Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CAMERON S. DUNNAN/2
KEY PROJECTS (Continued)
Authored organic and inorganic data validation report, in accordance with USEPAFunctional Guidelines, for a non-regulated environmental site in Dos Campos, Brazil.
Performed contract compliance screening and organic/inorganic data assessments andvalidations, in accordance with USEPA Region II protocols, for a chemical productionfacility in Morristown, New Jersey.
Authored multiple organic and inorganic data validation reports, in accordance withUSEPA Region III guidelines, for ground water, soil, and sediment samples from alandfill in South Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania.
Managed extensive historical database for ground-water chemistry of drinking water wellsin St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Established communication link for electronic transfer of project data from laboratory.
Created database application for tracking and scheduling of laboratory analyses andvalidation/management in support of current site investigations.
Implemented database application for comparing applicable regulatory limits with sample-specific contamination.
3/92
AR300237GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
UMA PARASAR
Scientist
CREDENTIALS/REGISTRATIONM.S. Environmental Science, Toxicology, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 1990B.S. Environmental Science, Chemistry, Botany, St. Josephs College, Bangalore, India,
. 198840-Hour OSHA Training Course
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONSAmerican Chemical Society
FIELDS OF SPECIALIZATION- Data validation.- Data management.- Bioremediation of incinerator ash.- EP toxicity and TCLP tests.- Risk assessments.- Environmental regulations.- Field sampling.
EXPERIENCE SUMMARYAt Geraghty & Miller, Ms. Parasar performs data validation and data management. She hasalso worked on field investigations where she sampled soil, ground-water, and sediment, andsupervised the installation of monitoring wells. Prior to joining Geraghty & Miller, Ms.Parasar performed laboratory research and worked as an adjunct professor at RutgersUniversity and as a teaching assistant at the New Jersey Institute of Technology.
KEY PROJECTS- Participated in field activities related to the New Jersey Environmental Cleanup
Responsibility Act (ECRA) in Boonton, New Jersey. Project included installingmonitoring wells and deep soil borings and collection of soil and water samples.
- Performed preliminary assessment to evaluate overall data quality for an ECRA facilityin Garfield, New Jersey.
- Performed a preliminary data assessment in support of the soil and ground-waterinvestigations carried out at a trichloroethylene-contaminated site in Hillside, New Jersey.
- Performed the data validation for a chromium remediation project in Hudson County,New Jersey, using the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy(NJDEPE) regulations.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
UMA PARASAR/2
KEY PROJECTS (Continued)
- Performed data validation in support of an ECRA investigation at a service station in theU.S. Virgin Islands using United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),Region II guidelines.
- Performed data validation to assess data quality under a Resource Conservation andRecovery Act (RCRA) investigation at an oil refinery in Puerto Rico, using USEPARegion II guidelines.
- Performed the preliminary data validation on residential well water samples collectednear a municipal sanitary landfill in Pennsylvania, using USEPA Region III guidelines.
- Performed the quarterly renewals for the NJPDES permits for monitoring wells at anECRA site in Boonton, New Jersey.
3/92
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. ^ " J (J 0 2 3 9
APPENDIX C
ANALYTICAL METHOD SUMMARIES
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. $ R 3 Q 0 2 if i i
APPENDIX C
ANALYTICAL METHOD SUMMARIES
Appendix C is a summary of analytical methodologies that will be used by EnsecoEast or their subcontractors in support of the RI/FS at the Dublin TCE Site, Dublin,Pennsylvania.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will be analyzed using various U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) analytical methods based on the RI/FSrequirements, the data quality objectives and the sample matrices.
USEPA Method 524.2 Revision 3.0
USEPA Method 524.2 (Revision 3.0) is a general purpose method for theidentification and simultaneous measurement of purgeable VOCs in finished drinking water,raw source water, or drinking water in any treatment stage. VOCs are determined bypurging 25 milliliters (ml) of sample and analyzing by capillary column gaschromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The method detection limits are compound-and instrument-dependent and vary from approximately 0.02 to 0.35 micrograms per liter(ug/L). This method has been modified for the quantitation of target compound list (TCL)VOCs. The surrogate compounds normally used for USEPA Method 524.2 will besubstituted with the TCL VOC surrogate compounds in accordance with the USEPA March1990 contract laboratory program (CLP) VOC protocols.
