1
Building Collaborative Research Relationships Amy J. Hadley * Richard Stockton College, School of Health Sciences, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway NJ 08205, USA * Corresponding author: Amy J. Hadley, Ed.D., CCC-SLP, Associate Professor of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Program Director, MSCD, Richard Stockton College, School of Health Sciences, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway NJ 08205, USA, Tel: 609-626-3531; E-mail: [email protected] Received: October 30, 2014; Accepted: October 30, 2014; Published: October 31, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Hadley AJ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Citation: Hadley AJ (2014) Building Collaborative Research Relationships. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 2: e116. Editorial Recently, New Jersey passed legislation addressing the issue of early identification of reading disorders. A task force comprised of parents, professionals, and community members helped to guide the language of the legislation. Several other states including Mississippi and Virginia have also adopted state-wide policies on early identification of reading disabilities. A colleague of mine in private practice, Karen T. Kimberlin, M.S., CCC-SLP approached me about conducting a pilot study to gather data on appropriate screening tools and screening procedures appropriate for children in kindergarten. e purpose of our study was to gather data on the feasibility of identifying children at risk for reading disorders in a grade level screening during the kindergarten year. e collaborative project included two public school districts, which varied from each other in the characteristics of their student populations. A compilation of screening tools was used that probed: oral language skills, phonological awareness skills, rapid naming, alphabetic knowledge, and encoding. e preliminary results of the study indicated that among the children screened, 48% demonstrated at least one skill area below the expected performance range (a “red flag) and 26% demonstrated a “red flag score in at least two areas. We are currently working with the districts to implement strategies that the teachers can utilize in classrooms to address the areas of weakness. We are advocating for a response to intervention model. One of the desired outcomes of the pilot study was to gather data that would help guide educational policy regarding screening procedures. Hofmeyer, Scott, and Lagendyk [1] suggested that policy can be influenced when policy-makers are also included as research partners. e authors offer guiding principles for collaborative research teams such as identifying individuals with links to the research setting. Collaborative research partnerships are an excellent way to address clinical questions impacting the well-being of clients. Practitioners oſten encounter obstacles to conducting research in clinical settings such as: a) time constraints, b) lack of preparation or experience in designing and conducting a study, or c) lack of funding [2]. Practitioners, however, oſten generate valuable research questions with implications for evidence-based practice. Demers and Poissant [3] emphasized the importance of communication in collaborative research partnerships. “Group discussions and information sessions can be useful means for obtaining feedback, generating ideas, and sharing progress”. Collaborative research partnerships can facilitate answering clinical questions that relate to evidence-based practice. Research addressing clinical questions posed by policy makers and or practitioners can help to guide policy impacting provision of services. References 1. Hofmeyer A, Scott C, Lagendyk L (2012) Research-decision-maker partnerships in health services research: Practical challenges, guiding principles. BMC Health Services Research 12: 280-285. 2. Craig J (2014) Establishing a clinical research collaboration: An SLP perspective. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders 24: 15-20. 3. Demers L, Poissant L (2009) Connecting with clinicians: opportunities to strengthen rehabilitation research. Disabil Rehabil 31: 152-159. Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids Hadley, Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 2014, 2:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000e116 Editorial Open Access Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids ISSN:2375-4427 JCDSHA, an open access journal Volume 2 • Issue 3 • 1000e116

Building Collaborative Research Relationships

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Building Collaborative Research Relationships

Citation preview

Building Collaborative Research RelationshipsAmy J. Hadley*

Richard Stockton College, School of Health Sciences, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway NJ 08205, USA*Corresponding author: Amy J. Hadley, Ed.D., CCC-SLP, Associate Professor of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Program Director, MSCD, Richard Stockton College,School of Health Sciences, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway NJ 08205, USA, Tel: 609-626-3531; E-mail: [email protected]

Received: October 30, 2014; Accepted: October 30, 2014; Published: October 31, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Hadley AJ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Hadley AJ (2014) Building Collaborative Research Relationships. Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids 2: e116.

EditorialRecently, New Jersey passed legislation addressing the issue of early

identification of reading disorders. A task force comprised of parents,professionals, and community members helped to guide the languageof the legislation. Several other states including Mississippi andVirginia have also adopted state-wide policies on early identification ofreading disabilities.

A colleague of mine in private practice, Karen T. Kimberlin, M.S.,CCC-SLP approached me about conducting a pilot study to gatherdata on appropriate screening tools and screening proceduresappropriate for children in kindergarten. The purpose of our study wasto gather data on the feasibility of identifying children at risk forreading disorders in a grade level screening during the kindergartenyear. The collaborative project included two public school districts,which varied from each other in the characteristics of their studentpopulations. A compilation of screening tools was used that probed:oral language skills, phonological awareness skills, rapid naming,alphabetic knowledge, and encoding.

The preliminary results of the study indicated that among thechildren screened, 48% demonstrated at least one skill area below theexpected performance range (a “red flag”) and 26% demonstrated a“red flag” score in at least two areas. We are currently working with thedistricts to implement strategies that the teachers can utilize inclassrooms to address the areas of weakness. We are advocating for aresponse to intervention model.

One of the desired outcomes of the pilot study was to gather datathat would help guide educational policy regarding screeningprocedures. Hofmeyer, Scott, and Lagendyk [1] suggested that policy

can be influenced when policy-makers are also included as researchpartners. The authors offer guiding principles for collaborativeresearch teams such as identifying individuals with links to theresearch setting.

Collaborative research partnerships are an excellent way to addressclinical questions impacting the well-being of clients. Practitionersoften encounter obstacles to conducting research in clinical settingssuch as: a) time constraints, b) lack of preparation or experience indesigning and conducting a study, or c) lack of funding [2].Practitioners, however, often generate valuable research questions withimplications for evidence-based practice. Demers and Poissant [3]emphasized the importance of communication in collaborativeresearch partnerships. “Group discussions and information sessionscan be useful means for obtaining feedback, generating ideas, andsharing progress”.

Collaborative research partnerships can facilitate answering clinicalquestions that relate to evidence-based practice. Research addressingclinical questions posed by policy makers and or practitioners can helpto guide policy impacting provision of services.

References1. Hofmeyer A, Scott C, Lagendyk L (2012) Research-decision-maker

partnerships in health services research: Practical challenges, guidingprinciples. BMC Health Services Research 12: 280-285.

2. Craig J (2014) Establishing a clinical research collaboration: An SLPperspective. SIG 3 Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders 24: 15-20.

3. Demers L, Poissant L (2009) Connecting with clinicians: opportunities tostrengthen rehabilitation research. Disabil Rehabil 31: 152-159.

Communication Disorders, DeafStudies & Hearing Aids

Hadley, Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing Aids2014, 2:3

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000e116

Editorial Open Access

Commun Disord Deaf Stud Hearing AidsISSN:2375-4427 JCDSHA, an open access journal

Volume 2 • Issue 3 • 1000e116