braf dia

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    1/15

    1

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    BRAF V600E expression and distribution in desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma

    / ganglioglioma1

    Christian Koelsche1,2, Felix Sahm1,2, Werner Paulus3, Michel Mittelbronn4, Felice

    Giangaspero5, Manila Antonelli5, Jochen Meyer2, Felix Lasitschka6, Andreas von

    Deimling1,2 and David Reuss1,2

    1Department of Neuropathology, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    2Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg,

    Germany

    3Institute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Mnster, Mnster, Germany

    4Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    5Department of Radiological Oncological Sciences and Pathology, Universit Sapienza, Roma, Italy

    6Institute of Pathology, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Corresponding Author

    David Reuss, MD

    Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg

    Department of Neuropathology

    Im Neuenheimer Feld 224

    D-69120 Heidelberg

    Fon: +49 (0)6221 56 4651

    Fax: +49 (0)6221 56 4566

    Email: [email protected]

    Running title: BRAF V600E mutation in DIA/DIG

    This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the

    copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this

    version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/nan.12072

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    2/15

    2

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Key words: desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma, desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma, BRAF,

    BRAF V600E, glioma, tumour, VE1, immunohistochemistry

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    3/15

    3

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Abstract

    Aims: Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma / ganglioglioma (DIA/DIG) is a rare primary

    neuroepithelial brain tumour typically affecting paediatric patients younger than 24

    months. Knowledge about genetic alterations in DIA/DIG is limited. However, a

    previous study on BRAF V600E mutation in paediatric glioma revealed a BRAF

    mutation in one of two tested DIAs/DIGs. The limited number of cases in that study

    did not allow any conclusion about mutation frequency ofBRAFin this tumour entity.

    Methods: We collected a series of 18 DIAs/DIGs for testing BRAFV600E mutational

    status by BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (clone VE1). Cases with sufficient

    DNA were tested forBRAFV600E mutation by pyrosequencing.

    Results: Three out of 18 DIAs/DIGs presented with VE1 binding. A considerable

    proportion ofBRAFV600E mutated tumour cells was detected in the cortical tumour

    component, whereas the pronounced leptomeningeal tumoral stroma was

    predominantly negative for VE1 binding. Pyrosequencing confirmed BRAF V600E

    mutation in two of three VE1 positive cases.

    Conclusion: BRAF V600E mutation affects a subset of DIAs/DIGs and offers new

    therapeutic opportunities.

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    4/15

    4

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Introduction

    Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma / ganglioglioma (DIA/DIG) is a meningocerebral

    neuroepithelial tumour with a pronounced desmoplastic leptomeningeal tumour

    component [1]. The overall incidence of DIAs/DIGs has been estimated at less than

    0.3 %, but when limited to infancy age, DIAs/DIGs accounts for approximately 16 %

    of intracranial tumours [2, 3]. Most DIAs/DIGs have been described in paediatric

    patients younger than 24 months. However, rare cases have been reported in

    paediatric patients exceeding this age-range [4]. DIAs/DIGs almost always grow

    supratentorial favouring the fronto-temporal region [4]. Upon neuroimaging

    DIAs/DIGs typically present with a cystic mass of deep localization and a peripheral

    solid tumour portion [5].

    Histologically, the neuroepithelial tumour can present with purely astrocytic

    differentiation (DIA) or be composed of tumour cells with astrocytic and neuronal

    differentiation (DIG) [1]. Due to their very close histomorphological relationship, DIAs

    and DIGs have been categorized together in the WHO classification of tumours of the

    central nervous system [1]. DIA/DIG corresponds to WHO grade I because of their

    benign biological behaviuor with a favorable clinical course even after subtotal

    resection, [1, 2, 6]. Nevertheless, single cases have been reported with signs of

    malignant transformation or multifocal intracranial growth which then behaved

    aggressively [7, 8].

    Knowledge of the genetic background in DIA/DIG is very limited and cytogenetic data

    are only available of a small number of cases. TP53 mutation, which is often found in

    diffuse astrocytoma, was not found in DIA/DIG and suggests no close genetic

    relation of these entities [9]. Furthermore, an array CGH based study of 3 DIAs/DIGs

    revealed no consistent chromosomal gains or losses [10].

