Calculators for all?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Calculators for all?

    1/1

    Student Name: Thomas GroveI.D. Number: 22661727Programme: PGCE (Primary)

    Calculators for all?

    WILLIAMS, H.J. and THOMPSON, I (2003) Calculators for all? IN: THOMPSON, I. ed., EnhancingPrimary Mathematics Teaching, Maidenhead: Open University Press, 153-168.

    Before:

    I personally believe that there is a place for calculators within primary mathematics education,however, I think this should be restricted, or at least extensively monitored until Key Stage 2, asused responsibly calculators can be used as a invaluable teaching aid. I believe that during Key

    Stage 1 the emphasise of teaching and learning should be placed on childrens numerical knowledgeand understanding, which in turn can be built upon in Key Stage 2 with the introduction ofcalculators. I also believe that introduced during Key Stage 1, calculators could be a distraction, withchildren becoming highly dependent on them, thus impairing the previously mentioned numerical

    knowledge and understanding.

    After:

    Twenty years after the appearance of Girlings article1 a Numeracy Task Force wasestablished by the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, David Blunkett, to

    develop a national strategy to raise standards in order to reach the Governments nationalNumeracy targets by 2002 (DfEE, 1998: 4). Included in this brief was a request to look atthe calculator issue.

    (Williams & Thompson, 2003: 153)

    It seems a long passage of time passed before any official stance on the place of calculators withinprimary mathematics education was released, and even then this was only a request to look at the

    calculator issue (Williams & Thompson, 2003). This less than confident stance furthers the notionthat the Government, namely the Secretary of State for Education and Employment at the time,David Blunkett, are not completely in agreement over the issue.

    After reading this article I was amazed at the amount of contradictory advice from Governmentreleases, such as, The Framework for Teaching Mathematics from Reception to Year 6, that suggestthat they (calculators) offer a unique way of learning about numbers and the number system, placevalue, properties of numbers, and fractions and decimals (DfEE, 1999). However, this favourable

    stance towards calculators in primary mathematics education is later completely contradicted withthe statement schools should not normally use the calculator as part of Key Stage 1 mathematics,but should emphasise oral and mental calculation (DfEE, 1999), a position previously adoptedpersonally.

    The research presented within this extract is extremely convincing and, after unravelling theenormous amount of contradiction surrounding the issue, puts forward an excellent and compellingargument for the introduction of calculators through both Key Stage 1 and 2. Any issues raised

    personally, relating to calculators becoming a distraction and children becoming highly dependenton them, are dealt with in a clear and concise manner with relevant and appropriate research to

    substantiate any claim made.

    References

    DfEE (DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT) (1998) Numeracy Matters: ThePreliminary Report of the Numeracy Task Force, London: DfEE.

    DfEE (DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT) (1999) Framework for TeachingMathematics from Reception to Year 6, London: DfEE.

    GIRLING, M.S. (1977) Towards a definition of basic Numeracy. Mathematics Teaching, 81, 4-5.

    1Defining basic numeracy as the ability to use a four function calculator sensibly (Girling, 1977).

    Mathematics Directed Activity 3. 1.