Upload
others
View
8
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
bottom and charm hadronspectroscopy from lattice QCD
mu ≈ md < ms ∼ ΛQCD < mc <1
a< mb
bottom baryons in context
Y
B
I
ΞΞb
−
Ξb−
Σbo
Ξob
bo
+Σ
oΞ
p
Λ
−Ξ
−Σ
n
Σο
Ω
ΣΛ
Σ
Ξ
Ω
Ξ
b−
b−
bo
b+
bbo
bb−
bb−
bb
Σ
Ξ
Σ’
bΩ
Ξ
bbb
b
bb
Σ−
b
Σ
−
’b
o*
+*
o*−*
−*
−*
−*
−*
Ξ
o*
++∆
−∆
Ω−
Σ+
Ξo
o
+∆
o∆
Ξb
Σ b−*
bb
Ω
Ξ
Ω
spin 1/2 spin 3/2
Mass differences between these multiplets, eg. m(Σ∗)−m(Σ), vanish as mb →∞.
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.They see a curious systematic dependence:O5 for Λb,Ξb versus Oµ for Σb,Ξ
′b,Ωb.
MDLW also have preliminary results for bband b baryons (see LAT2009 proceedings).
4. Results and discussion 91
(absolute masses) in Sec. 1.3.2, and here in the figure we show mass differences obtained by simply
subtracting the original data. We also show the four independent mass differences in Fig. 4.7.
Figure 4.6: The mass differences of Jp = 12
+singly bottom baryons. In the legend, “full” indicates
the full QCD data point fit result, and “quad” indicates the simultaneous quadratic fit result.
In general, the error bars are compatible with that of the singly charmed baryons, except on some
occasions of the medium-coarse lattice with the full QCD data point fit.
The pattern of the result in Fig. 4.6 is similar with that of the singly charmed baryons. The
mass differences of !b ! "b, !!b ! #b, $b ! #b, and $b ! !!
b, which consist of the same operator,
agree with the experimental data and the Lewis and Woloshyn’s result. There are the constant shift
about 60 " 100 MeV in the other mass differences of baryons that consist of the different operator
combinations. For the fine lattice especially we can observe the pattern more clearly.
Lastly, we show the doubly charmed and bottom baryons in Fig. 4.8. We display our fine and
coarse lattice results with ! = 2.1 and 2.5 lattice results of Lewis et al. [3] for the doubly charmed
baryons, and Lewis and Woloshyn [5] for the doubly bottom baryons. We note that Lewis and
Woloshyn’s paper [5] contains a dynamical sea quark flavor simulation result. We set the scale of
This is figure 4.6 of Heechang Na’s thesis (2008).
Fine lattice results produce systematically large splittings of (Λb,Ξb) versus (Σb,Ξ′b,Ωb)
relative to other lattice results and experiment.
The thesis suggests a possible cause: “we cannot separate Jp = 12
+ and 32
+ states usingthe spin projection operators” for Oµ. See the thesis for a thorough discussion.
