Building Learner Engagement - Pearson India Learner Engagement September 2016 1 Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in white

Building Learner

Engagement

September 20161

Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in black type) or

Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in white type)

Index

3 Introduction to the Survey

6 Summary of Findings

11 Detailed Findings

25 Annexures

25 I – State-level Snapshot

41 II – City-level Snapshot

51 III – Cities and Towns Covered

57 IV – Questionnaire

2

Introduction to the Survey

3

4

India’s Draft National Education Policy 2016:

Vision and Primary TenetsLearner engagement is a key enabler of outcomes and, therefore, ties closely to the vision of India’s National

Education Policy

Learning Outcomes and Student Engagement:

The Critical Linkage

The Draft National Education

Policy (NEP) envisions a

credible education system

capable of:

Ensuring inclusive quality

education

Lifelong learning

opportunities

Producing students

equipped with specified

learning outcomes

(knowledge, skills,

attitudes and values)

that are required to lead a

productive life.

Engaged Learner

Emotionally

Involved

Greater

efforts

More positive

emotions

Higher

attentiveness

Improved

Learning Outcomes

5

Introduction—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016

2,941; 45%

Female

3,553; 55%

Male

Higher Education

Schools

3,417; 53%

3,077; 47%

North

1,680; 26%

East

978; 15%

West

1,106; 17%

South

2,501; 38%

Central

229; 4%

6,494 teachers surveyed across 546 cities and towns

(teaching over 18,91,677 students)

Private Institutes

Government Institutes

4,287; 66%

2,207; 34%

The 4th edition of Pearson Voice of Teacher Survey aims to understand teachers’ perspective

on level of engagement among students and ways to enhance engagement

The partner for this survey is Spire Research and Consulting. Spire is a leader in strategic market research and consulting

with focus on customized, strategic research studies.

Profile of teachers surveyed…

Note: Survey administered between July and August 2016

Summary of Findings

6

42% teachers opine that values and ethics have

declined over the past five years

7

Snapshot—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016

Current Engagement among Learners1Parameters of Student Behavior with

Most Decline over Past 5 Years2

Note: An actively engaged learner is someone who proactively puts in effort to learn, asks questions and participates in activities in and outside the classroom

Learner engagement varies by level—61% at

schools and 50% at higher education institutions

42%teachers

Values

and ethics

38%teachers

Discipline

28%teachers

Attentiveness

in class

% of respondents holding this opinion

55%students

actively

engaged

45%students

not actively

engaged

8

Snapshot—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016

Top 3 Inhibitors to Learner Engagement13 Top 3 Enablers of Learner Engagement24

86% teachers consider use of real-life examples

and stories a highly useful technique to improve

engagement level

29% teachers consider excessive use of personal

gadgets a distraction and key inhibitor to learner

engagement

Lack of parental

support 12% teachers 83% teachersGroup discussions/

activities

Lack of interest in

subject/ career

stream9% teachers 81% teachers

Technology

platforms to

improve student-

teacher interaction

Note: 1Out of 12 inhibitors to engagement; 2Out of 14 enablers of engagement

Excessive use of

personal gadgets

as a distraction29% teachers 86% teachers

Real-life examples

and stories

9

Key Findings (1/2)

Level of

Learner

Engagement

Teachers believe that 55% of the students in India are actively engaged in

the learning process (45% not as engaged)

• Engagement is perceived to drop from school (61%) to higher

education level (50%)

– Learners in government schools are believed to be significantly

less engaged (51%) than those in private schools (67%). There is no

variation between higher education institutions.

At the state level, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Haryana and Gujarat have student

engagement level below 50%

Trend of

Learner

Engagement

over Past

5 Years

Overall, 59% of teachers opine that learner engagement has increased in the

past 5 years

• This trend can be attributed more to changes at the school level (78%

teachers perceive improvement) than at higher education level (41% teachers)

Behaviourally, participation in activities (academic and extra-curricular) has

improved; however, there is a perceptible decline in values & ethics (42%

decline) and discipline (38% decline)

1

2

3

4

10

Key Findings (2/2)

Inhibitors to

Learner

Engagement

Excessive use of personal gadgets is considered a key inhibitor to learner

engagement; interestingly, teachers also consider use of technology platforms an

important enabler

• In government schools, lack of parental support is a much bigger

challenge

Further, only 49% of the respondents agree that 'teachers receive adequate

training to enhance learner engagement and inquisitiveness'

• Satisfaction with training support is much higher among school teachers

(70%) than higher education teachers (30%)

