5
 Internati onal Journa l of Engin eering Tren ds and Techn ology- Volu me4Issue3- 2013 ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 354 Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering Manali Patil Samata Prabhu Sonal Patil Sunilka Patil Mrs.Prachi Kshirsagar I. T. Department, Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan’s College Of Engineering. Sion (East), Mumbai-400 022, India.  Abstract The project is entitled as “BRAIN TUMOR IDENTIFI CATION”. The idea behind choosing this topic was to simplify the process of tumor identification. The system will be computerized and hence time consumed will be less. The system will also keep records of patients who are affected by tumor and who are not. So the doctors can schedule the further treatments for the patients.  Keywords Tumor, Brain, Clustering, MRI image, identifying tumor. I. INTRODUCTION A brain Image consists of four regions i.e. gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and  background. These regions can be considered as four different classes. Therefore, an input image needs to be divided into these four classes. In order to avoid the chances of  misclassification, the outer elliptical shaped object should  be r emoved. By removing this object we will get rid of non  brain tissues and will be left with only soft tissues. Brain tumor identification is used to identify tumor from particular image. Brain tumor identification image application is typically based on clustering concept of image pixels matrix. Brain tumor identification is used to identify tumor affected image based on clustering and centroid concept. The basic concept is that local textures in the images can reveal the typical regularities of the biological structures. Thus, the textural features have been extracted using a co- occurrence matrix approach. The level o f recognition, among three possible types of image areas: tumor, non-tumor and  back ground. The main objective of this project is to study the design of a computer system able to detect the presence of a tumor in the digital images of the brain, and to accurately define its  borderline s A. Images clustering Convert 2-D report into 3-D images because brain is mass  body to calculate centroid so it has 3 dime nsions and we need to calculate centroid, as also we can get more accurate results with 3 dimensions. B. Algorithm k-means 1. Place K points into the space represented by the objects that are being clustered. 2. These points represent initial group of centroids. 3. Assign each object to the group that has the closest centroid. When all objects have been assigned, recalculate the  positions of t he K centroids. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the centroids no longer move. This  produces a separation o f the objects into groups from which the metric to be minimized can be calculated.

Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

7/27/2019 Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brain-tumor-identification-using-k-means-clustering 1/4

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology- Volume4Issue3- 2013

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 354

Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means

ClusteringManali Patil Samata Prabhu Sonal Patil Sunilka Patil

Mrs.Prachi Kshirsagar 

I. T. Department,Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan’s College Of Engineering.

Sion (East), Mumbai-400 022, India.

 Abstract

The project is entitled as “BRAIN TUMOR

IDENTIFICATION”. The idea behind choosing this topic

was to simplify the process of tumor identification. The

system will be computerized and hence time consumed

will be less. The system will also keep records of patientswho are affected by tumor and who are not. So the

doctors can schedule the further treatments for the

patients.

 KeywordsTumor, Brain, Clustering, MRI image, identifying tumor. 

I. INTRODUCTION

A brain Image consists of four regions i.e. gray matter (GM),

white matter (WM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and  background. These regions can be considered as four different classes. Therefore, an input image needs to be

divided into these four classes. In order to avoid the chances

of  misclassification, the outer elliptical shaped object should 

 be removed. By removing this object we will get rid of non brain tissues and will be left with only soft tissues. Brain

tumor identification is used to identify tumor from particular 

image. Brain tumor identification image application is

typically based on clustering concept of image pixels matrix. Brain tumor identification is used to identify tumor affected 

image based on clustering and centroid concept.

The basic concept is that local textures in the images can

reveal the typical regularities of the biological structures.

Thus, the textural features have been extracted using a co-

occurrence matrix approach. The level of recognition, amongthree possible types of image areas: tumor, non-tumor and 

 back ground.

The main objective of this project is to study the design of acomputer system able to detect the presence of a tumor in the

digital images of the brain, and to accurately define its

 borderlines

A. Images clustering

Convert 2-D report into 3-D images because brain is mass

 body to calculate centroid so it has 3 dimensions and we need to calculate centroid, as also we can get more accurate results

with 3 dimensions.

B. Algorithm k-means

1. Place K points into the space represented by the objects

that are being clustered.2. These points represent initial group of centroids.

3. Assign each object to the group that has the closest

centroid.

When all objects have been assigned, recalculate the

 positions of the K centroids.Repeat Steps 2 and 3 until the centroids no longer move. This

 produces a separation of the objects into groups from which

the metric to be minimized can be calculated.

