Upload
fedfraser
View
240
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABORJAMES J. DAVIS, Secretary
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSETHELBERT STEWART, Commissioner
BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES \ \T CA ABUREAU OF LABOR STA TISTICS/ • • • • JlOe DU U
M I S C E L L A N E O U S S E R I E S
BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1928
NOVEMBER, 1929
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON : 1929
Fpr sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C* - Price 20 cents
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
ContentsPage
Introduction and summary_______________________________________ 1Families provided for________________________________________ 3Building trend, 1927 and 1928_________________________________ 5Per capita expenditure for buildings____________________________ 6
Expenditures for building operations in representative cities, 1921 to 1928. 20Average estimated cost of dwellings per family__________________ 21
Apartment-house living in American cities, 1928_____________________ 23Comparison of conditions in cities of over 500,000_______________ 24Comparison of conditions in cities of under 500,000______________ 25
General table___________________________________________________ 32in
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
BULLETIN OF THEU. S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSNo. 500 WASHINGTON NOVEMBER, 1929
BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES OF THE UNITED STATES IN 19281
Introduction and SummaryT HE Bureau of Labor Statistics presents in this bulletin the ninth
annual report of building permits issued in cities of the United States having a population of 25,000 and over. According to the estimate of the Census Bureau as of Julj 1, 1928, there were 319 cities in the United States in this population group.
On January 1 of this year schedule forms were mailed by the bureau to all of these cities except those in States where local bureaus are collecting like information. In these States the information is collected by the State and mailed to the Federal bureau. Schedules were received from 310 cities and data for these cities are shown herein. The States of Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania are now cooperating with the bureau in this work.
The city building officials are also heartily cooperating with the work of the bureau. In 1922 it was necessary to send agents to 33J£ per cent of the cities from which data were collected. In 1927 only
per cent of the cities were visited by the bureau’s agents and in collecting the 1928 information it was necessary to send to only 6.1 per cent of the cities.
The costs shown in the following tables refer to the cost of the building only, land costs not being included. The costs are estimated by the builder at the time of applying for his permit to build and are recorded on the application. There is probably a tendency in many cases to underestimate. Some cities are stricter than others in making applicants state a true cost.
Table 1 shows the total number of new buildings and the estimated cost of each of the different kinds of new buildings for which permits were issued in the 310 cities from which schedules were received for the year 1928, the per cent that each kind forms of the total number, the per cent that the cost of each kind forms of the total cost, and the average cost per building.
i Earlier reports concerning building permits issued in the United States are published in Bulletins Nos. 295, 318, 347, 368, 397, 424, 449, and 469 of the Bureau of Labor Statistics; also in issues o f the Labor Review for July, 1921; April, 1922; July and October, 1923; June and October, 1924; June, September, and October, 1925; June, July, and October, 1926; M ay, June, July, October, and November, 1927; M ay, June, October, and November, 1928; M ay and June, 1929.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 1 .— N U M B E R A N D COST OF N E W BU ILD IN G S AS S T A T E D B Y P E R M IT S ISSU ED IN 310 CITIES D U R IN G C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928, B Y K IN D OF B U IL D IN G
New buildings for which permits were issued
Kind of building Numberof
buildings
Per cent of grand total
Estimated cost
A m ou nt'Per
cent of grand total
Averageper
building
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS1-family dwellings....................................................2-family dwellings....................................................1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores
combined...............................................................Multifamily dwellings............................................Multifamily dwellings with stores combined__Hotels_______________________________________
145,32219,963
2,62512,0701,528
23537
209
37.75.2
.73.1.4.1
(,) . i
$715,317,535153,157,386
26,702,412776,520,45890,754,524
114,928,650780,576
35,559,169
23.14.9
.925.12.9 3.7
0 )1 .1
$4,9227,672
10,17264,335 59,394
489,058 21,097
170,140Lodging houses.........................................................A ll other....................................................................
Total................................................................ 181,989 47.2 1,913,720,710 61.8 10,516NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Amusement buildings............................................Churches_______ - ____________________________
950 1,009 3,973 3,839
156,457 4,520
304 1,353
243 517 852
11,787 367
13. I l l 4,158
.2
.31 .01 .0
40.61 .2.1.4.1.1. 2
3.1 .1
3.41 .1
84,914,600 49,059,444
152,649,534 70,690,699 55,140,483 14,913,812 65,080,263
256,101,159 29,378,349 38,690,950
143,519,854 4,895,029
583,553 211,890,765
7,710,836
2.7 1.6 4.92.31 .8 .5
2 .18.3 .9
1 .24.6
.20
6 .8.2
89,384 48,622 38,422 18,414
352 3,300
214,080 189,284 120,899 74,837
168,451 415
1,590 16,161 1,854
Factories and workshops........................................Public garages..........................................................Private garages,.......................................................Service stations........................................................Institutions...............................................................Office buildings........................................................Public buildings.......................................................Public works and utilities......................................Schools and libraries...............................................Sheds___________ ____________________________Stables and barns....................................................Stores and warehouses............................................A ll other_______ _____________________________
T otal............................................................... 203,440 52.8 1,185,219,330 38.2 5,826Grand total.................................................... 385,429 100.0 3,098,940,040 100.0 8,040
1 Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.
In the 310 cities for which reports were received for the year 1928 permits were issued for 385,429 buildings. Of this number, 181,989 buildings, or 47.2 per cent, were for residential purposes and 203,440, or 52.8 per cent, for nonresidential use.
Of the residential buildings 145,322 were 1-family dwellings; this is 37.7 per cent of the total number of new buildings for which permits were issued or 79.8 per cent of the total number of residential buildings. Two-family dwellings, the next most numerous group of residential buildings, comprised only 5.2 per cent of the total number of buildings. With the exception of private garages no other kind of building in either the residential or nonresidential group constituted as much as 5 per cent of the total number of buildings for which permits were issued.
In the nonresidential group private garages were far the most numerous kind of building. Of all buildings for which permits were issued in these 310 cities during the calendar year 1928, over 40 per cent were private garages, over 7 per cent more private garages being erected than 1-family dwellings.
Stores and warehouses ranked next after private garages in the nonresidential group and formed only 3.4 per cent of the total number of new buildings.
It will be seen from the above that out of every 100 buildings for which permits were issued in cities having a population of 25,000 or over, 78 were either 1-family dwellings or private garages.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The total estimated expenditure for new buildings in these 310 cities was $3,098,940,040 of which $1,913,720,710, or 61.8 per cent, was for residential buildings and $1,185,219,330, or 38.2 per cent, for nonresidential buildings. ^
The Bureau of Labor Statistics has been collecting figures concerning building permits issued for every year since 1920, and in each of these years up to 1928, 1-family dwellings accounted for the greatest expenditure of any kind of buildings. In 1928, however, the permits issued for multifamily dwellings (apartment houses) show a larger estimated expenditure than those issued for 1-family dwellings. The estimated cost of apartment houses for which permits were issued in these 310 cities during 1928 was $776,520,458, or 25.1 per cent of the expenditure for all new buildings, as compared with $715,317,535, or 23.1 per cent, for 1-family dwellings.
If we group apartment houses and apartment houses with stores we find that the expenditure for both kinds of apartment houses equaled the expenditure for 1-family dwellings and 2-family dwellings combined. Each combination comprised approximately 28 per cent of the total estimated expenditure for all buildings.
In the nonresidential group, office buildings accounted for the largest expenditure of money, $256,101,159 being expended for this class of structure. Stores and warehouses rated next in expenditures in this group, followed by factories, and schools and libraries in order. Private garages which comprise 40.6 per cent of the number of new buildings account for only 1.8 per cent of the cost.
The average cost per building of all new buildings in these 310 cities was $8,040. In residential buildings the average cost was $10,516 and in nonresidential buildings, $5,826. The average cost of nonresidential buildings, however, is “ pulled down” by the inclusion of a large number of private garages and sheds. If we exclude these two classes of buildings the average cost of the remaining nonresidential buildings is $13,992 per building.
Families Provided For
Table 2 shows the number and per cent of families provided for by each of the different kinds of dwellings for which permits were issued in 302 identical cities during the calendar years 1927 and 1928, by land of dwelling.
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 3
T a b l e 2»—N U M B E R A N D P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES TO BE H OUSED IN N E W D W E LLIN G S FO R W H ICH P E R M IT S W E R E ISSUED IN 302 ID E N T IC A L CITIES D U R IN G T H E C ALE N D A R YE A R S 1927 A N D 1928, B Y K IN D OF D W E L L IN G
Kind of dwelling
Number of new buildings for which permits were issued
Families provided for
Number Per cent
1927 1928 1927 1928 1927 1928
1-family dwellings...................................................2-family dwellings...................................................1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores
combined..............................................................Multifamily dwellings...........................................Multifamily dwellings with stores com bined.. _
Total...............................................................
164,268 25,227
3,329 13,663 1,768
143,88919,956
2,620 12,063 1,528
164,268 50,454
5,399 179,177 19,580
143,88939,912
4,276 190,282 19,780
39.212.0
1.342.84.7
36.110.0
1 .147.85.0
208,255 180,056 418,878 398,139 100.0 100.0
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Data were received from 302 cities for both 1927 and 1928. In these 302 cities 398,139 families were provided with dwellings in new buildings in 1928, as compared with 418,878 in 1927, a decrease of 20,739 dwelling units or 5.0 per cent in 1928 as compared with 1927.
There were 164,268 families accommodated in the new 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued in 1927 in these 302 cities. This is 39.2 per cent of the total number of families provided for during that year. In 1928, 1-family dwellings provided for 143,889 families, which was 36.1 per cent of the total number of families supplied with new dwelling places. In contrast, the number of families provided for in apartment houses increased from 179,177 in1927 to 190,282 in 1928. In 1927, 42.8 per cent of the total number of family dwelling places for which permits were issued were in apartment houses, while in 1928 this percentage had risen to 47.8. The percentage of families supplied with residences in new 2-family dwellings decreased from 12 in 1927 to 10 in 1928.
Table 3 shows the number and percentage distribution of families provided for in the different kinds of dwellings in the 257 identical cities from which reports were received each year from 1921 to 1928, inclusive.
4 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 3 .—N U M B E R A N D P E R C E N T OF FAM ILIES P R O V ID E D F O R IN T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES, 1921 T O 1928, IN CLU SIVE
Year
Number of families provided for in— Per cent of families provided for in—
1-familydwellings
2-family dwellings i
Multifamily
dwellings 2All classes of dwellings
1-familydwellings
2-family dwellings 1
Multifamily
dwellings *
1921......................... 130,873 38,858 54,814 224,545 58.3 17.3 24.41922......................... 179,364 80,252 117,689 377,305 47.5 21.3 31.21923......................... 207,632 96,344 149,697 453,673 45.8 2 1.2 33.01924......................... 210,818 95,019 137,082 442,919 47.6 21.5 30.91925_....................... 226,159 86,145 178,918 491,222 46.0 17.5 36.41926......................... 188,074 64,298 209,842 462,214 40.7 13.9 45.41927....................... 155,512 54,320 196,263 406,095 38.3 13.4 48.31928......................... 136,907 43,098 208,673 388,678 35.2 11.1 53.7
* Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined. 3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores combined.
The trend toward apartment-house dwelling continues in full swing. This fact is amply shown by the above table. In 1921 accommodations were provided for 224,545 families in the new buildings for which permits were issued during that year. Of this number 58.3 per cent were sheltered in 1-family dwellings, 17.3 per cent in 2-family dwellings, and 24.4 per cent in apartment houses.
Seven years later, in 1928, it is found that 53.7 per cent of the 388,678 new family dwelling units were in apartment houses and only 35.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings and 11.1 per cent in 2-family dwellings.
The total number of families provided for in 1928 increased 73.1 per cent in 1928 over 1921. One-family dwellings, however, increased only 4.6 per cent in number in 1928 over 1921, while the family units provided in apartment houses in 1928 increased 280.7 per cent over those provided during 1921,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The per cent of families housed in 1-family dwellings has decreased each year from that of the preceding year, except that 1924 showed a slight increase over 1923. Apartment units have shown exactly the opposite trend; 1924 was the only year that the percentage of families housed in apartment houses was less than that of the preceding year. The percentage of families housed in 2-family dwellings reached a peak in 1924; since that year there has been a steady decline in the percentage of families housed in this class of dwelling.
Building Trend, 1927 and 1928
Table 4 shows the number and cost of the different kinds of buildings for the 302 identical cities from which reports were received in 1927 and 1928 and the per cent of increase or decrease in the number and in the cost in 1928 as compared with 1927.
T a b l e 4 .—N U M B E R A N D COST OF N E W BU ILD IN G S FO R W H ICH P E R M IT S W E R E ISSUED IN 302 ID E N T IC A L CITIES D U R IN G T H E C A L E N D A R Y E A R S 1927 A N D 1928, B Y K IN D OF B U IL D IN G
INTR0DUCTTON AND SUMMARY 5
Kind of building
New buildings for which permits were issued
1927
Number Cost
1928
Number Cost
Per cent of increase (+ ) or decrease (—) in 1928 compared
with 1927
Number Cost
PRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
1-family dwellings..................................2-family dwellings................................. .1-family and 2-family dwellings with
stores combined—...............................Multifamily dwellings-.......................Multifamily dwellings with stores
combined............................................ .H otels_________________________________Lodging houses....................................A ll other...............................................
Total-
NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Amusement buildings........ .Churches--.......................... .Factories and workshops...Public garages.......................Private garages.................... .Service stations....... ............ .Institutions.......................... .Office buildings. ..................Public buildings................. .Public works and utilities..Schools and libraries...........Sheds......................................Stables and barns.................Stores and warehouses____All other.................................
Total-
Grand total-
164,268 25,227
3,32913,663
1,78320179
213
208,763
943 1,118 4,181 4,192
181,859 4,919
332 1,271
339 593 837
13,608 358
13,280 4,283
$789,382,883208,578,118
34,978,625736,830,499
90,666,916 69,393,263 1,305,302
30,763,923
143,88919,956
2,62012,063
1,52823437
207
$710,900,837153,128,386
26,678,912776,419,458
90,754,524 114,289,650
780,576 35,369,533
-1 2 .4-2 0 .9
-21 .3-1 1 .7
-14 .3+16.4-5 3 .2- 2 .8
1,961,899,529 180,534 1,908,321,876 -1 3 .5
128,208,773 58,890,438
141,307,499 74,395,804 65,449,178 15,022,065 75,132,340
242,853,223 47,450,619 45,389,033
155,542,100 5,091,261
823,018 215,747,108
7,239,146
947 1,002 3,932 3,836
155,478 4,462
303 1,352
243 516 843
11,658 356
12,925 4,127
84,676,800 48,852,444
152,410,564 70,656,199 54,921,052 14,768,932 65,001,863
255,801,159 29,378,349 38,670,950
142,154,423 4,869,737
581,478 210,305,687
7,703,679
+•4-10 .4- 6 .0-8 .5
-14 .5-9 .3-8 .7+6.4
-28 .3-13 .0
+ .7-14 .3
- . 6-2 .7-3 .6
232,113 1,278,541,605 201,980 1,180,753,316 -13.0
440,876 3,240,441,134 12,514 3,089,075,192 -1 3 .2
- 9 .9-2 6 .6
-2 3 .7+5.4
+ . 1 +64.7 -40 .2 +15.0
-2 .7
-34 .0-17 .0+7,9-5 .0
-16.1-1 .7
-13 .5+5.3
-38 .1-14 .8- 8 .6-4 .4
-29 .3-2 .5+6.4
-7.6
-4 .7
In the 302 cities from which reports were received for both 1927 and 1928 permits were issued for 382,514 new buildings during the calendar year 1928 as compared with 440,876 during the calendar year 1927. This is a decrease, in the number of buildings, of 13.2
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
per cent. The estimated amount spent for the erection of the buildings for which permits were issued in 1928 was $3,089,075,192, a decrease of 4.7 per cent from the $3,240,441,134 spent during 1927.
Residential buildings decreased more in number but less in estimated expenditure than nonresidential buildings in 1928 as compared with 1927. The decrease in the number of residential buildings for which permits were issued during 1928, in these 302 cities, being 13.5 per cent over 1927, while nonresidential buildings decreased in number 13.0 per cent. In estimated costs, however, the decrease in residential buildings was only 2.7 per cent as compared with 7.6 per cent in nonresidential buildings.
All classes of residential buildings except hotels showed a decrease in the number of buildings, comparing 1928 with 1927. Hotels increased 16.4 per cent in number. The greatest decrease was in 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores where there was a falling off of 21.3 per cent.
In estimated expenditure four classes of structures in the residential group showed a decrease and four showed an increase. The decreases ranged from 9.9 per cent in the case of 1-family dwellings to 40.2 per cent in lodging houses. The increases in estimated expenditure in this group ranged from one-tenth of 1 per cent for multifamily dwellings with stores combined to 64.7 per cent for hotels.
In the nonresidential group all classes of buildings showed a decrease in number except amusement buildings, office buildings, and schools and libraries, office buildings showing the largest increase with a gain of 6.4 per cent over 1927. The decreases ranged from six-tenths of 1 per cent for stables and barns to 28.3 per cent in the case of public buildings.
In amounts expended factory buildings, office buildings, and miscellaneous buildings showed an increase in 1928 as compared with 1927. All other nonresidential buildings showed a decrease in expenditures ranging from 1.7 per cent for service stations to 38.1 per cent for public buildings.
Per Capita Expenditure for Buildings
Table 5 shows the total and the per capita expenditures for new buildings, new housekeeping dwellings, repairs and additions, and for all lands of buildings in each of the 310 cities for which reports were received for the calendar year 1928; the total number of families provided for and the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population in these 310 cities; and the total expenditure for all classes of buildings in 302 cities in 1927.
In the 310 cities which reported for 1928 there was an expenditure of $3,423,584,461 for building operations of all kinds. Of this amount, $3,098,940,040 was for new buildings and $324,644,421 for repairs to old buildings. Of the amount spent for new buildings, $1,762,452,315 was for housekeeping dwellings. The expenditure for all buildings for the 302 cities which reported for 1927 was $3,593,839,405.
The per capita expenditure for the cities from which reports were received for 1928 was $76.18 for all building operations, divided as follows: $68.96 for new buildings and $7.22 for repairs; $39.22 of
6 BUILDING PERMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
the amount expended for new buildings was for housekeeping dwellings. The population of these 310 cities, as estimated by the Bureau of the Census for July 1, 1928, was 44,940,049.
The five leading cities in per capita expenditure were White Plains, N. Y ., $440.15; Yonkers, N. Y ., $293.64; Evanston, 111., $276.85; Mount Vernon, N. Y ., $260.74; and New Kochelle, N. Y ., $230.19. All of these cities are suburban cities, four being suburbs of New York and one of Chicago. In all of these cities residential buildings accounted for the large per capita expenditure.
Following is a list of the five leading cities in total expenditure for the years 1920 to 1928, inclusive. It will be noted that the cities of New York, Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia make up this list each year except for 1920 and 1921 when Cleveland was included and Philadelphia slumped below the leading five.
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMABY 7
1920New York___________ $277, 695, 337Chicago_____________ 84, 602, 650Detroit______________ 77, 737, 215Cleveland____________ 64,198, 600Los Angeles__________ 60, 023, 600
1921New York__Chicago___Cleveland - _. Los Angeles. Detroit____
1922New York__Chicago____Los Angeles.. Philadelphia. Detroit_____
1923New York...Chicago------Los Angeles..Detroit_____Philadelphia-
1924New York-Chicago__Detroit___
442, 285, 248 133, 027, 910 86, 680, 023 82, 761, 386 58, 086, 053
645, 176, 481 229, 853, 125 121, 206, 787 114, 190, 525 93, 614, 593
789, 265, 335 334, 164, 404 200,133, 181 129, 719, 831 128, 227, 405
836, 043, 604 308, 911, 159 160, 547, 723
1924—ContinuedLos Angeles__________ $150, 147, 516Philadelphia________ _ 141, 402, 655
1925New York............. ....... 1,020,604,713Chicago--____ ______ 373,803,571Detroit______________ 180,132, 528Philadelphia_________ 171, 034, 280Los Angeles................ 152, 646, 436
1926New York___________ 1,039,670,572Chicago-------------------- 376, 808, 480Detroit______________ 183, 721, 443Philadelphia_________ 140, 093, 075Los Angeles........... ....... 123, 006, 215
1927Now York__Chicago____Detroit_____Los Angeles.. Philadelphia-
1928New York__Chicago____Detroit_____Philadelphia. Los Angeles. _
880, 333, 455 365, 065, 042 145, 555, 647 123, 027,139 117, 590, 650
916, 671, 855 323, 509, 048 129, 260, 285 112, 225, 865 101, 678, 768
During 1928 accommodations were provided in the new dwellings for which permits were issued for 399,657 families, or at the rate of 88.9 families to each 10,000 of population in these 310 cities.
Following is a list of the five leading cities in the building of homes for each year since 1921. This list shows the number of families provided with homes in new buildings for each 10,000 of the city’s population. Four of the five for 1928 are contiguous to the great metropolitan center of New York City.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
1921Long Beach_______________ 631. 9Los Angeles_______________ 320. 9Pasadena_________________ 251. 7Shreveport________________ 249. 8Lakewood________________ 191. 3
1922Long Beach_______________ 1, 081. 0Los Angeles______________ 441. 6Lakewood------------------------- 358. 9Miami____________________ 268. 1East Cleveland------------------- 267. 6
1923Long Beach_______________ 1,038. 1Los Angeles_______________ 657. 4Miami___________________ 611. 1Irvington_________________ 432. 1Lakewood------------------------- 381. 5
1924Miami 1__________________ 2, 248. 9Irvington_________________ 501. 2Los Angeles 2______________ 448. 3San Diego________________ 378. 0Long Beach_______________ 347. 6
1925Miami ------------------------- 1,342.0San Diego------------------------- 392. 0Tampa___________________ 379. 3Irvington_________________ 374. 6Los Angeles2......................... 331. 0
1926St. Petersburg_____________ 700. 3Mount Vernon____________ 644. 7Irvington_________________ 398. 6White Plains______________ 367. 2San Diego________________ 339. 5
1927Irvington_________________ 740. 5White Plains______________ 419. 5Mount Vernon____________ 414. 8Yonkers__________________ 349. 0East Orange______________ 338.1
1928Yonkers__________________ 347. 6Mount Vernon____________ 299. 1White Plains______________ 298. 3Long Beach_______________ 297. 4Irvington_________________ 295. 4
* The ratio of families provided for in Miami in 1924 was based on the population as estimated b y the Census Bureau for that year. In the light of the actual census taken by State enumeration in 1925, it would seem that the estimate for 1924 was below the actual population for that year, hence the ratio here shown for 1924 is probably higher than the actual population in that year would warrant.
> Population not estimated in 1924 or 1925; 1923 estimate used.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
10 B U I L D I N G P E R M IT S I N tTH E P R I N C I P A L C IT IE S
T a b l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D FO R
City and StateExpenditure
for new buildings,
1928
Expenditure for repairs and addi
tions. 1928
Total expenditures
1928 1m
Expenditure for new
housekeeping dwellings
only,1928
Akron, Ohio.............Alameda, Calif........Albany, N. Y ..........Allentown, Pa_____Altoona, Pa..............Amsterdam, N. Y__Alton, 111...................Anderson, Ind_____Asheville, N . C____Ashtabula, Ohio___Atlanta, Ga.............. .Atlantic City, N . J .Auburn, N. Y_........ .Augusta, Ga.... ........ .Aurora, HI..................
Baltimore, M d .........................Bangor, M e..............................Battle Creek, M ich ................Bay City, M ich......................Bayonne, N. J.........................Beaumont, Tex........................Belleville, HI............................Bellingham, Wash..................Berkeley, Calif........................Bethlehem, Pa.........................Binghamton, N. Y ............. .Birmingham, Ala....................Bloomfield, N. J......................Bloomington, 111____________Boston, Mass...........................Bridgeport, Conn.... ...............Brockton, Mass................... .Brookline, Mass........ .......... .Buffalo, N. Y ............................Burlington, Iowa............. ........Butler, Pa..................................Butte, M ont_______________ _
Cambridge, Mass______Camden, N. J .................Canton, Ohio..................Cedar Rapids, Iowa___Central Falls, R . I_____Charleston, S. C _______Charleston, W . Va____Charlotte, N. C ..............Chattanooga, Tenn____Chelsea, Mass_________Chester, Pa......................Chicago, 111......................Chicopee, Mass...............Cicero, 111.........................Cincinnati, O h io .. ........Clarksburg, W . Va........ .Cleveland, Ohio.............Clifton, N. J....................Colorado Springs, Colo..Columbia, S. C ................Columbus, Ga..................Columbus, Ohio............. .Council Bluffs, Iowa___Covington, K y ............... .Cranston, R . I ..................Cumberland, M d._.........
Dallas, Tex......... .Danville, 111..........Davenport, Iowa. Dayton, Ohio____
$17,837,6001,994,724
12,503,7155,484,7152,898,276
677,675816,115
2,169,0142,832,362
25,119,931 6,786,810
858.870 1,185,8482,650,700
28,478,200 489,260
2,686,5051,490,2011.807.300 3,615,913 1,014,881 1,608,1055,517,9503,479,3902,762,317
12,820,6643,932,1001.319.300
47,961,4323,070,5241,448,908 5,738,345
23,279,259402.871 302,740 215,050
7.146.1136,762,090 3,083,1471,856,631
230,345 383,228
2,613,790 7,048,994 3,978,069
898,540 1,537,867
315,208,908 1,161,2653.560.114
30,679,9901,075,450
47,017,150 3,437,510
614,466 1,347,695
984,84814,857,790
701,4501,299,4003,607,224
924,421
6,360,840752,159
1,060,3629,010,900
1 Not estimated by Census Bureau.
$1,647,598 136,672
2,389,810 450, S25 463,631
8,000 228,340
n
1,624,032158,728
m m
7,467,150156,350184,807354,695188,065710,856
6,740264,213558,676363,616694.076
1,403,913608,500 63,500
7,737,125 456,098 276,950553.077
1,122,72440,90086,096
151.390
937,610665.965 579,171 581,59973,000
177,407259.390 409,270 725,417 265,175 208,675
8,300,140114,300299.966
4,778,740113,935
9,141,375 104,545 198,029 262,080 169,154
1,379,460 108,800 292,350 103,025 75,127
1,728,159 163,189 289,379
1,347,478 ,
$19,485,098% m > m
14,893,525 5,035*040 3,360,907
88i 1,044,455% 452, m§,095,110
513,878 27,894 ^
615,596 1,550,944 2,950,472
33,945,350 625,610
2,871,312 1,844,8961,995,365 4,326,7691,021,6211.872.318 6,076,6263,843,0083,456,393
14,224,5774,540,600 1,382,800
55,698,557 3,526,6221,725,858 8,291,422
24,401,983 443,771 388,836366,440
8,083,7237.428.0553.662.318 2,438,230
303,345560,635
2,873,1807,458,264 4,703,4861,163,715 1,746,542
323,509,0481,275,565 3,860,080
35,458,730 1,189,385
56,158,5253.542.055
812,4951,609,775 1,154,002
16,237,250810,250
1,591,750 3,710,249
999,548
8,088,999915,348
1,349,74110,358,378
$20,196,0^81,536,930
16,188,741 6,518,16® 3*041,304
807,580 (8)
2,218,31
i|Jlo,§075,822,864
843,1941,459,0902,791,528
28,437,790851,355
4,751,866775,209
1,949,950
1,787,110 8,683,0682,476,6214,290,909
21,786,696 6,880,077
924,200 60,987,468 5,186,712 1,433,3695,902,440
33,073,453 721,140
<*>
9,557,469 5,330,3274,156,0202,602,622
798,730586,099
2,038,709 5,554,8844,874,201
866,0602,396,265
365,065,0421,117,1104,635,829
30,570,2991,007,635
45,480,5503,388,565
577,398 1,533,3751,539,749
23,282,600930,250
1,722,3102,669,634
942,465
9,773,5231,036,7912,053,351
10,332,026
$12,164,1481,429,2247,460,200 Z, 165,000
1,749* 300150,250
9,968,489259,265 159,125815,644
1,561,549
12,660,000136,550752,750229.200 968,500
1,486,841666,000674.000
4,107,5511.421.0001,264,421 7,130,3353.370.000
601.00026,867,550
1.945.000 732,950
5,065,100 10,750,950
178,100258.30011,500
3,581,3001,164,950 2,180,850
688,940 92,000
160.300 860,000
4,432,0201,862,875
573,000 1, 000,000
174,749,900368.300
2,537,60021,628,235
357,23516,247,100 2,539,650
340,4401.108.000
700,72411,533,300
261,400953.200
2,775,200284,010
3,187,924599,086 635,6501
2,703,48a* EstiiRatQ as of July 1,1926,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
R E P A IR S, A N D FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, I N 310 C ITIE S IN TH E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 11
Estimated
Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita
expenditure for
City and State population, July 1,1928
NumberRatioper
10,000
For new buildings
For repairs and additions
TotalRank
ofcity
housekeeping
dwellings only, 1928
Akron, Ohio . ______ (>)>32,400
2,557504Alameda, Calif-...................... 155.6 $61.57 $4.22 $65.78 78 $44.11
Albany, N. Y .......................... 120,400 615 51.1 103.85 19.85 123.70 22 61.96Allentown, Pa........................ 99,400 556 55.9 55.18 4.53 59.71 93 31.84Altoona, Pa.............................. 69,100 155 22.4 41.94 6.70 48.64 136 13.46Amsterdam, N . Y _________ 36,200 42 11.6 18.72 .17 18.89 258 6.70Alton, 111.................................. < 26,797 167 62.3 30.46 8.52 38.98 171 21.19Anderson, Ind......................... 2 34,600 268 77.5 62.69 8 .20 70.89 66 25.48Asheville, N . C ....................... 9 32,000 370 115.6 88.51 8.21 96.72 40 54.67Ashtabula, Ohio..................... 2 25,500 20 7.8 15.49 4.66 20.15 254 5.89Atlanta, Ga.............................. 255,100 3,170 124.3 98.47 8.92 107.39 27 39.08Atlantic City, N . J -_ ............Auburn, N. Y ..... ...................
54,700 57 10.4 105.79 29.69 135.48 20 4.74< 35,677 31 8.7 10.00 4.45 14.45 272 4.46
Augusta, Ga............................Aurora, 111................................
56,700 318 56.1 20.56 6.79 27.35 223 14.3947,100 301 63.9 56.28 6.36 62.64 88 33.15
Baltimore, M d ........................ 830,400 2,884 34.7 31.89 8.99 40.88 160 15.25Bangor, M e................. - .......... >26,800 38 14.2 17.51 5.83 23.34 243 5.10Battle Creek, M ich ............... 47,200 177 37.5 56.92 3.92 60.83 91 15.95Bay City, M ich...................... 49,600
95,30057 11.5 30.04 7.15 37.20 180 4.62
Bayonne, N. J ........................ 436 45.8 18.96 1.97 20.94 250 10.16Beaumont, Tex....................... 56,300 540 95.9 64.23 12.63 76.85 53 26.41Belleville, 111............................ <26,969
2 26,300136 50.4 37.63 .25 37.88 178 24.70
Bellingham, Wash................. 264 100.4 61.14 10.05 71.19 64 25.63Berkeley, Calif....................... 71,000 1,330 187.3 77.72 7.87 85.59 47 57.85Bethlehem, Pa........................ 67,600 223 33.0 51.47 5.38 56.85 101 21.02Binghamton, N. Y ................. 74,800 306 40.9 36.93 9.28 46.21 145 16.90Birmingham, Ala...................Bloomfield, N . J___________
222,400<9
2 30,700
2,589675
116.4 57.65 6.31 63.96 87 32.06
Bloomington, HI..................... 90 29.3 42.97 2.07 45.04 148 19.58Boston, Mass.......................... 799,200 6,805 85.1 60.01 9.68 69.69 67 33.62Bridgeport, Conn................... < 143,535 388 27.0 21.39 3.18 24.57 237 13.55Brockton, Mass...................... <65,343 141 2 1.6 22.17 4.24 26.41 229 11.22Brookline, M a s s ................... 45,700 556 121.7 125.57 12.10 137.67 19 110.83Buffalo, N . Y .......................... 555,800 3,181 57.2 41.88 2 .02 43.90 149 19.34Burlington, Iowa................... 2 27,100 55 20.3 14.87 1.51 16.38 266 6.57Butler, P a ............. ................. < 25,230 40 15.9 12.00 3.41 15.41 267 10.24Butte, M ont............................ 43,600 7 1 .6 4.93 3.47 8.40 288 .26
Cambridge, Mass...... ............ 125,800 863 6 8 .6 56.81 7.45 64.26 83 28.47Camden, N . J_______ ______ 135,400 350 25.8 49.94 4.92 54.8 6 111 8.60Canton, Ohio..........................Cedar Rapids, Iowa...............
116,800 374 32.0 26.40 4.96 31.36 210 18.6758,200 157 27.0 31.90 9.99 41.89 157 11.84
Central Falls, R . I _________ 2 95,700 44 17.1 8.96 2.84 11.80 282 3.58Charleston, S. C ................... . 75,900 46 6 .1 5.05 2.34 7. 39 289 2.11Charleston, W . Va.................Charlotte, N* C......................
55,200 258 46.7 47.35 4.70 52.05 124 15.5882,100 1,237 150.7 85.86 4.99 90.84 43 53.98
Chattanooga, Tenn__............ 73,500 611 83.1 54.12 9.87 63.99 86 25.35Chelsea, Mass......................... 49,800 142 28.5 18.04 5.32 23.37 242 11.51Chester, Pa.............................. 74,200 243 32.7 20.73 2.81 23. 54 240 13.48Chicago, HI.............................. 3,157,400
45,40034,447 109.1 99.83 2.63 102.46 32 55.35
Chicopee, Mass......................Cicero, 111.................................
102 22.5 25.58 2.52 28.10 221 8.1171,600
413,700464 64.8 49.72 4.19 53.91 116 35.44
Cincinnati, Ohio..................... 3,559 86.0 74.16 11.55 85.71 46 52.28Clarksburg, W . V a................ 2 30,900 98 31.7 34.80 3.69 38.49 174 11.56Cleveland, Ohio..................... 1,010,300 3,167 31.3 46.54 9.05 55.59 107 16.08Clifton, N. J ............................Colorado Springs, Colo_____
236,200(950,600
54795
151.1 94.96 2.89 97.85 36 70.16
Columbia, S. C ....................... 272 53.8 26.63 5.18 31.81 208 21.90Columbus, Ga........................ 46,600 321 68.9 21.13 3.63 24.76 236 15.04Columbus, Ohio.....................Council Bluffs, Iowa.............
299,000 2,477 82.8 49.69 4.61 54.31 114 38.5742,300 94 22.2 16.58 2.57 19.15 255 6.18
Covington, K y ........................ 59,000 314 53.2 22.02 4.96 26.98 228 16.16Cranston, R . I ........................ 37,500 559 149.1 96.19 2.75 98.94 35 74.01Cumberland, M d ................... 2 34,400 67 19.5 26.87 2.18 29.06 218 8.26
Dallas, Tex..............................Danville, 111.............................
217,800 1,199 55.1 29.20 7.93 37.14 181 14.6438,800 164 42.3 19.39 4.21 23.59 239 15.44
Davenport, Iowa....................Dayton, Ohio..........................
3 Data no
<52,469 140 26.7 20.21 5.52 25.72 233 12.11184,500
t collected.732 39.7
<•£48.84
Itate cen7.30
sus Jan. 1,56.14
1925.102 14.65
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T ab l e S .—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D F O R
1 2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
City and StateExpenditure
for new buildings,
1928
Expenditure for repairs and addi
tions, 1928
Total expenditures
1928 1927
Expenditure for new
housekeeping dwellings
only,1928
Decatur, 111.............Denver, Colo..........Des Moines, Iowa.Detroit, M ich........Dubuque, Iowa___Duluth, M inn........Durham, N . C ------
East Chicago, Ind........East Cleveland, Ohio—Easton, Pa.....................East Orange, N. J ........East Providence, R . I-East St. Louis, 111_____Elgin, 111........................Elizabeth, N . J_______Elkhart, Ind..................Elmira, N. Y .................El Paso, Tex..................Erie, Pa..........................Evanston, HI.................Evansville, Ind_______Everett, Mass...............Everett, Wash..............
Fall River, M ass... Fitchburg, M ass....Flint, M ich.............Fond du Lac, Wis_.Fort Smith, Ark__Fort Wayne, In d ... Fort Wayne, Tex... Fresno, Calif______
Galveston, Tex............Gary, Ind.....................Grand Rapids, M ich .Great Falls, M ont___Green Bay, W is_____Greensboro, N . C ____Greenville, S. C ..........Greenwich, Conn____
Hagerstown, M d ..........Hamilton, Ohio_______Hammond, Ind.............Hamtramck, M ich____Harrisburg, Pa..............Hartford, Conn.............Haverhill, Mass............Hazelton, Pa.................Highland Park, M ich .Hoboken, N . J..............Holyoke, Mass..............Houston, Tex................Huntington, W . Va__Hutchinson, Kans____
Indianapolis, Ind.. Irvington, N . J___
Jackson, M ich........Jacksonville, F la ... Jamestown, N . Y_. Jersey City, N . J__Johnstown, Pa____Joliet, 111.................Joplin, M o ..............
$3,906,71015,113,000 4,154,173
117,458,340 764,425
9,672,888
3,126,499 1,678,961
426,330 7,266,012 2,972,117 2,490,326 2,013,0755,473,100
832,616 1, 668,1211,836,814 3,846,534
12,306,1754,780,0901,521,858
677,590
2,546,384570,115
13,112,152493,631
1,004,184 4,284,436
10,083,9371,205,652
5,240,8756,435,2452,525,6521,831,8614,520,1441,197,4525,736,745
462,2001,920,9346,057,9801,056,9304,713,635 9,394,186
444,190 1,011,988 1,675,167
320,790913,700
34,598,940929,600
1,067,390
19,354,5736,556,253
1,550,6906,818,5901,554,990
12,943,194 961,341
2,773,8281,231,393
$262,635 1,657,750
355,807 11> 801,945
112,961 1,006,036
355,405 110,291 306,669 366,373 117,984 216,608 356,571 30,500
231,273 237,596 307,411 917,154 872,050 330,724 238,901 509,000
289,260252,235
1,310,57785,499
604,518
1,459,850455,913
368,246 800,275
1,751,510 133,830 160,000 528,151 242,691 867,635
215,034 142,099 469,300 288,045 881,140
1,884,257 109,875 183,022 928,110 244,173 347,400 710,563 52,000
201,722
2,612,81383,041
546,396 841,569 291,880 933,050 133,753 307,792 172,346
$4,169,34516,770,7504,509,980
129,260,285 877,386
3,289,404 9,905,838
3,481,904 1,789,252
733,0087,632,3853,090,1012,706,934 2,369,646 5,503,6001,063,889 1,905,7172,144,225 4,763,688
13,178,2255,110,814 1,760,7591,186,590
2,835,644822,350
14,422,729 579,130
1,608,702 5,011,124
11,543,7871,661,565
2,676,8086,041,150 8,186,755 2,659,4821,991,861 5,048,295 1,440,143 6,604,380
677,234 2,063,033 6,527,2801,344,9755,594,775
11,278,443 554,065
1,195,0102,603,277
564,9631,261,100
35,309,503981,600
1,269,112
21,967,3866,639,294
2,097,0867,660,1591,846,870
13,876,244 1,095,0943,081,620 1,403,739
$5,790,41515,754,6002,876,131
145,555,6471,288,2074,431,4352,587,754
4,304,3661,220,6201,299,670
12,313,0922.389.700 5,562,971 1,891,883
10,922,8772,660,5661,311,7831,792,5615,393,056
15,917,2253,415,9982.097.830
(’)
1,840,768637,975
22,087,4511,000,179
<*>6,002,498
28,483,764 2,690,578
2,974,415 15,016,529 12,319,420 1,163,119 2,508,8984.837.830 1, 111, 182 5,700,062
1,558,2051,782,7496.431.2001,545,8153,569,365
17,529,941 909,625
2,072,504 2,654,960 1,519,5992.044.200
27,326,4751,547,150
(8)23,682,316 12,960,227
2,575,64412,768,386 2,745,835
13,851,780 1,386,1832.793.700 1,355,533
$1,967,5008,249,2001,675,328
66,448,106269.500 947,650
1,582,935
950,850186,000202.425
4,631,150 1,478,025 1,843,880 1,055,5703.451.000
590,261 631,100900.426
2.104.5007.714.000 1,488,250
977,600262,300
469,020110.500
8,495,144203.000 184,488
2,128,8156,402,445
480,645
1,146,686 3,701,575 3,584,100
789,830 834,180
2,030,865 729,547
4,559,300
300,510 1,538,487 2,759,700
404.2001.214.500 4,650,269
271,400343,264364.500 70,500
492,80017,806,385
467,900467,270
10,224,100 5,021,800
1,107,450 5,263,115
855.0007.649.000
345,1501,412,900
591.200i Not estimated by Census Bureau. 3 Estimate as of July 1,1926. * Data not collected.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 3
REPAIRS, AND FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR, ETC., IN THE CALENDAR YEAR 1928—Con.
City and StateEstimated population, July 1,1928
Families provided for
NumberRatioper
10,000
Per capita expenditure, 1928
Fornewbuild-
For repairs and additions
TotalRank
ofcity
Per capita expenditure for house
keeping dwellings only, 1928
Decatur, 111.............Denver, Colo..........Des Moines, Iowa..Detroit, M ich.........Dubuque, Iowa___Duluth, M inn........Durham, N . C ........
East Chicago, Ind..........East Cleveland, O hio...Easton, Pa...................... .East Orange, N. J......... .East Providence, R. I—East St. Louis, 111......... .Elgin, 111...........................Elizabeth, N. J...............Elkhart, In d ...................Elmira, N. Y ...................El Paso, Tex....................Erie, Pa............................Evanston, HI...................Evansville, Ind...............Everett, Mass................ .Everett, Wash--------------
Fall River, Mass__Fitchburg, M ass-—Flint, M ich.............Fond du Lac, W is. Fort Smith, Ark___Fort Wayne, Ind__Fort Worth, Tex___ Fresno, Calif...........
Galveston, Tex............Gary, Ind.....................Grand Rapids, M ich -Great Falls, M ont___Green Bay, Wis..........Greensboro, N . C ------Greenville, S. C ...........Greenwich, Conn........
Hagerstown, M d ......... .Hamilton, Ohio...........Hammond, Ind............Hamtramck, M ich____Harrisburg, Pa............. .Hartford, Conn.............Haverhill, Mass........... .Hazleton, Pa................ .Highland Park, Mich..Hoboken, N . J............. .Holyoke, Mass............. .Houston, Tex............... .Huntington, W . Va___Hutchinson, Kans____
Indianapolis, Ind . Irvington, N . J___
Jackson, M ich___Jacksonville, F la .. Jamestown, N . Y . Jersey City, N . J~Johnstown, Pa___Joliet, 111.................Joplin, M o .............
57,100294,200151,900
1,378,90042,300
116,80047,600
50,800 2 39,400
38,40065.000
2 27,10074.00036.000
850.000 117,800
a .47.60098.100 43,300
<29,303
134.30045.200
148,800 2 26,500 4 31,643105.300 170,60064.000
50.60089.100
164,200 *30,900
36.10051.900
*28,100(9
2 32,00044.20056.000 99,80086.900
172.300 * 49,232
38,30086.400 0 )60.400
*164,95468.600 0 )
382,100 2 34,600
63.700140.70046.000
324.70073.70041.900(9
3391,869
406 15,929
67196464
20413624
968 271 501 207
1,002155120310397945420283123
11025
2,2215961
407 1,758
146
890895260186446193344
410
2061,363
6857
1175
864,463
87146
2,5111,022
2501,658
1692,155
73180151
59.463.526.7
115.515.816.897.5
40.234.5 6.3
148.9100.067.757.5
$68.4251.3727.3585.1818.0719.55
203.21
61.55 42.61 11.10
111. 78 109.67 33.65 55.92
24.0 33.3615.59
198.542.865.442.0
8 .25.5
149.322.319.338.7
103.02 2 .8
72.999.954.584.151.585.9 68.7
258.5348.73 35.1523.12
18.96 12.6188.12 18.6331.73 40.69 59.11 18.84
45.6258.8239.1981.7450.74 87.09 42.61
25.6 92.8
124.68.9
23.7 79.113.814.9 13.5
14.4443.46
108.1810.5954.2454.529.02
26.4219.39
14.2270.612.7
15.13209.7513.55
65.7 295.4
39.2117.836.7 66.49.9
43.0
50.65189.49
24.3448.46
13.0466.20
$4.605.632.34 8.56 2.67 8.614.89
7.002.807.995.644.35 2.939.90
$73.0257.0029.6993.7420.74 28.16
208.11
68.54 45.41 19.09
117.42 114.03 36.58 65.82
5910021642
253220
8
1472572426
18677
4.752.61
38.11 18.20
177260
18.323.375.52
17.37
2.15 5.58 8.81 3.23
19.10 6.90 8.56 7.12
7.288.98
10.674.334.43
10.188.64
276.8552.1040.66 40.49
21.11 18.19 96.9321.85 50.84 47.5967.67 25.96
52.9067.8049.86 86.07 55.18 97.27 51.25
3123162164
24926139
24412813972
12171
13345
10938
125
6.72 3.21 8.38 2.89
10.14 10.94 2.23 4.78
10.74
21.16 46.67
116.56 13.48 64.38 65.46 11.25 31.20 30.13
24814325
2778279
283212215
5.754.31.76
20.88 214.06 14.31
2516
274
6.842.40
8.585.986.35 2.87 1.817.35
57.49191.89
32.9254.4440.1542.7414.8673.55
10
20411216515227157
$34.4928.0611.0448.136.378.11
33.25
18.724.725.27
71.25 54.54 24.92 29.32
12.627.64
162.06 15.17 22.58 8.95
3.492.44
57.097.665.83
20.2237.53 7.51
22.6641.54 21.83 25.56 23.11 39.13 25.96
9.3934.8149.284.05
13.9826.99 5.51 8.96 4.22
8.16 107.95
6.82
26.76 145.14
17.3937.4118.5923.564.68
33.72
< State census, Jan. 1,1925.
61318°—29----- 25 Estimate as of July 1,1925.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1 4 b u i l d i n g P e r m i t s i n t h e p r i n c i p a l c i t i e s
T ab l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D F O B
City and StateExpenditure
for new buildings,
1928
Expenditure for repairs and addi
tions, 1928
Total expenditures Expenditure for new
housekeeping dwellings
only,19281928 1927
Kalamazoo, M ich..................... $1,559,478 $475,386 $2,034,864 $2,223,046 $640,525Kansas City, Kans................... 1,562,452 88,825 1,651,277 1,586,790 648,620Kansas City, Mo__................... 14,739,275 802,000 15,541,275 14,822,336 7,629,200Kearny, N. J_............................ 6,115,160 136,430 6,251,590 5,795,875 2,945,000Kenosha, W is............................ 3,291,659 434,745 3,726,404 4,468,453 2,484,518Kingston, N. Y ......................... 1,020,006 716,784 1,736,790 2,140,093 683,050Knoxville, Tenn........................ 6,784,741 329,796 7,114,537 5,699,417 3,187,541Kokomo, Ind.... ......................... 459,013 67,653 526,666 480/095 350,262
Lakewood, Ohio........................ 4,512,046 110,050 4,622,096 3,516,399 2,172,400Lancaster, Pa............................. 1,528,895 860,180 2,389,075 3,004,838 839,050Lansing, M ich........................... 4,919,662 284,685 5,204,347 7,330,420 2,004,800
'Lawrence, Mass__..................... 427,500 175,135 602,635 913,134 104,200Lebanon, Pa.............................. 403,000 257,325 660,325 604,500 101,000Lewiston, M e............................ 985,000 5,000 990,000 469,100 148,000Lexington, K y ........................... 1,448,119 169,299 1,617,418 2,350,985 573,400Lima, Ohio................................. 295,217 159,217 454,434 707,313 86,100Lincoln, Nebr............................ 3,450,854 192,495 3,643,349 4,398,540 1,801,712Little Rock, Ark....................... 3,804,523 455,585 4,260,108 2,993, 636 2,079,137Long Beach, Calif..................... 15,607,585 700,240 16,307,825 13,639,425 8,631,515Lorain, Ohio.............................. 1,079,714 97,660 1,177,374 1,300,534 815,140Los Angeles, Calif..................... 91,279,946 10,398,822 101,678,768 123,027,139 60,977,127Louisville, K y............................ 15,462,120 2,657,955 18,120,075 23,340,610 8,250,300Lowell, Mass.............................. 630,805 310,945 941,750 971,115 170,600Lynchburg, Va_........................ 916,244 176,839 1,093,083 1,528,729 499,710Lynn, Mass................................ 2,841,269 945,535 3,786,804 3,877,775 1,898,500
McKeesport, Pa........................ 1,845,076 339,909 2,184,985 2,356,119 980,535Macon, Ga................................. 1,997,240 352,449 2,349,689 2,886,116 1,248,170Madison, W is............................ 6,860,767 769,347 7,630,114 4,461,813 4,646,200Malden, Mass............................ 2,695,847 197,097 2,892,944 3,800,093 2,307,250Manchester, N . H ..................... 827,360 231,359 1,058,719 1,940,074 339,625Mansfield, Ohio........................ 1,668,055 140,839 1,808,874 1,779,555 663,000Marion, Ind............................... 1,243,660 63,500 1,307,160 521,560 382,000Marion, Ohio............................. 1,106,345 33,940 1,140,285 557,793 439,900Medford, Mass.......................... 4,324,637 190,196 4,514,833 4,370,512 3,689,450Memphis, Tenn........................ 12,223,414 2,059,625 14,283,039 12,402,920 6,100,030Meriden, Conn.......................... 1,008,926 259,795 1,268,721 1,316,177 678,200Miami, Fla................................. 1,262,488 683,575 1,946,063 9,540,937 592,855Milwaukee, Wis........................ 31,764,594 3,641,787 35,406,381 37,747,895 19,159,269Minneapolis, Minn................... 20,057,560 3,200,165 23,257,725 22,429,620 8,377,920Mobile, Ala................................ 3,158,310 187,508 3,345,818 2,146,241 1,690,456Moline, 111.................................. 1,458,440 201,335 1,659,775 1,170,010 553,084Montclair, N. J......................... 4,119,035 524,233 4,643,268 5,446,164 3,673,324Montgomery, Ala..................... 2,981,098 307,820 3,288,918 2,531,347 1,023,355Mount Vernon, N . Y ________ 13,650,885 611,564 14,262,449 16,775,452 10,991,935Muncie, Ind............................... 2,422,019 452,129 2,874,148 3,038,813 1,134,885Muskegon, M ich........ ............. 1,533,007 277,328 1,810,335 1,078,668 318,010Muskogee, Okla........................ 530,330 35,255 565,585 842,567 314,350
Nashville, Tenn...... ................. 4,893,949 670,694 5,564,643 7,078,073 1,916,074Newark, N. J_______ _______ 29,391,765 4,893,388 34,285,153 51,451,630 16,655,563Newark, Ohio................. .......... 1,038,316 28,600 1,066,916 653,822 338,300New Bedford, Mass................. 808,753 286,622 1,095,375 2,166,627 281,100New Britain, Conn_............. 2,889,608 • 642,509 3,532,117 4,103,884 1,762,950New Brunswick, N. J .............. 1,757,670 426,395 2,184,065 2,839,066 807,925Newburgh, N. Y ....................... 989,275 248,692 1,237,967 1,517,651 429,800New Castle, Pa__..................... 1,358,740 107,500 1,466,240 3,037,495 938,825New Haven, Conn.......... ........ 7,779,394 1,019,000 8,798,394 11,741,379 2,227,300New London, Conn................. 1,919,465 269,187 2,188,652 1,801,715 1,453,400New Orleans, La....................... 9,858,184 2,769,494 12,627,678 15,898,775 5,305,913Newport, K y ............................. 259,810 167,140 426,950 439,225 185,300Newport, R . I ............................ 564,520 115,545 680,065 906,330 309,300Newport News, Va............... . 600, 111 219,194 819,305 548,015 347,203New Rochelle, N . Y — ............ 10,386,272 847,046 11,233,318 9,735,614 8,639,450Newton, M ass.......................... 10,094,405 707,673 10,802,078 10,138.606 8,986,720New York City, N . Y ............. 849,962,931 66,708,924 916,671,855 880,333,455 526,470,604Niagara Falls, N . Y ................. 4,270,153 599,325 4,869,478 4,791,480 2,447,278Norfolk, V a ............................... 3,347,903 491,840 3,839,743 3,346,826 1,984,650Norristown, Pa.......................... 981,025 313,940 1,294,965 1,826,101 574,000Norwalk, C o n n ....................... 4,225,963 555,740 4,781,703 3,592,009 2,371,683
* Not estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimate as of July 1,1926.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
R E P A IR S, A N D FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, E T C ., IN TH E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928—Con.
