiene.♦No. 104. Lead poisoning in potteries, tile works, and porcelain enameled sanitary ware factories.

[1912.]No. 120. Hygiene of the painters’ trade. [1913.]

♦No. 127. Dangers to workers from dusts and fumes, and methods of protection. [1913.]♦No. 141. Lead poisoning in the smelting and refining of lead. [1914.]♦No. 165. Lead poisoning in the manufacture of storage batteries. [1914.]♦No. 179. Industrial poisons used in the rubber industry. [1915.]N o. 188. Report of British departmental committee on the danger in the use of lead in the painting of

buildings. [1916.]*No. 201. Report of committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost of the International Asso­

ciation of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions. [1916.]♦No. 207. Causes of death, by occupation. [1917.]♦No. 219. Industrial poisons used or produced in the manufacture of explosives. [1917.]No. 221. Hours, fatigue, and health in British munition factories. [1917.]No. 230. Industrial efficiency and fatigue in British munition factories. [1917.]

♦No. 231. Mortality from respiratory diseases in dusty trades (inorganic dusts). [1918.]♦No. 234. Safety movement in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1917.No. 236. Effects of the air hammer on the hands of stonecutters. [1918.]N o. 249. Industrial health and efficiency. Final report of British Health of Munition Workers’

Committee. [1919.]♦No. 251. Preventable death in the cotton-manufacturing industry. [1919.]N o. 256. Accidents and accident prevention in machine building. [1919.]N o. 267. Anthrax as an occupational disease. [1920.]No. 276. Standardization of industrial accident statistics. [1920.]No. 280. Industrial poisoning in making coal-tar dyes and dye intermediates. [1921.]N o. j291. Carbon-monoxide poisoning. [1921.]N o. 293. The problem of dust phthisis in the granite-stone industry. [1922.]N o. 298. Causes and prevention of accidents in the iron and steel industry, 1910-1919.N o. 306. Occupation hazards and diagnostic signs: A guide to impairments to be looked for in

hazardous occupations. [1922.]N o. 392. Survey of hygienic conditions in the printing trades. [1925.]No. 405. Phosphorus necrosis in the manufacture of fireworks and in the preparation of phosphorus.

[1926.]No. 427. Health survey of the printing trades, 1922 to 1925.No. 428. Proceedings of the Industrial Accident Prevention Conference, held at Washington, D . 0 „

July 14-16, 1926.No. 460. A new test for industrial lead poisoning. [1928.J No. 466. Settlement for accidents to American seamen. [1928.]N o. 488. Deaths from lead poisoning, 1925-1927.N o. 490. Statistics of industrial accidents in the United States to the end of 1927.

Industrial Relations and Labor Conditions.No. 237. Industrial unrest in Great Britain. [1917.]No. 340. Chinese migrations, with special reference to labor conditions. [1923.]No. 349. Industrial relations in the west coast lumber industry. [1923.]No. 361. Labor relations in the Fairmont (W . Va.) bituminous-coal field. [1924.]No. 380. Postwar labor conditions in Germany. [1925.]No. 383. Works council movement in Germany. [1925.]No. 384. Labor conditions in the shoe industry in Massachusetts, 1920-1924.No. 399. Labor relations in the lace and lace-curtain industries in the United States. [1925.]No. 483. Conditions in the shoe industry in Haverhill, Mass., 1928.

Labor laws o f the United States (including decisions o f courts relating to labor).No. 211. Labor laws and their administration in the Pacific States. [1917.]No. 229. Wage-payment legislation in the United States. [1917.]N o. 285. Minimum-wage laws of the United States: Construction and operation. [1921.]No. 321. Labor laws that have been declared unconstitutional. [1922.]No. 322. Kansas Court of Industrial Relations. [1923.]No. 343. Laws providing for bureaus of labor statistics, etc. [1923.]No. 370. Labor laws of the United States, with decisions of courts relating thereto. [1925.]No. 408. Laws relating to payment of wages. [1926.]N o. 444. Decisions of courts and opinions affecting labor, 1926.N o. 467. Minimum wage legislation in various countries. [1928.]No. 486. Labor legislation of 1928.

