Upload
geraldine-eaton
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Capacity Gap & Initiatives on Capacity Gap & Initiatives on First Nations Water & First Nations Water &
WastewaterWastewater
March 10, 2010Hilton Hotel & Suites, Niagara Falls, Ontario
Wesley Bova, P.Eng.Matawa First Nations Management
The Walkerton Inquiry Part 2 (2002)
“water provided to First Nations reserves is some of the poorest qualitywater in the province.” It went on to indicate that water quality is notprovided at the standards that prevail throughout the province.
Walkerton Inquiry Part 2First Nations Issues were summarized as follows:• infrastructure is either obsolete, entirely absent, inappropriate, or
of low quality; • not enough operators are adequately trained or certified; • testing and inspection are inadequate; • microbial contamination is frequent; and • distribution systems, especially on reserves, are sized to deliver
about half the water available per capita to other Ontarians. The report stated that “This is not acceptable”.
Report of the Expert Panel on Safe Drinking Water for First Nations
Indicated the need for a comprehensive approach to reduce the risk of unsafe drinking water to negligible level by:
• putting in place multiple barriers aimed at preventing contaminants from reaching consumers;
• adopting a cautious approach to making decisions that affect drinking water safety;
• ensuring that water providers apply sound quality management and operating systems; and
• providing effective provincial government regulation and oversight.
Report of the Expert Panel on Safe Drinking Water for First Nations
The multi barrier approach • source water protection;• effective drinking water treatment; and• secure distribution of treated water to consumers.
“These steps rely on effective monitoring of drinking water quality, aswell as enlightened management of the various systems involved in producing, protecting and delivering drinking water.”
2005 Engineers Reports on Water SystemsCommunityCommunity Estimated Cost Estimated Cost
of Mitigation of Mitigation MeasuresMeasures
Estimated Cost Estimated Cost of Treatment of Treatment
UpgradesUpgrades
Total Cost of Total Cost of Mitigation and Mitigation and
Treatment Treatment UpgradesUpgrades
Constance Lake Constance Lake First NationFirst Nation
$1,400,000$1,400,000 $4,000,000$4,000,000 $5,400,000$5,400,000
Eabametoong Eabametoong First NationFirst Nation
$703,350$703,350 $4,000,000$4,000,000 $4,703,350$4,703,350
Marten Falls First Marten Falls First NationNation
$699,975$699,975 $4,000,000$4,000,000 $4,699,975$4,699,975
Neskantaga First Neskantaga First NationNation
$791,100$791,100 $4,000,000$4,000,000 $4,791,100$4,791,100
Nibinamik First Nibinamik First NationNation
$707,400$707,400 $4,000,000$4,000,000 $4,707,400$4,707,400
TotalsTotals $4,301,825$4,301,825 $20,000,000$20,000,000 $24,301,825$24,301,825
2005 Engineering Assessment Waste Water Systems
CommunityCommunity Estimated Cost Estimated Cost to Implement to Implement Recommended Recommended Operations and Operations and Maintenance Maintenance RequirementsRequirements
Estimated Cost Estimated Cost to Address to Address DeficienciesDeficiencies
Total Estimated Total Estimated Cost of O&M and Cost of O&M and Deficiencies Deficiencies
Constance Lake Constance Lake First NationFirst Nation
$14,000$14,000 $497,000$497,000 $511,000$511,000
Eabametoong Eabametoong First NationFirst Nation
$14,000$14,000 $6,323,200$6,323,200 $6,337,200$6,337,200
Marten Falls Marten Falls First NationFirst Nation
$12,000$12,000 $2,351,800$2,351,800 $2,363,800$2,363,800
Nibinamik First Nibinamik First NationNation
$33,000$33,000 $1,849,200$1,849,200 $1,882,200$1,882,200
TotalsTotals $73,000$73,000 $11,021,200$11,021,200 $11,094,200$11,094,200
Questions