89
Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Capital Expenditure Decisions 16 Chapter Chapter Sixteen Sixteen

Capital Expenditure Decisions

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

16. Chapter Sixteen. Capital Expenditure Decisions. Learning Objective 1. Discounted-Cash-Flow Analysis. Plant expansion. Equipment selection. Equipment replacement. Cost reduction. Lease or buy. Net-Present-Value Method. Prepare a table showing cash flows for each year, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Capital Expenditure Decisions

16 Chapter Chapter SixteenSixteen

Page 2: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

1

Learning Objective

1

Page 3: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Discounted-Cash-Flow AnalysisDiscounted-Cash-Flow Analysis

Cost reductionCost reductionCost reductionCost reduction

Plant expansionPlant expansionPlant expansionPlant expansion

Equipment selectionEquipment selectionEquipment selectionEquipment selection

Lease or buyLease or buyLease or buyLease or buy

Equipment replacementEquipment replacementEquipment replacementEquipment replacement

Page 4: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

o Prepare a table showing cash flows for each year,o Calculate the present value of each cash flow using a

discount rate,o Compute net present value,o If the net present value (NPV) is positive, accept the

investment proposal. Otherwise, reject it.

o Prepare a table showing cash flows for each year,o Calculate the present value of each cash flow using a

discount rate,o Compute net present value,o If the net present value (NPV) is positive, accept the

investment proposal. Otherwise, reject it.

Page 5: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value MethodMattson Co. has been offered a five year contract to

provide component parts for a large manufacturer.

Page 6: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

• At the end of five years the working capital will be released and may be used elsewhere by Mattson.

• Mattson uses a discount rate of 10%.

Should the contract be accepted?

• At the end of five years the working capital will be released and may be used elsewhere by Mattson.

• Mattson uses a discount rate of 10%.

Should the contract be accepted?

Page 7: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Annual net cash inflows from operations

Page 8: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Page 9: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Present value of an annuity of $1 Present value of an annuity of $1 factor for 5 years at 10%.factor for 5 years at 10%.

Page 10: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Present value of $1 Present value of $1 factor for 3 years at 10%.factor for 3 years at 10%.

Page 11: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Present value of $1 Present value of $1 factor for 5 years at 10%.factor for 5 years at 10%.

Page 12: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net-Present-Value MethodNet-Present-Value Method

Mattson should accept the contract because the present value of the cash inflows exceeds the present

value of the cash outflows by $85,955. The project has a positivepositive net present value.

Mattson should accept the contract because the present value of the cash inflows exceeds the present

value of the cash outflows by $85,955. The project has a positivepositive net present value.

Page 13: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal-Rate-of-Return MethodInternal-Rate-of-Return Method

• The internal rate of return is the true economic return earned by the asset over its life.

• The internal rate of return is computed by finding the discount rate that will cause the net present value of a project to be zero.

• The internal rate of return is the true economic return earned by the asset over its life.

• The internal rate of return is computed by finding the discount rate that will cause the net present value of a project to be zero.

Page 14: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal-Rate-of-Return MethodInternal-Rate-of-Return Method

• Black Co. can purchase a new machine at a cost of $104,320 that will save $20,000 per year in cash operating costs.

• The machine has a 10-year life.

• Black Co. can purchase a new machine at a cost of $104,320 that will save $20,000 per year in cash operating costs.

• The machine has a 10-year life.

Page 15: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal-Rate-of-Return MethodInternal-Rate-of-Return Method

Future cash flows are the same every year in this example, so we can calculate the

internal rate of return as follows:

Investment required Investment required Net annual cash flowsNet annual cash flows = Present value factor= Present value factor

$104, 320 $104, 320 $20,000$20,000 == 5.2165.216

Page 16: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal-Rate-of-Return MethodInternal-Rate-of-Return Method

$104, 320 $104, 320 $20,000$20,000 = 5.216 = 5.216

The present value factor (5.216) is located on the Table IV in the Appendix. Scan the 10-

period row and locate the value 5.216. Look at the top of the column and you find a rate of

14% which is the internal rate of return.

The present value factor (5.216) is located on the Table IV in the Appendix. Scan the 10-

period row and locate the value 5.216. Look at the top of the column and you find a rate of

14% which is the internal rate of return.

