23
LABOR MARKET REVIEW CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

LABOR MARKETR E V I E W

C A L I F O R N I A

Page 2: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

1

February 2020

Quick Facts:

(Data are Seasonally Adjusted)

CA Unemployment Rate

Feb 2020 3.9%

Jan 2020 3.9%

Feb 2019 4.3%

U.S. Unemployment Rate

Feb 2020 3.5%

Jan 2020 3.6%

Feb 2019 3.8%

CA Nonfarm Employment

Feb 2020 17,612.500

Month Over Change 0.2%

Year Over Change 1.6%

Inside this issue:

The California unemployment rate remained at 3.9 percent in February. California’s nonfarm payrolls gained 29,000 jobs in February, following a revised 29,100-job gain in January. Professional and business services (up 9,800) gained the most jobs in February while other services (down 3,000) lost the most jobs.

Labor Force Trends 1

Unemployment Facts 2

Nonfarm Employment 5

Hours and Earnings 7

Industry Employment 8

Regional and County 10

Unemployment Rates 12

U.I. Program Data 16

D.I. Program Data 18

Glossary 20

California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID). For additional labor market information and this publication in PDF, please visit LMID’s website at:

www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov

CaliforniaCalifornia Labor Market Review

California Labor Force Trends(Thousands of Persons, Seasonally Adjusted)

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO M ONT H-OV E R CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

LABOR FORCE STATUS Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent

Revised

Population 31,063 31,177 31,184 7 0.0% 121 0.4%

Labor Force 19,374 19,510 19,516 6 0.0% 142 0.7%

Employment 18,546 18,756 18,757 1 0.0% 211 1.1%

Unemployment 828 753 759 6 0.8% -69 -8.3%

Unemployment Rate (%) 4.3 3.9 3.9 0.0 ----- -0.4 -----

LF Participation Rate (%) 62.4 62.6 62.6 0.0 ----- 0.2 -----

Source: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, BLS Labor Force Model.

CURRE NT

Preliminary

Note: All data are for the civilian, noninstitutional population, 16 years and older. "LF" is labor force. Data may not add

due to rounding. The unemployment rate is calculated using unrounded data.

U.S. Labor Force Trends(Thousands of Persons, Seasonally Adjusted)

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO M ONT H-OV E R CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

LABOR FORCE STATUS Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent

Revised

Population 258,392 259,502 259,628 126 0.0% 1,236 0.5%

Labor Force 163,047 164,606 164,546 -60 0.0% 1,499 0.9%

Employment 156,866 158,714 158,759 45 0.0% 1,893 1.2%

Unemployment 6,181 5,892 5,787 -105 -1.8% -394 -6.4%

Unemployment Rate (%) 3.8 3.6 3.5 -0.1 ----- -0.3 -----

LF Participation Rate (%) 63.1 63.4 63.4 0.0 ----- 0.3 -----

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "U.S. Employment Situation" News Release, Table A-1.

CURRE NT

Preliminary

Note: All data are for the civilian, noninstitutional population, 16 years and older. "LF" is labor force. Data may not add

due to rounding. The unemployment rate is calculated using unrounded data.

E X P ANS ION

P E AK (* )

RE CE S S ION

LOW (* )

LABOR FORCE STATUS Dec 07 Jun 09 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent

Population 27,426 27,924 31,184 498 1.8% 3,260 11.7%

Labor Force 18,012 18,233 19,516 221 1.2% 1,283 7.0%

Employment 16,956 16,185 18,757 -771 -4.5% 2,572 15.9%

Unemployment 1,056 2,048 759 992 93.9% -1,289 -62.9%

Unemployment Rate (%) 5.9 11.2 3.9 5.3 ----- -7.3 -----

LF Participation Rate (%) 65.7 65.3 62.6 -0.4 ----- -2.7 -----

Source: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, BLS Labor Force Model.

CURRE NT

M ONT H

CALIFORNIA CHANGE

DURING U.S . RE CE S S ION

CALIFORNIA CHANGE

DURING U.S . E X P ANS ION

Business Cycle Trends in California Labor Force(Thousands of Persons, Seasonally Adjusted)

Preliminary

(*) Date of expansion peak and recession low are those established by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Note: All data are for the civilian, noninstitutional population, 16 years and older. "LF" is labor force. Data may not add

due to rounding. The unemployment rate is calculated using unrounded data.

Page 3: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

2

Unemployment Rate Gap Between California and U.S.

Employment Status and

Unemployment Rates Vary

Among Demographic Groups

California's seasonally adjusted unemployment was 3.9 percent in February, unchanged from January, and down 0.4 percentage point from one year ago.

In comparison, the U.S. unemployment rate was 3.5 percent in

February, down 0.1 percentage point from January and down 0.3 percentage point from one year ago.

Civilian employment increased by 1,000 in February to 18,757,000

persons. This followed an increase of 27,000 persons in January. On a year-over basis, civilian employment was up 211,000 persons (1.1 percent).

Unemployment increased by 6,000 in February to 759,000 persons,

following a decrease of 2,000 persons in January. The number of unemployed was down 69,000 persons (8.3 percent) from February 2019. Over the year, the California civilian labor force was up 142,000 persons (0.7 percent) in February 2020.

By race and ethnicity, the February unemployment rate for blacks was 5.3 percent, Hispanics 4.7 percent, and whites 4.0 percent. The unemployment rate remained unchanged for each group.

By age group, the unemployment rate was highest for Californians aged 16-19 years at 14.8 percent, up 0.5 percentage point from January. The rates for the six age groups between 20 and 65+ years ranged from 2.9 percent to 7.3 percent.

Over the month, the unemployment rate for those in age groups 20-24 years, 35-44 years and 55-64 years increased by 0.1 percentage point, while those in age group 45-54 years decreased by 0.1 percentage point. Those in age group 25-34 years remained unchanged, while those in age group 65+ years decreased by 0.2 percentage point in February.

Employment Status Feb 19 Dec 19 Jan 20 Feb 20

(Number in Thousands)

Total, Age 16+

Labor Force 19,509 19,435 19,427 19,430

Employed 18,691 18,642 18,643 18,646

Unemployed 818 794 783 784

Unemployment Rate 4.2% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0%

Male, Age 16+

Labor Force 10,646 10,609 10,595 10,605

Employed 10,227 10,179 10,171 10,177

Unemployed 419 430 424 429

Unemployment Rate 3.9% 4.1% 4.0% 4.0%

Female, Age 16+

Labor Force 8,863 8,826 8,831 8,824

Employed 8,464 8,463 8,472 8,469

Unemployed 399 364 359 355

Unemployment Rate 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0%

Both Sexes, Age 16-19

Labor Force 538 525 527 531

Employed 458 449 452 452

Unemployed 80 76 76 79

Unemployment Rate 14.9% 14.5% 14.3% 14.8%

White, Age 16+

Labor Force 14,085 14,063 14,077 14,077

Employed 13,502 13,495 13,519 13,520

Unemployed 583 567 558 558

Unemployment Rate 4.1% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

Nonwhite, Age 16+

Labor Force 5,424 5,373 5,350 5,352

Employed 5,189 5,146 5,125 5,126

Unemployed 235 226 225 226

Unemployment Rate 4.3% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Employment Status by Demographic Group, California

(Data are Not Seasonally Adjusted, 12-month Moving Average)

Note: Data may not add due to rounding on a 12-month moving average.

Employment Status Jan 19 Nov 19 Dec 19 Jan 20

(Number in Thousands)

Total, Age 16+

Labor Force 19,501 19,431 19,435 19,427

Employed 18,682 18,638 18,642 18,643

Unemployed 820 793 794 783

Unemployment Rate 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0%

Male, Age 16+

Labor Force 10,647 10,616 10,609 10,595

Employed 10,227 10,184 10,179 10,171

Unemployed 421 432 430 424

Unemployment Rate 4.0% 4.1% 4.1% 4.0%

Female, Age 16+

Labor Force 8,854 8,815 8,826 8,831

Employed 8,455 8,454 8,463 8,472

Unemployed 399 361 364 359

Unemployment Rate 4.5% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1%

Both Sexes, Age 16-19

Labor Force 540 526 525 527

Employed 456 450 449 452

Unemployed 84 76 76 76

Unemployment Rate 15.6% 14.5% 14.5% 14.3%

White, Age 16+

Labor Force 14,102 14,040 14,063 14,077

Employed 13,515 13,472 13,496 13,519

Unemployed 587 568 567 558

Unemployment Rate 4.2% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

Nonwhite, Age 16+

Labor Force 5,399 5,391 5,373 5,350

Employed 5,167 5,166 5,146 5,125

Unemployed 232 225 227 225

Unemployment Rate 4.3% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Employment Status by Demographic Group, California

(Data are Not Seasonally Adjusted, 12-month Moving Average)

Note: Data may not add due to rounding on a 12-month moving average.

3.9

3.5

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20

Perc

ent

(%)

Three-Year Trend in California and U.S.

Unemployment Rates(Seasonally Adjusted)

California U.S.

Page 4: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

3

California Unemployment by Reason and Duration

Job losers comprised of the largest group of unemployed persons categorized by reason (394,000 persons or 50.3 percent of all unemployed). Job losers remained unchanged over the month and decreased by 23,000 persons (5.5 percent) since February 2019. Labor force re-entrants were the next largest reason group, accounting for 212,000 persons or 27.1 percent of all unemployed in February.

