Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
BusinessandtheSouthAfricanTransition
ItumelengMakgetlaandIanShapiro
Draft:February20,2016
Abstract
Thispaperexplorestheunder-appreciatedroleofbusinessinnegotiatedtransitionstodemocracy.DrawingonourinterviewsofkeySouthAfricanbusinessleadersandpoliticalelites,weshowhowbusinessplayedavitalroleinenablingpoliticianstobreakoutoftheprisoners’dilemmainwhichtheyhadbeentrappedsincethe1960sandmovethecountrytowardthedemocratictransitionthattookplacein1994.Businessleaderswereuniquelypositionedtoplaythisrole,butitwasnoteasybecausetheywereinternallydividedanddeeplyimplicatedinApartheid’sinjustices.Weexplainhowtheyovercamethesechallenges,howtheyfacilitatednegotiations,andhowtheyhelpedkeepthembackontrackwhenthegoinggotrough.Wealsolookatbusinessinothertransitionalsettings,drawingonSouthAfrica’sexperiencetoilluminatewhybusinesseffortstoplayacomparableroleintheIsraeli-Palestinianconflicthavefailed.Weendbydrawingouttheimplicationsofourfindingsfordebatesaboutdemocratictransitionsandtheroleofbusinessinterestsinthem.
DepartmentofPoliticalScience,P.O.Box208301,NewHaven,CT06520-830.Phone:(203)432-3415;Fax:(203):432-93-83.
Email:[email protected]@yale.edu
-1-
OnMarch21,1960,policeopenedfireonademonstrationagainstSouthAfrica’s
passlawsinSharpeville,fiftymilessouthofJohannesburg,killing69people.The
callousnessofthemassacre–manyvictimswereshotinthebackwhilefleeing–
triggeredamajorescalationintheconflictbetweentheAfricanNationalCongress
(ANC)andtheNationalParty(NP)government.Demonstrationseruptedatmass
funeralsforthevictimsandprotestersmarchedonpolicestationsacrossthecountry.
TendayslaterthegovernmentbannedtheANC,declaredaStateofEmergency,and
arrestedhundredsofactivists.TheANCendeditscommitmenttononviolence,formeda
militarywingUmkhontoweSizwe(“SpearoftheNation”–MK),andsoonlaunchedits
firstattacksongovernmentinstallations.Foralmostthreedecades,repressionand
violentresistancefedeachother.InFebruary1990,whenPresidentFWdeKlerk
announcedtheunbanningofoppositionorganizationsandtheimminentreleaseof
NelsonMandelaandallotherpoliticalprisoners,thecountrywasonthevergeofcivil
war.1Yet,fouryearslaternegotiationsledtosuccessfulelections,consummatinga
peacefultransitiontodemocracy.
Theresultsurprisedtheworld,asitshouldhavedone.Theconflictembodieda
classicprisoners’dilemma,inwhichthebestresultforbothsides–acooperative
solution–isunavailablebecauseeachplayer’simmediateincentiveistodefectno
matterwhattheotheronedoes.ThegovernmentandwhiteSouthAfricansit
representedexpectedthatgivingintooppositiondemandswouldunleashatidalwave
ofswartgevaar(“blackdanger”)heraldinga“totalonslaught”ofcommunismthat
woulddestroycivilizationastheyknewit.2OfficialANCpolicywastocreateanon-
racialdemocracy,butmanywhitesbelievedtheirassetswouldbeexpropriatedand
industriesnationalized,reflectingtheANC’slong-standingalliancewiththeSouth
AfricanCommunistParty(SACP)anditscommitmenttoasocialisteconomy.TheANC
wasstuckwiththerealitythatnonviolentresistancesinceitsfoundingin1912had
yieldedthecreationofapartheidstatein1948,forcedremovalsinthe1960s,violent
repressionofallcallsforchange,andexecutionandimprisonmentofmanyofits
leaders.Anythingotherthancontinuedresistanceseemedguaranteedtobringfurther
-2-
entrenchmentoftheapartheidorder,whichtheNationalPartyshowednosignsof
givingup.TheANC’sdominantstrategywastoresist.
Hencethedilemma.Withthegovernmentincreasinglycommittedtotheuseof
forcetosquashdissent,theANCthoughtitfoolishtorelinquishitsarmedstruggle.And
withtheANCunwillingtoforsakethearmedstruggle,thegovernmentjudgedcontinued
repressionnecessary.Theconflictonthegroundpolarizedbothsides,trappingthem
intoadownwardlyspiralingequilibrium.Theself-reinforcingcycleofrepressionand
resistancemadethecooperativesolutionevermoreelusive.Therewasarealdanger
thatthecooperativepossibilitywoulddisappearentirely.
Thatkindoftragedyhasbeenseenelsewhere.Intheearly1990s,Israelisand
Palestiniansoverwhelminglysupportedtheagreementonatwostatesolutionthathad
painstakinglybeencraftedinOsloandwouldhaveendedtheirdecadeslongconflict.
ButadisgruntledIsraeliright-wingerassassinatedIsraeliPrimeMinisterYitzhakRabin
duringthefinalstagesofnegotiationsinDecemberof1995,andthetalkscollapsed.The
escalatingviolenceandrepressionthatfollowedtooktheOslopossibilityoffthetable,
asPresidentClintonlearnedwhenhetriedtoreviveitinthesummerof2000.Bythen,
peopleonbothsideshadsufferedsomuchthattheirmutualhatredandmistrust
preventedtheiracceptingtermsthattheyhadembracedfiveyearsearlier.3A
comparablescenariowasarealpossibilityinSouthAfrica,resultinginafull-blowncivil
warthatwouldhavebeencatastrophicallycostlyforall.
OurgoalhereistohelpilluminatehowSouthAfricansavoidedthisoutcome,
whichwaswidelyexpectedatthetime.WebegininPartIbyexplainingwhythe
prevailingpessimismwaswarranted.Theprisoners’dilemmaSouthAfrican’sfacedwas
embeddedindecadesofbitterconflict,andthestandardpathsoutofitwereblocked.
Spoilersinbothcommunitieswereunalterablyopposedtothesettlementthat
reformersinthegovernmentandmoderatesintheANChopedtoestablish.Thestakes
werehighandescalating.Surmountingtheobstaclesrequiredleaderswithunusual
capacitiesforempathyandrisk,4buttheydidnotfalloutofthesky.Peoplewithfew
reasonstotrustoneanotherhadtodevelopsuchreasons,andthenactonthemand
keepactingonthem,evenaspowerfulgroupsonbothsidesoftheconflictsoughtto
underminetheirefforts.
-3-
OurthesisisthatSouthAfricanbusinesselitesplayedadecisive,yetunder
appreciated,roleinfacilitatingthisresult.Businessleaderswereunlikelymidwivesof
thetransitionbecausebigbusinesshadaccumulatedmassiveprofitsinahighly
uncompetitiveeconomy,aidedinlargepartbytheoppressiveapartheidregime.Yetthe
country’seconomicelitescametoseethattheirpoliticalleaderswereclingingtoa
statusquothathadbecomeawastingasset.TheycouldhelpBothaandthe
conservativeelementsofwhitesocietyrearrangedeckchairsonasinkingship,leading
toanunforeseeablefutureattheendofabloodyroad.Ortheycouldhelpbuilda
climateoftrustinwhichthepoliticalleaderscouldmovethecountrytowarda
cooperativefuture.Paradoxically,takingthispathwouldmeanopenlydefyingan
increasinglymilitaristgovernmentandreachingouttoenemieswhofordecadeshad
promisedtonationalizetheeconomyandexpropriatetheirill-gottengains.
Howbusinesselitescametoperceivetheirevolvingoptionsisoursubjectin
PartII.Thereweexplainwhytheimperativetoquellescalatingindustrialunrest
changedthethree-partrelationshipamongbusiness,labor,andgovernment,andwhy
theglobalcollapseofcommunismledeconomicelitestoviewatransitiontodemocracy
inanewandmorefavorablelight.InPartIIIwedescribetheformationofabusiness
organization,theConsultativeBusinessMovement(CBM),anddetailitsvariousrolesin
thetransition.WeexplainhowtheCBMcreatedtheclimateandrelationshipsthatwere
essentialtoresolvingthetrustproblemattheheartoftheprisoners’dilemma,andhow
theyworkedtopreventitsresurfacingasinevitablecriseseruptedduringthe
transition.IttookyearsofcostlyeffortbytheCBMleaderstobuildtheirreputationas
honestbrokers,toorganizeandsustaincivilsocietygroupstostempoliticalviolence,
andtoconvincepotentialspoilersnottoboycottandderailthefirstdemocraticelection
inApril1994.
Evolvingbusinessinterestsmadethispossible,butitwasnoteasy.Businessis
nevermonolithic,andvariouslysituatedSouthAfricanbusinesselitesviewedthe
situationandchoicesbeforethemdifferently.InPartIVwetakeuptheresulting
politicalandcollectiveactionproblemsthatbusinessleadershadtosolve,oratleast
manage,amongthemselvesinordertobeeffective.Thisinvolvedtakingadvantageof
theunusualstructureofbigbusiness,whichwashighlyconcentratedbutnonetheless
-4-
integratedacrosstheeconomy.Businesselitesalsohadtodevelopandsustaina
delicatedualrole:theyhadtoensurethatkeyprotagonistsonbothsideswouldsee
themassufficientlyindependenttobetrustworthyduringtheperiodsofgreatest
danger,buttheyalsohadtobeseenascommittedtoachievinganon-racialdemocracy
andwillingtopaysignificantcoststoachieveit.Weunderscorehowimportant,if
challenging,thiswasinPartVviaacomparativelookateffortsbybusinesselitesto
haveasimilarimpactontheIsraelPalestineconflict.Theretheeconomyisdifferently
structured,economicandpoliticalelitesviewthestatusquodifferentlythantheydidin
SouthAfrica,andbusinessleadershavenotmanagedtofashionacomparablerolefor
themselves.
InPartVIweturntotheimplicationsofouranalysisforthestudyofdemocratic
transitions.Therewearguethat,thoughnegotiatedtransitionscanneverbepredicted,
itispossibletoimproveourunderstandingofthefactorsthatmakethemmoreandless
likelytostartandtosucceed.Wecannotsaythattherewouldhavebeennonegotiated
SouthAfricantransitionwithouttheenablingparticipationofbusiness.Butitisdifficult
toimaginehowitcouldhaveoccurredwithouttheactiveinvolvementofsomesemi-
independentgroupwiththeheft,status,andcommitmentthattheCBMbusinesselites
displayed.Politicalleadersonbothsideswhofavoredanegotiatedsettlementneeded
themtobuildandsustaintherequisitetrusttoescapetheirprisoners’dilemma,
hammeroutthetermsofanacceptabledeal,anddefenditagainstthespoilersonboth
sides.ItishardtoseewhoelsecouldhaveplayedthisroleinSouthAfrica,anditis
doubtfulthatnegotiationsincomparablesettingscouldsucceedwithoutcomparable
help.
SeveralscholarsoftheSouthAfricantransitionhavefocusedonfactorsthat
makeitmorelikelythatregimeeliteswillpreferdemocracytoautocracy.5Butitisone
thingtoprefer,oratleastbeopento,anoutcomeandanothertoreachitin
circumstancesthatprevailedinSouthAfricabefore1990.Ourgoalistoilluminatethe
unlikelypaththatledtothatresult.Weexplainhowregimeelitesmanagedtocommit
themselvestonegotiationsduringanongoingconflictthathadbecomelockedintoan
iteratedprisoners’dilemmawherethestatusquowasamutualdefection.This
malevolentequilibriumhadpersistedthroughmultipleiterationsovermanydecades
-5-
andshowednosignsofending.Yetitdid,anoutcomethatdependedvitallyonSouth
Africanbusinessinwaysthathaveyettobefullyappreciated.
I.Theworstkindofprisoner’sdilemma
Acooperativesolution,inwhichbothsidesagreetonegotiate,offeredthe
prospect,butnoguarantee,ofadesirablesettlement.Negotiationscancollapsefor
manyreasons,promptingareversiontoviolentconflictashappenedinIsrael-Palestine
after1995.Evenwhennegotiationsdosucceed,isnotobviousexantewhatagreement
thepartieswillarriveatwhentheycommittothecooperativepath.TheSouthAfrican
governmentwantedconstitutionallymandatedpowersharing,otherprotectionsforthe
whiteminority,strongfederalism,anamnestyprocess,protectionofcivilservicejobs,
andmanyotherthingsthattheANCviewedwithvaryingdegreesofantipathy.Its
agendaconsistedofmajorityrule,economicredistribution,landreform,large-scale
nationalizations,andothermeasuresthatwereanathematothegovernment.Theses
issueswerecomponentsofwhatJamesFearon(1995)describesasabargainingrange:
asetofpossibleoutcomesthattheplayersseeasworthnegotiatingoverinviewofthe
costsoftheongoingviolentconflict.6
Eventscould,ofcourse,haveprovedthemwrong.Neithersideknewwherethey
wouldendupifnegotiationsstarted,andbothknewthattheotherwouldhaveto
extractminimumconcessionsforthegametobeworththecandleforthem–evenifthe
incompleteinformation,bluffing,andgenuineuncertaintythatinvariablyattends
negotiationsmadethisreservationpricehardtoidentify.Thereisalwaysthechance
that,oncethingsclarify,eachside’sreservationpricewillturnouttobeunacceptableto
theother.Thatwouldrevealtheapparentbargainingrangeaschimerical,scuttlingthe
negotiations.Buttheprevailingequilibriumofmutualdefectionwasworse.Itruledout
thepossibilityofanegotiatedsettlement,perpetuatingasituationinwhichneitherside
couldwinunilaterally,yetbothcouldimposesignificantandincreasingcostsonthe
other–erodingeveryone’squalityoflifeandthreateningtheirsecurity.7Continuing
defectionpromiseddebilitatingcivilwar,orperhapsamilitarycouporsomeotherhard
lineauthoritarianorder.
ItisremarkablethatSouthAfricansescapedtheirprisoners’dilemmabecause
thestandardwaysoutofitwereunavailable.Inthetextbookformulation,wheretwo
-6-
prisonersmusteachdecidewhethertoselloneanotherouttoprotecttheirownhide,
theirinabilitytocommunicatekeepsthecooperativesolutionoutofeitherprisoner’s
grasp.Iftheycouldagreetokeepsilent,theprosecutorwouldlacktheevidenceto
imposeanythingmorethanaminorsanctiononboth.Sosheisolatesthem,offering
eachthesamedeal:ratoutyouraccompliceandyougetoffscotfreeifheisfoolish
enoughtotrustyou,andIwillguaranteeyoualightersentenceifyoutalkratherthan
staymumifhetestifiesagainstyou.Whethertheprisonerswouldhavetrustedeach
othereveniftheyhadbeenabletocommunicateisatopicforgametheoryseminars,
butinthetextbookcasetheprosecutorusestheirisolationtoensuretheircontinuing
mutualmistrust.Thismakesdefectionthedominantstrategyforeach,nomatterwhat
theotheronedoes.
ThetwosideswerenotisolatedinSouthAfricainthe1960sandafter,butthey
mightaswellhavebeen.ThemorerepressivetheSouthAfricanstatebecame,theless
reasontheoppositionhadtotrustanythingthegovernmentproposed.Andescalating
blackresistancefedwhitefearsofexistentialannihilation.“Onesettler,onebullet!”was
themuch-publicizedbattlecryofthePanAfricanistCongress(PAC),whichhadbeen
banned,anditsleadersimprisoned,onthesamedayastheANC.
Anyleaderwhoproposedanopeningtotheothersidewouldquicklyhavelost
grassrootssupport.ThiswasillustratedbyInkathaFreedomParty(IFP)leader
MangosuthuButhelezi’smarginalizationintheliberationmovementoncehebegan
makingoverturestothegovernmentinthelate1970s.8In1985,whenMandeladecided
thatthesituationwasgettingsobadthathehadbetterexplorethepossibilityoftalks
withthegovernmentfromprison,herealizedthathewouldhavetokeepthissecret.He
wastakinganenormousriskthatwouldlikelyfinishhimasaleaderintheANCif,as
wasquitepossible,hisgambitbecamepublic.9
TheNPgovernmentwasinacomparabletrap.WhenP.W.BothabecamePrime
Ministerin1978heannouncedaseriesofreforms,buildingonhiswidelyquoted
declarationthatwhiteSouthAfricansmust“adaptordie.”Thereformswerecosmetic,
buttheyraisedexpectationsthat“farreachingchangewasontheway.”10Itsoon
becameclear,however,thatBothacouldnotcedegroundtohisopponents;hewastoo
dependentonthehardlineNPfactionswhobelievedthateffortstocooperatewiththe
-7-
ANCweredangerouslyfutile.BothabacktrackedinAugust1985,dashingthe
expectationswithhis“Rubicon”speechtoParliamentwhichconfirmedthattherewas
noprospectofhisreleasingMandelaornegotiatingrealchangewiththeANC.The
speechreaffirmedthehardlineNPself-imageofanembattledstatecommittedto
protectingwhiteSouthAfricansfromviolentrevolutionariesbentonleadingthe
countryintodestruction.Itdashedoppositionhopesathomeandstrengthenedcritics
of“constructiveengagement”withtheapartheidregimeabroad.11TheUnitedStates
CongresspassedsanctionsoverPresidentReagan’svetothefollowingyear.12
WhateverreformistimpulsesBothahadentertainedweresoonscrapped.He
strengthenedthemilitarybyestablishingtheNationalSecurityManagementSystem
andenhancedthesecurityministries,creatingtheStateSecurityCouncilwithitsown
permanentsecretariat.Comprisedofministersfromthelawandorderdepartments,it
waschairedbyBothapersonallyandsoondisplacedthecabinetasthesiteofkey
decision-makingasthegovernmentpursueda“totalstrategy”againstwhatthey
perceivedasthe“totalonslaught”bytherevolutionaryforces.13Thecircleofhawks
aroundBothacontinuedpushingforanon-cooperativesolution,believingmilitary
confrontationpreferabletogivingintotheotherside.
