Brine School Starfish

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    1/123

    CLEAR BRINE FLUIDS

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    2/123

    CLEAR BRINE FLUIDS

    B Tropics to be Covered:

    CBF Properties & Testing

    Applications

    CBF Selection criteria

    Fluid Planning & Maintenance

    Corrosion

    Displacement

    Fluid Loss Control

    Filtration

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    3/123

    BRINE PROPERTIES & TESTING

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    4/123

    CLEAR BRINE FLUIDS

    B Description of Clear Brine Fluids (CBF)

    CBF generally fall into two categories

    Halides Chloride [Cl-] and Bromide [Br-]

    Formates [COOH-]

    Water based fluid

    Dissolved salt(s) for density No suspended solids

    Non-formation damaging

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    5/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    6/123

    CLEAR BRINE FLUIDS

    NH4Cl

    KCl/NaCl

    KCl

    NaCl

    KCl/KBr

    KBr

    HCOONa

    NaCl/CaCl2

    CaCl2

    KCl/NaBrNaBr

    KCl/NaCl/NaBr

    NaCl/NaBr

    HCOONa/HCOOK

    HCOOK

    CaBr2

    CaCl2/CaBr2

    HCOOK/HCOOCs

    CaCl2/CaBr2/ZnBr2

    Ca/ZnBr2HCOOCs

    Ca/ZnBr2

    8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

    DENSITY, lb /gal

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    7/123

    Halide CBF vs Formate CBF

    B Inorganic vs Organic

    Halide CBF inorganic ionic salts

    Formates Organic salts

    M+(H C ) where M+= Na+, K+and Cs+

    B History of Formate CBF Introduced in the 90s as an alternative fluid to halide brines

    Touted advantages

    more environmentally friendly

    More compatible with polymers

    Greater clay stabilization

    More compatible with scaling anions

    Offer advantages due to all formates are mono-valent salts, sodium,potassium & cesium

    O

    O

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    8/123

    Brine Parameters

    B Density

    B Crystallization TCT & PCT

    B pH

    B Viscosity

    B Turbidity

    B pH

    B Filterability

    B Chemical Composition Primary components

    Contaminants

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    9/123

    Density = mass/volume

    B Temperature

    Increase in temperature causes volume expansion thereby decreasingdensity value

    Thermal expansion factors vary according to fluids and density

    B

    Pressure Increase in pressure causes fluid compression thereby increasing densityvalue

    Less impact on density as compared to temperature affects

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    10/123

    Density

    B Temperature correction for surface fluids

    B Pressure & Temperature Correction for downhole

    Increases in pressure, increases density

    Well bore conditions, pressure and temperature corrections are madesimultaneously

    dc = du + CT - Cp

    dc: corrected density, ppgdu: uncorrected density, ppg

    CT: average temperature correction, ppgCP: average pressure correction, ppg

    B Use TETRAs TP-Pro to do simultaneous temperature and

    pressure corrections for wellbore conditions

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    11/123

    Version 2.2

    OPERATOR:

    WELL NAME:

    LOCATION:

    DATE:

    SURFACE TEMPERATURE: 70 DEG FBHT: 213.8 DEG F

    TVD: 5751 FT

    BHP: 3855 PSI

    OVERBALANCE: 0 PSI

    REQUIRED EFFECTIVE DENSITY: 12.89 PPG

    SELECTED SURFACE DENSITY: 13.35 PPG

    TCT: 60 DEG F

    FLUID COMPOSITION ( 1- Salt; 2-Salt; 3-Salt): 2

    ACTUAL OVERBAL ANCE: 83 PSI

    EFFECTIVE DENSITY AT 5751': 13.17 PPG

    VERTICAL ACTUAL TEMP

    DEPTH DENSITY DEGREE

    FEET PPG PPG PSI FAHRENHEIT

    0 13.35 13.35 0 70

    221 13.34 13.34 153 76

    442 13.32 13.34 307 81

    664 13.31 13.33 460 87

    885 13.29 13.32 613 92

    1106 13.28 13.31 766 981327 13.27 13.31 918 103

    1548 13.25 13.30 1071 109

    1770 13.24 13.29 1223 114

    1991 13.22 13.29 1375 120

    2212 13.21 13.28 1527 125

    2433 13.20 13.27 1679 131

    2654 13.18 13.27 1831 136

    2876 13.17 13.26 1983 142

    3097 13.15 13.25 2134 147

    3318 13.14 13.24 2285 153

    3539 13.12 13.24 2436 158

    3760 13.11 13.23 2587 164

    3981 13.10 13.22 2738 170

    4203 13.08 13.22 2888 175

    4424 13.07 13.21 3039 181

    4645 13.05 13.20 3189 186

    4866 13.04 13.20 3339 192

    5087 13.03 13.19 3489 197

    5309 13.01 13.18 3639 203

    5530 13.00 13.17 3788 208

    5751 12.98 13.17 3938 214 TVD

    NOTE: Results are based on best available information and assume

    equilibrium and static well conditions.

