Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Calibration and evaluation of the prediction accuracy of a (micro-pollutant) influent generator
Laura Snip, Xavier Flores-Alsina, Ignasi Aymerich, Lluis Corominas, Benedek Plosz, Ulf Jeppsson and Krist Gernaey
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
2 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Calibration and evaluation of the prediction accuracy of a (micro-pollutant) influent generator
• Materials & Methods: – Catchment – Pharmaceuticals studied – Influent generator – Calibration technique – Evaluation methods
• Results: – Calibration WWTP Puigcerdà
• Traditional variables • Pharmaceuticals
– Application of tool • Conclusion & Further perspectives
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
3 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Catchment under study - Puigcerdà
• Wastewater from Spain and France • Widespread catchment (area of 100 km2) • No industry present • Population equivalent 16.000 PE
– Fluctuating due to touristic activities – Average flow rate of 4100-8300 m3/day – Organic load of 595-1785 kg BOD/day – Nitrogen load of 123-349 kg N/day
• 60% from Puigcerdà
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
4 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• Ibuprofen (IBU) and metabolite 2-Hydroxyibuprofen (IBU-2OH) – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compound – 6 hours body residence time – Excretion in urine, 15% IBU, 26% IBU-(2)OH
• Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and metabolite N-Acetyl Sulfamethazine-d4 (SMX-N4)
– Antibiotic – 10 hours body residence time – Excretion in urine, 14% SMX, 44% SMX-N4
• Carbamazepine (CMZ) and metabolite 2-Hydroxy Carbamazepine (CMZ-2OH)
– Mood stabilising drug – 8-72 hours body residence time – Excretion in urine 1% and faeces 28 % as CMZ,
4% urine CMZ-2OH
Pharmaceuticals studied
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
5 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Influent generator
HOUSEHOLDS (HH)
INDUSTRIES (IndS)
SEASONAL CORRECTION
FACTOR
RAINFALL
HOUSEHOLDS (HH)
INDUSTRIES (IndS)
SOIL MODEL
SEWER SYSTEM
MODEL ASM-X FRACTIONATION
TEMPERATURE
FLOW RATE MODEL BLOCK
POLLUTANTS MODEL BLOCK
TEMPERATURE MODEL BLOCK
TRANSPORT MODEL BLOCK
100-aH
aH
FIRST FLUSH EFFECT
MODEL
infiltration
PHARMACEUTICALS
Gernaey et al., 2011
Environ. Modell. Softw. 26(11)
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
6 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• Flow rate – Dry and wet weather – Blocks HH, Rainfall, Soil and Sewer system
• Soluble pollutant, ammonium – Block HH
• Particulate pollutant, COD particulate – Block HH and First flush effect
• Temperature – Block Temperature
• Automatic calibration procedure with Bootstrap
(optimisation of error)
1
1 2 3 3
Calibration technique
4
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
7 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Evaluation methods
• Quantitative – Peak evaluation
• Magnitude of peak • Timing of peak
– Relative criteria • Bias of prediction
– Overall criteria • Index of Agreement
• Qualitative – Plot of the sequence of the normalised residuals
• Part of the time-series
Dawson et al., 2007, Environ. Model. Softw., 22, 1034-1052
Hauduc et al., 2015, Environ. Model. Softw., 68, 196-204
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
8 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Calibration and evaluation of the prediction accuracy of a (micro-pollutant) influent generator
• Materials & Methods: – Catchment – Pharmaceuticals studied – Influent generator – Calibration technique – Evaluation methods
• Results: – Calibration WWTP Puigcerdà
• Traditional variables • Pharmaceuticals
– Application of tool • Conclusion & Further perspectives
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
9 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• Calibrated parameters: – HH: flow per QperPE = 110 m3/d; PE = 16,000 – Soil: area connected to sewer pipes – Sewer system: HRT = 3 h; – Rainfall: flow per mm rainfall = 824 m3/mm
October5 10 15 20 25 30Fl
ow ra
te (m
3 /day
)
05000100001500020000
Results of influent generator – Traditional compounds
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
10 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Traditional compounds • Ammonium and COD particulates • Calibrated parameters:
– HH: • Ammonium per day per PE = 5.53 mgN/(day.PE) • COD particulate per day per PE = 57.11 mg/(day.PE)
– First flush effect: • Trigger flow rate = 10.000 m3/day • Maximum accumulated mass = 700 kg/SS • Fraction of settling particles = 0.40
October5 10 15 20 25 30N
H4+ lo
ad (k
g/d)
0100200300400500
October
5 10 15 20 25 30CO
D lo
ad (k
g/d)
0100020003000400050006000
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
11 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• Temperature – Average temperature, Tbias 17.7 ºC – Daily variation in temperature, TdAmp 0.38 ºC
– Temperature decrease due to rain, Grain_Temp 0.14
Results of influent generator – Traditional compounds
October5 10 15 20 25 30Te
mpe
ratu
re (o C
)
81012141618
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
12 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Pharmaceuticals - Ibuprofen
IBU IBU-2OH
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
• Ratio IBU:IBU-2OH 1:0.6
• Theoretical ratio 1:1.7
• Different IBU administrations, waste of IBU, transformation in sewer, data uncertainty
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
13 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Pharmaceuticals - Sulfamethoxazole
SMX SMX-N4
• Considerably lower load than IBU and IBU-2OH • Ratio SMX:SMX-N4 1:0.6 • Theoretical ratio 1:3 • Retransformation of SMX-N4 to SMX
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
2
4
6
8
10
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
2
4
6
8
10
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
14 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Pharmaceuticals - Carbamazepine
CMZ CMZ-2OH
• Different pattern due to different excretion paths • Ratio CMZ:CMZ-2OH 1:3 • Theoretical ratio 1:4 • Desorption of CMZ, retransformation of CMZ-2OH
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
2
4
6
8
10
Date11/10/2012 12/10/2012 13/10/2012
Pol
luta
nt lo
ad (g
/d)
0
2
4
6
8
10
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
15 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Qualitative evaluation - Traditional variables
Ammonium COD particulates
Flow rate Temperature
Data points0 250 500 750 1000 1250
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 250 500 750
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-30-20-10
0102030
Data points0 250 500
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
Data points0 250 500 750 1000 1250
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-400
-200
0
200
400
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
16 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Results of influent generator – Qualitative evaluation - Pharmaceuticals
IBU SMX CMZ
IBU-‐2OH SMX-‐N4 CMZ-‐2OH
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
Data points0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Sequ
ence
of r
esid
uals
-10
-5
0
5
10
• Similar results are obtained with quantitative evaluation methods
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
17 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• In-sewer transformations (Jelic et al., 2015 Wat. Res. 68, 98-108) – ASM-X transformation SMX (Plósz et al., 2010 Environ. Sci.Technol.
44, 734-742) – Parameters estimated for activated sludge
– Ratio SMX:SMX-N4 with reactions 1:1.2 thus closer to theoretical ratio (1:3)
Results of influent generator – Application of tool
Estimated load
without reactions
(g/d)
Estimated loads with
reactions (g/d)
Difference in
estimation (%)
SMX 0.1227 0.1091 -11
SMX-N4 0.08 0.1281 +60
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
18 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
Calibration and evaluation of the prediction accuracy of a (micro-pollutant) influent generator
• Materials & Methods: – Catchment – Pharmaceuticals studied – Influent generator – Calibration technique – Evaluation methods
• Results: – Calibration WWTP Puigcerdà
• Traditional variables • Pharmaceuticals
– Application of tool • Conclusion & Further perspectives
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
19 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
• Influent generator can reproduce dynamics of ‘traditional’ variables and pharmaceuticals
• Different pharmaceuticals show different occurrence at inlet of WWTP
• The tool can extra- and interpolate time series • In-sewer transformations can be taken into account when
back calculate consumption rates
Conclusion & Future perspectives - Pharmaceuticals
8/6/2015 PhD defence Upgrading the BSM framework with emerging challenges
20 DTU Chemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark
The research leading to these results has received funding from the People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 under REA agreement 289193. This presentation reflects only the author’s views and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Thank you for your attention!
www.sanitas-itn.eu