Page 17: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal-Rate-of-Return MethodInternal-Rate-of-Return Method

Here’s the proof . . .

Page 18: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

2

Learning Objective

2

Page 19: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Comparing the NPV and IRR Comparing the NPV and IRR MethodsMethods

Net Present Value The cost of capital is

used as the actual discount rate.

Any project with a negative net present value is rejected.

Net Present Value The cost of capital is

used as the actual discount rate.

Any project with a negative net present value is rejected.

Page 20: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Comparing the NPV and IRR Comparing the NPV and IRR MethodsMethods

Internal Rate of Return The cost of capital is

compared to the internal rate of return on a project.

To be acceptable, a project’s rate of return must be greater than the cost of capital.

Net Present Value The cost of capital is

used as the actual discount rate.

Any project with a negative net present value is rejected.

Net Present Value The cost of capital is

used as the actual discount rate.

Any project with a negative net present value is rejected.

Page 21: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Comparing the NPV and IRR Comparing the NPV and IRR MethodsMethods

The net present value method has the following

advantages over the internal rate of return method . . .

Easier to use.Easier to adjust for risk.Provides more usable

information.

The net present value method has the following

advantages over the internal rate of return method . . .

Easier to use.Easier to adjust for risk.Provides more usable

information.

Page 22: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Assumptions Underlying Assumptions Underlying Discounted-Cash-Flow AnalysisDiscounted-Cash-Flow Analysis

All cash flows areAll cash flows aretreated as thoughtreated as though

they occur at year end.they occur at year end.

Cash flows are Cash flows are treated as iftreated as if

they are knownthey are knownwith certainty.with certainty.

Cash inflows areCash inflows areimmediatelyimmediatelyreinvested atreinvested atthe requiredthe required

rate of return.rate of return.

Assumes aAssumes aperfectperfectcapitalcapitalmarket.market.

Page 23: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Choosing the Hurdle RateChoosing the Hurdle Rate

• The discount rate generally is associated with the company’s cost of capital.

• The cost of capital involves a blending of the costs of all sources of investment funds, both debt and equity.

Page 24: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Depreciable AssetsDepreciable Assets

Both the NPV and IRR methods focus on cash flows, and periodic depreciation

charges are not cash flows . . .

Tax ReturnTax ReturnForm 1120Form 1120 DepreciationDepreciation

is taxis taxdeductibledeductibleand . . .and . . .

ReducesReducescashcashoutflows foroutflows fortaxes.taxes.

Page 25: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

3

Learning Objective

3

Page 26: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Comparing Two Investment Comparing Two Investment ProjectsProjects

To compare competing investment projects we can use the following net present value

approaches:– Total-Cost Approach.– Incremental-Cost Approach.

Page 27: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Total-Cost ApproachTotal-Cost Approach

• Each system would last five years.

• 12 percent hurdle rate for the analysis.

MAINFRAME PC _Salvage value old system $ 25,000 $ 25,000Cost of new system (400,000) (300,000)Cost of new software ( 40,000) ( 75,000)Update new system ( 40,000) ( 60,000)Salvage value new system 50,000 30,000================================================Operating costs over 5-year life:Personnel (300,000)(220,000)Maintenance ( 25,000) ( 10,000)Other costs ( 10,000) ( 5,000)Datalink services ( 20,000) ( 20,000)Revenue from time-share 25,000 -

Page 28: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Total-Cost ApproachTotal-Cost ApproachMAINFRAME ($) Today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5Acquisition cost computer (400,000)Acquisition cost software ( 40,000)System update ( 40,000)Salvage value 50,000Operating costs (335,000) (335,000) (335,000) (335,000) (335,000) (335,000)Time sharing revenue 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Total cash flow 440,000 (315,000) (315,000) (355,000) (315,000) (265,000)X Discount factor X 1.000 X .893 X .797 X .712 X .636 X .567Present value (440,000) (281,295) (251,055) (252,760) (200,340) (150,255)

SUM = ($1,575,705)