IN T R O D U C TIO N AND S U M M A R Y 1 5
City and State Estimated
Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928
population, ju ljr i, 1928
Numberla tio For new
build* iflgs
For repairs and additions
TotalRank
ofcity
56,400 165 29.3 $27.65 $§.43 $36,08 188118,300 32i 27.1 13.21 <75 13.90 275391, ood 1,969 50.4 37.70 2.05 39.75 1092 32,100 857 267.0 190,50 4,25 194.75 0
56,500 295 52.2 58,26 7.69 05.95 70i 28,400 126 44.4 35.92 25.24 61,15 90i05,400 040 89.2 64.37 3.13 07.50 7340,400 82 20.3 11,36 1.67 13.04 270
65,000 537 &2.0 69.42 1.69 71.11 6558,300 154 26.4 26.22 14.75 40.98 15979,600 443 55.7 01.80 3.58 65.38 80
2 93,500 32 3.4 4.57 1.87 0.45 2902 25,300 19 7.5 15.93 10.17 20, 10 231
36,600 77 21.0 26.91 .14 27.05 22748,700 104 21.4 29.74 3.48 33.21 20149,700 19 3.8 5.94 3.20 9.14 28071,100 497 69.9 48.54 2.71 51.24 12079,200 527 66.5 48.04 5.75 53.79 117
• 104,200 3,099 297.4 149. 78 6.72 156.51 1444,9000 )
329,400
22721,081
1,542
50.6 24.05 2.18 26.22 230
46.8 46.94 8.07 55.01 110< 110,296 50 4.5 5.72 2.82 8.54 287
38,600 114 29.5 23.74 4.58 28.32 219105,500 501 47.5 26.93 8.96 35.89 189
50,400 203 40.3 36.61 6.74 43.35 15161,200 321 52.5 32.63 5.76 38.39 17550,500 542 107.3 135.86 15.23 151.09 1653,400 718 134.5 50.48 3.69 54.17 11585,700 116 13.5 9.65 2.70 12.35 281
2 32,500 0 )
2 33,400 52,900
127158
39.1 51.32 4.33 55.66 105
172 51.5 33.12 1.02 34.14 199745 140.8 81.75 3.60 85.35 48
190,200 1,887 99.2 64.27 10.83 75.09 5437,100 137 36.9 27.19 7.00 34.20 197
156,700 124 7.9 8.06 4.36 12.42 280544,200 4,965 91.2 58.37 6.69 65.06 81455,900 2,240 49.1 44.00 7.02 51.01 12769,600 638 91.7 45.38 2.69 48.07 13835,600 109 30.6 40.97 5.66 46.62 144
2 33,700 323 95.8 122.23 15.56 137.78 1863,100 726 115.1 47.24 4.88 52.12 12254,700 1,636 299.1 249.56 11.18 260.74 446,800 371 79.3 51.75 9.66 61.41 8946,600 104 22.3 32.90 5.95 38.85 17233,200 116 34.9 15.97 1.06 17.04 265
139,600 753 53.9 35.06 4.80 39.86 168473,600 3,288 69.4 62.06 10.33 72.39 612 30,600 108 35.3 33.93 .93 34.87 191
4119,539 42 3.5 6.77 2.40 9.16 28572,800 327 44.9 39.69 8.83 48.52 13740,800 210 51.5 43.08 10.45 53.53 12030,400 74 24.3 32.54 8.18 40.72 16152,500 143 27.2 25.88 2.05 27.93 222
187,900 546 29.1 41.40 5.42 46.82 1412 29,700 218 73.4 64.63 9.06 73.69 56429,400
0 )< 27,757
2,10743
49.1 22.96 6.45 29.41 224
61 2 2.0 20.34 4.16 24.50 23853,300 101 18.9 11.26 4.11 15.37 26848,800 1,205 246.9 212.83 17.36 230.19 557,300 939 163.9 176.17 12.35 188.52 11
6,017,50068,300
109,523 182.0 . 141.25 11.09 152.33 15506 74.1 62.52 8.77 71.30 62
184,200 634 34.4 18.18 2.67 20.85 25236,200 96 26.5 27.10 8.67 35.77 190
2 30,100 358 118.9 140.40 18.46 158.86 13
Per capita expenditure for house-
keep
on ly , 19!
Kalaflaazoo, M ich .., Kansas City, Kans.. Kansas City, M o . . . Jteitfiiy, N p fid s M ,JOngstoii, N ; Y___^_ Knijx¥ille,Teriii-^ . Kokomo, Ind.......... .
Lakewood, O h io ...Lancaster, Pa..........Lansing, M ich........Lawrence, Mass___Lebanon, Pa...........Lewiston, M e.........Lexington, K y ........Lima, Ohio..............Lincoln, Nebr.........Little Rock, A rk ... Long Beach, Calif..Lorain, Ohio...........Los Angeles, Calif..Louisville, K y ........Lowell, Mass..........Lynchburg, Va____Lynn, Mass.............
McKeesport, Pa..........Macon, Ga....................Madison, W is...............Malden, Mass..............Manchester, N. H ____Mansfield, Ohio...........Marion, Ind..................Marion, Ohio...............Medford, Mass.............Memphis, Tenn..........Meriden, Conn...........Miami, F la .. ...............Milwaukee, W is..........Minneapolis, M inn__Mobile, Ala...................Moline, 111....................Montclair, N. J ______Montgomery, Ala........Mount Vernon, N . Y_Muncie, I n d ................Muskegon, M ich.........Muskogee, Okla______
Nashville, Tenn_______Newark, N . J .................Newark, Ohio..............New Bedford, Mass___New Britain, Conn___New Brunswick, N . J_.Newburgh, N. Y ...........New Castle, Pa.............New Haven, Conn........New London, Conn___New Orleans, La...........Newport, K y .................Newport, R. I _ ..............Newport News, Va__New Rochelle, N . Y___Newton, Mass...............New York City, N . Y_Niagara Falls, N . Y ___Norfolk, Va.....................Norristown, Pa..............Norwalk, Conn..............
$11.36 5.48
19.61 91.74 48,07 24.0530.24 167
S3.42 14.39 25.19
1 .11 3.99 4.04
11.77 1.73
25.3426.25 82,84m i s
25.05 1.55
12.95 18.00
10.4020.39 92.00 43.213.90
20.40
13.17 69.74 32.07 18.283.78
35.21 18.38 24.29 15.54
109.0016.22
200.9524.256.829.47
13.7335.17 11.062.35
24.22 19.80 14.14 17.88 11.85 4a 94 12.36
11.146.51
177.04156.8487.4935.8310.7715.8678.79
* State census, Jan, 1, 1925. 6 Estimate as of July 1,1927,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T ab l e 5.—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S F O R N E W B U ILD IN G S A N D FO R
1 6 BUILDING PEEMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
City and StateExpenditure
for new buildings,
1928
Expenditure for repairs and addi
tions, 1928
Total expenditures Expenditure for new
housekeeping dwellings
only,19281928 1927
Oakland, Calif........................... $17,824,002 $1,713,163 $19,537,165 $20,518,417 $8,107,443Oak Park, 111............................. 9,074,251 216,244 9,290,495 9,080,676 5,265,455Ogden, Utah.............................. 1,202,325 145,900 1,348,225 1,498,260 476,300Oklahoma City, Okla.............. 12,267,630 1,254,368 13,521,998 12,682,293 8,709,509Okmulgee, Okla........................ 227,615 25,350 252,965 262,150 45,550Omaha, Nebr............................. 8,422,073 628,337 9,050,410 4,567,218 2,257,950Orange, N . J.............................. 2,708,090 398,409 3,106,499 5,581,523 1,306,400Oshkosh, Wis............................. 686,924 165,922 852,846 1,494,076 539,066Ottumwa, Iowa......................... 328,450 65,325 393,775 579,900 204,800
Paducah, K y ............................. 527,590 81,015 608,605 356,000 202,735Pasadena, Calif......................... 5,056,253 893,300 5,949,553 8,965,720 3,347,929Passaic, N . J .............................. 2,573,057 488,461 3,061,518 5,603,448 1,766,650Paterson, N . J........................... 6,214,664 1,142,027 7,356,691 6,369,917 2,580,513Pawtucket, R. I ........................ 2,430,159 392,430 2,822,589 3,586,765 1,923,850Peoria, 111................................... 3,411,295 539,965 3,951,260 3,409,575 2,182,500Perth Amboy, N . J.................. 910,022 457,337 1,367,359 1,671,872 432,082Petersburg, V a . ........................ 416,767 151,861 568,628 279,466 187,650Philadelphia, Pa....................... 100,023,155 12,202,710 112,225,865 117,590,650 51,432,580Phoenix, Ariz............................. 5,604,161 372,501 5,976,662 5,645,124 2,146,922Pittsburgh, Pa.......................... 35,223,329 4,150,203 39,373,532 37, 111, 332 13,270,969Pittsfield, Mass......................... 1,657,915 155,215 1,813,130 1,650,690 1,117,200Plainfield, N. J.......................... 3,058,148 406,623 3,464,771 5,046,011 2,066,779Pontiac, Mich............................ 12,637,246 477,980 13,115,226 17,558,296 5,801,365Port Arthur, Tex...................... 1,646,320 234,916 1,881,236 1,731,380 457,877Port Huron, M ich.................... 429,450 31,725 461,175 839,065 190,550Portland, M e............................. 2,218,792 520,094 2,738,886 2,326,783 1,046,350Portland, Oreg.......................... 18,407,440 2,868,530 21,275,970 28,973,455 9,907,285Portsmouth, Ohio..................... 1,145,200 101,885 1,247,085 1,585,007 615,350Portsmouth, Va__..................... 534,945 153,586 688,531 463,385 242,055Poughkeepsie, N . Y ................. 1,460,119 204,701 1,664,820 1,147,667 691,550Providence, R . I ....................... 13,172,494 2,831,025 16,003,519 23,132,819 7,190,600Pueblo, Colo.............................. 1,170,983 295,829 1,466,812 1,625,382 911,825
Quincy, 111.................................. 1,096,736 180,221 1,276,957 1,073,321 529,775Quincy, Mass............................ 6,505,572 364,440 6,870,012 5,231,872 3,695,600
Racine, W is............................... 4,134,138 283,351 4,417,489 6,391,171 3,109,193Reading, Pa............................... 2,809,366 998,954 3,808,320 4,614,067 1,507,650Revere, Mass............................. 1,118,897 108,245 1,227,142 1,602,120 942,545Richmond, Ind.......................... 703,017 237,706 940,723 1,826,139 598,342Richmond, Va........................... 7,579,286 1,265,595 8,844,881 15,216,203 3,625,166Roanoke, Va.......... .................. 3,108,331 171,092 3,279,423 2,583,996 1,369,582Rochester, N. Y ........................ 15,683,912 1,936,886 17,620,798 22,589,418 7,960,709Rockford, 111.............................. 4,281,725 1,454,917 5,736,642 6,553,423 2,721,500Rock Island, 111........................ 503,515 1,079,729 1,583,244 1,999,890 453,500
Sacramento, Calif..................... 4,674,424 849,908 5,524,332 8,814,211 3,302,972Saginaw, M ic h .. . ..................... 3,871,672 477,913 4,349,585 3,610,783 1,469,116St. Joseph, M o...................... 1,878,643 125,975 2,004,618 768,898 374,200St. Louis, M o ............................ 38,215,329 4,613,166 42,828,495 41,417,221 19,228,980St. Paul, Minn.......................... 7,026,558 1,672,955 8,699,513 10,071,216 4,529,238St. Petersburg, Fla................... 1,540,000 306,100 1,846,100 2,907,500 828,100Salem, Mass............................... 1,323,125 396,560 1,719,685 2,727,080 707,000Salt Lake City, Utah............... 3,930,626 1,346,778 5,277,404 4,855,845 2,297,410San Antonio, Tex...................... 16,732,750 1,567,609 18,300,359 12,190,280 8,661,556San Diego, Calif.............. ......... 11,310,940 839,198 12,150,138 13,877,153 7,247,101San Francisco, Calif................. 33,822,280 3,682,158 37,504,438 46,448,676 19,944,664San Jose, Calif........................... 2,233,010 308,290 2,541,300 3,554,430 1,301,010Savannah, Ga............................ 2,010,069 127,065 2,137,134 2,180,050 1,429,665Schenectady, N. Y ................... 2,962,070 466,410 3,428,480 4,318,270 1,669,500Scranton, Pa.............................. 3,597,993 1,034,250 4,632,243 5,707,115 1,632,495Seattle, Wash............................. 30,540,015 4,266,960 34,806,975 29,070,080 15,833,350Sheboygan, W is........................ 1,596,165 512,554 2,108,719 2,171,940 1,037,400Shreveport, La.......................... 4,039,341 807,084 4,846,425 3,946,370 2,039,914Sioux City, Iowa....................... 1,966,060 204,380 2,170,440 1,867,575 1,058,750Sioux Falls, S. Dak................... 1,843,540 161,185 2,004,725 2,042,505 858,920Somerville, Mass................. ..... 1,203,945 220,252 1,424,197 3,385,850 861,300South Bend, Ind ....................... 6,032,415 330,770 6,363,185 4,888,660 2,951,350
* Not estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimate as of July 1,1926.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 7
REPAIRS, AND FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR, ETC., IN THE CALENDAR YEAR 1928—Con.
City and StateEstimated
Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita
expenditure for
population, July 1,1928
NumberRatio
per10,000
For new buildings
For repairs and additions
TotalRank
ofcity
housekeeping dwellings only, 1928
274,100 2,430 88.7 $65.03 $6.25 $71.28 63 $29.5857,700 745 129.1 157.27 3.75 161.01 12 91.2639,100 157 40.2 30.75 3.73 34.48 196 12.18
7,104,0800 )
222,800
2,63715
253.4 117.87 12.05 129.92 21 83.68
412 18.5 37.80 2.82 40.62 163 10.1336,500 281 77.0 74.19 10.92 85.11 49 35.7933,200 155 46.7 20.69 5.00 25.69 234 16.24
3 27,400 38 13.9 11.99 2.38 14.37 273 7.47
2 26,100 94 36.0 20.21 3.10 23.32 241 7.7762,100 600 96.6 81.42 14.38 95.80 41 53.9171,800 351 48.9 35.84 6.80 42.64 153 24.61
144,900 748 51.6 42.89 7.88 50.77 129 17.8173,100 455 62.2 33.24 5.37 38.61 173 26.3284,500 437 51.7 40.37 6.39 46.76 142 25.8350,100 104 20.8 18.16 9.13 27.29 225 8.6237,800 48 12.7 11.03 4.02 15.04 269 4.96
2,064,200 10,576 51.2 48.46 5.91 54.37 113 24.92a 42,100 748 177.7 133.12 8.85 141.96 17 51.00673,800 2,544 37.8 52.28 6.16 58.44 96 19.7050,000 211 42.2 33.16 3.10 36.26 187 22.34
a 32,500 311 95.7 94.10 12.51 106.61 30 63.5961,500 1,735 282.1 205.48 7.77 213.26 7 94.33
2 33,000 210 63.6 49.89 7.12 57.01 99 13.882 30,700 71 23.1 13.99 1.03 15.02 270 6.21
78,6000 )41,200
2612,321
169
33.2 28.23 . 6.62 34.85 192 13.31
41.0 27.80 2.47 30.27 214 14.9461,600 85 13.8 8.68 2.49 11.18 284 3.9339,100 96 24.6 37.34 5.24 42.58 154 17.69
286,300 1,134 39.6 46.01 9.89 55.90 103 25.1244,200 372 84.2 26.49 6.69 33.19 202 20.63
39,800 133 33.4 27.56 4.53 32.08 205 13.3167,600 977 144.5 96.24 5.39 101.63 33 54.67
74,400 681 91.5 55.57 3.81 59. 37 95 41.79115,400 263 22.8 24.34 8 .66 33.00 203 13.0636,000 247 68.6 31.08 8.01 34.09 200 26.14
2 31,000 153 49.4 22.68 7.67 30.35 213 19.30194,400 764 39.3 38.99 6.51 45.50 146 18.6564,600 364 56.3 48.12 2.65 50.77 130 21.20
328,200 1,862 56.7 47.79 5.90 53.69 118 24.2682,800 779 94.1 51.71 17.57 69.28 68 32.8742,700 146 34.2 11.79 25.29 37.08 182 10.62
75,700 917 121.1 61.75 11.23 72.98 60 43.6375,600 577 76.3 51.21 6.32 57.53 97 19.4378,500 98 12.5 23.93 1.60 25.54 235 4.77
848,100 7,190 84.8 45.06 5.44 50.50 131 22.67• 250,100 773 30.9 28.09 6.69 34.78 194 18.11
53,300 172 32.3 28.89 5.74 34.64 195 15.5443,000 120 27.9 30.77 9.22 39.99 166 16.44
138,000 731 53.0 28.48 9.76 38.24. - 176 16.65218,100 2,784 127.6 76.72 7.19 83.91 50 39.71119,700 2,146 179.3 94.49 7.01 101.50 34 60.54585,300 6,084 103.9 57.79 6.29 64.08 85 34.0845,500 370 81.3 49.08 6.78 55.85 104 28.5999,900 430 43.0 20.12 1.27 21.39 246 14.3193,300 269 28.8 31.75 5.00 36.75 183 17.89
144,700 292 20.2 24.87 7.15 32.01 206 11.28383,200 4,658 121.6 79.70 11.14 90.83 44 41.3935,100 188 53.6 45.47 14.60 60.08 92 29.5881,300 713 87.7 49.68 9.93 59.61 94 25.0680,000 282 35.3 24.58 2.55 27.13 226 13.29
2 31,200 211 67.6 59.09 5.17 64.25 84 27.53102,700 199 19.4 11.72 2.14 13.87 276 8.3386,100 579 67.2 70.06 3.84 73.90 55 34.22
Oakland. Calif.....................Oak Park, 111.......................Ogden, Utah........................Oklahoma City, Okia........Okmulgee, Okla..................Omaha, Nebr.......................Orange. N . J........................Oshkosh, W is...... ................Ottumwa, Iowa...................
Paducah, K y .......................Pasadena, Calif...................Passaic, N . J........................Paterson, N . J .....................Pawtucket, R . I ..................Peoria, 111........................—Perth Amboy, N . J ............Petersburg, Va.................... .Philadelphia, Pa................. .Phoenix, Ariz......................Pittsburgh, Pa......................Pittsfield, Mass.......... .........Plainfield, N. J ...................Pontiac, M ich..................... .Port Arthur, Tex--------------Port Huron, M ich........ — .Portland, M e........ .............. .Portland, Oreg.....................Portsmouth, Ohio...............Portsmouth, Va..................Poughkeepsie, N . Y ...........Providence, R . I ._ .............Pueblo, Colo........................
Quincy, HI............................Quincy, Mass......................
Racine, Wis....................—Reading, Pa.......... — .........Revere, Mass--------------------Richmond, Ind...................Richmond, Va__.................Roanoke, Va........................Rochester, N . Y ..................Rockford, 111........................Rock Island, HI..................
Sacramento, Calif..............Saginaw, M ich....................St. Joseph, M o....................St. Louis, M o......................St. Paul, M inn...................St. Petersburg, Fla_______Salem, M ass.......................Salt Lake City, Utah_____San Antonio, Tex...............San Diego, Calif_________San Francisco, Calif______San Jose, Calif.....................Savannah, Ga— ...............Schenectady, N . Y .............Scranton, Pa........................Seattle, Wash.......................Sheboygan, Wis..................Shreveport, La....................Sioux City, Iowa...............Sioux Falls, S. Dak_______Somerville, Mass.................South Bend, In d ................
• Estimate of July 1,1927,
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1 8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 5 .—T O T A L A N D P E R C A P IT A E X P E N D IT U R E S FO R N E W BU ILD IN G S A N D FO R
City and StateExpenditure
for new buildings,
1928
Expenditure for repairs and addi
tions, 1928
Total expenditures Expenditure for new
housekeeping dwellings
only,19281928 1927
Spokane, Wash.......................... $4,879,063 $857,715 $5,736,778 $3,656,500 $2,244,025Springfield, 111............................ 3,319,125 420,028 3,739,153 3,770,303 1,929,900Springfield, Mass...................... 4,956,324 1,020,475 5,976,799 8,905,819 2,776,050Springfield, M o......................... 1,366,035 249,620 1,615,655 (3) 677,275Springfield, Ohio...................... 1,407,564 149,203 1,556,767 1,693,927 987,550Stamford, Conn........................ 4,009,610 1,185,668 5,195,278 6,042,716 2,244,550Steubenville, Ohio.................... 1,151,595 41,815 1,193,410 1,856,435 708,000Stockton, Calif.......................... 1,411,142 363,724 1,774,866 2,803,347 809,210Superior, Wis............................. 1,665,705 186,447 1,852,152 1,277,019 551,850Syracuse, N . Y .......................... 11,861,603 1,358,826 13,220,429 21,^90,371 8, 000,200
Tacoma, Wash.......................... 4,026,470 633,945 4,660,415 4,764,728 2,546,000Tampa, Fla................................ 3,042,030 575,024 3,617,054 6,145,201 1,620,260Taunton, Mass.......................... 768,247 114,250 882,497 1,055,999 215,300Terre Haute, Ind...................... 605,195 368,292 973,487 1,212,771 336,050Toledo, Ohio.............................. 14,463,296 2,882,899 17,346,195 15,513,710 6,658,125Topeka, Kans............................ 1,832,950 158,564 1,991,514 2,222,196 1,187,550Trenton, N. J ............................ 3,314,867 791,054 4,105,921 4,539,632 1,172,100Troy, N. Y ................................. 1,061,600 262,064 1,323,664 3,206,057 786,750Tucson, Ariz.............................. 2,726,395 168,996 2,895,391 2,322, 550 1,102,972Tulsa, Okla................................ 12,697,207 713,844 13,411,051 14,791,854 7,613,800
Union City, N . J...................... 749,085 371,671 1,120,756 3,409,526 326,300Utica, N . Y ................................ 3,475,465 441,505 3,916,970 3,381,105 2,140,100
Vallejo, Calif.............................. 372,488 69,359 441,847 492,898 182,950
Waco, Tex.................................. 1,997,020 294,319 2,291,339 1,573,641 631,003Waltham, Mass......................... 2,285,970 191,085 2,477,055 2,217,925 1,744,300Warren, Ohio__........................ 1,667,940 143,680 1,811,620 1,425,474 1,084,830Washington, D . C.................... 50,284,426 3,690,553 53,974,979 39,263,477 29,601,350Waterbury, Conn..................... 2,944,450 543,850 3,488,300 5,015,638 1,963,500Waterloo, Iowa.......................... 2,460,584 261,610 2,722,194 1,151,981 848,700Watertown, Mass..................... 2,729,425 94,670 2,824,095 4,281,230 2,246,800Watertown, N. Y ..................... 931,030 221,419 1,152,449 756,204 278,800West New York, N. J............. 1,272,875 355,510 1,628,385 1,685,293 577,000Wheeling, W . Va...................... 1,331,806 635,682 1,967,488 3,014,131 641,280White Plains, N. Y .................. 12,093,064 539,142 12,632,206 10,125,792 6,365,600Wichita, Kans........................... 7,323,978 650,243 7,974,221 5,848,942 3,976,615Wichita Falls, Tex__............... 1,315,400 596,012 1,911,412 4,050,687 900,788Wilkes-Barre, Pa...................... 3,233,464 662,881 3,896,345 4,934,339 753,540Wilkinsburg, Pa........................ 1,810,556 105,005 1,915,561 1,932,390 1,009,095Williamsport, Pa...................... 1,733,765 347,175 2,080,940 2,732,695 730,090Wilmington, Del....................... 4,447,657 1,129,452 5,577,109 6,805,900 2,307,463Wilmington, N. C.... ................ 592,500 156,000 748,500 552,125 222,000Winston-Salem, N. C________ 8,001,722 529,306 8,531,028 6,539,187 3,597,360Woonsocket, R . I ...................... 464,470 454,073 918,543 1,360,179 271,300Worcester, Mass........................ 5,772,236 1,488,084 7,260,320 8,814,669 2,509,535
Yonkers, N . Y ........................... 34,373,299 1,245,525 35,618,824 32,585,888 29,553,210York, Pa..................................... 1,347,932 717,117 2,065,049 1,588,854 575,300Youngstown, Ohio..... .............. 8,108,260 529,415 8,637,675 9,007,160 5,043,935
Zanesville, Ohio........................ 475,276 72,788 548,064 1, 021,100 372,785
Total................................. 3,098,940,040 324,644,421 3,423,584,461 3,593,839,405 1,762,452,315
1 N ot estimated by Census Bureau. * Estimated as of July 1,1926.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
R E PA IR S, A N D F A M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR, E T C ., IN T H E C A L E N D A R Y E A R 1928—Con.
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 1 0
City and StateEstimated population, ^ u ly l, 1928
Families provided for Per capita expenditure, 1928 Per capita
expenditure for house
keeping dwellings only, 1928
NumberRatioper
10,000
For new buildings
For repairs and additions
TotalRank
ofcity
Spokane, Wash_____________ 109,100 574 52.6 $44.72 $7.86 $52.58 119 $20.57Springfield, 111_____________ 67,200 352 52.4 49.39 6.25 55.64 106 28.72Springfield, Mass___________ 149,800 647 43.2 33.09 6.81 39.90 167 18.53Springfield, M o______ _____ 51,700 305 59.0 26.42 4.83 31.25 211 13.10Springfield, Ohio_____ _____ 73,000 315 43.2 19.28 2.04 21.33 247 13.53Stamford, Conn...... ................ 43,800 331 75.6 91.54 27.07 118.61 23 51.25Steubenville, Ohio............— 2 32,600 191 58.6 35.33 1.28 36.61 185 21.72Stockton, Calif....................... 51,000 226 44.3 27.67 7.13 34.80 193 15.87Superior, W is______________ 0 ) 136Syracuse, N . Y ........................ 199,300 1,561 78.3 59.52 6.82 66.33 75 40.14
Tacoma, Wash...... ................. 110,500 822 74.4 36.44 5.74 42.18 156 23.04Tampa, Fla............................. 113,400 647 57.1 26.83 5.07 31.90 207 14.29Taunton, Mass....................... 40,600 60 14.8 18.92 2.81 21.74 245 5.30Terre Haute, Ind___________ 73,500 113 15.4 8.23 5.01 13.24 278 4.57Toledo, Ohio.... ....................... 313,200 1,698 54.2 46.18 9.20 55.38 108 21.26Topeka, Kans......................... 62,800 304 48.4 29.19 2.52 31.71 209 18.91Trenton, N . J.......................... 139,000 223 16.0 23.85 5.69 29.54 217 8.43Troy, N . Y .............................. 72,300 157 21.7 14.68 3.62 18.31 259 10.88Tucson, Ariz............................ 8 27,500 336 122.2 99.14 6.15 105.29 31 40.11Tulsa, Okla.............................. 170,500 2,187 128.3 74.47 4.19 78.66 52 44.66
Union City, N . J.................... 64,400 84 13.0 11.63 5.77 17.40 263 5.07Utica, N. Y .............................. 104,200 342 32.8 33.35 4.24 37.59 179 20.54
Vallftjn, Calif (l) 43
Waco, Tex................................ 46,600 177 38.0 42.85 6.32 49.17 135 13.54Waltham, Mass...................... 37,100 362 97.6 61.62 5.15 66.77 74 47.02Warren, Ohio.......................... 2 36,100 306 84.8 46.20 3.98 50.18 132 30.05Washington, D . C ................. 552,000 4,305 78.0 91.09 6.69 97.78 37 53.63Waterbury, Conn__________ 0 ) 504Waterloo, Iowa__................... 37,100 270 72.8 66.32 7.05 73.37 58 22.88Watertown, Mass................... 2 26,400 454 172.0 103.39 3.59 106.97 28 85.11Watertown, N. Y ................... 33,700 53 15.7 27.63 6.57 34.20 198 8.27West New York, N . J........... 2 41,000 170 41.5 31.05 8.67 39.72 170 14.07Wheeling, W . Va__________ 0 ) 125White Plains, N . Y ............... 2 28,700 856 298.3 421.36 18.79 440.15 1 221.80Wichita, Kans........................ 99,300 1,207 121.6 73.76 6.55 80.30 51 40.05Wichita Falls, Tex_________ (i) 222Wilkes-Barre, P a - - ............... 91,900 174 18.9 35.18 7.21 42.40 155 8 .20Wilkinsburg, Pa..................... 2 28,000 90 32.1 64.66 3.75 68.41 70 36.04Williamsport, Pa__............... 44,000 169 38.4 39.40 7.89 47.29 140 16.59Wilmington, Del.................... 128,500 365 28.4 34.61 8.79 43.40 150 17.96Wilmington, N. C ................. 39,100 64 16.4 15.15 3.99 19.14 256 5.68Winston-Salem, N . C ............ 80,000 965 120.6 100.02 6.62 106.64 29 44.97Woonsocket, R . I ................... 53,400 79 14.8 8.70 8.50 17.20 264 5.08Worcester, Mass..................... 197,600 474 24.0 29.21 7.53 36.74 184 ! 12.70
Yonkers, N . Y ........................ 121,300 4,216 347.6 283.37 10.27 293.64 2 243.64York, Pa__.............................. 49,900 144 28.9 27.01 14.37 41.38 158 11.53Youngstown, Ohio................. 174,200 929 53.3 46.55 3.04 49.58 134 28.95
Zanesville, Ohio...................... 2 30,600 138 45.1 15.53 2.38 17.91 262 12.18
Total.............................. 44,940,049. 399,657 88.9 68.96 7.22 76.18 39.22
8 Data not collected.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Expenditures for Building Operations in Representative Cities, 1921 to 1928
D ATA have been collected since 1921 concerning the amount expended for building operations in 257 identical cities. The
information was obtained from the record of permits issued by the local building officials of the different cities. The costs are the estimated costs given by the prospective builder at the time of applying for Ins permit. The cost of the building only is included. The total expenditure for new buildings was less in these cities during 1928 than for any year since 1922 and fell below $3,000,000,000 for the first time since that year. Table 6 belowN shows the estimated expenditures for residential buildings, nonresidential buildings, and total new buildings; the population as estimated by the Census Bureau as of July 1 each year; the number of families provided for; the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population; the index number of each of these items; and the index number of families provided for weighted by population.T a b l e 6 .— E ST IM A T E D E X P E N D IT U R E S A N D IN D E X N U M B ER S OF E X P E N D IT U R E S
FO R N EW R E SID E N T IA L BUILD ING S, N O N R E SID E N T IA L B U ILD IN G S, A N D T O T A L N E W BUILD ING S; ALSO FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR A N D R A T IO OF FA M ILIES PR O V ID E D FO R TO E A C H 10,000 OF POPU LATION IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES IN 1921 TO 1928, IN CLU SIVE
Residential buildings Nonresidential buildings Total new buildings
YearEstimated
expenditureIndex
numberEstimated
expenditureIndex
numberEstimated
expenditureIndex
number
1921..................................... $937,352,739 1,612,352,921 2,000,986,900 2,070,276,772 2,461,546,270 2,255,994,627 1,906,003,260 1,859,429,751
100.0 $635,775,199 876,276,713
1,070,596,718 1,137,631,080 1,343,880,884 1,300,840,876 1,231,785,870 1,135,549,986
100.0 $1,573,127,938 2,488,629,634 3,071,583,618 3,207,907,852 3,805,427,154 3,556,835,503 3,137,789,130 2.994.979. 737
100.01922..................................... 172.0 137.8 158.21923..................................... 213.5 168.4 195.31924..................................... 220.9 178.9 203.91925................................. — 262.6 211.4 241.91926..................................... 240.7 204.6 226.11927..................................... 203.3 193.7 199.51928..................................... 198.4 178.6 190.4
Population Families provided for
Year As estimated by Census Bureau for
specified year
Indexnumber Number Index
number
Ratio to each 10,000 of popula
tion
Index number weighted b y popula
tion
1921..................................... 36,575,118 37,511,516 38,447,913 39,384,311 40,320,708 41,257,106 42,058,897 42,767,125
100.0 224,545 377,305 453,673 442,919 491,222 462,214 406,095 388,678
100.0 61.4 100.0163.71922..................................... 102.6 168.0 100.6
1923..................................... 105.1 202.0 118.0 192.2183.2 198.4
1924..................................... 107.7 197.3 112.51925..................................... 110.2 218.8 121.81926..................................... 112.8 205.8 112.0 182.41927.................................... 115.0 180.9 96.6 157.3
148.11928.................................... 116.9 173.1 90.9
The peak expenditure for new buildings was reached in 1925, when $3,805,427,154 was expended for building operations, according to permits issued in these 257 cities. The expenditure for 1928 was nearly a billion dollars less than the 1925 peak. Each year since
20
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
1925 has shown a decrease in amount expended for new buildings over the preceding year. The 1928 expenditure was 21.3 per cent less than the 1925 expenditure, but was 90.4 per cent above the expenditure for 1921.
Expenditures for residential and nonresidential buildings each reached a peak in 1925. The amount expended for residential buildings that year was $2,461,546,270. During 1928 the expenditure for residential buildings was $1,859,429,751, which was 24.5 per cent less than the 1925 expenditure, but was 98.4 per cent above the expenditure for 1921. The expenditure for nonresidential buildings during 1925 was $1,343,880,884 and during 1928 it was $1,135,549,986. That is, during 1928 15.5 per cent less was expended for nonresidential buildings than during 1925 or 78.6 per cent more than during 1921.
The population of these 257 cities on July 1, 1921, was 36,575,118 according to the estimate of the Census Bureau and by July 1,1928, it had risen to 42,767,125, or 16.9 per cent above the 1921 population.
During 1925 housing units were provided for 491,222 families. This is the record year in regard to families provided for. During1928 only 388,678 families were provided with dwelling places in new buildings, this being 20.9 per cent less than the number accommodated during 1925 and 73.1 per cent more than those provided for during 1921.
In 1921 there were 61.4 families provided for to each 10,000 of population. By 1925 this ratio had risen to 121.8 but in 1928 had fallen to 90.9. The index number of families provided for weighted by population reached a peak of 198.4 in 1925 and then declined steadily each year until it stood at 148.1 in 1928.
Average Estimated Cost of Dwellings per Family
Table 7 shows the average cost each year, 1921 to 1928, of dwelling accommodations per family in each of the different kinds of dwellings for which permits were issued in the 257 identical cities from which reports were received every year.
The costs from which these averages were computed are the costs of the building as stated by the prospective builder at the time of applying for his permit to build. Land costs are not included. There may be a profit or loss between the cost to the builder and the cost to the home purchaser.T a b le 7.—A V E R AG E COST OF D W E LLIN G S P E R F A M IL Y IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES,
1921 TO 1928
E XP E N D IT U R E S IN R EPRE SEN TA TIV E C IT IE S 2 1
Year
Average cost of dwellings per family l in—
Index numbers of cost of dwellings per family in—
On©*familydwellings
Two- family dwellings 2
Multifamily dwellings 8
All classes of
dwellings
One-familydwellings
Two- family dwellings 2
M ultifamily dwellings 3
All classes of
dwellings
1921............................... $3,972 $3,762 $4,019 $3,947 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.01922............................... 4,134 3,801 3,880 4,005 104.1 101.0 96.5 101.51923............................... 4,203 4,159 4,001 4,127 105.8 110.6 99.6 104.61924............................... 4,317 4,336 4,418 4,352 108.7 115.3 109.9 110.31925............................... 4,618 4,421 4,289 4,464 116.3 117.5 106.7 113.11926............................... 4,725 4,480 4,095 4,422 119.0 119.1 101.9 112.01927............................... 4,830 4,368 4,170 4,449 121.6 116.1 103.8 112.71928............................... 4,937 4,064 4,129 4,407 124.3 108.0 102.7 111.7
1 Buildings only; see text above.2 Includes one-family and two-family dwellings with stores.3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
The average cost of the 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued has advanced nearly a thousand dollars between 1921 and 1928. In 1921 the average cost of the separate dwelling was $3,972, while in 1928 it was $4,937. There has been a steady increase each year over the preceding year. The average cost of the 1-family dwellings for which permits were issued in 1928 was 24.3 per cent higher than the average cost of those for which permits were issued during 1921.
The average cost of 2-family dwellings was $3,762 per family in 1921. This rose steadily until a peak of $4,480 per family, or 19.1 per cent above the 1921 cost, was reached in 1926. In 1928 the average cost of 2-family dwellings was $4,064 per family. This is 8 per cent above the 1921 cost.
The average cost per family provided for in apartment houses was lowest in 1922, the cost being $3,880 per family that year. By 1924 the average cost had risen to $4,418 per family. In this year average expenditure j>er family provided for was higher in apartment houses than in single-family dwellings. In 1925 and 1926 the per family cost of multi-family dwellings declined, climbed slightly in 1927, and again sank in 1928, the 1928 cost being $4,129 per family, or only 2.7 per cent higher than the 1921 cost.
The average cost per family of all dwelling units in new buildings was $3,947 in 1921. In 1925 a peak cost of $4,464 was reached. The cost in 1928 was $4,407, which was an increase of 11.7 per cent over the 1921 per family cost.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics collects monthly the wholesale prices of building material and from such figures computes index numbers. Retail prices as paid by builders are not avaliable, but it is believed that the trend of retail prices follows closely the trend of wholesale prices. The index number of wholesale prices shown in Table 3 differs from that previously shown because of a different weighting for the different building materials.
The index numbers shown in Table 8 for wages in the building trades are wage rates for union labor only. In many cities the building trades are highly organized, while in others there is much nonunion labor. The bureau has no data concerning wages of nonunion labor in the building trades. It is thought, however, that the trend of wages of nonunion labor would follow closely that of union labor.
The price of building material reached a peak of 111.6 in 1923 and fell to a low of 95.8 in 1927. The 1928 price stood at 96.2. Union wage rates reached their highest point, 129, in 1928, rising from the low of 93.4 in 1922.
2 2 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 8 .— IN D E X N U M B E R OF W H OLESALE PRICES OF B U IL D IN G M A T E R IA L A N D OF U N ION W AG E R ATE S IN T H E B U IL D IN G T R A D E S , 1921 to 1928
Year
Index numbers for
Year
Index numbers for
Wholesale
prices of building material
Union wage rates per hour
in the building
trades
Wholesale
prices of building material
Union wage rates per hour
in the building
trades
1921................................................ 100.099.9
111.6105.0
100.093.4
103.6112.2
1925............................... 104.4102.795.896.2
116.3124.0 128.5129.0
1922................................................ 1926............................................1923................................................ 1927.......................................1924................................................ 1928..........................................
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Apartment House Construction in American Cities, 1928
T HERE is no abatement of the trend toward apartment houses as dwelling places in the cities of the United States. Figures
taken from permits issued in 257 cities in the United States having a population of 25,000 or over show that the popularity of the multifamily dwelling is still growing. A multifamily dwelling is one designed to accommodate three or more families. The term is equivalent to the more generally used appellations “ apartment house ” or “ tenement house.”
Reports have been received from 257 identical cities continuously since 1921 showing the number of families provided for and the class of dwelling with which they were provided. This information is shown below in Table 9.
In 1928 homes were provided in new buildings for 388,678 families;53.7 per cent of these were in apartment houses; 35.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings, and 11.1 per cent in 2-family dwellings. This is the first year since the compilation of these data by the bureau that more than half of the families provided for in new buildings were housed in apartment houses. In new construction in 1921 only24.4 per centof all families provided for were housed in apartment houses, and 58.3 percent in 1-family dwellings.T a b l e 9 .—P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R IN TH E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF
D W E LLIN G S IN 257 ID E N T IC A L CITIES, 1921 TO 1928, IN CLU SIVE
Year
Number of
families provided for in all classes
of dwellings
Per cent of families provided for in—
Year
Number of
families provided for in all classes
of dwellings
Per cent of families provided for in—
One-fam ilydwellings
Two- fam ily dwellings 1
Multifamily dwellings 2
One-fam ilydwellings
Two- fam ily dwellings 1
M ultifamilydwellings2
1921........................... 224,545 377,305 453,673 442,919
58.347.5 45.847.6
17.321.3 21.2 21.5
24.431.233.030.9
1925........................... 491,222 462,214 406,095 388,678
46.040.738.335.2
17.513.913.411.1
36.445.4 48.3 53.7
1922.......................... 1926...........................1923.......................... 1927...........................1924........................... 1928...........................
1 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined.2 Includes multi-family dwellings with stores combined.
This is the third consecutive year that more family units have been provided in apartment houses than in 1-family dwellings. Just what effect this change in the type of dwelling will have on the social, economic, and political life of the country is hard to determine. That it will have its impress on the character and life of the people is an undoubted fact. Few apartment-house dwellers are home owners. As has been pointed out before by the bureau, apartment-house construction is changing the character of building labor by giving more opportunity for work to certain trades, namely, structural-iron workers, concrete workers, marble and stone cutters, etc., and less to other trades, especially carpenters.
23
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Comparison of Conditions in Cities of Over 500,000
In t h e 14 cities of the United States which have a population of500,000 or over 67.2 per cent of the families provided for in1928 were housed in apartment houses, 22.1 per cent in 1-family dwellings, and 10.7 per cent in 2-family dwellings. In 1927 the same classes of dwellings housed 60.8 per cent, 25.8 per cent, and 13.4 per cent, respectively. These 14 cities provided for 236,113 families in1927 and 232,681 families in 1928, as shown in Table 10.
Data are shown in this table for New York as an entity and for each of the five boroughs separately. Chicago provided for a larger portion of families in apartment houses than any other city, 80.7 per cent of the total housing units in new dwellings being in this class of building in 1928 as compared with 12.2 per cent in 1-family dwellings.
The per cent of families housed in new apartment houses in New York practically equaled that of Chicago, 80.3 per cent of the new housing units being in apartment houses and 12.4 per cent in l-family dwellings.
There was a great difference, however, in the class of homes provided in the different boroughs. In Manhattan 99.9 per cent of new housing units were in apartment houses and only one-tenth of 1 per cent in1-family dwellings. In the borough of Richmond 60.3 per cent were in 1-family dwellings and only 23.3 per cent in apartment houses.
Baltimore built a larger proportion of 1-family dwellings than any other city in this population group, but even in Baltimore there was an increase in the percentage of families provided for in apartment houses in 1928 as compared with 1927. Detroit and San Francisco were the only cities in the United States having a population of 500,000 or over where a larger percentage of the families provided for in new buildings were housed in 1-family dwellings in 1928 than in 1927. In 1927 there were 15,614 families provided for in new buildings in Detroit; of this number 35.9 per cent were accommodated in 1-family dwellings. In 1928 of the 15,929 families provided for,42.7 per cent were housed in 1-family dwellings.
Boston, Buffalo, Cleveland, Detroit, and Milwaukee built large numbers of 2-family houses.
2 4 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 1 0 .— PE R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T T Y P E S OF DW E LLIN G S IN C ITIES H A VIN G A PO PU LA TIO N OF 500,000 OR O VER IN 1921,1927, A N D 1928
Total number of
Per cent of families provided for in— Total
number of
Per cent of families provided for in—
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
One-familydwellings
Two- family dwellings 1
Multifamilydwellings2
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
One-familydwellings
Two- family dwellings i
Multifamily dwellings 2
Baltimore, M d.: 1921..................... 2,176
3,5462,884
878
85.0 4.5 10.5Buffalo, N . Y .:
1921..................... 2,405 3,373 3,181
12,252 41,201 34,447
51.6 48.0 0.41927__................. 94.4 0 .2 5.4 1927.............. 34.2 36.7 29.1
33.41928.................... 86.4 13.6 1928..................... 22.1 44.5Boston, Mass.:
1921 ..................... 15.5 30.5 54.0Chicago, 111.:
1921..................... 37.9 17.6 44.61927.................... 5,316
6,80510.3 32.2 57.5 1927..................... 13.6 1 0.2 76.2
1928..................... 9.5 28.0 62.5 1928..................... 12.2 7.1 80.71 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined.3 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores combined.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 25
T able 10.—PER CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT TYPES OFDWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF 500,000 OR OVER IN 1921,1927, AND1928—Continued
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
One-familydwellings
Two-familydwellings
Multifamilydwellings
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
One-familydwelling
Two-familydwellings
Multifamilydwellings
Cleveland, Ohio: 1921.....................192 7 1928....................
Detroit, Mich.:1921.....................1927...................192 8
Los Angeles, Calif.:1921.................192 7 192 8
Milwaukee, Wis.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
New York City,N. Y .:
1921.....................192 7 192 8 B ron x -
1921............ .1927............ .1928............
B rook lyn -1921..............1927..............1928...........
Q ueens-1921............1927..............1928............
M anhattan- 1921-...........192 7 192 8
4,0843,6313,167
6,74315,61415,929
19,57220,80121,081
2 ,2124,2524,965
51,360 105,519 109,523
14,03730,02533,768
16,636 33,172 28,938
13,25631,20528,797
4,837 9,502
15,983
35.5 43.942.8
46.935.942.7
6 8.039.5 31.3
44.930.919.7
31.6 15.912.4
11.74.03.8
24.111.69.1
60.033.429.4
0.7(8)0 .1
40.530.721.7
17.926.6 28.4
16.9 8.7
10.0
38.226.722.3
24.213.3 7.2
11.98.53.4
44.017.512.5
24.417.1 9.8
3.7(8)0 .1
24.025.535.5
35.237.5 28.9
15.251.858.8
16.9 42.458.0
44.2 70.980.3
76.487.592.8
31.9 71.078.4
15.649.5 60.8
99.9
New York City, N . Y —Contd.
R ich m on d - 1921............192 7 192 8 .
Philadelphia, Pa.:1921..................1927...................1928..................
Pittsburgh, Pa.:1921...................192 7 .192 8 .
St. Louis, M o.:1921.................. .1927.................. .1928.....................
San F r a n c is c o , Calif.:
1921.....................192 7 192 8
Washington, D . C.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Total (14 cities):
1921...........1927.........1928..........
2,5941,6152,037
2,406 12,197 10,576
1,3352,5882,544
2,0725,4637,190
8,6746,084
2,1953,9384,305
100.077.960.3
93.371.269.2
59.3 73.862.4
49.029.123.4
37.631.136.2
75.447.330.4
20.616.4
3.37.3
26.87.6
10.2
24.116.818.7
17.09.55.7
0.50.7
1.523.3
6.725.523.4
13.918.727.4
54.157.9
45.459.358.1
24.652.2
112,373 236,113 232,681
44.225.822.1
21.7 13.410.7
34.060.867.2
* Less than one-tenth of 1 per cent.
Comparison of Conditions in Cities of Under 500,000
In t a b l e 11 are shown cities having a population of 25,000 or over which provided for 200 or more families in either 1927 or 1928. The table shows figures for 1921, 1927, and 1928, where data are available for these three years. When the information is not available for 1921 it is shown for the earliest year for which data were collected. A few of the smaller cities, which have reached a population of25,000 since 1920, are shown for 1927 and 1928 only.
Most of the cities having a population of 500,000 or less built most of their new family housing units in 1-family dwellings. There are some exceptions, however, even in cities having a population of less than 100,000. In Mount Vernon, N. Y., for instance, 83.7 per cent of the family units built in 1927 and 77 per cent of those built in1928 were in apartment houses. The Bureau of the Census estimated the population of Mount Vernon to be 54,700 on July 1, 1928. Evanston, 111., with a population of 47,600, accommodated 70.5 per cent of the families provided for in 1927 and 75.6 per cent of those provided for in 1928 in apartment houses.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2 6 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
In most of the cities which might be classed as suburbs of larger cities the majority of the family units provided were in apartment houses in 1927 and 1928. Among cities in this class are Yonkers, N. Y .; White Plains, N. Y .; Elizabeth, N. J.; East Cleveland, Ohio; Cambridge, Mass.; and Highland Park, Mich. In the last-named city only one-half of 1 per cent of the family units for which permits were issued in 1927 and only 2.6 per cent of those for which permits were issued in 1928 were 1-family dwellings.
