Building a Comprehensive, Effective, and Successful 1 st -year Engineering Program

Building a Comprehensive, Effective, and Successful

1st-year Engineering Program

Rick Freuler

First-year Engineering Program

Engineering Education Innovation Center

[email protected]

30 March 2012 KEEN 2012 Regional Conference 2

The "Roadmap" for Today

• Who is this guy, anyway• Introduction & background• Early program details• Current program description• The “Freshman Cornerstone”• Observations, Lessons Learned, Impacts• Summary


Who Is This Guy Anyway?

• Rick Freuler is– Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors

(FEH) Program Director, Engineering Education Innovation Center

– Professor of Practice in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

– ASEE First-year Programs Division Chair– 44th Year Student of Engineering (I was

there for the 1968 football season and Rose Bowl.)


Introduction

• OSU’s First-year Engineering Program initially developed over an 11-year period from 1992 through 2003

• Arose from concern about student retention in engineering– In 1988 the retention to a degree in Engineering at

Ohio State was only 38%

• Survey of Ohio State alumni in industry• Ohio State part of Gateway Coalition– Agreed to adapt or adopt the Drexel E4 model


Early Efforts

• The Drexel E4 Program –– Combined Chemistry with Biology – Combined Math with Physics. – Engineering had both a lecture portion and a

hands-on lab portion.

– Humanities were combined with communication, both technical and non-technical components.

• E4 Program Results -– >60% retention results and feedback co-op

employers was very positive.


OSU's "Gateway" Program

• OSU adaptation of Drexel's E4 involved select and dedicated faculty from two Colleges (ENG and MPS)

• Engineering Mechanics combined with Math– Accelerated Calculus– Statics, Particle Dynamics, Rigid Body

Dynamics• Engineering Graphics, Programming• Engineering hands-on lab each quarter


Current OSU First-Year Engineering Program

• First-year Engineering now offered in four course sequences for first-year students:– Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)

– Fundamentals of Engineering for Scholars (FES)

– Fundamentals of Engineering for Transfers (FET)

– Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH)

• All sequences include hands-on labs, with engineering "up-front" and team-based design/build introduced early and often


Early Timeline for 1st-Year Program

Year Activity (Students)• 1992 Planning for Gateway• 1993 Pilot 1 (30)• 1994 Pilot 2 & 3 (38 & 65)• 1995 Pilot 4 & 5 (37 & 64)• 1996 Pilot 6 (64)• 1997 FEH Approved (71)• 1998 FEH (105)• 1999 FEH (173)• 2000 FEH (218)• 2001 FEH (252)• 2002 FEH (250) …

• 2011 FEH (452)

Year Activity (Students)

• 1997 Planning for FE• 1998 Pilot 1 (105)• 1999 Pilot 2 (275)• 2000 FE Approved (681)• 2001 FE (~800)• 2002 FE (~1,050) …

• 2011 FE/FES (~1,700)

First-year Engineering Program Enrollment Trends

Yes…There is a Well Defined First-Year Engineering Honors Program• 1st year program option

offered only for University Honors designated students

• A tightly-coupled year-long course sequence in engineering fundamentals

• Coordination among the core first-year classes of engineering, math, and physics

30 March 2012 10KEEN 2012 Regional Conference


Comparing First-Year Sequences

FEH• Emphasis on hands-on

learning and design• Coordination among the

FEH core classes • More challenging• Students take a 3-course

sequence of Honors Engineering (ENG H191, ENG H192, & ENG H193)

• 12 credit hours

FE/FES• Emphasis on hands-on

learning and design• No coordination among

any freshman classes• Challenging• Students take a 2-course

sequence of engineering (ENG 181 & ENG 183) and usually EG 167

• Usually 10 credit hours

Yes…You Will Get Connected to the Engineering Faculty in the First

Year• First-year engineering courses are taught by

faculty• Hand-picked from among the departments in

the College


• These represent the some of the best researchers & teachers

• Instructional team includes graduate and undergraduate students

Yes…You Are Going to Design and Build During the First Year!

• Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH)– Autonomous Robot

Design– Nanotechnology

• Fundamentals of Engineering (FE/FES)– Rollercoaster Design– Nanotechnology– Advanced Energy

Vehicle


Cornerstone Design Projects

FE Roller-CoasterFE/FES Advanced Energy Vehicle

(AEV)

FEH Robot

FEH/FE Nanotechnology

Cornerstone Common ElementsTypical Project Goals

Students will have…• Hands-on engineering design/build experience• A team-based project with peer evaluation• Laboratory activities

– Measure, record, analyze, and present– Build, test, modify, test, demonstrate, and report

• Multiple opportunities to improve – Self-learning ability– Ability to work with a team– Ability to communicate effectively


Cornerstone Common ElementsTypical Learning Objectives Students will…

• Complete a term-length, design-build project which serves as a cornerstone experience

• Be able to visualize and present objects in systems in three-dimensions

• Develop professional skills for success in engineering

• Have an introductory level of knowledge of project management


Assessing the Design Experience

• Elements of the design experience– Identifying solution options– Identifying constraints– Performing research– Performing analysis– Evaluating analysis (making a decision)– Implementing design decision– Performing project management


Assessing the Design Experience

• Survey to gather data on time spent and iterations on activities• Anonymous• No effect on grades• Weekly updates

• Student teams were asked to indicate:

• Amount of time spent• Number of participants• Number of times revisited


Observations & Lessons Learned

% Total Time Spent - AEV• Reasonably full set of activities for most any design project

• Measureable amount of exposure to each design activity

• No less than 8% time in any one activity

16%

8%

14%

15%10%

14%

22%

% TOTAL TIME SPENT

ProjectManagement

ImplementDesign Decision

Evaluate Analysis

Perform Analysis

Perform Research

IdentifySolution Options

Identify Constraints


Observations & Lessons Learned

• More complex design projects require more visits and revisits to specific design activities

• Such multiple visits highlight and reinforce the iterative nature of design

Weekly Visits - ROBOT


Impact of First-year Engineering Program on Retention to Degree

Cornerstone Design Projects

FE Roller-CoasterFES Advanced Energy Vehicle

(AEV)

FEH Robot

FEH/FE Nanotechnology


Summary

A First-year Engineering Program that is

• Comprehensive

• Effective

• Successful


Comprehensive

• Uniformly required of all students in all COE majors

• Four sequences to accommodate all students– University Honors students– University Scholars students– Standard track students– Transfer students

• Variety of hands-on lab activities and cornerstone projects to appeal to all majors

• Portable to OSU regional campuses


Effective

Students-• Have a good understanding of what

engineering is all about• Have a positive attitude toward engineering• Are better informed when selecting a major• Are better prepared for entry into their major• Receive a foundation on which to build rest of

college career in engineering• Get connected to other students, faculty, the

College, and the profession


Successful

• Retention of students into second year is up• 6-year graduation rates are up (to ~60%)• Helps recruit the better and the best students• Acknowledged as one of the top first-year

programs in the country• Industry recognizes the teamwork and

leadership skills developed in students • Industry is now contributing advancement

funding & gifts-in-kind to the 1st-year program


Acknowledgements

• NSF funded the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition for early development

• Ohio State’s College of Engineering for support, equipment, and renovated space

• All of the faculty, staff, and students who contributed to the program development

• All of the EEIC faculty, staff, and students who teach and facilitate program delivery


Comments or Questions and Contact Info

Rick FreulerFundamentals of Engineering for [email protected]

Bob GustafsonEngineering Education Innovation [email protected]

Cliff WhitfieldFES AEV Design Project [email protected]

OSU first-year Engineering classrooms


30

Space RenovationSummer 2000 & Summer 2001

Existing space was renovated to produce

• One 72 seat computer classroom

• Three 36 seat computer classrooms

• Three hands-on labs - each with 9 benches for 9 teams of 4 students

30 March 2012 KEEN 2012 Regional Conference


Classrooms and Laboratory Rooms

• In the classroom two students sit side-by-side and across from two other students

• Provides for teams of 4 students, each with easy individual access to a computer

Classrooms – 36 Seats or 72 Seats


Laboratory Rooms – 36 Students


72 Seat Classroom – Isometric View

The FEH Robot design project



Key Features of the FEH Robot Design-Build Project

• There is a new robot scenario and obstacle course each year

• There is an alternative project each year

• Both students and faculty have input to team selection

• Students work in four person teams and develop their own working agreements

• The robot competition is done in public – arena or field house is rented



• Design-build project uses skills and knowledge developed in earlier quarters

• Project planning, management, and documentation are key concepts

• These elements constitute about 80 percent of grade; 20 percent is on robot performance

• Final report has a solid model and dimensioned drawings



• Weekly review by teaching team of robot and project notebook

• Peer evaluation at 4th, 7th, and 10th week

• Peer evaluation affects course grade

• Documentation includes progress report, draft and final written reports, project notebook, and oral presentation

• Math, Physics, and Engineering faculty meet weekly

Robot Competition Venue


The Individual Competition

– Gauge performance vs. other teams

– Used to seed teams in final competition

– Motivates students to make last-chance revisions

• Individual (8th week of class)

