Sagutin ang mga sumusunod na bugtong: 1. Kung kelan pinatay, saka humaba ang buhay. 2. Baboy ko sa pulo, balahibo'y pako 3. Nang sumipot sa maliwanag, kulubot na ang balat. 4. Isang butil ng palay, sakot ang buong buhay. 5. Ako'y may kaibigan, kasama ko kahit saan. 6. Sa araw ay bungbong, sa gabi ay dahon. 7. Dumaan ang hari, nagkagatan ang mga pari. 8. Munting hayop na pangahas, aaligid-aligid sa ningas. 9. Tinaga ko ang puno, sa dulo nagdurugo. 10. Abot na ng kamay, ipinaggawa pa sa tulay. 11. Malaking supot ni Mang Jacob, kung sisidlan ay pataob. 12. Maliit pa si kumare, malakas na kung humuni. 13. Baka sa palupandan, ang unga ay nakakarating kahit saan. 14. May bintana, walang bubungan may pinto, walang hagdanan. 15. Heto na si Kaka, bubuka- bukaka. 16. Isang prinsesa, nakaupo sa tasa. 17. Hindi pari, hindi hari, nagdadamit ng sari-sari. 18. Dalawang batong itim, malayo ang nararating. 19. Kay lapit-lapit na sa mata, hindi mo pa rin makita. 20. Sa isang kalabit, may buhay na kapalit. 21. Sa buhatan ay may silbi, sa igiban ay walang sinabi. 22. Hindi tao, hindi hayop, kung uminom ay salup-salop. 23. Isa ang pasukan, tatlo ang labasan. 24. Buto't balat na malapad, kay galing kung lumipad. 25. Lumuluha walang mata, lumalakad walang paa. 26. Nagbibigay na, sinasakal pa. 27. May puno walang bunga, may dahon walang sanga 28. Hinila ko ang baging, sumigaw ang matsing. 29. Yumuko man ang reyna, di malaglag ang korona 30. Nakatalikod na ang

Bug Tong

Download DOCX Report

Upload
ricky-james-laggui-suyu
View
18
Download
0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

El Banco Espanol-Filipino vs. Vicente Palanca G.R. No. L-11390, March 26, 1918El Banco Espanol-Filipino vs. PalancaG.R. No. L-11390, March 26, 1918* JURISDICTION, HOW ACQUIRED: Jurisdiction over the property which is the subject of the litigation may result either from a seizure of the property under legal process, whereby it is brought into the actual custody of the law, or it may result from the institution of legal proceedings wherein, under special provisions of law, the power of the court over the property is recognized and made effective.* The action to foreclose a mortgage is said to be a proceeding quasi in rem, by which is expressed the idea that while it is not strictly speaking an action in rem yet it partakes of that nature and is substantially such.* DUE PROCESS IN FORECLOSURE PROCEEDINGS: Property is always assumed to be in the possession of its owner, in person or by agent; and he may be safely held, under certain conditions, to be affected with knowledge that proceedings have been instituted for its condemnation and sale.FACTS:Engracio Palanca Tanquinyeng y Limquingco mortgaged various parcels of real property in Manila to El Banco Espanol-Filipino. Afterwards, Engracio returned to China and there he died on January 29, 1810 without returning again to the Philippines. The mortgagor then instituted foreclosure proceeding but since defendant is a non-resident, it was necessary to give notice by publication. The Clerk of Court was also directed to send copy of the summons to the defendant’s last known address, which is in Amoy, China. It is not shown whether the Clerk complied with this requirement. Nevertheless, after publication in a newspaper of the City of Manila, the cause proceeded and judgment by default was rendered. The decision was likewise published and afterwards sale by public auction was held with the bank as the highest bidder. On August 7, 1908, this sale was confirmed by the court. However, about seven years after the confirmation of this sale, a motion was made by Vicente Palanca, as administrator of the estate of the original defendant, wherein the applicant requested the court to set aside the order of default and the judgment, and to vacate all the proceedings subsequent thereto. The basis of this application was that the order of default and the judgment rendered thereon were void because the court had never acquired jurisdiction over the defendant or over the subject of the action.ISSUE:* Whether or not the lower court acquired jurisdiction over the defendant and the subject matter of the action* Whether or not due process of law was observedRULING:On JurisdictionThe word “jurisdiction” is used in several different, though related, senses since it may have reference (1) to the authority of the court to entertain a particular kind of action or to administer a particular kind of relief, or it may refer to the power of the court over the parties, or (2) over the property which is the subject to the litigation.The sovereign authority which organizes a court determines the nature and extent of its powers in general and thus fixes its competency or jurisdiction with reference to the actions which it may entertain and the relief it may grant.How Jurisdiction is AcquiredJurisdiction over the person is acquired by the voluntary appearance of a party in court and his submission to its authority, or it is acquired by the coercive power of legal process exerted over the person.Jurisdiction over the property which is the subject of the litigation may result either from a seizure of the property under legal process, whereby it is brought into the actual custody of the law, or it may result from the institution of legal proceedings wherein, under special provisions of law, the power of the court over the property is recognized and made effective. In the latter case the property, though at all times within the potential power of the court, may ne

Citation preview