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : GAUGE ACTIONLW : IwasakiNG : one-loop Symanzik
BHLLS : one-loop Lüscher-WeiszDLW : Iwasaki
LCMO : SymanzikMDLW : Iwasaki
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : u,d,s ACTIONLW : nonpert-tuned cloverNG : improved staggered
BHLLS : chirally improvedDLW : domain wall
LCMO : sea = impr. staggered: valence = domain wall
MDLW : domain wall
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : b ACTIONLW : NRQCD incl O(1/M 3)NG : Fermilab
BHLLS : staticDLW : static
LCMO : staticMDLW : NRQCD
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : LATTICE SPACINGLW : 0.104 fmNG : 0.15, 0.12, 0.09 fm
BHLLS : 0.11, 0.16 fmDLW : 0.114 fm
LCMO : 0.124 fmMDLW : 0.11 fm
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : LATTICE VOLUMELW : (2.1 fm)3
NG : (2.4 fm)3
BHLLS : (1.35 fm)3, (2.5 fm)3
DLW : (2.7 fm)3
LCMO : (2.5 fm)3
MDLW : (2.7 fm)3
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : PION MASSLW : 4; minimum∼600 MeVNG : 2 or 3; min∼290 MeV
BHLLS : 461 MeV and 525 MeVDLW : 3 sea + 6 valence;
: minimum∼275 MeVLCMO : 4; minimum∼290 MeVMDLW : 331 MeV
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : s MASSLW : 2; interpolate to physicalNG : ∼physical
BHLLS : s quark is absentDLW : O(10%) > physical
LCMO : ∼physicalMDLW : O(10%) > physical
Ω*bbb
14.3
14.4
14.5m
ass
[ G
eV/c
2 ] Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009
( Preliminary. Systematic errors unavailable. )
Ξbb Ωbb Ξ*bb Ω*
bb
10.1
10.2
10.3
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ] Lewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009
Λb Ξb Σb Ξ' b Ωb Σ*b Ξ*
b Ω*b
5.4
5.6
5.8
6
6.2
mas
s [
GeV
/c2 ]
experimentLewis,Woloshyn PRD,2009Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD,2009Detmold,Lin,Wingate NPB,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos PRD,2009
CDF
D0
ALSO:Na (and Gottlieb) PhD thesis, 2008contains valuable data for mass differencesof b and bb baryons.
AUTHORS : b MASSLW : 3; interpolate to physicalNG : 1; ∼physical
BHLLS : ∞DLW : ∞
LCMO : ∞MDLW : 1; physical
charmed baryons in context
I
Y
CΣ Λ
−
pn
Σο
−Ξ
Ξo
Ωco
Ξc+
Σc++Σc
o
Ωcc+
Ξcc++
Ξcc+
Λ+c
Σ+
Ξco
cΞo Ξc
+
Σc+
Ω
Σ
cc
Σ
o
o*
Σ
++*
c
−
+*
o
++*
c
ΞΞ
+∆
o∆
Ω
+
c++∆
Σ
Ξ
−∆
−
c
Ωccc
−
c’
Σ
++*
Ξc
’
Ξ
+*
+*
o*
cc
o*
Ξ
Ω
cc
Σ
+
spin 1/2 spin 3/2
á
á á
áá
á áá
á á
áá
á
á
á á
áá
á áá
á á
áá
á
ç
ç
ç
ç ç
ç
ç
ç
ç
ç
ç ç
ç
ç
ç
ç
õ õ
õ
õ
õ
õ õ
õ
õ
õ
ó
ó ó
ó
ó
ó
áá
áá
çç
çç
õõ
óó
Liu et al. 1Liu et al. 1Liu et al. 2Liu et al. 2Na et al.Ha~0.12 fmLNa et al.Ha~0.12 fmLFlynn et al.Flynn et al.
Mathur et al.Mathur et al.Chiu et al.Chiu et al.
Lc Xc Sc Xc' Wc Xcc Wcc
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
MeV
This is figure 14 of Liu,Lin,Orginos,Walker-Loud arxiv:0909.3294.
LLOW use Symanzik gauge, staggered sea, domain wall valence, Fermilab charm,a = 0.125 fm, volume = (2.4 fm)3, mπ ≥ 290 MeV.
NG study many mass differences, including Ξ∗cc and Ω∗cc.
Flynn+, Mathur+, and Chiu+ are quenched results, including spin 3/2.
(direct)(from splittings)
bottom mesons in context
I
Y
B
_
B
Ko
π+πο
ηc
η
’η
−π
K+
*
−+
ο
ρρ
ρ ω
φ
KKo +
B−
*
*_
Bs
B+
o
B+
Bo
B+
_
s
−*K o_
K*
s
J/ψ
**
Bo
oK
B
B*o
B*−
K
_
−
_
s*B
pseudoscalars vectors
As mb →∞, heavy quark symmetry⇒ m(B−) = m(B∗−), m(B0) = m(B∗0), m(Bs) = m(B∗s ).
These doublets are named 1S. Excited doublets are named 1P−, 1P+, 1D−,1D+,. . . 2S,. . . .
Status of the static-strange (∼ Bs) spectrum for Nf = 2 in 2007
0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18Lattice spacing a
400
600
800
1000∆E
2S-1S1P
--1S
1P+-1S
D--1S
D+-1S
MeV
ETM
UKQCD
BGR
TrinLat
This is figure 21 of Koponen Phys.Rev.D78:074509,2008.