USEPA Method 8240
USEPA Method 8240 is used to determine VOCs in a variety of solid waste matricesincluding ground waters, aqueous sludges, waste solvents, oily waste, soils, and sediments.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. A R 3 0 0 '£ k
C-2
This method is based upon a purge-and-trap GC/MS procedure. The practical quantitationlimit (PQL) of Method 8240 is approximately 5 micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg) forsoil/sediment samples (wet weight) and 5 ug/L for water samples.
USEPA March 1990 Contract Laboratory Program Routine Analytical ServicesStatement of Work
The USEPA March 1990 CLP routine analytical services (RAS) statement of work(SOW) protocols cover the determination of the TCL VOCs and include an optionalhexadecane screening procedure. The extract is screened on a gas chromatograph/flameionization detector (GC/FID). to determine the approximate concentration of organic
constituents in the sample. The actual analysis is based on a purge-and-trap GC/MSmethod. For soil/sediment samples, the purge device is heated. This method is based onUSEPA Method 624.
USEPA Method TO-14
USEPA Method TO-14 is used to determine VOCs in ambient air using SUMMA™passivated canister sampling and GC/MS analysis in the scan mode.
BASE NEUTRAL AND ACID EXTRACTABLE SEMIVOLATILEORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Base neutral and acid extractable (BNA) semivolatile organic compounds will beanalyzed using the USEPA March 1990 CLP RAS SOW protocols.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
C-3
USEPA March 1990 Contract Laboratory Program Routine Analytical Services
Statement of Work
The USEPA March 1990 CLP RAS SOW method involves solvent extraction of thesample matrix, characterization by GC/FID screening to determine the appropriateanalytical protocol to be used, and GC/MS analysis to determine the TCL constituent levels
present in the sample. This method is based on USEPA Method 625.
PESTICIDES AND POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS
Pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) will be analyzed using the USEPAMarch 1990 CLP RAS SOW protocols.
USEPA March 1990 Contract Laboratory Program Routine Analytical ServicesStatement of Work
The USEPA March 1990 CLP RAS SOW protocols are designed to analyze water,sediment, and soil from hazardous waste sites to determine the presence and concentrationof the chlorinated pesticides and PCBs found on the TCL. The method can be used fordetermining analyte concentrations in the range from the contract required quantitationlimits (CRQL) to one million times the CRQL in these matrices. The method is based onUSEPA Method 608.
METALS
Target metals will be analyzed using the USEPA March 1990 CLP RAS SOWprotocols.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. ^ L'" J
C-4
USEPA March 1990 Contract Laboratory Program Routine Analytical ServicesStatement of Work
The USEPA March 1990 CLP RAS SOW protocols specify use of analytical methodsfrom Methods of Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, as modified for the CLP.Instrumental techniques include analyses by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emissionspectrometry (ICP-AES), graphite furnace atomic absorption, and cold vapor atomicabsorption for 23 metals of the target analyte list (TAL).
TREATABILITY
Analytical results of several parameters will be used collectively to determine theeffectiveness of the treatment system design. These have been designated as treatabilityparameters in this QAPP and consist of the following determinations: alkalinity, calcium,iron, magnesium, manganese, hardness, total dissolved solids, and total suspended solids.
Alkalinity
Alkalinity is calculated by analysis of an unaltered sample that is titrated to anelectronictrically determined endpoint of pH 4.5.
Metals
Concentrations of calcium, iron, magnesium, and manganese will be determined byICP-AES after appropriate sample preparation.
Hardness
Water hardness is calculated using the calcium and magnesium concentrations thatare determined by ICP-AES analysis.
/1R3002HGERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
C-5
Total Dissolved Solids
A \vell-mked sample is filtered through a glass fiber filter and the filtrate isevaporated and dried to a constant weight. The weight of the remaining residue is reportedas total dissolved solids (TDS) in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
Total Suspended Solids
A well-mixed sample is filtered through a glass fiber filter and the residue retainedon the filter is dried to a constant weight. The weight of the remaining residue is reportedas total suspended solids (TSS) in mg/L.
WET CHEMISTRY/PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Various chemical determinations and physical tests will be performed to classify thetransport characteristics of the sediment samples. These include analyses for total organiccarbon and grain-size determinations.