PERSONAL COMPUTER ($) Today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5Acquisition cost computer (300,000)Acquisition cost software ( 75,000)System update ( 60,000)Salvage value 50,000Operating costs (235,000) (235,000) (235,000) (235,000) (235,000) (235,000)Time sharing revenue -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- _ Total cash flow 375,000 (235,000) (235,000) (295,000) (235,000) (205,000)X Discount factor X 1.000 X .893 X .797 X .712 X .636 X .567Present value (375,000) (209,855) (187,295) (210,040) (149,460) (116,235)

SUM = ($1,247,885)

Page 29: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Total-Cost ApproachTotal-Cost Approach

Net cost of purchasing Mainframe system ($1,575,705)

Net cost of purchasing Personal Computer system ($1,247,885)

Net Present Value of costs ($ 327,820)

Mountainview should purchase the personal computer system for a cost savings of

$327,820.

Page 30: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Incremental-Cost ApproachIncremental-Cost Approach

MAINFRAME PC _ Differentials Salvage value old system $ 25,000 $ 25,000 0Cost of new system (400,000) (300,000) (100,000)Cost of new software ( 40,000) ( 75,000) 35,000Update new system ( 40,000) ( 60,000) 20,000Salvage value new system 50,000 30,000 20,000 ===========================================================Operating costs over 5-year life:Personnel (300,000) (220,000) ( 80,000)Maintenance ( 25,000) ( 10,000) ( 15,000)Other costs ( 10,000) ( 5,000) ( 5,000)Datalink services ( 20,000) ( 20,000) 0Revenue from time-share 20,000 - 20,000

Irrelevant

Page 31: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Incremental-Cost ApproachIncremental-Cost Approach

INCREMENTAL ($)Today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Acquisition cost computer (100,000)Acquisition cost software 35,000 System update 20,000Salvage value 20,000Operating costs (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000)Time sharing revenue 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Total cash flow ( 65,000) ( 80,000) ( 80,000) ( 80,000) ( 80,000) ( 60,000)X Discount factor X 1.000 X .893 X .797 X .712 X .636 X .567Present value ( 65,000) ( 71,440) ( 63,760) ( 42,720) ( 50,880) ( 34,020)

SUM = ($ 327,820)

Page 32: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Total-Incremental Cost ComparisonTotal-Incremental Cost Comparison

Total Cost:

Net cost of purchasing Mainframe system ($1,575,705)

Net cost of purchasing Personal Computer system ($1,247,885)

Net Present Value of costs ($ 327,820)

Incremental Cost:

Net Present Value of costs ($ 327,820)

Different methods, Same results.

Page 33: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Managerial Accountant’s RoleManagerial Accountant’s Role

Managerial accountants are often asked to predict cash flows related to operating cost

savings, additional working capital requirements, and incremental costs and

revenues.

When cash flow projections are very uncertain, the accountant may . . . increase the hurdle rate, use sensitivity analysis.

Page 34: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Postaudit of Investment ProjectsPostaudit of Investment Projects

A postaudit is a follow-up after the project has been approved to see whether or not expected results are actually realized.

A postaudit is a follow-up after the project has been approved to see whether or not expected results are actually realized.

Page 35: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

4

Learning Objective

4

Page 36: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Income Taxes and Capital Income Taxes and Capital BudgetingBudgeting

Cash flows from an investment proposal affect the company’s profit and its income tax

liability.

Income = Revenue - Expenses + Gains - LossesIncome = Revenue - Expenses + Gains - LossesIncome = Revenue - Expenses + Gains - LossesIncome = Revenue - Expenses + Gains - Losses

Page 37: Capital Expenditure Decisions

After-Tax Cash FlowsAfter-Tax Cash Flows

The tax rate is 40%, so income taxes areThe tax rate is 40%, so income taxes are$525,000 × 40% = $ 210,000$525,000 × 40% = $ 210,000

The tax rate is 40%, so income taxes areThe tax rate is 40%, so income taxes are$525,000 × 40% = $ 210,000$525,000 × 40% = $ 210,000

High Country Department Stores

Income Statement

For the Year Ended Jun 30, 2007

Revenue $ 1,000,000

Expenses (475,000)

Income before taxes 525,000

Income taxes (210,000)

Net Income 315,000

Page 38: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Cash RevenuesCash Revenues

High Country’s management is considering the purchase of a new truck that will increase cash

revenues by $120,000 and increase cash cost of goods sold by $60,000. The company is subject

to a tax rate of 40%.