By duration, the largest group of unemployed persons was those unemployed less than five weeks, accounting for 252,000 persons or 32.1 percent of all unemployed. The number of persons unemployed less than five weeks increased by 3,000 persons (1.3 percent) over the month and have decreased by 13,000 persons (4.9 percent) since February 2019. The next largest group was those who had been unemployed 5 to 14 weeks, accounting for 230,000 persons or 29.3 percent of all unemployed.

California Unemployment by Reason and Duration

(Number and Percent of Employed Persons, 12-month Moving Average)

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO CURRE NT M ONT H-OV E R-CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number PercentApr 49 Oct 49 Oct 49 -0.1 -5.5E-06 194.6 0.01081

Number (1,000s) 818 783 784 1 0.1% -34 -4.1%

Unemployment by ReasonJob losers 417 394 394 0 0.1% -23 -5.5%

Job leavers 89 86 86 0 0.0% -3 -3.3%

Re-entrants 220 213 212 -1 -0.4% -8 -3.8%

New entrants 91 90 92 2 1.7% 0 0.4%

Unemployment by Duration -1.3 -0.01387 -4.0 0

Less than 5 weeks 265 248 252 3 1.3% -13 -4.9%

5 to 14 weeks 240 227 230 3 1.5% -10 -4.3%

15 to 26 weeks 130 121 122 0 0.2% -9 -6.7%

27 to 51 weeks 77 74 69 -5 -6.4% -8 -9.9%

52 weeks and over 106 113 111 -2 -1.3% 6 5.5%

Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding. Job losers includes persons who completed temporary jobs.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

Page 5: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

4

Full-time and Part-time Employment; Persons Not in the Labor Force

The majority (82.3 percent) of all employed Californians usually work full time (35 hours or more per week

in all jobs).

There were 656,000 persons who worked part time involuntarily, also known as "part time for economic reasons.” They comprised of 3.5 percent of all persons at work during the survey week. The number of persons who worked part time for economic reasons has decreased by 64,000 (8.8 percent) since February 2019.

Persons not in the labor force decreased by 3,000 (0.0 percent) to 11,824,000 in February. Over the past year, the number of persons not in the labor force has increased by 87,000 (0.7 percent). The number of persons who are not in the labor force but want a job remained unchanged from January and has decreased by 10,000 (1.6 percent) to 611,000 persons since February 2019.

Persons Not in the Labor Force, California(Number and Percent of Persons Not in the Labor Force, 12-month Moving Average)

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO M ONT H-OV E R CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

DISCOURAGEMENT Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent

Number (1,000s)

Not in the labor force… 11,736 11,827 11,824 -3 0.0% 87 0.7%

… but want a job 621 611 611 0 0.0% -10 -1.6%

… and searched recently 246 228 226 -2 -0.9% -20 -8.0%

… and available to work 185 167 164 -2 -1.3% -20 -11.0%

… and discouraged 53 47 44 -4 -7.6% -9 -17.4%

Percent of NILF (%)

Want a job 5.3% 5.2% 5.2% 0.0 ----- -0.1 -----

… and searched recently 2.1% 1.9% 1.9% 0.0 ----- -0.2 -----

… and available to work 1.6% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0 ----- -0.2 -----

… and discouraged 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0 ----- 0.0 -----

Note: "NILF" is "not in the labor force". Detail may not add to total due to rounding. "Searched recently" means in the past 12 months.

"Discouraged" are, specifically, those persons not currently looking for work because they are discouraged over job prospects.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey.

CURRE NT

Full-time and Part-time Employment, California

(Number and Percent of Employed Persons, 12-month Moving Average)

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO CURRE NT M ONT H-OV E R-CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

WORK SCHEDULE Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number PercentApr 49 Oct 49 Oct 49 -0.1 -5.5E-06 194.6 0.0108102

Number (1,000s) 18,691 18,643 18,646 2 0.0% -45 -0.2%

Usual Work Week Schedule

Usually full time 15,339 15,343 15,353 9 0.1% 14 0.1%

Usually part time 3,352 3,300 3,293 -7 -0.2% -59 -1.8%

Percent of Employed (%)

Usually full time 82.1% 82.3% 82.3% 0.0 ----- 0.2 -----

Usually part time 17.9% 17.7% 17.7% 0.0 ----- -0.2 -----

Part-time For Economic Reasons

At work part time for economic reasons 720 653 656 4 0.6% -64 -8.8%

… usually full time, at work part time 180 160 163 3 1.6% -17 -9.5%

… usually part time, at work part time 540 492 494 1 0.3% -47 -8.6%

Percent of Employed (%) 3.4 0.006344 -56.0 -0.09407

At work part time for economic reasons 3.9% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0 ----- -0.4 -----

… usually full time, at work part time 1.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0 ----- -0.1 -----

… usually part time, at work part time 2.9% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0 ----- -0.3 -----

Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding. In all jobs, full time is 35 or more hours per week; part time is less than 35 hours. Among

those who usually work full time, working part time for economic reasons consists mainly of persone citing "slack work," because there is

insufficient demand for the employer's goods and services to support more work hours. Among those who usually working

part time, the most often stated reason for working part time for economic reasons was "inability to find full time work." The number

includes those who cite such a reason for working part time only if the person actually worked part time during the survey week.

Source: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, BLS Model and Current Population Survey (CPS).

Page 6: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

5

Nonfarm Payroll Employment

In California there were 17,612,500 jobs in total nonfarm industries in February, a gain of 29,000 jobs from last month. This follows a revised 29,100-job gain in January and a 26,300-job gain in December.

Nationwide, nonfarm payrolls were up 273,000 jobs (0.2 percent) over the month and up 2,409,000 jobs (1.6 percent) over the year. In comparison, California nonfarm jobs were up 29,000 (0.2 percent) over the month and up 269,000 (1.6 percent) since February 2019.

Nonfarm payrolls in California have grown over the past year in all but one sector: information (4.4 percent); education and health services (2.9 percent); construction (2.8 percent); professional and business services (1.7 percent); leisure and hospitality (1.6 percent); other services (1.4 percent); government (1.4 percent); financial activities (1.4 percent); mining and logging (0.9 percent) and trade, transportation and utilities (0.5 percent). The only sector that lost jobs was manufacturing (0.7 percent).

Private sector employment in California which excludes government gained 27,200 jobs (0.2 percent) in February following an increase of 27,400 jobs in January. Over the last year, employment in California’s private sector has increased by 233,500 jobs (1.6 percent).

Y E AR AGO M ONT H AGO M ONT H-OV E R CHANGE Y E AR-OV E R CHANGE

Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent

Revised Preliminary

Total Nonfarm 17,343.5 17,583.5 17,612.5 29.0 0.2% 269.0 1.6%

Mining and Logging 22.6 22.7 22.8 0.1 0.4% 0.2 0.9%

Construction 872.4 888.6 896.4 7.8 0.9% 24.0 2.8%

Manufacturing 1,327.3 1,320.1 1,318.5 -1.6 -0.1% -8.8 -0.7%

Trade, Transp. & Utilities 3,048.7 3,062.9 3,062.5 -0.4 0.0% 13.8 0.5%

Information 562.1 580.2 586.6 6.4 1.1% 24.5 4.4%

Financial Activities 837.3 845.8 849.4 3.6 0.4% 12.1 1.4%

Profess. & Business Serv. 2,706.7 2,744.0 2,753.8 9.8 0.4% 47.1 1.7%

Educational & Health Serv. 2,774.7 2,851.3 2,855.0 3.7 0.1% 80.3 2.9%

Leisure & Hospitality 2,024.0 2,055.7 2,056.5 0.8 0.0% 32.5 1.6%

Other Services 573.5 584.3 581.3 -3.0 -0.5% 7.8 1.4%

Government 2,594.2 2,627.9 2,629.7 1.8 0.1% 35.5 1.4%

California Nonfarm Payroll Employment by Industry Sector(Thousands of Jobs, Seasonally Adjusted)

CURRE NT

Data may not add due to rounding.

Source: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, Current Employment Statistics (CES) Program.

Page 7: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

6

The Labor Force Participation Rate (LFPR) is the civilian labor force expressed as a percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population. California’s LFPR remained unchanged at 62.6 in February.