RobertAxelrod’sresearchoniteratedprisoners’dilemmassuggeststhatthere
areconditionsthatcanpromotecooperation,butthesewerenotpresentinapartheid
SouthAfrica.Axelrod’sinitialcomputersimulationssuggestedthatadominantstrategy
isTitforTat(TFT):cooperateinthefirstroundandthenmimictheotherside.InSouth
Africaafter1960mutualdefectionwasthestatusquo,sothatTFTreinforcedit.As
Axelrodnotes,“Onceafeudgetsstarted,itcancontinueindefinitely.”14
InsubsequentworkAxelrodconsideredwaysoutofthissituation.Playerscan
testthewaterswith“generoustit-for-tat”(cooperatinginthefaceofanopponent’s
defection)and“contritetit-for-tat”(cooperatingwhentheopponenthasdefectedin
responsetotheirearlierdefection.Theycannotdoittoooften,however,orthese“nice”
strategieswillbeinvadedbe“nasty”ones.Thebiblicalinjunctionalwaystoturnthe
othercheekwouldquicklyleadyoutobeplayedforasucker.Evenregularuseoftitfor
twotatsistoogenerous;itwillbeinvadedbynastystrategies.Makingtherestorative
-8-
moveaboutonetimeintenseemsfeasible,however.Itputsadefect/defectiterated
prisoners’dilemmabackonamutuallycooperativeTFTpath.15
Buttheserestorativestrategiesdependontwoconditionsthatwerenotably
missinginSouthAfrica.Thestakesneedtobecomparativelylowbothtomakeiteration
possible(lifeanddeathsituationsarenotiterative)andtopermitpeopletotestthe
waterswithbabystepsbeforemakingbiggerones.16Theyhavetobeabletostickatoe
inthewater,notplungeinheadfirst.InSouthAfrica,bycontrast,thestakeswerehigh
andincreasing.Evenifanorganization,suchastheANCortheNPgovernment,could
viewthesituationasmultiplyiterated,theindividualleadersfacedmassivecostsinthe
eventoffailure,anditwastheywhohaddecidewhetherornottoexploreacooperative
opening.1718
Second,Axelrod’scooperativeTFTequilibriumdependsonuncertaintyabout
thefuture.Ifeveryoneknowswhichwillbethelastround,thenthedominantstrategyis
todefectinthepenultimateround.Buttheneveryoneknowswhichisthepenultimate
round,makingdefectionontheroundbeforethatthedominantstrategy–andsoby
backwardsinductiondefectionbecomesthedominantstrategyfromthestart.
Forestallingthisdynamicdependsnoone’sknowingwhichroundwillbelast.The
situationisespeciallybadwhentherearebothhighstakesandcertaintyabouttheend
game.Thisiswhybankrunsaresohardtostoponcetheystart.Thestakesarehighand
increasingandtheendgame–collapseofthebank–increasinglyobvioustoall.The
resultingpanicbecomesself-fulfilling.
ThesituationthatunfoldedinSouthAfricaresembledabankrunmorethanone
ofAxelrod’svirtuousTFTsimulations.Thestakeswerehighandgrowinganda
catastrophicendresultwasincreasinglylikely.BythetimeprotestsexplodedinSoweto
andotherblacktownshipsin1976,growingnumbersofpeopleonallsidesbelieved
thattheendgamewascomingalltooclearlyintoview.Thousandsstreamedoutofthe
countrytojointheANC’smilitarywinghopingtoliberateSouthAfricabyforce.19Two
yearslater,hardlinerPWBothabecamepresident,committingthecountrytoacourse
ofmilitarizationtoprotectitfromthe“totalonslaught.”Nicknamedthe“BigCrocodile,”
BothausedthemilitarytofighttheANCandengageinproxywarsinnearbystates
whilepouringpoliceintoblackcommunitiesathome.Thefuturelookedincreasingly
-9-
bleakasthepresidentduginhisheelstopreserveaSouthAfricaunderwhitecontrol.If
therewasgoingtobeanyimpetustohalttheescalatingcycleofviolentrepressionand
resistanceitdidnotlooklikeitwasgoingtocomefromthepoliticalleadershipson
eitherside.20
II.ChangingSouthAfricanBusinessInterests
InSeptember1985AngloAmericanChairmanGavinRellyledadelegationto
meettheANC’sexiledleaderOliverTamboatagamereserveineasternZambia.Anglo
Americanwasagiantminingconglomeratethat,accordingtooneestimate,accounted
foraquarterofthecountry’seconomicactivity.21Themeetingwasawatershedevent
thatunnervedthegovernment,provokingPresidentBothatoattackRellyferociously
fordisloyaltyandtoforbidplannedfollow-uptripsbystudentandchurchgroups.22But
businessgroupscontinuedtripstomeetwithexiledANCleadersinwhatsoonbecame
knownastheLusaka“trek”or“pilgrimage”andthoughthegovernmentmadethreating
noisesitdidnotbanthemoutright.23
ItwasagutsymovebyRelly,inflagrantviolationofthegovernment’s
suppressionofcommunismlaws.TheSecurityPolicecoulddetainpeople
incommunicadoforupto180dayswithoutcharges,authoritythathadbeenusedto
holdsuspectedmembersoftheSouthAfricanCommunistParty(SACP)andfellow
travelersforyears–simplyre-arrestingthemonthedayoftheirrelease.Nooneof
Relly’sstaturehadbeendetainedunderthe180daylaw,butthegovernmentregularly
usedittointimidatepeoplewhoshowedaninterestinbannedpoliticalparties,
organizations,andindividuals.24Itwasfarfromclearbeforethetripthattheywould
notactagainsthim.25
Onapersonallevel,theLusakameetingsucceededinunderscoringthe
participants’sharedcommitmenttothecountry’sfuture.Businessleadersdiscovered
thatANCleaderswerenotthewild-eyedterroristsdescribedbythepresident.Their
suitscontrastedwiththebusinessmen’sinformalkhakiattire,signalingtheirintentto
engageseriouslyonSouthAfrica’sfuture.26Returninghome,RellyreferredtotheANC
leadershemetas“myfellowSouthAfricans”onnationaltelevisionafterthetrip.27
-10-
Relly’scontroversialgambitwasthesubjectoftensedebateamongAnglo
executives.SomeopposedtheANC’sstrategyandwereafraidforthemselvesandthe
company,butothersworriedaboutthecostsofnotinterveninginSouthAfrica’s
deterioratingandincreasinglyrepressivepoliticalstalemate.Inonetellingremark,the
headofanAnglosubsidiarystoodupataboardmeetingtoask:“Gentlemen,whichone
ofyouwantsthiscompanytoberememberedastheI.G.FarbenofApartheid?”28But
HitlerhadsecuredsupportfromGermanbusinessleadersbyintimidation;theyquickly
fellintolineafterhejailedafewrecalcitrantexecutivesearlyinthewar.29
Understandably,someatAnglolackedthestomachtoriskthatkindofconfrontation.
HarryOppenheimer,Relly’smentorwhohadsteppeddownasChairmanthethreeyears
earlier,opposedtheplanstrenuouslyandtriedtoforbidit,butRellywentanyhow.3031
Relly’sdecisionreflectedthechangedterrainthatSouthAfricanbusinessfaced
by1985.Traditionally,SouthAfricanbusinesshadavoidedpolitics,embracingthe
conventionalattitudeinauthoritariansettingsthat“thebusinessofbusinessis
business,andleavepoliticstothepoliticians.”32ManyinthewhiteEnglishspeaking
businesselitedislikedapartheidandtheincreasinginternationalopprobriumit
brought,butmost–likeOppenheimer(anoppositionMPfrom1948to’57whenhe
tookoverthecompanyfollowinghisfather’sdeath)–believedthatexpandingtheblack
franchisehadtobegradualandtheydidnotwantaseriousconfrontationwiththe
government.Businesselitesalsobenefitedfromstatecoercion,whichkeptwagesdown
andlaborquiescent.33However,theeconomicfalloutfromapartheidbegan
accumulatinginthe1970s,makingtheirapoliticalstanceincreasinglycostly.34
Theinitialfaultlinewasindustrialpeace.AsmanufacturingexpandedinSouth
Africainthe1960s,thenumberofindustrialworkersgrew.Companiesrelied
increasinglyonalimitedsupplyofrelativelyskilledworkerswhosewageswerekept
lowbyapartheidlaborinstitutions.35Thissituationrepresentedapotentmixforlabor
unrest,butlaborlawsdidnotrecognizeblacksasemployeesandfromthe1950s
forbadeblackworkersfromjoiningregisteredunions.Staterepressionofanti-regime
politicalpartiesinthe1960salsodepressedeffortstoorganizeblackworkers.This
suitedbusinessownersuntiltheeconomytookoffinthe1960s,butitwasatickingtime
bomb.
-11-
Miningwageswerenotattractive.Earningsforblackunskilledworkersin
mininghadstagnatedinrealtermsfrom1911to1970.Astheeconomyboomed,
industrybegantoattractlaborawayfromtheminesandtheapartheidlaborregime
begantochafe.Anglo’spressuretoincreasewagesfinallyledtochangesinthe1970sas
theregionalsupplyofmigrantstightenedandacommodityboomleadtoincreasesin
miningrevenue.Thechamberofminesalsobegancampaigningforinfluxcontrol
reformstostabilizetheirworkforce.36
Industrialmilitancyexplodedintheearly1970s.Thewildcatstrikesthat
eruptedinDurban1973wereminorcomparedtowhatwouldunfoldinthe1980s,but
theyendeddecadesoflaborquiescence,renderingthemines,inparticular,
ungovernable.37LeadersatAnglo,thecloselyalliedDeBeersmininggroup,andother
majorcompaniesthoughtitimperativetolegalizeblackunionssothatcorporatist
settlementscouldbenegotiated.38Theyalsowantedastableworkforcethatwould
enablethemtoholdontoskilledworkers.Fosteringapoolofskilledblackworkers
wouldhavetheadditionalbenefitofboostingdomesticdemand,industrialistshoped,
againstabackdropofdomesticrecession,oilboycottsagainstSouthAfricaandfalling
commoditypricesinthe‘70s.39
Oppenheimerpubliclyvoicedhissupportforblackunionsin1975,articulating
thepositiondevelopedin-housethatthecompanyneededtounionize.Thegovernment
resisted,butafterseveralyearsofbusinesslobbyingandthe1976Sowetouprising
appointedacommissionrunbyafavorablyinclinedacademic.Thegovernment
acceptedtheWiehahnCommission’srecommendationsandin1979,blackunionswere
legalizedandgrewrapidly.IthelpedthatoneofthecommissionmemberswasanAnglo
executive,perfectlysituatedtoadvocatethecompany’sposition.40Withinfiveyears,
blacktradeunionmembershipgrewfrom70,150to300,000by1983.41
Supportingblacktradeunionsalsohelpedbusinessunderminewhiteorganized
labor.Astheeconomygrewinthe1960s,thecolorbar,whichreservedskilledpositions
forwhitesworkers,begantohurtbusiness.Thisconstraintbecamemorecostlyas
industryexpanded,increasingthedemandforskilledworkers.42Recognizingblack
tradeunionsandremovingApartheid’sprotectionswouldhelpbringdownthecostof
whitelabor.43
-12-
Businessleadershadlittledoubtthatunionswouldleadtohigherblackwages
andamorepoliticizedworkforce.44Ontheindustrialfront,asOppenheimerputit,
apartheidkeptwageslowbutmadelaborchronicallyunproductive.45Politically,with
everyotheravenueofpoliticaloppositionclosedoff,itwasobviousthatblacktrade
unionswouldbecomethemagnetsforpoliticalorganizing.CyrilRamaphosa,aleading
ANCpoliticalactivist,ledtheNationalUnionofMineworkers(NUM)formedin1982
andhelpedcreatetheCongressofSouthAfricanTradeUnions(COSATU)threeyears
later.ItsoonbecameweldedintotheANCastheindustrialarmoftheliberation
struggle.46IndustrialistswhohadopposedthelegalizationcametoblameAngloandthe
otherswhohadlobbiedforitoncewavesofmassivestrikesbeganyieldinglargewage
increasesinthelate1980s,butbothatthetimeandinretrospectitsleadersthought
theyhadlittlechoice.47AsWoodemphasizes,bythemid1980sthelaborinsurgency
hadeffectivelydestroyedtheeconomicandpoliticalstatusquoasacontinuingoption.48
Butthisdidnotmeantherewouldbeapeacefultransitiontodemocracy.
Fromthemid-1980s,foreigngovernmentsandbusinessescutmanyeconomic
tieswithSouthAfrica,bolsteringbusinessmotivationtochangethestatusquo.In1985,
internationalbanksbeganrefusingtorollovershort-termdebtwiththeresultthat,
overthenextyear,thecountrywouldhavetopayonebillionUSdollarsinloans.
Inflationroseto16percent,thecurrencytumbledandthegovernmentintroduced
exchangecontrols.By1986,over100multinationalshaddisinvestedfromSouth
Africa.49ThiscreatedsomeopportunitiesforSouthAfricanfirmstodiversifybypicking
uptheirassets,butgrowingisolationina“hothouseeconomy”leftthemfallingbehind
internationalcompetitors.50
Businessleadersalsomadeconnectionswiththeliberationmovementasa
byproductofeffortstoeffortsbybankersandstockbrokerstoattractforeigncapital.
Wheninternationalboycottsbeganrampingupinthe1970s,stockbrokersand
investmentfirmsbegantryingtocountertheireffectsbyinvitingforeigninvestorsto
thecountrytopersuadethemthatSouthAfricahadafuture.Theyorganizeddozensof
tripsinwhichpotentialinvestorstouredminesandfactories,wereintroducedto
governmentofficials,andparticipatedinconferences.Theyalsometwithleadersofthe
liberationmovement,despiteoppositionfromthegovernmentwhoforbadeministers
-13-
fromattendingifanyonefromtheUnitedDemocraticFront(UDF,thelegalfront
organizationfortheillegalANC)waspresent.51
Theinvestmenttripsfailedtogenerateinvestmentorevenstemcapital
outflows,52buttheorganizersdevelopedvaluableconnectionswithANCleaders.Thisis
howSidneyFrankel,ChairmanofJohannesburg’slargeststockbrokers,gottoknow
CyrilRamaphosa,whomhelaterconnectedwithRoelfMeyeratafamousbonding
weekendoverfishingaccidentatFrankel’sfarm.5354Theimportanceofthissingleevent
isdebatable,butitunderscorestherealitythatbusinessleadersdevelopedpersonalties
withANCleadersthatpoliticianslacked,tiesthatbecameimportantlaterwhenthe
governmentfinallywantedtotalkbutdidnotknowwhomtotalkto,andwhenthey
foundthedistancesweretoogreatandneededintermediariestobuildbridgesandfix
themwhentheycollapsed.55
BusinessoverturestotheANCleadershipservedanadditionalpurpose,
connectedtothecollapseofSovietbloccommunism.TheCommunistPartyofSouth
Africa(formedin1921)haddissolveditselfinanticipationofbeingbannedbythe
ascendantapartheidgovernmentin1948andthenreemergedwithintheANCinthe
early1950s.PartofthereasonthatwhiteSouthAfricanbusinesselitessawnoreasonto
challengethegovernmentthroughthe1960sand’70swasthewell-knownSACP
influencewithintheANCleadership.Indeed,Rellyclaimedafterthe1985Zambiatrip
thathissolepurposehadbeen“todevelopajudgmentabouttheimportanceofthis
crummyMarxism,whichtheypurportedtoadvocate.”56
ButthepoliticalterrainchangedasSoviettheempirebegancomingapart.For
onething,theUSSRstoppedfunding,training,andequippingMKintheearly1980s,as
theSovietswentbrokefromthetwincostsoftheAfghanwarandtheStarWars-
inducedarmsracewiththeReaganAdministration.ThisforcedANCleadersseriously
toconsiderreturningtonegotiations,recognizingthatWesternpowersmightpushto
resolvetheSouthAfricaproblemwithoutthem.Therewasanotherimplicationfor
whitebusinesselites.Oncecommunismceasedtobeaseriousthreattheunthinkable
specterofanANCgovernmentstartedtobecomethinkable.Asthethreatof
internationalcommunismfaded,proponentsofapartheidlostakeymotivationtoresist
-14-
democracy.57Asonebusinessmanputit,“Iwokeuponemorningandrealized:wedon’t
havetohaveCuba;wecanhaveBrazil!”58
ThelossofSovietsupportalsomeantthattheANCwouldhavegreatdifficulty
sustainingitsarmedstruggle.MKhadmountedseveralbombattacksintheyears
followingRelly’sLusakatrip.59Somebusinessmenhadrefusedtoparticipateintalks
withtheANCbecauseofitsuseofviolence.ThecountrybecametenserasthePresident
declaredasecondstateofemergency,empoweringpoliceyetagaintodetainpeople
withouttrial.ButevenbeforetheUSSRbeganwindingdownmilitarysupport,some
businessmenwhometwiththeANCacceptedtheirargumentthatgovernmentviolence
wasworse.“ThereweremorepeoplekilledbytheagentsofthisAfricangovernment
thandiedasaresultoftheactivitiesoftheANC,”saidChrisBall,theCEOofBarclays–
thecountry’slargestcommercialbank.“Andtheviolentactivitieswereneveraimed
directlyatcivilians.”60
IfthefaultlineswereshiftingformainlyEnglish-speakingbigbusinesselitesby
themid1980s,thingsweredifferentforpredominantlyAfrikanerNPpoliticiansand
theirrankandfilesupporters.Manyofthemremaineddeeplyinvestedintheir
politicallychargedidentityasanethnicallypurechosenpeople,forwhomracial
compromisewasimpossible.Tobesure,therewerereformistAfrikanersintheNPand
instalwartinstitutionsliketheDutchReformedChurch.61SomeAfrikanerbusiness
groupseventooktheLusakatrek,althoughtwoAfrikanerbusinessmendroppedoutof
the1985RellytripwhenBothapubliclyopposedit.62ButmanyAfrikanerswhosawthe
needforchangeoptedfor“strategiesthatplayedintothereformistpossibilitiesoffered
bythesystem.”63“Enlightened”verligtesbattledconservativeverkramptesforthesoul
oftheNP.Butthishappenedgraduallyandsubtlywithinthecommunity,notthrough
opencondemnationoftheparty’sleadership.