    Recently, point mutation of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)

    at codon position 600 has been shown in roughly 60 % of ganglioglioma and 10 % of

    pilocytic astrocytoma [11-13]. Due to their close relation regarding clinical

    presentation and histological features, a similar genetic background has been

    assumed [14]. Data about BRAFV600E mutation in DIA/DIG are very limited. One

    sequencing-based study revealed BRAFV600E mutation in a single DIG case [15].

    However, the small number of investigated DIGs did not allow any extrapolation in

    terms of incidence ofBRAFV600E mutation.

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    5/15

    5

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    The present study was conducted to investigate the frequency of BRAF V600E

    mutation in 18 DIAs/DIGs by applying the BRAFV600E mutation specific monoclonal

    antibody clone VE1.

    Materials and methods

    Tissue samples and patient characteristics and histology

    In total, 16 DIGs and 2 DIAs WHO grade I were included in this study. Tissue

    samples were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Neuropathology of

    the University Heidelberg, of the Department of Neuropathology of the University

    Bonn, of the Department of Radiological Oncological Sciences and Pathology of the

    University of Roma (Italy), of the Institute for Neuropathology of the University

    Mnster, of the Institute of Neurology (Edinger-Institute) Frankfurt. The median age

    at surgery was 10.5 months (ranging from 1 to 60 months) and the female/male

    gender ratio was 0.8. Tumour growth was located supratentorial for 17 cases and in

    the posterior fossa for one case. All cases with available neuroimaging report

    presented with a large cystic neocortical lesion (Table 1). All included DIAs/DIGs

    were reviewed by members of the Department of Neuropathology Heidelberg (CK,

    FS, DR) and diagnosed according to the revised WHO 2007 classification of brain

    tumours [1]. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the

    ethical policies of the involved institutions.

    IHC, assessment and microscopy

    To ensure proper antigenicity for IHC we used fresh-cut slides from formalin-fixed

    paraffin embedded tissue which was not previously frozen and was free of

    coagulation artifacts. Sections cut to 4 m were dried at 80C for 15 min and stained

    with BRAF V600E specific clone VE1 on a Ventana BenchMark XT immuno stainer

    (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, USA). The Ventana staining procedure included

    pretreatment with cell conditioner 1 (pH 8) for 64 min, followed by incubation with

    VE1 hybridoma supernatant (monoclonal, dilution 1:5) at 37C for 32 min. Antibody

    incubation was followed by OptiView HQ Universal Linker for 12 min, incubation with

    OptiView HRP Multimer for 12 minutes, signal amplification including the Ventana

    OptiView Amplification Kit (Ventana, catalogue number 760-099), counterstaining

    with one drop of haematoxylin for 4 min and one drop of bluing reagent for 4 min. As

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    6/15

    6

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    positive and negative controls a tissue micro array consisting of 4 melanoma

    samples with known BRAF V600 status (2 BRAFwild type, 2 BRAFV600E) were

    included in every staining run. VE1 was scored as either positive or negative.

    Macro-, Laser-capture microdissection and DNA extraction

    Macro-dissection was performed of corresponding VE1 positive areas on unstained

    slides of 10 m thickness and collected in 1.5 ml Eppendorf Safe-Lock tubes

    (Eppendorf AG). For LASER-assisted microdissection VE1 stained slides of 10 m

    thickness were washed in ethanol and incubated for 5 min in xylene. After air-drying

    the slides were dissected by the Microbeam LMPC System (Carl Zeiss

    MicroImaging) using the RoboLPC method. Dissected material was captured and

    collected in 1.5 ml AdhesiveCaps opaque (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). DNA was

    extracted applying the NucleoSpin Tissue XS kit (Machery-Nagel) according to the

    manufacturers instructions.

    Sequencing

    DNA was available from 4 DIGs and 1 DIA. Pyrosequencing for codon 600 of BRAF

    was performed as previously described [16]. The sequence was compared with

    GenBank sequence NM_004333 forBRAFas reference.

    Results

    A total of 16 DIGs and two DIAs were screened for BRAF V600E mutated protein by

    applying VE1 IHC (Table 1). Three cases, two DIGs and one DIA, presented with

    VE1 immunoreactivity (Figure 1).