Labor Force Participation Rates

62.362.1

62.4

62.6

Feb 17 Feb 18 Feb 19 Feb 20

Rate

(%

)

California Labor Force ParticipationFebruary 2017- February 2020

(Seasonally Adjusted)

Not Seasonally Adjusted Jul 19 Aug 19 Sep 19 Oct 19 Nov 19 Dec 19 Jan 20 Feb 20

Working-aged Population 31,106 31,120 31,135 31,148 31,159 31,168 31,177 31,184

Labor force 19,466 19,429 19,506 19,538 19,535 19,470 19,477 19,528

Employment 18,608 18,621 18,802 18,812 18,817 18,759 18,637 18,687

Unemployment 858 808 704 726 718 711 840 841

Unemployment Rate 4.4 4.2 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.3 4.3

LF Participation Rate 62.6 62.4 62.6 62.7 62.7 62.5 62.5 62.6

Total Nonfarm 17,310.9 17,423.9 17,438.7 17,593.6 17,697.6 17,711.8 17,445.8 17,540.7

Total Private 14,854.6 14,923.1 14,866.7 14,945.6 15,026.8 15,052.8 14,812.2 14,887.4

Natural Resources and Mining 23.2 23.1 23.0 23.0 22.7 22.4 22.1 22.1

Construction 904.5 910.6 905.2 901.5 892.7 877.3 861.5 875.3

Manufacturing 1,330.2 1,336.8 1,332.0 1,323.5 1,317.5 1,317.5 1,306.9 1,306.7

Trade, Transportation and Utilities 3,041.6 3,053.1 3,039.2 3,063.4 3,141.1 3,165.9 3,064.2 3,033.1

Information 554.7 564.4 569.4 569.6 582.5 575.9 577.0 591.2

Financial Activities 847.1 847.7 841.0 849.5 849.6 850.5 844.0 848.6

Professional and Business Services 2,731.4 2,751.0 2,734.7 2,754.5 2,758.1 2,763.4 2,711.6 2,740.5

Educational and Health Services 2,770.9 2,792.1 2,805.9 2,839.7 2,852.3 2,859.2 2,839.9 2,864.9

Leisure and Hospitality 2,069.4 2,063.3 2,038.4 2,039.6 2,031.7 2,042.6 2,009.8 2,028.7

Other Services 581.6 581.0 577.9 581.3 578.6 578.1 575.2 576.3

Government 2,456.3 2,500.8 2,572.0 2,648.0 2,670.8 2,659.0 2,633.6 2,653.3

Seasonally Adjusted

Working-aged Population 31,106 31,120 31,135 31,148 31,159 31,168 31,177 31,184

Labor force 19,381 19,420 19,458 19,485 19,488 19,484 19,510 19,516

Employment 18,609 18,656 18,700 18,731 18,734 18,729 18,756 18,757

Unemployment 772 764 758 754 754 755 753 759

Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9

LF Participation Rate 62.3 62.4 62.5 62.6 62.5 62.5 62.6 62.6

Total Nonfarm 17,439.7 17,472.6 17,471.2 17,503.6 17,528.1 17,554.4 17,583.5 17,612.5

Total Private 14,836.6 14,857.8 14,862.4 14,883.5 14,904.1 14,928.2 14,955.6 14,982.8

Natural Resources and Mining 22.6 22.5 22.4 22.4 22.5 22.6 22.7 22.8

Construction 888.9 891.3 892.1 889.9 887.6 889.3 888.6 896.4

Manufacturing 1,318.5 1,318.8 1,318.1 1,320.6 1,321.4 1,321.7 1,320.1 1,318.5

Trade, Transportation and Utilities 3,053.9 3,056.2 3,049.7 3,056.4 3,053.4 3,056.4 3,062.9 3,062.5

Information 560.0 563.1 567.2 566.9 576.3 573.0 580.2 586.6

Financial Activities 842.0 843.3 844.3 847.5 847.5 845.6 845.8 849.4

Professional and Business Services 2,725.1 2,732.8 2,733.5 2,733.9 2,738.6 2,748.2 2,744.0 2,753.8

Educational and Health Services 2,815.2 2,820.0 2,823.9 2,823.2 2,835.9 2,842.7 2,851.3 2,855.0

Leisure and Hospitality 2,031.9 2,031.5 2,033.6 2,044.1 2,043.1 2,047.3 2,055.7 2,056.5

Other Services 578.5 578.3 577.6 578.6 577.8 581.4 584.3 581.3

Government 2,603.1 2,614.8 2,608.8 2,620.1 2,624.0 2,626.2 2,627.9 2,629.7

California Labor Force and Job Numbers, Most Recent 8 Months

(Employment and Unemployment, Thousands of Persons)

(Nonfarm Payroll Employment, Thousands of Jobs)

Page 8: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

7

Hours and Earnings

INDUSTRY

Year Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan 20

Current

Feb 20

Year Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan20

Current

Feb 20

Year Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan 20

Current

Feb 20

Total Private 34.0 34.0 34.9 $32.11 $33.15 $33.57 $1,091.74 $1,127.10 $1,171.59

Goods Producing 37.2 38.2 38.5 $34.60 $35.54 $35.58 $1,287.12 $1,357.63 $1,369.83

Private Service Providing 33.4 33.2 34.3 $31.63 $32.68 $33.17 $1,056.44 $1,084.98 $1,137.73

Construction 34.4 36.8 36.7 $37.12 $37.55 $37.56 $1,276.93 $1,381.84 $1,378.45

Manufacturing 39.2 39.3 39.9 $33.17 $33.87 $33.97 $1,300.26 $1,331.09 $1,355.40

Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 34.3 33.9 35.4 $24.60 $25.64 $25.81 $843.78 $869.20 $913.67

Information 36.9 36.1 37.8 $49.29 $51.43 $53.57 $1,818.80 $1,856.62 $2,024.95

Financial Activities 36.9 37.8 38.7 $38.06 $39.83 $40.66 $1,404.41 $1,505.57 $1,573.54

Professional and Business Services 36.1 36.2 37.5 $40.75 $41.92 $42.92 $1,471.08 $1,517.50 $1,609.50

Education and Health Services 33.8 33.5 34.1 $31.44 $31.63 $31.53 $1,062.67 $1,059.61 $1,075.17

Leisure and Hospitality 26.1 25.7 26.6 $19.20 $20.46 $20.59 $501.12 $525.82 $547.69

Other Services 30.9 30.8 31.6 $28.03 $29.02 $29.19 $866.13 $893.82 $922.40Data may not add up exactly due to rounding

Industry Hours and Earnings Average Weekly Hours Average Hourly Earnings Average Weekly Earnings

Metropolitan Statistical Areas Hours and Earnings

AREAYear Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan 20

Current

Feb 20

Year Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan 20

Current

Feb 20

Year Ago

Feb 19

Month Ago

Jan 20

Current

Feb 20

Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine MD 34.1 34.2 35.2 $32.11 $32.99 $33.41 $1,094.95 $1,128.26 $1,176.03

Bakersfield MSA 35.7 35.6 36.1 $27.11 $28.90 $28.64 $967.83 $1,028.84 $1,033.90

Chico MSA 30.2 31.4 32.1 $26.42 $26.49 $27.12 $797.88 $831.79 $870.55

El Centro MSA 32.3 34.2 34.7 $18.70 $19.36 $19.69 $604.01 $662.11 $683.24

Fresno MSA 33.4 33.5 34.7 $23.30 $24.05 $24.13 $778.22 $805.68 $837.31

Hanford Corcoran MSA 33.6 32.7 33.8 $21.38 $21.75 $21.98 $718.37 $711.23 $742.92

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale MD 34.8 34.7 35.5 $30.96 $31.71 $32.21 $1,077.41 $1,100.34 $1,143.46

Madera MSA 31.9 32.1 33.0 $29.62 $27.98 $27.21 $944.88 $898.16 $897.93

Merced MSA 29.4 30.8 31.5 $21.96 $20.63 $21.07 $645.62 $635.40 $663.71

Modesto MSA 32.0 32.7 33.8 $25.92 $25.31 $25.00 $829.44 $827.64 $845.00

Napa MSA 32.2 32.4 34.4 $32.75 $30.96 $30.10 $1,054.55 $1,003.10 $1,035.44

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley MD 34.2 34.1 35.3 $34.79 $35.97 $36.27 $1,189.82 $1,226.58 $1,280.33

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura MSA 33.1 33.5 34.5 $29.49 $30.19 $30.23 $976.12 $1,011.37 $1,042.94

Redding MSA 32.0 30.6 32.1 $24.37 $23.95 $23.85 $779.84 $732.87 $765.59

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA 34.1 34.8 35.3 $24.34 $25.24 $25.51 $829.99 $878.35 $900.50

Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade MSA 32.5 32.9 33.9 $28.50 $29.28 $29.45 $926.25 $963.31 $998.36

Salinas MSA 33.0 32.8 33.5 $26.74 $28.38 $28.60 $882.42 $930.86 $958.10

San Diego-Carlsbad MSA 34.2 34.0 34.5 $29.18 $31.59 $31.65 $997.96 $1,074.06 $1,091.93

San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco MD 34.5 34.3 35.8 $45.00 $44.97 $46.17 $1,552.50 $1,542.47 $1,652.89

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara MSA 34.9 34.7 36.1 $45.60 $47.59 $48.33 $1,591.44 $1,651.37 $1,744.71

San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo 29.6 30.4 31.4 $22.81 $23.97 $23.34 $674.88 $728.69 $732.88

San Rafael MD 30.0 30.9 32.7 $33.11 $34.71 $35.24 $993.30 $1,072.54 $1,152.35

Santa Cruz-Watsonville MSA 32.1 31.8 33.7 $28.03 $29.96 $30.39 $899.76 $952.73 $1,024.14

Santa Maria-Santa Barbara MSA 33.4 31.3 32.5 $28.50 $28.67 $28.13 $951.90 $897.37 $914.23

Santa Rosa MSA 31.7 31.8 32.8 $29.39 $29.76 $29.69 $931.66 $946.37 $973.83

Stockton-Lodi MSA 33.2 33.1 33.7 $23.79 $25.48 $25.90 $789.83 $843.39 $872.83

Vallejo-Fairfield MSA 31.9 34.3 35.1 $28.60 $29.15 $29.24 $912.34 $999.85 $1,026.32

Visalia-Porterville MSA 32.4 31.9 32.7 $21.40 $23.56 $23.27 $693.36 $751.56 $760.93

Yuba City MSA 34.3 35.6 36.7 $23.20 $23.50 $23.64 $795.76 $836.60 $867.59

Data may not add due to rounding

NOTE: Hours and earnings data are based on reports of payrolls and the corresponding paid hours for all employees in California and its Metropolitan StatisticalAreas (MSA). Hours and earnings are for private-sector employees.

HOURS: Total hours during the pay period include all hours worked (including overtime hours), hours paid for standby or reporting time, and equivalent hours for whichemployees received pay directly from the employer for sick leave, holidays, vacations, and other leave. Average weekly hours are the total weekly hours divided by the

employees paid for those hours.

EARNINGS: Average hourly earnings are on a "gross" basis. Average weekly earnings are derived by multiplying average weekly hours estimates by average hourlyearnings estimates.

Average Weekly Hours Average Hourly Earnings Average Weekly Earnings

Page 9: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

8

Eight sectors gained jobs and three sectors lost jobs

Industry Sector Highlights

Within nonfarm industries, eight sectors saw month-over job gains and three sectors experienced month-over job losses. The sectors that gained jobs in February were: professional and business services (9,800); construction (7,800); information (6,400); educational and health services (3,700); financial activities (3,600); government (1,800); leisure and hospitality (800) and mining and logging (100). The sectors that lost jobs were other services (3,000); manufacturing (1,600) and trade, transportation and utilities (400).

Mining and Logging payrolls increased by 100 jobs in February. This followed a 100-job gain in

January. Over the year, sector employment was up by 200 jobs (0.9 percent)

Construction payrolls increased by 7,800 jobs in February. This followed a 700-job loss in January.

Over the year, sector employment was up by 24,000 jobs (2.8 percent).

Manufacturing payrolls decreased by 1,600 jobs in February. This followed a 1,600-job loss in January.

Over the year, sector employment was down by 8,800 jobs (0.7 percent).

Trade, transportation, and utilities payrolls decreased by 400 jobs in February. This followed a 6,500-job

gain in January. Over the year, sector employment was up by 13,800 jobs (0.5 percent).

Information payrolls increased by 6,400 jobs in February. This followed a 7,200-job gain in January.

Over the year, sector employment was up by 24,500 jobs (4.4 percent).

Financial activities payrolls increased by 3,600 jobs in February. This followed a 200-job gain in January.

Over the year, sector employment was up by 12,100 jobs (1.4 percent).

Professional and business services payrolls increased by 9,800 jobs in February. This followed a

4,200-job loss in January. Over the year, sector employment was up by 47,100 jobs (1.7 percent).

Educational and health services payrolls increased by 3,700 jobs in February. This followed an 8,600-job

gain in January. Over the year, sector employment was up by 80,300 jobs (2.9 percent).

Leisure and hospitality payrolls increased by 800 jobs in February. This followed an 8,400-job gain in

January. Over the year, sector employment was up by 32,500 jobs (1.6 percent).

Other services payrolls decreased by 3,000 jobs in February. This followed a 2,900-job gain in January.

Over the year, sector employment was up by 7,800 jobs (1.4 percent).

Government payrolls increased by 1,800 jobs in February. This followed a 1,700-job gain in January.

Over the year, sector employment was up by 35,500 jobs (1.4 percent).

Page 10: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

9

YEAR-OVER CHANGE

Comparisons of Job Growth in

California Industry Sectors(Seasonally Adjusted, February 2020)

MONTH-OVER CHANGE

9.8

7.8

6.4

3.7

3.6

1.8

0.8

0.1

-0.4

-1.6

-3.0

Prof. & Bus. Services

Construction

Information

Educ.and Health

Financial Activities

Government

Leisure & Hospitality

Mining & Logging

Trade, Transp. & Util.

Manufacturing

Other Services

Thousands of Jobs

1.1%

0.9%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.1%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

-0.1%

-0.5%

Information

Construction

Mining & Logging

Financial Activities

Prof. & Bus. Services

Educ.and Health

Government

Leisure & Hospitality

Trade, Transp. & Util.

Manufacturing

Other Services

Percent Change

80.3

47.1

35.5

32.5

24.5

24.0

13.8

12.1

7.8

0.2

-8.8

Educ.and Health

Prof. & Bus. Services

Government

Leisure & Hospitality

Information

Construction

Trade, Transp. & Util.

Financial Activities

Other Services

Mining & Logging

Manufacturing

Thousands of Jobs

4.4%

2.9%

2.8%

1.7%

1.6%

1.4%

1.4%

1.4%

0.9%

0.5%

-0.7%

Information

Educ.and Health

Construction

Prof. & Bus. Services

Leisure & Hospitality

Financial Activities

Government

Other Services

Mining & Logging

Trade, Transp. & Util.

Manufacturing

Percent Change

Page 11: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

10

California Area Trends

The lowest unemployment rate among California counties in February was 2.1 percent in San Mateo County. Five other counties had rates below 3.0 percent in February: San Francisco (2.2 percent); Marin (2.3 percent); Santa Clara (2.6 percent); Orange (2.8 percent) and Sonoma (2.8 percent). The highest unemployment rate in February was 19.9 percent in Colusa County. The comparable, not seasonally adjusted California unemployment rate was 4.3 percent in February.

The unemployment rate decreased in 29 counties in February. Imperial County experienced the highest rate decrease (0.9 percent). The statewide not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate remained unchanged from January 2020.

Over the year, the unemployment rate decreased in all but five counties. Alpine County (up 0.9 percent) experienced the largest rate increase, while Plumas County experienced the largest rate decrease (down 1.3 percent). The statewide not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate decreased by 0.2 percentage point from February 2019 to February 2020.

Current monthly payroll employment estimates are reported for 50 sub-state areas in California. Forty of the

50 areas recorded month-over increases in nonfarm payrolls. Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale MD experienced the largest month-over job gain (41,200), while Yuba City MSA experienced the largest month-over decrease (300 jobs).

Forty-five of the 50 sub-state areas recorded year-over employment gains, with the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale MD showing the largest numerical job growth of 83,500 jobs (1.8 percent) and Yuba City MSA showing the largest percentage growth of 8.3 percent (3,700 jobs). Merced MSA experienced the largest numerical decline of 1,000 jobs (1.4 percent) while Alpine County experienced the largest percentage decrease, down 10.2 percent (120 jobs).

Among the ten California areas with more than 290,000 nonfarm jobs, February 2020 unemployment rates varied from a low of 2.2 in the San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco MD to a high of 8.5 percent in the Fresno MSA. Year-over change in nonfarm jobs ranged from an increase of 0.4 percent in the Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley MD to an increase of 3.0 in the San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco MD.

(See chart below)

Page 12: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

11

YEAR AGO MONTH AGO CURRENT MONTH-OVER CHANGE YEAR-OVER CHANGE RANK BY

AREA Feb 19 Jan 20 Feb 20 Number Percent Number Percent Yr Over Pct

Revised Preliminary

Statewide 17,250,500 17,445,800 17,540,700 94,900 0.5% 290,200 1.7%

Sum of Areas 16,910,950 17,101,170 17,214,130 112,960 0.7% 303,180 1.8%

Alpine County 1,180 1,080 1,060 -20 -1.9% -120 -10.2% 50

Amador County 12,050 12,430 12,500 70 0.6% 450 3.7% 5

Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine MD 1,657,700 1,668,100 1,677,300 9,200 0.6% 19,600 1.2% 35

Bakersfield MSA 269,400 277,200 278,200 1,000 0.4% 8,800 3.3% 8

Calaveras County 9,200 9,700 9,750 50 0.5% 550 6.0% 3

Chico MSA 80,300 79,400 80,100 700 0.9% -200 -0.2% 48

Colusa County 6,210 6,220 6,310 90 1.4% 100 1.6% 29

Del Norte County 7,970 8,080 8,110 30 0.4% 140 1.8% 27

El Centro MSA 52,900 53,600 53,900 300 0.6% 1,000 1.9% 22

Fresno MSA 354,900 362,200 364,900 2,700 0.7% 10,000 2.8% 11

Glenn County 7,100 7,220 7,260 40 0.6% 160 2.3% 17

Hanford-Corcoran MSA 40,800 40,500 41,100 600 1.5% 300 0.7% 41

Humboldt County 50,200 49,900 50,600 700 1.4% 400 0.8% 38

Inyo County 7,500 7,620 7,620 0 0.0% 120 1.6% 30

Lake County 15,750 15,980 15,960 -20 -0.1% 210 1.3% 34

Lassen County 9,210 9,170 9,200 30 0.3% -10 -0.1% 47

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale MD 4,549,400 4,591,700 4,632,900 41,200 0.9% 83,500 1.8% 25

Madera MSA 38,200 38,900 39,500 600 1.5% 1,300 3.4% 7

Mariposa County 5,090 4,920 5,090 170 3.5% 0 0.0% 46

Mendocino County 30,860 30,870 31,100 230 0.7% 240 0.8% 40

Merced MSA 70,000 68,900 69,000 100 0.1% -1,000 -1.4% 49

Modesto MSA 177,800 180,900 181,600 700 0.4% 3,800 2.1% 20

Modoc County 2,230 2,260 2,240 -20 -0.9% 10 0.4% 42

Mono County 8,100 8,360 8,120 -240 -2.9% 20 0.2% 45

Napa MSA 72,900 73,800 74,600 800 1.1% 1,700 2.3% 16

Nevada County 32,950 33,420 33,210 -210 -0.6% 260 0.8% 39

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley MD 1,176,000 1,176,700 1,180,300 3,600 0.3% 4,300 0.4% 44

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura MSA 309,400 311,100 312,800 1,700 0.5% 3,400 1.1% 36

Plumas County 5,990 6,130 6,080 -50 -0.8% 90 1.5% 32

Redding MSA 66,200 67,400 67,200 -200 -0.3% 1,000 1.5% 31

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario MSA 1,523,800 1,543,100 1,550,300 7,200 0.5% 26,500 1.7% 28

Sacramento-Roseville-Arden Arcade MSA 1,006,600 1,019,600 1,025,300 5,700 0.6% 18,700 1.9% 24

Salinas MSA 142,700 144,800 146,500 1,700 1.2% 3,800 2.7% 13

San Diego-Carlsbad MSA 1,488,000 1,504,600 1,514,400 9,800 0.7% 26,400 1.8% 26

San Francisco-Redwood City-South San Francisco MD 1,157,100 1,184,400 1,191,800 7,400 0.6% 34,700 3.0% 10

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara MSA 1,133,800 1,147,800 1,154,900 7,100 0.6% 21,100 1.9% 23

San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles-Arroyo Grande MSA 117,600 120,400 121,800 1,400 1.2% 4,200 3.6% 6

San Rafael MD 114,700 116,700 117,200 500 0.4% 2,500 2.2% 18

Santa Cruz-Watsonville MSA 101,900 102,800 104,600 1,800 1.8% 2,700 2.6% 14

Santa Maria-Santa Barbara MSA 185,700 187,300 189,700 2,400 1.3% 4,000 2.2% 19

Santa Rosa MSA 205,000 208,400 209,900 1,500 0.7% 4,900 2.4% 15

Sierra County 540 590 580 -10 -1.7% 40 7.4% 2

Siskiyou County 12,610 12,940 12,960 20 0.2% 350 2.8% 12

Stockton-Lodi MSA 242,400 245,600 247,200 1,600 0.7% 4,800 2.0% 21

Tehama County 16,980 17,310 17,500 190 1.1% 520 3.1% 9

Trinity County 2,700 2,690 2,710 20 0.7% 10 0.4% 43

Tuolumne County 17,730 18,280 18,470 190 1.0% 740 4.2% 4

Vallejo-Fairfield MSA 141,700 143,000 143,200 200 0.1% 1,500 1.1% 37

Visalia-Porterville MSA 127,300 128,500 129,200 700 0.5% 1,900 1.5% 33

Yuba City MSA 44,600 48,600 48,300 -300 -0.6% 3,700 8.3% 1

Nonfarm Payroll Employment by California Area(Number of Jobs, Not Seasonally Adjusted)

Data may not add to total due to rounding.

Source: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, Current Employment Statistics (CES) Program.

Page 13: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

12

Jan 20 Feb 19

AREA / COUNTY RANK LABOR FORCE EMPLOYMENT UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%) M onth-Ago Y ear-Ago

CALIFORNIA --- 19,588,400 18,869,300 719,100 3.7% 4.3% 4.8%

ALAMEDA 7 858,600 837,100 21,500 2.5% 3.1% 3.4%

ALPINE 27 610 590 20 3.8% 4.6% 4.2%

AMADOR 24 14,810 14,270 540 3.7% 4.7% 5.0%

BUTTE 31 102,700 98,400 4,300 4.2% 5.6% 6.9%

CALAVERAS 22 21,500 20,750 740 3.5% 4.3% 4.8%

COLUSA 57 10,650 9,140 1,510 14.2% 19.2% 19.7%

CONTRA COSTA 9 570,700 555,600 15,100 2.6% 3.2% 3.7%

DEL NORTE 42 9,690 9,150 540 5.6% 6.5% 7.3%

EL DORADO 15 92,300 89,500 2,900 3.1% 3.7% 4.3%

FRESNO 48 453,100 421,600 31,500 6.9% 8.1% 9.0%

GLENN 41 12,940 12,230 710 5.5% 7.3% 8.1%

HUMBOLDT 15 63,700 61,800 1,900 3.1% 4.1% 4.6%

IMPERIAL 58 73,800 59,500 14,300 19.4% 18.0% 18.3%

INYO 15 8,640 8,370 270 3.1% 3.9% 4.9%

KERN 50 385,600 357,700 27,900 7.2% 8.6% 9.0%

KINGS 53 58,300 53,800 4,500 7.7% 9.4% 9.7%

LAKE 39 29,120 27,650 1,470 5.1% 6.0% 6.6%

LASSEN 31 9,700 9,290 400 4.2% 5.6% 6.0%

LOS ANGELES 30 5,194,800 4,986,700 208,000 4.0% 4.5% 5.0%

MADERA 47 61,800 57,600 4,200 6.8% 8.1% 8.6%

MARIN 2 142,900 140,200 2,800 1.9% 2.4% 2.7%

MARIPOSA 34 6,930 6,620 320 4.6% 6.3% 7.1%

MENDOCINO 24 39,030 37,580 1,450 3.7% 4.8% 5.3%

MERCED 55 115,600 106,500 9,100 7.9% 9.8% 10.1%

MODOC 49 3,040 2,830 220 7.1% 9.7% 11.5%

MONO 14 9,350 9,070 280 3.0% 3.5% 4.0%

MONTEREY 50 214,500 199,100 15,400 7.2% 9.7% 10.1%

NAPA 12 72,800 70,700 2,100 2.9% 3.5% 4.0%

NEVADA 12 48,690 47,260 1,430 2.9% 3.7% 4.1%

ORANGE 5 1,633,200 1,593,500 39,700 2.4% 2.9% 3.3%

PLACER 10 187,100 182,000 5,100 2.7% 3.3% 3.7%

PLUMAS 54 7,470 6,880 590 7.8% 10.5% 11.5%

RIVERSIDE 24 1,111,200 1,070,400 40,800 3.7% 4.2% 4.8%

SACRAMENTO 18 717,100 694,000 23,100 3.2% 3.9% 4.4%

SAN BENITO 38 31,200 29,600 1,500 5.0% 6.2% 6.5%

SAN BERNARDINO 19 979,000 946,500 32,500 3.3% 3.9% 4.4%

SAN DIEGO 11 1,614,200 1,569,400 44,800 2.8% 3.3% 3.8%

SAN FRANCISCO 2 591,700 580,400 11,300 1.9% 2.3% 2.6%

SAN JOAQUIN 44 325,100 306,600 18,500 5.7% 6.7% 7.2%

SAN LUIS OBISPO 7 140,100 136,600 3,600 2.5% 3.1% 3.5%

SAN MATEO 1 467,100 458,900 8,200 1.8% 2.1% 2.5%

SANTA BARBARA 23 215,800 208,000 7,800 3.6% 4.7% 5.3%

SANTA CLARA 4 1,073,900 1,050,600 23,300 2.2% 2.6% 2.9%

SANTA CRUZ 36 139,900 133,100 6,800 4.9% 6.1% 6.6%

SHASTA 31 73,500 70,400 3,100 4.2% 5.4% 6.1%

SIERRA 35 1,310 1,250 60 4.7% 6.2% 7.3%

SISKIYOU 46 17,140 16,050 1,090 6.3% 8.3% 9.2%

SOLANO 20 207,700 200,700 7,000 3.4% 4.0% 4.7%

SONOMA 5 262,600 256,400 6,200 2.4% 2.9% 3.3%

STANISLAUS 42 241,900 228,300 13,600 5.6% 6.6% 7.4%

SUTTER 52 45,700 42,400 3,300 7.3% 8.7% 9.8%

TEHAMA 36 25,490 24,250 1,250 4.9% 6.3% 7.1%

TRINITY 40 4,550 4,310 240 5.2% 6.9% 7.4%

TULARE 56 203,700 184,700 19,000 9.3% 11.0% 11.4%

TUOLUMNE 28 21,600 20,750 850 3.9% 4.9% 5.7%

VENTURA 20 424,000 409,600 14,400 3.4% 3.9% 4.4%

YOLO 28 109,500 105,200 4,300 3.9% 4.9% 5.4%

YUBA 45 29,700 28,000 1,700 5.8% 7.0% 7.9%NOTE: Unemployment rates are calculated from unrounded labor force and unemployment level data.

NOTE: The 'RANK' assigned to each county is a whole number based on the ascending order of unemployment rates for the current month (e.g.,the

county with the lowest unemployment rate is assigned a 'RANK' of 1; conversely, the county with the highest rate is assigned a 'RANK' of 58).

SOURCE: EDD, Labor Market Information Division, Current Economic Statistics Group.

February 2020, revised January 2020 and February 2019; Not Seasonally Adjusted

2019 Benchmark

Page 14: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

13

Page 15: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

14

CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET INFORMATIONAND UNITED STATES UNEMPLOYMENT RATES

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED(IN THOUSANDS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC AVG

2011 18,363 18,362 18,360 18,360 18,367 18,384 18,408 18,436 18,462 18,481 18,489 18,487 18,413

2012 18,478 18,473 18,474 18,481 18,492 18,506 18,522 18,540 18,563 18,586 18,605 18,617 18,528

2013 18,615 18,614 18,615 18,622 18,634 18,646 18,652 18,647 18,632 18,618 18,615 18,624 18,628

2014 18,604 18,626 18,647 18,663 18,677 18,693 18,715 18,742 18,773 18,799 18,814 18,821 18,715

2015 18,805 18,811 18,819 18,827 18,831 18,828 18,820 18,815 18,816 18,830 18,859 18,893 18,830

2016 18,926 18,952 18,970 18,984 19,001 19,019 19,038 19,056 19,071 19,081 19,087 19,094 19,023

2017 19,137 19,149 19,160 19,172 19,186 19,202 19,219 19,234 19,243 19,248 19,250 19,253 19,204

2018 19,204 19,217 19,239 19,257 19,268 19,273 19,276 19,284 19,301 19,326 19,354 19,375 19,281

2019 19,383 19,374 19,357 19,342 19,338 19,350 19,381 19,420 19,458 19,485 19,488 19,484 19,405

2020 19,510 19,516

2011 16,143 16,160 16,175 16,185 16,194 16,209 16,236 16,273 16,316 16,360 16,397 16,424 16,256

2012 16,443 16,459 16,477 16,496 16,523 16,558 16,603 16,651 16,702 16,748 16,787 16,817 16,605

2013 16,836 16,857 16,880 16,911 16,943 16,969 16,988 17,000 17,011 17,025 17,048 17,081 16,962

2014 17,086 17,131 17,175 17,213 17,247 17,285 17,326 17,370 17,416 17,459 17,496 17,527 17,311

2015 17,534 17,557 17,582 17,608 17,634 17,654 17,671 17,687 17,707 17,735 17,773 17,815 17,663

2016 17,855 17,889 17,914 17,934 17,953 17,973 17,994 18,015 18,033 18,048 18,064 18,085 17,980

2017 18,139 18,168 18,196 18,223 18,250 18,278 18,307 18,334 18,357 18,376 18,390 18,403 18,285

2018 18,365 18,383 18,407 18,430 18,446 18,457 18,467 18,479 18,494 18,513 18,532 18,546 18,460

2019 18,551 18,546 18,538 18,536 18,545 18,569 18,609 18,656 18,700 18,731 18,734 18,729 18,620

2020 18,756 18,757

2011 2,220 2,202 2,186 2,175 2,173 2,174 2,172 2,163 2,146 2,121 2,093 2,063 2,157

2012 2,035 2,013 1,998 1,985 1,969 1,948 1,920 1,889 1,861 1,838 1,818 1,799 1,923

2013 1,779 1,758 1,734 1,711 1,692 1,677 1,665 1,647 1,621 1,593 1,566 1,543 1,666

2014 1,517 1,494 1,472 1,451 1,430 1,408 1,389 1,373 1,358 1,340 1,317 1,294 1,404

2015 1,271 1,253 1,237 1,219 1,198 1,174 1,149 1,128 1,109 1,095 1,085 1,078 1,166

2016 1,071 1,063 1,056 1,050 1,047 1,046 1,044 1,041 1,038 1,033 1,023 1,009 1,043

2017 997 981 964 950 936 923 912 900 886 872 860 850 919

2018 839 834 831 827 822 816 809 806 807 813 821 829 821

2019 832 828 819 806 793 781 772 764 758 754 754 755 785

2020 753 759

2011 12.1 12.0 11.9 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.7 11.6 11.5 11.3 11.2 11.7

2012 11.0 10.9 10.8 10.7 10.6 10.5 10.4 10.2 10.0 9.9 9.8 9.7 10.4

2013 9.6 9.4 9.3 9.2 9.1 9.0 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.3 8.9

2014 8.2 8.0 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.0 6.9 7.5

2015 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.2 6.1 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.7 6.2

2016 5.7 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.5

2017 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.8

2018 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3

2019 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.1

2020 3.9 3.9

2011 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.1 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.9

2012 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.1 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.9 8.1

2013 8.0 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.2 6.9 6.7 7.4

2014 6.6 6.7 6.7 6.2 6.3 6.1 6.2 6.1 5.9 5.7 5.8 5.6 6.2

2015 5.7 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.0 5.0 5.1 5.0 5.3

2016 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.9

2017 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.3

2018 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.9 3.9

2019 4.0 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.7

2020 3.6 3.5

NOTE: The statewide labor force data presented here are derived from BLS-developed, time series regression

models and are based on the 2019 Benchmark.

SOURCE: U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

CALIFORNIA LABOR FORCE

CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT

CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT

CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT RATES (%)

UNITED STATES UNEMPLOYMENT RATES (%)

Page 16: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

15

INITIAL CLAIMS FOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (UI)(FOR THE WEEK INCLUDING THE 19TH OF THE MONTH)

(IN THOUSANDS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 117.5 128.0 121.4 119.3 123.5 130.7 118.0 109.1 106.4 124.7 131.3 137.3

2012 101.9 102.2 114.9 115.4 103.3 109.1 94.7 90.7 89.3 93.9 64.7 93.0

2013 120.0 69.0 93.0 90.5 90.9 104.0 106.5 81.4 59.4 103.2 64.6 107.8

2014 77.6 67.3 53.6 63.1 53.6 62.9 56.6 47.7 52.3 52.8 60.3 47.9

2015 41.1 43.3 44.6 47.5 43.0 45.6 45.5 43.4 40.9 46.3 54.5 53.4

2016 53.8 42.3 44.4 46.9 40.9 50.1 43.0 39.2 38.4 44.9 54.4 53.0

2017 62.3 43.6 42.9 45.4 38.4 47.0 45.4 38.2 39.7 42.2 36.2 45.5

2018 52.1 31.4 39.5 41.0 41.9 47.1 39.9 36.0 34.6 40.1 34.2 48.7

2019 51.7 34.7 40.1 44.1 38.5 39.0 39.6 34.9 35.4 39.5 49.5 50.2

2020 45.7 41.8

DATE

SOURCE: EDD, Unemployment Insurance Division, Program Analysis and Reporting Unit.

SOURCE: EDD, Unemployment Insurance Division, Program Analysis and Reporting Unit.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Feb 11 Feb 12 Feb 13 Feb 14 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17 Feb 18 Feb 19 Feb 20

T

H

O

U

S

A

N

D

S

DATE

INITIAL CLAIMS

Page 17: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

16

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 1,269.1 1,394.0 1,325.6 1,219.7 1,189.1 1,147.1 1,171.5 1,127.6 1,050.4 1,035.0 1,108.6 1,091.2

2012 1,127.8 1,108.2 1,115.4 1,083.4 1,041.7 889.1 920.0 900.1 850.2 820.6 696.3 848.0

2013 988.0 749.0 857.0 770.0 817.0 751.2 835.9 767.8 685.0 617.3 696.3 747.3

2014 541.6 557.2 518.2 484.8 438.6 420.8 428.0 416.7 394.3 393.9 394.2 437.7

2015 398.2 428.4 466.7 418.5 382.3 364.3 379.9 369.3 345.8 336.6 358.4 395.3

2016 412.8 390.4 423.6 401.2 365.7 347.9 356.0 354.5 328.8 325.7 360.8 370.8

2017 389.4 408.0 423.6 391.2 357.3 333.1 346.2 343.0 315.5 301.8 259.3 354.6

2018 345.0 398.6 406.0 393.5 340.9 306.1 326.0 308.5 287.2 274.8 263.3 341.2

2019 379.0 391.8 390.3 367.0 324.0 304.5 310.5 311.9 283.3 263.0 296.2 330.3

2020 341.2 374.8

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 603.9 666.3 630.8 584.1 553.0 528.9 566.4 543.1 494.8 494.8 536.3 536.42012 575.9 565.4 570.1 552.2 515.4 483.4 518.6 501.2 470.5 453.4 391.9 496.5

2013 519.6 487.0 533.0 497.2 479.7 445.9 510.9 465.9 362.5 405.7 391.8 504.5

2014 495.2 539.0 510.9 481.0 435.7 418.9 426.2 411.0 392.8 392.0 392.6 436.0

2015 397.1 426.8 464.5 415.9 379.9 362.1 377.9 367.2 343.4 334.2 355.9 393.3

2016 410.2 388.4 420.5 398.0 362.5 345.1 353.6 352.0 326.2 323.1 358.0 367.9

2017 386.8 405.1 420.5 388.1 354.3 330.4 343.7 340.6 312.9 299.2 256.9 351.9

2018 342.4 396.0 403.1 390.3 337.9 303.5 323.5 306.1 284.7 272.5 261.0 338.7

2019 376.4 389.4 387.7 364.4 321.3 302.1 308.2 309.6 281.0 260.7 293.5 327.7

2020 339.0 372.3

E ffective December 21, 1991, total weeks claimed includes extended unemployment compensation claims.

E xcludes any special programs.

SOURCE: EDD, Unemployment Insurance Division, Program Analysis and Reporting Unit.

(IN THOUSANDS)

TOTAL WEEKS CLAIMED FOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (UI)(FOR THE WEEK INCLUDING THE 19TH OF THE MONTH)

(IN THOUSANDS)

REGULAR WEEKS CLAIMED FOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (UI)**(FOR THE WEEK INCLUDING THE 19TH OF THE MONTH)

0.0

100.0

200.0

300.0

400.0

500.0

600.0

700.0

800.0

900.0

1000.0

1100.0

1200.0

1300.0

1400.0

1500.0

Feb 11 Feb 12 Feb 13 Feb 14 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17 Feb 18 Feb 19 Feb 20

T

H

O

U

S

A

N

D

S

DATE

TOTAL WEEKS

CLAIMED

REGULAR WEEKS

CLAIMED

Page 18: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

17

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (U. I.) INSURED UNEMPLOYMENT RATE *(EXCLUDING EXTENDED BENEFIT PROGRAMS)

(IN PERCENT)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 4.22 4.37 4.42 4.35 4.16 3.92 3.80 3.76 3.70 3.57 3.47 3.51

2012 3.66 3.91 3.96 3.85 3.83 3.58 3.43 3.39 3.35 3.25 3.08 3.16

2013 3.27 3.52 3.48 3.56 3.41 3.22 3.16 3.15 2.97 2.78 3.08 2.91

2014 3.06 3.50 3.45 3.44 3.27 3.02 2.83 2.72 2.63 2.49 2.40 2.45

2015 2.57 2.72 2.82 2.76 2.65 2.45 2.34 2.30 2.28 2.17 2.68 2.16

2016 2.31 2.46 2.58 2.56 2.48 2.28 2.18 2.15 2.13 2.05 2.00 2.06

2017 2.18 2.41 2.50 2.50 2.38 2.17 2.06 2.02 1.99 1.91 1.81 1.90

2018 2.00 2.21 2.27 2.29 2.21 2.03 1.91 1.85 1.81 1.73 1.64 1.71

2019 1.84 2.06 2.17 2.19 2.10 2.00 1.85 1.79 1.74 1.67 1.60 1.65

2020 1.81 2.02

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (U.I.) FUND BALANCE(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011-10283.4 -10424.4 -10921.6 -11085.9 -8834.3 -8426.9 -8782.1 -8735.7 -9098.0 -9418.3 -9371.5 -9862.6

2012 -10294.8 -10356.2 -10804.9 -10926.9 -8484.7 -8904.2 -9254.0 -9196.8 -9543.1 -9788.9 -9684.5 -10183.2

2013 -10567.6 -10633.8 -10608.1 -10548.7 -8094.1 -8464.0 -8827.0 -8681.6 -9031.6 -9332.5 -9215.9 -9669.1

2014 -10039.2 -10003.4 -9836.4 -9930.0 -7294.4 -7590.4 -7896.9 -7652.6 -8011.5 -8273.8 -8097.3 -8575.4

2015 -8843.3 -8642.0 -8177.6 -7831.6 -5272.3 -5633.3 -5839.3 -5566.0 -5922.3 -6121.5 -5963.9 -6376.4

2016 -6615.1 -6511.6 -5850.1 -5423.4 -2753.6 -3075.7 -3271.8 -3039.7 -3373.0 -3593.3 -3471.0 -3857.0

2017 -4147.8 -4099.7 -3110.3 -2577.5 20.9 -306.0 -540.0 -315.4 -630.2 -850.2 -722.2 -1138.5

2018 -1385.7 -1280.9 126.1 697.0 3332.3 3034.7 3410.2 3058.2 2763.8 2634.5 2736.9 2336.7

2019 2129.9 2216.0 1859.2 1999.8 4301.3 3967.0 3829.9 4002.5 3684.3 3487.4 3659.2 3280.5

2020 3052.0 3133.7

NOT E : #N/A' indicates that data are not available at this time.

* The insured unemployment rate (IUR) is based on a ratio of a 13-week moving average of weeks of unemployment insurancebenefits claimed divided by a 12-month moving average of covered employment. This ratio is used to trigger "on" and "off" of the average of the rates for the last two years, this triggers the federal extended benefits program to "on." This program

allows Individuals to receive additional unemployment benefits when they exhaust their regular benefit awards.

** The disbursements on the UI Fund Table reflect checks issued to claimants. The actual cash balance in the fund at any time is

larger than the UI Fund Table Balance, due to the time lag in which these checks are actually redeemed.

UI Insured Unemployment Rate Source: EDD, Unemployment Insurance Division, Program Analysis and Reporting Unit.

UI Fund Balance Source: EDD, Fiscal Programs Division, Cost Review and Automation Section.

P

ER

CEN

T

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

5.00

5.50

6.00

Feb

11

Feb

12

Feb

13

Feb

14

Feb

15

Feb

16

Fe

b 1

7

Fe

b 1

8

Fe

b 1

9

Fe

b 2

0

U. I. INSURED UNEMPLOYMENT RATE

-12,000.0

-10,000.0

-8,000.0

-6,000.0

-4,000.0

-2,000.0

0.0

2,000.0

4,000.0

6,000.0

Feb

11

Feb

12

Feb

13

Feb

14

Feb

15

Feb

16

Fe

b 1

7

Fe

b 1

8

Fe

b 1

9

Fe

b 2

0

U. I. FUND BALANCE

P

ER

CEN

T

M

IL

LIO

NS

Page 19: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

18

Disability Insurance Program

(IN THOUSANDS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 48.6 48.8 57.5 54.5 54.7 56.8 52.2 59.7 55.3 54.6 52.9 52.7

2012 51.6 52.0 56.4 54.0 59.0 54.9 53.9 60.3 27.8 55.0 50.3 44.0

2013 51.2 50.0 49.9 59.8 58.6 50.0 53.7 57.6 54.8 55.5 45.9 50.2

2014 52.8 48.3 49.7 56.1 53.9 54.6 54.6 53.0 54.0 57.2 51.2 55.0

2015 50.1 51.3 54.1 56.8 51.5 54.8 53.5 52.6 53.3 54.0 45.8 59.6

2016 53.0 51.2 54.8 54.1 54.7 57.9 48.5 57.9 54.1 54.6 52.5 53.2

2017 50.5 46.5 56.3 53.5 57.1 55.2 47.3 61.8 48.8 56.6 49.4 49.2

2018 53.4 47.9 55.7 55.2 55.2 53.8 56.4 58.9 50.8 60.4 53.6 53.5

2019 55.9 53.5 58.3 56.9 59.0 52.3 57.4 57.6 54.4 63.4 51.6 60.1

2020 56.3 50.8

(IN THOUSANDS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 13.0 12.1 14.5 13.8 14.0 14.5 13.8 15.9 14.3 14.3 13.1 13.52012 13.9 13.2 13.8 13.5 14.6 13.9 14.2 15.8 7.3 13.9 12.3 10.4

2013 12.4 12.1 12.0 14.1 13.7 11.8 13.6 15.0 14.8 14.8 11.7 13.0

2014 14.3 12.5 12.8 14.3 13.8 14.2 14.6 14.3 14.8 15.1 11.9 14.5

2015 13.8 12.4 14.0 14.4 13.1 14.6 14.2 14.4 14.8 14.6 11.7 15.5

2016 14.8 13.8 14.5 14.3 14.4 15.6 13.5 16.5 15.6 15.3 13.9 14.1

2017 14.3 12.7 15.0 14.1 15.3 15.0 13.1 17.4 13.7 15.6 12.9 12.6

2018 14.9 12.6 14.6 14.5 14.3 14.1 15.4 15.9 14.0 16.3 13.9 13.3

2019 15.1 13.1 14.8 14.6 14.7 13.6 15.2 15.3 14.6 16.2 12.5 14.3

2020 14.6 12.9

.

(IN THOUSANDS)

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 15.8 15.0 16.6 15.1 15.7 18.2 15.0 17.9 18.7 16.4 14.9 16.6

2012 18.0 15.4 18.1 15.6 16.1 17.3 16.9 19.3 15.1 18.0 14.9 17.3

2013 18.2 16.1 14.4 19.0 17.6 15.4 16.1 17.6 18.0 18.2 15.7 17.0

2014 19.5 19.2 17.4 18.4 18.1 18.0 19.4 18.3 18.6 20.1 16.7 21.6

2015 19.8 16.7 18.3 19.1 17.2 19.1 19.7 17.9 18.8 19.9 16.8 21.3

2016 20.0 19.2 19.7 19.6 19.4 20.2 19.1 21.7 20.1 20.5 19.7 21.9

2017 20.9 18.7 20.7 19.3 20.5 21.7 19.6 22.9 19.5 21.0 18.9 20.6

2018 23.8 19.8 22.9 22.2 22.6 22.6 22.6 23.7 22.0 24.8 19.6 22.9

2019 24.8 20.7 24.4 24.4 23.6 21.9 21.5 22.9 24.6 24.1 22.5 24.5

2020 26.1 20.5

SOURCE: EDD, Disability Insurance Branch, Program Data & Research Unit.

Note: Paid Family Leave started in July 2004 (http://www.edd.ca.gov/Disability/Paid_Family_Leave.htm)

Note: September 2012 was the implementation of the new SDI Online program, which may initially cause lags in theprocessing of disability claims.

TOTAL FIRST PAYMENTS AUTHORIZED FOR PAID FAMILY LEAVE (PFL)

PREGNANCY-RELATED FIRST PAYMENTS AUTHORIZED FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE (DI)

TOTAL FIRST PAYMENTS AUTHORIZED FOR DISABILITY INSURANCE (DI)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Feb 11 Feb 12 Feb 13 Feb 14 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17 Feb 18 Feb 19 Feb 20

T

H

O

U

S

A

N

D

S

TOTAL FIRST PAYMENTS

PREGNANCY-RELATED FIRST PAYMENTS AUTHORIZED

PAID FAMILY LEAVE FIRST PAYMENTS

DATE

Page 20: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

19

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2011 1,618.4 1,748.6 1,883.4 1,997.1 2,014.4 2,102.5 2,184.1 2,237.9 1,970.1 1,976.4 1,995.0 1,967.3

2012 2,014.8 2,166.5 2,287.4 2,291.1 2,322.2 2,329.7 2,307.2 2,327.6 2,032.0 1,973.3 1,954.0 1,886.8

2013 1,925.4 2,047.9 2,218.8 2,198.0 2,267.0 2,332.5 2,342.4 2,375.3 2,325.6 2,311.0 2,315.2 2,240.2

2014 2,240.2 2,295.4 2,566.2 2,601.5 2,646.6 2,694.5 2,727.3 2,772.2 2,721.4 2,699.1 2,660.3 2,575.3

2015 2,592.1 2,710.1 2,775.0 2,811.7 2,829.7 2,844.7 2,841.4 2,810.6 2,771.5 2,719.8 2,643.3 2,556.9

2016 2,557.2 2,669.6 2,789.9 2,823.4 2,839.5 3,174.7 3,159.3 3,162.5 3,112.9 3,029.4 2,846.4 2,946.4

2017 2,851.5 2,937.3 3,027.7 3,078.6 3,091.9 3,190.0 3,181.0 3,157.1 3,102.6 3,037.9 2,977.5 2,864.3

2018 2,944.7 3,113.0 3,282.9 3,332.8 3,402.8 3,455.4 3,410.2 3,435.6 3,370.6 3,293.6 3,238.7 3,112.3

2019 3,102.4 3,236.5 3,265.6 3,368.7 3,351.0 3,527.5 3,573.7 3,704.6 3,711.9 3,553.5 3,422.8 3,294.0

2020 3,112.1 3,389.2

SOURCE: EDD, Fiscal Programs Division, Accounting Section.

DISABILITY INSURANCE (DI) FUND BALANCE

(IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2200

2400

2600

2800

3000

3200

3400

3600

3800

4000

Feb 11 Feb 12 Feb 13 Feb 14 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17 Feb 18 Feb 19 Feb 20

M

I

L

L

I

O

N

$

DATE

DI FUND

Page 21: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

20

GLOSSARY

Current Population Survey (CPS) or “Household Survey”. The monthly survey of households from which are derived estimates of

civilian labor force, employment, unemployment, and unemployment rate for Los Angeles County and the Balance of California. The

CPS is a stratified random sample conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Employment, Civilian. As measured by the Current Population Survey (CPS), consists of civilian or noninstitutional workers 16

years of age and older who (a) during the survey week, worked as paid employees, or in their own business or farm or profession, or who

worked 15 hours or more as unpaid workers in a family enterprise, and (b) were not working but who had jobs or businesses from which

they were temporarily absent because of illness, inclement weather, vacation, work stoppage or labor management dispute, or personal

reasons, whether or not they were paid for the time-off.

Hispanic. An ethnic classification that includes persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, or any other nationality based on the

Spanish cultures or languages; persons of Hispanic origin may be of any race.

Hours of Work. The number of hours worked during the survey week. Persons who worked at least 35 hours during the survey

week are designated as full-time; persons who worked less than 35 hours are considered part-time.

Labor Force, Civilian. Those individuals, 16 years of age and older, who were working or actively seeking work during the

survey week; also, the aggregration of civilian employment and civilian unemployment.

Labor Force Participation Rate. The civilian labor force expressed as a percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population.

Nonfarm (Nonagricultural) Wage and Salary Employment. The count of all full-time and part-time employees (including employees

on paid vacation or paid sick leave), by industry, who worked in or received compensation from nonfarm establishments for any part of

the pay period including the 12th of the month; employees involved in labor management disputes are not included. Hours and earnings

data by industry are also collected as part of this survey.

Population, Civilian. As defined by the Current Population Survey (CPS), includes persons 16 years of age and older who

reside in the 50 United States, and are not institutionalized or on active duty in the Armed Forces.

Race. The Current Population Survey (CPS) requests the respondent to identify the race of all members of the household, 16

years of age and older. The three racial categories identified on the survey instrument are White, Black, and Other.

Black - A racial classification for persons with origins related to any of the black racial groups of Africa.

Other - The “Other” racial group includes Asians and Pacific Islanders, as well as native americans such as American Indians and

Alaskan Natives.

White - A racial classification for persons with origins related to any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or the Middle East.

Seasonal Adjustment. The removal of the effects of regular periodic events such as weather conditions, holidays, and school

schedules from labor force and payroll employment data. The X-12 ARIMA is the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) recommended

seasonal adjustment program used to seasonally adjust these time series data.

Survey Week. Refers to the week, each month, that includes the 12th during which the Current Population Survey (CPS) is

conducted.

Unemployment, Civilian. Comprised of noninstitutionalized civilians who did not work but made specific efforts to find a job

within the past four weeks and were available for work (except for temporary illness) during the survey week. Also included as

unemployed are those who did not work but were available for work and (a) were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been

laid off or

(b) waiting to begin a new job within thirty days. (See also Unemployment, Duration of and Reasons for.)

Unemployment, Duration of. The length of time (including the current survey week) during which they have been classified as

unemployed and looking for work. For persons on layoff, duration of unemployment represents the number of weeks since the

termination of their most recent employment.

Unemployment, Reasons for. The unemployed are classified into one of four major groups:

Job losers - Persons whose employment ended involuntarily and who immediately began looking for work.

Job leavers - Persons who quit their job or otherwise terminated their employment voluntarily and immediately began looking for

work.

Re-entrants - Persons who worked previously but have been out of the labor force for a period of time before actively seeking work

again.

New entrants - Persons who are seeking employment for the first time (i.e., they have never previously held a job).

Unemployment Rate. The number of unemployed individuals expressed as a percentage of the civilian labor force.

Page 22: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

21

NOTE TO OUR READERS:

The Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID) collects the labor market information presented in this report on a monthly basis, as an agent for the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

Information presented is derived from BLS labor force models, Current Population Survey (CPS), Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS), or the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey.

The CPS measures levels of employment and unemployment through a statewide monthly survey of approximately 5,100 households. This survey collects information on the employment status of each member of these households, 16 years of age and over. Members of these households who are working at more than one job are counted as employed only once. The data reflect the county where the person lives.

The CES survey contacts approximately 71,000 businesses in California each month and collects information as to the number of jobs on the payroll for that month. Individuals who hold more than one job are counted once for each job. The data reflect the county where the job is located. These data, which present employment by industry division, are commonly referred to as the “establishment survey” or the “wage and salary employment series.” Each month the CES Program releases “Preliminary” employment and hours and earnings data for the prior month; also, “Revised” data are published for the month preceding the prior month. Once LMID and BLS have verified the “Revised” data, they remain unchanged until the new benchmark is completed in March of the following year.

The LAUS county data are estimated using a BLS prescribed multi-step estimation process, incorporating a variety of information including, but not limited to, CES survey data, agricultural employment, and unemployment claims data for local areas. The estimates of county employment/unemployment are adjusted so that all areas add to the statewide total, which is derived from BLS-developed regression models. The data reflect the county where the person lives.

Seasonally adjusted labor force data are depicted in some charts. The seasonal adjustment process is used to remove typical seasonal employment fluctuations from a time series. Seasonal activities, which affect employment, occur at various times throughout the year (e.g., additional hiring by retail stores during the Christmas season).

This workforce product was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The product was created by the recipient and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites and including, but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or ownership. This product is copyrighted by the institution that created it. Internal use by an organization and/or personal use by an individual for non-commercial purposes is permissible. All other uses require the authorization of the copyright owner.

This publication is available in PDF at

www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov

Want to subscribe to the California Labor Market Review? You will be

notified as soon as the latest edition is available. Here’s how. Send a request with your

email address to [email protected] or [email protected]

Page 23: CALIFORNIA LABOR MARKET · California Labor Market Review is a monthly publication of the California Employment Development Department’s Labor Market Information Division (LMID)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

The California State Employment Development Department (EDD) is a recipient of federal

and state funds, is an equal opportunity employer/program, and is in compliance with

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Special requests for alternate formats need to be made by calling 916-651-6592.