Upload
ngokiet
View
217
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2
Introduction and
backgroundThe East Midlands Special Operations Unit
(EMSOU) is a collaborative unit shared by the
fi ve police forces of Derbyshire, Leicestershire,
Lincolnshire, Northamptonshire and
Nottinghamshire. It provides the East Midlands
with the capability to respond to the most
strategic threats from organised crime, terrorism
and major criminality which collectively pose
the highest risk to the communities of the East
Midlands and national security.
It comprises fi ve main areas
of business:
Serious Organised Crime
Major Crime
Intelligence
Forensics (currently Derbyshire,
Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire)
Counter Terrorism
These units have been established as a result
of detailed baseline assessments coupled with
expert professional opinion and have been
ratifi ed by the fi ve force Chief Constables and
Chairs of the respective Police Authorities. This
is formalised in the Section 23 Police Act 1996
collaboration agreement and the fi ve force
fi nancial contributions are in line with the Home
Offi ce formula grant.
Nottinghamshire 27.6%
Derbyshire 22%
Leicestershire 23.1%
Lincolnshire 12.6%
Northamptonshire 14.7%
EMSOU complements the strategic direction set
by the Home Offi ce under:
❚ Local to Global; Reducing the Risk from
Organised Crime - Home Offi ce, Local to
Global: Reducing the Risk from Organised
Crime, July 2011
❚ Shadow Strategic Policing Requirement -
Home Offi ce, November 2011
❚ Contest: The United Kingdom’s strategy for
countering terrorism - Home Offi ce, July 2011
The Unit ensures integration with other UK Law
Enforcement partners (SOCA, HMRC, UKBA
and the Security Services) and has an advanced
police operating model that enables a symbiotic
approach, providing a regional dimension and
the vital links between local communities and
both national and international work streams to
combat the threats from terrorism and organised
crime. EMSOU provides the linkage from national
agencies to neighbourhood policing.
EMSOU’s collaborative working provides a
cohesive approach in the East Midlands and is the
most cost effective means of providing essential
specialist police services to mitigate and reduce
serious harm within the region. EMSOU is centrally
managed by a regionally appointed Deputy Chief
Constable and further governance is provided by
a management board and the Joint Committee of
Police Chiefs and Police Authorities.
3
The development of EMSOU has been incremental
and professionally considered at each stage;
1999-2001 Regional Discussions by the
heads of crime and initial
proposals made to Chief Offi cers
2002 EMSOU created with a
dedicated undercover and test
purchase unit
2002 A legal Collaboration agreement
with shared liability signed by all
5 Chief Constables and Police
Authorities
2003-2004 Further development discussions
by the heads of crime with the
lead ACC for the region
2004 Agreement to create an
Intelligence Unit
2005 HMIC Report into policing
structures identifi ed signifi cant
risk from serious and organised
crime to the East Midlands
region
2005 Regional Chief Offi cers agreed
to EMSOU expansion to include
dedicated operational teams
2006 Home Offi ce Funding Support
given for the EMSOU expansion
2007 EMSOU operational surveillance
and investigation structure
created
2008 Bespoke accommodation
opened and EMSOU identifi ed
as the key collaborative project
for the region
2009-2011 Continued expansion work
with further ‘functionality’ to
include technical surveillance,
asset recovery and regional
review teams
2011 Launch of Regional Serious and
Organised Crime and Major
Crime Units
2 National organised
crime risk and threatOrganised crime is complex; however the
overriding dynamic is to facilitate fi nancial gain.
Broad estimates value the economic and social
costs it causes to the UK at between £20 billion
and £40 billion per year. (A caveat should be
afforded to all references to such estimates in
this document given the nature of the criminal
economy. This is a very conservative fi gure
when the estimated cost of individual crime
types amount to a much more substantial
total. Nevertheless organised crime is currently
considered by the Government to be one of the
most strategic threats to the UK and is a tier 2
threat within the National Security Strategy). As
is too often the case the effects of organised
crime are felt hardest in the UK’s most deprived
communities.
An Organised Crime Group (OCG) is defi ned
in the Local to Global strategic document as
‘individuals, normally working with others, with the
capacity and capability to commit serious crime
on a continuing basis, which includes elements of
planning, control and coordination, and benefi ts
those involved’.
4
A national OCG mapping system is utilised that
enables forces and agencies to identify and
assess the intent, capability and criminality of
each OCG and this is represented by a threat
score. This informs tasking processes and allows
the prioritisation of resources.
The total number of OCG’s and members
nationally as of April 2012:
2.1 Drugs supply
The use of illegal drugs, particularly Class A
drugs, causes signifi cant harm to the social and
economic well-being of the country as a whole,
including to our reputation overseas. A recent
government report into serious organised crime
estimated the cost of illegal drug markets to the
UK to be approximately £17.6 billion per year.
The level of Class A drug usage, specifi cally
heroin, cocaine, crack cocaine, and ecstasy, has
increased from 2.7% to 3.7% of the population
in the last ten years. This is mainly due to the
increase in use of cocaine powder. Criminals
from Pakistan and other south Asian countries,
and British criminals with a variety of ethnic
backgrounds, are also well-established in the
supply and distribution of heroin, particularly in the
Midlands.
The UK wholesale cannabis market is worth in
excess of £1 billion a year. Substantial quantities
of cannabis resin and herbal cannabis continue
to be imported into the UK. Cannabis remains
the most widely produced and consumed
illicit substance globally. SOCA estimated that
approximately 270 tonnes annually of cannabis is
required in the UK to satisfy user demand.
National analysis shows that commercial
cultivation of cannabis continues to pose a
signifi cant risk to the UK. Increasing numbers of
organised crime groups are diverting into this area
of criminality; their perception is that it is a low-risk
highly profi table criminal business.*
The number of commercial cultivation of cannabis
farms continues to rise although this increase
has stabilised. A total of 7,865 were identifi ed in
2011/12 compared to 3,032 recorded in 2007/08
(an increase of 159%).*
* Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) – the agency responsible
for tackling national and international organised crime.
* Association of Chief Police Offi cers (ACPO) – the 43 police forces of
England and Wales
* United Kingdom Border Agency (UKBA) – the agency responsible for
the protection of the UK border, visas and immigration.
* National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB) – this is government funded
and run by the City of London Police, which is the National lead force
for fraud in partnership with police forces and the public and
private sector.
* Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) – the agency required to
collect and administer taxes as well as border and frontier protection.
* Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) - the police force of
Northern Ireland.