    EFFECTIVE

    DENSITY

    PEMEX

    Vigilante

    Mexico

    14-Mar-08

    Input Well Data

    Calculated corrected density@ down hole conditions

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    12/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    13/123

    Crystallization Temperature

    B Definition: Temperature at which a consti tuent of the brine

    fluid will come out of solution

    B Terminology

    Surface crystallization

    FCTA - First crystal to appear TCT - True crystallization temperature

    LCTD - Last crystal to dissolve

    Pressurized crystallization

    PCT Pressurized crystallization temperature

    Notation reference pressure tested and PCT value ie 4/35 has been tested at

    4000 psi with a PCT of 35 deg. F

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    14/123

    Schematic of crystallization curve

    FCTA

    TCT

    LCTD

    Time

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    15/123

    PCT

    B Crystallization temperature shift due to pressure effects

    B Depending upon the salt composit ion, pressure wil l either

    have no effect or elevated the expected crystallization

    temperature

    B

    PCT are measured with a high pressure apparatus,monitoring temperature, volume & pressure changes.

    B PCT is a phenomenon to be consider for offshore

    completions at water depths greater than 1500 ft

    B PCT fluids are rated for the minimum encountered

    temperature and the corresponding maximum pressure Sea bed temperature

    BOP testing pressure

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    16/123

    TETRAs PCT Tester

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    17/123

    Viscosity

    B Definition: Property of a fluid that resists the force tending to

    cause the fluid to f low.

    B Viscosity, = [Shear stress, ] in units of centipoise, cp

    B Rheological Models

    Newtonian Model

    Bingham Plastic Model

    Power-Law Model

    B Application

    Calculation of pressure drop under flow

    Calculation of equivalent circulating density

    [Shear rate, ]

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    18/123

    Viscosity

    B All CBF brines are nearly Newtonian in fluid behavior

    B Apparent viscosities are sensitive to salt composition

    B Within a salt system, as the salt concentration increases, the

    viscosity wil l increase coorresponding

    B

    Measurements are typically made with Fann 35 typeviscometer at either 600 rpm or 300 rpm.

    B Payzone fluids are either Bingham or Power law fluids

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    19/123

    Clarity - API 13J, 2nd Ed

    B Definition: Relative expression referring to the turbidity of a

    brine due to the presence of suspended insoluble or non-

    miscible particulate matter.

    B Monitored to determine formation damage potential

    B QA/QC on fi ltration performance

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    20/123

    Clarity Measurements

    B Turbidimeter Nephelometer type

    Data - NTUs

    Value is influenced by particlesize, size distribution andrefractive index

    May be correlated to suspendedsolid concentration by calibrationcurve

    B Gravimetric Method Measures total suspended solids

    1.2 m filter disks Dry retained solids and filter disk at

    105oC for 1 hour

    Data is reported as mg of dried solidsper volume of test fluid

    B Particle Counters

    Measures particle size & concentration

    Does not require sample preparation

    Data is reported as particle sizedistribution

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    21/123

    pH

    B Fluid specification

    Neutral to slightly alkaline CBFs

    Sodium chloride & sodium bromide

    Potassium chloride & potassium bromide

    Calcium chloride & Calcium bromide

    Highly alkaline CBFs Sodium, Potassium & Cesium formate fluids

    Artificially buffered to 10 with carbonate solution

    Acidic CBFs

    Zinc CBF

    Ammonium chloride

    B Monitoring of acid/base contamination

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    22/123

    Filterability

    B Objective

    Evaluate the ability of filtration to bring used fluid back to specification

    Determine possible polymer or other contamination

    B Test Method

    Filter CBF through a 0.45 micron absolute filter paper using an inline filter

    holder and syringe Passing: Greater than 50 ml of filtrate thru one filter paper

    Failure: List actual filtrate volume thru one filter paper

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    23/123

    TETRAs QA/QC

    B Brine Analysis Program Part of TETRAs CBF management program

    QA blending at the plant facility

    QC of return fluids from rig

    Measures salt composition

    Physical properties Density

    Crystallization

    Turbidity

    Filterability

    Contaminates

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    24/123

    APPLICATIONS

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    25/123

    B Completion/Workover Fluid

    Gravel pack fluid

    Stimulation fluid

    Frac fluid

    B Packer Fluid

    B PayZone Drilling Fluids

    Applications

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    26/123

    Completion and Workover Fluid

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    27/123

    Completion & Workover Fluids

    B Desired Properties Density - well control

    Non-formation damaging

    Solids Free

    Compatible with formation water

    Compatible with clays/shale

    Non-Corrosive

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    28/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Density 8.5 ppg to 21.0 ppg

    Maximum equivalent pressure gradient of 1.1 psi/ft

    Density increase with spike fluid or anhydrous salts

    Density decrease with low density fluid or water

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    29/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Solids Free Fluid Low pumping pressures

    No solids to obstruct wellbore operations

    Avoid density stratification

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    30/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Formation Damage - Overview

    Permeability - fluid flow

    Porosity - pore volume

    Production

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    31/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Formation Damage - Partic le Invasion

    No suspended solids in brine fluids

    Brine filtration is extremely important

    Diatomaceous earth filtration

    Cartridge filtration

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    32/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Formation Damage thru c lay hydration and dispersion Damage mechanism

    Hydrated clays/shale decrease porosity

    Dispersed clays/shale may potentially reduce permeability

    High salinity fluids inhibit clay swelling and migration

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    33/123

    Water sensitive clays

    INSITU CLAYS

    HYDRATED CLAYS

    DISPERSED HYDRATED CLAYS

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    34/123

    Completion & Workover Fluid

    B Formation Damage - Water Compatibil ity

    Insitu precipitation reduces permeability & porosity Seawater

    s Sulfates

    s Bacteria

    Formation water compatibility

    s Cation scaling/precipitation

    Sodium

    Calcium, Barium, Strontium

    Heavy metals - iron

    s Anion scaling/precipitation

    Bicarbonate/carbonate

    Sulfates

    Sulfides

    Halides & Formates are extremely soluble

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    35/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    36/123

    Packer Fluid

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    37/123

    Packer Fluid

    B Maintain complete or partial hydrostatic pressure

    requirement of the well

    B Long term application

    B Closed system

    B Desired Properties No solids, non-damaging, inhibitive, no physical obstruction

    Temperature stability

    Low corrosion

    Remain pumpable

    Compatibility with elastomers

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    38/123

    Packer Fluid

    B Advantages Wide range of densities

    Non-formation damaging

    Solids free

    Fluid stability

    Low corrosion rate

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    39/123

    Packer Fluid

    B Solids Free Fluid Unlike muds, no solids to settle over time

    No solids to hinder or prevent removal of packers

    Fluid can be used as non-damaging workover or kill fluid

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    40/123

    PACKER FLUID

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

    TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS, mg /l

    HEIGHTO

    FSETTLEDSOLIDS

    ,cm

    15,000 FT (4572 M) 9 5/8 IN CASING5,000 FT (1,524 M) 7 5/8 IN CASING

    2 7/8 IN TUBING

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    41/123

    Packer Fluid

    B Fluid Stability Thermally stable - >400oF for halides,

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    42/123

    CBF SELECTION CRITERIA

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    43/123

    Fluid Selection

    Correct Density

    [Temperature & Pressure]

    PCT Check

    [Pressure & Crystallization point]

    Fluid Evaluation

    Formation Damage

    Fluid Economics Environmental & Safety

    Corrosion Resistant Alloy Compatibility

    Final Working Fluid Specification

    Completion Fluid's Density

    & Crystallization point

    Well Design

    & Hydraulics

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    44/123

    Well Design & Hydraulic

    B Provide hydrostatic pressureBHP = grads , psi/ft x TVD, ftDensity, ppg = grad, psi/ft x 0.052

    B Desired CBF density may be based upon the overburden pressure,underburden pressure or ECD

    Overburden pressure =BHP +Overbalance pressure Underburden pressure =BHP Underbalance pressure

    ECD takes into consideration of pressure drops under dynamic conditions Pressure consideration due to weak liner top, cement etc. Open hole consider pore & fracture presure

    B Final density must be calculated to compensate for temperatureand pressure using TP-Pro

    Onshore calculation Offshore calculation allows for temperature modeling to seabed temperature and from seabed

    temperature to bottom hole temperature

    C lli i P i

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    45/123

    Crystallization Point

    B Definition: Temperature at which a consti tuent of the brine

    fluid will come out of solution

    B Selected according to the lowest temperature to be

    encounter

    Ambient temperature

    Sea bed temperature

    B The specified TCT of the CBF should approximately 5 deg. F

    lower than the minimum working temperature

    PCT

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    46/123

    PCT

    B Factors to consider for PCT fluids

    Consider PCT effects when well is in 1500 ft of water or greater Sea bed temperature

    Hydrostatic pressure at sea bed

    Any overburden pressure at sea bed depth such as BOP testing

    Maximum calculated pressure is hydrostatic pressure (corrected) plusoverburden pressure

    B As with TCT, PCT ratings should have a safety factor

    The PCT temperature rating should be 5 deg. F lower than the minimumtemperature at the given maximum pressure

    Example a well with a sea bed temperature of 35 deg. F and maximumpressure at sea bed depth of 10,000 psi should have a fluid with rating of

    10/30

    Fi l Fl id S ifi ti

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    47/123

    Final Fluid Specification

    B Once density and TCT/PCT are determined, types of possible

    salt systems can be defined

    CLEAR BRINE FLUIDS

    NH4Cl

    KCl/NaCl

    KCl

    NaCl

    KCl/KBr

    KBr

    HCOONa

    NaCl/CaCl2

    CaCl2

    KCl/NaBr

    NaBr

    KCl/NaCl/NaBr

    NaCl/NaBr

    HCOONa/HCOOKHCOOK

    CaBr2

    CaCl2/CaBr2

    HCOOK/HCOOCs

    CaCl2/CaBr2/ZnBr2

    Ca/ZnBr2

    HCOOCs

    Ca/ZnBr2

    1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60

    SPECIFIC GRAVITY

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    48/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    49/123

    Mechanisms of Formation Damage

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    50/123

    Mechanisms of Formation Damage

    B Change of Wettabili tyB Particle Invasion

    B Clay Hydration

    B Formation Water Compatibili ty

    B Crude Compatibility

    B Other Fluids

    FORMATION WATER

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    51/123

    FORMATION WATER

    B Anions Sulfates

    Carbonates

    B Cations

    Barium

    Heavy metals

    Sodium

    B pH Destabilization of Clays

    Precipitation

    Formation Water Compatibil ity

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    52/123

    p y

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    25/75 50/50 75/25

    Completion Brine/Formation Water Ratio

    Turb

    idity,

    ntu

    11.5 ppg NaCl/NaBr

    12.5 ppg NaBr

    11.0 ppg CaCl2

    12.0 ppg CaCl2/CaBr2Formation Water:SG =1.109Na =53551 ppmFe =3 ppmBa =ND

    Ca =7060 ppmMg =571 ppmCl =93174 ppmCO3

    -2 =926 ppmSO4

    -2 =3375 ppmpH =10.8

    Formation Water Compatibili ty

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    53/123

    Formation Water Compatibili ty

    0

    2

    46

    8

    10

    1214

    16

    25/75 50/50 75/25Completion Brine/Formation Water

    Sol

    ids,

    vo

    l.%

    12.5 ppg CaCl2/CaBr2

    12.5 ppg CaBr2

    14.0 ppg CaBr2

    Formation Water:SG =1.14NaCl =18.6 wt.%

    CBF Selection

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    54/123

    CBF Selection

    B

    Environmental Governmental regulations

    Zinc CBF zero discharge

    Reportable quantities GOM

    s Zinc Bromide 1000 lbs

    s Ammonium chloride 5000 lbs

    Toxicity values

    Disposal considerations

    Toxicity

    Salinity

    Halides

    Safety & Personnel handling

    Zinc CBF

    CBF Selection

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    55/123

    CBF SelectionFluid Economics

    B Each salt has different COG

    B Fluids are blended as mixed salts to lower cost

    B Generally chlorides are less expensive than bromides

    B Should be last cri teria

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    56/123

    Fluid Planning & Maintenance

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    57/123

    Working Fluid

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    58/123

    (2 to 3 times circulating volume)B Calculating working flu id volume requirements

    Circulating volume

    Volume of wellbore with drill pipe in place

    Holding tanks

    Minimum of one hole volume

    Filtration equipment

    Fluid hold in the equipment

    Filtration rate of equipment versus fluid circulation rate

    Surface piping

    Fluid volume held in the system

    Re-supply turnaround time

    Contingency needs and pill requirements

    Fluid loss thru displacement interface, downhole & surface

    Make up of fluid loss pills

    Working Fluid Maintenance

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    59/123

    Working Fluid Maintenance

    B Fluids can lose density from water or other low density fluidingression

    B Density increase required to maintain well control or wellbore

    B Use of spike fluid or material for working fluid density

    maintenance

    Fluid with a significantly higher density than the working fluid Dry salts

    Density Loss due to Fluid Ingression

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    60/123

    Density Loss due to Fluid Ingression

    B All clear brine fluids are hygroscopic absorb water fromatmosphere at points of exposure

    Rigs utilizing clear brine fluids require closed tanks to minimize this problem

    B Surface fluid handling system are not completely water tight

    and water run off can contaminate brine fluid.

    B Contamination of brine fluid from water lines Standard operating procedure is to lock off all water lines prior to bringing

    CBF onto rig.

    B Contamination of brine fluid from ingression of reservoir

    fluids

    Oil

    Formation water

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    61/123

    Spike Fluid/MaterialFactors

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    62/123

    Factors

    B Determine during well pre-planning

    B Based upon most l ikely density range increase of workingfluid for well control

    B Weigh up option must keep TCT or PCT at or below wells

    specification

    B Consider rig l imitations

    Tank capacity The lesser the density differential, the greater volume consumption of spike fluid

    impacting volume of spike fluid

    Mixing capabilities (dry materials)

    B Time

    Time require to maintain the working fluid

    Turnaround time for bringing new fluid onsite

    B Economics

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    63/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    64/123

    CORROSION

    Definition of Corrosion

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    65/123

    B Destruction or deterioration of a material by reaction with its

    environment.

    Metals

    Non-metallic materials such as plastics, ceramics

    B These reactions may be chemical and/or physical.B Corroded metal reverts back to most stable form - oxides

    Corrosion Problems

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    66/123

    B Metal Loss

    B Formation of Solids which contr ibute to formation damage

    B Contamination of Clear Brine Fluid

    B Possible Catastrophic Failure of Tubing and Equipment

    Types of Corrosion

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    67/123

    yp

    B Uniform Corrosion Metal loss distributed over entire

    exposed surface area

    Most common form

    Caused by chemical reactions

    Long term corrosion effects can beaccurately predicted

    B Localized Corrosion Crevice

    Pitting

    Stress

    Intergranular

    Can lead to premature failure of tubingor equipment

    B Environmental Assisted Cracking

    Form of Stress corrsion

    Requires an applied stress andelectrochemical reaction

    Primary considerations are on CRA

    Effective corrosion control requires a

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    68/123

    multiple approach method

    B Brine compositionB Aeration

    B Contaminates

    B Corrosion inhibitors

    B Oxygen scavenger

    B Biocides

    B Corrosion resistant alloy

    Uniform Corrosion Data

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    69/123

    s CaCl2/CaBr2/ZnBr2 Brine

    Test conditions: 177oC, N-80

    steel, 7 days

    s Inhibited Systems

    1.86 sg brine: 121oC, N-80 steel, 5

    days

    2.04 sg brine: 149oC, N-80 steel, 7days

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    1.76 1.86 1.96 2.06 2.16 2.26

    DENSITY, sg

    CORROSIONR

    ATE,mpy

    Composition A

    Composition B

    Composition C

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    1.86 2.04

    DENSITY, sg

    CORROSIONR

    ATE,mpy

    Control

    Tetrahib Plus

    MatchWell

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    70/123

    B Empir ical Corrosion Database developed by TETRA on CBFs

    and additives to predict EAC on various metallurgiesB MatchWell is a fluid selector program that recommends an

    optimum fluid system to avoid EAC for the given well

    metallurgy & parameters

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    71/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    72/123

    DISPLACEMENT

    Displacement And CleanupD fi iti

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    73/123

    Definition

    Substitute one fluid for another in the wellbore

    while removing all residue of the original fluid.

    Displacement And Cleanup Goals

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    74/123

    B Maintain well control

    B Avoid Health Safety & Environmental concerns

    B Maintain wellbore integrity

    B Provide a solids free environment for completion

    B Minimize operational costs Minimize operational time

    Minimize fluid losses due to contamination

    Displacement And CleanupDesign Considerations

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    75/123

    Design Considerations

    B Original fluid type and density

    B Displacing fluid type and density

    B Wellbore geometry

    B Wellbore integrity

    B Equipment limitations

    Displacement And CleanupMethods

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    76/123

    Methods

    B Direct Displacement

    All three operations are performed by one or more chemical spacers in onecirculation

    B Indirect displacement

    An intermediary fluid (usually seawater) is introduced to aid in theperformance of the removal of the original fluid and residue.

    Displacement And CleanupMethod Advantages/Disadvantages

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    77/123

    Method Advantages/Disadvantages

    B Direct Displacement

    Advantages Disadvantages

    Minimizes pumping time Spacers are typically more expensive

    Provides better down hole pressure

    control

    May generate high downhole

    pressures

    Protects integri ty of or iginal fluid Places higher importance on pump

    capabilities

    Minimizes volume of waste fluid

    generated

    Fluid compatibilities may be more

    critical

    Mud mobility is cruc ial

    Displacement And CleanupMethod Advantages/Disadvantages

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    78/123

    Method Advantages/Disadvantages

    B Indirect Displacement

    Advantages Disadvantages

    Spacer cost minimized Downhole hydrostatic pressures

    are reduced

    Insures clean hole, beforeintroducing completion fluid

    Creates larger amounts of wastefluid

    Allows greater tolerance of

    mechanical difficulties

    Requires more pumping time

    Mud mobility requirements are

    less crucial

    May need to discharge first step

    cleaning flu id (seawater)

    Displacement And CleanupMethod Selection

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    79/123

    Method Selection

    B Indirect Displacement

    Preferred method, unless prohibited by circumstances

    B Direct displacement Utilized when circumstance prohibit an indirect displacement

    Indirect DisplacementPump Schedule

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    80/123

    Pump Schedule

    Stage Volume Rate

    Seawater Minimum One hole volume Maximum

    Caustic Soda 50 barrels Maximum

    Seawater 50 barrels Maximum

    Surfactant 50 barrels Maximum

    Seawater 50 barrels Maximum

    Caustic soda 50 barrels Maximum

    Seawater One hole volume Maximum

    Short Trip Casing Scrapers and Brushes

    Rig up to reverse circulate

    Seawater One hole volume Maximum

    High Vis. Sweep 50 barrels Maximum

    Filtered Completion

    Fluid

    Until returns are clean Maximum

    Displacement Systems

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    81/123

    B

    TDSP System Balanced displacement

    Minimum size, multiple pills

    Low pump rates

    Generally used in direct displacement

    B TETRACLEAN System

    Large single pill

    Balanced displacement

    High pump rates

    Utilized in direct and indirect displacement

    Direct DisplacementSpacer Design - TDSP System

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    82/123

    Spacer Design TDSP System

    B Base Fluid

    B TDSP I

    B TDSP II

    B TDSP III

    Direct DisplacementTDSP Spacer Design

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    83/123

    TDSP Spacer Design

    B Base Fluid

    Base fluid of the mud system being displaced, with no additives.

    Included when compatibility is a concern

    Acts as a turbulent sweep, helping to clean mud cake from casing interior

    Protects integrity of fluid being displaced

    Commonly used in SBM and OBM displacement

    Volume designed to provide adequate separation of original fluid and TDSP I

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    84/123

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    85/123

    Direct DisplacementTDSP Spacer Design

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    86/123

    S Space es g

    B TDSP III

    Viscosified intermediate density fluid, usually 11.6 ppg

    HEC polymer

    HEC/XC polymer

    XC polymer

    Rheology designed to provide maximum suspension and lifting capabilities Volume designed to provide adequate separation between TDSP II and the

    completion fluid

    Recommended minimum coverage of 1,000 feet in largest annular space

    Recommended minimum contact time is 5 minute.

    TETRACLEAN SYSTEM

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    87/123

    B Single multi-function fluid

    SOBM

    OBM

    WBM

    B Minimal use of space/tanks/pits

    B System can be pre-blended or made on-site

    B

    Versatile Unbalanced displacement

    Balanced displacement

    B High Rate displacement

    B Environmental Compliance

    TETRACLEAN SYSTEMComponents

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    88/123

    Components

    B

    Blend of Polymers Spacer

    Suspend/carrier of solids

    B TETRACLEAN 105 & TETRACLEAN 106

    Surfactants & Cleaning agents

    Remove any remaining solids on casing

    Disperse solids

    Water wet metal surfaces

    B Base Fluid

    Water/seawater

    Brines

    TETRACLEAN SYSTEM

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    89/123

    B SOBM/OBM

    Preceded by a base oil pill

    Formulation of surfactant/cleaning agents according to mud type

    brine

    B WBM

    Clean up and displacement with TETRACLEAN pill

    B Unbalance Displacement

    Preceded by Hi-vis push pill & seawater

    Clean up with TETRACLEAN pill

    B High Flow Rate

    Circulating sub in wells utilizing liners

    Kill/Choke lines to boost rates in riser

    Displacement And Cleanup Products

    B Caustic Soda sodium hydroxide

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    90/123

    Cleans by saponification of oils to soap

    B TETRA OMD Surfactant and dispersant for water based and diesel based muds

    B TETRA O-Sol Blend of surfactants designed for diesel and synthetic based oil muds

    B TETRASol Blend of surfactants and solvents to remove hydrocarbons, oil based muds,

    pipe dope, asphaltenes and resinsB TETRAClean 103

    Flocculate mud, pipe dope, oil, polymers and other solids.

    B TETRAClean 105 Surfactant component of TETRAClean system

    B TETRAClean 106 Cleaning booster for TETRAClean 105 used in non-calcium displacement

    pills

    Direct DisplacementPump Schedule

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    91/123

    Stage Stage Volume Cumulative Volume Rate Returning Fluid

    TDSP I 25 25 2.5 Mud

    TDSP II 50 75 2.5 Mud

    TDSP III 25 100 2.5 Mud

    Completion Fluid 185 285 4.25 Mud

    Completion Fluid 250 535 5.5 Mud

    Completion Fluid 25 560 5.5 TDSP I

    Completion Fluid 50 610 5.5 TDSP II

    Completion Fluid 25 635 5.5 TDSP III

    Completion Fluid 435 1070 5.5 Completion Fluid

    Short Trip Casing Scrapers

    Completion Fluid Until Clean Max. Rate Completion Fluid

    DeepDesignDisplacement Modeling Software

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    92/123

    DeepDesign

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    93/123

    B Database management of input data

    B Hydraulic calculation on the exact configuration of the well Subsea completion

    Pipe joints

    Eccentricity

    Tool configuration

    B Fluids Density and rheology corrected as a function of temperature & pressure

    Track fluid properties as a function of circulating or static mode.

    Displacement Summary

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    94/123

    Variables Flow

    rate

    (bpm)

    Pump

    P (psi )

    Pump

    HP (HP)

    P @ TD

    (psi)

    ECD

    @ TD

    (ppg)

    ECD @

    TOL

    (ppg)Maxi.

    value

    8.00 7689 1507. 17873 17.85 18.57

    Mini. value 3.57 0 0. 15631 15.61 8.62

    Maxi. @

    time (min)

    0.0 40.9 40.9 48.5 48.5 181.2

    Mini. @

    time (min)

    218.4 120.0 120.0 61.2 61.2 205.2

    PRESSURE @TD

    DeepDesign Output

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    95/123

    7800

    8000

    8200

    8400

    8600

    8800

    9000

    9200

    9400

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

    PRESSURE@TD,PSI

    CUMULATIVE VOLUME, BBL

    PRESSURE @TD

    DeepDesign Output

    PUMP PRESSURE

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    96/123

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

    PUMPP

    RESSURE,PSI

    ELAPSED TIME, MIN.

    PUMP PRESSURE

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    97/123

    DOWNHOLE FLUID LOSS CONTROL

    Fluid Loss Control

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    98/123

    B Pre-plan FLC options

    First option FLC pill

    Contingency option pill

    Reduction of fluid density

    B Fluid loss rates

    Seepage less than 10 bbl/hr

    Moderate fluid loss

    High fluid loss

    Lost circulation rate of lost fluid is greater than pump fluid rate

    Selection Criteria

    FLUID LOSS PILLS

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    99/123

    Fluid Loss P il l Requi rements Operational Requi rements

    Polymer Pill

    Polymer Crosslinked Pill

    Solids Free Pills

    Sized Salt Pill

    Sized Carbonate Pill

    PayZone MagmaFiber

    Solids Laden Pills

    Discharge

    Clean Up

    Environmental & Safety

    Monovalent halide CBF

    Divalent Halide CBF

    Formate CBF

    Base Brine System

    Final Working FLC Specification

    Reservoir Data

    FLUID LOSS PILLS

    Fluid Loss PillSelection Criteria

    B Reservoir dataP bilit f i

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    100/123

    Permeability of reservoir Determines the applicability of polymer pills

    Sizing of bridge solids Porosity

    Determines the depth of pill invasion

    Dictate size of pill & clean up

    Bottom hole temperature Determines the applicability of polymer pills

    Determines the additive package

    Determines the pill component

    Formation water Compatibility with base brine & clean up chemicals

    Lithology of reservoir Compatibility with base brine & Clean up chemicals

    Pore pressure ECD consideration

    Fracture pressure ECD consideration

    Fluid Loss PillSelection Criteria

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    101/123

    B Fluid loss pil l properties Desired final density

    May opt to decrease density to lower hydrostatic column

    Base brine fluid

    B Operational Requirements Time interval for performance of FLC pill

    Well design Aperture restriction in tools

    Pumping limitation

    Rig equipment limitation

    Mode of Clean up if required Acids

    Enzymes

    Oxidizers flowback

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    102/123

    Final FLC Specification

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    103/123

    B Density

    B Length of time for FLC performance @ temperature

    B Clean up option

    Types of FLCSolids-Free Pil ls

    B Polymer FLC

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    104/123

    B Polymer FLC Density range: 8.5 19.2 ppg

    Mechanism: Bulk viscosity with HEC polymer

    Banking & Gel Strength with XC polymer

    Advantage Low residual

    Least formation damaging

    Degrades naturally over time with sufficient temperature Disadvantages Limited to reservoirs with permeability less than 1 darcy

    Temperature limitations HEC approximately 200 deg. F

    s XC 220 240 deg. F

    Greater invasion into formation

    Types of FLCSolids-Free Pil ls

    B TETRA Flex pill

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    105/123

    B TETRA Flex pill

    Pre-crosslinked polymer gel in CBF

    Solids-free FLC

    Density range: 8.5 ppg to 14.0 ppg

    Mechanism

    Crosslinked gel function as a bridging material

    Advantages

    Low residual, less formation damaging than solids laden FLC Easily degraded by acid

    Can be extended to higher density fluid with a viscosified carrier brine

    Disadvantages

    Limited to reservoir formation of less than 2.5 darcy

    Temperature limitation of 240 deg. F

    Types of FLCSolids-Laden Pills

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    106/123

    B Characteristics of Solids-laden pil ls

    Contains bridging solids

    Contains a polymer with solids suspension property

    May contain starch component for additional filtrate control

    All degradable under appropriate conditions and treatment

    Types of FLCSolids-Laden Pills

    B Sized Salt pil ls

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    107/123

    Bridge solids suspended in polymer

    Ideal density range: 10.5 to 13.0 ppg

    Mechanism:

    Forms an impermeable filter cake with NaCl

    Advantages

    Very effective in controlling fluid loss

    Capable of spanning a wide range of reservoir permeability

    Bridge solids are water soluble

    Disadvantages

    Size salt may dissolve prematurely

    May be damaging to formation

    Temperature limitation is function of polymers used

    Optimal applications is limited to sodium halide CBF

    Usage in non-sodium CBF can lead to unpredictable bridge solids sizing &dissolution

    Types of FLCSolids Laden Pill

    B Sized Carbonate Pill

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    108/123

    Bridge solids suspended in polymer

    Density range: 8.7 ppg to 19.2 ppg

    Mechanism:

    Forms an impermeable filter cake

    Advantages

    Very effective in controlling fluid loss

    Capable of spanning a wide range of reservoir permeability

    Bridge solids are highly acid soluble

    Wider range of density pill available than sized salt pills

    Disadvantages

    Acidization is required for removal of bridge solids

    May be damaging to formation

    Temperature limitation is a function of polymers used in pill

    Types of FLCSolids Laden Pills

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    109/123

    B Fiber Bridging Solid

    PayZone MagmaFiber fiber-like bridge solids in viscosified base brine

    Density range: 8.6 ppg to 19.2 ppg

    Mechanism: Forms an impermeable matted filter cake

    Advantages:

    Very effective in controlling fluid loss

    Effective in controlling losses in fracture face and vugular formations due to thefiber like bridge solids

    PayZone MagmaFiber are acid soluble

    Wide range of density available, similar to sized carbonate pills

    Disadvantages:

    Acidization is required to remove bridge solids

    Residuals of FLC may contribute to formation damage

    Temperature limitation is a function of polymers used in pill

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    110/123

    Polymer Products

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    111/123

    B TETRA Vis HEC polymer

    B TETRA Vis L low concentration liquid HEC product

    B TETRA Vis L Plus High concentration liquid HEC product

    B BioPol - Biopolymer

    B BioPol-L (liquid) Biopolymer

    B BioPol HT High temperature biopolymerB PseudoPol (liquid) Synthetic polymer

    B PseudoPol D Synthetic polymer

    B PseudoPol HT High temperature synthetic polymer

    B Payzone HPS Starch for fi ltrate control

    Thermal Extender

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    112/123

    B Formate CBFs

    B TETRA Buff-10

    pH stabilizer

    B PayZone 750

    Anti-oxidant

    Prevents oxidation of polymer

    Bridge Solids

    B Sized Sodium Chloride, 25 to 50 ppb TETRA SS-Fine, particle size ranging from1.0 800 mand D50 of 48 m

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    113/123

    TETRA SS Fine, particle size ranging from 1.0 800 m and D50 of 48 m

    TETRA SS-Medium, particle size ranging from 100 1500 m and D50

    of 500 m

    TETRA SS-Coarse, particle size ranging from 1000 10,000 m

    B Sized Calcium Carbonate, 25 to 50 ppb PayZone Carb-Prime, particle size ranging from 2.0 150 m and D50 of 12 m

    PayZone Carb-Ultra, particle size ranging from 1.5 20 m and D50 of 4 m

    TETRACarb Fine, particle size ranging from 10 500 m and D50 of 55 m

    TETRACarb Medium, particle size ranging from 85 1200 m and D50 of 370 m TETRACarb Coarse, particle size ranging from 1000 3500 m and D50 of 1800 m

    TETRACarb Flake, flat sheet like shaped solid

    B PayZone 530 & 532, 8 to 30 ppb PayZone 530 Regular grade

    PayZone 532 Fine grade

    Well PlanningFLC

    S f C

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    114/123

    B Size of FLC pill

    Typically 1.5 to 2.0 times the wellbore section that requires sealing off

    Solids-Free Pills will require a larger volume than typical due to volumelosses from invasion into formation

    Sized Salt pills will require a larger volume than typical to limit losses of sizedbridge solids

    B

    Develop guidelines for application of FLC and contingencyFLC pil l

    Rate of fluid losses to the application of FLC pills

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    115/123

    FILTRATION

    Filtration Applications

    Filt ti f CBF

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    116/123

    B Filtration of CBFs

    Removal of suspended solids in brines

    Removal of fisheye in viscosified pills

    B Oil Removal

    CBF

    Produced water

    FiltrationClear Brine Fluids

    B t il bl t h l f t ti th d ti i t f

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    117/123

    B Best available technology for protecting the productivi ty of

    reservoir Meet hydraulic requirements of well

    Meet working environments of well

    Least formation damaging fluid to the formation

    B In order to maintain the integrity of CBF, fluid fi ltration isessential

    B Fluid fil tration is part of CBFs daily maintenance

    QA/QC Filtration PerformanceMethods

    B Turbidity Generally used by most operators Nephelometric method light deflected at 90 deg.

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    118/123

    Indirect measurement of solids in fluid

    Standards utilized by operators can range from 10 NTU to higherB Gravimetric measurements used by operators requiring tighter

    solids control Absolute weight of solids retained by pre-determined size filter Standards utilized by operators can range from 10 mg/l to higher

    B Particle Counts Most stringent method ut ilized by operators wi thhighly sensitive formation

    Typically utilize laser particle counters Monitor particle size and concentration Standards utilized by operators can range from specified maximum particle size,

    minimum particle count reduction and maximum particle concentrations

    B All the above methods has been implemented successfully byTETRA

    Formation DamageCompletion Fluid Contamination

    B Problems Created by Solids in Completion Brine

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    119/123

    B Problems Created by Solids in Completion Brine

    Skin Damage by particle invasion to reservoir Pore throat blocking thereby reducing permeability

    Reduction of overall porosity

    Contributes to overall loss of net production

    Operational problems Plugging of perforations

    Plugging of slots in liner

    Plugging of gravel pack

    Obstruction downhole that may lead to inoperable tools

    Settlement of solids on packer that could lead problems in removal of packer inworkovers.

    Loss in value of completion brine Brine cannot be used as packer fluid

    Brine cannot be used in another well

    Formation Damage

    Particle invasion

    0.8

    1

    /Ki)

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    120/123

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200

    Cummulative Throughput, PV

    Permea

    bility

    Change

    (k2.5 md

    7.3 md

    39.1 md

    Completion brine contaminated with 100 mg/l hydrated API bentonite through well core samples

    Graph illustrates the magnitude in reduction of permeability due to loss of completion brinecontaminated with 100 mg/l of solids. The core sample with an initial permeability of 39 md lostmore than 80% of its original permeability after a flow of 26 pore volume into the core. The pore

    volume is fairly low since it is the equivalent measured pore space in the core sample.

    PACKER FLUID

    1000

    1200

    DS

    ,cm

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    121/123

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

    TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS, mg/l

    HEIGHTOFSETTLEDSO

    LID

    15,000 FT (4572 M) 9 5/8 IN CASING

    5,000 FT (1,524 M) 7 5/8 IN CASING

    2 7/8 IN TUBING

    This graph illustrates the amount of settled solids that will occur when packer fluids are not filtered.

    The height of settled solids is a function of the level of solid contamination in the brine. Settled solidson a packer can prevent its removal at a future date without a milling operation.

    DE Brine FiltrationStandard of the Industry

    B TETRA - DE Plate & Frame Filtration

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    122/123

    B TETRA DE Plate & Frame Filtration

    Sizes: 600 ft2, 1100 ft2, 1300 ft2 and 1500 ft2 Capacity to filter brines with densities ranging from 8.5 ppg to 19.2 ppg

    Filter media diatomaceous earth

    Cake filtration

    Flow rates: 5 to 20 bpm, dependent upon size of filtration unit & brine density

    Cartridge Pod units

    Placed immediately downstream of SafeDEflo DE unit

    Primary function is a guard unit to prevent solids bypass in the DE unit Dual pod with 64 cartridge capacity

    TETRA C2 Pleated Cellulose Filtration Cartridges

    TETRA PP2 Polypropylene Filtration Cartridges

    Resin Bonded Filtration Cartridges

    Cartridge Filtration

    B Utilized as guard fi ltration in DE fil tration Insures fluid clarity in the event of tears in the filter cloth

  • 7/27/2019 Brine School Starfish

    123/123

    DE filter aid grade should be match with cartridge rating such that solids areremoved by DE

    B Utilized to f ilter viscosi fied pill Solids-free fluid loss pill

    XC polymer

    HEC polymer

    Remove fisheyes Fisheyes are partially or un-hydrated polymer

    Fisheyes are a source of formation damage

    B Oily water reclamation Special cartridges made of material to absorb oil

    Design to meet Oil & Grease discharge regulations