Let’s calculate the company’s after-tax cash flows.

High Country’s management is considering the purchase of a new truck that will increase cash

revenues by $120,000 and increase cash cost of goods sold by $60,000. The company is subject

to a tax rate of 40%.

Let’s calculate the company’s after-tax cash flows.

Page 39: Capital Expenditure Decisions

After-Tax Cash FlowsAfter-Tax Cash Flows

The tax rate is 40%, so income taxes areThe tax rate is 40%, so income taxes are$60,000 × 40% = $ 24,000$60,000 × 40% = $ 24,000

The tax rate is 40%, so income taxes areThe tax rate is 40%, so income taxes are$60,000 × 40% = $ 24,000$60,000 × 40% = $ 24,000

High Country Department Stores

Income Statement

For the Year Ended Jun 30, 2007

Revenue $ 120,000

Cash CGS ( 60,000)

Income before taxes 60,000

Income taxes (24,000)

Net Income 36,000_

Page 40: Capital Expenditure Decisions

After-Tax Cash FlowsAfter-Tax Cash FlowsHigh Country Department Stores

Income Statement

For the Year Ended Jun 30, 2007

Revenue $ 120,000

Cash CGS ( 60,000)

Income before taxes 60,000

Income taxes (24,000)

Net Income 36,000_A short cut works like this:A short cut works like this:Increase in income × ( 1 - tax rate)Increase in income × ( 1 - tax rate)

$60,000 × ( 1 - .4) = $36,000$60,000 × ( 1 - .4) = $36,000

Page 41: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Noncash ExpensesNoncash Expenses

Not all expenses require cash outflows. The most common example is depreciation.

Recall that High Country’s proposal involved the purchase of a truck. The truck cost $40,000 and will be depreciated over four years using straight-line depreciation. The truck is to be purchased on

June 30, 2007. One-half year depreciation is taken in 2007.

Not all expenses require cash outflows. The most common example is depreciation.

Recall that High Country’s proposal involved the purchase of a truck. The truck cost $40,000 and will be depreciated over four years using straight-line depreciation. The truck is to be purchased on

June 30, 2007. One-half year depreciation is taken in 2007.

Page 42: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Noncash ExpensesNoncash Expenses

Here is a complete depreciation schedule for High Country.

Depreciation Tax Reduced Tax

Year Expense Rate Payment _

1 $ 5,000 40% $ 2,000

2 10,000 40% 4,000

3 10,000 40% 4,000

4 10,000 40% 4,000

5 5,000 40% 2,000

40,000 16,000

DepreciationDepreciationTaxTax

ShieldShield

Page 43: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Net Present Value AnalysisNet Present Value Analysis

Calculation of the present value of proposal cash flows.

The sum of the present values from thisThe sum of the present values from thisproposal is a positive $75,000proposal is a positive $75,000

The sum of the present values from thisThe sum of the present values from thisproposal is a positive $75,000proposal is a positive $75,000

INCREMENTAL ($)Today Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

Acquisition cost $( 40,000)Cash flows from proposal $ 18,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 36,000 $ 18,000Depreciation shield 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 2,000Total cash flow ( 40,000) 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 20,000X Discount factor X 1.000 X .893 X .797 X .712 X .636 X .567Present value ( 40,000) 17,860 31,880 28,480 25,440 11,340

SUM = $ 75,000

Page 44: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

5

Learning Objective

5

Page 45: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Modified Accelerated Cost Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)Recovery System (MACRS)

Tax depreciation is usually computed using MACRS. Here are the depreciation rate for 3,

5, and 7-year class life assets.

Page 46: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Modified Accelerated Cost Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)Recovery System (MACRS)

A company is considering the purchase of a machine that will increase after-tax cash flows

by $20,000 over the next five years. The machine is depreciated using MACRS and the company uses a 10% discount rate to compute

all present values. The machine will cost $100,000 and the company is subject to a 28%

tax rate.

Let’s calculate the net present value of the proposal.

A company is considering the purchase of a machine that will increase after-tax cash flows

by $20,000 over the next five years. The machine is depreciated using MACRS and the company uses a 10% discount rate to compute

all present values. The machine will cost $100,000 and the company is subject to a 28%

tax rate.