Enablers of

Learner

Engagement

Teachers consider use of real-life examples, group discussions and

technology platforms critical enablers of learner engagement

• However, teachers at government schools assign higher importance to

counselling sessions with students, teacher training and audio-visual

content for building engagement

Detailed Findings

11

12

Learner Engagement—Status and Trend (1/4)

Teachers: 55% learners are actively engaged—61% at school and 50% at higher education level. 59% teachers

perceive an improvement in learner engagement; 31% a decline and 10% teachers perceive no change

67%

51%

50%

50%

55%

~81% teachers learner engagement has

improved

Private Schools


improved

Govt. Schools


improved; 49% teachers declined

Private H.Ed.

Institutes


improved; 46% teachers declined

Govt. H.Ed.

Institutes


improved over the past 5 years

All-India

Current Engagement Level among Learners

Learners

Actively

Engaged

% of

Change in Learner Engagement over the Past 5 Years*

Govt. H.Ed. InstitutesGovt. Schools Private H.Ed. InstitutesPrivate SchoolsAll-India

Note: An actively engaged learner is someone who proactively puts in effort to learn, asks questions and participates in activities in and outside the classroom; *The

figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have been

grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: All-India: 6,487; Government Schools: 1,185; Private Schools: 1,892; Government H.Ed.

Institutes: 1,019; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,391

13


Improvement in learner engagement over the past 5 years has been more pronounced at junior levels in schools.

In higher education institutes, teachers perceive a decline in engagement across levels.

Engagement Level among Learners (by Level) Change in Engagement over the Past 5 Years* (by Level)

% of learners engaged

Note: *The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have

been grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: Pre-primary: 199; Primary: 1,040; Secondary: 1,228; Senior Secondary: 560;

Undergraduate: 716; Postgraduate: 2,694

67%

63%

59%

61%

49%

51%

Pre-primary

Primary

Secondary

Senior Secondary

Undergraduate

Postgraduate

Pre-primary

Primary

Secondary

Senior Secondary

Undergraduate

Postgraduate

84% 14% 2%

83% 12% 5%

78% 12% 10%

71% 7% 22%

41% 12% 47%

41% 11% 48%

National average (55%) National average (59% improved)

DeclinedImproved No change

14


Learner engagement is the highest in Telangana (63%) and lowest in Haryana (48%).

Teachers in Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Kerala perceive a decline in student engagement in the past 5 years.

Current Engagement Level among Learners – By State*

Note: *States with a sample of 100 or above; Sample: Andhra Pradesh: 222; Bihar: 396; Gujarat: 242; Haryana: 130; Karnataka: 828; Kerala: 137; Madhya Pradesh:

145; Maharashtra: 842; NCT of Delhi: 411; Punjab: 126; Rajasthan: 149; Tamil Nadu: 663; Telangana: 629; Uttar Pradesh: 651; West Bengal: 408

63% 61%59% 58% 56% 56% 56%

53% 52% 52% 50% 49% 49% 48% 48%

Tela

ng

ana

Karn

ata

ka

Bih

ar

Utt

ar

Pra

desh

West B

eng

al

Ra

jasth

an

NC

T o

f D

elh

i

Ma

dhya P

rad

esh

Punja

b

Andh

ra P

radesh

Ma

hara

sh

tra

Guja

rat

Tam

il N

ad

u

Kera

la

Ha

ryan

a

National average (55%)

Trend

Improvement in learner

engagement in the past 5 years

Decline in learner engagement in

the past 5 years

No change

15


At the city level*, learner engagement is the highest in Hyderabad (64%); lowest in Chennai (46%). Engagement is

perceived to have improved across cities in the past five years, except in Mumbai.

Hyderabad

Lucknow

Bengaluru

Patna

Kolkata

Pune

NCT of Delhi

Mumbai

Chennai

64%

63%

60%

59%

58%

58%

56%

51%

46%

Note: *Cities with a sample of 100 or above; Sample: Bengaluru: 616; Chennai: 413; Hyderabad: 558; Kolkata: 242; Mumbai: 200; NCT of Delhi: 411; Pune: 270; Patna:

388; Lucknow: 388

Current Engagement Level among Learners – By Cities*

Improvement in learner

engagement in the past 5 years

Decline in learner engagement in

the past 5 years

No change

16

Behavioural Changes in Learner Engagement over the Past 5 Years

73%63% 62% 61% 60% 55% 54% 52%

43% 41%

15%

18% 15% 16% 17% 22% 17% 23%

19%17%

13%19% 23% 23% 23% 23% 28% 25%

38% 42%

Participationin

extra-curricularactivities

Collaborativelearning

Participationin class

discussions

Askingquestions

Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers

Attendance Attentivenessin class

Regularcompletion ofassignments

Discipline Values andethics

Improved No change Declined

Behavioural Changes in Learner Engagement

Improvement is observed on participation in activities (academic and extra-curricular) over the past five years; however,

teachers perceive most decline in values and ethics (42%) and discipline (38%).