    Expression and distribution of BRAF V600E mutated protein in DIA/DIG

    A case of an 6 month old infant with a cystic lesion localized in the temporal lobe (ID

    60212) was diagnosed as DIG and exhibited the predominant BRAF V600E positive

    tumour cell proportion in the cortical tumour component, which presented as a

    subpial ribbon of cells (Figure 1a,b). BRAF V600E positive tumour cells were also

    found accentuated around cortical vessels (Figure 1c). In this region, space-

    occupying subpial cystic changes and distinctive regions with a spongy, microcystic

    appearance were apparent. Both the ganglionic and the undifferentiated

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    7/15

    7

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    neuroepithelial tumour cell component were positive for synapthophysin and VE1.

    The desmoplastic leptomenigeal component contributed the largest tumour part and

    presented with small nests of BRAF V600E expressing tumour cells. VE1 negative

    spindle cells surrounded these nests. Nevertheless, even if most cortical tumour cells

    were VE1 positive, they made only the minor tumour cell fraction in the desmoplastic

    leptomeningeal tumour region (Figure 1c).

    The second VE1 positive DIG (ID 60192) developed in the occipital lobe of a 5 year

    old child. The tissue solely comprised of the desmoplastic leptomeningeal tumour

    component. Here, small nests of tumour cells faintly bound VE1 (Figure 1d,e).

    The BRAFV600E mutated DIA (ID 56972) occurred in the suprasellar region of a 4

    months young infant. The tumour bulk completely consisted of desmoplastic tumour

    tissue with VE1 positive tumour cells arranged in nests surrounded by predominantly

    VE1 negative spindle-shaped cells (Figure S1).

    Confirmation ofBRAFV600E mutation by DNA-based method

    VE1 specificity was verified by pyrosequencing ofBRAFcodon 600 in 5 cases (Table

    1). All VE1 negative cases with DNA available were confirmed as BRAF wt.

    Pyrosequencing revealed BRAFV600E mutation in case 57094 and 60212. For the

    latter one macro-dissection of VE1 positive cells was performed to enrich tumour

    DNA. The cortical and desmoplastic leptomeningeal tumour components were

    separately dissected. BRAF V600E mutated allele was detected in both fractions,

    however the allelic frequency ofBRAFV600E mutation was somewhat lower in the

    desmoplastic region (Figure 1b,c inlet).

    The small amount of VE1 positive cells in case 60192 impeded the confirmation of

    BRAF mutation by sequencing. Preceding laser-capture microdissection was

    performed to enrich the proportion of VE1 positive tumour cell DNA. However, BRAF

    V600E mutant alleles were not detected.

    Discussion

    BRAF mutation has been shown to play a pivotal role in glioma tumorigenesis,

    especially in paediatric patients [12, 15, 17]. The close relationship of DIA/DIG with

    pilocytic astrocytoma and ganglioglioma, the latter harboring BRAFV600E mutation

    in the majority of cases, and the previously described detection of BRAF V600E

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    8/15

    8

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    mutation in a single DIG case raised the hypothesis that BRAFmutation might also

    be a common genetic alteration contributing to DIA/DIG tumorigenesis [12-14].

    BRAF V600E (VE1) binding was detected in 3 of 18 DIA/DIG and confirmation by

    sequencing was yielded in two cases (IDs 57094 and 60212). VE1 binding was

    confined to the non-spindle cell component whereas the desmoplastic spindle-

    shaped cells were predominantly VE1 negative. Of note, almost all DIAs/DIGs

    reported here presented with a pronounced leptomeningeal desmoplastic tumour

    component, whereas the cortical component was lacking or represented a minor

    fraction of samples. Since spindle-shaped cells in the leptomeningeal component

    were predominantly VE1 negative, tumour cell dilution by these VE1 negative cells

    possibly reduced the probability of finding mutation by DNA-based methods and

    might explain the failure ofBRAFV600E confirmation by sequencing for case 60192.

    However, BRAF V600E mutation specific antibody staining is a useful tool in

    particular for tumour regions with low tumour-cell density resulting from prominent

    desmoplasia, for instance. VE1 IHC allows the detection of BRAF V600E mutated

    protein close to the single cell level. Previous studies have confirmed the high

    reliability, sensitivity and feasibility of BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody application in

    such tumour entities [12, 18-23].