Total Organic Carbon
A sample is oxidized with potassium chromate in the presence of sulfuric acid. Theexcess chromate is determined by titration with a standard iron sulfate solution. Thequantity of substances oxidized is calculated from the amount of chromate that is reducedby the titrant. *
Grain Size
Grain size is performed in accordance with ASTM D422, D4318, and D2487-85,which classify soils after particle size is determined through sieve analysis.#NJ14301-QAPPT/APP-B.WP
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
APPENDIX D
USEPA REGION IIIORGANIC AND INORGANIC DATA VALIDATION REPORTING FORMS
HR30G2U6GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
•s |Sg£
1 ' 11r '-33DATA SUMMARY FORM: VOLATILES 1
WATER SAMPLES
(ug/L)
Site
Name:
Case#:
•
Sampling Date(
s):To
calcu
late s
ample q
uai
(CROL'Di
Sample No
.Dilution Fa
ctor
Location
CRQL
Compound'
| Chloromethane
0
j0
| 'Vinyl C
hloride
0
| Chloroethane
2
•Methylaie
Chloride
1 Acetone
0
[ Carbon
Disulfide
•1,1-Dichtaroethene
1 1,1-Dfahbroethane
| 'Total 1,2-Dichloroethene
| Chloroform
| '1,2-Dichloroethane
| *2-Butanone
0
| '1,1,1-TrfchIoroethane
vn
| 'Carbon
Tetraihloride
11>,
0
| Bromodchloromethane
! ( = Contract Re
quired Quantitation Limit
*Action Level E
xists
See Narrative f
or Code Definitions
CD
^i
revise
d 07/90
CD ro jr-
i
C/3wH
9 wg
1 J11 ^
1
sii/3 Z
t/a
I.3
I
. .
a
'R 2
ititat
ion li
lution
Fac
0"*<U ,_)n°SD
11
-
c
I
Dikation Fa
ctor 1
1(3§
CLs1.uQ
3s— 13-Dchloroptopane
'rbhloroethene
~) ibromochloromethane
w
1,1,2-Trehlorethane
c
IX
IC
.uQ
T1 Sr
omoform
c
IvsSi
a
,-Hacanone
'o
Tetrachloroethene
l,l,2,2-Tetra;hlorotthane
1
<uc
g 1<u
1I
AR3002U8
0}•DATA SUMMARY
FORM: V
OLATILES
1
SOIL SAMPLES
(ug/Kg)
Site
Name:
Case#:
Sampling Date(s):
To ca
lculat
e sample q
uantitation l
imit:
rCROL * Dilution Fa
ctor VfYlOO - % mo
istureVlOOl
Sample No
.Ditition Fa
ctor
% Mo
isture
Location
CRQL
Compound
Chloromethane
o
Bromometbane
o
| 'Vinyl Chloride
0
| Chloroethane
0
| 'Methylene Chloride
VO
,o
| CarbonDisulfide
[ '1,1-Dichloroetbene
I 1,1 -
D chloroethane
'Total 1,
2-Dichloroethene
| Chlorofonn
V>
| *1,2-D chloroethane
| *2-Butanone
o
•1,1,1-Trbhloroethane
•Carbon Tetrxhioride
V
1Oi— t
[ Bromodchloromethane
i\ ft 3<
Definitions
vised 07/90
e for
Na
o
>
onW
&g"B.
ate sa
mple
quantitation li
mit:
3rW100-%moistureVian
To ca
lcul
( CROL*
Dilution Fa
ct*Sample No
.Dilation Fa
ctor
% Mo
isture
Location
CRQL
Compound
ojiO.S
2.si
3r-**
in
1eD-
1.c.uQi
I(3 Tr
fchloroethene
D ibromochloromethane
1,1,2-Trichlorethane
uiOJCO*
11zsJZ,uQ
T(- Br
omoform
OJ
11
"a
1
g
2-Heranone
c
•Tetrxhioroethene
1,1,2,2 -
Tetrachloroethane
•Toluene
•Chlorobenzene
•Ethylbenzene
*
">,X
v> M Q, = Contract Re
quired Qu
antitation Limit
• See N
arrative fo
r Code
Definitions
CD
4ABj|f
t2 rev
ised 07/90
fXJ
rt. s -,-, «t" • ••• -f
j
t — i
55
S i-C &Z)
P nq• C t
i
CD
K Z
s
ug.f"fi.
ua
| s11jj-c
1SE2
-
Sample No.
Dilation Fa
ctor
Location
IaBd_J
If
O
1o
•bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
o
2-Chlorophenol
o
•1,3-Dichlorobenzene
o
*l,4-Dichlorobenzene
o
Benzyl Ab
ohol
0
•
1,2— Dchlorobenzene
0
2-Methylphenol
o
_to
a..i
6S0
4-Methylphenol
0
.1
11•51
'EiZo
Hexachloroethane
0
Nitrobenzene
0
o.co.J0
1 2-Nitrophenol
0
2,4-Dimethylphenol
0
BenzocAcid
0
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
o|
t
[ 2,4-Dfahlorophenol
0
fi
' 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
c
3
Naphthalene
0
.1
1
02,
&3 o0 .?£ l T
ieDefinit
revise
d 0'
6i—i
arrati
ve fc
Z
JS
31
13h— 1
I
•*— >
g .1•£*
= Contract Re
quired Qi
•T4/bnasfrl
Sf
*S 'go
1 P1 11
'g 3
§-Qa"**-£ i — 'o-OE p£Sy
38
^
« a>
0 1 ^ * ' . •*fe ^ b>" S-S-
i ^OO
1
a
f"B-,S
i5 ^
ll d
0>n.
Dilation Fa
ctor
Lxation
11e6j
H
Hexachlorobutadiene
o
.cji,
H11S°eo
2 - Methy I
naphthalene
o
Hexachlorccjc l
opentadiene
o
2,4,6-Trichlorophenoi
o
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
o
2-Chloronaphthalene
o
2-Nkroaniline
o
4j
1|1c<=
<usfflO
2,6-Dinitrotobene
o
3-Nitroaniline
o
11o
|Q
r-f
o
c8iz1e
Dibenzofuran
o
2,4-Dinitrotobene
o
Jli131J3aI5OJ5<=>
S3•S
1
S6io
Fluorene
a
4-Nitroaniline
/
I11§.3Q1
IFn\ w
J «^o 3 o1 -£1 gfc
§> 1|P"1 '-S £
CT<*
1§a "~CO
DATA SUMMARY FORM: BNAS 3
WATER SAMPLES
(ug/L)
Site
Name:
Case#:
Sampling Date(s):
To ca
lcul
Sample No
.Dilltion Fa
ctor
Location
CRQL
Compound
N -Nitrosodiphenylaoiine
o
4— Bromophenyl-phenylether
o
S
JD
2
o
a.
11o
|o
Anthracene
o
Di-n-butyfcbthalate
o
Fluoranthene
o o
Butylbenzylphthalate
o
3,3'-Dicbk»robenzidine
o
*
Benzo(a)anthracene
o o
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
o
3a1IiQo
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
i
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
81s In
deno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
s Dibenz(a,h)antbracene
(J1i25;3
<4-lO
U£PiSit
eName:
CaTo ca
lculat
e sample q
uantitation l
imit:
CCROL * Dilution Facto
r1) / (d - % moistureVKXtt
Sample No
.Dibtion F
actor
% Mo
isture
Location
CRQL
Compound
1
§
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
CO
I.9
§
*1,3 -D
bhlorobenzene
&en
*l,4-Dbhlorobenzene
13
Benzyl Ab
ohol
9
1,2-Dbhlorobenzene
§
1
t1
cr
11
1CL.iefiIB
§
is1
8
11a1
I
"c1&.tf
11ss
c
|iz
S
1
tuC
1
fl
ccOJ
_c
IQ
^
Benzob
Acid
bi$(2-Chloroethoxy)rnethane
l?|l
a1a2i.uQ1
i
1,2,4-Trbhlorobenzene
iV.
a11
tj
t— Choroaniline
oo
"E.I ———————————————————
o
<u
,o
CO
c
iOS
DATA SUMMARY FORM: BNAS 2
SOIL SAMPLES
(ug/Kg)
Site
.Name:
Case#:
Sampling Date(s):
To ca
lculat
e sample q
uantitation l
imit:
CCROL *
Dilution Fa
ctor
/ fd
OO - % mo
istureVlOm
*
Sample No.
Dilition Factor
% Mo
isture
Location
CRQL
Compound
Hexachlorobutadiene
S
D.
|-u81fO1££51• t
^
| 2-Methylnaphthalene
S
<u.§
J"|5
XSfO
[ 2,4,6-TrichtophenoI
^
| 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
1
2-Ch!oronaphthalene
g
2-Nitroaniline
1
5J£J:0>
58
8??JZ
RCO
trotobene
1*0M
S!CO
ze i
1
x:J3
1g
2.5Q•< "
— H
4-Nitrophenol
—H
C
JQ
§
[ 2,4-Dinitrotohene
S
Diethylphthalate
g
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
H
Fhorene
fi
4-Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
SE
1-<U
aCD
11
|s'§
•s1OS|,^ii ?
300255
§1
S 11ll•u 1"H.QE o
« r^
DATA SUMMARY FORM: BNAS
3
SOIL SAMPLES
(ug/L)
Site
Name:
Case#:
Sampling Date(
s):Tocalcul
fCROL*
Dilution Fa
ct*Sample No
.Ditltion Fa
ctor
% Mo
isture
Location
CRQL
Compound
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
8
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
8
'Hexachlorobenzene
8
'Pentachlorophenol
11c
CU
a
Anthracene
tr
<u
JS>Iic1Q
8
Ftaoranthene
8
S&cu8
^1jIX
8
3,3' -D i
chlorobenzidine
1 Benzo(a)anthraeene
8
I8
a.s1
1aci
8
as-8iciQ
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
ff BenzofOfluoranthene
I ffi
r
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
r<
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
<u
•c"
f56
"8
Z
IG
",
PQOa<Q
noWQ o o
W1-1 >Ju S« §H <en wW Pi
I2
DCO
Qeo
"5,I
*« I 8•" C3 ea33 !Z U
ntitat
ion li
mit:
lution Factor")
To ca
lculate sample qua
f (CRQL * Di
Sample No.
Dilution Factor
Location
CRQL
Compound g
CQ
aj."to
VIoo
OacCO
n«JD
toO
O
IS1
1 'gamma- BHC(Lindane)
W-lo
•Heptachlor
«/>o
o•a<v%
Heptachlor Epoxide
t/i
Endosulfan 1
i
Dieldrin
o
§Q_l•v"o
cs&•0
Endosulfan 11
o0
QQQ
VTT"
oo
Endosulfan
Sulfate
;
oo
SQSr•nf
0
o
*Metboxycblor
o0
! Endrin Ketone
oo
us•5og1nsa
O
o
gamma-Chlordane
X)a
1,
N6
Aroclor-1 S
Aroclor-
MR
Aroclor-
S
Aroclor-1
00Si a
Aroclor-1
os
Aroclor-
1
5R300257L
o
ueoP-.
0ftiQ
C/3WQHH
CJ W3P-4 W
OO &w 5CU oo.. i-JS H H
na; ooo
aa*"5.E
« 6« « ca55 Z 0
||
ititation li
moisture)y
0" |o 10,0E 2
<O •w U3 •'-'o t;1? LL-
Toc
Dilution
-
dZ
ien
Dilution Fa
ctor
Location
•oca
1
Cct
O£CO1I nac
00
S1At
00
5i1•aCO
T:c
CK
gamma-B
CO
1c1
00
cIS
oO
121ta
|ICO
Endosufan
CO
Dieldrin
>o
QQJ
«
_c'C•c
M5
Endosulfai
•c
QDQ1
«
i Sulfate
Endosulfa
va
C1
•0
Metbosyct
o
4J
P3 uupug
«
uc
5X_c
1
ilordane
U
E
a
o
V.
So
?I
Aroclor-1
o
0
ArocIor—1
o
Aroclor-1
S.S
Aroclor-1
o
'8
Arocior— 1
0CO
Aroclor-1
i?!
S^
102
QJ•1 S31^Iscr*f2
. 33£
00u1—4z<oerfO C / 3
DJ.. g
g l*ii < -
1 ^
i
•CO
Saeuo.scS?
y t'.S| Moo Z O
1u
s
Dihtion F
actor
Location
•g!E6o fl f?30025 •4
II4> §
.s
I§ „I!
COO
oPio
WATER SAMPLES
(ug/L)
.
.Sit
eName:
CA
¥abfl
fs8
%
ititat
ion li
mit:
ution Fa
ctor)
ate sa
mple
quat
fOL*Di
To ca
lcul
if^300260 QL = Quantitation L
imit
^
See Narrative f
or Qx
tefinitions
NJ 14301 -T4Matero^
^^
^BSed 07/90
2
ate sa
mple
quantitation li
mit:
)rVfUOO-%itoistureVHXn
|i
C
Sample No
.Dibtion F
actor
% Mo
isture
Location
QL Compound
i
.-
i
AR30026 ! QL = Qu
antitation Limit
See Narrative f
or Code Definitions
NJ14301-T4/»ilorql
.
revised 07/90
o
uI:
ate sa
mple
quant
itatio
n limi
t:>rW100 - %
moistureVlOOl
DATA SUMMARY FORM: O
RGANICS
SOIL SAMPLES
(ug/Kg)
Site
Name:
Case#:
Sampling Date(
s):Tocalcul
COL*
Dilution Fa
ctc
-
§ i 300262 = =33=;u
IIllp£1CO!Z
5
1
ilS [?••H C*•O _2ert 9
i!j O 2
<u•
O W*7 1— Z p,
• fe H>- <
I 'DCOI
3?CSQ,SH,E
nit is
affected.
s. for
specifics.
+ Due to dilution, sample
quantitation
lir
See dilution
tabl
Sample No.
Dilution Factor
Location
CRQL
ANALYTE
Alum
inum
St*l
Antimony
oo
*Arsenic
:
o
Barium
(M
Beryllium
* Cadmium
\
<S)
Calcium
V>
•Chromium
0
Cobalt
S
uVO-o.Qr-l
nJ
§
•avJ•en
a1
1
$
1S_fra&1
31-< n i
•sz*
1 V
Potaaaium
i
Selenbm
•ft5j4 So
dium
ft
Thallium
0
Vanadium
o10
I
S
•Cyanide
o
DATA SUMMARY FORM: INORGANICS
SOIL SAMPLES
(mg/Kg)
Site
Name:
Case#:
.
Sampling Date(s):
nit is
affected.
j for specifics.
+ Due to dilution, s
ample quantitation
lir
See dilution
tabl<
Sample No.
Dilution Factor
% S
olids
Location
CRQL
ANALYTE
| A
luminum
o
I Antimony
*"
»
I | B
arium
"
1 Beryllium
1 -Cadmium
Calcium
o§
| 'Chromium
cOQ
S3CLCL
5CB
o
1*
°
1i
?
Ic
-
Mercury
<M_0
1GO
Potaseium
Ls Selenium
FT
i«3
Sodium
a
Thallium
0
Vanadium
omics
6_
•Cyanide
4
APPENDIX E
QA/QC DATA ASSESSMENT CHECKLISTS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. flR300265
ORGANIC OA/OC DATA ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Project Number:_____________Project Manager:________Project Name/Site:_____________No. of Samples/Matrix:_____
Laboratory:_________________Project/Log-in/SDG No:____Parameter(s)/Method(s):__________________________
DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARYNotes: 1. Flag major deficiencies/discrepancies; specify parameter and sample
number, if appropriate.2. State not applicable (NA) if not required or if no deviations were
observed.3. Attach substantiating raw data documentation copies, if necessary.
1. Holding times:_____________________________________
2. Blanks:
3. Calibrations:
4. Surrogates:.
5. GC/MS tune and instrument performance:
6. Internal standards:
7. Matrix QC:_
8. Quantitation limits:,
9. Other:
Overall assessment:
Data Reviewer:__________________Date reviewed:.cc: QA officer, Project manager, Project fileNJ14301/qappT/qaform2.wp
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Project Number:_____________Project Manager:____Project Name/Site:____________No. of Samples/Matrix:_Laboratory:__________________Project/Log-in/SDG No:.
Parameter(s)/Method(s):______________________
DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARYNotes: 1. Flag major deficiencies/discrepancies; specify parameter and sample
number, if appropriate.2. State not applicable (NA) if not required or if no deviations were
observed.3. Attach substantiating raw data documentation copies, if necessary.
1. Holding times:__________________
2. Blanks:
3. Calibrations:
4. ICP Interference check standard:
5. Laboratory control sample(s):
6. Matrix QC:_
7. Quantitation limits:
8. Other:
Overall assessment:
Data Reviewer:________:_________Date reviewed:.cc: QA officer, Project manager, Project fileNJ14301/qappTl/qaform.wp
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. flR300267
APPENDIX F
FIELD AUDIT FORM
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Page 1 of 3
FIELD AUDIT CHECKLIST
Project___________ Date____________ Time____________
Auditor(s)__________.____________________________________________________
On-site Sampling Personnel_________________________________________
Activity(ies) Audited_________________________________________________
Ground-Water Sampling Observations:
Proper sampling locations?
Residential well samples collected prior to treatment?
Sampling location documented?
Sampling times documented?
Well specifications noted accurately?
Purge volume calculated correctly?
Field filtering for dissolved metals analysis?
Proper measurement of field parameters?
Proper calibration of field instruments anddocumentation?
Dedicated bailer line and/or tubing?
Proper disposal/containment of purge water?
Sampling proceeding from suspected leastcontaminated well to most contaminated?
Sample bottles properly labeled?
Proper containers and preservation used?
Sample bottles filled in correct order?
Volatile sample vials checked for bubbles?
Samples refrigerated/iced immediately after collection?
GERAGHTY<2? MILLER, INC. " " "
Page 2 of 3
Soil/Sediment Sampling Observations:
Proper sampling locations? _________
Sampling locations documented? _________
Sampling times documented? _______
Dedicated spoons/trowels used? __________
Sample bottles properly labeled? ______
Sampling proceeding from suspected leastcontaminated area to most contaminated area? __________
Sample bottles filled to maximum extent possible? __________
Samples refrigerated/iced immediately after collection? __________
Proper sample selection criteria employed? _________
Proper depth of sample collection? _________
Log (grain size, color, etc.) of material complete and accurate? __________
Air Sampling Observations:
Proper sampling locations? __________
Background sample location free of potentialcontaminant sources? ______________
Vacuum pressure of sample canister at least 28-inchesof mercury before sampling? __________
«
Sample lines flushed prior to sampling? _________
Proper sample period used? _________
Final vacuum pressure of sample canister at least5-inches of mercury after sampling? _________
Initial and final vacuum pressures recorded onsample sheets and tags? _____________
Safety: Ground-Water Soil/Sediment AirSampling Sampling Sampling
Proper level of protective clothing? _____ _____ _____
HASP available? ____ ____ ____
Monitoring equipment available? ____ ____ ____
Monitoring equipment properly calibrated?
Disposable surgical gloves changed betweensample locations? _____
—— ATT30Q270GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Page 3 of 3
Ground-Water Soil/Sediment AirSampling Sampling Sampling
General:
Collection of appropriate QA/QC samples(trip blank, field, replicate)?
Does the potential for sample cross-contamination existexist based on procedures served?
Proper decontamination procedures followed?
Are employees conducting the investigationin a professional manner?
Sampling objectives understood by personnel?
Are weather conditions affecting sample quality?
Efficient operation of field activities?
Do field personnel have QA/QC manual availablefor reference?
Do field personnel have proper protocolsavailable?
Is work area kept clean, orderly and contamination free?
Are all required supplies available?
Are field forms filled out completely and accurately?
Are chain-of-custody procedures followed?
Audit Summary and Comments:
Recommendations:
Signature:_____________________:_________________ Date:
DV/5cqiudil.fral
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
APPENDIX G
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
AR300272GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT(CAR)
Project Number:_______________ Project Manager:.
Project Name:_______________________________
CAR No.:___________________ [ ] Sample Location(s) Affected:
Date: __________________ __________________
Name of Individual Initiating CAR: [ ] Sample ID(s) Affected:
Note: Attach copies of all pertinent documentation, if applicable.
Field and/or Laboratory Observation/Anomaly:
Signature: Date:
Project Manager/Project Officer/QA Officer Management Action:
Signature: Date:
Proposed CAR Review Date/Schedule:
Signature: Date:
Quality Assurance Approval:
Signature: • Date:
Copy To: [ ] Project File [ ] Project Manger [ ] Project Officer
[ ] QA Officer [ ] Client [ ] Agency (specify).OV-1/carfonn
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