Let’s calculate the net present value of the proposal.

Page 47: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Modified Accelerated Cost Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)Recovery System (MACRS)Calculation of the present value of the

depreciation tax shield.

$5,600 × (1.10)^-1$5,600 × (1.10)^-1

$20,000 × 28%$20,000 × 28%

$100,000 × 20%$100,000 × 20%

Page 48: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Modified Accelerated Cost Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)Recovery System (MACRS)

Calculation of the present value proposal cash flows.

$20,000 × (1.10)^-1$20,000 × (1.10)^-1

Page 49: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Modified Accelerated Cost Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS)Recovery System (MACRS)

Net present value of the proposal.

The presentThe presentvalue of thevalue of the

proposal is lessproposal is lessthan the costthan the cost

of the equipmentof the equipment($100,000). The($100,000). Theproposal has aproposal has a

negativenegative net netpresent value.present value.

The presentThe presentvalue of thevalue of the

proposal is lessproposal is lessthan the costthan the cost

of the equipmentof the equipment($100,000). The($100,000). Theproposal has aproposal has a

negativenegative net netpresent value.present value.

Page 50: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Investment in Working CapitalInvestment in Working Capital

Some investment proposals require additional outlays for working capital such as

increases in cash, accounts receivable, and inventory.

Some investment proposals require additional outlays for working capital such as

increases in cash, accounts receivable, and inventory.

Page 51: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

6

Learning Objective

6

Page 52: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Let take a close look at a present value analysis for an investment decision

facing James Company.

Let take a close look at a present value analysis for an investment decision

facing James Company.

JamesCompany

Page 53: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended IllustrationJames Company has been offered a five-year contract to

provide component parts for a large manufacturer.

Page 54: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration• At the end of five years the working capital

will be released and may be used elsewhere by James.

• James Company uses a discount rate of 10%.

• James uses straight-line depreciation.• All items in this example are taxed at 30%.

Should the contract be accepted?

Page 55: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Annual accounting income from operations

RememberRememberdepreciation isdepreciation isa non-casha non-cashexpense thatexpense thatprovides aprovides atax shield.tax shield.

Page 56: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Annual cash inflows from operations

RememberRememberdepreciation isdepreciation isa non-casha non-cashexpense thatexpense thatprovides aprovides atax shield.tax shield.

Page 57: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

The relining is considered normal maintenance The relining is considered normal maintenance and will reduce income in year 3. Because the and will reduce income in year 3. Because the cost is tax deductible, income will be lower by cost is tax deductible, income will be lower by

$21,000 ($30,000 × 1- tax rate).$21,000 ($30,000 × 1- tax rate).

Page 58: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Because the salvage value of the equipment will equal Because the salvage value of the equipment will equal the book value (cost less accumulated depreciation), the book value (cost less accumulated depreciation),

there will be no taxable gain or loss.there will be no taxable gain or loss.

Page 59: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Page 60: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Present value of $1 factor for 3 years at 10%.

Present value of $1 factor for 3 years at 10%.

Page 61: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

Present value of $1 factor for 5 years at 10%.

Present value of $1 factor for 5 years at 10%.

Page 62: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

We should accept the contract because the presentWe should accept the contract because the presentvalue of the cash inflows exceeds the present valuevalue of the cash inflows exceeds the present valueof the cash outflows by of the cash outflows by $92,836$92,836. The project has a . The project has a

positivepositive net present value.net present value.

Page 63: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Extended IllustrationExtended Illustration

General decision rule . . .

Page 64: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

7

Learning Objective

7

Page 65: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

We can invest in either of these projects. Use a 10% discount rate to determine

the net present value of the cash flows.

We can invest in either of these projects. Use a 10% discount rate to determine

the net present value of the cash flows.