    Furthermore, VE1 IHC has the advantage of being able to evaluate the distribution of

    BRAF V600E mutated protein in tissue. Case 60212 was suitable for a

    comprehensive examination of the expression and distribution of BRAF V600E

    mutated protein in both the cortical and leptomeningeal tumour component.

    Interestingly, the cortical tumour region presented with a prominent subpial ribbon

    and angiocentric pattern of VE1 positive tumour cells, whereas the leptomeningeal

    tumour part had intermingled groups of VE1 binding cells. Previous studies had

    assumed that somatic mutations of common neoplastic precursor cells like

    specialized subpial glial cells might lead to brain tumours with neocortical localization

    and a close relation to the meninges [9]. The cortical ribbon of VE1 positive cells

    might reflect the subpial origin of DIA/DIG.

    Case 60192 solely covered a small part of the leptomeningeal desmoplastic tumour

    component. Thus, this case was ineligible for a comprehensive analysis of tumour

    cell distribution. Nevertheless, the VE1 positive cells arranged in nests and were

    surrounded by VE1 negative spindle shaped cells, a similar pattern as seen in case

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    9/15

    9

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    60212 and 57094. The distribution of VE1 positive cells in these cases may argue for

    the cortical tumour cells as the true neoplastic component whereas the prominent

    desmoplastic component may be purely reactive in nature.

    Recently, we revealed the expression of BRAF V600E mutated protein in the

    ganglionic tumour cell component of ganglioglioma [12]. Corresponding to the finding

    in ganglioglioma, we also found an overlap of synaptophysin- and BRAF V600E

    (VE1) staining in DIG case ID 60212 (Fig. S2). VE1 positive ganglionic cells were

    detected in both the cortical and the desmoplastic leptomenigeal tumour part.

    Interestingly, the frequency of BRAFV600E mutation in DIAs/DIGs is considerably

    lower than in ganglioglioma (60%) [12, 13]. This may point to a different cell of origin

    in the neuronal lineage which has a different susceptibility to BRAFV600E -induced

    tumor initiation. Further studies are required to reveal more details about the

    molecular relation between DIA/DIG and ganglioglioma including DNA-methylome

    analysis.

    The low rate of BRAF V600E mutation in DIA/DIG argues for additional molecular

    mechanisms that drive tumorigenesis. Candidate alterations include those who also

    activate the MAPK signaling pathway like Neurofibromin 1 (NF1) gene mutation or

    BRAF-fusion. There are indeed single case reports about neurofibromatosis type I

    associated DIG [24]. BRAF-fusion has almost exclusively been restricted to pilocytic

    astrocytoma [25]. Accordingly, we did not find BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion in two cases

    (ID 57094, 60210) analyzed by FISH analysis (data not shown). Nevertheless, a very

    recent whole-exome sequencing based study of different paediatric low-grad glioma

    revealed a new gene fusion involving Fragile X related protein 1 (FXR1) and BRAFin

    one investigated DIG case.

    However, deregulation of BRAF activity by fusion or point mutation indicates the

    importance of MAPK signaling pathway in the development of DIA/DIG.

    A favorable clinical course of DIA/DIG after gross total resection has been reported

    for the great majority of cases, but malignant transformation and multifocal growth

    have been reported in some cases [7, 8]. The latter cases may benefit from a

    systemic therapeutic approach. New drugs targeting the MAPK signaling pathway, by

    selective inhibition of BRAF mutated protein for instance, offer new therapeutic

    options with promising results in BRAFV600E mutated melanoma metastases and

    glioma [26-28].

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    10/15

    10

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Recently, a case with a prenatal diagnosis of DIG has been reported [29]. The young

    age of patients with DIA/DIG has raised the question whether DIA/DIG formation

    starts with the mutation of a progenitor cell conferring to a selective growth

    advantage. Some DIA/DIG cases might be caused by congenital mutations. Thus,

    further investigation of the temporal and spatial development of DIA/DIG might give

    new insights in the biology of this rare disease.