Note: The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have

been grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: 6,494

Schools Higher Education Institutes

17

Inhibitors to Learner Engagement (1/3)

Educators (29%) view excessive use of personal gadgets as a distraction and major deterrent for learner engagement.

At the school level, lack of parental support (34%) is the top concern.

Lack of

interest in

subject/

career

stream

9%

Lack of

parental

support

12%

Excessive use

of personal

gadgets

as a

distraction

29%

Top 3 Reasons

for Low or

Declining

Learner

Engagement

1

2

3

Lack of parental support: 34%

Excessive use of personal gadgets

as a distraction: 16%

Too much pressure to perform: 10%

1

2

3

Excessive use of personal gadgets

as a distraction: 36%

Lack of interest in subject/ career

stream: 12%

Mismatch between formal education

and competitive exams: 11%

Note: The figures presented are based on most important reason cited by respondents who estimated current engagement as less than 50% or agreed that there had

been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: All-India: 3,569; Schools: 1,233; H.Ed. Institutes: 2,336

18


Lack of parental support is a bigger concern at government schools (43%). Performance pressure at private schools is

also viewed as one of the key factors for low/ declining learner engagement (15%).

6%

7%

11%

13%

43%

15%

27%

2%

4%

24%

Government Schools Private Schools

Lack of

parental support

Lack of

parental support

Challenges faced outside

of school/ college

Past performance

Excessive use of personal

gadgets as a distraction

Too much pressure to perform

Top 3 Reasons for Low or Declining Learner Engagement – by Types of Schools


of school/ college

Past performance



Too much pressure to perform


been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: Government Schools: 655; Private Schools: 578

1

2

3

1

2

3

19


Excessive use of personal gadgets is viewed as a distraction across government and private higher education

institutions.

6%

9%

10%

14%

33%

6%

8%

12%

10%

38%

Government H.Ed. Institutes Private H.Ed. Institutes



Top 3 Reasons for Low or Declining Learner Engagement – by Types of Higher Education Institutions


and competitive examinations

Lack of interest in

subject/ career stream




and competitive examinations

Lack of interest in

subject/ career stream

Traditional teaching methodology

Lack of balance between academics

and extra-curricular activities

Traditional teaching methodology

Lack of balance between academics

and extra-curricular activities


been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: Government H.Ed. Institutes: 702; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 1,634

1

2

3

1

2

3

≠ ≠

20

Enablers of Learner Engagement (1/4)

Use of real-life examples (86%) and group discussions (83%) are considered the most useful techniques to improve

engagement.

Real-life

examples and

stories

Group

discussions/

activities

86%83%

81%80% 79% 79% 78% 77% 76% 76%

71%

65%63%

Technology

platforms to

improve student-

teacher

interaction

Better

assessment of

students'

interests

Regular

counselling

sessions with

students

Regular teacher

trainings

More audiovisual

content

Detailed feedback

on areas of

improvement

Field trips and

outdoor lessons

Smaller class

sizes

More hygienic

school/ college

premises

Higher

involvement of

parents

More extra-

curricular

activities

Useful Tools and Techniques to Improve Learner Engagement

Note: The figures presented are Top 2 box ratings (‘4-highly useful’ and ‘5-extremely useful’) on a scale of 1 to 5; Sample: 6,494

Government Schools Government Higher Education Institutes

Private Schools Private Higher Education Institutes

21


Regular counselling sessions with students and teacher trainings are considered more useful in government schools.