Albany, N. Y . ; Bethlehem, Pa.; Bridgeport, Conn.; Medford, Mass.; New Britain, Conn.; and Pawtucket, R. I., were large builders of2-family dwellings.
Richmond, Ind., was the only city where no apartment houses were built in any of the three years for which data are shown.T a b le 11.—P E R C E N T OP FAM ILIES PR O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S
OF D W E LLIN G S IN C ITIES H A VIN G A P O PU LA TIO N OF F R O M 26,000 TO 500,000 JEN SP E C IF IE D Y E A R S
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
1-family
dwellings
2-family
dwellings 1
Multifamily dwellings 2
100.083.9 3.4 12.780.2 5.9 13.8
88.2 11.881.2 5.4 13.433.7 .8 65.5
59.3 39.7 1 .048.9 44.6 6.548.8 28.9 22.3
90.2 2 .0 7.874.9 1.9 23.186.7 1.3 12.1
93.4 6 .692.6 .4 7.196.1 3.9
100.072.4 1.5 26.192.5 1.5 6 .0
97.1 2 .1 .870.4 1.1 28.569.7 2 .2 28.1
78.1 3.3 18.654.1 20.6 25.341.6 14.2 44.2
51.9 27.9 2 0.225.8 33.9 40.364.9 19.3 15.881.4 9.7 8 .8
100.085.7 1.9 12.487.7 1.3 11.0
92.1 1 .6 6.391.8 5.2 3.092.1 5.6 2.3
56.9 28.1 15.02.3 39.5 58.1.7 19.0 80.3
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
1-fam-iiy
dwellings
2-family
dwellings 1
M ultifamilydwellings2
540 100.0
348 90.8 9.2264 94.3 5.7700 77.6 1.7 20.7867 65.6 8 .1 28.3
1,330 28.0 1.7 70.382 96.3 3.7
230 35.7 46.1 18.3223 43.5 41.7 14.8
327 55.7 30.6 13.8310 31.6 32.3 36.1306 34.6 30.7 34.6
1,659 93.7 .5 5.73,019 78.2 1.3 20.42,589 70.2 . 8 29.0
675 42.7 29.2 28.1
404 35.6 32.7 31.7497 41.6 31.4 27.0388 44.6 27.3 28.1
118 2 2.0 54.2 23.7472 2 2.0 28.0 50.0556 21 .2 14.4 64.4
43 7.0 93.0636 5.5 33.7 60.9863 5.3 26.7 6 8 .0
145 100.0559 85.3 5.2 9.5350 87.7 12.3
403 86.1 1 .0 12.9512 90.0 2 .2 7.8374 89.6 1 .6 8 .8
712 77.7 6 .0 16.4269 73.2 3.7 23.0258 83.7 7.0 9.3
Akron, Ohio:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Alameda, Calif.:1921__.................1927.....................1928__.................
Albany, N. Y .:1921.....................1927_...................1928....................
Allentown, Pa.:1921.....................1927....................1928_...................
Altoona, Pa.:1921.....................1927.....................1928_...................
Anderson, Ind.:1921.....................1927 . .......1928-...................
Asheville, N . C.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8
Atlanta, Ga.:1921_...................1927.....................1 9 2 8 -.................
Atlantic City, N. J.: 1921.....................192 7 1928 . .......
Augusta, Ga.: 1928- Aurora, 111.:
1921................1927__............192 8
Battle Creek, Mich.:1921................192 7 192 8
Bayonne, N. J.:1921................192 7 192 8
2342,5212,557
152239504
302558615
102681556
91282155
37456268
374449370
1,6142,5633,170
36624857
318
126418301
127268177
274344436
Beaum ont, Tex.:1928. ................. .
Bellingham, Wash:192 7 .192 8 .
Berkeley, Calif.:1921................... .1927....................1928........... ........
Bethlehem, Pa.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .
Binghamton, N. Y .:1921....................192 7 .192 8
Birmingham, Ala.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Bloomfield, N . J.:1928.....................
Bridgeport, Conn.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Brookline, Mass.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Cambridge, Mass.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Camden, N . J.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Canton, Ohio:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Charleston, W . Va.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
1 Includes 1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores.2 Includes multifamily dwellings with stores.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 2 7
T able 11.—PER CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued
Total number of
Per cent of families provided for in—
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-ily
dwellings
2-fam-iiy
dwellings
Multifamilydwellings
Charlotte, N . C.:1921..................... 322 93.2 3.1 3.71927..................... 1,052 48.1 13.3 38.61928..................... 1,237 47.9 13.7 38.3
Chattanooga, Tenn.:1921................... 226 65.9 5.8 28.31927..................... 596 56.9 8.7 34.41928..................... 611 50.9 6.4 42.7
Chester, Pa.:1921..................... 47 91.5 8.51927..................... 361 82.3 9.4 8.31928..................... 243 92.6 7.4
Cicero, 111.:1921..................... 453 57.8 40.8 1.31927................... 559 26.3 27.0 46.71928..................... 464 23.3 12.9 63.8
Cincinnati, Ohio:1921..................... 1,161 92.9 1.3 5.81927..................... 3,212 52.3 18.0 29.71928..................... 3,559 51.2 10.1 38.8
Clifton, N. J.:1921..................... 540 39.8 58.2 2 .01927..................... 567 58.9 23.8 17.31928..................... 547 43.9 26.9 29.3
Columbia, S. C.:1928..................... 272 82.4 14.7 2.9
Columbus, Ga.:1921..................... 88 68.2 31.81927..................... 325 92.6 7.41928.................... 321 100.0
Columbus, Ohio:1921..................... 1,317 65.8 31.7 2.51927..................... 2,430 60.5 19.7 19.81928..................... 2,477 58.1 12.1 29.9
Covington, K y.:1921..................... 198 95.5 2.5 2 .01927..................... 346 81.5 13.9 4.61928..................... 314 54.8 34,7 10.5
Cranston, R . I.:1921..................... 154 72.7 27.31927..................... 452 79.2 18.8 2 .01928..................... 559 77.3 12.9 9.8
Dallas, Tex.:1921..................... 2,846 80.8 5.6 13.61927..................... 986 67.1 27.0 5.91928..................... 1,199 58.7 29.0 12.3
Dayton, Ohio:1921..................... 546 96.0 2 .2 1 .81927..................... 1,201 43.8 37.3 18.91928..................... 732 40.7 11.7 47.5
Decatur, 111.:1921..................... 335 82.7 13.7 3.61927..................... 613 96.1 3.91928..................... 339 97.6 2.4
Denver, Colo.:1921..................... 1,624 87.8 4.8 7.41927.......... . . . . . . 1,847 72.4 3.2 24.41928..................... 1,869 60.8 3.9 35.4
Des Moines, Iowa:1921..................... 758 87.1 7.1 5.81927..................... 360 86.7 2 .2 11.11928..................... 406 83.0 1.5 15.5
Duluth, Minn.:1921..................... 637 96.4 1.7 1.91927..................... 303 95.0 2 .0 3.01928..................... 196 90.3 3.6 6 .1
Durham, N. C.:1927..................... 508 81.1 9.1 9.81928..................... 464 8 6 .2 3.4 10.3
East Chicago, Ind.:1921..................... 168 57.1 31.0 11.91927..................... 406 40.9 32.5 26.61928..................... 204 28.9 19.6 51.5
City, State, and year
Total number o f
Per cent of families provided for in—
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-iiy
dwellings
2-family
dwellings
M ultifamilydwellings
472258136
13.14.7
10.3
39.89.31.5
47.08 6.0 8 8 .2
3762,140
968
26.64.23.9
38.66 .88.7
34.889.087.4
249271
79.978.2
17.720.7
2.41 .1
260 93.8 6 .2585501
6 6.873.3
12.39.8
20.917.0
67262207
52.293.593.7
20.92.32.9
26.94.23.4
5141,6501,002
28.012.414.3
66.413.412.5
5.674.273.3
310 71.0 4.5 24.5
518 62.5 37.5444397
74.580.6
24.517.4
.92 .0
4151,423
945
74.022.620.7
5.86.9 3.7
20.270.575.6
509420420
84.393.891.2
2.44.85.2
13.41.43.6
15 46.7 53.3440283
13.911.3
69.135.3
17.053.4
141251n o
47.554.673.6
22.729.515.5
29.815.810.9
3483,5592,221
61.892.275.7
33.04.9
16.7
5.22.97.6
586485407
81.498.498.5
14.21.6.2
4.4
1 .2
909 96.7 3.33,1601,758
55.573.9
2 2.05.1
22.52 1.0
103 96.1 3.9571 96.7 3.3369 8 6 .2 4.1 9.8
4941,675
890
59.132.867.4
0.429.99.2
40.537.323.4
6301,709
895
94.995.293.5
2.5 3.36.5
2.51.4
East C levelan d ,Ohio:
1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .
East Orange, N . J.:1921.............. .192 7 .192 8 .
East Providence,R . I.:
192 7 .192 8 .
East St. Louis, 111.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Elgin, 111.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Elizabeth, N. J.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
El Paso, Tex.:1928................... .
Erie, Pa.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8
Evanston, 111.:1921................... .192 7 192 8
Evansville, Ind.:1921.................192 7 .192 8
Everett, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8
Fall River, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .
Flint, Mich.:1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .
Fort Wayne, Ind.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Fort Worth, Tex.:1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Galveston, Tex.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Gary, Ind.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
G ran d R a p id s ,Mich.:
1921.....................192 7 192 8
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2 8 BUILDING PERMITS IN THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b l e 11.—P E R C E N T OF FA M ILIES P R O V ID E D FOR B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN CITIES H A V IN G A PO PU LA TIO N OF F R O M 25,000 TO 500,000 IN SP E C IF IE D Y E A R S —Continued
Total number of
Per cent of families provided for in Total
number of
Per cent of families provided for in—
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
i-family
dwellings
2-fam-ily
dwellings
Multifamilydwellings
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-iiy
dwellings
2-family
dwellings
M ultifamilydwellings
Great Falls, M ont.: 1928..................... 260 52.7 6.5 40.8
Kenosha, Wis.:1921_................... 128 82.8 14.1 3.1
Greensboro, N . C.: 1927.................... 303 77.9 14.5 7.61928..................... 446 90.1 5 4 4.5 1928-................... 295 90.2 7.5 2.4
Greenwich, Conn.: 1928..................... 344 68.9 13.1 18.0
Knoxville, Tenn.: 1921.................... 489 98.8 1.2
Hamilton, Ohio: 1921.....................
1927-................... 818 83.9 .9 15.2192 100.0 1928-................... 940 77.2 6.4 16.4
1927..................... 362 100.0 Lakewood, Ohio:1928..................... 410 99.0 1 .0 1921-................... 877 26.3 72.3 1.4
Hammond, Ind.: 1921
1927-................... 582 22.0 18.9 59.1288 87.8 1? 2 1928..................... 537 15.8 11.5 72.6
1927..................... 1,141 60.5 6 0 33.6 Lancaster, Pa.:1928..................... 698 67.6 6.4 25.9 1921-................... 73 76.7 19.2 4.1
Harrisburg, Pa.: 1921.....................
1927.................... 247 97.6 2.4179 48.6 44 7 6.7 1928.................... 154 100.0
1927 319 98.7 1 3 Lansing, Mich.:1921.....................1928 206 97.6 2.4 492 93.7 3.9 2.4
Hartford, Conn.: 1921
1927-................... 420 87.1 1.9 11.0717 7.8 39 9 52.3 1928-................... 443 99.1 .9
1927..................... 1,270 11.0 21.7 67.2 Lincoln, Nebr.:1928.....................
Highland P a r k , Mich.:
1921.....................
1,363 8 .0 12.8 79.2 1921..................... 241 97.5 2.51927-................... 388 80.7 19.31928..................... 497 62.6 37.4
250 13.2 15.2 71.6 Little Rock, Ark.:1927 366 .5 1 .6 97.8 1921..................... 749 96.0 1.3 2.71928..................... 117 2 .6 1.7 95.7 1927-................... 514 83.9 .4 15.8
Holyoke, Mass.: 1921.....................
1928..................... 527 76.5 23.599 53.5 46.5 Long Beach, Calif.:
1927 275 14.2 11.6 74." 2 1921..................... 3,8821,4793,099
33.2 7.3 59.51928 ............. 86 46.5 16.3 37.2 1927..................... 57.6 10.6 31.8
Houston, Tex.: 1928-................... 41.9 14.9 43.21921..................... 2,572 88.9 3.4 7.7 Lorain, Ohio:1927..................... 4,536
4,46359.9 20.3 19.8 1921.................... 146 87.7 6 .8 5.5
1928 ............... 63.5 21.7 14.8 1927.................... 237 99.6 .4Indianapolis, Ind.:
1921........._..........1928-................... 227 100.0
2,565 56.1 21.4 22.5 Louisville, K y.:1927 2,400
2,51158.5 19.1 22.4 1921_................... 677 88.9 11.1
1928..................... 52.0 14.3 33.7 1927-................... 1,5741,542
70.0 7.5 22.5Irvington, N. J.:
1921.....................1928-................... 54.9 10.6 34.5
389 38.8 39.3 21.9 Lynn, Mass.:1927..................... 2,562
1,022
108
4.5 23.1 72.4 1921..................... 140 57.1 12.9 30.01928..................... 3.9 11.2 84.9 1927..................... 528 24.4 22.0 53.6
Jackson, Mich.:1921..................... 87.0 3.7 9.3
1928.....................McKeesport, Pa.:
1921....................
501 26.9 24.0 49.1
1927 . 206 87.4 12.6 127 89.0 11.01928_................... 250 93.6 6.4 1927.................... 246 90.7 " 4.1 5.3
Jacksonville, Fla.: 1928..................... 203 82.3 11.8 5.91921..................... 747 75.8 9.9 14.3 Macon, Ga.:
1921.....................1927 2,0981,658
59.5 25.5 15.1 162 95.1 4.91928..................... 60.1 17.2 22.6 1927..................... 352 89.2 . 6 10.2
Jamestown, N . Y .: 1922.....................
1928..................... 321 98.1 1.9161 94.4 3.7 1.9 Madison, Wis.:
1927 225 77.8 8.9 13.3 1921..................... 283 73.5 12.7 13.81928..................... 169 94.7 5.3 1927..................... 489 79.8 3.9 16.4
Jersey City, N . J.: 1921.....................
1928..................... 542 74.5 8.7 16 .8970
1,2872,155
4.4 46.3 49.3 Malden, Mass.:1927 1.9
.425.812.9
72.386 .6
1921..................... 94 40.4 27.7' 31.91928 1927..................... 415 S6.9 55.9 7.2
Kansas City,Kans.: 1921.....................
1928..................... 718
256
18.4
46.1
12.0
48.0
69.6
5.9395 100.0 Medford, Mass.: 1921.....................1927 .............. 387 100.0
89.4 1927..................... 628 53.7 42.8 3.51928.................... 10.6321 1928..................... 745 48.3 37.3 14.4Kansas City, M o.:
1921..................... 2,578 70.1 1.7 28.2 Memphis, Tenn.: 1921 1,245
1,8651,887
71
75.3 47.1
2.417.9
2 2 .21927..................... 3,104 33.1 2.3 64.6 1927 35.01928..................... 1,969 49.0 3.8 47.2 1928 41.4 19.1 39.5
Kearny, N. J.: 1921 205 52.7 35.6 11.7
Meriden, Conn.: 1921..................... 26.7 43.7 i 29.6
1927 696 31.5 35.3 33.2 1927..................... 211 82.0 5.2 1 2.81928..................... 857 15.3 34.1 50.6 1928..................... 137 88.3 7.3 4.4
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 2 9
Table 1 1 .-P E R CENT OF FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued
City, State, and year
Total number of
Per cent of families provided for in— Total
number of
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-ily
dwellings
2-family
dwellings
Multifamilydwellings
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
959 85.9 14.1Oakland, Calif.:
1921..................... 2,6812,6942,430
720
698 83.2 5.7 11.0 1927.....................124 97.6 2.4 1928.....................
Oak Park, 111.:1921.....................
3,5742,1892,240
75.9 5.2 18.9 1927..................... 91865.2 11.8 23.0 1928.................... 74557.1 11.6 31.3 Ogden, Utah:
1921..................... 477638 92.3 1.3 6.4 1927..................... 200
276334323
65.951.854.2
9.432.617.3
24.715.628.5
1928.....................O k l a h o m a City,
Okla.:1921.....................
157
1,7241,7522,637
1,298477
1927.....................726 91.2 . 8 8 .0 1928___________
Omaha, Nebr.:1921....................
246 66.3 16.3 17.4 1927_...................11 10.9 5.4 83.7 1928................... 4121,636 18.5 4 5 77.0 Orange, N. J.:
1921..................... 5564 75.0 12.5 12.5 1927.................... 722317 94.6 5.4 1928 281
1,262790600
371 90.8 .3 8.9 Pasadena, Calif.: 1921....................
470 89.8 10.2 1927654 82.7 1.5 15.7 1928....................753 71.3 1 1.2 17.5 Passaic, N . J.:1921..................... 4261,393 19.1 49.1 31.8 1927..................... 4675,144 3.5 16.2 80.3 1928..................... 3513,288
215537327
2.3
20.028.739.1
12.9
38.130.2 33.0
84.8
41.9 41.2 27.8
Paterson, N . J.:1921..................... 5871927..................... 1,167
7481928___________Pawtucket, R . I .:
1921.................... 277129195210
25.6 36.948.6
71.3 46.212.4
3.116.939.0
1927..................... 5811928___________ 455
Peoria, 111.:1921..................... 300
444497546
21.224.323.3
40.17.28.4
38.768.468.3
1927..................... 3491928..................... 437
Phoenix, Ariz.:1921..................... 407
218 46.8 21.1 32.1 1927..................... 6141928..................... 748
2,3352,0772,107
41.824.620.7
47.264.772.9
11.010.8
Pittsfield, Mass.: 1921.................... 431927.................... 1186.3 1928..................... 211
2471,0491,205
74.9 26.122.9
17.85.22.3
7.368.6
Plainfield, N. J.: 1921.................... 135
74.8 1927-................... 5071928.................... 311
249734
83.568.461.2
15.331.638.8
1 .2 Pontiac, M ich.:1921..................... 60
939 1927..................... 1,0691,735
508
1928. ...................286397506
419496634
72
56.368.369.2
69.2 63.9 43.8
83.3
37.1 26.4 22.9
17.2 2 .0.9
6 .65.37.9
13.634.155.2
Port Arthur, Tex.: 1927-...................1928-................... 210
Portland, M e.:1921..................... 2071927..................... 2161928-.................. 261
16.7Portland, Oreg.:
1921..................... 3,1363,1662,321
285 77.5 10.5 11.9 1927.....................358 69.3 13.1 17.6 1928.....................
Per cent of families provided for in—
1-family
dwellings
2-fam-ily
dwellings
M ultifamilydwellings
Miami, Fla.:1922................192 7 192 8
M i n n e a p o l i s ,M inn.:
1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Mobile, Ala.:1928.....................
Montclair, N . J.: 1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Montgomery, Ala.:1928................... .
M o u n t V e rn o n , N . Y .:
1921.....................192 7 .192 8 .
M untie, Ind.:1921....................1927................... .1928................ .
Nashville, Tenn.: 1921................... .192 7 .192 8 .
Newark, N. J.:1921................... .192 7 192 8 _
New Britain, Conn.:1921....................1927.....................1928_..................
New Brunswick* N . J.:
1921.....................192 7 192 8
New Haven, Conn.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
NewLondon,Conn.:1928... .................
New Orleans, La.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8
New Rochelle,N.Y.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Newton, Mass.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Niagara Falls,N.Y.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Norfolk, Va.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
Norwalk, Conn.:1921.....................192 7 192 8
77.957.141.6
70.322.725.9
91.289.588.5
83.866.476.9
76.170.982.3
25.5 6 .8 6 .8
85.957.858.3
16.411.618.8
39.219.223.4
45.846.363.5
82.093.182.4
73.9 6 6 .069.5
95.3 61.065.9
100.049.373.6
96.755.2
100.0100.0
78.3 68.1 62.1
91.471.069.1
4.34.12 .2
4.7.3.7
2.5
2 .215.16.4
. 62.94.4
52.76.4
2 1 2
2 .25.3
10.5
60.115.011.1
54.519.6 20.9
32.547.829.9
12.7 1.7.7
26.717.6
4.729.7 15.2
8.914.5
3.31 2.07.7
i7. a 38.8 56.1
25.077.073.48 .8
10.5 8.9
13.918.416.7
23.3 26.213.3
21.8 86 .8
11.936.8 31.2
23.573.470.1
6.361.255.7
21.7 5.8 6 .6
5.35.2
16.9
26.17.3
12.8
9.319.0
41.811.9
32.823.1
.53.72.7
2 .63.23.4
21.328.235.2
6 .125.9
61318°—29-
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
30 BUILDING PERMITS IK THE PRINCIPAL CITIES
T a b le 11.—P E R C E N T OF FAM ILIES P R O V ID E D FO R B Y T H E D IF F E R E N T K IN D S OF D W E L L IN G S IN CITIES H A VIN G A PO PU LATIO N OF F R O M 25,000 TO 500,000 IN S P E C IF IE D Y E A R S —Continued
Total number o f
Per cent of families provided for in— Total
number of
Per cent of families provided for in—
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-ily
dwellings
2-fam-iiy
dwellings
Multifamilydwellings
City, State, and year
familiespro
videdfor
1-fam-ily
dwellings
2-family
dwellings
M ultifamilydwellings
Portsmouth, Ohio: 1921..................... 113 91.2 9 8 .0
San Diego, Calif.: 1921..................... 1,450
2,6132,146
300
8 8 .6 .3 11.11927..................... 224 95.1 3,6 1.3 1927..................... 76.8 7.6 15.61928..................... 169 95.3 1 ,2 3.6 1928..................... 73.6 3.7 22.7
Providence, R . I.: 1921..................... 566 33.9 51,2 14.8
San Jose, Calif.:1921..................... 83.7 3.6 12.7
1927..................... 1,1881,134
288
37.4 37.3 25.3 1927..................... 385 73.0 10.4 16.61928..................... 42.2 31.7 26.1 1928..................... 370 67.0 5.9 27.0
Pueblo, Colo.:1921..................... 98.6 1.4
Savannah, Ga.:1921 ................. 347 81.0 19.0
1927..................... 401 89.3 10,7 1927 ................. 401 72.6 15.0 12.51928..................... 372 79.0 17,5 3.5 1928 ................... 430 59.1 15.8 25.1
Quincy, Mass.:1921..................... 404 57.2 34.4 8.4 Schenectady, N . Y .:
1921 193 70.071.389.2
30.09.79.7
1927..................... 926 52.8 16.6 30.6 1927 349269
18.91 .11928.................... 977 46.4 14.3 39.3 1928.....................Racine, Wis.:
1921..................... 169 77.5 15.4 7.1 Scranton, Pa.: 1921 75
280292
81.357.1 51.7
90.561.050.1
18.7 42.913.7
1927..................... 609 62.7 19.0 18.2 19271928..................... 681 43.2 33.2 23.6 1928 34.6
9.539.049.4
Reading, Pa.:1922..................... 333 56.2 27.0 16.8 Seattle, Wash.:
1921 1,9614,5054,658
1927..................... 233 82.4 3.4 14.2 19271928..................... 263 97.3 2.7 1928 . 6Revere, Mass.:1921..................... 152
241247
69.7 50.253.8
30.338.238.1
Sheboygan, W is.:4.41927 11.6
8 .11921..................... 90 95.6
1928_...................Richmond, Ind.:
1921.....................
1927.................... 204 88.2 11 .81928.................... 188 82.4 16.0 1 .6
41 58.5 41.5 Shreveport, La.:1927 228
153
7411,774
764
100.0100.0
78.1 44.9
1921 ..................... 1,157 100.01928.....................
Richmond, Va.:1921.....................
1927..................... 185 66.5 15.1 18.4
21.9 45.7
1928....................Sioux City, Iowa:
713 70.5 11.5 18.0
1927 9 4 1921 ..................... 638 90.4 5.0 4.51928 63! 4
100.0
9 A 27! 2 1927.................... 267 72.7 ______ 27.3Roanoke, Va.:
1921..................... 3511928__.................
Sioux Falls, S. D .:282 69.9 3.5 26.6
1927 395364
90.956.0
9.130.2
303 100.01928 13.7 1927.................... 151 •84.8 7.3 7.9
Rochester, N . Y .: 1921....................
1928-................... 211 71.6 28.41,3192,4481,862
351
72.1 17.1 10.8 Somerville, Mass.:1927 50.4 8 .1 41.5 1921 ..................... 204 5.4 75.5 19.11928 46.1 6 .8 47.2 1927- — ............. 399 1 .0 54.1 44.9
Rockford, 111.:1921..................... 68.7 16.5 14.8
1928.....................South Bend, Ind.:
199 1 .0 64.3 34.7
1927 926 55.754.6
22.2 2 2 .028.0
1921-................... 665 78.0 13.8 8 .11928.....................
Sacramento, Calif.: 1921.....................
779 17.5 1927.................... 540 96.3 2 .6 1 .11928-................... 579 95.9 2.1 2 .1
737 84.0 4.6 11.4 Spokane, Wash.:1927 959 82.7
74.45.0
12.312.313.3
1921 ..................... 438 98.7 1.31928 917 1927.................... 595 85.2 .5 14.3
Saginaw, M ich.: 1921....................
1928................... 574 82.8 1.4 15.9251 96.8 1 .6 1 .6 Springfield, 111.:
1927 347 98.8 1 .2 1921.................... 210 76.7 6.7 16.61928 577 90.5 2 .6 6." 9 1927-................... 354 92.7 3.1 4.2
St. Paul, Minn.: 1921.....................
1928.................... 352 81.0 2 .8 16.22,1941,148
773
78.6 4.6 16.8 Springfield, Mass.: 1921.....................1927..................... 72.0 7.0 21.0 827 59.9 30.0 10.2
1928..................... 86.3 6.7 7.0 1927..................... 1,240647
36.5 18.2 45.2St. Petersburg, Fla.:
1927.....................1928.................... 63.8 13.9 22.3
442 84.2 7.0 8 .8 Springfield, M o.: 1928-...................1928...................... 172 98.8 1 .2 305 87.9 1 .6 10.5
Salt Lake City, (Jtah: 1921..................... 826 90.0 3.8 6 .2
Springfield, Ohio: 1921 ..................... 253 90.9 9.1
1927..................... 850 56.1 8 .0 35.9 1927..................... 285 84.9 15.11928..................... 731 52.7 15.0 32.3 1928-................... 315 79.7 15.2 5.1
San Antonio, Tex.: 1921..................... 1,718
2,1712,784
95.5 4.5Stamford, Conn.:
1921.................... 190 50.5 34.7 14.71927..................... 79.6 3.7 16.7 1927..................... 559 30.6 21 .8 47.61928..................... 70.8 6 .1 23.1 1928............ 331 60.4 27.8 11.8
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
APARTMENT HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 3 1
table 1 1 —PER CENT OP FAMILIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE DIFFERENT KINDSOF DWELLINGS IN, CITIES HAVING A POPULATION OF FROM 25,000 TO 500,000 INSPECIFIED YEARS—Continued
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
1-fam-ily
dwellings
2-family
dwellings
Multifamilydwellings
City, State, and year
Total number of families pro
vided for
Per cent of families provided for in—
1-family
dwell-
2 family
dwellings
M ultifamily
ings
Stockton, Calif.:m i ....................1927-.................1928...................
Syracuse, N . Y .:1921....................192 7 192 8
Tacoma, Wash.:192 1 192 7 192 8
Tampa, Fla.:192 2 192 7 192 8
Toledo, Ohio:1921....................192 7 192 8
Topeka, Kans.:1921....................192 7 192 8
Trenton, N . J.:1921....................192 7 192 8
Tucson, Ariz.:192 7 192 8
Tulsa, Okla.:1921....................192 7 192 8
Union City, N . J.:1921....................192 7 192 8
Utica, N . Y .:1921....................192 7 192 8
Waltham, Mass.:1921....................192 7 192 8
Warren, Ohio:1921...................192 7 192 8
624412226
6271,8381,561
843769822
422826647
6001,7491,698
188320304
317316
535336
1,1381,4342,187
5625584
478259342
137285
171321306
66.870.9 86.3
55.553.053.1
93.180.565.9
94.893.0
80.381.0 68.0
84.087.5 75.7
89.396.277.6
54.291.7
77.568.1 48.0
33.9
43.383.459.9
92.7 49.148.9
94.795.395.4
2.94.4
38.8 16.514.8
5.2 1.1 1.7
15.78.3
10.5
.7
1.9
7.5 6 .0
5.1 13.9 2 1.8
14.312.59.5
56.716.68 .2
4.430.525.4
5.34.72 .6
33.226.2
5.730.532.1
6.919.534.1
5.54.15.3
4.010.621.4
16.012.523.7
10.71.9
22.4
38.32.4
17.418.1 30.3
51.887.586.9
31.9
2.920.425.7
2 .0
Waterbury, Conn.: 1921.....................192 7 192 8
Waterloo, Iowa:
Watertown, Mass:1927.....................1928....................
West New York, N . J.:
1921....................1927.....................1928-...................
WhitePlains,N.Y.:192 7 192 8
Wichita, Kans.:1921-...................1927 . 1928 . .......
Wichita Falls, Tex.:192 7 1928_...................
Wilkes-Barre, Pa.:1921.....................1927-...................192 8
Wilmington, Del.:1921....................1927.....................1928_ ...................
Winston-S a 1 e m, N . C.:
1921.....................192 7 192 8 ............
Worcester, Mass.:1921-...................1927-...................1928....................
Yonkers, N . Y .:1921-—...............1927-...................1928....................
Youngstown, Ohio:1921.....................1927-...................1928.....................
271675504
270
759454
170
1,204856
1,336988
1,207
548222
82230174
356923965
715795474
4,1464,216
7241,148
929
54.444.6
98.5
14.117.6
6.38.51 .2
22.5 34.8
93.277.773.1
90.5
91.5 64.8 52.3
71.283.188.5
94.174.863.8
67.059.0 68.4
76.0 14.314.8
80.883.6
22.920.719.0
85.982.4
62.53.5
12.4
3.81.9
2 .84.97.4
5.85.4
4.9 25.2 24.1
7.6 .5 . 8
2 .65.9
17.818.616.5
6.74.9
20.711.8 10.2
33.924.9 36.3
1.5
31.2 8 8 .086.5
73.763.3
4.017.419.6
3.75.4
3.610.023.6
2 1.216.410.7
5.3 22.630.3
15.222.415.2
24.079.180.3
17.17.3 6 .1
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
General Table
G ENERAL TABLE A, pages 33 to 108 shows detailed information for 310 cities in 1928 and 302 cities in 1927. The table is di
vided into three parts.Part 1 relates to new residential buildings, giving the number and
cost of each kind of dwelling, the number of families provided with dwelling places in new buildings, and the ratio of families provided for to each 10,000 of population in each city from which data were received for 1927 and 1928. The ratio of families provided for is based both on the 1920 census and the population as estimated by the Census Bureau for the specified year.
Part 2 gives the number and cost of new nonresidential buildings for each city from which reports were received.
Part 3 shows the number and cost of additions, alterations, and repairs to old buildings, the number and cost of installations, and the grand total of all buildings, both new and old.
The number of installation permits and their construction costs were obtained whenever such permits were issued by the building inspector. In a number of cities, however, these permits were issued by offices other than that of the building inspector, and no data were collected in such cities.
In 1927 there were 77,818 permits issued for installations to cost $37,772,931, compared with 70,850 permits and an estimated cost of $38,351,921 in 1928.
The bureau attempted to classify additions, alterations, and re-
Eairs under the headings repairs, etc., to housekeeping dwellings, non- ousekeeping dwellings, and to nonresidential buildings. Many of
the cities which reported by mail, however, grouped them. ^In the 310 cities which reported for 1928 permits were issued for
279,020 repairs to old buildings. The cost of these repairs was estimated at $324,644,421. In 1927 permits were issued for 288,824 repairs at an estimated cost of $353,398,271.
The total estimated expenditure for the 664,449 building operations (including new buildings and repairs to old buildings), for which permits were issued in 1928, was $3,423,584,461. In 1927 permits were issued for 729,685 building operations at an estimated expenditure of $3,593,839,405.
32
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .—Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by 'permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
Housekeeping dwellings
C ity and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores combined
Multifamily dwellings with stores^combine?
Num ber Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Num ber Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
lies
Akron, Ohio.................. 1927 2,117 $10,702,908 2,117 42 $331,387635,750
84 1 $33,000 1 48 $1,124,300 1,179,400
25,000 532,407152.000765.000436.000 116,500
319Alameda, Calif-............
1928 2,051 10,348,998 2,051 76 152 71 3541927 194 867,956 194 6 29,100 12 1 1,500 1 1 32Albany, N . Y ________
1928 170 886,317 170 2 10,500 4 11 3301927 273300
3,878,000 4,516,700 2,653,200 2,779,300 1,277,135
904,390
273300
12489
2.851.5002.078.500
248 1 9,000 1 512
241219435
8
21
$48,000100,000376.000223.000 78,500
1216633212
1928 178Allentown, Pa.............. 1927 510 510 10 92,500
46.200 3,500
21.200
14 8 1131928 482 482 5 7 4
Altoona, Pa................... 1927 261 261 1 1 2 33,000 AAmsterdam, N . Y ____
1928 149 149 1 4,500208,000
2 4 41927 28 220,500 28 19 38 1 11,000 1
Alton, HI........................1928 18 149,100 18 11 83,500 22 1 10,000 21928 156 544,224 156 4 12,500 8 2 11,000
9,10012,500
3Anderson, Ind________ 1927 330 868,000
824,550330 1 7,000
6,5002 3 5 4 312,000
38,00011316
1 10,000 6
Asheville, N . C_______1928 248 248 1 2 1 2 31927 316
2581,299,960 1,178. 750
162, 700
316258
x 2,500 2 3 8,50025,0007,000
3 1015
396,200 495,550
12594
11
18,00050,000
3101928 4 8
Ashtabula, Ohio........... 1927 36 36 1 21928 20 150,250 20
Atlanta, Ga__________ 1927 1,387 1,319
64 37 12
5,155,610 5,607,700
263,718 151,265 85,400
1,387 1,319
64 37 12
253 638,001939,089210,500
21,00026,300
50644072108
19961
35,350 18,300
105,750 16,000
221012
1
80149
111
1,026,0503,400,900
949,00055,000
6181,398
756
30.000 2,500
149,00016.000
303
253
Atlantic City, N . J___
Auburn, N . Y ..............
192819271928 1927
2203654
161
1928 31 159,125 31Augusta, Ga.................. 1927 310 807,143 310 10 57,950
42,25020 6 20,225
10,3006 2 16,666
120,0008
1928 259 643,094 259 13 26 4 5 1 28Aurora, 111..................... 1927 358 1, 814,525
1,426,549358 3 27,000
9,0006 2 20,000 2 2 108,000
110,000691,000
1,910,000
4833
1 22,000 41928 264 264 1 2 1 16,000 2 1
Baltimore, M d ............. 1927 3,348 13,626,000 3,348 1 12,000 2 5 26,000 6 13 1901928 2,491 10,750,000 2,491 10 393
Bangor, M e................... 1927 31 129,600 31 1 7,000 21928 33 117,550 33 1 7,000 2 3 12,000 3
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Table A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits CO*issued in 1927 and 1928, &?/ intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
Housekeeping dwellings
City and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores combined
Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
N um ber Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
lies
Battle Creek, M ic h ... 1927 246 $836,475 669,750 161,425 209,20031.00020.000
1,486,841666,000 757,910629.000
2,541,080 1, 893,701
517, 750777.000 612,050 608,881
7,627, 214 5,575,0041.989.150 1,656,000
474,500561.000
3,277,700 3,877,400 1,181,460 1,043,300
767,175 695,950
1.639.150 2,127,100 4,963,800 3,330,075
246 6 $39,00043,000
12 2 $13,000 2 2 $30,000 81928 163 163 5 10 1 $40,000 4
Bay City, M ich______ 1927 42 421928 54 54 1 20,000
368,500557,000
3Bayonne, N . J_______ 1927 8 8 62 396,000
257,500124 6 42,800
16,00012 20 197 1 10,500
118,0003
Beaumont, Tex______19281928
3540
3540
39 78 3 5 21 306 8 44
Belleville, 111................. 1928 136 136Bellingham, Wash___ 1927 316 316 2 22,000 14 2 47,000 18
1928 249 249 2 45.000 773,700
2,067,35071.00057.000
272,100 268,000
2,350,250 1,499,631 2,121,700
562,00040.00040.000
10,856,340
15Berkeley, Calif_______ 1927 569 569 35 315,000
52,000603,500
70 34 204 3 101,00068,00087,600
24
Bethlehem, Pa_______19281927
37282
37282
953
18106
3 26,500 5 685
91116
15
2426
Binghamton, N. Y —19281927
9798
9798
4150
478,500 407,900 387,540 63,750 10,500
82100
7 63,500 11 420
17112
1 45,000 16
1928 106 106 47 94 13 106Birmingham, A la------- 1927
1928 1927
2,3621,818
2,362 1,818
365
124
248
1312
51,925 45,200 47,650 75,000
1612
6983
590751
4 90,625 27
Bloomfield, N . J_____ 365 82 813.000922.000
5,500
164 4 10 26 437 3 290,000 86
Bloomington, Til19281927
28884
28884
941
1882
5 9 162
15510
2 155,000 35
1928 85547
85 1 5Boston, Mass________ 1927 547 852 7,436,603
8,163,200 596,550 441,10077.00037.000
784,000 491,500
2,759,875 2,969,025
1,704 3 82,000 6 511 2,799 50 1,069,500 260192819271928 1927
647207173
647 952 1,904156
2 22,000 3 558 14,804,950 382,950 255,600
20,000
4,251134Bridgeport Conn 207
17378 4153 106 19 57 4 205,000 52
Brockton, Mass 152 152 9 18 2 6192819271928 1927
131 104 118
1,155
131 5 10Brookline, !Mass 104
118 1,155
66 132 41 1.616.5002.446.500 3,299,4323.282.500
40546
80 63 358Bu£aJo, N , Y ................ 1,092 111 1,725,650
487,500145 39 847 19 508,400 134
1928 704 704 676 1,352 36 63 52 896 47 681,850 166
BUILDING
PEBM
ITS IN'
THE PBIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Burlington, Iowa_____
Butler, Pa......................Butte, M ont.................
Cambridge, Mass........
Camden, N . J...............
Canton, Ohio___..........
Cedar Rapids, Iow a...
Central Falls, R . I ___
Charleston, S. C ..........
Charleston, W . Va___
Charlotte, N . C ...........
Chattanooga, Tenn___
Chelsea, Mass...............
Chester, Pa...................
Chicago, HI...................
Chicopee, Mass............
Cicero, HI.......................
Cincinnati, Ohio..........
Clarksburg, W . Va___
Cleveland, Ohio...........
Clifton, N . J - ..............
Colorado S p r i n g s , Colo.............................
Columbia, S. C ............
Columbus, Ga..............
Columbus, Ohio..........
Council Bluffs, Iowa__
19271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928
85 53 401 7
35 46
477 307 461 335 145 151
3 3
26 45
197 216 506 593 339 311
5 11
297 225
5,604 4,209
72' 71
147 108
1,679 1,821
56 58
1,593 1,354
334 240
6786
188 224 301 321
1,469 1,438
101 75
200,000177.500258.300 10,00011.500
441,150461.500
1,944,9501.070.6502.131.200 1,878,550
637,815 653,94029.00012.000 35,250
158.800 643,450731.500
1,746,960 2,770,740 1,027,858 1,123,075
25,60050.500
1,291,600930.000
36,108,800 26,597,300
278.000254.300
1.139.200813.800
11,718,234 13,927,985
202,750254.350
8.712.1008.298.100 1,880,7251.357.650
236,075 296,440698.350914.000 910,643 700,724
7,299,9007.382.100
342,900 234,400
85 4 47,140 853 1 600 240
17
35 107 1,031,800 898,800
214 42 1,545,500 2, 221,000
180,000
359 6 88,700 2846 115 230 17 587477 23 150,600
59,5008,000
29 3 50 x 4,000 3307 13 34,800 26 10 17461 5 44,850 10 1 1 7 347,500
31,00040
335 3 21,300 6 2 9 1 250,000 24145151 1 35,000
7,5007,000
643
33
1519
100,20073,000
3038
1 12,600 1 11
12 109,800 3626 5 49,000 10 1 7,000 245 1 1,500
55,0001
197 1 3,666 2 4 8 13 154,450 62216 8 25,500 16 2 7,000 2 8 96,000 24506 67 193,250 134 3 43,000 6 74 1,136,550 406593339311
5
81201751
305,110 50,654 39,500
397,700
1624034
102
5115
34,80054,30017,600
8125
721823
1,270,370304,293637,700
466,178250
282
51.000 70,07545.000
82711
11 64 512,500 128 1 10,000 60,000 70,000
138,513,700 111, 734,200
3297 17 109,900 34 2 30225 3 18
27,01123,247
5,6044,209
721,926 1,090
19
22,434,450 11, 635,900
149,500
3,8522,180
38
257192
4,003,600 2,786,500
350252
1,9991,537
238318
25,830,20021,996,000
4,3844,559
71 14 104,000 28 1 10,000264,500857,000
3147108
1,679
6129
289
763,500 354,800
3,207,150
12258
578
181
262,20020,000
292
181049
899.000492.000
3,560,500 5,781,000
196136955
620
65160
1,821 179 1,888,750 358 82 1,377 1 30,500 356 15 31,05080,385
2058 2 22,500 4 20 36
1,5931,354
334240
67
5423116267
5,257,500 3, 219,500
446,560 469,500
1,084622124134
193778
298.000224.000120.500128.500
29661113
53654
15
2,585,500 4,080,000
61,000 509,000
7761,050
18145
151910
1
560.000 425,500266.000 75,000
149758015
86 1 44.00080.00044.00080.000
9188 4 30,000 8 3 10224 20 150,000 40 2 8301 1 24321
1,4691,438
101
230147
1
1,843,900 1,184,200
8,000
460294
2
1042
146,50029,5003,000
1952
53865
1,508,0002,336,500
112,40018,000
30362531
2617
1,061,000601,000
179115
75 3 9,000 3 2 16 0 0Crc
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits Ctfissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
H ousekeeping dwellings
C ity and State Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores combined
Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Num ber Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
lies
Covington, K y _______ 1927 282 $871,700584,000
1,857,5502,164,900
425,538071 Q1A
282 22 $106,000 44 3 $17,000 4 4 $28,000 16192819271928 1927
172358432
172QKQ 4840
261,200344,500288,300
9680
112
53.00024.000
135
73
55.00036.000
300,000
339Cranston, R . I ----------- OOO
432 36 72 1 49 2 $22,000 6Oi’imVkAflotl/l TUT/I 96 96CA 2 18,750
1 2002 2 40,000 12
11 000 o 1192819271928 1927
64662704184
Zi 1, olU1,626,3051,804,009
812,500
04662
X130 596*725 260 3 40* 000 6 15 190,000 58Dallas, rex ............ ——
704184
1741
1,015 665 4,200
3482
23 356,250qi Ann
143 1 12,000 4Danville, HI.................. 07 1 16,496 6
Davenport, Iow a.........19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927
137 119 132 526 298 589 331
1,337 1,136
312 337
5,602 6,794
67
518,086 563,170 588,250
2,437,346 1,333,188 3,060,400 1,935,500 6,462,900 5,869,200 1,421,482 1,564,328
29,695,263 35,841,184OKO OOK
1371191QA
i 8,0009,400
881,954254,300
211
ol, UUU15.00016.000
885,000
Z4411 o 2 99 OOft ? 1
394
T\aT7+/vn AIiia16Z526298589
224 448UW
194 5 284,600 3343 86 35 968,000 323 4 148,000 25
T aaa ‘1'11* Til 3 125,000 24331
1,3371,136
312337
5,602
2 32.0001.157.0002.105.000
59,60088.000
15,856,432
8n 1 30 236.000275.000 33,022 23,000
14,936,347
60 30 450Denver, Colo— ..........36
472
86
4,130
50 661Des Moines, Iowa........ 5 40
32,065
2 63Detroit, M ic h _______ 17 139,690 25 480 5,179 133 3,554,235 678
35919281007
6,79467
2,242 15,368,447 4,484 30 459,500 40 350 12,740,280 4,252 89 2,038,695Dubuque, Iowa—------- Vo LI
19281097
54ooo 219,500 1,373,874
874,650 1,122,205
54288177412
1 50,000 132 15,800
23,000142,100
4 2 6,5005,000
2 2 30,000 9XuAt1COQ 400177 3 6 1 1 3 45,000 12
Durham, N . C ..............IvZo1927
1# / 412 23 46 5 iio ,666
179.500 308,900222.500 625,000
50486860
195East Chicago, Ind------
East Cleveland, Ohio.
19281927192819271928
400166591214
1,340,035699,742281,750113,500143,700
400166591214
8451412
1
63,400392,600143,850126,500
9,500
16902824
288
349,00075,350
4212
4171212
4102
201,000227,40098,000
404527
2 8 32,800 120
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Easton, Pa....................
East Orange, N . J___
East Providence, R . I.
East St. Louis, HI____
Elgin. Ill...................... .
Elizabeth. N . J .............
Elkhart, Ind.................
Elmira, N . Y .............. .
E l Paso, Tex...............
Erie, Pa........................
Evanston, 111... ...........
Evansville, In d ..........
Everett, Mass.............
Everett, W ash............Fall River, Mass........
Fitchburg, Mass........
Flint, M ich.................
Fond du Lac, W is.___
Fort Smith, A rk........Fort Wayne, Ind____
Fort Worth, Tex_____
Fresno, Calif................
Galveston, Tex........... .
Gary, Ind......................
Grand Rapids, Mich..
Great Falls, M ont-----
Green Bay, W is---------
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928 1927 192S 1927 1923192719281927192819271928
169138
199212391367245194205143219 140 109 10258
220 331 320 322 196
61 32
107 137 81 52 19
3,280 1,682
86 55 60
477 401
1,758 1,299
145 118 552 318 550 600
1,627 837 82
137 165 167
352,060149,425651,750311,650915.400
1,227,725 1,456,397 1,391,980 1,160,560 1,015,0701.278.0001.130.000
850,105 490,261 731,312 556,100 294,415 790,441
1,852,700 1,754,100 3,617,5002.711.000 1,447,950 1,392,550
237,500222,600222,300656,440353,420191.400 85,800
10,923,266 7,014,241
295,740 193,000 183,488
2,423,160 2,107,815 9,216,896 5,201,087
506,161 415,645
1,051,414 1,022,459 2,896,438 2,795,995 6,707,3003.405.000
289,853 481,930 761,555 760,180
39169138
199212391367245194205143219 140 109 10258
220 331 320 322 196 394 3836132
107137815219
3,2801,682
865560
477401
1,7531,299
145118552318550600
1,62783782
137165167
154
66382225342333
10951
74328471746
15250
842
76176
313323
125033292988
136,50053.000
620,100327.000176.000 207,300 208,080 131,40029.000 18,500
983.000415.000
22,650
29,010234,800228,100818,000244.000 24,500 31,000
905.000 344,500
237,38567,10017,5009,700
1,031,832
640,130 184,768 15,000
4,850 967,842 153,780 187,300 179,100 61,750 60,100
64.000
81327644506846
66
218102
1486569434
812
304100
1684
152352
64
5006658581616
16
10
4,000
92,00044,500
32,00027,80024,400
17,000104,000
2,500
12,000
114,00096,30042.00016.000 43,450 36,700
56,3753,000
18,00015,000
113,83290,940
1,00055,5653,000
310,365117,483
15,000
"”33,“477
"l06,"000'
9.0004.000
5837
2117131
212611111
2256
140435
8,299,5003.808.000
18,000 11,000
437,820260,60015.00022.000
2.960.0001.616.000
7,000100,00075.000
171,65080,97520,40026.000
7.138.0003.688.000
15.00016.000
177,000 410,50040.000
139,68434.000
8 ,000
217,505
2,170,014766,94716,00050.00034.00053.000
529,80022,000
121,500164,800
8,00010,000
1,854813
63
11881117
1,175671
4 15
18967648
974526
69
751511640
133
558316
624 1925
325 17224
1508233
30,225
318,500140,000
30,00035,500
361.000186.000
9,500
255,0001,055,000
12,000
11,500
83,450109,500
10,000
18,000 364,085 132,160
32,900 1,192,600
116,000
79,000
7
”B5
49
29188
1836
515454
1130036
240 0
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Year
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
. 19271928
d estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations t and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
030 0
PART U—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
Housekeeping dwellings
1-family dwellings
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
2-family dwellings
Number Cost Fami
lies
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined
Number Cost Fami
lies
Multifamily dwellings
Number Cost Fami
lies
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Number Cost Fami
lies
4021101692502375449
3624066904722541
315 201 140 109685242 20
23
402,7152,836
13545
$1,804,527 1,920,465
398,875 682,957
3,591,735 4,050,300
294,085 215,610
1,244,724 1,519,9872.964.8001.945.800
96,850236,400
1,792,100 1,168,500 1,525,551 1,252,017
280,700 213,900 318,013 134,89313.50021.500
4021101692502375449
3624066904722541
315201140109
$84,00023,600
8,500138.000200.000 98,500 76,900
205,000108,90084,20093,800
113687145
4211
10,0001,641,209
797,35299,40035.500
475,275 112,84726.500
8,000
45,000 329,750 299,300
8,675,363 11,459,985
467,225 364,800
402,7152,836
13545
167
445
160,80071.000
3,457,122 4,226,050
25,50029.000
$13,0007.0005.000
43,000
227217428108422
62
107,80023.00095.50034.50019.00036.00016.000
84,386 11
12,00025,500
$269,99573,80019,30033,09049,000
183,0004,5008,000
$380,60083,000
18.500 764,500 374,00012,00039.500
4253904
14
957,600308,000
2,305,3792,125,400
6,00022,000
710927
36
611,000475,500
11,138 806,000 335,000 60,000
4242112
20
450,000
236,150174,000
9,00015,100
31104
9
639.500122.500
2,603,820 1,737,550
124.00049.000
16832
8616164016
153,000
128,500 208,800
5,000 10,000
6516
13091
144153
116
BTJILDING PEBM
ITS IN
THE PBIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Hutchinson, Kans _ _ Indianapolis, I n d .._
Irvington, N . J .........
Jackson, M ich ..........
Jacksonville, Fla___
J amestown, N . Y _ _.
Jersey City, N . J___
Johnstown, Pa..........
Joliet, 111....................
Joplin, M o.................
Kalamazoo, M ich ...
Kansas City, Kans..
Kansas City, M o . . .
Kearny, N . J ............
Kenosha, W is...........
Kingston, N . Y ____
Knoxville, T enn___
Kokomo, Ind .......... .
Lakewood, Ohio___
Lancaster, Pa.......... .
Lansing, M ich ........ .
Lawrence, Mass___
Lebanon, Pa.............
Lewiston, M e...........
Lexington, K y ........ .
Lima, Ohio...............
Lincoln, N ebr._____
192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927
1261,4051,305
11540
180234
1,248997175 160249
9346176 148 11499
193148387237
1,0289652191312362661261146867263940
12885
241154366439
128
32192219
1601043213
313
433,770 6,276,714 6,122,670
703,478259.000 817,550
1,043,450 4,055,500 3,381,565
871.200813.000156.60065.500
482,900 250,250
1.235.600 1,178,400
398.200367.200 641,100 591,025 720,950 578,620
4,400,207 4,594,700 1,189,900
7 8,500 1,368,197 2,248,418
678.600626.050
2,395,814 2,497,141
162.000 195,262
1,097,755920.600
1.346.600839.050
1,585,665 1,986,800
92.20053.200
191.500 101,00069,500 62,000
971,558 573,400144.600 68,100
1,605,590
126 2 12,500 4 3 21,00® 1,812,800 s 3,079,00® 7,053,5®©, 3,342,90®
16 480 816
1,759 720
1,405 229 1,107,745 458 31 2 204.000145,550535.000 791,400
573096
148
1,305 180 876,880 360 31 4.11540
1802905513
3,074,950585,50092,550
58011026
73
103,00043,000
124
19495
1213
234 8 61,000 161,248
997175
25112810
1,055,525461,80074,400
50225620
2421
102,500140,200
3230
58653
1,107„0@© 1,221, @5®
59*7m
29235430
44
92,50057,900
2421
160 3 21,000 6 2 21,000 3249
9315130210
1,245,700 829,500 92 095
30220420
183911
194,500336,00072,200
307511
55101
12,832,, 500 5,512,0®©
12*080873
1,6394
8;7
223,500906,000
58228
46 9 69,500 18 5 15,400 5 1 30*. 060 4176148114
72
169,00035,500
144
21
34.00044.000
42
221
45*0001301.000 1^000
224.000
8181452
11
; 20,000 25,000
48
99 3193148 1 4,500 2 3 30,000 12 2 15,000 Q387 6287 4 59.000
3,571,657 2,701,000
524,0001,135,500
55.000
351,852
92718542123
1 ii aha 4152
3Aft1,028
9653437
261.500323.500881.500 991,00096,600
6874
2 13,000 4 9341 7
11, uuu 489, 500 10,000
152.00068.000
219 123 246 11 I g131236
14414
28828
29
32,000113,500
416
203 3 13
266 8 77,600 16 5 114,500 6 2 44,000 7126 4 40,800 8114 3 32,000 6 1 25,000
588,6396686 4 22,800 8 20 124
726 30 163,600 60 20 526,800 15439 3 1,500 640 2 155.000
1,133,000775.000
42128 55 480,000
397,800110 14 307
3704 17s nnn
85 31 62 12 5 1 f o, uuu 70 AHA OfOA241 4 13,800 6 iVy UUU M154366 4 29,500 8 2 . 180,000 46439 2 18,000 412 6 52.000
14.00012 5 60,600 198 1 2 4 37,000 2232
1922 3 28,000 6 3 38.000
58.0001519 2 21,000 4 1 7,000 2 5 52160
10432 1 8,000 313 3 18,000 6
313 12 284,555 75 COO
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State
Little Rock, A rk ...
Long Beach, Calif____
Lorain, Ohio...........
Los Angeles, Calif—
Louisville, K y .........
Lowell, Mass...........
Lynchburg, V a____
Lynn, M ass.............
McKeesport, P a_~
Macon, Ga—............
Madison, W is_____
M alden, M ass.........
Manchester, N . H ____
Mansfield, Ohio—
Marion, In d ............
Marion, Ohio..........
Year
192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Housekeeping dwellings
1-family dwellings
N um ber
311431403 852
1,297236227
8,2136,5931,102
847734887
114129135223167314315 390404 153 132 13592
1511234171
123160
Cost
$1,491,712 1,393,368 1,724,985 2,829,165 4,134,840
806,300 815,140
32,135,913 25,487,4015.955.5504.669.550
322,700 165,600 355,023 499,710 708,100 701,850
1,353,873 808,235
1,150,065 1,233,170 2,051,300 4,028,000
821,675 717,150 631,225 262,325 707,800 624,500 91,840
168,000 361,650 425,900
Families
311431403 852
1,297236227
8,2136,5931,102
847734887
114129135223167314315 390404 153 132 13592
1511234171
123160
2-family dwellings
Number
73225
908 L, 051
50 57 3 1 1
58
717
116431212
Cost
$360,000 1,157,335
7,075,7687,220,809
225,450576,80017,8005,0009,500
521.900492.900
71,5007,000
57.300 168,800 997,850 335,10084,00077.300
11,50035.00034.00010.000 6,000
Fami-
146450
1,8162,102
100114
62
116120
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined
Number Cost
$5,700
40,50043,3505,000
103,300184,750
99,45058,800
49,500111,900
27,0006,0004,000
Families
Multifamily dwellings
Num ber
9182475
174
1,0421,106
50114
Cost
$310,000193,050354,152
1,151,4002,931,840
22,866,436 28,268,917 2,468,900 2,518,100
703,75033.00035.00080.000 15,000
315.500187.500 211,000
1,255,0009,600
18,000176,000
5.0008.000
Families
18675
124448
1,278
10,772 12,386
264
259246
6765630
5006
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Number Cost
$20,900
89,300364,150
699,370 301,100
70,000
26,2007,000
65,000150,000
25,000
Fami-
6
'2 261
90
24
435
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Medford, M ass.............
Memphis, Tenn...........
Meriden, Conn............
Miami, Fla....................
Milwaukee, W is..........
Minneapolis, M in n ...
Mobile, Ala...................
Moline, HI.....................
Montclair, N . J ............
Montgomery, Ala........
M ount Vernon, N . Y_
Muncie, Ind.................
Muskegon, M ich.........
Muskogee, Okla...........
Nashville, Tenn..........
Newark, N. J ................
Newark, Ohio...............
New Bedford, Mass__
New Britain, Conn. _.
New Brunswick, N . J.
Newburgh, N. Y . .........
New Castle, Pa............
New Haven, Conn___
New London, C on n ...
New Orleans, La..........
Newport, K y ................
1927 337 2,086,600 3371928 360 2,239,450 3601927 878 3,699,425 8781928 782 3,239,080 7821927 173 709,050 1731928 121 622,700 1211927 581 1,264,656 5811928 121 557,855 • 1211927 1,314 7,227,412 1,3141928 979 5,742,220 9791927 1,427 6,259,570 1,4271928 1,278 5,655,670 1,2781927 365 878,500 3651928 589 1,547,956 5891927 109 522,125 1091928 108 543,084 1081927 173 2,443,413 1731928 175 2,862,619 1751927 361 720,000 3611928 662 877,355 6621927 240 2,598,300 2401928 302 3,475,335 3021927 300 1,021,746 3001928 337 1,016,650 3371927 119 334,350 1191928 104 318,010 1041927 92 224,500 921928 102 297,850 1021927 541 1,470,650 5411928 537 1,164,124 5371927 179 1,880,197 1791928 77 673,923 771927 65 215,500 651928 108 338,300 1081927 116 679,900 1161928 36 252,800 361927 154 1,090,100 1541928 128 1,025,450 1281927 72 335,200 721928 102 418,625 1021927 74 465,340 741928 62 380,300 621927 146 822,750 1461928 133 839,125 1331927 121 858,000 1211928 127 908,800 1271927 107 768,450 1071928 102 782,400 1021927 510 2,051,969 5101928 437 1,745,805 4371927 44 182,700 441928 41 178,800 41
134139156180
44
15
531129130
46
542
407181
1.098.0001.050.000
525,200 809,55026,00027,00034,550
4,511,520 4,294,950
968,100 852,850
23,500
473,394 246,705
18,000718,000539,600
9,500 36,000
123,450 4,829,410 2,185,070
154,70028,300
663.000382.500266.50081.500 67,80049.500
100.000152.000 168,500150.000239.000
2,011,530 2,057,010
........6,'500
268278312
1,0761,062
258260
8
611874
61084
814
326
1601088022161220
36383246
1,1981,376
19
19,300
50,700
9.00010.000 23,750
547,800410,200
8,00010,000
282,000
16,000
5,135
260,500584,990
5,000
42,000
40,00032,800
67,10099,700
45,000
732,607 145161
971665574
320245
70,000400,000
1,590,4502,051,400
74.50018.500
118,300
3,419,500 6,840,899 1,291,530 1,869,400
82,000119.000205.000
143,600 24,000
100,000 128,000
7,645,000 5,453,500
83,150 113,100
7,000267,000608,500
17,811,30011,956,580
280,000 52,000
210,500
687.000 1,093,000
106.000 373,000
1,241,196451,640
2210765374527
661
1,3222,454
504702
224148
31
1,6861,053
9
8103128
3,8612,563
221762474
3403703256
179110
58.00035.000
2,430,400 1,871,000
279,700540,000
861,000 1,523,500
15,400
20,0001.300.0001.255.000
24,000
75.00051.000 64,500
12,00021,00059.00087.000
113,770
163
427
21
165207
8
4271224
1598
34
14 45 23
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits ^issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
C ity and State Year
Housekeeping dwellings
1-family dwellings
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
2-family dwellings
Number Cost Fami
lies
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined
Number Cost Fami
lies
Multifamily dwellings
Num ber Cost F am i
lies
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
Newport, R . I _______
Newport News, Va_ _
New Rochelle, N . Y ._
Newton, Mass............ .
New York C ity,N .Y .: The Bronx.............
Brooklyn.............. .
Manhattan______
Queens.................. .
R ichm ond............ .
Niagara Falls, N . Y__.
Norfolk, Va_.................
Norristown, Pa.......... .
Norwalk, Conn______
Oakland, Calif—........ .
Oak Park, HI..........Ogden, Utah.......... ......
19271928192719281927192819271928
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
355955 73
274276502575
1,211 1,271 3,843 2,631
4 12
10,425 8,477 1,258 1,229
271 350 317 27856 82
221 248
1,537 1,012
208 193 179 139
$382,000301.300 191,336 294,703
3.501.6504.223.650 5,235,725 7,026,620
8,981,200 8,949,000
25,648,850 17,909,150
94, 500731.000
60,719,140 47,311,8105,999,839 5,557,609 1,434,508 1,856,983 1,370,900 1,071,950
312,900531.000
1,649, 530 1,840,483 5,599,687 4,122,993 2,287,600 2,577,955
507,050435.300
355955 73
274276502575
1,211 1,271 3,843 2,631
4 12
10,4258,4771,2581,229
27135031727856 82
221248
1,5371,012
208193179139
2714
116 182
1,223537
2,1421,270
24
2,1079031211264553334 7
15 21 51 22
$12,000 8,000
273,300149.000
1,252,400 1,960,100
13,100,150 5,749,635
22,316,200 12,281,400
28,500131.000
17,428,7517,379,500
895.250 911,500336.250 342,69526,000 13,700 26,000 43,000
125,900 200,200 274,780 117,750
5428
232364
2,4461,0744,2842,540
48
4,214 1,806
242 252 90
106 6 6 8
14 30 42
102 44
$19,000$52,500
4,005,240 2,377,800
28677553
$237,8001,889,000
5642
754540
832,700 626,000
9.469.5007.019.500
1,508 1,080
648585
6,155,900 5,255,100
531.000498.000 118,85075,100 16,500
1,121 1,013
90 82 15 10 4
9,500
7831,5701,031
163229
1,006775
21825
1327
101,178,500 115,621,200 77,759,050 74,453,400 79,073,000
123,860,000 49, 765,100 55,234,150
37,000 1, 599,000
37,500 144,500383.000865.000
24,374 27, 720 19,432 19,311 9,494
15,963 14,597 16,295
8 434
7 34
54102311277
8,456,00016,912,05016,906,00013,225,500
3,616,000 5,093,100
80,000 162,000 96,000 28,000
34,000
8,000
"e’ooo
46,000 49,373 43,900
218,000 36,500
60,000285.000
2,238,830 3,737,8002.991.0002.243.000
335.000 35,000
5674752114
143,500
335,95685,000
762.000400.000
43348
1,896 3,627 4,105 3,376
8481,206
174014
11641
14072
BTJILDING PERM
ITS IN
THE PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Oklahoma City, Okla.
Okmulgee, Okla...........
Omaha, Nebr................
Orange, N. J—..............
Oshkosh, W is................
Ottumwa, Iow a...........
Paducah, K y ................
Pasadena, Calif............
Passaic, N . J.................
Paterson, N . J..............
Pawtucket, R . I ...........
Peoria, 111.......................
Perth Am boy, N . J . . .
Petersburg, Va.............
Philadelphia, Pa..........
Phoenix, Ariz................
Pittsburgh, Pa..............
Pittsfield, Mass............
Plainfield, N . J.............
Pontiac, M ich..........
Port Arthur, Tex.........
Port Huron, M ich____
Portland, M e................
Portland, Oreg_______
Portsmouth, Ohio____
Portsmouth, Va...........
1927 1,1641928 2,0291927 121928 71927 3381928 3391927 491928 191927 1621928 1501927 381928 381927 1361928 841927 4571928 3501927 541928 661927 2241928 1751927 2691928 2891927 3251928 3601927 771928 521927 401928 401927 8,6811928 7,3211927 4051928 5201927 1,9091928 1,5881927 721928 1391927 2501928 2291927 5901928 1,2011927 5081928 2101927 1021928 691927 1471928 1621927 2,2471923 1,6031927 2131928 1611927 621928 71
4,294,925 7,071,259
27,900 27,050
1,683,295 1,838,750
460,600216.900 480,839 535,366248.750 204; 800290.000 186,735
2,979,373 2, 774,358
430,800 468,150
1,079,866764.900
1,262,900 1,318,550 1,665,150 1,973,500
404,183 245,677 150,080179.750
39,990,675 31,255,6701,232,420 1,674,357
11,729,951 9,929,044
480,700824.000
1,906,915 1,769,479 2,421,056 3,907,465 1,075,654
457,877 343,100 184,050681.550721.550
9,500,360 7,149,585
713,645 595,450 191,925 206,055
1,164 2,029
12 7
338339 49 19
162150
13684
4573505466
224175
32536077524040
8,6817,321
405520
1,9091,588
72139250229590
1,20150821010269
147162
2,2471,603
2131616271
13181
657,670 447,700
262162
23
16,00035,700
36
4862
1
1,083,4501,043,350
12,000
315411
4
17
18,000111,500
829
479
2033
18,500 56,000
149,200 201,950 311,500
814184066
117
2011
387,500270.000
2,521,000758.000
12555
510194
42
78.00020.000
62
4 530,000 117
2 1,200 4 1 2,500 1
1 2,000 2 2 14,000 821 91,805 42 20 841,300 279 4 63,030 1231 142,867 62 1 6,500 1 24 405,204 179 1 19,000 833 351,170 66 2 37,500 4 15 1,284,000 319 2 118,000 2415 168,500 30 5 70,000 9 10 975,000 225 1 85,000 21
101 684,850 202 21 193,400 27 68 1,502,100 626 16 240,000 8867 448,313 134 16 160,300 22 70 1,175,000 408 2 32,000 9
136 983,350 272 3 32,800 6 5 62,700 21 3 36,000 1366 482,800 132 3 27,500 4 1 10,000 4 2 85,000 26
2 30,000 4 1 40,000 2 3 90,000 181 10,000 2 1 5,000 1 7 194,000 74
22 228,800 44 3 38,000 5 2 178,000 60 2 27,850 68 84,780 16 7 41,625 11 2 60,000 252 5,000 42 2,400 4 1 5,500 4
16 221,540 32 281 1,513,270 371 49 10,320,770 2,484 46 2,566,120 629280 1, 709,350 560 172 1,190,110 215 43 13,821,960 1,990 38 3,455,490 49082 328,860 164 14 135,300 4566 300,565 132 12 172,000 9675 673,400 150 38 347,500 46 15 2,588,000 461 5 94,000 22
118 1,151,325 236 18 140,600 23 35 1,817,000 614 11 233,000 8317 135,500 34 1 8 ,0 0 0 1 3 33,5G0 1116 143,200 32 1 150,000 4019 139,050 38 5 65,100 7 7 899,000 21222 161,400 44 1 1,900 1 4 134,000 3764 402,500 128 40 1,592,000 35167 496,600 134 39 1,397,300 400
2 3,500 21 6,500 2
4 40,500 8 5 268,000 612 10,000 4 3 9,800 3 5 305,000 92
50 385,000 100 45 2,529,000 774 3 240,000 4539 294,500 78 46 2,313,200 620 3 150,000 20
5 21,800 8 1 2,500 32 6,900 2 2 13,000 6
2 3,000 4 1 1,500 1 1 39,000 121 6 ,0 0 0 2 1 30,000 12
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
C ity and State Year
Housekeeping dwellings
1-family dwellings
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
2-family dwellings
Number Cost Fami
lies
1-family and 2-family dwellings with stores combined
N um ber Cost Fami
lies
Multifamily dwellings
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Num ber Cost Fami
lies
Poughkeepsie, N . Y.
Providence, R . I —
Pueblo, Colo.______
Quincy, 111—............. .
Quincy, Mass...........
Racine, W is________
Reading, Pa............ .
Revere, Mass.......... .
Richmond, Ind____
Richmond, V a_____
Roanoke, Va.............
Rochester, N . Y ___
Rockford, 111............. .
Rock Island, HI____
Sacramento, Calif...
Saginaw, M ich_____
1927 361928 571927 4441928 4781927 3581928 2941927 1771928 1311927 4891928 4531927 3821928 2941927 1921928 2561927 1211928 1331927 2281928 1531927 7971928 4841927 3591928 2041927 1,2341928 8581927 5161928 4261927 1531928 1141927 7931928 6821927 3431928 522
$297,000663,050
3.586.200 4,202,600
893,675 732,425 766,850 517,775
2.304.200 2,136,900 2,076,513 1,671,568 1,183.700 1,455,650
524,900 522,745 837,870 598,342
3,629,843 2,428,501 1,582,286
903,832 6,822,905 4,983,570 1,936,000 1,789,500
590,275 399,500
2,806,322 938,800
1,353,066
3657
444478368294177131489453382294192256121133228163797484359204
1,234858516425153114793
522
104
2111731932
1777055
111
36
$98,90038,500
2,034,5001,697,000
115,600138,200
12,000683,100514,700414,340846,125
10,000340,000364,800
626,000206,665
119.500852.500 467,400 574,800 422,000
123,650275,050
7,00032,500
208
4223463864
$9,000
226,700131,000
7.5004.500
$23,600 44,000 1,120,000
1,105,000
1316
256281
2164140110222
36,7007,200
94
33.50023.00041.00042.00018.500
637.000 1,044,000
278.500406.500123.000
38495
12824
102,00056,000
16672
60190112194132
48,500107,65078.00026.000
46112
212
9,0004,700
10,00022,500
3,662,000990.000 82,225
346,2501.647.5002.065.500
461,500484.000150.000 64,000
178,010216,900
81120836
110761767181218553294
122
$90,00046.000
237,00066.000
160,000
61,000162,00060,000
835,840336,589122,900
39,500
16154515
20
16339
11123
24
61,050 40
BUILD
ING
PEEM
ITS IN
THE PKINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
St. Joseph, M o .............
St. Louis, M o...............
05 St. Paul, M inn_______M52 St. Petersburg, Fla___00|° Salem, Mass..................
Salt Lake City, U tah.
San Antonio, T ex____
San Diego, Calif...........
San Francisco, Calif__
San Jose, Calif_______
Savannah, Ga________
Schenectady, N . Y ___
Scranton, Pa______
Seattle, Wash_____
Sheboygan, W is___
Shreveport, La____
Sioux City, Iowa__
Sioux Falls, S. Dak___
Somerville, Mass__
South Bend, Ind__
Spokane, W ash____
Springfield, HI.........
Springfield, M ass..
Springfield, M o . . . Springfield, Ohio..
Stamford, Conn___
Steubenville, Ohio___
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928
10763
1,6891,682
827667372170 61 49
477 386
1,728 1,972 2,008 1,679 2,701 2,204
281248 291 264249 240 160 161
2,7602,332
180156123603194197128161
42
620656607475328285453413268242251171 200 126 155
261,734 304,200
5,798,235 6,000,340 4,392,054 4,028,118 1,015,600
824.100390.000332.000
2,061,560 1,542,010 5,373,134 7,169,571 6,607,004 5,847,376
13,000,000 9,933,034 1,040,485
947,7801.155.300
805,3751,554,1501.540.900
729,900 652,385
9,464,5268.082.900
938,800 903,600
1,355,385 1,519,397
650,700 753,750640.000 676,48016,0005,800
2,600,0002,851,3501.888.550 1,853,875 1,536,410 1,520,8001.957.550 1,920,650
621,775 784,650 828,950
1.319.300 1,614,250
802.100550.000
10763
1,5891,682
827667372170 51 49
477 385
1,728 1,972 2,008 1,579 2,701 2,204
281248 291 254249 240 160 151
2,7502,332
180155123503194197128151
42
520555507475328285453413268242251171 200 126 155
436648402612
5724345536 85 8337
410 16514
54
3010664
55
112451212460449
2,764,900 4,017,340
398,520 258,600 28,900
693.000260.500172.500 140,400 250,365 567,595 370,626 134,175
1,926,069 1,308,945
53,120 29,500
172,300 278,250105.00040.000
368,200 119,710
78,450 70,400
104,600 55,891
195,785
19.00032.000
182,4401,010,920
547,500
25,000
47.100 35,600
720.600 272,400
4,000107.100113.600 613,500 453,30048.00018.000
872
1144868
11072
17016674
82033028126068228
9834
212128
1010
22490
24248
1208818
32
16 115,790 323 11,000 55 84,000 77 71,500 148 35,065 128 73,580 10
12
248,200327,100
11,5004,000
10,000
36,140
108,00065,60078,70017,000
28,00016,200
15,000
23,000
50,50039,00010,40027,1502,000
6,500
11,5002,000
14.000 34,5007,500
77.000
3 434 504154 6
54
159
41618155
350221
56
13 2951
106143
70,000 6,181,000 7,780,200
832,800 210,600 64,500
241.000 114,500
1,010,500615.000 753,480 924,390
1,004,400994,300
13,846,9758,381,185
110.150230.150 106,400 346,040262.000 23,000
787,000 6,290,100 7,672,000
45,100 324,732 172,800 286,000 \65,000
622,600280,00075.00036.000
147.000363.000 54,400
373,5001,683,000
425.00040.000
45.000 966,000 127,50064.00063.000
352,6103,764
22946
52 23
305236350642407410
5,0903,476
53 94 50
108603
1,7552,300
341287075'12
176
1285911257
56111832
16
1.123.0001.104.000
163,20031,920 35,000
260,250 107,500 250,000 35,150 20,000
85,000
56,400
13,000
10,000
9,00028,000
10,000
158,000
223,30015.00030.000
346400
1287
12
78566011
16
18
26
6 Or
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued o >
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
City and State
Stockton, Calif__
Superior, W is___
Syracuse, N . Y __
Tacoma, Wash__
Tampa, Fla_____
Taunton, Mass__
Terre Haute, Ind.
Toledo, Ohio____
Topeka, Kans___
Trenton, N . J___
Troy, N . Y ..........
Tucson, Ariz____
Tulsa, Okla..........
Union City, N . J.
Utica, N . Y _____
Vallejo, Calif____
Waco, Tex—........
H ousekeeping dw ellings
Year 1-family dwellings 2-family dwellings1-family and 2-family
dwellings with stores combined
Multifamily dwellings Multifamily dwellings with stores combined
Num ber Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
liesNum
ber Cost Families
Number Cost Fami
lies
19271928
292195
$1,094,250 707, 260
292195
54
$25,20020,350
108
22
$6,6509,800
22
22
$88,00071,800
4821
3 $264,500 60
1927 72 256,550 551,850
6,030, 6004.977.000 1,655,5901.539.000 1,782, 245 1,495,860
261,905 190,800 546,025 336,050
5,906,425 4,902,450
936,900 861, 550
1, 721,150
72 8 24,200 121928 136 13619271928 1927
974829619
974829619
14099
1,195, 700 847,000
280198
723
108,000 181,200
2433
26197
1.473.0001.386.000
487.000970.000 80,800 76,700 50,000
346369144
12102
735.000609.00015.00037.000 3,500
214132
61928 542 542 7 254 2 261927 783 783 7 55,350
47,7009 7 31 1 3
1928 602 602 11 11 8 341927 65 65 4 35,500 8 1 181928 50 50 5 24,500 101927 182 182 1 9,000 21928 113 11319271928 1927
1,417 1,155
280
1,417 1,155
280
5976
432,550 552,125
118152
1523
177,750 93,750
2827
17113
568,500227,800198.000266.000
10,000150,000
1587830
751
120,150 882,00035.00051.000 4,500
48,500
28286
101928 230 230 i 9,000 2 8 63 1 91927 304 304 4 40,000 6 1 3 1 31928 173 973,600
551,800 593,650
1.470.099 998,832
4, 649,1004.659.100
173 4 41 2 91927 88 88 10 106,450
152,800 69,620 38,052
410,575 1,096,100
127,500 45,000
193.000106.000
20 1 6,500 21928 104 104 21 42 2 40,300
10,197 23,575
111927 290 290 20 40 5 15 63 103,359 1901928 308 308 5 10 6 42,513
6,00010 2 8
19271928
9761,049
9761,049
99238
198476
1 1 2644
646,100 1,765,600
488,000 17,800
240641
21
45.00093.000
313.000245.000
1921
1927 11 22 5 117,000 10 11 133 4 901928 3 18,500
1,346,600 1,401,100
106.950182.950 555,275 608,003
3 4 8 1 4 5 691927 216 216 21 42 1 6,000
18,0001
1928 205 205 13 26 2 2 3 615,000 1091927 26 261928 43 431927 169 169 1 3,300 21928 171 171 I 23,666 6
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Waltham, Mass______ 1927 140 784,500 1,003,100 1,072,459 1,028,030
12,451,095 11,316,8501.751.5001.071.500
512,900 844,700
140 43 427,750 421,70034.000 22,800 42,30092.000
535,000 375,500
86 1 12,000 1 13 152.000154.000
52 1 30,000165,500
6421928 177 177 46 92 12 51 6
Warren, Ohio................ 1927 306 306 6 12 3 15.500 14,00050.500
31928 292 292 2 4 2 4 2 20,000 6
Washington, D . C ____ 19271928
1,863 1,307
1,8631,307
715
1430
4 6 6257
8, 592,500 15,392,500
551,000 422,500
1,8242,592
16563
827,0002,800,000
12,00094,000
231376
Waterbury, Conn____ 1927 367 367 70 140 55 1 31928 225 225 48 96 25 153 9 30
Waterloo, Iowa............. 1927 142 142 1 14,000 21928 266 266 1 4,000 4
Watertown, Mass........ 1927 107 773, 500 568,600
107 326 2.855.2001.678.200
6521928 80 80 187 374
Watertown, N. Y ........ 1927 50 255,550 275,800
501928 51 51 1 3,000
51,50057.00037.000
2West New York, N . J - 1927 24 143,500 24 5 10 6 405.000
419.500 18,50092.000
3,854,500 2, 220,000
363.000547.500 73,76837.000 88,900
187,90051.000
140 4 315,00020,00049,000
109Wheeling, W . Va_____
192819271928
214787
20,500 789,490 549,280
3,015,850 3,578,700 2,533,785 3,076,615 2,023,066
214787
76
1412
56
60,00051,688
77
622
1428
38
12
58
White Plains, N . Y___
Wichita, Kans_______
19271928 1927
271298768
271298768
226
23
240,000 63,500
131,750 300,500 53,300 28,000
219,020 168,425 81,000
441246
221
11.40032.4003.0005.000
242
472215
859442167
251
160,000471,00013.00047.000
28100
5
Wichita Falls, Tex-----19281927
882496
882496
4416
8832
1 1 287
21620
3 20
1928 198 835,788 729,657 397,215 696,100
1,009,095 615,250 549,390
198 6 12 3 12Wilkes-Barre, Pa......... 1927
192814991
14991
2821
5642
1 10,000 2 55
2041
1 8,200 3Wilkinsburg, Pa_____ 1927 114 114 9 18 3 18,000 3 3 11 6 130,300 20
1928 90 90Williamsport, Pa......... 1927 132 132 13 76,700
141,50026 7 75.200
13.200 351,000
51 4 75,500 241928 108 108 21 42 10 26,000
13,00020,3006,400
10 3 9Wilmington, Del_____ 1927 304 2,001,205
2,133,163 178,200 195,000
304 2 2 4 54 2 32.00028.000
661928 323 323 3 3 2 126,000 33 1
Wilmington, N . C ___ 1927 53 53 6 18,20027,000
12 2 31928 52 52 6 12
Winston-Salem, N . C .
Woonsocket, R . I____
19271928 1927
69061671
3,324,101 2,842,385
318.800164.800
2,913,550 1,930,635 5,751,685 6,933,910
372,500 575,300
4,476,100 4,389,835
424,206 346,285
9061671
52520
24,050 103,950 169,300 41,000
586,000 327,400
1.543.8001.205.800
105040
96
58,21530,300
147
43679
325,155463,725
86,000 65,500
20025639
361
29.500 157,00017.500
9364
1928 36 36 6 12 6 31Worcester, Mass.......... 1927 469 469 67 134 7 68,500 14 48 684,100
251,500 18,262,800 21,074,500
1781928 324 324 39 78 15 72
Yonkers, N . Y .............. 1927 591 591 137 274 2 20,000 2 155 3,2073,306
3 335.000339.000
8,000
72801928 622 622 104 208 136 4
York, Pa........................ 1927 99 99 1 31928 144 144
Youngstown, Ohio___ 19271928
928777
928777
5033
420,200252,400
10066
2720
233,400 196,700
10,000
3629
113
186,000205,000
12,0005,000
5357
4 123,000 31
Zanesville, Ohio______ 1927 105 105 1 2 1 41928 128 128 3 21,500 6 1 4
Total:302 cities.................. 1927 164,268
145,322789,382,883715,317,535
164,268145,322
25,22719,963
208,578,118 153,157,386
50,45439,926
3,329 34,978,625 26,702,412
5,3994,283
13,663 12,070
736,830,499 776,520,458
179,177 190,346
1,768 1,528
90,666,916 90,754,524
19,580 19,780310 cities................. 1928 2,625
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Numoer and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by 'permitissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
00
City and State YearGrandtotal
families
Population
Census of 1920.
Estimate for specified
year
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
Estimate for specified
year
Non hou sekeepin g dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
Lodging houses
Number Cost
Other
Number Cost
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
Number Cost
Akron, Ohio............ .
Alameda, Calif.____
Albany, N . Y ______
Allentown, P a ........ .
Altoona, Pa________
Amsterdam, N . Y__
Alton, 111.................. .Anderson, In d ........ .
Asheville, N . C ____
Ashtabula, Ohio___
Atlanta, Ga________
Atlantic City, N . J_
Auburn, N . Y _____
Augusta, G a_______
Aurora, HI_________
Baltimore, M d _____
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
2,5212,557
2395045586156815562821556742
167456
370
2,563 3,170
248 57 20 31
344 318 418 301
3,546 2,884
208,435
113,344
” 73,’ 502
60,331
33," 525
'24,'682 29,767
28,507
"22"082
200,616
"50,"707'
36,192
52," 548
36,397
733,826
120.9122.783.0
175.049.254.3 92.775.646.725.720.012.567.7
153.290.0
157.5129.817.2 9.1
127.8158.0 48.911.25.58.6
65.560.5
114.882.7 48.3
46.751.170.2 55.941.6 22.418.7 11.6
102.9124.345.810.4
61.256.189.963.9 43.3 34.7
$5,000
$40,000
230,000
4,244,750 42,000
2,450,000
$300,000
300.000475.000
27,061
30,000
340,000
146,540
306.000331.000
2,2082,200
2021844064045394952681564830
162 339 253 332 2783720
1,740.1,698
124511631
328 278 366 267
3,3712,507
$12,191,595 12,469,148
923,556 1,469,224 7,238,500 7, 935,200 3, 557,700 3,395,000 1,392,135
957,151 439,500 242,600 567,724
1,206,100 881,550
1,755,160 1,749,300
169.700 150,250
6,885,011 9,968,489 2,017,968 4,546,015
111.700 159,125 901,318 962,184
1,991,5251,561,549
14.661.00015.441.000
BUILDING
PEBM
ITS IN
THE PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Bangor, M e_________
Battle Creek, M ich ___
Bay City, M ich____
Bayonne, N . J______
Beaumont, T ex___Belleville, 111............Bellingham, Wash_
Berkeley, Calif.........
Bethlehem, P a.........
Binghamton, N . Y_.
Birmingham, A la . . .
Bloomfield, N. J ___
Bloomington, HI___
Boston, M ass.......... .
Bridgeport, C onn ...
Brockton, Mass____
Brookline, Mass___
Buffalo, N . Y . ........ .
Burlington, Iow a....
Butler, P a___Butte, M ont..
Cambridge, M ass_____
Camden, N . J...... ..........
•Canton, Ohio_________
Cedar Rapids, Iow a....
•Central Falls, R . I ____
(Charleston, S. C .......... .
1927 33 25,978 0 ) 12.71928 38 0 ) 14.61927 268 36,164 46,100 74.11928 177 47,200 48.91927 42 47,554 49,400 8.81928 57 49,600 12.01927 344 76,754 93,100 44.81928 436 95,300 66.81928 540 40,422 56,300 133.61928 136 24,823 (') 54.81927 348 25,585 0) 136.01928 264 0) 103.21927 867 56,063 69,400 164.61928 1,330 71,000 237.21927 230 50,358 66,000 46.71928 223 67,600 44.31927 310 66,800 73,900 46.41928 306 74,800 45.81927 3,019 178,806 217,500 168.81928 2,589 222,400 144.81927 1,062 22,019 0) 482.31928 675 (9 306.61927 96 28,725 (*) 33.41928 90 0) 31.31927 5,316 748,060 793,100 71.11928 6,805 799,200 91.01927 497 143,535 0) 34.61928 388 0) 27.01927 176 66,254 0) 26.61928 141 0) 21.31927 472 37,748 44,800 125.01928 566 45,700 147.31927 3,373 ........ 556,"775 650,000 66.61928 3,181 555,800 62.81927 93 24,057 38.71928 55 22.91928 40 23,778 0) 16.81927 1 41,611 43,300 .21928 7 43,600 1.71927 636 109,694 123,900 58.01928 863 125,800 78.71927 559 116,309 133,100 48.11928 350 135,400 30.11927 512 87,091 113,300 58.81928 374 _ 116,800 42.91927 145 ..........45,'566' 54,100 31.81928 157 58,200 34.51927 74 24,174 30.6.1928 44 _ 0 18.21927 38 67,957 75,000 6 .61928 46 75,900 6.8
i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.
68.137.68.5
11.536.945.895.9
124.9187.334.8 33.041.940.9
138.8116.4
67.085.1
105.4121.761.357.2
.21.651.368.642.025.8 45.232.026.827.0
5.16.1
639,000
550.000 348,500150.00015,000
25,000
700,000
260,000
10,00
187,636
66,000543,000
63.00054.000
117,4507^000
5,085,00080,00018,000
60,000
32 37
256 169 42 55 97 74
542 136 320 252 646 460 145 152 169 166
2,465 1,918
481 405 87
- 86 1,969 2,160
327 250 163 136 211 221
1,870 1,516
90 54 40 1 7
190 178 505 330 474 341 145 152 32 23 32 46
27,26,
2,1,
136,600136.550 918,475 752,750 161,425 229,200 848,800968.500 313,477 666,000 826,910224.000 145,280800.551279.850489.000 346,050 264,421 301,214 155,335268.500370.000520.000601.000 807,143947.550 860,960 963,000 864,175732.950 039,650065.100 257,157810.950 257,140178.100258.300 10,000 11,500
107,150581.300 539, 560164.950531.550180.850 637,815 688,940259.100 92,000 91,250
160.300
£§>t"1
CD
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State
Charleston, W . Va____
Charlotte, N . C............
Chattanooga, T arn___
Chelsea, M ass..............
Chester, Pa__...............
Chicago, 111...................
Chicopee, M a ss ..........
Cicero, HI.......................
Cincinnati, O hio.........
Clarksburg, W . Va___
Cleveland, Ohio...........
Clifton, N . J .................
Colorado Springs, C olo.
Columbia S. C _____
Columbus, Ga______
Columbus, Ohio____
Year
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Grandtotal
families
268 1,052 1,237
596 611 107 142 361 243
41,201 34,447
110 102 559 464
3,212 3,559
76 98
3,631 3,167
567 547 67 95
206 272 325 321
2,430 2,477
Population
Census of 1920
39,607
46,338
‘ 57,"895
43," 187
58,030
2,"76170536,214
44,995
401,247
"27,"869'
796,841
""26,"470'
‘ "§6,"l05 "~37,‘ 524
" ‘ 31,"125
"237,’ 03l'
Estimate for specified
year
0)972,5001,010,300
50,00050.600 45,80046.600
291,400 299,000
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
67.965.1
227.0267.0 102.9105.524.832.962.241.9
152.5127.530.4 28.2
124.2103.1 80.1 88.7 27.335.245.639.7
214.2206.622.3 31.654.972.5
104.4 103.1102.5104.5
Estimate for specified
year
50.446.7
188.2150.781.8 83.1 21.828.5 49.932.7
132.8 109.124.822.581.664.877.9 86.0
37.331.3
156.6
41.253.8 71.068.9 83.4 82.8
Nonhousekeeping dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost Number Cost
$424,500
"‘ 170,"555"
4,919,00013,432,000
350.000 50,000
325.000 475,60d
Lodging houses
$25,000
25,000112,000
95,000
Other
Number CostNumber
$26,4002,500
40,00077,100
15,0004,650,0003,379,600
68,000
900,0001,115,000
1,400,000
660,00068,000
Total new housekeeping and isonhouse- keeping dwellings
Cost
215 $855,900236 Ir 310,900651 3,, 122,260755 4,642,020398 1,584,280358 1,862,87556 423,30076 573,000
317 1,486,500229 1,015,000
10,067 23%484,750' 7,427 lOH* 673,500
91 427,50088 436,300
250 3,328,400168 2,537,600
2,018 19,385,8842,086 22,743,235
72 583,80081 407,235
2 ,224 IT, 738,1001*791 By 122,700
417 2*774,785331 2,539,65067 236,07587 340,440
W5 808,350•m 1,108,000
990,643m . 700,724
1,781 1% 614,3001,60» 11,601,300
BUILDING PEBM
ITS IN
THE PBIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Council Blufis, Iowa___ 1927 136 36,162 41,600 37.61928 94 42,300 26.0
Covington, Ky_.............. 1927 346 57,121 58,700 60.61928 314 59,000 55.0
Cranston, R . I ................ 1927 452 29,407 36,600 153.71928 559 37,500 190.1
Cumberland, M d .......... 1927 110 29,837 36.91928 67 O) 22.5
Dallas, T ex..................... 1927 986 ........ 158,976" 211,600 62.01928 1,199 __ 217,800 75.4
Danville, 111.................... 1927 192 33,776 38,200 56.81928 164 38,800 48.6
Davenport, Iowa........... 1927 125 ..........56,"727" 0 ) 22.01928 140 (*) 24.7
Dayton, Ohio................. 1927 1,201 152,"559" 180,700 78.71928 732 184,500 48.0
Decatur, 111................— 1927 613 ..........43,"818 56,000 139.91928 339 57,100 77.4
Denver, Colo.................. 1927 1,847 ........ 256,"49l" 289,800 72.01928 1,869 294,200 72.9
Des Moines, Iowa.......... 1927 360 126,468 148,900 28.51928 406 151,900 32.1
Detroit, M ich................. 1927 15,614 993,678 1,334,500 157.11928 15,929 1,378,900 160.3
Dubuque, Iowa.............. 1927 67 ..........39,'H i ' 41,900 17.11928 67 42,300 17.1
Duluth, M inn................ 1927 303 98,917 114,700 30.61928 196 116,800 19.8
Durham, N . C ............... 1927 508 ..........21,"719" 45,700 233.91928 464 47,600 213.6
East Chicago, Ind......... 1927 406 ..........35,"967’ 49,100 112.91928 204 50,800 56.7
East Cleveland, O h io .. 1927 258 ..........27,"292' 0) 94.51928 136 0) 49.8
Easton, Pa....................... 1927 77 33,813 37,900 22.81928 24 38,400 7.1
East Orange, N . J......... 1927 2,140 ..........50,716" 63,300 422.01928 968 65,000 190.9
East Providence, R . I . 1927 249 ..........21,"793’ 0) 114.31928 271 0) 124.4
East St. Louis, 111........ 1927 585 66,767 73,100 86.61928 501 74,000 75.0
Elgin, HI........................ 1927 262 ..........27,‘ 454’ 35,000 95.41928 207 36,000 75.4
Elizabeth, N . J .............. 1927 1,650 ......... 95,"783" ft) 172.31928 1,002 ?i) 104.6
Elkhart, Ind................... 1927 224 24,277 (l) 92.31928 155 (1) 63.8
Elmira, N . Y .................. 1927 116 45,393 49,500 25.61928 120 50,000 26.4
i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.
32.722.268.953.2
123.5149.1
46.655.150.342.3
66.539.7
109.559.463.763.524.226.7
117.0115.5 16.015.826.416.8
111.297.5 82.740.2
20.3
338.1148.9
80.067.774.957.5
23.424.0
117,000
700,0002,234,000
50,000
1,346,940 172,000
27,500
1,030,000
600,000
6,000
75,000
15.00025.000
50,000
90,000
>9,291
16,000183,100
3,493,3002,433,000
20,000
1,000
41,000
200,000
426,000
10980
31224040347110066
810906186138122136795383592333
1,3981,225
321342
8,3149,513
6756
29418544041226110338235820
225119223242447406249199460321221141113105
466,300 261,400
1,037,700 984,200
2,262,050 2,775,200
484,288 284,010
2,453,030 3,354,924
833,196 599,086 676,170 635,650
5.188.900 6,026,7793.185.400 1,967,5007.871.900 8,482,300 1,514,104 1,675,328
69,022,207 69,053,106
252,325 289,500
1,426,174 975,150
1,374,305 1,582,935 1,952,242
950,850963.000186.000 563,785 202,425
9,981,850 4,631,1501.109.400 1,478,025 2,360,097 1,843,880 1,204,560 1,055,5707.055.0003.451.000
859,605 590,261 765,962
1,306,100Crc
&ENEBAL TA
BLE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART I.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
OrfcO
City and State YearGrandtotal
families
PopulationBatio of families
provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
Estimate for specified
yearCensus of 1920
Estimate for specified
year
Nonhousekeeping dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
Lodging houses
Number Cost
Other
Number Cost
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
N um ber Cost
E l Paso, Tex.........
Erie, P a ......................
Evanston, 111............
Evansville, In d ........
Everett, M ass...........
Everett, W ash..........Fall River, Mass___
Fitchburg, Mass___
Flint, M ich...............
Fond du Lac, W is........
Fort Smith, A rk___Fort W ayne, Ind___
Fort Worth, Tex___
Fresno, Calif.............
Galveston, Tex_____
Gary, Ind -.................
Grand Rapids, M ich ..
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
158310444397
1,4239454204204402831232511106725
3,5592,221
61 485 407
3,160 1,758
157 146 571 369
1,675 890
1,709
77,560
‘ 93,'372
’ 37,"234
85,264
40,’ 120
27,644 120,485
41,029
9i,599
23,427
'28,’ 870* 86,549
106,482
"45,086"
44,255
'"S5,"378
"137,'634*
113,500117,800
846,40047,600
98,10042,90043,300
0)132,600134,30044,70045,200
142,700148,800
20.440.047.642.5
382.2 253.849.349.3
109.770.544.5 20.89.1
16.36.1388.5242.536.7 25.221.156.047.0
296.8165.134.832.4
129.083.4
302.5 160.7124.265.0
13.926.3
306.7198.543.5 42.8
102.665.4
18.98.215.05.5
249.4149.3
47.038.7
193.2 103.025.222.8
114.472.9
196.699.9
105.6 54.5
$42,78080,000
400,000
185.000190.000
$99,000250,000
75,216
370,00091,800
$32,761
1,107,121 185,000
2,000
2,300,000704,141 81,076
1,585,109 8,500
206,792
305,650400,00025,000
28,00040,000
135,000
71 $518,345242 980,426392 2,621,900360 2,203,500447 12,120,500263 7,899,000409 1,720,900400 1,488,250218 1,319,50091 977,600
110 262,300186 1,089,88495 544,23661 234,90022 110,500
3,399 12,233,6421,895 8,586,944
86 295,74056 203,00062 186,488
483 3,585,846404 2,313,815
14,990,7402,2951,417 8,792,021
151 743,953122 480,645558 1,391,064338 1,546,686979 6,004,512699 3,729,575
1,661 6,916,600867 3,719,100
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Great Falls, M ont__
Green Bay, W is........
Greensboro, N . C___
Greenville, S. C ........
Greenwich, C o n n ...
Hagerstown, M d___
Hamilton, Ohio........
Hammond, In d ........
Hamtramck, M ich ..
Harrisburg, Pa..........
Hartford, Conn........
Haverhill, Mass____
Hazleton, Pa.............
Highland Park, Mich__
Hoboken, N . J..........
Holyoke, Mass..........
Houston, Tex............
Huntington, W . Va___
Hutchinson, Kans__ Indianapolis, Ind___
Irvington, N. J_____
Jackson, M ich..........
Jacksonville, Fla____
Jamestown, N . Y ___
Jersey City, N. J___
Johnstown, P a .........
1927 260 24,121 0) 103.61928 260 0) 107.81927 168 3i,'oi7" 35,600 54.21928 186 36,100 60.01927 455 19,861 60,300 229.11928 446 51,900 224.61927 119 23,127 0) 51.51928 193 P) 83.51927 363 22,123 P> 164.01928 344 0) 155.51927 97 28,064 y> 34.61928 82 0) 29.21927 362 39,675 43,770 91.21928 410 44,200 103.31927 1,141 ..........36,004~ 54,200 316.91928 698 56,000 193.91927 70 48,615 93,800 14.41928 89 _ 99,800 18.31927 319 75,'917" 85,700 42.01928 206 86,900 27.11927 1,270 138,036" 168,300 92.01928 1,363 172,300 98.71927 99 53,884 18.41928 68 __ _ 0) 12.61927 126 32,277" 37,500 39.01928 57 38,300 17.71927 366 ..........46,’ 499’ 81,700 78.71928 117 86,400 25.21927 22 68,166 <l) 3.21928 5 0) .71927 275 60,203 6u,400 45.71928 86 60,400 14.31927 4,536 138,276 328.01928 4,463 0) 322.81927 194 "50,"l77" 66,900 38.71928 87 68,600 17.31928 146 23,298 0) 62.71927 2,400 314,194 374,300 76.41928 2,511 382,100
W79.9
1927 2,562 25,480 1,005.51928 1,022 0) 401.11927 206 48,374 61,700 42.61928 250 63,700 51.71927 2,098 91,568 138,900 229.11928 1,658 140,700 181.11927 225 38,917 45,100 57.81928 169 46,000 43.41927 1,287 298,103 321,500 43.21928 2,155 _ 324,700 72.31927 128 67,"327" 73,000 19.01928 73 73,700 10.8
* Population not estimated by Census Bureau.
47.351.590.5 85.9
1 30,0001 45,000
1 505,000
82.792.8
210.5124.6
7.5 8.9
37.223.775.579.1
31
352,00043,000
33.614.944.813.5
45.514.2
21
62,00012,000a 270,000
29.012.7
64.165.7 4 1,030,000
1 120,00033.4 39.2
151.0 117.849.936.740.066.417.5 9.9
2 222,0001 2 2,000
97 482,103155 789,830166 769,555176 834,180403 2,158,522418 2,030,865113 425,175178 759,547275 4,204,335266 4,559,30076 902,08565 300,510
362 1,244,724407 1,538,487764 4,999,700515 2,759,70048 288,55064 404,200
319 1,811,100205 1,214,500385 6,451,139278 4,693,26983 386,10059 271,40084 793,28841 343,26415 1,296,0007 364,5002 72,0004 70,500
68 1,283,05050 492,800
3,361 15,162,9553,440 18,088,385
164 630,72562 467,900
131 467,2701,667 9,401,2591,524 11,254,100
618 11,469,928207 5,141,800193 910,100242 1,107,450
1,585 6,413,0251,215 5,263,115
188 1,005,300165 855,000258 4,874,800259 7,671,000115 659,19561 345,160
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
City and State
Joliet, HI...................
Joplin, M o...............
Kalamazoo, M ich ..
Kansas City, Kans.
Kansas City, M o . .
Kearny, N . J...........
Kenosha, Wis.........
Kingston, N. Y ___
Knoxville, Tenn . _.
Kokomo, Ind_____
Lakewood, O h io ...
Lancaster, Pa..........
Lansing, M ich........
Lawrence, Mass___
Lebanon, P a ...........