Agency OCG’s % of
OCG’s
Nominals % of
Nominals
SOCA* 4240* 56% 5366 19%
ACPO* 2515 34% 18936 69%
UKBA* 475 6% 1806 6%
NFIB* 157 2% 1070 4%
HMRC* 66 1% 381 1%
PSNI* 48 1% 190 1%
TOTAL 7501 100% 27423 100%
National OCG total
SOCA
56% ACPO
34%
UKBA
6%
NFIB
2%
HMRC
1%
PNSI
1%
5
The UK Commercial Cultivation of Cannabis
Problem Profi le highlights that both indigenous
and South East Asian OCGs are linked to
Cannabis Cultivations in the UK with a growing
degree of co-operation between them. There are
identifi ed gaps in intelligence around the extent
and role played by human traffi ckers bringing
‘gardeners’ into the UK who will in effect run the
cultivation on behalf of the main criminal gang.
While money laundering methods employed by
SE Asian OCGs are known it is the methodologies
employed by indigenous OCGs that provide the
large intelligence gap.*
*Taken from the UK Commercial Cultivation of Cannabis National Problem
Profi le 2012.
2.2 Firearms
The availability and use of fi rearms by criminals
makes the criminal world more volatile and
puts innocent members of the public and law
enforcement offi cers at risk of physical and
psychological harm. Firearms crime also causes
economic and social harm to the UK through
increased costs in terms of law enforcement,
criminal justice, prison and probation services
and health service expenditure. It has a deeply
corrosive effect on the well-being of communities
and damages public confi dence in the rule of law.
Fear of fi rearms crime by the public is, relatively
speaking, much higher than for other types of
violent crime and some communities in the UK
perceive that they have become stigmatised as
‘gun culture hotspots’. (The impact this has upon
the region appears at 3.3)
Number of nominals linked to Firearms related
OCG activity:
2.3 Money laundering
The United Nations Organisation on Drugs and
Crime (UNODC) suggests that worldwide total
criminal proceeds are likely to amount to some
3.6% of global GDP, equivalent to 2.1 trillion US
dollars. There are 635 OCGs nationally with
potential assets of over £1 million and 93 OCGs
potentially with assets of over £10 million in
July 2011.
Most organised criminal activity is directly or
indirectly aimed at making money. The ability
to disguise or “launder” this money to prevent it
being associated with criminal activity is a major
objective for organised crime groups. Organised
criminals will often make use of corrupt specialists
and professionals as well as various businesses
that may operate in a semi-legitimate manner to
facilitate this.
Money laundering occurs in almost every country
in the world and a typical scheme may involve
transferring money through several countries in
order to obscure its origins. Other types of money
laundering are far more simplistic and utilise ‘semi-
legitimate’ cash businesses as a means of moving
the criminal money. A recent response was the
withdrawal from circulation of the 500 euro note to
stem the problem.
Agency Firearms
converter/re-activater
Supplier (fi rearms)
ACPO 15 196
HMRC 0 0
NFIB 0 0
PSN 0 5
SOCA 11 173
UKBA 0 1
6
2.4 Human traffi cking
It is diffi cult to assess the scale of people
smuggling (illegal entry) and human traffi cking
(exploitation), however the former is believed
to exceed the latter. Both provide organised
criminals with opportunities to exploit migrants,
often placing them at physical risk in order to
make money. In the case of people smuggling, the
physical risk occurs mostly in transit, when various
clandestine means of travel are used, some
of them hazardous. Human traffi cking victims
continue to be exploited once they have arrived at
their destination, and are controlled often through
the use of violence and intimidation.
2.5 Cyber crime
Though relatively new, the cost to the UK of
computer enabled crime is estimated at £27
billion. It broadly manifests itself in three ways:
by allowing organised criminals to exploit new
technology to commit established crimes, such
as fraud, on an industrial scale; the distributed
denial of service attacks (hacking and the unlawful
disruption of computers and networks) and
by creating new crimes such as ‘phishing’ for
personal data or hacking.
2.6 HGV crime
Road freight crime is relatively low risk to commit
and potentially highly profi table. As such, it
attracts organised criminals. Some organised
crime groups are known to have made millions
of pounds from road freight crime. Organised
road freight criminals travel extensively to commit
offences. (The East Midlands region is impacted
upon by West Yorkshire OCG’s committing these
offences along the A1/M1 corridor particularly in
Northamptonshire).
2.7 Olympic games
The London 2012 Olympic Games will be one of
the largest events ever staged in the UK, with a
number of training camps based in the region,
this will present organised criminals with a range
of money-making opportunities. Mass marketing
fraud, organised immigration crime, intellectual
property crime, cyber crime and money
laundering are the main threats with criminal
activity starting well in advance of the Games
themselves.
3 Regional organised
crime risk and threatThere are a number of ‘signal events’ that have
occurred over recent years in the East Midlands
highlighting the threat, risk and harm associated
with serious and organised crime;
❚ The carefully planned revenge execution of
Joan and John Stirland in Lincolnshire by an
organised crime group from Nottingham
❚ The gang killing of a 15 year old schoolboy,
Kadeem Blackwood, in Derby - a killing the
direct result of gang and gang rivalry
❚ The ‘drive by’ shooting of 14yrs old Danielle
Beccan in Nottingham
A number of individual crime types exist within
each criminality strand. For example, drugs
activity has fi fteen crime types that include heroin,
cocaine distribution, amphetamine, cutting agents
and LSD for example. In contrast the harm from
fi rearms criminality is split over two categories;
commodity (fi rearms or ammunition importation,
exportation or supply) and violent criminal activity
(criminal use of fi rearms). Whilst this now presents
7
law enforcement with a better understanding of
the extent of organised crime it is not the entire
picture with an element of the unknown still
remaining.
All current OCGs identifi ed through the National
OCGM process, that impact on Regional Forces,
are detailed in a separate confi dential document
presented to attendees at the Regional Tasking
meeting.
Regional comparison of OCG’s nationally as of
April 2012:
Each individual region has a different number of
recorded OCGs which are based upon the level of
OCG development and resources applied within
each force or region. This should be considered
as a ‘developing picture’ of OCGs within the UK
and not the defi nitive position.
Regional overview of OCGs that are mapped by
the forces of the East Midlands Region as of
April 2012:
The table below shows the number of OCGs
from ACPO forces and agency partners that
are recorded as having an impact upon the
East Midlands region. Each impact is assessed
to determine the risk and threat it poses to the
region as these can be current, historical, limited
or signifi cant.
