Upload
dorcas-cobb
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lansing Central School District
Office of Special Services
Board of Education MeetingSeptember 10, 2012
Special Education Quality Review
-Monitor compliance related to programs and
services provided to students with disabilities.
State Performance Plan Indicator / Target
2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010
School-Age Enrollment 1,518 1,470 1,387
School-Age SWD Enrollment 173 179 182
Classification Rate 11.4% 12.2% 13.1%
Preschool Enrollment 18 13 11
Total Cohort SWD * 19 19
Total Cohort SWD * 19 19
1. 4-year Graduation Rate (44% or higher) * 78.9% 78.9%
Total Cohort SWD * 18 18
5-year Graduation Rate * 77.8% 77.8%
2. 3-8 ELA Performance Index (Make AYP) 115 135 137
3. 3-8 Math Performance Index (Make AYP) 145 161 164
4. Long-term Suspension Rate (2.7% or lower)
0.6% 0.6% 2.7% (4A)
5. LRE – 80% or more of day (More than 53.3%)
81.5% 77.5% 69.6%
6. Preschool Outcomes – Percent functioning within age expectations by the time they exited the program (55.4%; 55.3%; 63.2%)
NA NA No (Social/Emotional)Yes (Knowledge & Skills)
Yes (Behaviors)
7. Timely Evaluations (100%) NA 90.9% (Preschool)100% (School-age)
NA
8. Early Childhood Transition (100%) NA NA NA
9. Secondary Transition (100%) 43.3% 100% NA
10. Post-School Outcomes Within One Year – Baseline data collected
NA NA 38% (Higher Ed.)75% (Higher
Ed./Employment)88% (Postsecondary education or some
employment)
LCSD Data Profile for 2006-2011- Special Education
Consultant teacher 20:1 ratio Resource Room 5:1 ratioIntegrated Co-teachingSpecial Class 15:1 ratio Related Services Speech and Language Pathology Audiology services Psychological services Physical therapy Occupational Therapy Counseling Services Assistive technology services Teacher of visually impaired
Special Education Continuum of Services
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Development
IEP Implementation
Appropriate Instruction from Qualified Staff
Access to and Participation and Progress in the General Education Curriculum
Specially-designed Instruction
Instruction in Literacy
Behavioral Supports
Parental Involvement
Focused Review -designed to provide information
Review of school records
Classroom visitations and interviews
Observations of Committee on Special Education
Interviews of administration and faculty
Interview of parents and guardians
Case studies
Elements for Evidence
Response to Intervention (RtI)
Layered Curriculum that allows for differentiated instruction
Implementation of Just Words (Wilson Reading) MS/HS
SPED teachers participating in PD on goal development& progress monitoring
Leveled Literacy Intervention (Fountas & Pinnell) as a Tier II intervention
at the elementary level
The development of effective practices for a student strength-based functional behavioral assessment (FBA) and BIP process.
Positive practices
Alignment of annual goals and progress monitoring
Progress monitoring of Behavior Intervention Plans
Areas of non-compliance
Continued Professional development
Development of RtI (HS/MS)
Aligned FBA/BIP in the district
Where we are
“I”m not afraid of storms, for I’m learning to sail my ship”. Aeschylus
CHANGE…CHANGE…CHANGE…CHANGE…CHANGE…