    In summary, we described the presence of BRAF V600E mutation in a subset of

    DIA/DIG and assigned the major proportion of BRAF V600E expressing tumour cells

    to the cortical tumour region.

    Figure 1:

    BRAF V600E (VE1) immunohistochemistry of case 60212 (a-c) and case 60192

    (d,e). (a) Overview of a DIG with cortical and desmoplastic leptomeningeal tumour

    parts. (b) Corresponding magnification of the cortical tumour region with BRAF

    V600E positive ribbon-like staining pattern (arrow) and angiotropism of BRAF V600E

    mutated tumour cells (two-headed arrow). The inlet shows the BRAF codon 600

    pyrogramm of this region with a T to A substitution in 16 % of alleles. (c)

    Corresponding leptomeningeal tumour part with nests of VE1 positive tumour cells

    surrounded by VE1 negative spindle-shaped cells. The inlet shows the BRAFcodon

    600 pyrogramm of this region with a T to A substitution in 10 % of alleles. (d) VE1

    staining of a DIG with faint positive tumour cell nests surrounded by VE1 negative

    desmoplastic stroma. (e) Corresponding magnification of VE1 positive cell nests.

    Magnification: (a) 4-fold; (b,c,e) 200-fold; (d) 30-fold.

    Table 1: Clinical, immunohistochemical and molecular data of DIAs/DIGs

    IDDiagnosis

    (WHO grade)

    Age atsurgery(month)

    Sex Location VE1 Seq

    60194 DIG (I) 1 m temporal - NA

    60196 DIG (I) 2 m supratentorial - NA60214 DIG (I) 3 f posterior fossa - NA

    60206 DIG (I) 4 f temporal - ND

    56972 DIA (I) 4 m suprasellar + V600E

    60188 DIG (I) 6 f temporo-parietal - NA

    60198 DIG (I) 6 m supratentorial - NA

    60212 DIG (I) 6 f temporal + V600E

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    11/15

    11

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    60200 DIG (I) 7 m parietal - NA

    60216 DIG (I) 8 m temporo-parietal - NA

    60202 DIG (I) 8 m frontal - NA

    60218 DIA (I) 9 f frontal - NA

    60220 DIG (I) 9 m frontal - wt

    60222 DIG (I) 10 m occipital - NA

    60204 DIG (I) 12 f supratentorial - NA

    60190 DIG (I) 12 f supratentorial - wt

    60210 DIG (I) 17 f fronto-parietal - NA

    60192 DIG (I) 60 m occipital + wt

    ID ~ internal patient number; DIG ~ desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma; DIA ~

    desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma; m ~ male; f~ female; NA ~ not available; VE1 ~

    antibody clone VE1; - ~ immunonegative; + ~ immunopositive; Seq ~ BRAFcodon

    600 pyrosequencing status; V600E ~ BRAFV600E mutation; wt ~ BRAFwild type;

    Figure S1:

    Sagittal postgadolinium T1-weighted (a) and sagittal T2- (CISS) weighted (b) MR

    images of a 4 month old child showing a large primarily supratentorial solid-cystic

    tumour. (a) The solid component (white arrow) shows heterogeneous enhancement

    following gadolinium injection. (b) T2 (CISS) weighted images visualize a large

    anterior and small posterior cystic component (white arrows). Note the subdural

    hygroma surrounding the anterior cystic tumour mass. (c) H&E staining shows an

    astrocytic tumour with abundant desmoplasia. (d) BRAF V600E (VE1)

    immunohistochemistry shows positive tumor cells embedded in a desmoplastic

    matrix. Magnification: (c-d) 200-fold. (e) BRAFcodon 600 pyrogramm with a T to A

    substitution in 20 % of alleles.

    Figure S2:

    (a) BRAF V600E (VE1) staining of tumour cells in the desmoplastic component of

    DIG case 60212. (b) Corresponding region stained against Synaptophysin (Syn)

    revealed a similar staining pattern compared to VE1 IHC. Magnification: 100-fold.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Tanja Goeck and Jutta Scheuerer for excellent technical

    assistance, Philipp Kickingereder for MRI examination and images, and Andrey

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    12/15

    12

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    Korshunov forBRAF-KIAA1549 FISH analysis. This work was in part funded by the

    Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SFB 938/TP Z2 (F.L.).

