36
Building a culture of growth: performance review and teacher development at Monash Jennifer Coster Mark Rooney Susan Derry Penz

Building a culture of growth: performance review and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Building a culture of growth: performance review and teacher development at Monash

Jennifer Coster Mark Rooney Susan Derry Penz

Building a culture of growth: performance review and teacher development at Monash

Jennifer Coster, Associate Director of Learning and Teaching Susan Derry Penz, Teacher Developer

Mark Rooney, Teacher Developer

City Campus

Clayton Campus

Monash English Elementary – Advanced (CEFR A2 to C1)

Monash English Bridging for Monash College Diplomas

Monash English Bridging for Monash University (Undergrad/Postgrad/HDR)

Introductory Academic Program (Monash University students with full offers)

Our context

Monash 2013 Inconsistent performance across teaching teams

Ineffective leadership support

Lack of role clarity

Lack of feedback and consultation

Professional development lacking a strategic focus

Not enough stretch

Our Challenges

Lack of staff to guide teacher development

2013 2015

99 teachers

177 teachers

136 teachers

2014

Renew Performance Review Process

Micro PD Program

Introduce Observations

Opportunity

Performance Review

Why redesign the performance review process?

What was missing What teachers wanted

• a process designed for teachers not administration staff

• conversations about the

Learning and Teaching Plan and the individual teacher’s role in achieving this Plan

• areas of instruction teachers

require development in • the support required for

teachers’ to reach their goals

• a process that values the skills and strategies required to be a good teacher

• a process that targets

individual professional development

• a process that does not

require teachers to comment on performance in tasks which are part of their everyday job

• user-friendly documentation

Review of literature

Analysis of current practices

Teacher and manager focus groups

The Redesign Process

Best Practice Learning and Teaching: a guide for teacher development

Reflection to inform goal setting

Profiling Grid

Observation rubric and feedback

Student performance data

Smart Goals

The performance review cycle

Separating Performance Review process with EBA

Opportunity to opt in or opt out of trial

Consultation with staff

Overcoming challenges with launching the new Performance Review Process

Google Site

Trial helped staff feel listened to and increased their level of motivation

provided insights into team members

Feedback

highlighted common areas for development

enabled managers to raise awareness of PD opportunities for their team satisfied with feedback they received through performance review conversation found the goal-setting process very useful and motivating

Introducing Teacher Developers

Teacher Observations

Why have classroom observations?

Encourage self development

Address each teacher’s individual needs

Discover the centre’s professional developments needs

Challenges Solutions

Loss of work due to negative observation

Negative past experiences

Observations not fed back to managers

Standardise procedures

Set teachers up

for success

Pre Observation

Email

Lesson plan pro-forma

Pre Observation

Email

Lesson plan pro-forma

Pre observation chat

45 Minute Classroom Observation

Post Observation

Observation notes

Post Observation

Post obs conversation

Follow up

Observation notes

Results and feedback

Approximately 150 individual teachers observed

Over 200 observations

81% Observations were helpful or very helpful

90% will/have put ideas from observation into practice

Results and Feedback: Teacher Comments • “It was very clear that the goal was my

improvement as a teacher.”

• “The observations gave me assurances of my capabilities.”

• “It gave me a ton of new ideas to try out”.

• “I can’t help feeling like a lab rat in this process - I doubt the validity of observations as a development tool.”

Micro PDs Micro PDs

Establishing Micro PDs

Why • Personal development • Support teachers • Improve teaching

quality at MUELC

Where & When • 30 minute sessions

• Four time slots • Building

momentum

Designing Micro PDs

• Thematic suite of 3 sessions

• Building on ideas

• Encouraging implementation

What • Teacher developer

observations

• Teacher requests

• Curricula and centre needs

How

Session One What are appropriate lessons aims?

Session Two

Tasks and aims

Session Three Lesson aims in the context of a curriculum

Sample Micro PD suite 1: Aims

Term 1 Setting and achieving lesson aims

Term 6 Dealing with emerging language in the classroom

Term 2 Addressing phonology in the classroom

Term 7 Integrating grammar in skills based courses

Term 3

Integrating technology and blended learning

Term 8 Addressing lexis

Term 4 Action research projects Term 9 Cohesion and coherence in academic writing

Term 5 The influence of L1 language and culture –

Chinese students

Term 10 Teaching not testing skills

Micro PD Plan 2015

For teachers Forum for discussing new strategies and sharing ideas

For MUELC Better learning and teaching

Results of Micro PDs

Culture of growth

Finding a passion and conducting action research

Presenting at PD Days and conferences

Recognition

• “A totally worthwhile PD on Chinese learners. The very next day I was able to adjust my reading lesson tasks at Elementary level in the light of my new understanding.” (Teacher A)

• “I’ve always struggled with teaching pronunciation, • but now it’s a huge part of my lessons and I teach it with

more confidence than ever.” (Teacher B)

Testimonials

Future for PD at Monash

Higher uptake of ideas

Increased teacher attendance

More teacher involvement

Thank you

Questions?

Our contact details: [email protected]

[email protected] [email protected]

Reference List BALEAP. (2008). Competency Framework for Teachers of English for Academic Purposes. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/pdfs/teap-competency-framework.pdf Haughey, D. (2014). A Brief History of Smart Goals, Retrieved from www.projectsmart.co.uk, Mahteva, G., Vitanova, A. & Tashevska, S. (2013). European Profiling Grid User Guide. Retrieved from http://www.adam-europe.eu/prj/9149/prj/The_EPG_PDF_publication_2013.pdf Monash College Diplomas. (2013). Monash College Developing Our Practice. Melbourne, Australia, Monash College Pty Ltd. The Department of Education and Training, (2004), Competency Framework for Teachers, Retrieved from http://det.wa.edu.au/policies/detcms/policy-planning-and-accountability/policies-framework/guidelines/competency-framework-for-teachers.en?cat-id=3457997 The Department of Education & Training. (2005). Professional Learning in Effective Schools: the seven principles of highly effective professional learning, Retrieved from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/profdev/proflearningeffectivesch.pdf Timperley, H. (2009, August). Using assessment data for improving teaching practice. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Conference. Assessment and Student Learning: Collecting, interpreting and using data to inform teaching, Western Australia.