View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 1
Development of spherical HPDs Development of spherical HPDs
for a Water Cherenkov Detectorfor a Water Cherenkov Detector
(initiated by C2GT study)(initiated by C2GT study)
A. Braem, E. Chesi, Christian Joram, J. Séguinot, P. WeilhammerCERN / PH
representing the C2GT team
www.cern.ch/ssd/HPD
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 2
Hybrid Photon Detectors (HPD)Hybrid Photon Detectors (HPD)
V
photocathode
focusing electrodes
siliconsensor+ FEelectronics
e-
light quantum
segmentedsiliconsensor
Combination of sensitivity of PMT with excellent spatial and energy resolution of silicon sensor
Gain:
Gain is achieved in a single dissipative step !
eV6.3CUeG
UC = 20 kV G ~ 5000
GFG small compared to electronics
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 3
Classical HPD designsClassical HPD designs
• Proximity focused• 1:1 imaging• Operates in axial
magnetic fields.
• ‘Fountain’ focused• Demagnification D• No real focusing
ballistic point spread• Intolerant to magnetic fields
• ‘Cross’ focused• Demagnification D• Focusing leads to
small point spread• Intolerant to magnetic fields
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 4
Main advantages of HPD technologyMain advantages of HPD technology• Excellent signal definition• Allows for photon counting• Free choice of segmentation (50 m - 10 mm)• Uniform sensitivity and gain• no dead zones between pixels
2 p.e.
Drawbacks
• Rel. low gain (3000 - 8000) low noise electronics required
• Expressed sensitivity to magnetic fields
CMS HCAL, 19-pixel HPD (DEP, NL)
Pad HPD
Single padS/N up to 20
1 p.e.
2 p.e.
3 p.e.
Viking VA3 chip (peak = 1.3 s, 300 e- ENC)UC = -26 kV
elec
tron
ic n
oise
cut
• e- backscattering from Si surface continuous ‘background’
det (p.e.) ~ 85-95 %
pulse height (ADC counts)
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 5
Some prototype developments for physics experimentsSome prototype developments for physics experimentsdeveloped and built at CERN
NIM A 442 (2000) 128-135 NIM A 478 (2002) 400-403
www.cern.ch/ssd/HPD
5-inch 10-inch
127 mm Ø, D ~ 2.5,2048 channels 1mm2
bialkali photocathode
NIM A 504 (2003) 19 NIM A 518 (2004) 574-578
254 mm Ø, D ~ 4,2048 channels 1mm2
bialkali photocathode
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 6
e, ,
CC reactionsin H2O
segmented photosensitive ‘wall’about 250 × 250 m2
Fiducial detectorvolume ~ 1.5 Mt
(E below threshold for production)
~ 50 m
e±, ± 42°Che
renk
ov lig
ht
Cherenkov light
Principle of neutrino detection by Cherenkov effectin C2GT (CERN To Gulf of Taranto)
The wall is made of ~600 mechanical modules (10 x 10 m2), each carrying 49 optical modules.
10
m
A. Ball et al., C2GT, Memorandum, CERN-SPSC-2004-025, SPSC-M-723
A. Ball et al., Proc. of the RICH2004 conference, subm. to NIM A
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 7
The ideal photodetector for C2GTThe ideal photodetector for C2GT
• large size (>10”)
• spherical shape, must fit in a pressure sphere
• ± 120° angle of acceptance
• optimized QE for 300 < < 600 nm
• single photon sensitive
• timing resolution 1-2 ns
• no spatial resolution required
• electronics included
• cost-effective (need ~32.000 !)
• adapted to industrial fabrication
120°
42°
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 8
Design considerations Silicon or dynodes ?Silicon or dynodes ?
silicon dynodesAngular coverage > ± 90° Angular coverage < ± 60°
TTS < 1 ns (FWHM) ? TTS ~ 3 ns
det (1 p.e.) ~93% (back scattering) det (1 p.e.) ~90%
‘delicate’ components (Si, ceramics) only metal inside tube
no magnetic shielding needed (to be verified !)
mu-metal shielding needed
Uniform response over ± 90° Uniform response over ± 25°
If silicon, p-i-n diode or APD ?p-i-n diode or APD ?
p-i-n APD
Signal at 20 kV: 5·103 e, G = 1 2-3 ·105 e, G ~ 50
Cd = 35 pF/cm2 , ENF ~ 1 Cd = 300 - 1500 pF/cm2, ENF = 2 - 5
detector size ‘arbitrary’ few sizes available (1,3,5 mm Ø, 5x5 mm2)
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 9
432 mm
(17”)380 mm
PAHV
optical gel(refr. index matching + insulation)
benthos sphere(432 / 404)
electrical feed-throughsvalve
standard base plate of HPD 10” (prel. version).
C2GT Optical Module
15
joint Si sensor
ceramic support
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 10
ElectrostaticsElectrostatics
Simulations Simulations with SIMION 3Dwith SIMION 3D
110º
-150 -100 -50distance from centre (mm)
-15000
-10000
-5000
0
5000
10000
15000
(V
) or
E (V
/cm
)
~ 1/r
E ~ 1/r2
• Potential and field distribution similar to a point charge.
• Low field at photocathode (~100 V/cm),
• Very high field close to Si sensor (~10,000 V/cm). Try to reduce by a grounded field cage around Si sensor.
- 20 kV
120º
- 20.3 kV
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 11
9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0Transit Time (ns)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
rel.
freq
uenc
y (a
.u.)
= 0.15 nsRMS = 0.18 ns
angles > 110°
0 20 40 60 80 100 1209
10
11
12
Tra
nsit
time
(ns)
polar angle (deg.)
0 < < 120°
Transit TimeTransit Time
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 12
Effect of angular spread and magnetic fieldEffect of angular spread and magnetic field
• Ekin(t0) = 2 eV (conservative)
• -40º em 40º (rel. to surface)
0.45 Gauss
B
E~1/r2 produces a focusing effect
effect of earth magentic field seems
to be marginal
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 13
0 V
~23
mm
500 V/mm
1000 V/mm
1500 V/mm
2000 V/mm
Is E-field around Si sensor too high ?Is E-field around Si sensor too high ?
A grounded grid could help
0 V
Gradients at Si sensor reduced to ~500 V/mm. High field around grid, f(diam.).
-11.000 V
Gradients up to 2000 V/mm at edges of Si sensor
500 V/mm
Grid at 0 V
Grid at ‘natural’ potential: -11 kV Grid at 0 V
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 14
A ‘half-scale’ prototypeA ‘half-scale’ prototype208 mm (~8-inch)
Al coating2 rings
Development in collaboration with Photonis-DEP, C. Fontaine et al.
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 15
Enevlope fabricated by SVT, France.
Sphere blown from a glass cylinder !
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 16
Current status: All components ready ‘dry assembly’. Processing soon.
First tests will be done with a metal cube rather than Si sensors
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 17
Fabrication
Large number of tubes needed industrial fabrication internal process (as for large PMTs).
However, this would lead to a ‘pollution’ of Si-sensor and high field region with Cs/K/Sb. protect by mask (difficult!) use ‘hybrid’ process ?
Q.E. monitoring
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 18
Processing in the existing set-up at CERN, used for 5” and 10” HPDs
10ӯ
Only minor mechanical adaptations required.
5ӯ
heating element
glass envelope Sb source
K/Cs sources
base plate with pre-mounted sensor
C. Joram CERN / PH International Scoping Study CERN Meeting September 2005 19
SummarySummary
A spherical HPD has been designed which promises to meet the C2GT requirements
Strong featuresStrong features• Large acceptance• Low TTS• Good signal definition
IssuesIssues• Low noise and short peaking time for large detector capacitance • Industrialization of production
A half scale propotype tube is under construction in collaboration with Photonis to prove the basic characteristics of this design.