    Conflict of interest

    AvD has applied for a patent on the diagnostic use of BRAF V600E mutant-specific

    antibody VE1. All terms are being managed by the German Cancer Research Center

    in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

    Authors contribution

    CK histologic imaging, data analysis and manuscript preparation

    FS data analysis

    WP collection of cases, clinical data

    MM collection of cases, clinical data

    FG collection of cases, clinical data

    MA collection of cases

    JM molecular analysis

    FL molecular analysis

    AvD data analysis, manuscript preparation

    DR project conception, data analysis and manuscript preparation

    References

    1 Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A,Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the centralnervous system.Acta Neuropathol2007; 114: 97-1092 VandenBerg SR. Desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma and desmoplasticcerebral astrocytoma of infancy. Brain Pathol1993; 3: 275-813 Zuccaro G, Taratuto AL, Monges J. Intracranial neoplasms during the first yearof life. Surg Neurol1986; 26: 29-364 Gelabert-Gonzalez M, Serramito-Garcia R, Arcos-Algaba A. Desmoplasticinfantile and non-infantile ganglioglioma. Review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev2010; 34: 151-8

    5 Trehan G, Bruge H, Vinchon M, Khalil C, Ruchoux MM, Dhellemmes P, AresGS. MR imaging in the diagnosis of desmoplastic infantile tumor: retrospective studyof six cases.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2004; 25: 1028-336 Takeshima H, Kawahara Y, Hirano H, Obara S, Niiro M, Kuratsu J.Postoperative regression of desmoplastic infantile gangliogliomas: report of twocases. Neurosurgery2003; 53: 979-83; discussion 83-4

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    13/15

    13

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    7 Al-Kharazi K, Gillis C, Steinbok P, Dunham C. Malignant desmoplastic infantileastrocytoma? a case report and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol2013; 32:100-68 Uro-Coste E, Ssi-Yan-Kai G, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Boetto S, Bertozzi AI, SevelyA, Lolmede K, Delisle MB. Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma with benignhistological phenotype and multiple intracranial localizations at presentation. J

    Neurooncol2010; 98: 143-99 Louis DN, von Deimling A, Dickersin GR, Dooling EC, Seizinger BR.Desmoplastic cerebral astrocytomas of infancy: a histopathologic,immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic study. Hum Pathol1992; 23: 1402-910 Kros JM, Delwel EJ, de Jong TH, Tanghe HL, van Run PR, Vissers K, AlersJC. Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma and ganglioglioma: a search for genomiccharacteristics.Acta Neuropathol2002; 104: 144-811 Dias-Santagata D, Lam Q, Vernovsky K, Vena N, Lennerz JK, Borger DR,Batchelor TT, Ligon KL, Iafrate AJ, Ligon AH, Louis DN, Santagata S. BRAF V600Emutations are common in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: diagnostic andtherapeutic implications. PLoS ONE2011; 6: e17948

    12 Koelsche C, Wohrer A, Jeibmann A, Schittenhelm J, Schindler G, Preusser M,Lasitschka F, von Deimling A, Capper D. Mutant BRAF V600E protein inganglioglioma is predominantly expressed by neuronal tumor cells.Acta Neuropathol2013; 125: 891-90013 Schindler G, Capper D, Meyer J, Janzarik W, Omran H, Herold-Mende C,Schmieder K, Wesseling P, Mawrin C, Hasselblatt M, Louis DN, Korshunov A, PfisterS, Hartmann C, Paulus W, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A. Analysis of BRAF V600Emutation in 1,320 nervous system tumors reveals high mutation frequencies inpleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma and extra-cerebellar pilocyticastrocytoma.Acta Neuropathol2011; 121: 397-40514 Komori T, Scheithauer BW, Parisi JE, Watterson J, Priest JR. Mixedconventional and desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma: an autopsied case with 6-year

