Upload
hillary-davis
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Larry MorrisseyPediatrician (who happens to work with Prostate Cancer)
Medical Director for Quality Improvement Stillwater Medical Group
Chair, Minnesota Shared Decision Making Collaborative (MSDMC)
Patient Centered CareProviding care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions.
-The Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm
The Patient as the Source of ControlGive the necessary informationGive the opportunity to exercise the degree
of control they choose over health care decisions that affect them
Accommodate differences in patient preferences
Encourage shared decision making
Institute of Medicine Crossing the Quality Chasm
Key Components of SDMKnowledgeKnow that there are options including doing
nothingDiscuss RisksDiscuss BenefitsUnderstand patient preferences and values
and include them in the discussion
What is informed consent?It is a process of communication between a
patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention.
Has similar elements to SDMKnowledge, alternatives, risks, benefits
Both an ethical obligation and a legal requirement spelled out in statutes and case law in all 50 states.
Source: AMA website
How SDM goes beyond Informed ConsentCollaborative decision making—decide together
vs. accept or reject recommendationGiving the patient the best chance to be
adequately informedExplicit clarification of preferences and valuesAvoidable decision conflict surfaced and resolvedTaking the time to make a good decisionInformed consent is the legal “closing” of the
deal
Why is SDM important?Decisions are often complexPatients want to make a good choiceDecisional conflict often existsNature of the decision will affect our goalsVariation exists in motives for supporting it
EthicalEfficiencyEffectiveness
Ethical ImperativeThe strongest caseRespect the autonomy of the patientAddress the balance between helping and not
doing harmAvoid the danger of undeclared uncertaintyA person cannot express their preferences if
they do not know the choices they have
What is the nature of the intervention?
Effective CareLarge benefitMinimal harmsGood evidence
Preference Sensitive CareAlternatives exist with no clear best choiceDepends on personal valuesHow important are the benefits versus the
harms?
What is a “Quality” Decision?The goal is an informed decision that is based
on patient values and evidence.However:
Knowledge cannot be assumedBenefits and risks are not presented equallyWe can make unwarranted assumptions about
patient preferences and actions
An Important Challenge for Shared-decision MakingWhat outcomes do we expect? Should we expect?
Lower costs (i.e. Commonwealth report)Reduce non-adherenceKnowledge transfer Decrease liability (i.e. an enhanced informed
consent)Should we take a more simple approach? “It’s the
right thing to do.”How do you actually do this well in everyday
practice?
Barriers that Clinicians FearTimeCostAnother thing to doI already know/do thisResistance to the
resultsDifficulty with change
of our roleBeing afraid to take riskHow fast can this go
from a good idea to a proven way of improving the lives of our patients?
How do we make informed decisions based on medical evidence and patient values something people experience all the time?
“ Each one of us matters, has a role to play and makes a difference.”- Jane Goodall
Step one: You can inspire change!