Externally Impacting OCGs
Force Total number of
OCGs
Total number of
Key Members
Derbyshire 62 409
Nottinghamshire 51 648
Lincolnshire 62 379
Leicestershire 53 362
Northamptonshire 95 526
East Midland Region 323 2,324
East Midlands Region OCGs
ACPO 352
SOCA 81
UKBA 23
NFIB 19
HMRC 5
North
West
18%
West
Midlands
9%
East
Midlands
8%
South
West
6%
North
East
3%
Wales
4%
Eastern
9%
South West
9%Yorkshire &
Humberside
10%
London
24%
Northamptonshire*
30%
Derbyshire
19%Lincolnshire
19%
Nottinghamshire
16%
Leicestershire
16%
8
3.1 Emerging Threats
Intelligence work currently undertaken (within the
Regional Intelligence Unit) includes:
❚ Future Threats
❚ Emerging criminal markets
❚ New areas of activity
❚ Changing criminals and victims
❚ More capable criminals
❚ A more fl exible and sophisticated threat
3.2 Drugs Supply
There are 168 recorded OCGs within the East
Midlands that are engaged in drugs activity,
although 70% of these are also involved in at least
one other form of criminality; particularly violence,
organised theft and specialist money laundering.
Many of these crime groups make signifi cant
profi ts by utilising bulking agents to increase the
amount of commodity for sale and maximise their
return.
Cannabis
Cannabis farms are prevalent throughout the East
Midlands forces and present signifi cant logistical
and operational challenges. The number of farms
identifi ed in the East Midlands region by 100,000
population 2010/2011 is as follows:*
Derbyshire 12 126 identifi ed farms
Nottinghamshire 18 200 identifi ed farms
Lincolnshire 3 20 identifi ed farms
Leicestershire 4 36 identifi ed farms
Northamptonshire 21 142 identifi ed farms
*Taken from the UK Commercial Cultivation of Cannabis National Problem
Profi le 2012
Current regional work is based around a three
month project to identify OCGs linked to Cannabis
farm recoveries in the region.
Cocaine
Regionally there are 63 known OCGs involved in
cocaine powder distribution.
Heroin
There are 69 known regional OCGs identifi ed as
being involved in heroin drug activity.
3.3 Firearms
In the East Midlands region there are 34 OCGs
involved in the criminal use of fi rearms. 17 are
considered medium harm, ie. fi rearms use has
been threatened, and 9 display a high harm score
which signifi es that the OCG or its members
have discharged fi rearms. The East Midlands
has experienced a rise in violence between
street gangs, evident within an increased use in
fi rearms to threaten or enforce with Leicestershire,
Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire most affected.
Firearms are being increasingly used to settle
disputes between rival Nottinghamshire OCGs.
There is evidence to show the movement and use
of weapons between West Midlands and East
Midlands forces, perhaps refl ecting established
gang affi liations.
Gang related shootings and murders
The NABIS (National Ballistics Intelligence Service)
quarterly report highlights six active inferred
(discharged within the last 6 months) and 49
inactive inferred weapons (not discharged within
the last 12 months) outstanding in the region.
The six weapons discharged in the last six months
are identifi ed as:
❚ Two Original Lethal Purpose
❚ Two Converted Blank Firers
❚ Two unknown weapon types
All six were identifi ed from the Nottinghamshire
force area. Nottinghamshire has recently identifi ed
9
a series of linked fi rearm discharges one of which
resulted in the murder of Malaki McKENZIE in
April 2012. A number of individuals have been
arrested in connection with this murder and have
links to regionally identifi ed OCGs and gang
related activity.
3.4 Violence against the person
There are 104 OCGs within the East Midlands that
are involved in various forms of violence against
the person, however the majority operate at a low
level of such criminality and consequently have
a minimal harm impact. In contrast there are 5
OCGs which exercise high levels of violence and
these are predominantly based in Nottinghamshire
and Lincolnshire.
3.5 Cash and Valuables in Transit (CVIT)
In the last twelve months, there have been 14
CVITs offences within the East Midlands and of
these 50% have occurred within Leicestershire,
with a further 29% and 21% in Nottinghamshire
and Derbyshire respectively. The number of
offences began to increase post May 2011 and
the offenders were successful in stealing cash in 6
of the 14 offences.
3.6 Money laundering
Regionally, 57 East Midlands OCGs are shown as
routinely engaged in specialist money laundering,
and represent 20% of the regional OCG total.
There are 14 OCGs with assets of over £1 million
of which 2 have assets over £10 million. The East
Midlands region has 43 OCGs primarily engaged
in fraud and fi nancial crime; 32 concentrate on
non fi scal fraud and 11 on fi scal.
4 EMSOU serious
organised crime -
structure & processIncludes a number of units each with
their own responsibilities:
4.1 Regional Intelligence Unit (RIU)
The RIU consists of a number of Police Offi cers
& Police staff providing intelligence & analytical
support. The unit is divided into three areas of
work:
❚ Organised Crime Group Mapping - Providing
the identifi cation, assessment and
management of those Organised Crime
Groups which pose the greatest threat.
❚ Strategic Intelligence - Providing the
intelligence support to projects such as
fi rearms supply, sexual exploitation of children
and metal theft. Responsible for producing a
strategic assessment of the threat from
serious & organised crime and tactical
assessments to enable delivery of services.
❚ Tactical Intelligence - Providing real time
intelligence to EMSOU operational teams.
4.2 Operation Liberal
Liberal is a long established and valuable national
intelligence unit based and line managed within
EMSOU targeting distraction burglary offences
committed in local force areas across England
and Wales. It is funded nationally through force
contributions at a cost of approx £600k.
(All forces contribute with the exception of the City
of London)
Operation Liberal collates intelligence in relation
to travelling criminals who commit crime against
10
the elderly, in particular those who undertake
distraction burglary and rogue trading. It provides
support to forces in relation to investigations
and prosecutions, resulting in substantial prison
sentences for those who are engaged in serial
criminality. As a consequence of its work,
distraction burglary has reduced nationally by over
50% in the last 10 years.
4.3 Government Agency Intelligence
Network (GAIN)
The East Midlands GAIN partnership provides
a formalised structure for partners who have
both an intelligence and enforcement capability
to progress and support joint investigations and
share knowledge of risk. There is a GAIN group
in each of the fi ve forces, a regional group, and
strategic governance is provided by the regional
Deputy Chief Constable at the GAIN Executive
Board. The recent review of Regional Organised
Crime Units (ROCUs) along with the Government
Organised Crime Strategy ‘Local to Global’ both
recommend that each region should follow the
East Midlands innovative lead and have a GAIN
network.