Project A Project BImmediate cash outlay 100,000$ 100,000$ Cash inflows: Year 1 50,000$ 30,000$ Year 2 40,000 40,000 Year 3 30,000 50,000 Total inflows 120,000$ 120,000$

Project A Project BImmediate cash outlay 100,000$ 100,000$ Cash inflows: Year 1 50,000$ 30,000$ Year 2 40,000 40,000 Year 3 30,000 50,000 Total inflows 120,000$ 120,000$

Page 66: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Project A Project BImmediate cash outlay 100,000$ 100,000$ Cash inflows: Year 1 50,000$ 30,000$ Year 2 40,000 40,000 Year 3 30,000 50,000 Total inflows 120,000$ 120,000$

Project A Project BImmediate cash outlay 100,000$ 100,000$ Cash inflows: Year 1 50,000$ 30,000$ Year 2 40,000 40,000 Year 3 30,000 50,000 Total inflows 120,000$ 120,000$

We can invest in either of these projects. Use a 10% discount rate to determine

the net present value of the cash flows.

We can invest in either of these projects. Use a 10% discount rate to determine

the net present value of the cash flows.

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

The total cash flows are the same,The total cash flows are the same,but the pattern of the flows isbut the pattern of the flows is

different.different.

The total cash flows are the same,The total cash flows are the same,but the pattern of the flows isbut the pattern of the flows is

different.different.

Page 67: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

Let’s calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with Project A.

Page 68: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

Let’s calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with Project A.

(1.10)-1 = 0.909 rounded(1.10)-1 = 0.909 rounded

Page 69: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

Let’s calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with Project A.

(1.10)-2 = 0.826 rounded(1.10)-2 = 0.826 rounded

Page 70: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

Let’s calculate the present value of the cash flows associated with Project A.

This project has a positive net present value which means This project has a positive net present value which means the project’s return is the project’s return is greater than greater than the discount rate.the discount rate.

This project has a positive net present value which means This project has a positive net present value which means the project’s return is the project’s return is greater than greater than the discount rate.the discount rate.

Page 71: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Ranking Investment ProjectsRanking Investment Projects

Here is the net present value of the cash flows associated with Project B.

Project B PV Factor PV

Immediate cash outlay (100,000)$ 1.000 (100,000)$ Cash inflows: Year 1 30,000$ 0.909 27,270 Year 2 40,000 0.826 33,040 Year 3 50,000 0.751 37,550 Net present value (2,140)$

Project B has a negative net present value which means Project B has a negative net present value which means the project’s return is the project’s return is less than less than the discount rate.the discount rate.

Project B has a negative net present value which means Project B has a negative net present value which means the project’s return is the project’s return is less than less than the discount rate.the discount rate.

Page 72: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

The interest rate that equates the present value of inflows and outflows from an

investment project.

The interest rate that equates the present value of inflows and outflows from an

investment project.

Page 73: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

When the cash flows from a project are constant, the present value of an annuity

factor can be used to approximate the rate of return.

A project cost $90,119, and will yield net cash inflows of $25,000 at the end of each of the

next five years.

When the cash flows from a project are constant, the present value of an annuity

factor can be used to approximate the rate of return.

A project cost $90,119, and will yield net cash inflows of $25,000 at the end of each of the

next five years.

Let’s determine the IRR for this project!Let’s determine the IRR for this project!

Page 74: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

PV factor = PV factor = Required InvestmentRequired Investment Annual net cash flowAnnual net cash flow

$90,119$90,119 $25,000$25,000

3.605 rounded3.605 rounded

The present value of an annuity factor of 3.605,The present value of an annuity factor of 3.605,is an internal rate of return of is an internal rate of return of 12%12%..

The present value of an annuity factor of 3.605,The present value of an annuity factor of 3.605,is an internal rate of return of is an internal rate of return of 12%12%..

PV factor = PV factor =

PV factor = PV factor =

Page 75: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

8

Learning Objective

8

Page 76: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Alternative Methods for Making Alternative Methods for Making Investment DecisionsInvestment Decisions

Payback Method

PaybackPaybackperiodperiod

Initial investment Initial investment Annual after-tax cash inflowAnnual after-tax cash inflow

==

PaybackPaybackperiodperiod ==

$20,000 $20,000 $4,000$4,000 == 5 years5 years

A company can purchase a machine for $20,000 thatA company can purchase a machine for $20,000 thatwill provide annual cash inflows of $4,000 for 7 years.will provide annual cash inflows of $4,000 for 7 years.A company can purchase a machine for $20,000 thatA company can purchase a machine for $20,000 thatwill provide annual cash inflows of $4,000 for 7 years.will provide annual cash inflows of $4,000 for 7 years.