InaparallelprocesstotheLusakameetings,verligteAfrikanersbegan
establishingtieswiththeANCatthebehestofthestate’sintelligenceservices.The
projectwasthebrainchildofMichaelYoung,pressdirectorfortheBritishmininghouse
ConsolidatedGoldfields.YoungmetANCleadersalongwithrepresentativesoftop
companiessuchasBarclaysandminingcompanyRioTintoin1986.64YoungaskedANC
leaderOliverTambohowhecouldhelpandTamborespondedbyaskinghimtobroker
-15-
meetingswithAfrikanersconnectedtothegovernment.6566Young’smoreconservative
boss,whofavoredtheIFP,explainedhisdecisiontookaytheprocess:“Apartheidwasa
formofgovernmentwhichcouldn’tlast.Itwasn’tamatterofrightorwrong.Whatever
theidealistsbelieved,itwaslikesocialism:itdidn’twork.”
Eightthree-daysecretmeetingswereheldoverthreeyears,atthecostof
betweenhalfamillionandamillionpoundstothecompany.67Thesemeetingswere
vitalforbuildingconfidencebetweenANCandAfrikanerpoliticalleaders,aswellas
identifyingareasforfuturenegotiations.Themeetingsalsofacilitatedcontactbetween
ANCleadersandheadoftheSouthAfricanintelligenceagenciesthroughoneofthe
participants,WillieEsterhuyse.68AsEsterhuyse,notes,itbecameobviousthatthe
governmentwouldhavetotalkdirectlytotheANC;everythingelsewasasideshow.But
“leadersanddecision-makershavetobehelpedtoembarkona‘loveaffair’withtrust
andconfidence.”69Businessprovidedthathelp.
III:TheConsultativeBusinessMovement
TheLusakatripledtothecreationoftheCBM.Afewseniorbusinessmenwho
manageditsaffairsweretheactivistcore.Theday-to-dayworkinvolvedestablishing
tiesbetweenthebusinesscommunityandrepresentativesofthemassdemocratic
movement.Buildingontheserelationships,theCBMmadethreenotablecontributions
toSouthAfrica’stransition.First,itcombinedforceswithreligiousleaderstomobilize
civilsocietygroupsforpeaceamidsttheviolenceoftheearly1990swhenpolitical
actorswereunabletofindcommoncause.Second,itprovidedinstitutionalsupport
duringthenegotiationstoendapartheid,usingthisroletokeeptalksontrackand
facilitatetracktwonegotiationswhentheycollapsed.Third,ithelpedmanagepolitical
spoilersdaysbeforetheelectionsin1994,smoothingatensionthathadthepotentialto
derailthetransition.
AlthoughtheCBMbecameasizeableorganization,itneverclaimedtorepresent
theentirebusinessspectrum.TheCBMexistedalongsideotherbusinessorganizations
suchastheUrbanFoundation,establishedin1976byHarryOppenheimerand
AfrikanerbusinessmogulAntonRuperttoadvocatereformstoimprovethesocial
conditionsofblacksinurbanareas.70TheUrbanFoundationcontributedtopolicy
debatesbutwaslessactivistthantheCBM.Moreover,theFoundation’smoderate
-16-
positionearnedtheopprobriumofgroupstoitsleftandright.Blackactivistssawitas
supportingapartheidandthegovernmentvieweditastoocritical.71Otherbusiness
groupsincludedchambersofcommerceandemployerrepresentativegroups.These
groupstookstancesonpolicyissues,suchaslaborlegislationorrestrictionsonthe
internalmovementofblackpeople,buttheirmandatewasmorenarrowlyfocusedon
businessconcerns.Moreactivistbusinessleadersfeltthattheprimaryconcernof
conventionalbusinessgroupswas“nottoantagonizegovernment”.72
FormationoftheCBM
Thepaceofengagingwithanti-apartheidactivistsslowedaftertheLusakatrip.
Onenewspaperattributedtheapparentdeclineofbusinessoppositiontoapartheidtoa
governmentinvestigationdesignedtointimidatebankerChrisBalloveraloanthathad
fundedadvertisingonbehalfoftheANC.Bothaorderedtheinquiryhimselfand
appointedaSupremeCourtjusticetoconductitaftermaking“veiledinnuendosabout
[Ball]inparliament.”73ThejudgefoundnoevidencethatBallknewthattheloanwould
fundproANCadvertising,butjudgedhimguiltyanyway,promptinganoutcryfromthe
legalfraternity.FormerjudgeturnedbusinessmanMervynKingorganizedapaid
newspapernoticesignedbysome40chiefexecutivessupportingBall,suggestingthat
thatthecampaigntointimidatebusinesshadlimitedimpact.74
BusinessleaderscontinuedsecretmeetingswiththeANC.Theyapproached
businessconsultantChristoNeltoaskhimtocontact“legitimatebroad-basedblack
leadership”ontheirbehalf.75BallhadpreviouslyhiredNeltotransformattitudes
towardracewithinthebank.NelwasalsopartofamostlyAfrikanerdelegationthat
visitedtheANCin1987.TwojournalistswhohadexcellentcontactshelpedNelsetup
meetingsbetweenbusinessleadersandthetopbrassoftheanti-apartheidmovement,
includingUDFheadAlbertinaSisulu.Thebusinessmenfacedlessdangerthantheir
activistpartners,manyofwhomwereinhiding.Butsomebusinessmenwereharassed
fortakingpartinthetalks.76
EighteenmonthsoffurtiveinvolvementledtothecreationoftheCBMinAugust
of1988.Some80leadersofbusinessandpro-democraticgroups,mostlyfromtheUDF
andtradeunions,metfortwodaysinBroederstroom,thetrainingsiteofamining
companyroughlyanhour’sdrivefromJohannesburg.Athoroughaccountofthe
-17-
meetingproducedbytheCBMpaintsaportraitofatenseandattimesuncomfortable
encounterthatsucceededbecausekeyindividualsweredeterminedtofindcommon
groundandmovetheprocessforward.77
Thebusinessmenagreedtoformanorganizationinresponsetopressurefrom
theliberationmovementactivists,arecurringdemandthattheymadeagainatthe
encounter.“Justrememberthatvisionsandstatementsmakepeopleenthusiastic,”Nel
recallsUDFleaderAzharCachaliatellinghim,“Structuresmovethem.Wecannotafford
toonlymeetwithindividualsbecausewhentheindividualsgo,nothingstaysbehind.”78
ButthebusinessleadersatBroederstroomwerenotofonemind.Theystruggledto
agreeonacommonsetofprinciples,andafewrefusedtosupportanynameusingthe
word“democracy.”Eventuallytheyarrivedatanameandsetofmutuallyacceptable
goalsandprinciples.Theseincludedacommitmenttoanon-racialdemocracyandto
continuingconsultationwithallinterestgroupsanddemocraticmovements.79
TheCBMstaffeditssecretariatwithpeoplefrom“liberalandstudentactivists
circles,”whichgaveitcredibilitywithblackleadersandencouragedtheorganizationto
“venturewherethemorematurebusinessleaderswouldhavehesitated.”80This
includedpeoplelikeChristoNel,whowasthefirstteamleader,andTheunsEloff,CEOof
theorganizationfrom1990.LikeNel,EloffvisitedtheANCinDakar.Hereturnedhome
toatorrentofcriticismfromfellowAfrikanersandresignedasaDutchReformed
Churchminister.Eloff’ssocialostracismandprincipledstanceonapartheidearnedhim
therespectofmanyactivists.AnotherANCstudentactivist,ColinColeman,whowould
laterbecomeheadofGoldmanSachsforsub-SaharanAfrica,washiredbytheCBMin
1989.81Nel,EloffandColemanreportedtoasmallteamofseniorbusinessleaders.They
couldactwithoutconsultingthebroadermembership.Asaresult,theorganization
earnedareputationforbeingmorefleetoffootthanotherbusinessassociationsand
federations.82
Byearly1989,theCBMhadattractedover100businessestoitsranks.Itsfirst
memberswereEnglishspeakingbut,onceafewprominentAfrikanersjoinedthe
organization,moresignedup.TheCBMsetupregionalofficesandorganizedmeetings
aroundthecountrywithrepresentativesofpoliticalpartiesacrossthepolitical
-18-
spectrum,fromtheAfrikanerhardrighttoblacknationalists.83TheCBMalsoheld
meetingswiththeUDFinthecountryandANCleadersabroad.84
TheNationalPeaceAccord
Threeandahalfthousandpeoplediedinpoliticalviolencein1990,theyear
Mandelaleftprison.85Thousandsmorediedoverthenextfewyears,primarilyinthe
areasthattodaycomprisetheKwaZuluNatalandGautengprovinces.Muchofthe
conflicttookplacebetweenANCandIFPsupporters,withthestateplayingtheroleofa
“thirdforce”behindthescenestosowdiscordamongblacks.86Repeatedeffortsto
brokersettlementsnationallyandlocallyfailedintheabsenceofthird-party
enforcementcombinedwiththeactionsofstatesecurityactorsworkingtofoment
instability.87TheCBMwasvitalinensuringthatthispoliticalviolencedidnotscuttlethe
negotiationstoendapartheid.
InApril1990,ANCleadersthreatenedtowithdrawfromtalksabouttalksonthe
newconstitutionifPresidentdeKlerkfailedtomeetaseven-pointultimatum,which
includedstepstheybelievedwouldhelpquelltheviolence.88DeKlerkrespondedby
callinganationalpeaceconferencethefollowingmonththatdrewsome200delegates
fromacrossthepoliticalspectrum.Butitremainedasideshow.Convincedof
governmentcomplicityintheongoingviolence,theANCanditssupportersboycotted
themeeting,NewspapersreportedthatMandelawouldbewillingtoattenda
conferenceonlyifneutralpartiesorganizedit.89
TheCBM’sColinColemanandFrankChikane,headoftheSouthAfricanCouncil
ofChurches(SACC),leaptintothebreachtosecurebuy-inforasecondconferencein
thedaysbeforedeKlerk’ssummit.Bothbusinessandthechurcheshadmootedtheidea
ofapeaceprocesswithkeystakeholdersbefore,signalingtheiravailabilitytofacilitate
suchadialogue.ButtheIFPvetoedtheSACCasthesolefacilitatorsofanyprocess.They
considereditpartoftheproblemgivenitstiestotheANC.90Afacilitatingcommittee
waseventuallysetupbybothbusinessandchurchgroups,andthesecondconference
wentaheadinJuneyieldinganationalpeaceaccordandnational,regional,andlocal
peacecommitteesthreemonthslater.9192BarlowRandexecutivedirectorandDeKlerk
confidantJohnHallchairedthenationalcommittee.93
-19-
Businesscontributedfinanciallytothepeaceprocessandbysharingdispute
resolutionexperiencefromothercontexts.94JohnHalldrewonpersonaleffortstocalm
unrestinthesmalltownofMiddelberg,wheremanagersofaBarlowsubsidiaryhad
heldtheirownpeaceforumtheyearbefore.95Thisinitiativebroughttogethervarious
actors,rangingfromwhiteelectedofficialstoANC-aligned“comrades”inthetownships,
andledtoaseriesofprojectsthathelpedquelltheviolencethreateningthecompany’s
businessinthearea.96Moreover,businessmenlikeAndreLamprechtbroughtlessons
fromtherealmofindustrialrelations,motivatingtheinclusionofelementssuchas
internaldisputemechanisms.97
TheNationalPeaceAccorddidnothaltallpoliticalviolence,butpoliticianslater
acknowledgeditsimportanceinprovidingthemwithspacetoengageintalksabouta
politicaltransition.98TheAccordhadthefortuitousbyproductofbolsteringtheCBM’s
credibilityasnon-partisanandcommittedtopeacefulchange.99IndividualsintheCBM
secretariat,inparticular,gainedthetrustofpoliticalleadersonbothsides.Thiswould
beavitalresourceoncerealnegotiationsstarted.
MultipartyTalksonaNewConstitution
TheCBMplayedacriticalroleintheconstitutionaltalks.Thefirstround,called
theConventionforaDemocraticSouthAfrica(CODESA),beganinDecember1991atthe
JohannesburgWorldTradeCenter.Some400delegates,representing20different
groupsincludingthegovernmentparticipatedinthefirstsession.CODESAconsistedof
aseriesofworkinggroupsthatdeliberatedoverthenextfewmonths.TheCBM
providedsecretariatsupportalongwithcivilservantsfromthedepartmentof
constitutionaldevelopment,butitsmostimportantworkwasback-channelshuttle
diplomacyamongpoliticalleaderswhentalksbrokedown.100“Itdidnothappenoften
butinthosetwoyears,firstwithCODESAandthenafterwardswithmultiparty
negotiatingprocess,weoftensawaclashcoming,”saidEloff,theCBM’schiefexecutive,
“Wewouldthenjustalertsomeofthebusinessleadersandtheywouldtrytousetheir
contactstosaycanwedosomething,canwehelp?”Businessleaderssometimes
approacheddiplomats,especiallyambassadors,tohelpintervenetoprevent
breakdowns.OthersrecallEloffasanastutemanagerofdifficultmeetingswhogained
credibilityfromhisreputationasanAfrikanervilifiedbytheestablishment.101
-20-
WhentheCODESAtalksbrokedownfollowingamassacreinJune1992,theCBM
tackledsomeoftheintractableissues.102Thepowersofprovincialandlocal
governmentswereparticularlyfraught,especiallyfortheIFPandhomelandleaders
whowantedtoprotecttheirlocalbastions.“Butheleziwantedafullfederation,the
NationalPartywantedlessandtheANCdidn’twantanythingtodowithfederation,”
saidEloff.TheCBMinvitedinternationalexpertsandtechnicalexpertsfromthe
differentpartiestodraftareportondecentralizationandfiscalarrangementsina
federalsystem.Thewordingondecentralizationintheinterimconstitutioncame
straightoutoftheirreport.103
Inthethirdroundoftalks,whichbeganinApril1993,theCBMheadedthe
secretariatwithanexplicitmandatetohelpthepartiesresolvestickingpoints(Eloff
1999:332).BythentheCBM’ssecretariathadestablishedarapportwiththekey
playersandhadgainedthetrustnecessarytohelpnegotiatorsfindcommonground.
Oncetheinterimconstitutionwassigned,Eloffservedasthedeputyexecutivedirector
forthetransitionalstructuresetuptorunthecountryuntilelectionday.
BringingtheIFPintotheElections
TheCBMplayedakeyroleingettingtheIFPtoparticipateinthefounding
elections.Soonafterthemulti-partytalksresumedin1993,aprominentANCleader
ChrisHaniwasassassinated.Tostaveoffapopularupheaval,theANCandNPmadea
firmcommitmenttoholdelectionswithintheyear.TheIFPandwhiterighthadwalked
outofthenegotiations.Colemanrecallsthatexcludingthesegroupsfromtheelections
represented“animmensedangertothecountry…andtheunityofthecountryafterthe
election.”ButtheIFPwantedthedateoftheelectiontobesubjecttodebate,hopingto
pushitfurtherintothefuture.TheANCandNPrefused.Colemanwascentralin
bringingininternationalmediators,ledbyBritishForeignSecretaryLordCarrington
andformerUSSecretaryofStateHenryKissingertowhosoughttoresolvethisissuea
monthbeforetheelections.Theeffortfailedandthemediatorsleft.Colemanrecalls
thinking,“Wehadthepotentialforincredibleviolencetooccurwith,effectively,ten
daysleftbeforeApril27,1994.”104
OnemediatorwhoknewButheleziwell,KenyanprofessorWashingtonOkumu,
stayedbehind.OkumupersuadedButhelezitoparticipateintheelection.105
-21-
Immediately,ColemanbroughtCBMheavyweightsonboardandflewaroundthe
countryonanAngloAmericanjettoworkoutanagreementthatwouldensuretheIFP’s
participation.“Weliterallyhadhours,notdays,todealwiththis.”StickerswiththeIFP
nameandlogowereprintedintheUK,flowntoSouthAfrica,stuckatthebottomofthe
ballotandflownaroundthecountry.TheIFPparticipatedintheelectionsandbecame
partofthenewdemocraticgovernmentafter1994.
IV:ExternalandInternalChallenges
Tobeaseffectiveastheywere,businessleadershadtowincredibilitywiththe
ANC.ThepersonaltrustrelationshipsthattheybuiltupthroughtheLusakatreks,peace
committees,andtheongoingCBMactivitiescouldonlytakethemsofar.Business
leadersalsohadtobeconvincingthattheywerecommittedtorealchange.Unlikethe
GroupofSevenbusinessorganizationsinNorthernIreland,whichproclaimed
neutralitythecontendingcamps,theCBMstakeditsfutureonregimechange.106The
advantagesapartheidhadgivenwhitebusinesstookthepossibilityofneutralityoffthe
table.Whatevertheirgripesaboutitscostsandinefficiencies,SouthAfricanbusiness
hadmadebillionsinprofitsbysustainingoneofthemostracistandunequalcountries
onearth(SouthAfricahadandhasoneofthehighestGinicoefficientsintheworld).
MandelacalledAngloAmericanoutonitsreluctanceseriouslytochallengethesystem
in1953,insistingthatitslimpsupportforchangewasacynicalefforttodivertthe
liberationmovement“withfinewordsandpromisesanddivideitbygivingconcessions
andbribestoaprivilegedminority.”107Businessleadershadtobecomecredibleas
activelycommittedtochange,anddemonstratethattheyhadboththewillandthe
capacitytotakeonthepowerfulforcesthatwouldresistthem.Theirhonestbrokerrole
before,during,andafterCODESAwasvital,butithadtobereconciledwiththefactthat
theywerealsomanifeststakeholders.
Therewasnooneelsetoplaythisrole.TheKissinger-Carringtonfailure
reflectedtherealitythatunlesstheingredientsofasettlementareclosetohandamong
theprotagonists,outsiderslackleveragetoimposeit.Churchgroups,whichhave
mediatedinothersettings,mirroredthedivisionsthatthenegotiationshadto
overcome.TheSouthAfricanCouncilofChurcheswasalliedwiththeANC,creating
difficultieswiththeIFPaswesaw.TheDutchReformedChurchembodiedtheevolving
-22-
tensionsanddivisionsamongAfrikaners.Aftermuchtortureddebateitsleadership
declaredapartheidasinin1989,butthedecisionprovokedmajorconflictandturmoil
withintheirranksandtheystillrefusedtoendorseoppositiontoapartheid.108109Inthis
SouthAfrica’swhitechurcheswerelikechurchesintheAmericanCivilWar,where
everydenominationsplitintopro-unionistandpro-secessionistcongregations.110
EsterhuyseobservesthatwhileSouthAfricanchurchleaderslikeArchbishopTutu,
AllanBoesak,ImamSolomans,andNazeemMohamedbecomeoutspokenonblack
socioeconomicrightsby1988,theAfrikanerwhitechurcheswere“lightyears”behind
them.Thisconvincedhimthat“withintheAfrikanercommunity,allhopehadtobe
pinnedonbusinessleaders.”111
Thestandardaccountofbusiness’simpactondemocratizationturnsonthreatof
exit.Whenexitcostsarehighforeconomicelites,usuallybecausetheirassetswouldbe
trapped,weexpectthemtoresistdemocratization.Especiallyinahighlyunequal
country,therichhavenointerestingivingthevotetopeoplewhowilltaxawaytheir
wealth.112Thisonlystartschangingascapitalmobilityincreasesandthethreatofexit
canforestallredistributivetaxation.Atthatpointtherichbeginlosingtheirinterestin
resistingdemocracy.113Thisiswhylandedaristocraciesopposedemocracywhereas
industrialcapitalistsdonot,andwhyrichcountriesfailtodemocratizewhentheyare
heavilydependentonspecificassetslikeoil,mining,oragriculture.114
InSouthAfrica,however,althoughthebigconglomerateswerequitediversified
aswediscussbelow,theywereheavilyinvestedinassetspecificindustries,notably
mining.Businesselitesstoodtolosesubstantiallyfromempoweringlabor,asindeed
happenedthroughthelegalizationofunions–whichtheynonethelesssupportedaswe
saw.Auniversalfranchisewouldpresumablyhavecomparableeffects.Capitalmobility
wasfurtherconstrainedbystrictcapitalcontrols,115andbythehighpersonalexitcosts
forindividuals.Unlikemostcolonialelites,theirfamilieshadoftenbeeninSouthAfrica
formanygenerations.Emigrationdidoutstripimmigrationforthefirsttimein1977,116
butthosewholeftweremainlypeoplewithpersonalnetworksabroad.117Bythemid
1980s,thosewhowerestilltherehadplentytolosebyleaving.Conventionalwisdom
wouldthereforepredictthattheywouldsupportthegovernment.Yetsignificant
-23-
playersthrewtheirweight,earlyanddecisively,onthesideofchangeaswehaveseen.
Thiswasessentialtotheircredibility,butwhydidtheydoit?
Theanswerliespartlyinwhiteelites’realizationthatthestatusquowasa
wastingasset.Hirschman(1970)tellsusthatwhenexitiscostlyvoicebecomes
correspondinglymoreimportant.118Theconventionalaccountmightberightthatthose
forwhomexitwasexpensivewouldresistdemocratizationiftheycould.Butifthey
couldnot,thenthenextbestthingistheTocquevilliansolution:getbehindthe
inevitablesothatyouarebetterpositionedtoshapeitscourse.119Thishelpsexplain
whySouthAfricanbusinessleadersinvestedsomucheffortinreshapingANC
perceptionsofwhatwashappeningtotheworldeconomy,whatSouthAfrica’splacein
itwouldandcouldbe,andwhytheyshouldabandontheirsocialisteconomicagenda.It
wouldtakeworktoensurethatBrazilratherthanCubabecamethemodel,workthat
whitebusinesselitesrealizedtheyhadtoundertake.
ThemeetingsbetweenwhitebusinesselitesandtheANCabouteconomicswere
notformalnegotiations,buttheymirroredthepoliticaltalksinonerespect.Negotiated
transitionstodemocracycanoccurwhenneithersideisstrongenoughtoimposean
outcomeunilaterally,butthereisapotentialcoalitionbetweengovernmentreformers
andoppositionmoderatesiftheycanescapetheirprisoners’dilemmaandreachan
agreement;convince,coopt,ormarginalizepotentialspoilersontheirrespectiveflanks
toacceptit;andbuildenoughcivilsocietysupportforthenewdispensationtomakeit
stick.120Analogously,neitherwhitebusinessnortheANCwereinapositiontoimpose
theireconomicvisionsonthecountry.121
Hencetheeconomicparallel.Thechallengewasforcentristsonbothsidesto
buildenoughtrusttofindamutuallyacceptableeconomicunderstanding;convince,
coopt,ormarginalizepotentialspoilersonbothsides;andbuildsufficientpublic
supportfortheneweconomicordertomakeitsustainable.InthewordsofUDFactivist
CasCoovadia:“Whilewerecognizethatbyandlargebusinessissupportiveofapartheid
andtheybenefittedfromapartheid,wealsorecognizethatbusinessisacriticalplayer
andwillbeacriticalplayerpostapartheid,andthattherearepocketsofbusinesswe
canworkwithwhocanbehighlyinfluentialinthecurrentgovernment.”122Inshort,the
businessmeetingswiththeANCandthepeacecommitteeswerejustasvitaltothe
-24-
outcomeastheirdiplomatic-cumpoliticalroleassecretariatofCODESAand
backchanneldiscussionsafterCODESAcollapsed.
Thebusinessleaderswhowantedtonegotiatebelievedtherewerepragmatic
leaderstoworkwithintheANC.“TheleadershipoftheANCwouldbemoreinterested
inaviableandvibrantSouthAfricaneconomythantheywouldbeintheMarxianform
ofeconomy,”GavinRellydeclaredafterhisLusakatrip.“Theywerepeoplewhocanbe
talkedtoandIamnotsorigidaboutmyownpointofviewthatIamnotcapableof
beingtalkedtoeither.”123124WorkingwiththeANCdidnotmeanadoptingitsviews.
“Therewerestillveryconservativeevenreactionarypeopleinbusinessaswellas
peopleontheothersideofthespectrum,”remarkedSpicer,whoparticipatedinthe
CBMonbehalfofAnglo.“Whattheywerealllookingforwasapragmaticwaytohave
changethatallowedthemtogetonwiththebusinessofdoingbusiness.”125Business
alsowantedadiscussionofthepost-apartheideconomybuttheANCwasnotprepared
totacklethattopicyet.
Thingschangedintheearly1990s,whentheANCbeganconfrontingpost-
communistglobalrealities.Thenengagementwithbusinessoneconomicpolicybecame
possible.SomeofthetalksinvolvedCBMleaders.Otherswerewiththeinternational
businesscommunity,suchasthethreeSouthAfrica-focusedforumsorganizedbythe
WorldEconomicForum(WEF)inSwitzerlandintheearly1990s.Mandelatoldhis
biographerthathebacktrackedonhiscommitmenttonationalizationafterhearingloud
andclearthatthiswouldforestallinternationalinvestmentinSouthAfricainapost-
apartheidworld.126
Theeconomicdiscussionsfedintothepoliticaldynamic.AngloAmerican
executiveBobbyGodsellwasoneofaseveralbusinessleaderswhousedtheirextensive
laborrelationsexperienceinpoliticalnegotiations.Henotedthatthattheinclusive
decision-makingpracticesthatemergedinthisperiod“modeledforthegovernmentthe
possibilityofnegotiationsthatcouldleadtoanewandacceptablepoliticalorder,rather
thansimply'defeat’.”127Thiswasonemorewayinwhichbusinessleadersreshapedthe
terrainonwhichpoliticalleaderswouldnegotiate.
MostEnglish-speakingbusinessleaders,evenbigbusinessleaders,hadlong
beenalienatedfromthecentersofpoliticalpower.128HarryOppenheimernevermetor
-25-
spokewithJohnVorsterinhisthirteenyearsasPrimeMinister.129Englishbusiness
leaderswerealsowaryofNPeconomicpolicy,withitsstrongcommitmenttoand
burgeoningparastatalspublicemploymentofAfrikaners.Itsinterventionistapproach
tothemarketteeteredontheedgeofnationalizationintheeyesofwhitebusiness,
cominguncomfortablyclosetoANC’sideologicalstance.Thisdifferenceineconomic
outlookreflectedthecontrastingculturalworldsofAfrikanerandEnglishspeaking
elites,whoattendeddifferenthighschoolsanduniversitiesandmovedinseparate
socialcircles.130Thereweresomeexceptions.Businesshadtheearoftradeand
industryministerDawiedeVilliersandyoungdeputyministerslikeRoelfMeyerand
LeonWessels,whowouldlaterbecomemajorplayers.131ButforthemostpartEnglish
businesselitesfoundpoliticalleadersinsulatedanduninformed.132
Asignificantaspectofwhiteelites’swillingnesstoembracedemocraticchange
concernscostsofrepressionthatarenotcapturedinpurelyeconomicmodels.Some
wereconvincedthatapartheidwasmorallyindefensible,andtheyfeltobligedtoget
helpridofit.Manyalsobeganchafingatitstollonthequalityoflife.Benhabiband
Przeworskisuggestthatthediminishingmarginalutilityofincomemakespeople
increasinglywillingtotradeitoffforotherthings,notablypoliticalfreedom.133
BenhabibandPrzeworskihaveinmindthewillingnesstotoleratesomelevelof
redistributivetaxationasthepriceforprotectingpropertyrightsandotherbourgeois
freedoms,butsustainingauthoritarianregimesthatrepressthepooralsocompromises
thosefreedoms.
AstheSouthAfricanconflictescalated,sodidthecostsofrepressionforwhite
elites.Compulsorymilitaryservicefortheirteenagesonswentfromninemonthstoa
yearin1972andthentwoyearsin1977,withmorefrequentandlengthycallbacks.134
After1976thisbeganmorphingintodistastefulanddangerouscrowdcontrolinthe
townships,nottomentionfightingrealwarsinNamibiaandAngola.Statesof
emergencymeanttheerosionofcivicfreedoms,fearofthesecuritypolice,andever-
moreintrusivecensorship.Sanctionsandinternationalpariahstatusmadetravel
irksome.Minorbycomparisonwiththerepressionbeingexperiencedbyblacks,these
costsofrepressionwerenonethelessincreasingwithnoendinsight.Thedesiretobe
-26-
ridofthempressedinthesamedirectionastheimperativetoshapeunstoppable
change.
Butthegovernmentwasboundtoresistbecausewhiteswhowerenotin
business,mostlyAfrikaners,wereamajorNPconstituency.Manyofthemfaced,and
presented,challengesthatarenotcapturedintheeconomicmodels.Tobesure,someof
whatAfrikanershadatstakewaseconomic.Farmershadland.Governmentworkers
hadjobs.Thosethingscanbemanagedtosomeextent–astheyeventuallywere–by
constitutionalguaranteesandprotectionofcivilserviceemployment.Butidentity
politicsareanothermatterbecauseitinvolvesindivisiblegoods.
Unlikedivisiblegoods,whichfacilitatepluralistpoliticsandcompromise,
indivisiblegoodsproducewinnertakeallpolitics.135Apartheid’sstalwartssaw
themselvesasaraciallypurechosenpeople,committedtoexclusivecitizenshipinan
ethnicstate.Yetanegotiatedpartitionwasnotaviableoption.Theapartheideconomy
dependedonmigrantlaborfromBantustansthatwerenotthemselveseconomically
viable.Asaresult,therewasnoremotelyequitablepartitiontowhichAfrikanerswould
agreevoluntarily.136Whitebusinesseliteswereboundtofacehardgovernment
oppositionwhentheybeganseriousoverturestotheANCthatthreatenedthislarge
partofitssupportbase.AnydoubtaboutthatwasscotchedintheMay1987general
election,inwhichtheNationalPartyincreaseditsoverwhelmingmajorityinParliament
to123outof166seatsandthebreakawayhardrightConservativeparty(whichhad
beenformedin1982toopposethegovernment’splanforaTricameralParliamentthat
wouldgivelimitedrightstoIndiansandColouredsinseparatechambers)won23seats,
replacingtheProgressiveFederalPartyastheofficialopposition.137
Apartheidrestedonprinciplesthatthatledtoapoliticsofindivisiblegoods,but
theANC’scommitmenttonon-racialismheldoutthepromiseofamoreinclusivefuture.
SouthAfricanshadseenIdiAminforceUgandanAsianstofleein1972,surrendering
thousandsofbusinessestootherUgandansandthestate.TheANC’sphilosophyofnon-
racialism,underscoredbyitscomparativelydiverseleadership(anironicconsequence
ofthemostlywhiteSACPleadershipwithintheANCelite),gavewhiteelitessome
reasontothinkthattheycouldworktogethertowardsacommonfuture–morelike
BrazilthanUganda.
-27-
Bigbusinesswasalsofortuitouslystructuredtoresistgovernmentintimidation.
Theeconomywascomparativelydiversified,138butownershipwashighlyconcentrated
inthehandsofafewlargeconglomerates.In1988,fivebusinessgroupscontrolled
fourthfifthsoftheJohannesburgstockexchange,withtheAnglo-AmericanGroupand
DeBeersalmosthalf(45.3percent)ofthat.139OrganogramsofAnglo-Americaninthis
periodshowasprawlingempirewithownershipoffirmsinmining,media,textiles,
automobiles,banking,propertyandchemicalswithatotalof1,350subsidiaries.140141
SouthAfricaalsohadahighlydevelopedfinancialsector,comprisingthecontinent’s
largestbanksanditsonlymajorstockmarket.
Historically,Afrikanershadlivedontheperipheryoftheindustrialand
commercialeconomies.TheNPpoliticalleadershipcamefromtraditionalAfrikaner
circles.Oncomingtopowerin1948,theNPtriedtochangethat,bypromoting
corporationsownedbyAfrikaners–particularlyinthefinancialsector.142But
Afrikanersworkedmainlyinfarming,smallbusiness,themilitary,thepolice,andcivil
service,andmostNPleadershadlittlebusinessexperience.Thismadethemrelative
price-takerswithrespecttobigbusiness.Thegovernmentwasnotinapositionto
intimidateSouthAfricanbusinessleadersasHitlerhaddonewithGermanbusiness.
