Bluegrass Conspiracy Scratch a Child Support Case and Solve Murder Part 2

8/8/2019 Bluegrass Conspiracy Scratch a Child Support Case and Solve Murder Part 2

1/6

LexingtonChristopher Hignite

Bluegrass Conspiracy : Scratch a child support case andsolve murder (Part 2)September 21st, 2010 2:31 am ET

Do you like this story?

Like One person likes this.

Let's continue along where we left off and piece

together a tale of corruption, murder and organized

crime.

II: Michelle Brizendine

It is true that I ran into Michelle on two subsequent

occasions, once in 1995 at a tanning salon and once

in 1996 at a bar, the Looney Tunes Saloon. On the

first of these occasions, at the salon, Michelle was

visibly pregnant and when I commented on this, shehastened to inform me that the child she was carryin

was conceived by her with a man she was planning

to marry, that the child was not mine, and that I

should give it no further thought. On the second

occasion, at the Looney Tunes Saloon, Michelle had

given birth to her child. She said that she and the

child were living with the childs father, that she

intended to marry him, and that she was moving to

Indiana

I now know that Madison Brizendene was born toMichelle Brizendine on April 24, 1996. I do not know

who Madisons birth certificate names as her father.

do now know that, sometime in 1996, Michelle

Brizendine gave my name as the childs father in

order to get a medical card.

The Civil Summons which would not be served to me

until April 26, 2007 was signed on November 11,

1997. In November 1997 I was living in Lexington on

Snow Road. I was not difficult to find. However, as I

Unbridled What?Photo: Christopher Hignite

Bob Schulz mischaracterized inTime magazine article

Why do I agitate? Why do I ask theuncomfortable questions?

Bluegrass Conspiracy : Scratch achild support case and solve murder(Part 2)

Bluegrass Conspiracy continues:Scratch a child support case andsolve a murder.

Twenty reasons not to re-electFayette Co. Sheriff Kathy Witt

Kentucky's Cross to bear

1. Caffeinated alcohol? Four Lokocauses problems - Video

2. Somali pirates seize two ships offAfrican coast

3. Karzai goes booyah over Iran madmoney

4. New Water System Activated on ISS

Related articles

Popular articles


2/6

now know, Michelle Brizendine and her daughter

Madison had left the state: on October 31, 2007

Michelle told my mother and my brother that she live

in Indiana from the end of 1997 until the end of

2001. I now know that, after Michelle and her then

husband (whoever he was) divorced, Michelle,

Madison, and Michelles younger daughter returned

to Lexington. By that time, however, by December

2001, I had left Kentucky. I did not move back to

Lexington until November 2004 when my mothers

circumstances and a desire to help her in caring for

my brother Brandon brought me back to share her

home. I did not know in 1997, in 2001, or in 2004, in

fact, I did not know until April 26, 2007 that it was

claimed by anyone that I was a father. Only today,

November 6, 2007, have I been able to extract from

the County Attorney the date that is written on his

scrap of paper; it is now claimed, with no evidence

whatsoever on the document itself, that an attempt

was made to serve me with the Civil Summons 17

July 2000 (see below p.11 ). Finally, my mother will

swear that no one at any time prior to April 26, 2007

made any attempt to contact me through her

concerning either Michelle or Madison Brizendine.

III: The DNA Tests

The DNA tests were done on June 28, 2007. The

report was stamped by the lab on July 6, 2007.

Presumably Byron Ockerman received them shortly

thereafter. However, he did not forward them to my

attorney until October 1, 2007, and it was at this late

date, with this short notice that he informed her of his

intention to seek the Summary Judgement which Ms

Scott rightly called devastating.

If these DNA tests are accepted, then I am the father

of Madison Brizendine. However, if I am the father o

Madison Brizendine, then I have every right to befurious that I was not informed of that fact prior to or

at the time of her birth. Not only would I have had an

opportunity to spend some time with her and be of

some influence on her in her most formative years,

but also I would have been afforded the chance to pu

the child on my insurance, hence eliminating the

need for a medical card in the first place.