(n)

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 115: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Proceedings o f Annual Conventions o f the Association o f Governmental Labor Officials o f the United States and Canada. (Name changed in 1928 to Association of Governmental Officials in Industry of the United States and Canada.)

•No. 266. Seventh, Seattle, Wash., July 12-15,1920.No. 307. Eighth, New Orleans, La., M ay 2-6,1921.No. 323.,Ninth, Harrisburg, Pa., M ay 22-26,1922.No. 352. Tenth, Richmond, Va., M ay 1-4, 1923.

♦No. 389. Eleventh, Chicago, HI., M ay 19-23, 1924.*No. 411. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 13-15,1925.

No. 429. Thirteenth, Columbus, Ohio, June 7-10,1926.No. 455. Fourteenth, Paterson, N . J., M ay 31 to June 3, 1927.No. 480. Fifteenth, New Orleans, La., M ay 15-24, 1928.

Proceedings o f Annual Meetings o f the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions.

No. 210. Third, Columbus, Ohio, April 25-28, 1916.No. 238. Fourth, Boston, Mass., August 21-25,1917.No. 264. Fifth, Madison, Wis., September 24-27, 1918.

♦No. 273. Sixth, Toronto, Canada, September 23-26,1919.No. 281. Seventh, San Francisco, Calif., September 20-24, 1920.No. 304. Eighth, Chicago, 111., September 19-23, 1921.N o. 333. Ninth, Baltimore, M d., October 9-13, 1922.No. 359. Tenth, St. Paul, Minn., September 24-26, 1923.No. 385. Eleventh, Halifax, Nova Scotia, August 26-28, 1924.No. 395. Index to proceedings, 1914-1924.No. 406. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 17-20, 1925.No. 432. Thirteenth, Hartford, Conn., September 14-17, 1926.No. 456. Fourteenth, Atlanta, Ga., September 27-29, 1927.N o. 485. Fifteenth, Paterson, N . J., September 11-14, 1928.

Proceedings o f Annual Meetings o f the International Association o f Public Employment Services.No. 192. First, Chicago, December 19 and 20,1913; second, Indianapolis, September 24 and 25,1914;

third, Detroit, July 1 and 2,1915.No. 220. Fourth, Buffalo, N . Y ., July 20 and 21,1916.N o. 311. Ninth, Buffalo, N . Y ., September 7-9,1921.No. 337. Tenth, Washington, D. C., September 11-13,1922.N o. 355. Eleventh, Toronto, Canada, September 4-7, 1923.No. 400. Twelfth, Chicago, 111., M ay 19-23, 1924.No. 414. Thirteenth, Rochester, N . Y ., September 15-17, 1925.No. 478. Fifteenth, Detroit, M ich., October 25-28,1927.

Productivity o f Labor.N o. 356. Productivity costs in the common-brick industry. [1924.]N o. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.N o. 407. L abor cost o f production and wages and hours o f labor in the paper box-board industry.

[1926.]No. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.No. 441. Productivity of labor in the glass industry. [1927.]No. 474. Productivity of labor in merchant blast furnaces. [1928.]No. 475. Productivity of labor in newspaper printing. [1929.]

Retail Prices and Cost o f laving.*No. 121. Sugar prices, from refiner to consumer. [1913.]*No. 130. Wheat and flour prices, from farmer to consumer. [1913.]No. 164. Butter prices, from producer to consumer. [1914.]No. 170. Foreign food prices as affected by the war. [1915.]No. 357. Cost of living in the United States. [1924.]No. 369. The use of cost-of-living figures in wage adjustments. [1925.]No. 495. Retail prices, 1890 to 1928.

Safety Codes.*No. 331. Code of lighting: Factories, mills, and other work places.No. 336. Safety code for the protection of industrial workers in foundries.No. 350. Specifications of laboratory tests for approval of electric headlighting devices for motor

vehicles.No. 351. Safety code for the construction, care, and use of ladders.No. 375. Safety code for laundry machinery and operations.No. 378. Safety code for woodworking plants.No. 382. Code for lighting school buildings.No. 410. Safety code for paper and pulp mills.No. 430. Safety code for power presses and foot and hand presses.