Warning: Do not attempt continuum extrapolations with different actions.
spectrum of static-light mesons with Nf = 2
S P- P+ D± D+ F± S P- P+ D± D+ F±static with u,d static with s
500
1000
1500m
ass r
elat
ive
to 1
S [
MeV
/c2 ]
Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer PRD 2009Jansen,Michael,Shindler,Wagner JHEP 2008Michael,Shindler,Wagner arxiv:1004.4235
JMSW use tree-level Symanzik gauge, two twisted mass light quarks, static “b”,a = 0.0855 fm, volume = (2.05 fm)3, mπ ≥ 300 MeV.
MSW is similar but a = 0.051, 0.064, 0.080 fm and a partially-quenched s quark.
(Black ovals are onlyto guide the eye ingrouping relevant data.)
spectrum of bottom mesons
B B* B0 B1 B' 1 B2 Bs B*s Bs0 Bs1 B' s1Bs2 Bc B*c Bc05200
5400
5600
5800
6000
6200
6400
6600
6800m
ass [
MeV
/c2 ]
experimentKoponen PRD 2008Lewis,Woloshyn PRD 2009Jansen,Michael,Shindler,Wagner JHEP 2008Gregory et al. (HPQCD) LAT2009Michael,Shindler,Wagner arxiv:1004.4235
HPQCD: tune parameters to Υ, ηc, pion and kaon.
charmed mesons in context
D−
D
_
I
C
Y
o +K
π−
η’
η
cη
οπ+π
−+
ο
ρρ
ρ ω
φ
KKo +
*
oD
K
s−
Ds*
_
−
−*K
o*D
o_
K*o
D
_
D
K
J/ψ
**
o
*s+
D
*+
sD+
D
−*D
+
D
o
−K
pseudoscalars vectors
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
Mas
s(M
eV)
Ds(0−) D∗s0(0
+) Ds1(1+) Ds1(1+) D∗s(1
−?)
Ds(1969)
Ds1(2460)Ds1(2536)
D∗s0(2317)
D∗s(2112)
ss
s
s
This is figure 5 of Dong,Alexandru,Draper,Liu,Li,Streuer,Zhang LAT2009.
Iwasaki gauge, domain wall sea, overlap valence,a = 0.08 fm, volume = (2.7 fm)3, mπ = 331 MeV.
References mentioned on the preceeding pages
Mathur,Lewis,Woloshyn Phys.Rev.D66:014502,2002Flynn,Mescia,Tariq JHEP0307:066,2003Chiu,Hsieh Nucl.Phys.A755:471,2005Foley,O’Cais,Peardon,Ryan (TrinLat) Phys.Rev.D75:094503,2007Koponen Phys.Rev.D78:074509,2008Burch,Chakrabarti,Hagen,Maurer,Schafer,Lang,Limmer (BGR) LAT2007 arxiv:0709.3708Lewis,Woloshyn Phys.Rev.D79:014502,2009Na PhD thesis August 2008. Available from proquest.umi.com.Jansen,Michael,Shindler,Wagner (ETMC) LAT2008 arxiv:0808.2121Burch,Hagan,Lang,Limmer,Schafer Phys.Rev.D79:014504,2009Jansen,Michael,Shindler,Wagner JHEP0812:058,2008Na,Gottlieb LAT2008 arxiv:0812.1235Detmold,Lin,Wingate Nucl.Phys.B818:17,2009Lin,Cohen,Mathur,Orginos Phys.Rev.D80:054027,2009Liu,Lin,Orginos,Walker-Loud arxiv:0909.3294Meinel,Detmold,Lin,Wingate LAT2009 arxiv:0909.3837Dong,Alexandru,Draper,Liu,Li,Steuer,Zhang LAT2009 arxiv:0911.0868Gregory,Davies,Follana,Gamiz,Kendall,Lepage,Na,Shigemitsu,Wong LAT2009 arxiv:0911.2133
Michael,Shindler,Wagner arxiv:1004.4235