Page 77: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Payback: Pro and ConPayback: Pro and Con

Fails to consider the time value of money.

Does not consider a project’s cash flows beyond the payback period.

Fails to consider the time value of money.

Does not consider a project’s cash flows beyond the payback period.

Page 78: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Payback: Pro and ConPayback: Pro and ConProvides a tool for

roughly screening investments.

For some firms, it may be essential that an investment recoup its initial cash outflows as quickly as possible.

Provides a tool for roughly screening investments.

For some firms, it may be essential that an investment recoup its initial cash outflows as quickly as possible.

Page 79: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Accounting-Rate-of-Return MethodAccounting-Rate-of-Return Method

Discounted-cash-flow method focuses on cash flows and the time value of money.

Accounting-rate-of-return method focuses on the incremental accounting income that

results from a project.

Discounted-cash-flow method focuses on cash flows and the time value of money.

Accounting-rate-of-return method focuses on the incremental accounting income that

results from a project.

Page 80: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Accounting-Rate-of-Return MethodAccounting-Rate-of-Return Method

The following formula is used to calculate the accounting rate of return:

AccountingAccountingrate ofrate ofreturnreturn

==

Average Average Average Average incremental incremental expenses,incremental incremental expenses, revenues including depreciationrevenues including depreciation

--

Initial investmentInitial investment

Page 81: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Accounting-Rate-of-Return MethodAccounting-Rate-of-Return Method

Meyers Company wants to install an espresso bar in its restaurant.

The espresso bar:– Cost $140,000 and has a 10-year life.

– Will generate incremental revenues of $100,000 and incremental expenses of $80,000 including depreciation.

What is the accounting rate of return on the investment project?

Meyers Company wants to install an espresso bar in its restaurant.

The espresso bar:– Cost $140,000 and has a 10-year life.

– Will generate incremental revenues of $100,000 and incremental expenses of $80,000 including depreciation.

What is the accounting rate of return on the investment project?

Page 82: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Accounting-Rate-of-Return MethodAccounting-Rate-of-Return Method

The accounting rate of return method is not recommendedThe accounting rate of return method is not recommendedfor a variety of reasons, the most important of which for a variety of reasons, the most important of which

is that it ignores the time value of money.is that it ignores the time value of money.

The accounting rate of return method is not recommendedThe accounting rate of return method is not recommendedfor a variety of reasons, the most important of which for a variety of reasons, the most important of which

is that it ignores the time value of money.is that it ignores the time value of money.

AccountingAccountingrate of returnrate of return

$100,000 - $80,000 $100,000 - $80,000 $140,000$140,000 = 14.3%= 14.3%==

Page 83: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Capital Budgeting PracticesCapital Budgeting Practices

Percent of managers who believe each technique is important.

Page 84: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

9

Learning Objective

9

Page 85: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Estimating Cash Flows:Estimating Cash Flows:The Role of Activity-Based CostingThe Role of Activity-Based Costing

ABC systems generally improve the ability of an analyst to estimate the cash flows associated with a proposed project.

ABC systems generally improve the ability of an analyst to estimate the cash flows associated with a proposed project.

Page 86: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Justification of Investments in Justification of Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Advanced Manufacturing

SystemsSystems

HurdleHurdlerates arerates aretoo hightoo high

HurdleHurdlerates arerates aretoo hightoo high

TimeTimehorizonshorizonsare tooare tooshortshort

TimeTimehorizonshorizonsare tooare tooshortshort

BiasBiastowardstowards

incrementalincrementalprojectsprojects

BiasBiastowardstowards

incrementalincrementalprojectsprojects

GreaterGreatercash flowcash flow

uncertaintyuncertainty

GreaterGreatercash flowcash flow

uncertaintyuncertainty

BenefitsBenefitsdifficult todifficult toquantifyquantify

BenefitsBenefitsdifficult todifficult toquantifyquantify

Page 87: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Learning Objective

10

Learning Objective

10

Page 88: Capital Expenditure Decisions

Inflation EffectsInflation Effects

Nominal Dollars

Real dollars

Nominal Dollars

Real dollars

Page 89: Capital Expenditure Decisions

End of Chapter 16End of Chapter 16