    follow-up. Mod Pathol2001; 14: 720-615 Dougherty MJ, Santi M, Brose MS, Ma C, Resnick AC, Sievert AJ, Storm PB,Biegel JA. Activating mutations in BRAF characterize a spectrum of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Neuro Oncol2010; 12: 621-3016 Capper D, Voigt A, Bozukova G, Ahadova A, Kickingereder P, von Deimling A,von Knebel Doeberitz M, Kloor M. BRAF V600E-specific immunohistochemistry forthe exclusion of Lynch syndrome in MSI-H colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer2013:17 Hasselblatt M, Riesmeier B, Lechtape B, Brentrup A, Stummer W, Albert FK,Sepehrnia A, Ebel H, Gerss J, Paulus W. BRAF-KIAA1549 fusion transcripts are lessfrequent in pilocytic astrocytomas diagnosed in adults. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol2011; 37: 803-618 Andrulis M, Penzel R, Weichert W, von Deimling A, Capper D. Application of aBRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody for the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia. AmJ Surg Pathol2012; 36: 1796-80019 Capper D, Berghoff AS, Magerle M, Ilhan A, Wohrer A, Hackl M, Pichler J,Pusch S, Meyer J, Habel A, Petzelbauer P, Birner P, von Deimling A, Preusser M.Immunohistochemical testing of BRAF V600E status in 1,120 tumor tissue samplesof patients with brain metastases.Acta Neuropathol2012; 123: 223-33

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    14/15

    14

    This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

    20 Capper D, Preusser M, Habel A, Sahm F, Ackermann U, Schindler G, PuschS, Mechtersheimer G, Zentgraf H, von Deimling A. Assessment of BRAF V600Emutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonalantibody.Acta Neuropathol2011; 122: 11-921 Lade-Keller J, Kristensen LS, Riber-Hansen R, Guldberg P, Hansen LL,Steiniche T, Hager H. A role for immunohistochemical detection of BRAF V600E prior

    to BRAF-inhibitor treatment of malignant melanoma? J Clin Pathol2013:22 Long GV, Wilmott JS, Capper D, Preusser M, Zhang YE, Thompson JF,Kefford RF, von Deimling A, Scolyer RA. Immunohistochemistry is highly sensitiveand specific for the detection of V600E BRAF mutation in melanoma.Am J SurgPathol2013; 37: 61-523 Sahm F, Capper D, Preusser M, Meyer J, Stenzinger A, Lasitschka F,Berghoff AS, Habel A, Schneider M, Kulozik A, Anagnostopoulos I, Mullauer L,Mechtersheimer G, von Deimling A. BRAFV600E mutant protein is expressed in cellsof variable maturation in Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Blood2012; 120: e28-3424 Rodriguez FJ, Perry A, Gutmann DH, O'Neill BP, Leonard J, Bryant S,Giannini C. Gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: a clinicopathologic study of 100patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol2008; 67: 240-9

    25 Horbinski C. To BRAF or not to BRAF: is that even a question anymore? JNeuropathol Exp Neurol2013; 72: 2-726 Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J,Dummer R, Garbe C, Testori A, Maio M, Hogg D, Lorigan P, Lebbe C, Jouary T,Schadendorf D, Ribas A, O'Day SJ, Sosman JA, Kirkwood JM, Eggermont AM,Dreno B, Nolop K, Li J, Nelson B, Hou J, Lee RJ, Flaherty KT, McArthur GA.Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N EnglJ Med2011; 364: 2507-1627 Nicolaides TP, Li H, Solomon DA, Hariono S, Hashizume R, Barkovich K,Baker SJ, Paugh BS, Jones C, Forshew T, Hindley GF, Hodgson JG, Kim JS,Rowitch DH, Weiss WA, Waldman TA, James CD. Targeted therapy for BRAFV600Emalignant astrocytoma. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 7595-604

    28 Rush S, Foreman N, Liu A. Brainstem ganglioglioma successfully treated withvemurafenib. J Clin Oncol2013; 31: e159-6029 Alghamdi S, Castellano-Sanchez A, Brathwaite C, Shimizu T, Khatib Z, BhatiaS. Strong desmin expression in a congenital desmoplastic infantile gangliogliomamimicking pleomorphic rhadomyosarcoma: a case report including ultrastructural andcytogenetic evaluation and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst2012; 28: 2157-62

  • 7/28/2019 braf dia

    15/15

    nan_12072_f1.tif