Lewiston, M e--------
Year
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Grandtotal
families
206 180 128 151 193 165 387 321
3,104 1,969
696 857 303 295 134 126 818 940 45 82
582 537 247 154 420 443 43 32 32 19 43 77
Population
Census of 1920
38,442
“29,"902
48,487
"ioi,’ i77
324,416
“ 26,"724'
""45,"472
77,818
“30,‘ 567
"41,'732
" 53,"Iso'
”57,"327"
’ 94,"275"
24,643
“31,"791'
Estimate for specified
41,50041,900
855,500 56,400
117,500 118,300 383,100 391,000
854.600 56,500
0)0 102,100 105,400 39,100 40,400 62,200 65,000 57,700 58,30075.60079.600 0)
36,100 36,600
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
46.842.850.539.834.038.231.795.760.7
260.4320.774.972.950.247.2
105.1120.815.027.3
139.5 128.746.529.073.377.34.6 3.4
13.07.7
13.5 24.2
Estimate for
year
49.643.0
34.829.332.9 27.1 81.050.4
55.552.2
80.189.211.520.393.682.6 42.826.455.655.7
11.921.0
Nonhousekeeping dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
$341,200
20,000180,000
32,400210,000
1,390,000
Lodging houses
Number Cost
$7,000
13,200
16,000
Other
Number Cost
24
$370,000
222,00050,000
512,000
5,000
'§6,"155'
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
Number
189154115103193153 387 293
1,169 1,047
358 300 262 281 130 118 712 801 42 42
203 134 254154 372 441231332192828
Cost
$1,873,6001,412,900
414.200932.400 641,100 640,525 720,950 655,620
8,977,864 7,859,200 2,747,400 2,945,000 1,633,297 2,484,518
719.400
3,052,853 3,909,541
163.500 350,262
2,893,755 3,562,400 1,396, 500
839,050 1,795,165 2,004,800
204,800 104,200191.500 101,000135.500 164,000
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Lexington, K y ................
Lima, Ohio.....................
Lincoln, Nebr.................
Little Rock, Ark............
Long Beach, Calif.........
Lorain, Ohio...................
Los Angeles, Calif.........
Louisville, K y ................
Lowell, Mass..................
Lynchburg, V a..............
Lynn, Mass....................
McKeesport, Pa............
Macon, Ga—...................
Madison, Wis.... ............
Malden, Mass................
Manchester, N. H _____
Mansfield, Ohio.............
Marion, Ind....................
Marion, Ohio..................
Medford, Mass...............
Memphis, Tenn.............
Meriden, Conn__..........
Miami, Fla.....................
Milwaukee, W is............
Minneapolis, M inn____
1927 160 41,534 48,100 38.51928 104 48,700 25.01927 35 41,326 48,700 8.51928 19 49,700 4.61927 388 54,948 69,900 70.61928 497 71,100 90.41927 514 65,142 77,500 78.91928 527 79,200 80.91927 1,479 55,593 104,200 266.01928 3,099 0) 557.41927 237 ..........37,295” 44,000 63.51928 227 44,900 60.91927 20,801 ........576,‘ 673' (0 360.71928 21,081 ___ 0) 365.61927 1,574 234,891 320,100 67.01928 1,542 329,400 65.61927 79 112,759" 0) 7.01928 50 2 110,296 4.41927 89 30,070 38,600 29.61928 114 38,600 37.91927 528 99,148 104,800 53.31928 501 105,500 50.51927 246 46,781 49,900 52.61928 203 50,400 43.41927 352 52,995 60,100 66.41928 321 61,200 60.61927 489 ..........38,‘ 378' 48,800 127.41928 542 ______ 50,500 141.21927 415 49,103 52,900 84.51928 718 53,400 146.21927 165 78,384' 84,800 21.11928 116 _ 85,700 14.81927 157 27,"824" 0) 56.41928 127 (l) 45.61927 77 ........ 23,’ 747" 32.41928 158 66.51927 128 ........ 27,'89l" (l) 45.91928 172 0) 61.71927 628 39,038 51,300 160.91928 745 52,900 190.81927 1,865 162,‘ 35I" 178,900 114.91928 1,887 190,200 116.21927 211 ..........29,'867' 36,800 70.61928 137 37,100 45.91927 698 29,571 140,000 236.01928 124 156,700 41.91927 4,252 ‘ 457,‘ l47‘ 536,400 93.01928 4,965 ______ 544,200 108.61927 2,189 380,582" 447,700 57.51928 2,240 455,900 58.9
i population not estimated by Census
2 270,000
72
178,00031,0001 40,000
122
500,000 1,851,000
90,000
1916
1,979,5001,000,200
55
400.000285.000
1 225,000
2 11,000
1 8,000
2 520
1 100,000116224
100,000 25,000
3,725,000470.000535.000453.000
2 40,000
21
136,00065,000
2355
200,000 355,882364.000438.000
sau. 1 State census, 1925.
971,558843,400152.600 86,100
2,067,590 1,872,712 1,613,018 2,579,137 6,321,365 8,721,515
811,300 815,140
64,057,617 61,977,327 9,452,570 8,250,308
340,500170.600 364,523 499,710
1.986.5001.898.500 1,512,523. 980,535
1,237,065 1,248,170
2,030,5252,307,250
724,825564,625732,800663.000 161,840382.000 384,650 439,900
3,273,900 3,689,450 5,866,295 6,100,030
818, 550 778,200
1,639, 256 617,855
22,197, 632 20,050.151 9,418; 200 9,268,920
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
Oxo
City and State
Mobile, Ala...............
Moline, 111.................
Montclair, N . J ........
Montgomery, Ala—
M t. Vernon, N. Y ._
Muncie, Ind ..............
Muskegon, M ich___
Muskogee, Okla------
Nashville, Tenn.......
Newark, N . J ............
Newark, Ohio...........
New Bedford, Mass___
New Britain, Conn___
New Brunswick, N . J~
Newburgh, N . Y ......... .
Newcastle, Pa-............. .
Year
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927
Grandtotal
families
387638158109334
7262,2111,636
31737111910492
116654753
5,1443,288
6610815142
5373271952109074
182143
Population
Census of 1920
60,777
30,734
28,"810
43,464
‘ 42," 726
36,524
36," 570
"30,"277
118,342
‘ 414,"524'
~26,~7i8
'I2i,"2i7‘
"5 9 ’ 3i6
“ 32,"779
30,366
‘ 44,‘ 938
Estimate for specified
year
67,70069.600 35,10035.600
8(947.600 63,100 53,300 54,70045.80046.800 45,50046.600 32,900 33,200
137,800139.600 466,700473.600
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
63.7105.051.435.5
115.9112.190.4
167.0 517. 5382.986.8
101.632.528.430.438.355.363.6
124.179.324.740.412.5 3.5
90.555.159.564.129.624.440.5
Estimate for specified
57.291.745.030.6
115.1 414.8299.169.279.3 26.222.3 28.034.9 47.553.9
110.269.4
75.444.948.951.3 23.229.567.523.4
Nonhousekeeping dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
$75,000
600,000236,000
603,000
‘560,"ooo
850,000
30,000
'218,“OOO
Lodging houses
Number Cost
$24,000
Other
Number Cost
$29,500
65,000
210,000
40,000
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
Number
19611220924430736467835437830334011910692
10655960094656266
108133 39
281204122134 82 68
165138
Cost
$1,035,500 1,690,456
735,125 553.084
3,622,107 3,702,8241.420.000 1,259,355
11,838,300 10,991,935 1,120,296 1,134,885
334.350 921,010224.500314.350
2,273,650 1,916,074
26,081,407 17,594,563
220.500 338,300 858,600 281,100
2.184.000 2,002,950
744,700 1,065,925
533,140 429,800 989,850 938,825
BUILDING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
New Haven, Conn____
New London, Conn___
New Orleans, La___
Newport, K y ............
Newport, R . I ...........
Newport News, V a .
New Rochelle, N . Y___
Newton, Mass..........
New York City, N .Y .: The Bronx...............
Brooklyn................ .
Manhattan............ .
Queens......................
R ichm ond..............
Niagara Falls, N . Y „ .
Norfolk, Va...................
Norristown, Pa ............
Norwalk, Conn............
Oakland, Calif..............
Oak Park, 111................
Ogden, Utah.................
Oklahoma City, O kla..
Okmulgee, Okla____
Omaha, Nebr............
Orange, N . J_______
Oshkosh, Wis............
1927 497 162,537 184,900 30.6 26.9 2 187,230302.000160.000 70,000
130,000
1928 646 187,900(l)
33.6 29.1 41927 176 25,688 68.1 11928 218 0) 84.9 11927 2,077 387,219 424,400 63.6 48.9 3 2,186,127 11928 2,107 429,400
0)(>)
54.4 49.11927 44 29,317 15.01928 43 14.7 2 8,5001927 37 30,255 0) 12.21928 61 2 27,757 20.2 22.01927 65 35,596 51,700 15.5 10.6 1 200,0001928 101 63,300 28.4 18.91927 1,049 36* 213 47,300 289.7 221.81928 1,205 48,800 332.8 246.9 1
1156,00075,0001927 734 46,064 56,000 159.4 131.1
1928 939 57,300 203.9 163.9
1927 30,0261928 33,7681927 33,172 1 170,0001928 28,938 6 5,055,0001927 9,602 . 5,620,048 J 5,970,800 187.8 176.7 20 24,127,000 21 4,056,000
11,593,600535,000
1928 15,983 \ 6,017,600 194.9 182.0 33 49,630,000622,500150,000
181927 31,205 7 51928 28,797 11927 1,615
2,0371 85,000
5,900135,000
1928 2 160,000 11927 397 50,760 66,600
68,30078.2 59.6 2 104,000 1
1928 606 99.7 74.11927 496 115,777 179,200 42.8 27.71928 634 184,200 54.8 34.4 1 168,0001927 66 ..........32,'3i9‘ 35,800 20.4 18.41928 96 36,200 29.7 26.51927 285 ..........27,"743" 0) 102.71928 368 0) 129.01927 2,694 ........ 216,‘ 26l" 267,300 124.6 100.8 3 638,000 1 360.000
600.000 160,000
1928 2,430918
274,10066,600
112.4 88.7 2 282,000 320,000
1,660,000
21927 39,858 230.3 165.1 2 11928 745 57,700 186.9 129.1 51927 200 32,804 38,300 61.0 52.21928 157 39,100
0)47.9 40.2
1927 1,7522,637
16
91,295 191.9 3 622,00020,0001928 0) 288.8 1
1927 17,430 C1) 9.21928 15 0)
219,200222,80036,10036,50033,200
8.61927 477 191,601 24.9 21.8 1 46,0001928 412 21.5 18.5 1 1,000,0001927 722 ^3,268 217.0 200.01928 281 84.5 77.01927 162 33,162 48.9 48.8 1 750,0001928 155 33,200 46.7 46.7
177190128140
1,2721,267
444436606674
330319619767
3,628 2,735 8,621 6,765
210 296
14,272 10,811 1,443 1,436
336 417337 31061 89
243 280
1,698 1,132
261 233 181 142
1,349 2,183
13 11
357 366 97 66
163 163
i Population not estimated by Census Bureau. ’ State census, 1926.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits Orissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued 00
PART l .—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
C ity and StateGrand
PopulationRatio of families
provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Non housekeeping dwellingsTotal new housekeep
ing and nonhousekeeping dwellings
tOlalfamilies
Census of Estimate for specified
yearCensus
Estimate for
Hotels Lodging houses OtherNumber Cost1920 of 1920 specified
year Number Cost Number Cost Number Cost
Ottumwa, Iowa_______ 1927 38 23,003 0) 16.5 38 $248,750 204,800 290,000 405,735
4,035,508 3,383,929
1928 38 (1) 16.5 38Paducah, K y __________ 1927 136 24,735 (1) 55.0 136
1928 94 0) 38.0 1 $200,00060,000
1 $3,000 89Pasadena, Calif_______ 1927 790 45,354 60,500 174.2 130.6 1 503
1928 600 62,10070.80071.800
143,800 144,90072.10073.100 83,500
132.3 96.6 1 36,000170,000
408Passaic, N . J__________ 1927 467 63,841 73.2 66.0 1 1 $40,000 108 2,431,470
1,766,650 3,704,216 2,586.513 2,377,750 1,923,850 1,825,150 2,182, 500
876,833 432,082 155,080
1928 351 55.0 48.9 97Paterson, N . J _________ 1927 1,167
748135,875 85.9 81.2 1 4.000
6.000431
1928 55.1 51.6 1 331Pawtucket, R . I _______ 1927 581 64,248 90.4 80.6 416
1928 455 70.8 62.2 361P p. nr in., Til 1927 349 76,121 45.8 41.8 331
1928 437 84,50049,100
57.4 51.7 369Perth Am boy, N . J___ 1927 192 41,707 46.0 39.1 106
1928 104 50.10037.100 37,800
2,035,9002,064,200
0)
24.9 20.8 69Petersburg, Va________ 1927 44 31,012 14.2 11.9 42
1928 48 15.5 12.7 43 187,650Philadelphia, Pa ___ 1927 12,197
10,576 614
1,823,779" 66.9 59.9 10 1,283,100 3,349,000
25,000
9,083 55,895,475 55,781,580 3,190,075 2,446,922
16,882,851 13,567,969
657,700
1928 58.0 51.2 1 1,000,000 1,468,495
300,000 1,390,000
7 7,862504Phoenix, Ariz_________ 1927 29,053 211.3 2 1
1928 748 (0 257.5 1 599Pittsburgh, Pa ___ 1927 2,588
2,544118
588,343 665,500673,80049,10050,000
Q(1)
44.0 38.9 3 1 60,000297,000
2,0461,772
931928 43.2 37.8 2
Pittsfield, Mass_______ 1927 41,763 28.3 24.01928 211 50.5 42.2 156 1,117,200
3,010,065 2,066,779 4,615,556 6,101,365 1,075,654
920,377
Plainfield, N . J .............. 1927 507 27,700 183.0 2811928 311 112.3 256
Pontiac, M i c h . . . .____ 1927 1,0691,735
508
..........34,"273' 54,00061,500
(1)311.9 198.0 1 200,000
300,000695
1928 506.2 282.1 2 1,309508Port Arthur, T e x .____ 1927 22,251 228.3
1928 210 I1) 94.4 2 462," 500 212
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Port Huron, M ich ...
Portland, M e .............
Portland, Oreg...........
Portsmouth, Ohio— .
Portsmouth, Va.........
Poughkeepsie, N . Y_.
Providence, E . I .......
Pueblo, Colo...............
Quincy, 111..................
Quincy, Mass.............
Racine, Wis................
Reading, Pa................
Revere, Mass.............
Richmond, Ind ..........
Richmond, V a...........
Roanoke, Va...............
Rochester, N . Y ........
Rockford, HI...............
Rock Island, 111.........
Sacramento, Calif___
Saginaw, M ich...........
St. Joseph, M o...........
St. Louis, M o.............
St. Paul, Minn______
St. Petersburg, F la...
1927 104 25,944 (*)1928 71 0)1927 216 69,272 77,5001928 261 78,6001927 3,166 258,2881928 2,321 h1927 224 33,011 40,5001928 169 41,2001927 79 54,387 60,7001928 85 61,6001927 87 35,000 35,9001928 96 _ 39,1001927 1,188 237,595" 280,6001928 1,134 __ 286,3001927 401 43,050’ 44,1001928 372 _ 44,2001927 181 35,978" 39,5001928 133 39,8001927 926 47,876" 65,3001928 977 67,6001927 609 ..........58,‘ 593’ 71,3001928 681 74,4001927 233 i07,784~ 114,5001928 263 115,4001927 241 28,823 35,2001928 247 36,0001927 228 26,765 0)1928 153 0)1927 1,774 171,567 191,8001928 764 194,4001927 395 50,842 63,2001928 364 64,6001927 2,448 ........295,750" 324,5001928 1,862 328,2001927 926 65,651 80,9001928 779 82,8001927 208 35,177 41,9001928 146 42,7001927 959 ..........65,"908" 74,6001928 917 75,7001927 347 61,903 74,4001928 577 75,6001927 107 77,939 78,5001928 98 78,5001927 5,463 " 772,"897" 839,2001928 7,190 848,1001927 1,148 234,698 250,1001928 773 0)1927 442 14,237 48,5001928 172 53,300
i Population not estimated by Census Bureau.
2 55021
550,00085,000 1 60,000
12
80,000435,000
11
287,000 79,777
1 600,000
i1
200,00075,0001 1,500,000
2 194,1781 1,000,000
1 150,00071
329,50045,000
1 150,000
492
1.995.0002.967.000
240,000
33
249.000361.000
i 20.006
104 346,60070 190,550
158 990,600172 1,046,350
2,347 13,204,3601,693 10,052,285
219 737,945165 615,35066 235,425
242,0557352 518,40068 691,550
714 7,284,400706 7,625,600380 1,016,675331 911,825178 774,050132 529,775618 3,684,300586 3,695,600454 2,863,853422 3,109,193205 1,694,700263 1,587,427174 985,400182 942,545229 1,437,870153 598,342958 8,117,843535 5,200,166
1,664,511363240 1,369,582
1,397 10,207,245968 8,154,887665 4,173,200538 2,721,500157 890,275118 453,500836 3,948,358751 3,347,972346 955,800533 1,619,116107 261,73466 374,200
2,527 18,359,3352,915 22,556,980
6,026,574888699 4,529,238396 1,155,500172 848,100
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Table A.—Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 1,—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
o
City and State YearGrandtotal
families
Population
Census of 1920
Estimate for specified
year
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—
Census of 1920
Estimate for specified
year
Nonhousekeeping dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
Lodging houses
Number Cost
Otfiers
Number Cost
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
Number Cost
Salem, Mass.................
Salt Lake City, Utah.
San Antonio, Tex........
San Diego, Calif..........
San Francisco, Calif__
San Jose, Calif..............
Savannah, Ga..............
Schenectady, N . Y —
Scranton, Pa_...............
Seattle, Wash...............
Sheboygan, W is...........
Shreveport, L a .............
Sioux City, Iowa-........
Sioux Falls, S. D a k . . .
Somerville, Mass.........
South Bend, In d .........
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
218120850731
2,1712,7842,6132,1468,6746,084
385370401430349269280292
4,5054,658
204188185713267282151211399199540579
42,529
118,110
"161,379
74,683
"558," 676
~39,"642
83,252
88," 723
137,783
"315,"§i2'
" "30,"955'
"43,874"
71,227
25,‘ 262"
93,091
70,983
42.90043.000
135.700138.000 211,400 218,100115.300119.700576.000585.300 44,800 45,50099.70099.900 93,20093.300
143.900144.700375.300 383,200
35,10078.00081.30079.00080.000
101,600 102,700 84,200 86,100
51.3 28.272.0 61.9
134.5172.5349.9 287.3170.5119.697.193.348.251.739.330.320.3 21.2
142.9147.765.960.745.1
162.537.539.659.983.742.921.476.1 81.6
50.827.9 62.653.0
102.7127.6226.6 179.3150.6 103.985.981.340.243.037.4 28.819.520.2
120.0121.6
53.6 25.487.733.8 35.3
19.464.167.2
$35,000
$1,400,000
263.000153.000
2,825,000 2,445,800
6,60015,000 $60,000
884,0001,778,000
175,000
........800‘
255,000
4,30068,000
174,000
94,988
150,000
11478
526449
1,8172,1182,1901,6903,4802,612
311270334317
220184
2,8612,496
19217214456720320913618114469
532566
$1,334,000742.000
3,244, £60 2,297,410 7,846,719 8,661,556 8,360,820 7,400,101
31,796,144 22,465,464
1,273,970 1,301,010 1,434,000 1,429,665 2,369,1501.844.500 1,181,100 1,700,495
16,639,425 17,785,350 1,037,200 1,037,400 1,456,376 2,134,902
833,500 1,058,750
752.000 858,920
1,831,420861,300
2.725.500 2,951,350
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
61318*
Spokane, W a s h ...
Springfield, HI------
Springfield, Mass.
Springfield, M o . .. Springfield, Ohio..
Stamford, Conn___
Steubenville, Ohio.
Stockton, C alif..—
Superior, W is..........
Syracuse, N. Y ........
Tacoma, Wash........
Tampa, Fla.............
Taunton, Mass____
Terre Haute, Ind ._
Toledo, Ohio...........
Topeka, Kans.........
Trenton, N . J..........
Troy, N . Y ..............
Tucson, Ariz............
Tulsa, Okla.............
Union C ity, N . J ...
Utica, N . Y .............
Vallejo, Calif-..........
W aco, T ex...............
Waltham, Mass—
Warren, Ohio..........
1927 595 104,437 109,0001928 574 ____ 109,1001927 354 ‘ 59,"i§3~ 66,4001928 352 67,2001927 1,240 129,614 147,4001928 647 149,8001928 305 39,6§I 51,7001927 285 60,840 71,6001928 315 73,0001927 559 35,096 42,8001928 331 43,8001927 171 28,5081928 191 0)1927 412 40,296 49,8001928 226 51,0001927 84 “39,"67l"1928 136 (*)1927 1,838 171,717 197,0001928 1,561 199,3001927 769 96,965 107,2001928 822 110,5001927 826 51,608 107,8001928 647 113,4001927 91 ..........37," 137’ 40,2001928 60 40,6001927 184 66,083 72,7001928 113 73,5001927 1,749 243,164 305,4001928 1,698 313,2001927 320 50,022 61,9001928 304 62,8001927 316 119,289 136,7001928 223 139,0001927 110 72,013 72,3001928 157 72,300
0)1927 535 20,2921928 336 (41927 1,434 72,075 150,0001928 2,187 ___ _ 170,500
: 1927 255 40,074 64,0001928 84 64,4001927 259 94,156 103,4001928 342 104,200
(01927 26 21,1071928 43 01927 171 38,500 45,7001928 177 46,6001927 285 30,915 36,4001928 362 37,1001927 321 27,050 0)1928 306 0)
57.055.059.859.595.749.977.046.851.8
159.394.360.067.0
102.256.121.234.3
107.090.979.384.8
160.1125.424.5 16.227.817.171.969.864.060.826.518.715.321.8
263.7165.6199.0303.463.621.0 27.536.312.320.444.4 46.092.2
117.1 118.7113.1
i Population not-estimated by Census Bureau.
54.652.6 1 25,00053.352.484.1 1 500,00043.2 1 500,00059.039.843.2 1 20,000
130.6 1 200,66575.6 1 230,000
_________ 1 20,000
82.7 2 70,00022,50044.3 1
93.3 i 250,0007&3 1 80,000 1 55,00071.774.4 1 115 00ft76.6 1 40,000
XXl/p Uw57.1 1 100,00022.614.8 1 300,00025.315.457.354.251.748.423.116.0 1 350,00015.221.7 i 4,000
1 15,000170,0003 1 25,000
27,80095.6128.3
25
135,0001,240,000
2 2 11,50039.813.025.032.8 1 250,000
i 76,000500,00037.4 1
38.078.397.6
2 350,005
513
29559447027226427724825214417330620480
1361,160
552 799 622 70 56
183 113
1,515 1,270
284240 310 18099
128 379 325
1,110 1,337
31 13
238 224 26 44
171172 198241 315 300
2,045,9502,269,0251,649,9101.929.9004.867.650 3,276,050
677,275893.750
1.007.5503.336.1002.474.550
971,600 708,000
1.548.600 831,710280.750 551,850
9.792.300 8,135,200 2,157,590 2,661,000 1,961,895 1,720,260
347,405515.300 555,025 336,050
7,205,3756,658,1251.169.9001.187.5501.775.6501.522.100
664.750790.750
1,668,275 1,297,972 5,931,075 8,853,800 1,045,500
326.3001.545.6002.390.100
106.950258.950
1,058,575631,003
1,406,2501.744.300 1,121,959 1,434,830
O
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 1.—NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
C ity and State Year
Washington, D . C ........
Water bury, Conn.........
Waterloo, Iowa..............
Watertown, Mass..........
Watertown, N . Y ..........
West New York, N . J~
Wheeling, W . V a...........
White Plains, N . Y ___
Wichita, Kans...............
Wichita Falls, Tex____
Wilkes-Barre, Pa..........
Wilkineburg, Pa............
Williamsport, Pa______
Wilmington, Del...........
Wilmington, N . C .........
Winston-Salem, N , CL-.
Grandtotal
families
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
3,9384,305
675504
759 454
50 53
283 170 182 125
1,204 856 988
1,207 548 222 230 174 166 90
233
365
64923
Population
Census of 1920
437,571
91,715
36," 230
'21,"457
31,285
29," 926
56,208
"2l’ 6§r
"72,"217
40,079
73,833
*24,"403*
36,198
"116," 168'
” §3,372
"48,"395
Estimate for specified
year
96,10099,300
0)90.90091.900 0)(043,60044.000
126,400 128,50038,40039.10077.10080.000
Ratio of families provided for per 10,000 of population based on—-
Census of 1920
73.55. 39.74.
353. 211.16.16.94.56.32. 22.
572.407.136.167.136.55.31.23.68.38.64.46.33. 33. 20. 19.
190.199.
Estimate for specified
year
72.978.0
72.8
15.015.7
102.8121.6
25.318.9
53.438.4 29.028.4 17.716.4
119.7 120.6
N on h ou sek eep in g dwellings
Hotels
Number Cost
$1,350,000 3,500,000
Lodging houses
Number
400,000
353,300
640,000
29,750
Cost
Other
Number Cost
$492,000 236,000 98,500 77,000
$12,000
145.000 222; 600
2,800299.000 41,122
620.000
27,350
Total new housekeeping and nonhousekeeping dwellings
Number
1,947 1,385
495 308 143 268 433 267 50 52 39 23
16589
345 334 808 962 519 207 184 117 13590
158 143 313 3306158
753720
Cost
0 5 fcO
$23,805,395 33,337,350 2,948,000 2,040,500
526,900 1,248, 700 3,628,700 2, 246,800
255, 550278.800915.000722.000
1,168,278641,280
7,293, 750 6,718,900 3,044, 535 4,616, 615 2,150,134
900,788 1,055, 777
753, 540 976,400
1,009,095 845, 450
1,029,090 2,438, 327 2,927,463
202.800 222,000
3,813,0663,597,360
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRINCIPAL
CITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Woonsocket, R . I_.
Worcester, M ass...
Yonkers, N . Y ____
York, Pa..................
Youngstown, Ohio.
Zanesville, Ohio___
Total:302 cities. 310 cities.
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
19271928
154 79
795 474
4,146 4,‘ 216
102 144
1,148 929 111 138
418,878399,657
43,496
132,368
' 29," 569
38,015,164 38,248,312
52,300 53,400
195,500 197,600 118,800 121,300 49,600 49,900
169,400 174,200 0)0)
3 43,919,581 8 44,940,049
35.4 18.244.226.4
413.9420.9 21.630.586.770.237.546.7
110.4104.5
29.414.840.7 24.0
349.0347.620.628.967.8 53.3
95.4 200235
100,000
400,000
69,093,263 114,928,650
1,305,302 780,576
214209
3,500300,000389,60050,000
31,063,923 35,559,169
10149
592381890866100144
1,021833107132
208,748 181,989
29,
591,600 274,800 552,150 899,135 063,285 553, 210 380,500 575,300 838,700 043,935 446,206 372,785
1,961,899,529 1,913,720,710
1 Population not estimated by Census Bureau. 8 See notes to details.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENT!AL BUILDINGS
City and State Year
Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,
etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings
Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
AlrfOT>, Ohin 1927 3 $818,350 235,500
4,200
9 $427,171 72,500 13,356 42,700
350,000 80,000
25 $223,400 1,332,975
378,630 13,500
100,000
2,262 2,163
257
$762,915 471,537
41 $102,009102,022
5,50015,475
2 $616,00019281927
5 3 27 191
$531,35020,000
28AlarriArla; Hal if 6 2 12 48,090
39,401 377,615 411,215 351,675
3 1 $5,50027,8201928 2 3 187 13 2
Albany, N . Y 1927 4 260,000224.000146.000357.000
1 1 8 144,300438,50095,50045,000
354 22 59,20016,00031,700
1 100,000900,000
1,500198,400
Allentown, Pa________19281927
23
1 23
58,000 230,000 242,500
8,165 201,175
116
358655
310
13
1,250,000530,000
22
1928 7 4 2 517 522,915 97,148 94,427 50,530 55,875 25,452 29,240 27,814 28,080
9 38,100 1 235,000 5Altoona, Pa 1927 3 78,000
832,6908 334 6 5,100 1 25,000
192819271928
4 5 263 2 2,050Amsterdam, N . Y 1 50.000
35.0001 25,000
5,000113
1 1 119 1 3,0009,100
91.50021.500 37,000 37,800
2 5,500 1 250,000Alton, Til 1928 4 21,185
28,000 2,400
84 4 1 78,400Anderson, Ind 1927 3 117,100
1,000,00030.00036.000
3 24, 500 3 128 16 1 400,00019281927192819271928 1927
2 2 1 4,000 198,500 142,250 51,500 36,800
133,100
142 3Asheville, N . C 1 1 2,000
6,70012 216 13
2 5 8 177 20,400 26,330 24,123 35,905
8 2 365,000Ashtabula, Ohio 5 49,800
17,450 287,500
3 116 7 4,150 15,200
172,975
3 8501 25,000
135,500 1,969,500
115,000
2 49,900 333,425 208,500
3,500 115,000
5 3 124 5 2 50,500125,000Atlanta, Ga..... .............. 9 24 7 8 312 45 5 196,372 1
Atlantic City, N . J___192819271928
41
1811
911
361,00020,000
1,0008,5002,000
15,388800
1332
292,750120,000265,000
2,00010,410
29610670
33,656 32,379 33,365 50,252 41,119
2769
97.25042.250 70,0006,800
21
181,500476,000
242
6,122,000 763,800 228,000
Auburn, N . Y __ 1927 4 1 137 4 2 238,00019281927
3 28,826 1 70.000 6,000
11,69023.000
1 2 145 10 16,95046,52731,80029,600
Augusta, Ga 1 *400 2 8 103 9,3994,289
76,36256,494
1,764,5001,304,700
18,50522,61083,53161,955
14 1 7,000 1 9,97519281927
1 25,0006,400
3 2 1 8,500 53 8 3 2,43040,000Aurora, 111________ __ 2 1 3 19,000
27,750723,000
1,144,0004,200
75
5 88,00037,500
302,900
243 11 11928 5 7 192 3 6,600
220,3001 60,000
Baltimore, M d _______ 1927 4 85.00035.000
15 741,000618,500
20 51 3,353 40 4 570,000 5 1.135.0004.152.000
40,000Bangor, M e___19281927
1 7 262
152
106,00053.50026.500
192,40041,400
2,20464
343
373,000875
2 420,000 41
1928 1 2 73 3 4,80032,50018,350
2 265,000Battle Creek, M ich___ 1927
192821
225,0007,000
32
375,00051,000
1614
428,850272,200
57
299239
148
12
1,930,000850,000
55
111,600418,300
BUILD
ING
? PERM
ITS IK
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Bay City, M ich
Bayonne, N . J.
Beaumont, Tex___Belleville, HI..........Bellingham, Wash.
1927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
i Includes public garages.
Berkeley, Calif............
Bethlehem, Pa_______
Binghamton, N. Y ___
Birmingham, Ala____
Bloomfield, N . J.........
Bloomington, HI_____
Boston, Mass...... ........
Bridgeport, Conn____
Brockton, Mass______
Brookline, Mass..........
Buffalo, N . Y ..............
Burlington, Iowa........
Butler, P a.— Butte, M ont
Cambridge, M ass._
Camden, N . J..........
Canton, Ohio______
Cedar Rapids, Iowa___
Central Falls, R . I ___
Charleston, S. C_____
Charleston, W . V a------
Charlotte, N . C____
50,000130,000
5,000
191,7505,000
15,962138,00016,000
650,626260,963
150.000442.00033.00018.000 82,000
832,500448,000
163,03829.00050.000
237,366100,000
1,140,000121,000
25036,000
53,000
55.00080.000
169,65041,800
60,000
411,112 381,716
200,000
60,000630.000388.000
23,000
175.000175.000
924,700271,000
8,100
40,00064,300
172,500
130.000 158,500
1,00025,000
400.000
79.000 21,91820.000
131,500 40,000
402,400
2410
51,3251,051,350
607,000280,180
19,“655" 12,000
12106
10174132
2521
203,050 241,967233.500 29,800
753,400 895,600
1,991,414 540,850 92,500
20^705"35,000611,600
1,080,000110.500
80,000
7578531
1,907,420 1, 389,902
70,000 39,500 1,800
11513 36 361416 6 5 2
10,000 891,500 159,000 406,985 748,600 464,400 180,075 133,950 595,541 39,000
2959
18
2,65015,00021,500
125,080218,615
37,500
26," 66534,700
8,80014,350
108,71021,50046.80083.800
76.000 323,810 361,93020.00035.000 6,000
14.000 1,506,000
424,00098,700
16,00030.000 93,50035.000
537,258 235,19012.000
9.000 92,400
469,180 37,900 43,750 28,000 15,250 49,1009.000
99,500 15,600 14,305
3,000 18,000
151,5G0 94,200
263,500
286 48,620 6 20,500185 37,181 5 10,25072 38,100 3 2,70075 46,650 3 7,200
155 183,269 10,231 22,845
108166 5 3,100121 13,680 15 184,950666 151,302 8 12,650457 125,990 12 20,080305 182,191 7 65,200241 152,785 8 17,200389 177,799 3 29,000352 110,070 5 51,350311 70,699 47 285,437487 78,865 22 87,900424 188,700
162,6001 1,000
397 2 15,00038 21,500 6 18,00024 13,300 2 8,000
1,189 909,075 19 71,6001,176 946,915 28 242,100
591 268,592 8 138,620455 255,774 17 89,100257 82,300 5 55,465241 77,113 2 2,550120 133,477 3 7,350132 191,145 1 45,000
2,591 1,059,024 87 88,7152,211 686,074 19 16,075
25 8,000 3 6,00096 29,094
19, 74038 1 1,50011 2,898 2 5,15058 10,300 7 14,350
194 175,443 6 25.500205 158,805 6 53,100444 395,800 17 76,150284 107,580 6 39,795724 198,529
112,76221 29,250
570 17 119,650397 79,481 12 48,195360 74,947 13 98,56081 36,615
18,040 2,190
2512 4 8,50024 3,095 3 25,500
163 43,310 11 39,124175 99,190 6 30,20058 9,885 13 34,05081 15,959 9 25,150 .
165,000
540,852
1,485,208
60,150674,812228,500
125,000 1,503,413 1,752,248
37,477
30,000
1,385,000320.000300.000
2,013,170 1,551,000
112,000 150,000
18,000
18,000
14,000
4,20a
"I," 6655,300
39,676
38,500
1,545,062701,434
105,000
218,0003,395,7808,068,000
661,30029,550
513,0002,050,000
320,90032,100
181,0002,058,875
22,000
27,329150,000
559,500941.800536.800
O l
GEISfEftAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T ables A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in .1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
a>o *
C ity and State
Chattanooga, Tenn___
Chelsea, Mass...............
Chester, Pa___............
Chicago, H I.................
Chicopee, Mass______
Cicero, m ._ _ ...............
Cincinnati, Ohio_____
Clarksburg, W . V a_~
Cleveland, Ohio_____
Clifton, N . J ....... .........
Colorado Springs,Colo_
Columbia, S. C______
Columbus, Ga.............
Columbus, Ohio..........
Council Bluffs, Iowa_
Covington, K y ............
Cranston, R . I ............
Cumberland, M d ____
YearNum
ber
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Amusement and recreation places
Cost Number
$87,260 173,000
25,000 2,363,000
15,939,500 200,000
175,00050,000
4 102,0002 51,8001 100,000
18 2,845,0006 619, 5001 2,7751 153,000
24,800 1,100
60,000
1,995,000167,00040,0003,000
12,000
13.00049.000
Churches
47
Cost
$281,200154,744
3, COO 20,000
3,371,000 6,855,100
80,000141.000 519,0C0750.00049.5004.000
285.000288.000
8.0005.000 5,727
22,000117.50056.500
9008.000
111, 500152.500
3,000
20,0008,000
*350,000154,00087,500
Factories, shops, etc.
Number
262197
15
1213 1814 7 4
52591010
. . . . .
2
Cost
$207,018147,64343.000
148.700194.800145.000
10,096,600 14,556,300
10.00090.000
415.000368.900
1,468,0C0763.000
3,8C0100.700954.700
1,182,600137.900 339,500
s'ooo'3,400
59.50074.000
112.000 114,000272.800 25,60061.00040.50041.500
101,100 232,52567,250 2,120
Number
Garages (public)
2212156
Cost
$501,250 80,000 23,800 5,000
53,000 9,445,000 4,692,900
49,355 88,000
411,0C0 1,426, SCO
10,000 53,000
958,500 615,300 35,800 63,600 40,750 1,500
1,275 1,044,000
30,200 46,000
16,0009,000
11,400
Garages (private)
Number
253 121 39 51
181 137
7,372 4,994
167 143 187 170
1,659 1,613
134 107
4, 540 3,724
490 . .436
216 217 67 77 62 60
2,681 2,370
82 74
180 125 391 465 124 103
Cost
$85,733 20,617 22,805 27,565
104,440 131,767
2,914,500 1,831,600
53,750 43,575 61,495 54,220
711,045 793,590 51, 680 31,325
1,059,650 876,150 160,425 149,260 30,223 33,015 7,025
14,850 11,102 5,019
782,050 701,340 15,900 19,050 84,210 70,950
164,194 175,999 31,478 30,991
Gasoline and service stations
Number
283207
71
116
2620182
14086
57557
Cost
$138,393 46,000
4,30024.400
113.300 986,50031.400
40094,375 16,100 62,785 57,600 38,350 11,000
217.300132.300
7,17516,9008,075
13.500 40,800 29,9C033.25051.500
110,450 153,400
7,500 500
2,000 10,000 8,140 1,750
21.250
Institutions
Number Cost Num
ber
$175,000
3,970,900 3,600,000
530,000610,800
250,000 4,475,000
$90,000
453,000
Office buildings
Cost
$478,100 1,057,000
23,350
24,700 43,981,950 36,599,213
80,400
59,000 96,500
1,259, 500 1,335,000
140,200 51,000
5,476,600 83,625 29,300
7,000
15,000
1,487,000372,000
134,00052,0002,800
BUILDING
P
EB
MIt
S IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Balias, Tex...... ..............
Danville, 111...................
Davenport, Iowa..........
Dayton, Ohio__............
Decatur, 111....................
Denver, Colo.................
Des Moines, Iowa........
Detroit, M ich ................
Dubuque, Iow a__........
Duluth, M inn...............
Durham, N . C ..............
East Chicago, Ind........
East Cleveland, Ohio..
Easton, P a .....................
East Orange, N . J_____
East Providence, R. I .
East St. Louis, 111........
Elgin, 111.........................
Elizabeth, N . J.............
Elkhart, Ind__..............
Elmira, N . Y .................
El Paso, Tex..... ............
Erie, Pa..........................
Evanston, HI.................
Evansville, Ind.............
Everett, Mass...............
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
64.00012.000
14,500 29,800
202,500 71,616
650,000
642,000
2,700 10,650
8,776,800 3,647, 500
72,650
54,000
165,0003,700
64,68146.00012.000 60,000
, 059,800
"39,350
168,00077,000
1 18,0001 10,5001 8,0001 1,5004 54,4003 38,100
800,00021,000
326,760 359,100
18,400
20,00039.000
587.50032.000
139.500 166,000 149,200 310,505
1,551,500 1,906,600
75,844
14.50046.50031.500 71,90054.000 89,30080.000 4,000
35,000
242,000
3,00060,00024,00023,500
20,000166,000
2,500
8.700 16,750
182,57017.700 96,000
228,000 65,000
100,000 177,500
7 151,66532 351,3266 50,1601 6,9885 30,9002 70,200
44 795,81545 621,43315 180,00012 118,40015 245,0005 57,000
57,"55l"131 7,939,284172 9,843,388
3 168,550
5 157,00017 170,77513 303,20026 414,55045 956,355
5 68,0902 2,0003 10,3003 140,0004 20,8625 850,000
16 336,8006 108,425
10 182,5314 102,5001 7,0009 326,0008 143,0007 750,9006 32,3252 2,6504 25,800
7 38,1005 39,250
14 169,1003 180,000
6 290,50018 1,348,50012 236,7656 103,913
280,836 124,750
6,500 5,105
60,490 30,000
319,268 611,643 27,050 12,700
330,500 313,000 152,215 46,475
2,457,468 4,339,203
24.00052.50013.000
112,00029.000 6,000
120,00042.500 8,000
18,90728,600
309,80085.00012.000 74,750 15,000
3,00049.00084.00016.000 46,450
45.10028.1003.000
15,875161,000 107,385 131,000 90,000 64,850
111,9002.000 3,950
190212
34
280 230
1,317 1,061
658 465 810 672 526 497
11,501 11,067
208 141 390 156 14 12
127 84
126 106
395311240264442336325308619526218252249232172206772612556379380 397 183 172
46,927 41,448 2,900 1,800
58,432 46,012
701,075 550,399 163,045 104,910 380,150 327, 500 84,828 76,371
3,089,379 2,875,042
60,873 39,594 93,655 34,814 5,980 3,365
52,039 37,764 32,035 27,196 83,120 46,819
394,039 280,875130.500 110,14283,316 74,154
116,373 102,005221.500184.500 44,447 56,580 52,021 43,034 25,080 44,969
205,326 151,709 330,755 285,775 49, 571 47,72987.25075.250
38
111
111721112113
100,35097.900 11,74269.900 56,5006,200
121,80058,000
131,000 72,750 42,400 74,950
664,718 364,87022.300 9,500
15,87552,72947,80042.00066.500 8,740 1,950
20.300 5,900
10,435 53,05099.00030.000
5,80039,100 54,64211.70017.50030.00065.000 38,55028.700 4,400
27.300 500
41, 759 9,150
37,20028.000 20,000 75,690
155,250
21,00085,200
28,000
‘so,“ooo'50.000
187,400 120,000
40,000 3,370,000 1,145,774
2,50024,50030,000
1,000,000
301,000
14,5006,000
40,000400,00098,100
140,500
443,260102,640
930,000
"713,’ 565
2,254,000425.000111.000
5,15020,980,340 6> 139,974
60,000 121,000
257,800500,000
75,000
157, 500 461, 200 10,00092.000
1,024,50025.000
600,060880,000102,500
30,000
4,500 29,300
400,000 351,500 128,400
GENEBAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
O00
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State Year
Amusement and recreation places
Number Cost
Churches
Number Cost
Factories, shops, etc.
Number Cost
Garages (public)
Number Cost
Garages (private)
Number Cost
Gasoline and service stations
Number Cost
Institutions
Number Cost
Office buildings
Number Cost
Everett, Wash______Fall River, Mass-----
Fitchburg, M ich____
Flint, M ich__............
Fond du Lac, Wis.__
Fort Smith, Ark____Fort W ayne, Ind-----
Fort W orth, Tex____
Fresno, Calif..... .........
Galveston, Tex..........
Gary, In d ...................
Grand Rapids, M ich
Great Falls, Mont__.
Green Bay, W is........
Greensboro, N. C ___
Greenville, S. C ........
Greenwich, Conn___
Hagerstown, M d -----
Hamilton, Ohio-------
192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$18, 525 199,150
175.000 514,500942.000
229,80010,000
21 135,51210 66,5003 427,1531 25,0003 3,5503 100,3005 868,5002 12,800
22,00057,656
142,000
""'5,"ooo'
"557,"565'
157,214
$8,000188,000200,000
160,000 355,150 63,545
$11,000 25,450 50,59045.00069.000
1,026,348580,225
345,87214.000
115,865 283,69827,30050.000 6,500
75,000 145,700299.000287.000 115,30042,500
127.000 117,450 472,600 195,300174.000
78,000
107,00012,0001,000
6,550 31,900
251,190 100,068 78,914
188,682 10,250 23,125
494,050 8,000
86,45071.000
305,600 556,80043.000 8,350 2,200 3,500
347,543 247,22518.000 4,700
75.00031.000 54,700 22,95025.000 1,400
46
103494
$24,950 21,850
182,700 10,500
111, 149 155,747
5,000
40,400 61,100
484,168 371,137
7,500 2,800
12,000 184,500 110,800 81,000
185,900 39,500
124,230 24,600 7,100
233,00036,000
1,0003,000
86,70052,500
174 200 132 10459
2,2151,706
172149151810716496296221158213178825608
2,4021,498
167157312233115984826
120119162136175 189
$10,640 71,690 43,834 32,365 17,885
666,616 528,769 34,592 22,231 19,579
275,988 208,592 77,795 52,495 35,982 26,450 23,248 29,476
293,475227.790 669,735363.790 47,236 43,800 62,239 39,338 15,675 15,393 14,2002,450
75,020 110,725 37,255 27,030 38,521 53,072
$17,200 8,315
39,950 ‘2,375 6,900
45,695 206,065
12,700 8,930
25,430 48,500 91,783
100,502 61,457 17,350 19,677 5,250 2,000
29,925 24,450
117,600 79,160 6,000
11,200
1,62536,00045,150
6,0002,500
10,00025,000
17,950 11,650
$681,00025,000
$11,200 1,157,865 251,600
180,000 631,384 62,162
162,475
1,"685,*804
11,91038,000
97.00040.000
141,200
54,995
"i58,640
158,0001,054,860
""452,"166 13,500
27,880550,000
65,000
4,000
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Hammond, In d _______
Hamtramck, M ich____
Harrisburg, Pa..............
Hartford, Conn.............
Haverhill, Mass______
Hazleton, Pa..................
Highland Park, M ich .
Hoboken, N . J _ . ..........
Holyoke, Mass..............
Houston, Tex_________
Huntington, W . Va___
Hutchinson, Kans........Indianapolis, Ind..........
Irvington, N . J_______
Jackson, M ich________
Jacksonville, Fla______
Jamestown, N . Y _____
Jersey City, N . J ........ .
Johnstown, Pa________
Joliet, HI______________
Joplin, M o____________
Kalamazoo, M ich_____
Kansas City, Kans___
Kansas City, M o..........
Kearny, N . J.............
Kenosha, Wis................
Kingston, N . Y _______
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
100,00020,000
253,00022,6006,000
240,235206.500152.500
230,000202,290
387,000
18,000903.000309.000350.000182.000
8,0002,450,921
84.000 125,000
" ’ "428,'42235.000
219,30014.000
700,0001,000,000
375
5,000
65.000 192,125 990,000
10.000
740,000
500
18
115.000107.000450.000
120,00060,000
245,938
228,000 315,273
263,200
371.040 643,650147.000160.000 55,000
420.040 1,608,500
5,000
76,300 421,650 361,500
107,000
105,00071.000 6,000
98,70046.00062.000
228,000304.000 61,500 15,200
314,500154.00040.00015.00060.000
254,375 117,000
2,000
424244
161222
4 43 415 2
1459258
1114
10146 2
2517161118
131689
50161075
2
108,30017.500 7,500
85.00032.00037.400
216,000 170,70013,20027,82035,10010.400
115,00034.000 77,80072.500 32,650 26,750
623,675 505,650 132,50010.000
102,929 182,620158.500308.500
301,50059,500
334,254
25,000
68,00050.000 99,90047.000 72,550 84,219
1.5007.500
145.000512.500156.000103.500
12,000 16,900 57,526
172168271259579419147 127 10856
1241551520
110109148 1154 162 120 191
4,5632,755
738
361414320318
29415813721107491
267232203272592402261242371313195164
127,700171,68048,90244,240
197,365161,235466,010462,35344.74538.745
186,62777,12760,32567,92718.750 37,290 54,80045.750 73,155 94,301 37,811 12,500 35,410
1,081,264 712,179 490,079 343,923 83,446 97,494 95,035 64,885
108,225 83,590
301,267 276,799 89,101 75,159 29,250 6,678
30,005 33,493 43,434 36,828 24,615 33,277
122,175 138,975 81,855 82,710
109,395 97,476 63,785 56,065
1004
12
21.700 6,000 5,200 4,500
57.00038.00073,16053.700 7,885
27,35014,0822,9586,0003,000
6,000 34,400 11,350
108,618 163,029
3,800 29,000 24,650
128,850 116,675 17,200 34,300
83,550 96,450 8,800 8,300
13,96161.30094.00020.00017.00030.000 52,5208,750
32,10014.40020.300 3,700
156.200182.20020.400 2,500
42.50012.500 4,250
13.000
23
59.00092.000
133
10,500470,000310,400
124
10,000 2,003,000
367,900
1 1,400
1 50,000
154
35,000859.500100.500
516222
225,5501,999,9126,261,803
9,500
33
862,000665,000
65
28,000116,600
2 538,525
1 900,000 22
160,00098,000
1 300,000
1612
1,391,479663,7002 740,000
112
175.000100.000 52,500
311
37.000 110,00040.000
2 516,0002 40,250
2 77,500
6 785,000 5531
1,552,000441,880105.000395.000
12
100,000313,000
2 315,000 12
115.000145.000
CJCO
GENERAL TA
BLE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS-*Continued
City and State Year
Amusement and recreation places
Number Cost
Churches
Number Cost
Factories,etc.
Number Cost Num
ber
Garages (public)
Cost
Garages (private)
Number Cost
Gasoline and service stations
Number Cost
Institutions
Number Cost
Office buildings
Number Cost
Knoxville, T en n „.
Kokomo, Ind_____
Lakewood, Ohio...
Lancaster, Pa.........
Lansing, M ich.......
Lawrence, Mass_„.
Lebanon, Pa_____
Lewiston, M e....... .
Lexington, K y .......
Lima, Ohio_______
Lincoln, N ebr____
Little Rock, Ark__
Long Beach, Calif.
Lorain, Ohio_____
Los Angeles, Calif.
Louisville, K y ____
Lowell, Mass_____
Lynchburg, Va___
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$192,000 42,240 3,500
$131,300210,600
6,000
35,00019,000
355,0005,000
125,000
44.00072.00015.000
11
1 65,0001 254,9601 20,0001 170,0001 12,0001 900,000
300.000 500
62,500 156,500118.000
4504,075,925
577,493 1,231,750
40,‘ OOO* 135,000
1,500 8,000
15.000 200,000 343,20042.000 7,000
10.000 102,90012,500
228,750 2,800
99,625 13,000
104,000
1,801,725 1,909,944 1,343,250
948,500 55,000
198142
31
258284
1521
12289,00048,500
$368,256 79,000
124,420
75,0005,800
3,350,000 1,415,400
52,000
$166,800 298,56037.200 10,000 63,500 15,00031.200 35,7008,000
115,000
47.000 26,15025.000 16,500
90,000 5,000
64.500 500
34.500 43,800 10,000
10 87,134
70,000 116,770 198,094
2,836,155 2,071,215
25,700 400
3,017,873 2,919,254 1,121,000 1,191,000
98,400273,450
4,500
1,500 46,800
14697
2,002,734 569,330 643,725 158,510
6,500
202,550 6,600
27092
1972834223231601304634098285
203483017
126132166144471479168168961
1,418195234
10,0258,378
513679180139114
$45,550 14,538 34,034 34,221
113,835 93,976
121,19597.875
139,79092.875 38,915 37,82585.00014.000 2,100
41.000 172,55518,13524.800 18,267 86,528 97,907 32,370 27,711
345,570 521,565 34,519 39,944
2,627,398 2,522,701
149,975 205,35540.800 31,935 15,256 15,524
354472
146775
$40,560 75,425 24,575 28,600 15,000 21,900 5,000
77,625 136,700 24,705
10,000 15,500
500
21,00094.550 28,200 13,200 30,150 21,800 51,7507,300
16.550 36,7803,000
22,000 347,697 410,28154.500 25,30028.50012.625 42,00025.625
$136,800
80,00073,000
300.000225.000
224,000
50,000
9,281,883 1,086,782 1,900,000
80
$87,000572,400
2,600
500.000226.000 75,000
162,000
732, 700
'650,’ 000
3,492,595 4,203,490 2,750,000
900,000
22,9245,500
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Lynn, Mass................
