52
Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Breast Cancer Genetics Module

M. Kent Froberg, M.D.

2009

Page 2: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Objectives

• Learn the basic genetics for sporadic and familial forms of breast cancer

• Learn the Bloom-Richardson grading system for breast cancer

• Learn the significance of ER, PR and HER2 proteomics in the Rx and prognosis of breast cancer

Page 3: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 4: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 5: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 6: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 7: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Sporadic Breast Cancer

• ~95% of cases

• Usually NL by cytogenetics

• Alterations include– Activation of oncogenes– Inactivation of tumor suppressor genes– Include gene mutations, deletions,

hypermethylation

Page 8: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Sporadic Breast Cancer

• Amplified Oncogenes:1. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2

(ERBB2, HER2) at 17q12, tyrosine kinase activity. Overexpression in 25-30% of

breast tumors

Associated with a worse prognosis

Page 9: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

HER 2 Targeted Therapy

• Herceptin (trastuzumab) mouse monoclonal Ab vs HER2

12-20% response rate alone, 30-50% response in combination RxBinding internalizes receptors & NK cell-mediated killing

• Tykerb (lapatinib) tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2

Approved by FDA (March 2007) in combination with Capectabine for HER2 + breast cancerSmall molecule enters cell and blocks signal transductionDelayed progression in women that had failed anthracycline, Taxane and trastuzumab

Page 10: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 11: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More Oncogenes

2. Myc at 8qOverexpressed in ~20% of breast CANuclear protein involved in regulation of growth & apoptosis

3. CCND1 (cyclin D1) Overexpression in 15-20% of breast CA (& 80% of invasive lobular carcinomas at protein level)Can bind and activate estrogen receptors

Page 12: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Tumor Suppressor Genes in Breast Cancer

• Inactivated tumor suppressor genes1. p53 at 17p13

nuclear protein that induces cell cycle arrest or apoptosis ~20% of invasive breast carcinomas most are missense mutations, some frameshift with loss of wild type allele May be present by IHC because of failure to degrade p53

Page 13: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More Tumor Suppressor genes

2. RB1CC1 at 8q11

regulator of RB1 gene

seen in ~20% of breast Ca

3. CDH1 at 16q22

cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin

seen in 60% of invasive lobular CA, not ductal

Page 14: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Breast Biopsy

• Needle core or mammatome bx

• Routine:– Dx: Type of Ca (infiltrating ductal, lobular,

intraductal, etc.) – Tumor grade– Lymphovascular permeation– ER/PR/HER2 testing

Page 15: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Lumpectomy or Mastectomy

• Routine pathology:– Confirm Dx of invasive CA, intraductal

– Margins + or -

– Tumor grade

– Lymphatic/vascular invasion + or -

– Maximum dimension (or multifocality)

– Sentinel node or axillary LN metastasis + or -

Page 16: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Histologic Grade

• Bloom/Scarff/Richardson:Tubule formation Nuclear pleomorphism Mitosis (per hpf)

>75% 1 Mild 1 <8 1

10-75% 2 Moderate 2 8-14 2

<10% 3 Marked 3 >14 3

___ ___ ___

Total score of each 3 to 9 used to establish

Page 17: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Bloom/Scarff/Richardson

Grade Description 5yr survival 10yr survival

1 Well-differentiated (3-5) 95% 90%

2 Moderately-differentiated (6,7) 75% 63%

3 Poorly-differentiated (8,9) 50% 45%

Page 18: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Histopathology of well- (A), moderately- (B) and poorly-differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. “A” shows abundant tubules without pleomorphism or mitotic activity, while “C” shows lack of tubules with numerous mitotic figures and nuclear pleomorphism. The tumor in “B” is intermediate.

Page 19: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Routine Proteomics

• ER/PR: ER+ = better prognosis– IHC, also true if PR+– >10% of cells with nuclear staining = positive– <5% nuclear staining = neg

• Her2 (IHC, ELISA, FISH, mRNA)– >30% of cells with membrane staining =

positive

Page 20: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

ER+ breast cancer cells

Page 21: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

PR+

Page 22: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

HER2+

Page 23: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Genetic Assessment for Familial Cancer

• When?

• Who?

• What?

Page 24: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

When?

• ASCO recommends testing for cancer predisposition when there is:

1. Strong family Hx/early onset

2. Tests can be adequately interpreted

3. Results may influence medical mgt

4. >10% probability of detectable mutation in a family

Page 25: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Who?

• Proband and 1st & 2nd degree relatives of the proband

Page 26: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

What?

• Family Hx of specific cancers

• Deleterious mutation in gene of interest

Page 27: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Familial Cancer Syndromes

• Characteristics:1. 5% of all cancers

2. Earlier presentation

3. Vertical transmission within a family

4. lifetime risk

Page 28: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Familial Cancer Syndromes

• More red flags1. Clustering of unusual or rare cancer

2. Multifocal disease

3. Bilateral disease in paired organs

4. Multiple 1 cancers

Page 29: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Familial Cancer Syndromes

• Genetic heterogeneity: same disease from alterations in different genes

• Breast Cancer Syndromes:BRCA1, BRCA2, Li-Fraumeni (p53), Cowden

Disease (PTEN), Ataxia-telangiectasia (ATM)

Page 30: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Breast Cancer

• General: 1 in 10 females by age 70• If familial cancer: lifetime risk is 40-87%• RR depends on:

– age at Dx,

– specific penetrance (as determined by epidemiologic studies),

– specific genes (& mutations) involved,

– carrier rate in population,

– environmental factors

Page 31: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Familial Breast Cancer Syndromes

1. Cowden’s Disease: multiple hamartoma syndrome, mandibular hypoplasia, acral keratoses, scoliosis, tumors

• Breast CA, 25-50% lifetime risk• Thyroid CA (& benign adenomas)• Gene PTEN (10q23.3): phosphatase

(dephosphorylates PI3P) and tensin-like (adhesion)• Tumor suppressor gene seen in ~70% glioblastomas

& 60% prostate CA

Page 32: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More Breast CA Syndromes

2. Ataxia-telangiectasia: autosomal recessive progressive neurologic disorder (cerebellar degeneration), risk cancer

– 50-150 X risk of CA– 70% are lymphomas & T-cell leukemias– Also CA of stomach, ovary & skin (melanomas) – Heterozygotes have 3-8 fold risk of breast CA– Gene ATM (11q22-23): role in sensing & signaling

DNA double-strand breaks, also may have PI3K-like function and binds p53, BRCA1 & CHEK2 proteins

Page 33: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More

3. Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: autosomal dominant associated with multiple 1 neoplasms in children and young adults– Sarcoma prior to age 45 + 1st degree relative

with CA before 45 risk breast CA, soft tissue sarcomas,

osteosarcomas, & brain tumors– Gene TP53 (17p13.1):

Page 34: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 35: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 36: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More4. BRCA2: autosomal dominant trait with risk of

early onset breast CA & male breast CA (less frequently pancreatic or ovarian CA)

• prevalence ~1/1000, Ashkenazi Jews ~1.5%, Icelanders ~0.6%

• Risk of breast CA by age 70 is ~27%, 80% penetrance

• BRCA2 (13q12.3): 27 exons, exon 11 has BRC repeats which controls RAD51, a recombinase enzyme

Page 37: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More BRCA2

• Mutations lead to chromosomal abberations from defective double-stranded DNA repair

• Mutations in both BRCA2 alleles Fanconi Anemia

• Male familial breast CA also associated with mutations in DHTR (androgen receptor)

Page 38: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 39: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 40: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 41: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

More

5. BRCA1: autosomal dominant trait with markedly susceptibility to breast & ovarian CA

• Breast CA prior to age 40 without DCIS component

• Prevalence 1 in 883 Caucasians, ~1% of Ashkenazi Jews

• Penetrance ~50-60%, cumulative life time risk ~87% of breast CA, 44% for ovarian CA

• Cancers usually higher-grade & stage

Page 42: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

BRCA1

• Large gene: 24 exons at 17q21, protein 220-kDa• NH2 terminus RING finger domain (ubiquitin

ligase activity) & carboxy-terminus BRCT repeats are highly conserved

• BRCA1 complexes with proteins involved in DNA repair, transcription, chromatin remodeling, & protein ubiquination

• DNA damage leads to hyperphosphorylation of BRCA1

Page 43: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

BRCA1

• BRCA1 colocalizes with BRCA2 & RAD51 proteins during S-phase

• BRCT domain is protein-protein interaction module involved in DNA repair & cell cycle control

• Mutations in mouse Brca1 lead to -irradiation hypersensitivity & genetic instability

Page 44: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 45: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 46: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009
Page 47: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Screening for Familial Breast Cancer

• Consider for presentation <50 with two first degree relatives <50 with breast or ovarian CA

• Bilateral breast cancer

• Breast and ovarian in same patient

Page 48: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

BRCA1

• ~50% of familial breast CA if 4 family members <60 with breast CA

• ~80% if both breast and ovarian Ca

• Tumor suppressor gene > 100 mutations described

Page 49: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Risk Assessment

• References:– Couch FJ, et al. BRCA1 mutations in women attending

clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. NEJM 1997;336:1409-15.

– Gail MH, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Nat Cancer Inst 1989;81:1879-86.

– Colditz GA, et al. Family history, age, and risk of breast cancer: prospective data from the Nurses’ Health Study. JAMA 1993;270:338-43.

Page 50: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Probability of Detecting BRCA1 Mutation in Families

Page 51: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Treatment

• Selective estrogen receptor modulators = tamoxifen

• Aromatase inhibitors= anastrozole, letrozole– Improved disease-free survival compared to tamoxifen

• HER2 inhibition = Herceptin (trastuzumab)• Zinc-binding inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors

(Tykerb), anti-VEGF & other HER2 directed drugs all in clinical trials

Page 52: Breast Cancer Genetics Module M. Kent Froberg, M.D. 2009

Treatment

• Tamoxifen: breast cancer trial 45% reduction in incidence compared to placebo

• Prophylactic mastectomy: 85% reduction in risk, life expectancy 2.9-5.3 yrs, but may still develop breast CA