4.4 Covert Operations Syndicate
The Nationally Accredited Unit has specialist
offi cers who provide undercover covert provision
both within and outside of the Region and further
specialist support to ‘crimes in action’ such as
kidnap and extortion.
4.5 Regional Confi dential Unit (RCU)
The RCU handles the most sensitive sources
of intelligence available to Law Enforcement
Agencies and complements a network of similar
units around the UK. This is particularly effective in
disrupting threat to life scenarios and progressing
investigations against the most organised criminal
networks.
4.6 Operational Syndicates
The operational teams provide investigative and
surveillance support and are responsible for the
evidence gathering and subsequent prosecution
of Serious & Organised Crime investigations that
are adopted through tasking.
4.7 Regional Asset Recovery Team (RART)
The RART is Home Offi ce funded and part of
a national structure which provides specialist
fi nancial investigators in support of the fi ve East
Midland Forces conducting high level money
laundering investigations in order to remove
criminally derived assets. Financial investigative
support is also provided to partner agencies.
4.8 Regional Review Unit (RRU)
The RRU conduct reviews which include
murder, stranger rape, proactive serious and
organised crime investigations, non-stop fatal
road traffi c collisions, high risk and long term
missing persons, and critical incidents. It assists
investigators and ensures good practice is
promulgated.
4.9 Police Central e-crime Unit (PCeU)
The Police Central e-Crime Unit and its regional
hubs (one is based in the East Midlands within
EMSOU), constitute the ACPO lead unit for
combating cyber crime and strives to tackle those
responsible for the most serious cyber-crime
offences. This includes offences against the
Computer Misuse Act 1990 which may involve:
❚ Distributed denial of service attacks (DDOS)
❚ Unauthorised access to systems and
networks and causing malicious damage
11
❚ Phishing and using malicious software to
facilitate on line banking fraud
4.10 Technical Surveillance Unit (TSU)
The TSU provides covert and overt technical
support for EMSOU and the East Midlands
forces. Additionally the regional unit provides
highly specialised support around threats to life
scenarios and ‘crimes in action’
5 EMSOU serious
organised crime
-outcomesIt is diffi cult to accurately assess impact and
success in relation to this area of work given the
often diverse nature of the criminality involved.
Whilst there is data showing arrests, seizures
and convictions it is much more problematic
to measure ‘harm reduction’ and effective
‘disruption’.
In the East Midlands, in addition to data
collection, a subjective review is undertaken at the
conclusion of each operation which assesses the
level of disruption to the OCG and the reduction in
harm to the community.
Outcomes April 2011 - February 2012
317 Arrests
32 kg Class A drugs seized
977 kg Class B drugs seized
Over £400K cash seized
Over £165K confi scation orders granted
£3.3 million worth of assets under restraint
(as of February 2012)
9 fi rearms and ammunition recovered
Examples of recent operations
Operation Telesse
This operation tackled a Derbyshire &
Nottinghamshire based OCG with connections to
drugs supply and fi rearms believed to be supplied
by South Yorkshire criminals.
Prior to enforcement this operation lasted 10
months and an additional 14 months was spent
on fi le preparation and the judicial process. At any
one time there was a range of between 10 and
120 staff involved in the operation. EMSOU staff
worked alongside Local Authority staff as part of
the investigation. The CPS Complex Case Unit
prosecuted the case.
This resulted in successful convictions for Class A
and fi rearms offences plus:
❚ 16 arrests
❚ Total of 74 years imprisonment
❚ 5 kg cannabis, 2 kg heroin and 6000
ecstasy tablets seized
❚ Sawn off shotgun and handgun recovered
❚ £12k cash seizure
❚ £480K payment to the Inland Revenue
for tax evasion
Following enforcement activity, the threat score
in relation to that OCG has been signifi cantly
reduced.
Operation Canta
A Leicestershire and Northamptonshire based
Organised Crime Group linked to Class A and
B drugs supply in the East Midlands, Northern
Ireland, Lancashire, West Midlands and Greater
Manchester. The operation was 12 month’s in
development and then took a further 12 months
post enforcement. The investigation team
ranged from 10 staff to up to 200+ at the time of
12
enforcement. This was a multi-agency operation
along with SOCA and the Police Service of
Northern Ireland (PSNI).
The case was prosecuted the CPS complex case
unit. Following enforcement activity the threat
score has been signifi cantly reduced.
The outcome of this investigation was:
24 arrests ( including 9 in Northern Ireland)
275 kg Cannabis seized
3 kg Cocaine seized
3 kg of cutting agent
50,000 Ecstasy tablets seized.
£93k cash seized
Operation Ridion
This OCG was involved in the distribution of
Class A and B controlled drugs. Their network
was identifi ed as covering Lincolnshire and
Nottinghamshire. This operation lasted approx 2
and a half years from start to fi nish and involved
a team ranging from 10 up to 100 staff at varying
times.
The outcome of this investigation was:
❚ 23 arrests
❚ 22 kg of fl ouroamphetamine
❚ 119 grams of cocaine
❚ 2 fi rearms and ammunition recovered
All defendants pleaded guilty and received a total
of 25 years imprisonment.
Operation Guinness
Referred by Lincolnshire, and concerning
an OCG involved in Class A drug traffi cking
impacting upon Derbyshire, Northamptonshire,
Nottinghamshire, Lincolnshire, Leicestershire and
Cambridgeshire. The investigation uncovered
a network spanning the UK and reaching into
Belgium and South America. The group had
planned to fl y Cocaine into the UK via Antwerp
using a private aircraft. The seizure of 88 kilos
of cocaine at Antwerp docks prevented this and
Belgium law enforcement assisted this enquiry.
Following enforcement a Belgium national was
arrested by EMSOU Offi cers and extradited back
to Belgium where he has subsequently been
sentenced to 5 yrs imprisonment for his part in the
seizure at the docks.
From commencement to sentence at court the
operation took approx 20 months. Up to 40 staff
were involved in the investigation which involved
multi-agency working with HMRC and SOCA. The
case was prosecuted by the CPS complex case
unit.