HadtheyhadtriedtoseizeAnglo,theywouldnothaveknownwheretostart.Nodoubt
thisisagoodpartofthereasonthat,thoughtheycomplainedabouttheLusakaand
treksandenforcedprohibitionsagainstothergroupsthatmetopenlywiththeANC,
theyleftbusinessalone.143
Thesmallnumberoflargeplayersalsohelpedbusinesssolvewhatwould
otherwisehavebeensubstantialcollectiveactionchallengesinitsownranks.Thekey
playerswhomovedforwardwiththeinformalmeetingsthatbecamethecoreofthe
CBM[ChrisBall(CEOofBarclaysBank),NealChapman(CEOandChairmanofSouthern
Life),MikeSander(CEOofAECI),ChrisWyk(CEOofTrustBank),ZachdeBeer
(DirectoratAngloAmerican),MervynKing(Chairman,Tradegro),WillemvanWyk(MD
ofIscor)andAntonMostert(ex-judgeadvocate)]144constitutedwhatRussellHardin
referstoasaKgroup,whereKisthesizeofanysubgroupthatstandstobenefitfrom
providingacollectivegoodregardlessofwhethertheotherscontribute.145
-28-
InthiscasethemajorbusinessplayerswereaKgroupinthreesenses.In
Hardin’seconomicsensetheyinternalizedthecostsoffurnishingthecollectivegood:
theyfundedmeetings,thecostsofservingasCODESA’ssecretariat,theirsubsequent
shuttlediplomacy,andhelpedfundinfrastructureforthefirsttheelection.The
presenceofaKgroupalsomeantthattheycouldlimitdecision-makingcostswithinthe
CBMbymovingdecisivelywhenscoresofplayerswhomightdisagreeabouttacticsor
strategymighthaveledtoparalysis.146OncetheCBMwasestablished,thesecretariat
ranthingsinclosecoordinationwithasmallgroupofseniorbusinessmen.147A1997
CBMmemonotedthatthisgroupwasa“soundingboard”and“quickdecision-making
mechanism”thatwas“verynecessary,especiallygiventhehighdegreeoffluidityof
circumstancesatthetime,”148InthissensetheCBMenjoyedtheadvantagesoffnot
beinghighlydeliberative.149150
Third,theywereakindofpoliticalKgroupinthattheygavecovertosmaller
playerswhomightotherwisehavebeenintimidatedbythegovernment.Ball,who
approachedexecutivesfromsmallerfirmstomeetwithanti-apartheidgroups,
estimatedthattwo-thirdsofthemrefused.Butwhenaskedwhetherhepersonally
feareddetention,heexplainedthathewastoovisibletohavetoworry.“Toputinjail
theheadofthelargestbankinthecountrywhohadnotbrokenthelawwouldhave
beenquiteproblematicforhim[Botha].”151GavinRelly’s1985Zambiagambitwas
comparable.ANCNECmemberPalloJordan,whowasthere,notedthatbymeetingthe
ANCleadershipinexile,Relly“createdthepossibilityforotherorganizedbodies,
politicalandincivilsocietyinSouthAfrica,tomeetanddiscusswiththeANCwithout
fearofprosecution…Thefloodgates,inaway,wereopenforanyonewhowas
interestedenoughtocomeandmeettheterroristsbecauseGavinRellymetthem.He
wasn’tprosecutedsowhycan’tsomeoneelsecomeandnotbeprosecuted?”152
V:ComparativeConsiderations
Onereasontherehasbeensolittleattentiontotheplaceofbusinessin
democratictransitionsconcernsskepticismofthewholeenterprisethathas,somewhat
disparagingly,becomeknownastransitology.Allpathstodemocracydependon
contingencies.Negotiatedtransitionsinparticularexhibitathread-the-needlequality;
manyfactorshavetolineupfavorablyattherightmoments,andtherearealwaysmore
-29-
waysforthemtofailthantosucceed.Andexogenousfactorscanbedecisive,aswehave
seenhere.Withoutthecollapseofcommunisminthelate1980s,therequisite
realigningofinterestsandmotivationswouldnothaveoccurredamongthewhite
establishmentortheANC.Staterepression,supportedbypowerfuleconomicelites,
wouldarguablyhavebeenthelikelierresponsetothelaborinsurgenciesofthe1970s
andtheANCmighthavestuckwitharmedstruggle.Itisnotsurprisingthatscholarslike
Przeworskiet.alconcludethatthereislittlesystematictosayabouttransitions,and
thatthebetterfocusisonhowlikelydemocraciesaretosurvive–nomatterhowthey
comeabout.153
Weareskepticaloftheskepticism.Predictingtheoutcomeofnegotiated
transitionsisindeedamug’sgame.Aswellasexternalfactors,theydependonthe
availabilityofleaderswithunusualhumanskillsandthewillingnesstotakegreat
personalrisks.154Thisisalsoinherentlyunpredictable.Butotherthingsalsoaffectthe
likelihoodoftransitions.Junget.alnote,forinstance,thatthatitisvanishinglyunlikely
thatagovernmentwillnegotiateatransitionunlessitssupportersbelievethatthe
statusquoisunsustainable.155WhenJerryAdamsemergedasanIRAleaderwho
seemedtohavetherequisiteleadershipskillsin1983,therewasmuchspeculationover
thepossibilityofanegotiatedsettlement.ButbecauseMargaretThatcher’smajorityat
WestminsterdependedontheUnionistMPsinUlster,farfrombeingawastingassetthe
statusquowasindispensible.ThatwouldchangeonceLabourcametopowerin1997,
atwhichpointhavinganappropriateSinnFeinleaderdidmatter.Anagreementstill
couldnotbepredicted,butitisworthunderstandingwhyitbecamepossible.
Herewehaveseenthatactivebusinessinvolvementintransitionnegotiations
washugelyimportant,perhapsevenvital,totheirsuccess.Itishardtoseehowpolitical
leadersinSouthAfricawouldhavebeenabletobuildorsustainthenecessarytrustto
breakoutoftheirprisoners’dilemmaforlongenoughtostarttalks,sustaintheminthe
faceofspoilerswithotheragendas,orbuildenoughsupportfrombelowtoimplement
anagreement.Thisistosaynothingoftheimportanceofrecastingbusiness’sownrole
frombeinganimplicatedbeneficiaryofapartheidintoacredibleagentofprogressive
changewhosememberswerewillingtomakesubstantialsacrificestobuyindustrial
andpoliticalpeace.Withouttakingthenecessaryrisksonthatfront,byactively
-30-
supportingeconomicchangeanddefying–ifnotconfronting–governmenthardliners
overpoliticalchange,CBMleaderswouldnothavebecomecrediblefacilitatorsof
negotiations.
Understandingtheroletheyplayedhelpsevaluatetheprospectsforsuccessof
comparableeffortselsewhere.Forinstance,inMayof2013,attheregionalWEF
meetinginJordan,IsraelitechbillionaireYossiVardiandPalestinianoilmagnateMunib
al-MasriunveiledBreakingtheImpasse(BTI),a“strictlynon-politicalandindependent”
groupofbusinessleadersdedicatedtosettlingtheIsrael-Palestinianconflict.156BTI
receivedstrongbackingfromWesternleadersandWEFPresidentClausSchwab,who
declaredatitslaunchthat“themajorityonbothsidesoftheIsraeli–Palestinianconflict
yearnforpeaceandprosperity,andtheBTIprovidesafocusforthisenergy.”157The
groupclaimssome300members,accountingforsome30percentoftheGDPofIsrael
andthePalestinianAuthority(PA).BTI“callsonpoliticalleaderstoattachthehighest
prioritytowardsachievingatwo-statesolution”thatwillendtheconflict.Thegroup
“takesituponitselftobacksuchanendeavorandtogarnerdomesticandinternational
supportforit.”158BTI’smostvisibleactivitytodatehasbeenadvertisingcampaigns
exhortingpoliticalleaderstonegotiateatwostatesolution.Therealsoappeartohave
beensomesecretmeetings,thoughitisunclearwhohasparticipated.159
Evaluatinganinitiativeinitsinfancyischallenging,buttheSouthAfrican
experiencesuggestsfewgroundsforconfidencethatBTIwillhelpresolvethe
Palestinian-Israeliconflict.Foronething,BTI’smainagendaappearstohavebeen
holdingmeetingsattheWEFandotherinternationalvenues,andforIsraeliand
PalestinianbusinessleadersseparatelytolobbytheIsraeligovernmentandthePA
leadershiptonegotiateanagreement–withoutBTImembersthemselvesgetting
involved.Itishardtoseewhatvaluetheseactivitiescanadd.SouthAfricanbusiness
madeadifferencebyengagingthedeadlockedgroupsonthegroundtoconvincethem
thattherewasaviablefuturethattheyhadhithertodismissed.Itisunclearwhether
anythinganalogousispossibleintheMiddleEast,orjusthowitwouldchangethe
politicalequation.Butbusinesscannothaveanimpactwithoutengagingthe
constituenciestowhichdeadlockedpoliticiansrespond.
-31-
MostBTIactivityhasbeenontheIsraeliside,withPalestinianbusinesseselites
whosupporttheinitiativeconfrontingseriouslegitimacychallengesontheArab
street.160Tellingly,in2015theBTIwebsitecouldbereadonlyinHebrewandEnglish.
ThisreflectstherealitythatIsraelibusinessleadersdonotseethemselvesashaving
potentialPalestinianconstituencies.ArelateddifficultyconcernsBTI’sdeclarationof
neutrality.JustasbusinessneutralitywouldhavebeenineffectiveinSouthAfrica,
Israelibusiness,widelyseenbyArabsashavingbenefittedfromdecadesofoccupation,
cannotexpectPalestinianstoembracethemasneutral.AsonePalestinianmemberof
BTIputit,“Israelibusinessleaderslackthecouragetopushtowardpeace–nottowards
compromise.”161BTI’sunequivocalembraceofatwostatesolutioninanycasebeliedits
neutralityatatimewhengrowingnumbersofPalestiniansandtheirleaders,including
Fatahleaders,weredeclaringitunviableandcallinginsteadforabinationalstate.162
AseconddifficultyisthatnoneoftheBTIfoundingstatementsorpressreleases
envisagearolefor–orevencontactwith–Hamas.163ThismirroredthestanceofIsraeli
andWesternpoliticians,butitignoredrealityontheground.164TheSouthAfrican
analoguewouldhavebeenforbusinessleaderstoinsistondealingonlywiththeIFPon
thegroundsthattheANCwasaterroristorganization.InMiddleEast,thecostsof
refusingtodealwithHamaswerethrownintosharpreliefinAprilof2014,whenU.S.
SecretaryofStateKerry’ssponsorednegotiationsthatBTIhadbackedcollapsedandthe
PAleadershipandHamasannouncedtheformationofaunitygovernment.Atthatpoint
BTIactivistGadPropper(directorandformerCEOofOsemInvestments,oneofIsrael’s
largestfoodmanufacturers)concededthathedidnotopposenegotiatingwithHamas
because“peaceissomethingyoumakewithenemies.”ButheinsistedthatHamasmust
firstabandonterrorismandrecognizeIsrael.Otherwise,“there’snoroomfor
negotiations.”165
Propper’scommentsunderscorethegulfbetweenBTIthinkingandwhatwould
actuallyhavetohappentobreaktheimpasse.Ifin1985SouthAfricanbusinessleaders
hadconditionedtalkingtotheANC,likethegovernmentoftheday,onitssuspending
thearmedstruggleandrecognizingoftheNPgovernment,talkswouldneverhave
begun.Indeed,theANCneverrecognizedthegovernment’slegitimacy.WhentheANC
didsuspendthearmedstrugglethreemonthsafterthegovernment’sdecisiontorelease
-32-
allpoliticalprisonersandlegalizeallpoliticalorganizations,theydidsounilaterally.
TheANCrejectedallNPdemandsforMKtodecommission,andneverpromisednotto
reinstatethearmedstruggle.Wisely,theCBMandthegovernmentcontinuedthetalks
withtheANCanyhowuntiltheyreachedasettlement.166
Preconditionsaretheenemyofsuccessfulnegotiations.Theyinvariablybecome
targetsforspoilerswhowantthetalkstofail.167Constituentsoftenboxpoliticiansinto
preconditionsanyhow,butbusinessleaders,whodonothavetorunforoffice,have
moreflexibilitytogowherepoliticianscannotorwillnotgo.Buttheymustbewillingto
taketherisksofthinking,andactingon,theunthinkable.SouthAfricanbusinessdidthis
inthe1980s.Tohaveanimpact,BTIleaderswouldhavetotakecomparablerisksinthe
MiddleEast.
Arelatedissueconcernswhathappenswhenthepoliticalconditionsdeteriorate.
AfterIsrael’sOperationProtectiveEdgeinthesummerof2014,whichleftsome2,300
Palestiniansand71Israelisdead,itbecamehardtodiscernmuchBTIactivity.This,too,
wasdiscouraginginlightofSouthAfricanexperience,wheresomeoftheCBM’smost
importantworkwasdonewhenthepoliticalsituationwasatitsbleakest.Itwas
PresidentBotha’s1985RubiconSpeech,signalingintransigentNPresistancetochange,
thatconvincedmanybusinessleaderstogetinvolvedinthefirstplace.Itwaswhen
CODESAfellapartthatCBMleadersengagedintracktwodiplomacyaimedat
resuscitatingtalks.ItwaswhentheIFPwasboycottingandtryingtoderailthe1994
electionsthatCBMshuttlediplomacywentintooverdrive.Runningads,asBTIwas
doinginmid2015,thatdeclare“Withoutanagreementwewillnotbeabletopreserve
theJewishDemocraticNatureofIsrael”and“WithoutanAgreementwewillnotbeable
toLowertheHighCostsofLiving”signalnosenseofurgencyorinterestinanypointof
viewotherthantheIsraelione.168
Thisdifferenceisnotsurprising.Israelibusinesshasnotbeendesperateenough
tointernalizetherelevantcostsortaketherelevantrisks.TheIsraelieconomyhas,by
mostmeasures,beenincomparativelygoodshapesincethe2008financialcrisis.Israeli
businessdoesnotdependsignificantlyonPalestinianlabor,makingitmuchless
vulnerablethanwasSouthAfricanbusiness.169Israelhasnotfacedsignificantsanctions.
ThisenvironmentisradicallydifferentfromSouthAfrica’sdeteriorationinthe1980s.
-33-
Thecostsofrepressionhavenoterodedthebenefitsthatflowfromthestatusquo
enoughforbusinessleaderstotaketherisksinvolvedinpushingforrealchange.The
costoffoodishardlycredibleasmotivationtoembarkontheriskypathtowards
negotiationswithlong-timeadversaries.BouillonreportsthatIsraelibusiness
involvementintherunuptotheOsloaccordsintheearly1990failedpartlybecausethe
businesseliteswhoparticipatedwereinterestedinpeaceonlyontheirterms,toget
boycottslifted,andgainaccesstoregionalmarkets.170Todate,thesameseemstobe
trueofBTI.
Ademographicoxymorondoesindeedthreatentheviabilityofa“Jewish
democracy”makingthepoliticalstatusquounsustainableinthemediumterm,butitis
farfromclearthatademocraticalternativewillwintheday.Significantpartsofthe
IsraelirightappearincreasinglywillingtosacrificedemocracytoretainaJewishstate,
orperhaps–thoughfewwillsaythis–toengageinannexationandethniccleansing.171
IfthereisaMiddleEasternanaloguetoSouthAfricans’decisiontoembraceaunitary
democracy,itisunclearwhowouldsupportit.Evenifsomeinthebusinesscommunity
weretoentertainit,thereisnothingremotelyresemblingaKgroupwithinBTI.This
makesitdoubtfulthatanyonecouldshiftitscenterofgravityinanysuchrisk-
embracingdirection.Butpartitionismostlikelynotaviableoptionanymoreeither,
giventheentrenchedandgrowingsettlercommunityintheWestBankandthereality
thatthePalestinianeconomywouldnotbeviable.
OurfocusonbusinessintheSouthAfricantransitionshedslightontwodebates
aboutdemocratization,onepoliticalandoneeconomic.Thepoliticaldebateconcerns
whetherdemocracyemanatesprimarily“fromabove”asapactamongelites,or“from
below”–theconsequenceofanorganizedinsurgency.Junget.alrejectedthisdebateas
artificialinthatsuccessfultransitionsinvolvebothdecisiveactionfromaboveatkey
juncturesandbuildingsupportfrombelowtolegitimatetheemergingorder.172But
Junget.almissedtheroleplayedbybusinessatbothlevels.Theprisoners’dilemma
underlyingthenegotiationscreatedtheneedforathirdpartythatwasenoughofa
stakeholdertowanttoworkforacooperativeoutcome,butsufficientlyindependentto
betrustedbybothsides–especiallywhenthegoinggotrough.Businesswasuniquely
placedtoperformthatrole.
-34-
Withrespecttopressurefrombelow,theinsurgencyhadmadetheeconomic
statusquounsustainablebytheearly1970s.173Butthisdidnotmakeatransitionto
democracyinevitableorevenlikely.Acoup,protractedcivilwar,orsomenewbrutal
regimemighthaveresultedinstead.Afterall,whenIanSmith’sgovernmentunilaterally
declaredindependence(UDI)fromBritaininSouthernRhodesia1965,therewasno
effortbywhiteRhodesianbusinessleaderstofosterthedemocratictransitionthat
HaroldWilson’sgovernmentinLondonwasdemandingasthepriceforindependence.
Instead,underthreatofseveredeconomictiesandsanctions,theybackedarepressive
newwhiteminorityregimeagainstinternaloppositionandtheUK.Inreturn,after
SmithdeclaredUDI,hisgovernmenthelpedbusinessweatherthesanctionsby
stockpilingtobacco,subsidizingindustrialdiversificationandagriculture,andusing
publicemploymenttosavejobs.174175
Creativeinterventionbybusinessleadershelpedforestallthiskindofoutcome
inSouthAfrica.Indeed,wesawthattheirinteractionswithinsurgentleaders,whilenot
formalnegotiations,mirroredthestructureofthepoliticalnegotiations.The
legalizationofblacktradeunionsthatbusinesssupportedinthe1970s,andthe
corporatistmanagementofindustrialrelationsitusheredin,helpedcreatethisnew
order.Itbecameatemplateforfuturedealingsbetweenbusinessandlaborbothinthe
economyandintheserviceofpoliticalchange.
Theeconomicdebateconcernswhetherdemocracyarrivesonthebackofthe
bourgeoisie,asMoore(1966)maintainedor,asscholarslikeRueschmeyer,Stevens&
Stevens(1992)contend,onthewingsoftheproletariat.176Theviewthatemergeshere
hasmoreincommonwiththescholarshiponcorporatismandtheroleofcrossclass
alliancesincreatingwelfaresstates.177Theseliteraturesbeginbyrecognizingthatfirms
andunionsoftendonotoperateintheinterestsof“capital”and“labor.”Stigler(1971)
pointedoutlongagothatfirmslobbyforregulationsthatunderminecompetitionin
theirindustriesandPeltzman(1976)addedthatthestate’sresponsivenessis
conditionedbypoliticalconstraints.178Bythesametoken,unionsseeklaborlawsthat
shieldtheirmembersfromlabormarketcompetition–whichhascostsfornonunion
laborandtheunemployed.Corporatistarrangementsareessentiallycollusive
agreementstogetgovernmenttohelpfirmsandunionspursuetheircommoninterests
-35-
whileexternalizingthecostsontoothers.Itwouldbeanoverstatementtosaythatin
SouthAfricabusinessesandworkersplannedtocreatearegimethatwoulddothat.But
ithasbeenabyproductoftheircourtshipandmarriagedatingbacktothe1970s.
Thiscooperationbetweenbigbusinessandinsurgentunionsstandsareminder
thatgoodthingsdonotalwaysgotogether.Vitalasthatcooperationwastothepeaceful
demiseofapartheid,thedownstreameffectshavebeenmixed.Oneconsequencehas
beenalabormarketregimethatcontributestoexceedinglyhighlevelsof
unemploymentandmarginalizeslaborthatisoutsidethecorporatistbargaining
structures.179180Fourdecadesafterthewildcatstrikesthatusheredinbusinesssupport
forblackunionsandledtothecreationoftheNUMandthenCOSATU,aseriesofwildcat
strikeseruptedintheminesatMarikana,outsideRustenburgintheNorthWest
Province.Itculminatedinahorrificpolicemassacreof34miners.181Thestrikeswere
triggeredbyperceivedsweetheartdealsbetweenNUMrepresentativesandtheLonmin
mineownersattheexpenseoffrontlineworkers.182183Commentatorswerequickto
pointtothebitterironyofthislegacyoftheliberationstruggle,whichwouldhavebeen
unimaginabletoitsarchitectshalfacenturyearlier.184
VI.Conclusion
Itwasclearbythe1980sthatapartheidwasnotsustainable,butitwasnot
obviousthatchangewouldhappensosoonorwithoutmorecarnageandadescentinto
full-blowncivilwar.Ifthathadhappened,thereisnoreasonforconfidencethatthe
conflictwouldhaveendedinthecreationofademocracy.Yetinitiatingtalkswasabold
movethatcouldeasilyhavebackfiredforbothsides,destroyingthelivelihoodsand
evenlivesofthosewhotooktherisks.Stayingthecoursewasalsohard,withmassacres,
assassinations,andrecriminationsrepeatedlythreateningtoderailtheprocess.
Politiciansoneachsidepreferredpeacetodestroyingthecountrythroughrepression
orwar;neitherpartycouldachievethisoutcomeunilaterally.
Businessplayedavitalroleinhelpingthepartiesnegotiateitinstead.Byforging
connectionswiththeanti-apartheidmovement,businessleadersdevelopedtrust
relationshipsthathelpedgetthepoliticalelitestothetable,andwhichbusinesslater
utilizedtoplayanessentialintermediaryrolewhentalkscollapsedandviolenceflared.
Bysignalingtheiroppositiontoapartheid,businessleadersforced“enlightened”
-36-
governmentelitestorealizetheircommitmenttoapartheidwasillfated.And,though
businessleaderswereneverinvolvedinformalnegotiationsontheeconomy,they
convincedANCleaderstomoderatetheireconomicpolicy.Thisalsomadecompromise
withthegovernmentmorelikely.
Critically,thesmallgroupofpowerfulbusinessleaderswhotookpartinthe
processwerenotneutralthirdparties.Onthecontrary,theywereheavilyinvestedin
thesystemandhadagreatdealtolosefromfurthereconomicdeclineonthebackof
politicalupheaval.Thisbothmotivatedthemandgavethemthecredibilitytohelpthe
politicalactorsintheirstumblingeffortstobuildthetrustneededtocooperate.
BusinessleadersdidnotnegotiateSouthAfrica’stransition,butitmightwellnothave
happenedwithoutthem.Bankrunsareforestalledbydepositors’insurance;athird
partyguaranteethatgivesdepositorsenoughconfidencenottoescalatethecrisisintoa
catastrophe.Therearenothirdpartyguarantorswhenpoliticalconflictstartsescalating
towardcivilwar,butSouthAfricanbusinessleadersimprovisedwhatmighthavebeen
thenextbestthing.
Studyingregimechangeisabitlikestudyingearthquakes.Predictingwhenthey
willhappenishopeless,butplatetectonicscantellusalotaboutwheretheyareliable
tooccurandhowdangeroustheyarelikelytobe.Studyingtransitionstodemocracy
addsanotherchallenge:evenifwecanbeconfidantthataregimewilleventuallyfail,it
mightnotbereplacedbyademocracy.Thatoftendependsonunpredictablefactors.
Fewwouldclaim,forinstance,thatSouthAfricacouldhavetransitionedtoademocracy
intheearly1990swithouttherareleadershipskillsofNelsonMandelaandF.W.de
Klerk.Butnoonecouldhavepredictedthattheywouldbeintherightplaceattheright
timetoconsummatethedealthattheydid.Thisistrue,butwecanstilltrytoisolate
factorsthatmakedemocratictransitionsmoreorlesslikelyintheeventthatthe
contingenciesdounfoldfavorably.Nobodycouldhavenegotiatedademocratic
transitioninSouthAfricain1970.185Ourgoalherehasbeentoexplainhowandwhy
SouthAfrica’spoliticalgeologychangedenoughtomakeitpossibletwodecadeslater,
andtospelloutitsimplicationsforothertransitionalsettings.
Ourcentralfocushasbeenononeofthetectonicplates:business;principally
whitebigbusiness.Thereasonisnotthatitwasthemostimportant,butratherthatits
-37-
importancehasnotbeenfullyappreciated.Businessplayedmajorrolesinreshapingthe
perceptionsandagendasonbothsidesofthepoliticaldivide;increatingsocialsupport
foratransitiontotheneworder;inbuildingtrustandthenrepeatedlyrebuildingit
whennegotiationsstaggeredandcollapsed;inmanagingspoilerswhosoughttoscuttle
thetransition;andinensuringthatthefoundingelectionstookplaceasscheduledand
thatallpartiesacceptedtheresult.Thisdoesnotreadilytranslateintosomepercentage
ofthevarianceinexplainingdemocratictransitions,butitdoeshelpusseewhythere
areobstaclestotransitionsthatnooneelsewilllikelybeabletoremove.Understanding
whatittookforSouthAfricanbusinesstosucceedhelpsusevaluatepotential
transitions,bothwherebusinesshasbeeninvolvedandwhereithasnot.
-38-
Notes
1Byconventionalmeasuresofbattledeathsper1,000ofpopulation,partsofthecountrycrossed
thethresholdintocivilwarinthemid1980s.Bytheearly1990stheconflictintheeasternpartofthe
countrycertainlyhadcrossedthethreshold,seeNicholasSambanis,“WhatIsCivilWar?Conceptual
AndEmpiricalComplexitiesOfAnOperationalDefinition,”JournalofConflictResolution48(2004):
814-58.
2PrimeMinisterPWBothafirstused“Totalonslaught”inaspeechinParliamentin1978.It
quicklybecameshorthandfortheperceivedSovietagendaforSouthAfricaduringtheColdWar,see
WillieEsterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid(CapeTown:Tafelberg,2012),p.32.
3CourtneyJung,EllenLust-OkarandIanShapiro,“Problemsandprospectsfordemocratic
settlements:SouthAfricaasaModelfortheMiddleEastandNorthernIreland,”inIanShapiro,ed.,
TheRealworldofDemocraticTheory(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress2011),80-142,pp.110-
114,133-40.
4JamesReadandIanShapiro,“TransformingPowerRelationships:Leadership,Risk,AndHope,”
AmericanPoliticalScienceReview108,no.1(2014):40-53.
5SeePeterB.Rosendorff,“ChoosingDemocracy,”EconomicsandPolitics13,no.1(2001):1-28;
CarlesBoix,DemocracyandRedistribution(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress2003);Daron
AcemogluandJamesA.Robinson,EconomicOriginsofDictatorshipandDemocracy(Cambridge:
CambridgeUniversityPress,2006).
6JamesFearon,“RationalistExplanationsforWar,”InternationalOrganization49,no.3(1995):
379-414.
7Huntington(1991)callsdescribesconflictsas“transplacements”andPrzeworski(1991)calls
them“extrications.”Forfurtherdiscussion,seeIanShapiro“Democraticinnovation:SouthAfricain
comparativecontext,”WorldPolitics,Vol.46,No.1(October1993):121-50.
8ButhelezialsolostfavorwithhisformeralliesintheANCaftertransformingandtheZulu
culturalmovementInkathaintoanethno-nationalistparty,seeAllisterSparks,TomorrowisAnother
Country:TheInsideStoryofSouthAfrica’sRoadtoChange(Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress
1996).
9Asheputitinhisautobiography:“Ifwedidnotstartadialoguesoon,bothsideswouldbe
plungedintoadarknightofoppression,violence,andwar…Bothsidesregardeddiscussionsasasign
ofweaknessandbetrayal.Neitherwouldcometothetableunlesstheothermadesignificant
concessions…Someonefromoursideneededtotakethefirststep.IchosetotellnooneofwhatI
-39-
wasabouttodo…Iknewthatmycolleaguesupstairswouldcondemnmyproposal,andthatwould
killmyinitiativeevenbeforeitwasborn,”seeNelsonMandela,LongWalktoFreedom:The
autobiographyofNelsonMandela(Boston:Little,BrownandCompany,1994),457-8.
10HermanGiliomee,“SurrenderwithoutDefeat:AfrikanersandtheSouthAfricanMiracle,”
Daedalus126,no.2(1997):113-46.
11FortheANC’sreactiontotheRubiconspeech,seeOliverTambo,“ResponsetoP.W.Botha’s
‘Rubicon’speech,”Lusaka,August16,1985.
https://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv03445/04lv04015/05lv04016/06l
v04025/07lv04026.htm[11-03-2015].OntheresponseamongwhiteSouthAfricansseeHerman
Giliomee,“TheRubcionrevisited,”PoliticsWeb:NewsandAnalysis,20August,2008.
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/news-and-analysis/the-rubicon-revisited[11-03-2015].
12Thevetooverride(whichrequiresatwothirdsvoteinboththeHouseandtheSenate)made
theComprehensiveAnti-ApartheidActof1986lawonOctober2,1986.
13MargaretLee,“TheRepublicofSouthAfrica,”ConstantineDanopoulousandCynthiaWatson,
eds.,inThePoliticalRoleoftheMilitary:AnInternationalHandbook,(Westport,CT:GreenwoodPress,
1996),374-390,p.379.
14RobertAxelrod,TheEvolutionofCooperation(NewYork:BasicBooks,1984),p.138.
15JianzhongWuandRobertAxelrod,“HowToInterpretNoiseInTheIteratedPrisoner’s
Dilemma,”RobertAxelrod,ed.,inTheComplexityofCooperation(Princeton:PrincetonUniversity
Press,1997),33-39.
16IanShapiro,PoliticsAgainstDomination(Cambridge:HarvardUniversityPress,2016),pp.14-
20.
17AsMandela,LongWalktoFreedom,noted,failurewouldhavemeantoblivionforhim:“My
isolationfurnishedmyorganizationwithanexcuseincasematterswentawry:theoldmanwas
aloneandcompletelycutoff,andhisactionsweretakenbyhimasanindividual,notarepresentative
oftheANC.”Mandela,LongWalktoFreedom,pp.457-59,466-67.
18ReadandShapiro,TransformingPowerRelationships:Leadership,Risk,AndHope.”
19WilliamsRocky,“TheOtherArmies:ABriefHistoricalOverviewofUmkhontoWeSizwe(MK,
1961-1994),”MilitaryHistoryJournal11,no.5,(2000).
20Woodprovidesamodelofstrategicinteractionbetweenelitesandinsurgentsbutdoesnot
characterizeitasaprisoner’sdilemma.Rather,conflictisParetooptimalinitiallyandasinsurgent
mobilizationtransformstheplayers’payoffsovertime,itevolvesintoanassurancegame.Elisabeth
-40-
JeanWood,ForgingDemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouthAfricaandElSalvador
(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress2000),pp.213-18.
21AnthonyButler,CyrilRamaphosa(Johannesburg:JacanaMedia,2008),p.117.
22SheilaRule,“Bothascornsplanstotalkwithrebels,”NewYorkTimes,September9,1985
http://www.nytimes.com/1985/09/09/world/botha-scorns-plan-for-talks-with-rebels.html[07-13-
2015];AlanCowell,ThosetripstoLusakaaresendingsignalstoPretoria,”NewYorkTimesNovember
3,1985http://www.nytimes.com/1985/11/03/weekinreview/those-trips-to-lusaka-are-sending-
signals-to-pretoria.html[07-13-2015].
23Thesetripsincluded:adelegationfromtheProgressiveFederalParty,aliberalparty
representedinparliament,inOctober1985;eightuniversityofStellenboschstudentsinNovember
1985;AnglicanChurchdelegationinDecember1985;studentuniongroupsinMarchandApril1986;
CatholicbishopsdelegationinApril1986;organizedblackbusinessinMay1986;UniversityofCape
TownandUniversityoftheWesternCapedelegationinSeptember1986.HughMacMillan,The
LusakaYears:TheANCinExileinZambia,1963to1994(AucklandPark,SouthAfrica:JacanaMedia,
2013).
24JohnDugard,HumanRightsandtheSouthAfricanLegalOrder(Princeton:PrincetonUniversity
Press,1978),p.155.
25WillieEsterhuysereportsthatBothaplannedtoarrestthepredominantlyAfrikaans-speaking
delegateswhometwiththeANCinSenegalin1987,suggestingthattheintelligenceagencybossNiel
Barnardpersuadedhimagainsttheidea,Esterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid.
26InterviewwithPalloJordan,July162013.
27NealChapmanandPeterWrighton,“CivilSociety:TheRoleOfBusinessAndTheChurchesIn
FacilitatingTheTransition,”inSouthAfricaat10:PerspectivesbyPolitical,BusinessandCivilLeaders
(CapeTown:Human&Rousseau,2004),29-44.p.32.
28MichaelHiltzik,“ThepoliticsofprofitinSouthAfrica,”LosAngelesTimes,July9,1990.
http://search.proquest.com/latimes/printviewfile?accountid=15172[07-13-2015].
29Tooze,Adam,TheWagesofDestruction:TheMakingandBreakingoftheNaziEconomy(New
York:Penguin,2008),pp.99-134.
30DespiteHarryOppenheimer’soppositiontothetrip,hewasconsideredtobepoliticallyleftof
GavinRelly.Rellysupportedtheideaofatricameralparliament,whichOppenheimeropposed,see
StefanKanfer,TheLastEmpire:DeBeers,Diamonds,andtheWorld(NewYork,NY:FarrarStraus
Giroux,1993),pp.347,354.
31SaulDubow,Apartheid:1948-1994(Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,2014),p.244.
-41-
32TheunsEloff,“TheBusinessCommunityAfterApartheidAndBeyond,”IanShapiroandKahreen
Tebeau,eds.,inAfterApartheid:ReinventingSouthAfrica?(Charlottesville:UniversityofVirginia
Press,2011),105-35,p.106.
33Wood,ForgingDemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouthAfricaandElSalvador,p.
6.
34Moreover,theANChadlimitedinterestinestablishingtieswithliberalparliamentarians,
realizingthatanydialoguetoendapartheidwouldhavetotakeplacewiththeNationalParty.There
wasnoroomfortheliberalProgressiveParty,whoseanti-apartheidstanceinparliamentmeantthat
itwasalienatedfromtherealleversofpower.TheANCthusneededcontactsthatcouldhelpthem
penetratetheAfrikaans-speakingestablishment,observesWillieEsterhuyse,anAfrikaneracademic
whometwithexiledANCleadersonbehalfofthestate’sintelligencewing.Hemakestheadditional
pointthattheANCperhapsfeltagreaterkinshipwiththesocialdemocraticphilosophyoftheNP
thantheEnglish-speakingliberalpoliticians.Esterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid,35.
35GaySeidman,ManufacturingMilitance(BerkleyandLosAngeles,California:Universityof
CaliforniaPress,1994),pp.73,90.
36NicoliNattrass,“BusinessandEmployersOrganisationsinSouthAfrica,”OccasionalReport5,
EmploymentandTrainingDepartment(Geneva:InternationalLabourOrganization,1997),pp.11-
12.
37ElisabethWoodshowsthatintheearly1970s,strikingworkerscomprisedabouttwopercent
ofallworkers.Whilethiswasupfromclosetozerostrikeactivityinthedecadebefore,strikes
subsequentlyroseinthe1980s.Herdatashowthepercentofstrikingworkerssoaredtoahighof
over10percentafter1985,stabilizingatlevelsaroundthreetofourpercent.Wood,Forging
DemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouthAfricaandElSalvador.
38Angloarguedforallworkerstohavetradeunionrights,includingforeignnationsinSouth
Africa.Itwastheonlyminingcompanytodo,accordingtoAngloexecutiveBobbyGodsell(written
replyfromBobbyGodselltoquestions.21January2013).
39Seidman,ManufacturingMilitance,pp.128-130.
40Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,pp.116,124-5.
41HaroonBhorat,KarmenNaidooandDerekYu,“TradeUnionsinSouthAfrica,”CélestinMonga
andJustinYifuLin,eds.,TheOxfordHandbookofAfricaandEconomics:PoliciesandPractices
(Forthcoming)(OnlinePublication:OxfordUniversityPress,2014),p.3.
41JeremySeekingsandNicoliNattrass,Policy,Politics,andPovertyinSouthAfrica(London&
Johannesburg:PalgraveMacMillan,2015),pp.53-79.
-42-
42SeidmanManufacturingMilitance,pp.84-5.
43Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,pp.114-5.
44Godselllaterconfessedthatperhapstheynaivelyfailedtorecognizehowintensethepolitical
clashwouldbe,seeButler,CyrilRamaphosa,p.125.
45“I’veneverthoughtthatthepolicyofracialdiscriminationhadbeenagreatbenefittobusiness
becausewhileitmayhavehadtheeffectofkeepingwageslow,italsohadtheeffectofkeepinglabor
exceptionallyinefficient.Ibelievethatapartheidissomethingthatworksagainsttheinterestof
economicdevelopment,notforit.”MarilynBerger,“HarryOppenheimer,91,SouthAfrican
Industrialist,dies,”NewYorkTimes,August21,2000
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/21/business/harry-oppenheimer-91-south-african-
industrialist-dies.html[07-13-2015].
46InLusaka,GavinRellyaskedtheANCtokeeptheirfingersoutofthetradeunionmovement,to
whichANCexecutivecommitteememberMacMaharajrepliedthatitwastoolate,seeMacMillan,
TheLusakaYears:TheANCinExileinZambia,1963to1994,p.202.
47AngloexecutiveMichaelSpicerrecalledHarryOppenheimer’sviewonunions,saying,“Hesaid
thatinamodernindustrialeconomyit’smuchmorefunctionaltodealwithorganizedlaborthan
withdisorganizedlabor.We’dhadtheexampleofthestrikesinDurbanin1973,aseriesofother
strikesinthe1970sshowingwhatdealingwithdisorganizedlaborwaslike.Hesaidthegains,
despitethefactthattheunionswillbepoliticizedwillultimatelyinthelongtermbegreaterthanthe
problems.”InterviewwithMichaelSpicer,January10,2013.
48ElisabethJeanWood,“AnInsurgentPathtoDemocracy:PopularMobilization,Economic
Interests,andRegimeTransitioninSouthAfricaandElSalvador,”ComparativePoliticalStudies34,
no.8(2001):862-888.
49FrankCurtis,“ForeignDisinvestmentandInvestment–SouthAfrica1960-1986,”Zbigniew
Konczacki,JaneParpartandTimothyShaw,eds.,inStudiesintheEconomicHistoryofSouthernAfrica
(NewYork,NY:FrankCass&Co.Ltd,1991),175-210,p.199.
50InterviewwithMichaelSpicer,January10,2013.
51InterviewwithSidneyFrankel,March20,2013.
52Privateinvestmenttumbledfromaboutsixpercentofallcapitalstockintheearly1980stoless
thanfourpercentinthemid-1980s.Short-termcapitalflowsalsotookaseriousknock;in1985,the
countryexperiencedanetlossofUS$15billion(in1990dollars)andremainedinnegativeterritory
fortherestofthedecade,seeWood,ForgingDemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouth
AfricaandElSalvador,pp.153,156.
-43-
53MeyerallegedlygotafishhookstuckininhisfingerwhichRamaphosaremovedwithapairof
pliersaftergivinghimashotofwhiskeyandsaying“you’llhavetotrustme.”
54Sparks,TomorrowisAnotherCountry:TheInsideStoryofSouthAfrica’sRoadtoChange,pp.3-4,
177-9.
55TheMeyer/Ramaphosarelationshipmatterednotonlybecausetheyturnedouttobethe
principalNPandANCnegotiators.WhenthenegotiationscameclosetocollapseaftertheBoipatong
massacreinJune1992,theirjointeffortswerevitalinde-escalatingtheviolence,seeEsterhuyse,
Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid,p.294.
56MichaelHiltzik,“ThepoliticsofprofitinSouthAfrica,”LosAngelesTimes,July9,1990.
http://search.proquest.com/latimes/printviewfile?accountid=15172[07-13-2015].
57Wood,ForgingDemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouthAfricaandElSalvador,15.
58Anonymousinterviewwiththeauthor.
59In1985,theANC’smilitarywingsetoffabombataseasidetownaroundChristmasthatkilled
fivecivilians.In1986,anotherbombkilledthreepeople.
60InterviewwithChrisBall,July16,2015.
61HermanGiliomee,TheAfrikaners:BiographyofaPeople,2nded.,(Charlottesville:Universityof
VirginiaPress,2010),pp.487-585.
62MacMillan,TheLusakaYears:TheANCinExileinZambia,1963to1994,200.
63Esterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid,p.20.
64ThiswasoneofseveralmeetingsorganizedbyjournalistAnthonySampsonandformereditor
DavidAstor,seeRobertHarvey,TheFallofApartheid:TheInsideStoryfromSmutstoMbeki
(HampshireandNewYork:Palgrave,2001),p.15.
65TheANCaskedChrisBallfollowinghistriptoLusakabefore1985tohelporganizemeetings
withthegovernmentbutmoreconservativegovernmentleadersrefusedtheproposal(Interview
withChrisBall,July16,2015).
66Harvey,TheFallofApartheid:TheInsideStoryfromSmutstoMbeki,p.23.
67Ibid.,p.20.
68Ibid.,p.127.
69Esterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid,p.333.
70RupertheadedtheRembrantGroup,oneofthecountry’sfivemajorconglomerates.
71Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,p.107.
72Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,p.273.
-44-
73Membersofthelegalcommunityhavesubsequentlythiscaseanhistoricalillustrationofthe
executive’sabuseofthejudiciary.
74ChrisBall,incorrespondence.
75Ballrecalls,“I’llneverforgetatonestageaskingChris,“So,arethereanyparticularleadersthat
youhaveinmind?”Hiscommentwas,‘Ifweknewtheleaderswewouldn’tbeaskingyoutomake
contactwiththem.’Soascrazyasitsounds,1985-86wedidn’tactuallyknowwhowasit.”Interview
withChrisBall,July16,2013.
76“Afteroneofthelatenightmeetingsoneofthebusinessmenwasfollowedandtwonightslater
hishomewasattackedwithgunfire,”twobusinessmenlaterrecounted.“Withinthesamefortnight,
Christowaspulledofftheroadbyhoodedgunmenwhofiredathimashestoodbesidehiscar,”
ChapmanandWrighton,“CivilSociety:TheRoleOfBusinessAndTheChurchesInFacilitatingThe
Transition,”p.33.
77Forsome,thedeterminationtopersistarosefromaveryrealsensethattimewasrunningout
foranegotiatedtransition.AsonebusinessmansaidofNelsonMandelaatthemeeting,“Whatscares
meisthatthereisa70-year-oldclocktickingawayatPollsmoorPrisonandwhenthatclockstops
thistypeofopportunitymaynolongerexist,”seeMaxduPreez,GavinEvansandRosemaryGrealy,
eds.,TheBroederstroomEncounter:BusinessmeetstheUDFandCOSATU(Johannesburg,Consultative
BusinessMovement,1988),p.5.
78InterviewwithChristoNel,March20,2013.
79DuPreezet.al,TheBroederstroomEncounter:BusinessmeetstheUDFandCOSATU,p.78.
80TheunsEloff,“TheConsultativeBusinessMovement:1988-1994.ASubmissiontotheTruthand
ReconciliationCommission,”Unpublishedreport,December14,1997,pp.9-10.
81InterviewwithColinColeman,March05,2013
82GuyStanding,JohnSender,andJohnVeeks,RestructuringtheLabourMarket:TheSouthAfrican
Challenge(Geneva,Switzerland:InternationalLabourOrganization,2000),p.170.
83InterviewwithColinColeman,March05,2013andinterviewwithChristoNel,March20,2013
84InterviewwithColinColeman,March05,2013
85SAIRRtableinO’Malleyarchives
https://www.nelsonmandela.org/omalley/index.php/site/q/03lv02424/04lv03275/05lv03294/06l
v03321.htm
86TheTRClaterconfirmedwidespreadallegationsthatthestatehadarmedandtrainedtheIFP,
ranitsownhitsquads,andspreadmisinformationabouttheliberationmovements,seeAudreyR.
ChapmanandPatrickBall,“LevelsofTruth:Macro-TruthandtheTRC,”AudreyR.ChapmanandHugo
-45-
vanderMerwe,eds.,inTruthandReconciliationinSouthAfrica:DidtheTRCDeliver?(Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania:UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress,2008),143-168,p.167.87CraigCharney,“CivilSociety,PoliticalViolence,andDemocraticTransitions:Businessandthe
PeaceProcessinSouthAfrica,1990to1994,”ComparativeStudiesinSocietyandHistory41,no.1
(1999):182-206,p.187.
88PeterGastrow,BargainingforPeace:SouthAfricaandtheNationalPeaceAccord(Washington,
D.C.:UnitedStatesInstituteofPeace,1995),p.18.
89Kraft,Scott,“SouthAfricaisAnkle-DeepinBlood,”LATimes,May25,1991
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-05-25/news/mn-2013_1_south-africa[07-19-2015]
90Wren,ChrisopherS,“UnrestMediatorNamedbyDeKlerk”,May26,1991.
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/05/26/world/unrest-mediator-named-by-de-klerk.html[07-19-
2015]
91BusinessleadersreportedlyreachedoutdirectlytoButhelezitosecuretheIFP’sinvolvement,
thoughaccountsvaryregardingwhoinbusinessplayedthisrole.Gastrowsuggeststheinclusionof
SeanCleary,abusinessmanandpoliticalconsultant,securedtheIFP’ssupportfortheprocess,see
Gastrow,BargainingforPeace:SouthAfricaandtheNationalPeaceAccord.OthersmaintainthatJohn
HallandBobbyGodsellofAnglo-AmericanwereabletopersuadeIFPleaderMangosuthuButhelezi
toattendthemeeting,seeKimonPhitidis,“BarloworldCaseStudy,”Unpublishedreport,2006,20.
92Gastrow,BargainingforPeace:SouthAfricaandtheNationalPeaceAccord,pp.22-4.
93BarlowRandalsoletthedelegatesuseitsheadquartersforthemeeting.
94TheDanishandBritishgovernmentsalsocontributedsubstantialfunds.Itisunclearwhatthe
relativecontributionwasanditmaybethatthebulkofoperationalcostscamefromforeign
governments,seeGastrow,BargainingforPeace:SouthAfricaandtheNationalPeaceAccord,53.
95AccordingtoaBarlowmanager,ArchbishopTutu,whosurprisedtheparticipantsbyattending
theMiddelbergforum,concludedwithaprayerandtheremarkthat“ifwhatwashappeningin
Middelburgcouldberepeatedthroughoutthecountry,thanSouthAfricawouldhaveagreatfuture
aheadofit,”seePhitidis,“BarloworldCaseStudy,”p.17.
96“CaughtintheCrossfire,”leaderarticle(nobyline),FinancialMail,June14,1991.
97InterviewwithAndreLamprecht,March19,2013.
98InterviewwithRoelfMeyer,March20,2013.
99Thebusinesscommunitydidcomeundersomecriticismforsupportingtheprocessunevenly
andnotcommittingresourcesinthehardesthitareas.Theseconcernsunderscorethechallengesof
organizingadiversecommunitywithdifferentlevelsofresourcesandunderstandingsoftheir
-46-
responsibilitytohelpblackcommunities,seePhiroshawCamayandAnneJ.Gordon,“TheNational
PeaceAccordanditsStructures,”SouthAfricaCivilSocietyandgovernanceCaseStudyNo.1.Co-
operativeforResearchandEducation.Johannesburg,SouthAfrica,2000;Charney,“CivilSociety,
PoliticalViolence,andDemocraticTransitions:BusinessandthePeaceProcessinSouthAfrica,1990
to1994,”p.195.
100InterviewwithColinColeman,March05,2013
101InterviewwithCasCoovadia,November21,2012.
102CODESA’ssecondroundbeganinMay1992butsooncollapsedaftertheBoiphatongmassacre
ofabout50membersofaninformalresidenceinJune,killedbyhostel-dwellersaffiliatedwiththe
IFP.TheANCstormedout,accusingthegovernmentofcomplicityinthemurder.Communication
betweenkeymembersofthenegotiationsteamcontinued,however,andnegotiationsresumedin
April1993.
103InterviewwithTheunsEloff,November19,2012.
104OtherintervieweesdenythattheNPandANCagreedtointernationalmediation.Interview
withRoelfMeyer,March20,2013.
105OkumuwarnedButhelezithathewouldfacethemilitaryonslaughtofthenewgovernmentif
hepersistedinviolentresistance.Butheleziagreedtoparticipateintheelectionsonthecondition
thatthenewdispensationrecognizedthesovereigntyofthekingdomofKwaZuluandthat
internationalmediationoccurredaftertheelection.InterviewwithColinColeman,March05,2013.
106TheGroupofSevenrefusedeventotakeapositionintheMay1998referendumonthehard
wonGoodFridayAgreementthathadbeennegotiatedamongthekeyplayers.PortlandTrustReport,
TheRoleofBusinessinPeacemaking:LessonsfromCyprus,NorthernIreland,SouthAfricaandthe
SouthCaucasus(London:PortlandTrust,2013),pp.24-5.
107Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,p.122.
108GregMyre,“Afrikanerchurchwon’tdenounceApartheid,”WashingtonPost(March18,1989)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1989/03/18/afrikaner-church-wont-denounce-
apartheid/02940f2b-3128-45f6-bbbf-a142a7a2232e/[07-20-2015].
109BarryBotha,TheAfrikaner’sEmancipation:FreeingSouthAfricansfromtheirApartheidMindset
(Indiana:iUniverse,2008),163-5;HermanGiliomee,TheAfrikaners:BiographyofaPeople
(Charlottesville:UniversityofVirginiaPress,2003).
110DavidGoldfield,AmericaAflame:HowtheCivilWarCreatedaNation(NewYork:Bloomsbury
Press,2012).
111Esterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid,pp.136-7.
-47-
112AllanMeltzerandScottRichard,“ARationalTheoryOfTheSizeOfGovernment,”Journalof
PoliticalEconomy89,no.5(1981):914-927.
113Forasurveyofadditionalobstaclestodownwardredistributionincapitalistdemocracies,see
IanShapiro,TheStateofDemocraticTheory(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,2003).
114BarringtonMoore,TheSocialOriginsofDictatorshipandDemocracy:LordandPeasantinthe
makingoftheModernWorld(Boston:Beacon,1966);Carles,DemocracyandRedistribution,pp.38-44,
78-88.
115Capitalcontrolswouldnotberelaxeduntil1995,andtheANCgovernmentonlybegan
allowingSAcompaniestoshifttheirprimarylistingstotheLondonexchangein1998,seePatrick
Bond,2012.“Financialization,corporatepower,andSouthAfricansubimperialism,”RonaldCox,ed.,
inCorporatePowerandGlobalizationinU.S.ForeignPolicy.Routledge(London:Routledge,2012),
114-32.
116LeonardThompson,AHistoryofSouthAfrica3rded(NewHaven:YaleUniversityPress,2000),
p.221.
117Emigrationfiguresareoftenunreliable,butdatafromtheSouthAfricanInstituteforRace
Relationsshowsthat47,000peopleemigratedin1977and1978,twicethenumberineachyearas
insubsequentyears.Factoringinimmigrationinflowsrevealsthatthenetlosswasabout3,000
people.Thisdoesnotincludeblackeconomicmigrants.SAIRRfiguresinSallyFrankental,andOwen
Sichone,“Statesofemergency:Urbanresistanceandviolence,”SouthAfrica'sdiversepeoples:A
referencesourcebook(SantaBarbara,CA:ABC-CLIO,2005).
118AlbertHirschman,Exit,Voice,andLoyalty:ResponsestoDeclineinFirms,Organizations,and
States(Cambridge:HarvardUniversityPress,1970).
119DeTocqueville’s(1969[1835,1840])agendainwritingDemocracyinAmericawastoconvince
theFrenchAristocracythatflatoutoppositiontodemocracywouldfail,andthattheywouldbe
betterofflearningfromtheAmericansthatembracingdemocracywouldenablethemtoshapit’s
futurecourse.SeeespeciallythePrefacetothe12thedition,publishedin1848.AlexisdeTocqueville,
1969[Vol.I:1835,Vol.II:1840]DemocracyinAmerica,J.P.Mayer,ed.,(NewYork:PerennialClassics,
1969).
120SamuelHuntington,TheThirdWave:DemocratizationintheLateTwentiethCentury(Norman&
London:UniversityofOklahomaPress,1991);AdamPrzeworski,DemocracyandtheMarket:Political
andEconomicReformsinEasternEuropeandLatinAmerica(Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,
1991);CourtneyJung,EllenLust-Okar&IanShapiro,“Problemsandprospectsfordemocratic
settlements:SouthAfricaasaModelfortheMiddleEastandNorthernIreland,”IanShapiro,ed.,in
TheRealworldofDemocraticTheory(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,2011),80-142.
-48-
121SeeWood,ForgingDemocracyfromBelow:InsurgentTransitionsinSouthAfricaandEl
Salvador,p.5.
122InterviewwithCasCoovadia,November21,2012.
123ItwascleartotheANCinLusakathatpartofbusiness’sagendawastosteeritclearof
communism,recallsanANCmemberpresentatthemeetingwholaterwentontooccupyasenior
governmentroleafter1994(personalinterview,November23,2012,offtherecord).ForAnglo
executiveMichaelSpicer,theLusakameetingsrevealedthat“theANChadnomoderneconomic
thinking.”TheFreedomCharterwas“atbest,FabianSocialist;atworst,Stalinist”andeitherwaya
thirty-yearolddocument,saidSpicer.InterviewwithMichaelSpicer,January10,2013.
124Kanfer,TheLastEmpire:DeBeers,Diamonds,andtheWorld,p.354.
125Personalinterview,23Nov2012,offtherecord.
126AnthonySampson,Mandela:TheAuthorizedBiography(NewYork,NY:Knopf,1999),p.429.
127WrittenreplyfromBobbyGodselltoquestions.21January2013.
128TonyBloom,amajorSouthAfricanbusinessman,isquotedassayingthat“English-speaking
businesshasaboutasmucheffectongovernmentpolicyasaping-pongballbouncingoffastone
wall.”JesmondBlumenfeld,SouthAfricainCrisis(Kent:CroomHelm,1987),p.39.
129WrittenreplyfromBobbyGodselltoquestions.21January2013.
130Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,pp.120-1.
131MeyerandWesselsbothwouldbothbecomeseniorministersinthe1990s.
132InterviewwithSidneyFrankel,March20,2013.Butbusinesswasnotalwayssensitivetothe
constraintsofpoliticians,saidaformerverligtecabinetministerunderBotha.Theyoftenpresented
plansthatechoedoppositionviewsandviolatedgovernmenttenets,whichwas“untenable”.He
preferredtheapproachofpeoplelikestockbrokerSidneyFrankelandsomeAfrikanerbusinessmen
whometwithrisingstarsinthegovernmenttochatabouttheirexperiences,detailsthathecoulduse
indebateswithmoreconservativecabinetmembers.Interviewwiththeauthor,March23,2013,off
record.
133JessBenhabib,andAdamPrzeworski,“ThePoliticalEconomyofRedistributionunder
Democracy,”EconomicTheory29(2006):271-290.
134J.A.Kalley,E.Schoeman&L.E.Andor(Eds),SouthernAfricanPoliticalHistory:achronologyof
keypoliticaleventsfromindependencetomid-1997(Westport:Greenwood,1999),pp.357,425.
135IanShapiro,PoliticsAgainstDomination(Cambridge:HarvardUniversityPress,2016),pp.46-
61.
-49-
136Amulti-partycommissionsetupinearly1993todeterminenewregionalboundariesbefore
theelectionsexplaineditsdecisionnottodelimitaregionforanAfrikanerhomelandbecausethe
Afrikanergroupsthatitconsultedhadbeenunabletoagreeonalocation,seeRachelJacksonand
TumiMakgetla,“RedrawingtheMapforDemocracy,”ForeignPolicyOctober11,2013.
137WilliamSmith,“SouthAfrica:Alurchtotheright,”Time,May18,1987.
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,964393,00.html[07-20-2015].
138A2010OECD/UNstudyratesSouthAfricaandTunisiaasthetwomostdiversifiedeconomies
ontheContinent(OECD/UN2010:20).
139JoeGerson,“CorporateandFinancialStructures,”MerleLiptonandCharlesSimkins,eds.,in
StateandMarketinPost-ApartheidSouthAfrica(Boulder,CO:WestviewPress,Inc,1993),161-201,p.
165.
140Seeappendixfortheorganogram.
141Butler,CyrilRamaphosa,117;RobinMcGregor,1993.McGregor’sWhoOwnsWhom:Front
MatterThirteenthEdition(CapeTown:Juta&Co.Ltd,1993).
142BenFineandZavarehRustomjee,ThePoliticalEconomyofSouthAfrica:FromMinerals-Energy
ComplextoIndustrialization(London:Hurst,1996),pp.148-9.
143Thoughtherewereothersecretmeetingsthatthegovernmentknewaboutandeven
participatedin,seeEsterhuyse,Endgame:SecretTalkstoEndApartheid.
144TheunsEloff,“TheConsultativeBusinessMovement:1988-1994.ASubmissiontotheTruth
andReconciliationCommission,”Unpublishedreport,December14,1997,p.2;DuPreezetal.,The
BroederstroomEncounter:BusinessmeetstheUDFandCOSATU,p.3.
145RussellHardin,CollectiveAction(Baltimore,MD:JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress,1982),p.41.
146Thereluctanceofthebroaderbusinesscommunitytoincurthecostsofmeetingwiththe
leadershipoftheanti-apartheidmovementdidslowdowntheeffortsoftheKgroup.InJune1987,
only12businessleaderswerewillingtoputtheirnamestoapublicappealforthestateofemergency
tobelifted,anactionrequestedbytheirUDFcounterparts,andtheletterdidnotgoahead.Laterthat
year,aplanned20-asidemeetingbecameasix-asidewhentwothirdsofthebusinessdelegation
decidedtoleaveaheadofthearrivaloftheUDFandtheirallies.Themeetingstilltookplaceandby
thenextyear,businesswasabletoorganize40privatesectorrepresentativestomeetforaweekend
encounterwithpro-democracyactivists.Eloff,“TheConsultativeBusinessMovement:1988-1994,”
p.3.
147Atfirstitwastwoandthenfourseniorbusinessmen.Ibid.,p.10.
-50-
148TheCBM’ssuccesspointsoutatensioninorganizingbusiness.Bigbusinesscanoften
commandtheattentionofpoliticalelitesbutdialogueinstitutionsprioritizeinclusivity.Asone
executiveobserved,“Boththenandnowtherewerelotsofveryseniorbusinesspeoplethatsaid,“We
don’tneedthesebodies.IcancallthePresident…I’mnotgoingtositinlong-windedmeetingswith
otherpeople.’…Thatwasoftenfunctionalforthatindividualcompanybutdysfunctionalforthe
collectivebusinessinterest.”InterviewwithMichaelSpicer,10January2013.
149Businesselitestraditionallywereusedtobeing“moreindividualistic,self-motivatedandfast
moving”thantheircounterparts.Representativesofpro-democracyorganizations,bycontrast,
operatedaccordingto“anentirelydifferentprocessdictatedbyconsultation,andadherencetomore
clearlydefinedlong-termstrategy,”seeDuPreezet.al,TheBroederstroomEncounter:Businessmeets
theUDFandCOSATU,pp.35-36.
150HenryHansman,TheOwnershipofEnterprise(Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress,
1996).
151InterviewwithChrisBall,July16,2015.
152InterviewwithPalloJordan,July16,2013.
153AdamPrzeworski,MichaelAvarez,JoseCheibubandFernandoLimongi,Democracyand
Development:PoliticalInstitutionsandWell-BeingintheWorld,1950-1990(Cambridge:Cambridge
UniversityPress,2000),pp.89,91-103.
154Read&Shapiro,“TransformingPowerRelationships:Leadership,Risk,AndHope.”
155Junget.al,“Problemsandprospectsfordemocraticsettlements:SouthAfricaasaModelfor
theMiddleEastandNorthernIreland,”p.124.
156RimelHabibi,“IsraeliandPalestinianbusinessleaderssupportSecretaryKerry’seffortsand
DCtalks,”WorldEconomicForumnewsrelease(July29,2013)
http://www.weforum.org/news/israeli-and-palestinian-business-leaders-support-secretary-kerry-
s-efforts-and-dc-talks[07-22-2015].
157KlausSchwab,“BreakingtheimpasseintheMiddleEast,”ElArabiyaNews(May29,2013)
http://english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2013/05/29/Breaking-the-impasse-in-
the-Middle-East.html[07-23-2015].
158BreakingtheImpassewebsite.http://www.breakingtheimpasse.org/en/about-bti[07-22-
2015].
159JohnReed,“IsraeliandPalestinianexecutivesinMideastpeaceinitiative.FinancialTimes(May
23,2013)http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/6be56356-c389-11e2-8c30-
00144feab7de.html#axzz3gdTvdSdU[07-22-2015];GreerCashman,“IsraeliandPalestinianleaders
-51-
joinforces,”JerusalemPost(March25,2014)http://www.jpost.com/Business/Business-
Features/Israeli-and-Palestinian-business-leaders-join-forces-346383[07-22-2015].
160SeeJalalAbukhater,“OutrageasPalestiniantycoonMunibMasrihostsIsraelisettlermogul
withEgypt’sAmrMoussaandJordanex-PM,”TheElectronicIntifada(November5,2012)
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/jalal-abukhater/outrage-palestinian-tycoon-munib-masri-
hosts-israeli-settler-mogul-egypts-amr[07-31-2015]
161InterviewwithZahiKhouri,ChairmanofPalestinianInvestmentTourismCompanyandCEOof
PalestinianNationalBeverageCompany.January3,2016.Khouriaddedthatinhisjudgment
Palestinianbusinessleadersdifferedinthattheywerecommittedtopeace.FoundingBTImember
MosheLitchman(GeneralPartnerofIsraelGrowthPartners)notedthattheneutralitystancewas
necessarytokeepthediversemembersofBTIonboard,butthatitlimitedtheirabilitytopush
politicianstowardspecificgoals.Interview,December31,2015.
162DaliaHatuqa,“Israeli,Palestinianbusinessleadersseektobreakimpasse,”Al-Monitor
PalestinePulse(May24,2013)http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/05/israel-
palestine-economic-forum-business.html[07-22-2015].
163AtaNovember2013BTIconferencesponsoredbytheMiddleEastInstituteinWashingtonDC,
bothMunibAl-MasriandYossiVardideclinedtoansweraquestionfromIanShapiroaboutany
possibleroleforHamas.SeetranscriptoftheBTIkeynoteluncheon,November26,2013.
http://www.mei.edu/content/transcript-breaking-impasse-keynote-luncheon[07-23-2015].
164ReluctancetospeaktoHamaswasconfirmedinaJanuary4,2016interviewwithBTImemberEdouardCukierman(managingpartnerofCatalystinvestments)whosaidthatnodirectdialogis
possiblewithHamas,whichwouldinanycasenotpermitanyonefromGazatoparticipateinBTI.
AnotherfoundingBTImember,formerIDFBrigadierGeneralMichaelHerzog,observedthatcreating
aGazanegotiatingchanneltoHamaswhilecuttingoutthePalestinianAuthoritywouldbeharmfulto
Abu-Mazen,theonlyleaderinapositiontopushtowardatwostatesolutiononthePalestinianside.
HerzogthoughtthattheIsraeligovernmentwouldinanycaseinterveneifanyIsraelibusinessleader
triedtospeaktoHamasleaders.Interview,January3,2016.165Niv,Elis,“Breakingtheimpasseatanimpasse?”JerusalemPost(May14,2014)
http://www.jpost.com/Business/Business-Features/Breaking-the-Impasse-at-an-impasse-352207
[07-22-2015].
166Eventually,ontheeveofthe1994elections,MK,thearmedwingsoftheotherresistance
groups,andthehomelandarmiesweremergedwiththeSADFtoformtheSouthAfricanNational
DefenseForce.(Stott2002).Stott,Noel.2002.“FromSADFtoSANDF.”UniversityofWitwatersrand
ViolenceandTransitionSeries7http://www.csvr.org.za/wits/papers/papvtp7.htm[07-22-2015].
-52-
167EllenLustandIanShapiro,“Players,preconditions,andpeace:Whytalksfailandhowthey
mightsucceed,”IanShapiro,ed.,inTheRealWorldofDemocraticTheory(Princeton:Princeton
UniversityPress,2011),143-56.
168BTIransomecommercialsintherun-uptothe2015elections,butinterviewswithMoshe
Litchman(December31,2015)andMichaelHerzog(January3,2016)revealedthatBTIhadallbut
givenuponthepoliticalprocessandwasinsteadpursuingjointeconomicventureswithPalestinians.
169PalestinianworkersmakeuproughlythreepercentofallpeoplewithjobsinIsrael.The
Palestinianstatisticsbureaureportedin2015that110,300PalestiniansworkedinIsraelandthe
Israelisettlements.Moreover,thesearerelativelyunskilledjobs;about65percentofPalestinians
workedinconstruction(PalestinianCentralBureauofStatistics2015).PalestinianCentralBureauof
Statistics,“PressReleaseontheResultsoftheLabourForceSurvey.January-March2015Round,”
May19,2015.
http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/site/512/default.aspx?tabID=512&lang=en&ItemID=1397&mid=3172&wv
ersion=Staging[August6,2015]
TheIsraelieconomyemploysover3millionpeopleandsotheproportionofPalestinians
employedinIsraelisaboutthreepercent.MarkFedlman,“LabourForceSurveyData,Marchand1st
Quarterof2015,”April30,2015,Jerusalem,2.
http://www1.cbs.gov.il/hodaot2015n/20_15_110e.pdf[August06,2015]
170MarcusE.Bouillon,ThePeaceBusiness:MoneyandPowerintheIsrael-PalestineConflict
(London&NewYork:I.B.Taurus,2004),pp.105-12,166-72.
171ForalarminglyhighlevelsofIsraelisupportforethniccleansingseepollresultsreportedby
GideonLevyin“Survey:MostIsraeliswouldn’tgivePalestiniansthevoteifWestBankwasannexed,”
Haaretz(July23,2015)http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel/survey-most-israeli-jews-wouldn-t-
give-palestinians-vote-if-west-bank-was-annexed.premium-1.471644[07-15-2015].
172Junget.al,“Problemsandprospectsfordemocraticsettlements:SouthAfricaasaModelfor
theMiddleEastandNorthernIreland.”
173Wood,“AnInsurgentPathtoDemocracy.”
174IthelpedthatcountrieslikeSouthAfricaandPortugalmaintainedtradewithwhatwasthen
Rhodesia.RobertMcKinnell,“SanctionsandtheRhodesianEconomy.”TheJournalofModernAfrican
Studies7,no.4(1969):559-581.
Further,thegovernmentspentuptotenpercentofitsbudgetonsubsidiestoagriculture.Feeling
thepinchfromsanctions,organizedbusinesslaterurgedthegovernmenttosettlewiththeBritish.
Still,thevastmajorityofwhiteRhodesiansralliedbehindSmith’swhovowedtoprotectthemfrom
communismandBritain’sdesiretoerodethecountry’sindependence,seeRobertC.Good,The
-53-
InternationalPoliticsoftheRhodesianRebellion(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,1973),pp.82,
159,215.
175Good,TheInternationalPoliticsoftheRhodesianRebellion,pp.215,218.
176Moore,TheSocialOriginsofDictatorshipandDemocracy;DietreichRueschmeyer,Evelyne
HuberStevensandJohnD.Stevens,CapitalistDevelopmentandDemocracy(Oxford,UK:PolityPress,
1992).
177PeterSwenson,FairShares:Unions,Pay,andPoliticsinSwedenandWestGermany(Ithaca:
CornellUniversityPress,1989);PeterSwenson,CapitalistsAgainstMarkets:TheMakingofLabor
MarketsandWelfareStatesintheUnitedStatesandSweden(Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,2002).
178GeorgeStigler,“TheTheoryofEconomicRegulation,"BellJournalofEconomicsand
ManagementScience3(1971):3–18;SamPeltzman,“TowardAMoreGeneralTheoryOfRegulation,”
JournalofLawandEconomics19(1976):211-40.
179StudiesvarywidelyintheirestimationofunionwagepremiainSouthAfrica,withmorerecent
studiesplacinggreateremphasisoncontrollingforselectioneffects.Anexampleofthisisa2012
studybyBhoratetal,whichfindsthattheunionwagepremiumisabout6%,thebargainingcouncil
premiumfornon-unionworkersisabout10%and22%forunionworkersinpublicbargaining
councils.Previousstudiesfindpremiamuchhigherandinexcessof20%.Bhoratetal.,“Institutional
WageEffects:RevisitingUnionandBargainingCouncilWagePremiainSouthAfrica.”
180JeremySeekingsandNicoliNattrass,Policy,Politics,andPovertyinSouthAfrica(London&
Johannesburg:PalgraveMacMillan,2015),pp.53-79.
181Atotalof44peoplediedduringtheentirestrike.
182Inareportbasedprimarilyoninterviewswithworkers,PeterAlexanderconcludesthat
Marikanawasa“rankandfilerebellion,notaninter-uniondispute,”seePeterAlexander,“Analysis
andConclusion,”PeterAlexander,LukeSinwell,ThapeloLekgowa,BotsangMmopeandBongani
Xezwi,eds.,inMarikana:AViewfromtheMountainandaCasetoAnswer(AucklandPark,South
Africa:JacanaMedia,2013),136-162,p.137.
183Alexander,“AnalysisandConclusion.”
184JohnKane-Berman,“Violencearelicfromthepeople’swartomakeSAungovernable,”Business
Day(August20,2012).http://www.bdlive.co.za/opinion/2012/08/20/violence-a-relic-from-
peoples-war-to-make-sa-ungovernable[07-22-2015].
185Indeed,WalterSisulutoldAnthonySampsonthatcivilwarwouldnothavebeenavoidedeven
ifMandelahadbeenreleasedaslateas1985.DelaywasnecessaryfortheAfrikaners“tosoberup,”
seeHarvey,TheFallofApartheid:TheInsideStoryfromSmutstoMbeki,p.102.