In 1995 and again in 1996 Michelle Brizendine told

5. Tabloids speculate Glees MatthewMorrison is dating Cameron Diaz

6. Missing: Bones of 4 newborns foundin closet were thrown away, thenfound

1. Man buys Ansel Adams photos at

garage sale for $45, worth $200million

2. Priyanka Chopra Hot Photo Gallery

3. In photos, Sept. 11, 2010 WorldTrade Center attack: AmericaRemembers

4. Mark David Chapman up for parole

5. Mallika Sherawat Starrer Hisss -photo gallery

6. Maruti Alto K10

1. 22-yr old war crime whistleblowersoldier in solitary confinement

2. Massive magnitude 7.7 earthquaketriggers tsunami that kills 113 inIndonesia

3. US military trained Mex drug cartelops

4. Protestor attacked outside KentuckySenate debate

5. Why has Sam Champion beenmissing from Good MorningAmerica?

6. 'Text neck' cure? Duh. Text less,with better posture

New Micro Stock AlertAEGY - Proven steadygains. Set as an emergingenergy market leader.www.EnergyStockReports.com

Investing For RetirementFool Proof InvestmentStrategies and InformationHere!www.PensionPlanServices.com

Super Hot Stock AlertsPenny Stocks Ready toRun. Huge Gains! #1Newsletter. Free Join Now.www.WallStreetsHottestStocks.co

Chitika | Select

Popular slideshows

Most comm ented articles


3/6

me that another man was the father of her child, and

by the end of 1997 she had left the Commonwealth o

Kentucky, and moved with her man and her daughte

to Indiana where she raised the child as his.

On June 28, 2007, in the presence of the DNA nurse

Michelle told me that she had never asked for and

had never received child support for Madison, that,

even now she was not asking for it. Michelle saidthat she had been surprised when she received a

copy of the summons to me dated November 11,

2007. She couldn't understand why she was even

being asked to take a DNA test. She had never

requested any of this. She wanted to raise Madison

on her own.

When I told Michelle what I believed the County

Attorney was intent on achieving, she told me not to

worry because they couldn't ask for what they hadntpaid her..

On October 2, 2007 Jenny Scott wrote a letter to

Michelle Brizendine requesting a meeting about how

the city is acting in this case. By the end of the

month Scott told me that she had heard nothing from

Michelle in answer to her request.. On October 30,

2007 my mother, Jane Hignite, and my brother, Cory

Hignite, went to see Michelle where she, Madison

and a younger daughter now live, with her parentshere in Lexington. They were greeted cordially.

Michelle was not at home, but her father encouraged

my mother to speak with her on the phone and a

meeting between them was arranged for the evening

of the following day, October 31, 2007. .

At that meeting, the meeting of October 31, 2007,

Michelle Brizendine made several quite significant

statements.

First, in answer to my mothers query about

Michelles (non-) response to Jenny Scotts letter to

her, Michelle stated: I didn't even get anything today

I had my dad open my mail yesterday after I got off

the phone with you. I don't have anything in the mail.

Second, with regard to the summons and to the

forthcoming court hearing, Michelle reiterated to

mother and to my brother some of what she had told

me in person on June 28. You know, every time


4/6

through the years, they send, they've sent me

papers, like, every year. They always ask me if I

know anything about him, his whereabouts or

anything else and I always put, I don't know. Cuz, I

don't know. Michelle had run into my brother Cory

earlier this summer, once at Gatti-town, once, in July

at the Southland swimming pool. Did I ever ask

you? she said. Cory said No. Michelle continued:

Did I ever one time ask you? Did I say, because if I

knew, I would feel like I had to tell them, does that

make sense? So, I never asked. I've never one time

asked him. Well, where is he livin' or where is he

workin'. I've never asked anything because I knew if

asked I'd feel like when they sent that paper again, I'

have to put it on there.

Third, when my mother apprised Michelle of the

conditions which Byron Ockerman was asking the

Judge to enforce, Michelle expressed shock: Did he

[Chris] piss somebody off? If he's pissed somebody

off down there, then, there ain't nuthin' I can do.

There ain't nuthin' nobody can do. Considering the

matter yet again, Michelle concluded as follows;

Well, it sounds like this really doesn't have anything

to do with me or Madison ... is what it sounds like. It

sounds like they found something they could screw

him on and they're gonna try to do it.