McKeesport, Pa____
Macon, Ga.................
Madison, Wis............
Malden, Mass______
Manchester, N . H ~ .
Mansfield, Ohio........
Marion, Ind...............
. Marion, Ohio.............
Medford, Mass_____.
Memphis, Tenn____
Meriden, Conn___ _
Miami, Fla.................
Milwaukee, W is____
Minneapolis, Minn_.
Mobile, A la.......... .
Moline, 111..................
Montclair, N . J_____
Montgomery, Ala_._
M t. Vernon, N . Y . ..
Muncie, Ind..............
Muskegon, M ich___
Muskogee, Okla____
Nashville, Tenn........
Newark, N. J............
Newark, Ohio...........
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1027 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
150,500 800
33,900 377,850 32,800 5,000
200,000
500,000
160,000443,000
400.000235.000
67,600788,60097,500
134.000 70,525
2,374,667300.000
1,179,400600
31,000
383,131
6,500150,000
97,0004,500
236,325
214.000 38,500
147,6003,621,000
68,177200.000
73.000 2,200
15,30048.000
199,99733,92647.000
357,123
55.00020.000 58,000
128,000168,35014,300
830,900 40,900 59,500
222,948 361,800 335,700 39,000 68,752
51,80080,000
91,600100,00058.000 7,000
192,095 33,17515.000
275.000 49,15015.000
228.000418.000172.00030.000
140,675 302,800
8,20015.00061.000 48,200
143,072 182,950 179,00070.000 59,9357,400
18,70088.00063.00075.000 17,600 14,300
17,500426,20096,2009,000
93,750 4,500
712,900 1,359,371
719.500 315,725
11,000125.500
.136,856 318,538
15.000175.000124.00020.000
135,518 160,468
7,50021,20016,00015,900
113,700833,500
2,040,5321,348,762
20,000
18 68,570 341 119,035 4 8,00012 35,900 360 117,931 5 6,2406 15,920 182 64,402
54,9565,6009,970
90,404
157 5 22,50050 11 44.100
31.100 69,910
80 77 320,000 390 143 62,500 437 104,800 16 93,300
10 27,200 231 105,291 8 44,2004 40,500 181 81,617 6 37,9003 48,000 246 76,341 3 9507 80,500 196 63,705 10 30,3001 2,000 267 56,890 8 20,6001 8,000 207 39,462
12,8005 17,650
4 24,000 64 9 27,1004 57,000 112 20,160 14 30,000
268 30,210 36,830
179,591
4 4,90022,00027,800
316 314 78,900 343 413 16,200 346 169,612 2 22,5007 319,800 897 254,215 18 140,4005 119,600 934 284,384 23 80,8603 17,000 170 112,113 5 7,050
135456
66,510 116,799
1 2,00075,55032 294,650 35
12 101,750 189 39,698 18 39,55033 901,040 3,723 1,447,334 60 138,72521 786,900 2,711 1,037,086 23 52,21038 163,335
233,8252,562 592,205 76 163,550
45 2,367 577,630 53 138,9253 94,000 11 5,520 12 81,6685 71,600 514 102,530 3 15,4724 31,200 176 49,146 5 13,4813 45,460 160 42,612 4 14,9752 23,000 365 238,871 10 28,553
31690
230,4119,000
3 31,00010,4001 30,000 3
400 40,000 175,627
5 10,000 151,30018 754,000 260 18
23 1 ,310,000 224 134,831 11 47,8004 16,900 437 82,250 10 17,7353 112,905 520 94,783 3 5,490
228 108,687 53,847 12,027
12 106,100 63,150 6,855
253 946 880 13, 795
13,4508 20,500
33,90044,800
io 124,700 136 1113 193, 700 130 13,210 17
134 543,740 1,271 1,615,604 23 171,65012 508,542 942 1,136,609 26 130,6002 11,200 137 27,804 5 17,2002 10,800 167 32,416 4 6,000
11
150,00072,000
11
15.00048.000
211
115, 300 35,000
200,0001 15,000
24
40,300 740,000
1 6,000
343 24 1 3
16 1 24
17 19 1 3
101,500291,200
2,605,10072.000
138,6661,250
41,701 231,919
1,503,250 1,308,825 5,654,150
75.000 628,000
32
166,400 143,000
32133
539.000 879,738140.000 693,21025,000
121
3,50028,000
50011
10,000100,000
754
1,173,000 327,176 38,0001
2743,200 296,750
11
97.50067.500
2 46,000
4
42271
28,000
12
785.000240.000
7,936,402 1,826,644
150.000
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs j alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State
Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,
etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings
Num ber Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
19271928192719281927192819271928 1927
$1,500 3 $34,000 379
$181,725 114,750
7,000 500,900 109,100138.000 99,000
155.000 67,300
16 $56,30016,500
295 $227,30066,665
212,540113,29033,50023,57548,39051,35079,580
31 $89,450 31,400 36,250 1,0257.000
14,5004.000
5 114 10New Britain, Conn— X 25.000
50.000 100,00018.000
1 324 10 2 $211,000212
91,00053,900
183.000155.000
12 220 1New Brunswick, N . J. 11
33
32
33,00038,17562,20033,42519,500
159106
33
2 $475,000 42
290,000 61,695
2 3 15 97 1inewDurgu9 in* x148,000 3 11 100
New Castle, Pa- 1 38,000 6 3 306 8 33,500 1 270,000 10 392,300192819271928
3 141,00052,000
2 40.000 348,000
1,087,3628,200
35.000 193,072
5 130,000 244 69,920340,723466,000
1 4,00076,55080,500New Haven, Conn____ 4 533.000
205.000 7,600 8,300
234,060268,094
2 14 449 21 6 529,0003 18 9 138,000 331 20 1 90,000 3 364,166
New London, C on n .— 19271928 1927
327
4 180 107,850 105,165 60,277
3 11,2009,000
173,4442 10 96,500
72,529179 2 1 40,000
164*823New Orleans, La_____ 5 101,900 9 7 86 42 1 4 1,686,763
XT otrnnrf XT \r192819271928 19271 QOfi
3 72
504,34356,000
7 44,235 191
37,500 10,000 2,750
20,000 51,100
11056
35,961 26,500
283
65,55016,500
900
22
202,85554,000
3 1,419,037
2 14,4006,000
15,000
1 41 25,760 57,300 49,370 13,549 7,296
208,084
1XT + T> T 5 261,200
3 8001 3 123 4 5,750
8003 1 74,0004,500
1 10 116104
1Newport News, Va----- 1927
192819271928
279
New Rochelle, N . Y __ 1 4,000 3 210,000545,00050,000
7 53,60082,500
244 7 24,000 1 1,500 1 175,0002 2 1,900 9 231 224,352 3 11,600 1 40,000 2 200,700
Newton, Mass________ 1927 4 40,800 1 9 120,500 1 30,000 469 314,901 6 23,850 3 1,260,000 2 59,0001928 3 38,000
9,496,400 4,270,904
12.139.000 6,808,000
15.991.000
3 29,000
2,755,5963.442.5507.327.550
2 32,000 436 279,305 2 5,500 1 25,000 1 100,000New York City, N. Y .:
TMia Tlfnny 19271928 1927
4220940
158
24
1.330.000 937,500
2.395.000
100 529 7,288,105 8,460,295 5,774,000
611 329,600203,315
2,791,315
24 118,200222,150420,975
38 701,600
Brooklyn,, ............106204
433157
6495,496
32136
31
798,00075,000
2229
1,857,2506,051,500
Manhattan_______19281927
3232
295
2.237.0003.825.000
18738
9,061,55015,163,200
16555
8,196,000 7,848,800
4,414160
2,145,055 41,710
17019
454,725 27,745
—..."l2,’ 750,'666'
2675
3,135,500 67,045,500
Queens___________19281927
2138
6,295,0006,084,800
221
180,000 3,736,500
4087
28,864,000 1,659,300
3795
3,229,650 2,386,350
3187,219
184,1802,629,372
1796
60,300388,387
74
9,800,000530,000
5535
74,875,750 3,110,500
T> {/ihmnnH192819271928
324
1,427,900529,500981,200
277 1,191,500 238,500 206,200
7911
3,625,300120,500129,200
1129
4,010,80093,500
606,000
6,643987
2,508,370255,904265,327
1309
414,915 30,350 79,550
1 20,000 444
2.219,050 295,480
8 7 6 11 1,001 44 3 i,i86,666 8 46,700
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Niagara Falls, N . Y . . .
Norfolk, V a ....................
Norristown, Pa..............
Norwalk, Conn.............
Oakland, Calif________
Oak Park, 111........ .........
Ogden, Utah..................
Oklahoma City, Okla.
Okmulgee, Okla............
Omaha, Nebr.................
Orange, N . J ..................
Oshkosh, W is_________
Ottumwa, Iowa............
Paducah, K y .................
Pasadena, Calif............
Passaic, N . J.................
Paterson, N . J...........
Pawtucket, R . I ............
Peoria, 111.......................
Perth Am boy, N . J___
Petersburg, Va..............
Philadelphia, Pa...........
Phoenix, Ariz................
Pittsburgh, P a..............
Pittsfield, Mass............
Plainfield, N . J..............
90,00011,7005,500
1,011,600 287,749
67,500
”40,00038,362
190,000
115,0002,258,000
45,000
59.000
‘ _3,"666'35.000
31,522165.000 10,000 71,500
186.000454.000472.000 60,000 95,000
109,500129,568
199,50029,400
354,00055,000
1315676
458,156 470,571 97,209
327,100 226,600 21,900 17,650
492,500 651,932 614,850
3312
26.300 25,0002,000
21.300
244
5259
11925
21151
75,502 9,000
114,450 361,189476.000185.000 70,0001 30,000 3
2 205,000 4 53,50036 320,625 6 66,75016 404,150 14 267,50022
15,4001,400
178,500
2 13,000
6 1 1,6004 107,000 6 260,0001 40,000 1 1,375322
34,30082,00026,000
1 1,637
8 173,650 1 40,0006 49,000 2 18,000
2 25,600 2 18,6001 19,750 13 201,1503 14,225 13 64,142
16 250,282 9 44,1003 30,100 7 44,100
10 261,000 57 66,92518 957,500 12 11,6753 245,000 2 12,0004 144,700 1 4,000
12 117,500 13 132,0008 85,850 9 111,6004 58,000 10 48,2005 262,500 1 14,500
1 10,000 2 13,200174 7,791,070 102 3,306,385162 6,626,870 100
22,250,560
44,00090,8461 60,000 11
33 589,100 17 99,85023 1,224, 740 209 721,971
12 169,150 5 16,7002 21,500 4 173,0003 30,000 1 100,000
1,50032,37549,800
48,00060,300
140,000
"”"6,"000*
2,500796,56944,000
112.500 33,450
102,000311.500
75,0002,500
11,941
17
185378
300 4,801,600 5,032,500
351,735 101,100
1,623,000 753,460
131.0002.249.500 1,681,700
258,063164,500237.000
1.149.500
222,850361,000158,150
63,200
405381459455129
231232
1,935 1,473
531506115
1,1851,027
197
322362 163 115 213 18339451517
472363 222 209 340 331 412 396 469 445 122 1054756
1,5561,300
10073
1,9801,467
181151347
144,688 127, 742 83,981 93,423 90,602
116,600 100,155 607,842 456,844 275,781 218,91522.650 1,400
210,635 228,710
5,465 2,615
90,230 84,448
319,151 164,073 52,415 51,908 16,70015.650 5,000 4,155
102,044 66,145
178,522 157,035 261,971 164,922 198,070 162,194 129,085 125,465 59, 655 50,840 9,297
10,017 1,765,500
964,530 43,265 33,151
1,231,082 1,180,019
125,145 79,590
178,568 189,372
109
15
121028487
11
48
22
232555
558
291954
131397
15741
13102428
26,40034,72514,25036,585
100,10023,75053,80058,37024,900
106,397
11,00031,25098,9007,500
41,450 61,100 19,300 21,900
6,40017.20019.0005.500
15,450 48,33331.050 15,42025.000 94,775
142,80022,95032.05065.200 19,50023.0007.500
48,000
30,00020,695
205,000147,600
9,750
6,5005,100
210,000
28,000
125,700640.000180.000 532,234 215,00025.00070.000
471,729 50,000
400,00035,000
33,40065,29130,000
184,100600,000
11,000
4,090,060 5,742,600
120,800
2,044,0004,072,100
14,500
12
79,90042,44324,750
5,15076,500
375,000 995,700
1,199,000
201,190
2,676,800 114,100
160,5001,032,710
122,900
31,000
209,500156,00098,5503,000
59,000
239,00017,387
6,151,125 7,622,365
462.000 749,903
2,308,7507,084,050
245.000
135,000312,500
GO
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—GoatixmeA
City and State
Pontiac, M ich............
Port Arthur, Tex____
Port Huron, M ich ...
Portland, M e_______
Portland, Oreg..........
Portsmouth, Ohio—
Portsmouth, V a ........
Poughkeepsie, N . Y_
Providence, R . I ------
Pueblo, Colo------------
Quincy, 111..................
Quincy, Mass............
Racine, W is................
Reading, Pa................
Revere, Mass_............
Richmond, Ind..........
Richmond, Va...........
Roanoke, V a ..............
YearNum
ber
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927 192$
Amusement and recreation places Churches
Cost Number
$92,500
4,600 6,250
1,593,440 866,000
1,600
1,959,000166,000
1,5006,0006,000
6,000677,000
428,110
90.00059.000
500 700
1,034,444
Cost
$279,500 10,000 26,700 16,200
5,5006,000
260,000335,000
3,90027,000
56,000
134,500
1,00012,00085,000
300,000
206,600125.000215.000
1,068,842216,80071,950
525,000
Factories, shops, etc. Garages (public) Garages (private)
Number
$11,166,2001,820,100
Cost Number
5,50077,8006,100
175.000 46,330
615,950 456,100 47,150
228.000 16,500
111,900,800
355,500664,150
10,5502,900
65037,000
100,000503.700 313,900217.700 399,095
2,200
17,000
100,000
Cost Number
$100,260 520,500
4.700 2,000
88,126184,000
2,046,6501,023,855
2.700 4,000
43,48533,500
707,000364,800
18,400 4,500 6,000
20,00051.00020.000
158,850 235,125
7,000
27,500 3,500
557,900 105,150
707 787 148 139 28 30
217 253
3,150 2,365
101 81 99 80 83
106 903 905 349 317 159 131 696 726 577 408 377 313
137114549279324255
Cost
$204,044220,04632,51834,9835,9157,030
66.525 85,092
506,445 399,020 15,765 12,475 9,985 9,190
37,067 43,010
651,954 597,960105.522 119,48940,758 25,236
274,952 240,321 179,465173.523 245,365 235,52552,495 53,352 37,24428.525
220,269 138,57434,517 26,490
Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings
Number Cost Num
ber
$45,160 47,800
9,40011,72011,25012.500
260,00082.500 60,650 16,350 12,385 14,875 22,10040.000
102,20054.000 21,10024.00011.500
20,375 45,500 26,785 3,250
22,200 43,000
12,00014,5003,500
27,951 26,400
Cost Number
$10,000
40.00039.000
1,410,000
1,500
40.00050.000
21,500
340,000
125,000
18,000
182,944
Cost
$91,0801,166,480
200,00035,0005,600
1,839,6001,166,500
550,000
200,000
3,726,700 500,700
850,0006,200
99,000
95,575
138,57518,300
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Rochester, N . Y ............
Rockford, 111..................
Rock Island, 111............
Sacramento, Calif.........
Saginaw, M ich ..............
St. Joseph, M o ..............
St. Louis, M o ................
St. Paul, M inn..............
St. Petersburg, Fla___
Salem, Mass...................
Salt Lake City, Utah__
San Antonio, T ex_____
San Diego, Calif______
San Francisco, C alif.. .
San Jose, Calif..............
Savannah, G a...............
Schenectady, N . Y ___
Scranton, Pa..................
Seattle, W ash.......... .
Sheboygan, W is............
Shreveport, L a ..............
Sioux City, Iowa..........
Sioux Falls, S. Dak___
Somerville, Mass..........
South Bend, Ind ..........
Spokane, Wash.............
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
-1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
114221
1,779,200 379,482 210,000 18,600 2,000
75,000196,200
7,000
34184
142
1,317,583 989,730 37,000
476,000 1,500
78,500241,288
264,950 152,529
2,200
76
15,0001,000
2,648,200830,644
4 3 2 25 2 3 2
1779735
58,6007,500
22,00027.000
209,10063.000
123.000 1,130,000
785.000 192,125
2,472,385 352,750 135,140 94,890
36,60065.000
418,400 831,800234.000150.000 36,50029.000
69,50077.000
521,160 192,02585,925
180,100 95,550
102,00057.000 33,920
1315
'25"5645
24
16 161667
159
2115593710237
23,500 49,050
191,500 , 239,300
,’ 233,‘ 655" ,246,650 695,300
6,120 110,352
7,300 14,400 3,000
128,000 57,000 29,225
474,900112.650 105,86550,820
999,364 674,706 28,765
250,705115.650
2213
1113 24 4 2 1 1
110,00010,900
1.496.000178.000
2.163.000100.000292.000117.000 25,471
490,955 11,00030.00010.000
132,000
' “74,"oo5'
359,200114,000
23,500158,00050.00050.000
60,0005,000
435,80025,000
75,000
81084
59423375
141134
10
298.000 88,850
533,800 81,640
575,875 772,050
4.375 22,500 20,645 94,707
237,150 476,850325.000
4.375 297,400
44,550
109.000 95,000 31,500
337.000
6151110
136,100 903,800 41,650 56,700
267,300 260,865 136,500 166,350 16,000
’" ’ 96,"755"12,700 3,500
12,800 15,000 25,800
190.000665.000 49,680
664,8002,8008,100
135,200138.000 410,560 305,500 197,400 365,900 309,950291.000 59,0451,600
44.00079.000 81,200
593,900 611,35030.500 25,600 71,175
164,557 103,50069.50050.000
’ 120,"555"30.000
100,000 119,70027.000
341,300
2,2041,655
796601201183282222466467 17370
3,547 3,566 1,509 1,380
422 257 143 122 90
130 409 338 870 713 140 150 204 160 81 48
402 444 451 324
2,003 1,789
303 243 275 247 305 345 27 27
183 79
1,320 1,203
858 644
792,322 573,626 228,392 179,100 51,180 39,515 43,800 44,301 80,424
142,566 34,242 42,413
939,528 825,544 343,137 333,411 125,800 70,600
124,450 86,525 41,95539.386
118,950 130,159 169,646 174,008 146,48599,221 31,170 26,680 19,805 19,175
183,045 189,670 297,867 165,400 341,000 290, 96582.729 69,675 60,373 45,493 40,185 45,785 14,500 39,155
161,82857.730
304,178 271,735 101,00684.386
128,850 195,950 49,30062.500
• 46,6003.000
25,975 28,39224.10013.700 33,95015.800 78,25561.80052.800 52,20037.700 21,6002.000 1,850
56.700108.500 182,695 230,80058.800 81,711 28,805
115,01017.075 35,235 34,60038.800 1,500
37.00019.800 77,90088.250
192,0208,025
24.075 85,325 15,160 18,50018.10055.000 55,44032.250
68,000 50,050 22,675 32,200
375.000 6,850
47.000170.00050.000
385,00025,000
2,00025,000
154.000 2,290,000
138.000
87,500
’ 355'555"
" ’ 55,606
300,000
61,000 546,500 577,399 145,000
3,000
135.000286.000
260,058526.000200.000
101,345
25,000375.000160.000
1,092,000
2,083,000 338,900 330,800 10,300
361,000
456,250
603, lOO 111,000
11,500 1,896,000 1,327,660
276,000
‘ 506,’ §5&
34,75038.000
667,4753,907,500 1,130,800
117,75080.000
4,655,720941,185
329,004180,000
91,000 350,000 145,550
2, 739,400
44,000685,229
10,000
5,200
245,000458,200
5,00001
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS —Continued
City and State Year
Amusement and recreation places
Number Cost
Churches
Number Cost
Factories, shops, etc.
Number Cost
Garages (public)
Number Cost
Garages (private)
Number Cost
Gasoline and service stations
Number Cost
Institutions
Number Cost Num
ber
Office buildings
Cost
Springfield, 111____
Springfield, Mass..
Springfield, M o___Springfield, O hio..
Stamford, C on n ...
Steubenville, Ohio.
Stockton, Calif___
Superior, W is.........
Syracuse, N . Y ___
Tacoma, W ash___
Tampa, Fla............
Taunton, Mass___
Terre Haute, Ind ..
Toledo, Ohio..........
Topeka, Kans........
Trenton, N . J ........
Troy, N . Y .............
Tucson, Ariz..........
Tulsa, Okla............
1927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$60,000730.000237.000
40,0001,500
300385,000
40.00011.00030.00025.000
55972,884278.00042.90060.00030.900
292,600 169,750162.000
515,2071,432,064
12,000503,300447,500
2,800
10,616 4,000
98,670 366,000
$907,5006,000
355,00060,0009,000
37,000126,000
151,60432,275
1 6,0006 566,8001 85,0001 5,0004 41,0006 90,4005 49,900
10,000 76,000 88,500 7,400
13,300 194,725 28,400
4,00019,0004,700
1,047,80072,350
$11,100 18,000
150.000203.000 142,750 315,500139.000
90040,000
141,900 108,488 13,8Q0 47,250
405,575 344,790 985,600 422,000 103,150 427,960 69,125 3,4005.000 7,500
800,021 :, 082,500
6.000
288,882341,40045,5001,500
34,20023,850
124,300129,700
$40,500 47,400
120, 740 250,000 34,50030.00037.000 12,950
132,200
30.000 28,44923.000 9,670
40,550 405,500 211,000 74,500
156,300 26,750 3,100
20,725
40,965 23,850 13,500
463,250 4,000
12,200 111, 592
9,650 375,500 50,000 20,786 48,700
313,800 419,650
31635679962978
30139429025294
122420296136137
1,510 1,245
358228531348132 127 441 370
2,8362,378
496467402338163133 279138
1,296 1,458
$76,763 73,690
352,650 235, 570
15.110 53,995 71,327
150,910144,83529.110 29,195 53,034 36,186 21,158 20,565
549,544 465,670 44,345 30,800 73,780 46,920 39,619 41,572 90,542
.69,185 765,027 565,239 88,600 86,623
194,718 134,900 89,919 69,875 24,688 42,164
409,842 502,998
$52,50023.300 65,950 34,81467.00031.20023.000 16,59710.200 6,000
17.00021.00031.500 20,968 12,250 94,65064.100 12,000 44,00069.30027.100 7,625 1,200
35,4008,500
48,98878.50043.30023.100 61,750 70,150 18,350
. 14,650 4,025 1,250
98,900 224,600
$275,000
110,000
30,000
62,000
200,0003,290,500
155, 568
"184,500
10,000 1,328,000
95,918 260,000207.000
16,700 76,000
522.00083.000
14
$250,150
118,300175.000300.000
521,500614,900
218,000102,60031,000
2,438,000 1,177,300
20,000 56, 570
1,50010,000
72,065369,200
155,0009,300
680,3814,283,800
375,000
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
8T8I
9Union City, N . J..........
Utica, N . Y ....................
Vallejo, Calif..................
W aco, T ex____________
|° Waltham, Mass______
to Warren, Ohio.... ............
Washington, D . C ........
<Ja Water bury, Conn........
Waterloo, Iow a.............
Watertown, Mass.........
Watertown, N . Y -------
West New York, N . J__
Wheeling, W . Va..........
White Plains, N . Y ___
Wichita, Kans...............
Wichita Falls, Tex____
Wilkes-Barre, Pa..........
Wilkinsburg, Pa...........
Williamsport, Pa..........
Wilmington, D el..........
Wilmington, N . C ........
Winston-Salem, N . C__
Woonsocket, R . I___
Worcester, Mass___
Yonkers, N . Y ........ .
York, P a................... .
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 3927 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
100,000
900,00036,000
6,500160,800251,00035,000
150,6121,294,296
250,000
“ '96,"705
250,000
554,713 8b,000
822,977 604,000
178,80026,0001,000
”l84,~73713.00037.000
150.000200.000
20,000710,000
2,500
12,500 46,200 25,000
1,700
70,000
169,200
15,43253,500
30,000
8,200 1,034,500 1,236,350
22,000 13,000, 35,000 2,500
65,000
22,50045.00015.000
331.000113.000 366,500
2,9007,400
130,200139,600
256.000 35,500
103,200232.00091.00090.000
125.000 179,500 3b7,39072,400
444,500250.000844.000266.000254.000214.000
175,00036,95076.000 6,700
10.000
22417
269
111612
1212
52.00025.00079.00035.000 71,500 78,710
1,009,250 203,500 175,375
9,00063.000
695.000307.00089.000
142
13846
10827
1125
250 39,500
263,250 98,802 97,200 15,700
428,900 217,200 188,600 130,000 84,150
247,730 226,477
412131543
" T9
2427145
172
47.800687.800 78,505
1,034,77015,40010,500
’ ’ "340,"545"296.800 97,85031.800
167,175 218,025 439,300 276,500 305,72020,200
14 85,6003 66,2007 41,200
11 185,500
‘ " ‘ "49,"970"1 34,0005 82,8905 50,8001 14,5001 9,5001 7,5008 717,000
20 981,740
1 4,5004 29,5002 50,000
1 2,000
4 84,0004 84,0006 19,5845 56,0006 64,500
14 846,90010 187,60013 168,5001 2,8003 6,850
73 143,67054 107,709
5 54,2002 25,5005 58,500
2 2,500
3 150,5005 122,000
"l24“ " ’ "457,'530’79 205,07549 1,065,20051 1,463,8005 24,2003 60,000
26181
280198232886
1013620747794
1,6581,554
382296311358239220198 1917339
199 147 219 210397 3552318
175162159 111160 168 857 7943645
55153315796
449398 556 513 173 222
131.100 45,485
102,945 70,715 24,474 19,337 1,950 9,853
68,770 111, 500 86,740 16,200
469,545 460,460288.100 310,30045,70655,158
109,305112,52548,870
35,55051,87574,46351,526
159,689193,38981,34059,65513,6324,667
52,548112.090 74,861 47,423 77,670
255.091 291,60010,075 13,500
137,254 146,582 59,474 33,701
212,267 185,484 393,516 307,389 75,852 88,582
7,000
22.35046.350 25,680
9,600 57,169 5,500
28.500 14,650 41,200
124,000189,50034.30019.30014.30038.500
3,050 950
5, oOO7.000
15.500 21,610 51,00021.500 21,900 84,750 40,6503.000
28,260 15,794 11,6001,500
10,8503,000
55,30039.200 8,500
30,500 29,400 28,000 9,200
27,71541.200 33,900 80,260
188,100
2,500
100,000
53,000
9,20020,00050,000
254,000
374,113 1,078,990
386,000 20,000
1,500
91,300
110,000
"228,'226
697,755 178,631
68,00030,000
17,000
loo,"555'
199,500
6,000
65,000675,000
2,000
59,000 2,706,110 6,550,700
225.000127.000
75,000
3,00075.00065.000
227,000 1,155,375
645,000
1,370,370 1,453,469
351.000115.00045.000
221,60087,20010.000
1,992,625150,000
256,45056.20036.200
477,900
350,000
GENERAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits ^issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
City and State Year
Amusement and recreation places Churches Factories, shops,
etc. Garages (public) Garages (private) Gasoline and service stations Institutions Office buildings
Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
Youngstown, Ohio____
Zanesville, Ohio............
Total:302 cities 310 cities____
1927192819271928
381
$225,000183.000150.000
52
$144,20079,500
201463
$71,750191,950128,90011,150
187
$116,60079,200
86394711591
$180,235 136,810 i8 ,605 15,066
3315125
$111,700 41,350 39,666 26,800
12
$90,0001,400,000
2911
$300,000 521,300
4,000 30,000
19271928
943950
128,208,773 84,914,600
1,1181,009
58,890,438 49,059,444
4,1813,973
141,307,499152,649,534
4,192 3,839
74,395,804 70,690,699
181,859 156,457
65,449,178 55,140,483
4,9194,520
15,022,065 j.4, 913,812
332304
75,132,340 65,080,263
1,271 1,353
242,853,223 256,101,159
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State
Akron, Ohio_________
Alameda, Calif............
Albany, N. Y ..............
Allentown, Pa_______
Altoona, P a .—............
Amsterdam, N . Y ___
Alton, 111............. .........Anderson, Ind...........
Asheville, N . C_..........
Ashtabula, Ohio_____
Atlanta, Ga.................
Atlantic City, N. J___
Auburn, N . Y .............
Augusta, Ga.................
Aurora, 111....................
Baltimore, M d___ - __
Bangor, M e__________
Battle Creek, M ich___
Year
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Public buildings
Number Cost Num
ber
$61,000 6,500
122,655 357,000
15,600
1,754,000
3,100 22,690
863,700 194,900 161,000
12,000
Public works and utilities
Cost Number
$238,100 39,400
117,805110,00025,000
490,000
34,752
175,600 81,500
1,400 134,600
1,700,000 15,000 44,500
2,3002,838
225,00087,000
800160,000
Schools, libraries, etc.
15
Cost
$376,000469.000
5.000 36,900
350.000500.000
5.000187.000621.000 663,944
25,000767,348
85,000
75,628 1,961,029
82,500215,000
67,4472,000
662,457988.000
1,567,000550.000
6,0004,400
Sheds
Number
31349
651721
12136
2113
10 1484
250187
Cost
$11,985 13,660 6,125
31,724 2,200 3,750 2,000
24,400 25,590
290 1,140
200 2,215
937 1,050
695 67,226 30,833 76,427 8,600 1,850
2,122 2,056
700 250
3,500
1,3254,5254,6606,800
Stables and barns
Number Cost
$1001,000
1,000
" m
2050
900150
8001,200
55610
4,000
400
Stores, warehouses, etc.
Number
149116
4 197
17563019
148190441629
17151314 68 7825
2928
Cost Number
$3,429,887 1,829,558
77, 520 3,898,800
664,050 440,650 238,400 256,025 146,839
77.700 113,96451,625
206,550 508,970 392,425
2,000 19,725
1,914,050 1,329,724
658,784 99,980 25,50024.700
120,33049,040
179,400 233,950
1, 242,500 1,212,000
3,650 8,400
71,025 195,850
All other
19
Cost
$209,850
19,000
"3M 56'
800
27,400800
96,300 131,850
1,900 240
4,150
"6,"555*
6,500
Total new nonresi- dential buildings
Number
2,5352,406
294293445404730596510293115 131 114 176 171 319 249 154 159 814 767 201116 158 176 1£5 121 282 230
3,5752,399
8197
Cost
$7,005,817 5,368,352
492,901 525,500
6,128,115 4,568,515 2,355,275 2,089,715 1,166,380 1,941,125
125, 530 435, 075 248,391 744, 305
1,287,464 3,503,733 1,083,062
248,980 244,843
3,633,971 15,151,442 2,614,340 1, 240,795
550,602 197, 745 220,034 203, 662 464,462
1,089,151 8,004,700
11,037,200 672,455 332,710
3,620,566 1,933,755
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 0Oissued in 1927 and 1828, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State YearNum
ber
Public buildings
Cost Num ber
Public works and utilities
Cost
Schools, libraries, etc.
Number Cost
Sheds
Number Cost
Stables and barns
Number Cost
Stores, warehouses, etc.
Number Cost
All other
Number Cost
Total new nonresidential buildings
Number Cost
Bay City, M ich -----
Bayonne, N . J.........
Beaumont, Tex........Belleville, 111______Bellingham, Wash..
Berkeley, Calif........
Bethlehem, Pa.........
Binghamton, N . Y_
Birmingham, Ala—
Bloomfield, N. J___
Bloomington, 111___
Boston, Mass...........
Bridgeport, Conn__
Brockton, M ass.___
Brookline, Mass___
Buffalo, N. Y ...........
Burlington, Iowa___
Butler, Pa.... ............Butte, M on t.............
Cambridge, M a ss..
1927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928
$210, 500 12,000
5,280
14,500
199, 239 12,000
275,000
184,000
42,273
‘ i e i ’ ooo
1,118,638 2,715,193
109,047
372,759
12$162,900 287,770
75,000
90.00065.000
261,5065,150
16,500
5.545.0001.529.000
200,00050,90013,000
5,087,00022,100
$106,000
659,453 219,000
63,600 60,123
468,000 50,000
193,977 920,186 215,427
190.000116.000
3,989,264181,70070,000
120,000
60,000144,000
3,762,9491,455,000
31 $4,4756,220
40120
12,171 23,175
1,000900200
5,6607,9501,0003,000
316212168
5666
336,032 233,369 14,040 7,300
10,945 15,845
1,325 31,430 43,900 1,000
50 13,400
75,000
36,000420,00029,700
6006,8556,790
$23,200
5,625100
2,0002,000
5,0002,500
10,000
10,240
$1,000
5 12 8026
13 30 35 164
1519
294181586
1213
127 1422314 18
1039
13942211
1,600
16,500 172,000 504,714 20,000
101.500 135,950 160,390 191,55963,150 81,250
148, 975164.000
2,994,043 2,039,435
692.45023.00069.000
129.000 3,972,567 5,664,050
120,050 364,800 30,335
131.450 858,700247.000
1,015,800 2,815,875
10.000 6,600 8,000
15,000900
352.500 1,405,518
4 169
35113136
56
$6,450 4,100 8,850
85, 785 8,236 9,726
17,450 38,350
23.00060.000
33,5009,775
$336222119120 239 115 235 272 736 540 355 310 538 537 845 863 500 4366251
1,7331,630
662505343325147151
3,2092,758
48108451574
290
$220,6201,261,001
984.200 838,800
1,302,436 348,881 650, 592 384,105
1,608,404 717, 399 647,191
1,990,390 1,873, 610 1,497,896 9,630,442 5,665,329 1,486,077
562,100327.200 718,300
22,832,331 21,013,882 1,594,552 1,107, 524
337,945 715,958
1,361,527 673, 245
18,273,674 12,468,309
407,000 224,771 44,440 32,048
203,550 5,250,845 3,564,813
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CiTIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Camden, N . J ................
Canton, Ohio_________
Cedar Rapids, Iowa___
Central Falls, R . I ____
Charleston, S. C______
Charleston, W . V a____
Charlotte, N . C _______
Chattanooga, Tenn ..
Chelsea, Mass................
Chester, Pa......... ...........
Chicago, 111.....................
Chicopee, Mass_______
Cicero, HI.......................
Cincinnati, Ohio______
Clarksburg, W . V a___
Cleveland, Ohio............
Clifton, N. J....... ..........
Colorado Springs, Colo.
Columbia, S. C .........
Columbus, Ga...............
Columbus, Ohio............
Council Bluffs, Iow a. _
Covington, K y ..............
Cranston, R . I ..............
Cumberland, M d _____
Dallas, Tex___________
435,040
50014,000
9,50035.00015.000
8,275,600 2,584, 000
22,600 215,000
90,000
60,000
300,000
9,000
748,300 61,892
65,000115,000
4,000
"i,"505‘
285
1,896,600 2,797,800
4,000
68,50062,000
66,000810,000
5,470,000300
40,000
35,000
3,450
61,000180,000
35.00020.000
100,000
8,000 181,700 43,000
200,000 288,727
13,495,00015,796,100
175.000359.000 85,000
1,060,0001,532,000
75.00095.000
3,357,500 3,026,900
78,000384,000
15,000 1,610,000
500,000
6,000100,000
192,250113,960
10,0002,5005,1454,9359,345
1,700 1,495
775 1,600
600 20,605 3,600
12,905 4,075 1,550
325
396194363442
8487146
14487
334,98588,29514,8107,640
700300
50,17537,685
500625
10,9505,9004,7555,1212,2304,845
40
89, 650 63,950
900750
2,150100400
88,25627,752
3,000 1,200 3,050
"“ 675
17,000
19,300 16,700
7,800
7,00011,000
12575
1,80015,300
5001,500
750
600400
100
5,7008,500
3133506450
10258
218
568
2626139
16318517 22 13 12 12 15 39 27 67 64 24 19 12 157
18 6 3
85126
596,880 1,728,750
103,999 76,725
158,925 136,900
4,3006,650
15,990500.000 127,200 278,795 669,950 323,673 256,83041,500
118,500314.30099.000
15.815.40017.141.400
24,3005,350
108.000 191,885252.300 365,28048,025 59,850
7,610,250 6,657,800
54,750127.900 25,140 91,09029.40074.100
156,34091, 330
1,030,400752.900 146,000 347, 50047.40076.00028.100 53,250 58,828 17,800
3,035,317 1, 627,948
161
22,50018,3401,800
18 39,470
50
3
26,621
8,956"2,100
911
63,30050,000
200
15
18,00015,609
40 6,440
43
27,5006,000
22
1,500900
..........
53537384366448447495395554
228234165215484
73214159
9,3506,640
224194233214
1,8541,800
197183
4,9634,137
560499281274119 132 115 102
2,9402,577
120 103 212 158 421 504 149 115 536 559
2, 171,065 5,597,140 1,185,139
902,297 1,618, 236 1,167, 691
505, 215 138, 345 166,134 222,928 663,034
1,302, 890 1,611,165 2,406,974 2,445,870 2,115,194
141, 605 325, 540 637,840 522, 867
117,156, 435 123,535,408
612,460 724,965
1,153, 725 1,022, 514 6,399, 305 7,936, 755
328, 780 668, 215
18,400,700 28,894,450
529, 700 897,860 114,670 274,026 593, 205 239, 695 340, 632 284,124
8, 674, 6503, 256, 190
321,000 440, 050 425,110 315,200 333,684 832, 024 357,606 640, 411
5, 502,371 3,005,916
0 tel
§
r*
1
00
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings {new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 00issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
City and State Year
Public buildings
Public works and utilities
Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and
barnsStores, warehouses, etc. All other Total new nonresi
dential buildings
Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
Danville, 111................... 1927 3 $11,000 66,280 1,175
17 $82,3021928 1 $3,000
22,90012 32 153,073
Davenport, I o w a .__ 1927 14 $17,150 12,320 10,487 32,630
2 5 324 1,238,447 424,7121928 1 $4,100 1 $6,000
1,227, 26626 13 220,080
94,700 206,400 537,725
1,213,000 712,250
4,372,350 422,043 204,825
8,894,416 13,105, 210
280Dayton, Ohio________ 1927 6 33 2 1,185 8 1,462
1,2393,494, 096 2,984,121 2,351,820
1928 74 14Decatur, HI___________ 1927 5 $131,500
358,2002 75.000
50.000536.000651.000
65 7691928 6 1 118 616 1,939,210
Denver, Colo_________ 1927 2 707 139,40092,4504,1254,418
83 276 $162,450 1,973 5,859, 6501928 3 33,650 12 520 132 1,400
6586,630,700 1,053, 611Des Moines, Iowa _ __ 1927 3 85,000
1,065,00021 1 100 72
1928 1 523,000 1,101,639
154,813 203,278
2 25 1 100 48 24 59,850 659 2,478,845Detroit, M ic h _____ 1927 5 33 4,055, 582
3,814,860635 21 251,050
1,068,00012,776 63,132,176
1928 5 25 618 9 12,181 265
48,405,234 806,737Dubuque, Iowa 1927 1 1 250.000
125.000 1,600
38 10, 592 5 15,30036,600
803,3001928 1 2 240,231
14,0004 154 474, 925
Duluth, Minn _ _ 1927 3 715,000 2 1 62 24,585 7 10,025 10 11 4,976 511 1,822, 6661928 2 27,500 45 6,125 1 100 11 68,000 4 839,950 402 1,308, 218
Durham, N . C __ 1927 5 42,800 3 332,826 5 5,150 26 168,875 166,300
90 1,063,2061928 2 10,990
20,0004 7,421,198
59,808 406,000
1 2,000 25 2 10,000 77 8,089,953East Chicago, Ind 1927 1 3 18 80,100
56,0906,000
194 2,010,7971928 2 4 1,400
3,65011 159 2,175, 649
220,135East Cleveland, Ohio— 1927 5 1 1411928 11 1,350,000 6 1,375 1 14,000 136 1,492,961
Easton, Pa 1927 4 39.500 19,850
101,00077.500 70,000 56,800
349,240 261,869
110 424,4271928 1 8,000
12,2401 96,210 3 89 223,914
East Orange, N . J 1927 1 10,000 1,057,797
2 2 700 3 18,624850
19 11 124,9009,380
472 1, 628, 5341928 4 1 493, 598
106,0004 2,800
1,8001 20 11 385 2, 634,862
East Providence, R . I_ 1927 4 18 3 290 1,222, 3001928 2 750,000
20,00013 4,800
2,6307 320 1,494,092
East St. Louis, Til 1927 1 2 198,000 6 41 1 725 533 2,960,7361928 1 23,000 2 400 41 7 850 426 646,446
Elgin, "Hi 1927 2 800 8 90,800 2 1,500 347 389, 5231928 3 182,000
687.000489.000
321 957, 505 2,911,500 2,022,100
Elizabeth, N . J 1927 3 106,000 3 73,000 1 15,000678,000
11 6711928 2 1 2,566 2 600 11 5 98,000 582
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Elkhart, Ind..................
Elmira, N . Y .................
E l Paso, T ex..................
Erie, Pa.............._..........
Evanston, HI.................
Evansville, Ind.............
Everett, Mass...............
Everett, W ash________Fall River, Mass--------
Fitchburg, Mass...........
Flint, M ic h . . ...............
Fond du Lac, W is____
Fort Smith, Ark...........Fort Wayne, Ind..........
Fort Worth, Tex...........
Fresno, C alif.. . . ...........
Galveston, Tex.............
Gary, Ind..... ..................
Grand Rapids, M ich ..
Great Falls, M ont........
Green Bay, W is............
Greensboro, N. C .........
Greenville, S. C ._ ........
Greenwich, Conn.........
Hagerstown, M d ..........
Hamilton, Ohio_______
Hammond, Ind_______
9.0008.000
146,000
739,95314,000
100,000
110,800
1,100
13
10750.000 622.960277.000
943,877
47,650
16,000142,000
1,000
8,000 362,640 30,000
111,500117,000
987,00035,000
3,060
18,00012,000
180,713
12,8001,200,000
10,9203,275
5,00026,000
180,000
14,50027,329
127,00024,50077,000
65,350 459,000
200,000
214,000
8,000
28,7056,000
247
108
1.026,5001.365.0001.765.000
326,779 379,541
680,084
5,000 1,233, 216
846.950
""loo ,’ 666"486,978 140.000 81,304
325.950
1410
732,242 378,799
35,00012,500
"573,'266 ' 111,000 816,135
280,601 749,095 660,000
4,000168,00095,000
270,60020,000
101,000
112
50050
2,600
70 16,920
13
1,0001,040
2142
3,500 3,000
14,751 2,550
8 850
41234
700 14,800 16,342
1 1,000
2 200
3............
2
275
’ " ‘ i,’ 576"
"15.456"44,000
3 11,066
31284
13 20 34 135
13 19 26 11 10 105
3619212
939517 8
135940
2997924441613 56 21
102616
1418 18 27 48 10 16 17 111
852.425112.850
4,750208.850 161,312 629,190 525,72945.400
236,300493.500131.750 39,500
124,000168,100367.450 95,755 74,550 48,350
1,200 655,283 780,585150.700 30,17515.400
519,165 653,415
t, 451,438 217,495 171,410155.450 69,230
273.700 L, 628,100
118.750 L, 364, 900
618.500 67,445
601,272 332,145 407,049 308,737 551,521 24,200
163,170274.425 128,55055,000
19,250 33,650
520,300 530,700
3 990
31313
1,875 11,100 63,650
22
480175
9291
2,370 115,907
1021
10,1254,207
911
7,8412,110
76 76,000
1 7,500
1
"""is"
245
4,755"
30 18,709
2825
67,99536,320
1 10,000
2 1,400
302315300214280860754627441493536217211192299229160106
2,5702,354
197197286919819
1,055578306268252281
1,000692
2,7051,674
2082023532752222168784
183178222163208213368326
1,743,438 242,355 212, 684 362,021 650,437 856,388
1,209,335 1,643,034 3,082,855 4,107,175 1,425,740 3,291,840
586,015 544,258 415,290 441,410
2,002,148 342, 507 459,615
8, 584,192 4,525,208
378,705 290.631 817,696
1,973,790 1,970, 621 8, 746, 501 1,291,916 1,452,927
725,007 603,878 761,876
5,090,570 1,511,300 3,799,970 2,716,145
524, 231 1, 735,822 1, 528,456
997,681 2,188,4182.489.279
338,720 437,905
1,143,490 1,177,445
496,475 161,690 496,185 382,447
1,209,6003.298.280
O
W>tr*
0003
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PART 2 —NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS— Continued
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits 00issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
City and State Year
Public buildings
Public works and utilities
Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and
barnsStores, warehouses, etc. All other Total new nonresi
dential buildings
Number Cost Num
ber Cos Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost N um
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
TTamt.ramn.lr, Mich 1927 1 $5,000 13 $120,980 200 $773,6001928 1 $6,800 11 $1,040
70010 127,850
85,125 72, 250
1,417,283 1,158,292
205 652. 7301927 1 1,000 2 14 305 543,7901928 2 $3,020,000
1,624,3001 $35,000
907,783 1,585,000
13 297 3,499,135 8> 484,914 4,700,917
1927 3 8 307,060 23,315
6 47 14,06522,320
520
3 2,03013,000
65 7601928 5 3 42 2 35 30 $32," 492 581
Haverhill, Mass 1927 1 35,000 7 3 1,950 2 1,150 3 6,500 187 266,2001928 16 3,350
5,8363 1,575 10 20,600 1 450 178 172, 790
Hazleton, Pa 1927 1 6,400 2 20 277,663 145 998,0291928 1 7,530
350,0007 47,938 2 564 75 668,724
Highland Park, M ich. 1927 1 1 134,000 6 19,200 161,240
141 1,079,5251928 3 5,300
1,00012 180 1,310.667
Hoboken, N . J 1927 1 150,000 1 10.000 2 1 2,500 1 6,800 35 1,049,1501928 2 1,900
4.8501.850
2 51,000 38 250,290Holvoke Mass 1927 1 4,500 13 9 54,900 172 230,200
1928 1 4,500 10 2 1,400 4 17,250 2,881,739
3 14,500 159 420,900Houston, Tex 1927 2 135,900
367, 5003 734,013
373,968 5,000
16 955,916 2,303,257
163 82 84,001 582 11,408,844192819271928 1928
5 31
23 2 13,000700
178 3,105,919 47, 750
274 946,292 818 16,510, 555 784,911Huntington, W . V a___ 6 1 50 34 223
1 20,000 25 2.5005.500
11,0727,3326.500
50
6 700 3 15,000 166 461,700Hutchinson K!ans 50 2 225 37 460,650 306 600,120Indianapolis, Ind 1927
1928 1927
30 522, 754 29 485,915 2 1,800,000903,500
100 162 1,525,055 2,043,095
132,925
5,031 10,427,4694 73 153 3,162 8,100,473
Irvington, N . J 2 85,063 2 1 1,500 17 17 14,660 797 1,207,9271928 1 220,000
190,0001 7 126,500 21 62,680 557 1,414,453
1,415,848Jackson, IVEich 1927 1 25 19,680 21,071 40,970 29,875
47 150, 775 4811928 60 37 210,275 465 443,240
Jacksonville, Fla 1927 5 241,900 130,000
17 706,250128,150
1 6.5003.500
600,500 362,000
139 133 1,756,390 428,350 168,750 52,800
339,000 177,740
664 49,735 1,442 5,034,530
J amestown N Y192819271928 1927
1 5 13
102 2 7,075 8220
121 9,490 699351
1,555,475 1,322,775
2 2 1,100 9 253 699,990Jersey C ity N J 19 2,011,069
1,149,0254 4,800
19,750 1,232 1,857
2 1,500 42 514 7,636,8251928 18 1 250,000 14 2 26,500 22 423 5,272,194
Johnstown, Pa 1927 40 7 38,000 1 400 235 429,1831928 2 250,000 27 1 5,500 5 17,325 192 616,191
Joliet Til 1927 1 600 13 95,400 49 558,9501928 1 3,950 4 96,655 15 779,000 62 1,360,928
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Joplin, M o .....................
Kalamazoo, M ich____
Kansas City, Kans___
Kansas City, M o_____
Kearny, N . J.................
Kenosha, W is.............. .
Kingston, N . Y_.......... .
Knoxville, Tenn...........
Kokomo, Ind............... .
Lakewood, Ohio______
Lancaster, Pa________
Lansing, M ich_______
Lawrence, M ass,........
Lebanon, Pa................
Lewiston, M e..............
Lexington, K y .............
Lima, Ohio...................
Lincoln, Nebr..............
Little Rock, Ark.........
Long Beach, Calif____
Lorain, Ohio................
Los Angeles, Calif____
Louisville, K y .............
Lowell, M ass..............
Lynchburg, Va—........
