Annex A

Caley Oils Operations Manual – list of contents

Annex B

Erin Wood – Non-convention sized ship safety certificate

Annex C

Erin Wood – Minimum Safe Manning Certificate

Annex D

Paris MoU Performance Tables for Flag States and Recognised Organisations for the period 2012 - 2014

1France

278

0

27

12

-1,92

2Hong Kong, China

1709

20

137

102

-1,77

3Bahamas

2308

31

182

141

-1,74

4Norway

1472

19

120

86

-1,71

5Sweden

405

3

37

19

-1,69

6Isle of Man, UK

731

8

63

39

-1,68

7Denmark

1082

14

90

61

-1,67

8United Kingdom

1,369

19

112

80

-1,66

9United States of America

235

1

23

10

-1,64

10Italy

1210

17

100

70

-1,64

11Singapore

1517

23

123

89

-1,63

12Marshall Islands

2807

51

219

174

-1,58

13China

212

1

21

8

-1,56

14Greece

913

15

77

51

-1,50

15Germany

754

12

65

41

-1,48

16Finland

401

5

37

19

-1,46

17Liberia

4215

95

323

267

-1,45

18Belgium

228

2

23

9

-1,39

19Netherlands

3170

79

246

198

-1,34

20Bermuda, UK

252

3

25

10

-1,29

21Malta

4369

126

334

278

-1,22

22Cayman Islands, UK

357

6

33

17

-1,22

23Gibraltar, UK

848

20

72

47

-1,19

24Croatia

140

1

15

4

-1,12

25Cyprus

1976

69

157

119

-0,91

26Faroe Islands, DK

252

5

25

10

-0,91

27India

81

0

10

1

-0,90

28Iran, Islamic Republic of

81

0

10

1

-0,90

29Saudi Arabia

81

0

10

1

-0,90

30Kazakhstan

75

0

9

1

-0,79

31Barbados

363

10

34

17

-0,77

32Turkey

1494

61

121

88

-0,65

33Estonia

67

0

9

1

-0,62

34Japan

66

0

9

1

-0,60

35Antigua and Barbuda

3,623

174

279

228

-0,52

36Latvia

63

0

8

1

-0,52

37Russian Federation

1386

62

113

81

-0,50

38Ireland

91

1

11

2

-0,48

39Panama

6098

315

460

394

-0,45

40Philippines

161

4

17

5

-0,40

41Switzerland

107

2

12

3

-0,29

42Luxembourg

210

7

21

8

-0,23

43Korea, Republic of

103

2

12

2

-0,21

44Switzerland

99

2

12

2

-0.13

45Lithuania

176

6

18

6

-0.06

RANK FLAG INSPECTIONS 2012-2014

DETENTIONS 2012-2014

BLACK TO GREY LIMIT

GREY TO WHITE LIMIT

EXCESS FACTOR

WHITE LIST

1 France 278 0 27 12 -1.92

2 Hong Kong, China 1,709 20 137 102 -1.77

3 Bahamas 2,308 31 182 141 -1.74

4 Norway 1,472 19 120 86 -1.71

5 Sweden 405 3 37 19 -1.69

6 Isle of Man, UK 731 8 63 39 -1.68

7 Denmark 1,082 14 90 61 -1.67

8 United Kingdom 1,369 19 112 80 -1.66

9 United States of America 235 1 23 10 -1.64

10 Italy 1,210 17 100 70 -1.64

11 Singapore 1,517 23 123 89 -1.63

12 Marshall Islands 2,807 51 219 174 -1.58

13 China 212 1 21 8 -1.56

14 Greece 913 15 77 51 -1.50

15 Germany 754 12 65 41 -1.48

16 Finland 401 5 37 19 -1.46

17 Liberia 4,215 95 323 267 -1.45

18 Belgium 228 2 23 9 -1.39

19 Netherlands 3,170 79 246 198 -1.34

20 Bermuda, UK 252 3 25 10 -1.29

21 Malta 4,369 126 334 278 -1.22

22 Cayman Islands, UK 357 6 33 17 -1.22

23 Gibraltar, UK 848 20 72 47 -1.19

24 Croatia 140 1 15 4 -1.12

25 Cyprus 1,976 69 157 119 -0.91

26 Faroe Islands, DK 252 5 25 10 -0.91

27 India 81 0 10 1 -0.90

28 Iran, Islamic Republic of 81 0 10 1 -0.90

29 Saudi Arabia 81 0 10 1 -0.90

30 Kazakhstan 75 0 9 1 -0.79

31 Barbados 363 10 34 17 -0.77

32 Turkey 1,494 61 121 88 -0.65

33 Estonia 67 0 9 1 -0.62