1

2

3

Regular counselling sessions

with students: 84%

Technology platforms to improve

student-teacher interaction: 84%

Regular teacher trainings/

More audio-visual content: 84%

1

2

3

Real-life examples and

stories: 81%

Group discussions/

activities: 78%

Better assessment of students'

interests: 74%

1 Real-life examples and stories:

86%1 Real-life examples and

stories: 91%

2 Group discussions/ activities:

80%2 Group discussions/

activities: 89%

3 Technology platforms to improve

student-teacher interaction: 78%3 More audio-visual

content: 88%

Note: The figures presented are Top 2 box ratings (‘4-highly useful’ and ‘5-extremely useful’) on a scale of 1 to 5; Sample: Government Schools: 1,185; Private Schools:

1,892; Government H.Ed. Institutes: 1,022; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,395

Top 3 Tools and Techniques to Improve Learner Engagement – by Type of Institution

22


49% agree that they receive adequate training to enhance learner engagement and inquisitiveness.

The perception of adequacy of teacher training is substantially lower at higher education level than that at school level.

agree

Higher Ed. Institutes

30%

Agreement with the Statement—"Teachers in India receive adequate training to enhance learner engagement

and inquisitiveness"

49%

15%

36%

Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree

All-India

agree

Schools

70%

Note: The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Strongly disagree and 5-Strongly agree. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have been

grouped into “Agree”, and those of 1 and 2 into “Disagree”; Sample: All-India: 6,464; Schools: 3,077; H.Ed. Institutes: 3,417

14% 16%70%

17% 53%30%

23


Most teachers opine that regular trainings on innovative teaching methodologies and new technology (esp. audio-visual

aids) would help them engage learners better.

Sample: All-India: 2,043

24

Pursuit of Career Stream according

to Choice and AbilityTeachers: 57% learners are able to pursue a career stream according to their choice and ability. Learners in government

schools least likely to be pursuing a career stream that complements their interests and abilities (42%).

Private

Schools

67%

Govt.

Schools

42%

Private

H.Ed.

Institutes

57%

Govt.

H.Ed.

Institutes

56%

Sample: All-India: 6,464; Government Schools: 1,184; Private Schools: 1,890; Government H.Ed. Institutes: 1,010; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,380

All-India

57%

% of Learners Pursuing Career Stream According to Choice and Ability – by Type of Institution

Annexure IState-level Snapshots

25

Reasons for Low/ Declining

EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years

26

Teachers’ Perspective: Andhra Pradesh*

47%

8%

45%

Declined

Improved

No change

52%

Actively

engaged

learners

% of Students Pursuing a

Stream of Choice/ Ability

56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

48%

50%

61%


Participation inclass

discussions

Participation inextra-curricular

activities

Increase in… Decrease in…

43%

49%

61%

Attentiveness inclass

Discipline

Values andethics



(35%)

Tools and Techniques to

Improve Learner Engagement

Real-lifeexamples

andstories

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Technologyplatforms to

improvestudent-teacher

interaction

78% 78% 74%

% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner

Engagement in Past 5 Years

47%

12%

41%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Adequacy of Teacher

Training

Lack of interest in subject/

career stream (14%)

Mismatch between formal

education and competitive

exams (11%)≠

Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 222



27

Teachers’ Perspective: Bihar*

89%

3%8%

Declined

Improved

No change

59%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

88%

89%

90%

Askingquestions

Attentivenessin class

Attendance


6%

7%

7%

RegularCompletion ofassignments

Discipline

Values andethics



Regularteachertrainings

Morehygienicschool/college

premises

Smallerclass sizes

90% 89% 89%



79%

7%

14%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Adequacy of Teacher

Training

Lack of parental support

(55%)

Too much pressure to

perform (9%)


of school/ college (7%)




28

41%

11%

48%

Declined

Improved

No change

49%

Actively

engaged

learners



55%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

48%

53%

70%


discussions



activities


44%

50%

53%


Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories



interaction

Regular teacher trainings

88% 82% 81%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

33%

16%

52%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Teachers’ Perspective: Gujarat*



examination (13%)


career stream(13%)



(29%)

≠




29

49%

2%

49%

Declined

Improved

No change

48%

Actively

engaged

learners



55%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

52%

52%

68%

Askingquestions



activities


45%

58%

72%


Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Regular teacher trainings

86% 85% 85%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

21%

15%

64%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Teachers’ Perspective: Haryana*

Traditional teaching

methodology (16%)



examinations (13%)



(27%)

≠




30

78%

8%

14%

Declined

Improved

No change

61%

Actively

engaged

learners



60%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

76%

78%

81%


discussions



activities


14%

23%

25%


Discipline

Values andethics



Groupdiscussions/

activities

Betterassessmentof students'

interests

Real-lifeexamples

and stories

88% 86% 85%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

64%

15%

21%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Teachers’ Perspective: Karnataka*


career stream (10%)





(29%)




31

41%

14%

45%

Declined

Improved

No change

48%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

47%

57%

64%


discussions



activities


39%

45%

55%

Askingquestions

Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/ activities

Betterassessmentof students'

interests

85% 81% 80%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

30%

14%

56%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Teachers’ Perspective: Kerala*


career stream (12%)


methodology (12%)



(37%)




32

43%

9%

48%

Declined

Improved

No change

53%

Actively

engaged

learners



57%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

53%

54%

69%

Askingquestions



activities


46%

57%

59%


Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/

activities


88% 81% 76%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

39%

15%

46%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Teachers’ Perspective: Madhya Pradesh*


career stream (15%)



examinations (11%)



(36%)

≠



Engagement

33

50%

14%

36%

Declined

Improved

No change

50%

Actively

engaged

learners



57%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

58%

62%

74%


discussions



activities

32%

41%

44%


Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Technology platforms to


interaction


85% 79% 76%



Adequacy of Teacher

Training

44%

14%

42%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Changes Observed in Past 5 Years

Teachers’ Perspective: Maharashtra*




perform (8%)



(29%)

Increase in…


Decrease in…


Engagement

34

Teachers’ Perspective: NCT of Delhi*

50%

20%

30%

Declined

Improved

No change

56%

Actively

engaged

learners



52%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

57%

58%

69%

Askingquestions


discussions


activities

30%

36%

46%


Discipline

Values andethics



Groupdiscussions/

activities

Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students

87% 85% 82%



40%

20%

40%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral


Adequacy of Teacher

Training


(15%)



examinations (11%)



(33%)

≠

Increase in…


Decrease in…


Adequacy of Teacher

Training


Engagement

35

Teachers’ Perspective: Punjab*

48%

8%

44%

Declined

Improved

No change

52%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

50%

52%

57%




activities

41%

52%

63%


Discipline

Values andethics





29%

10%

60%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral


career stream (12%)



examinations (11%)



(45%)

≠

Increase in…


Decrease in…

Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/

activities


89% 87% 85%


Adequacy of Teacher

Training


Engagement

36

Teachers’ Perspective: Rajasthan*

50%

10%

40%

Declined

Improved

No change

56%

Actively

engaged

learners



60%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

54%

58%

70%




activities

39%

47%

54%

Attendance

Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/

activities


88% 87% 81%



38%

14%

48%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral



examinations (15%)


career stream (14%)



(36%)

≠

Increase in…


Decrease in…

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


Engagement

37

Teachers’ Perspective: Tamil Nadu*

46%

15%

39%

Declined

Improved

No change

49%

Actively

engaged

learners



48%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

46%

52%

58%


discussions



activities

36%

47%

47%


Discipline

Values andethics



Real-lifeexamples

and stories



interaction

Groupdiscussions/

activities

83% 82% 80%



48%

21%

31%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral



(14%)


career stream (9%)



(32%)

Increase in…


Decrease in…


Adequacy of Teacher

Training


Engagement

38

Teachers’ Perspective: Telangana*

69%10%

21%

Declined

Improved

No change

63%

Actively

engaged

learners



63%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

76%

78%

84%


discussions

Askingquestions


activities

24%

39%

41%


Discipline

Values andethics





63%

14%

23%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral


(28%)



(22%)


career stream (12%)

Increase in…


Decrease in…

Real-lifeexamples

and stories



interaction

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students

90% 88% 86%


Adequacy of Teacher

Training


Engagement

39

Teachers’ Perspective: Uttar Pradesh*

59%

8%

33%

Declined

Improved

No change

58%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

62%

63%

75%



discussions


activities

29%

34%

40%


Discipline

Values andethics



(26%)





49%

14%

37%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral


(23%)



examinations (10%)

Real-lifeexamples

and stories



interaction


89% 83% 82%

≠

Increase in…


Decrease in…

Adequacy of Teacher

Training

Changes Observed in Past 5 YearsReasons for Low/ Declining

Engagement

40

Teachers’ Perspective: West Bengal*

58%

11%

31%

Declined

Improved

No change

56%

Actively

engaged

learners



61%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

61%

61%

69%

Askingquestions


discussions


activities

Decrease in…

27%

35%

47%


Discipline

Values andethics



(34%)



Real-lifeexamples

and stories

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students

84% 82% 80%



46%

16%

38%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral



examinations (9%)


methodology (10%)

≠

Increase in…


Annexure IICity-level Snapshots

41

68%

13%

19%

Reasons for low/ declining

engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years

42

Teachers’ Perspective: Bengaluru*

81%

7%

12%

Declined

Improved

No change

60%

Actively

engaged

learners



58%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

78%

81%

83%


discussions



activities


11%

20%

22%


Discipline

Values andethics



(27%)



Groupdiscussions/activities

Betterassessment of students'

interests

Real-lifeexamples

andstories

89% 86% 82%



Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Adequacy of Teacher

Training




perform (10%)

Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 616



43

Teachers’ Perspective: Chennai*

48%

18%

34%

Declined

Improved

No change

46%

Actively

engaged

learners



44%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

45%

49%

56%

Askingquestions



activities


34%

43%

46%


Values andethics

Discipline



(28%)





interaction

Real-lifeexamples

andstories

Betterassessment of students'

interests

83% 80% 79%


Engagement in Past 5 YearsAdequacy of Teacher

Training

51%

22%

27%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Adequacy of Teacher

Training




(20%)

Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide ; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 414

Real-lifeexamples

and stories



interaction

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students



44

Teachers’ Perspective: Hyderabad*

69%9%

22%

Declined

Improved

No change

64%

Actively

engaged

learners



65%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

77%

78%

85%


discussions

Askingquestions


activities


24%

40%

42%


Discipline

Values andethics



(25%)





64%

15%

21%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

90% 88% 86%

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


(22%)


career stream (14%)




45

Teachers’ Perspective: Kolkata*

62%

11%

27%

Declined

Improved

No change

58%

Actively

engaged

learners



64%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

65%

64%

72%


discussions

Askingquestions


activities


28%

35%

49%

Attendance

Discipline

Values andethics



(38%)





46%

16%

38%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Real-lifeexamples

andstories

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students

86% 84% 81%

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


methodology (10%)



examinations (11%)≠




46

Teachers’ Perspective: Mumbai*

39%

15%

47%

Declined

Improved

No change

51%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

49%

57%

73%


discussions



activities


43%

47%

51%


Discipline

Values andethics


methodology (11%)



(28%)





33%

19%

48%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Real-lifeexamples

andstories



interaction

Smallerclasssizes

84% 79% 78%

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


(12%)




47

Teachers’ Perspective: NCT of Delhi*

50%

20%

30%

Declined

Improved

No change

56%

Actively

engaged

learners



52%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

57%

58%

69%

Askingquestions


discussions


activities


30%

36%

46%


Discipline

Values andethics



(33%)





40%

20%

40%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Real-lifeexamples

andstories

Regularcounselling

sessionswith

students

87% 85% 82%

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


(15%)



examinations (11%)≠


Real-lifeexamples

andstories

Groupdiscussions/

activities

Moreaudio-visual

content



48

Teachers’ Perspective: Pune*

58%

9%

33%

Declined

Improved

No change

58%

Actively

engaged

learners



65%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

67%

69%

82%


discussions



activities


31%

44%

45%


Discipline

Values andethics

Lack of balance between

academics and extra-

curricular activities (9%)



(40%)





41%

15%

44%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

91% 86% 84%

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


career stream (11%)




49

Teachers’ Perspective: Patna*

90%

3%7%

Declined

Improved

No change

59%

Actively

engaged

learners



56%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

89%

89%

90%



Attendance


5%

6%

7%

Participationin class

discussions

Values andethics

Discipline


(56%)





80%

7%

13%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral

Adequacy of Teacher

Training




perform (8%)



Morehygienicschool/college

premises

Smallerclass sizes

90% 89% 89%



50

Teachers’ Perspective: Lucknow*

75%

7%

18%

Declined

Improved

No change

63%

Actively

engaged

learners



54%

Pursuing a career

stream according to

choice/ ability

72%

73%

79%


Askingquestions


activities


16%

17%

21%


Discipline

Values andethics





63%

12%

25%

Disagree

Agree

Neutral


(48%)



(12%)

Adequacy of Teacher

Training


perform (10%)


Real-lifeexamples

andstories



interaction


90% 87% 85%

Annexure IIICities and Towns

Covered

51

52

List of Cities and Towns Covered [1]

