22
Can We Get in Someone’s Head? Lecture 2: History and Methods 1/26/04

Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

  • Upload
    varian

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Can We Get in Someone’s Head?. Lecture 2: History and Methods 1/26/04. On human nature…. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle: pleasure, pain, imagination, desire, good vs. evil, free will >16 th century: studied soul, spirit, the “psyche” Descartes: body = physical; mind= spiritual - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Can We Get in Someone’s Head?Lecture 2: History and Methods

1/26/04

Page 2: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

On human nature…

Socrates, Plato, Aristotle: pleasure, pain, imagination, desire, good vs. evil, free will

>16th century: studied soul, spirit, the “psyche”Descartes: body = physical; mind= spiritual

Scientifically study body not mind

Hobbes- NO! Entire human experience comes from brain- even thoughts & feelings

Page 3: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Meanwhile…

German physiologists studied bodily sensations and our subjective awareness How are bodily sensations turned into mental

awareness? Are our perceptions of the world accurate reflections

or reality? How do the mind and body interact?

Page 4: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Pioneer #1: Wilhelm Wundtdiscovering the laws of consciousness

Father of Psychology • Estd. first psychology laboratory in 1879

“Color blue, sound of an E chord, Taste of smoked salmon, meaning of a sentence - all psychological”

Developed introspection. Report on conscious, moment-to-moment rxns.

Psychological Contrasts & Psychic Relations Love on the rebound Draw an apple

Page 5: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Structuralism: Mental

Page 6: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Pioneer # 2: William JamesPlagued by depressionPrinciples of Psychology, 1890

Habit formation, Stream of consciousness, individuality, link btw. Body & mind, emotions, the ‘self’,

• 1892: “Jimmy”

“Cash value” of an idea, not T vs. F Functionalism

• Darwin: natural selection; characteristics of species with survival advantage are ‘selected’--- consciousness must serve important purpose

“Lab is a waste of resources”

Page 7: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Structure vs. FunctionThe first great debate

Functionalism Investigate purpose of

consciousness, not structure

Stream of consciousness• Consciousness is a

continuous flow of thoughts, not static

Mental testing, development, education, individual differences

Structuralism Analyze consciousness into

basic elements

Introspection• Systematic, self-

observation in response to tones, optical illusions, fruit…

Sensation & Perception

Page 8: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Gestalt Psychology

The whole is greater than the sum of the partsStructuralism = wrong!

Mind perceives world in organized fashion, can’t be broken down into elements

• Phenomenological approach• Unstructured reporting of experience

***tspces***

Page 9: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Pioneer # 3: FreudWhat about the unconscious?

People are driven by UNconscious forces

Human mind is an icebergClinical practice for patients with

ailments with no physical basis “cured” with hypnosis and talking

The Interpretation of Dreams, 1900.• Psychoanalysis- Freud’s theory of personality and

method of psychotherapy,

Page 10: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Controversy strikes again: It’s not all in your head!

A psychology of observable behavior?

Page 11: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Controversy strikes again: It’s not all in your head!

Can a science be based on introspective reports of a subjective experience or mental processes that supposedly reside inside the unconscious?

“Psychoanalysis is voodooism”

Psychology should be a purely objective, experimental branch of natural science NOT the invisible and elusive mind

Page 12: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

The Behaviorist AlternativeFrom mind-body to nature-nurture

John B. Watson defined psychology as study of behavior; mind is irrelevant

Vary a stimulus in environment, observe response

Behaviorism Dominated from the 1920’s to the 1960’s

“Sensations, thoughts, feelings, and motivations may fuel speculation for the curious philosopher, but if it can’t be seen, it has no place in psychology”

Page 13: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Talk about controversy…

From ministry to philosophy to psychologyLearning in rats on mazes…

How young could they learn? Dabbled in neurology… what about people? “Crazed scientist, killer of rats, toasts and eats them”

Meets Mary Ickes, Intro PSY student “Ode to John B. Watson”

‘Robbing Psych’- No difference between rats and people Interest in children…

Affair with research assistant Rosalie Raynor On to advertising… impulse buys

“Made not born”

Page 14: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

“Children should be awakened at 6:30 A.M. for orange juice and a pee. Play 'till 7:30. Breakfast should be at 7:30 sharp; at 8:00 they should be placed on the toilet for twenty minutes or less 'til bowel movement is complete. Then follow up with a verbal report. The child would then play indoors 'till 10AM, after 10:00 outside, a short nap after lunch, then "social play" with others. In the evening a bath, quiet play until bedtime at 8:00 sharp.”

Page 15: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

The “Cognitive Revolution”But thought processes do influence outcomes

Behaviorism was too restrictive. Studies of child development, animal behavior,

brain studies, ‘self-actualization’, computers…• Thoughts, expectations, ‘soft stuff’ counts

Cognition• Mental processes such as thinking, knowing, and

remembering

Page 16: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

And social situations too...

Page 17: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Asch, 1955

Which of the comparison lines is the same as the standard line?

Page 18: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

76% went along with the clearly incorrect majority at least once

In all, P’s conformed 37% of the time

However, 24% NEVER conformed

What did participants do?

Page 19: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?
Page 20: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Doing PsychologyGetting in someone’s head

Page 21: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

LIFE Questionnaire

What did you think? Stream of consciousness Frequency of behaviors Social desirability?

Did you learn anything about yourself?Was anything missing?

Page 22: Can We Get in Someone’s Head?

Think about:

History of psychology has tried to come up with the best ways of understanding people What do you think are the best ways?

What do you think are interesting phenomena to study (mental activity, behavior)?