7/27/2019 Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brain-tumor-identification-using-k-means-clustering 2/4

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology- Volume4Issue3- 2013

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 355

II.PROPOSED SYSTEM 

In our project, first the MRI report of the patient is scanned 

and made into computerized form. As it becomes in computerized form, detection of the tumor becomes simpler 

as clustering is done on that MRI image and manual checking

 by doctors is avoided. So the results generated are morespecific.

The major role of this application is to identify the tumor inthe brain image and reconstruct the area which the tumor is

affected and based on the threshold value the system will

identify whether the image is affected by the tumor or not.Following are the functionality which is involved in the

tumor identification module.

  Identification   Reconstruction

  Testimony

A. Identification

K-Means algorithm is used to implement the Identification

of the MRI brain image. Clustering can be considered the

most important unsupervised learning problem; so, as everyother problem of this kind, it deals with finding a structure in

a collection of Unlabeled data. A loose definition of 

clustering could be “the process of organizing objects intogroups whose members are similar in some way”. A cluster  is therefore a collection of objects  which are “similar”

 between them and are “dissimilar” to the objects belonging to

other clusters.

We are implementing the k-means algorithm with brain

image. Algorithm will cluster the brain image and 

differentiate the cells into the affected cluster region and unaffected cluster region.

B.Reconstruction

The affected area will be selected and as a cluster and constructed as an image and it is displayed in the label. Based 

on the constructed area threshold values will calculated and 

the tumor identification process will performed based on the

threshold values. Our system will show the option panemessage dialog contain the image affected or not. 

 _  _ +

Fig: K-means clustering

C.Testimony 

The report is generated based on the affected and theunaffected image. The users have to select the option the

affected or un affected patients. The reports contain the

 patient id and the name of the candidate.

III.STEPS OF IMPLEMENTATION

1.  Register patient details with image of his/her brain.

2.  Select operation.

3.  Select patient ID for identification of image.4.  Select clustering for image clustering.

5.  Reconstruction of image with proper result.

A. Block Diagram

DatabaseUser Login

Clustering of 

3D MRI image

using threshold

value

Report

generation

No of 

clusters

centroid

Distance objects to centroid

endNo obj

move

Start

Grouping based on min

distance

7/27/2019 Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brain-tumor-identification-using-k-means-clustering 3/4

7/27/2019 Brain Tumor Identification Using K-Means Clustering

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brain-tumor-identification-using-k-means-clustering 4/4

 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology- Volume4Issue3- 2013

ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 357

V.CONCLUSION

The “BRAIN TUMOUR IDENTIFICATION” has beendeveloped to satisfy all proposed requirements.

The system is highly scalable and user friendly. Almost allthe system objectives have been met. The system has beentested under all criteria. The system minimizes the problem

arising in the existing manual system and it eliminates the

human errors to zero level.

The design of the database is flexible ensuring that the

system can be implemented. It is implemented and gone

through all validation.

VI.REFERENCES

[1]. Gerig, G., Martin, J., Kikinis, R., Kubler, O., Shenton,

M., Jolesz, F.: Automating Identification of dual-echo MR head data. In: IPMI.

Volume 511. (1991) 175{185

[2]. Kjaer, L., Ring, P., Thomson, C., Henriksen, O.: Texture

analysis in quantitative MR imaging: Tissue characterization

of normal brainand intracranial tumors at 1.5 T. Acta Radiologic (1995)

[3]. War_eld, S., Dengler, J., Zaers, J., Guttman, C., Wells,W., Ettinger, G., Hiller, J., Kikinis, R.: Automatic

identi_cation of gray matter structures from MRI to improve the Identification of white

matter lesions. Journal of Image Guided Surgery 1 (1995)326{338

[4]. Vinitski, S., Gonzales, C., Mohamed, F., Iwanaga, T.,Knobler, R., Khalili, K., Mack, J.: Improved intracranial

lesion characterization

 by tissue Identification based on a 3D feature map. Mag Re

Med (1997) 457{469

[5]. Zhu, Y., Yan, H.: Computerized tumor boundary

detection using a hop_eld neural network. IEEE-TMI (1997)55{67

[6]. Dickson, S., Thomas, B.: Using neural networks to

automatically detect brain tumours in MR images. Int J Neural Syst (1997) 91{99

[7]. Just, M., Thelen, M.: Tissue characterization with T1,

T2, and proton density values: Results in 160 patients with brain tumors.

[8]. O’reilly, Java Swings, Tata McGraw Hill, Fifth Edition,2002 

[9]. Java Handbook, Patrick Naughton & Michael Morrison,

McGraw Hill, 0-078-82199-1,1996

[10]. The Java AWT Reference, O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. ,John Zukowski,1-565-92240-9,1997