34 Japan 66 0 9 1 -0.60

35 Antigua and Barbuda 3,623 174 279 228 -0.52

36 Latvia 63 0 8 1 -0.52

37 Russian Federation 1,386 62 113 81 -0.50

38 Ireland 91 1 11 2 -0.48

39 Panama 6,098 315 460 394 -0.45

40 Philippines 161 4 17 5 -0.40

41 Switzerland 107 2 12 3 -0.29

42 Luxembourg 210 7 21 8 -0.23

43 Korea, Republic of 103 2 12 2 -0.21

White list

Valid 1 July 2015

44Portugal

376

18

35

18

0,02

45Ukraine

202

9

21

8

0,10

46Malaysia

52

1

7

0

0,13

47Spain

196

9

20

7

0,13

48Lithuania

160

7

17

5

0,14

49Lebanon

77

3

10

1

0,21

50Bulgaria

40

1

6

0

0,21

51Poland

157

8

17

5

0,24

52Libya

44

2

6

0

0,34

53Thailand

62

4

8

1

0,46

54Egypt

61

4

8

0

0,46

55Tunisia

46

3

7

0

0,47

56Curacao

216

15

22

8

0,49

57Morocco

41

3

6

0

0,52

58Vanuatu

265

19

26

11

0,53

59Albania

92

7

11

2

0,56

60Saint Kitts and Nevis

313

25

30

14

0,69

61Algeria

73

7

9

1

0,73

62Tuvalu

34

4

5

0

0,77

RANK FLAG INSPECTIONS 2012-2014

DETENTIONS 2012-2014

BLACK TO GREY LIMIT

GREY TO WHITE LIMIT

EXCESS FACTOR

GREY LIST

44 Portugal 376 18 35 18 0.02

45 Ukraine 202 9 21 8 0.10

46 Malaysia 52 1 7 0 0.13

47 Spain 196 9 20 7 0.13

48 Lithuania 160 7 17 5 0.14

49 Lebanon 77 3 10 1 0.21

50 Bulgaria 40 1 6 0 0.21

51 Poland 157 8 17 5 0.24

52 Libya 44 2 6 0 0.34

53 Thailand 62 4 8 1 0.46

54 Egypt 61 4 8 0 0.46

55 Tunisia 46 3 7 0 0.47

56 Curacao 216 15 22 8 0.49

57 Morocco 41 3 6 0 0.52

58 Vanuatu 265 19 26 11 0.53

59 Albania 92 7 11 2 0.56

60 Saint Kitts and Nevis 313 25 30 14 0.69

61 Algeria 73 7 9 1 0.73

62 Tuvalu 34 4 5 0 0.77

Grey list

63Sierra Leone

316

32

30

Medium

1.19

64Cambodia

442

43

40

1.20

65Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

861

79

73

1,09

66Belize

591

59

52

1,35

67Comoros

280

34

27

1,62

68Dominica

70

11

9

1,73

69Cook Islands

310

39

30

1,96

70Togo

353

45

33

MEDIUM TO HIGH RISK 2,00

71Moldova, Republic of

593

80

52

2,59

72Tanzania United Rep.

313

51

30

2,65

RANK FLAG INSPECTIONS 2012-2014

DETENTIONS 2012-2014

BLACK TO GREY LIMIT

GREY TOWHITE LIMIT

EXCESSFACTOR

BLACK LIST

63 Sierra Leone 316 32 30

MediumRisk

1.18

64 Cambodia 442 43 40 1.18

65 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 861 79 73 1.21

66 Belize 591 59 52 1.35

67 Comoros 280 34 27 1.71

68 Dominica 70 11 9 1.77

69 Cook Islands 310 39 30 1.89

70 Togo 353 45 33 1.99

71 Moldova, Republic of 593 80 52Medium to High Risk

2.43

72 Tanzania United Rep. 313 51 30 High Risk 3.00

Black list

Recognized Organization

Insp

ectio

ns

Det

entio

ns

Low

/med

ium

lim

it

Med

ium

/ h

igh

limit

Exce

ss F

acto

r

Perf

orm

ance

leve

l

DNV GL AS DNVGL 1718 0 44 24 -1.95

high

Det Norske Veritas DNV 10,219 7 228 181 -1.91

Lloyd's Register LR 11,485 10 255 205 -1.89

American Bureau of Shipping ABS 5,327 4 124 89 -1.89

China Classification Society CCS 769 0 22 8 -1.84

Registro Italiano Navale RINA 3,072 6 75 48 -1.70

Korean Register of Shipping KRS 936 1 26 11 -1.66

Bureau Veritas BV 11,239 37 250 200 -1.61

Germanischer Lloyd GL 12,674 47 280 227 -1.56

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai NKK 6,894 24 158 118 -1.56

Turkish Lloyd TL 776 2 22 9 -1.22

Russian Maritime Register of Shipping RMRS 4,011 23 95 65 -1.21

Polski Rejestr Statkow (Polish Register of Shipping)

PRS 471 3 15 4 -0.28

Croatian Register of Shipping CRS 169 0 7 0 0.02

medium

Indian Register of Shipping IRS 73 0 4 0 0.20

Hellenic Register of Shipping HRS 61 0 4 0 0.23

Other OTHER 437 7 14 3 0.34

Register of Shipping (Albania) RSA 93 1 5 0 0.34

Isthmus Bureau of Shipping, S.A. IBS 186 3 7 0 0.40

Macosnar Corporation MC 73 1 4 0 0.41

Shipping Register of Ukraine SRU 594 12 18 6 0.51

Dromon Bureau of Shipping DBS 484 10 15 4 0.53

International Naval Surveys Bureau INSB 667 14 20 7 0.55

Intermaritime Certification Services, ICS Class

ICS 79 2 4 0 0.58

Maritime Lloyd - Georgia MLG 164 4 7 0 0.60

Panama Register Corporation PRC 111 3 5 0 0.63

Maritime Bureau of Shipping MBS 101 3 5 0 0.67

Venezuelan Register of Shipping VRS 175 5 7 0 0.71

Global Marine Bureau Inc. GMB 125 4 6 0 0.74

Panama Maritime Documentation Services PMDS 81 3 4 0 0.77

Overseas Marine Certification Services OMCS 98 4 5 0 0.87

Phoenix Register of Shipping PHRS 171 6 7 0 0.87

Universal Shipping Bureau Inc. USB 129 5 6 0 0.89

Global Shipping Bureau Inc GSB 78 4 4 0 0.98

Bulgarian Register of Shipping BRS 256 10 9 1 1.21low

International Register of Shipping IS 390 16 13 3 1.64

Inspeccion y Clasificacion Maritima (INCLAMAR)

INCLAMAR 65 7 4 0 4.40 very low

In this table only Recognized Organizations that had 60 or more inspections in a 3-year period are taken into account.

The formula is identical to the one used for the White, Grey and Black list. However, the values for P and Q are adjusted to

P=0.02 and Q=0.01.

Recognized Organization performance table 2012-2014

Valid 1 July 2015

Annex E

Extract of relevant International Regulations for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea

Rule 5: Look-out

Every vessel shall at all times maintain a proper look-out by sight and hearing as well as by all available means appropriate in the prevailing circumstances and conditions so as to make a full appraisal of the situation and of the risk of collision.

Rule 7: Risk of collision

(a) Every vessel shall use all available means appropriate to the prevailing circumstances and conditions to determine if risk of collision exists. If there is any doubt such risk shall be deemed to exist.

(b) Proper use shall be made of radar equipment if fitted and operational, including long-range scanning to obtain early warning of risk of collision and radar plotting or equivalent systematic observation of detected objects.

(c) Assumptions shall not be made on the basis of scanty information, especially scanty radar information.

(d) In determining if risk of collision exists the following considerations shall be among those taken into account:

(i) such risk shall be deemed to exist if the compass bearing of an approaching vessel does not appreciably change;

(ii) such risk may sometimes exist even when an appreciable bearing change is evident, particularly when approaching a very large vessel or a tow or when approaching a vessel at close range

Rule 15: Crossing situation

When two power-driven vessels are crossing so as to involve risk of collision, the vessel which has the other on her own starboard side shall keep out of the way and shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, avoid crossing ahead of the other vessel

Rule 16: Action by give-way vessel

Every vessel which is directed to keep out of the way of another vessel shall, so far as possible, take early and substantial action to keep well clear.

Rule 17: Action by stand-on vessel

(a) (i) Where one of two vessels is to keep out of the way the other shall keep her course and speed. (ii) The latter vessel may however take action to avoid collision by her manoeuvre alone, as soon as it becomes apparent to her that the vessel required to keep out of the way is not taking appropriate action in compliance with these Rules.

(b) When, from any cause, the vessel required to keep her course and speed finds herself so close that collision cannot be avoided by the action of the give-way vessel alone, she shall take such action as will best aid to avoid collision.

(c) A power-driven vessel which takes action in a crossing situation in accordance with sub-paragraph (a)(ii) of this Rule to avoid collision with another power-driven vessel shall, if the circumstances of the case admit, not alter course to port for a vessel on her own port side. (d) This Rule does not relieve the give-way vessel of her obligation to keep out of the way