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
16,0004,000
73,920
275,000
23,000 156, 787
21, 741
175,000 86,450
392,330
20
500,000 29 841,844 30,000 29 704,702
1 150,000 1,185,000
1 65,0002 250,000 1 36,000
8,350* Includes stables and
41,000
41,50033.00055.000
155,300 1,200
47,520 480,000
80,000380,000
26,300
'l66,"o55'
65,500 690,525
1,146,000 500
299,900 42,000
108,000
233.000 6,000
813.000110.000
1,200
245,200 80,000 80,000
618,275 330,000
268,000334.000185.000
1,060,00053,000
150,000
84,200107,000
40,000635,000
53,000 171,800
1,963,825 4,825,645 1,463,400
984,500
26,000145,036
4442245
4733
106250
54 1, 750 4 1,459
415 403 43 26 27 19
4202,150
9,6006,3001,000
2005,5509,3755,9356,315
22,20090,587
870150
16,650 5,100
7001,000
7,030 1,350
85 375
23,375 9,525
325 300
4 519,482 * 613,326
311,170 45,010 6,010 5,105 4,755 5,890
814132
4,1005,0001,400
6,4001,200
57615,600
205
5,000450
500
(5)(5)
20,8005,6452,500
795585
79
106
32615171
2022219
6276049064
, 24,254, 129,
6 Included with sheds.
173,85092.000 74,072
187,060260.650 227,655 896,200
1,016,150 21, 56022.000
300,050 186,115175.650 36,850
283,080
6,775 35,780 8,360
19,770 356,815 56,270
178,450 455,000 20,300
259,325 5,000
79,000
125, 252, 68, 35, 84,
101, 323, 242, 296, 814,
2,043, 101, 201,
10,889, 8,662, 1,049, 1, 563,
1 50
4767
4,600 35,850
3 4,500
3 1,345
11 7,115
6 49,225
3 70,000
1 4,000
223 1, 450,650
109113
728,237 267,626
75
9,350315
145127333294278353926646304273433346282235550485246 307 482 350 179 158 557 501 143 127 220663627
253187 190 166 539 550 248 228
1,794 1,957
231 266
13,551 11,680 1,131 1,223
247188 184 156
723,175 298,993
1,198,058 918,953 740, 365 908,832
4,164,832 6,880,075 2,993, 395 3,170,160 2, 538,195
807,141 996,120 336,956
2,141, 262 2,875,200
240,179 108,751 494,810 949,646 985,010 689,845
5,283, 515 2,914,862
534,145 323,300240.000302.000 318,600821.000
1,140, 260604, 719 329, 735 209,117
2,148,548 1,578,142
865, 627 1,225,386 6,577, 740 6,886,070
392,149 264,574
42,090,606 29,302,619 12,189,070 7,211,820
278,460 460,205 924,671 416, 534
0 3CJ*
GENEBAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairsf alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
00
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State YearNum
ber
Public build-
Cost
Public works and utilities
Number Cost Num
ber
Schools, libraries, etc.
Cost
Sheds
Number Cost
Stables and barns
Number Cost
Stores, warehouses, etc.
Number Cost Num
ber
All other
Cost
Total new nonresi- dential buildings
Number Cost
Lynn, Mass_______
McKeesport, Pa___
Macon, Ga.__.........
Madison, W is..........
Malden, Mass.........
Manchester, N . H_.
Mansfield, Ohio___
Marion, Ind_______
Marion, Ohio______
Medford, Mass........
Memphis, Tenn___
Meriden, Conn____
Miami, Fla________
Milwaukee, W is___
Minneapolis, Minn.
Mobile, A la..............
Moline, 111________
Montclair, N . J------
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$2,8801,400
8,100
68,500
3,000,000 700
247,000 1,530,000 1,057,370
12,000
$340,0006,500 $15,000
90,000 219,400780,000
604,864460,000
15,000375,000
25,000
$13,079 8,175 1,185 9,835
11,250 3,100 1,752
930 5,895 1,480 4,322 3,625 1,800 2,591
23,000 1,500 4,565
390,000
24,5002,700
593,9533,500
1,400,30021,000
100,00070,000
292.500851.500
6,535875
37,05020,670
6,800 157,500 70,000
400,000 600
1,698,897 1,968,000
590,770 1,423,530
275,440 162,500
841223773952221
17,518 15, 732
268,661 384,740
1,850 2,580
825
230,000
$80024,742
1,500
8003,920
400
1,166'
7,800780
3,000
3,1504,000
60
20011,000
142665
3249421824131312128479
1471317805317
10465
10964
10315128214 7
195
$144,050245.000 76,85027.000
173.000 486, 774 415,297323.100 341,475157.100 104, 73550,185
183,850 99,10016.000
180.000 17,840
135,315 134, 525109.000
2,363,890 1,118,390
12,000 18,350
740, 772 215,130
1,794,775 1,669, 200 3,501,500 1,332,950
112.000 211,500
11,880 45,340
404.100 48,600
10
121991
$9,050 11,081
15,700
600
4,750
8,450
2,500 317,460 66,347
290,695 73,015
2,500
39,0005,500
426482216193118
497293212306267299243100172322473387390
1,0741,088
187149
4,383 3,297 2,892 2,729
67 560 198 188 405
$1,069,639 942,769 335,757 864,541
1,307,747 749,070
I ,138,935 1,929,567 1,163,061
388,597 870,583 262, 735 824,140
1,005,055 326,300 861,660 131,965 666,445 762,351 635,187
4,992,355 6,123,384
354,163 230, 726
$.619, 752 644,633
11,814,718 11,714,443 10,070,860 10,788,640
907,128 1,467,854
245,888 905,356
1,092,524 416,211
BUILDINGS PEEM
ITS IN
THE PR
INCIPAL,
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Montgomery, A la.........
M ount Vernon, N . Y__
Muncie, Ind..................
Muskegon, M ich_____
Muskogee, Okla............
Nashville, Tenn_..........
Newark, N. J.................
Newark, Ohio................
New Bedford, M a ss...
New Britain, Conn___
New Brunswick, N . J_
Newburgh, N. Y ______
New Castle, Pa.............
New Haven, Conn___
New London, C on n .—
New Orleans, La..........
Newport, K y .................
Newport, It. I ...............
Newport News, Va___
New Rochelle, N . Y__
Newton, Mass...............
New York City, N . Y .: The Bronx..............
Brooklyn.................
M anhattan............
Queens.....................
Richmond.... ..........
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928
20,000600,000
111, 595
325,250
1,006,161 162,181
2,500
45,497
27,200
37,000
15,"OOO
32,000
1
" 2 "
4 3
11158
11995 2
130.000
"” 153,'555'
205.000185.000
2.245.0002.163.000
695.000 1,835,5001.078.000
657.000360.000 80,000
239,1002,500
14,000
2,087,000
157,500177,950
8,000
115,150 206,500
150,000 1,397, 768
18,000 478,735
5.0001.000
21,000
75,000200,000
768,300330,600
5,280202,000
714,970275,000
193,600 255,175 15,000
1,083,000599.000
4,500969.000
450.000 2,000
156,458526.000
155,000
124,600
"§55,"555’6.515.0001.008.000
803,686 1, 318,672
95,800
261,000 457,879191.500
3.625.0008.604.000
12.461.0007.262.0007.380.0004.115.000
11,308,7002.986.000
739.5001.268.000
87
80100
265
316118134 3
145835
142
97
3,5552,0553,4072,8537,400
6,715 810
7,455 38,580 47,912 11, 510
950 800
36,045 7,230
525 124,743
6,370 14,495
104,999 88,898 4,525 2,200
31,243 62,105
2,3902,300
2,861 10,195 9,840 3,255 2,480
1,500500
62,936 59,070 18,577 25,600
10,5001,800
2,0052,2854,1509,500
1,300
8003,800
6,9306,700
300750
70010,0301,000
104,95058,450
1501,500
57920301311192299
3772
143117
4
2111932087153
440402103137
194.600 511,773324.600 700,08835,635 75,210
284,900 198,800 15,250 82,475
251,5,50 796,300
6,173,088 1,595,179
96,000
95,400134,650240,450
40,8007,000
182.700171.700
2,50020.500
200,000 323,60083.500 81,900
1,349,204580,83954,54522,20042,00012.500 38,553
146,951 169,450203.900 304,500251.900
4,695,950 5,864,700 3,236,800
10,471,250 20,929,600 8,443,500 5,774,810 5,754,550
608.700 537,627
_____ f_________
1 300
1411
157,90629,725
3 5,700
45 1,685
313
22,5006,380
4 12,600
2 12,306
28847382645
219241124142
1,500 926,195 884,820 23,960 85,040 75,713
111, 110 35,642 80,024
106 357,100494 1, 721, 743346 3, 778,182306 2,658,950575 1,576,535661 1,287,134266 544, 587289 611,997102 574,747108 215,980293 4,186,760347 2,977,875
1,731 20,963,7451,217 11,797,202
157 401,831180 700,016552 769,217235 527,653351 1,258,765381 886,658185 1,412,450124 691,745128 675,890138 559,475429 1,737,935286 419,915605 8,886,272470 5,250,094220 226,675225 396,065346 5,394,166349 4,552,27174 217,54551 66,010
168 399,940156 255,220118 56,602177 252,908296 1,007,529276 1,590,822542 2,677,991474 1,107,685
1,582 30,621,9511,698 35,047,6647,190 55,842,335'5,997 52,818,900
504 151,721,515614 137,967,920
8,406 39,698,6187,801 25,374,5151,310 3,331,5831,413 5,688.928
O«%W>rHIWFSI
0 0
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PART 2.—NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Contmned
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
City and State Year
Public buildings
Public works and utilities
Schools, libraries, etc. Sheds Stables and
barnsStores, warehouses, etc. All other Total new nonresi
dential buildings
Num ber Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost
1927 4 $21,500 1 $375,000 26 $5,430 2 $1,150 39 $171,357 511 $1,578,8811928 1 $40,000 5 642,300 2 236,249 17 1,480 4 440 59 192,525 11 $9,400 513 1,822,875
Norfolk, Va 1927 1 600,000 OQK 7f)A1 15,000 34 5,535 9 1,130 20 132,859 547 969,714
1928 3 43,200 4 1 161 000 30 6 245 x 150 21 155,850 543 1,205, 253Norristown, Pa 1927 1 9,000 2 450,500 10 ’ 610 3 2,100 9 88,650 163 878,712
1928 11 751 9 75,150 158 407,025Norwalk, Conn 1927 1 800 12 10,750 1 12,500 14 149,460 281 1,221,860
1928 2 300,000 32 53,125 2 8,000 13 197,300 306 1,854,280Oakland, C^lif 1927 3 187,600 17 460,797 18 2,137,095 10 14,040 111 1,633,765 33 173,618 2,258 8,892,612
1928 1 7,500 19 324,530 14 1,408,086 16 11,670 98 3,636, 264 18 52,696 1,783 8,934,559Oak Park, 111 1927 1 7,000 3 910,000 3 2,050 7 199,500 557 2,083,231
1928 3 30,000 3 239,994 1 2,000 12 638,500 2 12,300 450 2,158,796Ogden Utah 1927 1 5,000 1 35,000 39 83,810 53 206,460
1928 x 200,000 3 1,700 16 118,425 40 726,025nirlflllATnfl Pifrr Alrlo 1927 -- 30 002 2 42 100 4 383,000 4 390 80 961,075 1,357 5,342,218UiviaUUilicI) VJllj y VJilcli.
1928 j 38 302 2 26* 200 14 1 073 383 19 6 410 1 1,800 113 909,098 1,248 3,538,1211927 1 *750 5
JL} \J4 0f UOO143,400 2 *650 5 2,460 1 800 39 189,425
1928 2 140,000 9 38,050 20 182,065Omaha, Nebr___ ___ 1927 3 285,000 8 2,440 11 17,995 65 505,590 20 46,645 469 1,644,450
1928 3 192,000 30 134,825 83 965,640 9 39,000 535 5,164,123Orange, N. J 1927 3 850 1 850 13 123,350 192 1,026,776
1928 1 150,000 17 574,780 144 1,401,690Oshkosh, Wis 1927 2 24,090 1 7,000 219 200,505
1928 1 25,000 2 250 7 38,300 198 147,858Ottumwa, Iowa_ 1927 2 700 1 300 7 23,200 64 271,750
1928 4 22,000 62 123,650Paducah, K y 1927 5 1,500 8 30,000 33 42,000
1928 2 450 15 22,600 51 121,855Pasadena, Calif 1927 1 25,746 4 16,250 11 456,924 73 1,106,075 614 3,730,499
1928 6 15,700 5 380,828 39 676,310 162 55,333 624 1,672,324Passaic, N . J 1927 3 28,800 1 512,825 3 600 24 340,425 291 1,679,474
1928 21 131,500 1 150 14 238,522 266 806,407Paterson, N . J 1927 1 49,000 3 11,000 9 5,596 52 665,225 1 335 603 1,665,227
1928 5 279,000 1 48,579 6 1,700 1 400 55 1,046,875 3 4,200 453 3,628,151Pawtucket, Hr I 1927 1 3,000 22 3,170 1 250 16 134,750 469 759,190
1928 2 25,000 I 155,000 16 2,165 1 400 8 34,600 4 1,266 440 506,309
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Peoria, 111......................
Perth Am boy, N . J__
Petersburg, V a ............
Philadelphia, Pa.........
Phoenix, Ariz________
Pittsburgh, Pa............
Pittsfield, Mass______
Plainfield, N . J............
Pontiac, M ich..............
Port Arthur, Tex____
Port Huron, M ich___
Portland, M e...............
Portland, Oreg_______
Portsmouth, Ohio___
Portsmouth, V a ..........
Poughkeepsie, N . Y__
Providence, R . I_____
Pueblo, Colo................
Quincy, 111...................
Quincy, Mass________
Racine, W is.................
Reading, Pa.................
Revere, Mass_...........
Richmond, Ind.............
Richmond, Va_______
Roanoke, Va....... ..........
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
3 148,000
348,845 110,000 28,800
1,077,468 16,000
399,000
200,657 33,915
92,00069,200
33,753 463,000
1,432,364
11,000
53,870
176,000
1,407,50016,000
1,497,656
1,500110,600386,000183,627
82,0002,819,600
12,000
704,00012,0001,800
15,960
30,00044,400
3,600
45,000
9,314,825 6,285,790
107.300 693,386633.300
1,531,4356,500
343,755
1,956,775
443,000
85,000
"1,478,700 745,200
392,081 1,917,000
340,000 62,200
279,500 1,250, 000
52, 472420.000
78,369215.000
11,000 571,164
677,540
5669
345329
5 46
1421
89426535101420333
22
1627424
3
32,67510,230
2,700
2,190 16,913 11,910 4,900 7,750
634 4,550 5,050 2,048
14,878
750 13,211 8,400
261,125 454,225
1.825 1,800
5121.825
350 500
53,600 17,250 11,080 4,287 1,870 6,925
24, 710 12,851
525 14,050 12,725 10,000
1,950 250 100
174,989 106,883
3,060
1 17,2203 3,0502 5755 1,5253 1,800
14,000
171,00023,000
1,050800
2005,000
5,000
9,000500
1,1002,500
900
210186613
9513319 17 13 16 82 737
54 113 5
13 80 85 1220 54
1514 73 79 22 23 1216 29 37 27 1755 17 138
12 17
2321074748
366,500 588,650 42, 545
139,900
16,600 6,882,405 6,323, 240
695,163 164,000
2,789, 350 1,796,614
57,410 28,650
163,450 191,113 524,845 403,130
3,440 177,467 33,800 5,600
145.650 697,020 987,935
1,347,55517.700
237.925 22,5006,500
177,725224.925
1,170,850 1,295,920
120,250 45,37256.700
189.650 457,625
1, 246,800 168, 275 98, 750
222, 375 79,050 23,100 45,450
104,900 50,350
2,063,309 1,204, 349
417,640 329,449
2 26,000
6546
319,435170,920
54281
236,64182,255
800
I 3,000
1215
20093,0004,450
11
300700
1 4,500
413
56,750110
1 700
5312
8,0001,8006,0001,000
578525155129 47 74
2,2361,930
189233
2,3111,979
2132083784158759442352295347
318364
3,7602,939
141 117 120 111 116130
1,192 1,176
452397198166755813638454524408106120161142
1,463826394325
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 2.— NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Continued
City and State YearNum
ber
Public buildings
Cost Number
Public works and utilities
Cost Number
Schools, libraries, etc.
Cost
Sheds
Number Cost
Stables and bams
Number Cost
Stores, warehouses, etc.
Number Cost
All other
Number Cost
Total new nonresidential buildings
Number Cost
Rochester, N . Y ..........
Rockford, 111............ ...
Rock Island, 111______
Sacramento, Calif____
Saginaw, M ich ............
St. Joseph, M o ............
St. Louis, M o ..............
St. Paul, M in n ...........
St. Petersburg, F la ...
Salem, Mass........... .
Salt Lake City, Utah.
San Antonio, Tex........
San Diego, C alif.........
San Francisco, Calif. -
San Jose, Calif_______
Savannah, Ga..............
Schenectady, N . Y _ „ .
Scranton, Pa................
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927 19231927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$7,250 13,000
$457,200 80,500
10 $2,264,714 3,851,007
9581,410
69,500160,000
2, 111, 969 108,150
1,293,000
35.000 70,410
"§i9,‘ 77625.000
16,675 1,400 7,500 8,965
12,030 11,823 7,281
6,400,0001,000,000
114,000
26,000330,000
192,1001,700
150,00038,000
54,0006,5003,3005,000
965,300 1,146,600
942.000 9,283
235.000
20976957
5,230 168, 177 150,826
54,000
450.000125.000
661,000
2,90060075
7004,220
22,370
623,689281,39061,694
75,000 59,300
435,950 1,023, 740 1,363,781
21,200 12,075
327,500 65,000
275,778 1, 712,124 1,761,689
158,790
225211
19165937
45,773 45,667 23,995 30,150 19,470 9,835
77.000 2,300
90.000158,000
1,078,203
5,0003,6505,8408,515
$33,700
400'
605510
30,000
750
3,500200
2,000500
$516,657 506,350 683,125 373,200 20,000
40561623 21 15
1592192828561817103252
112127122109146101353024 28 24 20 172
1,
365,775 582,602 132, 500 400,348 202,600 79,050
569,300 503,175 399,166 440,280388.500 34,800
125, 700 187,050 193, 440 394,035 681, 320 190,081 910,906 142,390 421,041 502,985 374,340 467,060 417,075 193,425 160,100 262,000 79,255
236.500
49
182375
182014540
$2,175 34,455
50 5,000
18,050
3, 275
1,000
215,090 406,989 15,300
8,700 22, 370
469,979 10,240 20,000
1,100
2,508 1,914
888 684 230 185 455 344 581 601 211 148
4,946 4,963 1, 754 1,818
598 329 170 152 182 248 626 743
1,402 1,210
450 445 336 283 120 91
468 506 505 372
$10,127,687 7,529,025 1,736,417 1, 560, 225
710,0«0 50,015
3,914, 434 1,326,452 2,342, 752 2,252,556
362, 392 1, 504, 443
16, 730,810 15,658, 349 2,493,993 2,497,320 1,196, 500
691,900 1,032; 225
581,125 1, 020,465 1,633,216 3,502,430 8,071,194 4,309,344 3,910,839 9,952, 532
11,356,816 1,846,180
932,000 587,130 580,404
1,330,245 1,117,570 3,848,965 1,897,498
BUILD
ING
PEEM
ITS IN
THE PEIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Seattle, W ash______
Sheboygan, W is____
Shreveport, La........
Sioux City, Iowa___
Sioux Palls, S. D ak___
Somerville, Mass___
South Bend, Ind___
Spokane, Wash........
Springfield, HI_____
Springfield, Mass__ .
Springfield, M o.......Springfield, Ohio___
Stamford, Conn___
Steubenville, Ohio__
Stockton, Calif.........
Superior, W is...........
Syracuse, N . Y ........
Tacoma, W ash........
Tampa, Fla..............
Taunton, Mass........
Terre Haute, Ind___
Toledo, Ohio............
Topeka, Kans..........
Trenton, N . J ...........
Troy, N . Y ...............
Tucson, Ariz............
Tulsa, Okla..............
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
42,000590,250
28,300
18,13029.00020.000
60,0009,065
129,000
" 32,600
5,744
121,874 73,273
27,000
113,000
19,000125.000 121,10040.000
106,000
7,860301,500
66,00040,500
15,0009,840
’ l25,'666~
‘495,'665" 191,250
41,500856*800
3,00015,350
’~'i2,'566‘
’"'87,"666" 20,000
140,000
37,500650,00015*000
145,650
45.00026.000
"i06,~863"170,000
9.00013.000 81,1506,3005,000
540,600
23,900155,000
112,5008,000
64*830 52,930 3,175 4,500
16,419 1,450 6,915
32,325
1,275 6,345
13,300 9,830
525 17,200 2,3.00 2,300
71,575 59,675 2,550
13,725 1,500
16,800 7,750
30023,90031,5684,6104,585
8001,165
25,66054,32029,58827,3307,6142,385
340460
15,447 23,737 18,861 14,162 4,500 2,400 5,540 1,807
2a 152 30,980
1266
75700
1,3505,425
1 100
1 1,250
11
4,200250
1 150
2161
6,4002,500
580300
1 200
......3
2 725~750
1 15,000
42
3,400400
181185243026742021122719 15 44 3028 501720 1018 289
1318122
1533
59443935
106557 9 5 5
144130258 9
2947
22102103
2,690,335 6,022,100
186,268 202,690 367,435 660,018119.650154.750130.000213.750189.400 243,570310.000 230,950 337,261 391,55756,360
632,350237,600142.200 94,900 15,500 69,850
200.400 201,07575.000 14,100
108,332171.650686.000 756,300 647,315 486,150371.750 367, 550 796,450 320,850 117,31036,64062.000 11,650
2,403,794 1, 535,457
157, 630 64,150 58,285
258,205 338,70065.200
189, 434 1,160,120 1,346,340
17
4,400 31,650
921
621182710
7,500 18, 595 1,550
25,685 97,299 86,015
2,950
4221
19,837 1,600
700
51
5,20025
3832
25,5609,775
351
8,5006,0753,000
1 100
8 1,925
2845
35,637110,500
1*940
2,814 2,478
360 309 550 362 385 427 59 78
248 105
1,528 1,351
939 875 375 426 965 728 163 340 468 369 318 100 153 536 424 203 198
1,724 1,392
1,045668195171482395
3,0632,587
605583543430193164334228
1,5671,758
9,097,815 12,754,665
666,422 558,765
1,764,122 1,904,439
848,900 907,310
1, 154, 505 984,620
1,134,003 342, 645
1,937,878 3,081,065 1,045, 3322, 610, 038 1, 740, 173 1, 389, 225 2,331,114 1,680, 274
688,760 640,070 400,014
2,088,971 1, 535, 060
830,110 443, 595 979, 813 579,432 826, 786
1,113,855 10,126, 0023, 726, 403 2,031,323 1,365,470 3, 362, 290 1,321, 770
440, 793 252,947 348,847 269,145
6, 003,840 7,805,171
746,640 645,400
1,967,079 1, 792,767 2,043,269
270,850 382,600
1,428,423 8,386,146 3,843,407
Qfel
W > t-<
CD
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterationsy and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings—Continued
PART 2 —NEW NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS—Contiiraed
CDfcO
City and State YearNum
ber
Public buildings
Cost Number
Public works and utilities
Cost Number
Schools, libraries, etc.
Cost
Sheds
Number Cost Num
ber
Stables and barns
Cost
Stores, warehouses, etc.
Num ber Cost Num
ber
AH other
C ost
Total new nonresi- dential buildings
Num ber Cost
Union City, N . J........
Utica, N . Y ...... ..........
Vallejo, C alif..............
Waco, Tex__________
Waltham, Mass..........
Warren, Ohio............
Washington, D. C ___
Waterbury, Conn___
Waterloo, Iowa.........
Watertown, Mass___
Watertown, N. Y ____
West New York, N. J.
Wheeling, W . Va____
White Plains, N . Y ~
Wichita, Kans_______
W ichita Falls, Tex._ .
Wilkes-Barre, Pa____
Wilkinsburg, Pa____
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1627 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
$82,000
80, 778
53,000
20,0001,000
23,700510,000
286,934
$50,00030,000
$200,000
3,500
"145,’ 000*
" 26,000
3,000 69,498
857,786
$26050
4*26©3,606
10,6751,5051,220
$3, 500
700
1,720,835 1,801,104
368,563
14,826
"l2,"565‘
18,000
80,00080,000
23, 56 5 6,600
29,300 22,250 4,. 545 4,300 2,625
250
50,000
5.1006.100
568,000 115350)100:
110,850 15,500
155,000 9,000
264,276200,000
184,100
1,530,500120,000771,933282,075
1,750 200
1,000 2,300
16,737 6,830
6,500
10,000
10,000
886,666 51,000
625,000
161814196
186194452119256945 4 3
116
1314
106' 110; 1133015 12
$1,800 74,650
208,. 400 261,400 143,615 36,681 64,939
133.200 122,800
2,50® 27,720 19'300
2,385)450 2,281,250
189,700 128,000 193,600 274,39553.500 57,800 30,75035.00065.50024.000 42,425
127,950:369.200 464,900
1,. 127,359 506,695 482,490 159,485 91,950
105,450
$500
" i ’ 000*
21 9,165
15,1804,800
67,950
2,25019,8003,1504~0Q0
111,5004,100
12,000
34,800
2861053222552551095671
182260534140
2,0251,914
5713623854312722452092068953
269185 264 278 621 561186 70
292272165128
$670,500 422,785
1,354,395 1,085,365
316,729 113,538 262,881
1,366,017 640,545 541,670 211,330 233,110
10,930,436 16,947,076 1,839,288
903,950 404,751
1,211,884 602,430 482,625 94,920
652,230 579,050 550,875
1,321,073 690,526
2,167,566 5,374,164 2,312,986 2,707,363 1,663,497
414,612 3,172,439 2,479,924
841,590 801,461
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Williamsport, P a ...
Wilmington, D e l.. .
G* Wilmington, N . CL.
M Winston-Salem, N. C_ ooj° Woonsocket, R . I____
cp Worcester, M ass.____
Yonkers, N . Y ............
York, Pa.......................
Youngstown, O h io ...
Zanesville, Ohio..........
Total:302 cities.. 310 cities..
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
19271928
339243
206,840
9,20063,0006,400
650.000226.000
200,000
47,460,61929,378,349 617
60,000
23,9976,000
30,810114.000
4,000 4,535
101.000 1,017,495
33,50020,000
600,00098,000
45,389,033 38,690,950
837852
288,77767,000
162,000666,111
119,354 625,950 767,93796.00080.000
791,000
164,500
155,542,100143,519,854
213,608 Ul,787
2,555 31,087 2,200 1,000
14,2555,735
12,23010,31915,46818,4494,941
23,500
750 3,175 5,065
910 465
25,091,26124,895,029
2 358 2 367
1,110
1,0757,725
18,4926,144
73011,00020,000
920
750
2823,018 2583,553
13,28013,111
7,200 61,450
216,168 118,330 83,500
201,500 1,200,732
661,962 5,800
22,900 364,265 190,027 788,190
1,443,200 1,000
36,600 293,350 128,150 37,175 19,010
215,747,108211,890,765
10
4,2834,158
5,30012,2637,200
3,124
5,700 14,890 15,296 5,200
12,700 9,600
15,000
7,239,1467,710,836
2092529228405169
712672201146765654733674207240
1,0241,055
160114
232,113 203,440
1,465,715 704,675
3,378,799 1,520,194
220,075 370,500
2,199,176 4,404,362
422,654 189,670
2,229,729 2,873,101 5,333,244 4,820,089
752, 992 772,632
2,942,760 3,064,325
643,766 102,491
1,278,541,605 1,185,219,330
2 See notes to details.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits J©issued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings •Repairs, etc., on non- Grand total of all per Rank Installation
permitsCity and State Year
Housekeepingdwellings
N onhousekeeping dwellings
residential buildings 6
Total repairs, etc.6 mits— new construction and repairs, etc.
incostof
con
Number Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruction Num
ber Cost
1927 752 $998,676 1,647, 596
5,495 $20,196,088 253 $322,2191928 750 5,356 19,485,096 25 408 167,189
Alameda, Calif 19271928 1927
272244
$101,347 110,242
24 $19,126 26,430
296 120,473 136,672
2,822,128
792 1,536,930 2,131,396
16,188, 743 14,893,525
13 257 734 180Albany, N . Y 1,833
1,418394
2,684 120 122,3561928 2,389,810
675,194 450,325 482, 789
2,226 35Allentown, Pa 1927 304
382585
419,444311,400248,064189,814
90 255, 750 138,925 234, 725
1,663 6,588,16919281927
83116
465 1,556 1,479
5,935,040 3,041,304
87Altoona, Pa 701 77 16,973
1928 529 335 272,817 8C4 462,631 1,313 3,360,907 141 86 14,711Amsterdam, N . Y 1927 7 42,500
6,000 228,340
170 607,530 683,6751928 2 163 284
Alton, 111........................ 1928 204 107,724 162,439 114,094 249,760 121,203 50,010 40,510
84 125,616 288 564 1,044,455 264 245 74,892Anderson, Ind 1927 340 81 100,538
169,725421 262,977 936 2,213,382
2,452,8335,987,153
1 401928 315
45057 372 283,819
728,2C0796 168
Asheville, N . C 1927 86 478,500 141,545
536 1,187 58 15,4941928 267 107 374 262,748 901 3,095,110 147 54 11,091
Ashtabula Ohio 19271928
172 4 $750 43 27,34078,269
219 78,1G0 410 496, 780 32 7,412116 52 168 118, 779 347 513,872 300 27 4,765
Atlanta, Ga 1927 1,5311,487
766
1,341,925 4,085 11,860,907 369 220,2151928 2,274,848 3,952 27,394,779 19 222 185,762
Atlantic C ify, N . J 1927 534 432,499 488,748
35 128,038129,300
197 630,0191,005,984
1,190,556 1,091 5,822,864 410 490,758
Auburn N Y192819271928 1927
442 30 200 67276
1,624,032 180,892 158, 726 337,738
839250
7,410,842 843,194
71 333 291,676
921,2721,478
316
121,506 157,615 107,418 192,210 171,673
22 37,220 180,123
114 321 515, 596 1,459,090
299Augusta, Ga___ __ 170 1,442 1,965 52 5,635
Aurora, 11119281927
1 110,000 35572
167,680 143,331
1,834388
385,098 335,541
2,233 1,036
1, 550, 944 2,791, 528
’ ""226* 4627
2,85735,340
19281927192819271928
298 69 128,099 367 299,772 5,772,090 7,467,150
42,300 156,350
864 2,950,47228,437,79033,945,350
151”Baltimore, M d 13,679
12,193 21
20,62517,099 18
Bangor, ]Vte 620
5,10022,450
15 37,200132,900
134 851,355i 1,000 18 39 173 625,610 288
BUILD
ING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Battle Creek, M ich___
B ay City, M ich.............
Bayonne, N . J ...............
Beaumont, T ex___Belleville, 111..........Bellingham, W ash.
Berkeley, Calif.........
Bethlehem, Pa.........
Binghamton, N . Y_.
Birmingham, A la ...
Bloomfield, N . J___
Bloomington, HI___
Boston, Mass...........
Bridgeport, C onn ...
Brockton, Mass.......
Brookline, Mass___
Buffalo, N . Y .......... .
Burlington, Iowa___.
Butler, Pa___Butte, M ont.
Cambridge, Mass___
Camden, N . J...........
Canton, Ohio............
Cedar Rapids, Iowa___
Central Falls, R . I ------
Charleston, S. C ..........
Charleston, W . Va------
192719281927192819271928 1928 192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
207202
118120
255331
234 237 909 704
1,637 2,442
14 3615 14
4,2263,682
94201295294117130
1,166946
311792
34335056845940634365154255
250248
114,307
241,490103,450
84,58889,108
337,855 208,531 383,854 254,599 626,905 737,61515.50040.500 19,00021.500
2,795,530 2,263,774
105,310 94,055
115,738 92,375
286,270 314,694 760,702 589,701
25,460 7,250
81,830 264,919 245,149 272,661 211,250 155,495 120,126 194,608 174,048 26,855
201,33373,999
10
114106
7,95011,200
63 12,675
5,000
213,895
19,550550
10,050
1042
141135
5942
825866444460
48
1513
1,7971,677
621791511326186
360325
202242
234235 143 122 219 229788810
96106
6 For years in which figures are shown for total repairs, etc., only, no details were reported.
229 212,825 883 4,751,866265 184,807 762 2,871,312
1,109 393,164 1,487 775,209222 354,695 499 1,844,896122 116,950 338 1,949,950310 188,065 504 1,995,365
1,120 710,856 1,901 4,326, 76923 6,740 274 1,021,621
396 309,608 951 1,787,110466 264,213 990 1,872,318
1,287 929,384 2,669 6,683,0681,487 558,676 2,487 6,076,626
303 549,580 803 2,476,621281 363,616 743 3,843,006
1,734 1,071,249 2,441 4,290,9091,570 694,076 2,273 3,456,3932,082 1,855,040 5,392 21,786,6962,906 1,403,913 5,687 14,224,577
18 125,500 999 6,880,07750 608,500 891 4,540,60030 77,000 179 924,20027 63,500 164 1,382,800
6,137 10,347,994 9,839 60,987,4685,465 7,737,125 9,255 55,698,557
156 731,200 1,145 5,186,712380 456,098 1,135 3,526,622446 231,239 952 1,433,359426 276,950 887 1,725,858178 501,263 536 5,902,440216 553,077 588 6,291,422
1,526 1,542,622 6,605 33,073,4531,271 1,122,724 5,545 24,401,983
65 57,000 203 721,14076 40,900 238 443,77151 86,096 136 388,83639 26,201 55 68,249
134 151,390 215 366,440577 1,199,474 1,057 9,557,469585 937,610 1,052 8,083,723711 619,712 1,751 5,330,327590 665,965 1,293 7,428,055627 439,331 1,944 4,156,020574 579,171 1,579 3,662,318729 346,571 1,358 2,602,622630 581,599 1,256 2,438,23065 34,415 192 798,73036 73,000 98 303,345
346 328,715 433 586,099354 177,407 454 560,635168 519,775 611 2,038,709131 259,390 601 2,873,180
156
202
189115265
198
824359
8,65019,980123
139
' ' " 39"935779
878,135 598,877
110
232
........ 7"8,3017,380
8
7,814,242 8,104,037
4,196135
212
80
2045 1,350
303307
2125
6,795817308
64
70
"‘ "l30"4084
14,20914,687
169
309
295 3144104
412141,26431,894155
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new constructiony and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non
residential buildings
Grand total o f all per Rank Installationpermits
City and State YearHousekeeping
dwellingsN onhousekeeping
dwellings
Total repairs, etc. m its— new construction and repairs, etc*
incost
ofcon
Number Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruction Num
ber Cost
Charlotte, N C 1927 235 $165,258 207,052 370,624 305,612 92,630 83,955
112,925
86 $656,201 202,218 473,427 418,895 208,525
321 $821,459 409,270 844,051
1,137 1,397 3,006
$5,554,8847,458,2644,874,201
1928 356 71 427 69Chattanooga, Tenn___
Chelsea, Mass________
1927 1,5351,553
149
589 2,1242,275
225
114 $100,96619281927
5 $910 71776
725,417 301,155 265,175 271,925
2,939343
4,703,486866,060
"'105 1233
89,2281,200
19281927
126 73 181,220 199 348 1,163,715 2,396,265
253~Chester, Pa_____ ______ 91 42 159,000 133 664 15 16,450
1928 101 208,675 11,423,857
489 1,746,542 365,065,042
210" 28 25,400Chicago, 111___________ 1927 3,950 2,911,610
2,117,435 61,150 52,875
122,104 244,966
2,733 8,512,247 6,683 26,100 416 1,603,6001928 3,579
982,336
326,182, 705
16,000 61,425
5,915 8,300,140 77,150
114,300 153,704 299,966
4,785,110 4,778,740
95,055
19,982 323,509,048 ........2 856 3,614,000Chicopee, Mass 1927 130 445 1,117,110
1,275,565 4,635,829 3,860,080
30,570,299
19281927
91 33 124 406 241Cicero, 111 96 9 31,600
55,000105 588
19281927
162 3 165 547 122Cincinnati, Ohio 4,790 8,662
9,431422
2,9404,892
1, 704,7131928 5,545
15335,458,7301,007,635
13 3,446,565Clarksburg, W . Va — 1927 109 47,190
62,325 1,294,075 •1,089,550
44 47,865 51,610
7,992,675 7,866,925
37 5,6301928 128 35 163 113,935
9,341,750 9,141,375
84,080 104,545
427 1,189,385 45,480,550 56,158,525 3,388, 565 3,542,055
577,398 812,495
1,533,375
"~25o"Cleveland, Ohio 1927
1928 1927
1,8451,620
1 55,000184,900
3,0753,038
4,9214,665
157
12,108 10,593 1,134
987
7 6Clifton, N . J
1928 157 133Colorado Springs, C olo. 1927 275 121,562
95,971 93,675
138 105,091102,05838,145
413 , 226,653 198,029 131,820 262,080 208,474 169,154
1,993,650 1,379,460
142,950 108,800
76119281927
267 134 401 762 279Columbia, S. C __ _____ 317 58 375 689 136 33,625
1928 505 883 1,609,775 1,539,749 1,154,002
23,282,600 16,237,250
930.250810.250
22i~ 127 16,550Columbus Ga 1927
192819271928 1927
23823192575710776
86,774 67,072
779,350 553,260 112,600 78,700
1 14,00013,97574,350
500
7794
367
107.700 88,107
1,139,950825.700 30,350 30,100
316 733g 333 756 255
Columbus, Ohio 7 1,2991,078
147
6,0305,350
376i 320
4032
Council Bluffs, Iowa—1928 24 100 283 285
BUILDING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Covington, K y ...............
Cranston, R . I ................
Cumberland, M d ..........
Dallas, T ex......................
Danville, 111....................
Davenport, Iow a...........
Dayton, Ohio_________
Decatur, 111___________
Denver, C o lo . . . ............
Des Moines, Iow a.........
Detroit, M ich_________
Dubuque, Iowa.......... .
Duluth, M inn ................
Durham, N . C________
East Chicago, In d .........
East Cleveland, Ohio__
Easton, Pa.......................
East Orange, N . J .........
East Providence, R . I__
East St. Louis, 111..........
Elgin, 111..........................
Elizabeth, N . J ..............
Elkhart, Ind...................
Elmira, N . Y ..................
El Paso, Tex__________
Erie, P a ...........................
16712858
141,500108,95070,100
35542
118,000183,400
3,800
5259
1,2511,429
1440
244
39,151 18,292
752,898 692,862
18,980 53,000
108,274
2 1,600 17 16
936534223518
59,820 56,835
1,065,224 1,035,297
102,113 110,189 30,460
1 200
536648
320,161 334,997
325347
1,328,869 1,012,481
169 124,235 13 38,500 53 99,900
203224
166,563 108,402
6174
141,853247,405
86 1,429 1,358
87 111 148 139 33 39 98
135 297 260 150
35,396 439,580 437,299 86,875
100,412 175,480 188, 702 22,870 40,910
153,324 133,669 266,495 227,094 45,000
322192302532 23 20 44 38 5333
140 16426
77,565 743,015 568,737 63,368
132,538 165,847 166,703 14,615 69,381
158,134 154,800 436,213 139,279 13,000
3 18,200
10758
60,32330,123
113113
181,815186,485
419264
5151236419338
263,091 259,533
5,500 50,233
112,579 120,887 117,308
471
82,12515,000
20582
44108273181
11,355 681,844 25,000 7,290
118,694 211,125 118,738
22
1,125 1,550
504472
332,642344,299
200166
1,229,179 377,06027 195,795
20218260737175
2,1871,963
3775
262819861995254235
264 298
7,014 6,847
586 118
1,648 1,5"~
112 143 171 159 77 77
151 171 437 424 176 470 220 171 476 486 323
7 195 344 694 521 877 492 704 665
259,500292,350
73,900103,025100.571 75,127
1,818,122 1,728,159
121,293 163,189 138,734 289,379
1,649,030 1,347,478
253,195 262,635
2,023,050 1,657,750
308,416 355,807
13,401,264 11,801,945
229,145 112,961
1,182,595 1,006,036
150,243 232,950 341,327 355,405 37,485
110,291 311,458 306,669 702,708 366,373 58,000
117,984 242,138 216,608 297,800356.571 956,37730,500 57,523
231,273 333,137 237,596 623,779 307,411
1,561,821 917,154
726 580 884
1,048 320 256
3,533 3,428
240 245 708
1,235 3,118 2,617 1,615 1,184 7,339 6,154 1,243 1,299
28,104 28,541
918 328
2.453 2,175
642 632 626 421 256 236 319 280
1,134 928 689
1,032 1,200 1,003 1,072 1,0061.454
910 704 787
1,122 926
1,162 1,014 1,956 1,779
1,722,310 1,591,750 2,669,634 3,710,249
942,465 999,548
9,773,523 8,088,999 1,036,791
915,348 2,053,351 1,349,741
10,332,026 10,358,378 5,790,415 4,169,345
15, 754,600 16,770, 750 2,876,131 4,509,980
145,555,647 129,260,285
1,288,207 877,386
4,431,435 3,289,404 2,587,754 9,905,838 4,304,366 3,481,904 1,220,620 1, 789, 252 1,299,670
733,008 12,313,092 7,632,385 2,389,700 3,090,101 5,562,971 2,706,934 1,891,883 2,369,646
10,922,877 5,503,600 2,660,566 1,063,889 1,311,783 1,905,717 1,792,561 2,144,225 5,393,056 4 ,76S, 688
65 4,180223
12917
1,0002,345266
63 290 130,741
273
234
53
11776 51,050
30
112
3
275421154
95,02888,322143
54
1373825
92,95764,605207
282
" " ‘ 67'205207
19,62724,301
148163915
34,96322,87425,800
162
171
94
262
196
178
104 CO^ 1
Ge
ne
ra
l, t
ab
le
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 3.—REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
CD0 0
C ity and State Year
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings
Housekeepingdwellings
Number Cost
N onhousekeeping dwellings
Number Cost
Repairs, etc., on non- residential buildings
Number Cost
Total repairs, etc.
Number Cost
Grand total of all perm its— new construction and repairs, etc.
Number Cost
Rankin
costof
construction
Installationpermits
Num ber Cost
Evanston, 111..............
Evansville, In d ..........
Everett, M ass............
Everett, W ash.........._Fall River, Mass........
Fitchburg, Mass........
Flint, M ich .................
Fond du Lac, W is .~
Fort Smith, A rk........Fort W ayne, In d ____
Fort Worth, Tex........
Fresno, Calif__............
Galveston, T ex...........
Gary, Ind.....................
Grand Rapids, M ich .
Great Falls, M ont___
Green Bay, W is.........
Greensboro, N . C ____
192719281927192819271928 192819271928192719281927192819271928 1928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
333245916780202213
219124
45
1,767 154 167 790
1,843 281 440
1,617 1,497
3,7802,599
177156177
351406
$549,770 538,700 215,237 192,251 166,288 54,218
174,20983,60539,46027,610
583,942 100,185 56,914
122,011 174,105 213,401
$118,085
89,000
983,310 130,355 141,185
2632
255,762 325
203,6051,465
13,000
966,960 655,650 69,035 80,260
95,000 181,658
45.20026.200
1381441429
6845314
376113132
459283442107124
240261
150136
$164,100 333,350 54,121
138,473 26,027
184,683
135,265 205,655 21,108
224,625
726,635225,54928,585
364,422268,757424,287
220,778 363,018 314,728 629,510 151,641
635,8901,095,860
87,75053,570
120,992
350,690320,293
396
232233 152 357 26897 74
2,816 2,451
207 181
1,172 442 423
1,462 2,565
566 882
1,741 1,624
878 575
4,020 2,860
203 185 197 232 551 545
$713,870 872,050 269,358 330,724 192,315 238,901509.000 309,474 289,26060,568
252,235 1,269,617 1,310,577
325,734 85,499
604,518 442,862 726,688
4,746,5231.459.850
493,698 455,913 979,473 368,246
3,921,447800,275
1.602.850 1,751,510
156,785 133,830 210,887160.000 490,890 528,151
1,470 1,040 1,861 1,805
667 535 454 842 592 318 202
8,785 6,700
490 434
1,520 1,844 1,646 4,812 4,560 1,023 1,272 2,551 2,243 2,857 1,966 8,386 5,401
508 542 716 683
1,176 1,179
$15,917,225 13,178,225 3,415,998 5,110,8142.097.830 1,760,759 1,186,590 1,840,768 2,835,644
637,975 822,350
22,087,451 14,422,729 1,000,179
579,130 1,608,702 6,002,498 5,011,124
28,483,764 11,543,787 2,690,578 1,661,565 2,974,415 2,676,808
15,016,529 6,041,150
12,319,420 8,186,755 1,163,119 2,659,482 2,508,898 1,991,8614.837.830 5,048,295
44
209251
157
277
291222
100
215
1.63"
62
"164*
loo
"'99'
168
25408304
121158
$2,125
10,002
30,000
3009,6523,3177,039
21,065101,455
39,59762,575
BUILDING
PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Greenville, S. C_............
Greenwich, C on n .........
Hagerstown, M d ............
Hamilton, Ohio..............
Hammond, Ind ..............
Hamtramck, M ich........
Harrisburg, Pa...............
Hartford, Conn..............
Haverhill, Mass.............
Hazleton, Pa...................
Highland Park, Mich__
Hoboken, N. J...............
Holyoke, M ass...............
Houston, T ex.................
Huntington, W . Va___
Hutchinson, Kans_____Indianapolis, Ind ...........
Irvington, N. J ..............
Jackson, M ich ................
Jacksonville, Fla............
Jamestown, N . Y ..........
Jersey City, N . J...........
Johnstown, Pa...............
Joliet, 111..........................
Joplin, M o.......................
Kalamazoo, M ich_____
Kansas City, Kans........
26323183
111627043
195
272,150 126,048 215,162 494,465
36,565
18,870 121,034
75
3755
1926
1872212342582226986504840
268,500 225,240 165,405 385,475 286,840 364,696 378,662 48,510 41,225
142,297 98,627
54,95038,70096,600
36,45017,300
277
1514611047642249411723
15815611187
9081,081
10932
178
176,839 90,610
187,100 81,625
447,418 456,756 50,314 12,000 72,710
1,000
75,000
300
73418054
1,0297332210
129109427416
1,3101,016
325328
80163260247220322
102,375 60,746
137,890 145,294 676,865 417,228 125,965 117,207 328,360 344,815 123,285 94,833
216,450 246,875
1,000 35,167
4130
100 107 665 501 175 171 702 5306256
12031
192921
1,015
108,396 173,200 204,584
474751
338 347,287 242,691
538329 591 -120 352,237 578166 867,635 610100 159,645 398106 215,034 33462 41,840 632
221 142,099 841189 221,900 1,321214 469,300 1,055228 483,665 476249 288,045 518413 1,214,475 1,037342 881,140
2,593,888844
1,176 2,3211,072 1,884,257 1,931
101 257,325 37187 109,875 324
106 281,187 33591 183,022 207
216 279,435 928,110
372195 382234 398,449
244,173271
197 239192 530,950 432141 347,400
754,676350
1,937 5,8801,814 710,563 6,072
132 131,514 50942 52,000 270
214 201,722 6516,874 3,853,588 13,5725,531 2,612,813 10,217
170 282,372 1,585139 83,041 903527 249,696 1,201523 546,396 1,230
1,975 1,320, »31 5,0023,4311,517 841,569
500 417,760 1,039499 291,880 917782 1,340,155 1,554693 933,050 1,375322 297,805 672303 133,753 556341 361,150 579391 307,792
2 i8 ,158607
143 403239 172,346 469968 383,888 1,494
1,5131,066 475,386498 125,475 1,163397 88,825 1,043
1, 111, 182 1,440,143 5,700,062 6,604,380 1,558,205
677,234 1,782,749 2,063,0336.431.200 6,527,280 1,545,815 1,344,975 3,569,365 5,594,775
17,529,941 11,278,443
909,625 554,065
2,072,504 1,195,010 2,654,9602.603.277 1,519,599
564,9632.044.200 1,261,100
27,326,475 35,309,503
1,547, i50 981,600
1,269,112 23,682,31621.967.386 12,960,2276,639,294 2,575,644 2,097,086
12.768.386 7,660,159 2,745,835 1,846,870
13,851,780 13,876,244
1,386,183 1,095,094 2,793,700 3,081,620 1,355,533 1,403,739 2,223,046 2,034,864 1,586,7901.651.277
229 8 2,200
77
286
185
78
236 50 5,500
90116 172,260
50
296
248799
,7253,3631,463165
294
244
15
268242
650719
386,7141,120,83622
76
182560745
282,688 193,56166
200297645 3
95,200 200,050
2,300 1,025
77
40
"'"259“
" “ ’ 149’
231
186
217CDo *
GEN
ERAL, TA
BLE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A.— Number and estimated cost of buildings ( new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued §
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non- Grand total of all per Rank Installation
permitsC ity and State Year
Housekeepingdwellings
Nonhousekeepingdwellings
residential buildings
Total repairs, etc. mits — new construction and repairs, etc.
incostof
con
Number Cost Num ber Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruction Num
ber Cost
1927 524 $422,700 342,165 36,360 45,480
300 $1,256,940406,23518,72090,8.00
824 $1,679,640802,00055,080
2,9192,345
788
$14,822,33615,541,2755,795,875
1,098576
3
$310,204
Kearny, N . J . . . . . . .19281927
339102
58 $53,600 25524
652126
34 351,975568
Kenosha, W is_______19281927
81 2 150 23 106268
136,430296,961
679963
6,251,5904,468,4533,726,4042,140,0931,736,7905,699,4177,114,537
480,095
81 24513
4,200196,392
Kingston N Y19281927
250341
350,00098,298
142,959329,987
7 745 1063
84,000326,275535,435175,315
267404
434,745424,573716,784505,302
894816
128 337 272,220
19281927
312873
3 38,390 45335
360 713 211Knoxville, Tenn _ _ _ 1,208
8522,4702,138
410
66 9,1751928 329,796
Kokomo, Ind 1927 103 40,936 19 35,480 122 76,41667,653
127,8341928 71 420 526,666 298
Lakewood, Ohio 1927 170 108,184 99,800
139,878 115,640 244,240 156,755
15 19,65010,250
209,640744,540
7,500127,930
185 870 3,516,399 12 1,6721928 120 21 141 110,050
623,328625 4,622,096 109 280 21,766
Lancaster Pa 1927 280228297
59 273,810 84 423 856 3,004,838 2,389,075 7,330,420 5,204,347
913,134
19281927
107 335 860,180 251,740 284,685 174,189 175,135 173,000
647 170Lansing IvTicii 75 372 1,301
1,340261
19281927
301 97 398 96Lawrence, M ass. 95
1928 2758
64,86093,00047,575
55 116,’ 275“ 80,000
209,750
82 222 602,635 604,500 660,325 469,100 990,000
290Lebanon Pa- 1927 1 59 311
19281927
31 15 46 257,325 15,000 5,000
239,167
131 287Lewiston, M e 6 70
1928 10 3,500 75,991 37,686 56,855 57,297 91,460 93,195
331,523 266,241
1 1,500 163,176
11 66 267Lexington, K y . . . . . . ._ 1927 269 66 335 748 2,350,985 8 2,650
1928 177 86 131,613 263 169,299 556 1,617,418 219" 9 2,660Lima Ohio 1927
1928 1927
180189161
1 400 67 167,723100,33590,94299,300
183,468189,344
248 224,978159,217182,402192,495514,991455,585
471 707,313454,434
4,398,5403,643,3492,993,6364,260,108
X^ncoln, Nobr2 1,585 59
36250197
4321,0681,0702,0081,528
302 4 5,000
192819271928
1741,113
733
23 197 131Jjitflft Rftfsifj Ark- 195 1,308
872139 116
BUILDING PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Long Beach, Calif_____ 1927 719 335,360335,13560,90542,580
( 664 404,960 365,105 36,180 55,080
1928 741 568Lorain, Ohio__________ 1927 97 34
1928 77 36Los Angeles, Calif_____ 1927
1928LnnisvillA, TTy ___ 1927 385 739,755 535 959,215
1928Lowell, Mass__________ 1927 269 110,535 195 241,620
213,480 135,588 105,659 390,571 592,530 174,429 81,909
1928 255 97,465 141Lynchburg, V a________ 1927 240 103,947 86
1928 220 71,180 93Lynn, Mass 1927 408 431,065
353,005 322,140 253,000
2221928 416 169
McKeesport, P a_______ 1927 1,236879
3 11,2705,000
21669
Macon, Ga____________19281927
1
1928Madison, Wis_________ 1927 541 252,870
261,048 180,807 97,139
79 131,408508,299425,70099,958
135,716
1928 450 83Malden, Mass................ 1927 238 57
1928 167 62Manchester, N . H ......... 1927
1928554 204,450 2 4,500 179
Mansfield, Ohio.... ........ 1927 175 75,49843,477
56 147,11797,3421928 118 58
Marion, Ind ___________ 1927
Marion, Ohio__________19281927
7889
55,66619,043
2 1,500 843
7,000 22, m
1928Medford, Mass________ 1927 220 158*216
112,07129 176,045
78,1251928 193 44Memphis, Tenn_______ 1927
1928Meriden, Conn________ 1927
1928Miami, Fla____________ 1927 1,183
460571,108 314,806
23 24,6984,495
734441
686,123 364,274
Milwaukee, W is............19281927
14
1928Minneapolis, M inn____ 1927
1928Mobile, Ala..................... 1927 416 142,813 20 60,800
1928Moline, HI............... ....... 1927 453 l40,247
117,337107 48,750
77,973Montclair, N . J —..........
