Upload
verity-franklin
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Expected Edits to October 2015 Coal Tracking Progress Page 1, 2 nd paragraph: Correct Figure 1 reference from 1996 to 2007 and 2000 to 2007 Page 1, Figure 1: Add San Juan 4 reduction between 2017 and 2018 (M-S-R and Anaheim) Page 5, Table 2: –San Juan 4: M-S-R and Anaheim exiting by 2018 (from 2022) –2024 Imports: Replace note regarding San Juan 4 with note that expected imports from IPP would be zero if repowering to NG occurs by 2024 Page 8, Table 3: Add to Rio Bravo Poso note the expectation of RBP generating through at least 2026 Page 8, 2 nd paragraph: Revise to mention M-S-R’s action on San Juan 4 and results 3
Citation preview
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Tracking Progress: Coal
Marc PryorSupervisor, Procurement & Modeling Unit
California Energy Commission
December 1, 2015
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Tracking Progress
• Energy Efficiency• Statewide Energy Demand• Renewable Energy• Electric Vehicles• Installed Capacity• Reliance on Coal• Transmission Expansion• Combined Heat & Power• Resource Flexibility• Once Through Cooling• American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009• California Clean Energy Jobs Act Proposition 39
http://www.energy.ca.gov/renewables/tracking_progress/
2
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Expected Edits to October 2015 Coal Tracking Progress
• Page 1, 2nd paragraph: Correct Figure 1 reference from 1996 to 2007 and 2000 to 2007
• Page 1, Figure 1: Add San Juan 4 reduction between 2017 and 2018 (M-S-R and Anaheim)
• Page 5, Table 2:– San Juan 4: M-S-R and Anaheim exiting by 2018 (from 2022)– 2024 Imports: Replace note regarding San Juan 4 with note that
expected imports from IPP would be zero if repowering to NG occurs by 2024
• Page 8, Table 3: Add to Rio Bravo Poso note the expectation of RBP generating through at least 2026
• Page 8, 2nd paragraph: Revise to mention M-S-R’s action on San Juan 4 and results
3
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Historic: Coal In-State & Net Imports 1993-2014
(From CEC Energy Almanac)
4
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%19
8319
8419
8519
8619
8719
8819
8919
9019
9119
9219
9319
9419
9519
9619
9719
9819
9920
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
1020
1120
1220
1320
14
Perc
ent o
f Tot
al G
ener
ation
In State Imports (net)
Low Water Yr
High Water YrHigh Water
YrTemp loss of some IPP gen
Loss of Mohave
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Tracking Progress: In-State Historic by Type 2001-2014 (QFER Data)
5 -
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Ener
gy (G
Wh)
Wind
Solar
Hydro
Natural Gas
Coal
Biomass
Geothermal
Nuclear
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Tracking Progress: Out-of-State CoalPercent of Share by Plant
(IEPR Filings)
6
Intermountain49%
Four Corners18%
Navajo14%
San Juan 9%
Reid Gardner 5%
Boardman 3%
Deseret 2%
2007
Intermountain64%
Four Corners20%
Navajo14%
San Juan 2%
2014
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Tracking Progress: Coal(From QFER Data & IEPR Filings)
7
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Ener
gy (G
Wh)
Energy from In-State Coal and Pet-Coke Plants
Coal EnergyImports
Total EnergySupplies from Coal
Actual Expected
Reid Gardner (555 MW) & SDG&E's Boardman
Contract (86 MW)
ACE Cogen (108 mW)
Intermountain Repowers to Natural Gas (from EIA
Summer Capacity of 1,800 MW to Expected 1,200 MW
Combined Cycle)
Navajo: LADWP's Portion (477 MW)
5 GWF Plants (95MW)and Stockton Cogen (55
MW)
San Juan Unit 3 (496 MW)
To Biomass: Mt. Poso (64 MW, 2011); Buena Vista (18
MW, 2012); and DTE Stockton (50 MW, 2014)
Intermountain PartiallyOut-of-Service in 2012
(900 MW)
TXI Riverside (12 MW, 2008) and Hanford
(24 MW, 2011)
In-State Plants
Out-of-StatePlants
C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N
Drivers in Reduced Reliance on Coal
• California’s Emission Performance Standard– Baseload (Annual CF of at least 60%)– Investment of at least 5 years
• Revision $2.5 M– 1,100 lbs / MWh
• Price of Natural Gas– Lower than coal
• Other regulatory pressures– Retrofitting– Regional Haze Rule– Clean Power Plan– Fly ash– Mining activities
http://www.energy.ca.gov/emission_standards/
8