The result of this operation is as follows:
11 Arrests
11 kg amphetamine recovered
2 kg heroin recovered
104g cocaine recovered
£66K cash seized
£2.856 million assets seized
7 Firearms recovered
The members of this OCG were found guilty after
trial and received a total of 80 years imprisonment
Operation Orlando
Referred by the Environment Agency in
Nottinghamshire, this operation targeted a
waste recycling company that was operating a
number of sites illegally in Nottinghamshire and
Lincolnshire. As such they were able to undercut
13
other legitimate local business and evade landfi ll
and other associated costs. To aggravate matters
hazardous waste was also being disposed of
improperly creating public health and safety
concerns. Incidents involving serious injury to the
workforce were also investigated by the HSE. A
joint investigation led by the Environment Agency
and coordinated by the East Midlands GAIN
involved both Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire
Police with assistance form the RART. The
operation had a core investigation team of 10
staff increasing to over 60 upon enforcement. The
operation is still ongoing now awaiting trial some
18 months on from its commencement.
❚ 5 persons arrested
❚ £91k cash seizure
❚ 40 plus Environment Offences disclosed
Money Laundering – in excess of £2 million assets
identifi ed
5.1 Regional review unit
The Regional Review Unit has conducted 65
reviews (murder, stranger rape, major crime, fatal
collisions and missing persons) in all 5 forces
and made over 275 recommendations, including
recommendations with a National impact.
Additionally the Unit has identifi ed 150 areas of
good practice which have been disseminated
throughout the region at force development
seminars.
The Unit has quickly become established and
achieved a National reputation for excellence and
has subsequently been commissioned by Chief
Constables in the North West and South West
regions to conduct regional reviews and make
recommendations as to their regional structure.
The Unit has also been involved in the recent
major National review of 10 Regional Organised
Crime Units (of which EMSOU is one) identifying
operational gaps and making recommendations to
the Home Offi ce minister.
One of the most high profi le reviews conducted by
the Unit was of the deployment of the undercover
offi cer at the Ratcliffe on Soar power station and
the arrests of over 100 environmental protesters.
This review resulted in Local, Regional and
National recommendations being made but more
importantly highlighted Nottinghamshire’s decision
making process and subsequent investigation
which helped protect the reputation of the
Nottinghamshire Police service.
6 Regional major crime
- risk and treatMurder remains the most serious and high profi le
crime for forces to deal with. Those investigations
are usually the most resource intensive sometimes
with in excess of 100 staff involved at the
commencement including detectives, house
to house teams, search teams, forensic staff,
community offi cers and administrative support.
An early assessment is made of all murder
investigations to ensure they are adequately
resourced. The following long established national
guidelines determine the nature of the offending
and provide a guide to the initial deployment of
resources
Category A+
- a homicide or other major investigation where
public concern and the associated response to
media intervention is such that normal staffi ng
levels are not adequate to keep pace with the
investigation
14
Category A
- a homicide or other major investigation which
is of grave public concern or where vulnerable
members of the public are at risk, where the
identity of the offender(s) is not apparent, or
the investigation and the securing of evidence
requires signifi cant resource allocation
Category B
- a homicide or other major investigation, where
the identity of the offender(s) is not apparent,
the continued risk to the public is low or the
investigation and the securing of evidence can
be achieved within normal force resourcing
arrangements
Category C
- a homicide or other major investigation, where
the identity of the offender(s) is apparent from
the outset and the investigation or securing of
evidence can be achieved easily
The murder investigation team headed by
a trained and nationally accredited Senior
Investigating Offi cer (normally a Detective
Superintendent or Detective Chief Inspector) is
supported by a Major Investigation Room and a
case management system known as HOLMES
(Home Offi ce Large Major Enquiry System).
HOLMES is the long established system of
managing complex investigations and results
from the Byford review that followed the ‘Ripper’
convictions of Peter Sutcliffe. As well as the
outside enquiry team, made up of Detective
Constables and Detective Sergeants, there are
other roles that need to be resourced as detailed
below:
❚ Deputy Senior Investigating Offi cer
❚ An ‘offi cer manager’ who is responsible for
checking all documents and material secured
during the investigation
❚ An ‘action manager’ whose role is to
conduct an initial read of all documentation
and assessment of all material secured during
the investigation and to identify urgent lines of
enquiry for the outside enquiry team
❚ A ‘document reader’ whose role is similar
to that of the ‘action manager’. This person
will identify all other lines of enquires and
actions that need to be undertaken by the
outside enquiry team
❚ An exhibits offi cer responsible for the
reception, storage and integrity of all exhibits
❚ A disclosure offi cer who has a legal
responsibility under the Criminal Procedures
and Investigation Act to disclose all relevant
information to the Crown Prosecution Service
– including that which may potentially
undermine the prosecution case or support
the defendants case
❚ The inputting and indexing of information
on the HOLMES system is administered and
managed by a number of support staff roles
❚ A house to house supervisor. Where the
identity of the offender(s) is not apparent or the
enquiry is seeking to identify witnesses a
‘house to house’ enquiry is commenced. This
detailed examination of all households
identifi ed within the investigative strategy is
resource intensive particularly if accompanied
by a mass screen DNA operation or other
elimination process
❚ Scene preservation offi cers. Whilst the
crime scene(s) is examined by ‘crime scene
investigators/forensic scientists’ a secure
cordon is maintained around it by police
15
offi cers. This is to ensure the integrity of that
scene and any evidence contained within it
❚ Family Liaison Offi cers. These are trained
offi cers, usually deployed in pairs, to the
families of victims. They are the link between
the family and the investigation. It is a role that
is maintained until the conclusion of a criminal
trial and any subsequent appeal process
❚ Community liaison. This role is performed by
local offi cers and is overseen by a senior
offi cer. However, the Senior Investigating
Offi cer will from time to time, meet with
community groups as part of the response to
any local tensions or concerns
The number of new cases dealt with by the
unit since implementation has allowed an initial
analysis of the type of homicide experienced
across the region as well as emerging trends and
risks. There are two themes emerging behind
many of the offences investigated by the unit.
alcohol abuse/irresponsible drinking
the involvement whether as a victim, witness
or suspect of those who are not UK citizens
The latter presents two main challenges,
fi rstly relationships with Law Enforcement and
Governmental bodies outside of the UK and
predominantly across Eastern Europe and
secondly, the cultural differences within those
affected communities
Other murder/manslaughter types that continue to
feature are;
❚ Domestic - this is sub-divided into ‘current/
former spouse; sexual rival; parent/child
❚ Homicide in the course of other crime - this
is sub-divided into robbery; burglary; other
gain
❚ Gang homicide - usually between local rival
groups
❚ Confrontation homicide - this occurs
between unrelated individuals eg. drunken
brawls
Research into recent levels of murder/
manslaughter showed that between April
2004 and April 2010 there were three hundred
recorded incidents in the East Midlands.
