Upload
stacy-lay
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Buket AVCI
(with Karan GIROTRA and Serguei NETESSINE)
INSEAD
Is Better Place Really Better?
INSEAD
ELECTRICAL VEHICLES: 100 HUNDRED YEARS OF FAILURE
Electric vehicle model by Ányos Jedlik, the inventor of an early type of electric motor (1828, Hungary).
German electric car, 1904, with the chauffeur on top.
Thomas Edison and an electric car in 1913.East German electric vans of the Deutsche Post, 1953.
Buket AVCI 2
INSEAD
ELECTRICAL VEHICLES….
The Henney Kilowatt, a 1961 production electric car based on the Renault Dauphine
The Nissan Leaf
GM EV1 Tesla Roadster
3 Buket AVCI
INSEAD
BETTER PLACE V/S CONVENTIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLES
Battery Cost(c)
Battery Cost(c)
Total Cost of UsageTotal Cost of Usage
Years 1 to T
Electricity @ ce/miKK
EV Car + Battery
Better Place @ p/miKK
EV Car
Total Cost of UsageTotal Cost of Usage
Initial Purchase
Initial Purchase Years 1 to T
5 Buket AVCI
1) Cost of Ownership
BP does not sell batteries to customers, instead charges per mile usage.
2) Range Anxiety
BP installs a network of battery switching stations.
INSEAD
THE BUSINESS MODEL
Electricity
Customer
Charging Spots
Battery• Leased by BP• Limited Range• Cost
• Inventory of batteries• Service Level
• Payment Plan• Per-mile price• Subscription fee
• Paid by BP • Home or Work
Switching Station
6 Buket AVCI
INSEAD
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. How should Better Place decide on pricing and stocking quantities at switching stations given the current business model?
2. How do the advances in battery technology affect environment and optimal adoption of Better Place?
3. Can Better Place succeed where Conventional Electric Vehicles fail?
Which one can achieve a higher adoption?
Which one is environmentally better?
7 Buket AVCI
INSEAD
CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR
N potential customers
8 Buket AVCI
Util
ity
Utility from Driving
Green Utility ~ Heterogeneous
total miles: Y = e + ε and ε~ G
Cost
Cost of Driving
Range Inconvenience Penalty
Y = e + εRange
Customer maximizes the expected utility based on the following utility and cost elements:
INSEAD
ECONOMICS OF BETTER PLACE
Single Switching Station
Stocks Q batteries at the station In stock probability r
BP leases the battery Per-mile price contract (p) with subscription fee (S)
Firm’s decision variables: per-mile price (p), subscription fee (S) and number of
batteries to stock (Q)
9
Repairable Inventory System
M/G/∞ queue
-Average charging time τ-Electricity cost: ce per miles
Customer Demand for Switching
Buket AVCI
Number of customers
Probability ofgoing to station
R)P(Y*N
INSEAD
ECONOMICS OF BETTER PLACE
Buket AVCI 10
Customer optimizes over miles driven
Customer’s reservation utility is Ugas
Service level constraint
Timeline
Profit and Emissions are realized
Customers decide to buy a BP or a gasoline car
Adoption is realized
BP offers per-mile price contract with subscription fee
BP decides on the number of batteries to stock
Driving is realized
bpe
QSp NA
cQcecpSE *
,,)(max
Profit fromMiles Driven
Stocking Cost
Battery Investment
gas
e
UeUE
eUEe
rOQPts
)(
)(maxarg
)(..*
SubscriptionFee
INSEAD
LITERATURE REVIEW
1) Repairable Item Inventory Planning Literature Sherbrooke (1968, 2004) Muckstadt (2005)
2) Principal Agent Literature Bolton and Dewatripont (2005) Van Mieghem (2000) Kim et al. (2007)
3) Green Operations Literature Chocteau et al. (2011)
11 Buket AVCI
INSEAD
MODEL SOLUTION
Customer’s driving decision is set such that
BP’s stocking quantity solves
Per-mile price solves
Buket AVCI
No benefit of stocking more batteries than required
12
Cost of Electricity
Cost of Battery Switching Service
21
*
**
)(21)(
eRGNA
zeRgccp
bp
re
rOQP )( **Q
)()1()]([ *** eRgrMpeuE
*p
INSEAD
RESULTS: BETTER PLACE
Buket AVCI 13
Variable Price Adoption Driving
Cost of battery ↑ ↓ ↓
Range ↓ ↑ ↑
Population Size ↓ ↑ ↑
Advances in battery technology increase the adoption of Better Place vehicles, but they will also increase driving!
Adoption and driving increase with the population size due to the economies of scale in inventory.
Optimal customer adoption and optimal driving are strategic complements.
implies 0*
e
Abp )()(*
XesignX
Asign bp
*p *ebpA
INSEAD
CARBON EMISSIONS
Total Expected Carbon Emission
where and are per-mile emission from electric and gasoline vehicles.
Adoption and Driving affect in opposite directions:
Buket AVCI 14
Emission from Gasoline Vehicles
Emission from Electric Vehicles
))(1()( *gasgasbpebpbp eAeAEM
e gas
0
bp
bp
A
EM0
*
e
EM bp
bpEM
vs.
Are Better Place vehicles more effective than Conventional Electric vehicles in reducing emissions?
bpEM ?
INSEAD
ECONOMICS OF CONVENTIONAL ELECTRIC VEHICLES
CE sells the customer an electric vehicle including a battery. Fixed price contract
Customer pays ce per mile.
Firm’s decision variables: Fixed Price (F)
15 Buket AVCI
Customers decide to buy a CE or a gasoline car
CE Adoption is realized
CE offers fixed price contract
Driving is realized
Profit and Emissions are realized
Timeline
Customer optimizes over miles driven
Customer’s reservation utility is Ugas
Profit per customer
F-cF
max
gas
e
UeUE
eUEets
)(
)(maxarg.. *
INSEAD
NUMERICAL STUDY - PARAMETERS
Technology-related parameters are obtained from Better Place website.
Customer utility parameters are calibrated using daily driving data from EPA website.
Buket AVCI
Parameter R τ c ce cgas r
Value 100 miles 6 hours $ 13,500 ¢ 2.5
per mile¢ 10.9
per mile 99%
16
INSEAD
COMPARISON OF BP AND CE
Buket AVCI 17
Today the dual policy objectives of increasing electric vehicle adoption and reducing greenhouse gas emission are aligned.
We expect that these two goals will not be aligned in the future, when battery costs go down as forecasted !
Adoption (A) Usage (e*)
BP ↑ ↑
CE ↑ -
As battery price decreases
-0.035
0.035
-3%
3%
0 1 2 3 4
Em
issi
on (k
g CO
2)
Ado
ptio
n
EMbp-EMce
Abp-Ace
-0.04
0.08
-2%
4%
0 1 2 3 4
Em
issi
on (k
g CO
2)
Ado
ptio
n
EMbp-EMce
Abp-Ace
Range Inconvenience Penalty Range Inconvenience Penalty
2011 Values 2020 Projections
INSEAD
CONCLUSIONS
Buket AVCI 18
First stylized model on an Electric Car Model with Switching Stations.
Assuming that the electricity comes from the same typical mix, Better Place will have more CO2 emissions than Conventional Electric Vehicles in future even it achieves a higher adoption.
Technological advances in battery cost and range may hurt the environment.
Misguided policy actions will lead a misalignment in the dual objectives of increasing EV adoption and reducing carbon emissions.