( i n )

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 116: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Safety Codes—Continued.No. 433. Safety codes for the prevention of dust explosions.No. 436. Safety code for the use, care, and protection of abrasive wheels.No. 447. Safety code for rubber mills and calenders.No. 451. Safety code for forging and hot-metal stamping.No. 463. Safety code for mechanical power-transmission apparatus.—First revision.

Vocational Workers* Education.*No. 159. Short-unit courses for wage earners, and a factory school experiment. [1915.]♦No. 162. Vocational education survey of Richmond, Va. [1915.]No. 199. Vocational education survey of Minneapolis, Minn. [1917.]No. 271. Adult working-class education in Great Britain and the United States. [1920.No. 459. Apprenticeship in building construction. [1928.]

Wages and Hours o f Labor.♦No. 146. Wages and regularity of employment and standardization of piece rates in the dress and

waist industry of New York City. [1914.]♦No. 147 Wages and regularity of employment in the cloak, suit, and skirt industry. [1914.]N o. 161. Wages and hours of labor in the clothing and cigar industries, 1911 to 1913.No. 163. Wages and hours of labor in the building and repairing of steam railroad cars, 1907 to 1913.

♦No. 190. Wages and hours of labor in the cotton, woolen, and silk industries, 1907 to 1914 N o. 204. Street-railway employment in the United States. [1917.]N o. 225. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber, millwork, and furniture industries, 1915.N o. 265. Industrial survey in selected industries in the United States, 1919.N o. 297. Wages and hours of labor in the petroleum industry, 1920.N o. 356. Productivity costs in the common-brick industry. [1924.]No. 358. Wages and hours of labor in the automobile-tire industry, 1923.N o. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.N o. 365. Wages and hours of labor in the paper and pulp industry, 1923.No. 394. Wages and hours of labor in metalliferous mines, 1924.N o. 407. Labor cost of production and wages and hours of labor in the paper box-board industry.

[1925.]N o. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.N o. 416. Hours and earnings in anthracite and bituminous coal mining, 1922 and 1924.No. 435. Wages and hours of labor in the men’s clothing industry, 1911 to 1926.No. 438. Wages and hours of labor in the motor-vehicle industry, 1925.No. 442. Wages and hours of labor in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1926.No. 452. Wages and hours of labor in the hosiery and underwear industries, 1907 to 1926 No. 454. Hours and earnings in bituminous-coal mining, 1922, 1924, and 1926.No. 471. Wages and hours of labor in foundries and machine shops, 1927.No. 472. Wages and hours of labor in the slaughtering and meat packing industry, 1927.No. 476. Union scales of wages and hours of labor, 1927-1928. [Supplement to Bui. No. 457.]No. 482. Union scales of wages and hours of labor, M ay 15, 1928.No. 484. Wages and hours of labor of common street laborers, 1928.No. 487. Wages and hours of labor in woolen and worsted goods manufacturing, 1910tol928.No. 492. Wages and hours of labor in cotton-goods manufacturing, 1910 to 1928.No. 497. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber industry in the United States, 1928.No. 498. Wages and hours of labor in the boot and shoe industry, 1910 to 1928.N o. 499. History of wages in the United States from colonial times to 1928.

Welfare Work.♦No. 123. Employers’ welfare work. [1913.]No. 222. Welfare work in British munitions factories. [1917.]

♦No. 250. Welfare work for employees in industrial establishments in the United States. [1919.]No. 458. Health and recreation activities in industrial establishments, 1926.

Wholesale Prices.No. 284. Index numbers of wholesale prices in the United States and foreign countries. [1921.No. 453. Revised index numbers of wholesale prices, 1923 to July, 1927.No. 493. Wholesale prices, 1913 to 1928.

