Bravo Line lean manfacturing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    1/13

    The Story of the Bravo Line:A Tale of Reduced Lead Times

    and Lots of Early GainsPresented by:

    Charan

    Nageswara Rao

    BupendraNarayan

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    2/13

    If process improvement and the elimination of waste is yourobjective the Bravo Line improvements, show in dramatic

    fashion how important lead-time reductions are.

    They also show just how importantjidoka is to these processimprovements. Lead-time reductions serve many worthwhilefunctions.

    Quick feedback for problem solving Quick turnover of product

    Improved cash flow

    Generating future business

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    3/13

    On this line, which produced 11 different models, they hadalso made an effort to go to small lot production.

    They described a small lot as 50 units, which was a tray. Four trays were stacked in a small box and five small boxes

    were packed in a larger box, for a total of 1000 units perbox, and a typical shipping lot was 2000 units, or two large

    boxes on one pallet. The customer demand was 10,000 units per week

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    4/13

    Their problems were threefold:

    They could not produce to schedule and frequently missedshipments.

    It took nearly twice the time.

    It took nearly 70 percent extra labor to make a batch.

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    5/13

    Approaches:

    Synchronize supply to the customer, externally

    The Takt calculation

    Synchronize production, internally

    The Basic Time and Balancing Studies

    Create flow, including

    Establishingjidoka

    Working to destroy batches

    Establish a pull demand system

    Kanban system, Heijunka

    Implementing the Prescription

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    6/13

    Redesign based on an OEE of 1.00, so takt timeeffectively became cycle time.

    The work (from the time study) for Cell 1 was 207seconds and the work for Cell 2 was 105 seconds.Consequently, for a 39-second takt:

    I. At Cell 1 we needed 207/39 = 5.3, or six stations

    II. At Cell 2 we needed 105/39 = 2.7, or three stations

    Synchronizing Production, Internally

    The Basic Time and Balancing Studies

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    7/13

    It took less than one hour to see one of the major issues.

    Station 6 of Cell 1 was now only used for final visualinspection and packing.

    The very first unit it received had an incorrect O-ringinstalled.

    Fortunately, due to the kanban system, we had less than 25units to rework.

    On this run, we had to stop four more times for qualityproblems in the first four hours of production alone. It was

    clear at this point that process stability was nonexistent.

    he Production Run, with Problems Galor

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    8/13

    The most important quantity control tactic for process

    improvement is often first piece lead-time reduction.

    It is accomplished mainly by a reduction in lot size, ideallygoing to one-piece flow.

    Once achieved, this will allow the problem solving process

    to be responsive, and in this case, rework can be reduced onboth a batch and permanent basis.

    RESULTS

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    9/13

    The company was now able to produce to schedule, and missedshipments dropped to zero.

    First piece lead time was reduced from 3.9 hours to 6.5 minutes.

    They had now reduced the lot lead time from over six days toless than 30 hours.

    They found they could achieve these numbers with much less

    manpower. They reduced from 336 md/10,000 units to theplan of 210 md/10,000 units and then to a new low of 135md/10,000 units. All with virtually no extra investment.

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    10/13

    The Three Fundamental Issues of Cultural Change

    - Plan - motivation - problem solvers

    Foundational issues of quality

    Problem solving by all

    Understanding variation

    Process stability (Cp, Cpk)

    Cycle times reductions

    Standard work

    Availability

    How the Gains Were Achieved

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    11/13

    Quantity Control Techniques Applied

    Jidoka

    One-piece flow, small lot flow

    Balancing to takt

    Minimizing lot sizes

    Reducing bothWIP and lead times, which caused asignificant improvement in the flow

    Quality was improved.

    Lead times were reduced.

    The cost to produce was reduced.

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    12/13

    1. Reduce processing time

    2. Reduce piece wait time

    3. Reduce lot wait time

    4. Reduce process delays5. Manage the process to absorb deviations, solve problems

    6. Reduce transportation delays

    7. Reduce changeover times; employSMED

    Application of The Seven

    Techniques to Improve Flow

  • 8/8/2019 Bravo Line lean manfacturing

    13/13

    And the Story Goes OnThank U