Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003. Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels...
47
B ig B l ue R iver . - , 29 . - , 35 . - , 435 . - , 70 ( / 169 ( / 71 . - , 435 . - , 435 ( / 71 . - , 35 . - , 35 . - , 29 . - , 70 . - , 670 . - , 470 ( / 24 . - , 635 ô ó 9 ø ÷ 3 50 CLE AV E R IIB LVD P A S E O B L V D E 59T H S T E 63 R D S T P R O S P E C T A V E ( / 71 P A R K A V B lue H ills C itad el K ansas C ity Com m unity D evelopm ent Initiative R aytow n In depen dence N orth K ansas C ity G ran dview L ee's Su m m it B lue H ills A rea R eport: M arch,2003 K ansas C ity,MO U rb an C ore A rea N e igh borhoo d B ou ndarie s P rod uced by the U M K C C enter for E conom ic In form ation Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003
Blue Hills NPI Area Report March, 2003. Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598
Blue Hills Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels
with Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating3.598 2.Foundation/Wall
Rating4.187 3.Window/Door Rating4.038 4.Porch Rating3.862
5.Exterior Paint Rating3.719 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of
Items 1 - 5)3.881 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 3.8783.955 Results are from the Housing
Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and
Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November,
2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 6
Slide 7
Blue Hills Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with
Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private
Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6972.333 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.0894.296
3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.5684.704 4.Litter Rating4.7184.602
5.Open Storage Rating4.8114.796 6.Accessory Structure
Rating3.6023.833 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 -
5)4.3224.576 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 4.3224.323 Results are from the Housing
Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and
Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November,
2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 8
Slide 9
Blue Hills Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings
Parcels with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure
1.Public Sidewalk Rating4.0123.345 2.Curb Rating4.6284.313 3.Street
Light Rating4.9764.880 4.Catch Basin Rating4.3054.283 5.Street
Rating4.5084.414 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1
- 5)4.4214.061 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 4.4374.037 Results are from the Housing
Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and
Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November,
2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 10
Slide 11
BLUE HILLS AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single
Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied185461.9% Single
Family, Not Owner Occupied107936.0% Single Family, Undetermined
Occupancy Status622.1% Not Single Family Housing613 Source: KCMO
Real Estate file, November, 2002
Slide 12
Slide 13
Slide 14
Slide 15
Vineyard NPI Area Report March, 2003
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Slide 19
Vineyard Structure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with
Residential Structures 1.Roof Rating4.137 2.Foundation/Wall
Rating4.429 3.Window/Door Rating4.411 4.Porch Rating4.425
5.Exterior Paint Rating4.250 Structure Rating (Weighted Average of
Items 1 - 5)4.330 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 4.3284.711 Results are from the Housing
Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and
Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November,
2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 20
Slide 21
Vineyard Grounds Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels with
Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Private
Sidewalk/Drive Rating4.0103.400 2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.5313.158
3.Nuisance Vehicle Rating4.8274.761 4.Litter Rating4.8624.278
5.Open Storage Rating4.9024.750 6.Accessory Structure
Rating4.1473.444 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 -
5)4.5824.161 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 4.5824.62 Results are from the Housing Condition
Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and Community
Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI
and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst). Produced by the
UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 22
Slide 23
Vineyard Infrastructure Characteristics Average Ratings Parcels
with Residential Structures Parcels with No Structure 1.Public
Sidewalk Rating2.4452.162 2.Curb Rating4.1683.004 3.Street Light
Rating4.9014.877 4.Catch Basin Rating4.2793.708 5.Street
Rating4.6034.514 Infrastructure Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1
- 5)3.7453.230 Average Ratings by Residential TypeSingle
FamilyMulti-family 3.7424.323 Results are from the Housing
Condition Survey commissioned by the KCMO Department of Housing and
Community Development, conducted between May, 2000 and November,
2001 by CEI and KCNA. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 24
Slide 25
VINEYARD AREA - Single Family Housing Count Percent of Single
Family Housing Single Family, Owner Occupied111366.4% Single
Family, Not Owner Occupied53431.9% Single Family, Undetermined
Occupancy Status281.7% Not Single Family Housing299 Source: KCMO
Real Estate file, November, 2002
Slide 26
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
Blue Valley NPI Area Report March, 2003
Slide 30
Slide 31
Slide 32
Slide 33
Slide 34
Slide 35
Slide 36
Slide 37
Blue Valley Components of Change in Structure Ratings (2000 to
2002) Average RatingsParcels with Residential Structures
20002002Difference 1.Roof Rating3.5763.418-0.16 2.Foundation/Wall
Rating4.2414.7680.53 3.Window/Door Rating4.0564.5780.52 4.Porch
Rating3.7854.2080.42 5.Exterior Paint Rating3.734.3430.61 Structure
Rating (Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.8834.2640.38 Average
Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family
20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.8784.2640.394.1094.2790.17
Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the
KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted
between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a
resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1
(worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 38
Slide 39
Slide 40
Blue Valley Components of Change in Grounds Ratings (November,
2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with Residential
StructuresParcels with No Structure 20002002Diff20002002Diff
1.Private Sidewalk/Drive Rating3.6763.8880.212.8823.4000.52
2.Lawn/Shrub Rating4.2084.7420.534.0224.7490.73 3.Nuisance Vehicle
Rating4.7094.7690.064.7854.8940.11 4.Litter
Rating4.6884.676-0.014.5334.7530.22 5.Open Storage
Rating4.7244.7660.044.7714.9820.21 6.Accessory Structure
Rating3.5893.7150.133.5263.5710.05 Grounds Rating (Weighted Average
of Items 1 - 5)4.3454.5240.184.4794.8240.35 Average Ratings by
Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family
20002002Difference20002002Difference 4.3414.5220.184.5624.6160.05
Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the
KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted
between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a
resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1
(worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 41
Slide 42
Slide 43
Blue Valley Components of Change in Infrastructure Ratings
(November, 2000 to November, 2002) Average Ratings Parcels with
Residential StructuresParcels with No Structure
20002002Diff20002002Diff 1.Public Sidewalk
Rating3.5073.5420.032.3382.4890.15 2.Curb
Rating3.7313.9190.192.7022.8810.18 3.Street Light
Rating4.9924.986-0.014.5474.5600.01 4.Catch Basin
Rating4.2114.3650.154.1004.3080.21 5.Street
Rating4.6854.8850.204.2094.4650.26 6. Infrastructure Rating
(Weighted Average of Items 1 - 5)3.9834.1050.123.0903.2690.18
Average Ratings by Residential Type Single FamilyMulti-family
20002002Difference20002002Difference 3.9824.1020.124.0214.2730.25
Results are from the Housing Condition Survey commissioned by the
KCMO Department of Housing and Community Development, conducted
between May, 2000 and November, 2001 by CEI and KCNA, and from a
resurvey commissioned by the KCCDI. Ratings vary from 5 (best) to 1
(worst). Produced by the UMKC Center for Economic Information
Slide 44
Slide 45
BLUE VALLEY AREA - Single Family Housing (November, 2002) Count
Percent of Single Family Housing Single Family, Owner
Occupied148455.7% Single Family, Not Owner Occupied112242.1% Single
Family, Undetermined Occupancy Status592.2% Not Single Family
Housing693 Source: KCMO Real Estate file, November, 2002