The Final Competition

• Head-to-head (9th week of class)video

Team Project Oral Presentation



Observed Success: Some Statistics

Based on comparison with a matched control group, those who complete FEH will usually:

• Start into their majors 1 quarter earlier• Graduate in 4.3 rather than 4.8 years• Participate in a co-op or internship (80% of

FEH versus 50% of control)• Be more likely to become leaders in student

organizations (FIRST)


Observed Successes: Entry to Major

Quarters to Major

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12Number of Quarters Enrolled

Per

cen

tag

e o

f S

tud

ents

FEH

Control


Observed Success: More Statistics

Based on comparison with a matched control group, those who complete FEH will usually:

• Have better grades in subsequent math

and physics courses

• Have higher GPAs with an upward trend after three quarters

• Be more likely to stay with engineering


Observed Successes: Retention In Engineering Results

Retention of FEH Students in Engineering

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior 5th Year

Year in School

En

roll

ed

or

Gra

du

ate

d i

n E

ng

ine

eri

ng

2001-02 FEH

2000-01 FEH

1999-00 FEH

1999-00 Control

1998-99 FEH

1998-99 Control

1988 Baseline


FEH Enrollment GrowthFundamentals of Engineering for Honors

Students Enrolled

0

100

200

300

400

500

1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008

Year

Stu

den

ts


Recognition and Industry Response

• College of Engineering gave FEH the Boyer Award for Excellence in Teaching Innovation

• Several FEH instructors have been awarded the MacQuigg Award for Teaching Excellence

• Industry involvement– Example: P&G Product Launch exercise– Example: Alcatel-Lucent lectures to all sections

each year– Industry willing to take FEH students after first

year for Co-op and Internship


Recognition and Industry Response

• Companies which have been involved:– Alcatel-Lucent, American Electric Power,

Arvin Meritor, Autodesk, Caterpillar, DaimlerChrysler, Eaton, Exxon-Mobil, Ford, Honda, Lockheed-Martin, Mabuchi, Microsoft, National Instruments, Procter & Gamble, Raytheon, Shell, and Texas Instruments

• Ohio State President has attended robot competition

HOW the FEH H193 Robot project COURSE WORKS



Teaching ENG H193

• Lecture sessions– Include design techniques, calculations,

documentation methods, reporting methods, laboratory tools and techniques

– Less than 1/3 of class meeting time

• Lab sessions– Occupies majority of class time– Professor, graduate (GTA), & undergrad

teaching assistants (UTA) available to answer questions


Operational Details

• Scenario / Project specification

• Robot course

• Robot controller

• Materials made available to students

• Capable support systems


The Scenario

• Changed each year• Developed by team

of faculty, GTAs and UTAs

• Involves simulation of a real world problem

• Robots introduced as solution to problem

• Revealed on 1st day


Project Specifications

• Designed to allow creativity within specific constraints

• Developed using a team approach– Faculty members & TAs

– TAs provide input via past experience


The Robot Course

• Built by UTA “Course Team”

• Constructed during first twoquarters

• Materials and quality of construction determine project level of difficulty

– Driving surfaces, ramp location and materials, electrical components

– Keep difficulty uniform throughout course

– Production-quality working drawings

• Monitor wear on course during use

• Set up course on competition day


The Robot Course - 2003


The Robot Controller

• MIT Handy Board– 68HC11 CPU (2 Mhz)

– 32k RAM

– 16 inputs (digital/analog)

– 4 motor outputs

– 16 x 2 LCD Screen– Programmed via Interactive C – similar to Java VM

• Interpreted execution• Multitasking


The “Company Store”

• Primary outlet for parts and supplies– Structural materials, motors, gears,

wheels, electrical components, sensors– Open during most open lab times

• Catalog distributed to students and available online

• Staffed by UTAs• Team budget & store inventory are

tracked via online web application


The Support Systems

• Open labs & "Company Store"– At least two UTAs and one GTA

• Normal class time– Two UTAs, one GTA, one faculty member– More TAs typically intersect in adjacent rooms

• Instructional Lab Supervisors – Available during day

• Machine shop – Use of tools and training via UTA


The Support Systems

• Online – Message board or AIM

staffed by GTAs

• Weekly staff meetings– Include Math, Physics,

Statics, & Eng staff– Coordinate activities to

not overload students

• Weekly anonymous student journals

• Weekly progress reviews with teams


In Summary…

– Comparable to junior-or senior-level project

– Experience beneficial throughout collegiate career and beyond

• Operational supportvia past students

• Continuous feedback via present students

• H193 provides an exciting hands-on design/build experience

• ENG H193 is a unique first-year experience

Documents

Building a Comprehensive, Effective, and Successful 1 st -year Engineering Program