There are other categories of crime that are
equally resource intensive due to either the
vulnerability of the victim(s), complexity of the
investigation or public scrutiny such as ‘attempted
murder’, stranger rapes (offender is not known to
the victim) and the riots of 2011.
September 2011 to April 2012
During this period there was a 32% increase in
recorded homicide, which presented a massive
and early test of the newly formed regional Major
Crime Unit.
This is spread across the East Midlands as shown:
❚ Derbyshire 13
❚ Leicestershire 10
❚ Lincolnshire 8
❚ Northamptonshire 9
❚ Nottinghamshire 20
16
Recorded homicide from
September 2011 to April 2012
Date Location Offence Outcome
September
2011
Derbyshire Murder of Lee Hendry, who was killed in
the home of an ex partner
A man is charged with murder
September
2011
Derbyshire Unlawful killing of Richard Peat, who was killed
in the home of an associate
A man is charged with unlawful act
manslaughter
October
2011
Derbyshire Death of James Caunt who died in a public place This case will be heard at Derby Coroners
Court.
October
2011
Derbyshire Murder of Richard Ziemacki, who was killed in a
public place
16 October
October
2011
Derbyshire Murder of Alexander Blick, who was killed in a
public place
A man is charged with murder
November
2011
Derbyshire 1976 enquiry into missing person presumed dead This case is ongoing
November
2011
Derbyshire Unlawful killing of Selwyn Shelborne, who was killed
in his home
This case is ongoing
December
2011
Derbyshire Murder of Sharon Knapper, who was killed in her
home
A man is charged with murder
February
2012
Derbyshire Manslaughter of Kenneth Stott, who was killed in a
public place
A youth is charged with manslaughter
March
2012
Derbyshire Manslaughter of Riley Pettipeirre, a two year old
child, took a lethal dose of methadone whilst at home
A woman and man are charged with
negligence manslaughter
April
2012
Derbyshire Murder of Ashley Finley, who was killed in a
public place
A man is charged with murder
April
2012
Derbyshire Extortion of Jeweller, who received an unwarranted
demand with menaces
This case is ongoing
April
2012
Derbyshire Extortion of Solicitor, who received an unwarranted
demands with menaces
This case is ongoing
In addition support is provided to Professional
Standards Departments for specifi c complex
corruption investigations, and also to support
the force with dynamic ‘crimes in action’ such
as extortion, kidnap and other force major crime
investigations.
There have been seven new and two legacy cases
where other EMSOU assets such as SOC have
provided support to EMSOU Major Crime. (A
legacy case refers to an undetected investigation
that commenced before the implementation
of EMSOU Major Crime) As well as providing
specialist covert investigative support they have
proved instrumental in the arrest of suspects
who had sought to evade capture as well as the
recovery of kidnap hostages.
6.1 Kidnap/abduction
Kidnap is often used as a means of enforcement,
a way of dealing with disputes between OCGs
and a way of asserting status and power over the
17
victim/hostage. The nature of organised crime,
and the involvement in some form of criminality
by victims and hostages, means that offences are
likely to be under-reported. “Vendetta kidnaps”
generally link to criminal disputes such as drug
dealing. 22 of the 323 East Midlands OCGs are
engaged in such criminality, which is equal to 8%,
just above the national fi gure.
6.2 Extortion
In the East Midlands, those OCG’s engaged in
extortion account for 5% of the total. Similarly to
kidnap and abduction, extortion is intrinsically
linked to other criminal activity and is used as
a means of control to facilitate the commission
of serious and organised crime. In this way
the associated threat is not as high and the
intelligence coverage is poor. There are 15 OCGs
regionally linked to extortion, but only 3 have
extortion recorded as their primary harm.
7 Regional major crime
- structure & processThe regional Major Crime Unit provides a
collaborative multi-force unit to investigate
offences of Murder, Manslaughter and Kidnap
with demands and Extortion across the fi ve
forces of the East Midlands. This is a centrally
commanded and locally delivered unit currently
with a footprint in each of the fi ve forces.
The unit is the professional lead for major crime
ensuring standards are maintained, challenged
and where appropriate enhanced.
The Major Crime team provide a 24/7 365 days
per year response and subject to capacity also
assists forces with other investigations which
include stranger rape, arson with intent to
endanger life, criminal professional standards
department enquiries, linked sexual offences and
cold case reviews in conjunction with the RRU.
EMSOU Major Crime is built upon an assessment
of risk and threat pertaining to its primary function,
which is to respond to incidents of homicide,
kidnaps with demand and extortion.
It is known that levels of demand for responding
to major crime vary greatly over time and cannot
be accurately predicted. Through a regionally
commanded and locally delivered Major Crime
Unit this variance should level out ensuring local
force investigative resources are protected and
can remain focussed on local issues.
There will be signifi cant periods where the unit is
working to capacity in its primary area. There will,
though, be peaks and troughs in demand and, in
these periods, there will be some limited capacity
to provide support to forces in relation to ‘other’
serious crime.
8 Regional major crime
- outcomesIn total since its inception in September 2011,
EMSOU Major Crime has dealt with 44 new cases
as well as managing a number of existing legacy
solved and undetected cases. The new cases are
broken down as follows
Homicide 34
Missing person/no body enquires 3
Crime in action operations 4
Unexplained death enquires 3
18
9 Regional counter
terrorism - risk and
threatHistorical risk & threat
Historically the East Midlands region has had
a wide range of threats to deal with across the
whole spectrum of Domestic Extremism and
terrorist activity.
In partnership with the Security Services, the
Unit manages and mitigates the risks posed
by a signifi cant number of subjects of interest
based across the region. Many have featured in
national and local operations dealing with travel
overseas for training/fi ghting and terrorist related
facilitation and fundraising. The Unit endeavours
to reduce the threat caused by the radicalisation
of vulnerable sections of our communities
by playing an active part within the Channel
scheme.* A recent example of this happened in
north Nottinghamshire where the trustees of a
Mosque were made aware of radical sermons and
teachings taking place. They immediately agreed
to withdraw the use of the Mosque to the group
involved and corrective teachings took place.
Domestic Extremism
- Regional DE activity started with the early
development of Animal Rights direct action
in Northamptonshire in the late 1980’s to the
more recent conviction in November 2005 of an
extreme right wing group from Lincolnshire who
received a total of 15 years imprisonment for
the possession, publication and distribution of
material likely to cause racial hatred.