19281927
563 7 6,025 87
1928Montgomery, Ala_____ 1927
1928M ount Vernon, N . Y__ 1927 152 514,760
251,389110 644,210
360,1751928 138 124
1,3831,309
131 113
13,922 12,749
920 932 464 396 326 313 630 585
1,455 949
1,508 1,3!
620 533 295 229 735 598 231 176 134 88
132 64
249237
1,7971,872
253697
1,940915
2,1442,1952,2812,360
436491560657271268974
1,744262262
740,320700,24097,08597,660
16,878,91610,398,8221.698.970 2,657,955
352,155 310,945239.535176.839 821,636945.535507.839 339,909 341,304 352,449 384,278 769,347606.507 197,097 344,666 231,359 222,615140.819 33,420 63,500 41,178 33,940
334,261 190,196
1,544,270 2,059,625
143,464 259,795
1,281,929 683,575
3,735,545 3,641,787 2,940,560 3,200,165
203,613187.508 188,997 201,335 731,533 524,233 754,247307.820
1.158.970 611,564
4,1974,988
599606
37,65533,1953,2783,215
787
5831,2651,2791,9051,3251,9431,8171,5071,475
970 682 544 293 360 580 701
1,109 1,131 4,017 4,005
628 975
3,545 1,568 8,609 7,258 6,791 6,580
872 1,647
870 954 920 804
1,444 2,916
962 946
13,639,425 16,307,825 1,300,534 1,177,374
123,027,139 101,678,768 23,340,610 18,120,075
971,115941,750
1,528,7291,093,0833.877.775 3,786,804 2,356,119 2,184,985 2,886,116 2,349,689 4,461,813 7,630,114 3,800,093 2,892,944 1,940,074 1,058,719 3,779,555 1,808,874
521,560 1,307,160
557,793 1,140,285 4,370,512 4,514,833
12,402,920 14,283,039 1,316,177 1,268,721 9,540,937 1,946,063
37,747,895 35,406,381 22,429,620 23,257,725 2,146,241 3,345,818 1,170,0101.659.775 5,446,164 4,643,268 2,531,347 3,288,918
16,775,45214,262,449
609573
66,72084,01031
252
5
" ” 27"9,813
10,8132,997,5303,120,275
270
260~98
7751,250
12687
54440
101
12,682 178,683
9,755 22,159
175
”""l72~
68
153
263
206
238
256
111837936
1,170,070 1,020,04337
243638 524
25,811 24,105
380,51569,276
8,981,0169,082,880
193
14
21
14211 38,554
216
107
144
38
GENEKAL TAB
LE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued.
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued §
Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non Grand total of all per Rank Installation
permitsC ity and State Year
Housekeepingdwellings
N onhousekeeping dwellings
residential buildings
Total repairs, etc. mits — new construction and repairs, etc.
incostof
con
Number Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruction Num
ber Cost
1927 1,2331,320
647
$341,982 452,129 199,731 277,328 43,320 35,255
617,663 670,694
2,1112,3211,032
990
$3,038,813 158 $12,4781928 1,259 $348,025 61 $104,104 2,874,148 154 79 8,993
Muskegon M!ich 1927 1,078,6681928 595 1,810.335 205
Muskogee Okla 19271928 1927
54 31,895 31,255
14 11,425 68 262 842,567BO 15 4,000 45 259 565, 585 293
Nashville, Tenn 1,2451,280
2,097 7,078,073 226 38,2591928 2,227 5,564, 643 92 235 167,770
Newark, N . J _________ 1927 868 1,625, 318 2 $7,200 451 2,773,960 1,321 4,406,478 3,998 2,972
51,451,630 1, 515 1,181,568 1,998,5511928 769 1,290, 247 424 3,603,141 1,193 4,893,388
31,491 28,600
538,810 286,622 661,119
34,285,153 1, 210Newark Ohio 1927 64 287 653,822
1928 r 64 352 1,066,916 261N ew Bedford, Mass___ 1927
192819271928 1927
634271581
320,550 1.54,870 513,838
103 218,260 131, 752
737 1,422681
2,166,627 1,095,375136 407 258
N ew Britain, Conn___ 224 147,281 805 1,4371,227
451
4,103,884 3,532,117 2,839,066
642 642,509681,916
134N ew Brunswick, N . J— 106 198,300
165,833 66,265
38 483,616 128,752 242,356 195,042 240,320
144 1 5,50019281927
7410981
152
27 131,810 27 128 426,395 308,621 248,692
386 2,184,065 1,517,651 1,237,967 3,037,495 1,466,240
11,741,379
176""NT pwhn rcli N Y 45 154 364
19281927
53,650 69,390 57,910
227,314 336,000 75,375
134,982 772,300
1,191,215
58 139 345 246N ew Castle, Pa 48 200 309,710 794 9 1,330
19281927
118219
51 49,590 743,563 683,000
169 107,500 970,877
1,019,000
593 228N ew Haven Conn 513 732 1,514 359 37,154
1928 333 337 670 1,330551
8,798,394 58 369 84,650N ew London, Conn___ 1927
1928115150
1 5,000 87 299, 215 134,205
203 379,590 269,187
1,801,715 2,188, 652
3 4,40050 200 565 174 39 1,170
"NTaw OrlfiftTi*? Tift 19271928192719281927192819271928
380 435 1,289,880 1,578,279
815 2,062,180 2,769,494
38,980
2,4332,882
162
15,896,775 12,627,678
439,225744 532 1,276
4447
Newport, TCy72 36,565 2 7,250 25 123,325 99 167,140
112,390 115,545 100,077 219,194
194 426,950 906,330
305Newport, R . I 142 346
102 55,485 66 66,060 168 384 680,065 285Newport News, V a ____ 798 972 548,015
771 161,687 417 U 7,507 1,188* 1,439 819,305 278
BUILDING
PBEM
ITS IN
THE PEIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
N ew Rochelle, N . Y . _.
Newton, Mass................
N ew York City, N . Y : The Bronx...... .........
Brooklyn..................
Manhattan________
Queens......................
R ichm ond................
Niagara Falls, N . Y ___
Norfolk, V a.....................
Norristown, P a ..............
Norwalk, Conn..............
Oakland, Calif...............
Oak Park, HI..... ............
Ogden, Utah...................
Oklahoma City, Okla__
Okmulgee, Okla.... ........
Omaha, N ebr.................
Orange, N . J...................
Oshkosh, Wis.................
Ottumwa, Iow a.............
Paducah, K y __________
Pasadena, Calif..............
Passaic, N . J__________
Paterson, N . J_________
Pawtucket, R . I _______
Peoria, 331_____________
1927192819271928
192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
354327
627466
4,8304,8791,3651,4782,9822,525
555508328 412 369 345 221 191 295 280
489,945 454,847
1,491,805 1,310,380 5,523,040 5,958, 775 7,172, 791 7, 704,466 1,799,414 1,384,191
503,000 391,965 223,612 228,079 263,475 175,430 123,386 116,405 237,949 265,865
6755
273187
21
188,400 2,165,350 3,955,425
10,778,760
21,350
113118
6,1276,0601,7231,6721,4801,212
919964363409168214211185128113 95
114
1731357533
3713812010
105157
144,865 123,382 216,750 29,500
250,634 218,052 18,475 8,950
73,493 119,102
4,000
1,200
"6,"000'
28187
2391
1511316
104121
9524170834074
43,536 103,336 24,900 48,375 16,000 43,525
17141
77
1014
318347
214,769 204,425
24 41,857265
155129485420
94,43596,375
243,540271/115
3,6006198
104
279 691,095 905 9,735,614250 847,046 845 11,233,318467 897,490 1,628 10,138,606445 707,673 1,676 10,802,078
6,754 9,417,580 11,864 172,588,0816,526 6,919,304 10,959 189,824, 8536,620 12,857,025 22,431 220,968,9606,606 15,522. 055 18,358 198,284, 9053,118 31,220, 048 3,832 290,320, 5632,877 37,809, 648 3,787 361,723, 0683,901 5,897, 452 26,579 184,438,4613,489 5,767, 629 22,101 151,565, 804
918 1,057, 718 3,671 12,017, 390917 690,288 3,766 15,273, 225496 950, 491 1,343 4,791, 480647 599,325 1,577 4,869, 478580 580, 712 1,464 3,346, 826530 491,840 1,383 3,839, 743353 598,989 577 1,826,101304 313,940 551 1,294, 965390 391,219 914 3,592,009394 555, 740 980 4,781, 703
3,071 2, 239,179 7,027 20,518,4172,177 1, 713,163 5,092 19,537,165
202 268,845 1,020 9,080,676153 216,244 836 9,290, 49582 449,750 316 1,498, 26057 145,900 239 1,348, 225
462 648,030 3,168 12,682, 293534 1, 254,368 3,965 13, 521, 99833 32, 825 85 262,15026 25,350 57 252,965
209 750,973 1,035 4,567,218278 628, 337 1,169 9,050,410402 763,197 691 5,581, 523333 398,409 542 3,106, 499112 62, 732 494 1,494, 076382 165, 922 733 852,84677 59,400 179 579,90090 65,325 190 393. 77550 24,000 219 356,00088 81,015 228 608,605
1,661 1,199,713 2,778 8,965,7201,420 893,300 2,452 5,949, 553
588 1,492,504 987 5,603, 448612 488,461 975 3,061, 518
1,524 1,000,474 2,458 6.369, 9171,474 1,142, 027 2,258 7,356,691
255 449,825 1,140 3, 586, 765190 392,430 991 2,822, 589583 473,465 1,492 3,409, 575524 539,965 1,418 3,951,260
51
‘ "“ 52“4
10
1,488 3,053 3,383
1,8505,565
550,250 1,091,960 1,747,703
11,027 830,733
28 9,150
10137039711560
64,989 48,767 66,481 27,101
124
" ” 239"
103746 276,252
24
55
235 2243
177
249 11,777 45,43541
310
56
’ " ’ 146"2124
4,360 47,705
276
306 121 27,045
289
864776253924
31,245 103, 585 28,330 23,625
150
72
159
119
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b le A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— C ontinued
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
C ity and State
Perth Am boy, N . J .
Petersburg, Va..........
Philadelphia, Pa------
Phoenix, Ariz----------
Pittsburgh, Pa..........
Pittsfield, Mass........
Plainfield, N . J .........
Pontiac, M ich______
Port Arthur, T ex—
Port Huron, M ich_.
Portland, M e............
Portland, Oreg..........
Portsmouth, Ohio—
Portsmouth, Va____
Poughkeepsie, N . Y —
Providence, R . I —
Year
19271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings
Housekeepingdwellings
Number
2391905050
5,7884,940
2882,5912,681
138124128182447521
2515
558488
4,1533,891
15113019223211152
3,1492,524
Cost
$343,811 439,237 60,000 35,336
4,693,745 4,904,210
114,903 1,832, 9(31 1,997,640
83,610 83.315
199, 585 186,863 195,979 226,345
13,275 10, 250
259,996 159, 320
1,392, 610 1,271,905
50, 592 49,470
118,762 133,941 159,110 48, 261
1,181, 830 1,163,700
N onhousekeeping dwellings
Num ber
44
Cost
$3,051,400 365,470
50,0001,000
73,297 30,140
12,000
Repairs, etc., on non- residential buildings
Number
26
1827
1,9751,691
1399035592664
1101129777
24 8
242283
1,0341,044
523525 56 2326
387 573
Cost
$3,500 18,100 55,089
316,525 9,809, 680 7,298,500
257, 598 2,970,234 1,787,093
459.300 7i;900
338.588 218, 760 128,022 251,635
337,575 21,475
278,478 330, 634
1, 576,0401, 596,625
84,480 52,415 33,816 19,645 77,530
156,4402, 681,085 1,667,325
Total repairs, etc.
Number
241 396 68 77
7,763 6,631
485 427
3, 512 3,319
164 188 239 295 544
7664923
892815
5,1874,935
20416521728813478
3,5363,097
Cost
$347,311 457,337 115,089 151,861
14, 503,425 12,202, 710
299,923 372,501
7,854, 595 4,150, 203
542,910 155,215 588,173 406,623 324,001 477,980 206,736 234,916 350,850 31,725
611,771 520,094
2.968, 650 2,80S, 530
147,072 101,885152, 578153, 586 236,640 204,701
3,862,915 2,831,025
Grand total of all permits — new construction and repairs, etc.
Number
502 394 157 194
19,082 16,423 1,178 1,259 7,869 7,070
470 552
2,114 2, 8511.351 1,207
206140
1,3681.351
11,2949, 567
564 447 403 472 302 276
5,442 4,979
Cost
$1,671,872 1,367,359
279,466 568,628
117,590, 650 112,225, 865
5, 645,124 5,976,662
37, 111, 332 39,373, 532 1,650. 690 1,813,130 5,046,011 3,464, 771
17, 558, 296 13,115,226 1,731,380 1,881, 236
839,065 461,175
2,326,783 2,738,886
28,973,455 21,275,970 1,585,007 1,247,085
463,385 688, 531
1,347,667 1,664,820
23,132,819 16,003,519
Rankin
costof
construction
233
"292
""85
10
"253
138
45
197
301
"16023
*245
214
" 8 3
Installationpermits
Number
3052244655
4031
152152
34
1,800
Cost
$135,115 78,935 6,991 8,963
12,3503,800
28,43422,108
10,342 4,059 3,638
8,72011,500
186,095
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PBINCIPAL
CITIE
S
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Pueblo, C olo.................. 19271928
Qrrinny; 111 1927 47 23,793117,686
1 2,10053,535
112
44,5509,000
Quincy, M ass.-..............19281927
68 11928 874 281,934
162,518 156,206 503,047 319,804
629646
319321
82,506 294,750 124,645 381,395 674,550
Racine, W is.— — ____ 1927 185
Beading, Pa___________19281927
1551,3151,185
14
2,50053,5004,600
Bevere, Mass__________19281927
21928
Richmond, I n d - . -____ 1927 192 117,855 122,440 383,591 294,415
1 5,000 4968
80,520 115,266
1,379,831 965,806
1928 212Richmond, V a________ 1927 867 19 54,610
5,374584396
Boanoke, Va__________19281927
553 7
1928 289 110,092831,502531,950211,556296,322
26 61,000 1,391,984 1,404,936
432,250 1,158,595
Bochester, N . Y _______ 1927 914 1 31,000 8459231928 737
Bockford, ELL........ ......... 1927 299 2642621928 391
B ock Island, HI_______ 1927
Sacramento, Calif.........19281927
833645
1,556,484 299,329 622,398
19 61,000 28331
12,245652,090227,510138,231282,467
1928 227 537Saginaw, M ich.... ........... 1927 361 174,000
195,446138
1928 420 104St. Joseph, M o.... .......... 1927
1928 46 83,985 2,919,299 1,407,943
921,856 825,340 227,500 194,400 150,205 251,650 131,818
24 41,990 3,383,647 3,059,003
475,902 847,615 328,000 111, 700 210,650 144,910 459,002
1,215,293
St. Louis, M o__ - ______ 1927 3,3502,8821,7491,598
502
1237
142
24,130146,220152,891
2,2001,830
239884
St. Paul, M inn________192819271928
St. Petersburg, Fla____ 1927 1541928 342 111
Salem, Mass................... 1927 310 1801231928 477
Salt Lake City, U tah .. 1927 178 1141928 183 131,485 144
San Antonio, Tex_____ 19271928
San Diego, Calif_______ 19271928
San Francisco, Calif.__ 1927 1,8022,720
252
1,850,000 1,458,776
155,445
1,200847166135
2,850,000 2,120,229
278,835 199,365
San Jose, Calif— ..........19281927
24 103,1531928 260 108,925
Savannah, Ga................. 19271928
Schenectady, N . Y ____ 1927 269 397,950208,085
173 220,925238,3251928 266 5 20,005 138
613 284,145 1,445730 295,829 1,45859 70,443 43571 180,221 369
828 426,910 2,201936 364,440 2,335281 457,268 1,373202 283,351 1,078
1,638 937,942 2,3671,508 998,954 2,179
227 218,425 507152 108,245 454242 203,375 632280 237,706 575
1,470 1,818,032 3,891956 1,265,595 2,317399 181,423 1,156315 171,092 880
1,760 2,254,486 5,6651,660 1,936,886 4,542
563 643,806 2,116653 1,454,917 1,875545 399,535 932880 1,079,729 1,183976 951,419 2,267764 849,908 1,859499 312,231 1,426524 477,913 1,658341 144,772 659
70 125,975 2845,562 6,327,076 13,0354,749 4,613,166 12,6272,130 1,550,649 4,7722,482 1,672,955 4,999
656 555,500 1,650453 306,100 954490 360,855 774600 396,560 830292 590,820 1,000327 1,346,778 1,024
1,018 841,131 3,4611,423 1,567,609 4,2843,060 1,206,989 6,6522,250 839,198 5,1503,002 4,700,000 6,9323,591 3,682,158 6,648
418 434,280 1,065395 308,290 948157 158,920 611117 127,065 525442 618,875 1,192409 466,410 1,175
1,625,382 1,466,812 1,073,321 1,276,957 5,231,872 6,870,012 6,391,171 4,417,489 4,614,067 3,808,320 1,602,120 1,227,142 1,826,139
940,723 15,216,203 8,844,881 2,583,9963.279.423
22,589,418 17,620, 7986.553.423 5,736, 642 1,999,890 1,583,244 8,814,211 5,524,332 3,610,783 4,349,585
768,898 2,004,618
41,417,221 42,828,495 10,071,216 8,699,513 2,907,500 1,846,100 2,727,080 1,719,685 4,855,845 5,277,404
12,190,280 18,300,359 13,877,153 12,150,138 46,448,676 37,504,438 3,554,430 2,541,300 2,180,050 2,137,134 4,318,270 3,428,480
2273
..........211
2,865
1,53549,285
240
75
113 6772643
75,300 12,775 17,989126
247
271
5762
4,6001,025145
2858 3,265
8912 2,175
224202227
8
46,58173,8001,580
93
114
188690
’ "” 254"67
207,461
........57,"§7238,151
9
" ”"59"
201
213
95
26""7 4 2 "
7972,2481,408
1661191011
374,813 222,462 584,172 261,925 40,500 20,450 1,750 1,540
48
11
166
179
145 001
GENERAL TA
BLE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A .— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and additions to old buildings) covered by permitsissued in 1927 and 1928, by intended use of buildings— Continued
PART 3.— REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, AND ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS—Continued
City and State
Scranton, Pa............
Seattle, Wash..........
Sheboygan, W is—
Shreveport, La____
Sioux City, Iowa—
Sioux Falls, S. Dak
Somerville, Mass___
South Bend, Ind—
Spokane, W ash------
Springfield, 111........
Springfield, Mass__
Springfield, M o -----Springfield, Ohio__
Stamford, Conn___
Steubenville, Ohio.
Stockton, Calif____
Superior, W is--------
Year
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928 19281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
Repairs, etc., on residential buildings
Housekeepingdwellings
Number
525521
1,4571,447
1021052920
184300550503601348378
157131266
1611659285
179171173232
Cost
$234,280 181,544 329,511 378,890 65,275 48,955
116,000 20,810
52,867 92, 772
200,695 174,653 257,450 170,420 183,658
120,802 90,595 85,107
301,600 200,615 47,725 28,265 86,540 94,003 67, 708 98,657
N onhousekeeping dwellings
N um ber Cost
$500
6,335
2501,000
133,7604,000
13,2005,0506,925
Repairs, etc., on nonresidential buildings
Number
18416327553751584
20494657
1862207396
1616175
105991312
14012318
Cost
$234,038 330,510 396,361 421,859 119,900 155,425 20,000
140,375
167,385 132,510 130,075 390,315 599,265 209,800 236,370
765,913 155,025 75,000
316,045 985*053
7,000 13,550
175,194 264,671 94,850 87,790
Total repairs, etc.
Number
416633
4,2314,538
709685
1,7321,992
1531633340
430233346607
42147439534119334127226626410597
207
Cost
$677,050 1,034,250 3,332,840 4,266,960
468,318 512,554 725,872 807,084 185,175 204,380 136,000 161,185 420,427 220,252 225,282 330, 770 565,218 857, 715 380,220 420,028
1,707,055 1,020,475
249,620 160,107 149,203 617,645
1,185,668 54,725 41,815
274,934 363,724 169,483 186,447
Grand total of all perm its— new construction and repairs, etc.
Number
1.141 1,189 9,906 9,512 1,261 1,166 2,426 2,921
741799228299822407
2,4062,5242.142 2,187 1,134 1,195 1,954 1,539
628945
1,017883834349423
1,166926490614
Cost
$5,707,115 4,632,243
29,070,080 34,806,975 2,171, 940 2,108, 719 3,946,370 4,846,425 1,867,575 2,170, 440 2,042,505 2,004,725 3,385,850 1,424,197 4,888,660 6,363,185 3,656,500 5,736, 778 3,770,303 3,739,153 8,905,819 5,976, 799 1,615, 655 1,693, 927 1,556, 767 6,042,716 5,195,278 1,856,435 1,193,410 2,803,347 1,774,866 1,277,019 1,852,152
Rankin
costof
construction
108
”*16
" l8 l
”102177
187
230
"”79
127
84220
225
”"97
249
“208
199*
Installationpermits
Num ber
47449275
160
166
85124
10611392
Cost
$185,555 204,730 31,210 34,555
4,400
78,45044,195
56,796
37,016 109,710
20,846 23,972 35,773
BUILDING PERM
ITS IN
THE PRIN
CIPAL C
ITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Syracuse, N . Y _____
Tacoma, Wash_____
Tampa, Fla...............
Taunton, Mass-------
Terre Haute, Ind—
Toledo, Ohio.... .........
Topeka, Kans______
Trenton, N . J__........
T roy , N . Y ................
Tucson, Ariz..............
Tulsa, Okla................
Union City, N . J___
Utica, N. Y ...............
Vallejo, Calif.............
W aco, Tex.................
Waltham, Mass........
Warren, Ohio............
Washington, D . C__
Waterbury, Conn___
Waterloo, Iowa_____
Watertown, Mass—
Watertown, N. Y___
West New York, N . J__
Wheeling, W . Va___
W hite Plains, N . Y _ _ „
Wichita, Kans______
1927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928192719281927192819271928
465
2,1121,698
126150
1,0321,321
243
39431139929375
22056456970251549
13524920693
115109
147
189154155
52562
1214854128391
669632
569,775 439,140
458,610 316,302 51,273 48,732
338,134 905,613
88,827
392,992 127,730 188,840 139,267 100,482 117,798 314,891 322,584
1,551,686 229,856 80,910
141,470 45,352 43,778 86,950 94,452
50,485
185,550 51,625 72,340
110,569 75,685
147,615 339,334 275,843 193,350 226,162 243,644 290,007
1015
15
83,000
35,000912
63,578 4 934
29,100
20,315
7,450
6,57513,800
358261
79964995
105
156293
99
106141244884555
225165504163589089535235
99
103241
156157 60 80
224
1,373,471836,686
362,406 258,722 181,528 64,606
30,158
216,829
403,911 663,324 309,198 59,219
166.259 51,198
159,742391.260 112,740 141,815 400,200 279,72023,867 25,581
165,235 199,867 82,475
93,195
358,300 168,705 181,820
110,850 115,558 201,320 171,646 359,839 471,126 312,980 247,777 360,236
1,077 729
1,228 1,198 2,911 2,347
222 257 921
1,188 1,614 1,477
342294 500 452 643 482 125 275 789 734 758 556 112 201 339295 146 167 144 178 148 246
2,9823,617
22123724219949
11349953594
177647569143171
2,072,069 1,358,826
575,815 633,945 821,016
575,024 267,801 114,250 308,899 368,292
2,304,495 2,882,899
305,656 158,564 796,903 791,054 498,038 262,064 271, 675 168,996 474,633 713,844
1,693,526 371,671 481,110 441,505 69,219 69,359
252,185 294,319 171,130 191,085 92,185
143,680 4,527,646 3,690,553
228,350 543,850 220,330 261,610 50,100 94,670
405,734 221,419191.243 355,510 524,780 635,682 664,476 539,142 491,421650.243
3,961 3,103 2,453 2,341 4,755
3,637 487 484
1,586 1,696 6,192 5,334 1,231 1,117 1,353 1,062
935 774 838 828
3,466 3,829 1,075
674 672 680 630 448 373 410 524 679 997 686
6,954 6,916 1,287
907 770 898 754 625 758 793 222 253
1,081 843 752 783
2,322 2,390
21,990,371 13,220,429 4,764,728 4,660,415 6,145,201
3, 617,054 1,055,999
882,497 1,212, 771
973,487 15,513,710 17,346,195 2,222,196 1,991,514 4,539, 632 4,105,921 3,206,057 1,323,664 2,322,550 2,895,391
14, 791,854 13,411,051 3,409,526 1,120, 756 3,381,105 3,916,970
492,898 441,847
1,573, 641 2,291,339 2,217, 925 2,477,055 1,425,474 1,811,620
39,263,477 53,974,979 5,015,638 3,488,300 1,151,981 2,722,194 4,281, 230 2,824,095
756,204 1,152,449 1,685,293 1,628,385 3,014,131 1,967,488
10,125,792 12,632, 206 5,848,942 7,974,221
2 95043
106132133
16,152 24,055132
274
” ’ 269’10222
65,5276,790
29
191
118 2 8,200
237
152 355
13,819 47,000
42
’ ” 257’126128
18,23417,501
120
304
173
167
204 1561,019
22,150847,760'
8
136
161
158
2544
12184
62523,1636,200
47,300
218
192
46386 300,000
65 O
GENERAL TA
BLE
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
T a b l e A*— Number and estimated cost of buildings (new construction, and repairs, alterations, and addition to old buildings) covered by permits gissued in 1927 and 1928, intended use of buildings— Continued §
P A R 7* 3,—REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS, ^iV2> ADDITIONS TO OLD BUILDINGS, AND GRAND TOTAL OF ALL PERMITS— Continued
Repairs, etc., on residential buildingsRepairs, etc., on non- Grand total o f all per Rank Installation
permitsC ity and State Year
Housekeepingdwellings
Nonhousekeepingdwellings
residential buildings
Total repairs, etc. mits — new construction and repairs, etc.
incostof
con
Number Cost Number Cost Num
ber Cost Number Cost Number Coststruction Num
ber Cost
Wichita Falls, Tex........ 19271928
203264
$117,529 221,670
67 $119,527 374,342
270 $237,056596,012
975 $4,050,687 1,911,41272 336 613 195 1 $200
Wilkes Barre, Pa 1927 900 706,123 1,376 4,934,339 13 37,8751928 948 662,881 1,337 3,896,345 121“ 20 104,590
WilHnfihnro Pa 19271928 1927
37 114,400 337 1,932,39058 105,005 276 1,915,561 194
Williamsport, Pa 292 107,744 44 $4,905 133 308,881 469 421,530 836 2,732,695 101 13,2771928 546 347,175 941 2,080,940 183 183 14,680
Wilmington, Del 1927 689 988,774 1,924 6,805,900 186 151,230799 1,129,452 1,969 5,577,109 91 146 96,190
WilminfffnTi "NT f! 1927192819271928192719281927192819271928 1927
6597
8531,021
1295
471498216217375
49,25065,000
280,909346,34728,17060,726
20 80,000 91,000
246,036 182,959 317,755 393,347
85 129,250156,000526,945529,306345,925454,073
197 552,125 748,50015 112 239 281
Winston-Salem, N . C ~ 126 979 2,4442,550
463
6,539,187 8,531,028 1,360,179
918,543137 1,158
16161
"R T 149UUUQUvAOb, XV. J- - ---76 171 366 272 9 4,866
Wnrr*Astftr M ass 260,358 728,817 382,387 271,125 336,447 150,682 104,150
553 1,772,432 759,267 806,972 974,400 115,785
1,024964
2,032,790 2,381 8,814,669466 1,488,084
1,189,359 1,245,525
455,362
1,9992,0051,934
718
7,260,320 32,585,888
73VnnlrArs 'M V 166 382
177 394 35,618,824 1,588,854
12York Pa 5 3,130
360,00031 411 1 1,700
19281927192819271928
485203
2 83 206,435 121,550
570246
717,117 225,700 529,415
954 2,065,049 9,007,160 8,637,675
184VnnnffstftiFn Ohlrt 43 2,291
2,191303 607.anoQin11o flhin 66
9227,088 31,655
5 4,05028,793
71 31,138 72,788
328 1,021,100548,0641 12,340 5 $ 98 344 297
Total: 302 cities.. 310 cities..
19271928
a 122,687 * 122,244
3 85,333,662 3 79,522,037
31,134 3 1,396
3 9,237,804 3 16,430,601
3 57,108 3 55,849
3 156,006,017 3 138,423,293
3 288,824 3 279,020
3 353,398,271 3 324,644,421
729,685664,449
3,593,839,4053,423,584,461
77,81870,850
37,772,931 38,351,921
3 See notes to details.
BUILDIN
G
PERMITS
IN THE
PRINCIPAL
CITIES
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
LIST OF BULLETINS OF THE BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICSThe following is a list o f all bulletins o f the Bureau o f Labor Statistics published since
July, 1912, except that in the case o f bulletins giving the results o f periodic surveys o f the bureau only the latest bulletin on any one subject is here listed .
A com plete list o f th e reports and bulletins issued prior to July, 1912, as well as the bulletins published since that elate, will be furnished on application . Bulletins marked thus (*) are ou t o f print.
Conciliation and Arbitration (including strikes and lockouts).♦No. 124. Conciliation and arbitration in the building trades of Greater New York. [1913.]*No. 133. Report of the industrial council of the British Board of Trade on its inquiry into industrial
agreements. [1913.]No. 139. Michigan copper district strike. [1914.]No. 144. Industrial court of the cloak, suit, and skirt industry of New York City. [1914.]No. 145. Conciliation, arbitration, and sanitation in the dress and waist industry of New York City.
[1914.]*No. 191. Collective bargaining in the anthracite coal industry. [1916.]♦No. 198. Collective agreements in the men’s clothing industry. [1916.]No. 233. Operation of the industrial disputes investigation act of Canada. [1918.]No. 255. Joint industrial councils in Great Britain. [1919.]No. 283. History of the Shipbuilding Labor Adjustment Board, 1917 to 1919.No. 287. National War Labor Board: History of its formation, activities, etc. [1921.]No. 303. Use of Federal power in settlement of railway labor disputes. [1922.]No. 341. Trade agreement in the silk-ribbon industry of New York City. [1923.]No. 402. Collective bargaining by actors. [1926.]No. 468. Trade agreements, 1927.No. 481. Joint industrial control in the book and job printing industry. [1928.]
Cooperation.No. 313. Consumers' cooperative societies in the United States in 1920.No. 314. Cooperative credit societies in America and in foreign countries. [1922.]No. 437. Cooperative movement in the United States in 1925 (other than agricultural).
Employment and Unemployment.*No. 109. Statistics of unemployment and the work of employment offices in the United States.
[1913.]No. 172. Unemployment in New York City, N. Y. [1915.]
*No. 183. Regularity of employment in the women’s ready-to-wear garment industries. [1915.]♦No. 195. Unemployment in the United States. [1916.]No. 196. Proceedings of the Employment Managers’ Conference held at Minneapolis, Minn., Jan
uary 19 and 20,1916.♦No. 202. Proceedings of the conference of Employment Managers’ Association of Boston, Mass.,
held M ay 10,1916.No. 206. The British system of labor exchanges. [1916.]No. 227. Proceedings of the Employment Managers’ Conference, Philadelphia, Pa., April 2 and 3,
1917.No. 235. Employment system of the Lake Carriers’ Association. [1918.]
♦No. 241. Public employment offices in the United States. [1918.]No. 247. Proceedings of Employment Managers’ Conference, Rochester, N. Y ., M ay 9-11,1918.No. 310. Industrial unemployment: A statistical study of its extent and causes. [1922.]No. 409. Unemployment in Columbus, Ohio, 1921 to 1925.
Foreign Labor Laws.♦No. 142. Administration of labor laws and factory inspection in certain European countries. [1914.] No. 494. Labor legislation of Uruguay. [1929.]
Housing.♦No. 158. Government aid to home owning and housing of working people in foreign countries. [1914.] No. 263. Housing b y employers in the United States. [1920.]No. 295. Building operations in representative cities in 1920.
61318°—29------8a)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Industrial Accidents and Hygiene.♦No. 104. Lead poisoning in potteries, tile works, and porcelain enameled sanitary ware factories.
[1912.]No. 120. Hygiene of the painters’ trade. [1913.]
♦No. 127. Dangers to workers from dusts and fumes, and methods of protection. [1913.]♦No. 141. Lead poisoning in the smelting and refining of lead. [1914.]♦No. 165. Lead poisoning in the manufacture of storage batteries. [1914.]♦No. 179. Industrial poisons used in the rubber industry. [1915.]N o. 188. Report of British departmental committee on the danger in the use of lead in the painting of
buildings. [1916.]*No. 201. Report of committee on statistics and compensation insurance cost of the International Asso
ciation of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions. [1916.]♦No. 207. Causes of death, by occupation. [1917.]♦No. 219. Industrial poisons used or produced in the manufacture of explosives. [1917.]No. 221. Hours, fatigue, and health in British munition factories. [1917.]No. 230. Industrial efficiency and fatigue in British munition factories. [1917.]
♦No. 231. Mortality from respiratory diseases in dusty trades (inorganic dusts). [1918.]♦No. 234. Safety movement in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1917.No. 236. Effects of the air hammer on the hands of stonecutters. [1918.]N o. 249. Industrial health and efficiency. Final report of British Health of Munition Workers’
Committee. [1919.]♦No. 251. Preventable death in the cotton-manufacturing industry. [1919.]N o. 256. Accidents and accident prevention in machine building. [1919.]N o. 267. Anthrax as an occupational disease. [1920.]No. 276. Standardization of industrial accident statistics. [1920.]No. 280. Industrial poisoning in making coal-tar dyes and dye intermediates. [1921.]N o. j291. Carbon-monoxide poisoning. [1921.]N o. 293. The problem of dust phthisis in the granite-stone industry. [1922.]N o. 298. Causes and prevention of accidents in the iron and steel industry, 1910-1919.N o. 306. Occupation hazards and diagnostic signs: A guide to impairments to be looked for in
hazardous occupations. [1922.]N o. 392. Survey of hygienic conditions in the printing trades. [1925.]No. 405. Phosphorus necrosis in the manufacture of fireworks and in the preparation of phosphorus.
[1926.]No. 427. Health survey of the printing trades, 1922 to 1925.No. 428. Proceedings of the Industrial Accident Prevention Conference, held at Washington, D . 0 „
July 14-16, 1926.No. 460. A new test for industrial lead poisoning. [1928.J No. 466. Settlement for accidents to American seamen. [1928.]N o. 488. Deaths from lead poisoning, 1925-1927.N o. 490. Statistics of industrial accidents in the United States to the end of 1927.
Industrial Relations and Labor Conditions.No. 237. Industrial unrest in Great Britain. [1917.]No. 340. Chinese migrations, with special reference to labor conditions. [1923.]No. 349. Industrial relations in the west coast lumber industry. [1923.]No. 361. Labor relations in the Fairmont (W . Va.) bituminous-coal field. [1924.]No. 380. Postwar labor conditions in Germany. [1925.]No. 383. Works council movement in Germany. [1925.]No. 384. Labor conditions in the shoe industry in Massachusetts, 1920-1924.No. 399. Labor relations in the lace and lace-curtain industries in the United States. [1925.]No. 483. Conditions in the shoe industry in Haverhill, Mass., 1928.
Labor laws o f the United States (including decisions o f courts relating to labor).No. 211. Labor laws and their administration in the Pacific States. [1917.]No. 229. Wage-payment legislation in the United States. [1917.]N o. 285. Minimum-wage laws of the United States: Construction and operation. [1921.]No. 321. Labor laws that have been declared unconstitutional. [1922.]No. 322. Kansas Court of Industrial Relations. [1923.]No. 343. Laws providing for bureaus of labor statistics, etc. [1923.]No. 370. Labor laws of the United States, with decisions of courts relating thereto. [1925.]No. 408. Laws relating to payment of wages. [1926.]N o. 444. Decisions of courts and opinions affecting labor, 1926.N o. 467. Minimum wage legislation in various countries. [1928.]No. 486. Labor legislation of 1928.
(n)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Proceedings o f Annual Conventions o f the Association o f Governmental Labor Officials o f the United States and Canada. (Name changed in 1928 to Association of Governmental Officials in Industry of the United States and Canada.)
•No. 266. Seventh, Seattle, Wash., July 12-15,1920.No. 307. Eighth, New Orleans, La., M ay 2-6,1921.No. 323.,Ninth, Harrisburg, Pa., M ay 22-26,1922.No. 352. Tenth, Richmond, Va., M ay 1-4, 1923.
♦No. 389. Eleventh, Chicago, HI., M ay 19-23, 1924.*No. 411. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 13-15,1925.
No. 429. Thirteenth, Columbus, Ohio, June 7-10,1926.No. 455. Fourteenth, Paterson, N . J., M ay 31 to June 3, 1927.No. 480. Fifteenth, New Orleans, La., M ay 15-24, 1928.
Proceedings o f Annual Meetings o f the International Association of Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions.
No. 210. Third, Columbus, Ohio, April 25-28, 1916.No. 238. Fourth, Boston, Mass., August 21-25,1917.No. 264. Fifth, Madison, Wis., September 24-27, 1918.
♦No. 273. Sixth, Toronto, Canada, September 23-26,1919.No. 281. Seventh, San Francisco, Calif., September 20-24, 1920.No. 304. Eighth, Chicago, 111., September 19-23, 1921.N o. 333. Ninth, Baltimore, M d., October 9-13, 1922.No. 359. Tenth, St. Paul, Minn., September 24-26, 1923.No. 385. Eleventh, Halifax, Nova Scotia, August 26-28, 1924.No. 395. Index to proceedings, 1914-1924.No. 406. Twelfth, Salt Lake City, Utah, August 17-20, 1925.No. 432. Thirteenth, Hartford, Conn., September 14-17, 1926.No. 456. Fourteenth, Atlanta, Ga., September 27-29, 1927.N o. 485. Fifteenth, Paterson, N . J., September 11-14, 1928.
Proceedings o f Annual Meetings o f the International Association o f Public Employment Services.No. 192. First, Chicago, December 19 and 20,1913; second, Indianapolis, September 24 and 25,1914;
third, Detroit, July 1 and 2,1915.No. 220. Fourth, Buffalo, N . Y ., July 20 and 21,1916.N o. 311. Ninth, Buffalo, N . Y ., September 7-9,1921.No. 337. Tenth, Washington, D. C., September 11-13,1922.N o. 355. Eleventh, Toronto, Canada, September 4-7, 1923.No. 400. Twelfth, Chicago, 111., M ay 19-23, 1924.No. 414. Thirteenth, Rochester, N . Y ., September 15-17, 1925.No. 478. Fifteenth, Detroit, M ich., October 25-28,1927.
Productivity o f Labor.N o. 356. Productivity costs in the common-brick industry. [1924.]N o. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.N o. 407. L abor cost o f production and wages and hours o f labor in the paper box-board industry.
[1926.]No. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.No. 441. Productivity of labor in the glass industry. [1927.]No. 474. Productivity of labor in merchant blast furnaces. [1928.]No. 475. Productivity of labor in newspaper printing. [1929.]
Retail Prices and Cost o f laving.*No. 121. Sugar prices, from refiner to consumer. [1913.]*No. 130. Wheat and flour prices, from farmer to consumer. [1913.]No. 164. Butter prices, from producer to consumer. [1914.]No. 170. Foreign food prices as affected by the war. [1915.]No. 357. Cost of living in the United States. [1924.]No. 369. The use of cost-of-living figures in wage adjustments. [1925.]No. 495. Retail prices, 1890 to 1928.
Safety Codes.*No. 331. Code of lighting: Factories, mills, and other work places.No. 336. Safety code for the protection of industrial workers in foundries.No. 350. Specifications of laboratory tests for approval of electric headlighting devices for motor
vehicles.No. 351. Safety code for the construction, care, and use of ladders.No. 375. Safety code for laundry machinery and operations.No. 378. Safety code for woodworking plants.No. 382. Code for lighting school buildings.No. 410. Safety code for paper and pulp mills.No. 430. Safety code for power presses and foot and hand presses.
( i n )
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Safety Codes—Continued.No. 433. Safety codes for the prevention of dust explosions.No. 436. Safety code for the use, care, and protection of abrasive wheels.No. 447. Safety code for rubber mills and calenders.No. 451. Safety code for forging and hot-metal stamping.No. 463. Safety code for mechanical power-transmission apparatus.—First revision.
Vocational Workers* Education.*No. 159. Short-unit courses for wage earners, and a factory school experiment. [1915.]♦No. 162. Vocational education survey of Richmond, Va. [1915.]No. 199. Vocational education survey of Minneapolis, Minn. [1917.]No. 271. Adult working-class education in Great Britain and the United States. [1920.No. 459. Apprenticeship in building construction. [1928.]
Wages and Hours o f Labor.♦No. 146. Wages and regularity of employment and standardization of piece rates in the dress and
waist industry of New York City. [1914.]♦No. 147 Wages and regularity of employment in the cloak, suit, and skirt industry. [1914.]N o. 161. Wages and hours of labor in the clothing and cigar industries, 1911 to 1913.No. 163. Wages and hours of labor in the building and repairing of steam railroad cars, 1907 to 1913.
♦No. 190. Wages and hours of labor in the cotton, woolen, and silk industries, 1907 to 1914 N o. 204. Street-railway employment in the United States. [1917.]N o. 225. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber, millwork, and furniture industries, 1915.N o. 265. Industrial survey in selected industries in the United States, 1919.N o. 297. Wages and hours of labor in the petroleum industry, 1920.N o. 356. Productivity costs in the common-brick industry. [1924.]No. 358. Wages and hours of labor in the automobile-tire industry, 1923.N o. 360. Time and labor costs in manufacturing 100 pairs of shoes, 1923.N o. 365. Wages and hours of labor in the paper and pulp industry, 1923.No. 394. Wages and hours of labor in metalliferous mines, 1924.N o. 407. Labor cost of production and wages and hours of labor in the paper box-board industry.
[1925.]N o. 412. Wages, hours, and productivity in the pottery industry, 1925.N o. 416. Hours and earnings in anthracite and bituminous coal mining, 1922 and 1924.No. 435. Wages and hours of labor in the men’s clothing industry, 1911 to 1926.No. 438. Wages and hours of labor in the motor-vehicle industry, 1925.No. 442. Wages and hours of labor in the iron and steel industry, 1907 to 1926.No. 452. Wages and hours of labor in the hosiery and underwear industries, 1907 to 1926 No. 454. Hours and earnings in bituminous-coal mining, 1922, 1924, and 1926.No. 471. Wages and hours of labor in foundries and machine shops, 1927.No. 472. Wages and hours of labor in the slaughtering and meat packing industry, 1927.No. 476. Union scales of wages and hours of labor, 1927-1928. [Supplement to Bui. No. 457.]No. 482. Union scales of wages and hours of labor, M ay 15, 1928.No. 484. Wages and hours of labor of common street laborers, 1928.No. 487. Wages and hours of labor in woolen and worsted goods manufacturing, 1910tol928.No. 492. Wages and hours of labor in cotton-goods manufacturing, 1910 to 1928.No. 497. Wages and hours of labor in the lumber industry in the United States, 1928.No. 498. Wages and hours of labor in the boot and shoe industry, 1910 to 1928.N o. 499. History of wages in the United States from colonial times to 1928.
Welfare Work.♦No. 123. Employers’ welfare work. [1913.]No. 222. Welfare work in British munitions factories. [1917.]
♦No. 250. Welfare work for employees in industrial establishments in the United States. [1919.]No. 458. Health and recreation activities in industrial establishments, 1926.
Wholesale Prices.No. 284. Index numbers of wholesale prices in the United States and foreign countries. [1921.No. 453. Revised index numbers of wholesale prices, 1923 to July, 1927.No. 493. Wholesale prices, 1913 to 1928.
Women and Children in Industry.No. 116. Hours, earnings, and duration of employment of wage-earning women in selected industries
in the District of Columbia. [1913.]♦No. 117. Prohibition of night work of young persons. [1913.]No. 118. Ten-hour maximum working-day for women and young persons. [1913.]No. 119. Working hours of women in the pea canneries of Wisconsin. [1913.]
♦No. 122. Employment of women in power laundries in Milwaukee. [1913.]N o. 160. Hours, earnings, and conditions of labor of women in Indiana mercantile establishments and
garment factories. [1914.]
(IV)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Women and Children in Industry—Continued.♦No. 167. Minimum-wage legislation in the United States and foreign countries. [1915.]*N o. 175. Summary of the report on conditions of woman and child wage earners in the United
States. [1915.]•No. 176. Effect of minimum-wage determinations in Oregon. [1915.]♦No. 180. The boot and shoe industry in Massachusetts as a vocation for women. [1915.]♦No. 182. Unemployment among women in department and other retail stores of Boston, Mass. [1916.] N o. 193. Dressmaking as a trade for women in Massachusetts. [1916.]N o. 215. Industrial experience of trade-school girls in Massachusetts. [1917.]
•No. 217. Effect of workmen’s compensation laws in diminishing the necessity of industrial employment of women and children. T1918.]
No. 223. Employment of women and juveniles in Great Britain during the war. [1917.]No. 253. Women in the lead industries. [1919.]
Workmen’s Insurance and Compensation (including laws relating thereto).♦No. 101. Care of tuberculosis wage earners in Germany. [1912.]♦No. 102. British national insurance act, 1911.N o. 103. Sickness and accident insurance law in Switzerland. [1912.]No. 107. Law relating to insurance of salaried employees in Germany. [1913.]
♦No. 155. Compensation for accidents to employees of the United States. [1914.]N o. 212. Proceedings of the conference on social insurance called b y the International Association of
Industrial Accident Boards and Commissions, Washington, D . C., December 5-9,1916. ♦No. 243. Workmen’s compensation legislation in the United States and foreign countries, 1917 and
1918.N o. 301. Comparison of workmen’s compensation insurance and administration. [1922.]N o. 312. National health insurance in Great Britain, 1911 to 1921.No. 379. Comparison of workmen’s compensation laws of the United States as o f January 1, 1925. No. 477. Public-service retirement systems, United States and Europe. [1928.]N o. 496. W orkm en’s compensation legislation of the United States and Canada as of January, 1929
W ith text of legislation enacted in 1927 and 1928.Miscellaneous Series.
♦No. 174. Subject index of the publications of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics up to M ay 1,1915.
No. 208. Profit sharing in the United States. [1916.]No. 242. Food situation in central Europe, 1917.No. 254. International labor legislation and the society of nations. [1919.]N o. 268. Historical survey of international action affecting labor. [1920.]No. 282. Mutual relief associations among Government employees in Washington, D . C < [1921.] N o. 299. Personnel research agencies: A guide to organized research in employment, management,
industrial relations, training, and working conditions. [1921.]N o. 319. The Bureau of Labor Statistics: Its history, activities, and organization. [1922.]N o. 326. Methods of procuring and computing statistical information of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[1923.]N o. 342. International Seamen’s Union of America: A study .of its history and problems. [1923.] No. 346. Humanity in government. [1923.]No. 37?. Convict labor in 1923.No. 386. Cost of American almshouses. [1925.]No. 398. Growth of legal-aid work in the United States. [1926s]No. 401. Family allowances in foreign countries. [1926.]No. 420. Handbook of American trade-unions. [1926.]No. 439. Handbook of labor statistics, 1924 to 1926.No. 461. Labor organizations in Chile. [1928.]No. 462. Park recreation areas in the United States. [1928.]No. 465. Beneficial activities of American trade-unions. [1928.]N o. 479. Activities and functions of a State department of labor. [1928.]No. 483. Conditions in the shoe industry in Haverhill Mass., 1928.N o. 489. Care of aged persons in the United States. [1929.]No. 491. Handbook of labor statistics, 1929 edition.
(V)
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis