Upload
doantruc
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
&
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH
1 5 Contract N7onr -35801
T. 0. I.
NR -041 -032
C3 CO
Technical Report No. 93
THE BEARING CAPACITY OF A FOOTING
ON A SOIL (PLANE-STRAIN)
by
R. T. Shield
GRADUATE DIVISION OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS
BROWN UNIVERSITY
PROVIDENCE, R.I.
August, 1953
All-93/10
All-93 1
THE BEARING CAPACITY OF A FOOTING ON A SOIL (PLANE-STRAIN)1
2 by R. T» Shield
Brown University
The purpose of this report is to outline a method of
showing that the Prandtl stress solution [ll to the plane-
strain problem of a flat rigid punch (or footing) is valid for
soils with cohesion whose angles of internal friction are less
than 75 degrees. Since a kinematically admissible velocity
field can be associated with the Prandtl stress solution [2],
limit analysis [3,1*] shows that the Prandtl value [l]
2,« p = c cot 9 [exp(* tan <p)tan (3 +*L) - 1] (1)
is an upper bound for the collapse value of the average pres-
sure over the punch, where c is the cohesion and 9 is the angle
of internal friction of the soil, A statically admissible ex-
tension of the Prandtl stress field into the rigid region is
found here, so that the value (1) is also a lower bound and
therefore the true value of the average pressure.
In Fig. 1, OE is the center-line of the punch OA
indenting the surface OD of the soil. The region OBCD is com-
posed of the Prandtl stress field of two regions of constant
state, OAB and AX, and a region of radial shear ABC. The Prandtl
The rosults presented in this paper were obtained in the course of research sponsored by the Office of Naval Research under Contract N7onr-3',*801 with Brown University.
2 Research Associate in Applied Mathematics, Brown University,
^Numbers in square brackets refer to the bibliography at the end of the paper.
All-93 2
field is continued to the line of stress discontinuity BSP which
is as yet unspecified. The stress field below this line is de-
termined from the following conditions, (i) ox and d are func-
tions of y only and x only respectively and i^ is zero, satisfy-
ing the equilibrium equations and the symmetry condition across
OE. (ii) In the im^odiate neighborhood of the line of discon-
tinuity, the material is in a plastic state of stress. These
conditions, together with the jump conditions [?] across the line
of discontinuity, are sufficient to determine the stresses in
the region BEFSB and to determine the line BSF. Figure 2 shows
the Mohr's circles for the states of stress on either side of
the line at a typical point S. It is found that, in region
BEFSB, o is a monotonic algebraically decreasing function of y
and Oy io a monotonic algebraically increasing function of x.
The yield condition is nowhere violated in this region if <p is
less than 75 decrees.
A perfectly plastir material may be considered as a
soil for which ?—* 0. Designating the shearing stress on a
plane of slip by k, it follows from the above that the value
(2 +n)k Is a lov/er an well as an upper bound for the collapse
value of the average pressure in the indentation of such a mater-
ial. A somewhat similar method has been used by Bishop [6] to
show the validity of the "compieto" solution to the v-notched
bar problem for a perfectly plastic material.
All-93
APPENDIX
The soil is assumed to be a plastic material in which
slip or yielding occurs in plane strain when the stresses satisfy
the Coulomb formula [7]
2(dx + °y)sln <P + ji(ox " °y)2 + Txy\ " - c cos 9 = 0. (2)
This equation and the two equations of stress equilibrium (in
which the weight of the soil is neglected) form a hyperbolic
system of equations for the determination of the stresses dx, 0
and x , The two characteristic lines are inclined at an angle xy
*A + ?/2 to the direction of the algebraically greater principal
stress and will be called the first and second failure lines,
with the convention that the direction of the first failure line
is obtained from the direction of the algebraically greater
principal stress by a clockwise rotation of amount itA + 9/2.
The angle of inclination of the first failure line to the x-axis
is denoted by 9.
It is convenient to put
(d~ - d,) p - ~± L > 0, (3)
2 sin 9
whore 0, and dp (d. < dp) are the principal stresses. From (2)
and (3) it can be shown [8] that
d = - p [1 + sin 9 sin(20 + 9)] + c cot 9,
d = - p [1 - sin 9 sin(2S + 9)] + c cot 9, ^
T = p sin 9 cos(2© + 9). xy
(»0
All-93 *••
The equations of equilibrium can be replaced by the relations [9]
•T cot op log p + 0 - const, along a firs* failure line, 7 (5)
•1 cot 9 log p - 0 = const, along a second failure line.
Across a line of stress discontinuity in a plastic
stress field, the normal and tangential components of stress must
be continuous across the line for equilibrium. The equilibrium
conditions across aline of discontinuity separating two plastic
stress fields a and £ can be written [5]
sin(Oa + ©. - 2Q + <p) + sin <p cos(©a - ©.) = 0,
p cos(2©a - 2Q + 9) = pb cos(20b - 2Q + <p)
(6)
where Q is the inclination to the x-axis of the normal to the
line at a current point of the line. Subscripts £ and jb. distin-
guish the values \;hich p and © assume on the two sides of the
line.
Referring now to Fig. 1, the surface AD is free from
traction and o = 0 in the constant state region ACD. Since
0 = •n/V - qp/2 in ACD it follows from the second of fiqs. (h) that
p has the value c cot p 1
(1 - sin 9)
in the region ACD. The first of Eqs. (5) then shows that at a
point G on the first failure line BCD,
p = ° COt * cxp {?. tan9 q - » - a)) , (7) (1 - sin 9) l 2 J
where a is the value of © at the point G,
All-93 5
It has been mentioned above that the material Just
below the line of stress discontinuity BSP is assumed to be in
a plastic state of 9tress, We shall denote by ^ and £ the two
plastic stress fields immediately above and immediately below
the point S respectively, where S is the point of intersection
of the second failure lino AG and the line of discontinuity.
Since the failure line AGS is straight, the value of p, pa, in
region j at S is also given by Eq, (7) and we have 0. = o* In
region jj at S, ux < o so that ©^ = %/k - 9/2. Also the normal
to the 1.ne of discontinuity at S is inclined at an angle
Q = K/2 - \J> to the x-axis, where 9 is the inclination of tho
lino to the negative x-axis. Substitution of these values into
the first of the jump conditions (6) gives
sin(j- + | + a + 2\|i) = sin 9 sin(£ + .? + a),
and the relevant root of this equation is
where ,n 9
;in p. = sin 9 sin(r + -5 + <*), 0 < p < 9. (9)
.Vith this value of 9, the second of tuJ jump conditions (6) gives
cos(r - a + >i - 3J) Pb = P ft cos(j| . a - ji - |) '
c Jl+sin29-2 sin9Cos(£ + 2 +a-ji)} > pb= .--i r~2 2 ^-exp {tan 9 (5 -<p -2a) ,(10)
(1 - sin 9)sLn 9 cos 9 l 2 J
where the value (7) for p., and Eq. (9) have been used. a
All-93 6
yrora Eq. (M-), the non-zero stresses in region Jj at the
point S are given by
d = - Pfc(l + sin 9) + c cot 9,
d = - p^d - sin 9) + c cot cp.
(11)
u
For equilibrium, d,, and 0 are taken to be functions of y only 'A y
and x only respectively in region BEFSB. The values of <*x and
d just below the line BSF are known from Eqs. (11) and (10) 30
that d and d can be found at any ooint of the region BEFSB. * y
It can be shown that p^ is a monotonic decreasing function of a.
It follows that just below the line BSF, a% and d are increasing
functions of a, and hence that in region BEFSB 0 is a monotonic
decreasing function of y and d„ is a monotonic increasing func-
tion of x.
This extension of the Prandtl stress field is permiss-
ible only if the yield condition is nowhere violated in region
BEFSB, i.e., if the expression on the left hand side of Eq. (2)
is less than or equal to zero at all points in the region. Be-
cause of the monotonic character of the stresses d and 0 , the
yield condition will not be violated anywhere in the rezion if
it is not violated at the point E at infinity on the y-axis. At
the point E, cx has an (algebraic) maximum value and d has an
(algebraic) minimum value and these values are
dx = - 2 c tan<* + *),
d = - c cot 9 exp(n tan <p)tan2(J - %) - X *, y L » 2 j
All-93 7
Substituting these values into the expression on the loft hand
side of Eq. (2) and setting the resulting expression less than
or equal to zero gives, after reduction, the inequality
exp(it tan 9) £ tan (5 + $).
The inequality is satisfied if the angle 9 is less than an angle
which lies between 75 and 76 degrees. Thus the yield condition
is nowhere violated in region BEFSfl if 9 is less than 75 degrees.
If the length of the line AS in Fig. 1 is denoted by
r, then we have
dr = rdCa + 9)tan(\Ji + 0 + 9), or
dr = rda tanC^P + | + & - £).
a = - nA - 9/2, determines the line it discontinuity. As a tends
to 71A - 9/2, the line tends asymptotically to a straight line
inclined at an angle TIA - 9/2 to the negative x-axis.
AU-93 6
Bibliography
1. "Ueber die Haerte plastischer Koerper". by L. Prandtl, Nachrlchten von der Koeniglichen Gesellscnaft der Wissens- chaften zu Goettingen, Matheraatisch-Physikalische Klasse, 1920, pp. 7*f-85.
2. "Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Soil Mechanics", by R. T. Shield, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 11, 1953, pp. 61-75.
3. "On Plastic-Rigid Solutions and Limit Design Theorems for Elastic-Plastic Bodies", by D. C. Druuker. H. J. Greenberg, E. H. Lee, and W. Prager, Proceedings of the First U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics, June, 1951» PP» 533-538.
h, "Soil Mechanics and Plastic Analysis or Limit Design", by D. C. Drucker and W, Prager, Quarterly of Applied Mathemati cs, vol. 10, 1952, pp. 157-165.
5. "Stress and Velocity Fields in Soil Mechanics", by R. T. Shield, Brown University Report All-81 to the Office of foval Research, December, 1952.
6. Private coTiunication from J. F. w*. Bishop to W. Prager, October, 1952.
7. "Theoretical Soil Mechanics", by K, Ter-saghi, John V/iley and Sons, Inc., New York, .J. Y. , 19^3, p. 22.
8. "Statics of Earthy Media", by V. V. Sokolosky, I^datolsvo Akademii Nauk S. S. R. , Moscow, 19^2.
9» "Die Bestiramung des Drucks an gekruemmten Gleitflaechen, eine Aufgabe aus der Lehre vora Erddruck", by F. Ko'tter. Monatsberichte der Akidrmic der Jissonschaften zu Berlin, 1903, pp. 229-233.
AM-93
Fig. I An extension of the Prandtl stress solution for a footing on a soil
All-93 10
(/)
O Q.
CO CO a>
CO
CO <D
o
k- o •*: en
a
JC o
en iZ
LZ
APPROVED DISTRIBUTION LIST FOR UNCLASSIFIED TECHNICAL REPORTS
Issued by
BROWN UNIVERSITY Contract N7onr-3?8. T. 0. 1
NR 0*fl 032
Office of Naval Research Washington 25, D. C.
M-2 Attn: Mathematics Branch (Code **32) M-l Mechanics Branch (Code ^38) M-l Physic§l Branch (Code >+21) M-l Metallurgy Branch (Code ^23)
M-2 Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 150 Causeway Street Boston l*f, Massachusetts
M-l Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Broach Office 3*+6 Broadway New York, New York
M-l Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 8Mf North Rush Street Chicago 11, Illinois
M-l Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 1000 Geary Street San Francisco 9, California
M-l Commanding Officer Office of Naval Research Branch Office 1030 East Green Street Pasadena 1, California
M-17 Officer-in-Charge Office of Naval Research Navy #100 Fleet Post Office New York, New York
M-9 Director Naval Research Laboratory Washington 20, D. C.
Attn: Scientific Information Division M-2 Library (Code 2021) M-l Applied Mathematics Branch (Code 383O) M-l Shock and Vibrations Section (Code 3850) M-l Structures Branch (Code 3860)
Bureau of Ships Department of the Navy Washington 25, D. C.
M-2 Attn: Code }6k (Technical Library) R-l Code £23 (Underwater Explosion Research) M-l Code Mf2 (Scientific Section, Design)
David Taylor Model Basin Carderock, Maryland
M-2 Attn: Library M-l Structural Mechanics Division
Naval Ordnance Laboratory White Oak, Silver Spring 19, Maryland
M-2 Attn: Library
Bureau of Aeronautics Department of the Navy Washington 25, D. C.
M-l Attn: AER-TD-J+Hf R-l Materials Branch R-l Design Elements Division
Bureau of Yards and Docks Department of the Navy V.'ashing$on 25, D. C.
R-2 Attn: Director, Research Division
r> _ j ~~,
Norfolk Naval Shipyard Norfolk, Virginia
M-l Attn: Technical Library (Code 2^3A) M-l UERD (Code 290)
Superintendent Aeronautical Structures Laboratory Building 600, Naval Air Experimental Station Philadelphia 12, Pennsylvania
R-l Attn: Experimental Structures Section
Office, Assistant Chief of Staff, (ok The Pentagon Washington, D. C,
M-l Attn: Research and Development Division
M-l The Chief. Armed Forces Special Weapons Project Department of Defense P. C. Box 2610 Washington, D. C.
U. S. Army Arsenal '.-/atertown 72, Massachusetts
M-l Attn: Dr. R. Beeuvkes
Frankford Arsenal Pitman-Duni Laboratory Philadelphia 37,
M-l Attn: Dr. Herbert I. Fusfeld 2
Plcatinny Arsenal Dover, New Jersey
M-l Attn: Mr. L. Oilman
Commanding General Air Materiel Command Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Dayton, Ohio
M-l Attn: Chief, Materials Division (DCRTS) R-l Head, Structures Lab (MCREX-B)
Department of Commerce Office of Technical Service Washington 25, D. C,
M-l Attn: Library Section
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics I72h F. Street NW Washington 25. D. C.
M-l Attn: Ch46f of Aeronautical Intelligence
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Langley Aeronautical Laboratory Langley Field, Virginia
M-l Attn: Library
National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory Cleveland Airport Cleveland 11, Ohio
M-l Attn: Library
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D. C.
M-l Attn: Dr, W. H. Ramberg
Director of Research Sandia Corporation Albuquerque, New Mexico
M-l Attn: Dr. R. P. Peterson
Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute 85 Livingston Street Brooklyn, Now York
R-l Attn: Dr. N. J. Hoff R-l Dr. H. Reissnor M-l Dr. F. S. Shaw (Dopt. Aero. Engrg. & Appl. Mech.)
Brown University Providence 12, Rhode Island
M-l Attn: Chairman, Graduate Division of Applied Mathematics
California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California
R-l Attn: Dr. J. G. Kirkwood R-l Dr. Pol Duwez
University of California Berkeley, California
M-l Attn: Dr. J. E. Dorn R-l DP, H. Hultgren R-l Dr, G. C. Evana M-l Dr. C, F. Garland
University of California Los Angeles, California
R-l Attn: Dr. I. S. Sokolnikoff R-l Dr. D. Rosenthal
Carnegie Institute of Technology Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
R-l Attn: Dr. J. S. Koehler R-l Dr. G. H. Handelman M-l Dr. E. Saibel R-l Dr. H. J. Greenberg R-l Dr. E. D'Appolonia
Case Institute of Technology Cleveland, Ohio
M-l Attn: Dr. W. M. Baldwin, Jr., Metals Research Laboratory R-l Dr. 0. Hoffman
Catholic University of America Washington, D. C.
M-l Attn: Dr. F. A. Biberstein R-l Dr. K. Hertzfeld
University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois
R-l Attn: Dr. T S. Ke R-l Dr. C. S. Barrett
Columbia University New York, New York
M-l Attn: Dr. R. D. Mindlin M-l Dr. H. Bleich
Cornell Univ3r^ity Ithaca, New York
R-l Attn: Dr. H. S. Sack R-l Dr. A. Kontrowitz
University of Florida Gainesville, Florida
M-l Attn: Dr. C. G. Smith
Harvard University Cambridge 3^» Massachusetts
R-l Attn: Dr. P.. von Kises R-l Dr. F. Birch, Drmbar Laboratory R-l Dr. H. M. V/estergaard
«V.J» J-jLil >i(J_iJ —S_ii~J <—1. •
^DioioapD., ^Illinois" -B-I ' i±±aii Dr.. 1L. X. Dnnrtell _&-'! Dr. X. TSBX. Griff.is
' &—1 XT. E. SiaSTBtser^
University of ZLlinuis
J6-& Attn: LT.'L ib Jfewmari:
iUl 1. ri. Dolar E~l IT. F* •,aeJta&, Derj&rtment of Fhysies is-3; Deoartsest-of -3^ear#T.i«R.L *nc Allies ";-*fe^h^gjfe^icw
M-l
Inniana University
Iiirtitut-e^rar Advanced Stia£y
R-l Priceeton, Ne* Jersey
'Iowa State College
R-I Ames, lova
lita: ' -Drw BJ /Murohy ST. Z. L. Hall
Johns Hopkins Dniversity- Sssltlraore, iisrylaij&
H-l At-KIT Dr. y&. -B. Heppm&n, 11
IV1 Director, Applied^ Physics. Laboratory Johns Hopkins University 8621 Georgia Averse Silver- Soring, Maryland
Le hi gh Un iv er si ty Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
R-l Attm Mr. Lynn-S. Beedle
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge 39» Massachusetts
R-l Attn: Dr. F. B. Hlldebrand R-l Dr. C. W. MacGregor R-l Dr. J. M. Lessels R-l Dr. W. M. Murray R-l Dr. E. Reissner R-l Dr. H. S. Tsien R-l Dr. K. Cohen, Rm. 8-'+13, Department of Metallurgy R-l Dr. B. L. Averbach, Dopartment of Metallurgy R-l Dr. J. T. Norton R-l Dr. E. 13rowan M-I Dr. R. Bisplinghoff,Dept. Aero. Bns:rt
University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
M-l Attn: Dr. Bruce G. Johnston it-1 Dr. Paul Nagdhi R-l Dr. N. Coburn R-l Dr. W. Kaplan
New York University Institute for Mathematics & Mechanics U-5 Fourth Avenue New York 3, New York
R-l Attn: Professor R. Courant R-l Dr. G. Hudson
New York University New York 53» New York
R-l Attn: Dr. C. T. Wang, Department of Aeronautics
Northwestern University Evanston, Illinois
R-l Attn: Dr. M. M. Hetenyi
University of Notre Dane Notre Dame, Indiana
R-l Attn: Dr. P. A. Beck
Ohio State University Coiambus, Ohio
M-l Attn: Dr. B. A. Bo ley
Pennsvlvania State College State College, Pennsvlvania
R-l Attn: Dr. M. Censsumer R-l Dr. J. A. Sauer R-l Dr. Joseph Marin R-l Dr. J. W. Fredrickson
Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey
R-l Attn: Dr. S. Lefschetz R-l Dr. L. Lees R-l Dr. J. V. Charyk
Rensseiaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, New York
R-l Attn: Library R-l Dr. Paul Leiber
Santa Clara University Santa Clara, California
M-l Attn: Dr. R. M. Hermes
Stanford University Stanford, California
R-l Attn: Dr. L. Jacobsen M-l Dr. A. Phillips, Department of Mechanical Engineering R-l Dr. J. N. Goodiar
Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken, New Jersey
R-l Attn: Dr. E. G. Schneider
Swarthjuore College Swarthmore, Pennsylvania
M-l Attn: Capt. W. P. Roop
University of Texas Austin 12, Texas
R-l Attn: Dr. A. A. Topractsoglou
University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah
M-l Attn: Dr. H. Eyring
Washington State College Pullman, Washington
R-l Attn; Dr. B. Fried
Wheaton College Norton, Massachusetts
R-l Attn: or, H. Geiringer
Aerojet, Inc. Azusa, California
R-l Attn: F. Zwicky
Aluminum Company of America New Kensington, Pennsylvania
M-l Attn: R. L. Tenplin
Armstrong Cork Company Lancaster, Pennsylvania
R-l Attn: J. W. Scott
Bell Telephone Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey
R-l Attn: C. Herring R-l J. M. Richardson R-l D. P. Ling R-l W. P. Mason
Corning Glass Company Corning, New York
R-l Attn: J. T. Littleton
E. I. Dupont de Nemours u Co. , Inc. Wilmington 98, Delaware
R-l Attn: J. H. Faupel, Materials of Construction Section
General Electric Company Schenectady, New York
R-l Attn: H. Fehr R-l H. Poritsky R-l J. H. Hollomon
General Motors Detroit, Michigan
R-l Attn: J, 0. Almen
Lockheed Aircraft Company Department 72-25, Factory A-l, Building 66 Burbank, California
R-l Attn: Engineering Library
Midwest Research Institute Kansaa City, Missouri
R-l Attn: C. 0. Dohrenwend R-l M. Golan
Pratt <* Whitney Aircraft Corporation East Hartford, Connecticut
R-l Attn: R. Morrison
U. S. Rubber Company Passaic, New Jersey
R-l Attn: H. Smallwood
Welding Research Council Engineering Foundation 29 West 39th Street New York 18, New York
M-l Attn: W. Spraragen, Director
Westinghouse Research Laboratories East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
M-l Attn: Dr. A. Nadai R-l Dr. E. A. Davis
Westinghouse Electric Corporation Lester Branch P. 0. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
R-l Attn: R. P. Kroon, Mgr. of Engineering, ACT Division
8