Women and Children in Industry.No. 116. Hours, earnings, and duration of employment of wage-earning women in selected industries

in the District of Columbia. [1913.]♦No. 117. Prohibition of night work of young persons. [1913.]No. 118. Ten-hour maximum working-day for women and young persons. [1913.]No. 119. Working hours of women in the pea canneries of Wisconsin. [1913.]

♦No. 122. Employment of women in power laundries in Milwaukee. [1913.]N o. 160. Hours, earnings, and conditions of labor of women in Indiana mercantile establishments and

garment factories. [1914.]

(IV)

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

Page 117: bls_0500_1929.pdf

Women and Children in Industry—Continued.♦No. 167. Minimum-wage legislation in the United States and foreign countries. [1915.]*N o. 175. Summary of the report on conditions of woman and child wage earners in the United

States. [1915.]•No. 176. Effect of minimum-wage determinations in Oregon. [1915.]♦No. 180. The boot and shoe industry in Massachusetts as a vocation for women. [1915.]♦No. 182. Unemployment among women in department and other retail stores of Boston, Mass. [1916.] N o. 193. Dressmaking as a trade for women in Massachusetts. [1916.]N o. 215. Industrial experience of trade-school girls in Massachusetts. [1917.]

•No. 217. Effect of workmen’s compensation laws in diminishing the necessity of industrial em­ployment of women and children. T1918.]

No. 223. Employment of women and juveniles in Great Britain during the war. [1917.]No. 253. Women in the lead industries. [1919.]

Workmen’s Insurance and Compensation (including laws relating thereto).♦No. 101. Care of tuberculosis wage earners in Germany. [1912.]♦No. 102. British national insurance act, 1911.N o. 103. Sickness and accident insurance law in Switzerland. [1912.]No. 107. Law relating to insurance of salaried employees in Germany. [1913.]

♦No. 155. Compensation for accidents to employees of the United States. [1914.]N o. 212. Proceedings of the conference on social insurance called b y the International Association of

Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, Washington, D . C., December 5-9,1916. ♦No. 243. Workmen’s compensation legislation in the United States and foreign countries, 1917 and

1918.N o. 301. Comparison of workmen’s compensation insurance and administration. [1922.]N o. 312. National health insurance in Great Britain, 1911 to 1921.No. 379. Comparison of workmen’s compensation laws of the United States as o f January 1, 1925. No. 477. Public-service retirement systems, United States and Europe. [1928.]N o. 496. W orkm en’s compensation legislation of the United States and Canada as of January, 1929

W ith text of legislation enacted in 1927 and 1928.Miscellaneous Series.

♦No. 174. Subject index of the publications of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics up to M ay 1,1915.

No. 208. Profit sharing in the United States. [1916.]No. 242. Food situation in central Europe, 1917.No. 254. International labor legislation and the society of nations. [1919.]N o. 268. Historical survey of international action affecting labor. [1920.]No. 282. Mutual relief associations among Government employees in Washington, D . C < [1921.] N o. 299. Personnel research agencies: A guide to organized research in employment, management,

industrial relations, training, and working conditions. [1921.]N o. 319. The Bureau of Labor Statistics: Its history, activities, and organization. [1922.]N o. 326. Methods of procuring and computing statistical information of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

[1923.]N o. 342. International Seamen’s Union of America: A study .of its history and problems. [1923.] No. 346. Humanity in government. [1923.]No. 37?. Convict labor in 1923.No. 386. Cost of American almshouses. [1925.]No. 398. Growth of legal-aid work in the United States. [1926s]No. 401. Family allowances in foreign countries. [1926.]No. 420. Handbook of American trade-unions. [1926.]No. 439. Handbook of labor statistics, 1924 to 1926.No. 461. Labor organizations in Chile. [1928.]No. 462. Park recreation areas in the United States. [1928.]No. 465. Beneficial activities of American trade-unions. [1928.]N o. 479. Activities and functions of a State department of labor. [1928.]No. 483. Conditions in the shoe industry in Haverhill Mass., 1928.N o. 489. Care of aged persons in the United States. [1929.]No. 491. Handbook of labor statistics, 1929 edition.

(V)

Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis