BSB JOP Project BSBEEP Black Sea Buildings Energy Efficiency Plan GA 1 Status Report:

BSB JOP Project BSBEEPBlack Sea Buildings Energy Efficiency PlanGA 1 Status Report: “Knowledge and Information collection and dissemination - Analysis of external current situation”

2nd Meeting, Yerevan, 2013

Georgios GAIDAJIS, Komninos ANGELAKOGLOULaboratory of Environmental Management and Industrial Ecology (LEMIE)Department of Production Engineering & ManagementDemocritus University of Thrace, School of EngineeringXanthi, Greece

1. GA1 quick review2. Plan versus actual3. Work scheduled and done4. Work to be done5. Main bottlenecks and constraints6. Discussion

Structure of presentation

2/27

Basic outputs – Reminder!

GA1 outputs will provide the basis for a solid understanding of the current situation and potential regarding energy efficiency for buildings in the examined areas.

3/27

GA1.1 - Collection of building guidelines (legislation) concerning energy efficiency issues

Basic Output: Legal framework corpus, concerning the legal framework at EU, national and local level.

Basic Output: Guide for funding, political initiatives at EU, national and local level.

GA 1.2 - Collection funding opportunities and programs, political initiatives at EU, national and local level.

1. GA1 quick review

GA1.3 - Collection of applied best practices concerning energy efficiency issues and study visits at participating municipalities areas.

Basic Output: Best practices collection, from EU, national and local experience.

Basic outputs – Reminder!

4/27

GA1.4 - Collection of a pool of active bodies and experts that are involved on energy efficiency matters - BSBEEP POOL

GA1.5 - Collection of building materials and systems concerning energy efficiency issues - BSBEEP AGORA

Basic Output: Index of actors (institutions and bodies) at EU, national and local level.

Basic Output: Guide of building materials concerning energy efficiency issues.

1. GA1 quick review

Summary of participants in GA1 activity

ParticipantsGA1

Activity1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

Municipality of Kavala-GR Municipality of Galati-RO Municipality of Cahul-MD Municipality of Mykolayiv-UA Municipality of Samsun-TR Municipality of Tekirdag-TR Democritus University of Thrace (Leader)University “DUNĂREA" Galaţi-RO American University of Armenia-AM RR & Energy Efficiency Fund-AM

Municipalities of Cahul, Mykolayiv, Samsun and Tekirdag will participate in all 5 GAs

5/27

1. GA1 quick review

Description

Year 1Semester 1

(Month)Semester 2

(Month)1 2 3 4 5 6 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

GA1.1 - Collection of building guidelines (legislation) concerning energy efficiency issues GA 1.2 - Collection of funding, including funding opportunities and programs, political initiatives at EU, national and local level. GA1.3 Collection of applied best practices concerning energy efficiency issues and study visits at participating municipalities areas. GA1.4 Collection of a pool of active bodies and experts that are involved on energy efficiency matters - BSBEEP POOL GA1.5 Collection of building materials and systems concerning energy efficiency issues - BSBEEP AGORA

6 Months have passed!!Mostly administrative and preparatory activities…

No major work regarding GA1!

6/27

2. Plan versus actual

Description

Year 1Semester 1

(Month)Semester 2



GA1.1 and GA1.2 activities must end until end of December –That’s 23 days from now! (including Christmas…)

7/27


Description

Year 1Semester 1

(Month)Semester 2



8/27


GA1.3 and GA1.4 activities are estimated to have ended until February

GA1.5 activities are estimated to have ended until April

GAYear 1

Semester 1 (Month)

Semester 2 (Month)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12GA1.1 GA 1.2 GA1.3 GA1.4 GA1.5

Months 1-4 Until 1st Progress Report

What we had to do:• Specifications for five (5) studies

9/27

3. Work scheduled and done

What we have done: Specifications for all five GA1 studies have been prepared.

Moreover: An analytical timetable and a template including specific instructions and timeframe were

elaborated and were distributed to all partners (12/9/2013).

A questionnaire regarding the analytical profile of all municipalities has been developed and distributed.

Screening evaluation and collection of relative literature, preliminary analysis, summary lists.

Adaptation of GA1 internal structure

One (1) introductory chapter General information regarding

activity’s subject and notions.

Seven (7) chapters (one for each municipality and one for Armenia).

Focus on local national and EU level.

One (1) comparative final chapter

Identify common approaches, pros and cons, evaluate data adequacy etc.

Structure flexibility-adaptation since many municipalities fall under common legislative framework (i.e. EU, Turkish, etc.)

Avoidance of effort duplication (ensure the that participants will not work on identical subjects thus losing valuable time, i.e. EU and Turkish legislation should not be described in each EU and Turkish municipality respectively)

Indicative example GA1.3

10/27


Initial structure

New structure

& contents

Activity 1 (legislation)

11/27


GA1.1

1.Introduction2. EU Level 2.1 Legal Framework 2.2 Administrative Framework 2.3 Challenges and Opportunities 2.4 Problems and Constraints3. National and Local Level 3.1 Armenia & Yerevan 3.2 Greece & Kavala 3.3 Moldova & Cahul 3.4 Romania & Galati 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv4. Comparison and Conclusions

General information regarding activity’s subject and notions. Issues such as significance of accomplishing the specific activity, references to similar work, definitions et al. may be included.

2.1 & 2.2: Mention the temporal evolution of the legislation and the reasoning behind that evolution. Provide an exhaustive list with all the EU legislation related with Buildings and Energy Efficiency, and a brief summary of each legislation.

2.3 & 2.4: Mention and point out the challenges and/or the opportunities together with the problematic areas and any limitations, that may arise from the legislative framework.

Similar to EU Level.

Identify common approaches, pros and cons, evaluate data adequacy etc. Attempt to summarize, in a critical way the information collection.

Activity 2 (funding opportunities, political initiatives)

12/27


GA1.2

1. Introduction2. EU Level 2.1 Funding Programs 2.2 Political Initiatives3. National and Local Level 3.1 Armenia & Yerevan 3.2 Greece & Kavala 3.3 Moldova & Cahul 3.4 Romania & Galati 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv4. Evaluation

5. Comparison and Conclusions

General information regarding activity’s subject and notions. Issues such as significance of accomplishing the specific activity, references to similar work, definitions et al. may be included.

Analysis of funding programs and political initiatives available in EU.

Same as EU level – an international approach for non EU countries should also be reported.

Each partner-municipality should clarify a number of top priorities and needs regarding its energy related strategy. DUTH will elaborate those priorities according to the respective needs and will develop a dynamic Table for each municipality which will indicate which programs fit to its specific needs.

Identify common approaches, pros and cons, evaluate data adequacy etc. Report summary and conclusions..

Activity 3 (Best Available Practices)

13/27


GA1.3

1. Introduction2. Best Available Practices 2.1 Bioclimatic design (AUA) 2.2 RES integration (Samsun) 2.3 Insulation (Cahul) 2.4 Energy efficiency lighting (Tekirdag) 2.5 Automation systems (DUTH) 2.6 Frame replacement (Mykolaiv) 2.7 Update electro/mech syst. (DUNAREA)3. Proposals for Application 3.1 Yerevan 3.2 Kavala 3.3 Cahul 3.4 Galati 3.5 Samsun 3.6 Tekirdag 3.7 Mykolayiv


Introductory text on the best available practices (BAP) regarding energy efficiency in building sector.

Analytical description and presentation of BAPs related with the specific category..

At least one (1), maximum two (2) application-case study per participant according to the practice chosen before (Chapter 2).

Comparative summary of the BAPs and the case studies. Point out common applicable BAPs, highlight and evaluate BAPs with similar cases within the EU. Conclusive remarks.

Activity 4 (BSBEEP POOL)

14/27


GA1.4

1. Introduction2. EU Level 2.1 Public bodies 2.2 Institution 2.3 Private agents/experts3. National and Local Level 3.1 Armenia & Yerevan 3.2 Greece & Kavala 3.3 Moldova & Cahul 3.4 Romania & Galati 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv


Introductory text on bodies and experts involved on energy efficiency issues..

List of active bodies and experts in EU level (aim and scope of the body, brief description, service provided and contact details).

List of active bodies and experts (aim and scope of the body, brief description, service provided and contact details) for local.

Comparisons, Evaluation and separation of the mentioned bodies and agents according to the service they provide, Concluding remarks

Activity 5 (BSBEEP AGORA)

15/27


GA1.5

1. Introduction2. Building Product List 2.1 Armenia 2.2 Greece 2.3 Moldova 2.4 Romania 2.5 Turkey 2.6 Ukraine


Introductory text and general information regarding materials and systems related with energy efficiency issues.

Separate various products, materials and services according to their functionality. Each participant will be responsible for product identification in National level.

Summarize, in a critical way the information collected.

Municipalities’ profile(Questionnaire)

16/27


Why?

Help the participants in terms of comprehension of the spatial and special characteristics, thus enabling efficient benchmarking.

Provide an initial assessment of the current situation regarding data availability and readiness of your municipality.

Very useful for GA2.

Municipalities’ profile (Questionnaire)

17/27


GAYear 1

Semester 1 (Month)

Semester 2 (Month)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12GA1.1 GA 1.2 GA1.3 GA1.4 GA1.5

Months 5-8 Until 2nd Progress Report – February 2014

What we have to do:

• Four (4) studies collecting information and producing knowledge (from act. 1,2,3,4).

• Each study (approx. 200 pages in average) will be published in seven languages (English, Greek, Romanian, Turkish, Ukrainian, Armenian and Moldavian). [4 studies*200 pages=800 pages]

18/27

4. Work to be done

19/27

4. Work to be done

GA1.1

X: Deliverable is expected X: Deliverable is expected (deadline expired) √: Deliverable sent (revision needed) √: Deliverable sent (final)

Kavala

Galati

Cahul

Mykolayiv

Samsun

Tekirdag

AUA

DUNAREA

DUTH

R2E2 Deadline

1.Introduction (Leader: Cahul) X X 30/11/20132. EU Level (Leader: Kavala)

30/11/2013 2.1 Legal Framework X √ X 2.2 Administrative Framework X √ X 2.3 Challenges and Opportunities X √ X 2.4 Problems and Constraints X √ X 3. National and Local Level

30/11/2013

3.1 Armenia & Yerevan X 3.2 Greece & Kavala X 3.3 Moldova & Cahul X 3.4 Romania & Galati √ 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag X X 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv X

4. Comparison and Conclusions X 30/11/2013

20/27

4. Work to be done

GA1.2


Kavala

Galati

Cahul

Mykolayiv

Samsun

Tekirdag

AUA

DUNAREA

DUTH

R2E2 Deadline

1. Introduction (Leader: AUA) X √ X 30/11/20132. EU Level (Leader: DUNAREA)

30/11/2013 2.1 Funding Programs X √ 2.2 Political Initiatives X √ 3. National and Local Level

30/11/2013

3.1 Armenia & Yerevan X 3.2 Greece & Kavala X X 3.3 Moldova & Cahul X 3.4 Romania & Galati √ 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag X X 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv X 4. Evaluation X 31/12/2013

5. Comparison and Conclusions (Leader:DUTH) X X X 31/12/2013

21/27

4. Work to be done

GA1.3


Kavala

Galati

Cahul

Mykolayiv

Samsun

Tekirdag

AUA

DUNAREA

DUTH

R2E2 Deadline

1. Introduction X 31/1/20142. Best Available Practices

31/1/2014

2.1 Bioclimatic design X 2.2 RES integration X 2.3 Insulation X 2.4 Energy efficiency lighting X 2.5 Automation systems X 2.6 Frame replacement X 2.7 Update electro/mechanical syst. X 3. Proposals for Application

31/1/2014

3.1 Yerevan X 3.2 Kavala X 3.3 Cahul X 3.4 Galati X 3.5 Samsun X 3.6 Tekirdag X 3.7 Mykolayiv X


22/27

4. Work to be done

GA1.4


Kavala

Galati

Cahul

Mykolayiv

Samsun

Tekirdag

AUA

DUNAREA

DUTH

R2E2 Deadline

1. Introduction X 31/1/2014

2. EU Level (Leader: Mykolayiv)

31/1/2014 2.1 Public bodies X X X 2.2 Institution X X X 2.3 Private agents/experts X X X 3. National and Local Level

31/1/2014

3.1 Armenia & Yerevan X 3.2 Greece & Kavala X X 3.3 Moldova & Cahul X 3.4 Romania & Galati X 3.5 Turkey & Samsun & Tekirdag X X 3.6 Ukaraine & Mykolayiv X


23/27

4. Work to be done

GAYear 1

Semester 1 (Month)

Semester 2 (Month)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12GA1.1 GA 1.2 GA1.3 GA1.4 GA1.5

Months 9-12 Until Interim Report – May 2014

What we have to do:

• One (1) study collecting information and producing knowledge (from act.5).

• The study (approx. 200 pages) will be published in seven languages (English, Greek, Romanian, Turkish, Ukrainian, Armenian and Moldavian).

24/27

4. Work to be done

GA1.5


Kavala

Galati

Cahul

Mykolayiv

Samsun

Tekirdag

AUA

DUNAREA

DUTH

R2E2 Deadline

1. Introduction X 31/1/2014

2. Building Product List

31/1/2014

2.1 Armenia X

2.2 Greece X

2.3 Moldova X

2.4 Romania X

2.5 Turkey X X

2.6 Ukraine X

3. Comparison and Conclusions (Leader: DUNAREA)

X X 15/2/2014

25/27

5. Main bottleneck and constraints

Preparatory activities took too long!Administrative problems! (e.g. contracts, budget and work

allocation). Too much work to do in January/February (11 parallel GA

activities!).

Absorbing the delay is possible BUT We need to follow the timeline!!

26/27

6. Conclusions - Discussion

January is critical for the project.Don’t forget – GA2 has started too and requires our time!!Honest commitment to provide deliverables – Justification of

delay in advance.A good chance to discuss who will work with whom here.

Thank you for your attention!Partner: Democritus University of ThraceContact Person: Ass. Prof. Georgios GAIDAJISPresenter: Komninos ANGELAKOGLOUE-mail: [email protected]. & Fax: +30 25420 79877Mobile Phone: +30 6945 395 119Skype address: geogai

http://www.lemie.gr/en/

Documents

BSB JOP Project BSBEEP Black Sea Buildings Energy Efficiency Plan GA 1 Status Report: