Upload
dinhduong
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS –
HOT CURRENT ISSUES
William C. Staley Attorney
www.staleylaw.com 818 936-3490
Presenter
June 24, 2010
10653.doc William C. Staley 818 936-3490 062910:1645
CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS – HOT CURRENT ISSUES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. NONPROFIT REGULATION TIMELINE ........................................... 1
2. FUNDAMENTALS ................................................................... 2 2.1. Nonprofit organization ................................................... 2 2.2. Types of Nonprofit Corporations ....................................... 2 2.3. Members .................................................................... 3 2.4. Role of the California Attorney General ............................... 3 2.5. California Property and Sales Taxes ................................... 4 2.6. Types of Section 501(c)(3) organizations:............................. 4
3. OPERATING ISSUES ................................................................ 4 3.1. Fundraising ................................................................. 4 3.2. Gambling and raffles ...................................................... 4 3.3. Business investments ...................................................... 5 3.4. Tax-exempt bonds or certificates of participation .................... 6 3.5. Endowments ................................................................ 6 3.6. Enforcing pledges ......................................................... 7 3.7. Supporting organizations ................................................. 8
4. DUTIES OF DIRECTORS ............................................................ 8 4.1. Rights and duties: ......................................................... 8 4.2. Conflicts of interest: ...................................................... 9 4.3. Indemnification and insurance ......................................... 10 4.4. Political activities ........................................................ 10
5. AUDITS AND THE AUDIT COMMITTEE ........................................ 10 5.1. Audits ..................................................................... 10 5.2. Audit Committee ........................................................ 11
6. COMPENSATION ISSUES ......................................................... 13 6.1. Overlapping laws ........................................................ 13 6.2. Deferred compensation for founders and other key
personnel .................................................................. 14 6.3. IRS inquiry letters ....................................................... 14 6.4. Compensation Committees ............................................. 14
10653.doc -ii- 062910:1645
7. ASSET TRANSFERS AND MERGERS ............................................ 15 7.1. Prior notice to the Attorney General ................................. 15 7.2. Mergers ................................................................... 15
8. EXPANSION ....................................................................... 16
9. ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES .................................. 16 9.1. Increased role of the federal government after 9-11-01 ........... 17 9.2. Protecting the charitable contribution deduction ................... 17 9.3. Expenditure responsibility ............................................. 17 9.4. Protecting the trade name and trademarks .......................... 17
Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved
WILLIAM C. STALEY 818-936-3490
www.staleylaw.com This outline should be viewed only as a summary of the law and not as a substitute for legal or tax consultation in a particular case. Your comments would be appre-ciated and are invited.
10653.doc 062910:1645
CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS – HOT CURRENT ISSUES
William C. Staley
Attorney (818) 936-3490
1. NONPROFIT REGULATION TIMELINE
1916 – Deduction for charitable contributions allowed in first income tax law.
1959 –Uniform Supervision of Trustees for Charitable Purposes Act adopted in California (now “Supervision of Trustees and Fun-draisers for Charitable Purposes Act”)
1969 – Comprehensive revision of federal tax law for tax-exempt organi-zations, including penalty taxes on “prohibited transactions” for private foundations
1976 – Comprehensive revision of California corporate law
1978 – Comprehensive revision of California nonprofit corporation law
1990 – Uniform Management of Institutional Funds Act (“UMIFA”) adopted in California
1996 – Federal “intermediate sanctions” enacted
1997 – Federal Volunteer Protection Act
2001 – Enron declares bankruptcy
2002 – Arthur Anderson firm convicted of obstructing justice in Enron proceeding (overturned in 2005)
– Federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act”)
2003 – Boston Globe and San Jose Mercury News publish articles docu-menting abuses of exempt status by a few foundations
10653.doc 062910:1645 -2- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
2003 – Eliot Spitzer, then Attorney General of New York, proposes a NY “Sarbanes-Oxley Act for nonprofits” with annual revenue over $250,000 (never enacted)
2004 – California Nonprofit Integrity Act (a “Sarbanes-Oxley Act for nonprofits”)
2004 – IRS announces “listed transactions” that shift income to tax-exempt organizations (IRS shifts to “no more Mr. Nice Guy” about charities)
2004 and 2005 – Senator Grassley’s Senate Finance Committee (Federal) hold hearings about “Nonprofit Accountability”
2006 – (Federal) Pension Protection Act restricts tax-exempt organiza-tions, grant-making and charitable giving
2009 – New IRS Form 990 required for largest charities (for 2008 years)
2010 – New IRS Form 990, 990EZ and 990N required for more organiza-tions
2. FUNDAMENTALS
2.1. Nonprofit organization
Corporation, association or trust
Not necessarily tax-exempt
2.2. Types of Nonprofit Corporations
California public benefit (typical charity; Attorney General has a major role)
Need not have members
California mutual benefit (trade association or country club; Attorney General has a small role)
Must have members
California religious (church)
10653.doc 062910:1645 -3- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Very limited role for Attorney General
Family of a slain officer
Least structure imposed by law
Delaware nonstock corp
Need not have members
If operating in California, can be subject to supervi-sion by California Attorney General
2.3. Members
Analogous to shareholders in a for-profit corporation
Not necessary or even advisable to have members of a Cali-fornia public benefit or religious corporation or a Delaware nonstock corporation
Alternatives:
staggered board of directors – each year 1/3 of the board seats are elected. Directors serve for three-year terms.
A person, officer or organization designates the directors
2.4. Role of the California Attorney General
Charitable Trust Section - 7 attorneys, 15 auditors
No one has gone to jail for many years (except for tax fraud), but civil enforcement and computer testing are active
2004 Act civil penalties - $1,000 first offense, $2,000 if not promptly corrected
Suspension for not filing RRF-1 => $800 minimum tax ap-plies, even if otherwise exempt from California income tax
10653.doc 062910:1645 -4- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
2.5. Types of Section 501(c)(3) organizations:
Private foundations (the default)
Organizations exempt from private foundation status:
Publicly-supported charities
Self-supported charities
Supporting organizations
Other bases of exemption from private foundation sta-tus (educational institution, medical research organi-zation, etc.)
2.6. California Property and Sales Taxes
Welfare exemption from property tax
Museum exemption from sales and use tax
3. OPERATING ISSUES
3.1. Fundraising
Registering to solicit funds
Registered commercial fund-raisers
Contracts with commercial fund-raisers
Fundraising counsel
3.2. Gambling and raffles
Poker tournaments and casino nights must comply with the Attorney General’s rules
http://ag.ca.gov/gambling/content/fundraisers.php
10653.doc 062910:1645 -5- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Raffles must comply with the Attorney General’s rules
http://caag.state.ca.us/charities/raffles.htm
3.3. Business investments
Unrelated business taxable income
Theory: unfair competition with businesses subject to income tax
Threat to the exemption: more than “incidental” business activity
Overlap with “private activity” prohibition for tax exempt financing
UBTI tax returns must be disclosed (unlike returns of other businesses)
Tip: Use a corporate for-profit subsidiary (not an LLC or S corp) to conduct the unrelated business
Debt-financed property
Holding securities
Street name (and SIPC) vs. custodial accounts
Holding real estate for investment
Acting as general partner of a general or limited partnership
The LLC alternative
To hold real estate
To isolate related but risky investments
“Series” LLCs (usually bad) and single-member LLCs (often good)
10653.doc 062910:1645 -6- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Avoiding Ponzi schemes (or minimizing the risk) through asset allocation and portfolio diversification
Joint ventures with for-profit businesses:
The nonprofit must control the tax-exempt activity
Each venture requires specific tax advice to protect the tax exemption
FIN 48 disclosure rules apply to nonprofits
Regarding uncertain tax positions and issues
Disclose serious concerns about tax exempt status, unrelated business taxable income, unreported or un-paid sales tax
3.4. Tax-exempt bonds or certificates of participation
Complying with the trust indenture to avoid acceleration
Complying with the “private activity” rules to preserve the tax-exempt status of the interest payments
3.5. Endowments
Gift acceptance letters
Have a policy
Be clear about purpose and ability to change purpose
Keep them forever and ever
Spending policies (depend on gift acceptance letters)
Restricted funds and “borrowing” from them (Don’t!)
Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act – “UPMIFA” (Cal. Probate Code §§ 18500-18509) – Re-vised effective 1-1-09 – would allow directors to spend original principal, but …
10653.doc 062910:1645 -7- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
FASB Staff Position (FSP) 117-a limits discretion to spend original principal and requires additional dis-closure.
GASB alternative?
NY still as UMIFA, with “historical cost” rule
3.6. Pledges
Making pledges
The pledge should be made by the entity that is going to write the check
Problem: Mr. Donor makes the pledge, which is sa-tisfied by the Donor Family Foundation. Is the Foun-dation paying a debt of Mr. Donor? If so, it would be a “prohibited transaction” and both the IRS and the Attorney General would have problems with it.
Similar problems arise if Mr. Donor makes the pledge, which is satisfied by the Donor Fund at the Local Community Foundation or at the Brokerage House Foundation.
Enforcing pledges
Requires action by charity to make pledge enforceable
Will the board enforce the pledge, even if it is made enforceable?
If the pledge is enforceable but the board does not enforce it, do the board members breach their duty? What if the Pledgor is a director or officer?
If so, is it worthwhile to make the pledge en-forceable?
10653.doc 062910:1645 -8- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
3.7. Supporting organizations
After 2006, grant-seeking organizations will want to be ex-empt from private foundation status on some basis other than being a “supporting organization.”
If when the organization obtained its tax exemption, the or-ganization told the IRS that it would be a “supporting organ-ization,” then the IRS probably still lists it that way, even if on its Form 990 the organization reports a different basis for exemption from private foundation status.
If grant-making foundations see that a grant-seeking organi-zation is listed by the IRS as a supporting organization, the grant maker will ask for an IRS letter stating that the grant-seeker is a “good” supporting organization to which the grant maker can make grants with no problem. In 2006 the IRS required grant makers to check whether a donee was a supporting organization and, if to, to be sure that it was the right kind of supporting organization.
The bottom line: Grant-seeking organizations that are listed by the IRS as “supporting organizations” should apply to the IRS either (1) to change their classification from “supporting organization” to another exemption from private foundation status or (2) to get a letter from the IRS stating that the or-ganization is the “good” type of supporting organization.
4. DUTIES OF DIRECTORS
4.1. Rights and duties:
Duty of care (prudent person standard)
Right to information and duty to obtain it
Reliance on outsiders
Get the management letter from the auditor
All activities subject to directors’ supervision
10653.doc 062910:1645 -9- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Right to resign
Investment standard (for California nonprofit public benefit corporations): preserve principal
Different than the standard for trustees under Califor-nia trust law (which is modern portfolio theory: di-versification, asset allocation)
Delaware nonstock corporation: prudent person stan-dard.
Usually specific investment instructions in a gift in-strument trump the general duties of directors
4.2. Conflicts of interest:
Directors and officers doing business with the organization
Common directors
Loans, leases, guarantees
Enforcement by Attorney General
Some transactions require prior notice to the Attor-ney General
Prohibited transaction rules for private foundations
Excess benefit rules (“intermediate sanctions”) for public charities
Compensation or “transaction” committees to vet con-flict situations
Formal conflict of interest policies
Liability of directors, officers, trustees (and, possibly executive directors) who knowingly approve excess benefit transactions: up to $20,000 excise tax and…
10653.doc 062910:1645 -10- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
A possible requirement by the Attorney Gener-al to replace the lost dollars to the organization.
4.3. Indemnification and insurance
Liability protections
Requirement to obtain (or try to obtain) d&o insur-ance
Tip: Get EPL insurance, too. It is often of-fered with D&O.
Volunteer Protection Act of 1997, 42 U.S.C. §§ 14501-04
Bylaws issue: Optional vs. mandatory indemnification
4.4. Political activities
Candidates vs. causes
5. AUDITS AND THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
5.1. Audits
California law requires audited financial statements for cer-tain charitable organizations.
If a charitable organization receives or accrues in any fiscal year gross revenue of $2 million or more, it must have an audit.
Grants from government entities are excluded if the government entity requires an accounting of the funds received.
Receipts from contracts with government entities also are excluded if the government entity requires an ac-counting of the funds received.
10653.doc 062910:1645 -11- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
The auditor must be independent and must use generally ac-cepted accounting principles.
Government Auditing Standards apply to determine independence, but the Attorney General can issue regulations applying other standards.
For an organization with that controls other organization, a consolidated audited financial statement can satisfy the audit requirement.
The audited financial statements (including the footnotes, but not including the management letter) must be submitted to the Attorney General and made available for public in-spection.
The due date is nine months after the fiscal year end.
The public disclosure rules for Forms 990 apply.
If an organization has an audit performed that is not required by these rules, the audited financial statements must be sub-mitted to the Attorney General and made available for public inspection.
This would apply to organizations with receipts of less than $2 million but which are required by grant, contract or other laws to have audited financials.
5.2. Audit Committee
A charitable corporation that must have an audit because it passes the $2 million threshold (discussed above) must have an audit committee appointed by its board of directors.
This applies to corporations organized outside of Cali-fornia but required to file with the California Attorney General’s office.
Subject to the supervision of the board of directors, the audit committee is responsible for recommending to the board of
10653.doc 062910:1645 -12- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
directors the retention and termination of the independent auditor.
It may negotiate the independent auditor's compensa-tion, on behalf of the board of directors.
The audit committee:
Confers with the auditor to satisfy the committee members that the financial affairs of the corporation are in order;
Reviews the audit and decides whether to accept it;
Assures that any non-audit services performed by the auditing firm conform with standards for auditor in-dependence; and
Approves the performance of any non-audit services by the auditing firm.
The audit committee may include persons who are not mem-bers of the board of directors, but the member or members of the audit committee shall not include any members of the staff, including the president or chief executive officer and the treasurer or chief financial officer.
For a California nonprofit corporation or a Delaware nonstock corporation, a committee that exercises powers of the Board cannot have members who are not directors. The audit committee would often be this type of committee.
An advisory committee that advises the Board but cannot exercise any Board powers can have members who are not directors.
If the corporation has a finance committee, it must be sepa-rate from the audit committee.
Members of the finance committee may serve on the audit committee.
10653.doc 062910:1645 -13- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
The chairperson of the audit committee may not be a member of the finance committee and members of the finance committee must constitute less than one-half of the membership of the audit committee.
Members of the audit committee may not receive any com-pensation from the corporation in excess of the compensa-tion, if any, received by members of the board of directors for service on the board.
Members of the audit committee may not have a material fi-nancial interest in any entity doing business with the corpo-ration.
If the corporation is controlled by another corporation, the audit committee may be part of the board of directors of the controlling corporation.
6. COMPENSATION ISSUES
6.1. Overlapping laws
California corporate law –
No better deal available;
No payment for past service unless there was contract in place before the services were rendered
Federal tax law –
No excess benefit to others,
Safe harbor if independent comp committee, objective evidence, written reasoning and conclusions
Payment for past service allowed by tax law if prove undercompensated (but not allowed by the California Attorney General unless there was a deferred com-pensation agreement in place before the services were performed)
10653.doc 062910:1645 -14- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Nonprofit Integrity Act – “just and reasonable”
6.2. Deferred compensation for founders and other key personnel
The IRS allows compensation for past services if it is rea-sonable in view of the value of the services rendered and he compensation paid
The California Attorney General treats compensation for past services as a diversion of the organization’s funds for private purposes, unless the payments are made pursuant to a deferred compensation agreement that was enforceable at the time the services were rendered.
Consider having a friendly organization (possible for-profit) hire the retiree as a consultant or community relations offic-er.
6.3. IRS inquiry letters
The IRS periodically sends letters to organizations asking about compensation issues.
This is partly to build a database.
Also to search for noncompliance. Most issues are resolved by correspondence. but a few have resulted in audits
6.4. Compensation Committees
Nonprofits that must file Form RRF-1 must also have a compensation committee to review the compensation of their President and CFO.
They must determine if the comp packages are “just and rea-sonable.”
The review must be made at hiring and whenever the comp package changes.
The board of directors can undertake this review, but a comp committee of independent directors is usually more efficient
10653.doc 062910:1645 -15- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
(and also is required for the safe harbor to avoid the federal “intermediate sanctions”).
7. ASSET TRANSFERS AND MERGERS
7.1. Prior notice to the Attorney General
Before closing a transfer of substantially all of the entity’s assets, including sales or transfers incident to dissolving the entity.
Applies at dissolution – even if the corporation has no as-sets to distribute.
The Attorney General assures that the funds are used for the primary purpose that the organization or as required by the gift instrument.
The Attorney General can request additional information
Including appraisals and sale documents in the case of a sale
7.2. Mergers
A nonprofit corporation can merger with another entity, in-cluding a for-profit corporation or another nonprofit corpo-ration.
An alternative is to have the board of the “taken over” organization resign and directors of the “acquiring” organization become directors of the “taken over” or-ganization.
A for-profit corporation can convert to a nonprofit, but the conversion is treated as a taxable liquidation for federal in-come tax purposes.
A merger of a nonprofit into a for-profit is rarely possible.
10653.doc 062910:1645 -16- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
Mergers allow organizations to combine and become stronger
Will the surviving organization be able to receive more grant money than the merged organizations re-ceived before the merger? Less?
Before the merger, try to get buy-in from the board of directors, the staff, constituents and grantmakers.
8. EXPANDING
When a nonprofit expands to other geographic area, it needs to consider several additional issues:
Trademark protection and licensing
Often the right to use the nationally-known name is the glue that keeps the whole organization together.
Group tax exemptions
Clauses in the articles and bylaws of local chapters
Degree of control that the parent organization retains.
9. CHANGING PURPOSES
9.1. An organization can change its purpose
It must advise the IRS of the change
Donors might want a confirming letter from the IRS that the exemption is still good
It might need to get a new determination letter if the change it drastic
10653.doc 062910:1645 -17- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
9.2. The California Attorney General wants the pre-change funds to be used for the old purposes.
Funds raised after the change is effective can be used for the new purposes
This applies to all funds, not just to “restricted funds”
10. ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
10.1. Increased role of the federal government after 9-11-01
10.2. Protecting the charitable contribution deduction
10.3. Expenditure responsibility
10.4. Protecting the trade name and trademarks
[End of outline.]
10653.doc 062910:1645 -18- William C. Staley 818 936-3490
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION To receive more information about these issues, please check the box(es) below, provide your address (or business card) and return this page to Bill Staley -- or FAX it to Susan Rognlie at (818) 936-2990. 1. “Limited Liability Companies: An Introduction.”* 2. “New California Rules for Nonprofit Organizations” (SB 1262,
aka “The Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004”)* 3. “Penalty Taxes on Managers and Insiders of Organizations
Exempt from Tax under Sections 501(c)(3) or (c)(4): Inter- mediate Sanctions for Excess Benefits”
4. “Tax Planning for Large Charitable Contributions: Private
Foundations and Community Foundations.” A discussion of the alternatives and a list of local community foundations.
Name Address Telephone ( )
*Available on www.staleylaw.com.