Some signifi cant East Midlands based cases
include;
International Terrorism
- Most notable is the involvement of a Derby
resident in the May 2003 suicide bombing
outside a bar in Tel Aviv in which his accomplice
killed 3 people. Due to a device failure the
Derby resident’s bomb failed to detonate. This
is acknowledged as the fi rst case of a UK born
suicide bomber engaged in an act of terrorism.
2008
- Following threats to the then Prime Minister, a
warrant was executed in Derby where a quantity
of potassium nitrate, petrol and bomb making
instructions were recovered. The sole occupant
was found guilty of possessing articles intended
for use in terrorism.
* Channel uses existing collaboration between local authorities, the
police, statutory partners (such as education, social services, children’s
and youth services and offender management services) and the local
community to;
· Identify individuals at risk of being drawn in to violent extremism
· Assess the nature and extent of that risk
· Develop the most appropriate support for the individuals concerned
2010
- An investigation into a Lone Actor operative
named Krena LUSHA (an Albanian national),
resident in Derby. Derbyshire Special Branch,
at that time, worked in conjunction with the
North West CTU regarding an enquiry into a
communication between an extremist individual
abroad and a contact later identifi ed to be LUSHA.
When his home address was visited he was
found to have large amounts of petrol, extremist
literature and body armour in his possession.
There followed a lengthy joint enquiry into
LUSHA’s activities, associations, interests and
history to ascertain his actions and how he
19
came to have the mindset. This culminated in a
successful Terrorism Act prosecution and a term
of imprisonment. Upon his release deportation
proceedings will commence.
The East Midlands has been involved in a number
of other incidents including soliciting murder
during the Danish cartoon protest in London
in 2006, promotion of Al Muhajiroun (and all
associated proscribed organisations such as Al
Ghurabaa, Islam4UK, Call to Submission, Muslims
Against Crusades, etc) and the use of meeting
places in Wellingborough by associates of the 7/7
bombers who were found guilty of conspiracy to
cause explosions.
9.1 Current threat levels
The current threat level to the UK from
International Terrorism is SUBSTANTIAL; an attack
is a strong possibility.
Overall the Irish Republic Threat to the UK
Mainland is SUBSTANTIAL. Dissident Republican
Groups still aspire to attack targets within the UK.
The threat to Police Service of Northern Ireland
Offi cers and UK Police Offi cers in Northern Ireland
remains at SEVERE.
9.2 Regional threat and risk
❚ Travel to areas of Jihad for extremist training
continues to be a regional concern, reporting
indicates that Midlands-based individuals still
maintain an active desire to travel for training,
should the opportunity present itself.
❚ Facilitation networks are known to operate in
the Midlands which select potential trainees in
the UK, provide logistical support, and arrange
contact with extremists overseas who are able
to secure training. Fundraising also remains an
ongoing issue.
❚ Regionally there continues to be strong
support for Al-Shabaab the Somali
based terrorist organisation, including
reported fundraising and radicalisation activity
by Al-Shabaab supporters. Concern continues
regarding individuals who choose to travel from
the Midlands to Somalia to fi ght Jihad and the
potential long-term impact when they meet AQ-
connected individuals while overseas.
❚ Operationally the Somali extremist networks
show a wide range of inter-connectivity
across the country and through a large
proportion of Europe. The extremist networks
are believed to exploit these connections while
fundraising for different appeals such as the
Somali humanitarian crisis.
❚ Threats from Domestic Extremism remains
an issue with criminal acts and incidents
linked to Animal Rights (AR) extremists,
Extreme Right and Extreme left wing groups.
Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)
continuing to be the most prominent of such
groups. The English Defence League also has a
signifi cant footprint within the region.
10 Regional counter
terrorism intelligence
unit - structure and
process
The EMSOU Counter Terrorism Unit is responsible
for delivering counter terrorism and domestic
extremism (DE) policing on behalf of the fi ve
East Midlands forces. The unit is funded from
a number of different funding streams. The
overall budget is approximately £12 million and
20
is made up as follows, 38% contribution from
the 5 regional forces, 29% direct Home Offi ce
CT Grant, this effectively funds the element that
also forms part of the National CT/DE network
(formerly known as the EMCTIU. The remaining
33% is made up of other CT Home Offi ce grants,
the majority of which fund Prevent activity and
security policing at Ports throughout the region.
The consequence is that this collaboration attracts
£12 m worth of policing effort for a local force
contribution of approx £4.5m.
The unit regionally delivers the National CT and
Domestic Extremism Policing Strategy which
supports the Governments CONTEST strategy.
Contest introduces the four strands of Pursue,
Protect, Prevent and Prepare. Additionally, the
fi ve force Special Branches act as the operational
delivery aspect of the unit are now integrated
into this nationally and locally tasked, regionally
commanded and locally delivered unit.
11 Regional counter
terrorism intelligence
unit - outcomesEMSOU - CT is part of the National CT network
and therefore subject to national tasking meaning
the unit will properly support investigations outside
the region. Conversely and when necessary,
the East Midlands region will also benefi t from
national support from other regions. Between 1
April 2011 and 29 February 2012 the dedicated
CT Surveillance Team deployed on average over
6 times a week. During the same period, there
have been 36 occasions where the East Midlands
surveillance team has been deployed outside of
the region with, conversely, 70 deployments of
surveillance teams from other areas into the East
Midlands region.
In addition to surveillance resources, assistance
from the CT network has been secured on
a number of other occasions, this includes
the provision of Senior Investigating offi cers,
investigative teams, Hi-tech and Disclosure
Offi cer. Overall the East Midlands is a signifi cant
net importer of resources from the national
network.
12 Regional
forensic unitEMSOU-Forensic Service provides an end to
end forensic service and professional lead in
support of major and volume crime investigation,
currently across Derbyshire, Lincolnshire, and
Nottinghamshire Police forces. The unit delivers
specialist services covering fi ngerprints, laboratory
capabilities, case management and Crime Scene
Investigation (CSI).
Delivery is through local CSI deployment in
each of the three forces supported by unifi ed
collaborative Identifi cation and Forensic Analytical
Services teams, based in Nottinghamshire and
Derbyshire HQ sites respectively.
A forensic response is required in almost all major
and serious crime and over 90% of dwelling
burglaries. Historical data demonstrates that when
forensic identifi cations are available over 40% of
those crimes will result in detection.
EMSOU-FS will deliver combined savings of
approximately £1.4m per annum across the
3 forces whilst delivering a resilient, effective
and quality assured service. The unit was fully
21
functional by the middle of May 2012 and will
focus on value for money whilst demonstrating
effectiveness through continuous improvement
and contribution to detections.
