Upload
agnes-butler
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Historical Evaluation of goods, water, weapons, etc. by humans
The rise of trading graders professional tasters
Systematic “sensory” analysis based on:◦Wartime efforts
Historical Development of triangle test
(Scandinavia)◦Food Science Dept at UC Davis (1965)
Sensory methods developed to serve economic interests◦Worth or acceptability of commodity◦Evaluates alternate courses optimizes value for money
The assessment of all the qualities of a food item as perceived by the human senses
Not merely food “tasting” it can involve describing food color as well as texture, flavor, aftertaste, aroma, tactile response, and even auditory response
Sometimes sensory analysis is used interchangeably with sensory evaluation.
IFT Definition of Sensory Evaluation:
The scientific discipline used to evoke, measure, analyze, and interpret human reactions to those characteristics of foods and beverages as they are perceived by the senses of sight, smell, taste, touch, and hearing
Primary function of sensory testing:
To conduct valid and reliable tests, which provide data on which sound decision can be made.
The role of sensory evaluation is to….
provide valid and reliable information to R&D, production, and marketing for management to make sound business decisions about the perceived sensory properties of products.
Sensory Evaluation as a Scientific Method
Incorporates the following:◦Identification of a problem◦The statement of a hypothesis◦An experimental strategy to investigate the
problem Strategy accomplished through data collection and analysis and a conclusion is reached that answers the original question
Sensory Evaluation as a Scientific Method
The conclusion either accepts or rejects the hypothesis according to the results of the study
Sensory Evaluation as a Quantitative Science
When numerical data are collected to establish specific relationship between product characteristics and human perception.
Human responses to stimuli are quantified.
Classified according to their primary purpose and most valid use
Critical to match test method to objectives of project
Three classes are most commonly used◦Affective◦Discrimination◦Descriptive
Each have a different goal and selection criteria for panelist
Discrimination Panelist are screened for sensory acuity,
oriented to test method, sometimes trained
Descriptive Panelist are screened for sensory acuity and motivation, are highly
trained
Affective Panelist are screened for product use,
are untrained
Formal Evaluation R&D at Corporate Offices (McDonalds, Maggie Moo’s Ice Cream, Wendy’s, Denny’s
Informal Evaluation Wait staff sampling daily specials; Customers-specials of the day; chefs- developing new menu items (trial/error)
We tend to perceive the attributes of a food item in the following order…..
Appearance Odor / aroma / fragrance Consistency and texture Flavor (aromatics, chemical feeling, taste)
Taste Odor Mouth feel
Trigeminal perception
Flavor
The overall impression of flavor is a combination of taste, odor, mouthfeel, and trigeminal perception
TASTE
Sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami
ODOR / VOLATILES
TRIGEMINAL STIMULI
Excitement
Variety & Interest
Basic Notes
The Flavor Pyramid Concept by Dr. Kilcast
Similar in concept with Dr. Kilcast Describes the development of flavor differently
At the base or foundation of his pyramid is Emotion, followed by Appearance, Aroma, Texture, Sensation, and at the top, Basic Tastes.
How do you incorporate sensory evaluation into your curriculum?
As a course offering•An introductory or first level course focusing on all aspects of sensory evaluation
As a component in an existing course•Incorporating elements of sensory evaluation within an basic culinary course•Utilize ingredient companies educational initiatives
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Scope (Introduction)•Information on the topic
•Basic tastes types•History on umami•What is it?•Where can it be found?•How difficult is it to identify?•Characteristics
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Test Objective(s)•Why is the laboratory being conducted?•What do you expect the students to learn?•Objective for this laboratory:
To recognize and evaluate umami taste qualities
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Materials and Methods for the Laboratory•What supplies are needed – can be time intensive•Include every step in the process – makes it easier the next time it is conducted
•Note adjustment or changes immediately after lab
•Include directions for the students•If demonstrating, include also
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Key Teaching Points•List here the teaching points for the labs•Just the “cake”, no “icing”•As students are completing the lab, these would be the comments to emphasize the objectives stated in the beginning.
Basic Tastes – Umami LaboratoryReferences
•Include all of your sources•When using web-based sources, include address and date accessed – information do change•Allows for students to complete further research•Gives credit to researcher and authors
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Supplemental Handouts
•Tables and forms for students data collection•Additional information to reinforce topic or objectives
Basic Tastes – Umami Laboratory
Tasting Grid
Brewed Lite Soy Sauce Brewed Soy Sauce Non-brewed Soy Sauce
Chocolate Sauce w/o Soy Sauce Soy-Infused Chocolate Sauce
Fresh Butter
• Mild, sweet, clean, pleasant flavor and a delicate aroma
• Appetite seems to “craves more of the product
• Reminiscent of the best “butter popcorn”.
Butter Buds® 8x
• Enzyme modification technology
• Highly concentrated flavor in convenient powder form – 400 x the flavor strength
• 1# of Butter Buds® 8x = flavor strength of ~ 8# butter
• Typical usage level: 1.0%-4.0% total batch weight
Diacetyl
• Greenish yellow liquid compound (CH3CO)2
• Occurs as a natural byproduct of fermentation
• Found in several dairy products (butter, cheese, milk), as well as bread, coffee, and rum
• Component of artificial butter flavoring
References:
Kaun, S. 2006. The multi-sensory flavor experience. Flavor & the Menu. Tigard, Oregon. Pg. 48-52
------ 2006. Building on the flavor pyramid. Flavor & the Menu. Tigard, Oregon. Pg. 55-58------ 2006 Flavor by Latitude. Flavor & the Menu. Tigard, Oregon. Pg. 48-52Kikkoman International, Inc. 50 California Street, Suite 3600, San Francisco, Ca 94111.
Website: www.kikkoman-usa.com McGee, H. 2006. When science sniffs around the kitchen. New York Times. Accessed
December 11, 2006 at http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/dining/06curi.html?ei=5024&en=8b5dee2a4bc205a5&ex=1...
Meilgaard, MM., Civille, GV., Carr, BT. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. 3rd Edition. CRC Press. New York
Murano, P.S. 2003. Understanding food science and technology. Wadsworth / Thompson Learning. Belmont, CA
Powell, J. 2006. The way we eat: file of dreams. New York Times. Accessed December 11, 2006 at http://nytimes.com/2006/12/10/magazine/10food.t.html?ei=5024&en=a2188a66370da7ed....