Fourth, Michelle Brizendine divulged to my mother

and to my brother that she herself felt threatened by

the authorities. During the preceding week she had

been called by the County Attorneys Office and told

by her case worker that some discrepancies had

been found in the day-care payments that were being

made, not for Madison Brizendine, but for Michelles

little one, her younger daughter. This child attends

a day-care in Lexington on some days of the week

and a different day-care in Morehead, KY on other

days of the week; the Cabinet for Families and

Children had been paying each day-care for a full

weeks services; they now wanted their money back;

and, Michelle said, they did not intend to seek it from

the day-cares, but were demanding it from Michelle

herself. Michelles case worker set up a meeting wit

her, a meeting that was to take place the very next

day, the same day that Byron Ockerman would seek

a Summary judgement against me. Michelle said: to

my mother I owe them $2600, so tomorrow I'm goin


5/6

to pick up the papers from my work and I'm gonna si

down with the supervisor and I've called Frankfort, I

mean I've called everywhere. If I'm lucky, I can get it

cut in half. If I'm lucky.

IV: Purged Summons

On May 1, 2007, when my mother and I first visited

with Jenny Scott and when we hired her to representme, I had already explained to her that my case migh

not be routine. I believed the County Attorneys office

had been harassing me and filing false claims for

years in order to destroy my credibility and break my

will. She told me that Michelle Brizendine was not

pursuing the matter. She told me that, to the best of

her knowledge all summons and warrants this old

had been purged. She did grant, however, that its

really strange that a ten year old case, not being

pursued by the mother, would just appear onsomeones desk one day.

Ms. Scott called down to juvenile court. The lady

there agreed that the serving of a 10 year old

summons was strange; she suggested that perhaps

there had been some mistake; she felt that most

likely we had nothing to worry about. However, she

also felt we should contact Byron Ockerman, We did

just that. Ms Scott called Byron Ockerman and put

him on speaker phone so that my mother and I couldhear what he had to say. Ockerman told Scott that

he knew the file she was talking about. Oh, said my

attorney, well, this man is disabled and only works on

and off. Additionally, the mother has made no

attempt to pursue this matter. Shouldnt we just set

this aside? This could destroy this mans life. Byron

replied No, I dont think I will. Now that it has been

served I think Ill have some fun with this. My

attorney told him that I had no means to pay what

Ockerman was demanding and that it would bedevastating to me. Ockerman laughed. I know ,

he said, See you in court

.

V: Margaret Kannensohn and Byron Ockerman

In 1996 and again in 1997 Michelle Brizendine did no

want me to know that she thought I was the father of

her child. In fact, she explicitly denied to me that

paternity. And in so doing, she denied to me the righ


6/6

to be a father. Michelle Brizendine had no hand, she

says, in filing a complaint (by Kannensohn,

Ockerman et al.) and no knowledge of any warrant

issued against me.

Why then was a complaint filed? Why was a warran

issued at all? Why is there on the document itself,

even today, no proof whatsoever, either that any

attempt was ever made to serve it or that it was (afteten years) served at all? Why is it that the original of

my copy of the warrant was at some time, by some

one dated by hand in the upper right hand corner 07

17-06, only a month before Margaret Kannensohn

surprised the Lexington Herald-Leader by

announcing that she was retiring as County Attorney

five months before the expiration of her term of

office. And why has Byron Ockerman, Margaret

Kassensohns assistant in 1997, pursued with such

vigor a file that, like its fellows, should have seen the

trash after 3 years. (Rhodes, Mary, Kentucky

Automated Support and Enforcement System

Guidelines, p.7.)

The answers to these questions can be found in the

(abridged) history that follows in part 3:

Suggested by the author:

Deborah Wardlaw murdered by cops? Lexington Mayor says

Cops matter, prostitutes don't!

Bluegrass Conspiracy continues: Scratch a child support

case and solve a murder.

Bluegrass Conspiracy : Scratch a child support case and

solve murder (Part 3)

Lexington, Ky escort agency becomes a top national

agency...with help from police (Part 1)

Please ponder this plea from Pleas: A continuing story of

corruption in Kentucky

Documents

Bluegrass Conspiracy Scratch a Child Support Case and Solve Murder Part 2