13 Our people
Unit No of Police
Offi cer
No of Police
Staff
Total Staff
Serious
Organised
Crime
225 151 376
Major Crime 163 68 231
Counter
Terrorism159 79 238
Forensics 150 (90 CSI) 150
Total Staff 547 448 995
14 Business benifi tsAll 5 forces rely upon the capabilities provided
by EMSOU. It is a simple philosophy of one
cohesive unit providing the resilience rather than
this being replicated in each of the 5 forces. By
reviewing EMSOU running costs and considering
the approximated costs required to replicate
the current level of service provided by EMSOU
across the fi ve individual forces, it is estimated
that a minimum of £44.8m of effi ciency savings
have been achieved since 2004, as set out in the
table on the following page:
22
Year Area of
Collaborative Policing
Brief Details Est. Annual
Saving to the
Region £’000
Regional
Cumulative
Saving to 2012
£’000
2004 Covert Unit Regional Covert Unit established across
all fi ve forces
2,252 16,214
2006 Intelligence Unit Enhanced Regional Intelligence Unit established
at EMSOU to fully support the strategic and
tactical requirements of the region
510 2,754
2007 Confi dential Unit Regional Confi dential Unit established at EMSOU 1,653 7,852
2008 Covert Equipment Covert surveillance Equipment (ATLAS) deployed
across the region by EMSOU.
Forensic Co-ordinator appointed
1,467 6,968
2009 Technical collection Expansion of embedded offi cers working in
London
425 1,211
2010 Regional Review Unit 5 Force Collaborative Unit established 74 148
2011 Technical Surveillance
Unit
5 Force Collaborative Unit established 133 133
2011 Counter Terrorism Merger of 5 Force Special Branch Units into CT 593 593
2012 Major Crime 5 Force Collaborative Unit established 3,451 3,451
2012 Serious & Organised
Crime
5 Force Collaborative Unit established 4,027 4,027
2012 Intelligence 5 Force Collaborative Unit established 349 349
2012 Forensic 3 Force Collaborative Unit established 1,086 1,086
TOTAL 16,020 44,786
The extent of the level of savings for each
force will be dependent upon their previous
staffi ng establishment and their historic level of
investment. However all forces benefi t from these
arrangements not just fi nancially, but in terms of
capability and resilience.
The following table summarises the force
savings per annum through Specialist Crime
Collaboration:
23
Collaboration Nottinghamshire
£
Derbyshire
£
Leicestershire
£
Northamptonshire
£
Lincolnshire
£
Total
£
Regional Review Unit 29,839 - 9,048 45,298 - 15,761 23,652 73,980
Technical Support
Unit
- 163,143 67,708 166,995 14,887 45,851 132,298
Counter Terrorism -
SB Merger
122,870 72,670 122,870 138,072 136,375 592,857
Major Crime - 5 Force
Footprint Model
2,917,297 491,744 - 50,491 173,428 - 81,284 3,450,694
Serious and
Organised Crime
868,724 363,148 1,297,945 984,724 512,673 4,027,214
Intelligence (OCGM/
Support to MC-SOC)
324,636 28,314 - 75,524 - 21,022 93,038 349,442
Forensics 91,208 781,210 213,747 1,086,165
Total 4,191,431 1,014,536 2,288,303 1,274,328 944,052 9,712,650
Projected Savings/(Costs) to Forces through Regional Collaboration
Notes
1. Projected savings against reported baseline costs, extracted from
either the 2009/10 or 2010/11 budgets (Forensic savings are against the
2011/12 budget).
2. Some budget savings may have been achieved in force in advance of
collaboration.
3. The extent of Police Offi cer savings will be subject to a number
of factors including attrition rates and the timing of any internal re-
organisation of structures.
4. Forensic saving excludes any savings made in force since 2010 when
the Business Case was fi rst developed.
EMSOU acknowledges the current austerity
measures being faced by each force within the
region and continues to explore all opportunities
to achieve further cost savings and effi ciencies.
Since 2010 cashable savings of £707k have been
achieved through procurement, internal
re-structuring and a reduction in external services.
All savings are passed onto the forces through a
reduction in the Unit’s running costs which leads
to a lower level of funding required from each
force.
Substantial savings have also been achieved
through the loan of equipment to forces. The
‘buy-once’ approach (on behalf of the region) has
enabled specialist technical equipment including
camera cars, camera equipment and thermal
imagery equipment, to be loaned out to all fi ve
forces on a regular basis.
The brigading of resources at EMSOU enables
fl exibility of deployment for managers thereby
preventing the negative impact on front line
service delivery and allowing offi cers to remain in
their regular roles rather than be abstracted.
Since 2009 EMSOU has been treated as a
separate entity in relation to the Home Offi ce
Asset Recovery Incentivisation Scheme which
enables forces and agencies to receive a
proportion of seized criminal assets following
successful forfeiture or confi scation activity.
During this period over £200k has been returned
to forces in line with the fi ve force formula share.
EMSOU has been identifi ed nationally (by various
Policing Ministers, the Cabinet Offi ce, the Home
24
Offi ce and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary) as
the example of best practice and a suggested
collaborative model for other regions to follow.
Quite simply, it is regarded as the most cohesive
and effective model of its kind in England and
Wales.
The Unit provides the fi ve East Midlands Forces
increased operational and fi nancial effi ciencies
through the continued presence of one consistent
and cohesive collaborative approach rather
than each force providing their own response in
isolation. This is particularly evident in 2011/2012
when there was a signifi cant increase in
collaboration within Serious Organised Crime,
Major Crime, Intelligence, Forensics, and Counter
Terrorism.
EMSOU Forensic has enabled a signifi cantly
reduced headcount through the delivery of a
new operating model with a more focused and
targeted crime scene examination policy. The
collaborative elements of a Forensic Analytical
Services Team (FAST) and Identifi cation are
capitalising on improved processes and
effi ciencies to enable the delivery of a quality
effective service; this includes the signifi cant
reduction in bureaucracy achieved through
paperless systems and mobile data collection and
delivery.
15 SUMMARYEMSOU is a multi-force and multi-agency
collaborative and operational unit dealing with
strategic and sustained risk through the best
possible model in the most cost effective way.
It supports the fi ve local East Midlands forces in
tackling serious organised crime, major crime and
terrorism with intelligence functions and forensic
capabilities commensurate to the threat faced.
Peter Goodman
Deputy Chief Constable
East Midland