Andhra

PradeshKakinada Podalada Visakhapatnam Hajipur Daman and Diu Ankleshwar

Amalapuram Kovvur Proddutur Vizianagaram Munger Daman Atul

Anantapur Kurnool PuttaparthiArunachal

PradeshMuzaffarpur Goa Bakrol

Angalakuduru Lepakshi Rajahmundry Itanagar Patna Cuncolim Bardoli

Bapatla Machilipatnam Rajam Assam Samastipur Farmagudi Bharuch

Bhimavaram Madanapalle Rajampet Dibrugarh Chandigarh Mapusa Bhavnagar

Bobbili Mangalagiri Rayachoti Guwahati Chandigarh Margao Bhilad

Chilakaluripet Nandikotkur Sattenapalle Jorhat Chhattisgarh Nuvem Chaparda

Chirala Nandyal Srikakulam Kokrajhar Bhilai Panjim Dabhoi

Eluru Narasaraopet Srikalahasti Mirza Bilaspur Ponda Dholka

Gudivada Narsapur Sullurpet Nagarbera Durg Taleigao Gandhinagar

Gudur Nellore Tadepalligudem Silchar Jagdalpur Zuarinagar Godhra

Guntur Ongole Tenali Tezpur Kawardha Gujarat Himatnagar

Hanuman

JunctionPalakollu Tirupati Tinsukia Raipur Adipur Jamnagar

Hindupur Piduguralla Velivennu BiharDadra and

Nagar HaveliAhmedabad Junagadh

Kadapa Piridi Vijayawada Gaya Silvassa Anand Kherva

53


Gujarat (contd.) Visnagar Panipat Theog Karnataka Mandya Kannur

Mehsana Haryana RewariJammu and

KashmirAnkola Mangaluru Kasaragod

Mithapur Ambala Rohtak Anantnag Bagalkot Manipal Kochi

Morbi Bahadurgarh Sirsa Jammu Bantwal Mysuru Kollam

Nadiad Ellenabad Sonipat Kathua Belagavi Nitte Koodali

Navsari FaridabadHimachal

PradeshKatra Bellary Raichur Kothamangalam

Palanpur Gharaunda Barotiwala Srinagar Bengaluru Ramanagara Kottayam

Palitana Gurugram Dharamsala Jharkhand Dandeli Shivamogga Kozhikode

Patan Hisar Hamirpur Bokaro Steel City Davangere Sullia Palakkad

Petlad Jagadhri Mandi Deoghar Dharwad Tumakuru Panthavoor

Rajkot Kaithal Nurpur Dhanbad Gadag-Betageri Kerala Pathanamthitta

Surat Karnal Palampur Ghatshila Gokak Adoor Payyampally

Surendranagar Kurukshetra Pathiar Jamshedpur Hassan Amritapuri Pulpally

Vadodara Milakpur Shimla Mesra Hubballi Cheranalloor Puthiyathura

Vallabh

VidyanagarMurthal Sirmour Ranchi Huvina Hadagali Ernakulam Ranni

Vapi Palwal Solan Sahibganj Kalaburagi Kadannappally Thalassery

Vasad Panchkula Sundar Nagar Sindri Kinnigoli Kanjirappally Thiruvananthapuram

54


Kerala

(contd.)Mandleshwar Aurangabad Karad Pune Yavatmal Cuttack Faridkot

Thrissur Mandsaur Ballarpur Kirloskarwadi Sangamner Manipur Jeypore Fazilka

Tiruvalla Ratlam Baramati Kolhapur Sangli Imphal Kantabanji Ferozepur

Vazhakulam Rewa Bhusawal Kopargaon Satara Senapati Muniguda Giddarbaha

Madhya

PradeshSagar Budhgaon Kurul Selgaon Meghalaya Rambhadeipur Gurdaspur

Anuppur Satna Chandrapur Lonavala Shirpur Shillong Rourkela Hariana

Betul Sehore Chinchwad Malegaon Shirwal Mizoram Sambalpur Hoshiarpur

Bhopal Ujjain Dehu Road Mumbai Silapur Aizawl Sarang Jagraon

Burhanpur Vidisha Dhule Nagpur Solapur Nagaland Puducherry Jalandhar

Guna Maharashtra Digras NalasoparaTalegaon

DabhadeDimapur Karaikal Khanna

Gwalior Ahmednagar Dombivli Nashik Tarapur Delhi Puducherry Lehragaga

IndoreAitwade

BudrukGadchiroli Navi Mumbai Thane NCT of Delhi Punjab Longowal

Jabalpur Alandi Hadapsar Palghar Urun Islampur Odisha Amritsar Ludhiana

Katni Ambajogai Ichalkaranji Panvel Vasai BaharampurAnandpur

SahibMajitha

Khargone Amravati Islampur Pophali Vasai-Virar Bhubaneswar Banga Malout

Manawar Atigre Jalgaon Pulgaon Wardha Bolani Bathinda Moga

55


Punjab (contd.) Bikaner Sri Ganganagar Dindigul Nullivilai Thiruvallur Chintapatla

Mohali Falna Udaipur Erode Ooty Thiruvarur Ghatkesar

Nawanshahr Hanumangarh Sikkim Hosur Panruti Thuvakudi Hanamkonda

Pakka Kalan Jaipur Gangtok Kanchipuram Perambalur Tiruchirappalli Hayath Nagar

Pathankot Jaisalmer Mazitar Kanyakumari Periyapuliyur Tirunelveli Huzurabad

Patiala Jhalawar Namchi Kattankulathur Pollachi Tiruppattur Hyderabad

Phagwara Jodhpur Tamil Nadu Kilakarai Pudukkottai Tirupur Jagtial

Rajpura Kankroli Ambur Kovilpatti Rajapalayam Tiruvannamalai Karimnagar

Rupnagar Kishangarh Brammapuram Krishnagiri Salem Trichy Khammam

Sangrur Kota Chengalpattu Kumbakonam Sathyamangalam Tuticorin Kothapet

Rajasthan Laxmangarh Chennai Madurai Sattur Vellore Malakpet

Abu Road Makrana Chidambaram Mayiladuthurai Selaiyur Villupuram Peerzadiguda

Ajmer Newai Chinnasalem Melmaruvathur Sivakasi Telangana Ramachandrapuram

Alwar Pali Coimbatore Nagercoil Sriperumbudur Adilabad Ramanthapur

Banasthali Pilani Cuddalore Namakkal Srivilliputhur Boduppal Saroornagar

Bhilwara Sikar Dharmapuri Neyveli Thanjavur Cherlagudem Secunderabad

56


Telangana

(contd.)Barabanki Mathura Bhimtal Bally Hooghly Mecheda

Suryapet Bareilly Meerut Dehradun Bandel Howrah Memari

Vanasthalipuram Bijnor Modinagar Dwarahat Bankura Jalpaiguri Midnapore

Wanaparthy Bulandshahar Moradabad Haldwani Barasat Kalyani Mohanpur

Warangal Chandauli Moth Haridwar Bardhaman Kanaipur Murshidabad

Zahirabad Etah Muradnagar Kashipur Bishrail Kanchrapara Naihati

Tripura Faizabad Muzaffarnagar Kotdwar Bolpur KandiNorth 24

Parganas

Agartala Ghaziabad Noida Nainital Chakdaha Kankinara Purulia

Dharmanagar Gorakhpur Raebareli Pantnagar Chinsurah Kharagpur Ranaghat

Uttar Pradesh Greater Noida Saharanpur Rishikesh Darjeeling Khardaha Santiniketan

Agra Jaunpur Shamli RoorkeeDiamond

HarbourKolaghat Serampore

Aligarh Jhansi Sitapur Srinagar Domjur Kolkata Shyamnagar

Allahabad Kajari Sultanpur Tehri Durgapur Krishnanagar Siliguri

Anoopshahr Kanpur Varanasi West Bengal Haldia MadhyamgramSouth 24

Parganas

Auraiya Lucknow Uttarakhand Asansol Halisahar Malda Suri

Bahraich Mahoba Almora Baharampur Hindmotor Mankundu Tamluk

Annexure IVQuestionnaire

57

58

Questionnaire [1/3]

59

Questionnaire [2/3]

60

Questionnaire [3/3]

61

Research Partner

Spire Research and Consulting is a leading strategic market research consultancy specializing in global emerging

markets - the Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and Russia/CIS. Spire focuses on holistic research

projects which integrate traditional customer research with knowledge of the broader business eco-system. Through

its growth-focused solution portfolio, Spire Research and Consulting helps its clients with strategic decision-making

for market growth and entry. Spire’s management team works through its eight country offices, international advisors

and local associates in over 30 countries to bring to each project the highest standards of research conceptualization,

execution and delivery. The Spire Group has delivered over 1,000 market research and consulting projects for over

50 Global Fortune 1000 firms. Recently, Yamada Business Consulting acquired an 80 per cent stake in the Spire

Research and Consulting group. This acquisition gives Spire access to YBC’s extensive network of 5 offices and over

400 consultants in Japan to conduct research and advise clients on Japan market entry and growth.

Documents

Building Learner Engagement - Pearson India Learner Engagement September 2016 1 Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in black type) or Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in white